• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Curr Biol. Feb 24, 2009; 19(4): 297–304.
PMCID: PMC2648875

A Role for Id2 in Regulating Photic Entrainment of the Mammalian Circadian System

Summary

Inhibitor of DNA binding genes (Id1–Id4) encode helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcriptional repressors associated with development and tumorigenesis [1, 2], but little is known concerning the function(s) of these genes in normal adult animals. Id2 was identified in DNA microarray screens for rhythmically expressed genes [3–5], and further analysis revealed a circadian pattern of expression of all four Id genes in multiple tissues including the suprachiasmatic nucleus. To explore an in vivo function, we generated and characterized deletion mutations of Id2 and of Id4. Id2−/− mice exhibit abnormally rapid entrainment and an increase in the magnitude of the phase shift of the pacemaker. A significant proportion of mice also exhibit disrupted rhythms when maintained under constant darkness. Conversely, Id4−/− mice did not exhibit a noticeable circadian phenotype. In vitro studies using an mPer1 and an AVP promoter reporter revealed the potential for ID1, ID2, and ID3 proteins to interact with the canonical basic HLH clock proteins BMAL1 and CLOCK. These data suggest that the Id genes may be important for entrainment and operation of the mammalian circadian system, potentially acting through BMAL1 and CLOCK targets.

Keywords: DNA, MOLNEURO

Results and Discussion

Many aspects of biochemistry, physiology, and behavior are organized around a 24 hr rhythm, driven by an endogenous circadian clock [6]. Interlocked autoregulatory molecular transcriptional-translational feedback loops underlie circadian organization in single cells. Two core feedback loops have been described in the mammal; they consist of two period (mPer) genes and two cryptochrome (mCry) genes (negative loop), and basic helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim (bHLH/PAS) domain proteins BMAL1 (MOP3) and CLOCK (positive loop) [7, 8]. The master circadian oscillator in the mammal is located within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) [7], although many tissues of the body, as well as cell lines derived from them, harbor a circadian clock [9–11]. cDNA microarray analysis of one such line of mammalian fibroblasts identified a series of rhythmically expressed genes with a circadian periodicity [3]. Among these genes was inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (Id2) (Figure S1 available online), a member of an HLH transcriptional repressor family previously implicated in the regulation of differentiation, cell cycle, and apoptosis, primarily during early development, and whose misregulation is associated with tumorigenesis [1, 2, 12].

Id2 is a member of a family of four genes, Id1Id4, that share both structural and functional properties [1, 12, 13]. At the molecular level, it is known that ID proteins interact with bHLH factors through their HLH protein-protein binding domains; however, because they do not possess the basic region, the ID proteins sequester the bound bHLH transcription factor and prevent its binding to its partner bHLH factor. This, in turn, inhibits binding of the heterodimer to DNA. Given the identity of CLOCK and BMAL1 as bHLH transcription factors, the potential for ID proteins to influence the circadian system seemed apparent.

Id Genes Are Rhythmically Expressed in Tissues Harboring Central and Peripheral Clocks

Circadian regulation of Id genes was determined in SCN and heart tissue collected from mice held in constant darkness (DD) (Figure 1). In the SCN, expression of all four Id genes was rhythmic, with peak phases occurring near the middle of subjective night at circadian time (CT) 16 to CT20. In the heart, peak phases of Id1, Id2, and Id3 span the middle to late subjective day, CT8 to CT12, whereas expression of Id4 was below the level of detection. Impressively, Id gene expression showed a distinct circadian pattern in all tissues examined, namely SCN, heart, liver (peak phase at CT4; T. Hou and G.E.D., data not shown), and fibroblasts.

Figure 1
Id Genes Are Rhythmically Expressed in the SCN and Heart

The phases of rhythms of known clock genes, such as mPer1–2, mCry1–2, and Bmal1, are phase locked to one another in a characteristic pattern within and between individual tissues [6, 7]. For instance, mPer1 peaks ~2–4 hr prior to mPer2, both are antiphasic to Bmal1, and all these phases are delayed by 3–9 hr in peripheral tissues as compared to the SCN [6, 7] (Figure 1). This characteristic pattern is seen for Id2, whose peak phase lags that of Bmal1 in SCN, heart, liver, and rat1 and mouse NIH 3T3 fibroblasts by approximately 4–8 hr, although not for other Id genes (Figure 1 and Figure S1).

Id2−/− Mice Exhibit Disrupted Locomotor Rhythms, Reduced Locomotor Activity, and a Change in Phase Angle

Because Id2 had shown the most consistent rhythmic gene expression in all cell lines and tissues, we generated transgenic mice lacking the entire coding region and therefore null for the Id2 gene (Figure S2 and Supplemental Discussion) and examined their circadian systems (Figure 2, Table S1). Homozygous mutants are morphologically dissimilar to their wild-type littermate controls, being on average 27% smaller (F2,56 = 9.1, p = 0.0004), and exhibit a high level of lethality during the postnatal period; our other broad observations of the Id2−/− mice, such as immunocompromised status, are consistent with the Id2 null mice generated by Yokota and colleagues [14] (see Supplemental Data). Importantly, histological analysis of SCN coronal sections showed no gross anatomical difference between Id2+/+ and Id2−/− F2 littermates (Figure S3), indicating that any circadian phenotypes in the mutants are not due to a gross developmental defect in the basic organization of the SCN.

Figure 2
A Proportion of Id2 Mutant Mice Show Severe Disruption of Locomotor Activity Rhythms

Animals of all three genotypes were capable of entrainment and free-running rhythmicity, but a significant fraction (25%) of the homozygous mutant mice showed severely disrupted circadian rhythms (Figures 2D, 2G, and 2H and Figure S4), thereby defining a significant phenotype (Fisher's Exact test, df = 2,44, p = 0.0284; Figures S4–S6). They showed reduced use of the running wheel coupled with disorganized rhythms, as determined by analysis of passive activity (as measured by passive infrared motion detector; Figure 2D and Figure S4), with no significant rhythmicity detected during the last 10 days in DD (Figure 2H and Figure S6). Several additional older mice (>6 months age) developed antiphase diurnal rhythms while maintaining appropriate phase-response curves (data not shown). Id2 mutant mice with disrupted rhythms remained indistinguishable from the remaining Id2−/− mice as regards weight, gross morphology, and general health.

The entire class of Id2−/− mice displayed a 70% reduction in wheel-running activity as measured by mean wheel rotations/24 hr (F2,37 = 17.0, p = 0.0001; light-dark [LD], mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]: wild-type, 23,674 ± 1,278; heterozygote, 23,846 ± 3,045; and mutant, 7,687 ± 2,154). This is also reflected in the power measure at 24 hr derived from the Fourier analysis of wheel-running activity, a measure of amplitude of the detected rhythm, which is significantly lower in the mutant mice in both LD and DD (LD, F2,38 = 4.5, p = 0.0179; DD, F2,32 = 3.7, p = 0.037; Table S1) even when the four arrhythmic mice are excluded from the analysis. Their arrhythmic passive activity cannot be explained by the low quantity of wheel-running activity, because the passive activity of wild-type and heterozygote controls, tested in the absence of a running wheel, exhibited robust rhythms (Figure 2B). Moreover, certain Id2−/− mice exhibited clear rhythmicity of both wheel-running and passive activity despite showing little daily use of the wheel (Figures S4A, S4F, and S5A). No difference was observed between mutant mice and littermate controls in the quantity of their passive daily activity (Table S1; LD, mean ± SEM counts: wild-type, 2,878 ± 431; heterozygote, 3,100 ± 796; and mutant, 3,358 ± 374) nor in the power measure for passive activity in either LD or DD (Table S1). It seems that, for whatever reason, mice lacking Id2 can be characterized by reduced running on a wheel independent of their apparent circadian defects.

Free-running periods of the experimental mice were similar (wild-type, 23.78 ± 0.10 hr; heterozygote; 23.62 ± 0.05 hr; and mutant, 23.89 ± 0.10 hr; mean ± SEM), as were several other aspects of their circadian rhythmicity (Table S1). Interestingly, however, the phase angle of activity onset relative to the time of lights off (ZT12) was significantly different in mutant mice (t1,24 = 2.3, p < 0.05; Figure S7 and Table S1): all but one out of the 13 knockout mice showed a phase angle ≤ +30 min (that is, 30 min before ZT12), whereas six of the 13 wild-type mice exhibited phase angles between +36 and +106 min (mean ± SEM phase angles of +24 ± 11 min, +40 ± 21 min, and −3 ± 7 min for Id2+/+, Id2+/−, and Id2−/− mice, respectively). In addition, the variance of the phase angle was smaller in the mutant mice (wild-type, 1504; heterozygote, 5299; and mutant mice, 680). Thus, loss of ID2 can significantly affect entrainment as discussed more fully below.

Enhanced Speed of Re-entrainment and Magnitude of Phase Shifts in Id2−/− Mice

To examine the effect of the mutation on photic entrainment in greater detail, we measured the re-entrainment response of mice to a large delay in the daily photoschedule. Normally, mice entrained to a 12:12 LD cycle became active around the transition to lights-off, and after a 10 hr delay of this photoschedule, their activity-rest cycle achieved stable re-entrainment after 4.75 ± 0.19 days (wild-types) or 4.11 ± 0.39 days (heterozygotes). Surprisingly, however, the mutant mice showed a highly significant more rapid re-entrainment in 2.46 ± 0.26 days (F2,27 = 18.8, p = 0.0001, day 1 = day of treatment, Figures 3A–3C and 3G).

Figure 3
Id2 Mutant Mice Show Abnormally Rapid Entrainment to a New Light-Dark Cycle

To remove the possibility that this unexpected phenotype reflects a masking response due to the repeated light-dark cycle, we repeated the experiment with a modified protocol in which mice were transferred to DD after a single long day representing the shift of the photoschedule. The magnitude of the shift produced by this single 10 hr extension of the light phase was 3.54 ± 0.60 hr in wild-types and 3.59 ± 0.45 hr in heterozygotes, whereas consistent with the re-entrainment data, the phase shift of the mutant mice was significantly greater, at 5.87 ± 0.57 hr (F2,31 = 5.8, p = 0.0071; Figures 3D–3F and 3H).

In circadian theory, the effects of entraining agents have been modeled in two ways. In one, discrete or nonparametric entrainment, the phase of the circadian oscillator is thought to be abruptly shifted to the new phase soon after exposure to the entraining agent; in the other, continuous or parametric entrainment, the entraining agent acts continuously to adjust the period length of the oscillator so that rhythms in the exposed and unexposed organisms gradually move out of phase [15]. By this formalism, the 10 hr delay re-entrainment task could have yielded shifts by either mechanism, but the two can be distinguished through the use of short discrete pulses of light. Thus, to better characterize the role of Id2 on photoentrainment, we examined mice free running in DD after exposure to a discrete 30 min light pulse at CT14 or CT16, times expected to produce a large phase delay [16]. Surprisingly, unlike the large phase delays observed in Id2−/− mice after the continuous 10 hr light treatment, no difference was observed between genotypes when this discrete pulse of light was used (CT14, F2,32 = 2.24, n.s; CT16, t1,26 = 0.70, n.s.; Figure S8 and Table S1). These results indicate that the resetting mechanisms underlying continuous versus discrete entrainment are differentially influenced by ID2 (but not ID4; see below). We then examined the locomotor activity of mice under constant-light conditions. Similar proportions of mice exhibited a loss of a discernible locomotor rhythm, as determined by Fourier and χ2 periodogram analyses: Id2+/+ 38%, Id2+/−, 33%; and Id2−/−, 40%; no significant difference was observed between genotypes in free-running period lengths (Table S1). All mice showed an increase in period length with an increase in illuminance (p < 0.01), as predicted by Aschoff's rule [15].

In light of the photoentrainment phenotype, we examined the induction of Id genes in the SCN after light treatment during subjective night. Positive control genes c-fos and mPer2 were normally induced, but we found no increase in levels of Id14 expression (Figure S9).

Suppression of CLOCK:BMAL1 Transactivation by ID Proteins

As outlined above, the ID proteins are well known as repressors of the function of bHLH proteins, the class of protein to which CLOCK and BMAL1 belong. Because this suggested a potential mechanism by which the ID proteins might affect the clock, we examined the effect of each ID protein upon CLOCK:BMAL1-driven induction of mPer1 gene activity. In this transient transfection assay, ID1, ID2, or ID3 showed marked dose-dependent suppression of CLOCK:BMAL1-induced activation of mPer1, with the ID proteins showing a repression activity equal to or greater than that of mPER1 itself (Figures 4A–4C). However, little inhibitory effect was observed for ID4, a finding confirmed with an alternative expression vector for ID4 (data not shown). Because the ID proteins repress bHLH proteins through inhibition of DNA binding, we examined the ability of ID2 to suppress E-box-driven CLOCK:BMAL1 transactivation of the arginine vasopressin (AVP) gene [7, 17]. The single E-box is the only region conserved between the mPer1 and AVP promoters [18]. Consistent with the results for the mPer1 reporter, ID2 suppressed the AVP reporter activity by an average of 64%, similar to that demonstrated by mPER1 (Figure 4D) and consistent with ID inhibition of transcription through interference with CLOCK:BMAL1 transactivation of the E-box element. The specificity of the inhibitory action of ID1, ID2, and ID3, but not ID4, is particularly interesting and suggests that the interaction between ID1-3 and CLOCK:BMAL1 is not simply a generalized action on HLH domains.

Figure 4
ID Proteins Can Potently Inhibit CLOCK:BMAL1 Transactivation of the mPer1 and AVP Promoters

Id4−/− Mice Exhibit Normal Entrainment Responses

To explore the difference observed in the inhibitory action of ID2 versus ID4 upon canonical clock components, we analyzed the behavior of Id4 null mice and their wild-type and heterozygous littermates in vivo [19]. Apart from a reduction in wheel-running activity, most Id4−/− mice exhibited normal rhythmic profiles, as determined by actogram, periodogram, and Fourier analysis (data not shown). Because of the profound entrainment phenotype observed in Id2−/− mice, we measured the magnitude of the phase shift of Id4−/− mice in response to a 10 hr extension of the light phase followed by transfer to DD. The shift in the phase of activity onset was 3.79 ± 0.18 hr in wild-type mice, 4.20 ± 0.24 hr in heterozygote mice, and 3.50 ± 0.09 hr in Id4−/− mice. Therefore, unlike the findings for Id2−/− mice, no significant difference was observed in the shift in the phase of activity onset of the Id4 mutant mice (F2,24 = 2.9, n.s.; Figure S10).

The Id genes have well-characterized roles in embryonic differentiation and cell proliferation as well as in the differentiation of immune cells, but few other roles in normal adult tissues have been described. As revealed by our microarray and real-time RT-PCR analyses, Id2 is rhythmically expressed in mammalian fibroblasts and liver. Subsequent examination of murine SCN and heart in vivo revealed robust rhythmic patterns of expression for all four family members, where expressed. Our findings are consistent with the discovery of Id genes as rhythmically expressed in various tissues, specifically Id1 in the pineal gland and immortalized 2.2 SCN cells [20, 21], Id2 in SCN and liver [4, 5], and Id3 in the SCN [5, 21] (see Supplemental Discussion). What is particularly striking is the conserved phase-specific relationship for the Id2 rhythm with the canonical clock genes in all tissues examined, consistent with a possible effect of Id2 upon the circadian system. Apart from the canonical clock components, this is rare for rhythmic genes: less than 10% of rhythmic genes are found in common between two different tissue types (e.g., SCN and liver) [4, 5, 22, 23]. These results suggested the significance of ID2 for circadian biology.

Consistent with this hypothesis, homozygous loss of ID2 results in profoundly disrupted rhythmicity, albeit with only partial penetrance, as well as in extensive reductions in wheel-running activity. This significant proportion of mice exhibiting disrupted and/or antiphasic diurnal rhythms is consistent with a role for Id2 in either the SCN clock or output signaling from the SCN to the relevant relay centers in the central nervous system [7, 24–27]. A significant delay in the phase angle was also observed in the locomotor activity rhythms of Id2 null mice. Because there is no significant difference in period lengths between genotypes, these data indicate that some Id2−/− mice exhibit an abnormal phase relationship with the transition from lights on to lights off.

However, the most striking finding was that Id2 null mice re-entrain to a large phase delay twice as fast as their littermate controls, as if ID2 acts as a brake on the circadian system in terms of its response to large changes in the light-dark cycle [28]. Interestingly, all four Id genes cycle in phase with one another within the SCN, whereas in other tissues, such as the heart, the phase relationships are more widely distributed over the circadian day. This phase consistency might underlie the rigid limitations of the SCN clock in its response to changes in the environment during the phase-delay portion of circadian cycle.

A photoentrainment phenotype similar to that of the Id2 null mouse has recently been observed in mPer1 mutant mice [29–31]. These mice show an enhanced phase delay to continuous treatments of light, e.g., 8 hr and 12 hr, but no differences in phase responses to short light pulses. This surprising coincidence suggests that ID2 and the canonical clock protein mPER1 may contribute to photoentrainment in similar ways. Also, similar to Id2−/− mice and depending upon the study, mPer1-deficient mice can show normal circadian period lengths [32] and either normal or disturbed rhythms in DD [30, 32, 33].

Given that the ID proteins are known to interact with bHLH transcription factors, we tested the obvious hypothesis that the ID proteins might influence the activity of CLOCK and BMAL1. ID1, ID2, and ID3 were each shown capable of blocking CLOCK:BMAL1-driven transcriptional activation with a potency comparable to mPER1, suggesting a potential interplay between these transcriptional inhibitors and the bHLH transcriptional activators in the circadian feedback loop. The simplest interpretation is that ID proteins interact directly with CLOCK and/or BMAL1, reducing CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer binding to the E-box element and thereby muting the photic response at the level of clock genes (see Supplemental Discussion). In contrast to the other family members, ID4 did not interfere with CLOCK:BMAL1-driven transcriptional activation, and it correlates with the absence of the photoentrainment phenotype in the Id4−/− mice.

Although we were initially surprised not to see a greater effect of loss of Id2 on circadian period length, it should be noted that all four Id gene products display significant similarities in tissue distribution, amino acid sequence, and binding-partner affinities [1, 12, 13, 34], and all displayed rhythmic expression where they were expressed. Given these similarities, evidence of a more profound role for ID2 in the circadian system may have been obscured by functional redundancy with other members of the Id gene family [1], especially in the SCN, where all four genes cycle in phase.

A role for clock-controlled ID proteins, and specifically ID2, in a loop that closes outside the core oscillator but that affects aspects of circadian timing is reminiscent of the action of VIVID in Neurospora [35]. Expression of vvd is controlled by the clock, and VVD in turn feeds back to regulate the expression of several input and output genes yet is not required for circadian rhythmicity. Other examples of additional autoregulatory loops that contribute to the circadian system, but are not essential for the persistence of the oscillator, include Dec1 and Dec2, clockwork orange, CREB, CREM, and the frequency antisense transcript [6, 36, 37].

Acknowledgments

We thank E. Dufour, T. Sikorski, T. Hou and S. Ward for technical assistance, T. MacKenzie for advice on statistical methods, members of the respective laboratories for helpful discussions, and S.M. Reppert, P. Sassone-Corsi and C.J. Weitz for their gifts of gene plasmids. This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust (058332/Z/99/Z Prize Travelling Research Fellowship to G.E.D.), Royal Society (University Research Fellowship to G.E.D), Betz Foundation (M.A.I.), NIGMS (GM083336 to J.C.D. and J.J.L.), and University of Notre Dame (G.E.D.).

Supplemental Data

Document S1. Supplemental Results and Discussion, Supplemental Experimental Procedures, One Table, and Ten Figures:

References

1. Norton J.D. ID helix-loop-helix proteins in cell growth, differentiation and tumorigenesis. J. Cell Sci. 2000;113:3897–3905. [PubMed]
2. Ruzinova M.B., Benezra R. Id proteins in development, cell cycle and cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13:410–418. [PubMed]
3. Duffield G.E., Best J.D., Meurers B.H., Bittner A., Loros J.J., Dunlap J.C. Circadian programs of transcriptional activation, signaling, and protein turnover revealed by microarray analysis of mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:551–557. [PubMed]
4. Ueda H.R., Chen W., Adachi A., Wakamatsu H., Hayashi S., Takasugi T., Nagano M., Nakahama K., Suzuki Y., Sugano S. A transcription factor response element for gene expression during circadian night. Nature. 2002;418:534–539. [PubMed]
5. Panda S., Antoch M.P., Miller B., Su A., Schook A., Straume M., Schultz P., Kay S., Takahashi J., Hogenesch J.B. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell. 2002;109:307–320. [PubMed]
6. Dunlap J.C., Loros J.J., Decoursey P., editors. Chronobiology: Biological Timekeeping. First Edition. Sinauer Assoc.; Sunderland, MA: 2003.
7. Reppert S.M., Weaver D.R. Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2001;63:647–676. [PubMed]
8. Ko C.H., Takahashi J.S. Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:R271–R277. Spec No 2. [PubMed]
9. Yamazaki S., Numano R., Abe M., Hida A., Takahashi R.-I., Ueda M., Block G.D., Sakaki Y., Menaker M., Tei H. Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in transgenic rats. Science. 2000;288:682–685. [PubMed]
10. Balsalobre A., Damiola F., Schibler U. A serum shock induces circadian gene expression in mammalian culture cells. Cell. 1998;93:929–937. [PubMed]
11. Yoo S.H., Yamazaki S., Lowrey P.L., Shimomura K., Ko C.H., Buhr E.D., Siepka S.M., Hong H.K., Oh W.J., Yoo O.J. PERIOD2:LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:5339–5346. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Biggs J., Murphy E.V., Israel M.A. A human Id-like helix-loop-helix protein expressed during early development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:1512–1516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Andres-Barquin P.J., Hernandez M.-C., Israel M.A. Id genes in nervous system development. Histol. Histopathol. 2000;15:603–618. [PubMed]
14. Yokota Y., Mansouri A., Mori S., Sugawara S., Adachi S., Nishikawa S.-I., Gruss P. Development of peripheral lymphoid organs and natural killer cells depends on the helix-loop-helix inhibitor Id2. Nature. 1999;397:702–706. [PubMed]
15. Johnson C.H., Elliott J., Foster R., Honma K.-I., Kronauer R. Fundamental Properties of Circadian Rhythms. In: Dunlap J.C., Loros J.J., Decoursey P., editors. Chronobiology - Biological Timekeeping. Sinauer Assoc.; Sunderland, MA: 2003. pp. 67–106.
16. Schwartz W.J., Zimmerman P. Circadian timekeeping in BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred mouse strains. J. Neurosci. 1990;10:3685–3694. [PubMed]
17. Harmar A.J. An essential role for peptidergic signalling in the control of circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2003;15:335–338. [PubMed]
18. Kume K., Zylka M.J., Sriram S., Shearman L.P., Weaver D.R., Jin X., Maywood E.S., Hastings M.H., Reppert S.M. mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop. Cell. 1999;98:193–205. [PubMed]
19. Yun K., Mantani A., Garel S., Rubenstein J., Israel M.A. Id4 regulates neural progenitor proliferation and differentiation in vivo. Development. 2004;131:5441–5448. [PubMed]
20. Humphries A., Klein D., Baler R., Carter D.A. cDNA array analysis of pineal gene expression reveals circadian rhythmicity of the dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein-encoding gene, Id-1. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2002;14:101–108. [PubMed]
21. Menger G.J., Lu K., Thomas T., Cassone V.M., Earnest D.J. Circadian profiling of the transcriptome in immortalized rat SCN cells. Physiol. Genomics. 2005;21:370–381. [PubMed]
22. Duffield G.E. DNA microarray analyses of circadian timing: The genomic basis of biological time. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2003;15:991–1002. [PubMed]
23. Storch K.F., Lipan O., Leykin I., Viswanathan N., Davis F.C., Wong W., Weitz C.J. Extensive and divergent circadian gene expression in liver and heart. Nature. 2002;417:78–83. [PubMed]
24. Kalsbeek A., Palm I.F., La Fleur S.E., Scheer F.A., Perreau-Lenz S., Ruiter M., Kreier F., Cailotto C., Buijs R.M. SCN outputs and the hypothalamic balance of life. J. Biol. Rhythms. 2006;21:458–469. [PubMed]
25. Leak R.K., Moore R.Y. Topographic organization of suprachiasmatic nucleus projection neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 2001;433:312–334. [PubMed]
26. Kraves S., Weitz C.J. A role for cardiotrophin-like cytokine in the circadian control of mammalian locomotor activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2006;9:212–219. [PubMed]
27. Mrosovsky N., Hattar S. Diurnal mice (Mus musculus) and other examples of temporal niche switching. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 2005;191:1011–1024. [PubMed]
28. Comas M., Beersma D.G., Spoelstra K., Daan S. Phase and period responses of the circadian system of mice (Mus musculus) to light stimuli of different duration. J. Biol. Rhythms. 2006;21:362–372. [PubMed]
29. Masubuchi S., Kataoka N., Sassone-Corsi P., Okamura H. Mouse period1 (mPER1) acts as a circadian adaptor to entrain the oscillator to environmental light/dark cycles by regulating mPER2 protein. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:4719–4724. [PubMed]
30. Cermakian N., Monaco L., Pando M.P., Dierich A., Sassone-Corsi P. Altered behavioral rhythms and clock gene expression in mice with a targeted mutation in the Period1 gene. Embo J. 2001;20:3967–3974. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Spoelstra K., Albrecht U., van der Horst G.T., Brauer V., Daan S. Phase responses to light pulses in mice lacking functional per or cry genes. J. Biol. Rhythms. 2004;19:518–529. [PubMed]
32. Bae K., Jin X., Maywood E.S., Hastings M., Reppert S., Weaver D.R. Differential Functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN Circadian Clock. Neuron. 2001;30:525–536. [PubMed]
33. Zheng B., Albrecht U., Kaasik K., Sage M., Lu W., Vaishnav S., Li Q., Sun Z.S., Eichele G., Bradley A., Lee C.C. Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. Cell. 2001;105:683–694. [PubMed]
34. Langlands K., Yin X., Anand G., Prochownik E.V. Differential interactions of Id proteins with basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:19785–19793. [PubMed]
35. Heintzen C., Loros J.J., Dunlap J.C. VIVID, gating and the circadian clock: The PAS protein VVD defines a feedback loop that represses light input pathways and regulates clock resetting. Cell. 2001;104:453–464. [PubMed]
36. Honma S., Kawamoto T., Takagi Y., Fujimoto K., Sato F., Noshiro M., Kato Y., Honma K. Dec1 and Dec2 are regulators of the mammalian molecular clock. Nature. 2002;419:841–844. [PubMed]
37. Lim C., Chung B.Y., Pitman J.L., McGill J.J., Pradhan S., Lee J., Keegan K.P., Choe J., Allada R. Clockwork orange encodes a transcriptional repressor important for circadian-clock amplitude in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1082–1089. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Gene
    Gene
    Gene links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • HomoloGene
    HomoloGene
    HomoloGene links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Pathways + GO
    Pathways + GO
    Pathways, annotations and biological systems (BioSystems) that cite the current article.
  • Protein
    Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...