• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Curr Opin Oncol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Feb 11, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2640227
NIHMSID: NIHMS89019

Targeting transforming growth factor-β signaling

Abstract

Purpose of review

Most cancers are characterized by excessive transforming growth factor-β production by tumors, which can promote tumor growth and mediate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Transforming growth factor-β also has the ability to overproduce extracellular matrix components in response to injury and other stimuli. There are many strategies undergoing current evaluation for inhibiting the deleterious biological effects of transforming growth factor-β by disrupting its signaling at various levels. The current review focuses on the recent advances made in this area, and the potential of these strategies in the clinical treatment of cancer and fibrosis.

Recent findings

Four main strategies used most recently for disrupting transforming growth factor-β signaling are brought into focus in this review: inhibition or sequestration of the transforming growth factor-β protein ligands, inhibition of transforming growth factor-β receptor kinase activity, inhibition of SMAD signaling downstream of transforming growth factor-β kinase activity and restoration of antitumor immunity upon transforming growth factor-β inhibition. Various techniques currently used to employ these four strategies are discuussed.

Summary

Several lines of evidence suggest that altered transforming growth factor-β signaling contributes to tumor progression and metastasis as well as development of fibrosis. Accumulating data from preclinical and clinical studies indicate that antagonizing aberrant transforming growth factor-β signaling is a promising novel therapeutic approach in cancer and fibrotic disorders.

Keywords: cancer, fibrosis, SMAD, transforming growth factor-β receptor 1, transforming growth factor-β

Introduction

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is a ubiquitously expressed cytokine that belongs to a large superfamily of related polypeptides such as bone morphogenetic proteins and activins. This universally expressed cytokine displays an array of pleiotropic effects that have an active role in cellular functions such as proliferation, homeostasis, angiogenesis and wound healing [1,2]. Aberrant regulation of TGF-β function in these processes contributes to cancer progression and fibrotic disorders (Fig. 1, upper right panel), making TGF-β an attractive candidate for treatment of these conditions. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the current state of TGF-β signaling antagonism for the treatment of cancer and fibrosis by pointing out the current methodology in this field.

Figure 1
TGF-β signaling, its role in disease progression and methods of inhibition

Inhibiting/sequestering transforming growth factor-β ligand proteins

One popular method of TGF-β signaling inhibition in both cancer and fibrosis models is targeting the expression and function of TGF-β ligands. Strategies such as RNA interference (RNAi), neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and drug treatment are among the most commonly used recent approaches to prevent TGF-β ligand activation of downstream signaling (Fig. 1, lower left panel and Fig. 2, upper left panel).

Figure 2
Additional methods of TGF-β inhibition

RNAi is a relatively new technology that is becoming an active subject of investigation in the context of inhibiting aberrant TGF-β cytokine expression. Short hairpin RNA vectors, which contain small interfering RNA sequences that serve as guides for enzymatic cleavage of complimentary mRNAs, can be stably transfected into cells and used for inhibiting TGF-β ligand translation, thereby reducing TGF-β secretion (Fig. 2, upper left panel). Several preclinical studies support effective short hairpin RNA inhibition of TGF-β mRNA and protein expression producing desirable effects in induced models of fibrosis in vitro and in vivo [35]. One particular study showed the promise of a small interfering RNA strategy for prevention of induced liver cirrhosis in a mouse model. The investigators demonstrated a decrease in type I collagen and α-smooth muscle actin expression in mouse livers upon a small interfering RNA-targeted decrease of TGF-β expression, which subsequently resulted in enhanced liver regeneration after induced liver damage [4]. Another study was able to show type I collagen inhibition in a rat model of renal fibrosis resulting in decreased kidney damage, thus showing the promise of this method in treating various types of fibrotic disorders [3]. One challenge of this method is effective delivery of short hairpin RNA vectors in a clinical setting, warranting additional studies in this particular area.

Antagonizing TGF-β ligand activity is proving to be useful for treating increased levels of circulating TGF-β in cancer models. One group observed that an increase of TGF-β in the bloodstream induced by radiation and chemotherapy had a causative effect on the amount of lung metastasis occurring in a MMTV/PyVmT mouse model. With the use of 2G7, a neutralizing pan-TGF-β monoclonal antibody, investigators were able to significantly reduce radiation-induced surface lung metastasis and circulating tumor cells in these mice [6•]. This particular study highlights the potential benefits of screening patients for increased levels of TGF-β in the bloodstream for diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic purposes. It also justifies further investigation into the use of anti-TGF-β antibodies for the treatment of TGF-β responsive disease.

One interesting novel approach to reduce elevated circulating levels of TGF-β in the bloodstream was performed by Yamamoto et al. [7••] who used a specially constructed immunosuppressive substance adsorption column with the ability to adsorb the latent form of TGF-β for direct hemoperfusion treatment (Fig. 1, lower left panel). A single treatment was able to decrease rat hepatocellular carcinoma tumor volume and was shown to significantly increase survival in tumor-bearing rats.

Other methods of inhibiting TGF-β expression include the use of antiinflammatory drugs that target the transcription of TGF-β (Fig. 1, lower left panel). The drug pirfenidone inhibits human glioma cell proliferation in vitro. In addition to an observed decrease of cell proliferation in multiple cell lines, pirfenidone also has the ability to prevent the upstream activation of TGF-β by decreasing the enzymatic activity of furin, a TGF-β activating protease [8].

These observations show that controlling excessively expressed TGF-β protein ligands can reduce tumor cell proliferation and block the progression of fibrotic disorders. One potential advantage of cytokine inhibition is the opportunity to only partially inhibit TGF-β biological effects instead of totally abrogating its response. Treatment with moderate to low levels of TGF-β ligand inhibitors have the potential to halt the effects of excess TGF-β signaling while allowing normal levels of signaling to occur. This would theoretically prevent toxicity due to TGF-β signaling abrogation and could improve the efficacy of other treatments found to be previously ineffective due to the effects of excess TGF-β expression. In contrast to the severe toxicity due to TGF-β signaling abrogation observed in Tgfb1 knockout mice [9], long-term exposure of mice either to a TGF-β antibody [10] or a TGF-β soluble antagonist [11] is well tolerated. The results from these two studies suggest thatTGF-β blockade in post-embryonic animals yields acceptable toxicities and may be considered for therapeutic applications.

Inhibiting transforming growth factor-β receptor kinase activity

Inhibiting TGF-β signaling at the receptor kinase level is dominated by the use of small-molecule inhibitors. These inhibitors typically function by binding to the ATP-binding domain of the TGF-β receptor (TGFBR) 1 kinase and prevent its phosphorylation upon association with TGFBR2. This keeps TGFBR1 in an inactive configuration, rendering it incapable of activating down-stream targets such as SMAD2 and SMAD3 (Fig. 1, lower right panel). Inhibition of SMAD signaling by way of small-molecule inhibitors has shown to be sufficient for inhibiting tumor growth and proliferation of tumor cells, decreasing progression of cells into an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-like phenotype, inhibiting TGF-β-mediated transcriptional responses, and decreasing migration and invasion of tumor cells [12•,1316].

SD-208 is a small-molecule inhibitor that has been used recently in several animal studies for treating different types of cancer. Specifically, one group showed inhibition of mouse mammary tumor growth in vivo as well as reduced tumor-associated microvessel density upon oral administration of SD-208. The investigators also noted that SD-208 was well tolerated in mice, observing little to no clinically relevant toxicity upon prolonged treatment [13]. More recently, SD-208 was used in a study showing its ability to reduce tumor growth and metastasis in a mouse orthotopic xenograft model of pancreatic adeno-carcinoma. This group also showed SD-208-mediated attenuation of gene responses involved in tumor progression via gene arrays. Using the gene array analysis in conjunction with SD-208 allowed the discovery of novel TGF-β-mediated protein regulation in PANC-1 cells involving angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, indicating that small-molecule inhibitors like SD-208 can be useful in the molecular characterization of tumors [12•].

There are efforts underway to create a structurally ideal TGFBR1 small-molecule inhibitor that will reduce kinase activity more efficiently than those currently developed. Using already existing TGFBR1 inhibitors as a template, some groups are synthesizing slightly modified structures of these molecules to find a more structurally compatible isoform that will exhibit increased TGFBR1 binding efficiency. One recent example is a study performed by Tojo et al. [16] where 17 different small-molecule variants of a pyrazole-based inhibitor were developed. A screening process determined that one of them was superior in its ability to inhibit progression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Another recent study described by Ishida et al. [17] also utilized this approach for the development of SM305, a derivative of the previously described inhibitor, HTS466284 [18]. SM305 induced a decrease of TGF-β-dependent reporter activity and extracellular matrix protein expression in vitro and in vivo using primary fore-skin fibroblasts as a fibrosis model [17]. An advantage of screening inhibitor variants in this manner is the possible elimination of prospective inhibitor molecules that can cross-react with TGFBR1-like kinases, causing undesirable signaling alterations in other pathways.

TGFBR1 small-molecule inhibitors are also showing promise for treating fibrotic disorders with advancements made in studies utilizing induced fibrosis models. One particular molecule named IN-1130 was investigated in a comprehensive fibrosis study and was able to inhibit the overproduction of extracellular matrix proteins in the presence of induced renal fibrosis by unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats. This study tested a wide range of fibrosis-associated markers using fairly sensitive assays that underline the efficacy of this small molecule in the inhibition of fibrosis [19]. Another study used a liver fibrosis model in rats to study the effects of GW6604, a TGFBR1 small-molecule inhibitor, which was shown to decrease induced liver damage and increase levels of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy [20].

The use of small molecules can circumvent some technical challenges of clinical treatment in disease, such as delivery. The potential of oral administration of these inhibitors makes them attractive candidates for future clinical studies; however, the cross-reactivity of most small-molecule inhibitors with other kinases presents challenges that need to be assessed thoroughly in the clinical trials that are underway.

Direct inhibition of SMAD signaling

As it is well accepted that a majority of TGF-β-mediated responses occur through the action of SMAD signaling downstream of TGF-β kinase activity, it is not surprising that several groups are investigating ways to antagonize SMAD signaling in order to abolish the effects of TGF-β in disease. Many strategies have been utilized to accomplish this task including phosphatase inhibition, targeting receptor-regulated SMADs (R-SMADs) for ubiquitin-dependent degradation and sequestration of R-SMADs (Fig. 2, upper right panel) [21].

Overexpression of R-SMADs physiological inhibitors is a potentially interesting approach for treating TGF-β-responsive disease. SMAD7, an inhibitory SMAD, acts in normal cellular processes to prevent phosphorylation of R-SMADs and recruits ubiquitin ligases for degradation of the latter. A recent study used SMAD7 in a mouse model that mimicked melanoma-mediated bone metastasis. In mice overexpressing SMAD7 there was less total osteolytic lesion area observed at metastatic lesion sites coupled with an extended survival time when compared to controls [22].One downfall of this approach, however, is the fact that SMAD7 engages in cross-talk with important cellular response proteins including CDC42, mitogen-activated protein kinase-1 and β-catenin, which may lead to undesirable side effects.

Another group successfully inhibited R-SMAD activity by using a specific targeting and sequestration strategy. This was done by utilizing the Escherichia coli thioredoxin A protein (Trx) as a protein scaffold harboring different SMAD-binding protein elements that were able to efficiently bind and sequester R-SMAD proteins, therefore inhibiting their activity (Fig. 2, upper right panel). Two reports from the same group showed that four different R-SMAD-binding peptide elements were able to inhibit R-SMAD activity and block TGF-β-mediated transcriptional reporter activity [23,24••]. One specific study demonstrated inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition progression as a result of decreased R-SMAD activity using the Trx–SMAD anchor for activation complex, which is made up of the SMAD anchor for activation peptide recognition sequence harbored by the Trx protein scaffold [24••]. The possibility of Trx–SMAD anchor for activation binding to other important transcriptional regulators cannot yet be ruled out, but this approach is a novel proof of concept demonstrating the potential of SMAD signaling interference in the treatment of cancer and fibrosis.

The main benefit of direct SMAD inhibition is the ability to target SMAD-specific responses without affecting other pathways regulated by TGF-β such as mitogen-activated protein kinase-1 and c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase proteins which reside downstream of TGF-β activated kinase protein activation.

Restoring immunity through transforming growth factor-β inhibition

TGF-β is the most potent naturally occurring suppressor of immune function. Restoration of immunity is a direct result of targeting the TGF-β signaling pathway in conditions associated with excessive production of TGF-β ligands. In many studies, it is the primary desired outcome upon administration of TGF-β inhibitors and is worth mentioning in the context of treating cancer (Fig. 2, lower panel). Immune responses are occasionally depressed in patients with advanced cancer, and one potential explanation of this phenomenon is the excessive TGF-β secretion by tumors and fibroblasts, which may have both systemic and local immunosuppressive effects. This concept has led to the development of immunotherapeutic approaches for treating disease.

Suzuki et al. [15] observed that treatment with SM16, a TGFBR1 small-molecule inhibitor, was able to induce a CD8+ antitumor response in a murine mesothelioma model, resulting in the inhibition of malignant mesothelioma tumor growth. They justify their observation by noting a diminished antitumor response to SM16 treatment in the immunodeficient SCID mouse model.

Perhaps one of the more interesting approaches in this area involves an adoptive cell transfer technique that modifies immune cells isolated from the host ex vivo to render them insensitive to TGF-β signaling. By transfecting CD8+ T cells with a TGFBR2 dominant-negative green fluorescent protein construct, one group produced immune cells with the ability to kill tumor cells in the presence of excess TGF-β By coinjection of these TGF-β-insensitive CD8+ T cells with CD8-depleted splenocytes, investigators were able to induce a significant decrease in tumor volume and weight in a murine prostate cancer model [25••].

The use of tumor vaccines in combination with TGF-β2 antisense oligonucleotides is another immunotheraputic approach that has proven useful in treating preestablished and advanced glioma. Liu et al. [26] were able to show a reduction of implanted glioma tumor growth in rats receiving subcutaneously administered tumor cell vaccine and local anti-TGF- β2 oligonucleotide injection. A similar method described below has been used in humans yielding promising results in patients with advanced glioma [27].

Clinical trials of transforming growth factor-β signaling antagonists

The large amount of preclinical data generated to date provides a strong rationale to assess the potential clinical benefits of TGF-β signaling blockade in humans. Results from a phase I trial performed by NovaRx in San Diego using an antisense modified tumor vaccine indicate a reduction of tumor size in patients with advanced glioma. Increased immune cell infiltration of tumors was observed as well, presumably due to an increased antitumor immune response [27]. A study at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas is currently recruiting patients for a phase I trial to test another type of immunotherapeutic strategy for treatment of relapsed Epstein-–Barr virus-positive lymphoma with administration of TGF-β-resistant cytotoxic T lymphocytes, with the likely intent to induce an antitumor immune response [28].

Antisense Pharma of Germany is utilizing an antisense-based therapy against TGF-β2 overexpression in an international phase I/II study restricted to patients with malignant glioma as well as another phase I/II study investigating treatment of colorectal carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma and malignant melanoma. A recent report indicated encouraging results regarding the efficacy and safety of this treatment in the glioma trials [29].

Pirfenidone was tested in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pirfenidone resulted in a significant improvement of pulmonary function and prevented episodes of acute exacerbation [30].

Following the promising results of TGF-β neutralizing antibodies in preclinical studies, genzyme is currently recruiting patients into phase I clinical trials for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma/malignant melanoma and pulmonary fibrosis utilizing a pan-TGF-β neutralizing antibody, GC-1008 [31,32].

Conclusion

The current review of the recent literature shows that TGF-β signaling inhibition is becoming an important tool in elucidating the distinct roles of TGF-β in disease as well as the development of therapies. Much of our current knowledge regarding TGF-β antagonism derives from preclinical work with limited input from clinical studies. As TGF-β antagonists continue to demonstrate encouraging application for treatment of cancer and fibrosis, the field should experience an increased shift into clinical research in the next few years. Consequently, TGF-β signaling inhibition has the potential to emerge as novel effective therapy for a wide variety of conditions.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by grants CA112520 and CA108741 from the NCI, the Jeannik M. Littlefield-AACR Grant in Metastatic Colon Cancer Research and the Walter S. Mander Foundation Chicago, IL.

Abbreviations

RNAi
RNA interference
R-SMAD
receptor-regulated SMAD
TGF
transforming growth factor
TGFBR
transforming growth factor-β receptor
Trx
thioredoxin A

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current World Literature section in this issue (p. 684).

1. Massague J. TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:753–791. [PubMed]
2. Piek E, Heldin CH, Ten DP. Specificity, diversity, and regulation in TGF-beta superfamily signaling. FASEB J. 1999;13:2105–2124. [PubMed]
3. Hwang M, Kim HJ, Noh HJ, et al. TGF-beta1 siRNA suppresses the tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the kidney of ureteral obstruction. Exp Mol Pathol. 2006;81:48–54. [PubMed]
4. Kim KH, Kim HC, Hwang MY, et al. The antifibrotic effect of TGF-beta1 siRNAs in murine model of liver cirrhosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;343:1072–1078. [PubMed]
5. Liu F, Liu H, Peng Y, et al. Inhibition of TGF-beta1 expression in human peritoneal mesothelial cells by pcDU6 vector-mediated TGF-beta1 shRNA. Nephrology (Carlton) 2006;11:23–28. [PubMed]
6. Biswas S, Guix M, Rinehart C, et al. Inhibition of TGF-beta with neutralizing antibodies prevents radiation-induced acceleration of metastatic cancer progression. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1305–1313. [PubMed] This study demonstrates the efficacy of a pan-TGF-β neutralizing antibody in reducing the amount of circulating TGF-β induced by chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment, which can lead to increased tumor progression.
7. Yamamoto Y, Ueda Y, Itoh T, et al. A novel immunotherapeutic modality with direct hemoperfusion targeting transforming growth factor-beta prolongs the survival of tumor-bearing rats. Oncol Rep. 2006;16:1277–1284. [PubMed] An interesting novel approach for reducing protumorigenic circulating TGF-β levels by direct hemoperfusion sequestration with a specially constructed immunosuppressive substance adsorption column. This study provides an alternative to administration of TGF-β antagonists, which have the potential to cause undesirable side effects.
8. Burghardt I, Tritschler F, Opitz CA, et al. Pirfenidone inhibits TGF-beta expression in malignant glioma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;354:542–547. [PubMed]
9. Tang B, Bottinger EP, Jakowlew SB, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 is a new form of tumor suppressor with true haploid insufficiency. Nat Med. 1998;4:802–807. [PubMed]
10. Ruzek MC, Hawes M, Pratt B, et al. Minimal effects on immune parameters following chronic anti-TGF-beta monoclonal antibody administration to normal mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2003;25:235–257. [PubMed]
11. Yang YA, Dukhanina O, Tang B, et al. Lifetime exposure to a soluble TGF-beta antagonist protects mice against metastasis without adverse side effects. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:1607–1615. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Gaspar NJ, Li L, Kapoun AM, et al. Inhibition of TGFβ signaling reduces pancreatic adenocarcinoma growth and invasiveness. Mol Pharmacol. 2007 Epub ahead of print. [PubMed] A very comprehensive study showing the effective use of SD-208 for inhibiting pancreatic tumor growth and invasion.
13. Ge RR, Rajeev V, Ray P, et al. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of mouse mammary carcinoma by selective inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor kinase in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4315–4330. [PubMed]
14. Halder SK, Beauchamp RD, Datta PK. A specific inhibitor of TGF-beta receptor kinase, SB-431542, as a potent antitumor agent for human cancers. Neoplasia. 2005;7:509–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Suzuki E, Kim S, Cheung HK, et al. A novel small-molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor beta type I receptor kinase (SM16) inhibits murine mesothelioma tumor growth in vivo and prevents tumor recurrence after surgical resection. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2351–2359. [PubMed]
16. Tojo M, Hamashima Y, Hanyu A, et al. The ALK-5 inhibitor A-83-01 inhibits Smad signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by transforming growth factor-beta. Cancer Sci. 2005;96:791–800. [PubMed]
17. Ishida W, Mori Y, Lakos G, et al. Intracellular TGF-beta receptor blockade abrogates Smad-dependent fibroblast activation in vitro and in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1733–1744. [PubMed]
18. Singh J, Chuaqui CE, Boriack-Sjodin PA, et al. Successful shape-based virtual screening: the discovery of a potent inhibitor of the type I TGFbeta receptor kinase (TbetaRI) Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:4355–4359. [PubMed]
19. Moon JA, Kim HT, Cho IS, et al. IN-1130, a novel transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor kinase (ALK5) inhibitor, suppresses renal fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1234–1243. [PubMed]
20. De Gouville AC, Boullay V, Krysa G, et al. Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling by an ALK5 inhibitor protects rats from dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver fibrosis. Br J Pharmacol. 2005;145:166–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Itoh S, Ten DP. Negative regulation of TGF-beta receptor/Smad signal transduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19:176–184. [PubMed]
22. Javelaud D, Mohammad KS, McKenna CR, et al. Stable overexpression of Smad7 in human melanoma cells impairs bone metastasis. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2317–2324. [PubMed]
23. Cui Q, Lim SK, Zhao B, Hoffmann FM. Selective inhibition of TGF-beta responsive genes by Smad-interacting peptide aptamers from FoxH1, Lef1 and CBP. Oncogene. 2005;24:3864–3874. [PubMed]
24. Zhao BM, Hoffmann FM. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta1-induced signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by the Smad-binding peptide aptamer Trx–SARA. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:3819–3831. [PubMed] An interesting strategy using peptide aptamers as a scaffold for R-SMAD-targeting peptide sequences, which is useful for sequestering R-SMADs from activation. This approach could potentially provide higher specificity for R-SMAD inhibition than other methods previously attempted.
25. Zhang Q, Yang XJ, Kundu SD, et al. Blockade of transforming growth factor-β signaling in tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells activates the antitumor immune response cycle. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:1733–1743. [PubMed] An interesting study that improves upon tumor cell vaccine methods through adoptive transfer of TGF-β-insensitive CD8+T cells cotransferred with CD8+-depleted splenocytes.
26. Liu Y, Wang Q, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, et al. TGF-beta2 inhibition augments the effect of tumor vaccine and improves the survival of animals with preestablished brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2007;81:149–162. [PubMed]
27. Fakhrai H, Mantil JC, Liu L, et al. Phase I clinical trial of a TGF-beta antisense-modified tumor cell vaccine in patients with advanced glioma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006;13:1052–1060. [PubMed]
28. Baylor College of Medicine. Safety study of injections of autologous/allogeneic TGFbeta-resistant LMP2A-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) Bethesda: National Library of Medicine; 2006. [Accessed 14 May 2007]. Available from http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00368082.
29. Schlingensiepen KH, Schlingensiepen R, Steinbrecher A, et al. Targeted tumor therapy with the TGF-beta2 antisense compound AP 12009. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:129–139. [PubMed]
30. Azuma A, Nukiwa T, Tsuboi E, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:1040–1047. [PubMed]
31. Genzyme. Safety and efficacy study of GC1008 to treat renal cell carcinoma or malignant melanoma. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine; 2006. [Accessed 14 May 2007]. Available from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00356460.
32. Genzyme. Study of GC1008 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) Bethesda: National Library of Medicine; 2006. [Accessed 14 May 2007]. Available from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00125385.
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...