![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright Kamata et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Reassessing the Role of APOBEC3G in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection of Quiescent CD4+ T-Cells 1Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America 2Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Thomas J. Hope, Editor Northwestern University, United States of America * E-mail: syuchen/at/mednet.ucla.edu Conceived and designed the experiments: MK ISYC. Performed the experiments: MK YN. Analyzed the data: MK. Wrote the paper: MK ISYC. Received December 4, 2008; Accepted February 18, 2009. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract HIV-1 is restricted for infection of primary quiescent T-cells. After viral entry, reverse transcription is initiated but is not completed. Various hypotheses have been proposed for this cellular restriction including insufficient nucleotide pools and cellular factors, but none have been confirmed as the primary mechanism for restriction. A recent study by Chiu et al. implicates APOBEC3G, an anti-retroviral cytidine deaminase, as the cellular restriction factor. Here, we attempted to confirm these findings using the same strategy as reported by Chiu et al. of siRNA targeting knock-down of APOBEC3G expression. In contrast to the published study, our results do not support a role for APOBEC3G in restriction of HIV-1 in quiescent CD4+ T-cells. In our study, we tested the same siRNA as reported by Chiu et al. as well as two additional siRNAs targeting APOBEC3G, one of which showed 2-fold greater knock-down of APOBEC3G mRNA. However, none of the three siRNAs tested had a discernable effect on enhancing infection by HIV-1 in quiescent CD4+ T-cells. Therefore, we conclude that the primary mechanism of HIV-1 restriction in quiescent CD4+ T-cells remains to be elucidated. Author Summary In 1990, we demonstrated that unstimulated quiescent T-lymphocytes are resistant to HIV-1 infection. Viruses can get into the cell, and reverse transcription is started, but it is not completed. Various hypotheses have been proposed for this blockage including insufficient free nucleotides and inhibiting cellular factors, but none have been confirmed as the primary mechanism for this blockage. A recent study by Chiu et al. provided one possible mechanism for the blockage in quiescent T-lymphocytes: APOBEC3G, an anti-retroviral cytidine deaminase that was implicated as the responsible factor for this blockage. We have attempted to confirm these findings using published methods. Chiu et al. reported a 37-fold enhancement of HIV-1 infection in quiescent T-lymphocytes by decreasing the levels of APOBEC3G. In contrast to the published study, our results do not support a role for APOBEC3G in the inhibition of HIV-1 infection in quiescent T-lymphocytes. We believe the block of HIV-1 infection of quiescent T-cells remains unknown. Introduction Nonproliferating quiescent CD4+ T-cells are resistant to the infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) unless they are activated by mitogenic stimulation [1]–[5] or by cytokine stimulation [6]. Other studies demonstrated that quiescent T-cells at the stage of G0 or G1a of the cell cycle are nonpermissive to HIV-1 infection, but cells in the G1b phase of the cell cycle which show high levels of RNA synthesis, but no DNA synthesis [7] are permissive, and the induction of cell cycle progression per se is not needed to render cell permissive [8],[9]. Earlier studies showed that HIV-1 infection in quiescent CD4+ T-cells results in 4-fold lower levels of viral entry, and incomplete reverse transcription and minimum levels of integration are observed [5],[10],[11]. Although the precise mechanisms involved in this blockage remain unidentified, a number of cellular factors have been reported as restriction factors to HIV-1 infection in quiescent CD4+ T-cells (reviewed in more detail [12],[13]), including Murr1 [14] and most recently APOBEC3G [15]. APOBEC3G is a cytidine deaminase and has well characterized potent anti-retroviral activity, including against HIV-1 [16]–[20]. In the case of HIV-1, it acts through incorporation into virions where it edits newly synthesized viral DNA in the next infection cycle by deaminating dC to dU, resulting in lethal G-to-A hypermutations in the single stranded viral DNA intermediate (reviewed in [16],[21]). The HIV-1 encoded viral infectivity factor (Vif) counteracts the effects of virion incorporated APOBEC3G by mediating its degradation [22]–[24]. A deaminase-independent anti-viral activity has also been identified [15],[25],[26] but the detailed mechanism of action is poorly understood. Using siRNA mediated knock-down, Chiu et al. concluded that APOBEC3G plays role in HIV-1 restriction in quiescent resting CD4+ T-cells. In those cells, APOBEC3G exists as a low molecular-mass (LMM) ribonucleoprotein complex that inhibits HIV-1 infection prior to reverse transcription probably through its RNA binding activity. In this report, we attempted to reproduce the findings using the identical strategy of siRNA mediated knock-down of APOBEC3G expression as reported by Chiu et al. By nucleofection of the same siRNA as reported by Chiu et al (siA3G240WT) as well as two additional siRNAs targeting APOBEC3G, we confirm reduction in APOBEC3G mRNA and protein in quiescent CD4+ T-cells. However, none of the siRNAs resulted in a significant enhancement of HIV-1 infection in those cells. Therefore, we conclude that the role of APOBEC3G in the mechanism of HIV-1 restriction in quiescent CD4+ T-cells is unclear. Results Synthesized siRNAs can transduce into quiescent CD4+ T-cells with high efficiency by nucleofection Chiu et al. reported a 37-fold enhancement of HIV-1 infection by an HSA bearing reporter virus in unstimulated quiescent CD4+ T-cells following nucleofection of siRNA directed to APOBEC3G - a level that is nearly comparable to that observed in PHA/IL-2 stimulated cells [15]. We mimicked the experimental conditions of Chiu et al. using the same siRNA (siA3G240 WT) and VSV-G pseudotyped HSA reporter virus (NL4-3 HSA R-E- [27]). We first tested the efficiency of nucleofection using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated siRNA. Quiescent CD4+ T-cells (5×106) were nucleofected with 2 µg of siRNA following the manufacturer's protocol and the efficiency of siRNA transduction monitored by flow cytometry. We consistently observed 5–20% higher mortality between nucleofected cells compared to untreated control cells 48 hr after nucleofection. This level was similar or slightly lower than that reported by Chiu et al. [15]. As shown in Figure 1A
The expression of APOBEC3G effectively knock-down by nucleofection of siRNA directed to the sequence of APOBEC3G in quiescent CD4+ T-cells We next examined that the levels of knocking-down of APOBEC3G by siRNA reported by Chiu et al., that targeted APOBEC3G (siA3G240WT). We also tested two additional siRNAs, one previously published siRNA [28] and another identified by ourselves directed to distinct sequences of APOBEC3G (siA3G726 and siA3G883, respectively). These siRNAs gave greater downregulation of APOBEC3G mRNA than that reported by Chiu et al.; 6-fold reduction was observed in the case of siA3G883 (Figure 2A
APOBEC3G knock-down in quiescent CD4+ T-cells does not affect HSA reporter virus infection Using above described protocol, we nucleofected siRNAs targeted to APOBEC3G [siA3G240 WT, siA3G726 (see below), and siA3G883] or the mutant (siA3G240 MT) and non-specific siRNA (siControl) into quiescent CD4+ T-cells (Figure 3
Knock-down of APOBEC3G does not interfere with HIV-1 entry into quiescent CD4+ T-cells To ensure that the reporter viruses successfully entered quiescent CD4+ T-cells and to exclude the possibility that the nucleofection prevented the infection of the reporter virus, quiescent CD4+ T-cells were infected with virus and immediately stimulated with PHA/IL2. The marker gene expression was monitored by flow cytometry at 48 hr after stimulation. The stimulation status was monitored by the expression levels of two activation markers, CD25 and CD69. Nucleofection did not affect the expression levels of the activation markers (Figure S2). Similar to the results seen in Figures 3 Knock-down of APOBEC3G does not affect the levels of reverse transcription in HIV-1–infected quiescent CD4+ T-cells HIV-1 can enter into quiescent CD4+ T-cells, but it remains in an inactive state before completion of reverse transcription. Upon subsequent mitogentic stimulation, HIV-1 completes reverse transcription and p24 Gag expression is observable after approximately a 48 hr delay [5],[10]. Chiu et al. reported that this restriction on reverse transcription in quiescent CD4+ T-cells was alleviated by knock-down of APOBEC3G. We lastly examined the status of HIV-1 reverse transcription following downregulation of APOBEC3G. As reported by Vatakis et al.[10], the levels of early reverse transcripts decreased in stimulated cells over time, whereas they hardly changed in unstimulated cells until 48 hr after the reporter virus infection. Similar levels of early reverse transcripts were detected 12 hr after infection and there were no significant differences between siRNAs targeting APOBEC3G (Figure 6
Discussion The mechanisms involved in the restriction of HIV-1 infection in quiescent CD4+ T-cells remain unidentified. Some potential mechanisms for this blockage may be the presence of cellular inhibitors in quiescent cells [14],[15], the lack of cellular factors required for completion of HIV-1 infection [9] or both. Chiu et al. provided one possible mechanism for the restriction in quiescent T cells [15]. In contrast to their study, our results do not support a role for APOBEC3G in restricting HIV-1 infection of quiescent unstimulated human CD4+ T-cells. We also tested two additional siRNAs that were more efficient at decreasing APOBEC3G, both at the level of mRNA and protein. None of the siRNAs tested resulted in efficient HIV-1 reporter virus infection of quiescent CD4+ T-cells. It is unclear to us why our results are discrepant with those of Chiu et al. Our experimental conditions for maintaining quiescent T-cells are that which we used previously including in our first description of the block to HIV-1 infection [5]. From our past experience in working with quiescent T-cells, several factors may influence their behavior, including the source of cells and culture conditions. Our cells are obtained from fresh leukopaks from the UCLA blood bank and processed for peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) by a Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient within 24 hours. The cells are then used within 0.5 hours. In the past we used selected lots of human AB serum monitored for absence of growth stimulating activity rather than FCS. However, if carefully screened, FCS is also satisfactory and we observed no difference between use of 10% FCS and 10% human AB serum in our results (data not shown). Chiu et al. used 10% FCS for the culture of quiescent CD4+ T-cells. We also considered whether the nucleofection method might affect the results, in particular, the cytotoxicity associated with the procedure. Even under optimized conditions, the nucleofected cells consistently contained around 20% dead cells monitored by forward and side scatter compared to untreated control cells 48 hr after nucleofection. Those dead cells might have caused undesired activation of the remaining cells. We monitored the activation status of the nucleofected cells by CD25 and CD69 staining 48 hr after nucleofection, and as Chiu et al. also reported, we did not observe any induction of CD25 and CD69 expression. However, the activation state of T-cell permissive for infection varies depending on the stimuli [6],[8],[9]. Although the conditions reported by Chiu et al., to culture quiescent cells appear to be the same as ours, it is possible that unknown differences in culture conditions may result in subtle differences in cell activation, giving divergent results. Chiu et al. monitored HIV-1 entry and expression using flow cytometric analysis of HSA reporter gene expression. To exclude any confounding effects of marker gene expression or detection methods, we monitored HIV-1 entry by EGFP expression in addition to HSA expression. However, both detection methods showed identical results - we found no enhancement of HIV-1 entry by knocking-down of APOBEC3G in quiescent CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, we performed all our experiments under previously utilized optimum culture conditions to maintain quiescent T-cells and with experimental manipulation identical to Chiu et al., yet, we could not reproduce their results. As such, we believe the mechanism of HIV-1 restriction for quiescent CD4+ T-cells remains to be elucidated. Materials and Methods Antibodies PE conjugated anti-mouse CD24, Tri-color conjugated anti-human CD25 and PE conjugated anti-human CD69 monoclonal antibodies and isotype controls were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Anti-APOBEC3G antibody was obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program at NIH (Cat. No. 10201). Primary CD4+ T-cells Quiescent CD4+ T-cells from fresh human PBMCs were isolated with CD4+ microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA) and maintained in hTC medium (Lonza, Rockland, ME) supplemented with 2 mM L-Glutamine and 10% heat-inactivated FCS or human AB serum. For stimulation, isolated CD4+ T-cells were incubated with PHA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, 5 µg/ml; ) and IL-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, 20 U/ml) for 36 hr followed by IL-2 (20 U/ml) for 12 hr. Nucleofection of siRNA Isolated CD4+ T-cells were transfected with siRNAs using an Amaxa nucleofector (program V-024 as recommended by the manufacturer's protocol for primary human unstimulated T-cells; 2 µg of siRNA per 5–10×106 cells). siRNAs targeting APOBEC3G messenger RNA (Genebank accession number: NM_021822) at residues 240–258 in cording sequence for APOBEC3G (siA3G240 WT), 726–746 in cording sequence for APOBEC3G (siA3G726), 883–901 in cording sequence for APOBEC3G (siA3G883) were chemically synthesized by Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA) or Dharmacon (Chicago, IL). siRNA targeting CD4 (siCD4: #1024675) and control siRNA (siControl: #1027310) were purchased from Qiagen. Since dead cells have lower-forward scatter and higher-side scatter than live cells, cytotoxicity by nucleofection was monitored by measuring the dead cells with flow cytometry [29]. Virus production and titration We generated lentiviral vector stocks using an HIV-1 based reporter virus encoding HSA or EGFP (NL4-3 HSA R-E- [27] or NL4-3 EGFP R-E- substituted HSA with EGFP, respectively), packaging plasmid pCMV R8.2 δVpr, and the VSV-G envelope protein-coding plasmid by calcium phosphate-mediated transient transfection as previously described [30]. After 48 and 72 hr, lentiviral vector particles were harvested and concentrated by ultracentrifugation through a 10% sucrose cushion in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) with 1 mM EDTA and resuspended in a 100-fold lower volume of HBSS and stored at −80°C. The viral titer was measured by anti-p24 Gag ELISA and the infectious titer was determined in 293T cells by infecting with HSA or EGFP encoding vector and flow cytometric analysis. Viral infection and detection Forty-eight hr after nucleofection, CD4+ T-cells were incubated with reporter virus (125 ng of p24 per 1×105 cells) with 8 µg/ml of polybrene. After 3 hr incubation at 37°C, cells were washed extensively with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and cultured for 48 hr in the presence or absence of 25 µM AZT (A2169; Sigma-Aldrich). Unstimulated and non-nucleofected cells served as negative controls. Reporter gene expression (HSA and EGFP) and the activation markers (CD25 and CD69) were monitored by flow cytometry. Data were collected on a Cytomics FC500 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and analyzed using FCS express (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). Real-time PCR All real-Time PCR quantitations were performed using the BIO-RAD iQ5 system (BioRad, Hercules, CA) in parallel with a set of known quantitative standards. For quantitation of APOBEC3G mRNA, total RNA was extracted from approximately 5×105 cells with TRIZOL and used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The iScript one-step RT-PCR kit for probes (BioRad) was used with a 40 ng of total RNA for amplification of APOBEC3G and β-actin as control. The primers used were as follows. APOBEC3G: forward 5′CGCAGCCTGTGTCAGAAAAG3′; reverse, 5′CCAACAGTGCTGAAATTCGTCATA3′; probe, FAM-5′GTGCCACCATGAAGA3′-BHQ1 [31]. β-actin: forward 5′CGAGCGCGGCTACAGCTT3′; reverse, 5′ CCTTAATGTCACGCACGATT3′; probe, HEX-5′ACCACCACGGCCGAGCGG3′-BHQ2. All primers and probe were synthesized by Biosearch Technologies Inc. (Novato, CA). All RT-PCR reactions were carried out as follows: reverse transcription at 50°C for 10 min, inactivation of reverse transcriptase at 95°C for 5 min, and subsequently 45 cycles in two phases consisting of 95°C for 15 sec, and 58°C for 30 sec. APOBEC3G mRNA was normalized using the endogenous β-actin mRNA as a reference. Virus infection was measured by quantifying HIV-1 early and late reverse transcripts using TaqMan real-time DNA PCR as previously described [5],[8]. Briefly, DNA was extracted from approximately 5×105 cells with urea lysis buffer [4.7 M urea, 1.3% W/V SDS, 0.23 M NaCl, 0.67 mM EDTA, and 6.7 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)] and then subjected to phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Quantitative real-time DNA PCR was performed by iQ Supermix (BioRad) using primers specific for HIV-1 sequences as previously described [5]. The primer pairs M667/AA55 (R/U5 region) and M667/M661 (LTR/gag region) were used to detect early and late reverse transcripts of HIV-1, respectively. The standard curve used to determine HIV-DNA levels range from 1–1,000,000 copies of NL4-3 DNA. There was no background contamination from DNA of mock infected cells. The amounts of early and late reverse transcripts were normalized using the endogenous β-globin gene as a reference. Western blotting for APOBEC3G proteins 1×106 cells were lysed with 0.5% SDS containing protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich) and quantified with a BCA protein assay reagent (BioRad). Western blotting was performed as described previously [30]. Briefly, 2.5 µg protein was electrophoresis on 4–20% Precast SDS-PAGE gel (Lonza) and transferred onto immobilon membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). After blocking with 5% skim milk in PBS with 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T), membranes were reacted with either polyclonal anti-APOBEC3G antibody (Cat. No. 10201, NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) or polyclonal anti-β-Actin (Rockland Immunochemicals Inc., Gilbertsville, PA). Membranes were washed with PBS-T three times, treated with secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL plus; Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Figure S1 The infectivity of HIV-1 reporter virus on APOBEC3G knocked-down quiescent CD4+ T-cells is not affected by virus multiplicity of infection. Quiescent CD4+ T-cells derived from PBMCs were nucleofected with siRNAs and cultured for three days (A) or four days (B). Cells were subsequently infected with VSV-G pseudotyped NL4-3 EGFP reporter virus at three different MOIs (125, 250, and 500 ng of p24 per 1×105 cells) for 3 hr, and cultured in the absence or presence of 25 µM AZT. Expression of EGFP was monitored 48 hr after infection by flow cytometry. Unstimulated non-nucleofected cells (Unstimulated) and unstimulated cells nucleofected with control siRNA (siControl) or buffer only (buffer) served as negative controls. Cells stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and IL-2 (20 U/ml) served as positive controls (Stimulated). Comparable results were obtained using cells from two different donors. (5.56 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(5.2M, tif) Figure S2 Knock-down of APOBEC3G does not affect the activation status of quiescent CD4+ T-cells. Quiescent CD4+ T-cells derived from PBMCs were nucleofected with siRNAs and cultured for two days. Cells were then infected with VSV-G pseudotyped NL4-3 EGFP reporter virus (125 ng of p24 per 1×105 cells) for 3 hr. After infection, half of cells were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and IL-2 (20 U/ml) (Stim), and the other half of the cells were cultured without stimulation (-). The levels of CD25 and CD69 were monitored two days after infection by flow cytometry. Unstimulated none-nucleofected cells (Unstimulated), and unstimulated cell nucleofected with control siRNA (siControl) served as negative controls. Cells stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and IL-2 (20 U/ml) served as positive controls (Stimulated). Comparable results were obtained using cells from three different donors. Heat-inactivated (HI) viruses were used as negative controls for virus infection. (6.41 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(6.1M, tif) Acknowledgments We are grateful to Dr. Betty Poon for proofreading the manuscript and to Si-Hua Mao for technical help. We thank Drs. Jerome A. Zack and Dimitrios N. Vatakis for great technical assistance and for critical reading of the manuscript. The following reagents were obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: Anti-APOBEC3G-C terminal antibody from Dr. Jaisri Lingappa, pNL4-3.HSA.R-E- from Dr. Nathaniel Landau. Footnotes The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This work was supported by the NIH grant A1028697 (UCLA CFAR, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Zhou Y, Zhang H, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF. Kinetics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 decay following entry into resting CD4+ T cells. J Virol. 2005;79:2199–2210. [PubMed] 2. Swiggard WJ, O'Doherty U, McGain D, Jeyakumar D, Malim MH. Long HIV type 1 reverse transcripts can accumulate stably within resting CD4+ T cells while short ones are degraded. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20:285–295. [PubMed] 3. Pierson TC, Zhou Y, Kieffer TL, Ruff CT, Buck C, et al. Molecular characterization of preintegration latency in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 2002;76:8518–8531. [PubMed] 4. Tang S, Patterson B, Levy JA. Highly purified quiescent human peripheral blood CD4+ T cells are infectible by human immunodeficiency virus but do not release virus after activation. J Virol. 1995;69:5659–5665. [PubMed] 5. Zack JA, Arrigo SJ, Weitsman SR, Go AS, Haislip A, et al. HIV-1 entry into quiescent primary lymphocytes: molecular analysis reveals a labile, latent viral structure. Cell. 1990;61:213–222. [PubMed] 6. Unutmaz D, KewalRamani VN, Marmon S, Littman DR. Cytokine signals are sufficient for HIV-1 infection of resting human T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1999;189:1735–1746. [PubMed] 7. Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, Staiano-Coico L, Melamed MR. Subcompartments of the G1 phase of cell cycle detected by flow cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77:6696–6699. [PubMed] 8. Korin YD, Zack JA. Progression to the G1b phase of the cell cycle is required for completion of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription in T cells. J Virol. 1998;72:3161–3168. [PubMed] 9. Korin YD, Zack JA. Nonproductive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in nucleoside-treated G0 lymphocytes. J Virol. 1999;73:6526–6532. [PubMed] 10. Vatakis DN, Bristol G, Wilkinson TA, Chow SA, Zack JA. Immediate activation fails to rescue efficient human immunodeficiency virus replication in quiescent CD4+ T cells. J Virol. 2007;81:3574–3582. [PubMed] 11. Zack JA, Haislip AM, Krogstad P, Chen IS. Incompletely reverse-transcribed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes in quiescent cells can function as intermediates in the retroviral life cycle. J Virol. 1992;66:1717–1725. [PubMed] 12. Yamashita M, Emerman M. Retroviral infection of non-dividing cells: old and new perspectives. Virology. 2006;344:88–93. [PubMed] 13. Goff SP. Retrovirus restriction factors. Mol Cell. 2004;16:849–859. [PubMed] 14. Ganesh L, Burstein E, Guha-Niyogi A, Louder MK, Mascola JR, et al. The gene product Murr1 restricts HIV-1 replication in resting CD4+ lymphocytes. Nature. 2003;426:853–857. [PubMed] 15. Chiu YL, Soros VB, Kreisberg JF, Stopak K, Yonemoto W, et al. Cellular APOBEC3G restricts HIV-1 infection in resting CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2005;435:108–114. [PubMed] 16. Goila-Gaur R, Strebel K. HIV-1 Vif, APOBEC, and intrinsic immunity. Retrovirology. 2008;5:51. [PubMed] 17. Hache G, Mansky LM, Harris RS. Human APOBEC3 proteins, retrovirus restriction, and HIV drug resistance. AIDS Rev. 2006;8:148–157. [PubMed] 18. Mangeat B, Turelli P, Caron G, Friedli M, Perrin L, et al. Broad antiretroviral defence by human APOBEC3G through lethal editing of nascent reverse transcripts. Nature. 2003;424:99–103. [PubMed] 19. Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Choi JD, Malim MH. Isolation of a human gene that inhibits HIV-1 infection and is suppressed by the viral Vif protein. Nature. 2002;418:646–650. [PubMed] 20. Zhang H, Yang B, Pomerantz RJ, Zhang C, Arunachalam SC, et al. The cytidine deaminase CEM15 induces hypermutation in newly synthesized HIV-1 DNA. Nature. 2003;424:94–98. [PubMed] 21. Chiu YL, Greene WC. The APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases: an innate defensive network opposing exogenous retroviruses and endogenous retroelements. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:317–353. [PubMed] 22. Marin M, Rose KM, Kozak SL, Kabat D. HIV-1 Vif protein binds the editing enzyme APOBEC3G and induces its degradation. Nat Med. 2003;9:1398–1403. [PubMed] 23. Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Malim MH. The antiretroviral enzyme APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasome in response to HIV-1 Vif. Nat Med. 2003;9:1404–1407. [PubMed] 24. Stopak K, de Noronha C, Yonemoto W, Greene WC. HIV-1 Vif blocks the antiviral activity of APOBEC3G by impairing both its translation and intracellular stability. Mol Cell. 2003;12:591–601. [PubMed] 25. Bogerd HP, Wiegand HL, Doehle BP, Cullen BR. The intrinsic antiretroviral factor APOBEC3B contains two enzymatically active cytidine deaminase domains. Virology. 2007;364:486–493. [PubMed] 26. Nguyen DH, Gummuluru S, Hu J. Deamination-independent inhibition of hepatitis B virus reverse transcription by APOBEC3G. J Virol. 2007;81:4465–4472. [PubMed] 27. He J, Choe S, Walker R, Di Marzio P, Morgan DO, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral protein R (Vpr) arrests cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting p34cdc2 activity. J Virol. 1995;69:6705–6711. [PubMed] 28. Pion M, Granelli-Piperno A, Mangeat B, Stalder R, Correa R, et al. APOBEC3G/3F mediates intrinsic resistance of monocyte-derived dendritic cells to HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2887–2893. [PubMed] 29. Parks DR, Herzenberg LA. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting: theory, experimental optimization, and applications in lymphoid cell biology. Methods Enzymol. 1984;108:197–241. [PubMed] 30. Kamata M, Watanabe N, Nagaoka Y, Chen IS. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr binds to the N lobe of the Wee1 kinase domain and enhances kinase activity for CDC2. J Virol. 2008;82:5672–5682. [PubMed] 31. Jin X, Brooks A, Chen H, Bennett R, Reichman R, et al. APOBEC3G/CEM15 (hA3G) mRNA levels associate inversely with human immunodeficiency virus viremia. J Virol. 2005;79:11513–11516. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
J Virol. 2005 Feb; 79(4):2199-210.
[J Virol. 2005]Cell. 1990 Apr 20; 61(2):213-22.
[Cell. 1990]J Exp Med. 1999 Jun 7; 189(11):1735-46.
[J Exp Med. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov; 77(11):6696-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980]J Virol. 1998 Apr; 72(4):3161-8.
[J Virol. 1998]Retrovirology. 2008 Jun 24; 5():51.
[Retrovirology. 2008]Nature. 2003 Jul 3; 424(6944):94-8.
[Nature. 2003]Annu Rev Immunol. 2008; 26():317-53.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2008]Nat Med. 2003 Nov; 9(11):1398-403.
[Nat Med. 2003]Mol Cell. 2003 Sep; 12(3):591-601.
[Mol Cell. 2003]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]J Virol. 1995 Nov; 69(11):6705-11.
[J Virol. 1995]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]J Exp Med. 2006 Dec 25; 203(13):2887-93.
[J Exp Med. 2006]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]J Virol. 2005 Sep; 79(17):11513-6.
[J Virol. 2005]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]Cell. 1990 Apr 20; 61(2):213-22.
[Cell. 1990]J Virol. 2007 Apr; 81(7):3574-82.
[J Virol. 2007]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]Nature. 2003 Dec 18; 426(6968):853-7.
[Nature. 2003]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]J Virol. 1999 Aug; 73(8):6526-32.
[J Virol. 1999]Cell. 1990 Apr 20; 61(2):213-22.
[Cell. 1990]J Exp Med. 1999 Jun 7; 189(11):1735-46.
[J Exp Med. 1999]J Virol. 1998 Apr; 72(4):3161-8.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 1999 Aug; 73(8):6526-32.
[J Virol. 1999]Methods Enzymol. 1984; 108():197-241.
[Methods Enzymol. 1984]J Virol. 1995 Nov; 69(11):6705-11.
[J Virol. 1995]J Virol. 2008 Jun; 82(12):5672-82.
[J Virol. 2008]J Virol. 2005 Sep; 79(17):11513-6.
[J Virol. 2005]Cell. 1990 Apr 20; 61(2):213-22.
[Cell. 1990]J Virol. 1998 Apr; 72(4):3161-8.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 2008 Jun; 82(12):5672-82.
[J Virol. 2008]