![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||
Copyright © 2005 National University of Health Sciences Conservative management of a patient with lumbar disc disease: averting lumbar disc surgery aPrivate practice James E. Greathouse, Jr.: makg2/at/netzero.net *Address correspondence to: Dr. James E. Greathouse Jr., 1589 S. Wickham Rd., W. Melbourne, FL, 32904, Tel: 321 725-6314, Fax: 321 725-4047 Email: makg2/at/netzero.net Received March 31, 2004; Revised March 19, 2005. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions. Abstract Objective To illustrate multifaceted clinical components often present with lumbar disc herniation that require concomitant resolution before optimal conservative case management can be achieved. Clinical Features A 33-year-old male with insidious low back pain and a gradual onset of lower extremity symptoms had a declining physical activity lifestyle, diminished fitness level, and weight gain over a 4-year period. Symptoms progressively worsened over a two-year period. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a disc herniation with neurological compromise and surgical intervention was medically recommended. Intervention and Outcome Management consisted of patient education, acute inflammation control, closed disc reduction, remedial therapeutic (passive joint movement) care directed at preservation and improvement of joint and soft tissue mobility, low tech physical capacity evaluation and individualized rehabilitation training for home based care exercise. Patient compliance was ultimately achieved with a positive long-term outcome. Conclusion This case illustrates common clinical components of care associated with disc herniation case management, the potential of conservative care, and the benefits of combining manual therapy and rehabilitative exercise. Key Indexing Terms: Low back pain, Intervertebral Disk Displacement, Chiropractic, Rehabilitation Footnotes Sources of support: No funds were received for the preparation of this manuscript. References 1. Cox JM. Low back pain: mechanism, diagnosis and treatment. 6th ed. Williams & Wilkins Lippincott; Baltimore: 1999. p. 263. 2. Saunders HD. Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. In: Grieve GP, editor. Lumbar traction. Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh: 1986. p. 789. 3. Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine. 2nd Ed. Churchill Livingstone; Melbourne: 1991. 4. Cantu RI. Rehabilitation: for the post-surgical orthopedic patient. In: Magnusson J, Maxley L, editors. Soft tissue healing considerations after surgery. Mosby; St Louis: 2001. pp. 6–7. 5. Alaranta H. The clinical application of outcomes assessment. In: Yeomans SG, editor. Strength and endurance testing. Appleton and Lange; Stamford, CT: 2000. p. 155. 6. Cassidy JD, Thiel HW, Kirkaldy-Willis KW. Side posture manipulation for lumbar disc herniation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:96–103. [PubMed] 7. Nwuga VCB. Relative therapeutic efficacy of vertebral manipulation and conventional treatment in back pain management. Am J Phys Med. 1982;6:273–278. [PubMed] 8. Bozzao A, Gallucci M. Lumbar disc herniation: MRI assessment of natural history in patients treated without surgery. Neuroradiol. 1992;185:135–141. 9. Wiesel SW. A study of computer assisted tomography: the incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine J. 1984;9:549–551. 10. Thelander U, Fagerlund M, Friberg S, Larsson S. Straight leg raising test versus radiological size, shape, and position of lumbar disc hernias. Eur Spine J. 1992;17:395–399. 11. McKenzie RA. The lumbar spine; mechanical diagnosis and therapy. New Zealand; Spinal Publications: 1992. Waikanae. 12. Williams MM, Hawley JA, McKenzie RA, Van Wijmen P. Comparison of the effects of two sitting postures on back and referred pain. Spine J. 1991;16:1185–1191. 13. Green JP, Grenier SG, McGill SM. Low-back stiffness is altered with warm-up and bench rest: implication for athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1076–1081. [PubMed] 14. Christensen KD. Chiropractic rehabilitation: protocols, vol 1. Publication division of CRA; Ridgefield, WA: 1991. p. 19. 15. Yeoman SG. The clinical application of outcomes assessment. Appleton and Lange; Stamford, CT: 2000. pp. 30–291. 16. Mayer T, Polatin P. Principles and practice of chiropractic. In: Haldeman S, editor. Spinal rehabilitation. Appleton and Lange; Stamford, CT: 1992. p. 544. 17. Liebenson C, Oslance J. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Liebenson C, editor. Outcomes assessment in the small private practice. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996. p. 74. 18. Vasilyeva LF, Lewit K. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Liebenson C, editor. Diagnosis of muscular dysfunction by inspection. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996. p. 113. 19. Janda V. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Liebenson C, editor. Evaluation of muscular imbalance. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996. p. 97. 20. O'Sullivan PB. Lumbar segmental ‘instability’: clinical presentation and specific stabilization exercise management. Man Ther. 2000;5:4. 21. Haig A. Prospective evidence for changes in paraspinal muscle activity after HNP. Spine J. 1993;17:926. 22. Hides JA. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with actual subacute low back pain. Spine J. 1994;19:165. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||