![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright Van Doninck et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Phylogenomics of Unusual Histone H2A Variants in Bdelloid Rotifers 1Department of Biology, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium 2Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America 3Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America 4Laboratory of Bacterial Physiology and Genetics, Institute for Molecular Biology and Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Gosselies, Belgium 5Laboratory of Artificial and Natural Evolution, Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Sciences III, Geneva, Switzerland 6Harvard Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Resource Laboratory, FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America 7Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America Harmit S. Malik, Editor Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States of America * E-mail: karine.vandoninck/at/fundp.ac.be (KVD); Email: msm/at/wjh.harvard.edu (MM) Conceived and designed the experiments: KVD MLM MM. Performed the experiments: KVD MLM JHH PW WSL. Analyzed the data: KVD MLM JHH JG MCM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MM. Wrote the paper: KVD MCM MM. Contributed to the genomic data analysis: JHH. Contributed to the building of genomic libraries: JHH PW. Contributed to the phylogenetic analysis: JG MCM. Contributed to the mass spectrometry analysis: WSL. Received July 3, 2008; Accepted February 3, 2009. Abstract Rotifers of Class Bdelloidea are remarkable in having evolved for millions of years, apparently without males and meiosis. In addition, they are unusually resistant to desiccation and ionizing radiation and are able to repair hundreds of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks per genome with little effect on viability or reproduction. Because specific histone H2A variants are involved in DSB repair and certain meiotic processes in other eukaryotes, we investigated the histone H2A genes and proteins of two bdelloid species. Genomic libraries were built and probed to identify histone H2A genes in Adineta vaga and Philodina roseola, species representing two different bdelloid families. The expressed H2A proteins were visualized on SDS-PAGE gels and identified by tandem mass spectrometry. We find that neither the core histone H2A, present in nearly all other eukaryotes, nor the H2AX variant, a ubiquitous component of the eukaryotic DSB repair machinery, are present in bdelloid rotifers. Instead, they are replaced by unusual histone H2A variants of higher mass. In contrast, a species of rotifer belonging to the facultatively sexual, desiccation- and radiation-intolerant sister class of bdelloid rotifers, the monogononts, contains a canonical core histone H2A and appears to lack the bdelloid H2A variant genes. Applying phylogenetic tools, we demonstrate that the bdelloid-specific H2A variants arose as distinct lineages from canonical H2A separate from those leading to the H2AX and H2AZ variants. The replacement of core H2A and H2AX in bdelloid rotifers by previously uncharacterized H2A variants with extended carboxy-terminal tails is further evidence for evolutionary diversity within this class of histone H2A genes and may represent adaptation to unusual features specific to bdelloid rotifers. Author Summary Bdelloid rotifers are microscopic animals common in ephemeral freshwater environments throughout the world. They are unusual not only because they have been reproducing without males for millions of years, but also because they can survive long periods of complete desiccation at any life stage and exposure to levels of ionizing radiation that cause hundreds of DNA double strand breaks per genome. Canonical histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) are highly conserved proteins that package DNA in the nucleus and are involved in the regulation of chromatin metabolism. Because the conserved histone variant of canonical H2A, H2AX, is involved in the repair of DNA double strand breaks, we tested the possibility that bdelloid H2A histones are unusual. Strikingly, we find that bdelloids lack both H2A and H2AX, the absence of which is in contrast to their ubiquitous presence in other eukaryotes. Instead, we find that bdelloid rotifers replaced their canonical H2A protein by H2A variants not found in any other eukaryote. These results gain particular interest in view of the extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to desiccation and ionizing radiation and their attendant ability, possibly unique among metazoans, to repair massive levels of DNA breakage. Introduction Rotifers of Class Bdelloidea are freshwater invertebrates of widespread occurrence that have attracted particular interest because their apparent lack of both males and meiosis suggests they are ancient asexuals [1]. Bdelloids are also of interest because of their extraordinary ability to survive and continue reproduction after desiccation at any life stage [2],[3] and doses of ionizing radiation that cause hundreds of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) per genome [4]. In contrast, rotifers of their sister class, the facultatively sexual monogonont rotifers, can survive desiccation only at a specific stage in their life cycle, as resting eggs [5],[6], and are not unusually resistant to ionizing radiation [4]. Since the H2A histones and some of their variants are well conserved in other eukaryotes and are involved in DSB repair and in certain meiotic processes [7], we speculated that bdelloid H2A histones may be unusual. In order to test this expectation, we investigated histone H2A genes and proteins of two species of bdelloid rotifers, Adineta vaga (A. vaga) and Philodina roseola (P. roseola), which represent two distantly related families within the Class. Histones are architectural proteins that package eukaryotic DNA into nucleosomes, being essential in the maintenance, expression, and replication of the genome. The genes coding for the four canonical histones, H4, H3, H2B and H2A, which make up the nucleosome, are expressed during the S-phase of the cell cycle when the nuclear DNA is synthesized and are clustered in most metazoan genomes. These replication-dependent histone genes typically do not contain introns in animals and their mRNAs represent the only known cellular mRNAs that are not polyadenylated, ending instead in a highly conserved stem loop. The processing step in replication-dependent histone mRNA biosynthesis is a 3′-end endonucleolytic cleavage between the stem-loop and a so-called histone downstream element (HDE) [8]–[11]. In contrast, replication-independent histone genes encode variants of the canonical histones that are found outside of histone gene clusters and are expressed throughout the cell cycle. These variant histone genes may contain introns and their transcripts are polyadenylated [12]. Of the histone proteins, the H2A family includes the largest number of described variants and displays the greatest degree of diversity in carboxy-terminal tail length and sequence [12],[13]. One of these variants, H2AX, of wide occurrence in eukaryotes, is characterized by a unique and invariant C-terminal SQ(E/D)Φ-(end) motif, where Φ indicates a hydrophobic residue. It has been demonstrated, primarily in yeast and mammals [14],[15], that this highly conserved motif of H2AX is a consensus sequence for serine phosphorylation by PI3 kinases and that the serine residue is always located four amino acids from the C-terminal residue. In response to DSBs, H2AX becomes phosphorylated at this serine over large regions (~2 Mb) surrounding the sites of breakage. Although the mechanistic implications of phosphorylation of the SQ(E/D) motif in H2AX are not fully understood, it is apparently required for normal DSB repair throughout the eukaryotic kingdom, being involved in the retention and accumulation of repair and checkpoint proteins to DNA breaks [for review], [ see 7], [14]–[19]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated in several eukaryotes that phosphorylated H2AX also plays a role in meiotic processes, including repair of meiotic DNA breaks made by SPO11 [20]–[23], prophase meiotic sex chromosome inactivation [23]–[25] and telomere movement [26]. With the exception of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which lacks H2AX, it is ubiquitous throughout eukaryotes while the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has a H2AZ/H2AX chimeric H2A named H2AvD [16]. Considering the extreme radiation resistance of bdelloid rotifers [4] and the likelihood that, as in Deinococcus radiodurans, such resistance is an adaptation to repair and survive damage associated with desiccation including extensive DNA breakage [27],[28], one might expect in these organisms a high percentage of nucleosomal core H2A to be replaced by H2AX. For example in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, canonical H2A is replaced by H2AX and high levels of homologous recombination (and thus double strand breaks) occur [29]. Instead, we found that none of the H2A genes in the two bdelloid species have the H2AX-defining SQ(E/D) motif two amino acids from the C-terminal end and none of the bdelloid H2A genes is similar to canonical H2A. The absence of H2A and H2AX in bdelloid rotifers contrasts with their ubiquitous presence in other eukaryotes and with the presence of canonical H2A in the monogonont rotifer Brachionus plicatilis (B. plicatilis). The three different types of H2A genes we found in bdelloid rotifers are apparently unique to bdelloids and form distinct lineages that evolved from canonical H2As. We also found that the regions of the genome containing histone gene clusters are organized as two co-linear pairs, consistent with the degenerate tetraploidy of bdelloid rotifers [30],[31], with one pair lacking an H2A gene in the cluster while the other cluster contains an H2A gene, designated H2Abd, that has an unusual C-terminal tail. Although present in a cluster containing the canonical H4, H3 and H2B genes, it is not H2Abd that is highly expressed under normal conditions in the nucleosomes of both bdelloid species; instead, the principal H2A found in the nucleosomes is an unusual H2A variant coded by a gene designated H2Abd1 that is not located in the histone gene cluster. It seems reasonable to speculate that the various unusual features of bdelloid H2A histones are associated with the adaptation of bdelloids to survive desiccation and perhaps also with their lack of meiosis. Results Genomic Library Screens Primary genomic fosmid libraries of A. vaga and P. roseola were separately probed with PCR amplification products obtained by using primers based on highly conserved regions of the canonical H3 and H2A histone genes (indicated in Figure 1B
All fosmids from both bdelloid species containing canonical H3 fell into one of four categories, each coding for the same highly conserved H3 amino acid sequence (Figure S1), but clearly distinguishable at synonymous sites. One fosmid of each category from both A. vaga and P. roseola was fully sequenced (~35 kb) and annotated giving contigs Avhis-1 (EU652315), Avhis-2 (EU850438), Avhis-3 (EU652316), Avhis-4 (EU850439) and Prhis-1 (EU850440), Prhis-2 (EU652317), Prhis-3 (EU652318) and Prhis-4 (EU850441) respectively (Figure 1A Other fosmids in both bdelloid species were found to contain histone H2A genes not in clusters, but also with a uniquely long carboxy-terminal tail and are designated variants H2Abd1 and H2Abd2. The H2A gene H2Abd1 is present in four copies in both A. vaga and P. roseola, in two co-linear pairs of contigs, only one of which includes a gene for H2B (Figure 1A The bdelloid histone H2A variants and the canonical H2A genes we found in the monogonont rotifer B. plicatilis are aligned along with the canonical H2A genes and H2A variants of other eukaryotes in Figure 1B Since all H3 and H2A-containing fosmids were examined and the same three H2A variant genes, in the same organization, were found in both A. vaga and P. roseola, it is likely that we have identified all copies of the H2A genes containing a canonical H2A core. The canonical H2A genes we found in the monogonont rotifer B. plicatilis closely resemble the canonical H2A genes present in most eukaryotes and differ substantially from the bdelloid-specific H2A variants (Figure 1B Histone Proteins In order to confirm the absence of canonical histone H2A, and to determine which histone H2A replaces it in the nucleosomes of P. roseola and A. vaga, we compared the histones in the nucleosomal fraction of both bdelloid species with those of the monogonont rotifer B. plicatilis and human HeLa cells by denaturing gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE - Figure 2
Except for the bdelloid H2A, all rotifer histones displayed an electrophoretic mobility indistinguishable from to that of their human homologs. The identity of rotifer histones was further verified by LC-MS/MS, confirming the presence of the canonical histone proteins H4, H2B and H3 in bdelloid nucleosomes and all four canonical histones in monogononts. The region of the gels between rotifer H4 and H2B and the three prominent bands of mass greater than that of rotifer H3 (Figure 2 The substantial mass difference observed in Figure 2 The results of the SDS-PAGE/LC-MS/MS analysis corroborate the findings from the genomic sequence data: canonical H2A is absent from both bdelloid species and is replaced by the variant H2Abd1 and, at a much lower level, by H2Abd. Histone Gene Characteristics There is little similarity in amino-acid sequence among the three different H2A variant C-terminal tails in a given bdelloid species (Figure 1B
The amino acid alignment of the two copies of both H2Abd and H2Abd2 in A. vaga and P. roseola is given instead of the Logos representation (Figure 3A, 3C Excluding the distinctive C-terminal tails (starting at the arrow in Figure 1B We also examined the characteristics of the DNA sequence beyond the stop codon of the different bdelloid histone H2A variants and the canonical H3, H4 and H2B genes. Typically, only the replication-dependent histone genes expressed during DNA synthesis have a characteristic, unique 16-nucleotide stem-loop sequence in the 3′ untranslated region [8]–[11]. In contrast, all of the bdelloid histone genes depicted in Figure 1A Another unusual feature of bdelloid histones is the presence of introns in each of the various histone genes (canonical histones and variants) in one or both bdelloid species, except for the H2B gene adjacent to H2Abd1 (Table S1). The length of the introns ranges from 52 to 76 bp, which is typical of bdelloid introns [39]. This contrasts with the absence of introns in the canonical replication-dependent histone genes in other animals, although they are present in the canonical histone genes of plants and fungi [40],[41]. Adaptive Evolution Inter-species comparisons of the ratio of amino acid changes to synonymous changes (Ka/Ks) in the bdelloid histone gene sequences indicate that the amino acid sequences of the clustered H2B, H3 and H4 genes (Figure 4A, right column
In order to detect and measure selection on bdelloid rotifer H2A proteins we used the programs SELECTON [42],[43] and PAML [44],[45]. For both programs we used an amino acid based nucleotide alignment and corresponding phylogenetic tree (tree represented in Figure 4B The phylogenetic tree represented in figure 4B Phylogenetic Analysis A multiple amino acid alignment of canonical H2A genes and H2A variants was carried out in MAFFT [50],[51] (result not shown). The H2A variants included in this alignment are H2AX and H2AZ from distinct eukaryotic lineages, the vertebrate-specific H2A variants macroH2A and Barr-body deficient H2A (H2A Bbd), and the bdelloid H2A variants (H2Abd, H2Abd1 and H2Abd2). Based on this alignment we inferred the phylogeny of the H2A proteins using a maximum likelihood approach as implemented in Bootstrap Raxml [52] (Figure 5
We investigated in more detail the convergent evolution of H2AX found here and also by Li et al. [16] and Malik&Henikoff [29] by repeating the phylogenetic analysis in bootstrap Raxml using only H2A and H2AX sequences of specific plant, insect, vertebrate and fungi species in order to obtain a better alignment than in the previous analysis. It appears from this phylogeny (Figure 6
Discussion While the bdelloid canonical histones H2B, H3 and H4 are highly similar to their counterparts in other eukaryotes, we find that the bdelloid complement of H2A histones is highly unusual, with carboxy-terminal tails that are much longer than those of canonical H2A and that are unlike any other eukaryotic H2A variants. The bdelloid H2A histones may be classified as heteromorphous variants because the extent of amino acid sequence change involves a large portion of the C-terminal tail and not merely a few changes as is typical of H2A isoforms [13]. Even the H2A gene H2Abd found in half of the histone clusters in both bdelloid species codes for an unusual C-terminal tail and it seems apparent that canonical H2A is absent from bdelloid rotifers. One of the bdelloid variants, the unclustered H2Abd1 gene, is highly expressed in the embryos of both species during normal growth, while expression of the clustered H2Abd gene was detected at a substantially lower level and only in A. vaga. The H2Abd and H2Abd1 sequences in both bdelloid species specify both the stem-loop motif characteristic of the replication-dependent histones in other eukaryotes and a putative polyadenylation signal in the 3′ UTR characteristic of replication-independent histone variants. Since both of these bdelloid-specific H2A variants H2Abd and H2Abd1 have a stem loop beyond the stop codon and were found in the nucleosomal fraction, they are probably the H2A proteins incorporated into nucleosomes during normal DNA replication in bdelloid embryos, the only life stage in which mitosis occurs in the somatic cells of these eutelic organisms. These bdelloid H2A variants may also be expressed at other times throughout the cell cycle, as observed for H2AX in other eukaryotes [38], while H2Abd2 variants in both species lack the stem-loop motif and the corresponding histones were not found in the protein analysis of nucleosomal fractions. Nevertheless, considering the strong purifying selection under which they have evolved, the histones coded by these variants are almost certainly expressed and incorporated into nucleosomes under some specific conditions. The monogonont rotifer B. plicatilis, belonging to the sister class of bdelloids, has canonical H2A and appears to lack variants similar to those present in bdelloids. Since the three bdelloid H2A variants are found in each of the two studied species belonging to distantly related families, and as the bdelloid H2As group together with the canonical H2A of monogonont rotifers in the H2A phylogenetic tree (Figure 5 By analogy with the radiation- and desiccation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans, in which prolonged desiccation causes extensive DNA breakage [27],[28], it is likely that bdelloid radiation resistance similarly reflects an adaptation to survive DNA breakage associated with the frequent desiccation events they experience in the ephemerally aquatic habitats they typically inhabit [4]. DNA breakage in other eukaryotes is accompanied by phosphorylation at the serine in the invariant S[−4]Q(E/D)(I/L/F/Y) motif found in H2AX of protists, fungi, plants and animals. In fungi and Giardia, the H2AX variant has completely replaced the canonical H2A. Considering the involvement of H2AX in the cellular response to DSBs and its ubiquitous occurrence in eukaryotes, we expected to find H2AX genes and a high percentage of H2AX proteins in bdelloid nucleosomes. Instead, none of the bdelloid H2A genes contain the S[−4]Q(E/D) motif characteristic of H2AX. Although SQ occurs at the final two residues of A. vaga H2Abd and 26 amino acids from the C-terminal end of P. roseola H2Abd2, it is notable that these SQ residues are present in a different H2A variant in each species. They are therefore not conserved across bdelloid families and may therefore not represent a functional motif. Further, in all other eukaryotes the SQ motif characteristic of H2AX in which the serine is phosphorylated requires an adjacent acidic residue (glutamic or aspartic acid) that follows the SQ, a carboxy terminal hydrophobic residue, and an invariant position with regard to the carboxyl terminus [37]. Since the bdelloid SQ sequences lack these defining characteristics, we may conclude that there is no H2AX variant in either bdelloid species. It therefore appears that H2AX is dispensable for bdelloid DNA DSB repair, representing an extraordinary exception to the ubiquity of H2AX across eukaryotes. Although the functional significance of the unusual features of bdelloid H2A histone variants has not yet been investigated experimentally, the most plausible explanation of our findings is that they have evolved from canonical H2A as part of the ensemble of adaptations that have allowed bdelloid rotifers to survive desiccation and its attendant burden of DNA damage. One may speculate that differences in the conditions and possible nature of DNA breakage may have driven the evolution of different ensembles of H2A variants among eukaryotes. Such an explanation emphasizes the apparent evolutionary flexibility of H2A and its variants as compared to other histone genes and leads to the evolutionary question as to how H2AX and H2A variants, like those found in bdelloids, are reinvented in the mold of canonical H2A [29]. Materials and Methods Genomic Studies Fosmid genomic libraries were constructed from sheared genomic DNA of the bdelloid species Adineta vaga by J. Hur and Philodina roseola by K. Van Doninck and P. Wang. Genomic DNA was extracted from purified bdelloid eggs as described previously [4],[53] except that CsCl density-gradient purification was replaced by phenol chloroform extraction. The Epicentre CopyControl Fosmid Library Production Kit (EPICENTRE Biotechnologies) was used to construct fosmids of each bdelloid species as previously described [30].PCR-derived histone probes, using primers based on highly conserved regions of H3 and H2A, were used to screen the genomic libraries of bdelloid rotifers. Each library of each of the above mentioned bdelloid rotifer species was separately hybridized with probes for H3 and H2A.The DNA of all the selected histone fosmids was extracted manually [54] and tested by PCR and direct sequencing of fosmid templates to confirm the presence or absence of each histone gene H3, H4, H2B and H2A, and to verify which type of H2A gene was present. Histone genes were characterized by BLASTX searches on the National Centre for Biotechnology Information non-redundant databases. Exons and introns were mapped by comparison to homologous amino acid sequences using the software genewise [55]. Gene prediction and the mapping of introns were also verified using the program genemark self-trained on the C. elegans genome [56] and the translation tool Expasy. The canonical H2A primers used to make the probes for the bdelloid rotifers could also be used to amplify all H2A genes of the monogonont rotifer B. plicatilis containing a canonical H2A core. For both bdelloid species, four fosmids containing the histone clusters and each copy of canonical H3 were selected for complete sequencing (~35 kb). DNA from each of these fosmids was purified using Nucleobond Purification kits (BD Biosciences), sheared to a size range of 3–5 kb with a Genemachines Hydroshear (Genomic Solutions) and subcloned in TOPO vectors (Invitrogen) for shotgun sequencing. The resulting sequences were assembled into single contigs as described in [31] and the complete detailed annotation is published in a separate paper [30]. The multiple alignments of the H2A genes and their variants were done using the online version MAFFT v6 [50],[51] with the BLOSUM62 matrix. The “Mafft-homologs” option was enabled only for the alignments including less than 30 sequences. The algorithms used were G-INS-i and L-INS-i when macroH2A sequences were respectively excluded or included in the alignment. To determine which model of protein evolution would best fit our data we used ProtTest v1.4 [57]. The phylogenetic analyses were carried out with the maximum likelihood approach as implemented in the online version of Bootstrap Raxml [52] available on the CIPRES Portal (http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal/). The following parameters were applied: Dayhoff substitution matrix (selected by ProtTest), empirical base frequencies, maximum likelihood search and 1,000 bootstrapping runs. The trees obtained were displayed using FigTree v1.1.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree). The bdelloid H2Abd1 amino-acid carboxy-terminus tails or the nucleotide sequences beyond the stop codon were also aligned using MAFFT and displayed as Logos with the interface Weblogo [58],[59] to emphasize the conserved motifs. The Logos format is a graphical representation of aligned sequences where the size of the letter is proportional to the frequency of that particular residue in that position. For the sliding window analysis, coding sequences of histone genes were first aligned according to their translated peptide sequences with RevTrans 1.4 [60] using the Dialign 2 method. Sliding windows of the Ka/Ks ratio, among histone genes from the same co-linear pair but in different species, were then generated with DnaSP 4.0 [61] using 50 bp windows and 10 bp steps. To measure the nature and magnitude of natural selection acting on bdelloid H2A genes, an amino acid based nucleotide alignment using MAFFT and a corresponding phylogenetic tree with Bootstrap Raxml were built and then used in the program SELECTON for a so-called “High-precision” analysis (http://selecton.tau.ac.il/) [42],[43]. This program evaluates the dN/dS ratio (ω) [46]. Neutral evolution predicts an ω = 1 whereas significantly higher and lower values than 1 are respectively interpreted as evidence for positive and purifying selection. Furthermore, we used PAML v4.1 [44],[45] to test for positive selection along sequences and branches. PAML tests different codon substitution models and performs a likelihood ratio test of positive selection based on the dN/dS ratio. We tested branch-specific selection for every internal branch in the tree. Site-specific selection was tested by comparing different models: “M0” which corresponds to a single dN/dS ratio along the sequence, “M1a” and “M7” for neutral evolution (dN/dS = 1) and “M2a” and “M8” for positive selection (dN/dS>1).Proteomic Studies Histone proteins were extracted from A. vaga, P. roseola and B. plicatilis embryos following a modified protocol of Tops et al. [62]. The A. vaga and P. roseola rotifer cultures were bleached to obtain clean bdelloid eggs and embryos. B. plicatilis embryos were obtained from a filtered, snap-frozen B. plicatilis biomass (received from Terry Snell) washed with 0.1% SDS and then bleached. After the bleach treatment, the clean bdelloid and monogonont embryos were washed with extract buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.1; 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 10% glycerol and complete protease inhibitor tablets (Roche)) and finally resuspended in 0.5 volume extract buffer. The suspension was dripped in N2 (l) and the resulting frozen egg balls were ground in a cold mortar. The obtained powder was thawed on ice and sheared using a chilled dounce homogenizer (30 strokes, tight pistol). The obtained crude extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 14000 rpm to separate the pellet (with nuclei and membranes) from the soluble cytosol. The pellet was washed twice with extract buffer and subsequently resuspended in extract buffer with 0.4N sulfuric acid and left at 4°C overnight. After centrifugation at 14000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, the acid soluble histone proteins in the supernatant were precipitated with 20% Trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The obtained histone protein pellet was dried 10 min at 95°C and kept at −20°C or immediately resuspended in 1× alkaline sample buffer, heated at 100°C for 10 min and separated by electrophoresis on 15% Tris-glycine SDS-polyacrylamide gels as previously described [63]. Human cells were obtained from the Maniatis laboratory (MCB, Harvard University), washed with extract buffer (as above) and finally resuspended in 0.5 volume extract buffer. The following steps of the histone protein extraction of human cells were identical to the one described for bdelloid and monogonont embryos. The Coomassie blue stained bands of bdelloids and monogononts on the SDS-PAGE gels were excised (from the lowest band of the gel up to ~25 kD) and washed with 50% acetonitrile in water. Histones in gel slices were digested with trypsin and subjected to microcapillary reverse-phase HPLC nano-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on an LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher, San Jose CA). Acquired MS/MS spectra were then correlated with public sequences using the algorithm SEQUEST and custom programs developed in house. The MS/MS peptide sequences were then reviewed in detail for consensus with known proteins and the results manually confirmed for fidelity. The histone protein extractions, SDS-PAGE gels and mass spectrometry analyses of specific bands were done twice for each rotifer. In addition, de novo sequencing and additional LC-MS/MS analyses against the translated sequences known for bdelloid and monogonont histones were performed with alternative proteolytic enzymes (chymotrypsin, pronase and elastase) to extend the overall coverage of the carboxyl terminal tails of the histone H2A variants. Exhaustive coverage and redundant acquisition of peptides was maximized by the in-house program Enzyme Optimizer designed to choose a multi-enzyme strategy based on proteotypic peptide properties. Accession Numbers DNA sequences have been deposited at Genbank under accession numbers EU652315 to EU652318, EU850438 to EU850441 and EU853685 to EU853700. Figure S1 Histone gene clusters of bdelloid rotifers Philodina roseola (Pr) and Adineta vaga (Av). The histone gene cluster is organized as two co-linear pairs A (red) and B (blue). The amino acid sequence of canonical H3, H4 and H2B of both species are aligned and represented as a Logos format (note the conserved sequence among pairs and species). (1.23 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.1M, tif) Figure S2 Mass-spectrometric analysis of the H2A variant protein of Philodina roseola. An additional LC-MS/MS analysis was performed to obtain an overall coverage of the carboxyl terminal tail of histone H2A extracted from band H2Av of Philodina roseola (Figure 2 (0.15 MB PDF) Click here for additional data file.(142K, pdf) Table S1 Histone gene characteristics of the bdelloid rotifers Philodina roseola and Adineta vaga. The following histone gene features are given: presence/absence and the number of introns (in brackets); presence of a conserved stem-loop motif and putative HDE element beyond the STOP codon; the mass of each bdelloid histone gene calculated with PeptideMass (in kDalton), a range of masses for the histone genes of animals; the number of amino acids in the C-terminal tail for the bdelloid H2A variants, a maximum number is given for the canonical H2A and H2AX variants in other eukaryotes. The unique bdelloid histone gene features are in bold. (0.02 MB XLS) Click here for additional data file.(16K, xls) Acknowledgments We thank T. Maniatis and S. Schalm for providing Human Hela Cells, J. Neveu and R. Robinson for mass spectrometry, C. Daly and G. Kenty for assistance in library construction and J. Ausio for providing their H2A gene dataset of their phylogenetic study. Fosmid sequencing and contig constructions were facilitated by the assistance of members of the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole. We acknowledge J. Mark Welch and J. Vandenhaute for critically reviewing the manuscript as well as four anonymous reviewers and Prof. Harmit Malik whose comments greatly improved this manuscript. Footnotes The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. KVD was supported in part by grants from the Belgian American Educational Foundation and the Fulbright. Overall research support was provided by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Normark BB, Judson OP, Moran NA. Genomic signatures of ancient asexual lineages. Biol J Linn Soc. 2003;79:69–84. 2. Ricci C. Anhydrobiotic capabilities of bdelloid rotifers. Hydrobiologia. 1998;387/388:321–326. 3. Ricci C, Caprioli M, Fontaneto D, Melone G. Volume and morphology changes of a bdelloid rotifer species (Macrotrachela quadricornifera) during anhydrobiosis. J Morphol. 2008;269:233–239. [PubMed] 4. Gladyshev E, Meselson M. Extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:5139–5144. [PubMed] 5. Caprioli M, Katholm AK, Melone G, Ramlov H, Ricci C, et al. Trehalose in desiccated rotifers: a comparison between a bdelloid and a monogonont species. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2004;139:527–532. 6. Schröder T. Diapause in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia. 2005;546:291–306. 7. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Lee A, Nussenzweig M, Nussenzweig A. H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome (review). DNA Repair. 2004;3:959–967. [PubMed] 8. Jaeger S, Barends S, Giege R, Eriani G, Martin F. Expression of metazoan replication-dependent histone genes. Biochimie. 2005;87:827–834. [PubMed] 9. Marino-Ramirez L, King Jordan I, Landsman D. Multiple independent evolutionary solutions to core histone gene regulation. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R122. [PubMed] 10. Dominski Z, Marzluff WF. Formation of the 3′ end of histone mRNA: getting closer to the end. Gene. 2007;396:373–390. [PubMed] 11. Keall R, Whitelaw S, Pettitt J, Müller B. Histone gene expression and histone mRNA 3′ end structure in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Mol Biol. 2007;8:1–12. [PubMed] 12. Ausio J, Abbott DW. The many tales of a tail: carboxyl-terminal tail heterogeneity specializes histone H2A variants for defined chromatin function. Biochemistry. 2002;41:5945–5949. [PubMed] 13. Ausio J. Histone variants – the structure behind the function. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006;5:228–243. [PubMed] 14. Downs JA, Lowndes NF, Jackson SP. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature. 2000;408:1001–1004. [PubMed] 15. Celeste A, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Kruhlak MJ, Pilch DR, Staudt DW, et al. Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nature Cell Biol. 2003;5:675–679. [PubMed] 16. Li A, Eirin-Lopez JM, Ausio J. H2AX: tailoring histone H2A for chromatin-dependent genomic integrity (review). Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;83:505–515. [PubMed] 17. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, et al. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol. 2000;10:886–895. [PubMed] 18. Furata T, Takemura H, Liao ZY, Aune GJ, Redon C, et al. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX and activation of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 in response to replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammalian DNA Topoisomerase I Cleavage Complexes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20303–20312. [PubMed] 19. Fillingham J, Keogh MC, Krogan NJ. γH2AX and its role in DNA double-strand break repair (review). Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84:568–577. [PubMed] 20. Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JMA, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nature. 2001;27:271–276. 21. Viera A, Santos JL, Page J, Parra MT, Calvente A, et al. DNA double-strand breaks, recombination and synapsis: the timing of meiosis differs in grasshoppers and flies. EMBO Rpts. 2004;5:385–391. 22. Song X, Gjoneska E, Ren Q, Taverna SD, Allis CD, et al. Phosphorylation of the SQ H2A.X motif is required for proper meiosis and mitosis in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:2648–2660. [PubMed] 23. Ooi SL, Henikoff S. Germline histone dynamics and epigenetics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19:257–265. [PubMed] 24. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah SK, Celeste A, Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:497–508. [PubMed] 25. Cabrero J, Teruel M, Carmona FD, Camacho JPM. Histone H2AX phosphorylation is associated with most meiotic events in grasshopper. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;116:311–315. [PubMed] 26. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Liebe B, Scherthan H, Nussenzweig A. H2AX regulates meiotic telomere clustering. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:15–20. [PubMed] 27. Mattimore V, Battista JR. Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:633–637. [PubMed] 28. Zahradka K, Slade D, Bailone A, Sommer S, Averbeck D, et al. Reassembly of shattered chromosomes in Deinococcus radiodurans. Nature. 2006;443:569–573. [PubMed] 29. Malik HS, Henikoff S. Phylogenomics of the nucleosome (review). Nature Struct Biol. 2003;10:882–891. [PubMed] 30. Hur J, Van Doninck K, Mandigo M, Meselson M. Degenerate tetraploidy was established before bdelloid rotifer families diverged. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:375–383. [PubMed] 31. Mark Welch DB, Mark Welch JL, Meselson M. Evidence for degenerate tetraploidy in bdelloid rotifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:5145–5149. [PubMed] 32. Mark Welch DB, Meselson M. Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science. 2000;288:1211–1215. [PubMed] 33. Malik HS, Vermaak D, Henikoff S. Recurrent evolution of DNA-binding motifs in the Drosophila centromeric histone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1449–1454. [PubMed] 34. Suzuki M. SPKK, a new nucleic acid-binding unit of protein found in histone. EMBO J. 1989;8:797–804. [PubMed] 35. Churchill MEA, Suzuki M. ‘SPKK’ motifs prefer to bind to DNA at A/T-rich sites. EMBO J. 1989;8:4189–4195. [PubMed] 36. Lindsey GG, Orgeig S, Thompson P, Davies N, Maeder DL. Extended C-terminal tail of wheat histone H2A interacts with DNA of the “linker” region. J Mol Biol. 1991;218:805–813. [PubMed] 37. Redon C, Pilch D, Rogakou E, Sedelnikova O, Newrock K, et al. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr Opin Genetics Dev. 2002;12:162–169. 38. Bonner WM, Mannironi C, Orr A, Pilch DR, Hatch CL. Histone H2A.X gene transcription is regulated differently than transcription of other replication-linked histone genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:984–992. [PubMed] 39. Mark Welch DB, Meselson M. A survey of introns in three genes of rotifers. Hydrobiologia. 2001;446/447:333–336. 40. Ehinger A, Denison SH, May GS. Sequence, organization and expression of the core histone genes of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Gen Genet. 1990;222:416–424. [PubMed] 41. Sundås A, Tandre K, Kvarnheden A, Engström P. cDNA sequence and expression of an intron-containing histone H2A gene from Norway spruce, Picea abies. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;21:595–605. [PubMed] 42. Doron-Faigenboim A, Stern A, Mayrose I, Bacharach E, Pupko T. Selecton: a server for detecting evolutionary forces at a single amino-acid site. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2101–2103. [PubMed] 43. Stern A, Doron-Faigenboim A, Erez E, Martz E, Bacharach E, et al. Selecton 2007: advanced models for detecting positive and purifying selection using a Bayesian inference approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W506–W511. [PubMed] 44. Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13:555–556. [PubMed] 45. Yang Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1586–1591. [PubMed] 46. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. 47. Zhang J, Rosenberg HF, Nei M. Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3708–3713. [PubMed] 48. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AM. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics. 2000;155:431–449. [PubMed] 49. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:2472–2479. [PubMed] 50. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. [PubMed] 51. Katoh K, Toh H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2008;9:286–298. [PubMed] 52. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biol. 2008;57:758–771. 53. Mark Welch JL, Mark Welch DB, Meselson M. Cytogenetic evidence for asexual evolution of bdelloid rotifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:1618–1621. [PubMed] 54. Lee S, Rasheed S. A simple procedure for maximum yield of high-quality plasmid DNA. Biotechniques. 1990;9:676–679. [PubMed] 55. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. GeneWise and genomewise. Genome Res. 2004;14:988–995. [PubMed] 56. Lomsadze A, Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Chernoff Y, Borodovsky M. Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6494–6506. [PubMed] 57. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2104–2105. [PubMed] 58. Schneider TD, Stephens RM. Sequence Logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:6097–6100. [PubMed] 59. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14:1188–1190. [PubMed] 60. Wernersson R, Pedersen AG. RevTrans - Constructing alignments of coding DNA from aligned amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3537–3539. [PubMed] 61. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:2496–2497. [PubMed] 62. Tops BBJ, Tabara H, Sijen T, Simmer F, Mello CC, et al. RDE-2 interacts with MUT-7 to mediate RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:347–355. [PubMed] 63. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
J Morphol. 2008 Feb; 269(2):233-9.
[J Morphol. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5139-44.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]DNA Repair (Amst). 2004 Aug-Sep; 3(8-9):959-67.
[DNA Repair (Amst). 2004]Biochimie. 2005 Sep-Oct; 87(9-10):827-34.
[Biochimie. 2005]BMC Mol Biol. 2007 Jan 4; 8():1.
[BMC Mol Biol. 2007]Biochemistry. 2002 May 14; 41(19):5945-9.
[Biochemistry. 2002]Biochemistry. 2002 May 14; 41(19):5945-9.
[Biochemistry. 2002]Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006 Sep; 5(3):228-43.
[Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006]Nature. 2000 Dec 21-28; 408(6815):1001-4.
[Nature. 2000]Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Jul; 5(7):675-9.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2003]DNA Repair (Amst). 2004 Aug-Sep; 3(8-9):959-67.
[DNA Repair (Amst). 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5139-44.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]J Bacteriol. 1996 Feb; 178(3):633-7.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]Nature. 2006 Oct 5; 443(7111):569-73.
[Nature. 2006]Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):882-91.
[Nat Struct Biol. 2003]Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Feb; 26(2):375-83.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2009]Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Feb; 26(2):375-83.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2009]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5145-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Feb; 26(2):375-83.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2009]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5145-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006 Sep; 5(3):228-43.
[Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006]Science. 2000 May 19; 288(5469):1211-5.
[Science. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 5; 99(3):1449-54.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]EMBO J. 1989 Mar; 8(3):797-804.
[EMBO J. 1989]EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20; 8(13):4189-95.
[EMBO J. 1989]J Mol Biol. 1991 Apr 20; 218(4):805-13.
[J Mol Biol. 1991]Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):882-91.
[Nat Struct Biol. 2003]Biochimie. 2005 Sep-Oct; 87(9-10):827-34.
[Biochimie. 2005]BMC Mol Biol. 2007 Jan 4; 8():1.
[BMC Mol Biol. 2007]Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb; 13(2):984-92.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1993]Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Jul; 222(2-3):416-24.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1990]Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Feb; 21(4):595-605.
[Plant Mol Biol. 1993]Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1; 21(9):2101-3.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W506-11.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2007]Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct; 13(5):555-6.
[Comput Appl Biosci. 1997]Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug; 24(8):1586-91.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31; 95(7):3708-13.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jul 15; 30(14):3059-66.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]Brief Bioinform. 2008 Jul; 9(4):286-98.
[Brief Bioinform. 2008]Biochem Cell Biol. 2005 Aug; 83(4):505-15.
[Biochem Cell Biol. 2005]Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):882-91.
[Nat Struct Biol. 2003]Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006 Sep; 5(3):228-43.
[Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006]Biochem Cell Biol. 2005 Aug; 83(4):505-15.
[Biochem Cell Biol. 2005]Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):882-91.
[Nat Struct Biol. 2003]Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006 Sep; 5(3):228-43.
[Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006]Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb; 13(2):984-92.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1993]Biochemistry. 2002 May 14; 41(19):5945-9.
[Biochemistry. 2002]Biochem Cell Biol. 2005 Aug; 83(4):505-15.
[Biochem Cell Biol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 1996 Feb; 178(3):633-7.
[J Bacteriol. 1996]Nature. 2006 Oct 5; 443(7111):569-73.
[Nature. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5139-44.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Nat Struct Biol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):882-91.
[Nat Struct Biol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5139-44.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10; 101(6):1618-21.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Feb; 26(2):375-83.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2009]Biotechniques. 1990 Dec; 9(6):676-9.
[Biotechniques. 1990]Genome Res. 2004 May; 14(5):988-95.
[Genome Res. 2004]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(20):6494-506.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1; 105(13):5145-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Feb; 26(2):375-83.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2009]Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jul 15; 30(14):3059-66.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2002]Brief Bioinform. 2008 Jul; 9(4):286-98.
[Brief Bioinform. 2008]Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1; 21(9):2104-5.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 25; 18(20):6097-100.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1990]Genome Res. 2004 Jun; 14(6):1188-90.
[Genome Res. 2004]Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1; 31(13):3537-9.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12; 19(18):2496-7.
[Bioinformatics. 2003]Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1; 21(9):2101-3.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W506-11.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2007]Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct; 13(5):555-6.
[Comput Appl Biosci. 1997]Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug; 24(8):1586-91.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2007]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(1):347-55.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]Nature. 1970 Aug 15; 227(5259):680-5.
[Nature. 1970]