![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cell Death after Spinal Cord Injury Is Exacerbated by Rapid TNFα-Induced Trafficking of GluR2-Lacking AMPARs to the Plasma Membrane 1Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94110 2Department of Neuroscience, Center for Brain and Spinal Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 3Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology, and Medical Genetics, Center for Brain and Spinal Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 4Department of Biology, Coe College, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402 5Department of Neurosciences, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94107 6Neurology, Harvard University, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Corresponding author.Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Michael S. Beattie, Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Building 1, Room 101, San Francisco, CA 94110. E-mail: Michael.Beattie/at/ucsf.edu. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available free at J Neurosci.Abstract Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS, is implicated in both normal neurotransmission and excitotoxicity. Numerous in vitro findings indicate that the ionotropic glutamate receptor, AMPAR, can rapidly traffic from intracellular stores to the plasma membrane, altering neuronal excitability. These receptor trafficking events are thought to be involved in CNS plasticity as well as learning and memory. AMPAR trafficking has recently been shown to be regulated by glial release of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) in vitro. This has potential relevance to several CNS disorders, because many pathological states have a neuroinflammatory component involving TNFα. However, TNFα-induced trafficking of AMPARs has only been explored in primary or slice cultures and has not been demonstrated in preclinical models of CNS damage. Here, we use confocal and image analysis techniques to demonstrate that spinal cord injury (SCI) induces trafficking of AMPARs to the neuronal membrane. We then show that this effect is mimicked by nanoinjections of TNFα, which produces specific trafficking of GluR2-lacking receptors which enhance excitotoxicity. To determine if TNFα-induced trafficking affects neuronal cell death, we sequestered TNFα after SCI using a soluble TNFα receptor, and significantly reduced both AMPAR trafficking and neuronal excitotoxicity in the injury penumbra. The data provide the first evidence linking rapid TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking to early excitotoxic secondary injury after CNS trauma in vivo, and demonstrate a novel way in which pathological states hijack mechanisms involved in normal synaptic plasticity to produce cell death. Keywords: inflammation, excitotoxicity, trauma, plasticity, neuroinflammation, neural-immune interaction, glia-neuron interactions Introduction Glutamate receptors can be rapidly inserted or deleted from neuronal membranes, thereby affecting synaptic function (Malinow and Malenka, 2002). Trafficking of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) has been shown to be affected by synaptic activation, and in cultured hippocampal neurons appears also to be regulated by nonsynaptic events, including the release of insulin (Skeberdis et al., 2001), cholesterol (Hering et al., 2003), and glial tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) (Beattie et al., 2002). This has provided support to the concept that glial cells and circulating cytokines can affect synaptic regulation (Stellwagen and Malenka, 2006). TNFα and other cytokines are released in response to stress and after injury, suggesting that these pathological situations may also affect synaptic transmission. Furthermore, because AMPARs are implicated in excitotoxicity, injury-induced TNFα release could exacerbate cell death by the same mechanisms that control glutamatergic synaptic strength, i.e., receptor trafficking. This notion is supported by findings that coinjection of TNFα with low doses of the glutamate agonist kainic acid produce marked cell death in spinal neurons in vivo (Hermann et al., 2001). In addition, in hippocampal cultures TNFα increases GluR2-lacking AMPAR surface expression (Stellwagen et al., 2005), thereby enhancing Ca2+ influx (Leonoudakis et al., 2008) and providing a potential mechanism for the observed increase in excitotoxicity in vivo. The present study was aimed at determining whether rapid AMPAR trafficking occurs as part of the pathological sequelae in spinal cord injury (SCI), if it is mediated by TNFα, and whether blocking TNFα could reduce cell death. AMPAR trafficking has been studied in vitro using electrophysiology (Adesnik et al., 2005), live cell imaging (Sekine-Aizawa and Huganir, 2004) and cell surface biotinylation (Ehlers, 2000); these methods allow for separation of populations of receptors exposed to the extracellular space from those in intracellular stores. Measuring trafficking in vivo is more challenging because many of the above approaches cannot be used. However, if examinations of this and similar hypotheses are to be moved from the in vitro situation to the more translational setting of the intact adult CNS, such measurements will be necessary. In the present study, we tested for TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking in preclinical models of SCI by combining whole tissue membrane fractionation and Western blotting with optical methods using high-resolution confocal microscopy, blind iterative deconvolution, and automated image analysis techniques on fixed tissue. Laser scanning confocal data revealed that SCI significantly increases synaptic AMPARs in spinal neurons in vivo, suggesting increased excitotoxic potential. Biochemical fractionation and confocal techniques demonstrated that nanoinjections of TNFα also induce a rapid, dose-dependent increase in GluR2-lacking AMPARs in the neuronal plasma membrane at both extrasynaptic and synaptic sites. Finally, we show that sequestration of TNFα with a soluble form of human recombinant TNFα receptor 1 after spinal cord injury reduces both AMPAR trafficking to the membrane and acute neuronal excitotoxicity. These findings suggest that injury-induced increases in TNFα alter AMPAR trafficking and contribute to excitotoxic cell death via a novel process that involves the hijacking of mechanisms involved in the modulation of normal synaptic transmission. Materials and Methods Animals Subjects were 77- to 87-d-old female Long-Evans rats that were housed as pairs in Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-approved facilities at Ohio State University and the University of California, San Francisco. All experiments were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at The Ohio State University and the University of California, San Francisco. Cervical spinal cord injury Subjects were anesthetized with pentobarbital and a dorsal midline incision was made. Connective tissue was dissected and a C5 laminectomy was performed. Subjects were given unilateral cervical contusion injuries using a New York University/Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study device with a 2.0 mm head dropped from an impact height of 6.25 mm. These procedures have been shown to produce a focal lesion with minimal contralateral spread, allowing use of the contralateral side as an internal control (Gensel et al., 2006). Given the regional effect of injury, microscope field was used as the unit of analysis, yielding sample sizes of n = 17 for spinal cord injury and n = 21 for control. To provide an accurate estimate of total synaptic AMPAR, each field was sampled in three-dimensions (3D) with a laser scanning microscope (yielding 608 total images) and quantification was performed on the mean three-dimensional colocalization for each field. The experiment was replicated at 90 min and 3 h to provide a time course analysis (n = 4 subjects with SCI tested as a within-subject variable) (Fig. 1
TNFα nanoinjection Subjects were given stereotactic nanoinjections (35 nl) into the T9-10 ventral horn as previously described (Hermann et al., 2001) using compressed air micropressure applied to pulled glass pipettes (tip diameter, 30 μm; 30° bevel; Radnoti). Albumin (1 μM) was used as a control because it has molecular weight similar to rat recombinant TNFα (R&D systems). For biochemical experiments, subjects (n = 5) were given nanoinjections of either TNFα (1 μM) or albumin into four evenly spaced sites within a 750 μm length of spinal cord (Fig. 2A
Nanoinjection of soluble TNFα receptor 1 after cervical SCI Subjects were given unilateral cervical spinal cord injuries as described above and then placed in a spinal stereotaxic for intraparenchymal treatment with human recombinant soluble TNFα receptor (R&D systems). The dura was opened under a dissecting scope and then two nanoinjection pipettes (50 μm tip diameter, 30° bevel, Radnoti) were positioned under stereotaxic control to target the rostral and caudal edges of the lesion. Pipettes were mounted on a stereotaxic arm at a fixed space of 7.2 mm apart, with the visible contusion hematoma placed equidistant between the tips. Drug or vehicle was delivered into the spinal parenchyma at a depth of 1.4 mm at the midline, at a dose of 10 μg/ml dissolved in PBS containing 0.1% BSA. Solutions were delivered in 30 nl bursts over 5 min per pipette for 60 min (subjects were killed 90 min after injury), resulting in a total dose of 7.2 ng soluble TNFα receptor 1 (sTNFαR1) in 720 nl of solution per subject. To achieve a balanced design, nanoinjection of sTNFαR1 was compared against two control groups: vehicle nanoinjection, and a noninjected contusion lesion (n = 4). Subcellular fractionation Sixty minutes after TNFα or albumin nanoinjections, 7.5 mm of spinal cord was extracted under deep anesthesia, snap-frozen on dry ice, and placed in a −80°C freezer for later processing. The fractionation procedures were adapted from previous work with mouse spinal cord (Galan et al., 2004). Frozen spinal cord was homogenized with 30 passes of a “Type B” pestle in a dounce homogenizer (Kontes) followed by 5 passes through a 22 gauge needle in ice-cold buffer, pH 7.5, containing 10 mM Tris, 300 mM sucrose, and a complete mini protease inhibitor mixture (Roche). Crude homogenate was centrifuged at 5000 RCF for 5 min at 4°C. Supernatant (S1) was further fractionated at 13,000 RCF for 30 min. Supernatant (S2) was transferred to a new tube and pellet (P2) was resuspended in PBS (50 μl) containing protease inhibitor. All samples were sonicated and stored at −80°C for later processing. N-cadherin was used to confirm plasma membrane enrichment (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Protein assay and immunoblotting Total protein was determined with BCA (Pierce) and quantified with a plate reader (Tecan; GeNios). Samples from each subject were separately mixed with cold Laemmli sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris HCl, pH 6.8, 25% glycerol, 2% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol) and immediately loaded into precast 12.5% Tris-HCl polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad). Samples from albumin- and TNFα-treated subjects were loaded pairwise on adjacent lanes (40 μg/lane) in a semirandomized manner to counterbalance for regional variability within the gel. To minimize potential for bias, the experimenter was unaware of condition during gel loading. Spinal cord fractions and a positive control of brain homogenate (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) were electrophoresed in SDS running buffer (Bio-Rad; 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, pH 8.3). Molecular weights were confirmed with kaleidoscopic precision protein standard (Bio-Rad). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane in cold tris-glycine buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol, pH 8.3). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk in Tween-tris-buffered saline (TTBS) [0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.6] and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in 1% milk TTBS. Membranes were washed 3 × 10 min with TTBS and then incubated with goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (Pierce) for 1 h at room temperature in 1% milk TTBS. Membranes were washed 3 × 10 min with TTBS (0.05% Tween), incubated with ECL substrate (West Femto; Pierce), and exposed to x-ray film (Phenix). After blotting GluR1, membranes were stripped with 0.2 N NaOH for 5 min, rinsed with nanopure water and then reprobed for GluR2. A second stripping step was performed before probing with N-cadherin. The success of stripping was confirmed by ECL. Actin (BD transduction laboratories) was probed as a loading control after N-cadherin visualization (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Densitometry Films were digitized using a Perfection 1200 photo scanner (Epson) and quantified with Kodak 1d software. Bands were detected in an automated manner by the software with supervision by experimenter who was unaware of experimental condition. Mean intensity of each band was measured relative to the mean background immediately above and below the band. Exposure time was optimized for each protein to maximize the difference between band intensity and background. To control for potential loading-induced variance in total AMPAR levels while remaining sensitive to differential changes in subunit composition, the GluR1:GluR2 intensity ratio was used as the primary outcome. Statistical analysis of the actin density was used to confirm equal total protein loading. Histological processing For imaging experiments, subjects were killed under deep anesthesia by transcardiac perfusion with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Lengths of spinal cord (30 mm) centered on the injection sites or lesion were removed and postfixed overnight (<18 h) in 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissue was cryoprotected in 30% sucrose for 2 d, cut into 10 mm blocks, flash frozen on dry ice, and placed in a −80°C freezer for later processing. Tissue was embedded in OCT and sectioned 20 μm horizontally, dividing adjacent sections across four sets of slides. Immunohistochemistry Antibody labeling was performed on fixed tissue sections from a full set of experimental conditions simultaneously using a high-throughput staining station (Sequenza; Thermo Scientific). Before antibody application, tissue was blocked and permeabilized for 1 h with 5% normal goat serum and 0.3% Triton X-100. Sections were incubated overnight at room temperature with a solution containing mouse monoclonal antibody for presynaptic synaptophysin (1:200) and rabbit polyclonal anti-AMPAR antibodies (1:200) directed at the C-terminal intracellular domains of GluR1 or GluR2 (Millipore). cFos was labeled with a rabbit primary (Oncogene) at 1:5000 coincubated with synaptophysin to identify neurons. GluR1, GluR2, and cFos were applied to serial slide sets allowing regional specificity of the effects to be compared within a given subject. After a wash with 2 ml of PBS, all slides were incubated for 1 h at RT with the same freshly diluted fluorescent secondary antibody solution containing 1:100 Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen) and Alexa 633 goat-anti-mouse. These procedures labeled AMPARs or cFos as Alexa 488 and synaptophysin as Alexa 633. Slides were briefly rinsed with 2 ml PBS and coverslipped with Vectashield containing DAPI (4′ ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Vector Laboratories). Each immunolabel had three negative controls: no primary, and each individual primary with the incorrect secondary. Confocal microscopy on these controls revealed virtually no detectable label above threshold. Unbiased confocal sampling procedures For contusion tissue, a region of interest was selected using c-Fos within the penumbra of the expanding lesion. Although motoneurons do not label strongly for c-Fos, labeling in smaller neurons (Fig. 1B Laser scanning confocal microscopy and deconvolution Confocal stacks were generated for large motoneurons using a Zeiss 510 META laser scanning confocal microscope with a 63× objective (NA = 1.4) and a 2× zoom. Bandpass filter and laser settings were optimized on control tissue and then held constant for the duration of the experiment, providing consistent, near-complete spectral separation of synaptophysin (Alexa 633), FluoroRuby (Texas Red), and AMPARs (Alexa 488). Confocal slices (1 μm) over-sampled at 0.5 μm z-intervals were deblurred using 3D-blind iterative deconvolution (AutoQuant). Iteration number for the deconvolution algorithm was determined using a random subset of images and then held constant for each label for the duration of the study (iteration, 2 for GluR1; 4 for GluR2). Sequential use of confocal and deconvolution allowed higher resolution than achievable by either technique alone, providing more precise localization of receptor puncta (supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Automated confocal image analysis MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices) was used to quantify the number of fluorescently labeled receptor puncta on the plasma membrane using custom-designed macro programs. All measures represent the number of pixels above a predetermined threshold that was established on control tissue and then held constant throughout the study. The first macro measured, for the three-dimensional z-series of each field, the total number of AMPAR positive pixels (reflecting both membrane and intracellular receptors) and AMPAR/synaptophysin colocalized pixels (reflecting synaptic AMPARs in the neuropil). Similar measurement procedures have been shown to be sensitive to subcellular localization of receptors in vitro (Beattie et al., 2002). A second macro screened confocal stacks to identify the optical section with maximal synaptophysin/AMPAR colocalization. A blinded researcher supervised the algorithm, dropping planes that were inappropriately selected based on staining artifacts. The motoneuron plasma membrane was traced on the selected optical plane using the synaptophysin channel and a subroutine generated a 2 μm-wide cutout representing plasma membrane area (see Fig. 4C,D
Nissl staining Nissl staining was performed using 0.5% cresyl violet (Sigma) that was dissolved in dH2O and filtered. Tissue sections from each experimental condition were mounted on the same slide, and staining was performed on the entire set at the same time, thereby minimizing systematic variance in staining. Tissue was briefly rinsed in dH2O and then stained with cresyl violet for 10 min. After a 5 min wash in 95% EtOH, tissue was differentiated in 95% EtOH containing a small amount of glacial acetic acid (10 drops/180 ml). Differentiation was checked under a microscope by a researcher who was blinded to experimental condition. Tissue was serially washed in 100% EtOH (2 × 3 min), serially placed in Xylene (4 × 3 min), and coverslipped with DPX mounting medium (Sigma). Robotic brightfield microscopy and automated cell counts To quantify the extent of sparing after drug treatment we used a slide scanning system mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope. A motorized stage under precise digital feedback control allowed us to build, in an automated manner, full montage reconstructions of horizontal tissue sections through the ventral horn from high-power images (see Figs. 5
Statistical analyses Immunofluorescence data were analyzed using mixed ANOVA (injection side entered as a within-subject variable) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for overall changes in the number of AMPAR-positive puncta. By statistically controlling for total AMPAR labeling with ANCOVA, we were able to distinguish receptor trafficking (subcellular redistribution) from an increase in total AMPAR puncta numbers (presumably through de novo synthesis). Densitometry data were analyzed nonparametrically with Mann-Whitney U. Brightfield data were analyzed with mixed ANOVA with distance from lesion center as a within-subject variable. For all parametric analyses, main effects and interactions were followed up with one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests. Significance was assessed at p < 0.05. Results To achieve the highest possible standards for quantitative interpretation, all experiments were performed in a fully blinded manner. Arbitrary codes were used to label drug vials, subject conditions were unknown, and subcellular fractions were coded during gel loading to eliminate possible sources of systematic bias. Conditions were only decoded after all surgery, biochemistry, microscopy, image analysis and database compilation was completed. Spinal cord injury acutely increases synaptic GluR1 within a cFos+ penumbra at the lesion edge Previous in vitro work has revealed that AMPAR trafficking can be detected optically by simultaneously imaging the presynaptic vesicular protein synaptophysin and AMPARs, which are expressed postsynaptically (Lissin et al., 1998; Stellwagen et al., 2005). To test whether altered AMPAR trafficking occurs in spinal cord injury we applied a similar analysis method to perfused, fixed, and permeabilized tissue sections from a preclinical model of spinal contusion injury. Accurate subcellular localization of AMPAR puncta within fixed tissue sections was achieved using a serial imaging methodology of high-resolution confocal microscopy followed by 3 d blind-iterative deconvolution (supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Given that TNFα levels in spinal tissue become rapidly elevated after CNS trauma (Wang et al., 1996), we hypothesized that altered AMPAR trafficking would occur at early time points after spinal cord injury. Testing this hypothesis is challenging, in part, because cells that have the most robust increases in plasma membrane AMPAR may be selectively killed, thereby obscuring detection of AMPAR trafficking. However, if changes in AMPAR trafficking occur in a temporally and spatially graded manner, then interfering with AMPAR trafficking represents a valuable therapeutic target for stopping early secondary injury and limiting expansion of the lesion. To test this important hypothesis, we used a recently established unilateral model of cervical spinal cord injury (Gensel et al., 2006). This model is unique in that it provides the uninjured contralateral side as a control for surface AMPAR levels, allowing quantitative comparisons within a single subject (Fig. 1A Increased synaptic GluR1 after acute spinal cord injury is not attributable to an increase in total GluR1 Recent in vitro work has shown that rapid translation of AMPAR protein in the dendrites can lead to increased insertion of new GluR1 at synaptic sites in hippocampal cultures (Ju et al., 2004). To test whether spinal cord injury increases synaptic AMPARs by increasing GluR1 protein levels, we performed ANCOVA to statistically test whether variance in the total number of GluR1 puncta could account for the injury-induced increase in synaptic GluR1. ANCOVA indicated that the increase in synaptic AMPAR was not driven by a change in total cellular AMPAR (p < 0.0001 after correcting for total GluR1), implicating a receptor trafficking mechanism rather than protein synthesis/degradation. TNFα increases GluR2-lacking AMPARs in the plasma membranein vivo To test whether TNFα could contribute to SCI-induced AMPAR trafficking we delivered TNFα or the vehicle (albumin) to uninjured subjects and evaluated AMPAR trafficking in vivo using a biochemical assay (Fig. 2A TNFα increases GluR1 but not GluR2 levels at synaptic sites in the spinal neuropil in vivo Although the biochemical fractionation assay revealed in vivo trafficking of GluR2-lacking AMPARs by TNFα, it leaves two important questions unanswered: (1) Does TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking occur in clinically relevant populations of neurons? (2) Does TNFα induce divergent effects on GluR1 and GluR2 subunits within the same neurons, thereby predisposing these cells to excitotoxic cell death? To address these issues we performed immunohistochemistry and high resolution image analysis of large ventral horn motoneurons. These cells are exquisitely sensitive to excitotoxicity (Vandenberghe et al., 2000), and their loss contributes to functional deficits in spinal cord injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Grossman et al., 2001b; Sun et al., 2006). Subunit levels were evaluated using a modification of the imaging procedures that we used to evaluate AMPAR trafficking after SCI (Fig. 1
Increased synaptic GluR1 after in vivoTNFα is not attributable to an increase in total GluR1 ANCOVA was used to test whether increased total GluR1 protein levels were responsible for the TNFα-induced enhancement of synaptic GluR1. The dose-dependent effect of TNFα on synaptic GluR1 was robustly maintained after correcting for total protein levels (p < 0.0001), suggesting that the effect of TNFα on synaptic GluR1 was specifically driven by redistribution of AMPARs to synaptic sites rather than an increase in total GluR1. These data indicate that the targets for therapeutic intervention may be the specific mechanisms underlying AMPAR trafficking rather than mechanisms in control of protein synthesis and degradation, just as we saw in the spinal cord injury experiments above. GluR1:GluR2 ratios change on the somatic membrane of identified motoneurons after TNFα injection To test whether TNFα affected the relative levels of GluR1 and GluR2 on the plasma membrane of a single identified cellular population we developed an image analysis subroutine that generated an “optical fraction” of the somatic plasma membrane of large ventral motoneurons (Fig. 4C,D,K-L TNFα induced a significant dose-dependent increase in the number of GluR1 puncta at both extrasynaptic and synaptic sites in the somatic plasma membrane (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively) (Fig. 4A-H Postinjury treatment with soluble TNFα receptor 1 reduces synaptic GluR1 within the cFos+ SCI penumbra To test whether TNFα contributes to AMPAR trafficking after spinal cord injury, we nanoinjected a soluble form of human recombinant TNFα receptor (sTNFαR1) to reduce functional TNFα levels acutely after a unilateral cervical spinal cord injury. Synaptic AMPAR levels were measured by confocal analysis of the penumbra as identified by registering GluR1/synaptophysin-labeled sections to adjacent dorsal and ventral sections which were respectively labeled for Nissl and cFos. As observed in the first experiment (Fig. 1B Postinjury treatment with soluble TNFα receptor 1 reduces acute secondary excitotoxicity in SCI To test the therapeutic potential of interfering with TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking after CNS trauma, we tested the effect of sTNFαR1 on motoneuron sparing after SCI. An automated cell counting algorithm revealed significant sparing of Nissl-positive large motoneurons after sTNFαR1 treatment within a region of penumbra that was selected in a blinded, a priori manner (Fig. 6A Discussion After SCI, TNFα levels become elevated in the spinal cord, reaching peak levels within 1 h after initial trauma (Wang et al., 1996). Within the same time period, large numbers of neurons start to die through an excitotoxic mechanism. The present findings suggest that TNFα-induced trafficking of AMPA receptors contributes to this excitoxic cell death after spinal cord injury in vivo. We evaluated AMPAR trafficking in two in vivo models of spinal cord injury. We first tested for SCI-induced AMPAR trafficking using a hemi-contusion model of cervical spinal cord injury that produces a focal lesion with associated unilateral functional deficits (Gensel et al., 2006). The data revealed an increase in AMPAR numbers at synapses ipsilateral to the lesion at 90 min and 3 h after injury that was not accounted for by an increase in total GluR1, suggesting an AMPAR-trafficking mechanism. To test whether injury-induced TNFα may contribute to this AMPAR trafficking in the spinal cord in vivo, we nanoinjected TNFα into the ventral horns and performed biochemical and optical analysis of the tissue at 60 min after injection (supplemental Figs. 1, 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). These experiments revealed that in vivo TNFα simultaneously increases GluR1 and decreases GluR2 at both extrasynaptic and synaptic plasma membrane sites. Given that GluR2-lacking AMPARs have increased permeability to calcium (Cull-Candy et al., 2006), TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking is likely to contribute to postinjury excitotoxicity. Recent in vitro work has suggested that TNFα causes a transient exocytosis of GluR2-lacking AMPARs at extrasynaptic sites within 15 min of TNFα exposure in hippocampal primary culture, but then resolves by 1 h (Leonoudakis et al., 2008). This would suggest an unrealistic temporal window for intervention in most clinical settings, however the present findings suggest that in vivo these effects occur on a lagged timescale, offering a potential treatment opportunity. To test this therapeutic potential, we sequestered TNFα after cervical spinal cord injury with a soluble TNFα receptor and found a reduction in synaptic AMPAR, and associated reductions in excitotoxic cell death as measured by greater numbers of spared neurons after acute SCI. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking in the context of an in vivo preclinical model of a CNS disorder. Glutamate receptors have long been implicated in secondary excitotoxicity in disease and after neurotrauma (Gómez-Pinilla et al., 1989; Wrathall et al., 1996); however, reports of changes in the expression of glutamate receptors have generally been concerned with long term changes in total protein levels. Here, we emphasize the more rapid post-translational changes in excitotoxicity related to receptor trafficking events. Many drugs that directly antagonize glutamate receptors have profound negative side effects and have failed clinical trials (Walters et al., 2005; Chen and Lipton, 2006). The present findings suggest a novel approach for modulating glutamate excitotoxicity after spinal cord injury using drugs that act on TNFα signaling. This may have immediate translational benefit, as TNFα inhibitors have already passed clinical trials for other inflammatory syndromes such as rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, because SCI-induced AMPAR trafficking persisted for at least 3 h, there appears to be a relatively broad time window for therapeutic intervention. It is important to recognize that the present findings are based on several elegant in vitro studies of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, which have revealed that TNFα can alter synaptic strength by modulating AMPAR trafficking (Beattie et al., 2002; Stellwagen et al., 2005; Stellwagen and Malenka, 2006; Leonoudakis et al., 2008). However, before the present findings, TNFα-induced AMPAR trafficking had never been directly demonstrated in vivo and its role in cell death after CNS injury had not been known. Previous work has revealed that AMPAR subunit mRNA levels do not change within the first 24 h after spinal cord injury (Grossman et al., 2001a), although the majority of acute motoneuron excitotoxicity occurs (Grossman et al., 2001b), and anti-TNFα drugs are protective (Genovese et al., 2006) within this time frame. The present findings provide an explanation for this apparent paradox, suggesting that early injury-induced excitotoxicity (Hermann et al., 2001) is attributable to rapid trafficking of AMPARs to the synaptic plasma membrane rather than changes in total cellular AMPAR numbers. At later time points (>24 h), changes in total AMPAR protein levels (increased GluR1:GluR2 ratio) have been reported (Grossman et al., 1999), and these long term changes may contribute to ongoing cell death rather than early secondary injury processes. It is noteworthy that TNFα selectively increased plasma membrane levels of the GluR2-lacking receptor, an AMPAR subpopulation with increased current passing capability and greater permeability to calcium (Van den Bosch et al., 2000; Vandenberghe et al., 2000). AMPAR trafficking occurred at TNFα doses that potentiate excitotoxicity in the spinal cord in vivo (Hermann et al., 2001), providing a mechanism for these previous findings. Trafficking of GluR2-lacking receptors may also provide a mechanistic explanation for findings within the pain literature that TNFα increases excitability in cultured spinal cord sensory neurons (Schäfers et al., 2003a) and produces tactile hypersensitivity in vivo (Schäfers et al., 2003b). Thus, the implications of the present work extend beyond spinal cord pathology. Excitotoxicity through GluR2-lacking AMPARs may be a common mechanism of cell loss in a variety of neurodegenerative conditions including not only spinal cord injury but amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, ischemic injury, and Alzheimer's disease (Agrawal and Fehlings, 1997; Pitt et al., 2000; Blanchard et al., 2004; Leonoudakis et al., 2004; Lai et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2006; Tobinick and Gross, 2008), disease states that also have an inflammatory component. By providing the first in vivo demonstration that TNFα regulates trafficking of GluR2-lacking AMPARs, the present findings suggest novel therapeutic targets for treating excitotoxicity in CNS injury and disease. Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 NS38079 (J.C.B., M.S.B.), New York State CoRE (Center of Research Excellence) (M.S.B., J.C.B.), and Christopher Reeve Foundation Grants BB-0204-2 (M.S.B.), RO1 MH067931 (E.C.B.), F32 NS053059 (A.R.F.), F32 NS045468 (R.N.C.), and F30 NS053185 (B.A.M.). We thank C. Amy Tovar and Rochelle Deibert for technical and surgical expertise, Yvette S. Nout and Karen-Amanda Irvine for surgical expertise, John Komon for help with figures, Ohio State University Campus Microscopy and Imaging Facility, and Dmitri Leonoudakis for helping develop the image analysis techniques. We thank Karen-Amanda Irvine and Sergio Veiga for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Supplement 1 Click here to view.(32K, pdf) Supplement 2 Click here to view.(94K, pdf) References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002; 25():103-26.
[Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 13; 98(6):3561-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]J Neurosci. 2003 Apr 15; 23(8):3262-71.
[J Neurosci. 2003]Science. 2002 Mar 22; 295(5563):2282-5.
[Science. 2002]Nature. 2006 Apr 20; 440(7087):1054-9.
[Nature. 2006]Neuron. 2005 Dec 22; 48(6):977-85.
[Neuron. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 7; 101(49):17114-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Neuron. 2000 Nov; 28(2):511-25.
[Neuron. 2000]J Neurotrauma. 2006 Jan; 23(1):36-54.
[J Neurotrauma. 2006]Neurobiol Dis. 2001 Aug; 8(4):590-9.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2001]Pain. 2004 Dec; 112(3):315-23.
[Pain. 2004]Science. 2002 Mar 22; 295(5563):2282-5.
[Science. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9; 95(12):7097-102.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 23; 25(12):3219-28.
[J Neurosci. 2005]J Neuroimmunol. 1996 Sep; 69(1-2):151-6.
[J Neuroimmunol. 1996]J Neurotrauma. 2006 Jan; 23(1):36-54.
[J Neurotrauma. 2006]Nat Med. 1997 Jan; 3(1):73-6.
[Nat Med. 1997]Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar; 7(3):244-53.
[Nat Neurosci. 2004]Pain. 2004 Dec; 112(3):315-23.
[Pain. 2004]Science. 2006 Aug 25; 313(5790):1093-7.
[Science. 2006]Science. 1991 May 10; 252(5007):851-3.
[Science. 1991]J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1; 20(1):123-32.
[J Neurosci. 2000]J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1; 20(1):123-32.
[J Neurosci. 2000]Exp Neurol. 2001 Apr; 168(2):273-82.
[Exp Neurol. 2001]J Neurochem. 2006 Aug; 98(3):782-91.
[J Neurochem. 2006]J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 9; 26(32):8339-51.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Neuron. 2005 Dec 22; 48(6):977-85.
[Neuron. 2005]J Neuroimmunol. 1996 Sep; 69(1-2):151-6.
[J Neuroimmunol. 1996]J Neurotrauma. 2006 Jan; 23(1):36-54.
[J Neurotrauma. 2006]Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Jun; 16(3):288-97.
[Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006]J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 27; 28(9):2119-30.
[J Neurosci. 2008]Exp Neurol. 1989 May; 104(2):118-24.
[Exp Neurol. 1989]Exp Neurol. 1996 Jan; 137(1):119-26.
[Exp Neurol. 1996]Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 20(5):304-9.
[Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005]J Neurochem. 2006 Jun; 97(6):1611-26.
[J Neurochem. 2006]Science. 2002 Mar 22; 295(5563):2282-5.
[Science. 2002]J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 23; 25(12):3219-28.
[J Neurosci. 2005]Nature. 2006 Apr 20; 440(7087):1054-9.
[Nature. 2006]J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 27; 28(9):2119-30.
[J Neurosci. 2008]Exp Neurol. 2001 Apr; 168(2):283-9.
[Exp Neurol. 2001]Exp Neurol. 2001 Apr; 168(2):273-82.
[Exp Neurol. 2001]J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Mar; 316(3):1006-16.
[J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006]Neurobiol Dis. 2001 Aug; 8(4):590-9.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2001]J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 15; 19(14):5711-20.
[J Neurosci. 1999]J Neurol Sci. 2000 Nov 1; 180(1-2):29-34.
[J Neurol Sci. 2000]J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1; 20(1):123-32.
[J Neurosci. 2000]Neurobiol Dis. 2001 Aug; 8(4):590-9.
[Neurobiol Dis. 2001]J Neurosci. 1997 Feb 1; 17(3):1055-63.
[J Neurosci. 1997]Nat Med. 2000 Jan; 6(1):67-70.
[Nat Med. 2000]