Table 1 Recently completed microbial genomes (April–May 2008). |
![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||
Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd No claim to original US government works New feel for new phyla National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. *For correspondence. E-mail galperin/at/ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; Tel. (+1) 301 435 5910; Fax (+1) 301 435 7793. Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. According to the dictionary, the Latin term ‘phylum’ comes from Greek phylon (ϕũλov), which means ‘race, tribe or clan’ and is unrelated to either philia (ϕıλíα) meaning ‘love, affection’ or to the ‘feel’, which comes from Old English felan ‘to touch’. These similarly sounding words illustrate a key problem of systematic microbiology: How can we extract useful information from short sequence fragments and not be swayed by superficial similarities? One of the most useful approaches has been binning together sequences from related microorganisms, even if the nature of these organisms remained unknown. This resulted in a number of candidate microbial phyla that still have no cultivated representatives (Hugenholtz et al., 1998). Extensive sequencing has been the only way to get a ‘feel’ of these organisms, find out at least some information about their physiology and distribution in the environment. The ultimate goal, of course, is to get a complete genome sequence of the previously uncharacterized organism and use the power of comparative genome analysis to deduce its features. The past 2 months have been marked by the release of complete genome sequences from first representatives of two new phyla, Verrucomicrobia and Candidate division Termite group 1 (Table 1). The first one is now represented by three different genomes, the second one – by two.
The phylum Verrucomicrobia, first recognized as a separate bacterial lineage more than 20 years ago (Albrecht et al., 1987; Hedlund et al., 1997), remains poorly characterized. Environmental sampling revealed representatives of this phylum in a wide range of environments, including soils, seawater, hot springs and human gastrointestinal tract (Wagner and Horn, 2006). However, few members of Verrucomicrobia have been isolated in pure culture and, until recently, there were few sequences from this phylum. To address this deficiency, JGI scientists have launched genome sequencing of five members of Verrucomicrobia (see http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2006/Verrucomicrobia.html). Genomes of two organisms (Akkermansia muciniphila and Opitutus terrae) have now been completed and three more genomes released in the draft form (Bacterium Ellin514, 7.5 Mbp, GenBank accession number ABOX00000000, Opitutaceae bacterium TAV2, 4.9 Mbp, ABEA00000000; and Verrucomicrobium spinosum, 8.2 Mbp, ABIZ00000000). A genome of one more member of Verrucomicrobia, an extremely acidophilic methanotroph Methylacidiphilum infernorum, has been sequenced at the University of Hawaii (Hou et al., 2008). Akkermansia muciniphila is a strictly anaerobic bacterium, originally isolated from a human fecal sample, that can use gastric mucin as carbon, energy and nitrogen source (Derrien et al., 2004). It has been named after Dutch microbiologist Antoon D.L. Akkermans, professor at Wageningen University and a pioneer in studying molecular ecology of bacterial communities (see http://www.mib.wur.nl/UK/AF/). Recent studies showed that A. muciniphila is a common inhabitant of the human intestinal tract, comprising up to 1% of the total bacteria in the intestine (Derrien et al., 2008). It grows optimally at 37°C and is capable of fermenting glucose, N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine. The genome size of A. muciniphila is far smaller than those of other verrucomicrobia (see above), suggesting a massive gene loss in the course of adaptation to the life in nutrient-rich human intestine. Another sequenced member of Verrucomicrobia, O. terrae, is also a strictly anaerobic saccharolytic bacterium. It was isolated from a rice paddy soil microcosm, obtained from rice fields in Vercelli, Italy (Chin et al., 2001). Opitutus terrae can metabolize various mono-, di- and polysaccharides, fermenting them into acetate and propionate. The third verrucomicrobial genome represents one of the recently characterized methanotrophic strains, mentioned in this column 4 months ago. Three different groups reported independent isolation of extremely acidophilic methanotrophs belonging to the phylum Verrucomicrobia from a methane-emitting geothermal field in New Zealand, a Solfatara volcano mudpot in Italy, and from an acidic hot spring in Kamchatka, Russia (Dunfield et al., 2007; Pol et al., 2007; Islam et al., 2008). These three isolates were all thermophiles capable of growing aerobically at 55–60°C with methane as the sole carbon source. They had 98% identical rRNA sequences, indicating that they belong to the same genus, for which the name ‘Methylacidiphilum’ is being proposed. The complete genome sequence of the New Zealand isolate has now been published (Hou et al., 2008). Methylacidiphilum infernorum is an autotrophic bacterium whose 2.3 Mbp genome is even smaller than that of A. muciniphila. Signs of genome streamlining during adaptation to its unique ecological niche are seen in the organization of central metabolism of M. infernorum, including its C1-utilization pathways, simple signal transduction machinery and a limited set of transcriptional regulators (Hou et al., 2008). Verrucomicrobial genomes are very interesting from the evolutionary standpoint. Phylogenetic analysis of M. infernorum proteins confirmed earlier conclusions on the proximity of Verrucomicrobia and Chlamydiae (Hugenholtz et al., 1998; Griffiths and Gupta, 2007), which are often treated as a single Chlamydiae/Verrucomicrobia group. It also provided support for specific association of Chlamydiae/Verrucomicrobia with Planctomycetes and Lentisphaerae, and two candidate phyla; Poribacteria and OP3, referred to as Planctomycetes/Verrucomicrobia/Chlamydiae superphylum (Wagner and Horn, 2006). However, genome analysis did not support the idea of a potential evolutionary relationship between Verrucomicrobia and eukaryotes, which had been prompted by the discovery of tubulin in members of the genus Prosthecobacter, also belonging to the Verrucomicrobia (Jenkins et al., 2002; Staley et al., 2005). The genome of M. infernorum did not encode tubulin or, for that matter, close homologues of any other signature eukaryotic proteins (Hou et al., 2008). Tubulin genes were missing also in A. muciniphila and O. terrae genomes. These results argue against bacterial origin of tubulin and suggest that Prosthecobacter acquired tubulin genes through lateral gene transfer from some eukaryotic cells after its divergence from other verrucomicrobial lineages. The second new phylum with recently sequenced genomes, candidate division ‘Termite group I’ (TG-1), includes no cultivated representatives (however, see below) and has been defined on the basis of rRNA sequences obtain by environmental sampling (Hugenholtz et al., 1998). Representatives of one TG-1 lineage, the so-called “Endomicrobia”, are abundant in the termite gut, where they are found as intracellular symbionts of various wood-feeding protozoa (Stingl et al., 2005; Ikeda-Ohtsubo et al., 2007). TG-1 representatives can also be detected in many other habitats, including rice soil, river sediment and cow rumen (Herlemann et al., 2007b; Ohkuma et al., 2007). Although there have been no physiological studies of any TG-1 member, the conditions inside the termite gut suggest that they are obligately anaerobic bacteria that gain energy by fermentation of wood-derived carbohydrates. Now, after many years of having just bits and pieces of TG-1 sequences, we suddenly have two completely sequenced genomes of TG-1 members. The first of them comes from bacterial phylotype Rs-D17, a member of the “Endomicrobia”, which is found specifically within the cells of the cellulolytic flagellate Trichonympha agilis that inhabits the gut of the termite Reticulitermes speratus (Hongoh et al., 2008). By using as the DNA source only ~103 bacterial cells isolated from a single cell of T. agilis, it became possible to obtain sufficiently pure and uniform population to perform the sequencing and assembly of Rs-D17 genome. The reconstructed genome consists of a circular 1.1 Mbp chromosome and three plasmids of 11.6, 5.7 and 5.3 kb. It shows clear signs of genome streamlining, including presence of numerous pseudogenes and partial or complete loss of certain metabolic pathways. Still, cells of Rs-D17 appear to be able to synthesize at least 15 amino acids, purines and pyrimidines (Hongoh et al., 2008). The authors suggest that Rs-D17 serves as an intracellular symbiont of T. agilis, supplying the host protist cell with amino acids and vitamins more or less the same way as it happens in Buchnera-aphid symbiosis. The second TG-1-related genome comes from Elusimicrobium minutum Pei191, the first cultivated representative of this phylum, which still remains to be formally described. According to Andreas Brune and colleagues at Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology in Marburg, Germany, E. minutum is an obligately anaerobic ultra-microbacterium (0.2–0.3 μm in diameter) that was isolated from sterile-filtered gut homogenates of the larva of humivorous scarab beetle Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae; see Egert et al., 2003; Lemke et al., 2003). This organism grows heterotrophically on glucose and produces acetate, hydrogen and ethanol as major products (Herlemann et al., 2007a). It belongs to the so-called ‘Intestinal Cluster’, which represents a distinct lineage of TG-1-affiliated microorganisms present in arthropod guts and in the cow rumen (Herlemann et al., 2007b). The relatively small genome size of both E. minutum and Rs-D17 may reflect their adaptation to gut environment and is not necessarily representative of the whole TG-1 group. There have also been interesting genomes among relatively well-known bacterial phyla. Actinobacteria, for example, are represented by three new genomes coming from opportunistic human pathogens Corynebacterium urealyticum and Mycobacterium marinum and the soil bacterium Streptomyces griseus, the original producer of streptomycin. Although C. urealyticum is part of the natural flora of human skin, it often colonizes the urinary tract, causing a variety of urinary tract infections. Presence of C. urealyticum in urine samples correlates with elevated pH and presence of struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate) stones. The sequenced strain C. urealyticum DSM7109 was originally isolated from a patient with alkaline-encrusted cystitis. Its growth requires presence of exogenous lipids, explained by the absence of a fatty acid synthase gene and presence of a robust system for degradation of exogenous fatty acids (Tauch et al., 2008). Presence of several antibiotic-resistance determinants suggests high incidents of lateral gene transfers, which lead to the accumulation of multidrug-resistant strains. Mycobacterium marinum is close relative of M. tuberculosis that causes a tuberculosis-like disease in fish and amphibia. Owing to its lower temperature optimum (25–35°C) and a much faster growth than M. tuberculosis, it is often used as a convenient experimental model to study tuberculosis in humans (Tobin and Ramakrishnan, 2008). However, M. marinum can also infect humans, causing granulomatous skin disease. Comparison of mycobacterial genomes suggests that evolution of M. tuberculosis from a M. marinum-like ancestral form included reduction in the genome size, accompanied by specialization toward human host and the loss of the ability to survive in the environment (Stinear et al., 2008). The sequenced strain of S. griseus, IFO 13350, came from the Waksman laboratory at Rutgers University and is one of the original strains used for production of streptomycin (Ohnishi et al., 2008). Analysis of its genome revealed a significant degree of colinearity with genomes of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Streptomyces avermitilis with at least 45% of proteins shared by all three genomes. It also identified 34 clusters of genes encoding polyketide synthases and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. Some of these clusters are responsible for production of known secondary metabolites (streptomycin, grixazone, melanin, carotenoids, siderophores, lantibiotics), products of others remain unknown (Ohnishi et al., 2008). Nostoc punctiforme is a nitrogen-fixing terrestrial filamentous cyanobacterium that is closely related to Anabaena (Nostoc) PCC 7120. This organism can exist in a free state but readily forms symbioses with a wide variety of plants and fungi. It is a favourite model organism for studies of cyanobacterial growth, metabolism, cell development and symbiotic behaviour (Meeks et al., 2001; 2002; Meeks, 2006). Nostoc punctiforme has one of the most complex developmental programs known in bacteria: in addition to usual vegetative cells, it is capable of producing three kinds of differentiated cells: (i) heterocysts (5–10 μm in diameter) that are surrounded by a thick cell wall and maintain microoxic conditions, allowing fixation of atmospheric nitrogen; (ii) short, motile hormogonium filaments (1.5–2 μm); and (iii) large spore-like akinetes that can reach 15–20 μm in diameter (Meeks et al., 2002). The sequenced strain N. punctiforme PCC 73102 was isolated from a symbiotic association with the gymnosperm plant Macrozamia sp. Its genome consists of an 8.2 Mb chromosome and five plasmids, which range in size from 26 to 354 kb, and encodes an unusually high variety of complex multidomain signaling proteins. ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense’ is a mycoplasmal phytopathogen that causes several plant diseases, such as dieback in papaya and Australian grapevine yellows in grapevine (Davis et al., 1997). This organism is also remarkable for the place where it is studied, Charles Darwin University in Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia (Tran-Nguyen et al., 2008). This university (http://www.cdu.edu.au/) was established in 2003 through merger of several local colleges in Darwin area and is currently the only college in the world named after the great scientist. Politicians, including those that opposed teaching evolution, fared much better. Exiguobacterium sibiricum is a facultatively aerobic non-spore-forming representative of the family Bacillaceae. It was isolated from a permafrost core in the Kolyma-Indigirka lowland in Siberia from a depth of 43 m. This depth corresponds to a geological layer estimated to be 2–3 million years old (Rodrigues et al., 2006) and unaffected by all the turmoil in that area during the past century. The sequenced strain E. sibiricum 255-15 was able to grow at temperatures ranging from −6°C to +40°C and was able to survive long-term freeze and repeated freeze-thawing treatments (Vishnivetskaya et al., 2007). Other interesting organisms with recently sequenced genomes include the nitrogen-fixing acidophilic α-proteobacterium Beijerinckia indica ssp. indica, a non-methanotrophic bacterium that is closely related to the methanotroph Methylocella silvestris (Dunfield et al., 2003); plant growth-promoting β-proteobacteria Burkholderia phymatum (Elliott et al., 2007) and Burkholderia phytofirmans (Sessitsch et al., 2005); and the soil γ-proteobacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an opportunistic human pathogen that is closely related to the phytopathogenic xanthomonads (Crossman et al., 2008). In other genomics news, it is worth noting two publications that attempt to encourage community involvement in improving the genomic databases. One of them, produced by the Genomics Standards Consortium (Field et al., 2008), introduces the ‘minimum information about a genome sequence’ (MIGS) specification, a common-sense list of parameters that should be reported for each sequenced genome. This list includes, among others, the geographic location and time of the sample collection (plus depth or altitude, if appropriate) and properties of the habitat (temperature, pH, salinity, pressure, light intensity, dissolved organic carbon, dissolved oxygen, phosphate, nitrate, sulfates, sulfides, and so on). While this sounds like a sensible recommendation, this paper does not clearly articulate the penalties, if any, for non-compliance. Besides, what should one do with the isolate for which such data are unavailable, refrain from sequencing the genome or delay the release of the genome sequence until such data become available? Strict adherence to the MIGS standards would have prevented or greatly delayed public release of the genome of E. minutum, discussed above, as well as many other genomes sequenced at the JGI and other institutions. The second paper (Mons et al., 2008), whose authors include, among others, Wikipedia founders Jimmy Wales and Erik Moeller, announces creation of a Wiki-based system called WikiProteins, intended for ‘community annotation of biomedical concepts and their interactions’. The core of the system is based on ‘protein concepts’ (in plain language, extended protein annotations) from Swiss-Prot and on Unified Medical Language System (UMLS®) concepts for computer processing of natural language-based biomedical information (see http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umls.html). In the future, WikiProteins are expected to incorporate the Gene Ontology (GO) vocabulary and a variety of other databases. This sounds like a very promising undertaking, and the whole paper (which is freely available online with a variety of colourful links and pop-up windows) deserves a careful reading, even if the idea of ‘collaborative knowledge discovery’ might seem too far-fetched to most readers of this journal. In conclusion, a correction: in the previous Genomics Update (Galperin, 2008), I confused properties of two methylotrophs. Methylobacterium spp. 4-46 is a symbiont of the legume Lotononis bainesii, whereas Methylobacterium radiotolerans is not known for symbiosis. I thank Benjamin Gourion (ETH Zürich) and Ludmila Chistoserdova (University of Washington) for pointing out this mistake. Acknowledgments M.Y.G. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Library of Medicine. The author's opinions do not reflect the views of NCBI, NLM or the National Institutes of Health. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||
J Bacteriol. 1998 Sep; 180(18):4765-74.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1997 Jul; 72(1):29-38.
[Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1997]Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Jun; 17(3):241-9.
[Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006]Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Sep; 54(Pt 5):1469-76.
[Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar; 74(5):1646-8.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008]Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001 Nov; 51(Pt 6):1965-8.
[Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001]Nature. 2007 Dec 6; 450(7171):879-82.
[Nature. 2007]Nature. 2007 Dec 6; 450(7171):874-8.
[Nature. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 8; 105(1):300-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]J Bacteriol. 1998 Sep; 180(18):4765-74.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Microbiology. 2007 Aug; 153(Pt 8):2648-54.
[Microbiology. 2007]Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Jun; 17(3):241-9.
[Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 24; 99(26):17049-54.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Feb 1; 243(1):9-14.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005]J Bacteriol. 1998 Sep; 180(18):4765-74.
[J Bacteriol. 1998]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar; 71(3):1473-9.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005]Microbiology. 2007 Oct; 153(Pt 10):3458-65.
[Microbiology. 2007]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Oct; 73(20):6682-5.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007]FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jun; 60(3):467-76.
[FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8; 105(14):5555-60.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov; 69(11):6659-68.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov; 69(11):6650-8.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003]Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Oct; 73(20):6682-5.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007]Cell Microbiol. 2008 May; 10(5):1027-39.
[Cell Microbiol. 2008]Genome Res. 2008 May; 18(5):729-41.
[Genome Res. 2008]J Bacteriol. 2008 Jun; 190(11):4050-60.
[J Bacteriol. 2008]Photosynth Res. 2001; 70(1):85-106.
[Photosynth Res. 2001]Arch Microbiol. 2002 Dec; 178(6):395-403.
[Arch Microbiol. 2002]Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2006; 41():165-96.
[Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2006]Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Apr; 47(2):262-9.
[Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997]J Bacteriol. 2008 Jun; 190(11):3979-91.
[J Bacteriol. 2008]Extremophiles. 2006 Aug; 10(4):285-94.
[Extremophiles. 2006]Cryobiology. 2007 Apr; 54(2):234-40.
[Cryobiology. 2007]Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003 Sep; 53(Pt 5):1231-9.
[Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003]New Phytol. 2007; 173(1):168-80.
[New Phytol. 2007]Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 May; 55(Pt 3):1187-92.
[Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005]Genome Biol. 2008 Apr 17; 9(4):R74.
[Genome Biol. 2008]Nat Biotechnol. 2008 May; 26(5):541-7.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2008]Genome Biol. 2008; 9(5):R89.
[Genome Biol. 2008]Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun; 10(6):1383-91.
[Environ Microbiol. 2008]