• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(1): e4196.
Published online Jan 15, 2009. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0004196
PMCID: PMC2626286

Septins Regulate Bacterial Entry into Host Cells

Raphael H. Valdivia, Editor

Abstract

Background

Septins are conserved GTPases that form filaments and are required in many organisms for several processes including cytokinesis. We previously identified SEPT9 associated with phagosomes containing latex beads coated with the Listeria surface protein InlB.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we investigated septin function during entry of invasive bacteria in non-phagocytic mammalian cells. We found that SEPT9, and its interacting partners SEPT2 and SEPT11, are recruited as collars next to actin at the site of entry of Listeria and Shigella. SEPT2-depletion by siRNA decreased bacterial invasion, suggesting that septins have roles during particle entry. Incubating cells with InlB-coated beads confirmed an essential role for SEPT2. Moreover, SEPT2-depletion impaired InlB-mediated stimulation of Met-dependent signaling as shown by FRET.

Conclusions/Significance

Together these findings highlight novel roles for SEPT2, and distinguish the roles of septin and actin in bacterial entry.

Introduction

Septins were originally identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as required for septum formation and cell division [1]. Septins are small GTPases of 30–65 kDa found in fungi and animals sharing at least a conserved role in cytokinesis [2], [3]. Mammalian septins are increasingly recognized for other cellular functions including roles in cell membrane dynamics [4], [5], vesicle fusion events [6], [7], and the assembly of signaling complexes beneath the plasma membrane [8]. Septin dysfunction has been associated with several human pathological conditions such as cancer [9], hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy [10], and Parkinson disease [11]. Despite these important implications, the molecular functions of septins are poorly understood.

Fourteen human septin genes have been identified, and septins are classified on the basis of sequence identity into 4 groups consisting of the SEPT2 group (also called group 2B: SEPT1, SEPT2, SEPT4, SEPT5), the SEPT3 group (also called group 1A: SEPT3, SEPT9, SEPT12), the SEPT6 group (also called group 1B: SEPT6, SEPT8, SEPT10, SEPT11, SEPT14), and the SEPT7 group (a subclassification of group 2B: SEPT7, SEPT13) [2], [12]. Septins polymerize into hetero-oligomeric protein complexes that form filaments, and associate with cellular membranes, actin filaments, and microtubules [8], [13]. Thus, septins are increasingly regarded as a novel cytoskeletal component. In vitro, bundles of septin filaments can form rings of approximately 0.6 µm in diameter [14]. The crystal structure of a septin complex (SEPT2-SEPT6-SEPT7) was recently solved [15]. The structure demonstrated a central role for SEPT2 in filament formation, and definitively established that septins, as opposed to actin and microtubules, form non-polar filaments. Despite these and other structural insights [12], [16], to what degree septins represent a distinct component of the cytoskeleton remains to be determined. Furthermore, the extent to which other septin complexes, such as SEPT7-SEPT9-SEPT11 [17] or SEPT5-SEPT7-SEPT11 [18], share properties and/or functionally compete with the crystallized SEPT2-SEPT6-SEPT7 complex is not yet known.

Listeria monocytogenes is an intracellular pathogen able to induce its own internalization into non-phagocytic cells [19]. Of the several bacterial surface proteins that participate in Listeria entry into non-phagocytic cells [20], the two best characterized are InlA and InlB, either of which is independently sufficient to promote bacterial internalization into mammalian epithelial cells that express its respective receptor. InlA interacts with the surface protein E-cadherin [21], while InlB recognizes the receptor tyrosine kinase Met [22]. These different interactions both have well-described cell signaling consequences, including actin polymerization and membrane extension, which ultimately lead to bacterial uptake [23], [24]. In order to identify other cellular effectors involved in the early steps of Listeria infection, we previously performed a proteomic analysis of phagosomes containing latex beads coated with InlA or InlB [25]. This approach allowed us to detect SEPT9 associated with InlB-bead phagosomes, implicating septins for the first time in bacterial infection.

In contrast to the well-established roles of actin [26], [27] and microtubules [28], [29] during the infection process, septin function during microbial invasion has not yet been investigated. We thus decided to address this issue. We first show that SEPT9 interacts with several septins, including the core SEPT2. By infecting human cell lines we show septin recruitment at the site of bacterial entry. We then use siRNA and demonstrate a role for SEPT2 in the bacterial entry process.

Results

SEPT9 interacts with septins from other groups

A hallmark of septins is their ability to form protein complexes and filaments. Characterized complexes isolated from mammalian cells include SEPT2-SEPT6-SEPT7 [14], [15] and SEPT7-SEPT9-SEPT11 [17]. We previously found SEPT9 in association with phagosomes containing InlB-coated beads [25]. To identify unknown molecules interacting with SEPT9, we performed yeast-two hybrid screens using SEPT9 as bait against human placental and colon cDNA libraries, and identified SEPT2, SEPT6, SEPT7, and SEPT11 as binding partners of SEPT9.

We also used immunoprecipitation in HeLa cells, a cell line that expresses the InlB receptor but not the InlA receptor. Using antibodies for SEPT9, we performed immunoprecipitation experiments on cells stimulated or not with purified InlB, and identified by mass spectrometry, in both cases, SEPT2, SEPT7, and SEPT11 coimmunoprecipitating with SEPT9 (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Binding partners of SEPT9.

Together these data indicate that SEPT9 forms higher order structures with other septins in vivo. SEPT2, SEPT7, and SEPT6/SEPT11 each represent a different septin group, suggesting that SEPT9 interacts with members of other groups to form a complex, and/or participates in the formation of previously unidentified septin complexes.

Expression, localization, and recruitment during bacterial invasion of SEPT2, SEPT9, and SEPT11 in human non-phagocytic cells

Before starting to analyze if septin proteins play a role in Listeria invasion of non-phagocytic cells, we first compared by Western blotting septin expression in two different human epithelial cell lines: the well-studied HeLa cells, and JEG-3 cells, a trophoblast cell line that expresses both the InlA and InlB receptors. As our antibodies against SEPT2, SEPT9, and SEPT11 could be used in both Western blotting and immunofluorescence labeling, we focused our analysis on these septins. Figure 2A shows that SEPT2, SEPT9, and SEPT11 were more expressed in JEG-3 cells as compared to HeLa cells. We then confirmed using immunofluorescence labeling that SEPT2, SEPT9, and SEPT11 form filaments that partially colocalize with actin filaments and microtubules in non-dividing, non-infected HeLa and JEG-3 cells (Figure 2B and C) [8], [13].

Figure 2
Septin expression, localization, and recruitment at the bacterial entry site in human non-phagocytic cells.

To determine whether septins are involved in Listeria entry, a process known to involve actin [30], [31], we looked for septin recruitment during bacterial invasion. SEPT2, SEPT9, and SEPT11 were abundantly recruited with actin in JEG-3 cells (Figure 2D). Strikingly, septins did not strictly colocalize with actin, and often displayed a collar shape next to actin which is known to be enriched at the pole of invading bacteria [27]. To visualize recruitment in real-time, we co-transfected JEG-3 cells with actin-YFP and SEPT9-CFP, and observed cells by videomicroscopy during the early steps of Listeria invasion. Videomicroscopy confirmed septin collar-like recruitment at the site of Listeria entry (Movie S1). We also looked for septin accumulation during invasion of Shigella flexneri, a pathogen that enters host cells in a different manner than Listeria, i.e. via the type III secretion system [32]. In JEG-3 cells, septins were also recruited at the site of Shigella entry and formed rings around recently internalized bacteria (Figure 2E). It is interesting to note that the widths of Listeria and Shigella approximately range from 0.4 to 0.5 µm, consistent with the inner diameter of ring formation of recombinant septin complexes in vitro [14].

We then analyzed septin recruitment during bacterial invasion in HeLa cells. Septin collars could not be consistently observed at sites of Listeria entry in HeLa cells as observed in JEG-3 cells. We thus quantified the percentage of actin-positive Listeria that also recruit septin during entry. In JEG-3 cells, 75% of actin-positive Listeria had collars of SEPT2, SEPT9, or SEPT11. In HeLa cells, 8% of actin-positive Listeria recruited discernable septin collars. Our interpretation is that septin collars are also present with actin at the site of bacterial entry into HeLa cells, but in quantities too low to be systematically detectable. In the case of Shigella entry in HeLa cells, septin collars were also observed (Figure 2F).

SEPT2 inactivation decreases bacterial invasion

HeLa cells, which we routinely use for siRNA depletion experiments, and JEG-3 cells were treated with siRNA against SEPT2, the septin protein central to complex and filament formation [15]. siRNA depletion of SEPT2 protein was verified by Western blot (Figure 3A and B). Expression levels of actin were not affected.

Figure 3
The impact of SEPT2-depletion in HeLa and JEG-3 cells on bacterial entry.

To assess the functional consequence of septin-depletion on bacterial entry, we employed the classical gentamicin survival assay [33]. In this assay, internalized bacteria are plated and counted 24 hours after host cell lysis. Colony counts revealed that SEPT2 siRNA treatment significantly decreased Listeria and Shigella invasion into HeLa cells (P<0.0001 and P = 0.02 respectively) (Figure 3C and D) and JEG-3 cells (P<0.01 and P<0.05 respectively) (Figure 3E and F), revealing a role for SEPT2 during bacterial entry.

SEPT2 inactivation specifically modulates InlB-mediated entry

Latex beads coated with purified recombinant InlA or InlB protein have been extensively used to study the InlA- and InlB- entry pathways into mammalian cells [34], [35]. To understand further why L. monocytogenes invasion is decreased in HeLa cells upon SEPT2-depletion, we investigated particle uptake using 1 µm InlB-coated latex beads. Note that HeLa cells do not express E-cadherin, the host receptor for InlA.

siRNA-treated cells were incubated with InlB-beads, and were examined by a double immunofluorescence microscopy technique in order to distinguish intra- versus extracellular beads and provide a measure of InlB-induced phagocytosis [30]. At 5 minutes post-inoculation, bead internalization was severely impaired in SEPT2-depleted cells compared to control cells (P<0.01 and P<0.001) (Figure 4A).

Figure 4
SEPT2 inactivation impairs the entry of InlB-coated beads.

Scanning electron microscopy was also used to examine the uptake of InlB-beads (Figure 4B and C). Of note, the membrane surface of SEPT2-depleted cells presented microvilli-like structures as do control cells. At 5 minutes post-incubation, the majority of beads associated with control cells were already internalized, while remaining beads were adherent to the cell surface presumably engaged in initial stages of the uptake process. In contrast, beads were less frequently internalized in SEPT2-depleted cells. Together, these data definitively establish a role for SEPT2 during the InlB-mediated internalization process.

SEPT2 has a critical role in signaling events in response to Met stimulation by InlB

Listeria enter HeLa cells via interactions between the cell surface receptor Met and the bacterial ligand InlB. Given the impact of SEPT2 depletion on particle entry, we hypothesized that signaling events induced upon InlB/Met interaction should be affected. We focused our study on one signaling pathway induced upon InlB/Met interaction, that of phosphoinositide (PI) 3-kinase activation, and used a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based approach previously developed in our lab [36]. The assay is based on the fact that 3′-phosphoinositides produced by PI 3-kinase upon InlB-induced Met activation recruit the serine/threonine kinase Akt from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. SEPT2-depleted cells and control cells were co-transfected with plasmids encoding YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH. Morphological alterations were used as a gauge of which cells were efficiently silenced for SEPT2. The FRET stoichiometry measurement between YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH was then performed to determine FRET efficiency (Figure 5A and B, and Movie S2 and S3). As shown in Figure 5C, cells depleted of SEPT2 responded significantly less to InlB stimulation (P<0.0001), highlighting that SEPT2 has a critical role in signaling events contributing to Akt recruitment, i.e. PI 3-kinase activation during InlB/Met signaling.

Figure 5
SEPT2-depleted cells respond less to InlB stimulation.

Discussion

Septins are small GTPases that can form filaments, and are increasingly recognized as new cytoskeleton components different from actin, microtubules, and intermediate filaments [12], [13]. SEPT9 was previously identified by our laboratory to associate with InlB-bead phagosomes in non-phagocytic cells [25]. We demonstrate here that during infection septins and actin can be detected at the bacterial entry site, though septins form striking collar shape structures around entering bacteria similar to those found at the yeast mother-bud neck. Using siRNA to specifically establish a role for septins, we reveal that SEPT2 is critical for the bacterial entry process. This strongly introduces septins as new regulators of bacterial entry and phagocytosis, and highlights that septins have previously unrecognized cellular functions.

SEPT2 regulates the InlB/Met-mediated entry of Listeria into host cells

We have here performed our functional analysis on HeLa cells, a cell line that does not express E-cadherin and thus allows analysis of the Listeria InlB/Met entry pathway [24]. We could reveal that depletion of SEPT2 decreased the InlB/Met-mediated entry of L. monocytogenes. Furthermore, FRET analysis showed that SEPT2 is required for the appropriate signaling cascade in response to Met stimulation by InlB. Taken together, our data reveal an effect of SEPT2-depletion on the interaction of InlB with its host receptor Met, and consequently on bacterial entry.

Recent structural data has demonstrated that septins are ordered in the isolated complex as SEPT7-SEPT6-SEPT2-SEPT2-SEPT6-SEPT7 [15]. As the central subunit in this septin complex, SEPT2 has so far been described as not ‘replaceable’ by other septins. All our findings, starting from the observation that SEPT2-depletion consistently has a negative impact on bacterial invasion (Figures 3C–F), would argue that SEPT2 is indeed not replaceable at least in the cell types tested.

Septins form collars at the site of bacterial entry as at the yeast mother-bud neck

During L. monocytogenes entry in host cells (Figure 2D), actin is enriched at the invading pole of the bacteria, while septins form ring structures next to the actin-enriched region around incompletely-internalized bacteria in a geometry resembling ring structures observed at the yeast mother-bud neck [8], [12]. Septin rings are similarly detected at the site of entry of Listeria innocua expressing InlA and consequently capable of entering host cells via E-cadherin [37], and Escherichia coli expressing the Yersinia outer membrane protein invasin and consequently capable of entering host cells via β1-integrin [38] (data not shown). Moreover, septin rings are also detected at the site of entry of S. flexneri (Figure 2E and F) and Salmonella Typhimurium (data not shown), suggesting that septin recruitment is a general occurrence wherever there is actin polymerization upon bacterial entry. These results have been observed in several mammalian non-phagocytic cell lines (our unpublished results), and are in agreement with recent work showing that septin recruitment is required for phagosome formation during FcγR-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages [4]. However, we show here characteristic differences in the architecture of actin and septin enrichment at the site of bacterial entry, strongly suggesting distinct and probably complementary roles for actin and septin in the process of entry. Whether or not septin filaments assemble directly at the site of entry is currently unknown, and future study of bacterial invasion will address the kinetics and function of septin ring formation.

The mechanisms underlying septin recruitment at the site of particle entry, and more generally how septins interact with membranes, is not yet clear. To begin to investigate the signals responsible for septin accumulation at the site of bacterial entry, JEG-3 cells were treated with cytochalasin D which inhibits actin polymerization. This treatment resulted in an inhibition of both actin and septin accumulation at the site of Listeria entry (data not shown). Accumulation of septins at the phagocytic cup is thus intimately linked to the accumulation of actin, albeit in an unknown fashion. In contrast, inhibition of microtubule polymerization by pretreatment of JEG-3 cells with nocodazole did not prevent actin and septin accumulation at the site of Listeria or Shigella entry (data not shown).

Septins are capable of binding to phosphatidylinositol lipids [39], and thus could be targeted to the Listeria entry site by these secondary messengers. Considering that PI 4-kinase type II and PI 3-kinase type I are required for Listeria internalization of target cells [40], it is possible that these, and/or other lipid kinases, play a role in the spatial and temporal recruitment of septins during bacterial entry. In agreement with this proposal, during FcγR-mediated phagocytosis of latex beads, septin accumulation was colocalized with the phosphatidylinositol lipid PIP2 [4].

Do septins interact with other proteins during bacterial entry?

Activation of PI 3-kinase by InlB in HeLa cells leads to the activation of the small Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42, which act upstream of an elaborate signaling cascade that includes WAVE, N-WASP, LIM-kinase, cofilin, and the Arp2/3 complex [23]. All of these molecules participate in tightly regulated steps of actin polymerization and depolymerization required for Listeria uptake [30], [31]. It is now important to determine whether septins play a role in this pathway, or if activation of this pathway regulates septin recruitment. There is evidence that septin filament organization depends on Rho-family GTPase signaling pathways [41], and the organization of septin and actin filaments has been associated to Rhotekin, a downstream effector of Rho signaling [42]. Borg proteins, first identified as effectors of Cdc42 [43], have also been shown to regulate septin organization [44]. How the Rho/Rhotekin, Cdc42/Borgs, and likely other signaling pathways could influence septin assembly to regulate the efficiency of bacterial entry is not yet understood. This could occur potentially by recruiting multi-protein complexes to forming phagosomes on the plasma membrane [4], and/or by contributing towards the spatial organization of actin and/or surface receptors during this actin-based process.

Our findings for the first time highlight a role for a septin in regulating bacterial invasion. Future work will focus on understanding septin function and regulation during not only bacterial entry but also other stages of the infectious life cycle, in particular actin-based movements where septin accumulation has also been observed (data not shown). Ultimately, our goal is to characterize septin function and the contribution of septins as unique cytoskeletal components.

Materials and Methods

Mammalian cells, bacterial strains, and culture conditions

HeLa human cervix carcinoma cells (ATCC CCL-2) and JEG-3 human placenta choriocarcinoma cells (ATCC HTB-36) were cultured as recommended in DMEM+GlutaMAX (GIBCO) supplemented with 1% sodium pyruvate (GIBCO) and 10% FCS. Cells were grown at 37°C in 10% CO2 atmosphere.

L. monocytogenes (strain EGD BUG 600) was grown overnight at 37°C in brain heart infusion (BHI) media (Difco Laboratories), diluted 15× in fresh BHI, and cultured until OD600 nm = 0.8. L. monocytogenes BUG 1641 (a hyperinvasive strain expressing an InlB derivative containing the NH2-terminal region sufficient for entry which is covalently anchored at the bacterial surface [30]) and L. innocua expressing InlA (BUG 1489) [37] was similarly grown, except that media contained 5 µg/ml of erythromycin or chloramphenicol, respectively. Shigella flexneri strain M90T (gift from Phillipe Sansonetti, BUG 2505) was cultured in trypticase soy (TCS) as previously described [45]. After being grown overnight, S. flexneri was diluted 80× in fresh TCS, and cultured until OD600 nm = 0.6. GFP-expressing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain 12023 (gift from Stéphane Méresse, BUG 2562) was cultured in Luria Bertani (LB) medium as described in [57]. Escherichia coli expressing the Yersinia outer membrane protein invasin (gift from Guy Tran Van Nhieu, BUG 2563) was grown in LB medium supplemented with chloramphenicol (35 µg/ml). Before use, bacteria were incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking, diluted 100× in fresh media and incubated in the same conditions for 3.5 hours.

Gentamicin survival assays

Gentamicin survival assays were performed as previously described [46]. Cells were incubated in DMEM with Listeria at an multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50 for 1 hour at 37°C and 10% CO2, washed with DMEM without antibiotic, and subsequently incubated with fresh gentamicin-containing complete media (10 µg/ml) for an additional 1 hour. Cells were washed and then lysed with distilled H2O. The number of viable bacteria released from the cells was assessed by plating on BHI agar plates. Each experiment was done in triplicate, and triplicates were performed 3 or more times independently. Infections of cells with S. flexneri were performed as previously described [XPATH ERROR: unknown variable "start".], . Shigella were added to cells incubated in DMEM at MOI of 100 and centrifuged at 700 g for 10 minutes at 21°C. Cells were then placed at 37°C and 10% CO2 for 30 minutes, washed with DMEM without antibiotic, and subsequently incubated for 1 hour in presence of gentamicin (50 µg/ml). Cells were washed twice and then lysed with distilled H2O. Lysates were plated for bacterial counting on LB plates.

Antibodies and reagents

Primary antibodies used in this study included rabbit polyclonals anti-SEPT9 (R69) [25], anti-SEPT2 (gift from William Trimble), and anti-SEPT11 (gift from Makoto Kinoshita). Mouse monoclonal anti-InlB has been described previously [35]. Mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin was purchased from Molecular Probes. Mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), used as a control throughout Western blot experimentation [48], was purchased from AbCam (6C5).

Secondary antibodies used were Cy5-conjugated (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), Alexa 488–conjugated, and Alexa 546–conjugated goat anti–rabbit and goat anti–mouse antibodies (Molecular Probes). F-actin was labeled with Alexa 488 (FITC)- and Alexa 546-phalloidin (Molecular Probes). For immunoblotting, total cellular extracts were blotted with above-mentioned antibodies, followed by peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies (Biosys Laboratories). Proteins were run on 10% acrylamide gels.

Yeast-two hybrid screens and immunoprecipitation studies

Yeast-two hybrid screens using DNA sequence of human SEPT9 as bait against human placental and colon cDNA libraries were performed at Hybrigenics (http://www.hybrigenics.com/) as described in [49]. Immunoprecipitations were performed as described in [49], where we probed lysates from HeLa cells (untreated or stimulated for 2 minutes with 5 nM total of purified InlB) looking for binding partners of SEPT9. Cells were lysed in NP-40 buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1% (v/v) NP-40, 137 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol and protease inhibitors cocktail). Mass spectrometry was performed on samples analyzed by SDS-PAGE at Pasteur-Genopole® Ile-de-France / Plate-forme de Proteomique. The resulting sequences were used to identify the corresponding genes in the GenBank database (NCBI) using a fully automated procedure.

Preparation of InlB-coated beads

Coating of latex beads with purified InlB and incubation of host cells with InlB-coated latex beads were performed as previously described [25], [50], where 1 µm diameter latex beads were coated following the manufacturer's instructions (Molecular Probes). Prior to addition, InlB-coated beads were briefly sonicated, diluted in DMEM, and added to siRNA-treated HeLa cells at a multiplicity of approximately 100 beads per cell.

For kinetic analysis by immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy, host cells were stored at 4°C for 5 minutes before incubation with beads, then beads diluted in DMEM were added and cells were centrifuged at 1000 g for 1 minute at 4°C. Medium was removed and replaced with fresh DMEM. Cells were then incubated at 37°C and 10% CO2 for 5 minutes, after which they were washed twice with DMEM, and processed for immunofluorescence or scanning electron microscopy analysis.

Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy

Immunofluorescence analysis was performed as previously described [46]. Briefly, 105–106 HeLa or JEG-3 cells were plated onto glass coverslips in 6-well plates (TPP), and used for experiments 48 hours later. Cells on coverslips were fixed 15 minutes in 4% PFA, then washed with 1×PBS and processed for immunofluorescence. After 10 minutes of incubation in 50 mM ammonium chloride, cells were permeabilized 4 minutes with 0.1% Triton X-100, then incubated in 1×PBS. Hybridization of primary and secondary antibodies was performed in 1×PBS. Extracellular bacteria or InlB-beads were sometimes labeled prior to permeabilization. Vectashield hard set mounting medium with or without DAPI was applied (Vector Laboratories).

For incubation of host cells with bacteria, L. monocytogenes were grown as detailed above and added to cells at an MOI of 100. For kinetic analysis, cells were stored at 4°C for 5 minutes before incubation with bacteria, then once bacteria were added, cells were centrifuged at 1000 g for 1 minute at 4°C. Cells were then incubated at 37°C and 10% CO2 for 5, 10, and 15 minutes after which they were washed with 1×PBS, fixed with 4% PFA, and processed for immunofluorescence. To quantify the relative percentage of actin-positive Listeria during entry that also recruit septin, at least 200 actin-positive Listeria per cell line were analyzed at 5, 10, or 15 minutes post infection. Experiments involving cytochalasin D or nocodazole treatment were performed as described for other Listeria in vitro systems [51], [52], where cells were treated with DMSO, 5 µM of cytochalasin D, or 3.3 µM of nocodazole 30 minutes prior to infection. Kinetic analysis was performed as described above, though cells and bacteria were incubated in DMSO, cytochalasin D, or nocodazole throughout the infection. Cytochalasin D and nocodazole were suspended in DMSO and handled as suggested by the manufacturer (Sigma). For kinetic analysis of S. flexneri infection, infection of cells was performed as previously described [45]. Briefly, bacteria was grown in TCS as described above, and 400 µl of mid-exponential phase bacteria was centrifuged, resuspended in DMEM, and directly added to host cells. After centrifugation at 700 g for 10 minutes at 21°C, cells were then incubated at 37°C and 10% CO2 for 5 minutes. After these 15 minutes, cells were washed with 1×PBS, fixed with 4% PFA, and processed for immunofluorescence.

Images were acquired on a fluorescence inverted microscope Axiovert 200 M (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.) equipped with a cooled digital charge-coupled device camera (Cool SNAPHQ, Photometrics) driven by Metamorph Imaging System software (Universal Imaging Corp). Confocal images were acquired using a Leica TCS SP5 (Leica microsystems). Immunofluorescence and confocal images were visualized and processed using the ImageJ public domain image processing software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Real-time immunofluorescence microscopy was performed using actin-YFP (as constructed in [36], BUG 2016) and SEPT9-CFP (the plasmid encoding the alpha variant of SEPT9 was a gift from S.E. Hilary Russell, BUG 2309). For this, JEG-3 cells were transfected using jetPEI (PolyPlus Transfection) according to the manufacturer's instructions with actin-YFP and SEPT9-CFP for 24 hours, and were infected with L. monocytogenes 1641. Infected cells were centrifuged at 1000 g for 1 minute at 4°C, and immediately placed on the microscope stage at 37°C. Image series were collected every 15 seconds for 15 minutes.

RNA interference

HeLa cells (0.8×105) were plated in 6-well plates (TPP) and transfected the following day using oligofectamine (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Scramble sequence custom designed from septin sequence [(sense) AUAAGCGACGUCCGCGUGGtt and (antisense) CCACGCGGACGUCGCUUAUtt] was applied as our control throughout experimentation. Custom scramble sequence, as well as pre-designed siRNA for SEPT2 (ID#14709) were both from Ambion, and handled according to manufacturer's instructions. Cells were tested 72 hours after siRNA transfection.

Scanning electron microscopy

For scanning electron microscopy analysis, samples (non-infected siRNA-treated HeLa cells and siRNA-treated HeLa cells incubated with InlB-coated beads) were prepared as described above, subsequently washed in 1×PBS, prefixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 30 minutes, and then rinsed in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer. After post-fixation in 1% osmium tetraoxide (in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer), samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol concentrations. Specimens were critical-point dried using carbon dioxide, then coated with gold and examined/photographed with a JEOL JSM-6700F scanning electron microscope (http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/imagopole/microscopie.html).

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)

As previously described by our laboratory [36], PI 3-kinase activation can be measured by the production of its lipid products PI(3,4)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 which recruit the serine/threonine kinase Akt from the cytosol to the membrane, with the Akt pleckstrin homology (PH) domain specifically interacting with PI(3,4)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 [53], [54]. The quantification of FRET between two coexpressed fluorescent chimeras of the Akt PH domain, YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH, can be used as readout of PI 3-kinase activity. Without stimulation, the fluorescent chimeras are too dispersed in the cytosol to undergo FRET. Upon PI 3-kinase activation, the fluorescent AktPH chimeras concentrate at the plasma membrane, consequently leading to an increase in the FRET signal.

FRET occurs when an excited donor fluorophore (i.e. CFP) is located in close proximity to a lower-energy acceptor fluorophore (i.e. YFP). The proximity of fluorophores within the YFP-AktPH/CFP-AktPH complex allowed FRET stoichiometry measurements to quantify FRET inside cells. Image acquisition and processing for FRET stoichiometry were performed as originally described [55] and previously used in our laboratory [36]. In brief, siRNA-treated HeLa cells were co-transfected using jetPEI (PolyPlus Transfection) according to the manufacturer's instructions with plasmids encoding YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH. FRET stoichiometry measurement between YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH was applied as a readout of PI 3-kinase activation. Fluorescence images, corresponding to CFP, YFP, and FRET, and a fourth phase-contrast image were acquired every 15 seconds for 15 minutes with a consistent exposure time. A final concentration of 5 nM soluble InlB was supplemented after the 15th frame. Application of the FRET stoichiometry equations, pixel by pixel, to the CFP, YFP, and FRET images was used to create a new image in which each pixel corresponds to (EA+ED)/2, a correction for variability in fluorescent chimera expression within and among cells [55], [56]. This term, referred to as FRET efficiency, is calculated by averaging the acceptor FRET efficiency (EA) with the donor FRET efficiency (ED), and allows comparison of FRET signals from cells expressing different molar ratios of fluorescent proteins. For kinetic studies we calculated, for each cell and time point, the mean (EA+ED)/2 over the entire cell. Final kinetics were obtained for 19 and 18 experiments, representing at least 3 biological replicates for each siRNA treatment, for control and SEPT2 siRNA-treated cells respectively.

To automatically detect whether a cell could be classified as having responded or not to InlB stimulation, we designed our own analysis software carried out using an Excel Macro. Our analysis software is based on these following criteria. From the original kinetic signals [i.e. the mean (EA+ED)/2 over the entire cell], a first median linear filter [formula: yi = (∑i−n/2,i+n/2 yi)/n, n = 3] was applied to smooth artifact arising from the acquisition of original signal. The slope of each filtered curve was subsequently calculated for each time point, and was plotted as the processed ‘FRET response’ (i.e. as in Figure 5B). Starting from T0 (here defined as the time frame immediately following InlB stimulation, frame 16), Tmax was detected when the slope again reached a minimum, where minimum slope is based on a null second derivative function. Tmax−T0 was used to define the duration of FRET response (where units are frames per 15 seconds). Between these 2 time points, the amplitude of the original signal [i.e. the mean (EA+ED)/2 over the entire cell] was calculated as a characteristic to qualify the response. As a final characteristic, the maximum slope was calculated between T0 and Tmax. This value also served to determine if the FRET response of that cell was positive. In the case where Tmax could not be detected based on these criteria (i.e. the SEPT2-depleted cell from Figure 5B), such cells were then classified as not responding to InlB stimulation.

Supporting Information

Movie S1

Real-time SEPT9-CFP recruitment at the site of Listeria entry in JEG-3 cells. Videomicroscopy was performed to demonstrate the recruitment of SEPT9-CFP collars at the site of Listeria entry in JEG-3 cells, while actin-YFP is shown to be recruited as a positive control. JEG-3 cells transfected with SEPT9-CFP and actin-YFP were infected with L. monocytogenes 1641, and were immediately placed on the microscope stage at 37°C. Image series were collected every 15 seconds for 15 minutes. The white arrow is pointing to the site of septin recruitment for the bacteria in the process of entering the transfected JEG-3 cell.

(3.08 MB AVI)

Movie S2

Representative FRET movie of a control siRNA-treated cell. HeLa cells treated with control (CTRL) siRNA were transfected with YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH. Transfected siRNA-treated cells were placed on the microscope stage at 37°C and image series were collected every 15 seconds for 15 minutes. Purified InlB was added to a final concentration of 5 nM after frame 15 (i.e. time point just prior to 4 minutes) after the start of imaging. A movie for the entire timecourse of InlB stimulation for the control cell depicted in Figure 5A is here presented (i.e. frame 0 to 60), showing the collected images (phase-contrast, Akt recruitment, and FRET efficiency). Pseudocolor scale represents the range of FRET efficiency values from original signal ranging from blue (low) to red (high).

(9.54 MB MOV)

Movie S3

Representative FRET movie of a SEPT2-depleted cell. HeLa cells treated with siRNA targeted against SEPT2 were transfected with YFP-AktPH and CFP-AktPH. Transfected siRNA-treated cells were placed on the microscope stage at 37°C and image series were collected every 15 seconds for 15 minutes. Purified InlB was added to a final concentration of 5 nM after frame 15 (i.e. time point just prior to 4 minutes) after the start of imaging. A movie for the entire timecourse of InlB stimulation for the SEPT2-depleted cell depicted in Figure 5A is here presented (i.e. frame 0 to 60), showing the collected images (phase-contrast, Akt recruitment, and FRET efficiency). Pseudocolor scale represents the range of FRET efficiency values from original signal ranging from blue (low) to red (high).

(6.84 MB MOV)

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the P.C. laboratory, Christophe Machu, Dr. Claire Forestier, Dr. Elias Spiliotis, and Dr. Makoto Kinoshita for helpful discussions. Thanks to Dr. William Trimble (anti-SEPT2) and Dr. Makoto Kinoshita (anti-SEPT11) for antibodies. We thank Dr. S.E. Hilary Russell for providing plasmids encoding tagged SEPT9 isoforms.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: S.M. is supported by a long-term fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Foundation Louis Pasteur, and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. P.C. is an international research scholar from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This study received financial support from an ANR grant (ANR-05-MIME-O13-01).

References

1. Hartwell LH. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast : IV. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Experimental Cell Research. 1971;69:265–276. [PubMed]
2. Kinoshita M. Assembly of Mammalian Septins. J Biochem (Tokyo) 2003;134:491–496. [PubMed]
3. Kinoshita M. The septins. Genome Biology. 2003;4:236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Huang Y-W, Yan M, Collins RF, DiCiccio JE, Grinstein S, et al. Mammalian Septins Are Required for Phagosome Formation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:1717–1726. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Joo E, Tsang CW, Trimble WS. Septins: Traffic Control at the Cytokinesis Intersection. Traffic. 2005;6:626–634. [PubMed]
6. Beites CL, Xie H, Bowser R, Trimble WS. The septin CDCrel-1 binds syntaxin and inhibits exocytosis. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:434–439. [PubMed]
7. Hsu S-C, Hazuka CD, Roth R, Foletti DL, Heuser J, et al. Subunit Composition, Protein Interactions, and Structures of the Mammalian Brain sec6/8 Complex and Septin Filaments. Neuron. 1998;20:1111–1122. [PubMed]
8. Kinoshita M. Diversity of septin scaffolds. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2006;18:54–60. [PubMed]
9. Hall PA, Russell SE. The pathobiology of the septin gene family. The Journal of Pathology. 2004;204:489–505. [PubMed]
10. Kuhlenbaumer G, Hannibal MC, Nelis E, Schirmacher A, Verpoorten N, et al. Mutations in SEPT9 cause hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1044–1046. [PubMed]
11. Ihara M, Yamasaki N, Hagiwara A, Tanigaki A, Kitano A, et al. Sept4, a Component of Presynaptic Scaffold and Lewy Bodies, Is Required for the Suppression of [alpha]-Synuclein Neurotoxicity. Neuron. 2007;53:519–533. [PubMed]
12. Weirich CS, Erzberger JP, Barral Y. The septin family of GTPases: architecture and dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:478–489. [PubMed]
13. Spiliotis ET, Nelson WJ. Here come the septins: novel polymers that coordinate intracellular functions and organization. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:4–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Kinoshita M, Field CM, Coughlin ML, Straight AF, Mitchison TJ. Self- and Actin-Templated Assembly of Mammalian Septins. Developmental Cell. 2002;3:791–802. [PubMed]
15. Sirajuddin M, Farkasovsky M, Hauer F, Kuhlmann D, Macara IG, et al. Structural insight into filament formation by mammalian septins. Nature. 2007;449:311–315. [PubMed]
16. Barral Y, Kinoshita M. Structural insights shed light onto septin assemblies and function. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2008;20:12–18. [PubMed]
17. Nagata K-i, Asano T, Nozawa Y, Inagaki M. Biochemical and Cell Biological Analyses of a Mammalian Septin Complex, Sept7/9b/11. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:55895–55904. [PubMed]
18. Xie Y, Vessey JP, Konecna A, Dahm R, Macchi P, et al. The GTP-Binding Protein Septin 7 Is Critical for Dendrite Branching and Dendritic-Spine Morphology. Current Biology. 2007;17:1746–1751. [PubMed]
19. Pizarro-Cerda J, Cossart P. Bacterial Adhesion and Entry into Host Cells. Cell. 2006;124:715–727. [PubMed]
20. Bierne H, Cossart P. Listeria monocytogenes Surface Proteins: from Genome Predictions to Function. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:377–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Mengaud J, Ohayon H, Gounon P, Mège R-M, Cossart P. E-Cadherin Is the Receptor for Internalin, a Surface Protein Required for Entry of L. monocytogenes into Epithelial Cells. Cell. 1996;84:923–932. [PubMed]
22. Shen Y, Naujokas M, Park M, Ireton K. InlB-Dependent Internalization of Listeria Is Mediated by the Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase. Cell. 2000;103:501–510. [PubMed]
23. Hamon Ml, Bierne Hln, Cossart P. Listeria monocytogenes: a multifaceted model. Nat Rev Micro. 2006;4:423–434. [PubMed]
24. Cossart P, Pizarro-Cerda J, Lecuit M. Invasion of mammalian cells by Listeria monocytogenes: functional mimicry to subvert cellular functions. Trends in Cell Biology. 2003;13:23–31. [PubMed]
25. Pizarro-Cerda J, Jonquieres R, Gouin E, Vandekerckhove J, Garin J, et al. Distinct protein patterns associated with Listeria monocytogenes InlA- or InlB-phagosomes. Cellular Microbiology. 2002;4:101–115. [PubMed]
26. Gouin E, Welch MD, Cossart P. Actin-based motility of intracellular pathogens. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2005;8:35–45. [PubMed]
27. Cossart P, Sansonetti PJ. Bacterial Invasion: The Paradigms of Enteroinvasive Pathogens. Science. 2004;304:242–248. [PubMed]
28. Yoshida S, Sasakawa C. Exploiting host microtubule dynamics: a new aspect of bacterial invasion. Trends in Microbiology. 2003;11:139–143. [PubMed]
29. Greber UF, Way M. A Superhighway to Virus Infection. Cell. 2006;124:741–754. [PubMed]
30. Bierne H, Gouin E, Roux P, Caroni P, Yin HL, et al. A role for cofilin and LIM kinase in Listeria-induced phagocytosis. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:101–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Bierne H, Miki H, Innocenti M, Scita G, Gertler FB, et al. WASP-related proteins, Abi1 and Ena/VASP are required for Listeria invasion induced by the Met receptor. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1537–1547. [PubMed]
32. Ogawa M, Handa Y, Ashida H, Suzuki M, Sasakawa C. The versatility of Shigella effectors. Nat Rev Micro. 2008;6:11–16. [PubMed]
33. Pizarro-Cerdá J, Lecuit M, Cossart P. Measuring and analyzing invasion of mammalian cells by bacterial pathogens: the Listeria monocytogenes system. Methods Microbiol. 2002:161–177.
34. Lecuit M, Ohayon H, Braun L, Mengaud J, Cossart P. Internalin of Listeria monocytogenes with an intact leucine-rich repeat region is sufficient to promote internalization. Infect Immun. 1997;65:5309–5319. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Braun L, Ohayon H, Cossart P. The InlB protein of Listeria monocytogenes is sufficient to promote entry into mammalian cells. Molecular Microbiology. 1998;27:1077–1087. [PubMed]
36. Seveau S, Tham TN, Payrastre B, Hoppe AD, Swanson JA, et al. A FRET analysis to unravel the role of cholesterol in Rac1 and PI 3-kinase activation in the InlB/Met signalling pathway. Cellular Microbiology. 2007;9:790–803. [PubMed]
37. Lecuit M, Nelson DM, Smith SD, Khun H, Huerre M, et al. Targeting and crossing of the human maternofetal barrier by Listeria monocytogenes : Role of internalin interaction with trophoblast E-cadherin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101:6152–6157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Isberg RR, Leong JM. Multiple [beta]1 chain integrins are receptors for invasin, a protein that promotes bacterial penetration into mammalian cells. Cell. 1990;60:861–871. [PubMed]
39. Zhang J, Zhang C, Xie H, McPherson PS, Grinstein S, et al. Phosphatidylinositol polyphosphate binding to the mammalian septin H5 is modulated by GTP Current. Biology. 1999;9:1458–1467. [PubMed]
40. Pizarro-Cerda J, Payrastre B, Wang Y-J, Veiga E, Yin HL, et al. Type II phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases promote Listeria monocytogenes entry into target cells. Cellular Microbiology. 2007;9:2381–2390. [PubMed]
41. Nagata K-I, Inagaki M. Cytoskeletal modification of Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity: identification of a Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor as a binding partner for Sept9b, a mammalian septin. Oncogene. 2004;24:65–76. [PubMed]
42. Ito H, Iwamoto I, Morishita R, Nozawa Y, Narumiya S, et al. Possible role of Rho//Rhotekin signaling in mammalian septin organization. Oncogene. 2005;24:7064–7072. [PubMed]
43. Joberty G, Perlungher RR, Macara IG. The Borgs, a New Family of Cdc42 and TC10 GTPase-Interacting Proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:6585–6597. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Joberty G, Perlungher RR, Sheffield PJ, Kinoshita M, Noda M, et al. Borg proteins control septin organization and are negatively regulated by Cdc42. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:861–866. [PubMed]
45. Jaumouillé V, Francetic O, Sansonetti PJ, Tran Van Nhieu G. Cytoplasmic targeting of IpaC to the bacterial pole directs polar type III secretion in Shigella. EMBO J. 2008;27:447–457. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Pizarro-Cerdá JLM, Cossart P. Measuring and analyzing invasion of mammalian cells by bacterial pathogens: the Listeria monocytogenes system. Methods Microbiol. 2002:161–177.
47. Veiga E, Guttman JA, Bonazzi M, Boucrot E, Toledo-Arana A, et al. Invasive and Adherent Bacterial Pathogens Co-Opt Host Clathrin for Infection. Cell Host & Microbe. 2007;2:340–351. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Spiliotis ET, Hunt SJ, Hu Q, Kinoshita M, Nelson WJ. Epithelial polarity requires septin coupling of vesicle transport to polyglutamylated microtubules. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:295–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Sousa S, Cabanes D, Archambaud C, Colland F, Lemichez E, et al. ARHGAP10 is necessary for [alpha]-catenin recruitment at adherens junctions and for Listeria invasion. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:954–960. [PubMed]
50. Braun L, Dramsi S, Dehoux P, Bierne H, Lindahl G, et al. InlB: an invasion protein of Listeria monocytogenes with a novel type of surface association. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;25:285–294. [PubMed]
51. Ireton K, Payrastre B, Chap H, Ogawa W, Sakaue H, et al. A Role for Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase in Bacterial Invasion. Science. 1996;274:780–782. [PubMed]
52. Kuhn M. The microtubule depolymerizing drugs nocodazole and colchicine inhibit the uptake of Listeria monocytogenes by P388D1 macrophages. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1998;160:87–90. [PubMed]
53. Haugh JM, Codazzi F, Teruel M, Meyer T. Spatial Sensing in Fibroblasts Mediated by 3′ Phosphoinositides. J Cell Biol. 2000;151:1269–1280. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Osaki M, Oshimura M, Ito H. PI3K-Akt pathway: Its functions and alterations in human cancer. Apoptosis. 2004;9:667–676. [PubMed]
55. Hoppe A, Christensen K, Swanson JA. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Stoichiometry in Living Cells. Biophys J. 2002;83:3652–3664. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Hoppe AD, Swanson JA. Cdc42, Rac1, and Rac2 Display Distinct Patterns of Activation during Phagocytosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:3509–3519. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...