![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
A Novel Highly Articulated Robotic Surgical System For Epicardial Ablation 1 Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA 2 The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 3 Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc.Abstract We have developed a novel, highly articulated robotic surgical system to enable minimally invasive intrapericardial interventions through a subxiphoid approach and have performed preliminary tests of epicardial left atrial ablation in porcine (N = 3) and human cadaver (N = 2) preparations. In this study, the novel highly articulated robotic surgical system successfully provided safe epicardial ablations to the left atrium in porcine beating heart models via a subxiphoid approach. We have also performed complex guidance of the robot and subsequent ablation in a cadaveric preparation for successful pulmonary vein isolation. I. Introduction Percutaneous catheter-based endocardial ablation technique has currently become one of the major treatment strategies for arrhythmia (i.e. atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia) [1]. Despite its accelerated rate of adoption, there is significant potential for serious complications with these catheter-based techniques, including but not limited to cerebrovascular accidents, pulmonary vein stenosis, esophageal perforation, phrenic nerve injury and tamponade [2-5]. On the other hand, epicardial ablation is an established strategy for treatment of arrhythmia—particularly those with an epicardial arrhythmogenic focus refractory to endocardial ablation [6]. Hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation of the left atrium has also been shown to be feasible and effective in difficult cases of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation [7]. Several minimally invasive approaches to access the atrial epicardium have been recently reported, including total thoracoscopic ablation [8] and catheter-based subxiphoid access to the intrapericardial space [9]; with these approaches however, placement of several ports, double lumen ventilation, general anesthesia, and significant fluoroscopic exposure are increasingly necessary and contribute to morbidity. Recognizing that the subxiphoid approach is the most direct way to access the epicardium for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, we have developed a novel highly-articulated robotic surgical system (RSS) to enable minimally invasive intrapericardial therapeutic deliveries. The previous prototypes of the RSS were tested with in-vivo porcine experiments [10, 11]. An on-board fiber optic camera was also used to provide visualization for single port access into the intrapericardial space. In this study, we performed preliminary radiofrequency epicardial ablation trials with the current RSS using a beating porcine heart via a closed-chest subxiphoid approach and in a human cadaveric preparation. II. Methods A. Design of the RSS The fundamental mechanics of the RSS were described previously [10, 11]. Briefly, the RSS is composed of 50 rigid cylindrical links strung together by cables. Two adjacent links can rotate approximately ±10 degree relative to each other. All mechanical apparatuses to maneuver the probe are mounted within a feeder instrumentation box. The custom-designed software translates the master manipulator's input into movement of the RSS. While the current RSS model inherits the capability of preserving its previous 3-dimensional configuration (“follow-the-leader”) and multiple degrees-of-freedom (DOF) from the previous prototypes (i.e. 105 DOF in the present model) (Fig. 1A
B. Porcine epicardial ablation trials Healthy Yorkshire swine (N = 3, body weight 35 to 45 kg) were anesthetized and placed in a supine position. A small subxiphoid incision (20 mm) and pericardiotomy (15 mm) were created. The RSS was mounted on a standard surgical table (Fig. 1B The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Pittsburgh. All animals received humane care in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, published by the National Institutes of Health (1996). C. Human cadaver epicardial ablation trials Two unpreserved human cadavers (one male: height 180cm, one female: height 165cm) were used. One trial was performed under the full sternotomy and the other was under the subxiphoid approach. The setup of the RSS and instrumentation for radiofrequency ablation was the same as that of the porcine trials. We separately performed an intrapericardial navigation trial and a pulmonary veins isolation box lesion trial in the respective cadavers (Fig. 2
To observe the behavior of the robot within the pericardial space, a mediastinoscope was also inserted from the right thoracic wall through an additional pericardiotomy, which the surgeon did not use for visualization during the trials. The study protocol was approved by the University of Pittsburgh's Committee for Oversight of Research Involving the Dead (CORID). III. Results A. Porcine trials The distal apparatus of the RSS followed a complex tridimensional path from the subxiphoid incision along the anterolateral ventricular wall to the junction of the left atrium and the left upper pulmonary vein around the beating heart. A linear lesion composed of several consecutive “dot-to-dot” lesions at the base of the left atrial appendage was completed in the last trial (Fig. 3
B. Human cadaver trials The RSS proved to be a good fit for the human mediastinal anatomy without difficulty–having free access to the entire surface of the heart throughout the navigation trial. A box lesion set was successfully performed using the on-board camera view in the box lesion trial. The distal apparatus of the RSS accessed the transverse sinus from the left side and maneuvered to the pericardial reflection posterior to the superior vena cava. The superior portion of the box lesion set was then ablated with the RSS distal apparatus moving in reverse (Fig. 4A, B
IV. Discussion Due to a lack of dedicated minimally invasive technology, epicardial ablation therapy is at present typically performed using a relatively invasive approach (i.e. full sternotomy or thoracotomy/thoracoscopy), considering the intrinsically simple nature of these procedures. The subxiphoid approach is a useful method to access the pericardial space, as there are no significant anatomic barriers except in cases of severe pericarditis or previous surgical intervention. This approach allows facilitated access to the pericardial space through a single port while potentially not requiring general endotracheal anesthesia and lung deflation. Our group previously reported that using a prototype rigid shaft subxiphoid videopericardioscopy device with a percutaneous subxiphoid approach, endoscopic ligation of the left atrium appendage and pacing lead implantation was accomplished [12, 13]. Rigid shaft instruments, however, provide inadequate access to the posterior recesses of the paricardium due to their limited DOF [14]. Furthermore, rigid-type endoscopic instruments, including the DaVinci robotic surgical system, are unable to navigate complex tridimensional paths like the pericardial space occupied by the beating heart and may cause fatal complications (i.e. injury, arrhythmia, and hypotension). We have developed a novel highly articulated RSS in an effort to provide dedicated intrapericardial therapeutic deliveries with enhanced minimally invasiveness. The RSS is designed to accomplish a task in the intrapericardial space though single port access (i.e. subxiphoid approach). Furthermore the RSS is capable of reaching the entire surface of the heart, including the posterior heart, which often is challenging to access with even full sternotomy. The current iteration of the RSS made it possible to draw a linear lesion using a commercially available ablation catheter, compared with a single dot lesion by the previous prototype [10]. The current RSS was also able to provide fine and accurate manipulation required by the surgeon while using visualization from the on-board camera. An upgrade in the working port of the robot, the RSS also allowed simultaneous use of several tools (i.e. ablation catheter and irrigation/suction tool), which greatly contributed to the achievements in this study. The advances in the design of the probe were exemplified in our most recent ablation studies, where a box lesion set was accomplished in a human cadaveric preparation—requiring passage through an anatomically complicated path. One of the most important advantages of the robot is the ability to preserve its previous configuration and shape in 3-D space during navigation. This feature is distinctively different from general endoscopic devices which rely on a static shaft and the ability to only control the tip. The “shape-keeping” ability of the RSS is especially important in the pericardial space, where there is concern about interference with the beating heart. As expected, there were no associated adverse events in the beating heart porcine trials. The working port of the RSS allows utilization of commercially available endoscopic devices and catheters, which adds to the versatility of the RSS. As such, we have previously described pericardial biopsy, left atrial appendage ligation, and abdominal cavity access using off-the-shelf devices, in addition to epicardial ablation noted in this study [11]. Given the intrinsic flexibility of the present model of the RSS, future studies will focus on the feasibility of additional epicardial interventions, including epicardial injection, mapping, and pacing lead placement. Although our present focus is mostly towards intrapericardial interventions for minimally invasive cardiac surgery, the RSS is not exclusive to this field. Accordingly, we also plan to study the RSS in various gastrointestinal and intravascular interventions. Because the length of the RSS distal apparatus can theoretically be extended as long as needed, the possibility exists for future RSSs designed for access to the small intestines—a difficult to reach location with general endoscopic equipment—through natural orifices (i.e. transoral or transrectal) [15]. The precise maneuverability of the RSS may also potentially serve as a technological innovation in intravascular treatments like percutaneous coronary interventions. The concept of the RSS will make it potentially feasible to perform a procedure under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis, as opposed to other commercially available multi-arm robots requiring double lumen endotracheal intubation and multiple port placements. While a box lesion set was accomplished in the human cadaver trials, only a linear lesion on the left atrial appendage was able to be completed in the porcine trials. Because the heart and great vessels were in motion and filled with blood in the porcine model, the pericardial space was tighter than that of human cadavers. As a result, the on-board camera failed to provide adequate visualization of the anatomy to allow the user to navigate the probe into the transverse or oblique sinuses. We believe this technical difficulty will be resolved in future prototypes by both downsizing the diameter of the robot and improving the quality of the visualization equipment. In conclusion, the RSS successfully completed proof-of-concept epicardial ablations in both porcine beating heart and human cadaveric preparations via a subxiphoid approach. In the porcine model, safe left atrial epicardial linear ablations on a beating heart confirmed our hypothesis that the RSS could easily and accurately maneuver within the pericardial space using minimal surgical access. A feasibility study of pulmonary vein isolation with the RSS was also confirmed in a human cadaver preparation. In the future the RSS design and engineering will continue to focus on facilitating both minimally invasive intrapericardial and general surgical therapeutic deliveries. Acknowledgments The project described was supported by Grant Number R01HL079940 from the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute or the National Institutes of Health. References 1. Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL, Cappato R, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(6):816–61. [PubMed] 2. Robbins IM, Colvin EV, Doyle TP, Kemp WE, Loyd JE, McMahon WS, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1998;98(17):1769–75. [PubMed] 3. Oh S, Kilicaslan F, Zhang Y, Wazni O, Mazgalev TN, Natale A, et al. Avoiding microbubbles formation during radiofrequency left atrial ablation versus continuous microbubbles formation and standard radiofrequency ablation protocols: comparison of energy profiles and chronic lesion characteristics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(1):72–7. [PubMed] 4. Kok LC, Mangrum JM, Haines DE, Mounsey JP. Cerebrovascular complication associated with pulmonary vein ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13(8):764–7. [PubMed] 5. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Gencel L, Pradeau V, Garrigues S, et al. Right and left atrial radiofrequency catheter therapy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7(12):1132–44. [PubMed] 6. Schweikert RA, Saliba WI, Tomassoni G, Marrouche NF, Cole CR, Dresing TJ, et al. Percutaneous pericardial instrumentation for endo-epicardial mapping of previously failed ablations. Circulation. 2003;108(11):1329–35. [PubMed] 7. Pak HN, Hwang C, Lim HE, Kim JS, Kim YH. Hybrid Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation of Persistent or Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A New Approach for Difficult Cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:917–23. [PubMed] 8. Pruitt JC, Lazzara RR, Dworkin GH, Badhwar V, Kuma C, Ebra G. Totally endoscopic ablation of lone atrial fibrillation: initial clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(4):1325–30. [PubMed] 9. Sosa E, Scanavacca M. Epicardial mapping and ablation techniques to control ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(4):449–52. [PubMed] 10. Ota T, Degani A, Zubiate B, Wolf A, Choset H, Schwartzman D, et al. Epicardial Atrial Ablation Using a Novel Articulated Robotic Medical Probe Via a Percutaneous Subxiphoid Approach. Innovations Phila Pa. 2006;1:335–40. [PubMed] 11. Degani A, Choset H, Wolf A, Ota T, Zenati MA. Percutaneous Intrapericardial Interventions Using a Highly Articulated Robotic Probe. Proceedings, First IEEE/EBIB International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob'06); Feb. 2006; Pisa Italy. pp. 112–121. 12. Zenati MA, Schwartzman D, Gartner M, McKeel D. Feasibility of a new method for percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage. Circulation. 2002;106:II–619. 13. Zenati MA, Bonanomi G, Chin AK, Schwartzman D. Left heart pacing lead implantation using subxiphoid videopericardioscopy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:949–953. [PubMed] 14. Zenati MA, Shalaby A, Eisenman G, Nosbisch J, McGarvey J, Ota T. Epicardial Left Ventricular Mapping using Subxiphoid Video-Pericardioscopy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:2106–7. [PubMed] 15. Bardaro SJ, Swanstrom L. Development of advanced endoscopes for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15(6):378–83. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jun; 4(6):816-61.
[Heart Rhythm. 2007]Circulation. 1998 Oct 27; 98(17):1769-75.
[Circulation. 1998]J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Dec; 7(12):1132-44.
[J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996]Circulation. 2003 Sep 16; 108(11):1329-35.
[Circulation. 2003]J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Sep; 18(9):917-23.
[J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007]Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Apr; 81(4):1325-30; discussion 1330-1.
[Ann Thorac Surg. 2006]J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr; 16(4):449-52.
[J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005]Innovations Phila Pa. 2006; 1(6):335-340.
[Innovations Phila Pa. 2006]Innovations Phila Pa. 2006; 1(6):335-340.
[Innovations Phila Pa. 2006]J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Sep; 14(9):949-53.
[J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003]Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Dec; 84(6):2106-7.
[Ann Thorac Surg. 2007]Innovations Phila Pa. 2006; 1(6):335-340.
[Innovations Phila Pa. 2006]Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006; 15(6):378-83.
[Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006]