![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Bacterial Infection of Smad3/Rag2 Double-Null Mice with Transforming Growth Factor-β Dysregulation as a Model for Studying Inflammation-Associated Colon Cancer From the Department of Comparative Medicine,* University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology,† Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado; Seattle Genetics, Incorporated,‡ Bothell, Washington; the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,§ Seattle, Washington; and the Medical Service,¶ Departments of Veterans Medical Center and Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Accepted October 14, 2008. Abstract Alterations in genes encoding transforming growth factor-β-signaling components contribute to colon cancer in humans. Similarly, mice deficient in the transforming growth factor-β signaling molecule, Smad3, develop colon cancer, but only after a bacterial trigger occurs, resulting in chronic inflammation. To determine whether Smad3-null lymphocytes contribute to increased cancer susceptibility, we crossed Smad3-null mice with mice deficient in both B and T lymphocytes (Rag2−/− mice). Helicobacter-infected Smad3/Rag2-double knockout (DKO) mice had more diffuse inflammation and increased incidence of adenocarcinoma compared with Helicobacter-infected Smad3−/− or Rag2−/− mice alone. Adoptive transfer of WT CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells provided significant protection of Smad3/Rag2-DKO from bacterial-induced typhlocolitis, dysplasia, and tumor development, whereas Smad3−/− T-regulatory cells provided no protection. Immunohistochemistry, real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and Western blot analyses of colonic tissues from Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice 1 week after Helicobacter infection revealed an influx of macrophages, enhanced nuclear factor-κB activation, increased BclXL/Bcl-2 expression, increased c-Myc expression, accentuated epithelial cell proliferation, and up-regulated IFN-γ, IL-1α, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 transcription levels. These results suggest that the loss of Smad3 increases susceptibility to colon cancer by at least two mechanisms: deficient T-regulatory cell function, which leads to excessive inflammation after a bacterial trigger; and increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines, enhanced nuclear factor-κB activation, and increased expression of both pro-oncogenic and anti-apoptotic proteins that result in increased cell proliferation/survival of epithelial cells in colonic tissues. Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are at increased risk for developing colon cancer, indicating that chronic inflammation and cancer are closely linked in the gastrointestinal tract.1,2,3 In addition, bacteria are being increasingly appreciated as etiological agents that contribute to the development of certain cancers, in part by stimulating chronic inflammation.4,5,6 For example, in humans, the induction of gastritis, hepatitis, and colitis by bacterial pathogens has been implicated in the transformation of affected tissues. Host responses to selected intestinal microbial organisms can drive inflammation7 eventually leading to the development of dysplasia and cancer in these diseases. However, it is unclear how individual host factors influence whether particular organisms will induce inflammation followed by cancer, or inflammation followed by bacterial clearance or symbiosis. Altered responses to transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling can contribute to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colon cancer in both animal models and in humans. TGF-β is a multifactorial cytokine that controls many cellular functions including lymphocyte homeostasis, epithelial cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration.8 TGF-β molecules (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3) bind to heterodimeric receptor complexes of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases called type I and type II receptors (TβR1 and TβR2), which then phosphorylate the Smad family members Smad2 and Smad3. A complex of Smad2 and Smad3 associates with Smad4 and translocates to the nucleus to activate transcription. TGF-β also activates other downstream signaling pathways including Rho GTPases, the extracellular signaling-regulated kinases (ERK), c-Jun NH2-terminals kinase (JNK), and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K).9 Dysregulation of TGF-β signaling pathways are associated with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and colorectal cancer. In particular, mutations in the TGFBR2 gene are found in up to 90% of all microsatellite instability-positive cancer patients, whereas inactivating mutations in the Smad2 or Smad4 are associated with 5 to 10% of sporadic colorectal cancers.10 These data underscore the importance of TGF-β signaling molecules in limiting excessive bowel inflammation and the induction of colorectal cancer. However, it is unclear exactly how TGF-β receptors and signaling molecules normally function within different cell populations of inflammatory or colonic epithelial cells to inhibit excessive inflammation and transformation. We previously used bacterial organisms such as Helicobacter spp. to study how intestinal organisms can induce inflammation, dysplasia, and eventually transformation of colonic epithelial cells.11,12 We found that TGF-β dysregulation in Smad3−/− mice that contain normal, nonpathogenic, commensal bowel flora is insufficient for the development of colon cancer, but requires infection with Helicobacter spp. to initiate inflammation and transformation. To study whether abnormalities in TGF-β signaling in lymphocytes13 contribute to colon cancer susceptibility, we crossed Smad3−/− mice (129SvEv background) with Rag2−/−129SvEv mice. Our results show that Smad3/Rag2-double knockout (DKO) mice, which have defective regulatory adaptive immune responses in addition to defective TGF-β signaling, are acutely sensitive to bacterially induced inflammation and cancer, compared with Smad3−/− or Rag2−/− mice. Mechanisms are suggested by changes in expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, proto-oncogenes, and anti-apoptotic proteins in colonic tissue and epithelial cells from Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice, and offer a murine model to study the early and initial events in inflammation-associated cancer. Materials and Methods Mice Homozygous Smad3−/− (129-Smad3tm/Par/J) mice were generated as described14 with genotypes verified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Smad3−/− and Smad3+/− mice were used as donors in adoptive transfer studies and for studies of regulatory T cells (Treg). Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice were generated by intercrossing Smad3−/− and Smad3+/− mice with Rag2−/− (129S6/SvEvTac-Rag2tm1Fwa) mice. Smad3+/−Rag2−/− mice were used in two Helicobacter infection studies and four adoptive transfer experiments. Smad3+/+Rag2+/+ or Smad3+/+ were used as wild-type (WT) controls in all other studies. All mice were specific pathogen-free and annually screened for other rodent pathogens.11 Colon samples were screened annually for Citrobacter rodentium, Salmonella spp., and Clostridium spp. (Phoenix Laboratories, Seattle, WA); some fecal samples were culture- and PCR-positive for Klebsiella oxytoca. Mice were determined to be Helicobacter-free until infected with Helicobacter with infection confirmation by a modified fecal PCR procedure.15 Animals were fed irradiated Picolab Rodent Diet 20 no. 5053 (breeders; PMI Nutrition International, Brentwood, MO) or autoclaved Rodent Chow no. 5013 (study animals; Animal Specialties, Portland, OR), provided autoclaved and acidified water, and monitored as previously described.12 To increase survival of Helicobacter-infected Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice and allow sufficient time for tumor development, mice were intermittently fed medicated rodent chow (metronidazole, amoxicillin, bismuth; BioServe, Frenchtown, NJ). Mice given medicated chow were treated the same across groups within experiments. Differences in medicated chow regimens between experiments that were analyzed together are indicated in the figure legends. Mice were euthanized by CO2 in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association Panel on Euthanasia, when they developed severe diarrhea, 20% body weight loss, or rectal prolapse, at which point tissue samples were taken. All animal procedures were approved by the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Bacterial Infection H. bilis and H. hepaticus were cultured and mice infected by oral gavage.16 Mice were infected with 2 × 107 H. bilis twice followed by H. hepaticus once, or twice with H. bilis only unless otherwise noted. A cohort of Smad3−/− and DKO mice were infected by oral gavage with Enterococcus faecalis strain OG1RFSS,17 maintained on spectinomycin/streptomycin water (500 μg/ml) to favor E. faecalis colonization, and euthanized and necropsied at 4 to 6 months after infection. Pathology Necropsy, tissue sampling, processing, and histological examination were performed as described.15 Tumors were classified according to Boivin and colleagues18 and a tumor burden score assigned based on frankly invasive neoplasms (ie, invasion of neoplastic crypts into and beyond the tunica muscularis). By definition, herniation into the submucosa was not included in this score nor was carcinoma in situ. IBD scores were graded on a 0 to 64 scale,11 which included the cecum, proximal, mid and distal colonic tissues. Histological examination of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections was performed by pathologists (H.B.-O. and P.T.) blinded as to genotype and infection status. Immunohistochemistry Immunohistochemistry was done on sections from formalin-fixed tissue from the proximal colon of untreated WT mice, broth-treated DKO mice, and H. bilis-infected DKO mice at 1 week after infection. Three to five samples from each group were evaluated. Briefly, 4-μm sections were cut, deparaffinized, and rehydrated in wash buffer (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). Antigen retrieval was performed in a steamer (Black and Decker, Towson, MD). Cleaved caspase-3 slides were steamed for 15 minutes in preheated Target Retrieval Solution, High pH (DAKO), and then cooled for 15 minutes. Ki-67 slides were steamed for 40 minutes and F4/80 slides steamed for 20 minutes in preheated Target Retrieval solution (pH 6, DAKO) and cooled for 20 minutes. All subsequent staining steps were performed at room temperature using a DAKO Autostainer. Endogenous peroxide activity was blocked using 3% H2O2 for 8 minutes followed by protein blocking. Sections immunolabeled for cleaved caspase-3 and F4/80 were blocked with biotin block (DAKO) for 10 minutes and then using 15% goat serum and 5% mouse serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 10 minutes. Ki-67 slides were blocked in 15% swine serum and 5% mouse serum in TBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 10 minutes. Ki-67 labeling was visualized using a rabbit monoclonal antibody (RM-9106; Lab Vision, Fremont, CA) at a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml for 30 minutes followed by Envision Plus (DAKO) for 30 minutes. Cleaved caspase-3 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody (CP229B; Biocare Medical, Walnut Creek, CA) at a concentration of 0.2 μg/ml for 60 minutes followed by biotinylated goat anti-rabbit at 1:400 for 30 minutes (BA-1000; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and Vector Elite ABC. F4/80 (MCA497; Serotec, Oxford, UK) was used at 20 μg/ml followed by biotinylated goat anti-rat (112-065-167, Jackson ImmunoResearch) at 1:200 for 30 minutes followed by Vector Elite ABC. The staining for all slides was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAKO) for 7 minutes with sections counterstained using hematoxylin (DAKO) for 2 minutes. Concentration-matched isotype control slides were run for each tissue sample (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Flow Cytometric Analysis Cells were isolated from spleen, thymus, and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), stained for surface markers, and analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described.19 Single cell suspensions were generated from spleen, thymus, and MLN of WT, Smad3+/−, and Smad3−/− mice. Cells were stained with antibodies against the cell surface markers CD25, CD4, CD45RB, and TCR (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), followed by intracellular staining for Foxp3 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). FlowJo (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR) was used for data analysis. Adoptive Transfer Studies Cells for adoptive transfer studies were isolated from the splenocytes of Smad3−/− or WT mice. CD4+ T cells were isolated by negative selection using a CD4+ T-cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and an autoMACS (Miltenyi Biotech). Purified WT or Smad3−/− CD4+ T cells were adoptively transferred into recipient mice via intraperitoneal injection. For CD4+CD25+ Treg cell isolation, CD4+ T cells were isolated as above or CD25+ cells were isolated via anti-CD25-PE/anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD25, and anti-TCR antibodies. CD4+CD25+ T cells were sorted using the FACS Aria cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and adoptively transferred intraperitoneally into recipient mice. After adoptive transfer, recipients were infected with H. bilis (2 or 5 weeks) to initiate infection. In Vitro Treg Assays Single cell suspensions were prepared from the spleens of WT, Smad3+/−, or Smad3−/− mice. CD4+ T cells were isolated using the CD4+ T-cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) followed by magnetic cell isolation on an autoMACS (Miltenyi Biotech). Purified T cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies to anti-CD4, CD25, and TCR. TCR+CD4+CD25+ (Treg) and TCR+CD4+CD25− (T effector) cells were sorted on a FACSARIA cell sorter (BD Biosciences). CD25+ and CD25− T cells were found to be 98% and 99% pure, respectively, after sorting. Separate aliquots of splenocytes were prepared from WT or Smad3−/− mice and used to generate antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Splenocytes were depleted of T cells by labeling with anti-TCR-biotin (BD Biosciences) and binding to streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads and autoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec). APCs were irradiated before assay setup. Cells were cultured in 96-well round-bottomed plates in 200 μl of RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, nonessential amino acids, l-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate, HEPES, and 2-mercaptoethanol. Wells contained 2 × 104 T effector cells, 8 × 104 APCs, a titrated number of Tregs starting at a 1:1 Treg:T-effector ratio, and 0.5 μg/ml of either purified anti-CD3 antibody (BD Biosciences) or concavalin A (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Plates were incubated for 90 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Proliferation was determined by measuring [3H] thymidine incorporation during the last 18 hours of culture in triplicate or duplicate wells. Epithelial Cell Preparations Colonic epithelial cells were isolated using previously reported methods with minor modification.20 Whole colons were isolated at necropsy, split lengthwise, and flushed with saline to remove fecal material. They were minced into small (3 to 5 mm) pieces and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes in 1 ml of Hanks’ balanced salt solution containing 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol and 5 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. They were then transferred to Hanks’ balanced salt solution with 5 mmol/L each of dithiothreitol, CaCl2, and MgCl2, and vortexed gently for 45 to 60 seconds. The resulting cell suspension was separated from tissue pieces and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 5 minutes to pellet cells. Inflammatory and immune cells were removed by subtractive adsorption to antibodies on magnetic beads, using the mouse hematopoietic progenitor cell enrichment set from BD Bioscience. Total RNA was extracted from cell pellets. Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCR For Helicobacter spp. real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR), all of the cecum and 5- to 10-mm tissue samples (and contents) were collected from mid-jejunum, proximal colon, and distal colon. DNA was isolated and real-time RT-PCR performed as previously described.11 For confirmation of altered expression of genes from colonic epithelial cells or whole colonic tissue, total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Before use in cDNA synthesis for array or PCR analysis, RNA quality and integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry. Preparations having OD ratios less than 1.9 (260/280) and 1.7 (260/230) were repurified and cDNA was synthesized from RNA using the SuperScript SSIII kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with an oligo dT primer. Real-time RT-PCR was performed in the Mx3005P apparatus (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with Brilliant SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Stratagene), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specific oligonucleotide primers were designed with the MacVector DNA analysis program (Accelrys Corp., San Diego, CA) and purchased from IDT Technologies (Coralville, IA). Relative amounts of PCR products were calculated from threshold (CT) values for each sample after correction for variations in GAPDH content, assuming that a one-cycle difference represents a twofold change in target sequence. Western Blotting Cell lysates were prepared by addition of cold lysis buffer (30 mmol/L HEPES, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 10% Triton X-100) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma) to epithelial cell preparations. Total protein concentration was determined with the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biological, Rockford, IL). Fifty μg of each sample was boiled in 100 ml of sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (0.05 mol/L Tris, pH 6.8, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.025% bromphenol blue). Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis in 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose as described by Hossenlopp and colleagues.21 The transfer buffer contained 15 mmol/L Tris base, 120 mmol/L glycine, and 5% methanol. Membranes were washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS is 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 0.15 mol/L NaCl), and incubated overnight at 4°C with appropriate antibodies in TBS/0.1% Tween 20 containing either 5% nonfat milk (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) or 5% bovine serum albumin. They were washed with TBS/0.1% Tween 20, and bands were detected using horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (ECL system; Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Films were scanned and densitometry analysis was performed using an AlphaImager 3400 (Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA). Statistical Analysis Survival curves were generated and compared using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA) software. Statistical significance of differences between curves was determined using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test and differences in inflammation and tumor burden scores were tested using one-way analysis of variance followed by a multiple comparisons posttest (Bonferroni). Changes in cell numbers and populations between groups were compared using Student’s t-test assuming unequal variances. Results Loss of Rag2 Increases Inflammation and Cancer Severity in Smad3−/− Mice To examine the roles of B and T lymphocytes in Helicobacter-induced colitis and colon cancer in Smad3−/− mice, we infected Smad3−/−, Rag2−/−, and Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice with Helicobacter and measured subsequent survival, inflammation score, and tumor burden. As shown in Figure 1A
Unlike Helicobacter-infected Smad3−/− mice, which develop focal tumors primarily in the cecum and proximal colon (Figure 2A)
Fecal Helicobacter Levels Do Not Correlate with Inflammation or Tumor Burden Because Helicobacter-infected DKO mice exhibited more diffuse inflammation and cancer compared with Helicobacter-infected Smad3−/− and Rag2−/− mice, we next determined whether Helicobacter load was higher in Helicobacter-infected DKO mice. Using quantitative real-time PCR for Helicobacter spp., we found no differences in number of Helicobacter genomes in fecal samples from mice that develop tumors (Smad3−/−, DKO, and Smad3+/−/Rag2−/−) compared with WT mice that do not (data not shown). Infection with E. faecalis Does Not Induce Colitis or Colon Cancer in Smad3/Rag2-DKO Mice To determine whether other bacteria might also trigger inflammation and cancer in Smad3−/− and DKO mice, animals were challenged with E. faecalis, a human commensal that can induce colitis and colon adenocarcinomas in IL-10 knockout mice.22,23 Despite colonization of Smad3−/− mice with E. faecalis for 4 months and DKO mice for 6 months, neither IBD nor subsequent colonic tumors developed in any mouse. Some mice had mild to severe megaesophagus (common in the 129 line), and the only neoplasm noted was a transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in one DKO mouse colonized with E. faecalis; this tumor was also noted on one occasion in a DKO mouse infected with H. bilis (data not shown). T-Regulatory Cells from Smad3−/− Mice Function Normally in Vitro Because the severity of inflammation and multiplicity of tumor development was greater in DKO mice than in Smad3−/− mice, we postulated that Treg cells limit inflammation and confine tumors to the cecum and proximal colon in Helicobacter-infected Smad3−/− mice. Hence, we determined the percentage and total numbers of Treg cells in lymphoid tissues from Smad3−/− and WT mice and assessed their function using an in vitro Treg suppression assay. We found that Smad3−/− mice had comparable percentages and absolute numbers of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells in the thymus, spleen, and MLNs compared with WT and Smad3+/− mice (Figure 5, A and B)
Adoptive Transfer of Total CD4+ or CD4+CD25+ T Cells from WT Mice but Not Smad3−/− Mice Decreased Inflammation and Tumor Burden in Smad3/Rag2-DKO Mice In vitro assays suggested that T-regulatory cells from Smad3−/− mice function normally. We therefore examined the in vivo ability of total CD4+ cells or CD4+CD25+ Treg cells to protect DKO mice from inflammation and tumors after adoptive transfer. DKO mice were given total CD4+ T cells, or FACS-sorted CD4+CD25+ Treg cells, from WT or Smad3−/− mice, followed by infection with H. bilis 2 to 5 weeks after transplant. Surprisingly, adoptive transfer of total CD4+ T cells from Smad3−/− mice into DKO mice decreased survival compared with DKO mice receiving no cells, whereas adoptive transfer of total WT CD4+ T cells showed a trend toward increased survival (P = 0.089) (Figure 6A)
To further evaluate Smad3−/− Treg cell function in vivo, we adoptively transferred sorted CD4+CD25+ cells from WT or Smad3−/− mice into DKO mice and determined the effect of the transferred cells on bowel inflammation and tumor burden. DKO mice receiving WT CD4+CD25+ Treg cells had significantly better survival (P = 0.025) compared with DKO mice receiving Smad3−/− CD4+CD25+ Treg cells or no cells (Figure 7A)
To determine whether the lack of protection by transferred Smad3−/− CD4+CD25+ Treg cells was attributable to insufficient expansion, survival, or trafficking to the gut and associated MLNs, we adoptively transferred sorted Smad3−/− or WT CD4+CD25+ T cells into DKO mice and infected them with H. bilis 2 weeks later. Two and one-half weeks after adoptive transfer, we found comparable numbers of transferred T cells in MLNs (Figure 8, A and B)
Changes in Cytokine mRNA and Anti-Apoptotic Protein Expression in Colons from Smad3/Rag2-DKO Mice after Helicobacter Infection To further evaluate changes in colonic tissue and epithelial cells during the inflammatory phase and before tumor development, colonic tissue at 1 week after infection was analyzed for expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, cell cycle regulators, and oncogenes by real-time RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 9
A key signal transduction pathway that links inflammation with cancer is the canonical nuclear factor (NF)-κB nuclear transcription factor pathway,24 which is triggered by proinflammatory cytokines and several infectious agents.25 The most abundant form of the NF-κB family of transcription factors in nonactivated cells is a complex composed of dimers of p65 (RelA) and p50 or p52, which are retained in the cytoplasm by IκB inhibitor proteins. Phosphorylation of IκB proteins enables release of p65 for translocation to the nucleus, and p65 activity is commonly enabled or modified by phosphorylation as well. Analysis of the NF-κB pathway in colonic tissue by immunoblot revealed that activation of NF-κB (as indicated by p65 phosphorylation) was increased in uninfected DKO colonic tissue relative to WT colonic tissue, and was further elevated after Helicobacter infection (Figure 9D) Discussion We have previously shown that the loss of Smad3 in mice is not sufficient for colon cancer development, but requires a pathogenic bacterial trigger to induce chronic inflammation12 followed by carcinogenesis. In the studies outlined here using the combined null alleles of Smad3 and Rag2, we expand on these findings by showing that the loss of Smad3 predisposes mice to colon cancer by at least two different mechanisms: first, we show that removal of T and B lymphocytes (in Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice) results in more severe inflammation and colon cancer than is observed in Smad3−/− mice alone, and that inflammation and cancer are prevented by the adoptive transfer of WT Treg cells, but not Smad3−/− Treg cells. Second, we show that the combined loss of Smad3 and Rag2 (in Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice) results in more severe inflammation and colon cancer than is observed in Rag2−/− mice alone. Because both in Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice and Rag2−/− mice lack T and B cells, these results suggest that Smad3 also helps limit the development of colon cancer through its actions in other nonlymphoid cell types. When combined with our previous studies, as well as recent studies by other groups, these results reveal important tumor-suppressive functions for Smad3 in T-effector cells,12,26 T-regulatory cells,27 and intestinal epithelial cells, all of which may normally limit the development of colon cancer in response to bacterial inflammation. Regulatory T cells were originally identified by their ability to suppress autoimmune disease28 and are believed to control inflammation in some models of IBD29 and colon cancer.29,30,31,32 In addition, TGF-β is required for the expression of the forkhead winged-helix transcription factor Foxp3 within Treg cells, and Foxp3 expression is essential for Treg development and function.33,34,35 Because the absence of all lymphocyte populations in Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice resulted in more severe inflammation and colon cancer than in Smad3−/− mice, we hypothesized that Treg cells limit colon cancer in this model, and that Smad3 is required for normal Treg cell development and/or function. Analysis of lymphoid tissues revealed normal numbers of Treg cells in Smad3−/− mice relative to WT controls, which is in contrast to the data of Wang and colleagues27 who found that CD4+CD25+ T cells are increased in Smad3−/− mice. Differences between the latter study and ours may be attributable to differences in genetic background (C57BL/6 versus 129), bacterial colonization of the gut, or methods of data analysis. With regard to Treg function, Treg cells isolated from Smad3−/− mice were able to suppress the proliferation of WT T-effector cells equally as well as WT Treg cells in vitro. However, although adoptive-transfer of WT Treg cells into DKO mice reduced bacterial-induced inflammation and colon cancer, adoptive-transfer of Smad3−/− Treg cells had no significant effect, despite normal numbers and trafficking to MLNs and colon after transfer. In fact, transfer of total CD4+ T cells (containing both CD4+ T effector and CD4+ Treg cells) from Smad3−/− mice into Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice resulted in increased colonic inflammation and decreased survival, probably because T-effector cells from Smad3−/− mice do not respond normally to TGF-β suppression, as we and others have demonstrated in vitro.12,26 The latter results are consistent with previous studies by Fahlen and colleagues33 in which transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative TGF-β receptor II in pathogenic CD4+ T cells were refractory to control by Treg cells in a colitis model. However, in contrast to their findings that CD4+CD25+ Treg cells containing dominant-negative TGF-β receptor II retain an ability to suppress colitis in vivo, we find that CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from Smad3−/− mice are not capable of decreasing inflammation and tumor burden or increasing survival in Helicobacter-infected DKO mice, whereas the WT CD4+CD25+ Treg cells are protective. Our results are consistent with the demonstration by Marie and colleagues34 that TGF-β1 was required to maintain normal T-regulatory cell function, and also with an elegant study by Kim and colleagues36 in which T-cell-specific deletion of Smad4 was sufficient for tumorigenesis in multiple tissues. The discrepancy between our in vitro results (suggesting normal Treg function), and our in vivo results (suggesting defective Treg function), are likely attributable to the relatively high concentration of Treg and T-effector cells in microwell plates in vitro, which artificially increase cell contact and local cytokine concentrations, thus potentially skewing the results. Overall, these studies collectively reveal the importance of normal Smad3 signaling in maintaining both T-regulatory and T-effector cell functions and homeostasis, and emphasize the role of inflammation in predisposition to cancer. One unresolved issue, however, is why tumors localize to the cecum and proximal colon in Helicobacter-infected Smad3−/− mice whereas they occur throughout the large colon in Helicobacter-infected DKO mice. In DKO mice, the complete removal of Tregs, and other lymphocyte populations, results in diffuse inflammation and tumor formation throughout the colon and cecum. This could be because total T cells (Tregs and/or T effectors) help limit the amount and extent of inflammation, and/or that Helicobacter organisms are more diffusely spread throughout the colon in DKO mice. Inflammation within precancerous colonic tissue and colon carcinoma can involve a mix of inflammatory cells, including resident and recruited macrophages, dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes, and NK cells, all of which can contribute to the cytokine milieu.37 We had previously shown that Helicobacter infection led to increased production of IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ in colonic tissue from Smad3−/− mice.12 In this study, we found similar increases in these cytokines in precancerous colonic tissue from Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice after Helicobacter infection, suggesting that these pro-inflammatory cytokines are primarily produced by nonlymphoid cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and potentially colonic epithelial cells. Other studies have shown that pro-inflammatory cytokine production in the pretumor and tumor microenvironment contributes to transformation, tumor growth, progression, and metastasis.37,38 For example, TNF-α may stimulate the production of genotoxic molecules such as reactive oxygen species, leading to DNA damage and tumor initiation.39 In humans, genetic polymorphisms in the TNF-α locus are associated with increased incidence of many cancers including gastric, breast, prostate, colon, and some hematological malignancies.40,41,42,43,44 Mice deficient in the TNF-α receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2 have reduced tumorigenesis,45 and anti-TNF-α neutralizing antibody protects against inflammation-induced liver cancer in MDR2-null mice.46 IL-1β has also been linked to cancer initiation and progression. Polymorphisms in the promoter regions of the gene encoding IL-1β, as well as the gene encoding the IL-1 receptor antagonist IL-1RA, are associated with an increased risk of developing Helicobacter-induced gastric cancer.47 IL-1 increases tumor invasiveness and metastasis by increasing expression of adhesion molecules, cytokines, and pro-angiogenic molecules. Serum levels of IL-6 are increased in patients with colon cancer and correlate with tumor size.48,49 In vitro studies indicate that IL-6 stimulates the growth of colon cancer cells,50 whereas anti-IL-6 antibody inhibits colon cancer in mice.51 Our results collectively suggest that loss of Smad3 alone is sufficient to increase production of proinflammatory cytokines that can contribute to transformation and tumor progression. Helicobacter infection further increases proinflammatory cytokine production in a lymphocyte-independent manner. These results further suggest that Smad3 deficiency may result in hyperactivation of innate immune cells, perhaps in response to TLR signaling. Activation of toll-like receptors by bacteria or bacterial components such as lipopolysaccharide, as well as the interactions of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1 with their cognate receptors, can activate IκB kinase and NF-κB.24,52 Because we found elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines in DKO mice, we examined NF-κB activation in colonic tissue, both before and after bacterial infection. Notably, elevated levels of phosphorylated p65 (indicative of active NF-κB) were found in colonic tissue from uninfected Smad/Rag2-DKO mice, with further increases in phospho-p65 after Helicobacter infection. Activation of NF-κB paralleled the increases in proinflammatory cytokines we observed in DKO mice. These results suggest that loss of Smad3 is sufficient to result in increased proinflammatory cytokines, which may activate the NF-κB pathway in colonic epithelial cells. Helicobacter infection may drive further increases in proinflammatory cytokine production and NF-κB activation, resulting in recruitment of additional inflammatory cells, increased tissue destruction, and potentially genotoxic damage. Others have shown that NF-κB may also have distinct roles in intestinal tumorigenesis, independent of its role in inflammatory cells. For example, Greten and colleagues53 previously found that the specific deletion of Ikkβ in intestinal epithelial cells significantly decreased tumor incidence in a mouse colon cancer model, without affecting inflammation. Furthermore, the absence of Ikkβ in enterocytes prevented the induction of the NF-κB target gene and prosurvival protein Bcl-xL, resulting in increased apoptosis of carcinogen-exposed cells. In this study, we found that Bcl-xL was increased in intestinal epithelial cells from both uninfected and Helicobacter-infected DKO mice relative to WT mice, concomitant with increased NF-κB activation, particularly after Helicobacter infection (Figure 9D) One of the remaining issues to be resolved in this model is the ability of Helicobacter products to directly contribute to the development of colon cancer. Indeed, there is increasing evidence linking certain bacterial products with cancer.6 For example, the Gram-negative facultative intracellular pathogen Bartonella is associated with vasoproliferative tumors in humans55 and utilizes a type IV secretion system to deliver exotoxins that inhibit apoptosis of endothelial cells.56 Similarly, H. pylori utilizes a type IV secretion system to inject the CagA cytotoxin, which has a number of effects including promotion of cell proliferation and invasion and activation of signaling pathways including NF-κB.25 H. hepaticus has also been found to contain components of a type IV secretion system,57 suggesting that H. bilis (predominantly used in these studies) may also mediate its effects via a type IV system. H. bilis could also induce cancer via elaboration of cytolethal distending toxins as described for Escherichia coli and other Gram-negative bacteria.58,59,60 Chronic antigenic stimulation, inflammation, and bacterial cyclomodulins that alter cell cycle and apoptosis have all been proposed as potential mechanisms in bacteria-associated cancers.5 However, not all human cancer-associated bacteria are likely to induce cancer in all animal models. For example, E. faecalis, a Gram-positive human commensal organism that induces colitis and colon cancer in IL-10 knockout mice,22,23 failed to induce inflammation or tumors in Smad3−/− or Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice. However, in the IL-10−/− model, mice were monoassociated with E. faecalis. It is also possible that this organism may have triggered inflammation in the IL-10−/− mice through activation of dysregulated tissue macrophages.61 The Helicobacter-infected Smad3/Rag2-DKO mouse model firmly establishes the importance of bacteria and TGF-β signaling in inflammation and cancer progression. Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice do not develop the colon cancer phenotype when maintained Helicobacter-free; when infected, they develop multiple tumors throughout the colon at sites of inflammation. Our results are consistent with studies by Engle and colleagues62 showing TGFβ−/−Rag2−/− mice only develop colon cancer after infection with H. hepaticus. Similarly, mice expressing dominant-negative TGF-β type I/II receptors and infected with H. pylori develop gastric adenocarcinomas.63 These models, as well as the Smad3/Rag2-DKO mouse model, suggest mechanisms that are relevant to inflammation-associated colon cancer in humans. Mutations in genes involved in TGF-β signaling are found in human colorectal cancer, and TGF-β dysregulation is associated with IBD, which increases risk for colon cancer.64 The fact that inflammation and colon cancer in Smad3/Rag2-DKO mice only occurs in the presence of certain bacteria, notably Helicobacter spp., suggests that the inflammatory response to microorganisms, as controlled by Treg cells, is an early and critical event in the pathogenesis of colon cancer. This model offers an opportunity to examine initial events in carcinogenesis, particularly those associated with inflammation. Acknowledgments We thank Andy Chang, Aimee McMillan, and Leno Torres for care and monitoring of mice; and Karen Chase for necropsies of E. faecalis-infected mice. Footnotes Address reprint requests to Lillian Maggio-Price, V.M.D., Ph.D., University of Washington, School of Medicine, Dept. of Comparative Medicine, Box 357190, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: lmprice/at/u.washington.edu. Supported by the Broad Medical Research Program of The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Foundation (to L.M.P.), the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America (grant 1579 to LMP), the National Institutes of Heath (grants 1RO1AI053568 and 2RO1CA68328 to B.M.I.), the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (to H.B.-O.), the Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Review Program (to M.M.H.), and the Francis Duffy Endowment (to M.M.H.). References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Nature. 2004 Sep 23; 431(7007):405-6.
[Nature. 2004]Cell. 2004 Sep 17; 118(6):671-4.
[Cell. 2004]Gut. 2001 Aug; 49(2):190-8.
[Gut. 2001]J Intern Med. 2000 Sep; 248(3):171-83.
[J Intern Med. 2000]Trends Microbiol. 2002 Jun; 10(6):293-9.
[Trends Microbiol. 2002]Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Nov; 3(11):807-21.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2003]EMBO J. 2000 Apr 17; 19(8):1745-54.
[EMBO J. 2000]Science. 2006 Oct 13; 314(5797):268-74.
[Science. 2006]Am J Pathol. 2005 Jun; 166(6):1793-806.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Oncogene. 2005 Aug 29; 24(37):5701-12.
[Oncogene. 2005]Cell. 1998 Sep 18; 94(6):703-14.
[Cell. 1998]Am J Pathol. 2005 Jun; 166(6):1793-806.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Am J Pathol. 2002 Feb; 160(2):739-51.
[Am J Pathol. 2002]Carcinogenesis. 2002 Mar; 23(3):529-36.
[Carcinogenesis. 2002]Gastroenterology. 2003 Mar; 124(3):762-77.
[Gastroenterology. 2003]Am J Pathol. 2005 Jun; 166(6):1793-806.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Nov 9; 96(23):13180-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Am J Pathol. 2005 Jun; 166(6):1793-806.
[Am J Pathol. 2005]Anal Biochem. 1986 Apr; 154(1):138-43.
[Anal Biochem. 1986]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Am J Pathol. 2002 Jun; 160(6):2253-7.
[Am J Pathol. 2002]Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr; 128(4):891-906.
[Gastroenterology. 2005]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Nature. 2006 May 25; 441(7092):431-6.
[Nature. 2006]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 10(1):76-81.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Apr; 19(4):2495-504.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr 21; 12(15):2455-8.
[World J Gastroenterol. 2006]Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001; 490():21-32.
[Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001]Immunol Rev. 2005 Apr; 204():184-94.
[Immunol Rev. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2003 Feb; 162(2):691-702.
[Am J Pathol. 2003]Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 15; 63(18):6042-50.
[Cancer Res. 2003]Cancer Res. 2005 May 15; 65(10):3998-4004.
[Cancer Res. 2005]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Apr; 19(4):2495-504.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]J Exp Med. 2005 Mar 7; 201(5):737-46.
[J Exp Med. 2005]J Exp Med. 2005 Apr 4; 201(7):1061-7.
[J Exp Med. 2005]Nature. 2006 Jun 22; 441(7096):1015-9.
[Nature. 2006]Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Jan; 6(1):24-37.
[Nat Rev Cancer. 2006]Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15; 66(2):828-38.
[Cancer Res. 2006]J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20; 26(9):1544-52.
[J Clin Oncol. 2008]Cancer Res. 2006 Dec 15; 66(24):11565-70.
[Cancer Res. 2006]Prostate. 2008 Mar 1; 68(4):400-7.
[Prostate. 2008]Nature. 2006 May 25; 441(7092):431-6.
[Nature. 2006]Mol Carcinog. 2006 Jun; 45(6):355-61.
[Mol Carcinog. 2006]Cell. 2004 Aug 6; 118(3):285-96.
[Cell. 2004]Trends Genet. 1998 Sep; 14(9):364-7.
[Trends Genet. 1998]J Transl Med. 2006 Mar 28; 4():14.
[J Transl Med. 2006]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Aug; 3(8):621-31.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005]PLoS Pathog. 2006 Nov; 2(11):e115.
[PLoS Pathog. 2006]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007 Feb; 10(1):76-81.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24; 100(13):7901-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Cancer Res. 2002 Nov 15; 62(22):6362-6.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Immunogenetics. 2000 Aug; 51(10):869-72.
[Immunogenetics. 2000]