![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Rodrigues et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Architecture of thermal adaptation in an Exiguobacterium sibiricum strain isolated from 3 million year old permafrost: A genome and transcriptome approach 1Michigan State University, NASA Astrobiology Institute and Center for Microbial Ecology, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598-1604, USA 3Institute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 4Michigan State University, Department of Statistics and Probability, East Lansing, MI, USA Corresponding author.Debora F Rodrigues: rodri257/at/msu.edu; Natalia Ivanova: NNIvanova/at/lbl.gov; Zhili He: zhili.he/at/ou.edu; Marianne Huebner: huebner/at/msu.edu; Jizhong Zhou: jzhou/at/ou.edu; James M Tiedje: tiedjej/at/msu.edu Received May 23, 2008; Accepted November 18, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Many microorganisms have a wide temperature growth range and versatility to tolerate large thermal fluctuations in diverse environments, however not many have been fully explored over their entire growth temperature range through a holistic view of its physiology, genome, and transcriptome. We used Exiguobacterium sibiricum strain 255-15, a psychrotrophic bacterium from 3 million year old Siberian permafrost that grows from -5°C to 39°C to study its thermal adaptation. Results The E. sibiricum genome has one chromosome and two small plasmids with a total of 3,015 protein-encoding genes (CDS), and a GC content of 47.7%. The genome and transcriptome analysis along with the organism's known physiology was used to better understand its thermal adaptation. A total of 27%, 3.2%, and 5.2% of E. sibiricum CDS spotted on the DNA microarray detected differentially expressed genes in cells grown at -2.5°C, 10°C, and 39°C, respectively, when compared to cells grown at 28°C. The hypothetical and unknown genes represented 10.6%, 0.89%, and 2.3% of the CDS differentially expressed when grown at -2.5°C, 10°C, and 39°C versus 28°C, respectively. Conclusion The results show that E. sibiricum is constitutively adapted to cold temperatures stressful to mesophiles since little differential gene expression was observed between 4°C and 28°C, but at the extremities of its Arrhenius growth profile, namely -2.5°C and 39°C, several physiological and metabolic adaptations associated with stress responses were observed. Background About 80% of Earth's surface is 15°C or colder [1]. Psychrophilic together with psychrotolerant bacteria comprise the cold-adapted microorganisms. These microbes have been isolated and characterized from various environments such as polar sediments and soils, as well as open oceans [2,3]. Psychrotolerant microorganisms are of special interest since they grow at a wide range of temperatures, e.g. between -5 and +40°C [3,4], and tolerate large thermal fluctuations in diverse environments [2,5]. Although cold conditions are prevalent on Earth, a reference set of genomes of Gram-positive Bacteria from cold environments has not been available. Recently, whole genome sequences have been determined for a few cold adapted species: Listeria monocytogenes [6], Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H [7], Idiomarina loihiensis L2TR [8], Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125 [9], and Psychromonas ingrahamii 37 [10]. Most of the work on these microorganisms has not been devoted in exploring the mechanisms of thermal adaptation over their entire growth temperature range. During thermal adaptation cells undergo many cellular modifications in order to survive and grow at extreme temperatures. A network of genes that are activated simultaneously or in cascade fashion generates these modifications. These genes have not been completely elucidated in psychrotrophs and psychrophilic microoganisms. Most of the studies examining the cold and heat stress responses were done in mesophilic bacteria and a range of mechanisms has been identified. These mechanisms involve preserving the flexibility, topology, and interactions of macromolecules such as DNA, RNA and proteins, maintaining the homeoviscous adaption of the cell membrane, protecting the cell from disruption by producing osmoprotectants, and maintaining the diffusion rate and enzyme kinetics inside the cell [11-13]. The variation in specific growth rate as a function of temperature is commonly portrayed by Arrhenius equations [14]. The Arrhenius profiles of most bacteria are characterized by a linear portion in a 20°C suboptimal growth range, i.e. the normal Arrhenius range [14]. Below and above the normal range, deviations of the thermo-dependence of growth from the Arrhenius law reveals the inability of cells to maximize their growth rate [15], but little is known about the reasons why microbes are unable to maximize their growth rate at divergent temperatures. In the psychrotrophic bacterium Exiguobacterium sibiricum strain 255-15, growth occurs from -5°C to 40°C. This member of the Bacillaceae is Gram-positive, rod-shaped, facultative aerobic, and motile with peritrichous flagella [16]. The relevance of studying this microorganism is that this genus is adapted to diverse cold environments and has been shown to be prevalent in the Siberian permafrost [17-20]. Furthermore, this genus can be found in geological layers frozen for 20 thousands to up to 3 million years, indicating that this genus can endure long freezing periods [17]. This microorganism also grows over an unusually broad temperature range and hence provides a good model for exploring molecular mechanisms of thermal adaptation. The genome of E. sibiricum strain 255-15 has been sequenced to completion by DOE's Joint Genome Institute. The genome has been assembled into three contigs: one chromosome (3034146 bp, 3007 CDS) and two plasmids (1765 bp, 3 CDS and 4885 bp, 5 CDS). This study shows that few transcriptional changes were observed when the microbes were grown at 10°C and 28°C, but several stress related gene expression changes were observed after growth at -2.5°C and 39°C, indicating that E. sibiricum strain 255-15 is adapted for growth at cold to moderate range of temperatures. Results and discussion Genome analysis E. sibiricum CDS have most top hits in BLASTP with species belonging to the same order, Bacillales (Table 1). Its GC content was more similar to Bacillus species. The E. sibiricum genome is approximately the same size as Listeria innocua (3.0 Mb). The genome size and the GC content of E. sibiricum were also similar to Psychrobacter arcticus 273-4, a Gram-negative microorganism also isolated from the Siberian permafrost.
The cluster of orthologous groups (COGs) distribution, described in the IMG website of E. sibiricum genome, shows that approximately 27.7% of the genes do not have a function predicted. Since cold and heat stress related genes are not yet completely elucidated, it is possible that among these large numbers of poorly characterized genes are ones important for the cell acclimation to stress temperatures. The genome also encodes apparent homologs of stress-related proteins as well as many novel proteins that may have unique roles in adaptation to the permafrost environment (Table 2). We analyzed the genome of E. sibiricum 255-15 according to the following seven categories.
Carbohydrate metabolism Genome analysis and previous physiological studies showed that E. sibiricum 255-15 prefers sugars and carbohydrate polymers as carbon sources [16,21]. All the genes for Embden-Meyerhoff pathway (glycolysis) such as glucose-specific PTS (phosphotransferase), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, 6-phosphofructokinase, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, among others, are present (Figure (Figure1).1
E. sibiricum 255-15 has a number of enzymes for degradation of carbohydrate polymers, mostly starch and starch-derived oligosaccharides, which were observed in the genome and confirmed experimentally [16]. These include several alpha-amylases, oligo-1,6-glucosidases, non-glucogenic alpha-amylase, exo-alpha-1,4-glucosidase, alpha-glucosidase, pullulanases, and maltose phosphorylase. E. sibiricum may also store carbon as a non-branched glucose polymer, similar to glycogen, but without 1 -> 6 branches, since the branching enzyme is absent. The genome analysis showed that E. sibiricum can store glucans as extracellular carbohydrate polymers given that it has a putative glucansucrase that synthesizes insoluble alpha-D-glucans from sucrose. Although the linkage pattern of the glucan products cannot be predicted based only on the genome sequence, the specificity of the hydrolases found in the genome suggest 1 -> 4/1 -> 6 alpha-D-glucans as the most likely products. Previous work has shown the presence of granules inside the cell [16] as well as the presence of exopolysaccarides (Figure (Figure2),2
Amino acid biosynthesis E. sibiricum grows on media containing tryptic hydrolysates, which is consistent with its genome-predicted auxotrophy for several amino acids. The enzymes for biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine) and threonine are absent in E. sibiricum (Figure (Figure1).1 The genes from the sulfate activation pathway (ATP sulfurylase, APS reductase or APS kinase and PAPS reductase or any of sulfite reductase enzymes) were not found, which indicates that E. sibiricum cannot utilize sulfate and requires an organic source of sulfur, such as methionine, cysteine or methylthioribose. Lactococcus lactis and E. sibiricum have ortholog genes of a putative cysteine (cystine) ABC transporter and a methionine ABC transporter. E. sibiricum has a probable serine O-acetyltransferase and cysteine synthase for biosynthesis of cysteine from serine and sulfide. In addition, it seems to have a transsulfurylation pathway from methionine to cysteine represented by cystathionine beta-synthase and cystathionine gamma-lyase. The orthologs of homoserine O-succinyl (O-acetyl) transferase (metA) or O-acetylhomoserine sulfhydrylase (cysD) were not found in the genome. E. sibiricum has cobalamin-independent homocysteine S-methyltransferase and a pathway for methylthioribose-recycling to methionine. Thus, it appears that E. sibiricum requires methionine or methylthioribose for growth and can produce cysteine by transsulfurylation from methionine. Lysine biosynthesis appears to be proceeding via acetylated intermediates and employing a dapX-type diaminopimelate epimerase. Conventional amino acid biosynthesis pathways are present for the remaining amino acids including arginine, histidine, glutamate, glutamine, asparagine, serine, and polyamines. Amino acid catabolism E. sibiricum has some amino acid degradation pathways that can be used as energy sources (Figure (Figure1).1 E. sibiricum also has pathways for degradation of the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine and tryptophan. Phenylalanine dehydrogenase is present, which catalyzes the oxidative deamination of phenylalanine to phenylpyruvate, a product that can be further converted to phenylacetate (e.g., by pyruvate dehydrogenase found next to phenylalanine dehydrogenase). Phenylacetate can be further degraded via a ring-hydroxylation/beta-oxidation pathway encoded by an operon next to phenylacetate-CoA ligase. Tryptophan degradation genes encoding tryptophan dioxygenase, kynurenine formamidase and kynureninase are present and could produce enzymes to degrade L-tryptophan to anthranilate. There is no pathway for further degradation of anthranilate, so most likely tryptophan can be used as nitrogen, but not as carbon source. E. sibiricum has a pathway for anaerobic degradation of threonine into glycine and acetyl-CoA via threonine 3-dehydrogenase and 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate-CoA ligase. This pathway allows threonine to be used as nitrogen and probably as carbon source. Glycine can be further degraded via a glycine cleavage system. L-serine dehydratase and alanine dehydrogenase are also present; they produce pyruvate out of L-serine and L-alanine, respectively. Coenzyme and cofactor biosynthesis E. sibiricum is likely auxotrophic for biotin since KAPA synthase, KAPA aminotransferase, dethiobiotin synthase, and biotin synthase are not present in the genome. The biosynthesis pathways of the other known coenzymes are complete and essentially similar to those found in B. subtilis. Nucleotide biosynthesis Both purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis pathways are complete (Figure (Figure1).1 Energy metabolism E. sibiricum grows both aerobically and anaerobically [16]. For aerobic growth, the genome contains a complete TCA cycle and a branched aerobic respiratory chain, which consists of monomeric NADH-quinone oxidoreductase, menaquinol-cytochrome c reductase and three terminal oxidases. In some of the low G+C Gram-positive genomes the presence of TCA cycle is only observed in B. subtilis and B. halodurans, whereas the TCA pathway is entirely missing from both Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae genomes, and is incomplete in L. monocytognes, L. innocua, Clostridium acetobutylicum, and Clostridium perfringens [22]. One terminal oxidase, cytochrome bd-dependent enzyme similar to B. subtilis YthAB is likely a quinol oxidase, while two other enzymes, cytochrome caa3 and cytochrome ba3 are cytochrome c oxidases. Although there is no anaerobic respiratory chain observed in the genome, anaerobic growth has been shown to occur via fermentation of sugars [16]. Anaerobic fermentation of branched-chain amino acids and threonine is also possible in E. sibiricum. Fermentation pathways found in the genome include pyruvate-formate lyase and acetoin (butanediol). The pyruvate-formate lyase, an enzyme critical in mixed acid fermentation, is present in many enteric γ-proteobacteria and several low G+C Gram-positive sequenced genomes, such as Lactococcus lactis, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, Staphylococcus aureus, and C. perfringens [22]. This pathway, however, is missing in B. subtilis and B. halodurans [22]. Miscellaneous observations E. sibiricum has genes that encode the production of both glycerol teichoic and ribitol teichoic acids. It has only one fatty acid desaturase, no fatty acid hydroxylases, and no cyclopropane-fatty acid synthase, but it seems to produce mostly branched-chain fatty acids [21]. It might also be capable of producing rhodopsin and one or more different carotenoids (E. sibiricum has two squalene/phytoene synthases, one of them is clustered with a putative diapophytoene desaturase and the other with a phytoene dehydrogenase). The orange pigmentation, observed in Exiguobacterium colonies [16], suggests that it does make carotenoid compounds. The most abundant family of transcriptional regulators in E. sibiricum is the MarR family [see Additional file 1: Table S1]. E. sibiricum has one unexpected response regulator, spo0A, which in Bacillus works as a master regulator of sporulation and controls more than 100 genes. Exig_0912 is an ortholog of spo0A with 46% identity to B. subtilis protein. Orthologs of some genes in the phosphorelay cascade activating spo0A (kinA, kinB, spo0B) are also present. A homolog of Spo0F seems to be present as well, with only 38% identity to B. subtilis protein. Orthologs of the classic B. subtilis sporulation operons under the control of spo0A (spoIIA and spoIIG) are not present in E. sibiricum, so most likely it does not sporulate. This microorganism has several genes that may be involved in thermal adaptation, e.g. heat and cold-shock. The genes listed in Table 2 are present in E. sibiricum's genome and hence may be expressed under temperature stresses. These include several ribosomal binding proteins involved in translation, genes responsible for maintaining the membrane homeoviscous adaptation, sigma factors, genes involved in DNA replication, and genes involved in E. sibiricum's metabolism that may have special temperature adaptation roles. Since the genome analysis showed several stress related genes, we integrated the genome analysis with E. sibiricum's known physiology and its transcriptome responses. Transcriptome analysis To gain further insight into which of the organism's genes may be involved in temperature adaptations, transcriptome analyses were performed with cells grown at -2.5°C, 10°C, 28°C, and 39°C. The 28°C and 10°C temperatures were chosen as the mean of the maximum and the minimum temperature where the biphasic shift in the growth rate occurred (Figure (Figure3).3
The overall transcriptome studies showed that 27%, 3.2%, and 5.2% of E. sibiricum strain 255-15 CDS spotted on the DNA microarray were differentially expressed in cells grown at -2.5°C, 10°C, and 39°C, respectively, when compared to cells grown at 28°C (Figure (Figure5).5
Changes in gene expression commonly observed in cells enduring heat and cold shock were observed in E. sibiricum during growth at the upper temperature limit and at subzero temperature, respectively. These changes were in transcripts associated with carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis and catabolism, membrane and cell wall adaptation, as well as DNA replication, transcription, and translation (Figure (Figure44 Carbohydrate metabolism E. sibiricum seems to have different carbon source preferences related to growth temperatures [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. For instance, E. sibiricum can grow on glycerol at 24°C but not at 4°C [21]. In the transcriptome analysis, the genes from the glycerol metabolism, such as the glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (glpA), was up regulated at 39°C, but down regulated at 10°C. At -2.5°C, however, the pathway for glycerol degradation was again up regulated and its differential gene expression was higher than at all the other temperatures (glpKFA). The same pattern was seen for D-galactose catabolism genes. Temperature also seemed to affect which carbon compounds were taken up by the cell since we observed up-regulation of all the genes involved in the PTS transport system of glucose at -2.5°C, 10°C, and 28°C when compared to 39°C. The PTS system was down regulated at 39°C but glucose still appeared to be taken up by up-regulated glucose permeases, as was the case for other sugars such as maltose, melobiose, and polymers, since maltose-binding proteins, Na+/melobiose transporter, and alpha-amylases were up regulated at 39°C. The fact that enzyme structure and function can be affected by, either low or high temperatures, suggests that cells will increase the synthesis of proteins to compensate for a decrease in activity and stability [25], but in this case the cell may be coping with the different temperatures by changing its carbon source utilization or uptake mechanism. Another interesting observation was that several glucosidases (alpha-amylases) were differentially expressed at different temperatures; some were highly expressed and others were down regulated at -2.5°C. In a few cases, we observed gene expression for this type of enzyme to gradually change with temperature. For instance, the alpha-amylase encoded by the gene Exig_1739 was up regulated at -2.5°C, while Exig_2537 was down regulated at -2.5°C and slightly up-regulated at 10°C and 40°C when compared to 28°C [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. The analysis of these proteins showed that Exig_1739 has 22 amino acid residues more than Exig_2537 (Table 3). The secondary structure prediction of Exig_1739 showed that it has additional alpha-helices and extended strands when compared to Exig_2637 (Figure (Figure7).7
In the genome analysis we showed that E. sibiricum can produce intra and extracellular polymers composed by carbohydrates. Storage granules were observed previously by transmission electron microscopy [16], as was an external capsule (Figure (Figure2).2 Energy metabolism Further insight into the observed anaerobic growth of E. sibiricum came from the transcriptome analysis at 39°C (Figure (Figure44 Another indication that E. sibiricum changes its cell bioenergetics at the temperature extremes is the fact that ATPase sythase and cytochrome synthesis (cyoCBAE) operons were down regulated at -2.5°C and 39°C (Figure (Figure4).4 At 39°C all the genes for inorganic phosphate starvation response [30] are up regulated (pstABC and phoU, Figure Figure4),4 Amino acid biosynthesis and catabolism Amino acids in the cells are not only important as building blocks and energy sources but also as osmoprotectants [11]. The uptake and accumulation of compatible solutes, such as glycine betaine and carnatine in cold-stressed cells are known adaptive responses to low temperatures of many microorganisms [31-33]. At -2.5°C and 10°C the transport system of osmoprotectants, such as glycine betaine, carnitine, and choline, were up regulated and completely down regulated at 39°C (Figure (Figure44 E. sibiricum also seems to be changing its amino acids metabolism, especially at -2.5°C. Histidine, serine, arginine, and lysine biosynthesis genes were up regulated at -2.5°C when compared to the other temperatures. Hence, cold stress seems to lead to flux and pool size redistribution throughout the entire network of amino acid metabolism. A similar effect was observed in cowpea cells under heat shock, which modified their metabolism and concentrations of diverse amino acids in the cells [36]. The reason for a change in cell metabolism is uncertain, but it may be for synthesizing more flexible proteins for function at lower temperatures. Cell membrane and cell wall adaptation It is well known that after cold shock, bacterial cells modify their membranes by increasing unsaturation in the membrane phospholipids and decreasing chain length of fatty acids [37-40] to help maintain the homeoviscosity and hence, function [39-41]. This phenomenon has been extensively studied in Anabaena variabilis and Synechocystis PCC 6803. Mutants defective in the desaturation of fatty acids (desA) have a lower growth rate at low temperatures [42]. Furthermore, Vibrio sp. and Micrococcus cryophilus adapt to low temperatures by decreasing the chain length of their membrane fatty acids [38,39]. Further studies of cold-shock show an increased degree of unsaturation in the cold-adapted lipid A of E. coli [43] and changes in the branched fatty acid profile of B. subtilis[44]. E. sibiricum also seems to change its saturation and chain length under different temperature conditions (Figure (Figure4).4 Another noticeable change in E. sibiricum 255-15 that occurred only at -2.5°C was the increase in expression of peptidoglycan biosynthesis genes (murADEI) as well as lysine biosynthesis genes (dapABD), which is one of the main amino acids in the E. sibiricum peptidoglycan structure [16] [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. A thickening of the cell wall at -2.5°C was observed by an increased difficulty in lysing the cell with lyzozyme during the RNA extraction. This thickening of the cell wall may protect the cell against disruption by ice formation and/or osmotic pressure that can be generated at subzero temperatures. DNA replication, transcription, and translation dynamics Under cold conditions, DNA becomes more negatively supercoiled [40,41], while under heat stress the DNA becomes less negative supercoiled [45]. In both cases, the DNA must be stabilized in a more functional conformation. In the case of cold stress, nucleoid-associated proteins such as Gyrase A, IHF, and H-NS are suggested to be necessary for its relaxation [46-48]; while for heat stress, only gyrase A has been described as being important. In E. sibiricum, only at -2.5°C and 39°C DNA topoisomerases were up-regulated (gyrase B for both temperatures and gyrase A only at -2.5°C DNA), suggesting that E. sibiricum uses its DNA topoisomerases to adapt its DNA supercoiling to the temperature extremes [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. We observed several genes encoding transcriptional regulators in E. sibiricum, including ARO8, MarR, and GntR family proteins [see Additional file 1: Table S1], which showed significant expression changes at 39°C. The MarR family transcriptional regulators were also induced in B. subtilis and Thermothoga maritima during heat stress response [49,50]. In the case of T. maritima [50], the expression changes of MarR family proteins were dramatically higher during a long-term heat adaptation experiment, which were similar to the responses we observed in E. sibiricum at 39°C [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. This suggests that the MarR family proteins may play a role in the cell's adaptation under high temperatures. At cold temperatures, for instance, the transcription factor NusA is known to be involved in both termination and antitermination of transcripts in E. coli, and is highly expressed under low temperatures [38,51]. We also found this gene up regulated at -2.5°C and 10°C in E. sibiricum. Additionally, the RNA polymerase sigma 54 (rpoN) was up regulated and the RNA polymerase sigma 70 (housekeeping sigma) was down regulated only at -2.5°C, suggesting that sigma 54 may be responsible for the transcription of genes under cold or subzero conditions [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. Besides transcription, cells need to cope with the translation of the transcripts produced, and for that the cells need to have all ribosome-associated proteins required for the formation of the translation complex. During cold-shock, several studies demonstrated that the genes favoring the formation of the translation complex at cold temperatures are fully functional, such as DeaD-box RNA helicase, ribosome binding factor A (rbfA), initiation factor 2 (IF-2) [38,41,52] among several other ribosomal proteins. RNA helicases were up-regulated in E. sibiricum at -2.5°C and 10°C, which may help unwind the RNA secondary structure for efficient translation at low temperatures [38,53]. However, it was only at -2.5°C that IF-2, IF-3, and rbfA were significantly up regulated in E. sibiricum [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. Different temperatures, especially at -2.5°C and 39°C, also affected the transcription of ribosomal proteins. The transcript of the ribosomal protein L25 (rplY) was up regulated at 39°C and -2.5°C; while Rpl8A (L7Ae protein family) was up regulated only at -2.5°C. On the other hand, the ribosomal protein transcript of rpmF was down regulated at -2.5°C [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. This change in ribosomal protein expression in the cold has also been observed in several other microorganisms, e.g. Lactobacillus plantarum [54], Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 [55], and B. subtilis [56], among others. Since these proteins seem to be expressed under cold conditions in different microorganisms and are part of the ribosomal proteins, they probably play an important role in the translation complex at cold temperatures. After the mRNA is transcribed and translated it needs to be degraded. It has been shown that during cold-shock, the RNA produced is degraded by a 'cold-adapted' RNA degradosome that contains PNPase (polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase) [41,46]. E. sibiricum also increased its pnp gene expression at -2.5°C, which suggests that E. sibiricum may need this gene product for growth in cold temperatures [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. The proteins that come out of the translational machinery need to be folded properly to be fully functional. At high temperatures this can be a problem since protein denaturation can occur. E. sibiricum seems to overcome this problem at 39°C by inducing genes of diverse heat shock proteins. These proteins are homologous to B. subtilis and T. maritima class I heat-shock genes hrcA-gprE-dnaJ-dnaK and groEL-groES. In E. sibiricum 255-15, two operons are observed in the reverse strand: the first contains the genes dnaK, grpE and hrcA; the other operon contains adk (Cpn60) and groL. Both operons presented similar expression levels at 39°C. The gene for dnaJ was also highly expressed at 39°C, but it is not part of the same operon that contains dnaK, as seen in B. subtilis [57]. Additionally, some genes encoding ATP-dependent proteases clpA and clpP were also up regulated in E. coli and B. subtilis under heat stress [50,58,59], as well as in E. sibiricum at 39°C. Futhermore, the genes dnaK, groES, cpn60 were downregulated at -2.5°C and their expression increased with an increase in temperature and became highly expressed at 39°C [see Additional file 1: Table S2]. Miscellaneous observations Even though at 10°C E. sibiricum has flagella (Figure (Figure8),8
Conclusion In conclusion, few differences in gene expression related to cold adaptation were observed in E. sibiricum at the temperatures 10°C and 28°C. Similar results were obtained at 25°C and 4°C in proteome profiles of E. sibiricum [60]. This work demonstrates that this microorganism is constitutively adapted to cold temperatures since at stressful temperatures for mesophiles, such as 4°C and 10°C, genes related to temperature stress are not differentially expressed. Even though the growth rates change between 10°C and 28°C, it was surprising to see very little difference in gene expression and no expression of genes related to stress, especially because these two temperatures belong to two different phases of the biphasic Arrhenius plot (Figure (Figure3).3 Methods Bacterial strain and genome sequence E. sibiricum 255-15 was isolated from a depth of 43.6 m in the permafrost sediment of the Kolyma Indigirka Lowland [16]. At this depth, sediments are -10 to -12°C and are estimated to have been continuously frozen for 2 to 3 million years. The complete genome sequence was produced by the Department of Energy's Joint Genome Institute and annotated by the automated pipeline operated by Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Computational Genomics Group. The annotation used in this work is available at JGI/ORNL dated December 20th, 2007 http://genome.ornl.gov/microbial/exig/. The genome sequence is available online at NCBI [GenBank: CP001022 to CP001024]. The strain has been deposited in 3 culture collections under the accessions: DSM 17290, JCM 13490, and VKM B-2376. Arrhenius profile E. sibiricum strain 255-15 was grown in flasks containing 1/2 Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) (Difco, Detroit, MI) shaken at 200 rpm, at temperatures from 39°C to -2.5°C (precision +/- 0.2°C). Growth rates were calculated from the slope of optical densities for four or more time points for each temperature and summarized as an Arrhenius relationship. Transmission electron microscopy Inoculated agar plates were incubated at 30°C, 12°C, and -2.5°C, until they reached a colony size of 1 to 2 mm of diameter. Cell morphology and flagella were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Probe design and array construction The genome of Exiguobacterium strain 255-15 was used to select gene-specific or group-specific oligonucleotide (70 mer) probes using CommOligo [61] with group-specific probe design features. The design criteria were as follows: (i) 85% sequence similarity, 18-base stretch, and -35 kcal/mol free energy for gene-specific probes; and (ii) 96% sequence similarity, 55-base stretch, and -90 kcal/mol free energy for group-specific probes. Based on those criteria, 2931 CDS had gene-specific probes; 25 CDS were covered by six group-specific probes; no qualified probes were selected for 22 CDS. In addition, 10 human and 10 Arabidopsis probes were designed as controls. Those probes are expected to be very specific since the criteria used were even stricter than those previously suggested [62]. All designed oligonucleotides were commercially synthesized without modification by MWG Biotech Inc. (High Point, NC). The concentration of oligonucleotides was adjusted to 100 pmol μl-1. Oligonucleotide probes prepared in 50% DMSO (Sigma Chemical Co., MO) were spotted onto UltraGAPS glass slides (Corning Life Science, NY) using a Microgrid II robotic arrayer (Genomic Solutions Inc., MI). Each oligonucleotide probe had two spots on a single slide. Additionally, six different concentrations (5~300 ng μl-1) of genomic DNA were also spotted (four duplicates on a single slide) as positive controls. After printing, the oligonucleotide probes were fixed onto the slide by UV cross-linking (600 mJ of energy) according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Corning Life Science, NY). Growth conditions All the cells for the DNA microarray experiments came from the same E. sibiricum 255-15 frozen stock that was used for the genome sequencing. All experiments were performed by first plating the cells in 1/2 Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) and then transferred to 1/2 Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) twice. In total, six samples were grown independently at 39°C, 28°C, 10°C, and -2.5°C. For the growth at 39°C and 28°C the plates were incubated overnight. At 10°C, the plates were incubated for 3 to 4 days. At -2.5°C, the plates were transferred three times to new plates to acclimate the cells to lower temperature as follows: the first plates were incubated overnight at 22°C followed by incubation at 4°C for 3 days and then for 2–3 weeks at -2.5°C. After growing the cells in agar at the four temperatures, a loop from each plate was transferred to tubes containing 5 ml 1/2 TSB and grown in its respective temperatures until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 was attained. Then 1 ml of this culture was used to inoculate 100 ml of 1/2 TSB in a Nephlo Flask (Belco). The samples were incubated until reaching mid-log growth (0.1 < OD600 < 0.3) when 100 ml of RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, Texas) was added at the same temperature as the grown cells. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C and resuspended in 1 ml of RNAlater, transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube, and re-pelleted at 5,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. RNA isolation The cells were re-suspended in 100 μl of RNase-free 3 mg ml-1 Lysozyme in TE buffer pH 8 (50 mM Tris-Cl and 1 mM EDTA) by vortexing and then incubated at room temperature for at least 20 min or until the pellet cleared. The RNA was then isolated using the RNeasy mini Prep kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions; the step of DNase digestion was included. The resulting RNA was checked by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis for DNA contamination and for the presence and integrity of the rRNA bands. The amount of RNA was quantified using a UV-spectrophotometer at OD260. cDNA labeling and slide hybridization Amino-allyl labeling was performed as adapted from a protocol of The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) http://www.tigr.org/tdb/microarray/protocolsTIGR.shtml. Briefly, 10 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA overnight at 42°C using 0.5 mM of Random Hexamer Primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 3:2 ratio of 5-(3-amino-allyl)-dUTP and dTTP (Ambion), and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), and subsequently labeled by coupling reactive Cy5 or Cy3 fluorophores (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) to the amino-allyl groups. Purification after cDNA synthesis and chemical coupling were performed using QiaQuick PCR purification columns (Qiagen) as described in TIGR protocol. The quantity of labeled cDNA and the fluorophore incorporation efficiency were determined by using UV-visible spectrophotometry. Microarray slides were incubated for 60 min at 46°C with prehybridization solution (50% Ultrapure formamide (Invitrogen), 5× SSC, 0.1% SDS and 0.1 mg ml-1), washed three times in double-distilled water and one time in isopropanol, and dried by centrifugation at 50 × g for 3 min. Two cDNA's from different temperatures were mixed for direct comparisons for all temperature combinations. Each microarray received about 30 μl of hybridization solution (50% Ultrapure Formamide, 5× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 0.1 μg μl-1 Salmon sperm DNA) containing the two cDNAs. The solution was applied by capillary action under a coverslip (LifterSlip; Erie Scientific Company, Portsmouth, NH) placed over the microarray. The whole assembly was sealed in a hybridization chamber (CMT Hybridization Chamber; Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY) and submerged for 16 h in a 46°C water bath. Microarray slides were washed twice for 5 min at 46°C with 1× SSC – 0.1% SDS; twice for 10 min at room temperature with 0.1× SSC – 0.1% SDS and five times for 1 min at room temperature with 0.1 × SSC. Slides were dried by centrifugation at 50 × g for 3 min and were immediately scanned and analyzed. All microarray data and the 70 mer array v. 1.0 information are available at GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) [GEO: GSE10133, GEO: GSM256115- GSM25615, GEO: GPL6358]. Data analysis Slides were scanned with an Axon 4000B scanner and GenePix 5.0 used for spot finding. Only spots with more than 80% of pixels greater than background plus 2 standard deviations in either Cy5 or Cy3 channel were used for analysis. Analysis was performed with Limma (Linear models for microarrays data) library in the CARMAweb environment [63]. The background correction was done by background subtraction of the median value, followed by within and between arrays data normalization using the print tip Lowess method, and quantile method, respectively. A moderated t-test based on empirical Bayes approach (from the Bioconductors Limma package) with an adjustment of the calculated raw P-values was used with the following methods: Benjamini and Hochberg [64], Westfall and Young [65] as well as Bonferroni. Only P-values smaller that 0.01 for all these methods and an expression change higher than 2 folds were considered statistically significant for further analysis. Protein and codon usage analyses For the codon usage analyses of the CDS from the E. sibiricum genome and the two alpha-amylases (Exig_1739 and Exig_2537) we used the program CUSP (create a codon usage table) within the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suit (EMBOSS) [66]. The chi-square test comparing the codon usage results of the genome with each alpha-amylase was done with GraphPad Software, Inc. (La Jolla, CA) using 41 degrees of freedom (59 codons that code for 18 amino acids). The start codon and the tryptophan codon were omitted in the analysis because they occur only once, and therefore there is no codon bias. The stop codons were also omitted in the analysis because they occur only once per ORF, but are listed at a higher frequency in the concatenated genome sequences. Thus, the stop codons in the codon bias analysis would artificially inflate the chi-square statistics. The results were considered statistically significant for the calculated chi-square values that were greater than the values in the chi-square table for 41 degrees of freedom with P value of 0.01. For the protein statistics and for the secondary protein structure prediction we used pepstat and predator [67] programs within Mobyle portal [68]. Authors' contributions DFR generated all TEM images, analyzed the genome for stress related genes, annotated manually all genes described in this manuscript, designed the microarray experiments, analyzed, interpreted, and linked all the microarray data into pathways, did the protein analyses, and wrote the manuscript. NI analyzed the genome in a holistic view, prepared Figure Figure11 Additional file 1 Table S1 for regulation systems found in E. sibiricum genome, and Tables S2 and S3 for the transcriptome comparison results Click here for file(544K, doc) Acknowledgements This research was supported by a cooperative agreement with NASA Astrobiology Institute number NCC2-1274. The microarray synthesis was also supported by The United States Department of Energy under Genomics: GTL program through the Virtual Institute of Microbial Stress and Survival (VIMSS; http://vimss.lbl.gov) of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Office of Science. Thanks to Alla Lapidus, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Linda Peters, Duncan Scott and Thanos Lykidis for their contributions to the Exiguobacterium sibiricum genome. Thanks to Miriam L. Land for providing the locus tag mapping tables. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000 Dec; 64(12):2668-74.
[Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Jan 30; 326(1237):595-608, discussion 608-11.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990]Extremophiles. 2000 Jun; 4(3):165-73.
[Extremophiles. 2000]Bacteriol Rev. 1975 Jun; 39(2):144-67.
[Bacteriol Rev. 1975]J Appl Bacteriol. 1991 Nov; 71(5):386-97.
[J Appl Bacteriol. 1991]Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007 Jun; 71(2):377-97.
[Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2; 102(31):10913-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28; 101(52):18036-41.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Genome Res. 2005 Oct; 15(10):1325-35.
[Genome Res. 2005]BMC Genomics. 2008 May 6; 9():210.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Sep; 62(9):3319-24.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996]J Bacteriol. 1979 Jul; 139(1):185-94.
[J Bacteriol. 1979]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Feb; 59(2):489-99.
[FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007]Astrobiology. 2006 Jun; 6(3):400-14.
[Astrobiology. 2006]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Jun 1; 53(1):103-15.
[FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20; 101(16):6182-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2; 102(31):10913-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28; 101(52):18036-41.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]BMC Genomics. 2008 May 6; 9():210.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]J Biol Chem. 2006 Feb 17; 281(7):4042-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Apr; 139(4):807-13.
[J Gen Microbiol. 1993]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20; 101(16):6182-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Jun 1; 53(1):103-15.
[FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Jun 1; 53(1):103-15.
[FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jul; 63(7):2660-2664.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Oct 17; 1342(2):119-31.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997]Protein Eng. 2001 Mar; 14(3):141-8.
[Protein Eng. 2001]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]Bioessays. 1998 Jan; 20(1):49-57.
[Bioessays. 1998]J Bacteriol. 2003 Aug; 185(15):4305-14.
[J Bacteriol. 2003]J Bacteriol. 1994 Jan; 176(2):426-31.
[J Bacteriol. 1994]Arch Microbiol. 1988; 150(4):348-57.
[Arch Microbiol. 1988]Cryobiology. 1977 Jun; 14(3):251-72.
[Cryobiology. 1977]Plant Physiol. 1990 Oct; 94(2):796-810.
[Plant Physiol. 1990]Biochem J. 1995 May 15; 308 ( Pt 1)():1-8.
[Biochem J. 1995]Mikrobiologiia. 2003 Jan-Feb; 72(1):5-13.
[Mikrobiologiia. 2003]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar; 74(6):1677-86.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008]J Biol Chem. 1999 Apr 2; 274(14):9677-85.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Bacteriol. 1999 Sep; 181(17):5341-9.
[J Bacteriol. 1999]FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Jun 1; 53(1):103-15.
[FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]Mikrobiologiia. 2003 Jan-Feb; 72(1):5-13.
[Mikrobiologiia. 2003]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar; 74(6):1677-86.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008]Mol Microbiol. 1999 Aug; 33(4):766-77.
[Mol Microbiol. 1999]J Mol Biol. 2003 Aug 15; 331(3):527-39.
[J Mol Biol. 2003]Sci Prog. 2003; 86(Pt 1-2):9-75.
[Sci Prog. 2003]J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec; 183(24):7318-28.
[J Bacteriol. 2001]Extremophiles. 2004 Jun; 8(3):209-17.
[Extremophiles. 2004]Microbiol Rev. 1984 Dec; 48(4):299-325.
[Microbiol Rev. 1984]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar; 74(6):1677-86.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008]Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001 Apr; 4(2):166-71.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jan; 83(1):120-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar; 70(3):1336-46.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004]Proteome Sci. 2006 Apr 19; 4():6.
[Proteome Sci. 2006]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar; 74(6):1677-86.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008]J Mol Biol. 2003 Aug 15; 331(3):527-39.
[J Mol Biol. 2003]Cell Stress Chaperones. 2003 Fall; 8(3):207-17.
[Cell Stress Chaperones. 2003]Extremophiles. 2004 Jun; 8(3):209-17.
[Extremophiles. 2004]Mol Microbiol. 1999 Jan; 31(1):117-31.
[Mol Microbiol. 1999]Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999 Apr; 2(2):153-8.
[Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999]Proteomics. 2006 Oct; 6(19):5221-33.
[Proteomics. 2006]Bioessays. 1998 Jan; 20(1):49-57.
[Bioessays. 1998]Mikrobiologiia. 2003 Jan-Feb; 72(1):5-13.
[Mikrobiologiia. 2003]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(19):6114-23.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul; 71(7):3753-60.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1; 34(Web Server issue):W498-503.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Trends Genet. 2000 Jun; 16(6):276-7.
[Trends Genet. 2000]Proteins. 1995 Dec; 23(4):566-79.
[Proteins. 1995]