![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 The Author(s). Gene expression studies in kiwifruit and gene over-expression in Arabidopsis indicates that GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase is a major control point of vitamin C biosynthesis Plant and Food Research, PB 92169, Auckland, New Zealand †To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: wlaing/at/hortresearch.co.nz *Present address Scion, PB 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand. Received September 26, 2008; Revised November 2, 2008; Accepted November 19, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details) Abstract Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid, AsA) is an essential metabolite for plants and animals. Kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) are a rich dietary source of AsA for humans. To understand AsA biosynthesis in kiwifruit, AsA levels and the relative expression of genes putatively involved in AsA biosynthesis, regeneration, and transport were correlated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in leaves and during fruit development in four kiwifruit genotypes (three species; A. eriantha, A. chinensis, and A. deliciosa). During fruit development, fruit AsA concentration peaked between 4 and 6 weeks after anthesis with A. eriantha having 3–16-fold higher AsA than other genotypes. The rise in AsA concentration typically occurred close to the peak in expression of the L-galactose pathway biosynthetic genes, particularly the GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase gene. The high concentration of AsA found in the fruit of A. eriantha is probably due to higher expression of the GDP-mannose-3′,5′-epimerase and GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase genes. Over-expression of the kiwifruit GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase gene in Arabidopsis resulted in up to a 4-fold increase in AsA, while up to a 7-fold increase in AsA was observed in transient expression studies where both GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase and GDP-mannose-3′,5′-epimerase genes were co-expressed. These studies show the importance of GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase as a rate-limiting step to AsA, and demonstrate how AsA can be significantly increased in plants. Keywords: Ascorbate biosynthesis, GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase, GDP mannose epimerase, gene expression, over-expression, vitamin C Introduction L-ascorbic acid (AsA), commonly known as vitamin C, is an essential metabolite for plants and animals although humans, and some other animals, have to obtain their AsA from the foods they eat. Cooked meat and seeds contain low amounts of AsA and so the main dietary sources of AsA for humans are fruit and vegetables. In plants, AsA is a part of the antioxidant system important for photosynthesis and is vital for detoxifying the free radicals generated as side products from this process. AsA is also a cofactor for many enzymes (Arrigoni and De Tullio, 2000), controls cell division, and also affects cell expansion (Arrigoni and De Tullio, 2000; Noctor and Foyer, 1998; Pastori et al., 2003; Smirnoff and Wheeler, 2000). The role of AsA as a cofactor for ACC oxidase suggests it is required for fruit ripening in climacteric fruit (De Tullio et al., 2004; Green and Fry, 2005). It is also a substrate for the production of other fruit acids such as L-tartaric, L-threonic, L-glyceric, and L-oxalic acids (Debolt et al., 2007; Loewus, 1999). In addition, being an important part of the cellular redox system, the AsA redox state may also be important in plant senescence, defence, and stress responses (Barth et al., 2004; Lopez-Carbonell et al., 2006; Noctor, 2006). Several biosynthetic routes to AsA have been proposed (Fig. 1
The fruits of the kiwifruit vine (Actinidia spp.) are especially rich sources of AsA and a tremendous variation of AsA content exists within the fruits of this genus, ranging from 40 (2.3 μmol g−1 FW) to over 1500 mg (>85 μmol g−1) AsA per 100 g fruit fresh weight (Ferguson and MacRae, 1992), making kiwifruit an excellent species to investigate the genetic basis of AsA production. For this reason, the basis of the variation in AsA levels seen between the fruits of different kiwifruit genotypes has been investigated (Fig. 2
Materials and methods Genotypes chosen for analysis Samples were collected from two A. chinensis mapping population siblings with similar mature fruit weights but varying ascorbate levels. These plants are closely related to the commercial yellow kiwifruit in that the father of the mapping population and ‘Hort16A’ (also sold as ZESPRI™ GOLD) are siblings. In addition, tissues from the most widely consumed green kiwifruit variety (A. deliciosa ‘Hayward’), as well as from a very high AsA, but relatively unpalatable, species (A. eriantha) were also collected (Fig. 2 RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis Total RNA was extracted using a modified silica dioxide method. A 500 mg aliquot of frozen powder was transferred a 50 ml Falcon tube (Sarstedt) containing 6.75 ml extraction buffer (4.5 M guanidine HCl, 0.2 M Na acetate, 25 mM EDTA, 1 M K acetate, 2.5% (w/v) PVP-40, pH 5.2), 0.75 ml 10% (w/v) SDS and five glass beads (5–7 mm diameter). This was vortexed at maximum speed for 30 s and then incubated for 10 min at 70 °C. The liquid minus glass beads was transferred to a 50 ml Oakridge centrifuge tube (Nalgene®) and incubated on ice for 5 min. The tubes were then centrifuged for 10 min at 20 000 g at 4 °C, after which 6 ml supernatant was transferred to a new tube and then 6 ml NaI solution (5 M NaI, 0.1 M Na2SO3), 6 ml ethanol, and 550 μl of a silica milk suspension (1:1 w/v SiO2 to water, pH 2.0) were added. The samples were gently mixed by rolling at room temperature for 10 min. Following this, they were centrifuged for 1 min at 400 g at room temperature, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 10 ml wash buffer (10 mM TRIS-HCl, pH 7.5; 0.05 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 50% v/v ethanol) and then centrifuged for 1 min at 400 g, at room temperature. This wash cycle was repeated once more and then the pellet was air-dried for 10 min before being resuspended in 5 ml TE buffer (10 mM TRIS-Cl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8). The RNA was unbound from the silica suspension by incubation at 70 oC for 4 min followed by centrifugation at 20 000 g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and precipitated by the addition of one-third volume 8 M LiCl and incubating at –20 °C for 1 h, followed by centrifugation for 20 min at 20 000 g at 4 °C. The RNA pellet was washed three times with 2.5 ml cold (–20 °C) 75% (v/v) ethanol (with centrifugation at 20 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C), then air-dried for 10 min, resuspended in DNAse buffer [77 μl H2O+10 μl 10× DNAse buffer (Sigma)+3 μl RNAseOUT (Invitrogen)], then transferred to a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. To this, 10 μl DNAse I (Sigma) was added and the reaction was incubated at room temperature for 20 min. RNA integrity was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and DNAse treatment was repeated if DNA was seen (by incubating longer); otherwise 11 μl 50 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) was added and the mix was incubated at 70 °C for 10 min. RNA concentration and quality was determined using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Complementary DNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using SuperscriptIII reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) with oligo dT20 (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's instructions. After synthesis, 10 μl cDNA was diluted 100 times in water. Between 1 μl and 2.5 μl was used per 15 μl PCR reaction. Primer design Where possible, DNA of the full-length open reading frame of each EST sequence was aligned to a pre-alignment of the open reading frame and genomic DNA sequence of its best matching Arabidopsis protein hit from the TAIR database (http://www.arabidopsis.org/). Primers were then designed using Primer3 software (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1998) so that at least one of the primer pairs spanned an intron–exon junction. Where this was not possible, primers were designed to lie on either side of an intron splice site. Primer design specifications were: an amplicon size of 100/110/120 (minimum/optimum/maximum); optimum primer length of 20 bp; primer Tm of 59/60/61 °C (minimum/optimum/maximum); primer GC% of 45% min and 50% max; with all other parameters left at default. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) The relative expression of each transcript was determined in triplicate by qPCR using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Total reaction volumes of 15 μl contained 7.5 μl Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 200 pM forward and reverse primers, and between 1 μl and 2.5 μl pre-diluted cDNA. Thermocycling parameters were 10 min at 95 °C, then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, then 60 °C for 1 min, with data collection during annealing and extension. After each run, dissociation curves were run to check amplicon purity. Data from the individual runs were collated using 7500 Fast System SDS Software (Applied Biosystems) and the background subtracted cycle threshold (CT) and well component data were exported. The amplification efficiency (Re) of each reaction was calculated from the component data using LinRegPCR (Ramakers et al., 2003) and this was used to calculate relative expression of each gene using the delta CT method (ReCTa-CTb; where ‘a’ and ‘b’ are the CTs of the sample designated to have an expression of 1 and the sample being compared, respectively). The variation in expression values between samples was normalized to the expression of an internal reference gene, the kiwifruit orthologue of At1g13320, a 65 kDa regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). This was chosen from a suite of stable expressed internal reference gene candidates, which had been pre-tested on the entire cDNA set studied here. The choice of internal reference gene candidates was based on the Arabidopsis gene set described by Czechowski et al. (2005) and included orthologues of At1g59830 (PP2A catalyst), At4g27960 (UBC9), At1g13440 (GAPDH), and At5g09810 (actin). Ascorbate quantification Total kiwifruit tissue AsA was measured using HPLC on the same liquid nitrogen powdered samples as used for qPCR, as described earlier by Rassam and Laing (2005). Leaf tissue was measured after grinding under liquid nitrogen in the same manner (Laing et al., 2007; Rassam and Laing, 2005). As a measure of the total rate of synthesis of AsA in fruit, total AsA per fruit was calculated as a product of fruit AsA concentration (Fig. 3A
Arabidopsis transformation and transient expression in tobacco Arabidopsis was transformed using the Agrobacterium kiwifruit GGT in a pGreen construct as described elsewhere (Laing et al., 2007) using the floral dipping method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Seed were collected and kanamycin-resistant lines selected. Eight lines were chosen for further study and were taken on to the T3 generation. Plants were checked by growing on kanamycin plates for the presence of the selectable marker and were shown to be kanamycin-resistant. Gene expression was measured as described above. Tobacco was transiently transformed using the same Agrobacterium cloned genes (Hellens et al., 2005; Laing et al., 2007). Results AsA in fruit and leaves Vitamin C (AsA) levels were measured by HPLC in fruit, leaf, and flower samples collected from four kiwifruit (Actinidia) genotypes representing three different species with a range of fruit AsA concentrations: A. deliciosa (~80 mg per 100 g fresh weight AsA), A. chinensis (MP097 and MP212; two individuals from a population segregating for AsA concentration; ~50 mg and ~200 mg, respectively), and A. eriantha (11-4-18a; ~800 mg) (Fig. 2 As well as having the highest fruit AsA concentration, A. eriantha also had a significantly higher AsA concentration in both mature leaves (up to 3.5-fold) (Fig. 3C Selection of genes assayed by qPCR There are three processes that could determine fruit AsA levels: de novo biosynthesis, turnover (including recycling and degradation), and transport. The genes selected to cover these three processes and the evidence to verify their role in AsA biosynthesis is shown in Supplementary Table S2 at JXB online. Two transport genes were selected, three turnover genes, and 15 biosynthesis related genes. Expression of the last L-galactose AsA biosynthesis gene, L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase, could not be measured because there were no kiwifruit orthologues available in the HortResearch Actinidia EST database. There is only one EST for galactose dehydrogenase and none for galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase found in the Actinidia EST database while there are 11–69 ESTs for the earlier steps (Crowhurst et al., 2008). Examination of the Arabidopsis eFP Browser (http://bbc.botany.utoronto.ca/efp/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi?dataSource=Light_Series) shows the L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase gene is the lowest expressed gene of all the genes in the L-galactose pathway to ascorbate. Two potential candidates (GenBank accessions FG441979 and FG431619) for the six proposed L-gulono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase genes (Wolucka and Van Montagu, 2003, 2007) are present in the HortResearch EST database (Crowhurst et al., 2008) representing only two different Arabidopsis genes. However, there is no known direct experimental evidence proving what their function is and because there were only two candidates from six potential genes, the expression of these genes was not studied. For the recycling enzymes, Arabidopsis has five DHAR and MDAR genes (Chew et al., 2003). However, alignment of the available Actinidia DHAR ESTs with Arabidopsis DHAR genes showed each species clustered into separate gene families and so selection of genes representing different Arabidopsis members could not be done. Two divergent Actinidia ESTs were chosen to represent the DHAR family. In the case of MDAR and AO, only one EST was selected to quantify gene expression. The transport genes were selected based on their homology to the nucleobase-ascorbate family, although again there is no direct functional evidence (Maurino et al., 2006). The position of 18 of the selected genes in the three biosynthetic/recycling pathways is shown in Fig. 1 Genes influencing the de novo biosynthesis of AsA Expression of L-galactose pathway genes and a competing pathway: The expression of the six genes in the L-galactose pathway and two genes that divert material from ascorbate in two sets were assayed. The first set of four genes analysed are centred round GDP-mannose, the major branch point in the L-galactose pathway, which can also be utilized for the synthesis of fucose and cell wall precursors. The relative expression levels of GMP (gene encoding GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase; enzyme 4 in Fig. 1
The second set of four genes analysed encode enzymes that convert GDP-L-galactose to the precursor of AsA. GDP-L-galactose is thought to be mainly used for ascorbate biosynthesis although there are reports of L-galactose in cell walls (Roberts and Harrer, 1973; Zablackis et al., 1996) and mucilages (Anderson, 1933; Naran et al., 2008). GDP-mannose-3′,5′-epimerase (gene GME; enzyme 5 in Fig. 1
The expression of the kiwifruit transcript of GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase (GGT; enzyme 6 in Fig. 1 Comparing relative levels of GGT expression between genotypes other than A. eriantha did not explain the AsA variation observed. For instance, the low AsA A. chinensis Mp212 genotype had higher expression than its high AsA sibling, Mp097, up to and including the 4 WAA stage. After 4 WAA the high AsA Mp097 then had a constant level of expression between 4 WAA and 12 WAA, whereas expression in Mp212 fell after its maximum at 4 WAA to a minimum at 12 WAA, but then increased again after this stage. A. deliciosa had a somewhat similar GGT expression pattern to the low AsA Mp212, but peaked later at 6 WAA, corresponding with its peak in AsA concentration. Thus the high concentration of AsA found in the fruit of one genotype (A. eriantha) is probably due to higher expression of GME and GGT. The kiwifruit enzyme downstream of GGT is L-galactose-1-phosphate phosphatase (GPP; enzyme 7 in Fig. 1 Expression of the last AsA biosynthesis gene, L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase, could not be measured because there were no kiwifruit orthologues available in the HortResearch Actinidia EST database (Crowhurst et al., 2008) and attempts to clone the gene from kiwifruit using degenerate PCR primers failed. Expression of genes in the galacturonate pathway: The galacturonate pathway to AsA uses D-galacturonic acid reductase (GalUR; enzyme 16 in Fig. 1 Gene expression of the three GALUR genes is shown in Fig. 6
Expression of genes in the myo-inositol pathway: Myo-inositol is an important metabolite in A. deliciosa accumulating early in fruit development and declining after about 7 weeks (Klages et al., 1998).The first step of myo-inositol biosynthesis is the conversion of D-glucose-6-phosphate to L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate by L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase (gene IPS; enzyme 18 in Fig. 1 The expression pattern of IPS was similar in all genotypes and was highest in young fruit, after which it fell to low levels (Fig. 7A
There appears to be no relationship between either of these myo-inositol pathway genes and ascorbate levels, especially with respect to the high ascorbate A. eriantha. Expression of genes involved in ascorbate regeneration and oxidation: Oxidized AsA can be regenerated through the action of monodehydro-AsA reductase (gene MDHAR; enzyme 27 in Fig. 1
The expression pattern of DHAR genes is shown in Fig. 8B and C Ascorbate oxidase (AO) showed a strong peak at around 4–6 weeks (Fig. 8D Expression of genes in ascorbate transport: A number of permease-like/nucleobase-ascorbate transporters have been annotated in plant sequence databases, and a detailed study of 12 putative Arabidopsis genes that were matched by BLAST to a rat nucleobase-ascorbate transporter (NAT) gene family (RnNAT1; SVCT1; AF080453) has been published (Maurino et al., 2006). However, no Arabidopsis gene has definitively been proven to be an ascorbic acid transporter, so two kiwifruit members of this family were chosen that most closely matched animal ascorbate transporters, named T1 and T2. Recently, dehydroascorbate has been demonstrated to be the transported molecule in Arabidopsis cell culture (Horemans et al., 2008), but no genes were identified. For all genotypes, the expression of T1 increased after fertilization to a peak around either 2 WAA or 4 WAA and then fell as the fruit matured (Fig. 9A
Stable over-expression in Arabidopsis and transient expression in tobacco: The gene expression studies suggested that GGT and GME were key genes involved in the production of high AsA in A. eriantha. To test this, Arabidopsis plants were transformed with the kiwifruit GGT gene. Plants with leaf AsA over four times the control level (Table 1) were observed, but within a line with high AsA progeny, there were always plants with high and low AsA (Table 1) in spite of all plants coming from a high AsA kanamycin-resistant parent, suggesting the occurrence of gene silencing. In some cases the level of AsA fell below the leaf AsA in control plants, suggesting that the endogenous gene was also silenced. A comparison of the DNA sequences between 319998 and the Arabidopsis gene At4g26850 showed that there were stretches of greater than 20 bp that were identical.
The third generation plants were also checked for gene expression of the kiwifruit GGT gene (see Supplementary Table S5 at JXB online). In every case, plants with high AsA relative to controls also showed enhanced expression of the kiwifruit gene. In one case, a plant with a low AsA (no plants in this line had high AsA) also showed high levels of the kiwifruit transcript. This may be interpreted as being due to the incomplete processing of the silenced gene transcripts in this line, and hence leaving template for detection by qPCR. Transient tobacco leaf transformation (Hellens et al., 2005) were also used to measure the effect on leaf AsA of the simultaneous expression of GGT and GME (Table 2). Compared with the P19 control, transformation using the GME gene alone raised AsA by 20%. The GGT by itself resulted in a 4.2-fold increase in AsA. This is a similar result to that reported earlier for GGT (Laing et al., 2007). Simultaneous transformation of tobacco with both genes raised average AsA by 8.6-fold and a maximum of over 12-fold for the oldest leaf, over twice that observed with either gene alone.
Discussion Ascorbate in fruit The rate of total fruit AsA accumulation (in mg per week) showed a maximum early in fruit development in all genotypes (Fig. 3B AsA concentration peaked between 4 WAA and 6 WAA. Cell division in ‘Monty’ kiwifruit (A. deliciosa, previously known as A. chinensis) effectively ceases by 33 d after anthesis (4–5 WAA; Hopping, 1976). Therefore, assuming the genotypes that were tested behaved similarly, the rapid fruit increases in AsA concentration occurred mainly during the cell division phase, with the concentration peaking between the end of cell division and up to 2 weeks thereafter. The fresh weight and cell size both increased at their fastest rates between 3 WAA and 6 WAA (Hopping, 1976). This is therefore, a period of very high growth and metabolic activity and the concurrence of peak AsA concentration agrees with purported roles of AsA in cell division, cell elongation, and as a cofactor for many enzymes (Noctor and Foyer, 1998; Arrigoni and De Tullio, 2000; Smirnoff and Wheeler, 2000; Pastori et al., 2003). Even though the lowest AsA concentration genotypes had the highest fruit size by weight, fruit weight is not generally correlated with AsA concentration in this mapping population (R Ferguson et al., unpublished results). After peaking, AsA concentration fell as the fruit matured, presumably due to slowing of biosynthesis and dilution due to cell expansion (Fig. 3B Ascorbate in leaves The young leaves were rapidly expanding, and synthesis of AsA would have needed to be high to maintain their concentration, especially as in three out of the four genotypes AsA was higher in mature leaves than in young leaves. The exception again was A. eriantha, which not only had significantly higher levels of AsA than the other accessions, but also the levels of AsA tended to decline between young and mature leaves (Fig. 3C, D Fruit gene expression In general, transcripts for most, but not all, genes measured in fruit showed peak expression early in fruit development between 2 weeks and 12 weeks and declined as the fruit developed. The gene expression data for L-galactose pathway members in particular, tended to coincide with the early period of highest AsA accumulation per fruit (Fig. 3B Transcripts of early L-galactose pathway enzymes were higher in A. eriantha than other genotypes, particularly for the genes GME and GGT, during the period of highest increase in AsA concentration. Transient over-expression of GGT in tobacco leaves led to an approximate 3-fold increase in leaf AsA (Laing et al., 2007), and further transient expression experiments presented here, with co-expressed GME and GGT resulted in an 8–12-fold increase in leaf AsA, whereas transient expression of GME alone resulted in little change in leaf AsA. Stable over-expression of GGT in Arabidopsis also resulted in increased leaf AsA by up to ~4-fold. This suggests that GGT is a significant rate-limiting enzyme of AsA biosynthesis in vivo. This is supported by studies in Arabidopsis where it was shown that GGT and GME gene expression and GGT enzyme activity increased at high light intensities where ascorbate levels were also increased (Dowdle et al., 2007). The same study showed that vtc2/vtc5 double mutants were arrested in their growth past the cotyledon emergence stage, and then died. The very low ascorbate content of the vtc2 mutant shows that GGT (and thus the L-galactose pathway) is an important pathway for biosynthesis of AsA (Conklin et al., 2000). Later enzymes in the L-galactose pathway, especially GDH showed smaller differences in expression between A. eriantha and the other genotypes, suggesting they are not rate-limiting in AsA biosynthesis. This is borne out by the observation that over-expression of GDH in tobacco had no effect on leaf AsA levels (Gatzek et al., 2002). Unfortunately, there are no kiwifruit sequence data available for the final step of the AsA biosynthetic pathway, L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase, so the expression pattern of this gene could not be determined. However, in tomato plants down-regulated for L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase (total knockouts were not recoverable), total ascorbate amounts in both the young developing leaves and fruit tissues were unchanged (Alhagdow et al., 2007), although there were differing ratios of reduced to oxidized AsA. Recent L-galactono-1,4-lactone feeding experiments in strawberry and blackcurrant fruit, as well as earlier experiments, suggest that substrate limitation occurs at an earlier stage in the pathway because the inherent fruit L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase activity was sufficient to convert an increased supply of substrate to AsA (Baig et al., 1970; Nascimento et al., 2005; Hancock et al., 2007). Taking these observations into account it seems that L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase may not exert strong control over ascorbate flux (in fruit tissues at least), even though its expression pattern tends to correlate with AsA content in certain examples (Pateraki et al., 2004; Tamaoki et al., 2003). L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase also has the ability to oxidize L-gulono-1,4-lactone, although with a significantly lower substrate affinity (higher Km) and maximum rate (Yabuta et al., 2000; Leferink et al., 2008). Thus if L-gulose is a significant direct intermediate in AsA biosynthesis (Wolucka and Van Montagu, 2003, 2007), then it is likely to have a specific dehydrogenase enzyme to carry out the reaction. As stated previously, two potential candidates (GenBank accessions FG441979 and FG431619) for the six proposed L-gulono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase genes exist in the HortResearch EST database (Crowhurst et al., 2008). However, there is no direct experimental evidence proving their function and because there were only two candidates from six potential genes, the choice was made not to study the expression of these two genes until there is more evidence as to which of these genes are actually involved in ascorbate biosynthesis. Over-expression of a L-gulono-γ-lactone oxidase from rat liver converted both L-gulono-1,4-lactone and L-galactono-1,4-lactone to AsA, and raised AsA by 7-fold compared with controls (Jain and Nessler, 2000). Thus, the shunt through L-gulose may contribute to AsA biosynthesis. GDH can oxidize both L-galactose and L-gulose, although it has a much higher Km for L-gulose than L-galactose (Gatzek et al., 2002; Mieda et al., 2004; Laing et al., 2007). It was calculated that the kiwifruit GDH would have about 8% activity with L-gulose as compared to L-galactose at limiting L-gulose concentrations (Laing et al., 2007). Again this suggests that, if metabolism through L-gulose is a significant route to AsA, then a specific L-gulose dehydrogenase is likely to exist. For the two A. chinensis mapping population genotypes, there were no clear correlations between relative levels of gene expression and AsA concentration. Peaks in expression of GME and GGT coincided with AsA accumulation, but there was no clear difference between the low AsA Mp212 and the high AsA Mp097, and integrated expression was also very similar. Relative expression of GGT was actually higher in the low AsA Mp212 than in the higher AsA genotype at 4 WAA. However, GGT expression in relative terms remained close to its 6 WAA peak through to 12 WAA in the high AsA genotype (Mp097), around 2-fold higher than in the low AsA Mp212 at 12 WAA. Thus, the difference in AsA concentration is likely be a mix of this, different contributions by other biosynthetic routes and transport of AsA into the fruit. Some of these could be the higher expression of GALUR3 in high AsA Mp097 compared with low AsA Mp212, and the 50% higher expression of MIOX4 transcripts in Mp097 at 4 WAA compared with Mp212. The most striking difference between A. deliciosa and the other genotypes studied here was in the expression of the myo-inositol oxygenases, particularly MIOX4. However, the much higher relative expression of MIOX4 early on during fruit development did not appear to affect AsA concentration, suggesting that myo-inositol is used for something other than AsA biosynthesis in kiwifruit. Myo-inositol is a major carbohydrate of kiwifruit during the early stages of fruit development (Bieleski et al., 1997; Boldingh et al., 2000) and it has been suggested that the oxidized product D-glucuronate is utilized in the production of glucuromannan gum, of which there are high levels in A. deliciosa kiwifruit (Redgwell, 1983). The fall in AsA concentration in mature leaves during the peak period of AsA accumulation in A. deliciosa suggests that translocation from leaves is an important source of AsA in the fruit of this genotype. Leaf gene expression The two committed steps in AsA biosynthesis of GGT and GPP had lower relative expression in young leaves, (sink tissues), than mature leaves (source tissues). The converse was true for the pre-L-galactose pathway genes, PMM, GMP, GME, and also the side-pathway GMD and GER. This suggests that in young leaves, flux is directed to producing cell wall polysaccharides, which then shifts toward AsA as the leaf matures. Interestingly, fucose was reported to inhibit GME (Wolucka and Van Montagu, 2003), and the expression of GME transcripts in A. eriantha fruit dropped as GER transcripts peaked. This pattern was not seen in the other genotypes, however. Expression of the putative transporter T1 was also higher in young leaves than in mature leaves, suggesting that sink vegetative tissues might also import AsA. Conclusions The expression of the genes GGT and GME correlated with the peak in AsA accumulation in all genotypes and showed the highest expression in A. eriantha, the genotype with the highest AsA. Over-expression through stable transformation in Arabidopsis of GGT or transient expression in tobacco leaves of GME and GGT together confirms the hypothesis that GGT catalyses a major control point of AsA biosynthesis through the L-galactose pathway in plants, and that this in turn creates an earlier rate-limiting step catalysed by GME. It lends credence that the observed GGT and GME expression patterns do indeed have biological relevance to the content of AsA in fruit tissues. This emphasizes the importance of verifying gene expression studies with further physiological experiments, as gene expression does not necessarily reflect enzyme activity. The over-expression results also highlight the significant potential for breeding high AsA content plants by both conventional and transgenic means. Such plants and their fruit would not only be more nutritious, but may also be more resistant to abiotic stresses such as high light, ozone, salt, and drought. Supplementary data Supplementary data for this manuscript can be found at JXB online. Supplementary Table 1. Primers. Supplementary Table 2. Genes assayed for their expression by qPCR and comparisons against identified enzymes in Arbidopsis. Supplementary Table 3. Integrated gene expression for each gene in each pathway over the four genotypes from anthesis until fruit maturity. Supplementary Table 4. Gene expression for leaves and non-pistil floral tissue in the four kiwifruit genetypes. [Supplementary Material]
Acknowledgments We would like to thank Di Barraclough for technical contributions and the HortResearch Marketing department for supplying images. We would also like to thank Ross Ferguson for providing the plant material. Finally, we would like to thank Ross Atkinson for his suggestions for the manuscript. Funded by The New Zealand Foundation of Science, Research and Technology contract C06X0403. Abbreviations
References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant Cell. 2003 Apr; 15(4):939-51.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2000; 35(4):291-314.
[Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2000]Ann Bot. 2007 Jan; 99(1):3-8.
[Ann Bot. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr; 134(4):1784-92.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Nature. 1998 May 28; 393(6683):365-9.
[Nature. 1998]Plant J. 2007 Nov; 52(4):673-89.
[Plant J. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2007 Jun 29; 282(26):18879-85.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 28; 278(48):47483-90.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Phytochemistry. 2007 Nov; 68(21):2602-13.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Neurosci Lett. 2003 Mar 13; 339(1):62-6.
[Neurosci Lett. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2005 Sep; 139(1):5-17.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Mar 23; 53(6):2322-6.
[J Agric Food Chem. 2005]Plant J. 1998 Dec; 16(6):735-43.
[Plant J. 1998]Plant Methods. 2005 Dec 18; 1():13.
[Plant Methods. 2005]BMC Genomics. 2008 Jul 27; 9():351.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 28; 278(48):47483-90.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Phytochemistry. 2007 Nov; 68(21):2602-13.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 21; 278(47):46869-77.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Oct; 47(10):1381-93.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2006]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun; 7(3):277-84.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Science. 1996 Jun 21; 272(5269):1808-10.
[Science. 1996]Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep; 148(1):132-41.
[Plant Physiol. 2008]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 28; 278(48):47483-90.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Dec 28; 127(51):18309-20.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]BMC Genomics. 2008 Jul 27; 9():351.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]Plant Physiol. 1995 Feb; 107(2):613-619.
[Plant Physiol. 1995]Plant Cell. 1995 Dec; 7(12):2175-85.
[Plant Cell. 1995]Plant Physiol. 2004 Mar; 134(3):1200-5.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Oct; 47(10):1381-93.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2006]FEBS Lett. 2008 Aug 6; 582(18):2714-8.
[FEBS Lett. 2008]Plant Methods. 2005 Dec 18; 1():13.
[Plant Methods. 2005]Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2000; 35(4):291-314.
[Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2000]Plant Cell. 2003 Apr; 15(4):939-51.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Phytochemistry. 2007 Nov; 68(21):2602-13.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Plant J. 2007 Nov; 52(4):673-89.
[Plant J. 2007]Genetics. 2000 Feb; 154(2):847-56.
[Genetics. 2000]Plant J. 2002 Jun; 30(5):541-53.
[Plant J. 2002]Plant Physiol. 2007 Dec; 145(4):1408-22.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug; 46(2):277-80.
[Plant Physiol. 1970]J Exp Bot. 2004 Aug; 55(403):1623-33.
[J Exp Bot. 2004]Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Jun; 41(6):666-75.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2000]FEBS J. 2008 Feb; 275(4):713-26.
[FEBS J. 2008]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 28; 278(48):47483-90.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Phytochemistry. 2007 Nov; 68(21):2602-13.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]BMC Genomics. 2008 Jul 27; 9():351.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]Plant J. 2002 Jun; 30(5):541-53.
[Plant J. 2002]Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Sep; 45(9):1271-9.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 28; 278(48):47483-90.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]