![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright © The Author [2009]. Osteoclast-like multi-nucleated giant cells in uraemic tumoral calcinosis 1Departments of Medicine and Clinical Science 2Integrated Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan Correspondence and offprint requests to: Kazuhiko Tsuruya, Department of Integrated Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Tel: Phone: +81-92-642-5843; Fax: +81-92-642-5846; E-mail: tsuruya/at/intmed2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp Received April 30, 2008; Accepted January 8, 2009. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org Abstract A 46-year-old woman under 6-year haemodialysis was admitted for uncontrollable hip pain. An X-ray film revealed calcified mass around the ‘left femur head’, which was diagnosed as calcium deposition by percutaneous biopsy. Calcinotic tissues were removed surgically, and the resected specimen revealed tumoral calcinosis caused by low bone turnover. A complete resolution of calcinotic lesions around the ‘left knee’ occurred 6 months after treatment modification. Immunohistochemistry showed recruitment of multi-nucleated giant cells positive for CD68, tartrate resistant acidic phosphatase and calcitonin receptor, indicative of osteoclast-like features. We propose the involvement of osteoclast-like cells in active resorption of tumoral calcinosis. Keywords: calcitonin receptor, multi-nucleated giant cell, osteoclast, tumoral calcinosis Introduction Tumoral calcinosis, an ectopic calcification occasionally seen in haemodialysis patients, is characterized by massive periarticular deposition of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), and various factors are involved in its pathogenesis of tumoral calcinosis such as secondary hyperparathyroidism and adynamic bone disease [1]. With regard to the regression of tumoral calcinosis, there have been several case reports of haemodialysis patients who show complete resolution of such calcifications after appropriate treatment [2–4]. However, the precise mechanism of such regression remains unclear. We present here the case of a haemodialysis patient with tumoral calcinosis whose surgically resected specimen revealed recruitment of multi-nucleated giant cells with osteoclast-like features. These cells are presumed to play a role in the regression of tumoral calcinosis. Case report A 46-year-old female with 6-year history of haemodialysis therapy for chronic glomerulonephritis was admitted to Kyushu University hospital for the management of severe hip pain. The past history included the appearance of left hip pain about 3 years prior to admission, which gradually worsened with time. At that stage, plain X-ray films showed calcified masses around the ‘left femur head’ (Figure (Figure1A)1
At the first consultation, 3 days after surgery, the patient had high serum Ca level (12.2 mg/dl) (N; 8.7–10.3), high serum P level (6.4 mg/dl) (N; 2.5–4.7), high Ca–P product (78 mg2/dl2) and low levels of intact-parathyroid hormone (PTH, 19 pg/ml) (N; 10–65) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP, 109 IU/l) (N; 115–359). She had been treated for the last 6 years with alfacalcidol (0.25 μg/day), Ca bicarbonate (1.5 g/day) and high Ca dialysate (3.0 mEq/l). Based on these findings, we concluded that the calcified mass around the ‘left femur head’ and ‘left knee’ was tumoral calcinosis, which was caused by low bone turnover followed by reduced capacity for Ca and P. The clinical course is shown in Figure Figure2.2
Histopathological examination of the calcified mass around the ‘left femur head’ showed calcification areas surrounded by many multi-nucleated giant cells and mononuclear cells with fibrous tissues. Immunohistochemical staining showed that the multi-nucleated cells and mononuclear cells were positive for CD68, TRACP (tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase, calcitonin receptor) and RANK (receptor activator of nuclear kappa beta) (Figure (Figure33
Discussion We present here the case of a haemodialysis patient with tumoral calcinosis caused by low bone turnover. Tumoral calcinosis in one site was surgically resected and tumoral calcinosis in another site regressed spontaneously after treatment modification. The surgically resected specimen revealed recruitment of multi-nucleated giant cells positive for CD68 and calcitonin receptor, indicative of osteoclast-like features. Previous histopathological studies of resected tissues of tumoral calcinosis have already reported the presence of multi-nucleated giant cells and inflammatory cells surrounding the calcified region [5], and several groups have provided some explanation for the regression of ectopic calcification [6–8]. Veress et al. [7] histopathologically evaluated 20 patients with tumoral calcinosis, and proposed the involvement of the multi-nucleated giant cells in the regression process. Using a rat model, Bas et al. [8] found infiltrating CD68-positive mononuclear cells in the walls of calcified artery and reported the reversibility of arterial medial calcification. Although these two reports indicated the association of CD68-positive cells with regression of ectopic calcifications, they did not fully describe all the features of the giant cells. In our patient, the multi-nucleated giant cells and mononuclear cells around the calcified masses were positive for CD68, TRACP and calcitonin receptor. Thus, these multi-nucleated giant cells are phenotypically similar to osteoclasts since CD68 is a marker of macrophage differentiation and TRACP and calcitonin receptor are markers of osteoclasts. We also found these giant cells positive for RANK, which is essential for osteoclast maturation in the bone into activated osteoclasts that can interact with RANK-ligand [9]. Thus, we hypothesized that the mononuclear cells of macrophage lineage are recruited to tumoral calcinosis and eventually become multi-nucleated giant cells with osteoclast-like phenotype by fusion, where they participate in resorption of the calcified material similar to the resorption of bone by osteoclasts. Regarding the regression process in tumoral calcinosis, we speculate that such process depends on the relative balance between passive accumulation and active resorption of Ca–P products. It is likely that the osteoclast-like multi-nucleated giant cells are involved in removal of calcified material during the active resorption process. This hypothesis is proven by the clinical results that appropriate medical and surgical treatment can occasionally lead to spontaneous regression of tumoral calcinosis [2–4]. In the present case, before changing treatment, passive accumulation was dominant over active resorption. After changing treatment, the bone turnover improved, and active resorption process became relatively dominant. Finally, regression of tumoral calcinosis around the ‘left knee’ was evident radiologically. The present report has a few limitations. First, the specimen examined was from the ‘left femur head’ and not from the ‘left knee’ where spontaneous regression was noted. Second, whereas recruitment of giant cells was demonstrated, no evidence of activation and phagocytosis by giant cells was presented. In summary, we described here the case of a haemodialysis patient with tumoral calcinosis whose surgically resected specimen revealed recruitment of multi-nucleated giant cells with osteoclast-like features. We conclude that these cells were involved in the active resorption process of tumoral calcinosis. Conflict of interest statement. None declared. References 1. Parfitt AM. Soft-tissue calcification in uremia. Arch Intern Med. 1969;124:544–556. [PubMed] 2. Apostolou T, Tziamalis M, Christodoulidou C, et al. Regression of massive tumoral calcinosis of the ischium in a dialysis patient after treatment with reduced calcium dialysate and i.v. administration. Clin Nephrol. 1998;50:247–251. [PubMed] 3. Thakur A, Hines OJ, Thakur V, et al. Tumoral calcinosis regression after subtotal parathyroidectomy: a case presentation and review of the literature. Surgery. 1999;126:95–98. [PubMed] 4. McGregor D, Burn J, Lynn K, et al. Rapid resolution of tumoral calcinosis after renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol. 1999;51:54–58. [PubMed] 5. Slavin RE, Wen J, Kumar D, et al. Familial tumoral calcinosis. A clinical, histopathologic, and ultrastructural study with an analysis of its calcifying process and pathogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:788–802. [PubMed] 6. Thomson JG. Calcifying collagenolysis (tumoural calcinosis). Br J Radiol. 1966;39:526–532. [PubMed] 7. Veress B, Malik MO, El Hassan AM. Tumoral lipocalcinosis: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases. J Pathol. 1976;119:113–118. [PubMed] 8. Bas A, Lepez I, Perez J, et al. Reversibility of calcitriol-induced medial artery calcification in rats with intact renal function. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:484–490. [PubMed] 9. Anderson DM, Maraskovsky E, Billingsley WL, et al. A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature. 1997;390:175–179. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Arch Intern Med. 1969 Nov; 124(5):544-56.
[Arch Intern Med. 1969]Clin Nephrol. 1998 Oct; 50(4):247-51.
[Clin Nephrol. 1998]Surgery. 1999 Jul; 126(1):95-8.
[Surgery. 1999]Clin Nephrol. 1999 Jan; 51(1):54-8.
[Clin Nephrol. 1999]Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Aug; 17(8):788-802.
[Am J Surg Pathol. 1993]Br J Radiol. 1966 Jul; 39(463):526-32.
[Br J Radiol. 1966]J Pathol. 1976 Jun; 119(2):113-8.
[J Pathol. 1976]J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Mar; 21(3):484-90.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2006]J Pathol. 1976 Jun; 119(2):113-8.
[J Pathol. 1976]Nature. 1997 Nov 13; 390(6656):175-9.
[Nature. 1997]Clin Nephrol. 1998 Oct; 50(4):247-51.
[Clin Nephrol. 1998]Surgery. 1999 Jul; 126(1):95-8.
[Surgery. 1999]Clin Nephrol. 1999 Jan; 51(1):54-8.
[Clin Nephrol. 1999]