![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Neural differentiation potential of peripheral blood- and bone-marrow-derived precursor cells aDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan bDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan cDepartment of Neurology and Center for Neuroscience and Regeneration Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06516, USA dRehabilitation Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA *Corresponding author. Department of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1st, West-16th, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan. Fax: +81 11 614 1662. E-mail address: honmou/at/sapmed.ac.jp (O. Honmou). Abstract Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) prepared from adult bone marrow (BMSCs) has been reported to ameliorate functional deficits in several CNS diseases in experimental animal models. Bone marrow was enriched in MSCs by selecting for plastic-adherent cells that were grown to confluency in appropriate culture conditions as flattened fibroblast-like cells. Despite the fact that the stem/precursor cells in peripheral blood are widely used for reconstruction in the hematopoietic system, it is not fully understood whether peripheral blood-derived plastic-adherent precursor/stem cells (PMSCs) can differentiate into a neural lineage. To compare the potential of PMSCs and BMSCs for neural differentiation in vitro, BMSCs and PMSCs were prepared from the adult rat and expanded in culture. Although the growth rate of PMSCs was less than BMSCs, immunocytochemical and RT-PCR analyses indicated that both MSC types were successfully induced to nestin-positive neurospheres in the presence of EGF and bFGF. After withdrawal of the mitogens, these cells could differentiate into neurofilament-positive neurons or GFAP-positive glia. Thus, our findings suggest the potential use of PMSCs for a cell therapy in CNS diseases. Keywords: Blood, Bone marrow, Mesenchymal stem cell, Transplantation 1. Introduction Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are thought to represent a very small proportion of cells in the mononuclear population of bone marrow. As originally described by Freidenstein (1976), these cells will grow to confluency in appropriate culture conditions as flattened fibroblast-like cells (Majumdar et al., 1998), and have been suggested to differentiate into bone, cartilage (Kobune et al., 2003), cardiac myocytes (Toma et al., 2002) and neurons and glia (Prockop, 1997; Woodbury et al., 2000; Kobune et al., 2003; Iihoshi et al., 2004; Honma et al., 2006; Nomura et al., 2005) both in vitro and in vivo. MSCs prepared from human bone marrow (BMSCs) have been used in clinical studies for metachromatic leukodystrophy (Koc et al., 2002), Hurler syndrome (Koc et al., 2002), myeloablative therapy for breast cancer (Koc et al., 2000), graft-versus-host disease (Aggarwal and Pittenger, 2005), and stroke (Bang et al., 2005). Human mesenchymal precursor cells found in the blood of normal subjects proliferated in culture with an adherent-spread morphology, and displayed cytoskeletal, cytoplasmic and surface markers (CD34-, CD45-, and CD105+) of mesenchymal precursors (Zvaifler et al., 2000). These cells had a capacity for differentiation into fibroblast, osteoblast, and adipocyte lineages. A canine CD34- fibroblast-like cell in the peripheral blood showed mesenchymal stem cell characteristics (Huss et al., 2000). Because peripheral blood is readily accessible, stem cells isolated from blood may be a good candidate for a cell therapy. For example, the hematopoietic stem/precursor cells in peripheral blood are widely used for reconstruction in the hematopoietic system (Brown et al., 1997; Auner et al., 2005). Thus, although the potential of mesenchymal precursor cells in peripheral blood (PMSCs) has received much attention, it is not known whether peripheral blood-derived plastic-adherent precursor cells (PMSCs) can differentiate into a neural lineage. Here, we compared the growth properties and differentiating potential to neural lineages of rat PMSCs with those of rat BMSCs. 2. Results 2.1. Characteristics of BMSCs and PMSCs After removing nonadherent cells by replacing the medium (day 2 in culture), a small portion of attached nucleated cells was visualized in the BMSC culture dish. By day 14 in culture, the attached BMSCs had developed into an adherent layer containing abundant dispersed fibroblast-like cells, and each colony was predominantly formed by several fibroblast-like cells (Fig. 1A
In the cultures of PMSCs derived from peripheral blood, fibroblast-like cells with thin elongated processes around a central nucleus made their appearance at 2 weeks after culture initiation (Fig. 1C Figs. 1E and F 2.2. Growth rate The number of BMSCs and PMSCs was counted at weekly intervals in order to characterize the proliferation rate (Fig. 2
2.3. Transformation of MCSs to neurospheres BMSCs transformed to nestin-positive neurospheres using an induction protocol (Fig. 3A
2.4. Differentiation from MSC-derived neurosphere to neural cells MSC-derived neurospheres differentiated into neuron- and glia-like cells in the appropriate culture condition. BMSC-derived neurospheres differentiated into adherent neural cells when they were mechanically dissociated, plated on plastic culture dish, and maintained in NPBM without growth factors. Adherent single layers contained abundant neuron- and glial-like cells. Immunocytochemical analysis indicated that the neuronal cells showed NF-M positivity (Fig. 4A
3. Discussion The present study demonstrates that fibroblast-like adherent cells with phenotypic characteristics resembling those of mesenchymal stem cells prepared from the bone marrow can be cultured from rat peripheral blood. These cells showed proliferation and differentiation into neural lineages in vitro, confirmed by immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR. Mesenchymal precursor cell populations obtained from rat peripheral blood and bone marrow of the rat metaphysis easily expanded in vitro and exhibited a fibroblast-like morphology. Flow cytometry analysis to study the surface protein expression on undifferentiated BMSCs and PMSCs indicated that the myeloid progenitor antigen CD45 was not expressed by these cells. On the other hand, PMSCs and BMSCs expressed CD73 (SH3), which has been used to characterize mesenchymal stem cells (Majumdar et al., 1998; Kobune et al., 2003; Honma et al., 2006). In addition, nestin expression by PMSCs and BMSCs and their ability to grow in suspension in defined culture conditions brought them nearer to a neurosphere phenotype. When nestin-positive neurospheres were dissociated and plated onto an adherent surface without growth factors, neuronal and glial differentiation was observed. We are not certain from our results whether strictly regulated neuronal and glial cells were present in the PMSC population, or culture conditions determined cell fate into neurons or glia. A distinct difference between PMSCs and BMSCs in the present study is their growth rate in culture. The BMSCs showed a sigmoidal growth curve and extensive expansion over 8 weeks. In contrast, the PMSCs had a more linear growth curve and were much less proliferative. A possible explanation is that samples of BMSCs contain more primitive progenitor cells than samples of PMSCs. Although the CD34 antigen has been used to identify hematopoietic precursor cells, CD34+ cells were present in the circulation in only one-tenth the concentration of bone marrow and had a different spectrum of antigen expression. Indeed, CD33 (myeloid antigen) and CD45 (leukocyte common antigen) were highly expressed in CD34+ cells in the peripheral circulation, but not in bone marrow (Bender et al., 1991). Another hypothesis is that PMSCs require specific culture medium or growth factors which are different from those of BMSCs. To maintain viability and retain the ability to proliferate, stem cells need cell-to-cell contact and a microenvironment which provides necessary growth factors in adequate quantity, which may be supplied in an autocrine or paracrine fashion (Huss et al., 2000). The PMSCs in mobilized peripheral blood required BMSC conditioned medium which showed high proliferative potential with high express of Oct4, a transcriptional binding factor (Tondreau et al., 2005). Moreover, mesenchymal precursor cells in the peripheral blood of normal individuals proliferated logarithmically in 20% fetal calf serum without growth factor (Zvaifler et al., 2000). Thus, PMSCs may require a novel culture medium. The difference between cultures of BMSCs and PMSCs will be important in future considerations of PMSCs for clinical use, where a large number of cells will be necessary. The morphological and antigenic characteristics of MSCs are different among species (Kobune et al., 2003; Honma et al., 2006; Rochefort et al., 2005), which may indicate that the appropriate culture medium or growth factors of human PMSCs is different from rat PMSCs. Nevertheless, in the present study, we showed that the rat PMSCs proliferated, highly transformed to nestin-positive neural stem cells (neurospheres), and differentiated into neuronal or glial cells in vitro. Thus, autologous peripheral blood could be an important source of cells for a cell therapy, since they are easy to isolate and expand for autotransplantation with little risk of rejection. However, further investigations are needed to better characterize PMSCs and as well to further define their transplantability and differentiation potential in animal models. 4. Experimental procedures 4.1. Cell preparation The use of animals in this study was approved by the animal care and use committee of Sapporo Medical University and all procedures were carried out in accordance with institutional guidelines. Bone marrow was obtained from femoral bone in adult female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200–250 g. Rats were anesthetized with ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) i.p. A small hole (2×3 mm) in the femoral bone was made with an air drill following skin incision (1 cm). Bone marrow (0.5 ml) was aspirated, diluted to 25 ml with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (SIGMA, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco BRL), 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco BRL), was plated on 50-cm2 Tissue Culture Dish (IWAKI, Tokyo, Japan), and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 3 days. BMSCs, when selected by plastic adhesion, require the elimination of nonadherent cells by replacing the medium 48 h after cell seeding. When cultures almost reached confluence, the adherent cells were detached with trypsin—EDTA solution (SIGMA) and subcultured at 1×104 cells/ml. Peripheral blood was obtained from adult Sprague—Dawley rats weighting 200–250 g. Rats were deeply anesthetized with ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) i.p. Peripheral blood (about 8 ml) was aspirated from vena cava superior with a 18-gauge needle. Peripheral blood was diluted 1:3 in Puregene RBC Lysis Solution (Gentra systems, Minneapolis, MN) and was incubated in a 50-ml conical centrifuge tube for 5 min at room temperature. The tube was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 2 min and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was suspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin and was plated on 50-cm2 plastic tissue culture dishes and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. PMSCs, when selected by plastic adhesion, require the elimination of nonadherent cells by replacing the medium 48 h after cell seeding. When cultures almost reached confluence, the adherent cells were detached with trypsin—EDTA solution and subcultured at 1×104 cells/ml. The cell numbers of both BMSC and PMSC were counted in a cytometer every a week. Some of cultured cells were rinsed in PBS for three times and fixed for 10 min with a fixative solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.14 M Sorensen’s phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature. The cells were counterstained with May-Giemsa (Honma et al., 2006), and phase-contrast microphotographs were obtained using a Zeiss microscope. 4.2. Phenotypic characterization Flow cytometric analysis of BMSCs and PMSCs was performed as previously described (Honma et al., 2006). Briefly, cell suspensions were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). For direct assays fifty thousand cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated CD45 (Leukocyte Common Antigen) (BD Bioscience Pharmingen, San Jose, CA), PE-conjugated CD 73 (Ecto-5′-nucleotidase) (BD Bioscience Pharmingen), PE-conjugated CD 90 (Thy-1) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and PE-conjugated CD106 (VCAM-1) (BD Bioscience Pharmingen) at 4 °C for 30 min, and then washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% BSA. The cells were analyzed by cytometric analysis using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) with the use of CellQuest software. 4.3. Induction of MSCs to floating spheric cells When inducing MSCs to floating spheric cells like neurospheres, MSCs were detached with trypsin—EDTA solution and were collected in a 50-ml tube in DMEM+10% FBS. After rinsing with DMEM, cells (1×106 cells/ml) were suspended in 20 ml Neural Progenitor basal medium (NPBM) (Cambrex, One Meadowlands Plaza, NJ) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, were plated on 100 mm non-treated dish (IWAKI), and were incubated for 3 days. Growth factors (EGF and bFGF) were added every day. 4.4. Differentiation of neurospheres to neural cells When inducing the floating spheric cells (neurospheres) to neural cells, floating spheric cells were collected by centrifuging at 1500 rpm for 5 min, suspended in NPBM supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, mechanically dissociated, and were plated on plastic tissue culture dish for 1 week. 4.5. RT-PCR Total RNA was extracted from each cell culture using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). We performed the reverse transcription with 100 ng RNA using the SuperScript II RNase H- reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, we used a final volume of 20 μl containing 100 ng RNA, 4 μl First Strand Buffer, 10 mM dNTPs, 100 mM DTT, 0.5 μg Oligo(dt)12–18 and 100 U of SuperScript II RNase H- reverse transcriptase. We then carried out a PCR reaction using the Hot Star Taq Master Mix Kit (QIAGEN) in a final volume of 50 μl containing 25 μl Hot Star Taq Master Mix, and 10 mM upstream sense and downstream sense primers. Cyclical parameters were denatured at 94 °C for 30 s, annealed at 60 °C for 30 s, and finally elongated at 72 °C for 30 s. Thirty five cycles were performed for each primer set. We resolved the PCR products on 2% gel agarose. Primer sequence of amplified products was: mouse β-actin sense (5′-TGGAATCCTGTGGCATCCATGAAAC-3′), mouse β-actin antisense (5′-TAAAACGCAGCTCAGTAACAGTCCG-3′), rat nestin sense (5′-CTTAGTCTGGAGGTGGCTACATACA-3′), rat nestin antisense (5′-GAGGATAGCAGAAGAACTAGGCACT-3′), rat neurofilament M (NF-M) sense (5′-GGTCACTTCACATGCCATAGTCAA-3′), rat NF-M antisense (5′-GGCTCAGTTGGTACTTTGCGTAA-3′), rat glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) sense (5′-ATTCCGCGCCTCTCCCTGTCTC-3′), and rat GFAP antisense (5′-GCTTCATCCGCCTCCTGTCTGT-3′). 4.6. Immunocytochemical analysis To identify the cell type derived from the BMSCs and PMSCs, immunocytochemical studies were performed with the use of antibodies to neurons (1:400 monoclonal mouse NF-M, SIGMA), and astrocytes (1:400 monoclonal mouse anti-GFAP, SIGMA). Cultured cells were rinsed in PBS for three times and fixed for 10 min with a fixative solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.14 M Sorensen’s phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature. After washing twice in PBS and incubating in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min at room temperature, fixed cells were incubated for 30 min in a blocking solution containing 0.1% Triton X-100, and 3% BSA before incubation with the primary antibody. Primary antibodies are labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 using Zenon mouse IgG Labeling Kits (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. After immunostaining, cover-slips were mounted cell-side down on microscope slides using mounting medium (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA). Confocal images were obtained using a Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope with the use of Zeiss software. 4.7. Data analysis All data are presented as mean values±SD. Differences among groups were assessed by ANOVA with Scheffe’s post hoc test to identify individual group differences. Differences were deemed statistically significant at P<0.05. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture (16390414, 16591450, 16659393), Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) (RG2135; CA1009A10), the National Institutes of Health (NS43432), and the Medical and Rehabilitation and Development Research Services of the Department of Veterans Affairs. REFERENCES
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
J Cell Physiol. 1998 Jul; 176(1):57-66.
[J Cell Physiol. 1998]Exp Hematol. 2003 Aug; 31(8):715-22.
[Exp Hematol. 2003]Circulation. 2002 Jan 1; 105(1):93-8.
[Circulation. 2002]Science. 1997 Apr 4; 276(5309):71-4.
[Science. 1997]J Neurosci Res. 2000 Aug 15; 61(4):364-70.
[J Neurosci Res. 2000]Arthritis Res. 2000; 2(6):477-88.
[Arthritis Res. 2000]Stem Cells. 2000; 18(4):252-60.
[Stem Cells. 2000]J Clin Oncol. 1997 Sep; 15(9):3067-74.
[J Clin Oncol. 1997]Ann Hematol. 2005 Aug; 84(8):532-7.
[Ann Hematol. 2005]J Cell Physiol. 1998 Jul; 176(1):57-66.
[J Cell Physiol. 1998]Exp Hematol. 2003 Aug; 31(8):715-22.
[Exp Hematol. 2003]Exp Neurol. 2006 May; 199(1):56-66.
[Exp Neurol. 2006]Blood. 1991 Jun 15; 77(12):2591-6.
[Blood. 1991]Stem Cells. 2000; 18(4):252-60.
[Stem Cells. 2000]Stem Cells. 2005 Sep; 23(8):1105-12.
[Stem Cells. 2005]Arthritis Res. 2000; 2(6):477-88.
[Arthritis Res. 2000]Exp Hematol. 2003 Aug; 31(8):715-22.
[Exp Hematol. 2003]Exp Neurol. 2006 May; 199(1):56-66.
[Exp Neurol. 2006]Respir Res. 2005 Oct 27; 6():125.
[Respir Res. 2005]Exp Neurol. 2006 May; 199(1):56-66.
[Exp Neurol. 2006]Exp Neurol. 2006 May; 199(1):56-66.
[Exp Neurol. 2006]