![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Restraint Stress Induces Lymphocyte Reduction through p53 and PI3K/NF-κB Pathways aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medicine, College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China cDepartment of Laboratory Animal Resources, College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States dDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States eShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China **Corresponding author: Deling Yin, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, Phone: 423 439 8826 (o); Fax: 423 439 6387, E-mail: yin/at/etsu.edu. Corresponding author: Zhiyong Zhang, MD., Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Phone: 86-21-37990333, E-mail: Zhangzy/at/shaphc.org *These authors contributed equally to this project The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Neuroimmunol See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Restraint stress, either physical or psychological, can modulate immune function. However, the mechanisms associated with stress-induced lymphocyte reduction remains to be elucidated. We have previously shown that chronic stress induces Fas-mediated lymphocyte reduction. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which restraint stress modulates lymphocyte reduction. Our data have shown that inhibition of p53 by the p53 inhibitor PFT-α attenuates stress-induced reduction in lymphocyte numbers. These results were verified using p53 knockout mice, suggesting a pivotal role of p53 in this process. In addition our data have indicated that PI3K/ nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway plays an important role in the stress-induced lymphocyte reduction. Our study thus demonstrates that restraint stress promotes lymphocyte reduction through p53 and PI3K/NF-κB pathways. Keywords: Restraint stress, Mice, Lymphocyte reduction, p53, PI3K, NF-κB 1. Introduction The effects of stress, which may occur on a daily basis, on the immune system vary with the severity of the stress. It is generally believed that moderate stress, such as routine exercise, enhances immune response, while chronic stress, such as long-term emotional stress, can decrease immune function and increase susceptibility to diseases (Dhabhar and McEwen, 1997; Shi et al., 2003; Reiche et al., 2004; Quan et al., 2001). This effect is at least in part due to the reduction of lymphocytes (Zorrilla et al., 2001; Yin et al., 2000; Yin et al., 2006b). Dhabhar and McEwen have shown that acute restraint stress could significantly enhance delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions (Dhabhar and McEwen, 1999), while chronic stress could decrease immune function and enhance susceptibility to diseases (Yin et al., 2000; Dhabhar and McEwen, 1997). We and others have reported that stressors modulate immune regulation through stress hormones such as endogenous opioids, rather than exclusively through glucocorticoids (Yin et al., 2000; Shi et al., 2003; Moynihan et al., 2000; Minton, 1994). Moreover, we found that physical restraint stress modulates the immune system through the cell death receptor Fas-mediated apoptotic mechanism (Yin et al., 2000; Shi et al., 2003; Yin et al., 2006b). However, the mechanisms associated with stress-induced lymphocyte reduction remains to be elucidated. Apoptotic cell death is an active process mediated by various signaling pathways. P53 is a potent inhibitor of cell growth that can induce cell growth arrest and apoptosis (Tamura et al., 1995). Expression of wild-type p53 up-regulates the expression of Fas and renders cells sensitive to Fas mediated apoptosis in various types of tumor cells (Owen-Schaub et al., 1995). The role of p53 in the regulation of Fas expression was also observed in chemotherapy-induced apoptosis (Muller et al., 1997). These findings suggest that a Fas-mediated pathway is linked to a p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K) are a conserved family of signal transduction enzymes which are involved in regulating cellular proliferation and inhibit cell apoptosis (Franke et al., 1997). PI3K is an enzyme complex composed of a regulatory subunit (p85) and a catalytic subunit (p110) (Cantley, 2002). There may exist a reciprocal regulation between the PI3K pathway and p53 protein. In the immune system, impaired PI3K signaling leads to immunodeficiency, whereas unrestrained PI3K signaling contributes to autoimmunity and leukemia (Okkenhaug and Vanhaesebroeck, 2003). The PI3K inhibitors LY294002 and wortmannin have been used extensively as research tools. Intriguingly, recent studies reported that inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway increases the sensitivity of Fas-mediated apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma cells (Osaki et al., 2004). It has been reported that inhibition of PI3K with LY294002 or wortmannin completely eliminated the protection against septic mortality which resulted in increased serum levels of IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α in septic mice. They also reported that inhibition of PI3K in septic mice resulted in increased splenocyte apoptosis (Williams et al., 2004). Recent studies have shown that pretreatment of neutrophils with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 totally reversed the delay of apoptosis promoted by heme (Arruda et al., 2004). NF-κB, the ubiquitously expressed and highly regulated dimeric transcription factor, plays a fundamental role in modulating the expression of genes responsible for innate and adaptive immunity, cell proliferation and apoptosis (Li and Verma, 2002). Among five NF-κB isoforms in mammalian cells, the p50/p65 heterodimer is predominant in many cell types (Ghosh and Karin, 2002). In this study, we investigated the involvement of the pro-apoptotic p53 and anti-apoptotic PI3K/NF-κB pathways. Our data showed that restraint stress induced lymphocyte reduction is mediated through p53-mediated pathway. Furthermore, restraint stress modulates the number of lymphocytes through PI3K/NF-κB-mediated signaling. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Mice Balb/c mice were obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN), p53 knockout mice on a C57BL/6 background and wild type C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained in the Division of Laboratory Animal Resources at East Tennessee State University (ETSU), a facility accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC). All aspects of the animal care and experimental protocols were approved by the ETSU Committee on Animal Care. 2.2. Physical restraint stress and administration of reagents Six- to seven-week-old male mice were subjected to an established chronic physical restraint protocol used in our laboratory as well as others (Yin et al., 2000; Yin et al., 2006b; Sheridan et al., 1998; Zhang et al., 2008). Briefly, mice were placed in a 50-ml conical centrifuge tube with multiple punctures to allow ventilation. Mice were held horizontally in the tubes for 12 h followed by a 12-h rest. During the rest period food and water were provided ad libitum. Control littermates were kept in their original cage and food and water were provided only during the 12 h rest. Animal received a single intraperitoneal (ip) injection of one of the following: p53 inhibitor pifithrin-α (PFT-α) (60 µg/mouse; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (1 mg/25 g body weight; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), or pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC), an antioxidant which has been shown to inhibit NF-κB activation (Muller et al., 2000; Li et al., 2004b) (120 mg/kg/day; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Two days after physical restraint, mice were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation, and the spleens were harvested. 2.3. Western blot analysis Cytoplasmic proteins were prepared from spleenic tissues and immunoblots were performed as described previously (Yin et al., 1999; Yin et al., 2006a; Hua et al., 2007). Briefly, the cellular proteins were separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto Hybond ECL membranes (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The membrane was then incubated at room temperature in a blocking solution composed of 5% skim milk powder dissolved in 1x TBS (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and 140 mM NaCl) for 1 hour. The membrane was then incubated with the blocking solution containing the first antibody overnight at 4°C. The expression of p53 was detected with antibody specific to p53 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA). After washing three times with TBS for 5 min, the blot was then incubated with a second antibody. The blot was again washed three times with TBS before being exposed to the SuperSignal West Dura Extented Duration substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). 2.4. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) NF-κB binding activity was determined as described previously (Zhang et al., 2007; Li et al., 2004a) in 15 µl of binding reaction mixture containing 1× binding buffer, 15 µg of nuclear proteins, and 35 fmol of double-stranded NF-κB consensus oligonucleotide end-labeled with [γ-32P]ATP (Amersham) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega). After incubation at room temperature for 20 min, the binding reaction mixture was analyzed by electrophoresis on 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, and the gels will be dried by Gel-Drier, scanned, and quantified by a phosphor-imaging system (Bio-Rad). 2.5. Statistical analysis The results were presented as mean ± S.D. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni tests to determine where differences among groups existed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results 3.1. Inhibition of p53 attenuates stress-induced reduction of splenocyte numbers To examine the role of pro-apoptotic p53 signaling in physical restraint, we subjected Balb/c mice to a 12 hours physical restraint daily for 2 days, and administrated pifithrin-α (PFT-α) as a p53 inhibitor (Liu et al., 2004) prior to physical restraint. Although treatment of mice with PFT-α did not alter the number of splenocytes in unstressed mice (Fig. 1A), administration of PFT-α partially blocked stress-induced lymphocyte reduction in the spleen (Fig. 1B), suggesting that p53 plays a role in the physical restraint stress. We next examined the level of p53 expression in splencoytes with or without physical restraint. As shown in Figure 1C, the expression of p53 in splenocytes was significantly increased at 12 hours after physical restraint. To further verify the role of p53 in restraint stress, p53 knockout mice and wild type mice (control) were subjected to a 12 hours physical restraint daily for 2 days. Dysfunction of p53 in knockout mice partially inhibits stress-induced reduction in lymphocyte numbers in the spleen (Fig. 1D). P53 knockout mice have similar splenocyte numbers to the wild type mice in the absence of restraint stress (Fig. 1E). These data indicate that restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction is mediated through an apoptotic p53 signaling.
3.2. Inhibition of PI3K exerts an additive effect on stress-induced splenocyte reduction PI3K is generally considered to promote cell survival and inhibit cell apoptosis (Franke et al., 1997). We recently reported that inhibition of PI3K with LY294002 or wortmannin administration to mice significantly increased splenocyte apoptosis and cardiac myocyte apoptosis (Williams et al., 2004; Hua et al., 2007). Our published data support that PI3K plays an important role in anti-apoptotic signaling (Yin et al., 2006a). However, the role of PI3K in restraint stress-induced reduction in lymphocyte numbers is not known. To answer this question, we injected mice with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. We found that LY294002 did not alter splenocyte numbers in unstressed mice (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, administration of LY294002 before physical restraint caused a greater reduction in splenocyte numbers than stress alone (Fig. 2B). Similar results were obtained when we employed wortmannin as a PI3K inhibitor to instead of LY294002 (data not shown). These results demonstrate that the PI3K mediated signaling pathway plays an important role in stress-induced lymphocyte reduction.
3.3. Inhibition of NF-κB signaling exerts an additive effect on splenocyte reduction induced by stress Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) plays a central role in regulating the expression of genes responsible for innate and adaptive immunity, cell proliferation and apoptosis (Li and Verma, 2002; Burstein and Duckett, 2003). We have reported that NF-κB plays an anti-apoptotic effect (Yin et al., 2006a). The effect of restraint stress on NF-κB activation was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). As shown in Figure 3A, restraint stress significantly increased NF-κB binding activity. We next examined the role of NF-κB in restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction. Balb/c mice were subjected to a 12 hour physical restraint regimen daily for two days (Yin et al., 2000; Yin et al., 2006b). Administration of the NF-κB inhibitor PDTC (Li et al., 2004b; Muller et al., 2000) before physical restraint caused a greater reduction in splenocyte numbers than stress alone (Fig. 3B). NF-κB inhibitor PDTC did not change splenocyte numbers in unstressed mice (Fig. 3C). These results suggest that restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction is mediated through a NF-κB signaling.
4. Discussion Psychological and physical stress can alter the immune system in both humans and animals (Reiche et al., 2004; Frieri, 2003). Stress is a known risk factor for human diseases, such as autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases and cancer (Shi et al., 2003; Dhabhar and McEwen, 1997; Hawkley and Cacioppo, 2004). Various experimental systems have been explored to investigate how stress changes immune responsiveness. However, little progress has been made in understanding restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction. P53 has been established as an important apoptotic protein but the role of p53 in restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction is not known. We speculated that high levels of p53 may be responsible for the lymphocyte reduction induced by restraint stress. In this study, we demonstrated that inhibition of endogenously expressed p53 using a p53 inhibitor attenuated the stress-induced-induced lymphocyte reduction (Fig. 1B). We confirmed this result using p53 knockout mice (Fig. 1D). Thus, these data indicate that restraint stress may initiate the apoptotic process in animals resulting in modulation of p53-mediated apoptotic signaling. Anti-apoptotic genes inhibit cell apoptosis through activating specific signaling pathway(s), including the PI3K-mediated signaling. Activation of the PI3K-dependent signaling inhibits cardiac myocyte apoptosis (Li et al., 2004a; Matsui et al., 1999). Inhibition of PI3K-mediated pathway sensitizes cells to apoptotic stimuli (Osaki et al., 2004). It has been reported that LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, caused inhibition of cell proliferation but not induction of cell apoptosis and that inhibition of the PI3K-mediated signaling dramatically enhanced the sensitivity of human gastric carcinoma cell apoptosis (Osaki et al., 2004). The role of PI3K-mediated signaling in stress-induced lymphocyte reduction remains to be elucidated. We speculated that inhibition of PI3K attenuates stress-induced lymphocyte reduction. To test this hypothesis we administrated the PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, prior to restraint stress. We have observed that pharmacological inhibition of PI3K activity by LY294002 or wortmannin before physical restraint caused a greater reduction in lymphocyte numbers than stress did alone (Fig. 2). Therefore, restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction is mediated through a PI3K signaling. NF-κB, the ubiquitously expressed and highly regulated dimeric transcription factor, initiates transcription of genes associated with innate immune responses and inflammation (Hoshino et al., 2002). We observed that restraint stress significantly enhanced the level of NF-κB binding activity, suggesting that restraint stress stimulates activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway (Fig. 3A). NFκB is a transcription factor that controls the expression of a variety of target genes including those involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation (Li and Verma, 2002). We speculated that increased NF-κB binding activity by stress as a means to reduce lymphocyte reduction in the stressed animals. We observed that inhibition of NF-κB signaling exerts an additive effect on restraint stress-induced splenocyte reduction (Fig. 3B). Therefore, we conclude that restraint stress-induced lymphocyte reduction is mediated through a NF-κB signaling. In summary, to our knowledge this study is the first to demonstrate that the p53 and PI3K/NF-κB participate in restraint stress-mediated immune function. Our data suggest that inhibition of p53 pathway or modulation PI3K/NF-κB pathway may be an effective approach for prevention and/or treatment of stress-induced lymphocyte reduction. Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant DA020120 and East Tennessee State University Research Development Committee (ETSU RDC) 0048 to D. Yin. This work was also supported in part by ETSU RDC grant 07-026M to G. Hanley. Footnotes This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
Brain Behav Immun. 1997 Dec; 11(4):286-306.
[Brain Behav Immun. 1997]Brain Behav Immun. 2003 Feb; 17 Suppl 1():S18-26.
[Brain Behav Immun. 2003]Lancet Oncol. 2004 Oct; 5(10):617-25.
[Lancet Oncol. 2004]J Neuroimmunol. 2001 Apr 2; 115(1-2):36-45.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2001]Brain Behav Immun. 2001 Sep; 15(3):199-226.
[Brain Behav Immun. 2001]Oncogene. 1995 Nov 16; 11(10):1939-46.
[Oncogene. 1995]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun; 15(6):3032-40.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]J Clin Invest. 1997 Feb 1; 99(3):403-13.
[J Clin Invest. 1997]Cell. 1997 Feb 21; 88(4):435-7.
[Cell. 1997]Science. 2002 May 31; 296(5573):1655-7.
[Science. 2002]Nat Rev Immunol. 2003 Apr; 3(4):317-30.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2003]J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan; 130(1):8-14.
[J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004]J Immunol. 2004 Jan 1; 172(1):449-56.
[J Immunol. 2004]J Exp Med. 2000 Apr 17; 191(8):1423-8.
[J Exp Med. 2000]J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Aug; 177(1-2):11-7.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2006]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 May 1; 840():803-8.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998]J Neuroimmunol. 2008 Feb; 194(1-2):115-22.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2008]Hypertension. 2000 Jan; 35(1 Pt 2):193-201.
[Hypertension. 2000]J Immunol. 1999 Oct 15; 163(8):4328-34.
[J Immunol. 1999]J Neuroimmunol. 2006 May; 174(1-2):101-7.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2007 Jun 1; 178(11):7317-24.
[J Immunol. 2007]Oncology. 2006; 71(5-6):446-55.
[Oncology. 2006]Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Feb 15; 61(3):538-47.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2004]Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Mar; 286(3):H933-9.
[Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004]Cell. 1997 Feb 21; 88(4):435-7.
[Cell. 1997]J Immunol. 2004 Jan 1; 172(1):449-56.
[J Immunol. 2004]J Immunol. 2007 Jun 1; 178(11):7317-24.
[J Immunol. 2007]J Neuroimmunol. 2006 May; 174(1-2):101-7.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2006]Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Oct; 2(10):725-34.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2002]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003 Dec; 15(6):732-7.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003]J Neuroimmunol. 2006 May; 174(1-2):101-7.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2006]J Exp Med. 2000 Apr 17; 191(8):1423-8.
[J Exp Med. 2000]J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Aug; 177(1-2):11-7.
[J Neuroimmunol. 2006]Lancet Oncol. 2004 Oct; 5(10):617-25.
[Lancet Oncol. 2004]Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003 Jun; 90(6 Suppl 3):34-40.
[Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003]Brain Behav Immun. 2003 Feb; 17 Suppl 1():S18-26.
[Brain Behav Immun. 2003]Brain Behav Immun. 1997 Dec; 11(4):286-306.
[Brain Behav Immun. 1997]Brain Behav Immun. 2004 Mar; 18(2):114-9.
[Brain Behav Immun. 2004]Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Feb 15; 61(3):538-47.
[Cardiovasc Res. 2004]Circulation. 1999 Dec 7; 100(23):2373-9.
[Circulation. 1999]J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan; 130(1):8-14.
[J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004]Int Immunol. 2002 Oct; 14(10):1225-31.
[Int Immunol. 2002]Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Oct; 2(10):725-34.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2002]