![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peripheral, but not central nervous system, type I interferon expression in mice in response to intranasal vesicular stomatitis virus infection 1Biology Department, New York University, New York, New York, USA 2Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York, USA 3Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA 4NYU Cancer Center and Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA 5Department of Microbiology, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA Address correpondence to Carol Shoshkes Reiss, Biology Department and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. E-mail: carol.reiss/at/nyu.edu The current address of Mark D. Trottier is Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Neurovirol. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Type I interferon (IFN) is critical for resistance of mice to infection with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Wild type (wt) VSV infection did not induce type I IFN production in vitro or in the central nervous system (CNS) of mice; however IFN-β was detected in lungs, spleen, and serum within 24 h. The M protein mutant VSV, T1026R1 (also referred to as M51R), induced type I IFN production in vitro and in the CNS, with poor expression in spleens. In addition, VSV T1026R1 was not pathogenic to mice after intranasal infection, illustrating the importance of IFN in controlling VSV replication in the CNS. Experiments with chemical sympathectomy, sRAGE, and neutralizing antibody to VSV were performed to investigate the mechanism(s) utilized for induction of peripheral IFN; neither sRAGE infusion nor chemical sympathectomy had an effect on peripheral IFN production. In contrast, administration of neutralizing antibody (Ab) readily blocked the response. Infectious VSV was transiently present in lungs and spleens at 24 h post infection. The results are consistent with VSV traffic from the olfactory neuroepithelium to peripheral lymphoid organs hematogenously or via lymphatic circulation. These results suggest that VSV replicates to high titers in the brains of mice because of the lack of IFN production in the CNS after intranasal VSV infection. In contrast, replication of VSV in peripheral organs is controlled by the production of large amounts of IFN. Keywords: dendritic cells, iron production, viral encephalitis Introduction The rhabdovirus vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) causes severe central nervous system (CNS) pathology when administered to mice intranasally (i.n.) (Huneycutt et al, 1994; Sabin and Olitsky, 1938). Immunocompetent mice exhibit high morbidity and mortality at low doses of virus, succumbing to infection between 6 and 11 days post infection (p.i.). In contrast, inoculation of immunocompetent mice with high doses of VSV by the intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intraperitoneal routes generally leads to limited viral replication and no apparent disease (Reiss and Aoki, 1994). Similarly, intravenous (i.v.) inoculation of mice with high doses of VSV leads to limited viral replication in the periphery, but can cause CNS pathology if virus gains access to the brain. One of the major factors controlling VSV replication in peripheral organs is interferon (IFN); type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1)-deficient mice succumb rapidly to i.v. infection by VSV (100% mortality within 3 to 6 days p.i.), with high viral titers in peripheral organs (Muller et al, 1994). Similarly, STAT1-deficient mice succumb very rapidly to i.v. infection with VSV, with 100% mortality occurring within 2 days p.i. and high viral titers observed in the liver (Durbin et al, 1996). The ability of VSV to replicate in the mouse CNS to high titers while replication is controlled in the periphery suggests that either IFN is not produced in the CNS or neurons are not sensitive to IFN-mediated inhibition of VSV. Neurons are exquisitely sensitive to the antiviral effects of type I IFN, as both cultured lines and primary mouse neurons restrict VSV replication after pretreatment with IFN-β (Trottier et al, 2005). Such results suggest a lack of IFN induction in the mouse brain may contribute to the high pathogenicity of VSV in neural tissues. The VSV M protein has been shown to play an important role in suppressing IFN induction by VSV infection of L929, HeLa, and Baby Hampster Kidney (BHK) cells in vitro (Ahmed et al, 2003; Stojdl et al, 2003). VSV T1026R1 has been reported as an IFN-inducing mutant of VSV due to a mutation in the M protein (methionine to arginine in amino acid 51; M51R) (Francoeur et al, 1980, 1987). Subsequent studies using the cloned M gene from wild-type (wt) and T1026R1 virus have shown that wt M inhibits transcription of cellular genes including IFN-β, whereas M from T1026R1 does not (Ferran and Lucas-Lenard, 1997). wt M has also been shown to be able to block nucleocytoplasmic transport, in contrast to the M51R mutant (Petersen et al, 2000), and to be associated with induction of apoptosis (Gaddy and Lyles, 2005). Host induction of type I IFNs during innate immune responses to antigens, viral, fungal, or bacterial challenge, to single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), double-stranded (dsRNA), and CpG in DNA has been associated with the triggering of a family of receptors termed Toll-like receptors (TLRs) for their sequence similarity to Toll, which was first identified in the fruit fly (reviewed in Boehme and Compton, 2004; Conzelmann, 2005; Kawai and Akira, 2005; Yang et al, 2005). Although many cell types are able to express some TLRs, research has indicated that the plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) maintains a central role in the TLR-triggered IFN response (reviewed in Malmgaard, 2005). With viral challenges, type 1 IFN not only regulates host responses, but also can suppress viral replication. ssRNA viruses, like VSV, have been shown to elicit pDC activation through TLR7 and TLR8 (Diebold et al, 2004; Heil et al, 2004; Lund et al, 2004; Malmgaard, 2005), which signal through the MyD88 pathway (reviewed in Crozat and Beutler, 2004). A role for TLR 4 in VSV activation of pDCs has been suggested (Georgel et al, 2007; Jiang et al, 2005), as has the requirement for MyD88 signaling in VSV infection of the neuroepithelium (Zhou et al, 2007). In the case of VSV, activation of IFN production by pDCs has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo following peripheral inoculation (Barchet et al, 2002; Lund et al, 2004). The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) (Blalock, 1989; Madden, 2003; Weihe et al, 1991) and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (reviewed by Bailey et al, 2003; McEwen et al, 1997; Silverman et al, 2005) regulate many peripheral immune functions in health and disease. Thus, VSV infection of the CNS might activate host responses through the SNS. A common way to evaluate the contribution of the SNS to host immune responses is by chemical sympathectomy with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). In excitotoxicity or cerebrovascular ischemic events, traumatic insults to the brain, the host is alerted by a number of pathways, including the release of S100B by astrocytes (Herrmann and Ehrenreich, 2003). The receptor for S100B (and also for many other proinflammatory molecules including High Mobility Group B-1 (HMGB-1). (Chen et al, 2004) is RAGE (Hofmann et al, 1999), originally characterized as the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts in hyperglycemia (Neeper et al, 1992). Schmidt's group has elucidated many proinflammatory pathways and diseases in which RAGE contributes by the use of the soluble receptor, sRAGE (Lalla et al, 2000; Liliensiek et al, 2004; Yan et al, 2003). In this report, we analyze the ability of VSV to induce IFN synthesis in the periphery and CNS. Infection of NB41A3 neuroblastoma cells by VSV did not result in IFN production, whereas infection by Newcastle disease virus (NDV) did, suggesting that neuronal cells were capable of producing type I IFN, but not in response to wt VSV infection. No IFN mRNA could be detected in the brains of VSV-infected mice as late as 6 days p.i. In contrast, i.n. infection by VSV induces high levels of type I IFN mRNA in spleens and lungs, and protein detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and bioassay in the serum of mice 24 h p.i. To determine the mechanism of IFN induction in the spleen, we examined two well-characterized pathways of inflammatory signaling between the CNS and the immune system, the SNS and RAGE; neither was found to contribute to the production of IFN by the spleen. Infectious VSV was detectable in lungs and spleens of VSV-infected mice at 24 h p.i., but little was found in serum. When we used a virus that was mutated in the M protein (T1026R1), IFN mRNA was induced in vitro and also in the CNS; T1026R1 virus infection of mice showed low pathogenicity, suggesting that the viral M protein is critical for evasion of host responses. IFN production required hematogenous or lymphatic transfer of infectious virus from the nasal neuroepithelium, because it could be prevented by passive immunization with neutralizing antibody (Ab). The results suggest that the M protein of VSV blocks IFN synthesis in neurons and other infected CNS cells, whereas peripheral IFN production is not antagonized by the viral M protein. The failure to elicit IFN in the CNS may be attributable to the lack of expression of TLR7 by neurons, and contributes to the disease pathogenesis (Trottier et al, in preparation). Results VSV does not induce type I IFN in infected neuroblastoma cells NB41A3 cells, a neuroblastoma cell line, have been shown to have many properties of neurons, including the ability to form neurotubules and neurofilaments and in the storage and release of catecholamines (Breakfield et al, 1975; Schubert et al, 1969); they constitutively express neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS-1), IFN-γ eceptor (IFN-γ R), interleukin-12 receptor (IL-12R), and the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (Bi and Reiss, 1995; Ireland and Reiss, 2004; Komatsu et al, 1996). The effects of type I and II IFN on these cells have also been studied; the inhibitory effects of these cytokines on VSV replication are similar in these cells and in primary murine neurons (Chesler et al, 2003; Trottier et al, 2005). To determine if NB41A3 cells were able to synthesize type I IFN in response to virus infection, NB41A3 cells were infected with either VSV or NDV at various multiplicities of infection (m.o.i.). At 12 and 24 h p.i., cell supernatants were harvested and assayed for type I IFN by bioassay. IFN bioassays take advantage of the stability of type I IFN to both ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and to acid pH. Test samples were treated with HCl to pH 2 and then neutralized, or (in the case of small volumes) with UV light. Treated samples were then applied to an indicator cell line, in this case NB41A3 cells. If samples contained IFN, the cells were able to enter an antiviral state, and thus resist subsequent challenge with virus. Thus results of the IFN bioassay were expressed as plaque-forming units (PFU)/ml or log PFU/ml. In the absence of IFN, the sample would yield a high viral titer, whereas if IFN were present in the serum or cell culture supernatant tested, the indicator cell line would be protected from infection, and a low viral titer would be apparent. Supernatants from NDV-infected NB41A3 cells infected at a m.o.i. = 10 had antiviral activity in IFN bioassays when diluted up to 20-fold (Figure 1
VSV infection of neuroblastoma cells activates IRF-3 signaling pathway To determine whether neuroblastoma cells sense VSV infection, the ability of VSV to induce IFN regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) nuclear localization was tested. NB41A3 cells were infected for 4 h with wt VSV and assayed by immunofluorescence. Infection with VSV induced nuclear localization of IRF-3 (Figure 2
VSV infection does not induce IFN mRNA synthesis in mouse brains VSV infection of mice after i.n. inoculation results in rapid spread to the brain and resulting encephalitis. To determine whether i.n. VSV infection induced a type I IFN response in mouse brains, male BALB/c mice were infected intranasally with VSV. Brains from VSV-infected mice were harvested on days 1, 3, and 6 p.i. and analyzed for the presence of type I IFN mRNA. No IFN-β mRNA was detected in VSV-infected mouse brains (Figure 3A
Intranasal VSV infection induces splenic and serum IFN To analyze the peripheral IFN response to VSV infection, mice were infected i.n. with VSV and spleens and serum harvested at 24 h p.i. reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays performed on spleen total RNA revealed the presence of IFN-β mRNA at 24 h p.i. (Figure 3B Mutant VSV replicates and induces IFN in neuronal cells in vitro and in vivo VSV T1026R1 has been reported as an IFN-inducing mutant of VSV due to the M51R mutation in the M protein (Francoeur et al, 1980, 1987). To test the ability of this virus to replicate in neuronal cells, NB41A3 cells were infected with wt VSV or VSV T1026R1 at m.o.i. = 0.1. At 8, 24, 32, and 36 h p.i., supernatants were harvested and subjected to plaque assay to determine viral titers. VSV T1026R1 replicated to high titers in NB41A3 cells, similar to that observed for wild type VSV (Figure 4A
To determine the ability of mutant VSV to induce IFN production by neuronal cells, NB41A3 cells were infected with VSV, NDV, or VSV T1026R1 for 24 h at various m.o.i. and cell supernatants were assayed for the presence of IFN (Figure 4B To investigate the pathogenicity of and IFN induction by VSV T1026R1 in vivo, groups of 10 male BALB/c mice were infected i.n. with wt or T1026R1 VSV. wt VSV induced severe morbidity (Figure 4D How does the periphery know that there is an intranasal infection? In order to determine how the spleen “learned” that the nasal neuroepithelium and, after 6 to12 h, the olfactory bulb were infected, we investigated the possibility that the SNS was involved. Every lymphoid organ is innervated by sympathetic neurons (Blalock, 1989; Madden, 2003; Weihe et al, 1991). Mice were treated with 6-OHDA to establish a chemical sympathectomy and then challenged with VSV i.n. Serum was harvested at 24 h p.i. and presence of type I IFN was determined by bioassay. There was no difference between control and 6-OHDA–treated mice in the level of type I IFN present in serum (Figure 5A
If the infection in the nasal neuroepithelium and olfactory bulb were perceived of as traumatic by astrocytes, it was possible that S100B would be released (Herrmann and Ehrenreich, 2003). Previous studies in our laboratory had indicated that glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is readily expressed by astrocytes in the olfactory bulb as early as when viral antigens are first detected in the CNS (Barna et al, 1996b), which would be consistent with astrocytic responsiveness to the viral infection. To assess whether S100B was released and could activate splenic macrophages or plasmacytoid dendritic cells through the receptor, the soluble receptor, sRAGE, was obtained from Ann-Marie Schmidt (Columbia University) and administered to mice which were infected with VSV i.n. As shown in Figure 5B Intranasal VSV-infected mice produce IFN mRNA in the lung Another possibility for how i.n. infection of mice leads to peripheral IFN is via replication of VSV in the lungs. With delivery of large volumes of inoculum, and high titers of virus, VSV can be inhaled into the lung; however, we use 5 μl, a volume essentially restricted to the nasal turbinates. Alternatively, infection may lead to enhanced secretion of fluid by Bowman's glands in the neuroepithelial tissue, which could result in virus being carried into the lower respiratory tract. RT-PCR analysis of lung total RNA revealed the presence of type I IFN mRNA in lungs of infected animals at day 1 p.i. (Figure 6A
VSV replicates in lung and spleen at 24 h p.i. To determine if VSV is inducing peripheral IFN synthesis by infecting peripheral tissues, male BALB/c mice were infected i.n. with 1 × 104 PFU VSV and brains, lungs, spleens, and serum were harvested. Tissues homogenates were subjected to plaque assays to determine the presence of infectious VSV. As expected, infectious VSV was detectable in the brain at 24 h p.i. both by plaque assay and by RT-PCR for VSV M RNA (Figures 6B
How does VSV get from the neuroepithelium to the spleen? Although it is possible that VSV is passively carried by fluid in the nasal turbinates to the lung, the mechanism of transport of infectious virus from the nasal neuroepithlium to the spleen was investigated. One possibility we evaluated was the hematogenous route or via lymphatic drainage. If VSV were cell associated, it would be inaccessible to neutralizing Ab. To determine if free (that is, cell-free) virus were transmitted in either plasma or lymphatic fluid, groups of BALB/c mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with neutralizing sheep anti-VSV Ab or normal sheep serum either 2 h before the i.n. inoculation of VSV or 6 h thereafter. Spleens were harvested at 24 h p.i. and assessed for expression of VSV M and IFN-β mRNA. As shown in Figure 7 Discussion Previous studies have revealed the critical importance of the type I IFN pathway in control of VSV replication in mice. IFNAR1 −/− mice and STAT1 −/− mice are highly susceptible to lethal VSV infection, showing high viral titers in organs not normally infected productively in wt mice (Durbin et al, 1996; Muller et al, 1994). Similarly, dsRNA–dependent protein kinase (PKR) −/− mice were shown to be highly susceptible to lethal infection with VSV administered i.n. (Durbin et al, 2002; Stojdl et al, 2000). Thus, pathways involving type I IFN are crucial for control of VSV in peripheral organs. In contrast, wt mice are highly susceptible to viral encephalitis following i.n. inoculation, which allows VSV efficient access to the brain through olfactory receptor neurons (Plakhov et al, 1995b). In this study we tested the hypothesis that IFN rapidly controls peripheral infections but fails to suppress VSV infection of the CNS, and investigated the mechanisms that contribute to this innate immune failure. Of note, Stojdl et al (2000) showed low mortality in wild-type BALB/c mice infected i.n. with VSV. These results conflict with the severe mortality observed in wt VSV infected mice in our study (see Figure 4 We have shown previously that VSV replication in neurons is strongly inhibited by type I IFN in vitro (Trottier et al, 2005), suggesting that if IFN was produced in the CNS in response to VSV infection, neurons could be protected from VSV infection. In this study we investigated that possibility, showing that type I IFN was detected in mouse spleens, lungs, and serum of i.n. infected mice at 24 h p.i., but no IFN mRNA was found in brain tissue homogenates as late as day 6 p.i (Figure 3 Astrocytes respond to i.n. VSV infection as early as 24 h by the production of GFAP and NOS-3 (Barna et al, 1996b). Similarly, Campbell and colleagues have observed that the liver rapidly responds to CNS injury, triggering leukocyte recruitment and chemokine production (Campbell et al, 2005). To determine if there were a contribution of either S100B release by astrocytes reacting to infection of adjacent neurons, or the SNS, to the induction of the peripheral IFN in response to i.n. VSV infection, we administered the soluble receptor for S100B, sRAGE, and performed a chemical sympathectomy, respectively. Neither treatment abrogated the production of IFN in the spleen or serum (Figure 5A and B Examination of lung and spleen for infectious VSV or VSV RNA confirmed that virus had rapidly entered these organs and replicated (Figures 6 The relatively high VSV titer in mouse spleens at 24 h p.i. suggests that transient viral replication in the spleen leads to IFN induction. Indeed, i.n. application of UV-inactivated VSV does not induce peripheral IFN production indicating a need for viral replication. Thus, it appears that VSV gains access to either blood or lymphatic circulation and then travels to the lung and spleen. Analysis of mouse blood by plaque assay has shown no evidence of infectious VSV after our inoculum with low dose (data not shown); however, VSV in serum has been described after mice were infected with higher titers (Publicover et al, 2005). Administration of neutralizing Ab to VSV 2 h before, but not 6 h after, i.n. infection abrogated the IFN response in the spleen at 24 h p.i; this was also associated with inhibition of infection of the spleen when Ab was present before i.n. application of virus (Figure 6 Although the mutant virus T1026R1 replicated in the brains of mice at 24 h post i.n. infection, no virus was detected in the lung or spleen. In spite of this, 4 of 4 mice infected with T1026R1 virus produced detectable amounts of IFN-β in blood. The ELISA titers of IFN-β were substantially lower, however, than those obtained in mice administered wt VSV. In contrast to mice infected with wt VSV, IFN-β was found in the brains of T1026R1-infected mice. It is likely that the rapid production of IFN by this mutant virus profoundly limited its replication and spread in vivo, by eliciting a protective antiviral state in adjoining cells. The lack of IFN production in the CNS after VSV infection does not appear to be a universal phenomenon with viruses. Type I IFN is strongly induced, early, in brains of MHV-JHM infected mice, and IFN production was sustained for at least 7 days (Rempel et al, 2004). Similarly, the GDVII strain of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) induces type I IFN in the CNS, and this IFN is produced by neurons (Delhaye et al, 2006). Interestingly, both of these viruses cause severe, acute encephalitis similar to that observed with VSV. In contrast, studies with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and the BeAn strain of TMEV have shown a lack IFN production after early viral replication in the brain (Sandberg et al, 1994; Trottier et al, 2004). Similar to our findings, LCMV induced peripheral, but not CNS, production of IFN (Sandberg et al, 1994). One question in this viral encephalitis model is why a type I IFN response is not rapidly induced in the brains of wt VSV-infected mice whereas it was in the spleen. There are abundant pDCs in the spleen and lymph nodes, which are absent in the resting CNS, and pDCs monitor for pathogen exposure and produce IFN. It is clear that wt VSV blocks IFN synthesis in infected cells via the biological effects of M protein (Ahmed et al, 2003; Ferran and Lucas-Lenard, 1997; Francoeur et al, 1980, 1987; Petersen et al, 2000; Stojdl et al, 2003). Any VSV-infected neuronal or extraneuronal cell may have IFN gene expression limited by the activity of VSV M protein. In contrast, pDCs are poised to recognize Pathogen associated molecular pattern (PAMPs), through receptors including TLRs, and rapidly produce and secrete IFNs, despite the evasive pathways developed by pathogens. The cell type and critical molecules involved in this system are currently under investigation. Although many peripheral cell types infiltrate the CNS during the course of VSV encephalitis, starting with neutrophils as early as 24 to 36 h p.i. (Ireland and Reiss, 2006), followed by NK cells at 3 days p.i. and both CD4 and CD8 cells as well as macrophages around day 7 p.i. (Christian et al, 1996), we have found no evidence for the presence of plasmacytoid dendritic cells during the first 14 days after VSV infection (Palian et al, unpublished). Indeed, pDCs are reportedly absent from the brain parenchyma, but have been found in brain during chronic inflammation (Ambrosini et al, 2005; Bailey et al, 2007; Matyszak and Perry, 1997; Newman et al, 2005; Rosicarelli et al, 2005; Serafini et al, 2006; Zozulya et al, 2007). IFN-producing cells do not enter the CNS at early times after infection by wt VSV, and peripheral IFN does not cross the blood-brain barrier efficiently (Dafny and Yang, 2005). Thus it appears the lack of pDCs in the brain and the inability of infected neurons to produce IFN provides VSV with an ideal site for replication. Materials and methods Cells, animals, and viruses Mouse neuroblastoma (NB41A3) cells were purchased from ATCC and maintained in F12K medium with 15% horse serum, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells were a gift of Alice Huang and were maintained in Cellgro Free medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Taconic Laboratories (Germantown, NY). All mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free facilities at New York University in accordance with University Animal Welfare Committee (UAWC) guidelines. VSV (Indiana strain, San Juan serotype; originally obtained from Alice S. Huang) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV strain B1; generously provided by Peter Palese, Mt Sinai School of Medicine) were used for virus infections. UV-VSV and DI particles were prepared as previously described (Bi et al, 1995; Browning et al, 1991; Plakhov et al, 1995a, 1995b). VSV T1026R1 was isolated from the HR strain was generously provided by Laurent Poliquin (University of Quebec); the virus has been shown to have a mutation in the M protein and to induce IFN in several cell types including mouse L cells (Francoeur et al, 1980, 1987). Immunofluorescence studies NB41A3 cells were grown on 4-well chamber slides and infected with either VSV or NDV at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) = 10. At various times p.i., cells were washed and treated with 200 μl 10% buffered formalin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min at 4°C, washed again, and then permeablized with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS at 4°C for 10 min. After washing, slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with 5% goat serum, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, then incubated for 2 h at 20°C (room temperature [rt]) with rabbit anti-IRF-3 (Zymed, San Francisco, CA) at a concentration of 0.75 μg/ml in 1% BSA-PBS. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with goat anti-rabbit Alexafluor 488–conjugated secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) for 1 h at rt. Slides were washed before mounting in Permount containing Pro-Long antifade reagent (Molecular Probes) and 4′-6′-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (0.5 mg/ml). Experimental infection and treatment of mice Male BALB/c mice (6 to 7 weeks of age) were anesthetized with isofluorane and infected i.n. with various doses of VSV ranging from 30 to 1 × 104 PFU in PBS with a dose of 5 μl per nostril; mock-infected mice were inoculated with the same volume of PBS, i.n. Mice were treated with UV-VSV at a dose 5 × 106 PFU. At various times p.i., mice were anesthetized with Avertin. Blood was obtained from animals by cardiac puncture into Eppendorf tubes and stored at 4°C overnight for clotting, and subsequent collection of serum. Spleens, lungs, and brains were aseptically removed, divided in half and then immediately homogenized using Potter-Elvijem tubes either in PBS (for plaque assays) or in Trizol (Invitrogen) for isolation of total RNA. Mutant VSV T1026R1 was also used for intranasal infection at a dose of 4 × 106 PFU, and mice were processed as above. Chemical sympathectomy was performed by i.p. injection of groups of five male BALB/c mice with 100 mg/kg/day 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, Sigma) or media for 10 days prior to i.n. infection with VSV as described above. To assess the possible role of S100B release, groups of five male BALB/c mice were injected i.p. with either 100 μg mouse serum albumin (Sigma) diluted in saline or 100 μg sRAGE (generously provided by Ann-Marie Schmidt, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University) and immediately infected i.n. with 100 PFU VSV or mock-infected with PBS. Blood and organs were sampled as described above at 24 h p.i. Normal serum (Sigma) or sheep neutralizing polyclonal anti-VSV antibody (0.5 ml) were administered i.p. to groups of 10 mice either 2 h prior to or 6 h post i.n. infection with 30 PFU VSV. Tissues were harvested at 24 h p.i. and processed as above.
RT-PCR Total RNA was isolated from mouse tissues using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA was treated with DNase I (DNA-free kit, Ambion) to remove chromosomal DNA contamination. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen) in a volume of 20 μl. Two μl cDNA was used in PCR reactions using the GeneAmp Gold RNA-PCR kit (Applied Biosystems), with PCR conditions being 95°C 10 s followed by 35 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 55°C 30 s, 72°C 1 min. PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis. Primers for IFN-β and IFN-α were as reported previously (Marie et al, 1998). Primers and the size of the products follow. IFN bioassays IFN bioassays were used to estimate the amount of type I IFN in mouse serum or cell culture supernatants. Mouse serum was irradiated for 3 min in a 50-μl volume on ice using a Stratalinker (Stratagene). Tissue culture supernatants from NB41A3 cells (1 ml) were adjusted to pH 2 with 0.25 N HCl and incubated at 4°C for 24 h, after which the pH was adjusted to 7 with 0.25 N NaOH. Irradiated serum (50 μl) or acid-treated supernatants (500 μl) were added to NB41A3 monolayers and allowed to incubate 18 to 24 h to allow cells to achieve an antiviral state. After incubation, monolayers were challenged with VSV at m.o.i. = 0.1 for 30 min in 200 μl F12K medium, after which virus was removed and fresh media added. After 7 h, cell supernatants were harvested and serially diluted before adsorption on CHO cell monolayers. Following overnight incubation in 0.9% agar-containing medium, the monolayers were fixed and stained with methylene blue and plaques were counted. The presence of IFN in either serum or culture supernatant resulted in a 500- to 1000-fold decrease in plaques in the treated monolayers. Alternatively, to semiquantify the amount of IFN in serum samples, serial dilutions were added to NB41A3 cells and allowed to incubate for 18 h. Cells were challenged with VSV at m.o.i. = 0.01. After 24 h, cells were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and stained with methylene blue. Preserved monolayers stained blue after 24-h infection indicated the presence of IFN. Mouse IFN-β (R&D Systems; 100 U/ml) was used as positive control. IFN ELISA assays ELISA assays to determine concentration of murine IFN-β in plasma samples was performed according to manufacturer's directions (PBL Medical Laboratories). Mouse IFN-β (R&D Systems) was used as positive control. Normal mouse serum was used as a negative control. Acknowledgments The authors are very appreciative of Peter Palese and Neva Morales (Mt Sinai School of Medicine) for providing NDV, Laurent Poliquin (University of Quebec) for providing T1026R1 virus, and Ann Marie Schmidt (College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University) for sRAGE. Valuable conversations with Akiko Iwasaki (Yale University), V. Hugh Perry (University of Southampton), and Susan Morgello (Mt. Sinai School of Medicine) during the course of this work provided insights and are gratefully acknowledged. Technical support was provided by Marta Crowe and Ernest Yakob. Paul M. D'Agostino assisted in preparation of some figures. This work was supported by postdoctoral fellowship NS11073 to M.D.T. and a Research Challenge Fund award N5385 from New York University, and DC003536 and NS039746 to C.S.R. Footnotes Publisher's Disclaimer: Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brain Res. 1994 Jan 28; 635(1-2):81-95.
[Brain Res. 1994]Science. 1994 Jun 24; 264(5167):1918-21.
[Science. 1994]Cell. 1996 Feb 9; 84(3):443-50.
[Cell. 1996]Virology. 2005 Mar 15; 333(2):215-25.
[Virology. 2005]J Virol. 2003 Apr; 77(8):4646-57.
[J Virol. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2003 Oct; 4(4):263-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2003]Virology. 1980 Sep; 105(2):526-36.
[Virology. 1980]Virology. 1987 Sep; 160(1):236-45.
[Virology. 1987]J Virol. 1997 Jan; 71(1):371-7.
[J Virol. 1997]J Virol. 2004 Aug; 78(15):7867-73.
[J Virol. 2004]J Virol. 2005 May; 79(9):5241-8.
[J Virol. 2005]Arthritis Res Ther. 2005; 7(1):12-9.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2005]Immunity. 2005 Nov; 23(5):465-78.
[Immunity. 2005]Viral Immunol. 2005; 18(4):584-94.
[Viral Immunol. 2005]Physiol Rev. 1989 Jan; 69(1):1-32.
[Physiol Rev. 1989]Brain Behav Immun. 2003 Feb; 17 Suppl 1():S5-10.
[Brain Behav Immun. 2003]Int J Neurosci. 1991 Jul; 59(1-3):1-23.
[Int J Neurosci. 1991]Viral Immunol. 2003; 16(2):141-57.
[Viral Immunol. 2003]Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997 Feb; 23(1-2):79-133.
[Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997]Brain Res. 1975 Jul 11; 92(2):237-56.
[Brain Res. 1975]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Sep; 64(1):316-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969]J Virol. 1995 Apr; 69(4):2208-13.
[J Virol. 1995]Viral Immunol. 2004; 17(3):411-22.
[Viral Immunol. 2004]J Neuroimmunol. 1996 Aug; 68(1-2):101-8.
[J Neuroimmunol. 1996]Virology. 2005 Mar 15; 333(2):215-25.
[Virology. 2005]Virology. 1980 Sep; 105(2):526-36.
[Virology. 1980]Virology. 1987 Sep; 160(1):236-45.
[Virology. 1987]J Virol. 2003 Apr; 77(8):4646-57.
[J Virol. 2003]J Virol. 1997 Jan; 71(1):371-7.
[J Virol. 1997]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Nov; 20(22):8590-601.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]Cancer Cell. 2003 Oct; 4(4):263-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2003]Physiol Rev. 1989 Jan; 69(1):1-32.
[Physiol Rev. 1989]Brain Behav Immun. 2003 Feb; 17 Suppl 1():S5-10.
[Brain Behav Immun. 2003]Int J Neurosci. 1991 Jul; 59(1-3):1-23.
[Int J Neurosci. 1991]Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2003; 21(3-4):177-90.
[Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2003]Virology. 1996 Sep 15; 223(2):331-43.
[Virology. 1996]Cell. 1996 Feb 9; 84(3):443-50.
[Cell. 1996]Science. 1994 Jun 24; 264(5167):1918-21.
[Science. 1994]Viral Immunol. 2002; 15(1):41-51.
[Viral Immunol. 2002]J Virol. 2000 Oct; 74(20):9580-5.
[J Virol. 2000]Virology. 1995 May 10; 209(1):257-62.
[Virology. 1995]J Virol. 2000 Oct; 74(20):9580-5.
[J Virol. 2000]Viral Immunol. 2002; 15(1):41-51.
[Viral Immunol. 2002]J Neuroimmunol. 1996 Jun; 67(1):31-9.
[J Neuroimmunol. 1996]Virology. 2005 Mar 15; 333(2):215-25.
[Virology. 2005]J Virol. 1998 Jan; 72(1):542-9.
[J Virol. 1998]J Virol. 2003 Apr; 77(8):4646-57.
[J Virol. 2003]Cancer Cell. 2003 Oct; 4(4):263-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2003]Virology. 1996 Sep 15; 223(2):331-43.
[Virology. 1996]Am J Pathol. 2005 May; 166(5):1487-97.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]J Virol. 2006 Jul; 80(14):7028-36.
[J Virol. 2006]J Virol. 2005 Dec; 79(24):15043-53.
[J Virol. 2005]Infect Immun. 1980 Aug; 29(2):654-62.
[Infect Immun. 1980]J Virol. 2005 Nov; 79(21):13231-8.
[J Virol. 2005]Virology. 2004 Jan 5; 318(1):381-92.
[Virology. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 16; 103(20):7835-40.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]J Virol. 1994 Nov; 68(11):7358-66.
[J Virol. 1994]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(22):12480-8.
[J Virol. 2004]J Virol. 2003 Apr; 77(8):4646-57.
[J Virol. 2003]J Virol. 1997 Jan; 71(1):371-7.
[J Virol. 1997]Virology. 1980 Sep; 105(2):526-36.
[Virology. 1980]Virology. 1987 Sep; 160(1):236-45.
[Virology. 1987]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Nov; 20(22):8590-601.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]Viral Immunol. 2006 Summer; 19(3):536-45.
[Viral Immunol. 2006]Viral Immunol. 1996; 9(3):195-205.
[Viral Immunol. 1996]J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005 Aug; 64(8):706-15.
[J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005]Nat Immunol. 2007 Feb; 8(2):172-80.
[Nat Immunol. 2007]Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997; 417():295-9.
[Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997]J Virol. 1995 Oct; 69(10):6466-72.
[J Virol. 1995]J Immunol. 1991 Oct 15; 147(8):2685-91.
[J Immunol. 1991]J Neurovirol. 1995 Jun; 1(2):207-18.
[J Neurovirol. 1995]Virology. 1995 May 10; 209(1):257-62.
[Virology. 1995]Virology. 1980 Sep; 105(2):526-36.
[Virology. 1980]EMBO J. 1998 Nov 16; 17(22):6660-9.
[EMBO J. 1998]