![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Biochemistry A FERM domain autoregulates Drosophila myosin 7a activity aLaboratory of Molecular Physiology, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; bAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology and Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; and cMLW Consulting, 11 Race Hill, Launceston, Cornwall PL15 9BB, United Kingdom 2To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 50, Room 3523, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892., E-mail: sellersj/at/nhlbi.nih.gov Edited by Thomas D. Pollard, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved January 26, 2009 Author contributions: Y.Y., T.G.B., V.S., M.L.W., P.J.K., M.P., and J.R.S. designed research; Y.Y., T.G.B., V.S., M.C., M.L.W., and J.R.S. performed research; Y.Y., V.S., and J.R.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Y.Y., T.G.B., V.S., P.J.K., M.P., and J.R.S. analyzed data; and Y.Y., T.G.B., P.J.K., M.P., and J.R.S. wrote the paper. 1Y.Y. and T.G.B. contributed equally to this work. Received September 4, 2008. Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Full-length Drosophila myosin 7a (myosin 7a-FL) has a complex tail containing a short predicted coiled coil followed by a MyTH4-FERM domain, an SH3 domain, and a C-terminal MyTH4-FERM domain. Myosin 7a-FL expressed in Sf9 cells is monomeric despite the predicted coiled coil. We showed previously that Subfragment-1 (S1) from this myosin has MgATPase of Vmax ≈ 1s−1 and KATPase ≈ 1 μM actin. We find that myosin 7a-FL has Vmax similar to S1 but KATPase ≈ 30 μM. Thus, at low actin concentrations (5 μM), the MgATPase of S1 is fully activated, whereas that of myosin 7a-FL is low, suggesting that the tail regulates activity. Electron microscopy of myosin 7a-FL with ATP shows the tail is tightly bent back against the motor domain. Myosin 7a-FL extends at either high ionic strength or without ATP, revealing the motor domain, lever, and tail. A series of C-terminal truncations show that deletion of 99 aa (the MyTH7 subdomain of the C-terminal FERM domain) is sufficient to abolish bending, and the KATPase is then similar to S1. This region is highly conserved in myosin 7a. We found that a double mutation in it, R2140A-K2143A, abolishes bending and reduces KATPase to S1 levels. In addition, the expressed C-terminal FERM domain binds actin with Kd ≈ 30 μM regardless of ATP, similar to the KATPase value for myosin 7a-FL. We propose that at low cellular actin concentrations, myosin 7a-FL is bent and inactive, but at high actin concentrations, it is unfolded and active because the C-terminal FERM domain binds to actin. Keywords: regulation, electron microscopy, ATPase activity Myosins comprise a superfamily of actin-based motor proteins with >20 subclasses (1, 2). They participate in various cellular functions including cytokinesis, endocytosis, adhesion, and transport of intracellular cargo such as pigment granules, secretory vesicles, and mRNA (3). All myosins contain a conserved motor domain, usually located near the N terminus, that binds actin and hydrolyzes ATP, a lever region that binds calmodulin or calmodulin-like light chains via IQ motifs and a tail region that is largely responsible for the anchoring or targeting of the motor to its intracellular localization and may be involved in regulation of enzymatic activity. The tails of some myosins (e.g., myosin 2 and myosin 5) contain long coiled-coil motifs, which self-associate to produce 2-headed molecules. The predicted coiled-coil motifs of some other myosins such as myosins 10 and 6 do not induce dimerization but instead form stable single α-helices, termed SAH domains (4, 5). Other myosins lack obvious dimerization domains in their tails, and some, like myosin 1 isoforms, are monomeric, as demonstrated by physicochemical techniques and electron microscopy (6). Often, the tail domains of myosins are rich in functional domains, such as PH domains, MyTH4 domains, FERM domains, or SH3 domains, which enable the molecules to interact with specific proteins or phospholipid-containing membranes (3). Both human and Drosophila have 2 myosin 7 genes, termed 7a and 7b (2, 7). In mammals, myosin 7a mutations cause Usher syndrome 1B, the most common deaf/blindness disease (for review, see ref. 8). Myosin 7a is localized along the length of the stereocilia in hair cells and in the apical region of retinal epithelia cells (9, 10). Drosophila myosin 7a mutants, termed crinkled (ck), are lethal at larval stage (11). There is a small fraction of “escapers” that are sterile and deaf with abnormal bristle morphology (12). All myosin 7 isoforms have a conserved motor domain, 5 IQ motifs, and a tail that contains a short region predicted to form a coiled coil, followed by 2 MyTH4-FERM domains separated by an SH3 domain (Fig. 1
In this study of a purified full-length myosin 7a, we show that full-length Drosophila myosin 7a is monomeric, even though it contains a short region of predicted coiled coil and that intramolecular bending of the tail regulates its enzymatic activity. In the presence of ATP, the tail region of full-length Drosophila myosin 7a bends back on the motor domain, as shown by negative-stain electron microscopy and single-particle image processing. Under these conditions, the enzymatic activity and the in vitro motility of this bent myosin is inhibited. We demonstrate that the molecule is reversibly extended by raising the ionic strength, which results in uninhibited actin translocation. Finally, small deletions in the C-terminal tail region and selected point mutations reveal that the second MyTH7 subdomain is required for autoinhibition of the myosin's enzymatic activity. Results Expression and Purification of Full-Length Myosin 7a with Calmodulin. Full-length Drosophila myosin 7a heavy chain with a C-terminal FLAG purification tag (myosin 7a-FL) was cloned into pFast-Bac1 vector and was coexpressed with Drosophila calmodulin in the baculovirus/Sf9 system. Approximately 1 mg of protein is obtained from 109 cells. Purification results indicated calmodulin (3–4 mol/mol heavy chain) copurifies by anti-FLAG affinity resin as was previously found for Drosophila myosin 7a S1 and S1-SAH (previously called HMM) constructs (14) (Fig. 2
Myosin 7a-FL Exhibits Enzymatic Properties Distinct from S1. The actin-dependent MgATPase activity of myosin 7a-FL shows important differences compared with that of the S1 fragment reported previously (14, 15). The Vmax of both constructs is ≈1 s−1, but myosin 7a-FL has a high KATPase of 30 ± 12 μM, unlike S1 where the KATPase is 1.1 ± 0.1 μM (Fig. 2
Second MyTH7 Subdomain of Myosin 7a Is the Key to Regulate Motor Activity. To explore which regions of the tail domain of myosin 7a are required for regulating the motor activity, sequential C-terminal deletions were expressed and analyzed (Fig. 1 Tail Domain of Myosin 7a Folds Back and Interacts with Motor Domain. To examine whether myosin 7a-FL is in a bent conformation we observed the molecules in the electron microscope by negative stain under conditions where actin-activated MgATPase activity is low (100 μM ATP and at 100 mM KCl) (Fig. S2). Image processing was used to produce class averages (Fig. 3
Evidence for an Ionic Strength-Dependent Conformational Change in Myosin 7a-FL. The in vitro movement of actin filaments by Drosophila myosin 7a S1-SAH does not depend on ionic strength, and filaments are moved at a range of KCl concentrations from 10 mM to 400 mM (Fig. S4 and Movie S1). In contrast, the ability of myosin 7a-FL to move actin filaments depends strongly on the ionic strength. At 50 mM KCl, myosin 7a-FL binds actin filaments to the surface but does not move them. However, when the KCl concentration is increased to 200 mM, myosin 7a-FL moves actin filaments at the rate obtained with S1-SAH under these conditions (20 ± 5 nm/s). This ionic strength dependence is reversible because lowering the KCl concentration back to 50 mM stops actin movement. Because increasing ionic strength is known to extend myosins 2 and 5 (18, 19), it seems likely that at low ionic strength myosin 7a is bent and inhibited from moving actin filaments, but becomes extended at higher ionic strengths and is then able to move actin filaments. The off state of other myosins such as unphosphorylated (inactive) smooth muscle also tether immobile actin filaments to the surface (20). The basal MgATPase rate measured in the absence of actin also shows a strong dependence on ionic strength with a steep transition occurring in the range of 200 mM (Fig. S5). Previous studies on smooth muscle myosin 2 showed a similar ionic strength dependence of the basal MgATPase activity that was correlated with a switch from a bent to an extended structure (21). Microscopy of myosin 7a-FL at 400 mM KCl in the presence of ATP, showed the molecules to be largely extended with a globular feature at one end of a narrow rod that is likely to be the motor domain attached to the lever at a prepowerstroke angle (Fig. 3 Myosin 7a-FL forms aggregates at 0.1M KCl in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, and this precluded attempts to study putative conformational changes by using analytical ultracentrifugation. We used controlled proteolysis to show that there is an ATP-dependent difference in the rate of proteolysis of the heavy chain at 0.1 M KCl, but not at 0.5 M KCl (Fig. S6). MyTH7 Subdomain Is Required for the Folded Conformation. The structure of the truncated and unregulated myosin 7a-TD3, in which the C-terminal FERM/MyTH7 domain, is missing was also examined at 100 mM KCl and 100 μM ATP. In contrast to myosin 7a-FL, the TD3 molecules were mostly extended with a single, clearly discernable motor domain that is strongly angled to the rest of the molecule (Fig. 3 Conserved SH3-Binding Motif in the MyTH7 Subdomain Is Not Involved in the Regulation. There is a conserved PxxP motif in the second MyTH7 subdomain (Fig. 1 Point Mutations in the Second MyTH7 Subdomain Deregulate Myosin 7a-FL. Knowing that the bent inactive conformation had a strong electrostatic basis, we searched the second FERM/MyTH7 domain for conserved charges. R2140 and K2143 are highly conserved in the myosin 7a subfamily, and thus we mutated both these residues to alanines (Fig. 1 Second FERM Domain in the Myosin 7a Tail Binds with Actin Filament. The FERM domain in the tumor suppressor protein, merlin, binds weakly but directly to F-actin (23). To test whether the entire second FERM domain including the MyTH7 subdomain in the myosin 7a tail binds to actin filaments, we used actin cosedimentation experiments. These revealed that the second FERM domain bound to actin in a saturable manner with a Kd of 28 ± 6 μM (Fig. 4
Discussion Electron microscopy shows that full-length recombinant Drosophila myosin 7a, purified from Sf9 cells, is monomeric despite the presence of a short sequence of predicted coiled coil. The predicted coiled-coil motif in myosin 10 has been shown to form a stable single α-helix (SAH domain) rather than a dimeric coiled coil (4). A fragment of myosin 10 that contained the motor domain and all of the predicted coiled-coil domain was shown to be largely monomeric by electron microscopy and had a neck region substantially longer than that predicted for a myosin with 3 bound calmodulins. A similar domain has recently been shown to be present in myosin 6, which is also monomeric when expressed as the full-length molecule in the baculovirus/Sf9 system (5, 24). The sequence of 70 aa of myosin 7a-FL downstream of the IQ motifs, including the predicted coiled coil, would be able to form 26 intrahelical ionic bonds, which are the major stabilizers of SAH domains. By contrast, there is poor evidence of a hydrophobic seam in the predicted coiled-coil region, so it is unlikely to dimerize. Thus, the construct containing this sequence, previously called myosin 7a HMM (14), is better called S1-SAH. It is possible there are binding partners or other in vivo mechanisms that cause Drosophila myosin 7a-FL to dimerize in vivo, but none has been reported as yet. The regulatory mechanisms have been studied extensively for smooth muscle myosin 2 and myosin 5. Both of these myosins are dimers with respect to heavy chains and their regulated off states involve intramolecular bending where elements of the tail interact with the motor domains, although the mechanisms differ substantially between the 2 myosin types (see ref. 25 for review). Here, we show that monomeric myosin 7a exhibits a unique regulatory mechanism, which also involves an intramolecular bending. Negative-staining electron microscopy shows that myosin 7a has a compact structure. The orientation of the motors, levers, and the tails can be discerned in the negatively stained images of the regulated conformation of myosin 2 and myosin 5 (26, 27). For bent myosin 7a-FL we can identify the motor domain, but further work is required to unambiguously identify the tail domains and how they interact with the motor in the bent structure. Unlike myosin 5, in which the heads are not in a prepowerstroke state, the bent structure of myosin 7a requires ATP, and in the absence of ATP it extends. Like myosin 5 and myosin 2, bending is inhibited at higher ionic strengths (>200 mM KCl). The overall length of the bent molecule is less than expected even for the motor plus 5 IQ lever, suggesting that the lever itself may be bent or that not all IQ motifs are occupied by calmodulins (Fig. 3 Under conditions where myosin 7a adopts the bent conformation, its enzymatic activity is strongly inhibited, suggesting that the interaction of some portion of the tail domain inhibits the motor function. The results from a series of tail truncations showed that the C-terminal MyTH7 subdomain is required for regulation. Its removal both abolishes the ability to bend and dramatically reduces the concentration of actin required for activation of MgATPase activity. This subdomain is highly conserved among myosin 7a family members (11). Larger truncations, even ones that remove all of the tail up to the IQ motifs, have the same enzymatic signature as this minimal truncation. A nonsense mutation has been described for human myosin 7a associated with Usher 1B syndrome (29) that would truncate the molecule after residue 1896, resulting in a molecule similar in length to the TD3 construct, and we would predict this mutant to be unregulated. Raising the ionic strength or mutating the highly conserved, positively charged amino acids R2140 and K2143 to alanines in myosin 7a-FL both extended myosin 7a and allowed activation of the MgATPase activity by low concentrations of actin, suggesting that, as with myosin 5, specific electrostatic interactions between the tail and the motor domain are essential for regulation. The enzymatic mechanism of the regulation of myosin 7a differs from that of myosin 5 in an important respect. The Vmax of the actin-activated MgATPase activity of switched off preparations of myosin 5, even at high levels of actin, is much lower than that of myosin 5 that has been activated by addition of calcium ions or of the cargo receptor melanophilin (19, 30–32). In contrast, at high concentrations of actin, the MgATPase activity of full-length myosin 7a is the same as that of unregulated, truncated fragments. The difference between myosin 7a-FL and its truncated fragments is in the weaker apparent affinity for actin (KATPase of 30 μM compared with 1 μM, respectively). We have shown that the tail fragment comprising the second FERM domain including its MyTH7 subdomain binds directly to actin with a Kd of ≈30 μM. This similarity in the KATPase of myosin 7a-FL to the affinity of the second FERM domain for actin suggests that as actin concentration increases, the tail binding site binds to actin and causes the molecule to extend. This would result in an increase in the ATPase as the newly extended molecule would now be in the presence of essentially saturating actin allowing it to hydrolyze ATP at a rate of 1 s−1. Based on these results, we propose the following model for one possible way in which Drosophila myosin 7a might be regulated (Fig. 5
An alternative regulatory mechanism is that binding partners in the cell may bind to the tail region of myosin 7a, extending the molecule and activating its enzymatic and motile properties (Fig. 5 Materials and Methods Protein Expression, Purification, and Reagents. A Drosophila myosin 7a cDNA clone was provided by Daniel Kiehart (Duke University, Durham, NC). The length and domain structure of each construct shown on Fig. 1 ATPase Activity and Actin Sliding Assays. Steady-state MgATPase activities were measured at 25 °C (39) in a buffer containing 10 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM ATP, and 50 mM KCl. Motility assays were performed at 25 °C in motility buffer containing 20 mM Mops (pH 7.4), 4 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 50 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, various concentration of KCl and an oxygen scavenging system consisting of 25 μg/mL glucose oxidase, 45 μg/mL catalase, and 2.5 mg/mL glucose (37). Data fitting and analysis was performed by using ORIGINLAB 7.0 (Microcal, Amherst, MA). Actin Binding Assay. Actin was cosedimented with the second FERM domain of myosin 7a (GST-tag removed) at 100,000 × g for 20 min in 10 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.15 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT and in the absence of ATP or in the presence of 1 mM ATP. Quantification was performed by Western blot analysis of the supernatant and the resuspended pellet with anti-rabbit IRDye 680 fluorescent antibody. Fluorescence intensity was analyzed by ODYSSEY Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR). Electron Microscopy and Image Processing. All constructs were supplemented with a 2-fold excess of calmodulin and diluted to ≈100 nM myosin in 100 mM KCl, 5 mM Mops, 1 mM EGTA (pH 7.5) with the addition of 100 μM ATP and 3 mM MgCl2 where required. In addition, myosin 7a-FL was also diluted into buffer containing 400 mM KCl. Protein was applied to UV-treated, continuous carbon-coated grids and negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate. Images were recorded on film at a nominal magnification of 40,000× by using a JEOL1200EX at 80 kV and digitized at 0.52 nm/pixel, as calibrated by using the 14.4-nm repeat of paramyosin filaments. All image processing was performed by using SPIDER as described (40). Datasets ranged from 1,857 to 6,654 particles. K-means classification was performed by using masks based on the variance of the global average, with the exception of the RK/AA mutant in the absence of ATP and the S1-SAH construct, for which a mask of just the tail region was used. Atomic Model Building. A 5IQ model lever was constructed by using the 2.5-Å resolution structure of calcium-free calmodulin bound to IQ motifs 1 and 2 of murine myosin 5 (2IX7) (41). By using MacPyMol, the backbone atoms of IQ motif 2 were superposed on those of IQ motif 1 from a second 2IX7 structure, to give a 3IQ model (RMSD 0.21 Å). This process was repeated with a third and a fourth 2IX7 structure to give a 5IQ model with all IQ motifs having 23-residue spacing, as in myosin 7a. Overlapping CaM and IQ motif sequences were deleted. To create apo and prepowerstroke head models, backbone atoms of the first IQ motif of the 5IQ lever model were superposed on the first IQ motif of scallop myosin, PDB ID codes 1SR6 and 1QVI, respectively (RMSD of 0.252 and 0.416 Å, respectively) (41, 42), and the scallop lever was then deleted. Supporting Information
Acknowledgments. We thank Erica Perez for help in engineering some of the clones used in this study and Fang Zhang for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful for financial support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute intramural program and project funding and an Underwood Fellowship from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. Footnotes The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0808682106/DCSupplemental. References 1. Foth BJ, Goedecke MC, Soldati D. New insights into myosin evolution and classification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:3681–3686. [PubMed] 2. Odronitz F, Kollmar M. Drawing the tree of eukaryotic life based on the analysis of 2,269 manually annotated myosins from 328 species. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R196. [PubMed] 3. Mooseker MS, Foth BJ. In: Myosins: A Superfamily of Molecular Motors. Coluccio LM, editor. The Netherlands: Springer; 2008. pp. 1–34. 4. Knight PJ, et al. The predicted coiled-coil domain of myosin 10 forms a novel elongated domain that lengthens the head. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:34702–34708. [PubMed] 5. Spink BJ, Sivaramakrishnan S, Lipfert J, Doniach S, Spudich JA. Long single alpha-helical tail domains bridge the gap between structure and function of myosin VI. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:591–597. [PubMed] 6. Albanesi JP, et al. Monomeric acanthamoeba myosins I support movement in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:8649–8652. [PubMed] 7. Yamashita RA, Sellers JR, Anderson JB. Identification and analysis of the myosin superfamily in Drosophila: A database approach. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2000;21:491–505. [PubMed] 8. El-Amraoui A, Petit C. Usher I syndrome: Unravelling the mechanisms that underlie the cohesion of the growing hair bundle in inner ear sensory cells. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:4593–4603. [PubMed] 9. Hasson T, et al. Unconventional myosins in inner-ear sensory epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1997;137:1287–1307. [PubMed] 10. Hasson T, Heintzelman MB, Santos-Sacchi J, Corey DP, Mooseker MS. Expression in cochlea and retina of myosin VIIa, the gene product defective in usher syndrome type 1b. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:9815–9819. [PubMed] 11. Kiehart DP, et al. Drosophila crinkled, mutations of which disrupt morphogenesis and cause lethality, encodes fly myosin VIIa. Genetics. 2004;168:1337–1352. [PubMed] 12. Todi SV, Franke JD, Kiehart DP, Eberl DF. Myosin VIIa defects, which underlie the Usher 1b syndrome in humans, lead to deafness in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2005;15:862–868. [PubMed] 13. Pearson MA, Reczek D, Bretscher A, Karplus PA. Structure of the ERM protein moesin reveals the FERM domain fold masked by an extended. Cell. 2000;103:259–270. [PubMed] 14. Yang Y, et al. Dimerized Drosophila myosin VIIa: A processive motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5746–5751. [PubMed] 15. Watanabe S, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. Drosophila myosin VIIa is a high duty ratio motor with a unique kinetic mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:7151–7160. [PubMed] 16. Burgess S, et al. The prepower stroke conformation of myosin V. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:983–991. [PubMed] 17. Burgess SA, Walker ML, White HD, Trinick J. Flexibility within myosin heads revealed by negative stain and single-particle analysis. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:675–681. [PubMed] 18. Trybus KM, Lowey S. Conformational states of smooth muscle myosin. Effects of light chain phosphorylation and ionic strength. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:8564–8571. [PubMed] 19. Wang F, et al. Regulated conformation of myosin V. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2333–2336. [PubMed] 20. Cuda G, Pate E, Cooke R, Sellers JR. In vitro actin filament sliding velocities produced by mixtures of different types of myosin. Biophys J. 1997;72:1767–1779. [PubMed] 21. Ikebe M, Hinkins S, Hartshorne DJ. Correlation of enzymatic properties and conformation of smooth muscle myosin. Biochemistry. 1983;22:4580–4587. [PubMed] 22. Mayer BJ. SH3 domains: Complexity in moderation. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:1253–1263. [PubMed] 23. Sun CX, Robb VA, Gutmann DH. Protein 4.1 tumor suppressors: Getting a FERM grip on growth regulation. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:3991–4000. [PubMed] 24. Lister I, et al. A monomeric myosin VI with a large working stroke. EMBO J. 2004;23:1729–1738. [PubMed] 25. Sellers JR, Knight PJ. Folding and regulation in myosins II and V. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2007;28:363–370. [PubMed] 26. Jung HS, et al. Conservation of the regulated structure of folded myosin 2 in species separated by at least 600 million years of independent evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:6022–6026. [PubMed] 27. Thirumurugan K, Sakamoto T, Hammer JA, III, Sellers JR, Knight PJ. The cargo-binding domain regulates structure and activity of myosin 5. Nature. 2006;442:212–215. [PubMed] 28. Udovichenko IP, Gibbs D, Williams DS. Actin-based motor properties of native myosin VIIa. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:445–450. [PubMed] 29. Vastinsalo H, Isosomppi J, Aittakorpi A, Sankila EM. Two Finnish USH1b patients with three novel mutations in myosin VIIa. Mol Vision. 2006;12:1093–1097. 30. Krementsov DN, Krementsova EB, Trybus KM. Myosin V: Regulation by calcium, calmodulin, and the tail domain. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:877–886. [PubMed] 31. Li XD, Jung HS, Mabuchi K, Craig R, Ikebe M. The globular tail domain of myosin Va functions as an inhibitor of the myosin Va motor. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:21789–21798. [PubMed] 32. Li XD, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. Activation of myosin V activity by melanopilin, a specific docking partner of myosin V. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17815–17822. [PubMed] 33. Weil D, et al. Human myosin VIIa responsible for the Usher 1b syndrome: A predicted membrane-associated motor protein expressed in developing sensory epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:3232–3237. [PubMed] 34. Buss F, Kendrick-Jones J. Myosin VI: A multifunctional motor protein. In: Coluccio LM, editor. Myosins: A Superfamily of Molecular Motors. The Netherlands: Springer; 2008. pp. 325–352. 35. El-Amraoui A, Bahloul A, Petit C. Myosin VII. In: Coluccio LM, editor. Myosins: A Superfamily of Molecular Motors. The Netherlands: Springer; 2008. pp. 353–373. 36. Yang Y, Koivacs M, Xu Q, Anderson JB, Sellers JR. Myosin VIIb from Drosophila is a high duty ratio motor. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:32061–32068. [PubMed] 37. Wang F, et al. Effect of ADP and ionic strength on the kinetic and motile properties of recombinant mouse myosin V. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4329–4335. [PubMed] 38. Spudich JA, Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem. 1971;246:4866–4871. [PubMed] 39. Wang F, et al. Kinetic mechanism of non-muscle myosin IIb: Functional adaptations for tension generation and maintenance. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27439–27448. [PubMed] 40. Burgess SA, Walker ML, Thirumurugan K, Trinick J, Knight PJ. Use of negative stain and single-particle image processing to explore dynamic properties of flexible macromolecules. J Struct Biol. 2004;147:247–258. [PubMed] 41. Houdusse A, et al. Crystal structure of apo-calmodulin bound to the first two IQ motifs of myosin V reveals essential recognition features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:19326–19331. [PubMed] 42. Himmel DM, et al. Crystallographic findings on the internally uncoupled and near-rigor states of myosin: Further insights into the mechanics of the motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12645–12650. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7; 103(10):3681-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(9):R196.
[Genome Biol. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct 14; 280(41):34702-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Jun; 15(6):591-7.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008]J Biol Chem. 1985 Jul 25; 260(15):8649-52.
[J Biol Chem. 1985]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(9):R196.
[Genome Biol. 2007]J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2000; 21(6):491-505.
[J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2000]J Cell Sci. 2005 Oct 15; 118(Pt 20):4593-603.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]J Cell Biol. 1997 Jun 16; 137(6):1287-307.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Oct 10; 92(21):9815-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Cell. 2000 Apr 28; 101(3):259-70.
[Cell. 2000]Genetics. 2004 Nov; 168(3):1337-52.
[Genetics. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11; 103(15):5746-51.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11; 103(15):5746-51.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 17; 281(11):7151-60.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Cell Biol. 2002 Dec 23; 159(6):983-91.
[J Cell Biol. 2002]J Cell Biol. 1997 Nov 3; 139(3):675-81.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]J Biol Chem. 1984 Jul 10; 259(13):8564-71.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jan 23; 279(4):2333-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Biophys J. 1997 Apr; 72(4):1767-79.
[Biophys J. 1997]Biochemistry. 1983 Sep 13; 22(19):4580-7.
[Biochemistry. 1983]J Cell Sci. 2001 Apr; 114(Pt 7):1253-63.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]J Cell Sci. 2002 Nov 1; 115(Pt 21):3991-4000.
[J Cell Sci. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct 14; 280(41):34702-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Jun; 15(6):591-7.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008]EMBO J. 2004 Apr 21; 23(8):1729-38.
[EMBO J. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11; 103(15):5746-51.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2007; 28(7-8):363-70.
[J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22; 105(16):6022-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Nature. 2006 Jul 13; 442(7099):212-5.
[Nature. 2006]J Cell Sci. 2002 Jan 15; 115(Pt 2):445-50.
[J Cell Sci. 2002]Genetics. 2004 Nov; 168(3):1337-52.
[Genetics. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jan 23; 279(4):2333-6.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Cell Biol. 2004 Mar 15; 164(6):877-86.
[J Cell Biol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2006 Aug 4; 281(31):21789-98.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2005 May 6; 280(18):17815-22.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2005 May 6; 280(18):17815-22.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Cell Sci. 2005 Oct 15; 118(Pt 20):4593-603.
[J Cell Sci. 2005]J Cell Biol. 1997 Jun 16; 137(6):1287-307.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Curr Biol. 2005 May 10; 15(9):862-8.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 16; 93(8):3232-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11; 103(15):5746-51.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2005 Sep 16; 280(37):32061-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2000 Feb 11; 275(6):4329-35.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10; 246(15):4866-71.
[J Biol Chem. 1971]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 25; 278(30):27439-48.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2000 Feb 11; 275(6):4329-35.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Struct Biol. 2004 Sep; 147(3):247-58.
[J Struct Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19; 103(51):19326-31.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1; 99(20):12645-50.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]