• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(2): e4511.
Published online Feb 19, 2009. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0004511
PMCID: PMC2637982

Vibrio Zinc-Metalloprotease Causes Photoinactivation of Coral Endosymbionts and Coral Tissue Lesions

John F. Bruno, Editor

Abstract

Background

Coral diseases are emerging as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide. Of nine coral infectious diseases, whose pathogens have been characterized, six are caused by agents from the family Vibrionacae, raising questions as to their origin and role in coral disease aetiology.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here we report on a Vibrio zinc-metalloprotease causing rapid photoinactivation of susceptible Symbiodinium endosymbionts followed by lesions in coral tissue. Symbiodinium photosystem II inactivation was diagnosed by an imaging pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer in two bioassays, performed by exposing Symbiodinium cells and coral juveniles to non-inhibited and EDTA-inhibited supernatants derived from coral white syndrome pathogens.

Conclusion/Significance

These findings demonstrate a common virulence factor from four phylogenetically related coral pathogens, suggesting that zinc-metalloproteases may play an important role in Vibrio pathogenicity in scleractinian corals.

Introduction

Coral diseases have emerged over the last decades as a serious threat to coral reefs worldwide [1][2], with elevated seawater temperatures [3][5] and other anthropogenic stressors [6][7] identified as major contributors to marine ecosystem deterioration. Of nine coral infectious diseases, whose pathogens have been characterized by fulfilling Henle-Koch's postulates [8], six are caused by agents from the family Vibrionacae [9][12], adding to the many previously characterized Vibrio infections of shrimps [13], clams [14] and fish [15], which date back to 1817 [16]. Other coral disease signs in the Caribbean [17][18] have also been associated with the presence of Vibrio agents. The study of coral disease signs in Zanzibar [19], bleached corals on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR; [20]), black band disease signs on corals in the Gulf of Aquaba (the Red Sea; [21]) and even growth anomalies on Hawaiian corals [22] have all demonstrated significant correlation between disease signs and an elevated abundance of Vibrio strains. These newly emerging coral diseases, either caused or associated with members of the Vibrionacae family have sparked a debate on the origin of Vibrio pathogens and their role in the aetiology of coral diseases: Are Vibrio pathogens the primary causative agents of all these diseases? Are they opportunistic pathogens? Or are they secondary infections to other unknown causes? [23][31]

In a recent study [12] we identified two novel V. coralliilyticus strains and four additional Vibrio pathogens as causative agents of three Indo-Pacific coral white syndromes (WS's). In that study, a link was demonstrated between WS disease signs on corals and the presence of Vibrio strains possessing a zinc-metalloprotease gene [12]. Protein homologues of this gene have been identified as key virulence factors of Vibrio pathogens of fish [32], shrimp [33], mollusks [34] and humans [35] acting to digest mucin and other connective tissue components, such as collagen IV [36] and fibronectin [37]. These enzymes have also been shown to perturb paracellular barrier functions [38] and cause tissue necrosis [39] including pathogen detachment from epithelial mucus [40]. Ben-Haim et al. [41] suggested that V. coralliilyticus, the bleaching agent of the coral Pocillopora damicornis, expresses a V. cholera–like zinc-metalloprotease, which causes rapid photosystem II (PS II) inactivation of Symbiodinium endosymbionts. However, little is known about either the kinetics or the specificity of this reaction, and under which conditions it is likely to occur. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the zinc-metalloprotease gene is present in Vibrio pathogenic strains, but also in non-pathogenic strains [12], [42], suggesting that this gene may not be considered an essential virulence factor [39], [43].

In this study we tested this hypothesis and the role of zinc-metalloprotease in the pathogenicity of coral WS's by developing two novel bioassays. Symbiodinium cells from four coral hosts at two locations on the GBR were isolated and grown in cultures (Z1–Z4; Table 1) before being exposed in 96 well microtitre plates to bacterial supernatants derived from four coral pathogens (P1–P4; Table 2) that have been characterized as the causative agents of coral WS's on Pacific reefs, i.e., on the GBR (P1), in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (P2) and in Palau (P3–P4; [12]). In order to test the effects of pathogen supernatants on Symbiodinium cells living in hospite, a second bioassay was developed by rearing juveniles of Acropora millepora and infecting them with specific Symbiodinium isolates from clades C and D [44]. To test PS II inactivation by pathogen supernatants, this study used an imaging pulse amplitude modulation (iPAM) fluorometer (Walz, Germany) to measure both dark adapted PS II quantum yields, Fv/Fm = (FmFo)/Fm [45], and light adapted effective PS II quantum yields, ΔF/Fm′, which estimate Symbiodinium PS II activity in either a relaxed or active state, respectively [46][48]. Use of the iPAM system allowed up to 96 replicates per analysis of cultured Symbiodinium cells and up to 48 replicates per analysis of coral juveniles. From quantum yield values, PS II inactivation (I) was calculated as a proportion, where 1.0 represented 100% PS II inactivation following exposure to bacterial supernatants and four negative controls, including bacterial supernatants, whose proteolytic activity was inhibited by EDTA (Table S1).

Table 1
Symbiodinium cultures Z1–Z4.
Table 2
Vibrio White Syndrome coral pathogens.

Results

Symbiodinium culture Z1 is most susceptible to bacterial PS II inactivation

Symbiodinium culture Z1 isolated from the WS susceptible coral host Montipora aequituberculata at Nelly Bay, an inshore reef off Magnetic Island in the central GBR, was the most severely affected of the four Symbiodinium cultures tested when exposed to P1 supernatant under illumination (p<0.01; Fig. 1A). For Symbiodinium culture Z1, inactivation (I) of PS II (measured as light adapted quantum yields) was greater than 95% (mean I (Z1 ΔF/Fm′) = 0.968±0.016) following exposure to P1 supernatant for 10 min in two independent experiments, and total PS II inactivation resulted after 20 min (Fig. 1A). A significant (~40%; p<0.0001) difference in mean I was measured between this culture from Nelly Bay and culture Z2 isolated from the same coral species found at Davies Reef, a GBR midshelf reef located less than a 100 km away, where no signs of WS on M. aequituberculata have been observed [mean I (Z2 ΔF/Fm′) = 0.587±0.021 following exposure to P1 supernatant for 10 min in two independent experiments]. The impact of P1 on culture Z3, which was isolated from the coral Acropora tenuis at Nelly Bay, where it has not been observed with signs of WS, was similar to its impact on Symbiodinium culture Z2 throughout the experiment (p = 0.426). Symbiodinium culture Z4 isolated from the coral Acropora millepora at Nelly Bay, where it has not been observed with WS signs at this site, was the least affected (~3%; p<0.01) of all Symbiodinium cultures tested in this study [mean I (Z4 ΔF/Fm′) = 0.034±0.019 following exposure to P1 supernatant for 10 min in two independent experiments]. Control treatments with dinoflagellate growth medium F2 (Fig. 1A) and bacterial growth medium (MB) resulted in limited or no PS II inactivation of the respective cultures [mean I (F2 ΔF/Fm′) = 0.001±0.001; p<0.01, and mean I (MB ΔF/Fm′) = 0 following exposure for 10 min in two independent experiments]. Cloning and sequencing the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) region of Symbiodinium from cultures Z1–Z4 identified Z1 and Z2 as two distinct types phylogenetically affiliated with Symbiodinium clade A (Fig. 2). Culture Z3 was phylogentically affiliated with Symbiodinium clade C, and Z4 contained two Symbiodinium types affiliated with Symbiodinium clades A and D (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
PS II inactivation of Symbiodinium cultures by bacterial supernatants.
Figure 2
Neighbour joining phylogenetic tree of Symbiodinium cultures Z1–Z4.

Pathogen supernatants have a similar effect on Symbiodinium culture Z1

Exposure of the susceptible Symbiodinium culture Z1 to supernatants from pathogens P1–P4, resulted in total PS II inactivation (I) in all treatments after 20 minutes (Fig. 1B; p = 0.794). Comparisons of mean I among 16 pathogen-Symbiodinium culture combinations (P1–P4 and Z1–Z4) resulted in values ranging between 0 and 1.0 (Table 3).

Table 3
PS II inactivation (I) of Symbiodinium cultures Z1–Z4 by pathogen supernatants P1–P4.

Pathogen proteolytic activity is inhibited by EDTA and reactivated by ZnCl2

EDTA was the most potent inhibitor of proteolytic activity of bacterial supernatants P1–P4 when tested by the asocasein assay [49][50] incorporating three standard protease inhibitors (EDTA, 1,10 Pt and PMSF; Fig. S1A). Proteolytic activity was reduced by 98% with the addition of 50 mM EDTA to the supernatant of pathogen P1 (1 h incubation at 30°C; Fig. S1B) and by ~80%, on average, for pathogens P1–P4 (Fig. S1A). Addition of 10 mM ZnCl2 reversed the chelating effect of EDTA and reactivated the proteolytic activity of P1 supernatant to 77% of its original capacity (Fig S1C). This result combined with results from previous screenings [12], which detected the active zinc binding site of a metalloprotease using specific primers targeting the DNA in all pathogens (P1–P4), confirmed the presence of a zinc-metalloprotease. Following the addition of higher ZnCl2 concentrations (50 mM and 100 mM), no recovery was detected by the asocasein assay, suggesting that the P1 zinc-metalloprotease requires an optimal concentration of ZnCl2 for activity (For more on inhibition of proteolytic activity by excess ZnCl2 see Supporting Information Text S1). Other divalent cations (NiCl2, MnCl2, MgCl2, CaCl2, CuCl2, HgCl2 and FeCl2) failed to reactivate the P1 zinc-metalloprotease following inhibition by EDTA (data not shown).

Symbiodinium PS II inactivation by pathogen supernatants is inhibited by EDTA

Limited PS II inactivation was observed in all Symbiodinium cultures after 45 min when bacterial supernatant P1 was incubated with 50 mM EDTA (Fig. 1C). This was in contrast to strong PS II inactivation when all cultures were exposed to non-chelated supernatants (p<0.01) [mean I (Z1, P1 EDTA, ΔF/Fm′) = 0.119±0.017, mean I (Z2, P1 EDTA, ΔF/Fm′) = 0, mean I (Z3, P1 EDTA, ΔF/Fm′) = 0.267±0.015 and mean I (Z4, P1 EDTA, ΔF/Fm′) = 0]. The EDTA inhibition of proteolytic activity was not significantly different among the four pathogen supernatants tested (P1–P4; p = 0.566), supporting the hypothesis that they share a common virulence mechanism. Pooling all I (ΔF/Fm′) data for Symbiodinium cultures (Z1–Z4) exposed to four pathogen supernatants (P1–P4) clearly demonstrated that PS II inactivation (I) is caused by bacterial supernatants but was absent in controls in 16 experiments (Fig. 1C; p<0.001). Addition of 50 mM EDTA to pathogen supernatants resulted in significantly lower PS II inactivation (p<0.01). PS II inactivation was not eliminated completely, as shown by levels of I approaching non-EDTA treated supernatants in the first 5 min following exposure (Fig. 1C). However, I in EDTA treatments diminished as time progressed, suggesting that the initial I values were due to EDTA not chelating all zinc cations available in supernatants and therefore preventing complete inhibition of the supernatant activity.

PS II inactivation is significantly greater when PS II centers are active

Pathogen supernatant-exposure experiments under illumination, equal to the light intensity in the culturing incubator (90 µmol photons m−2 s−1), resulted in significantly higher I of all Symbiodinium cultures (Fig. 1C; p<0.001) in comparison to I calculated from identical control and supernatant exposure experiments that were conducted by measuring quantum yields (Fv/Fm) in the dark (Fig. 1D).

Pathogen supernatants cause Symbiodinium PS II inactivation in hospite

As Symbiodinium cells may function differently when free-living compared to when in hospite, a second bioassay system was developed, comprised of coral juveniles (Acropora millepora) harbouring Symbiodinium endosymbionts from clades C or D. Juveniles harbouring clade D (JD) Symbiodinium and exposed to supernatant from pathogen P1 demonstrated PS II inactivation with mean I (JD, P1, ΔF/Fm′) = 0.219±0.022 after 10 min and mean I (JD, P1, ΔF/Fm′) = 0.389±0.030 after 45 min, significantly greater PS II inactivation than found in controls (Fig. 3A; p<0.01). I of JD exposed to P1 continued to increase reaching total inactivation after 7 h. When 50 mM EDTA was added to bacterial supernatants, significantly lower I values were recorded (Fig. 3A; p<0.01). Medium F2 to which 50 mM EDTA were added to test the direct effect of EDTA on coral juveniles had no PS II inactivation effect on juveniles, with mean I (JD, F2+EDTA, ΔF/Fm′) = 0 after 4 h. A. millepora juveniles infected with Symbiodinium from clade C1 and exposed to identical treatments demonstrated similar patterns (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3
PS II inactivation (I) of Symbiodinium in coral juveniles.

Tissue lesions and Symbiodinium loss caused by pathogen supernatant

A. millepora juveniles harboring Symbiodinium clade D and exposed to bacterial supernatant (P1 and P3) were observed to pale within minutes following exposure (Fig. 4A). Following addition of bacterial supernatants, juvenile polyps retracted and extended vigorously for a period of 30 sec before becoming irreversibly still. Degradation of the coenosarc tissue (tissue between polyps) was observed (Fig. 4B) and Symbiodinium cells were clearly seen separating from juvenile tissue and accumulating beside the host coral. Within 4 h, tissue lesions were observed (Fig. 4C) and by 8 h only skeleton remained (Fig. 4D), corresponding with total PS II inactivation registered by the imaging PAM. A. millepora juveniles harboring Symbiodinium clade C1 demonstrated similar results when exposed to both P1 and P3 supernatants, while A. millepora juveniles treated with supernatants P1 and P3, to which 50 mM EDTA was added, did not show loss of Symbiodinium cells or any signs of tissue lesions.

Figure 4
Effect of P1 supernatant on the juvenile coral host, Acropora millepora.

A biological dose response between P1 Supernatant and Z1 PS II inactivation

Significant PS II inactivation of Z1 was measured by exposure to P1 supernatant concentrations as low as 1% of the original supernatant stock (Fig. 5A; p<0.001), with mean I (Z1, P1, 1%, ΔF/Fm′) = 0.226±0.028 following 10 min exposure. Total PS II inactivation of Z1 was measured in all P1 concentrations equal and above 25% following a 10 min exposure. In contrast, recovery of photosynthetic activity was detected in Z1 exposed to P1 concentrations of 5% and lower. Full recovery of photosynthetic activity was measured in Z1 cells exposed to 1% and 5% concentrations of P1 following 5 h and 24 h, respectively (p>0.1). In sharp contrast to the susceptible Symbiodinium culture Z1, Symbiodinium culture Z4 was only affected by higher P1 concentrations, with total PS II inactivation measured for P1 concentrations of 50% and 100% following 2.5 h and 45 min, respectively (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5
Dose response between P1 supernatant and Z1 PS II inactivation.

Proteolytic activity of bacterial supernatants, measured by the asocasein assay [49][50], was found in this study to correlate to culture cell density, with maximum activity measured when cultures reached their end logarithmic growth phase (18 h) and when cell density reached 1×109 cells ml−1 (Fig. S2A).

Enzymatic kinetics supports PS II inactivation by P1 supernatant

To explain the high efficiency of P1 in causing PS II inactivation against in its susceptible Z1 target, we plotted Z1 I (Z1, ΔF/Fm′) as a factor of P1 dose and obtained a parabolic curve (Fig. 5C) often common in catalytic reactions. Taking the reciprocals of P1 dose and Z1 I resulted in a linear Lineweaver-Burk [51] - ‘like’ plot (Fig. 5D; R2 = 0.9991), where apparent km′ represents the effective P1 supernatant concentration causing a 50% PS II inactivation of Z1 following 10 min of exposure. We were unable to determine an actual km and Vmax for P1 due to the fact that the exact concentrations of both the proteolytic peptide and its yet unknown Z1 substrate were not determined. An apparent km′ for Z1 was calculated from the linear regression as km′ = 0.0251, i.e., a P1 supernatant concentration of 2.5% is needed to cause a 50% PS II inactivation of Z1 within 10 min. Taking the reciprocal for P1 dose and Z4 PS II inactivation failed to produce the same linear kinetics.

Virulent zinc-metalloprotease is a 86.141 kDa Vibrio thermolysin

The putative zinc-metalloprotease suspected to cause Symbiodinium PS II inactivation and coral tissue lesions was characterised using nano-liquid chromatography peptide separation and mass spectrometry (nano-LC/MS/MS) of proteolytically active bands derived from all pathogen supernatants (P1–P4). These analysis produced signature sequences consistent (by MASCOT and BLAST alignments; see Text S2) with one common bacterial 86.141 kDa pre-propeptide from the family of thermolysin that has been previously identified in other Vibrio pathogens, such as V. cholera [52] and V. vulnificus [53]. Partial protein sequence alignments matched four domains of the common zinc-metalloprotease [54]: the N-terminal domain (PepSY propeptide and YPEB domain), the catalytic domain, the alpha helical domain and the C-terminal domain (Fig. S3).

Discussion

Bacterial caused PS II inactivation of Symbiodinium photosynthesis

Bacterial causative agents for coral diseases have been identified in previous studies [11][12], [55][60], including specific virulence mechanisms that enable coral colonization and disease progression [61][62], however, this study is the first to investigate the clinical effect of a virulence factor derived from multiple causative agents and applied to multiple targets. Our principal findings demonstrate that PS II inactivation of susceptible Symbiodinium cells (Z1) by pathogen supernatants is significantly higher than PS II inactivation of non-susceptible targets (Z2–Z4). Susceptibility of Symbiodinium cells to bacterial PS II inactivation was supported by demonstrating a biological dose response [63]. Partial peptide sequencing of proteolytically active fractions derived from WS pathogen supernatants identified a common 86.141 kDa zinc-metalloprotease from the family thermolysin, which is suspected of causing Symbiodinium PS II inactivation and coral tissue lesions. Nevertheless, our preliminary exposure trials could not determine the exact process by which bacterial zinc-metalloproteases affect Symbiodinium photosynthesis. A similar thermolysin derived from Bacillus thermoproteolyticus rokko has been reported to selectively cleave chloroplast outer envelope membrane (OEM) proteins causing PS II photoinhibition [64]. Tests performed with B. thermoproteolyticus rokko thermolysin revealed that it can not penetrate through the chloroplast OEM [64], but can affect about 20 OEM polypeptides [65], including components of a protein import apparatus [66] that may indirectly influence PS II performance.

This study identified specific Lineweaver-Burk - ‘like’ kinetics between P1 supernatant and its susceptible Z1 target, suggesting that PS II inactivation of Symbiodinium Z1 is potentially the result of a specific bond between an enzyme and its target substrate. Failure to produce similar kinetics between P1 supernatant and a non-susceptible (Z4) target, supports the specificity of this bond and may possibly explain why Acropora millepore coral hosts harboring culture Z4 Symbiodinium at Nelly Bay (GBR), or Montipora aequituberculata colonies harboring Z2 Symbiodinium at Davies Reef (GBR) have not been observed with WS disease signs, whereas M. aequituberculata colonies from Nelly Bay, which harbor susceptible Z1 Symbiodinium, often display WS disease signs. Nevertheless, further studies are needed in order to determine the specific substrate of the zinc-metalloprotease identified in WS coral pathogens in this study. Symbiodinium PS II inactivation by low pathogen supernatant concentration (≤5%) was found to be reversible in this study. Recovery of full photosynthetic capacity of Symbiodinium cells within 24 h, after short-term PS II inactivation following low concentration exposures, suggests that zinc-metalloprotease damage to PS II might be repairable, as demonstrated for PS II repair by heat shock proteins [67]. Alternatively, PS II inactivation may be caused by enzymatic cleavage of Symbiodinium cell membranes, resulting in an irreparable cellular collapse and Symbiodinium mortality, as observed by Cervino et al. [68] for yellow blotch/band infections of Montastraea spp. corals in the Caribbean. Our study, however, could not find adequate support for this hypothesis, since total PS II inactivation occurred less than 20 sec following exposure to bacterial supernatants. Further studies are needed to examine the pathology of Symbiodinium exposed to coral pathogen zinc-metalloproteases. Damage to Symbiodinium PS II has been shown to be caused by a variety of factors including light and heat stress [69][74] associated with mass coral bleaching [75][79], and by numerous bacterial toxins [41], [80] suggesting that PS II damage may result from independent disease aetiologies. In order to test the hypothesis that these factors act in synergism, specific diagnostics must be designed, such as monoclonal antibodies that will register zinc-metalloprotease signals in the field.

In this study, Symbiodinium isolates affiliated with clade A were found to be both susceptible and non-susceptible to bacterial PS II inactivation, in contrast to findings by Stat et al. [81], speculating that clade A Symbiodinium associations with diseased corals are closer to parasitism than to mutualism than similar associations of corals with clade C Symbiodinium. Better knowledge of Symbiodinium physiology and disease aetiology will assist in identifying why specific types are more susceptible to bacterial PS II inactivation. Further studies including the cloning and sequencing of the of zinc-metalloprotease genes from WS pathogens will enable validation of our current findings, potentially by utilizing mutant coral pathogen strains that lack the zinc-metalloprotease gene, or by utilizing differential expression and coral pathogen zinc-metalloproteases expressed by a vector system in additional exposure trials [82] aimed at fulfilling Koch's molecular postulates [83].

Bacterial caused tissue lesions and Symbiodinium loss

In this study, visual observations and iPAM measurements of exposed coral juveniles revealed three distinct phases of disease: 1. Symbiodinium PS II inactivation; 2. paling of coral tissue through loss of Symbiodinium cells; and 3. spread of coral tissue lesions culminating in mortality. These signs, which were expressed by coral juveniles in response to bacterial supernatants, were identical to WS disease signs observed on adult corals in the field [84][85] and during pathogen inoculation experiments [12], and further support our previous findings, which identified Vibrio pathogens as the primary causative agents of WS's [12]. This is the first study to successfully replicate WS disease signs by using cell free supernatants.

Vibrio zinc-metalloproteases are known to perform dual functions similar to the duality of function demonstrated by coral zinc-metalloproteases in this study, i.e., in causing both Symbiodinium PS II inactivation and coral tissue lesions. For example, in the human pathogen Vibrio cholera, a virulent zinc-metalloprotease has been named hemagglutinin/protease because of its dual capacity to cause both hemagglutination and proteolytic cleavage [53], [86]. The V. vulnificus elastase/protease has also been shown to possess dual functions, enhancing vascular permeability and causing hemorrhagic damage [87][88]. Numerous studies demonstrate that Vibrio zinc-metalloproteases are synthesized as inactive precursors that mature outside the bacterial cell following several processing stages which may alter their function [89], such as the cleavage of a C-terminal 10 kDa peptide from the V. vulnificus zinc-metalloprotease (VVP; [90]) by a specific processing protease [91], which mediates effective binding of V. vulnificus VVP to its substrate. Future studies will determine whether coral pathogen zinc-metalloproteases undergo a similar maturing process.

White syndrome is a multifactorial coral disease

Findings from our study support the classification of coral WS as a multifactorial disease with multiple component causes [92]. We found the expression of zinc-metalloprotease by WS coral pathogens to be cell density dependant, with greatest proteolytic activities measured at the end logarithmic phase, when bacterial cell density in cultures reached 1×109 cells ml−1. Based on dose response experiments, we calculated that the steady state concentration of coral pathogen derived zinc-metalloprotease required to cause a rapid and irreversible 50% PS II inactivation of susceptible Symbiodinium cells following 10 min of exposure is equal to the dose produced by a bacterial concentration of ~5×107 cells ml−1. This calculation, although preliminary, implies that WS disease signs are unlikely to occur in the field unless susceptible populations of Symbiodinium cells are exposed to a high concentration of pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the progressing band of exposed coral skeleton typical of WS signs in the field [84][85], can be explained by the presence of high densities of pathogens at the interface between exposed skeleton and healthy looking tissue in progressing lesions. In a previous study, we found that Vibrio cell densities associated with a lesion interface were more than a 100 times higher than the cell densities found on healthy-looking tissue [12]. In a field study, Roff et al. [93] provided evidence that coral tissues remain photosynthetically active when they are less than 10 cm away from the interface of a progressing WS tissue lesion, suggesting that pathogen zinc-metalloprotease concentrations may be diluted to a non-effective dose away from a progressing tissue lesion interface. Reductions in zinc-metalloprotease concentrations when conditions for optimal pathogen growth are impared may also explain how corals can recover from WS infections.

The findings by Bruno et al. [94], that both temperature and host density influence WS disease prevalence, support the definition of coral WS as a multifactorial disease. These two factors, plus the requirements for primary causative agents [12] at elevated concentrations and for susceptible target Symbiodinium types, may all contribute to facilitating WS epizootics. Elevated seawater temperatures have been shown to be a major contributing factor to Vibrio cholera pandemics [95] and a necessary factor for triggering the virulence of the coral pathogen Vibrio shiloi [96]. Based on our findings, we postulate that optimal temperatures for Vibrio WS pathogen growth may contribute directly to the cell density dependant synthesis of zinc-metalloprotease required for infections.

Are Vibrio WS pathogens primary pathogens? Opportunistic pathogens? or secondary pathogens to other unknown causes?

Detection of Vibrio strains on both healthy and diseased populations of fish [97], shrimps [98] and corals [24] has led to the conclusion that Vibrio infections are opportunistic in nature [99]. The term ‘opportunistic infection’ was first defined by Utz in 1962 relating to fungal infections [100], but has since been modified to include additional pathogen-host interactions, particulary those that can be represented by a ‘damage-response framework’ [101], which defines pathogenicity and host-susceptibility as coupled variant traits. This study identified the variant traits of Symbiodinium hosts exposed to a common zinc-metalloprotease. However, it has also been found that the presence of a zinc-metalloprotease gene can be detected in DNA retrieved from non-pathogenic strains, which were unable to cause disease signs in controlled exposure trials [12]. The presence of a zinc-metalloprotease gene in non-pathogenic Vibrio strains, suggests that the expression of other virulence genes is necessary for successful infections to occur. Thus we conclude that, although all WS pathogens identified possess a zinc-metalloprotease gene sufficient to cause rapid photoinactivation and coral tissue lesions, not all Vibrio strains possessing this gene can be classified as primary causative agents of WS. Genetic studies support the variant traits of Vibrio pathogens. From over 200 V. cholera serotypes, only a few have been shown to cause cholera pandemics, while others, possessing partial combinations of virulent genes, were shown to cause a gradient of attenuated disease symptoms [102][103]. Work by Austin et al. [104] demonstrated that the coral pathogen V. coralliilyticus [10][12] also affects rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Artemia nauplii by causing mortalities in animal models, suggesting it may target multiple species that are not necessarily compromised hosts by possessing broad pathogenicity. In contrast, the virulence of the coral bleaching agent V. shiloii [9] was not adequate to infect Oncorhynchus mykiss and Artemia nauplii [104]. In addition, V. shiloi has recently been reported to have stopped infecting its known coral host Oculina patagonica in the Mediterranean Sea [105], suggesting a shift in the ‘damage-response framework’ [101], defined by Rosenberg et al. [28] as the ‘hologenome theory of evolution’, i.e., the failure of variant pathogen-host traits to continue producing expected disease signs. Pathogen-coral interactions may be further complicated considering the fact that pathogens in the marine environment perform under different conditions than those confronted by terrestrial agents [106][107], and in particular, Vibrio coral agents, whose survival strategy might be aimed at specializing in ‘adaptability’ [108], rather than in an obligatory ‘selectivity’ towards specific hosts.

In conclusion, our findings support classifying coral WS's as multifactorial diseases, which are caused by primary Vibrio pathogens. Based on findings from this study, Vibrio pathogens may be involved in numerous coral disease aetiologies as pathogens of variant traits, and may operate as primary, opportunistic, or as secondary agents. Their ubiquity and modes of action underline the need for further collaborative studies to explore the complexity of roles performed by Vibrio zinc-metalloproteases in both coral health and disease.

Materials and Methods

Coral pathogens

Four coral pathogen strains (P1–P4; Table 2), previously identified as causative agents for white syndrome diseases (WS's) affecting Indo-Pacific scleractinian corals by fulfilling Henle-Koch's postulates [12], were examined in this study. 16SrRNA gene sequences of all four coral pathogen strains were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers: EU372917, EU372931, EU372934, EU372935 (www.ncbi.nih.nlm.gov/Genbank). All isolates were submitted to the public collection of BCCM/LMG at the Ghent University, Belgium under accession numbers LMG23691, LMG23693, LMG23695, LMG23696, and are available for public acquisition (Table 2).

Growth curve and proteolytic activities of bacterial supernatants

Each of the four bacterial pathogens (P1–P4) was inoculated into a general heterotrophic bacterial medium, Marine Broth-2216 (Difco, USA) and grown to end logarithmic phase at 27°C with shaking (150 rpm). Tests performed to determine the optimal growth conditions for pathogens P1–P4, demonstrated that culture supernatants expressed the strongest proteolytic activity when incubated for 18 h to end logarithmic phase (Fig. S2A). Bacterial cell density was determined by colony forming unit counts (CFU; described by Sussman et al. [12]) and by constructing a cell density calibration curve of absorbance (595 nn) vs. CFU (Fig. S2B). Absorbance (595 nm) of serial culture dilutions was measured in sterile microtitre 96 well plates (n = 6) using a Wallac Victor 2 1420 multi label counter spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, USA). Bacterial supernatants used in exposure experiments were obtained by centrifugation (12,000× g, 20 min, 4°C) and serial filtration through 0.45 µm and 0.22 µm filters (Millipore, USA). These solutions were defined as bacterial supernatants P1–P4, and their protease activity was measured by the asocasein assay [49] as proteolytic units [50], when 1 U = 1000×(OD450×CFU−1)×109. Protein concentrations in all bacterial supernatants (P1–P4) were determined by the Biorad protein assay (Biorad laboratories, USA). Bacterial supernatant aliquots were stored at −20°C until used.

Inhibition of proteolytic activity by EDTA and reactivation with ZnCl2

Bacterial supernatants (P1–P4) were exposed to treatments with four concentrations of EDTA (5 mM, 10 mm, 25 mM and 50 mM). Triplicate samples of each treatment were incubated for 1 h at 30°C and then tested for proteolytic activity by the asocasein assay [49][50]. Control treatments included bacterial supernatant with no EDTA. Treatments of pathogen supernatants inhibited by adding 50 mM EDTA and incubation (1 h, 30°C) were used as negative control treatments in all exposure experiments conducted in this study. The ability to reactivate the proteolytic activity of the P1 pathogen by adding divalent cations was tested by incubating P1 supernatant with 50 mM EDTA (1 h at 30°C ) and adding five concentrations of ZnCl2 (5 mM, 10 mM, 25 mm, 50 mM and 100 mM). Samples were incubated for 1 h at 30°C and then tested for proteolytic activity by the asocasein assay [49][50] (for more information on the inhibitory effect of excess ZnCl2 on the proteolytic activity of pathogen supernatants see Text S1).

Inhibition by 1,10 Phenanthroline monohydrate (1,10 Pt) and phenyl methylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)

1,10 Phenanthroline monohydrate (1, 10 Pt; SIGMA) was dissolved in DDW (Millipore). Pathogen supernatants were incubated for 1 h at 30°C with 1,10 Pt in a final concentration of 5 mM [109]. Proteolytic activity was measured by the asocasein assay [49][50]. PMSF (SIGMA), an alkaline serine protease inhibitor, was dissolved in ethanol and incubated for 1 h at 30°C with pathogen supernatants in a final concentration of 5 mM [110]. Following incubation, reactions were assayed for proteolytic activity by the asocasein assay [49][50].

Isolation of Symbiodinium cultures from sampled corals

Colonies of Montipora aequituberculata, Acropora tenius and Acropora millepora were collected in sterile containers at Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island, GBR (S19 10′ E 146 52′), an inshore fringing reef. Additional colonies of Montipora aequituberculata were collected at Davies Reef, GBR (S18°81′, E147°67′), a midshelf reef located less than 100 km away (Table 1). Coral tissue was removed by airbrush, centrifuged three times (3000× g, 5 min) and resuspended in 0.22 µm filtered SW (25°C). Coral nematocysts were removed by two consecutive filtrations (20 µm; Millipore, USA) using a vacuum pump.

Symbiodinium cultures

F2 dinoflagellate growth medium for Symbiodinium was prepared by modification of F2 and Erdschreiber media [111][112]. Briefly, seawater supplemented with 4 mg l−1 Na2HPO4, 1 g l−1 NaNO3, 1 ml l−1 from a ×1000 concentrated A5+CO micronutrient solution (described by Sussman et al. [113]), 2.5 mg l−1 GeO2, 80 mg l−1 G-Penicillin, 80 mg l−1 Streptomycin, 40 mg l−1 Amphotericin, 0.4 mg l−1 Thiamine-HCl, 2 µg l−1 Biotin and 2 µg l−1 Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin). The growth medium was 0.22 µm filtered and stored at 4°C in the dark. Before use, 0.22 µm filtration was repeated.

Symbiodinium cultures Z1–Z4 in F2 medium were inoculated into sterile 24 well plates (3 ml per well), covered and sealed. Plates were incubated at 27°C under 12h[ratio]12h light[ratio]dark irradiance (90 pmol photons m−2 s−1). Cells were inspected daily and contaminated plates were discarded. Prior to experimental exposures, Symbiodinium cells were quantified (n = 10) using a Neubauer haemocytometer and adjusted to one concentration (1×106 cells ml−1) by adding F2 medium before transferring cultures into sterile 96 well microtitre plates (250 µL per well). An attempt was made to maintain the original Symbiodinium populations that were associated with the host coral at the time of isolation rather than to purify and maintain single axenic cultures [114], which would have less ecological relevance when tested for their susceptibility to pathogen supernatants. In order to confirm the taxonomic identity of Symbiodinium types in each culture, cloning of Symbiodinium DNA was performed at the time of isolation from corals and prior to using the incubated cultures for experimental procedures. Experiments exposing Symbiodinium cells to bacterial supernatants and controls were repeated twice to confirm the consistency of results. A full description of treatments is presented in table S1.

PS II dark adapted quantum yields (Fv/Fm) and PS II inactivation (I)

96 well microtitre plates containing Symbiodinium cells (1×106 cells ml−1) were incubated in the dark (1 h) and centrifuged (5 min at 3000× g). F2 medium was discarded and wells were loaded with treatment solutions. Plates were exposed in a Maxi imaging-pulse-amplitude-modulation (iPAM) fluorometer (Walz, Germany) to a saturation light pulse (Gain = 1–2, Intensity = 1–2, Saturation Pulse = 7) at 5 min intervals and dark adapted PS II quantum yields were calculated by using the formula: Fv/Fm = (Fm−F0)/Fm [45], where Fm = maximal fluorescent yield, and F0 = Dark fluorescent yield. From Fv/Fm values, PS II inactivation values (I) were calculated as proportions by using the formula: I (Fv/Fm ) = (Fv/Fm at time 0−Fv/Fm at time n)/Fv/Fm at time 0, where 1.0 represented 100% PS II inactivation, following exposure to proteolytically-active and EDTA-inhibited bacterial supernatants and three additional controls (Table S1).

PS II effective light-adapted yields (ΔF/Fm′) and PS II inactivation (I)

The identical procedure for sample preparation before measurement of dark adapted yields was repeated before measuring effective light adapted yields. This step confirmed the results obtained from reading photosynthetic inactivation as a proportion of dark adapted yields. Some authors also consider it as a better estimate for photosynthetic function [115], because quantum yields are measured when the cells are photosynthetically active. 96 well microtitre plates were prepared as described above. Each plate was dark adapted first and Fm, F1 and dark adapted quantum yields (Fv/Fm) were recorded at 5 min intervals for a period of 30 min, until consistent levels were obtained. Plates were then centrifuged as described above and returned to the imaging PAM chamber for initial light adapted measurements. An actinic light source of 90 pmol m−2 s−1 was switched on in the measuring chamber and cultures were exposed to a saturation light pulse at 5 min intervals for a period of 30 min until it was confirmed that readings of effective light adapted quantum yields were stable (Gain = 1–2, Intensity = 1–2, Saturation Pulse = 7). Plates were then removed from the chamber and centrifuged. F2 medium was discarded from the plates and without further delay, plates were returned to the imaging PAM to be loaded with treatment solutions. Plates remained in the imaging PAM chamber under illumination for the entire duration of the experiment. The continuous measurement at 5 min intervals was preferred to the alternative of dark adapting the samples before each single light adapted reading, due to the nature of the experiment. Although photochemical quenching was not fully relaxed, this procedure allowed closer surveillance of the continuous effects of bacterial supernatant on PS II photosynthesis, as it might occur under environmentally relevant conditions, where corals are constantly exposed to light during the day and for longer periods during the summer compared to winter. A similar protocol was used by Schreiber et al. [116] to measure PS II photoinhibition caused by the toxic effects of diuron, suggesting that since quantum yields are calculated from the ratio of fluorescent values before (Ft) and after (Fm′) firing a constant saturation pulse, results are independent of signal amplitudes. According to Schreiber et al. [116], 100 sec intervals between consequent saturation pulses (SP) were sufficient to allow complete reoxidation of QA and re-establishment of the original Ft levels. Light adapted effective quantum yields (ΔF/Fm′) were calculated by the formula: (Fm′−Ft)/Fm′ [46], where Fm′ = maximal fluorescent yield under light conditions and Ft = fluorescence before a saturating pulse. PS II inactivation (I) was calculated (as a proportion) from light adapted effective quantum yields (ΔF/Fm′) as described above. An alternative method for calculating PS II inactivation by comparing PS II quantum yields of treatments with PS II quantum yields of negative controls at corresponding times [116] was tested and provided similar results.

Taxonomic identities of Symbiodinium cultures

DNA was extracted from Symbiodinium cultures incubated at 27°C or directly from corals [117] and amplified using primers targeting the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) internal transcribed spacer 1 region (ITS-1; [118]). PCR products were cloned (pCR 2.1 TOPO kit, Invitrogen, CA) and inserts containing plasmid DNA were amplified with a 5′- tet fluorescently labelled ITS-1 forward primer and then screened on a single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) gel before sequencing [119]. Retrieved nucleotide sequences (~360 bp) including the ITS-1 rRNA and its flanking regions were edited using Chromas Lite software version 2.01 (Technelysium) and aligned using ClustalX version 1.83 [120]. Distance matrices were calculated using the DNADIST program in PHYLIP [121] and phylogenetic trees were generated from distance matrices using the neighbour-joining method [122] and Kimura substitution algorithm [123]. Bootstrapping with 1000 replicates was performed using SeqBoot as integrated in PHYLIP [124] and values ≥50% were included for main nodes of the tree. Ribosomal RNA sequences of Symbiodinium microadriaticum amplified with the ITS-1 primers and cloned were submitted to GeneBank (www.ncbi.nih.nlm.gov/Genbank) under the accession numbers EU567151–567152, EU567155–567160, EU567167–567168, EU567170, EU567174 (Table 1). Reference Symbiodinium types for phylogenetic analyses were obtained from the following authors: AJ311944 [125], AF380532, AF380537, AF380543, AF380546 [118], DQ238587 [126], AY457958 [127], AF334660 [128], AF396629 [129], EF455526, EF455528 [130], out group Heterocapsa sp. FK6-D47 AB084097 [131].

Experimental coral juveniles

Rearing coral juveniles (Acropora millepora) and infecting them with Symbiodinium clades D and C1 was performed following the protocol of Little et al. [44]; [for details see Supporting Information Text S3]. Individual A. millepora juveniles infected with Symbiodinium clades D and C1 were placed in 48 well plates and exposed to the following treatments (n = 4): 1. F2 dinoflagellate medium; 2. P1 supernatant diluted 1[ratio]1 with sterile seawater; 3. P3 supernatant diluted 1[ratio]1 with sterile seawater; 4. P1 supernatant diluted 1[ratio]1 with sterile F2 medium, treated with 50 mM EDTA and incubated for 1 h at 30°C; 5. P3 supernatant diluted 1[ratio]1 with sterile F2 medium, treated with 50 mM EDTA and incubated for 1 h at 30°C; 6. bacterial medium (LB) mixed 1[ratio]1 with dinoflagellate medium (F2). All EDTA and non-EDTA treatments were incubated for 1 h at 30°C prior to use. Plates were acclimatized for five days prior to exposure. Measurements and calculation of PS II dark and light adapted quantum yields and PS II inactivation were performed as described above. For measurements of PS II effective light adapted quantum yields (ΔF/Fm′), an actinic light source of 5 pmol m−2 s−1, identical to light intensity in the field, was switched on in the measuring chamber of the imaging PAM. Well plates containing A. millepora juveniles identical to those exposed to pathogen supernatants and controls under the imaging PAM were exposed and photographed under identical conditions (5-pmol m−2 s−1, 27°C) at 30 min intervals using a dissecting microscope (×1.6) and a digital camera.

Pathogen concentration experiment

Symbiodinium cultures (Z1 and Z4) were prepared as described above. Pathogen supernatant concentrations were prepared by diluting 0.22 µm filtered P1 supernatant with modified F2 medium to end concentrations of 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, 1% and 0.1% from original stock. Effective light adapted quantum yield (ΔF/Fm′) was measured under illumination as described above and PS II inactivation (I) was calculated. I of Symbiodinium culture Z1 and concentrations of P1, as proportions of 1.0, were plotted resulting in a parabolic curve (Fig. 5C). Reciprocating data for Z1 PS II inactivation (I) and P1 concentrations resulted in a Lineweaver-Burk [51] - ‘like’ linear plot (Fig. 5D), commonly used to describe the relation between substrate concentration (S) and reaction velocity (V). The term ‘like’ is used in this study, since neither the substrate for bacterial supernatants nor the products of their catalytic activity were determined. It was thus assumed that both supernatant dose and PS II inactivation (I) values are good estimates of S and V. The linear equation (y = ax+b) was used to determine 1/km′, when y = 0 and, with km' defined as the concentration of P1 needed to cause a 50% PS II inactivation (I) of the susceptible Symbiodinium culture Z1 within 10 min following exposure.

Protein sequence retrieval

Bacterial cultures P1–P4 were grown (1.8 L) and crude extracts were derived by ammonium sulphate precipitation [38] and ultra filtration (Amicon 5,000 M MWCO, Millipore, USA) before screening by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC). 10 µL from all 72 FPLC-derived fractions were assayed for proteolytic activity by the asocasein assay [49][50] and selected samples were run on zymogen gels containing 0.1% Na-casein as substrate [132]. Active fractions were re-run on a 12% SDS-PAGE [133] and bands were excised for nano-liquid chromatography peptide separation and mass spectrometry. LC/MS/MS data were searched using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK) and bacterial entries in the NCBI non-redundant protein database [134]. Additional information on FPLC and nano-LC/MC/MC protocols appears in Supporting Information Text S2.

Statistical Analysis

Means and standard errors (SE) for bacterial colony forming unit (CFU) counts, for absorption readings (bacterial cell density and proteolytic activity), for PS II dark adapted quantum yields and light adapted effective quantum yields were compared among treatments using One-Way ANOVA (Statistica, StatSoft, Inc. USA). CFU counts are presented in this study using logarithmic scales. Means and standard errors (SE) for PS II inactivation (as a proportion of 1.0) in all exposure experiments (treatments and controls) were compared using multivariate repeated measures MANOVA (Statistica, StatSoft, Inc. USA), which does not rest on the assumption of sphericity and compound symmetry [135]. Four multivariate tests of significance were applied (Wilks' Lambda, Pillai-Bartlett Trace, Hotelling-Lawley Trace, and Roy's Largest Root) with non-significant results used to overrule any previous assumptions of statistical significance. Significant results were determined when α≤0.05.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Inhibition of proteolytic activity of Vibrio pathogens. Legend for Fig. S1 can be found in Supporting Information file S1

(0.49 MB EPS)

Figure S2

Pathogen P1 growth conditions. A. Mean bacterial cell density (absorbance 595 nm) vs. incubation time (27°C with shaking at 150 rpm) appears in grey, and mean proteolytic activity in Units determined by the asocasein assay (black line) vs. incubation time. B. Calibration curve for cultures of pathogen P1: mean cell density (CFU) vs. mean cell density (absorbance 595 nm). n = 6 measurements per treatment. Additional information on Fig. S2 can be found in Supporting Information file S2.

(1.80 MB EPS)

Figure S3

Zinc-metalloprotease conserved domains. Domains of a 86.141 kDa pre-propeptide, a zinc-metalloprotease derived from coral pathogen supernatants (P1–P4). Propeptide (pink); PepSY (propeptide and YPEB domain; yellow); Catalitic domain (green); α-helical domain (azure); C-terminal domain (red). P1–P4 partial protein sequence alignments (BLAST/MASCOT) matched sequences of four conserved domains from previously identified Vibrio zinc-metalloproteases: Pathogen supernatant P3 - PepSY (propeptide and YPEB domain; yellow); Pathogen supernatant P3 - Catalitic domain (green); Pathogen supernatant P2–P4 - α-helical domain (blue); Pathogen supernatant P1 - C-terminal domain (red). Additional information on Fig. S3 can be found in Supporting Information file S3.

(1.01 MB EPS)

Text S1

Effect of ZnCl2 on proteolytic activity

(0.03 MB DOC)

Text S2

Protein sequence retrieval

(0.03 MB DOC)

Text S3

Rearing coral juveniles

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S1

Bioassay of Symbiodinium cultures; treatment allocation. 1 Each 96 well micro titre plate was loaded with equal aliquots from three Symbiodinium cultures (250 µL = 1×106 cells ml−1). Treatments (250 µL per well) were added at experimental begin. Plates were rotated by 180° during the experiment in order to verify that PS II yield readings from the edges of the microtitre plates were identical to those obtained from its inner parts. 2 Treatments with 50 mM EDTA were incubated for 1 h at 30°C before being used for exposure experiments. Treatments without EDTA were incubated under the same conditions (1 h, 30°C).

(0.03 MB DOC)

Supporting Information File S1

Supporting Information file S1 contains the legend of Figure S1

(0.03 MB DOC)

Supporting Information File S2

Pathogen P1 growth conditions

(0.02 MB DOC)

Supporting Information File S3

Zinc-metalloprotease conserved domains

(0.02 MB DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank D Abrego, R Cobb, W Dunlap, A Jones, A Klüter, L Peplow and H Safavi-Hemami for assistance in sample collection, processing and maintenance of Symbiodinium cultures. We thank J Reimer for providing ITS-1 sequence alignment data. We thank E Rosenberg from the Tel-Aviv University for reading the MS and for his insightful comments. FPLC and nano-LC/MS/MS were performed at the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (Macquarie University NSW, Australia). We thank C Clarke for performing the assays and L Adler for analyzing the data.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was funded by an ARC Discovery grant and a James Cook University CRIG grant to BL Willis. JC Mieog was supported by a NWO-WOTRO grant (the Netherlands, project nr. W84-576). Work at the Cape Ferguson laboratories was supported by the Australian Institute of Marine Science. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Harvell CD, Kim K, Burkholder JM, Colwell RR, Epstein PR, et al. Emerging marine diseases - climate links and anthropogenic factors. Science. 1999;285:1505–1510. [PubMed]
2. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Bellwood DR, Card M, Connolly SR, et al. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science. 2003;301:929–933. [PubMed]
3. Rosenberg E, Ben-Haim Y. Microbial diseases of corals and global warming. Environ Microbiol. 2002;4:318–326. [PubMed]
4. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, et al. Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science. 2002;296:2158–2162. [PubMed]
5. Rosenberg E, Falkovitz L. The Vibrio shiloi/Oculina patagonica model system of coral bleaching. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004;58:143–59. Review. [PubMed]
6. Dinsdale EA, Pantos O, Smriga S, Edwards RA, Angly F, et al. Microbial ecology of four coral atolls in the northern Line Islands. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(2):e1584. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001584. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science. 2008;321:926–929. [PubMed]
8. Koch R. Über bakteriologische Forschung Verhandlungen des X internationalen medicinischen Congresses, Berlin 1890, 1, 35, August Hirschwald Berlin 1891
9. Kushmaru A, Banin E, Loya Y, Stackebrandt E, Rosenberg E. Vibrio shiloi sp. nov., the causative agent of bleaching of the coral Oculina patagonica. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:1383–1388. [PubMed]
10. Ben-Haim Y, Thompson FL, Thompson CC, Cnockaert MC, Hoste B, et al. Vibrio coralliilyticus sp. nov., a temperature-dependent pathogen of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:309–315. [PubMed]
11. Bally M, Garrabou J. Thermodependent bacterial pathogens and mass mortalities in temperate benthic communities: a new case of emerging disease linked to climate change. Global Change Biology. 2007;13:2078–2088.
12. Sussman M, Willis BL, Victor S, Bourne DG. Coral pathogens identified for white syndrome epizootics in the Indo-Pacific. Plos ONE. 2008;3(6):e2393. doi: 10.10371/journal.pone.0002393. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Goarant C, Régnier F, Brizard R, Marteau AL. Acquisition of susceptibility to Vibrio penaeicida in Penaeus stylirostris postlarvae and juveniles. Aquaculture. 1998;169:291–296.
14. Paillard C. A short-review of brown ring disease, a vibriosis affecting clams, Ruditapes philippinarum and Ruditapes decussatus. Aquatic Living Resources. 2004;17:467–475.
15. Egidius E. Vibriosis: Pathogenicity and pathology. A review. Aquaculture. 1987;67:15–28.
16. Woo PTK, Bruno DW. Fish diseases and disorders, Vol. 3: Viral bacterial and fungal infections. Oxford, UK: Cabi publishing; 1999.
17. Cervino JM, Hayes RL, Polson SW, Polson SC, Goreau TJ, et al. Relationship of Vibrio species infection and elevated temperatures to yellow blotch/band disease in Caribbean corals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:6855–6864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Gil-Agudelo DL, Smith GW, Weil E. The white band disease type II pathogen in Puerto Rico. Rev Biol Trop. 2006;54 (supl 3):59–67.
19. Bourne DG, Lida Y, Uthicke S, Smith-Keune C. Changes in coral-associated microbial communities during a bleaching event. ISME J. 2007;2:350–363. [PubMed]
20. Piskorska M, Smith G, Weil E. Bacteria associated with the coral Echinopora lamellosa (Esper 1795) in the Indian Ocean-Zanzibar region. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2007;1:93–98.
21. Barneah O, Ben-Dov E, Kramarsky-Winter E, Kushmaro A. Characterization of black band disease in Red Sea stony corals. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:1995–2006. [PubMed]
22. Breitbart M, Bhagooli R, Griffin S, Johnston I, Rohwer F. Microbial communities associated with skeletal tumors on Porites compressa. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2005;243:431–436. [PubMed]
23. Harvell1 D, Aronson R, Baron N, Connell J, Dobson A, et al. The rising tide of ocean diseases: unsolved problems and research priorities. Front Ecol Environ. 2004;2:375–382.
24. Bourne DG, Munn CB. Diversity of bacteria associated with the coral Pocillopora damicornis from the Great Barrier Reef. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1162–1174. [PubMed]
25. Smith JE, Shaw M, Edwards RA, Obura D, Pantos O, et al. Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae-mediated, microbe-induced coral mortality. Ecology Letters. 2006;9:835–845. [PubMed]
26. Lesser MP, Bythell JC, Gates RD, Johnstone RW, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Are infectious diseases really killing corals? Alternative interpretation of the experimental and ecological data. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2007;346:36–44.
27. Ainsworth TD, Kramaky-Winter E, Loya Y, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Fine M. Coral disease diagnostics: what's between a plague and a band? Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:981–992. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, Efrony R, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2007;5:355–362. [PubMed]
29. Muller E, Rogers C, Spitzack A, van Woesik R. Bleaching increases likelihood of disease on Acropora palmata (Lamarck) in Hawksnest Bay, St John, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs. 2008;27:191.
30. Rosenberg E, Kushmaro A, Kramarsky-Winter E, Banin E, Loya Y. The role of microorganisms in coral bleaching. 2008. The ISME Journal advance online publication, 13 November 2008; doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.104.
31. Work TM, Richardson LL, Reynolds TL, Willis BL. Biochemical and veterinary medicine can increase our understanding of coral disease. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2008;362:63–70.
32. Norqvist A, Norrman B, Wolf-Watz H. Identification and characterization of a zinc metalloprotease associated with invasion by the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum. Infect Immun. 1990;58:3731–3736. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Aguirre-Guzmán G, Mejia Ruíz H, Ascencio F. A review of extracellular virulence product of Vibrio species important in diseases of cultivated shrimp. Aquaculture Res. 2004;35:1395–1404.
34. Binesse J, Delsert C, Saulnier D, Champomier-Vergès MC, Zagorec M, et al. The metmlloprotease Vsm is the main toxic factor for Vibrio splendidus extracellular products. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;73:777–784.
35. Crowther RS, Roomi NW, Fahim REF, Forstner JF. Vibrio cholera metalloprotease degrades intestinal mucin and facilitates enterotoxin-induced secretion from rat intestine. Biochim Biophys Acte. 1987;924:393–402. [PubMed]
36. Miyoshi S, Nakazawa H, Tomochika K, Shinoda S. Characterization of the hemorrhagic reaction caused by Vibrio vulnificus metalloprotease, a member of the thermolysin family. Infect Immun. 1998;66:4851–4855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Finkelstein RA, Boesman-Finkelstein M, Holt P. Vibrio cholera hemagglutinin/protease hydrolyzes fibronectin and ovomucin: FM Burnet revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:1092–1095. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Wu Z, Milton D, Nybom P, Sjo A, Magnusson KE. Vibrio cholera hemagglutinin/protease (HA/protease) causes morphological changes in cultured epithelial cells and perturbs their paracellular barrier function. Microb Pathogenesis. 1996;21:111–123. [PubMed]
39. Milton DL, Norqvist A, Wolf-Watz H. Cloning a metalloprotease gene involved in the virulence mechanism of Vibrio anguillarum. J Bacterio. 1992;174:7235–7244. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Finkelstein RA, Boesman-Finkelstein M, Chang Y, Hässe CC. Vibrio cholera hemagglutinin/protease, colonial variation, virulence, and detachment. Infect Immu. 1992;60:472–478. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Ben-Haim Y, Zicherman-Keren M, Rosenberg E. Temperature-regulated bleaching and lysis of the coral Pocillopora damicornis by the novel pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:4236–4242. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Booth BA, Finkelstein RA. Presence of hemag-glutinin/protease and other potential virulence factors in 01 and non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:183–186. [PubMed]
43. Shao CP, Hor LI. Metalloprotease is not essential for Vibrio vulnificus virulence in mice. Infect Immu. 2000;68:3569–3573. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Little AF, van Oppen MJ, Willis BL. Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals. Science. 2004;304:1492–149. [PubMed]
45. Havaux M, Lütz C, Grimm B. Chloroplast membrane photostability in chlP transgenic tobacco plants deficient in tocopherols. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:300–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;990:87–92.
47. Ralph PJ, Larkum AWD, Kuhl M. Temporal patterns in effective quantum yield of individual zooxanthellae expelled during bleaching. JEMBE. 2005;316:17–28.
48. Ralph PJ, Schreiber U, Gademann R, Kühl M, Larkum AWD. Coral photobiology studied with a new imaging pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer. J Phycol. 2005;41:335–342.
49. Windle HJP, Kelleher D. Identification and characterization of a metalloprotease activity from Helicobacter pylori. Infect Immun. 1997;65:3132–3137. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Denkin SM, Nelson DR. Induction of protease activity in Vibrio anguillarum by gastrointestinal mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:3555–3560. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Lineweaver H, Burk D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J Am Chem Soc. 1934;56:658–666.
52. Booth BA, Boesman-Finkelstein M, Finkelstein R. Vibrio cholera soluble hemagglutinin/protease is a metalloenzyme. Infect Immun. 1983;42:639–644. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Miyoshi S, Wakae H, Tomochika K, Shinoda S. Functional domains of a zinc metalloprotease from Vibrio vulnificus. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7606–7609. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gonzales NR, et al. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nuc Acids Res. 2007;35D:237–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Kushmaro A, Loya Y, Fine M, Rosenberg E. Bacterial infection and coral bleaching. Nature. 1996;380:396.
56. Geiser DM, Taylor JW, Ritchie KB, Smith GW. Cause of sea fan death in the West Indies. Nature. 1998;394:137–138.
57. Ben-Haim Y, Rosenberg E. A novel Vibrio sp. Pathogen of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol. 2002;141:47–55. v.
58. Patterson KL, Porter GW, Ritchie KB, Polson SW, Mueller E, et al. The etiology of white pox, a lethal disease of the Caribbean elkhorn coral, Acropora palmata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:8725–8730. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Denner EBM, Smith GW, Busse HJ, Schumann P, Narzt T, et al. Aurantimonas coralicida gen. nov., sp. nov., the causative agent of white plague type II on Caribbean scleractinian corals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:1115–1122. [PubMed]
60. Barash Y, Sulam R, Loya Y, Rosenberg E. Bacterial Strain BA-3 and a filterable factor cause a white plague-like disease in corals from the Eilat coral reef. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2005;40:183–189.
61. Banin E, Israely T, Fine M, Loya Y, Rosenberg E. Role of endosymbiotic zooxanthellae and coral mucus in the adhesion of the coral-bleaching pathogen Vibrio shiloi to its host. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;199:33–37. [PubMed]
62. Banin E, Vassilakos D, Orr E, Martinez RJ, Rosenberg E. Superoxide dismutase is a virulence factor produced by the coral bleaching pathogen Vibrio shiloi. Current Microbiology. 2003;46:418–422. [PubMed]
63. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Cline K, Werner-Washburne M, Andrews J, Keegstra K. Thermolysin is a suitable protease for probing the surface of intact pea chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1984;75:675–678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Joyard J, Billecocq A, Bartlett SG, Block MA, Chua NH, et al. Localization of polypeptides to the cytosolic side of the outer envelope membrane of spinach chloroplasts. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:10000–10006. [PubMed]
66. Tranel PJ, Froehlich J, Goyal A, Keegstra K. A component of the chloroplastic protein import apparatus is targeted to the outer membrane via a novel pathway. EMBO. 1995;14:2436–2446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Schroda M, Vallon O, Wollman FA, Beck CF. A chloroplast-targeted heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) contributes to photoprotection and repair of photosystem II during and after photoinhibition. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1165–1178. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Cervino JM, Hayes R, Goreau TJ, Smith GW. Zooxanthellae regulation in yellow blotch/band and other coral diseases contrasted with temperature related bleaching: In Situ destruction vs. expulsion. Symbiosis. 2004;37:63–85.
69. Hill R, Larkum AWD, Frankart C, Kühl M, Ralph PJ. Loss of functional Photosystem II reaction centres in zooxanthellae of corals exposed to bleaching conditions: using fluorescence rise kinetics. Photosynth Res. 2004;82:59–72. [PubMed]
70. Lesser MP. Elevated temperatures and ultraviolet radiation cause oxidative stress and inhibit photosynthesis in symbiotic dinoflagellates. Limnol Oceanogr. 1996;41:271–283.
71. Asada K. Radical production and scavenging in the chloroplasts. In: Baker NR, editor. Photosynthesis and the Environment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. pp. 123–150.
72. Barber J, Andersson B. Too much of a good thing: light can be bad for photosynthesis. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992;17:61–66. [PubMed]
73. Warner M, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW. Damage to photosystem II in symbiotic dinoflagellates: A determinant of coral bleaching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8007–8012. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Takahashi S, Whitney S, Itoh S, Maruyama T, Badger M. Heat stress causes inhibition of the de novo synthesis of antenna proteins and photobleaching in cultured Symbiodinium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4203–4208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Smith GJ. The effect of sudden changes in temperature, irradiance and salinity on the population density and export of zooxanthellae from the reef corals Stylophora pistillata (Esper 1797) and Seriatopora hystrix (Dana 1846). J Exper Mar Biol Ecol. 1989;129:279–303.
76. Hoegh-Guldberg O. Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world's coral reefs. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1999;50:839–866.
77. Gates RD, Baghdasarian G, Muscartine L. Temperature stress causes host cell detachment in symbiotic cnidarians: implications for coral bleaching. Biol Bull. 1992;182:324–332.
78. Brown BE. Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs. 1997;16:S129–S138.
79. Fitt WK, Brown BE, Warner ME, Dunne RP. Coral bleaching: interpretation of thermal tolerance limits and thermal thresholds in tropical corals. Coral Reefs. 2001;20:51–65.
80. Banin E, Khare SK, Naider F, Rosenberg E. Proline-rich peptide from the coral pathogen Vibrio shiloi that inhibits photosynthesis of zooxanthellae . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:1536–1541. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Stat M, Morris E, Gates RD. Functional diversity in coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. PNAS. 2008;105:9256–9261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Foulongne V, Michaux-Charachon S, Jumas-Bilak E, O'Callaghan D, Ramuz M. Stratégies pour la recherche de gènes de virulence chez les bactéries pathogènes. Pathologie Biologie. 2004;52:104–114. [PubMed]
83. Falkow S. Molecular Koch's postulates applied to microbial pathogenicity. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;2:S274–276. [PubMed]
84. Willis B, Page C, Dinsdale E. Coral disease on the Great Barrier Reef. In: Rosenberg E, Loya Y, editors. Coral Health and Disease. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2004. pp. 69–104.
85. Anthony SL, Page CA, Bourne DG, Willis BL. Newly characterized distinct phases of the coral disease ‘atramentous necrosis’ on the Great Barrier Reef. Dis Aquat Org. 2008;81:255–259. [PubMed]
86. Finkelstein RA, Hanne LF. Purification and characterization of the soluble hemagglutinin (cholera lectin) produced by Vibrio cholera. Infect Immun. 1982;36:1199–1208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Kothary MH, Kreger AS. Production and partial characterization of an elastolytic protease of Vibrio vulnificus. Infec Immun. 1985;50:534–540. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Oliver JD, Wear JE, Thomas MB, Warner M, Linder K. Production of exocellular enzymes and cytotoxicity by Vibrio vulnificus. Diag Microbiol Infec Dis. 1986;5:99–111. [PubMed]
89. Miyoshi SI, Shinoda S. Microbial metalloprotease and pathogenesis. Microbes and Infection. 2000;2:91–98. [PubMed]
90. Miyoshi S, Kawata K, Tomochika S, Shinoda S, Yamamoto S. The C-terminal domain promotes hemorrhagic damage caused by Vibrio vulnificus metalloprotease. Toxicon. 2001;39:1883–1886. [PubMed]
91. Varina M, Denkin SM, Staroscik AM, Nelson DR. Identification and characterization of Epp, the secreted processing protease for the Vibrio anguillarum EmpA metalloprotease. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:6589–6597. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
92. Thrusfield M. Veterinary Epidemiology 3rd Edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2005.
93. Roff G, Ulstrup KE, Fine M, Ralph PJ, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic activity within diseased corals from the Great Barrier Reef. J Phycol. 2008;44:526–538.
94. Bruno JF, Selig ER, Casey KS, Page CA, Willis BL, et al. Thermal stress and coral cover as drivers of coral disease outbreaks. PloS Biol. 2007;5:e124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Colwell RR. Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm. Science. 1996;274:2025–2031. [PubMed]
96. Israeli T, Banin E, Rosenberg E. Growth, differentiation and death of Vibrio shiloi in coral tissue as a function of seawater temperature. Aqua Microb Ecol. 2001;24:1–8.
97. Thune RL, Stanley LA, Cooper RK. Pathogenesis of gram-negative bacterial infections in warm water fish. Annu Rev Fish Dis. 1993;3:37–68.
98. Karunasagar I, Malathi PR, Karunasagar I. Mass mortality of Penaeus mondon larvae due to antibiotic-resistant Vibrio harveyi infection. Aquaculture. 1994;128:203–209.
99. Lightner DV. Diseases of cultured shrimp. In: McVey PV, editor. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Handbook of Mariculture CRC Press; 1993. pp. 393–486.
100. Utz J. Symposium on opportunistic fungal infections. Lab Invest. 1962;11:1017–1242.
101. Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. the damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2003;1:17–24. [PubMed]
102. Singh DV, Matte MH, Matte GR, Jiang S, Sabeena F, et al. Molecular analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139, non-O1, and non-O139 strains: Clonal relationships between clinical and environmental isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:910–921. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
103. Reidl J, Klose KE. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: out of the water and into the host. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26:125–139. [PubMed]
104. Austin B, Austin D, Sutherland R, Thompson F, Swings J. Pathogenicity of vibrios to rainbow trout (O. Mykiss, Walbaum) and Artemia nauplii. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1488–1495. [PubMed]
105. Reshef L, Koren O, Loya Y, Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. The coral probiotic hypothesis. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:2068–2073. [PubMed]
106. McCallum HI, Kuris A, Harvell CD, Lafferty KD, Smith GW, et al. Does terrestrial epidemiology apply to marine systems? Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:585–591.
107. Murray AG. Using simple models to review the application and implications of different approaches used to simulate transmission of pathogens among aquatic animals. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2008 doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.09.006. [PubMed]
108. Higgins DA, Pomianek ME, Kraml CM, Taylor RK, Semmelhack MF, et al. The major Vibrio cholerae autoinducer and its role in virulence factor production. Nature. 2007;450:883–886. [PubMed]
109. Farrell DH, Crosa JH. Purification and characterization of a secreted protease from the pathogenic marine bacterium Vibrio anguillarum. Biochem. 1991;30:3432–3436. [PubMed]
110. Kuo-Kau L, Shu-Ru Y, Ping-Chung L. Alkaline serine protease is an exotoxin of Vibrio alginolyticus in Kuruma Prawn, Penaeus japonicus. Curr Microbiol. 1997;34:110–117. [PubMed]
111. Guilard RRL, Ryther JH. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea (Cleve). Gran Can J Microbiol. 1962;8:229–239. [PubMed]
112. Schreiber E. Die Reinkultur von marinem Phytoplankton und deren Bedeutung fur die Erforschung der Produktionfahigkeit des Meerwassers. Wiss Meeresuntersuch. 1927;16:1–34.
113. Sussman M, Bourne DG, Willis BL. A single cyanobacterial ribotype is associated with both red and black bands on diseased corals from Palau. Dis Aquat Organ. 2006;69:111–118. [PubMed]
114. Santos SR, Taylor DJ, Coffroth MA. Genetic comparisons of freshly isolated versus cultured symbiotic dinoflagellates: implications for extrapolating to the intact symbiosis. J Phycol. 2001;37:900–912.
115. Iglesias-Prieto R, Beltrán VH, LaJeunesse TC, Reyes-Bonilla H, Thomé PE. Different algal symbionts explain the vertical distribution of dominant of reef corals in the eastern Pacific. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2004;271:1757–1763. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Schreiber U, Quayle P, Schmidt S, Escher BI, Mueller JF. Methodology and evaluation of a highly sensitive algae toxicity test based on multiwell chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Biosen Bioelect. 2006;22:2554–2563. [PubMed]
117. Wilson KJ, Li Y, Whan V, Lehnert SA, Byrne K, et al. Genetic mapping of the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon with Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms. Aquaculture. 2002;204:297–309.
118. van Oppen MJ, Palstra FP, Piquet AM, Miller DJ. Patterns of coral-dinoflagellate associations in Acropora: significance of local availability and physiology of Symbiodinium strains and host-symbiont selectivity. Proc Biol Sci. 2001;1478:1759–67. Erratum in: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268: 2617 (2001) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
119. Ulstrup KE, van Oppen MJH. Geographic and habitat partitioning of genetically distinct zooxanthellae (Symbiodinium) in Acropora corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Mol Ecol. 2003;12:3477–3484. [PubMed]
120. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
121. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package. Cladistics. 1989;5:164–166.
122. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. [PubMed]
123. Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
124. Retief JD. Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP. Meth Mol Biol. 2000;132:243. [PubMed]
125. Pochon XC, Pawlowski J, Zaninetti L, Rowan RG. High genetic diversity and relative specificity among Symbiodinium-like endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in soritid foraminiferans. Mar Biol. 2001;139:1069–1078.
126. Santiago-Vazquez LZ, Newberger NC, Kerr RG. Cryopreservation of the dinoflagellate symbiont of the octocoral Pseudopterogorgia elisabethae. Mar Biol. 2007;152:549–556.
127. Fabricius KE, Mieog JC, Colin, Idip D, van Oppen MJ. Identity and diversity of coral endosymbionts (zooxanthellae) from three Palauan reefs with contrasting bleaching, temperature and shading histories. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:2445–2458. [PubMed]
128. LaJeunesse TC. Investigating the biodiversity, ecology, and phylogeny of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates of the genus Symbiodinium using the ITS region: In search of a ‘species’ level marker. J Phycol. 2001;37:866–880.
129. Santos SR, Kinzie RA, III, Sakai K, Coffroth MA. Molecular characterization of nuclear small subunit (18S)-rDNA pseudogenes in a symbiotic dinoflagellate (Symbiodinium, Dinophyta). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2003;50:417–421. [PubMed]
130. Magalon H, Flot JF, Baudry E. Molecular identification of symbiotic dinoflagellates in Pacific corals in the genus Pocillopora. Coral Reefs. 2007;26:551–558.
131. Yoshida T, Nakai R, Seto H, Wang MK, Iwataki M, et al. Sequence analysis of 5.8S rDNA and the internal transcribed spacer region in dinoflagellate Heterocapsa sp. (Dinophyceae) and development of selective PCR primers for the bivalve killer Heterocapsa circularisquama. Microbes Environ. 2003;18:216–222.
132. Secades P, Alvarez B, Guijarro JA. Purification and characterization of a psychrophilic, calcium-induced, growth-phase-dependent metalloprotease from the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2436–2444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. [PubMed]
134. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaeffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
135. Huynh H, Feldt LS. Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distribution. J Am Stat Assoc. 1970;65:1582–1589.
136. Larsen KS, Auld DS. Characterization of an inhibitory metal binding site in carboxypeptidase. A Biochem. 1991;30:2610–2613. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...