Logo of jbacterPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Bacteriol. 2003 Nov; 185(22): 6624–6632.
PMCID: PMC262090

SoxRS-Regulated Expression and Genetic Analysis of the yggX Gene of Escherichia coli


Genomic studies with bacteria have identified redox-responsive genes without known roles in counteracting oxidative damage. Previous transcriptional profiling showed that expression of one such gene, yggX, was activated by superoxide stress in Escherichia coli. Here we show that this activation could be mimicked by artificial expression of the regulatory protein SoxS. Northern analysis confirmed the transcriptional activation of yggX by oxidative stress or SoxS expression but not in response to the related MarA or Rob proteins. Northern analysis showed that mltC, which codes for a peptidoglycan hydrolase and is positioned immediately downstream of yggX, was also regulated by oxidative stress or ectopic expression of SoxS. Purified SoxS protein bound to the predicted yggX promoter region, between positions 223 and 163 upstream from the yggX translational start site. Within this region, a 20-bp sequence was found to be necessary for oxidative stress-mediated activation of yggX transcription. A yggX deletion strain was hypersensitive to the redox-cycling agent paraquat, and a plasmid expressing YggX complemented the sensitivity of the deletion strain. Under exposure to paraquat, the yggX deletion strain showed a deficiency in aconitase activity compared to the isogenic wild-type strain, while expression of YggX from a multicopy plasmid increased the aconitase levels above those of the wild-type strain. These results demonstrate the direct regulation of the yggX gene by the redox-sensing SoxRS system and provide further evidence for the involvement of yggX in protection of iron-sulfur proteins against oxidative damage.

Cellular responses to environmental stress involve concerted changes in the expression of multiple genes. Recently developed genomic techniques such as transcriptional profiling have allowed the identification of hundreds of stress-responsive genes, including many lacking a known function or significant homology to genes with known functions. In particular, the genetic response of Escherichia coli to oxidative stress includes dozens of such genes (39, 52). The observation that some of these uncharacterized genes are under the control of known oxido-responsive signal transduction systems suggests that they might have direct roles in the antioxidant response (39, 52).

The yggX gene of E. coli was identified as an open reading frame with a predicted 11-kDa protein product during genomic sequencing (7), and further protein expression studies demonstrated that the gene codes for a small and abundant protein (29, 49). Sequence comparisons revealed that yggX homologs are conserved through gram-negative bacteria and that the structural organization of three neighboring genes is conserved (15). Moreover, the yggX gene is transcribed as part of a complex operon that may direct several transcripts containing different combinations of structural genes (Fig. (Fig.11).

FIG. 1.
Structure of the mutY-yggX-mltC-nupG region. Schematic representation of the yggX region, after that described previously (15). The horizontal arrows represent promoters, and the thin vertical arrows show the approximate positions of proposed termination ...

The first report on YggX function showed that overexpression of the Salmonella enterica YggX protein complements the thiamine dependence of a gshA (glutathione-deficient) Salmonella strain, probably by restoring the function of thiamine-synthetic enzymes affected by increased oxidant levels (16). Overexpression of YggX also enhances Salmonella's resistance to oxidants, reduces oxidant-induced mutagenesis, and restores the aconitase deficiency of a gshA mutant. Hence, Gralnick and Downs have proposed that YggX protects FeS clusters in biosynthetic enzymes from oxidative damage (16). Recently, the same authors have shown that YggX decreases chelatable iron in solution and protects DNA from iron-mediated oxidative damage (16a).

Transcriptional profiling experiments (39) showed that yggX is activated as part of E. coli's response to superoxide stress under the control of SoxRS, a well-characterized signal transduction system (see reference 41 for a review). In the SoxRS regulatory cascade, SoxR senses oxidative stress in the cytoplasm via the oxidation state of its Fe-S cluster (24, 50). When oxidized, SoxR activates the transcription of soxS, and the resulting SoxS protein activates genes that collectively help to avoid or repair the damage caused by oxidants (13, 18, 19). SoxS binds as a monomer to sites resembling the asymmetric, degenerate consensus AYnGCACnnWnnRYYAAAYn (where n is any base, Y is T or C, W is A or T, and R is A or G) (33). SoxS-activated genes with known functions include sodA (Mn superoxide dismutase), acnA (aconitase A), fpr (ferredoxin oxidoreductase), and fur (Fe-binding transcriptional repressor).

In this report we show that the transcriptional activation of the E. coli yggX gene under oxidative stress is mediated directly by SoxS and provide further evidence for its role in the cellular defense against oxidation.


Bacterial strains and plasmids.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table Table11.

Bacterial strains and plasmids

DNA manipulation.

Plasmid and chromosomal DNA purification, restriction, and electrophoresis in agarose gels were performed by using well-established protocols (3).

Northern blot analysis.

Probes for specific genes were generated by PCR amplification with chromosomal DNA from strain GC4468 as the template and gene-specific primers obtained from Sigma-Genosys. Typically, PCR amplifications were done with 30 cycles of annealing at 60°C (45 s), elongation at 72°C (1 min), and denaturation at 94°C (30 s). The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis in 1.25% agarose gels, recovered by excision from the gel, and purified with Qiaquick DNA-binding microspin columns (Qiagen). The DNA fragments were labeled by using Klenow DNA polymerase fragment, random-hexamer primers (Gibco BRL), and [32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) plus unlabeled dATP, dGTP, and dTTP. The labeled probes were purified by gel filtration in Sephadex G-25 columns (Pharmacia). For the Northern blot experiments, 2 to 5 μg of total RNA per lane was run in 1.25% agarose gels containing formaldehyde and transferred to Nytran membranes by using a Turboblotter setup (Schleicher & Schuell). The RNA was cross-linked to the membrane by UV irradiation, and the membranes were then hybridized at 65°C with radioactively labeled DNA fragments in cylindrical tubes by using QickHyb solution (Stratagene). The membranes were washed according to the instructions from the manufacturer. X-ray films were exposed to the membranes at −70°C and developed with a Fuji automatic developer. The radioactive signals were measured with an Applied Biosystems phosphorimager.

Construction of a yggX promoter deletion set and assays of transcriptional activity.

Fragments of DNA containing the predicted yggX promoter region were amplified by PCR with primers that introduced convenient BamHI and EcoRI sites in the reaction products. The PCR products were cloned as BamHI-EcoRI fragments into the lacZ reporter vector pRJ800, a derivative of pRZ5202 (ColE1 replicon; Ampr; multiple cloning site from pUC18). Typical PCR mixtures included 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (courtesy of K. Nuesslein) in ThermoPol buffer (New England Biolabs) plus 50 pmol of specific primers designed to introduce convenient restriction sites (Operon), 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (New England Biolabs), and 100 ng of chromosomal DNA from strain GC4468. The E. coli strain GC4468 was transformed to ampicillin resistance with the resulting lacZ fusion constructs. For β-galactosidase activity assays, overnight cultures were diluted in 15 ml of fresh Luria-Bertani broth in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks and were grown at 37°C with strong aeration (250 rpm). After 2 h (optical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.5), the cultures were exposed to 250 μM paraquat (PQ) for 30 min, and cells were assayed as described by Miller (37).

In vitro binding of SoxS by gel mobility shift assay.

In vitro binding of SoxS protein to DNA targets was done as described previously (28). Essentially, purified SoxS protein was diluted in a buffer containing 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 75 mM sodium chloride, and 1 mM dithiothreitol and incubated with end-labeled PCR fragments. Typical binding reaction mixtures contained 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 75 mM potassium chloride, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 10 fmol of 32P-end-labeled PCR product, 1 pmol of randomized 32-mer oligonucleotide, and different amounts of purified SoxS protein as indicated, in a total volume of 20 μl. The binding reaction mixtures were incubated at 20°C for 20 min and run in 5% polyacrylamide gels (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 3 mM sodium acetate, and 1 mM EDTA) at 200 V for 3 to 4 h. Gels were dried and visualized by autoradiography.

Construction of a yggX deletion mutant.

The method of Datsenko and Wanner (9) was used to construct a ΔyggX strain. Briefly, a PCR product containing the kan gene and flanked by the phage lambda Red recombinase recognition sites was obtained by using custom designed primers and plasmid pKD13 as a template. The PCR product also contained 40-bp ends with sequences identical to the regions bordering the yggX coding region. GC4468 cells harboring plasmid pKD46, which allows the expression of lambda Red recombinase under the control of the araBAD promoter, were transformed to Kanr by using this PCR construct. Kanamycin-resistant colonies were tested for the simultaneous loss of the resident yggX gene and replacement by the kan marker by diagnostic PCR with an insert-specific primer and a gene-specific primer. The kan gene was excised from the yggX locus by transformation of the yggX::kan strain with pCP20, a plasmid that expresses the yeast Flp recombinase and recognizes sites included in the yggX::kan construct. This kanamycin-sensitive ΔyggX derivative strain was named PP139.

Construction of an arabinose-regulated yggX gene.

A PCR product containing the complete yggX coding region plus restriction sites included in the primers was cloned into plasmid pBAD28 (23) as a EcoRI-SalI fragment, and the resulting plasmid was named pJP133. This plasmid was tested for complementation of the PQ sensitivity phenotype of strain PP139 (GC4468 ΔyggX). Strain PP139/pJP133 grew very poorly in M9 medium supplemented with 0.4% glucose and 50 μM PQ but grew normally in M9 medium supplemented with 0.4% arabinose (data not shown). Strain PP139/pBAD28 grew poorly in M9 medium in the presence of 50 μM PQ either with glucose or with arabinose as a carbon source (data not shown).

Aconitase assay.

Aconitase activity was measured as described by Skovran and Downs (47). Cells were grown in Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with 1 mM l-arabinose and 50 μg of ampicillin per ml when required. Overnight cultures were diluted 1/100 in 2 ml of fresh medium in 20-mm tubes and grown at 37°C with strong aeration (275 rpm). The cultures were grown to an optical density at 600 nm of ~0.5 and treated with 500 μM PQ for 1 h. After this exposure, cells were harvested, washed once with cold 20 mM Tris-citrate buffer (pH 8), and resuspended in 0.5 ml of the same buffer. The cells were lysed by sonication, and the lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm in an Eppendorf 5417 microcentrifuge for 1 min in a microcentrifuge. The aconitase activity was assayed at room temperature by spectrophotometry, monitoring the increase of absorbance at 240 nm after lysates were mixed with 20 mM isocitrate. Protein concentrations were measured by the method of Bradford, and specific activities were calculated as the change in absorbance per minute per milligram of protein.


The yggX and mltC genes are transcribed under SoxS control.

In order to test the transcriptional activation of the yggX gene under oxidative stress, we performed Northern blotting of mRNA isolated from E. coli cultures. Strain GC4468 (wild type) was exposed to increasing concentrations of PQ, a redox-cycling agent that generates intracellular superoxide in a reaction dependent on NADPH and at least three diaphorases (30, 31). Strain DJ901/pJP115 (ΔsoxRS/pSoxS) was exposed to increasing concentrations of IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside), an artificial inducer of the soxS gene under the control of the lacZ promoter in pJP115 (39). A PCR product spanning the whole yggX coding sequence was radioactively labeled and used as a probe for yggX expression (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A). The autoradiogram of this Northern blot showed two transcripts. The smaller transcript comigrated with a 400-nucleotide (nt) molecular size marker, consistent with the size of the yggX coding region and the known promoter structure (15). The steady-state level of this transcript was elevated in a dose-dependent manner by either treatment with PQ or expression of SoxS. The relative abundance of this ~400-nt transcript was measured by phosphorimaging (Fig. (Fig.2D).2D). A larger transcript comigrated with a 1,520-nt molecular size marker and was activated by either treatment with PQ or expression of SoxS.

FIG. 2.
Expression of yggX and mltC under oxidative stress. (A) Northern blot analysis of yggX transcription. A PCR fragment containing the complete coding sequence of yggX was radioactively labeled and hybridized with total RNAs from strain GC4468 (wild type) ...

The size of the larger transcript was consistent with either a mutY-yggX message starting from one of the promoters upstream of mutY or, alternatively, a yggX-mltC message starting at the promoter upstream of yggX (Fig. (Fig.1).1). To distinguish between these two possibilities, the filter from the previous experiment was stripped and reprobed with a PCR fragment spanning the complete mltC coding region (Fig. (Fig.2B).2B). A single transcript was detected, and its size was estimated at ~1.5 kb. The steady-state level of this transcript containing mltC was increased by exposure to PQ or expression of SoxS. Due to the low levels of the basal mltC signal, reliable quantitation by phosphorimaging was difficult to obtain. However, we estimated that induction of mltC is similar in ratio to the yggX induction (data not shown).

In contrast, when the mutY coding region was used as probe, a ~1.5-kb transcript was detected, but this transcript did not show any activation by either treatment with PQ or expression of SoxS (data not shown). This lack of activation of mutY by PQ was consistent with the observations of Gifford et al. (14). Finally, probing the activity of the nupG gene with a PCR product spanning the nupG coding region revealed a single transcript of the expected size (~1 kb), which showed no variation with PQ treatment or SoxS expression (data not shown). These results suggest that the transcription of yggX and mltC, but not that of mutY or nupG, is activated by oxidative stress and that ectopic expression of the SoxS protein is sufficient to evoke this activation. Additionally, the yggX gene can be transcribed alone or as a transcript including both yggX and mltC.

Purified SoxS binds to the yggX promoter.

The observation that SoxS regulates the yggX-mltC promoter was inconsistent with a previous suggestion that SoxS binding sites are absent from this regulatory region (15). To rule out an indirect effect of SoxS on the activation of yggX, we mapped the putative SoxS binding site by constructing a set of nested deletions of the yggX promoter region (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). These deletion fragments were fused to a lacZ reporter gene, and β-galactosidase activity was measured for strains carrying each construct, both untreated and in the presence of 250 μM PQ. A lacZ fusion containing the 223 bp upstream from the yggX translational start site was regulated by oxidative stress. Conversely, a fragment containing the 163 bp upstream from the yggX translational start site was not regulated. In vitro binding experiments with purified components showed that SoxS formed a complex with the 223-bp fragment of the yggX promoter (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). In contrast, SoxS failed to form any detectable complex with the smaller, 163-bp fragment (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). Sequence analysis revealed a match for an inverted SoxS binding site (5′-TAGGCACAATATCTAAGTGG-3′) between positions 190 and 171 upstream from the yggX translational start site. To confirm the position of the SoxS binding site, two additional deletions of the yggX promoter were constructed and fused to lacZ. The lacZ fusion containing the 193 bp upstream from the yggX translational start site and harboring the proposed SoxS binding site was regulated by oxidative stress (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). Conversely, a fragment containing the 173 bp upstream from the yggX translational start site and lacking 17 out of the 20 bases of the putative SoxS binding site was not regulated (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). These in vitro binding and in vivo regulation results show that SoxS is directly involved in the transcriptional regulation of the yggX gene.

FIG. 3.
A deletion set of yggX-lacZ transcriptional fusions. (A) Solid rectangular bars indicate the lengths of the yggX promoter regions fused to a lacZ reporter gene in pRJ800. The bracketed sequence highlights the region necessary for the activation of yggX ...

The SoxS paralogs MarA and Rob are not sufficient for activation of yggX.

The SoxS protein is a member of the AraC-XylA family of transcriptional activators (12). The closest SoxS paralogs are MarA, a protein involved in multiple-antibiotic resistance (1), and Rob, an abundant protein of uncertain physiological relevance (6, 46). MarA and Rob can activate several of the SoxS-activated genes, since both MarA and Rob recognize the same DNA sequence for binding (26, 27). To test whether either MarA or Rob could activate the transcription of yggX, we measured the relative level of yggX mRNA in cells in which the expression of MarA or Rob could be selectively activated. This selective expression of MarA and Rob was achieved by using strains MB102 (ΔmarA) (39) and MB101 (ΔrobA) (6). Both strains are GC4468 derivatives transformed with plasmids that allow, respectively, the expression of MarA or Rob under the control of IPTG-regulated promoters. As shown before, the levels of yggX mRNA were increased after treatment with PQ or expression of SoxS (Fig. (Fig.4A).4A). In contrast, the level of yggX transcript was unaffected by the expression of MarA or Rob (Fig. (Fig.4A).4A). As a positive control for transcriptional activation by MarA and Rob, the membrane from the former Northern blot was stripped and rehybridized with a labeled PCR product containing the inaA coding region. The inaA gene is activated by SoxS, MarA, and Rob, with MarA being the strongest activator (34, 43). This experiment confirmed the transcriptional activity of artificially expressed MarA and Rob proteins (Fig. (Fig.4B)4B) and verified that they do not activate yggX expression.

FIG. 4.
Effect of MarA and Rob on the expression of yggX. (A) Northern blot analysis of yggX transcription. A PCR fragment containing the complete coding sequence of yggX was radioactively labeled and hybridize with total RNAs from the following strains: GC4468 ...

A yggX deletion mutant is hypersensitive to PQ.

It was reasonable to believe that the induction of yggX expression was indicative of a potential role for this gene in the resistance to oxidative stress. To test this putative role of yggX, we built strain PP139, a ΔyggX derivative of strain GC4468 (see Materials and Methods). Overnight cultures of both wild-type and ΔyggX strains were diluted into fresh medium in the presence or absence of 50 μM PQ and grown with strong aeration (Fig. (Fig.5).5). Both strains grew equally in the absence of PQ (Fig. (Fig.5A),5A), but the ΔyggX strain grew poorly in medium containing PQ (Fig. (Fig.5B).5B). The hypersensitivity of the ΔyggX strain was also measured in solid medium by using gradient plates (8), and this method was used to assay the growth of the yggX mutant exposed to various oxidative stress agents. This experiment showed that a ΔyggX strain was not only more sensitive to PQ than the isogenic wild-type strain but also more sensitive than a ΔsoxRS strain (Table (Table2).2). Interestingly, other superoxide-producing drugs, such as menadione and phenazine methosulfate, had a small or no effect on the growth of PP139 on plates. This observation was unexpected, since both menadione and phenazine methosulfate produce substantial oxidative stress through the generation of intracellular superoxide. The organic peroxide tert-butyl-hydroperoxide had only a modest relative effect on the growth of PP139.

FIG. 5.
PQ-sensitive phenotype of a ΔyggX strain. Cells were grown in M9 minimal salts medium supplemented with 0.4% arabinose, 0.1% Casamino Acids, 1 μg of thiamine per ml, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM CaCl2. Cells were untreated (A), or PQ was added ...
Sensitivity to oxidants

As shown before, the yggX and mltC genes are apparently cotranscribed, and therefore, the hypersensitive phenotype of a yggX mutant could result from polar effects on mltC expression. To test this possibility, we cloned the yggX gene under the control of the araBAD promoter by using the pBAD28 expression vector (23). By using the resulting plasmid, pJP133, the expression of yggX could be activated by the addition of arabinose. Strain PP139 (ΔyggX) was transformed to Ampr with either vector pBAD28 or pJP133, grown overnight, and diluted into fresh medium supplemented with arabinose in the presence or absence of PQ. In the absence of PQ, all three strains (wild type, ΔyggX/pBAD28, and ΔyggX/pJP133) grew similarly (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A). Alternatively, in the presence of PQ, strain PP139/pBAD28 grew poorly compared with the wild-type strain GC4468. This growth defect was complemented by plasmid pJP133, since strain PP139/pJP133 grew as well as the wild-type strain (Fig. (Fig.5B).5B). These results show that expression of yggX was sufficient to complement the PQ-dependent growth defects of the ΔyggX strain and therefore that the hypersensitive phenotype of PP139 was not due to polar effects.

Deletion of yggX results in decreased aconitase activity under superoxide stress.

Recent work has shown that overexpression of YggX complements the deficiency in aconitase activity displayed by S. enterica gshA mutants (16). This observation has been interpreted as evidence for a role of YggX in protecting or repairing oxidative damage of the Fe-S clusters that form the active site of aconitase. To test this putative protective role, we measured aconitase activity in wild-type and ΔyggX strains growing under oxidative stress (Fig. (Fig.6).6). In the absence of stress, the aconitase activities of the wild-type and ΔyggX strains were not significantly different, and the expression of YggX from plasmid pJP133 did not increase aconitase activity. Conversely, under oxidative stress induced by PQ, the ΔyggX strain showed a significant decrease in aconitase activity compared to the wild-type strain. Expression of YggX from plasmid pJP133 restored this activity and increased it to a level higher than that in the wild type (Fig. (Fig.6).6). These results showed that the product of the yggX gene is necessary to maintain high levels of aconitase under oxidative stress.

FIG. 6.
Aconitase activity in wild-type (wt) and ΔyggX strains. Cells were grown and treated as described in Materials and Methods. Bars represent the average aconitase activities and standard deviations from three independent experiments.


The yggX gene of E. coli codes for a predicted 91-residue, 11-kDa polypeptide of unknown in vivo function. Transcriptional profiling has suggested that the expression of yggX is activated by superoxide stress as part of the SoxRS regulon (39). The results presented here confirmed and extended the role of the SoxRS system in regulating not only yggX but also the downstream gene mltC. Our results are consistent with the genetic structure of the mutY-yggX-mltC-nupG region proposed by Gifford and Wallace (15) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The coregulation of yggX and mltC (Fig. (Fig.2)2) was consistent with SoxS-mediated activation of the proximal promoter upstream of the yggX coding region, with a termination point between yggX and mltC that allows readthrough. The binding of purified SoxS to the yggX promoter strongly suggests that the PQ- and SoxS-mediated activation of yggX is the result of direct interaction between promoter and SoxS. A sequence necessary for PQ-mediated transcriptional induction of yggX was mapped to a 20-bp region between positions 173 and 193 upstream the yggX translational start site. This 20-bp region contained 17 bp of a partial match for a putative SoxS binding site. This putative SoxS binding sequence diverges substantially from the mar-sox-rob consensus (33), with only seven matches out of 14 nonrandom positions.

Additionally, and despite similarities in the structures of their DNA binding domains and cognate DNA binding sites, the SoxS homologs MarA and Rob did not activate in vivo transcription of yggX under the conditions tested (Fig. (Fig.4).4). This result was somewhat surprising, since it has been repeatedly shown that regulatory cross talk exists between these proteins and SoxS (1, 17, 21, 27, 35). In this context, the different degree of activation of the inaA gene by the three homologous proteins (Fig. (Fig.4)4) is noteworthy but not surprising, since such differences have been reported for other genes. For example, SoxS appears to be a better activator of fumC than is MarA, which is in turn more potent than Rob (2, 34). A growing body of evidence suggests that, although overlapping, the MarA, Rob, and SoxS proteins have different regulatory targets. For example, the nfo gene, coding for endonuclease IV, is activated by SoxS but not by MarA or Rob (17). Similarly, the gshB gene, coding for a glutathione synthase, is activated by MarA but not by SoxS or Rob (5, 39). Recently, Barbosa and Levy showed that the nfnB gene is regulated preferentially by MarA, which binds to a site that diverges substantially from the Mar-Sox-Rob consensus, with eight mismatches out of the 14 nonrandom positions (4). Hence, divergence from the Mar-Sox-Rob box consensus sequence might determine differential regulation of a promoter by these transcription factors. It is tempting to hypothesize that the sequence divergence from the consensus in the putative SoxS binding site at the yggX promoter and the lack of regulation by the SoxS homologs MarA and Rob are related phenomena.

Recently, a function in antioxidant defense was proposed for the yggX gene of S. enterica, as a mediator of iron transactions between uptake and Fe-S cluster synthesis and/or repair (16a). The results presented here are consistent with this hypothesis, since growth of a ΔyggX strain was deficient in minimal medium under oxidative stress. Expression of YggX from a plasmid was sufficient to complement this sensitivity, which shows that the phenotype was not due to polar effects. Additionally, a ΔyggX strain showed deficient aconitase activity under oxidative stress, while expression of YggX in that same mutant enhanced aconitase activity above wild-type levels. Interestingly, acnA, the gene coding for one of the two E. coli aconitases, aconitase A, is also a member of the SoxRS regulon. It has been proposed that the SoxS-mediated induction of aconitase A replaces the labile activity of aconitase B, helping the cell in the adaptation to oxidative stress (22). Moreover, it has been estimated that under PQ-elicited oxidative stress, more than 95% of aconitase activity is provided by aconitase A (22). We can therefore propose a model in which the transcriptional activation of both acnA and yggX results in the maintenance of high levels of aconitase activity under oxidative stress. Moreover, the level of YggX appears to be limiting for aconitase activity under PQ-induced oxidative stress, since expression of YggX from a multicopy plasmid enhances aconitase activity beyond the wild-type levels. Interestingly, a recent report showed that despite its in vivo stability, the activity of purified aconitase A is destroyed in vitro by superoxide (48). The resistance of aconitase A to oxidation was restored in vitro by addition of cell extract. The protecting agent was sensitive to boiling but not to dialysis or RNase and could not restore the activity of damaged aconitase (48). It is tempting to speculate that the soluble factor that protects aconitase A in vitro from oxidative damage is YggX. We are currently addressing this hypothesis experimentally.

The significance of the SoxS-mediated activation of mltC is not clear. MltC is one of three E. coli lytic transglycosylases found in the outer membrane, where the enzyme modulates the turnover of the murein sacculus during cell growth (10, 11, 32). The products of murein lysis are transported into the cytoplasm and broken into peptide and disaccharide components by the amidase AmpD (25). The peptides are recycled into the cell wall as UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid peptide intermediates (36). The disaccharides are cleaved by the β-glucosaminidase NagZ, but the metabolic fate of the released 1,6-anhydromuramic acid is not known (20). Since E. coli cells under superoxide stress showed a global activation of genes involved in sugar transport (39), it is possible that the activation of mltC contributes to increase the intracellular sugar pools by degrading the peptidoglycan.

The possibility of stress-regulated Fe-S cluster protection or repair is certainly consistent with the present models of global antioxidant response. Furthermore, the transcriptional activation of yggX might not be the sole example. Recently, a study of global regulation in response to oxidative stress (52) showed the induction of genes of the isc region, which is known to be involved in Fe-S cluster assembly (38, 44, 45, 51). Interestingly, this transcriptional activation was independent of both OxyR and SoxRS. Therefore, stress-mediated activation of genes related to Fe-S cluster dynamics could involve multiple operons and pathways.


This work was supported by NIH grant CA37831 to B. Demple and by University of Massachusetts start-up funds to P. Pomposiello.

We are grateful to J. Beckwith for plasmid pBAD28 and to S. Sandler, T. Lessie, and K. Nuesslein for technical support and stimulating discussion.


1. Alekshun, M. N., and S. B. Levy. 1997. Regulation of chromosomally mediated multiple antibiotic resistance: the mar regulon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2067-2075. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Ariza, R. R., Z. Li, N. Ringstad, and B. Demple. 1995. Activation of multiple antibiotic resistance and binding of stress-inducible promoters by Escherichia coli Rob protein. J. Bacteriol. 177:1655-1661. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Ausubel, F. M., B. Roger, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1996. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
4. Barbosa, T. M., and S. B. Levy. 2002. Activation of the Escherichia coli nfnB gene by MarA through a highly divergent marbox in a class II promoter. Mol. Microbiol. 45:191-202. [PubMed]
5. Barbosa, T. M., and S. B. Levy. 2000. Differential expression of over 60 chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli by constitutive expression of MarA. J. Bacteriol. 182:3467-3474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Bennik, M. H., P. J. Pomposiello, D. F. Thorne, and B. Demple. 2000. Defining a rob regulon in Escherichia coli by using transposon mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol. 182:3794-3801. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Blattner, F. R., G. Plunkett III, C. A. Bloch, N. T. Perna, V. Burland, M. Riley, J. Collado-Vides, J. D. Glasner, C. K. Rode, G. F. Mayhew, J. Gregor, N. W. Davis, H. A. Kirkpatrick, M. A. Goeden, D. J. Rose, B. Mau, and Y. Shao. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453-1474. [PubMed]
8. Cunningham, R. P., S. M. Saporito, S. G. Spitzer, and B. Weiss. 1986. Endonuclease IV (nfo) mutant of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 168:1120-1127. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Datsenko, K. A., and B. L. Wanner. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6640-6645. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Dijkstra, A. J., and W. Keck. 1996. Identification of new members of the lytic transglycosylase family in Haemophilus influenzae and Escherichia coli. Microb. Drug Resist. 2:141-145. [PubMed]
11. Ehlert, K., J. V. Holtje, and M. F. Templin. 1995. Cloning and expression of a murein hydrolase lipoprotein from Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 16:761-768. [PubMed]
12. Gallegos, M. T., R. Schleif, A. Bairoch, K. Hofmann, and J. L. Ramos. 1997. Arac/XylS family of transcriptional regulators. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:393-410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Gaudu, P., and B. Weiss. 2000. Flavodoxin mutants of. Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 182:1788-1793. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Gifford, C. M., J. O. Blaisdell, and S. S. Wallace. 2000. Multiprobe RNase protection assay analysis of mRNA levels for the Escherichia coli oxidative DNA glycosylase genes under conditions of oxidative stress. J. Bacteriol. 182:5416-5424. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Gifford, C. M., and S. S. Wallace. 1999. The genes encoding formamidopyrimidine and MutY DNA glycosylases in Escherichia coli are transcribed as part of complex operons. J. Bacteriol. 181:4223-4236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Gralnick, J., and D. Downs. 2001. Protection from superoxide damage associated with an increased level of the YggX protein in Salmonella enterica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8030-8035. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16a. Gralnick, J., and D. Downs. 2003. The YggX protein of Salmonella enterica is involved in Fe(II) trafficking and minimizes the DNA damage caused by hydroxyl radicals: residue CYS-7 is essential for YggX function. J. Biol. Chem. 278:20708-20715. [PubMed]
17. Greenberg, J. T., J. H. Chou, P. A. Monach, and B. Demple. 1991. Activation of oxidative stress genes by mutations at the soxQ/cfxB/marA locus of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 173:4433-4439. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Greenberg, J. T., and B. Demple. 1989. A global response induced in Escherichia coli by redox-cycling agents overlaps with that induced by peroxide stress. J. Bacteriol. 171:3933-3939. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Greenberg, J. T., P. Monach, J. H. Chou, P. D. Josephy, and B. Demple. 1990. Positive control of a global antioxidant defense regulon activated by superoxide-generating agents in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:6181-6185. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Greenway, D. L., and H. R. Perkins. 1985. Turnover of the cell wall peptidoglycan during growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Escherichia coli. Relative stability of newly synthesized material. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131:253-263. [PubMed]
21. Griffith, K. L., and R. E. Wolf, Jr. 2001. Systematic mutagenesis of the DNA binding sites for SoxS in the Escherichia coli zwf and fpr promoters: identifying nucleotides required for DNA binding and transcription activation. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1141-1154. [PubMed]
22. Gruer, M. J., and J. R. Guest. 1994. Two genetically-distinct and differentially-regulated aconitases (AcnA and AcnB) in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 140:2531-2541. [PubMed]
23. Guzman, L. M., D. Belin, M. J. Carson, and J. Beckwith. 1995. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177:4121-4130. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Hidalgo, E., H. Ding, and B. Demple. 1997. Redox signal transduction: mutations shifting [2Fe-2S] centers of the SoxR sensor-regulator to the oxidized form. Cell 88:121-129. [PubMed]
25. Jacobs, C., B. Joris, M. Jamin, K. Klarsov, J. Van Beeumen, D. Mengin-Lecreulx, J. van Heijenoort, J. T. Park, S. Normark, and J. M. Frere. 1995. AmpD, essential for both beta-lactamase regulation and cell wall recycling, is a novel cytosolic N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanine amidase. Mol. Microbiol. 15:553-559. [PubMed]
26. Jair, K. W., W. P. Fawcett, N. Fujita, A. Ishihama, and R. E. J. Wolf. 1996. Ambidextrous transcriptional activation by SoxS: requirement for the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in a subset of the Escherichia coli superoxide-inducible genes. Mol. Microbiol. 19:306-317. [PubMed]
27. Jair, K. W., R. G. Martin, J. L. Rosner, N. Fujita, A. Ishihama, and R. E. Wolf, Jr. 1995. Purification and regulatory properties of MarA protein, a transcriptional activator of Escherichia coli multiple antibiotic and superoxide resistance promoters. J. Bacteriol. 177:7100-7104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Li, Z., and B. Demple. 1994. SoxS, an activator of superoxide stress genes in Escherichia coli. Purification and interaction with DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 269:18371-18377. [PubMed]
29. Link, A. J., K. Robison, and G. M. Church. 1997. Comparing the predicted and observed properties of proteins encoded in the genome of Escherichia coli K-12. Electrophoresis 18:1259-1313. [PubMed]
30. Liochev, S. I., and I. Fridovich. 1994. Paraquat diaphorases in Escherichia coli. Free Radical Biol. Med. 16:555-559. [PubMed]
31. Liochev, S. I., A. Hausladen, W. F. Beyer, Jr., and I. Fridovich. 1994. NADPH:ferredoxin oxidoreductase acts as a paraquat diaphorase and is a member of the soxRS regulon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1328-1331. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Lommatzsch, J., M. F. Templin, A. R. Kraft, W. Vollmer, and J. V. Holtje. 1997. Outer membrane localization of murein hydrolases: MltA, a third lipoprotein lytic transglycosylase in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:5465-5470. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Martin, R. G., W. K. Gillette, S. Rhee, and J. L. Rosner. 1999. Structural requirements for marbox function in transcriptional activation of mar/sox/rob regulon promoters in Escherichia coli: sequence, orientation and spatial relationship to the core promoter. Mol. Microbiol. 34:431-441. [PubMed]
34. Martin, R. G., W. K. Gillette, and J. L. Rosner. 2000. Promoter discrimination by the related transcriptional activators MarA and SoxS: differential regulation by differential binding. Mol. Microbiol. 35:623-634. [PubMed]
35. Martin, R. G., and J. L. Rosner. 2002. Genomics of the marA/soxS/rob regulon of Escherichia coli: identification of directly activated promoters by application of molecular genetics and informatics to microarray data. Mol. Microbiol. 44:1611-1624. [PubMed]
36. Mengin-Lecreulx, D., J. van Heijenoort, and J. T. Park. 1996. Identification of the mpl gene encoding UDP-N-acetylmuramate:l-alanyl-gamma-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelate ligase in Escherichia coli and its role in recycling of cell wall peptidoglycan. J. Bacteriol. 178:5347-5352. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Miller, J. H. 1993. Experiments in molecular genetics: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
38. Ollagnier-de-Choudens, S., T. Mattioli, Y. Takahashi, and M. Fontecave. 2001. Iron-sulfur cluster assembly: characterization of IscA and evidence for a specific and functional complex with ferredoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 276:22604-22607. [PubMed]
39. Pomposiello, P. J., M. H. Bennik, and B. Demple. 2001. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the Escherichia coli responses to superoxide stress and sodium salicylate. J. Bacteriol. 183:3890-3902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Pomposiello, P. J., and B. Demple. 2000. Identification of SoxS-regulated genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 182:23-29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Pomposiello, P. J., and B. Demple. 2001. Redox-operated genetic switches: the SoxR and OxyR transcription factors. Trends Biotechnol. 19:109-114. [PubMed]
42. Reznikoff, W., and W. R. McClure. 1986. E. coli promoters, p. 1-33. In W. Reznikoff, and I. Gold (ed.), Maximizing gene expression. Butterworths Publishers, Boston, Mass.
43. Rosner, J. L., and J. L. Slonczewski. 1994. Dual regulation of inaA by the multiple antibiotic resistance (mar) and superoxide (soxRS) stress response systems of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 176:6262-6269. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Schwartz, C. J., O. Djaman, J. A. Imlay, and P. J. Kiley. 2000. The cysteine desulfurase, IscS, has a major role in in vivo Fe-S cluster formation in Escherichia coli Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9009-9014. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Schwartz, C. J., J. L. Giel, T. Patschkowski, C. Luther, F. J. Ruzicka, H. Beinert, and P. J. Kiley. 2001. IscR, an Fe-S cluster-containing transcription factor, represses expression of Escherichia coli genes encoding Fe-S cluster assembly proteins Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14895-14900. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Skarstad, K., B. Thony, D. S. Hwang, and A. Kornberg. 1993. A novel binding protein of the origin of the Escherichia coli chromosome. J. Biol. Chem. 268:5365-5370. [PubMed]
47. Skovran, E., and D. M. Downs. 2000. Metabolic defects caused by mutations in the isc gene cluster in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium: implications for thiamine synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 182:3896-3903. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Varghese, S., Y. Tang, and J. A. Imlay. 2003. Contrasting sensitivities of Escherichia coli aconitases A and B to oxidation and iron depletion. J. Bacteriol. 185:221-230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Wasinger, V. C., and I. Humphery-Smith. 1998. Small genes/gene-products in Escherichia coli K-12. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 169:375-382. [PubMed]
50. Wu, J., W. R. Dunham, and B. Weiss. 1995. Overproduction and physical characterization of SoxR, a [2Fe-2S] protein that governs an oxidative response regulon in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 270:10323-10327. [PubMed]
51. Zheng, L., V. L. Cash, D. H. Flint, and D. R. Dean. 1998. Assembly of iron-sulfur clusters. Identification of an iscSUA-hscBA-fdx gene cluster from Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Biol. Chem. 273:13264-13272. [PubMed]
52. Zheng, M., X. Wang, L. J. Templeton, D. R. Smulski, R. A. LaRossa, and G. Storz. 2001. DNA microarray-mediated transcriptional profiling of the Escherichia coli response to hydrogen peroxide. J. Bacteriol. 183:4562-4570. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • Gene
    Gene links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Pathways + GO
    Pathways + GO
    Pathways, annotations and biological systems (BioSystems) that cite the current article.
  • Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem Substance links
  • Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...