![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Campbell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Adaptations to Submarine Hydrothermal Environments Exemplified by the Genome of Nautilia profundicola 1University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware, United States of America 2University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America 3University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America 4University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America 5University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 6University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America 7The J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America Claire M. Fraser-Liggett, Editor Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States of America * E-mail: bjc/at/udel.edu ¤Current address: University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada Conceived and designed the experiments: BJC JAE SCC. Performed the experiments: BJC JLS JMR HMK. Analyzed the data: BJC JLS TEH MGK LYS CKL DW JAE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JAE. Wrote the paper: BJC JLS TEH MGK CKL. Received August 14, 2008; Accepted December 31, 2008. Abstract Submarine hydrothermal vents are model systems for the Archaean Earth environment, and some sites maintain conditions that may have favored the formation and evolution of cellular life. Vents are typified by rapid fluctuations in temperature and redox potential that impose a strong selective pressure on resident microbial communities. Nautilia profundicola strain Am-H is a moderately thermophilic, deeply-branching Epsilonproteobacterium found free-living at hydrothermal vents and is a member of the microbial mass on the dorsal surface of vent polychaete, Alvinella pompejana. Analysis of the 1.7-Mbp genome of N. profundicola uncovered adaptations to the vent environment—some unique and some shared with other Epsilonproteobacterial genomes. The major findings included: (1) a diverse suite of hydrogenases coupled to a relatively simple electron transport chain, (2) numerous stress response systems, (3) a novel predicted nitrate assimilation pathway with hydroxylamine as a key intermediate, and (4) a gene (rgy) encoding the hallmark protein for hyperthermophilic growth, reverse gyrase. Additional experiments indicated that expression of rgy in strain Am-H was induced over 100-fold with a 20°C increase above the optimal growth temperature of this bacterium and that closely related rgy genes are present and expressed in bacterial communities residing in geographically distinct thermophilic environments. N. profundicola, therefore, is a model Epsilonproteobacterium that contains all the genes necessary for life in the extreme conditions widely believed to reflect those in the Archaean biosphere—anaerobic, sulfur, H2- and CO2-rich, with fluctuating redox potentials and temperatures. In addition, reverse gyrase appears to be an important and common adaptation for mesophiles and moderate thermophiles that inhabit ecological niches characterized by rapid and frequent temperature fluctuations and, as such, can no longer be considered a unique feature of hyperthermophiles. Author Summary Extreme environments, such as deep-sea hydrothermal vents, found 2,500 meters below the ocean surface, support large macrofaunal communities via microbially mediated carbon fixation processes using chemicals (chemoautotrophy) rather than light (photoautotrophy). The genome of one such model chemoautotrophic microbe, N. profundicola, was sequenced and described in this work. N. profundicola, distantly related to the pathogenic Helicobacter and Campylobacter species, contains a number of genes and pathways predicted to be important in DNA repair, environmental sensing, and metabolism, which are novel to either its subdivision or to all microbes. The genes and deduced metabolic pathways include several hydrogen uptake and release systems as well as a novel predicted nitrogen assimilation pathway. One gene involved in DNA repair, reverse gyrase, was thought to be a hallmark protein in hyperthermophiles, which are microbes that grow above 80°C. We found this gene to be highly expressed at 65°C, over 20°C above the optimal growth temperature of this organism. Therefore, the genome of this model deep-sea hydrothermal vent chemoautotroph may reflect what is required for life in an extreme environment, hypothesized to be similar to early earth conditions. Introduction Food webs at deep-sea hydrothermal vents are based on microbial primary productivity fueled by chemical reactions rather than light. Microorganisms that thrive in these environments must adapt to fluctuations in temperature and redox conditions, ranging from the hot, sulfidic, heavy metal-laden plume at the vent outlet to cold, oxic seawater in the surrounding region [1]–[4]. In addition, DNA damaging agents such as ionizing radiation add to the harsh conditions with which hydrothermal residents must contend [5]–[8]. While a variety of diverse organisms have been isolated from hydrothermal environments [9],[10], it is clear from molecular surveys and in situ hybridization studies that Epsilonproteobacteria are numerically dominant and therefore likely key players in the cycling of C, N, and S at deep-sea hydrothermal vents [11]. Vent-associated Epsilonproteobacteria are diverse, including the deeply-branching Nautiliales and Nitratiruptor groups, Sulfurospirillum, Arcobacter, and the “Thiovulgaceae” Marine Groups I and II [11],[12]. Molecular and culture-based surveys have demonstrated Epsilonproteobacteria in diverse sub-seafloor habitats [13]–[17]. Two complete genome sequences of cultured vent Epsilonproteobacteria are available, Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2 and Sulfurovum sp. NBC37-1 [18], while that of Caminibacter mediatlanticus, isolated from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge [19] has been sequenced to draft level. We describe here the 1.7 Mbp genome of Nautilia profundicola strain Am-H, the first from a member of the order Nautiliales isolated from hydrothermal vents [20],[21]. N. profundicola strain Am-H was originally isolated from the biomass of an Alvinella pompejana episymbiont community collected at 13°N along the East Pacific Rise Axial Caldera [20],[21]. Strain Am-H is only found in some episymbiont communities and is readily detected as a free-living organism in various mats on vent chimneys [20]. N. profundicola falls within the Nautiliales order of the Epsilonproteobacteria class, the deepest branching order of this subdivision [20], [22]–[25] and is closely related to other vent isolates: Caminibacter hydrogeniphilus and Nautilia lithotrophica [22],[23]. All are moderately thermophilic strict anaerobes that grow lithoautotrophically with H2 and elemental sulfur (S0). Most likely, all members of this group utilize the reductive or reverse tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle for CO2 fixation [19],[21],[26]. N. profundicola and relatives differ from vent isolates whose genomes have been sequenced, including Thiomicrospira crunogena (Gammaproteobacteria), Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2 (Epsilonproteobacteria), and Sulfurovum sp. NBC37-1 (Epsilonproteobacteria) [18],[27]. These are sulfur-oxidizing microaerophiles that fix CO2 via the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (T. crunogena) or the rTCA cycle (Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2, Sulfurovum sp. NBC37-1) [18], [27]–[29]. Am-H and N. lithotrophica are differentiated from C. hydrogeniphilus as well as other Epsilonproteobacteria (Caminibacter mediatlanticus, Wolinella succinogenes, and Sulfuromonas denitrificans) by the inability to respire nitrate [18],[19],[30],[31]. However, strain Am-H and N. lithotrophica can both utilize nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen [21],[23]. The large temperature and redox variations present in diffuse hydrothermal flow regimes, which may be extant examples of an early life environment [4], impose strong selective pressures for characteristic adaptations in resident microbial communities. Determining these exact mechanisms is one of the most compelling issues for vent microbiologists and others interested in adaptations to life in extreme environments. Prior surveys found that typical DNA-repair genes are absent from the Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2 and Sulfurovum sp. NBC37-1 genomes [18], perhaps indicating that Epsilonproteobacteria genomes can rapidly change, which may confer a selective advantage in either pathogenic associations or deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments [18],[32],[33]. However, this flexibility must be balanced against DNA damage–inducing conditions present at deep-sea hydrothermal vents, including high, fluctuating temperatures and ionizing radiation. A comparison of the N. profundicola genome to the genomes of other hydrothermal vent bacteria has suggested several common features of a hydrothermally adapted lifestyle. One example of such adaptation, a reverse gyrase, was further examined in terms of regulated expression in N. profundicola, distribution among other Epsilonproteobacteria, and expression in deep- sea hydrothermal environments. In addition, its genome sequence indicates that strain Am-H utilizes nitrate in the absence of a canonical nitrite reductase and instead likely relies on a novel pathway where hydroxylamine is a key intermediate. Our analyses suggest that not only is N. profundicola the deepest branching epsilonproteobacterial genome to be sequenced to date, but its genome may provide evolutionary insights beyond what is required for growth at hydrothermal vents. Results/Discussion General Genome Properties The genome of N. profundicola (GenBank accession number, CP001279) is a single circular chromosome of 1,676,444 bp containing 1,745 protein-coding genes (CDSs); a small genome compared to other free-living Epsilonproteobacteria [18],[31]. The compactness of the genome is reflected in the absence of duplicated gene clusters. The genome's general features are summarized in Figure 1
There is little evidence of recent widespread horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events into the genome of N. profundicola, based on % G+C ratio or tetranucleotide frequency anomalies (Figure 1 Signal Transduction Free-living bacteria must sense and respond to environmental changes quickly and do so through a variety of signal transduction mechanisms. Pathogenic species have fewer signal transduction proteins than their free-living counterparts, even when genome size is taken into account [39], as is the case among sequenced Epsilonproteobacteria. N. profundicola, Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2, and Sulfurovum sp. NBC37-1 each have over 100 signal transduction genes, while most strains of Campylobacter and Helicobacter have about half as many, most of which code for histidine kinases, response regulators, or methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. Free-living Epsilonproteobacteria have many genes containing diguanylate cyclase (GGDEF) and phosphodiesterase (EAL) domains, whereas Campylobacter and Helicobacter genomes have only a few or none. Among vent Epsilonproteobacteria, N. profundicola has the most stand-alone GGDEF and EAL domain family protein gene homologs, while Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2 and Sulfurovum sp. NBC37-1 have more gene homologs belonging to a predicted signal transduction protein family containing a membrane domain as well as GGDEF and EAL domains (Table 2). N. profundicola is the only vent Epsilonproteobacterium that also has the HD-GYP domain, another phosphodiesterase. Given its smaller genome size and comparatively limited metabolism, its numerous coding sequences for cyclic diguanylate signaling relative to other vent organisms seems counterintuitive. Perhaps having more of these intracellular signaling molecules allows N. profundicola to more precisely or rapidly regulate protein expression in the highly variable vent environment. Then again, this may also reflect N. profundicola's changing lifestyles between a free-living existence and being associated with a complex metazoan-microbial symbiosis system which is essentially a biofilm, and the different requirements for gene expression under these two conditions.
The sheer abundance of GGDEF and EAL domains within many genomes, including N. profundicola, suggests that a wide variety of environmental stimuli may be detected by these domains [40]. Both the two-component and c-diGMP signal transduction systems sense and respond to periplasmic substrates, and N. profundicola has GGDEF or EAL domains associated regions that bind amino acids (PBPb domain) or carbohydrates (CelB domain). In addition, as a strict anaerobe, N. profundicola requires the ability to detect oxygen and move away from it, and unsurprisingly possesses a PAS domain (common domain in Period circadian protein, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, and Single-minded protein) protein (COG 2202) that senses redox conditions and binds gaseous molecules like NO, CO, and O2 [41]. Known outputs of the c-diGMP system include changes in motility, virulence, heavy metal resistance, phage resistance, cell to cell communication, exopolysaccharide production, and biofilm formation [40],[42]. In the hydrothermal vent environment, N. profundicola would benefit from the regulation of motility and heavy metal resistance through c-diGMP molecules. In addition, regulation of phage resistance could be particularly important to Epsilonproteobacteria which lack traditional DNA repair systems. Cell Sensing Systems Nautilia profundicola has homologs of the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) system of quorum sensing, S-ribosylhomocysteinase (luxS) (GAmH_0429), and 5′methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase (pfs) (GAmH_0316). At the time of writing, 22 out of 26 sequenced Epsilonproteobacteria have the luxS and pfs genes, with only four Campylobacter species lacking the AI-2 system. While LuxS has been shown to affect biofilm formation, motility, type III secretion, and the production of virulence factors and toxins in pathogens, it remains unclear whether AI-2 is truly a universal signal or simply a metabolic byproduct for most bacterial strains [43]–[45]. In support of the widespread nature of LuxS/Pfs in Epsilonproteobacteria, the metagenome of the A. pompejana episymbionts contains 36 luxS sequences and 49 pfs sequences [46]. The abundance of these genes in Epsilonproteobacteria at hydrothermal vents may offer a mechanism through which this group dominates episymbiont communities. Alternatively and perhaps more likely, quorum sensing at hydrothermal vents could be used for diffusion sensing [47]. The ability to detect diffusion rates in highly variable flow regimes could allow N. profundicola to regulate secretion of extracellular enzymes. Since the AI-2 inducer is a metabolic byproduct, loss of AI-2 to the environment is less energetically costly than the loss of an enzyme. Biofilm-Related Pathways: Polyamine, Flagellar, and Pilin Syntheses N. profundicola likely maintains a mostly attached lifestyle due to the dynamic fluid flow and mixing occurring at vents. It is associated with some, but not all, episymbiont communities of the hydrothermal vent polychaete, A. pompejana, and is also associated with bacterial mats on chimney surfaces [20]. Polyamines have been shown to play significant roles in the formation of biofilms in Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of bubonic plague [48]. N. profundicola appears to be similar to Y. pestis and H. pylori in polyamine synthesis pathways [48],[49]. Genes encoding arginine decarboxylase (speA, GAmH_0346) and spermidine synthase (speE, GAmH_0033) are found in the N. profundicola genome for spermidine formation, but the conversion from agmatine to putrescine is likely performed jointly by agmatine deiminase (aguA, GAmH_1708) and N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase (aguB, GAmH_0211) instead of agmatinase (speB, GAmH_0211). Spermidine may also be synthesized from carboxyspermidine by carboxynorspermidine decarboxylase (nspC, GAmH_0102), which hints at norspermidine production in N. profundicola. Norspermidine plays a significant role in Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation [50], and a homolog of mbaA (GAmH_1695), a norspermidine-regulated biofilm maintenance protein containing GGDEF and EAL domains in V. cholerae [51], is present in the N. profundicola genome. However, a homolog of nspS, which encodes a norspermidine-binding regulatory protein in V. cholerae that mediates biofilm formation, was not identified in the N. profundicola genome. Findings from a recent survey of genes critical for biofilm formation in E. coli reinforced the theory that genes related to surface structures (i.e., flagella and pilin) play major roles in such processes [52]; similar findings have been reported for C. jejuni [53]–[55]. The highly motile N. profundicola has genes for 56 flagellar and pilin proteins, four chemotaxis proteins, and 11 methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. While N. profundicola has most of the same flagellar genes as found in Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2, the distribution of genes varies between the two organisms. Nitratiruptor flagellar genes are all found within the same region of the genome which has a distinct G+C content [18], while Nautilia flagellar genes are distributed throughout the genome and are most closely related to flagellar genes in other Epsilonproteobacteria. Detoxification and Resistance Pathways There are several genes in N. profundicola and other vent Epsilonproteobacteria that encode proteins directly or peripherally involved in resistance to toxins. One of these is a member of the Nudix family of proteins that clean the cell of toxic nucleotide metabolites [56]. This gene (GAmH_1363) is predicted to encode ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase and is found only in the vent epsiloproteobacterial and Arcobacter butzleri genomes and not in pathogenic Epsilonproteobacteria [18],[57]. The protein confers tellurite resistance in both Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Methanococcus jannaschii, presumably through detoxification of ADP-ribose, which non-enzymatically derivatizes terminal amino groups, lysines, and cysteines of proteins [58]–[60]. N. profundicola has two genes encoding proteins homologous to arsenate reductase genes, one of which (GAmH_1558) is homologous to members of the YffB subfamily of arsenate reductases that reduces arsenate to arsenite via reducing equivalents from glutathione. Similar genes are found in the other three vent Epsilonproteobacteria as well as W. succinogenes and A. butzleri. All the vent Epsilonproteobacteria as well as S. denitrificans and A. butzleri contain homologs to the second arsenate reductase (GAmH_0397 in N. profundicola). W. succinogenes, Sulfurovum, Nitratiruptor, and S. denitrificans contain an apparent operon that encodes an arsenite permease and regulatory protein, ArsR [18],[31],[61], whereas both N. profundicola and C. mediatlanticus lack an arsenical permease homolog (COG1055), but contain an arsR homolog (GAmH_0374) elsewhere. Therefore, these microbes may not detoxify arsenic or may use an as yet unrecognized mechanism for arsenite transport. The genome contains two types of cytochromes predicted to be involved in protection against O2 and H2O2: cytochrome bd (cydBA, GAmH_0086, 87), is used to reduce O2 to H2O, and cytochrome c551 peroxidase (GAmH_0241 and 0648) detoxifies peroxide. The genome does not contain predicted genes for catalase or superoxide dismutase, which may be involved in defense against oxidative stress in S. denitrificans [31]. However, N. profundicola has a homolog of alkylhydroperoxide reductase (Ahp, GAmH_0523) that can scavenge endogenous hydrogen peroxide [62], as well as a predicted peroxide stress regulator (GAmH_0524) which is most closely related to sequences in other Epsilonproteobacteria. The genome also contains 2 homologs of methionine sulfoxide reductases (msrA, GAmH_1068 and msrB, GAmH_0900) predicted to repair oxidative damage. All bacteria are thought to employ low molecular weight thiols as a component of oxidative stress resistance. These systems are typified by biosynthetic pathways for the thiol (i.e., glutathione or mycothiol), enzymes that utilize the reduced form of thiol as a reductant, and an enzymatic system for reduction of the oxidized disulfide form of the thiol. The N. profundicola genome does not encode a recognizable pathway for biosynthesis of typical redox balancing thiols or a cognate disulfide oxidoreductase. As noted above, N. profundicola contains a potential arsenate reductase that in other organisms requires glutathione as a reductant. Either the N. profundicola version of this enzyme utilizes a different reductant or N. profundicola must synthesize glutathione by a currently unrecognized pathway. Glutathione might be obtained from the environment, but this has only been reported for Streptococcus mutans [63]. Furthermore, we are unaware of any gene encoding a glutathione transporter in any microbial genome. Coenzyme A (CoA) could serve as an alternative to redox balancing thiol since N. profundicola encodes a potential CoA-disulfide oxidoreductase (GAmH_0923). CoA has been suggested as an alternative to glutathione in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus, based on high levels of intracellular CoA [64] and the presence of a CoA-disulfide reductase (CoADR) activity (PF1186) [65]. Recently, however, PF1186 was found to possess NAD(P)H:polysulfide oxidoreductase activity, and the transcript was positively regulated by the addition of elemental sulfur to P. furiosus cultures [66]. This suggests that the CoADR activity could be a side reaction, with a primary function in sulfur metabolism as described below. Carbon Metabolism N. profundicola was the first chemolithoautotrophic Epsilonproteobacteria isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vents [20] and was hypothesized early on to use the rTCA cycle for carbon fixation [26]. Enzymatic evidence, carbon isotopic fractionation patterns, and the genome sequence data presented in this paper all strongly support this hypothesis (Figure 2
Of the sequenced vent Epsilonproteobacteria, only N. profundicola can grow with formate as a carbon source, but it cannot utilize the C4 dicarboxylic acids (i.e., fumarate or succinate) [18],[19],[21] (Table 1). Therefore, it was surprising to find three homologs to genes encoding C4-dicarboxylate transporter proteins (GAmH_0376, 0470 and 0768) as well as two putative operons with genes encoding a C4-TRAP system for ATP-independent transport of C4 compounds (GAmH_1457-1459, 0113-0115), also found in C. mediatlanticus [70]. The closest homolog to one of the C4-TRAP system operons is from Psychromonas ingrahamii 37, a marine Gammaproteobacterium isolated from polar sea ice [71]. Further experiments are required to determine the functionality of C4 usage in N. profundicola. Sulfur Metabolism Sulfur serves two critical purposes for N. profundicola: as the terminal electron acceptor for energy conservation and as a source of sulfide for biosynthesis. N. profundicola utilizes only elemental sulfur/polysulfides, not sulfate or thiosulfate, as an electron acceptor and presumably must conserve energy in the form of proton motive force from this activity. Three enzymatic systems for the reduction of elemental sulfur have been described: membrane-bound polysulfide reductase [72], cytoplasmic sulfhydrogenase [73],[74], and a soluble cytoplasmic NAD(P)H:polysulfide oxidoreductase [75]. Membrane-bound polysulfide reductase is exemplified by the Wolinella succinogenes PsrABC enzyme that serves as the terminal oxidase for electron transport from H2 or formate to polysulfide via a quinone. The periplasmic enzyme Sud can accelerate this process by functioning as a polysulfide-binding protein that presents the substrate for reduction by the molybdopterin-containing PsrABC [76]. Phenotypically, N. profundicola should contain this enzyme system ,and homologs of the PsrABC system are indeed encoded by GAmH_1483-1485 (Figures 2
For biosynthesis, all organisms must either obtain sulfur-containing amino acids from the environment or synthesize them de novo by producing and capturing sulfide. In contrast to many bacteria, N. profundicola lacks a sulfate transporter and reductive sulfate assimilation pathway to produce sulfide in the cytoplasm. However, N. profundicola does contain genes that correspond to O-acetyl-serine sulfhydrylase (OAS, GAmH_1543) and O-acetyl-L-homoserine sulfhydrylase (OAHS, GAmH_0859) that capture sulfide for cysteine and methionine biosynthesis, respectively. Based on the genome sequence, we propose that N. profundicola utilizes NAD(P)H polysulfide oxidoreductase (GAmH_0923) to produce sulfide from polysulfide in the cytoplasm for assimilation. GAmH_0923 was noted above as a potential CoA-disulfide oxidoreductase involved in oxidative stress resistance. Clearly, GAmH_0923 is a high priority target for further biochemical and regulation studies to determine whether its primary role in N. profundicola is to serve as a terminal electron acceptor, a mediator of thiol redox balance, or both. A similar lack of reductive sulfate assimilation genes coupled with the presence of sulfide assimilation genes was found in the genome of Thiomicrospira crunogena [27], a vent-associated microaerobic sulfur-oxidizing chemoautotroph, suggesting that this may be a common trait of organisms inhabiting sulfide rich environments. Nitrogen Metabolism N. profundicola grows chemolithotrophically on hydrogen with ammonium or nitrate, but not with urea, as a sole N source [21]. Further growth experiments demonstrated similar specific growth rates (0.059 h−1 vs. 0.044 h−1) on nitrate and ammonium, respectively. However, morphological observations showed elongation and filament production atypical of normal growth in the nitrate-grown cells (data not shown). Genes encoding a typical ammonia transport and assimilation pathway are present: two AmtB transporters (GAmH_0198 and GAmH_0380), NADPH-glutamate synthase (GAmH_1535/ GAmH_1024), and glutamine synthetase (GAmH_0480) (Figures 2
In aerobic and anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, HURM functions as a quinone reductase mediating the oxidation of hydroxylamine and hydrazine [80]. In contrast, we propose that the N. profundicola HURM functions in opposite direction and similar to NrfAH as a periplasmic quinol oxidase system that reduces nitrite to hydroxylamine (Figure 4 The N. profundicola Hao- and cM552-encoding genes are in the vicinity of genes that encode critical functions in the cytochrome c maturation system II of N. profundicola: GAmH_1250, ccdA; GAmH_0538, resB. Also, the hao gene is adjacent to gene encoding a small monoheme cytochrome c (GAmH_1249) homologous to cytochromes c552 (M.G. Klotz, unpublished results), which serve as redox carriers in the respiratory chains of many chemolithotrophs and are known to redox-partner with complexes III and IV [27],[31],[87]. The N. profundicola genome does not encode a complex III, and complex IV is a cytochrome D ubiquinol oxidase (GAmH_0086-89). Because the predicted catabolic modules in the periplasm interact directly with the quinone pool (Psr, FDH, uptake-hydrogenase), cytochrome c552 likely connects both or one of the encoded cytochrome c551 peroxidases (GAmH_0241, GAmH_0648) to cM552, thereby providing hydrogen peroxide tolerance and an additional respiratory electron sink to the quinone pool. A putative redox interaction between cytochromes c552 and cM552 has been discussed in the literature ([78] and references therein). We have preliminary evidence to suggest that at least three genes in the pathway, napA, hao, and har, are upregulated in N. profundicola cells grown in the presence of nitrate vs. ammonium. These experiments are ongoing and will be published at a later date. This pathway may also be present in other bacteria, at least in other Nautilia strains. The genome sequence of Nautilia lithotrophica is currently being sequenced, and other Nautilia strains are also being tested for growth on nitrate as an N source. Energy Metabolism N. profundicola has a number of conserved genes involved in energy metabolism. We concentrate here on those that are unique, either to N. profundicola or other hydrothermal vent microbes. The importance of H2 metabolism observed in the physiology of N. profundicola is clearly reflected by the number of operons for hydrogenases. As evidenced by the phylogenetic relationships of the large subunits, there are one H2-sensing (Group 2), two H2-uptake (Group 1), and three H2-evolving (Group 4) hydrogenases in the N. profundicola genome (Figure 5
The physiological roles of the multiple hydrogenases likely reflect an adaptation to variable hydrogen and electron acceptor concentrations, though defining their specific roles will require significant experimental effort. We propose that the Group 1 membrane bound hydrogenase is a constitutive system that couples to the quinone pool and contributes to establishing and maintaining the proton gradient across the cytoplasmic membrane. Three of the hydrogenases appear to couple with ferredoxin. The reduction of ferredoxin with molecular hydrogen is thermodynamically unfavorable due to the difference in redox potentials with the reaction becoming even more unfavorable at low hydrogen concentrations. Two of the Group 4 energy-conserving hydrogenases may be able to utilize proton or sodium motive force to overcome this energy requirement and may be utilized to help provide reduced ferredoxin for CO2 fixation when hydrogen concentrations are low. This has been proposed for the homologous Methanosarcina barkeri Ech hydrogenase during autotrophic growth [94]. The soluble, cytoplasmic Group 2 hydrogenase cannot couple to ionic gradients, and we therefore hypothesize that it may only be important when hydrogen concentrations in the environment are high and the cell rapidly oxidizes reduced ferredoxin, conditions that would minimize the unfavorable energetics. This scenario has been proposed for the Aquifex aeolicus cytoplasmic hydrogenase, the closest characterized homolog to that of N. profundicola [31],[95]. Alternatively, this enzyme could be important during hydrogen and polysulfide starvation. Under these conditions, strain AmH may degrade internal carbon stores by running the rTCA cycle oxidatively, and the hydrogenase would reoxidize reduced ferredoxin, allowing the cycle to continue and produce hydrogen in a favorable reaction. The aforementioned Group 4 hydrogenases could also contribute in this scenario by maintaining a proton or sodium gradient. The role of the third Group 4 hydrogenase, CooLH, is enigmatic as N. profundicola does not, nor do any of the other Epsilonproteobacteria, encode a CooS-type CODH subunit that is required for CO-dependent H2 evolution in Rhodospirillum rubrum [96]. Similarly, the role of the periplasmic Group 1 hydrogenase is unclear. Besides the hydrogenases and a typical F1F0 ATPase enzyme complex (F0, GAmH_1440; F1, GAmH_0301-0306) closely related to other Epsilonproteobacteria ATPases, a vacuolar-type H+-transporting ATPase operon (GAmH_0030-0023) was also found in the N. profundicola genome. The genes in the operon are most closely related to Halothermothrix orenii H168 and Clostridium tetani E88, and other members of the Clostridia (Firmicutes) [97],[98]. Similar operon structures are found in Clostridium tetani and Nitrosococcus oceani and differ somewhat from the archaeal operons (e.g., Methanosarcina mazei, Pyrococcus horikoshi, and Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1) [87],[92],[97],[99]. Since this operon is only in the N. profundicola and not in any other epsilonproteobacterial genome, it was likely acquired via a horizontal gene transfer event. The function of this complex may be partially similar to that of N. oceani and other AOB, where it actively extrudes sodium [100]. However, N. profundicola lacks sodium-dependent complex I that in N. oceani likely reduces NAD to NADH [87]. N. profundicola contains several types of homologous genes that code for sodium transport proteins: sodium-proton antiporters (GAmH_0108, GAmH_1552, GAmH_0762, GAmH_0955) most likely used for motility and transport processes; a putative sodium-proline symporter (GAmH_0965, PutP) for amino acid uptake; and a putative sodium di- and tricarboxylate transporter (GAmH_0459, TrkA-C). N. profundicola likely uses the V-type ATPase to regulate the influx of sodium ions from these processes. The N. profundicola genome contains all but 4 (nuoE, F, G, K) of the subunits for NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (NADH dehydrogenase, complex I), which in other species contributes to proton motive force generation for oxidative phosphorylation. The gene structure here is identical to some other anaerobic bacteria, including C. mediatlanticus and Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans, but is missing two genes (F and G) that normally form the inner cytoplasmic structure of the oxidoreductase found in facultative anaerobes and microaerophilic bacteria belonging to the Epsilonproteobacteria. The missing part makes up the acceptor region of the molecule, and therefore these anaerobes most likely have a different acceptor portion of the complex not found in the nuo operon. In addition to the fumarate reductase mentioned above, the genome also contains a four-subunit formate dehydrogenase (GAmH_1274-1277), which enables N. profundicola to grow with formate as an electron donor and carbon source [21]. Cell energy requirements include both the reduced ferredoxin to drive rTCA cycle CO2-fixing reactions and reduced pyridine nucleotides to drive other anabolic processes. The production of reduced ferredoxin from hydrogen was discussed above. As N. profundicola lacks the genes necessary to generate NAD(P)H via the Pentose Phosphate pathway or via a ferredoxin-linked NADH oxidoreductase, we hypothesize that the partial complex I (NUO) acting in concert with formate dehydrogenase (FDH) or the membrane-bound uptake hydrogenase could form a reverse electron transport system responsible for producing NAD(P)H (Figure 6
DNA Replication and Repair Several DNA replication genes found in all vent Epsilonproteobacteria (but not exclusive to this group) include: nucleotidyltransferase/DNA polymerase (GAmH_0589); DNA polymerase (Pol) III epsilon subunit and related 3′–5′ exonucleases (GAmH_0148, GAmH_0193); and the gram positive type of DNA Pol III alpha subunit (GAmH_0988, GAmH_1246), which contains an internal proofreading exonuclease [101]. Only four Epsilonproteobacteria, including N. profundicola and C. mediatlanticus, contain multiple homologs of the Gram-positive DNA Pol III alpha subunit, and most of the vent Epsilonproteobacteria and a few free-living members contain 2–3 homologs of the epsilon subunit. The epsilon subunit provides proofreading for DNA Pol III (mutD in E. coli), and binds to the polymerase and histidinol phosphatase (php) domain of the E. coli DNA Pol III alpha subunit [102]. Wieczorek et al. (2006) suggested that the similar php domain found in DNA PolX, mentioned below, might also bind the epsilon subunit, enabling an additional coupled proofreading reaction beyond the DNA Pol III enzyme complex. The inventory of epsilon and alpha DNA Pol III subunits and DNA Pol X in vent Epsilonproteobacteria supports this hypothesis. There are three genes whose functions relate to DNA replication and repair and are found exclusively in the vent Epsilonproteobacteria and not in the subdivision as a whole; they may be very important in the repair of damaged DNA required under the extreme conditions found at vents (Table 1). First, a homolog to the DNA-repair photolyase or spore photoproduct lyase gene (GAmH_0507) is present. It is a member of the radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM, GAmH_0452 in N. profundicola) domain protein superfamily (Figure S3). This gene shares a strong similarity to other members of this superfamily cluster found in three out of four of the vent Epsilonproteobacteria (data not shown) but is not found in non-vent Epsilonproteobacteria. The most similar experimentally characterized protein to the gene in N. profundicola is a gene from Bacillus subtilis (23% protein sequence identity) which functions to repair thymine dimers (5-thyminyl-5,6-dihydrothymine, or spore product) specifically formed in spores during UV exposure [103]. Although there is evidence of some light emissions from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, most likely from geothermal energy found above 700 nm [104], there is no evidence of UV emissions. A member of this family was also identified in the genome of Idiomarina loihiensis L2TR, a Gammaproteobacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent at Loihi, Hawaii [105],[106]. In these vent bacteria, the related gene product could function in repair of damage to DNA generated by other processes. Possible conditions that could lead to nucleotide damage include high levels of ionizing radiation and metal complexes with reactive oxidative species [8], [107]–109. While there are few direct measurements of ionizing radiation on chimney surfaces, researchers have isolated bacteria and archaea resistant to high levels of radiation (>20–30 kGy) and found polychaetes containing very high levels of natural Pb-210 and Po-210 [5]–[8]. The second gene predicted to be involved in DNA replication and repair found in all vent Epsilonproteobacteria is DNA polymerase IV, family X (PolX, GAmH_1417). PolX homologs are found in 25–30% of sequenced bacterial genomes, and genetic evidence indicates that PolX contributes to double strand break repair in the radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans [110]. Eukaryotic PolX homologs act to repair double strand breaks with 3′-overhangs containing gaps on both strands, i.e., non-homologous end repair. While experimental and bioinformatics evidence suggest that a Ku-LigD system for non-homologous end repair is present in a wide variety of bacterial groups, it does not appear to be present in Epsilonproteobacteria [111],[112]. Therefore, PolX in Epsilonproteobacteria may substitute for the Ku-LigD system in countering DNA damage. Finally, a gene involved in DNA stability at high temperatures was found exclusively in vent associated Epsilonproteobacteria: reverse gyrase (rgy, GAmH_1041, Figure 7
We report here that other deeply-branching hydrothermal vent Epsilonproteobacteria, Caminibacter mediatlanticus [19] and Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2 [18], also contain a highly related rgy sequence; their optimal growth temperatures are 55°C (Table 1, Figure 7 = 33°C), was isolated from an in situ sampler and is phenotypically more similar to Thiomicrospira crunogena, a vent- associated microaerobic sulfur-oxidizing chemoautotroph that also does not contain the rgy gene [27],[29].A PCR survey of thermophilic Nautiliales from geographically distinct sites indicated that an rgy gene is also present in Lebetimonas acidiphila (Topt = 50°C) [25] and Nautilia sp. strain 4064-55 (Topt = 55°C). These sequences formed a monophyletic clade with N. profundicola and C. mediatlanticus rgy sequences (Figure 8
To determine if rgy might be involved in stress response or DNA repair, expression of this gene in cultured cells was monitored by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). Transcript abundance of N. profundicola rgy increased over 100 fold when actively growing cells were exposed to 65°C while rRNA transcript abundance remained constant or slightly decreased (Figure 9
To further extend these observations, the occurrence, phylogeny, and expression of rgy in vivo was assessed in representative deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples from 9°N and Guaymas Basin along the East Pacific Rise. PCR with degenerate primers produced a number of rgy sequences from these samples, including two groups (referred to as Epsilon-like) that are distinct from rgy sequences present in cultured members of the Epsilonproteobacteria (Figures 8
Conclusions The Epsilonproteobacteria, while perhaps better recognized as pathogens, are supremely adapted to hydrothermal vent ecosystems [11]. The N. profundicola genome reported here indicates that this organism's success in the vent environment relies on chemoautotrophy via the rTCA cycle and a tendency to reduce sulfur species driven by a prodigious capacity for hydrogen oxidation. It is truly remarkable that N. profundicola lacks much of the well-established electron transport chain inventory, but is able to utilize its large suite of hydrogenases and ATPases, the most described yet in any Epsilonproteobacteria, for energy and reducing equivalents. Presumably, these genes and pathways would be tightly regulated to follow the prevailing redox conditions found at highly fluctuating diffuse flow vents. The abundance of signal transduction genes similar to other free-living vent Epsilonproteobacteria implies that the lifestyle of N. profundicola is mainly independent of A. pompejana and its episymbionts. The N. profundicola genome also produced two unique insights that will drive further investigations. First, we propose a novel pathway for nitrate assimilation where Nap, HURM (Hao and cM552), and Har function together to produce ammonium via the toxic intermediate hydroxylamine. Second, N. profundicola, along with C. mediatlanticus and Nitratiruptor sp., contains a gene homologous to reverse gyrase, which most likely confers a selective advantage to these Epsilonproteobacteria in the face of rapid temperature fluctuations that occur at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. N. profundicola, therefore, contains all the genes necessary for life in conditions widely believed to reflect those in the archaean biosphere: anaerobic, sulfur, H2- and CO2-rich, with unstable redox potentials and temperatures [119],[120]. N. profundicola will thus be an important model system to understand early microbial life on earth. Material and Methods Growth and Sequencing of N. profundicola N. profundicola (Nautilia sp. AmH) was grown in an anaerobic autotrophic sulfur medium as described [20]. DNA was extracted from the cultured cells using a standard SDS/proteinase K/phenol/chloroform extraction technique [121]. The genome was sequenced with the whole-genome shotgun method with both small and medium insert libraries as previously described [122]. Physical and sequencing gaps were closed as described [122]. Assembly was performed with the Celera Assembler version 3. An initial set of predicted ORFs and the functional assignment of genes was performed using the TIGR (now JCVI) autoannotation pipeline. This included gene finding with Glimmer, Blast-extend-repraze (BER) searches, HMM searches, TMHMM searches, SignalP predictions, and automatic annotations from AutoAnnotate. For nitrate growth analysis, N. profundicola was cultivated in anaerobic salt water media with S0 and a headspace of H2/CO2 gas as previously described [21], with either 5 mM ammonium or 20 mM nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. After three passes in the indicated media, cell growth was monitored by direct counts of cells stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole using an Olympus Provis AX70 microscope and image analysis software (ImagePro Plus, Media Cybernetics). The production of hydrogen sulfide was monitored during cell growth using the Cline method [123]. Annotation The manual annotation tool Manatee was used to manually review the output from the prokaryotic pipeline of the TIGR (now JCVI) annotation pipeline (http://manatee.sourceforge.net/). Manual curation was performed on approximately 383 CDS. Further refinements and comparisons to other genomes were done with IMG, BLAST, and RAST [124]–[127]. GenBank accession number of the genome is CP001279. The N. profundicola genome report as recommended by Genome Standards Consortium [128] is outlined (Table S1). To identify redundant/duplicated operons, an all-vs-all self blastp was performed and an E-value cutoff (of 10–20) was applied to the results to establish links between proteins. The results were then visually analyzed using DagChainer [129], and no evidence of duplicated operons was found. Potential prophage regions were located by manually searching genome regions near tRNA as well as with the automated online tool, Prophage Finder [38], which looks for phage-like genes and changes in G+C content. Phylogenetic Analyses Phylogenetic trees of the translated rgy and large subunit hydrogenase sequences were constructed in MEGA4 [130] with the default parameters, based on both Neighbor-joining and minimum evolutionary algorithms with 500 bootstrap replicates. PHYML trees were calculated with the following parameters: Bootstrap replica number: 100; Substitution model: JTT; Proportion of invariable sites: automatic estimated by the program; Number of substitution rate categories: 4; Gamma distribution parameter: automatic estimated by the program; and Starting tree: BIONJ. The program was allowed to optimize the topology, the branch lengths and rate parameters of the start tree. Abundance of N. profundicola rgy mRNA Cells were grown at 45°C to mid-log phase (~12 hours) and triplicate tubes shifted to each indicated temperature for 2 hours. RNA was harvested using a CTAB extraction protocol [131], and genomic DNA was removed by gDNA wipeout buffer (Qiagen QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit). RNA samples were quantified using the RiboGreen Assay (Invitrogen) and diluted to the same concentrations with RNAase-free H2O. cDNA was produced using random primers and the Qiagen QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit. To estimate the abundance of rgy mRNA, specific primers were designed from the nucleotide sequences of the N. profundicola rgy gene (AmHrgy2022F: 5′-CACAGACCCCGA TAGGGAAGGTG; AmHrgy2203R: 5′-ACCCGACCCATCTGTCCGTAATTC). In addition, the 16S rRNA was quantified using primers and conditions described elsewhere [132],[133]. Genomic DNA was quantified using the picogreen assay (Invitrogen) and used in standard curves for both reactions. Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicate or quadruplicate with 1 µl of cDNA in a final volume of 12.5 µl using the Stratagene SYBR green mix on an ABI7500, and PCR conditions for the rgy primer set were: 95°C 10 minutes; followed by 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15 seconds, 62°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 45 seconds, with a final dissociation step. Final rgy primer concentrations were at 0.05 µM. Environmental Sample Analyses Chimney and Alvinella pompejana tube samples were collected as described previously during four cruises to the EPR in November 1999 (9°N, Io vent -773), January 2000 (Guaymas Basin, 534G and 855G), the Extreme cruises Extreme 2001, November 2001 (9°N, P vent-POB) and Extreme 2003, November 2003 (Alvinella pompejana tube-243T). In addition, a chimney sample (Michael's vent, Extreme 2004 cruise, Nov.-Dec., 2004, 9°N, EPR) was inoculated into anaerobic autotrophic sulfur medium as described [20] and incubated at 55°C. One strain (Nautilia sp. strain 4064-55) was detected in the third subculture by DGGE and sequenced as described [20]. DNA and RNA were extracted from the indicated samples and RNA was reverse transcribed as described previously with a modified rgy reverse PCR primer, without the KpnI restriction site [20],[134]. Reverse Gyrase PCR Amplifications, Cloning, and Abundance Estimates A portion of the rgy gene from environmental samples was PCR amplified with degenerate primers as previously described [134], cloned into a TOPO TA vector, and sequenced [26]. GenBank accession numbers of the clones are FJ597068-FJ597141. Two rgy clades (Epsilon-like 1 and Epsilon-like 2) were chosen for quantitative estimates based on SYBR green quantification on an ABI7500. Primers were: Egrp1 rgyF (5′-TGGATCGGTTTCGGAATTTCCG); Egrp1 rgyR (5′-GCAAATGCGTTCTCGAAACGTTC); Egrp2 rgyF (5′-GGTGGATCGGATTCGGGATTTC); and Egrp2 rgyR (5′-CTTGAATGCGAACTCGAGGCG). Conditions and primer concentrations were as described for RT-qPCR above, but with a two-step PCR reaction (95°C for 15 seconds, 65°C for 2 minutes). Standard curves were generated from dilutions of cloned DNAs within the specific clade (Epsilon-like 1 or 2). Figure S1 Alignment of the C-termini of Hao proteins with annotations based on Igarashi et al. [135] and Bergmann et al. [136]: CxxCH, heme binding motif 8; H459, axial ligand to heme; Y467, protein crosslink to catalytic heme; major alpha helices; alpha TMS, C-terminal transmembrane spanning domain. Sequence sources: CAD84873, Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718; ABB75723, Nitrosospira multiformis ATCC 25196; ABA57404, Nitrosococcus oceani ATCC 19707; AAU92745, Methylococcus capsulatus Bath; EDM23995, Caminibacter mediatlanticus TB-2; AM-H, Nautilia profundicola AM-H. [135], [136]. (4.15 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(3.9M, tif) Figure S2 Gene neighborhood of rgy gene (Reverse gyrase, GAMH_1041), coo (CO-hydrogenase, GAMH_1032-1026) and fdr (Fumarate reductase, GAMH_1024-1022) operons in Nautilia profundicola (A) and Caminibacter mediatlanticus (B). Genes of the same color (except light yellow) are from the same orthologous group (top COG hit). (2.94 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(2.8M, tif) Figure S3 Gene neighborhoods of the spl-related gene (DNA photolyase, Radical SAM domain protein) in Nautilia profundicola (A) and Caminibacter mediatlanticus (B). Genes of the same color (except light yellow) are from the same orthologous group (top COG hit). Abbreviations: spl = DNA photolyase; H = hypothetical protein; CH = conserved hypothetical; 1 = GAMH_0510, xanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase; 2 = GAMH_0506, short chain dehydrogenase; 3 = GAMH_0503, plasmid stabilization system; 4/5 = GAMH_0504/502, toxin/antitoxin gene pair, RelBE-3 family. Arrows indicate a probable genome inversion between the strains.(7.78 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(7.4M, tif) Table S1 Nautilia profundicola genome sequence report as recommended by the Genome Standards Consortium [137]. (0.06 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.(58K, doc) Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the Captain and Crew of the R/V l'Atalante and especially the Nautile pilots for help with sample collection. Footnotes The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This work was supported by an NSF grants to BJC, SCC and JAE (EF-0333203) and to BJC (DEB-0640414). TEH was supported by CAREER award MCB-0447649 from NSF. MGK was supported by NSF grant EF-0412129. LYS was supported by the UCR Ag. Exp. Sta. References 1. Lowell RP, Rona PA, Vonherzen RP. Sea-floor hydrothermal systems. J Geophys Res-Sol Ea. 1995;100:327–352. 2. Luther GW, Rozan TF, Taillefert M, Nuzzio DB, Di Meo C, et al. Chemical speciation drives hydrothermal vent ecology. Nature. 2001;410:813–816. [PubMed] 3. Von Damm KL. Controls of the chemistry and temporal variability of seafloor hydrothermal fluids. In: Humphris SE, Zierenberg RA, Mullineaux LS, Thomson RE, editors. Seafloor hydrothermal systems: Physical, chemical, biological, and geological interactions. Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union; 1995. pp. 222–247. 4. Scheirer DS, Shank TM, Fornari DJ. Temperature variations at diffuse and focused flow hydrothermal vent sites along the northern East Pacific Rise. Geochem Geoph Geosy. 2006;7:Q03002. doi:10.1029/2005GC001094. 5. Kadko D. Radioisotopic studies of submarine hydrothermal vents. Rev Geophys. 1996;34:349–366. 6. La Duc MT, Benardini JN, Kempf MJ, Newcombe DA, Lubarsky M, et al. Microbial diversity of Indian Ocean hydrothermal vent plumes: Microbes tolerant of desiccation, peroxide exposure, and ultraviolet and gamma-irradiation. Astrobiology. 2007;7:416–431. [PubMed] 7. Jolivet E, L'Haridon S, Corre E, Forterre P, Prieur D. Thermococcus gammatolerans sp nov., a hyperthermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent that resists ionizing radiation. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2003;53:847–851. 8. Cherry R, Desbruyeres D, Heyraud M, Nolan C. High levels of natural radioactivity in hydrothermal vent polychaetes. CR Acad Sci III. 1992;315:21–26. 9. Miroshnichenko ML. Thermophilic microbial communities of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Microbiology. 2004;73:1–13. 10. Reysenbach AL, Cady SL. Microbiology of ancient and modern hydrothermal systems. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:79–86. [PubMed] 11. Campbell BJ, Engel AS, Porter ML, Takai K. The versatile epsilon-proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:458–468. [PubMed] 12. Huber JA, Welch DBM, Morrison HG, Huse SM, Neal PR, et al. Microbial population structures in the deep marine biosphere. Science. 2007;318:97–100. [PubMed] 13. Huber JA, Butterfield DA, Baross JA. Bacterial diversity in a subseafloor habitat following a deep-sea volcanic eruption. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;43:393–409. 14. Takai K, Inagaki F, Nakagawa S, Hirayama H, Nunoura T, et al. Isolation and phylogenetic diversity of members of previously uncultivated epsilon-proteobacteria in deep-sea hydrothermal fields. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;218:167–174. [PubMed] 15. Reysenbach AL, Longnecker K, Kirshtein J. Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situ growth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent. Appl Environ Microb. 2000;66:3798–3806. 16. Longnecker K, Reysenbach AL. Expansion of the geographic distribution of a novel lineage of epsilon-Proteobacteria to a hydrothermal vent site on the Southern East Pacific Rise. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001;35:287–293. [PubMed] 17. Corre E, Reysenbach AL, Prieur D. Epsilon-proteobacterial diversity from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;205:329–335. [PubMed] 18. Nakagawa S, Takaki Y, Shimamura S, Reysenbach AL, Takai K, et al. Deep-sea vent epsilon-proteobacterial genomes provide insights into emergence of pathogens. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:12146–12150. 19. Voordeckers JW, Starovoytov V, Vetriani C. Caminibacter mediatlanticus sp nov., a thermophilic, chemolithoautotrophic, nitrate-ammonifying bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2005;55:773–779. 20. Campbell BJ, Jeanthon C, Kostka JE, Luther GW, Cary SC. Growth and phylogenetic properties of novel bacteria belonging to the epsilon subdivision of the Proteobacteria enriched from Alvinella pompejana and deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Appl Environ Microb. 2001;67:4566–4572. 21. Smith JL, Campbell BJ, Hanson TE, Zhang CL, Cary SC. Nautilia profundicola sp. nov., a thermophilic, sulfur-reducing epsilonproteobacterium from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2008;58:1598–1602. 22. Alain K, Querellou J, Lesongeur F, Pignet P, Crassous P, et al. Caminibacter hydrogeniphilus gen. nov., sp nov., a novel thermophilic, hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium isolated from an East Pacific Rise hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2002;52:1317–1323. 23. Miroshnichenko ML, Kostrikina NA, L'Haridon S, Jeanthon C, Hippe H, et al. Nautilia lithotrophica gen. nov., sp nov., a thermophilic sulfur-reducing epsilon-proteobacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2002;52:1299–1304. 24. Miroshnichenko ML, L'Haridon S, Schumann P, Spring S, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA, et al. Caminibacter profundus sp nov., a novel thermophile of Nautiliales ord. nov within the class ‘Epsilonproteobacteria’, isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2004;54:41–45. 25. Takai K, Hirayama H, Nakagawa T, Suzuki Y, Nealson KH, et al. Lebetimonas acidiphila gen. nov., sp nov., a novel thermophilic, acidophilic, hydrogen-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the Epsilonproteobacteria, isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal fumarole in the Mariana Arc. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2005;55:183–189. 26. Campbell BJ, Stein JL, Cary SC. Evidence of chemolithoautotrophy in the bacterial community associated with Alvinella pompejana, a hydrothermal vent polychaete. Appl Environ Microb. 2003;69:5070–5078. 27. Scott KM, Sievert SM, Abril FN, Ball LA, Barrett CJ, et al. The genome of deep-sea vent chemolithoautotroph Thiomicrospira crunogena XCL-2. PloS Biol. 2006;4:2196–2212. 28. Jannasch HW, Wirsen CO, Nelson DC, Robertson LA. Thiomicrospira crunogena sp. nov, a colorless, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 1985;35:422–424. 29. Nakagawa S, Takai K, Inagaki F, Hirayama H, Nunoura T, et al. Distribution, phylogenetic diversity and physiological characteristics of epsilon-Proteobacteria in a deep-sea hydrothermal field. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1619–1632. [PubMed] 30. Kern M, Mager AM, Simon J. Role of individual nap gene cluster products in NapC-independent nitrate respiration of Wolinella succinogenes. Microbiol Sgm. 2007;153:3739–3747. 31. Sievert SM, Scott KM, Klotz MG, Chain PSG, Hauser LJ, et al. Genome of the epsilonproteobacterial chemolithoautotroph Sulfurimonas denitrificans. Appl Environ Microb. 2008;74:1145–1156. 32. Eppinger M, Baar C, Raddatz G, Huson DH, Schuster SC. Comparative analysis of four Campylobacterales. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:872–885. [PubMed] 33. Kang J, Blaser MJ. Bacterial populations as perfect gases: genomic integrity and diversification tensions in Helicobacter pylori. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:826–836. [PubMed] 34. Lobry JR. A simple vectorial representation of DNA sequences for the detection of replication origins in bacteria. Biochimie. 1996;78:323–326. [PubMed] 35. Zhang Y, Romero H, Salinas G, Gladyshev VN. Dynamic evolution of selenocysteine utilization in bacteria: a balance between selenoprotein loss and evolution of selenocysteine from redox active cysteine residues. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R94. [PubMed] 36. Hayes F. Toxins-antitoxins: Plasmid maintenance, programmed cell death, and cell cycle arrest. Science. 2003;301:1496–1499. [PubMed] 37. Pandey DP, Gerdes K. Toxin-antitoxin loci are highly abundant in free-living but lost from host-associated prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:966–976. [PubMed] 38. Bose M, Barber RD. Prophage Finder: a prophage loci prediction tool for prokaryotic genome sequences. In Silico Biology. 2006;6:223–227. [PubMed] 39. Galperin MY. Bacterial signal transduction network in a genomic perspective. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6:552–567. [PubMed] 40. Jenal U, Malone J. Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:385–407. [PubMed] 41. Zhulin IB, Taylor BL, Dixon R. PAS domain S-boxes in archaea, bacteria and sensors for oxygen and redox. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22:331–333. [PubMed] 42. Romling U, Gomelsky M, Galperin MY. C-di-GMP: the dawning of a novel bacterial signaling system. Molecular Microbiol. 2005;57:629–639. 43. Keller L, Surette MG. Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:249–258. [PubMed] 44. Vendeville A, Winzer K, Heurlier K, Tang CM, Hardie KR. Making ‘sense’ of metabolism: autoinducer-2, LUXS and pathogenic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:383–396. [PubMed] 45. Xavier KB, Bassler BL. LuxS quorum sensing: more than just a numbers game. Current Opinion Microbiol. 2003;6:191–197. 46. Grzymski JJ, Murray AE, Campbell BJ, Kaplarevic M, Gao G, et al. Metagenome analysis of an extreme microbial symbiosis reveals eurythermal adaptation and metabolic flexibility. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:17516–17521. 47. Redfield RJ. Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:365–370. [PubMed] 48. Patel CN, Wortham BW, Lines JL, Fetherston JD, Perry RD, et al. Polyamines are essential for the formation of plague biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:2355–2363. [PubMed] 49. Doig P, de Jonge BL, Alm RA, Brown ED, Uria-Nickelsen M, et al. Helicobacter pylori physiology predicted from genomic comparison of two strains. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 1999;63:675–707. 50. Karatan E, Duncan TR, Watnick PI. NspS, a predicted polyamine sensor, mediates activation of Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation by norspermidine. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:7434–7443. [PubMed] 51. Bomchil N, Watnick P, Kolter R. Identification and characterization of a Vibrio cholerae gene, mbaA, involved in maintenance of biofilm architecture. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:1384–1390. [PubMed] 52. Niba ET, Naka Y, Nagase M, Mori H, Kitakawa M. A Genome-wide approach to identify the genes involved in biofilm formation in E. coli. DNA Res. 2007;14:237–246. [PubMed] 53. Reeser RJ, Medler RT, Billington SJ, Jost BH, Joens LA. Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni biofilms under defined growth conditions. Appl Environ Microb. 2007;73:1908–1913. 54. Joshua GW, Guthrie-Irons C, Karlyshev AV, Wren BW. Biofilm formation in Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology. 2006;152:387–396. [PubMed] 55. Kalmokoff M, Lanthier P, Tremblay TL, Foss M, Lau PC, et al. Proteomic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni 11168 biofilms reveals a role for the motility complex in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:4312–4320. [PubMed] 56. Bessman MJ, Frick DN, Ohandley SF. The MutT proteins or “nudix” hydrolases, a family of versatile, widely distributed, “housecleaning” enzymes. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:25059–25062. [PubMed] 57. Miller WG, Parker CT, Rubenfield M, Mendz GL, Wosten MM, et al. The complete genome sequence and analysis of the epsilonproteobacterium Arcobacter butzleri. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1358. [PubMed] 58. McLennan AG. The Nudix hydrolase superfamily. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:123–143. [PubMed] 59. Gabelli SB, Bianchet MA, Ohnishi Y, Ichikawa Y, Bessman MJ, et al. Mechanism of the Escherichia coli ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, a nudix hydrolase. Biochemistry. 2002;41:9279–9285. [PubMed] 60. Dunn CA, O'Handley SF, Frick DN, Bessman MJ. Studies on the ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase subfamily of the Nudix hydrolases and tentative identification of trgB, a gene associated with tellurite resistance. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:32318–32324. [PubMed] 61. Silver S, Phung LT. Genes and enzymes involved in bacterial oxidation and reduction of inorganic arsenic. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:599–608. 62. Seaver LC, Imlay JA. Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase is the primary scavenger of endogenous hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:7173–7181. [PubMed] 63. Sherrill C, Fahey RC. Import and metabolism of glutathione by Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:1454–1459. [PubMed] 64. Hummel CS, Lancaster KM, Crane EJ., 3rd Determination of coenzyme A levels in Pyrococcus furiosus and other Archaea: implications for a general role for coenzyme A in thermophiles. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;252:229–234. [PubMed] 65. Harris DR, Ward DE, Feasel JM, Lancaster KM, Murphy RD, et al. Discovery and characterization of a Coenzyme A disulfide reductase from Pyrococcus horikoshii. Implications for this disulfide metabolism of anaerobic hyperthermophiles. FEBS J. 2005;272:1189–1200. [PubMed] 66. Schut GJ, Bridger SL, Adams MW. Insights into the metabolism of elemental sulfur by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus: characterization of a coenzyme A- dependent NAD(P)H sulfur oxidoreductase. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:4431–4441. [PubMed] 67. Mussmann M, Hu FZ, Richter M, de Beer D, Preisler A, et al. Insights into the genome of large sulfur bacteria revealed by analysis of single filaments. PloS Biol. 2007;5:1923–1937. 68. Eisen JA, Nelson KE, Paulsen IT, Heidelberg JF, Wu M, et al. The complete genome sequence of Chlorobium tepidum TLS, a photosynthetic, anaerobic, green-sulfur bacterium. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:9509–9514. 69. Deckert G, Warren PV, Gaasterland T, Young WG, Lenox AL, et al. The complete genome of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. Nature. 1998;392:353–358. [PubMed] 70. Mulligan C, Kelly DJ, Thomas GH. Tripartite ATP-independent periplasmic transporters: Application of a relational database for genome-wide analysis of transporter gene frequency and organization. J Mol Microb Biotech. 2007;12:218–226. 71. Auman AJ, Breezee JL, Gosink JJ, Kampfer P, Staley JT. Psychromonas ingrahamii sp nov., a novel gas vacuolate, psychrophilic bacterium isolated from Arctic polar sea ice. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2006;56:1001–1007. 72. Krafft T, Gross R, Kroger A. The function of Wolinella succinogenes psr genes in electron transport with polysulphide as the terminal electron acceptor. Eur J Biochem. 1995;230:601–606. [PubMed] 73. Ma K, Schicho RN, Kelly RM, Adams MW. Hydrogenase of the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus is an elemental sulfur reductase or sulfhydrogenase: evidence for a sulfur-reducing hydrogenase ancestor. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:5341–5344. 74. Ma K, Weiss R, Adams MW. Characterization of hydrogenase II from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus and assessment of its role in sulfur reduction. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:1864–1871. [PubMed] 75. Childers SE, Noll KM. Characterization and regulation of sulfur reductase activity in Thermotoga neapolitana. Appl Environ Microb. 1994;60:2622–2626. 76. Klimmek O, Kreis V, Klein C, Simon J, Wittershagen A, et al. The function of the periplasmic Sud protein in polysulfide respiration of Wolinella succinogenes. Eur J Biochem. 1998;253:263–269. [PubMed] 77. Thomas GH, Mullins JGL, Merrick M. Membrane topology of the Mep/Amt family of ammonium transporters. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:331–344. [PubMed] 78. Klotz MG, Stein LY. Nitrifier genomics and evolution of the nitrogen cycle. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:146–156. [PubMed] 79. Cabello P, Pino C, Olmo-Mira MF, Castillo F, Roldan MD, et al. Hydroxylamine assimilation by Rhodobacter capsulatus E1F1 - Requirement of the hcp gene (hybrid cluster protein) located in the nitrate assimilation nas gene region for hydroxylamine reduction. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:45485–45494. [PubMed] 80. Bergmann DJ, Hooper AB, Klotz MG. Structure and sequence conservation of hao cluster genes of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: Evidence for their evolutionary history. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:5371–5382. 81. Klotz MG, Schmid MC, Strous M, Op den Camp HJM, M S M J. Evolution of an octaheme cytochrome c protein family that is key to aerobic and anaerobic ammonia oxidation by bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:3150–3163. [PubMed] 82. Poret-Peterson AT, Graham JE, Gulledge J, Klotz MG. Transcription of nitrification genes by the methane-oxidizing bacterium, Methylococcus capsulatus strain Bath. ISME J. 2008;2:1213–1220. [PubMed] 83. Kostera J, Youngblut MD, Slosarczyk JM, Pacheco AA. Kinetic and product distribution analysis of NO center dot reductase activity in Nitrosomonas europaea hydroxylamine oxidoreductase. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2008;13:1073–1083. [PubMed] 84. Lindsay MR, Webb RI, Strous M, Jetten MS, Butler MK, et al. Cell compartmentalisation in planctomycetes: novel types of structural organisation for the bacterial cell. Arch Microbiol. 2001;175:413–429. [PubMed] 85. Schmidt I, Look C, Bock E, Jetten MS. Ammonium and hydroxylamine uptake and accumulation in Nitrosomonas. Microbiology. 2004;150:1405–1412. [PubMed] 86. Rodionov DA, Dubchak IL, Arkin AP, Alm EJ, Gelfand MS. Dissimilatory metabolism of nitrogen oxides in bacteria: comparative reconstruction of transcriptional networks. PloS Comput Biol. 2005;1:e55. [PubMed] 87. Klotz MG, Arp DJ, Chain PSG, El-Sheikh AF, Hauser LJ, et al. Complete genome sequence of the marine, chemolithoautotrophic, ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Nitrosococcus oceani ATCC 19707. Appl Environ Microb. 2006;72:6299–6315. 88. Valente FAA, Almeida CC, Pacheco I, Carita J, Saraiva LM, et al. Selenium is involved in regulation of periplasmic hydrogenase gene expression in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:3228–3235. [PubMed] 89. Heidelberg JF, Seshadri R, Haveman SA, Hemme CL, Paulsen IT, et al. The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:554–559. [PubMed] 90. Maeder DL, Anderson I, Brettin TS, Bruce DC, Gilna P, et al. The Methanosarcina barkeri genome: Comparative analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensive rearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:7922–7931. [PubMed] 91. Larimer FW, Chain P, Hauser L, Lamerdin J, Malfatti S, et al. Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:55–61. [PubMed] 92. Deppenmeier U, Johann A, Hartsch T, Merkl R, Schmitz RA, et al. The genome of Methanosarcina mazei: Evidence for lateral gene transfer between bacteria and archaea. J Mol Microb Biotech. 2002;4:453–461. 93. Wu M, Ren QH, Durkin AS, Daugherty SC, Brinkac LM, et al. Life in hot carbon monoxide: The complete genome sequence of Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans Z-2901. PloS Genetics. 2005;1:563–574. 94. Meuer J, Kuettner HC, Zhang JK, Hedderich R, Metcalf WW. Genetic analysis of the archaeon Methanosarcina barkeri Fusaro reveals a central role for Ech hydrogenase and ferredoxin in methanogenesis and carbon fixation. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5632–5637. 95. Brugna-Guiral M, Tron P, Nitschke W, Stetter KO, Burlat B, et al. [NiFe] hydrogenases from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus: properties, function, and phylogenetics. Extremophiles. 2003;7:145–157. [PubMed] 96. Kerby RL, Hong SS, Ensign SA, Coppoc LJ, Ludden PW, et al. Genetic and physiological characterization of the Rhodospirillum rubrum carbon monoxide dehydrogenase system. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:5284–5294. [PubMed] 97. Bruggemann H, Baumer S, Fricke WF, Wiezer A, Liesegang H, et al. The genome sequence of Clostridium tetani, the causative agent of tetanus disease. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1316–1321. 98. Mijts BN, Patel BKC. Random sequence analysis of genomic DNA of an anaerobic, thermophilic, halophilic bacterium, Halothermothrix orenii. Extremophiles. 2001;5:61–69. [PubMed] 99. Fukui T, Atomi H, Kanai T, Matsumi R, Fujiwara S, et al. Complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 and comparison with Pyrococcus genomes. Gen Res. 2005;15:352–363. 100. Arp DJ, Chain PSG, Klotz MG. The impact of genome analyses on our understanding of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:503–528. [PubMed] 101. Barnes MH, Leo CJ, Brown NC. DNA polymerase III of Gram-positive eubacteria is a zinc metalloprotein conserving an essential finger-like domain. Biochemistry. 1998;37:15254–15260. [PubMed] 102. Wieczorek A, McHenry CS. The NH2-terminal php domain of the alpha subunit of the Escherichia coli replicase binds the epsilon proofreading subunit. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:12561–12567. [PubMed] 103. Rebeil R, Sun YB, Chooback L, Pedraza-Reyes M, Kinsland C, et al. Spore photoproduct lyase from Bacillus subtilis spores is a novel iron-sulfur DNA repair enzyme which shares features with proteins such as class III anaerobic ribonucleotide reductases and pyruvate-formate lyases. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:4879–4885. [PubMed] 104. White SN, Chave AD, Reynolds GT. Investigations of ambient light emission at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. J Geophysi Res-SE. 2002;107:B1. 105. Lombardot T, Kottmann R, Giuliani G, de Bono A, Addor N, et al. MetaLook: a 3D visualisation software for marine ecological genomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:406. [PubMed] 106. Hou S, Saw JH, Lee KS, Freitas TA, Belisle C, et al. Genome sequence of the deep-sea gamma-proteobacterium Idiomarina loihiensis reveals amino acid fermentation as a source of carbon and energy. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:18036–18041. 107. Jolivet E, Corre E, L'Haridon S, Forterre P, Prieur D. Thermococcus marinus sp. nov. and Thermococcus radiotolerans sp. nov., two hyperthermophilic archaea from deep-sea hydrothermal vents that resist ionizing radiation. Extremophiles. 2004;8:219–227. [PubMed] 108. Company R, Serafim A, Cosson RP, Fiala-Medioni A, Camus L, et al. Antioxidant biochemical responses to long-term copper exposure in Bathymodiolus azoricus from Menez-Gwen hydrothermal vent. Sci Total Environ. 2008;389:407–417. [PubMed] 109. Rodriguez H, Drouin R, Holmquist GP, Oconnor TR, Boiteux S, et al. Mapping of copper hydrogen peroxideiInduced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution in human genomic DNA by ligation-mediated Polymerase Chain Reaction. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:17633–17640. [PubMed] 110. Daley JM, Vander Laan RL, Suresh A, Wilson TE. DNA joint dependence of Pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:29030–29037. [PubMed] 111. Weller GR, Kysela B, Roy R, Tonkin LM, Scanlan E, et al. Identification of a DNA nonhomologous end-joining complex in bacteria. Science. 2002;297:1686–1689. [PubMed] 112. Shuman S, Glickman MS. Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:852–861. [PubMed] 113. Kampmann M, Stock D. Reverse gyrase has heat-protective DNA chaperone activity independent of supercoiling. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:3537–3545. [PubMed] 114. Hsieh TS, Capp C. Nucleotide- and stoichiometry-dependent DNA supercoiling by reverse gyrase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:20467–20475. [PubMed] 115. Kikuchi A, Asai K. Reverse gyrase-a topoisomerase which introduces positive superhelical turns into DNA. Nature. 1984;309:677–681. [PubMed] 116. LaMarr WA, Yu L, Nicolaou KC, Dedon PC. Supercoiling affects the accessibility of glutathione to DNA-bound molecules: Positive supercoiling inhibits calicheamicin-induced DNA damage. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:102–107. 117. Brochier-Armanet C, Forterre P. Widespread distribution of archaeal reverse gyrase in thermophilic bacteria suggests a complex history of vertical inheritance and lateral gene transfers. Archaea. 2007;2:83–93. [PubMed] 118. Atomi H, Matsumi R, Imanaka T. Reverse gyrase is not a prerequisite for hyperthermophilic life. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4829–4833. [PubMed] 119. McClendon JH. The origin of life. Earth-Science Rev. 1999;47:71–93. 120. Martin W, Russell MJ. On the origins of cells: a hypothesis for the evolutionary transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes, and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells. Philos T Roy Soc B. 2003;358:59–83. 121. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, et al. Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience; 1992. 122. Nierman WC, DeShazer D, Kim H, Tettelin H, Nelson KE, et al. Structural flexibility in the Burkholderia mallei genome. 2004. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14246–14251. [PubMed] 123. Cline J. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters. Limnology Oceanogr. 1969;14:454–458. 124. Markowitz VM, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Grechkin Y, Chu K, et al. The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D528–D533. [PubMed] 125. Altschul S, Madden T, Schaffer A, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. FASEB J. 1998;12:A1326–A1326. 126. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D16–D20. [PubMed] 127. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. [PubMed] 128. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:541–547. [PubMed] 129. Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Wortman JR, Salzberg SL. DAGchainer: a tool for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3643–3646. [PubMed] 130. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. [PubMed] 131. Dempster EL, Pryor KV, Francis D, Young JE, Rogers HJ. Rapid DNA extraction from ferns for PCR-based analyses. Biotechniques. 1999;27:66–68. [PubMed] 132. Suzuki MT, Taylor LT, DeLong EF. Quantitative analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5′-nuclease assays. Appl Environ Microb. 2000;66:4605–4614. 133. Campbell BJ, Waidner LA, Cottrell MT, Kirchman DL. Abundant proteorhodopsin genes in the North Atlantic Ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:99–109. [PubMed] 134. De la Tour CB, Portemer C, Kaltoum H, Duguet M. Reverse gyrase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima: Properties and gene structure. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:274–281. [PubMed] 135. Igarashi N, Moriyama H, Fujiwara T, Fukumori Y, Tanaka N. The 2.8 angstrom structure of hydroxylamine oxidoreductase from a nitrifying chemoautotrophic bacterium, Nitrosomonas europaea. Nature Struct Biol. 1997;4:276–284. [PubMed] 136. Bergmann DJ, Hooper AB, Klotz MG. Structure and sequence conservation of hao cluster genes of autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: Evidence for their evolutionary history. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:5371–5382. 137. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nature Biotech. 2008;26:541–547. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trends Microbiol. 2001 Feb; 9(2):79-86.
[Trends Microbiol. 2001]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Jun; 4(6):458-68.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Jun; 4(6):458-68.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Science. 2007 Oct 5; 318(5847):97-100.
[Science. 2007]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Dec 18; 205(2):329-35.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001]Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct; 7(10):1619-32.
[Environ Microbiol. 2005]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 2(11):872-85.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Nov; 4(11):826-36.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Biochimie. 1996; 78(5):323-6.
[Biochimie. 1996]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(10):R94.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct; 7(10):1619-32.
[Environ Microbiol. 2005]Science. 2003 Sep 12; 301(5639):1496-9.
[Science. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(3):966-76.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]In Silico Biol. 2006; 6(3):223-7.
[In Silico Biol. 2006]Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun; 6(6):552-67.
[Environ Microbiol. 2004]Annu Rev Genet. 2006; 40():385-407.
[Annu Rev Genet. 2006]Trends Biochem Sci. 1997 Sep; 22(9):331-3.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1997]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr; 4(4):249-58.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Trends Microbiol. 2002 Aug; 10(8):365-70.
[Trends Microbiol. 2002]J Bacteriol. 2006 Apr; 188(7):2355-63.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]J Bacteriol. 2005 Nov; 187(21):7434-43.
[J Bacteriol. 2005]J Bacteriol. 2003 Feb; 185(4):1384-90.
[J Bacteriol. 2003]DNA Res. 2007 Dec 31; 14(6):237-46.
[DNA Res. 2007]J Bacteriol. 2006 Jun; 188(12):4312-20.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1996 Oct 11; 271(41):25059-62.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]PLoS One. 2007 Dec 26; 2(12):e1358.
[PLoS One. 2007]Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Jan; 63(2):123-43.
[Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1999 Nov 5; 274(45):32318-24.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec; 183(24):7173-81.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]J Bacteriol. 1998 Mar; 180(6):1454-9.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Nov 15; 252(2):229-34.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005]FEBS J. 2005 Mar; 272(5):1189-200.
[FEBS J. 2005]J Bacteriol. 2007 Jun; 189(12):4431-41.
[J Bacteriol. 2007]Nature. 1998 Mar 26; 392(6674):353-8.
[Nature. 1998]Eur J Biochem. 1995 Jun 1; 230(2):601-6.
[Eur J Biochem. 1995]J Bacteriol. 2000 Apr; 182(7):1864-71.
[J Bacteriol. 2000]Eur J Biochem. 1998 Apr 1; 253(1):263-9.
[Eur J Biochem. 1998]Mol Microbiol. 2000 Jul; 37(2):331-44.
[Mol Microbiol. 2000]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Jan; 278(2):146-56.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008]J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 29; 279(44):45485-94.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Jan; 278(2):146-56.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008]Environ Microbiol. 2008 Nov; 10(11):3150-63.
[Environ Microbiol. 2008]ISME J. 2008 Dec; 2(12):1213-20.
[ISME J. 2008]J Biol Inorg Chem. 2008 Sep; 13(7):1073-83.
[J Biol Inorg Chem. 2008]Arch Microbiol. 2001 Jun; 175(6):413-29.
[Arch Microbiol. 2001]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Jan; 278(2):146-56.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008]J Bacteriol. 2006 May; 188(9):3228-35.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 May; 22(5):554-9.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2006 Nov; 188(22):7922-31.
[J Bacteriol. 2006]Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jan; 22(1):55-61.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2004]Extremophiles. 2003 Apr; 7(2):145-57.
[Extremophiles. 2003]J Bacteriol. 1992 Aug; 174(16):5284-94.
[J Bacteriol. 1992]Extremophiles. 2001 Feb; 5(1):61-9.
[Extremophiles. 2001]Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007; 61():503-28.
[Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007]Biochemistry. 1998 Nov 3; 37(44):15254-60.
[Biochemistry. 1998]J Biol Chem. 2006 May 5; 281(18):12561-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Bacteriol. 1998 Sep; 180(18):4879-85.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 22; 8():406.
[BMC Bioinformatics. 2007]Extremophiles. 2004 Jun; 8(3):219-27.
[Extremophiles. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 21; 270(29):17633-40.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]J Biol Chem. 2005 Aug 12; 280(32):29030-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Science. 2002 Sep 6; 297(5587):1686-9.
[Science. 2002]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Nov; 5(11):852-61.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007]Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(12):3537-45.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2005 May 27; 280(21):20467-75.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Archaea. 2007 May; 2(2):83-93.
[Archaea. 2007]J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul; 186(14):4829-33.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct; 7(10):1619-32.
[Environ Microbiol. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2005 May 27; 280(21):20467-75.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul; 186(14):4829-33.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Jun; 4(6):458-68.
[Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 28; 101(39):14246-51.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan; 36(Database issue):D528-33.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2008]BMC Genomics. 2008 Feb 8; 9():75.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]Nat Biotechnol. 2008 May; 26(5):541-7.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2008]Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 12; 20(18):3643-6.
[Bioinformatics. 2004]In Silico Biol. 2006; 6(3):223-7.
[In Silico Biol. 2006]Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug; 24(8):1596-9.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2007]Biotechniques. 1999 Jul; 27(1):66-8.
[Biotechniques. 1999]Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jan; 10(1):99-109.
[Environ Microbiol. 2008]J Bacteriol. 1998 Jan; 180(2):274-81.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]J Bacteriol. 1998 Jan; 180(2):274-81.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Nat Struct Biol. 1997 Apr; 4(4):276-84.
[Nat Struct Biol. 1997]