![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autonomous functions for the Sec14p/spectrin-repeat region of Kalirin 1 Department of Molecular, Microbial, and Structural Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030 2 Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030 *Address correspondence to Dr. Schiller or Dr. Eipper, co-corresponding authors: Martin R. Schiller, University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Molecular, Microbial, and Structural Biology, 263 Farmington Ave. Farmington, CT 06030-3305, Email: schiller/at/nso.uchc.edu The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Exp Cell Res. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Kalirin is a GDP/GTP exchange factor (GEF) for Rho proteins that modulates the actin cytoskeleton in neurons. Alternative splicing generates Δ-isoforms, which encode the RhoGEF domain, but lack the N-terminal Sec14p domain and first 4 spectrin-like repeats of the full-length isoforms. Splicing has functional consequences, with Kal7 but not ΔKal7 causing formation of dendritic spines. Cells lacking endogenous Kalirin were used to explore differences between these splice variants. Expression of ΔKal7 in this system induces extensive lamellipodial sheets, while expression of Kal7 induces formation of adherent compact, round cells with abundant cortical actin. Based on in vitro and cell-based assays, Kal7 and ΔKal7 are equally active GEFs, suggesting that other domains are involved in controlling cell morphology. Catalytically inactive Kal7 and a Kalirin fragment which includes only Sec14p and spectrin-like domains retain the ability to produce compact, round cells and fractionate as high molecular weight complexes. Separating the Sec14p domain from the spectrin-like repeats eliminates the ability of Kal7 to cause this response. The isolated Sec14p domain binds PIP2(3,5) and PIP3, but does not alter cell morphology. We conclude that the Sec14p and N-terminal spectrin-like domains of Kalirin play critical roles in distinguishing the actions of full-length and Δ-Kalirin. Keywords: alternative splicing, guanine nucleotide exchange factor, cytoskeleton, transferrin uptake, phosphatidylinositide, Kalirin 4 INTRODUCTION Kalirin is a GDP/GTP exchange factor (GEF) for small GTP binding proteins of the Rho subfamily and plays an essential role in establishing and maintaining neuronal morphology. Reduced Kalirin levels block axon initiation and outgrowth from sympathetic neurons, and reduce dendritic complexity and linear spine density in mature hippocampal pyramidal neurons [1,2]. Over-expression of Kalirin increases axon initiation and outgrowth in sympathetic neurons and increases linear spine density in hippocampal and cortical neurons [1,3]. Studies aimed at elucidating the pathways leading to these dramatic morphological responses have focused on the two RhoGEF domains of Kalirin and the actions of their target Rho GTPases. However, the use of several promoters and alternate 3′-ends produce multiple Kalirin isoforms that include or eliminate domains other than the two RhoGEFs, suggesting that there are other functional attributes of Kalirin proteins that remain to be elucidated. In support of this hypothesis, the expression of many alternatively spliced Kalirin isoforms is tissue-specific and developmentally regulated [4–6]. The major isoform in the adult rat brain, Kal7, has a Sec14p domain, 9 spectrin-like repeats, a single RhoGEF domain and a class I PDZ binding motif (Fig. 1
Here we show that exogenous Kal7 and ΔKal7 produce different phenotypes and adopt different subcellular localizations when expressed in cortical neurons or in non-neuronal cells. In exploring the underlying mechanism, we were surprised to find that neither the GEF activity nor the GEF domain of Kalirin was essential for many of its morphological effects. Differences in the actions of Kal7 and ΔKal7 arise from unique properties of the Sec14p and N-terminal spectrin-like repeat regions, the domains in Kal7 that are missing in ΔKal7. The majority of this region is expressed as a unique endogenous transcript designated Kal4. Both Kal4 and Kal7 oligomerize, are largely insoluble, associate with the cytoskeleton and inhibit endocytosis, whereas ΔKal7 does not. These different properties are consistent with the observed differences in morphological effect. Like spectrin itself, the Sec14p and spectrin-like repeat region of Kalirin can alter cell shape without any contribution from a GEF domain. In addition to assigning functional significance to the expression of Δ-vs. full-length Kalirin isoforms, our findings provide insight into a family of proteins that contain only a Sec14p domain and spectrin-like repeats [7]. EXPERIMENTAL Construction and sources of plasmids Several plasmids were used for transfection experiments; plasmids are numbered using the a-isoform numbering for Kalirin (Genbank U88157). The cDNAs for rat Kalirins 4, Δ7 and 7 were subcloned into the pEAK 10 vector (Edge Biosystems; Gaithersburg, MD) with an N-terminal His-Myc tag [8]. Vectors encoding GST-KalSpec(4–7) and GST-KalSpec(4–6) were described previously [9]. Vectors encoding GST-ΔKal7 and GST-KalSpec5 were constructed from the corresponding expression vectors [10]. Kal7(ND/AA) was generated by moving a fragment containing the N1415A and D1416A mutations from pEAK10.Kal-GEF1 into pEAK10.HisMyc.Kal7 (numbers are according to Accession # AAF66019, Kal12a) [1]. pCIneo.HisMycKalSec14p terminates with -LDYNH162. pCIneo.HisMycKalSec14pSpec1–4 terminates with -RKLLLD623. pCIneo.HA2KalSpec1–4 has a dual HA tag fused to spectrin repeat 1 (E163EWIE- ) and terminates with -RKLLLD623. pEAK10.HisMyc.KalSolo terminates with -ARKKEF1257. pCIneo.HA2ΔSec14pKal7 has the same NH2-terminal as pCIneo.HA2KalSpec1–4, but extends to the STYV1636 at the end of Kal7. All plasmids generated by PCR were verified by DNA sequencing. Kal-GEF1 (residues S1231-K1575) and psCEP.Kal7ΔCT (lacking the last 60 amino acids of Kal7) were previously reported [3,11,12]. Other plasmids used were pEGFP-N2 (Clontech; Palo Alto,CA) and pEAK10 (Edge Biosystems). Cell culture and transient transfection pEAK Rapid cells (Edge Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD) were maintained in DMEM:F12 medium containing 200 U/ml penicillin G, 20 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 25 mM HEPES, and 10% fetal bovine serum. Transient transfection was performed by mixing 330 μl Opti-MEM (Life Technologies) with plasmid (0.1–2.4 μg) and 330 μl Opti-MEM with Lipofectamine 2000 (2 μl per μg DNA; Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA). After 20–30 min at room temperature, the plasmid and lipid mixtures were combined and applied to cells. After 4–6 hr the DNA/lipid mixture was removed, cells were incubated in DMEM:F12, 10% serum for 1 day, and then in serum-free DMEM:F12 containing insulin-transferrin-selenium (Invitrogen), HEPES buffer, penicillin-streptomycin, plus 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA; fatty acid free) for 24 hr. Primary cortical cultures were prepared from P1 rat pups as described [1,2]. Vectors encoding HisMycKal7 or HisMycΔKal7 were introduced into dissociated cells using the rat neuron nucleofection kit (Amaxa Gmbh, Germany) as described [13]. Nucleofected neurons were plated, allowed to recover in DMEM for 3 hours and kept in maintenance medium for up to 3 weeks. Immunostaining Cells were plated in 24 well plates prepared by treating with UV light for 30 min, coating with polylysine (0.1 mg/ml in water) for 5 min and rinsing with DMEM:F12 containing serum. For some experiments cells were plated onto glass coverslips treated in the same way. After transient transfection, cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde/phosphate buffered saline (PBS), permeabilized with PBS/0.75% Triton X-100, and blocked with 2 mg/ml BSA/PBS (block buffer) [14]. Each well was incubated with antibodies (9E10 [15], pan-Kalirin JH2581 [8,16]) as indicated and fluorescently-tagged phalloidin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; TRITC, 1:4000; FITC, 1:1000) diluted in block buffer. Unbound antibody was removed by washing with PBS, and primary antibody was visualized by incubating with an anti-rabbit-fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA; 1:500) or an anti-rabbit-AlexaFluor 350 conjugate (Molecular Probes; Eugene, Oregon) as indicated. After washing in PBS, cells were visualized with a Nikon epifluorescence microscope using a 40X objective. Some digital images were recorded using a Spot CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments; Sterling Heights, MI). Where indicated, confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) as described [1,2,17]. Z-stacks were taken using a 63X objective (0.3 digital zoom factor); images of the entire cell were generated with Zmaris 3.2 software (Bitplane AG, Zürich). When quantitative data were to be obtained, images of 10 randomly selected fields from all samples were acquired under the same non-saturating conditions. Micrographs were coded and scored blind. For deconvolution, images (0.5 μm z-step; 15 to 20 μm thick) recorded using a Hamamatsu digital camera with Openlab 5.0.2 were processed using Volocity 4.1.0 (Improvision; Lexington, MA); individual layers are shown. Endocytosis of transferrin pEAK Rapid cells transfected 24 h or 48 h earlier were rinsed with L15 and placed into an air incubator. Cells were then incubated in L15 containing transferrin (50 μg/ml; Molecular Probes; AlexaFluor488 or AlexFluor546) for 10 min. Following two quick rinses, cells were fixed as described above. Transfected cells were identified by GFP fluorescence or by staining the epitope-tagged protein as described above; nuclei were visualized with the Hoechst stain. Western blot analysis and protein solubility Cell extracts were fractionated on 4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (BioRad; Hercules, CA) or 4–12% NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes (New England Nuclear; Boston, MA). Blocking, incubating with antibodies, washing and visualization with ECL reagent (Amersham; Piscataway, NJ) were as described [14]. The rabbit antibody to the spectrin repeat region of Kalirin (JH2581) and monoclonal antibody to myc were described [8]. pEAK Rapid cells harvested 24 – 48 h after transfection were extracted into 20 mM NaTES, 10 mM mannitol, 1% TX-100, pH 7.4 (TMT). Soluble proteins (S) were separated from insoluble proteins by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 min or by centrifugation at 430,000 × g for 15 min; the pellet (I) was solubilized using Laemmli sample buffer. Aliquots accounting for an equal percentage of each fraction were subjected to Western blot analysis using antibody to myc or HA. Cells expressing Kal7 or ΔKal7 were also analyzed using a modification of a protocol developed to extract spectrin from erythrocytes [18]. Cells scraped into spent medium were pelleted and sonicated in ice cold 20 mM NaTES, 10 mM mannitol (0.3 ml/well of a six-well plate). Nuclei and large debris were removed by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 30 sec; the supernatant was centrifuged at 435,000 × g for 15 min in a Beckman TL-100 centrifuge. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended and allowed to extract in 0.3 mM Na phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 9.5 containing PMSF, X and Na orthovanadate for 30 min of ice. The sample was again centrifuged at 435,000 × g for 15 min and the pellet was solubilized by incubation with SDS lysis buffer at 95°C for 5 min. GEF assays The GEF activity of ΔKal7and Kal7 was measured using cell-based assays and in vitro fluorescence assays. For cell based assays, activation of Rac in pEAK Rapid cells transfected with Kalirin plasmids was analyzed using GST-effector protein binding assay kits (Upstate Biosystems, Lake Placid, NY). Lysates prepared in MLB buffer (25 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P40, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5) with 0.3 mg/ml phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1.0 mM sodium vanadate, and protease inhibitors [19] were incubated with glutathione-agarose beads containing immobilized Pak-CRIB domain (residues 67–150; 10.0 μg) and unbound protein was removed with 3 washes of MLB buffer. Extract (50 μl) was incubated with 10 mM EDTA and 0.1 mM GTPγS (positive control) or 1 mM GDP (negative control) for 20 min at 30°C, chilled and brought to 100 mM MgCl2 prior to incubation with GST-effector protein bound to glutathione-agarose beads. Transfected Kalirin proteins and bound Rac (Transduction Laboratories; R56220; 1:1000) were analyzed by Western blot. For in vitro fluorescence based GEF assays, the activity of purified Kalirin proteins was assayed by following the release of the methylanthraniloyl analog of GDP (GDP-MANT) from loaded GST-Rac1 with modifications of a previously described assay [20,21]. GST- Rac1 expressed in E. coli was purified using glutathione Sepharose [1], dialyzed against 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.6, to remove any bound nucleotide, and then dialyzed against 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT. His-tagged Kalirin proteins were purified from transfected pEAK-Rapid cells using His-bind resin as described by the manufacturer (Novagen, Madison, WI), with elution in buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. Before each assay, the dialyzed GST-Rho protein (5–67 μM) was loaded with GDP-MANT (50–100 μM) in a volume of 80 μl. Reactions were supplemented to 10 mM MgCl2 and unbound GDP-MANT was removed using a G50 NICK™ column (Pharmacia) equilibrated and eluted in reaction buffer containing 10 mM MgCl2. Fluorescence was measured by excitation at 355 nm and recording emission at 460 nm using a Wallac Victor2 1420 Multilabel 96-well plate reader. Reactions were initiated by adding GTP to 800 μM and starting the reaction with 20 μl of Kalirin in reaction buffer. Reaction rates were determined by subtraction of the intrinsic rate of loss of fluorescence (reaction lacking enzyme). Subcellular Fractionation and Gel Filtration Parietal cortex from adult rat brain was subjected to subcellular fractionation as described [1,3]; the efficacy of the separation was verified using antisera to PSD95, synaptophysin, calnexin, NMDAR1 and glutamic acid decarboxylase. To obtain cytosol for gel filtration, adult rat cerebral cortex was homogenized in 320 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris HCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0 and centrifuged at 435,000 × g for 20 min; aliquots (1 mg protein) of the soluble fraction were applied to the gel filtration column. Extracts of transfected pEAK Rapid cells prepared using TMT as described above were also applied to the column. Samples were analyzed on a 1.5 × 17 cm column of Sephacryl S-400 equilibrated and eluted with 20 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, 0.05% TX-100, pH 7.0. Bovine serum albumin (1 mg) and phenol red (to mark the total volume, Vt) were added to each lysate as internal standards. The column was calibrated using blue dextran (V0), thyroglobulin, catalase, bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin and cytochrome c; the void volume (V0) was 0.32 × Vt and BSA eluted at 0.54+0.01 (VBSA/Vt). For unknowns, the elution positions of BSA and phenol red were determined by monitoring A280 and A560; elution positions are expressed as VX/Vt. Oligomerization of Kalirin GST-ΔKal7, GST-KalSpec(4–7), GST-KalSpec(4–6) and GST-KalSpec5 bound to glutathione agarose equilibrated with phosphate buffered saline were cleaved with thrombin (1 mg GST-fusion protein; 10 units thrombin); released protein was recovered and pooled with a subsequent wash. After dialysis into 0.1 M NaHCO3/0.5 M NaCl, recombinant protein was linked to 0.5 ml Affi-Gel 15 (BioRad); unreacted sites were blocked by incubation with 0.1 M ethanolamine HCl, pH 8.0. Linkage efficiency was verified by analyzing unbound protein. Binding assays were carried out in TMT; after incubation at 4°C for 2 h, beads were washed twice with TMT and once with the same buffer lacking TX-100. Bound protein was eluted using Laemmli sample buffer. HisMycΔKal7 expressed in insect cells using the Baculovirus expression system was purified using Talon resin as described (Clontech). PIP Strips Lipid strips from Echelon Bioscience (Salt Lake City, UT; P-6001) were blocked with 3% BSA (fatty acid free) in TTBS for 1 h at RT and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with GST or GST-Sec14p (10 μg/ml) in the same buffer. The strips were rinsed 6 times for 5 min in TTBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with monoclonal antibody to GST (Upstate). Bound antibody was visualized as described above; images were acquired using a GeneGnome digital imaging system. RESULTS Exogenous ΔKal7 and Kal7 produce different phenotypes when over-expressed in cortical neurons Expression of ΔKal7 and Kal7 in rodent brain is first detectable around post-natal day 14 [1,3]. To determine whether the different isoforms have different effects on neuronal morphology, dissociated neurons were transfected with vectors encoding ΔKal7 or Kal7 and examined sixteen days later. Low power images reveal ΔKal7 in the cell soma and extending into dendrites (marked by staining for MAP2, a dendritic marker) (Fig. 1B, C Endogenous ΔKal7 and Kal7 have different properties We next wanted to investigate the properties of these splice variants that lead to these differing morphologies. Both Kal7 and ΔKal7 are expressed in the adult rat brain. We first compared their subcellular localizations using standard procedures to prepare fractions enriched in post-synaptic densities, synaptic vesicles and cytosol (Fig. 2A
To further compare the properties of rat brain Kal7 and ΔKal7, we fractionated cytosol on calibrated gel filtration columns (Fig. 2B ΔKal7 and Kal7 produce different phenotypes in non-neuronal cells Spine formation is a complex process involving developmental changes in both the presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. Therefore we sought a simple system in which to systematically compare the properties of ΔKal7 and Kal7. pEAK Rapid cells were used previously to define the actions of the GEF1 domain of Kalirin [11]; these non-neuronal cells express very little endogenous Kalirin. Transfected cells were fixed and visualized with myc antibody to localize the transfected protein and with fluorescently tagged phalloidin to visualize filamentous actin. As observed in neurons, ΔKal7 and Kal7 produce distinctly different phenotypes. Expression of ΔKal7, much like expression of KalGEF1 or Rac1, produces cells with extensive, flattened lamellipodia filled with spokes of filamentous actin (Fig. 3A
Both KalGEF1 and ΔKal7 co-localize with the filamentous actin that forms the spoke-like structures radiating through the lamellipodia (Fig. 3A Quantification of these data shows that the lamellipodial and compact, round phenotypes are highly penetrant (Fig. 3C Expression of Kal7, but not ΔKal7, inhibits endocytosis The accumulation of filamentous actin beneath the plasma membrane following expression of Kal7 suggested that endocytosis might be affected. To explore this possibility, clathrin-mediated endocytosis was assessed by monitoring uptake of transferrin. Transfected cells allowed to internalize FITC-transferrin for 10 min at 37 °C were rinsed and fixed. Micrographs taken under identical conditions (Fig. 4A
The GEF activities of ΔKal7 and Kal7 are indistinguishable Since activated Rho GTPases are potent regulators of the actin cytoskeleton, we first explored the possibility that the GEF activities of ΔKal7 and Kal7 differed. Myc-tagged ΔKal7 and Kal7 were purified from transfected cells (Fig. 5A
Despite having similar in vitro activities, other molecules may differentially modulate the GEF activity of ΔKal7 and Kal7 in cells. The cell-based Pak-CRIB domain Rac activation assay was used to compare the ability of KalGEF1, ΔKal7 and Kal7 to activate Rac in a cellular environment (Fig. 5C GEF activity is not required for Kal7 to affect cell morphology While the global GEF activities of cells expressing ΔKal7 and Kal7 are similar, differential localization of the isoforms could allow GEF activity to play a key role in the morphological and functional differences observed. We therefore asked whether a catalytically active GEF domain were necessary for the unique morphological effects of Kal7. Replacement of Asn1415-Asp1416 near the C-terminus of the DH domain of KalGEF1 with Ala-Ala reduces its GEF activity ~50-fold [11]. The compact, round shape observed following expression of Kal7 is uniformly observed following expression of Kal7(ND/AA) (Fig. 5D ΔKal7 and Kal7 interact with the cytoskeleton in different ways We next compared the ability of Kal7 and ΔKal7 to associate with the particulate fraction following homogenization (Fig. 6
Based on the association of Kal7 with the plasma membrane observed by immunostaining, the protocol developed to extract spectrin from erythrocyte ghosts was used to compare the behavior of ΔKal7 and Kal7 [18]. Transfected cells were homogenized in low ionic strength, high pH buffer and soluble proteins (S) were separated from membranes, which were then solubilized using 1% TX-100 (M); the remaining pellet was solubilized using deoxycholic acid or SDS (P) (Fig. 6B We next asked whether Kal7 and ΔKal7 solubilized from pEAK Rapid cells using TX-100 fractionate in a manner similar to the Kal7 and ΔKal7 present in rat brain cytosol (Fig. 6C The spectrin-repeat region of Kalirin forms oligomers Differences in the behavior of ΔKal7 and Kal7 during gel filtration led us to explore the possibility that Kalirin, like erythrocyte spectrin, forms oligomers [18]. A GST fusion protein containing spectrin repeats 4–7 [KalSpec(4–7)] was used for the initial studies because it proved to be readily soluble. Lysates of cells transiently expressing KalGEF1, ΔKal7 or Kal7 were incubated with KalSpec(4–7) beads (Fig. 7A
Since these interactions could be indirect, we next asked whether purified ΔKal7 bound to KalSpec(4–7) beads (Fig. 7B We next evaluated the ability of Kal7 to interact with the various spectrin repeat regions. Transiently expressed Kal7 was less able than ΔKal7 to interact with ΔKal7, KalSpec5, KalSpec(4–6) or KalSpec(4–7) (Fig. 7D The GEF domain is not required for Kal7 to affect cell morphology To evaluate the role of the GEF domain of Kal7 in generating the compact round phenotype, we expressed a Kal7 variant truncated so that it lacks the entire GEF domain. KalSec14pSpec1–9 terminates after the ninth spectrin repeat and lacks a GEF domain (Fig. 8A
The solubility properties of these Kalirin mutants were next investigated (Fig. 8C Kal4 causes the formation of compact, round cells Expression of Kal4 produces a phenotype somewhat similar to the Kal7 phenotype, with compact, round cells lacking filopodia or lamellipodia (Fig. 9A
The solubility properties of these truncated proteins were assessed (Fig. 9D The Sec14p domain is necessary for formation of compact, round cells To determine whether the Sec14p domain of Kal7 plays a role in its ability to cause the formation of compact, round cells, we expressed ΔSec14Kal7, which lacks this domain (Fig. 10A
Yeast Sec14p is a lipid transfer protein [22]. Since its Sec14p domain is essential to the actions of Kal7, we next asked whether the Kalirin Sec14p domain binds lipids (Fig. 10B Expression of the isolated Sec14p domain of Kalirin had little effect on cell morphology; small lamellipodial extensions were commonly observed and 93% of the cells had the Flat morphology common to wildtype cells (Fig. 10C DISCUSSION We wanted to determine if there were functional differences between the Δ- and full length isoforms of Kalirin. By comparing Kal7 to ΔKal7, we discovered potent effects of the Sec14p domain and N-terminal spectrin-like repeats that are clearly distinct from those of the GEF domain. These non-enzymatic domains affect endocytosis, solubility, oligomerization, binding to the cytoskeleton and subcellular localization. Additional studies will be needed to understand how the actions of these domains are integrated to control the actions of Kalirin. The Δ-isoform of Kal7 does not stimulate spine formation Exogenous Kal7 stimulates the formation of dendritic spines by hippocampal and cortical neurons [2,3,13,24]. Antisense or shRNA mediated specific knockdown of Kal7, which also decreases ΔKal7, reduces linear spine density along the dendrites of pyramidal neurons and reduces the number of excitatory synapses on the dendrites of GABAergic interneurons [13]. The GEF activity of Kal7 and its PDZ-binding motif, which interacts with PSD95, both play essential roles in the effects of Kal7 on spine formation and function [3,24]. Although ΔKal7 has the same GEF domain and PDZ binding motif, we show here that exogenous ΔKal7 does not increase spine formation like Kal7. In the simple test system used here, both KalSolo and Kal4, which lack a GEF domain and a PDZ binding motif, produce phenotypes similar to that of Kal7. Amongst the 69 human RhoGEF family members, only Kalirin, Trio, Dbl and Dbs (Ost) have spectrin-like repeats [25]. With nine spectrin repeats, Kal7 is half the size of α- and β-spectrin. Our data suggest that Kal7, like α- and β-spectrin, forms high molecular weight complexes that participate in the formation of a membrane skeleton. Lacking the Sec14p and first four spectrin repeats, ΔKal7 forms dimers, but does not form high molecular weight complexes; its exogenous expression produces effects indistinguishable from those of the isolated Kal-GEF1 domain. The Sec14p/spectrin repeat region of Kalirin affects cell morphology Expression of KalSolo (Sec14p domain and 9 spectrin repeats) or Kal4 (Sec14p domain and 5 spectrin repeats) causes pEAK Rapid cells to adopt a compact round morphology. KalSolo and filamentous actin both accumulate beneath the plasma membrane. While Kal4 and SecSpec1–4 accumulate under the plasma membrane, filamentous actin is not especially prominent when these truncation mutants of Kalirin are expressed. These observations suggest that the spectrin repeat region of Kalirin contributes to the structural integrity of the compact, round cells. Loss of the KalGEF1-mediated interaction with filamin A (ABP280) in KalSolo and Kal4 may contribute to the less regular cell shape observed in cells expressing these constructs. Proteins in the spectrin family have well established roles linking the plasma membrane to the underlying actin cytoskeleton [26]. Erythrocyte spectrins associate with the plasma membrane both directly, through their PH domains and interactions with specific integral membrane proteins, and indirectly, through ankyrin. Erythrocyte spectrins interact with actin both directly and indirectly; these interactions are essential to membrane elasticity and stability [26–28]. Alternative splicing yields non-catalytic isoforms of Kalirin While less prevalent than longer Kalirin transcripts, Kal4 is expressed in the rat CNS, with levels increasing during development. In many spectrin family members, the rigid structure of the spectrin repeat regions ensures proper spacing between N- and C-terminal functional groups [28,29]. The nine spectrin repeats of Kal7 separate the Sec14p domain, which can bind phosphatidylinositol (3,5)P2, from both the GEF domain and the PDZ binding motif. Natural products such as Kal4 and zebrafish Solo contain only one functional domain and would be expected to alter the function of the Kalirin meshwork by uncoupling membrane attachment sites from the GEF domain and from the PDZ binding motif. Consistent with this role, the phenotypes of cells expressing Kal7 and KalSolo or Kal4 do differ. ΔKal7 forms soluble dimers while Kal7 forms insoluble oligomers As observed before, a substantial amount of the endogenous rat brain ΔKal7 is soluble, while very little rat brain Kal7 is soluble. Gel filtration identified endogenous Kal7 in high molecular weight complexes. Since ΔKal7 does not exhibit this behavior, neither the Kal-GEF1/filamin A interaction [11], the Kal-PH1/TrkA interaction [26–28] nor interactions with PDZ binding domain proteins such as neurabin, ZO-1, ZO-2 and afadin [24] plays an essential role in it. Although Kal7 andΔKal7 may differ in the ability of their spectrin repeat regions to bind to integral membrane proteins like peptidylglycine Δ-amidating monooxygenase [12] and membrane associated proteins like Arf6-GDP [10], the dramatic differences observed in transfected cells indicate inherent differences in the properties of these two proteins. Each of the spectrin repeat containing fragments of Kalirin examined was recovered almost entirely from the cytoskeletal pellet. In addition to a Sec14p-mediated association with membranes, the spectrin repeat region of Kalirin clearly contributes to its lack of solubility. Using purified ΔKal7, we identified a role for spectrin repeat 5 in the formation of Kalirin oligomers. While ΔKal7 forms what appear to be dimers, the additional spectrin repeats in Kal7 allow it to form larger oligomers. As for Kal7, gel filtration reveals high molecular weight complexes containing KalSolo. Kal4, with its five spectrin-like repeats, also forms high molecular weight complexes. The Sec14p domain of Kalirin fractionates as a monomer, identifying the spectrin repeats as responsible for formation of high molecular weight complexes. The spectrin repeat regions of erythroid spectrin are responsible for protein/protein interactions yielding dimers, tetramers and larger oligomers, allowing spectrin to perform a structural function. The Sec14p domain of Kalirin binds phosphoinositides and is necessary for localization of Kal7 to the plasma membrane Kal7, but not ΔKal7, can interact with membrane phospholipids through its Sec14p domain. Sec14 is a member of the lipid transfer family of proteins, which includes proteins that bind phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, α-tocopherol, and retinal [30–32]. Of the lipid transfer domains with known function, the N-terminal Sec14 domain of Kalirin is most homologous to yeast Sec14, a phosphatidylinositol-phosphatidylcholine transfer protein involved in protein trafficking from the Golgi that is also required for endocytosis [30,33]. A small subset of the human RhoGEFs (Kalirin, Trio, Dbs, and Dbl) contain Sec14p domains [25]. As for Kalirin, alternative splicing determines whether a Sec14p domain is included in Dbs and Dbl; protein localization and signaling ability differ for Dbs and Dbl isoforms having or lacking this Sec14p domain[34,35]. The Sec14p domain of Dbs binds to its PH domain, inhibiting transforming activity; removal of the Sec14p domain greatly increases transforming activity[35]. While the Sec14p domains of Kalirin, Dbs, and Dbl interact with the Gβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins [36], the functional significance of this interaction is not clear. Like the Sec14p domain of Kalirin, the Sec14p domains of Dbs and Dbl bind to phosphoinositides [34,35]. The Dbl Sec14p domain binds best to phosphatidylinositol monophosphates (PI3P, PI4P and PI5P) and the Dbs Sec14p domain prefers phosphatidylinositol bisphosphates [PI(4,5)P2, PI(3,5)P2, PI(3,4)P2]. The binding of KalSec14p to PI3P and PI(3,5)P2 suggests roles in early and late phases of endocytosis, respectively [23]. This is consistent with the fact that transferrin uptake is inhibited by expression of full-length Kal7 but not by expression of ΔKal7. Kal7 and ΔKal7 have similar guanine nucleotide exchange activity Since many mammalian RhoGEFs were identified as oncogenes activated by mutation or deletion of domains adjoining the GEF domain [37,38], the first hypothesis we tested was that the GEF activities of ΔKal7 and Kal7 differed. In vitro and cell-based GEF assays indicate that the GEF activities and substrate specificity of Kal7 and ΔKal7 are indistinguishable [11]. The fact that an inactive mutant of Kal7 exerts cytoskeletal effects similar to those of Kal7 was the first indication that non-catalytic regions play a key role in the formation of compact round cells. Plasma membranes form blebs when adhesion to the underlying cytoskeleton is lost or when gaps form in the cytoskeleton [39]. The fact that blebs are observed more frequently in Kal7(ND/AA)-expressing cells than in Kal7-expressing cells suggests that Rho proteins activated by KalGEF1 prevent this from occurring. A role for Rac in maintaining the actin/spectrin scaffold in erythrocytes is supported by deficits observed in erythrocytes lacking both Rac1 and Rac2 [40]. The controlled budding and vesiculation of membranes allows the partitioning of membrane components that remain attached to the underlying cytoskeleton from those that do not [41] and Kalirin is well designed to participate in a process of this type. Click here to view.(22K, pdf) Acknowledgments This research was supported by NIH grants DK32948 (REM), DA15464 (BAE) and MH65567 (MRS) and by a Career Development Award to Martin R. Schiller from the University of Connecticut Health Center. We thank Darlene D’Amato for keeping the Neuropeptide Lab running, and members of the Neuropeptide Lab for constant suggestions and encouragement Footnotes Betty A. Eipper, University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Neuroscience, 263 Farmington Ave. Farmington, CT 06030-3401, eipper/at/uchc.edu Reference List 1. May V, Schiller MR, Eipper BA, Mains RE. Kalirin Dbl-homology guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 domain initiates new axon outgrowths via RhoG-mediated mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6980–6990. [PubMed] 2. Ma XM, Huang JP, Wang Y, Eipper BA, Mains RE. Kalirin, a multifunctional Rho GEF, is necessary for maintenance of hippocampal pyramidal neuron dendrites and dendritic spines. J Neurosci. 2003;23:10593–10603. [PubMed] 3. Penzes P, Johnson RC, Sattler R, Zhang X, Huganir RL, Kambampati V, Mains RE, Eipper BA. The neuronal Rho-GEF Kalirin-7 interacts with PDZ domain-containing proteins and regulates dendritic morphogenesis. Neuron. 2001;29:229–242. [PubMed] 4. Johnson RC, Penzes P, Eipper BA, Mains RE. Isoforms of kalirin, a neuronal Dbl family member, generated through use of different 5′- and 3′-ends along with an internal translational initiation site. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:19324–19333. [PubMed] 5. McPherson CE, Eipper BA, Mains RE. Genomic organization and differential expression of Kalirin isoforms. Gene. 2002;284:41–51. [PubMed] 6. McPherson CE, Eipper BA, Mains RE. Kalirin expression is regulated by multiple promoters. J Mol Neurosci. 2004;22:51–62. [PubMed] 7. Sato T, Mishina M. Representational difference analysis, high-resolution physical mapping, and transcript identification of the zebrafish genomic region for a motor behavior. Genomics. 2003;82:218–229. [PubMed] 8. Penzes P, Johnson RC, Alam MR, Kambampati V, Mains RE, Eipper BA. An isoform of kalirin, a brain-specific GDP/GTP exchange factor, is enriched in the postsynaptic density fraction. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:6395–6403. [PubMed] 9. Mains RE, Alam MR, Johnson RC, Darlington DN, Back N, Hand TA, Eipper BA. Kalarin, a multifunctional PAM COOH-terminal domain interactor protein, affects cytoskeletal organization and ACTH secretion from AtT-20 cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2929–2937. [PubMed] 10. Koo TH, Eipper BA, Donaldson JG. Arf6 recruits the Rac GEF Kalirin to the plasma membrane facilitating Rac activation. BMC Cell Biol. 2007:8. [PubMed] 11. Schiller MR, Blangy A, Huang JP, Mains RE, Eipper BA. Induction of lamellipodia by Kalirin does not require its guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity. Exp Cell Res. 2005;307:402–417. [PubMed] 12. Alam MR, Johnson RC, Darlington DN, Hand TA, Mains RE, Eipper BA. Kalirin, a cytosolic protein with spectrin-like and GDP/GTP exchange factor-like domains that interacts with peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase, an integral membrane peptide-processing enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:12667–12675. [PubMed] 13. Ma XM, Wang Y, Ferraro F, Mains RE, Eipper BA. Kalirin-7 Is an Essential Component of both Shaft and Spine Excitatory Synapses in Hippocampal Interneurons. J Neurosci. 2008;28:711–724. [PubMed] 14. Schiller MR, Mains RE, Eipper BA. A neuroendocrine-specific protein localized to the endoplasmic reticulum by distal degradation. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26129–26138. [PubMed] 15. Kari B, Lussenhop N, Goertz R, Wabuke-Bunoti M, Radeke R, Gehrz R. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies reactive to several biochemically distinct human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein complexes. J Virol. 1986;60:345–352. [PubMed] 16. Field J, Nikawa J, Broek D, MacDonald B, Rodgers L, Wilson IA, Lerner RA, Wigler M. Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of an epitope addition method. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8:2159–2165. [PubMed] 17. Sobota JA, Ferraro F, Back N, Eipper BA, Mains RE. Not all secretory granules are created equal: Partitioning of soluble content proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Dec;17:5038–5052. [PubMed] 18. Morrow JS, Marchesi VT. Self-assembly of spectrin oligomers in vitro: a basis for a dynamic cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 1981;88:463–468. [PubMed] 19. Husten EJ, Eipper BA. Purification and characterization of PAM-1, an integral membrane protein involved in peptide processing. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;312:487–492. [PubMed] 20. Snyder JT, Worthylake DK, Rossman KL, Betts L, Pruitt WM, Siderovski DP, Der CJ, Sondek J. Structural basis for the selective activation of Rho GTPases by Dbl exchange factors. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;9:468–475. [PubMed] 21. Zhang B, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zheng Y. The role of Mg2+ cofactor in the guanine nucleotide exchange and GTP hydrolysis reactions of Rho family GTP-binding proteins. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:25299–25307. [PubMed] 22. Sha BD, Phillips SE, Bankaitis VA, Luo M. Crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae phosphatidylinositol-transfer protein. Nature. 1998;391:506–510. [PubMed] 23. Di Paolo G, De Camilli P. Phosphoinositides in cell regulation and membrane dynamics. Nature. 2006;443:651–657. [PubMed] 24. Penzes P, Beeser A, Chernoff J, Schiller MR, Eipper BA, Mains RE, Huganir RL. Rapid Induction of Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis by trans-Synaptic EphrinB-EphB Receptor Activation of the Rho-GEF Kalirin. Neuron. 2003;37:263–274. [PubMed] 25. Rossman KL, Der CJ, Sondek J. GEF means go: Turning on Rho GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:167–180. [PubMed] 26. De Matteis MA, Morrow JS. Spectrin tethers and mesh in the biosynthetic pathway. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(Pt 13):2331–2343. [PubMed] 27. Broderick MJF, Winder SJ. Towards a complete atomic structure of spectrin family proteins. J Struct Biol. 2002;137:184–193. [PubMed] 28. Liu SC, Derick LH, Palek J. Dependence of the permanent deformation of red blood cell membranes on spectrin dimer-tetramer equilibrium: implication for permanent membrane deformation of irreversibly sickled cells. Blood. 1993;81:522–528. [PubMed] 29. Lee A, Morrow JS, Fowler VM. Caspase remodeling of the spectrin membrane skeleton during lens development and aging. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:20735–20742. [PubMed] 30. Bankaitis VA, Malehorn DE, Emr SD, Greene R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SEC14 gene encodes a cytosolic factor that is required for transport of secretory proteins from the yeast Golgi complex. J Cell Biol. 1989;108:1271–1281. [PubMed] 31. Zhao R, Fu X, Li Q, Krantz SB, Zhao ZJ. Specific interaction of protein tyrosine phosphatase-MEG2 with phosphatidylserine. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:22609–22614. [PubMed] 32. Zimmer S, Stocker A, Sarbolouki MN, Spycher SE, Sassoon J, Azzi A. A novel human tocopherol-associated protein: cloning, in vitro expression, and characterization. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:25672–25680. [PubMed] 33. Kean LS, Fuller RS, Nichols JW. Retrograde lipid traffic in yeast: identification of two distinct pathways for internalization of fluorescent-labeled phosphatidylcholine from the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:1403–1419. [PubMed] 34. Ueda S, Kataoka T, Satoh T. Role of the Sec14-like domain of Dbl family exchange factors in the regulation of Rho family GTPases in different subcellular sites. Cell Signal. 2004;16:899–906. [PubMed] 35. Kostenko EV, Mahon GM, Cheng L, Whitehead IP. The Sec14 homology domain regulates the cellular distribution and transforming activity of the Rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor Dbs. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:2807–2817. [PubMed] 36. Nishida K, Kaziro Y, Satoh T. Association of the proto-oncogene product dbl with G protein betagamma subunits. FEBS Lett. 1999;459:186–190. [PubMed] 37. Whitehead IP, Campbell S, Rossman KL, Der CJ. Dbl family proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1332:F1–23. [PubMed] 38. Zheng Y. DBL family guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002;25:724–732. 39. Sheetz MP, Sable JE, Dobereiner HG. Continuous membrane-cytoskeleton adhesion requires continuous accommodation to lipid and cytoskeleton dynamics. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:417–434. [PubMed] 40. Kalfa TA, Pushkaran S, Mohandas N, Hartwig JH, Fowler VM, Johnson JF, Joiner CH, Williams DA, Zheng Y. Rac GTPases regulate the morphology and deformability of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton. Blood. 2006;108:3637–3645. [PubMed] 41. Knowles DW, Tilley L, Mohandas N, Chasis JA. Erythrocyte membrane vesiculation: Model for the molecular mechanism of protein sorting. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:12969–12974. [PubMed] 42. Tabaska JE, Zhang MQ. Detection of polyadenylation signals in human DNA sequences. Gene. 1999;231:77–86. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 19; 23(33):10593-603.
[J Neurosci. 2003]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):229-42.
[Neuron. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2000 Jun 23; 275(25):19324-33.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Mol Neurosci. 2004; 22(1-2):51-62.
[J Mol Neurosci. 2004]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):229-42.
[Neuron. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2000 Jun 23; 275(25):19324-33.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Genomics. 2003 Aug; 82(2):218-29.
[Genomics. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3; 275(9):6395-403.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 29; 274(5):2929-37.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]BMC Cell Biol. 2007 Feb 27; 8():8.
[BMC Cell Biol. 2007]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):229-42.
[Neuron. 2001]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 19; 23(33):10593-603.
[J Neurosci. 2003]J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 16; 28(3):711-24.
[J Neurosci. 2008]J Biol Chem. 1995 Nov 3; 270(44):26129-38.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]J Virol. 1986 Nov; 60(2):345-52.
[J Virol. 1986]J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3; 275(9):6395-403.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 1988 May; 8(5):2159-65.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1988]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]J Biol Chem. 1995 Nov 3; 270(44):26129-38.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3; 275(9):6395-403.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb; 88(2):463-8.
[J Cell Biol. 1981]Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994 Aug 1; 312(2):487-92.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994]Nat Struct Biol. 2002 Jun; 9(6):468-75.
[Nat Struct Biol. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2000 Aug 18; 275(33):25299-307.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):229-42.
[Neuron. 2001]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6980-90.
[J Neurosci. 2002]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):229-42.
[Neuron. 2001]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb; 88(2):463-8.
[J Cell Biol. 1981]J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb; 88(2):463-8.
[J Cell Biol. 1981]Genomics. 2003 Aug; 82(2):218-29.
[Genomics. 2003]Nature. 1998 Jan 29; 391(6666):506-10.
[Nature. 1998]Nature. 2006 Oct 12; 443(7112):651-7.
[Nature. 2006]J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 19; 23(33):10593-603.
[J Neurosci. 2003]Neuron. 2001 Jan; 29(1):229-42.
[Neuron. 2001]J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 16; 28(3):711-24.
[J Neurosci. 2008]Neuron. 2003 Jan 23; 37(2):263-74.
[Neuron. 2003]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb; 6(2):167-80.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005]J Cell Sci. 2000 Jul; 113 ( Pt 13)():2331-43.
[J Cell Sci. 2000]Blood. 1993 Jan 15; 81(2):522-8.
[Blood. 1993]Blood. 1993 Jan 15; 81(2):522-8.
[Blood. 1993]J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 8; 276(23):20735-42.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]J Cell Sci. 2000 Jul; 113 ( Pt 13)():2331-43.
[J Cell Sci. 2000]Blood. 1993 Jan 15; 81(2):522-8.
[Blood. 1993]Neuron. 2003 Jan 23; 37(2):263-74.
[Neuron. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1997 May 9; 272(19):12667-75.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr; 108(4):1271-81.
[J Cell Biol. 1989]J Biol Chem. 2000 Aug 18; 275(33):25672-80.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec; 123(6 Pt 1):1403-19.
[J Cell Biol. 1993]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb; 6(2):167-80.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005]Cell Signal. 2004 Aug; 16(8):899-906.
[Cell Signal. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2005 Jan 28; 280(4):2807-17.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]FEBS Lett. 1999 Oct 8; 459(2):186-90.
[FEBS Lett. 1999]Cell Signal. 2004 Aug; 16(8):899-906.
[Cell Signal. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2005 Jan 28; 280(4):2807-17.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Nature. 2006 Oct 12; 443(7112):651-7.
[Nature. 2006]Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Feb 22; 1332(1):F1-23.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006; 35():417-34.
[Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006]Blood. 2006 Dec 1; 108(12):3637-45.
[Blood. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Nov 25; 94(24):12969-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jul 15; 307(2):402-17.
[Exp Cell Res. 2005]