![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Magnetoacoustic tomographic imaging of electrical impedance with magnetic induction Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota *Correspondence: Bin He, Ph.D. University of Minnesota Department of Biomedical Engineering 7-105 NHH, 312 Church Street, SE Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA E-mail: binhe/at/umn.edu Abstract Magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI) is a recently introduced method for imaging tissue electrical impedance properties by integrating magnetic induction and ultrasound measurements. In the present study, we have developed a focused cylindrical scanning mode MAT-MI system and the corresponding reconstruction algorithms. Using this system, we demonstrated 3-dimensional MAT-MI imaging in a physical phantom, with cylindrical scanning combined with ultrasound focusing, and the ability of MAT-MI in imaging electrical conductivity properties of biological tissue. Noninvasive electrical impedance imaging of biological tissue has drawn considerable interest in recent years because it has been observed that changes in the electrical impedance are associated with physiological and pathological properties of tissue. Relevant methods in this field include electrical impedance tomography (EIT),1,2 magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT),3,4 magnetic induction tomography (MIT),5 and magneto-acoustic tomography (MAT).6,7 Among them, both EIT and MIT have to solve the ill-posed inverse problems based on surface measurements, thus having limited spatial resolution. MREIT can provide high spatial resolution with the aid of MRI measurements, but is still limited by its need of relatively high current injection levels. MAT uses electrical stimulation for an object placed under a static magnetic field and provides a way of estimating tissue properties from electrical-acoustic coupling. What remains to be seen is MAT's ability to image electrical impedance with high spatial resolution. Recently, magneto-acoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI)8,9 was proposed to achieve high spatial resolution noninvasive electrical impedance imaging by integrating magnetic induction and ultrasonic measurements. In MAT-MI, the object is placed in a static magnetic field and a time-varying magnetic field. The time-varying magnetic field induces eddy current in the object volume. Following that, the eddy current in the static magnetic field causes vibrations due to the Lorentz force and emits ultrasound waves. These ultrasound waves are collected by transducers surrounding the object and reconstruction of the conductivity properties is obtained with a spatial resolution close to that of sonography. In the present study, we have developed a focused cylindrical scanning mode MAT-MI system and the corresponding reconstruction algorithms and demonstrated its ability to perform 3-dimension (3D) MAT-MI imaging in a physical phantom and its ability to image conductivity properties in biological tissue. Fig. 1
In MAT-MI, the Lorentz force acting on the induced eddy current in the object is he driving force which generates the ultrasound signals.9 Considering a pulsed time-varying magnetic stimulation, the wave equation becomes
Defining
Considering a surface, S0, that encloses the sample volume, V, the acoustic pressure signal measured at position
, z0) as
where
Additionally, we can also use a simpler method to reconstruct a 2D image slice if the distance between the acoustic source and the transducer is much larger than the dimension of the object. In this case, the acoustic wavefront in the focal XY plane in the object can be approximated as a crossing line parallel to the transducer surface. Therefore, the acoustic signal received by the transducer at a certain time point can be considered as the summation of signals from a crossing line of the object parallel to the transducer surface. As the acoustic signal value at one time point can be considered to be proportional to one ray beam projection passing through one crossing line of the object, the reconstruction algorithm of parallel ray beam can be used in our MAT-MI experiment based on the principle of back projection. In such case, we can have a simplified reconstruction algorithm as
The system setup in the present experiment is shown in Fig. 2
To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed focused cylindrical scanning mode MAT-MI in 3D imaging, an experiment study was conducted on a 3D gel phantom and the results are shown in Fig. 3
Using this system, we also conducted an imaging study on a tissue phantom. However, due to limited signal strength of the current MAT-MI system, tissue phantoms with nearly uniform distribution in the Z direction were utilized and the flat transducer was used directly without the addition of the focusing lens. In this setup, the acoustic measurement can be considered to be the summation of signals from many similar slices. Also, because the tissue sample is uniform in the Z direction, the reconstruction algorithms in Eq. (5) and Eq. (6) can be applied and only one 2D MAT-MI image is reconstructed for each sample. Fig. 4
For the 3D MAT-MI, in order to increase the resolution in the elevation direction (the Z direction), a focused transducer with a narrower beam width should be used. In addition, since the collected acoustic signals are restrained in one single slice, more gain in signal strength is needed to obtain high resolution 3D MAT-MI images in biological tissue. In conclusion, we have developed a focused cylindrical scanning mode MAT-MI system and the corresponding reconstruction algorithms. We have demonstrated the 3D MAT-MI imaging in a physical phantom by cylindrical scanning combined with ultrasound focusing. Using the present MAT-MI system, we have demonstrated, for the first time, the ability of MAT-MI to image the conductivity properties of biological tissue. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by NSF BES-0602957, BES-0411898, BES-0411480, and NIH R01EB00178. REFERENCES 1. Paulson K, Lionheart W, Pidcock M. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1993;12:681. 2. Metheral P, Barber DC, Smallwood RH, Brown BH. Nature. 1996;380:509. [PubMed] 3. Joy M, Scott G, Henkelman M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1989;7:89. [PubMed] 4. Kwon O, Woo E, Yoon J, Seo JK. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2002;49:160. [PubMed] 5. Peyton AJ, Yu ZZ, Lyon G, Al-Zeibak S, Ferreira J, Velez J, Linhares F, Borges AR, Xiong HL, Saunders NH, Beck MS. Measurement Science and Technology. 1996;7:261. 6. Towe BC, Islam MR. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988;35:892. [PubMed] 7. Roth BJ, Basser PJ, Wikswo JP., Jr IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1994;41:723. [PubMed] 8. Xu Y, He B. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2005;50:5175. [PubMed] 9. Li X, Xu Y, He B. J. Appl. Phys. 2006;99:066112. 10. Xu M, Xu Y, Wang LH. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2003;50:1086. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Nature. 1996 Apr 11; 380(6574):509-12.
[Nature. 1996]Magn Reson Imaging. 1989 Jan-Feb; 7(1):89-94.
[Magn Reson Imaging. 1989]IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Feb; 49(2):160-7.
[IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002]IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988 Oct; 35(10):892-4.
[IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988]IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994 Aug; 41(8):723-8.
[IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994]