![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Gaglio et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Glutamine Deprivation Induces Abortive S-Phase Rescued by Deoxyribonucleotides in K-Ras Transformed Fibroblasts Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy Mikhail V. Blagosklonny, Editor Ordway Research Institute, United States of America * E-mail: ferdinando.chiaradonna/at/unimib.it Conceived and designed the experiments: DG FC. Performed the experiments: DG CS FC. Analyzed the data: DG MV LA FC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MV LA FC. Wrote the paper: MV LA FC. Received September 5, 2008; Accepted February 3, 2009. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Oncogene activation plays a role in metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells. We have previously shown that K-ras transformed fibroblasts have a stronger dependence on glycolysis and a reduced oxidative phosphorylation ability as compared to their normal counterparts. Another metabolic adaptation of cancer cells, that has long been established, is their propensity to exhibit increased glutamine consumption, although the effects induced by glutamine deprivation on cancer cells are still controversial. Methodology and Principal Findings Here, by using nutritional perturbations and molecular physiology, we show that reduction or complete depletion of glutamine availability in K-ras transformed fibroblasts causes a strong decrease of proliferation ability and a slower re-entry of synchronized cells into the cell cycle. The reduced proliferation is accompanied by sustained expression of cyclin D and E, abortive S phase entrance and is dependent on Ras signalling deregulation, since it is rescued by expression of a dominant negative guanine nucleotide exchange factor. The growth potential of transformed cells as well as the ability to execute the G1 to S transition is restored by adding the four deoxyribonucleotides, indicating that the arrest of proliferation of K-ras transformed cells induced by glutamine depletion is largely due to a reduced supply of DNA in the presence of signalling pathways promoting G1 to S transition. Conclusions and Significance Our results suggest that the differential effects of glutamine and glucose on cell viability are not a property of the transformed phenotype per se, but rather depend on the specific pathway being activated in transformation. For instance, myc-overexpressing cells have been reported to die under glutamine depletion and not under glucose shortage, while the opposite holds for ras-transformed fibroblasts as shown in this paper. These different responses of transformed cells to nutritional stress should be taken into account when designing anti-cancer therapies that aim to exploit metabolic differences between normal and transformed cells. Introduction Increasing attention has been given in recent years to the connection between metabolic alterations and cancer [1]. Under aerobic conditions, normal cells use oxidative phosphorylation as a predominant source for ATP generation. In sharp contrast to normal cells, a common feature of most cancer cells is a major use of glycolysis to produce ATP [2]–[6]. The onset of a glycolytic phenotype and/or impaired mitochondrial function [7]–[9] in cancer cells have been reported to derive from several mechanisms, including adaptation to hypoxia, oncogene activation or loss of anti-oncogene and the consequences of glucose deprivation have been extensively described in several cancer cells and tissues, for a review see [10]. Another metabolic adaptation of cancer cells, that has long been established, is their propensity to exhibit increased glutamine consumption, although the effects induced by glutamine deprivation on cancer cells are still controversial, mostly because of the diverse cellular processes in which glutamine is involved. Indeed, as a metabolic precursor glutamine is required for protein, RNA and DNA biosynthesis, and through glutaminolysis, participates in energy production and cellular redox homeostasis, especially to glutathione synthesis [11]. Accordingly, different Authors assigned to glutamine a role in: growth and survival of several cell lines such as fibroblasts, enterocytes, and lymphocytes through modulation of the signal transduction pathway(s) and the cell cycle machinery; suppression of apoptosis through a modulation of the ability to respond to stress; maintenance of metabolic processes such as TCA cycle, fatty acid synthesis controlling the supply of essential intermediates. Therefore, understanding the effects of glutamine deprivation is necessary to obtain a more complete appreciation of changes in tumor metabolism [11]. NIH3T3 cells are a genetically well defined immortalized cell line that has long established as a model parental cell line for the study of cell transformation [12], [13]. Like some other cancer cells, K-ras transformed fibroblasts exhibit a high rate of glucose consumption associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and deregulated transcription of several mitochondrial genes [14], [15] and unpublished results, events often associated with cancer phenotype. As a result, K-ras transformed NIH3T3 cells are remarkably sensitive to glucose deprivation [15], a condition in which they stop growth and die. Transformation-related phenotypes of K-ras transformed cell lines can be rescued by expression of a dominant-negative guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF-DN) [15]–[17]. Here we compared the physiological response to glutamine limitation of normal NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts (normal cells); NIH3T3 cells transformed by an activated form of the K-ras oncogene (transformed cells) and K-ras transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts reverted by expression of a GEF-DN (reverted cells). Glutamine deprivation strongly decreases proliferation of transformed cells, while having little, if any, effect on normal and reverted lines. No glutamine depletion-dependent reduction in overall protein synthesis or in ATP level was observed in transformed cells compared to their isogenic counterpart. Reduced proliferation of transformed cells was accompanied by sustained accumulation of cyclin D, E and A and abortive S phase entrance. The proliferation defect of transformed cells could be restored by adding the four deoxyribonucleotides (but not TCA cycle intermediates), indicating that the arrest of growth of K-ras transformed cells induced by glutamine depletion is largely due to a reduced supply of DNA precursors in the presence of active signaling pathways promoting entrance into S phase. Results Reduced proliferation of K-ras transformed fibroblasts in media containing low initial glutamine concentration is associated to an increased fraction of cells in S-phase Glutamine is an important substrate for several cellular processes. We tested whether lowering initial glutamine concentration in culture medium elicited differential effects on the proliferation of transformed cells as compared to normal cells. Asynchronous normal and transformed cell lines were cultured in normal growth medium (4 mM glutamine), in an intermediate medium (1 mM glutamine) and in a low glutamine medium (0.5 mM glutamine). These concentrations were chosen considering glutamine levels normally used in cell culture (between 4 and 2 mM) as well as that determined in human plasma (0.6 mM). All media were supplemented with 25 mM glucose. Cells were followed for at least 144 hours, that is, from the moment of seeding to when they either reached confluence, started to grow in multi-strata or to die. All experiments reported in this and the following paragraphs refer to the above-mentioned experimental setup. Normal cells stopped growth after 72 hours, regardless of glutamine concentration. At later time, cell number started to decrease (Fig. 1A–C symbol). Concurrently, apoptotic phenotypes - including the presence of floating, dead cells (Figure 1D
As previously reported [15], balanced exponential phase was very short, since despite exponential increase in cell number, the fraction of G1 cells started to increase as early as at 48 hours after the beginning of the experiment, the more so for normal cells (Fig. 1E Glutamine uptake was indirectly measured by assaying residual glutamine in the medium (Figure S1A and B). At each glutamine availability, normal and transformed cells consumed glutamine at the same rate. Remarkably, glutamine uptake was much faster in cells grown at low initial glutamine concentration (Figure S1B). We could show that at least 20% of initial glutamine (i.e. ca 0.8 mM) is still present at 96 hours in cells grown at 4 mM initial glutamine concentration, i.e. when normal cells have stopped to proliferate (Figure S1A). In normal and transformed cells grown in low initial glutamine concentration, on the contrary, no residual glutamine is present at 96 hours. Transformed cells stopped growth afterwards, indicating that glutamine acts as a limiting nutrient under these conditions. We could neither detect any glutamine in Newborn Calf Serum nor see any difference in growth when growth media were supplemented with dialyzed serum (data not shown). When initial plating density was lowered to 2000 cells/cm2 (compared to our standard plating density of 3000 cells/cm2) the same phenotypes reported above were observed, but with a 24 hour delay, consistently with the notion that glutamine is not the factor limiting proliferation of normal cells in our experimental set-up (Figure S2A, C and D). In transformed cells sustained S-phase in low glutamine is associated with prolonged expression of cyclin D, E and A, enhanced pRb phosphorylation, decreased level and cytoplasmic localization of p27Kip1 Oncogenic Ras activation is known to promote the G1 to S progression [15]–[18], [19]. Results reported in the previous paragraph indicate that transformed cells grown in low glutamine medium retain a large fraction of cells in S-phase while proliferation is stopped suggesting that in transformed cells glutamine depletion does not efficiently shut-down the G1 to S. It was therefore of interest to analyze both in normal and in transformed cells modulation by glutamine of relevant parameters, such as level, phosphorylation state and sub-cellular localization of proteins involved in the G1 to S transition. Transcription of genes required for the onset of S-phase in mammalian cells is induced by the E2F/DP transcription factors, whose activity in early G1 cells is down-regulated by the pRb protein. Release of inhibition by pRb requires its phosphorylation by upstream cyclin dependent kinase complexes, namely Cdk4/cyclin D and Cdk2/cyclin E [20]. Notably both Cdk2 and Cdk4 kinase complexes phosphorylate, during the G1 to S transition, pRb protein on Ser 795. Several Authors have considered this phosphorylation as a readout of Cdks activity. D-type and E-type cyclin/Cdk complexes are regulated by cyclin binding, by phosphorylation and by two families of Cdk inhibitors: the INK4 family, that acts specifically on Cdk4, and the KIP family, that comprises p21Cip1, p27Kip1 and p57Kip2 acting both on Cdk4 and Cdk2 [21]. Besides, p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 also facilitate assembly and activation of cyclin D/Cdk4 in early G1 [21], [22]. pRb phosphorylated on Ser795 was detected using a phospho-specific antibody raised against pRbSer795 and that does not cross react with unphosphorylated pRb. In normal cells, and regardless of initial glutamine concentration, Ser795-phosphorylated pRb - i.e. the form that monitors the activity of both Cdk4 and Cdk2 kinases - decreases as cells approach and reach confluence (Figure 2
The inhibitory function of p27Kip1 is regulated not only through synthesis and degradation, but also by sub-cellular localization. Indeed, cytoplasmic p27Kip1 has been detected in about 40% of primary human breast cancers in conjunction with Akt activation and is associated with poor patient prognosis and reduced Cdks inhibitory activity [23]–[25]. In normal cells, grown in 4 and 0.5 mM GLN, associated with the time-dependent increase of p27Kip1, we observed that p27Kip1 staining remained diffuse at early time points (24–48 hours - proliferating cells -, Figure 3 For transformed cells the pattern was very different. In cells grown in media supplemented with 4 mM glutamine, Cyclin D, A and E as well as phospho-Rb decreased only to about 50% of the level present at 24 hours (Figure 2 Down-regulation of Ras signalling by a dominant-negative Ras-specific GEF reverts low glutamine-dependent phenotype in K-ras transformed fibroblasts Overexpression of a dominant negative Ras-specific GEF protein has been reported to phenotypically revert several phenotypes in K-ras transformed murine fibroblasts, including Ras-GTP level, morphology, anchorage independent growth, reduction of Ras-dependent tumor formation in nude mice, glucose dependence and mitochondrial dysfunction [15]–[17]. As shown in Figure 4
Glutamine reduction does not substantially interfere with RNA synthesis, protein synthesis and energy metabolism Amino acid deprivation leads to a fall in the rate of RNA and protein synthesis and consequently to a reduction of total cellular protein content [26], [27]. Such effect could be even more significant upon depletion of glutamine - the more abundant amino acid in tissues, body fluids and cell culture medium - because of its involvement in the biosynthesis of several amino acids (glutamate, aspartate, arginine, alanine) as well as in energy production [28]–[30] and nucleotide biosynthesis [31]. We first analyzed whether glutamine deprivation could affect total RNA and protein accumulation. To this end, the time course of average of RNA and protein content per cell was analyzed. The average RNA content of normal and transformed cells, regardless of glutamine availability, slightly decreased along the time course of the experiment. The time course decrease in RNA content of transformed cells growing in low glutamine, was somehow more sizeable as compared to that observed in normal cells suggesting that glutamine reduction may hamper biosynthesis of nucleotides and hence the synthesis of stable RNA (Figure 5A and B
As cells approached and reached stationary phase, and regardless of glutamine concentration, a small decrease in protein content was observed in normal cells (Figure 5C and D Glutamine is an oxidizable fuel, which enters the TCA cycle as α-ketoglutarate, by reactions catalyzed by aspartate amino transferase (AST) and by glutamate dehydrogenase [32], [33]. Accordingly it has been reported that glutamine depletion could cause a deficiency of this cycle [34], [35]. Supplementing the growth medium (containing 0.5 mM glutamine) with either 2 mM pyruvate, which can enter the TCA cycle mainly through its conversion in Acetyl-CoA or 2 mM malate which can enter the TCA cycle by conversion into oxaloacetate and/or furnish reducing equivalents by malic enzyme activity, in the last steps of glutaminolysis, did not rescue the proliferation defect caused by low glutamine in transformed cells (Figure 5G and H The ATP level was measured in normal and transformed cells (24, 48, 72 and 96 hours in 4, 1 and 0.5 mM glutamine, Figure 5I, L and M Addition of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates rescues the abortive S-phase entrance induced by low or full absence of glutamine in K-ras transformed fibroblasts Results reported above indicate that in transformed cells energy metabolism under limiting glutamine concentration is not heavily unbalanced, since these cells have normal ATP and protein levels, and do not benefit from increasing fuel supply to the TCA cycle. On the other hand under limiting glutamine conditions, transformed fibroblasts fail to down-regulate the machinery responsible for the G1 to S transition, as evidenced by sustained accumulation of S-phase cyclins, low levels and larger cytoplasmic localization of p27kip1 and ensuing sustained phosphorylation of pRb. Nevertheless transformed cells are unable to proceed with proliferation although maintaining a fairly high level of S-phase cells. Since glutamine is an important intermediate in purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis, glutamine exhaustion could deplete intracellular nucleotide pools, bringing in turn to a failure in the execution of a normal cell cycle [31], [36]. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether adding deoxyribonucleotides (using a concentration that has been shown to not interfere with proliferation of several cell lines in vitro) [37] could affect proliferation of normal and transformed cell lines. The presence of 10 µM dNTPs (dATP, dGTP, dTTP and dCTP) had no effect on growth of both normal and transformed cells in media supplemented with 4 mM glutamine (Figure S6, panels A and B) and on growth of normal cells in media supplemented with 0.5 mM glutamine (Figure 6A
To better analyze the G1 to S transition, cells grown in medium containing 4 mM glutamine were synchronized by serum starvation for 24 hours. As expected, transformed cells did not block in G0/G1 as effectively as normal cells (Figure 6 C through F We next investigated whether nucleotide addition was effective also on cells released from a serum starvation block in complete absence of glutamine using the same protocol used in Figure 6
These data indicate that the major effect of glutamine limitation in transformed cells is to increase the length of S-phase, the peak of S-phase cells being reached 2 hours later in low glutamine (Figure 6 H Response of selected signalling pathways to glutamine availability and effect of rapamycin treatment on proliferation ability in normal and transformed cells In different transformed cell lines glutamine or other amino acids shortage has been reported to induce accumulation of cells in G0/G1 and/or an increase in doubling time and a decrease in maximal reached cell density [36], [38], [39]. Such anti-proliferative effects, most likely mediated by the TOR pathway [40], [41], have been associated either to a general decrease of mRNA translation and/or protein biosynthesis or to a specific decrease/increase of expression of both positive and negative regulators of cell cycle, as observed in cells deprived of arginine (decrease of Cdk4) [42], in cells deprived of hystidine (increase of p21waf1 and p27kip1) or methionine (increase of p21waf1) [43], [44]. In non-transformed cells, upstream activators such as PI3K/Akt and Ras/Raf/Erk and upstream inhibitors such as the phosphates PTEN and the AMP kinase properly control activation of TOR pathway. In transformed cells, the TOR pathway is deregulated through several pathways, among which a primary role is assigned to oncogenic Ras signalling, that is able to activate both positive regulators of TOR pathways (PI3K and ERK) [45], [46]. To investigate the role of signal transduction in the response of normal and transformed cells to glutamine shortage, we analyzed the level of expression and activation of two main regulators of the TOR pathway, Akt and AMPK, as well as the level of expression and activation of a downstream TOR target p70 S6 kinase (S6K). As shown in Figure 8A
As previously reported, TOR protein is also controlled through AMPK, which is activated by a drop in the ATP/ADP ratio with ensuing AMP accumulation that leads to a signaling bringing to different cellular responses as well as to cell cycle arrest [47]. Our Western blot experiments to analyze the AMPK activation status in cells grown in different glutamine availability, showed that in correlation with a drop of ATP levels in both cell lines, only in normal cells, in which the ATP decrease was greater (see Figure 5I, L and M
Together such results indicate that in normal cells amino acid deprivation may participate in TOR signalling inhibition inducing a G1 arrest, (i.e. by reducing mRNA translation, protein synthesis, ATP levels and expression of cell cycle regulators), in K-ras transformed cells such control is deranged by activation of Akt and by strong inhibition of AMPK, that, acting in a concerted fashion, maintain also at low or absent glutamine availability a sizable activity of the TOR pathway, able to promote entrance into S phase. Indeed, TOR signaling inhibition in synchronized cells completely block the ability of transformed cells to enter in S phase also in presence of dNTPs. Discussion A genetically defined experimental model in which the transformed phenotype is phenotypically reverted by expression of a dominant negative GEF protein that down regulates oncogenic K-ras [16], [17], has allowed us to show in this paper that glutamine deprivation induces abortive S-phase entrance in K-ras transformed cells while it does not participate to arrest normal and reverted cells in G1 phase. The main results presented in this paper are recapitulated in Figure 10
In asynchronous normal cells, contact inhibition, regardless of glutamine availability, brings to down-regulation of Akt that together with AMPK up-regulation, observed at low glutamine, will concur to TOR pathway inactivation. As a result, the expression of cyclin D, E and A is down regulated, pRb phosphorylation is strongly reduced, p27kip1 level is increased and its localization becomes preferentially nuclear, establishing therefore a condition that bring to a G1- cell cycle arrest (Figure 10B In K-ras transformed cells, in which the level of activated Ras-GTP is very high [17] and the contact inhibition is less efficient [17], the deprivation of glutamine affects Akt and AMPK in a way opposite to that observed in normal cells, leaving the TOR pathway at least partially activated (Figure 10C But why in low glutamine is the S phase of K-ras transformed cells abortive? Deprivation of glutamine reduces also availability of nucleotides that leads to a small decrease in RNA accumulation compared to growth in high glutamine (at least until the 72 hours, Fig. 5B When the low amount of glutamine is still compatible with cell cycle progression, as in serum starved cells substantially synchronized in G1 (Figure 6 Studies performed in several cellular models have shown that availability of dNTPs and therefore the regulation of their synthesis, plays a critical role in DNA replication [49]. Indeed expression of dNTP synthetic enzymes is cell cycle-regulated, with enhanced expression at the onset of S-phase [50], [51]. Additionally, dNTP levels vary within S-phase of the cell cycle [52] thereby changing the rate of DNA replication during S-phase [53]. Even subtle changes in the levels of dNTPs may have a sizable effect on DNA replication [54]. Nucleotide depletion, obtained through chemical inhibition of their biosynthesis, may induce either G1 or S-phase arrest or slow down the overall progression of S-phase [55], [56]. Addition of a mix of 10 µM deoxyribonucleotides reverted effects on both asynchronous and asynchronous cultures indicating that the earlier and major rate-limiting step dependent on glutamine-deprivation pathway is connected with nucleotide biosynthesis. Nevertheless, such connections appear to be lost both in asynchronous and synchronous cells when a complete limitation of glutamine in the culture medium occurs. Indeed at later time points of low glutamine proliferation curve of transformed cells (72–96 h), corresponding to almost a complete depletion of glutamine in the culture medium (Figure S2B), dNTPs are not more able to restore the proliferation (Figure 6B In cells exhibiting high metabolic rates, such as rapidly dividing cancer cells grown in vitro, glutamine, being the most readily available amino acid used as energy source, may became the major source of energy to sustain protein and nucleic acid synthesis [11], especially when glucose levels are low and energy demand is high. A correlation between glutamine depletion and decreased level of Krebs cycle intermediates in myc-transformed cells has been identified [35]. In our system metabolic readouts of transformed cells - including ATP, RNA and protein levels - are quite close to those found in normal and reverted cells. Addition of Krebs cycle intermediates has no effect on K-ras transformed fibroblasts (Figure 5 In conclusion, glutamine shortage in K-ras transformed cells limits proliferation by inducing abortive S-phase entrance, while glucose shortage in the same system enhanced cell death [14], [15]. The differential effects of glutamine and glucose on cell viability are not a property of the transformed phenotype per se, but rather depend on the specific pathway being activated in transformation. For instance, myc-overexpressing cells die under complete glutamine depletion in a myc-dependent way and not under glucose depletion [35]. In the same experimental conditions, complete glutamine depletion, cell death of K-ras transformed cells die is marginal compared to that observed in myc-overexpressing cells (data not shown). These different responses of transformed cells to nutritional stress should be taken into account when designing anti-cancer therapies that aim to exploit metabolic differences between normal and transformed cells. Materials and Methods Cell culture Mouse embryonic fibroblast NIH3T3 cells (CRL-1658; American Type Culture Collection) and a K-Ras transformed NIH3T3-derived cell line, 226.4.1 [59], were routinely grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% newborn calf serum, 4 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (normal growth medium) (all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The reverted cell line, stably and constitutively expressing the dominant negative mutant Cdc25MmW1056E (GEF-DN) [17] was maintained in normal growth medium supplemented with 0.7 mg/ml geneticin (G418; Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were passaged using trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Invitrogen) and maintained in culture for 48 h before manipulation. Cell treatments To verify cell response to glutamine, cells were plated at 3000 cells/cm2 in normal growth medium (4 mM Glutamine). 18 h after seeding, cells were washed 2× with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated in media with different glutamine (GLN) concentrations (4 mM, 1 mM and 0.5 mM glutamine). When required, 2 mM pyruvate (Sigma), 2 mM malate (Sigma), 10 µM dNTPs (Rovalab), and 20 nM rapamycin (ALEXIS Biochemicals), were added as indicated in the text. Cell synchronization Cells were plated at 5500 cells/cm2 in normal growth medium. 18 h after the seeding, cells were washed 2× with PBS and synchronized by 24 h of serum starvation with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 4 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), 6 ng/ml sodium selenite and 6 µg/ml transferrin (Sigma). Stimulation of quiescent cells was performed by adding 10% newborn calf serum in medium with the appropriate glutamine (and dNTPs, when required) concentration. DNA was labelled with 33 µM 5-Bromodeoxyuridine. Flow cytometric analysis The distribution of cells at specific cell cycle phases was evaluated by flow cytometry. Cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS and fixed in 75% ethanol at 4°C. The cells were washed in PBS for ethanol removal and incubated for 30 min in 0.25% Triton X-100 and HCl 2N. Subsequently, each sample was stained with an anti-BrdU primary antibody (Becton-Dickinson) for 1 h, and probed with Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) to identify S-phase. In addition, the same samples were stained with propidium iodide (Sigma) and analyzed by FACS (FACScan, Becton-Dickinson), using the Cell Quest software (BD Bioscience). Data analysis was performed with WinMDI software. Glutamine assay Glutamine variation in supernatants of normal and transformed fibroblasts was determined by using a spectrophotometric glutamine/glutamate enzyme assay kit (Sigma) based on enzymatic deamination of L-glutamine and dehydrogenation of L-glutamate with conversion of NAD+ to NADH. The assay was performed as specified by manufacturer datasheet and it is specific for glutamine and does not cross-react with other amino acids or ammonia. To calculate the quantity of glutamine a linear regression analysis of the standard curve was performed. Immunofluorescence microscopy Cells were grown on coverslip previously treated with 0.2% gelatine. The cells were washed 3× with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min. Subsequently, were washed 3× with PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, blocked with PBS+10% goat serum for 30 min, probed with primary antibody p27kip1 (1 100) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology CA, USA) in PBS+10% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature, washed 3× with PBS, probed with fluorescence-labeled secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1 400) (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) in PBS+10% goat serum for 30 min at room temperature, washed 3× with PBS, stained with DAPI for 2 min (1 500) (Sigma-Aldrich Inc), and then mounted in DABCO (Sigma-Aldrich Inc). For BrdU (Sigma-Aldrich Inc.) labeling, cells were fixed, permeabilized and blocked as described above. After the cells were incubate with an anti-BrdU monoclonal antibody (1 10) (Becton-Dickinson), MgCl2 (3 mM) and DNasi I (Invitrogen) 100 U/ml for 1 h at RT. Subsequently, the cells were washed 3× with PBS and incubated with fluorescence-labeled secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (1 100) (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) in PBS+10% goat serum for 30 min at room temperature, washed 3× with PBS, stained with DAPI for 2 min (1 500) and then mounted in DABCO.Microscopy The cover glasses, mounted in DABCO, were analyzed under a Nikon ECLIPSE 90i fluorescence microscope equipped with a b/w CCD camera (Hamamatsu-CoolSNAP, Hamamatsu Corporation Japan), using Plan Apo objective (40× dry and 60× oil; numerical aperture 0.75 and 1.4 respectively). The images were acquired using the imaging software Metamorph 7, then processed in Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1 with adjustments of brightness and contrast. The quantitative analysis image was performed using the imaging software Image J. The relative distribution of p27kip1 protein between the two compartments nucleo/cytoplasm, was calculated by measuring the pixel average signal both in the nucleus, cytoplasm and nucleo/cytoplasm compartments. At least 200 cells, together with negative controls (no primary antibody), were randomly selected. In order to exclude the background of staining and to select the positive stained parts of the cells for measurement, the images from the various samples were processed at the same threshold and then measured. Immunoblot analysis Cells were lised in a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1% glycerol, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5 mM ethyleneglycol tetracetate (EGTA), 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl (PMSF), 50 mM NaF and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Roche). After incubation for 30 min on ice, the extracts were centrifuged at 13.200 r.p.m. for 20 min. Protein concentration of supernatant was measured by the Bradford procedure (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA), using bovine serum albumin as a standard. These cellular extracts were electrophoresed in sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane by electroblotting and incubated with antibodies over night. The antibodies used were monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin A, p27Kip1, Cdk2, Cdk4 (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), phosphoRb-795, p70 S6 kinase, phospho-p70 S6 kinase and vinculine (all from Cell Signalling). Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with a peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody (Amersham, Othelfingen, CH) for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was visualized with ECL (Amersham) followed by exposure to an x-ray film. Protein expression levels were quantified by densitometric evaluation of antibody specific bands on scanned x-ray films by using the imaging software Image J. RNA extraction and analysis Total RNA was isolated from normal and transformed cell lines using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA purity and integrity were checked by direct observation loading 1 µg of total RNA on 1% agarose gel. Total RNA had a 28S 18S rRNA ratio of at least 2.0. Amount estimation was done by spectrophotometer analysis.Figure S1 Analysis of glutamine concentration, along a time course of 96 h, of normal (blue diamond) and transformed (red square) cells plated in 4 mM (A) and 0.5 mM (B) initial glutamine availability. (1.25 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.1M, tif) Figure S2 Proliferation and cell cycle analysis of lower density plated cells. (8.16 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(7.7M, tif) Figure S3 Cdk2 and Cdk4 proteins expression is more stable in transformed cells. (1.56 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.4M, tif) Figure S4 p27kip1 localization in BrdU positive cells and p21waf1 expression in normal and transformed cells. (2.65 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(2.5M, tif) Figure S5 Glutamine availability effect on total cellular proteins as detected by Gel-Code Blue Comassie staining. (4.43 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(4.2M, tif) Figure S6 Proliferation ability and time of re-entry upon serum starvation and release in cells grown in 4 mM glutamine. (2.68 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(2.5M, tif) Figure S7 Glucose depletion induces a strong cell proliferation arrest in K-ras transformed mouse fibroblasts. (1.15 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.0M, tif) Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Fabrizia Mastroianni and Lara Sala Danna for technical assistance. Footnotes Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Funding: From MIUR to L.A. (FIRB-ITALBIONET), M.V and F.C. (F.A.R.). D.G. and C.S. were supported by an INGENIO fellowship from Regione Lombardia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Deberardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7:11–20. [PubMed] 2. Ramanathan A, Wang C, Schreiber SL. Perturbational profiling of a cell-line model of tumorigenesis by using metabolic measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:5992–7. [PubMed] 3. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–14. [PubMed] 4. Mathupala SP, Rempe A, Pedersen PL. Aberrant glycolytic metabolism of cancer cells: a remarkable coordination of genetic, transcriptional, post-translational, and mutational events that lead to a critical role for type II hexokinase. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1997;29:339–43. [PubMed] 5. Mazurek S, Eigenbrodt E. The tumor metabolome. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:1149–54. [PubMed] 6. McFate T, Mohyeldin A, Lu H, Thakar J, Henriques J, et al. Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity controls metabolic and malignant phenotype in cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2008 7. Carew JS, Huang P. Mitochondrial defects in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2002;1:9. [PubMed] 8. Modica-Napolitano JS, Singh KK. Mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer. Mitochondrion. 2004;4:755–62. [PubMed] 9. Wallace DC. A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: a dawn for evolutionary medicine. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:359–407. [PubMed] 10. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:891–9. [PubMed] 11. Curi R, Lagranha CJ, Doi SQ, Sellitti DF, Procopio J, et al. Molecular mechanisms of glutamine action. J Cell Physiol. 2005;204:392–401. [PubMed] 12. Kahn S, Yamamoto F, Almoguera C, Winter E, Forrester K, et al. The c-K-ras gene and human cancer (review). Anticancer Res. 1987;7:639–52. [PubMed] 13. Yamamoto F, Perucho M. Activation of a human c-K-ras oncogene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:8873–85. [PubMed] 14. Chiaradonna F, Gaglio D, Vanoni M, Alberghina L. Expression of transforming K-Ras oncogene affects mitochondrial function and morphology in mouse fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757:1338–56. [PubMed] 15. Chiaradonna F, Sacco E, Manzoni R, Giorgio M, Vanoni M, et al. Ras-dependent carbon metabolism and transformation in mouse fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2006;25:5391–404. [PubMed] 16. Vanoni M, Bertini R, Sacco E, Fontanella L, Rieppi M, et al. Characterization and properties of dominant-negative mutants of the ras-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor CDC25(Mm). J Biol Chem. 1999;274:36656–62. [PubMed] 17. Bossu' P, Vanoni M, Wanke V, Cesaroni MP, Tropea F, et al. A dominant negative RAS-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor reverses neoplastic phenotype in K-ras transformed mouse fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2000;19:2147–54. [PubMed] 18. Filmus J, Robles AI, Shi W, Wong MJ, Colombo LL, et al. Induction of cyclin D1 overexpression by activated ras. Oncogene. 1994;9:3627–33. [PubMed] 19. Albanese C, Johnson J, Watanabe G, Eklund N, Vu D, et al. Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:23589–97. [PubMed] 20. Harbour JW, Dean DC. The Rb/E2F pathway: expanding roles and emerging paradigms. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2393–409. [PubMed] 21. Cheng M, Olivier P, Diehl JA, Fero M, Roussel MF, et al. The p21(Cip1) and p27(Kip1) CDK ‘inhibitors’ are essential activators of cyclin D-dependent kinases in murine fibroblasts. Embo J. 1999;18:1571–83. [PubMed] 22. Chang F, McCubrey JA. P21(Cip1) induced by Raf is associated with increased Cdk4 activity in hematopoietic cells. Oncogene. 2001;20:4354–64. [PubMed] 23. Liang J, Zubovitz J, Petrocelli T, Kotchetkov R, Connor MK, et al. PKB/Akt phosphorylates p27, impairs nuclear import of p27 and opposes p27-mediated G1 arrest. Nat Med. 2002;8:1153–60. [PubMed] 24. Shin I, Yakes FM, Rojo F, Shin NY, Bakin AV, et al. PKB/Akt mediates cell-cycle progression by phosphorylation of p27(Kip1) at threonine 157 and modulation of its cellular localization. Nat Med. 2002;8:1145–52. [PubMed] 25. Viglietto G, Motti ML, Bruni P, Melillo RM, D'Alessio A, et al. Cytoplasmic relocalization and inhibition of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1) by PKB/Akt-mediated phosphorylation in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2002;8:1136–44. [PubMed] 26. Everson WV, Flaim KE, Susco DM, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Effect of amino acid deprivation on initiation of protein synthesis in rat hepatocytes. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:C18–27. [PubMed] 27. Kimball SR. Regulation of translation initiation by amino acids in eukaryotic cells. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2001;26:155–84. [PubMed] 28. Le Bacquer O, Nazih H, Blottiere H, Meynial-Denis D, Laboisse C, et al. Effects of glutamine deprivation on protein synthesis in a model of human enterocytes in culture. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G1340–7. [PubMed] 29. Higashiguchi T, Hasselgren PO, Wagner K, Fischer JE. Effect of glutamine on protein synthesis in isolated intestinal epithelial cells. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993;17:307–14. [PubMed] 30. MacLennan PA, Brown RA, Rennie MJ. A positive relationship between protein synthetic rate and intracellular glutamine concentration in perfused rat skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett. 1987;215:187–91. [PubMed] 31. Boza JJ, Moennoz D, Bournot CE, Blum S, Zbinden I, et al. Role of glutamine on the de novo purine nucleotide synthesis in Caco-2 cells. Eur J Nutr. 2000;39:38–46. [PubMed] 32. Baggetto LG. Deviant energetic metabolism of glycolytic cancer cells. Biochimie. 1992;74:959–74. [PubMed] 33. Zielke HR, Zielke CL, Ozand PT. Glutamine: a major energy source for cultured mammalian cells. Fed Proc. 1984;43:121–5. [PubMed] 34. DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19345–50. [PubMed] 35. Yuneva M, Zamboni N, Oefner P, Sachidanandam R, Lazebnik Y. Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent apoptosis in human cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:93–105. [PubMed] 36. Wasa M, Bode BP, Abcouwer SF, Collins CL, Tanabe KK, et al. Glutamine as a regulator of DNA and protein biosynthesis in human solid tumor cell lines. Ann Surg. 1996;224:189–97. [PubMed] 37. Rathbone MP, Middlemiss PJ, Gysbers JW, DeForge S, Costello P, et al. Purine nucleosides and nucleotides stimulate proliferation of a wide range of cell types. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992;28A:529–36. [PubMed] 38. Drogat B, Bouchecareilh M, North S, Petibois C, Deleris G, et al. Acute L-glutamine deprivation compromises VEGF-a up-regulation in A549/8 human carcinoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007;212:463–72. [PubMed] 39. Turowski GA, Rashid Z, Hong F, Madri JA, Basson MD. Glutamine modulates phenotype and stimulates proliferation in human colon cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1994;54:5974–80. [PubMed] 40. Arsham AM, Neufeld TP. Thinking globally and acting locally with TOR. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:589–97. [PubMed] 41. Edinger AL. Controlling cell growth and survival through regulated nutrient transporter expression. Biochem J. 2007;406:1–12. [PubMed] 42. Lamb J, Wheatley DN. Single amino acid (arginine) deprivation induces G1 arrest associated with inhibition of cdk4 expression in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 2000;255:238–49. [PubMed] 43. Leung-Pineda V, Pan Y, Chen H, Kilberg MS. Induction of p21 and p27 expression by amino acid deprivation of HepG2 human hepatoma cells involves mRNA stabilization. Biochem J. 2004;379:79–88. [PubMed] 44. Kokkinakis DM, Liu X, Neuner RD. Modulation of cell cycle and gene expression in pancreatic tumor cell lines by methionine deprivation (methionine stress): implications to the therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1338–48. [PubMed] 45. Zhao JJ, Cheng H, Jia S, Wang L, Gjoerup OV, et al. The p110alpha isoform of PI3K is essential for proper growth factor signaling and oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16296–300. [PubMed] 46. Conde E, Angulo B, Tang M, Morente M, Torres-Lanzas J, et al. Molecular context of the EGFR mutations: evidence for the activation of mTOR/S6K signaling. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:710–7. [PubMed] 47. Zhuang Y, Miskimins WK. Cell cycle arrest in Metformin treated breast cancer cells involves activation of AMPK, down-regulation of cyclin D1, and requires p27Kip1 or p21Cip1. J Mol Signal. 2008:3, 18. [PubMed] 48. Friday BB, Adjei AA. K-ras as a target for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1756:127–44. [PubMed] 49. Eriksson S, Skog S, Tribukait B, Jaderberg K. Deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate metabolism and the mammalian cell cycle. Effects of thymidine on wild-type and dCMP deaminase-deficient mouse S49 T-lymphoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 1984;155:129–40. [PubMed] 50. Sherley JL, Kelly TJ. Regulation of human thymidine kinase during the cell cycle. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:8350–8. [PubMed] 51. Eriksson S, Graslund A, Skog S, Thelander L, Tribukait B. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of mammalian ribonucleotide reductase. The S phase-correlated increase in subunit M2 is regulated by de novo protein synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:11695–700. [PubMed] 52. Eriksson S, Groppi V, Ullman B, Martin DW., Jr Cell-cycle dependent variation in the levels of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate in mouse T-lymphoma cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984;165:407–10. [PubMed] 53. Collins JM. Rates of DNA synthesis during the S-phase of HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. 1978;253:8570–7. [PubMed] 54. Mathews CK. DNA precursor metabolism and genomic stability. Faseb J. 2006;20:1300–14. [PubMed] 55. Agarwal ML, Agarwal A, Taylor WR, Chernova O, Sharma Y, et al. A p53-dependent S-phase checkpoint helps to protect cells from DNA damage in response to starvation for pyrimidine nucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14775–80. [PubMed] 56. Agarwal MK, Hastak K, Jackson MW, Breit SN, Stark GR, et al. Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 mediates a p53-dependent protective arrest in S phase in response to starvation for DNA precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16278–83. [PubMed] 57. Abcouwer SF, Schwarz C, Meguid RA. Glutamine deprivation induces the expression of GADD45 and GADD153 primarily by mRNA stabilization. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:28645–51. [PubMed] 58. Wang XW, Zhan Q, Coursen JD, Khan MA, Kontny HU, Yu L, et al. GADD45 induction of a G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(7):3706–11. [PubMed] 59. Pulciani S, Santos E, Long LK, Sorrentino V, Barbacid M. ras gene Amplification and malignant transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5:2836–41. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cell Metab. 2008 Jan; 7(1):11-20.
[Cell Metab. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 26; 102(17):5992-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Mol Cancer. 2002 Dec 9; 1():9.
[Mol Cancer. 2002]Annu Rev Genet. 2005; 39():359-407.
[Annu Rev Genet. 2005]Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Nov; 4(11):891-9.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2004]Anticancer Res. 1987 Jul-Aug; 7(4A):639-52.
[Anticancer Res. 1987]Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Dec 11; 12(23):8873-85.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1984]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Sep-Oct; 1757(9-10):1338-56.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Oncogene. 2006 Aug 31; 25(39):5391-404.
[Oncogene. 2006]Oncogene. 2000 Apr 20; 19(17):2147-54.
[Oncogene. 2000]Oncogene. 2006 Aug 31; 25(39):5391-404.
[Oncogene. 2006]Oncogene. 2006 Aug 31; 25(39):5391-404.
[Oncogene. 2006]Oncogene. 1994 Dec; 9(12):3627-33.
[Oncogene. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 6; 270(40):23589-97.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]Genes Dev. 2000 Oct 1; 14(19):2393-409.
[Genes Dev. 2000]EMBO J. 1999 Mar 15; 18(6):1571-83.
[EMBO J. 1999]Oncogene. 2001 Jul 19; 20(32):4354-64.
[Oncogene. 2001]Nat Med. 2002 Oct; 8(10):1153-60.
[Nat Med. 2002]Nat Med. 2002 Oct; 8(10):1136-44.
[Nat Med. 2002]Oncogene. 2006 Aug 31; 25(39):5391-404.
[Oncogene. 2006]Oncogene. 2000 Apr 20; 19(17):2147-54.
[Oncogene. 2000]Am J Physiol. 1989 Jan; 256(1 Pt 1):C18-27.
[Am J Physiol. 1989]Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2001; 26():155-84.
[Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2001]Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Dec; 281(6):G1340-7.
[Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001]FEBS Lett. 1987 May 4; 215(1):187-91.
[FEBS Lett. 1987]Eur J Nutr. 2000 Feb; 39(1):38-46.
[Eur J Nutr. 2000]Biochimie. 1992 Nov; 74(11):959-74.
[Biochimie. 1992]Fed Proc. 1984 Jan; 43(1):121-5.
[Fed Proc. 1984]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4; 104(49):19345-50.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]J Cell Biol. 2007 Jul 2; 178(1):93-105.
[J Cell Biol. 2007]Eur J Nutr. 2000 Feb; 39(1):38-46.
[Eur J Nutr. 2000]Ann Surg. 1996 Aug; 224(2):189-97.
[Ann Surg. 1996]In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992 Jul-Aug; 28A(7-8):529-36.
[In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992]Ann Surg. 1996 Aug; 224(2):189-97.
[Ann Surg. 1996]J Cell Physiol. 2007 Aug; 212(2):463-72.
[J Cell Physiol. 2007]Cancer Res. 1994 Nov 15; 54(22):5974-80.
[Cancer Res. 1994]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006 Dec; 18(6):589-97.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006]Biochem J. 2007 Aug 15; 406(1):1-12.
[Biochem J. 2007]J Mol Signal. 2008 Feb 12; 3():3.
[J Mol Signal. 2008]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Nov 25; 1756(2):127-44.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005]J Biol Chem. 1999 Dec 17; 274(51):36656-62.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Oncogene. 2000 Apr 20; 19(17):2147-54.
[Oncogene. 2000]Oncogene. 2000 Apr 20; 19(17):2147-54.
[Oncogene. 2000]Exp Cell Res. 1984 Nov; 155(1):129-40.
[Exp Cell Res. 1984]J Biol Chem. 1988 Jun 15; 263(17):8350-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1988]J Biol Chem. 1984 Oct 10; 259(19):11695-700.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984; 165 Pt B():407-10.
[Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984]J Biol Chem. 1978 Dec 10; 253(23):8570-7.
[J Biol Chem. 1978]J Cell Physiol. 2005 Aug; 204(2):392-401.
[J Cell Physiol. 2005]J Cell Biol. 2007 Jul 2; 178(1):93-105.
[J Cell Biol. 2007]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Sep-Oct; 1757(9-10):1338-56.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Oncogene. 2006 Aug 31; 25(39):5391-404.
[Oncogene. 2006]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Sep-Oct; 1757(9-10):1338-56.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006]Oncogene. 2006 Aug 31; 25(39):5391-404.
[Oncogene. 2006]J Cell Biol. 2007 Jul 2; 178(1):93-105.
[J Cell Biol. 2007]Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Oct; 5(10):2836-41.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1985]Oncogene. 2000 Apr 20; 19(17):2147-54.
[Oncogene. 2000]