![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright Hill et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Ion Channel Clustering at the Axon Initial Segment and Node of Ranvier Evolved Sequentially in Early Chordates 1Penn Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America 2Mahoney Institute of Neurological Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America 3Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan 4National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan 5Office of Research and Development, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C., United States of America 6Department of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Wayne N. Frankel, Editor The Jackson Laboratory, United States of America * E-mail: edc/at/mail.med.upenn.edu Conceived and designed the experiments: ASH AN KN ECC. Performed the experiments: ASH AN KN GZ JRF YO ECC. Analyzed the data: ASH AN KN GZ JRF MES YO ECC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AN KN GZ MES YO ECC. Wrote the paper: ECC. Received August 15, 2008; Accepted November 24, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract In many mammalian neurons, dense clusters of ion channels at the axonal initial segment and nodes of Ranvier underlie action potential generation and rapid conduction. Axonal clustering of mammalian voltage-gated sodium and KCNQ (Kv7) potassium channels is based on linkage to the actin–spectrin cytoskeleton, which is mediated by the adaptor protein ankyrin-G. We identified key steps in the evolution of this axonal channel clustering. The anchor motif for sodium channel clustering evolved early in the chordate lineage before the divergence of the wormlike cephalochordate, amphioxus. Axons of the lamprey, a very primitive vertebrate, exhibited some invertebrate features (lack of myelin, use of giant diameter to hasten conduction), but possessed narrow initial segments bearing sodium channel clusters like in more recently evolved vertebrates. The KCNQ potassium channel anchor motif evolved after the divergence of lampreys from other vertebrates, in a common ancestor of shark and humans. Thus, clustering of voltage-gated sodium channels was a pivotal early innovation of the chordates. Sodium channel clusters at the axon initial segment serving the generation of action potentials evolved long before the node of Ranvier. KCNQ channels acquired anchors allowing their integration into pre-existing sodium channel complexes at about the same time that ancient vertebrates acquired myelin, saltatory conduction, and hinged jaws. The early chordate refinements in action potential mechanisms we have elucidated appear essential to the complex neural signaling, active behavior, and evolutionary success of vertebrates. Author Summary Because nervous systems generate behavior, innovations that confer new neuronal signaling functions are important potential factors in evolution. In mammals, clustering of ion channels on nerves is essential for electrical impulses used in rapid signaling. This channel clustering is generally absent in insects, worms, and other non-chordates. We traced the evolutionary emergence of mechanisms underlying channel clustering on nerves by analyzing the genomes of primitive chordates and studying the cellular distribution and functional properties of their channels. We found that sodium channel clustering evolved early in the chordate lineage, before the divergence of the earliest wormlike and planktonic groups (lancelets and sea squirts). Nerve fibers of the lamprey, a primitive fish, retained some invertebrate features but possessed dense sodium channel clusters like in more recently evolved vertebrates. A potassium channel clustering system evolved, after the divergence of lampreys, in a common ancestor of shark and humans. We conclude that the clustering of sodium channels on axons was the initial pivotal step in a chordate-specific series of evolutionary innovations, making nerve impulses more rapid and robust. The refinements in action potentials we have elucidated appear essential for the complex neural signaling and active behavior of vertebrates. Introduction Most animals, from jellyfish to man, rely on electrical impulses called action potentials (APs) for rapid, long-distance neuronal signaling. Although APs are nearly always based on flows of sodium and potassium ion currents through voltage-gated channel proteins [1], comparisons across phyla reveal important differences in the ways that APs are initiated and conducted [2]–[4]. In jawed vertebrates (i.e., sharks, jawed bony fish, and tetrapods), the rate of AP propagation along nerve fibers, or axons, is markedly increased by myelin, an insulating coating around the axon formed by glia, and by nodes of Ranvier, small gaps in the myelin where dense clusters of ion channels boost the AP signal. Most vertebrate neurons also possess a robust and stereotyped polarity of form and function, with well-segregated domains for reception and integration of synaptic inputs (the dendrites, soma and proximal axon), AP initiation (the proximal axon) and rapid propagation (the axonal arbor) (Figure 1A
In mammals, similar membrane-associated protein complexes mediate AP initiation by the proximal axon and AP conduction by nodes of Ranvier [11]–[14]. The axon hillock has no special role in AP initiation. Instead, at both the “axon initial segment” (AIS), a 10–60 µm long axonal unmyelinated domain bounded by the hillock and the first internode, and at the nodes, voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channels are concentrated at high densities, generating large transient inward currents that rapidly depolarize the membrane potential. NaV channel concentration at the AIS and node both depend upon a specialized membrane cytoskeleton of actin-spectrin modules [12], [15]–[18]. The actin-spectrin network is linked via the adaptor, ankyrin-G, to NaV channels, neurofascin 186 (a L1 family cell adhesion molecule), and the voltage-gated potassium ion (KV) channel subunits, KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 (Figure 1C A model of the molecular mechanisms by which ankyrin-G clusters mammalian NaV, KCNQ2, and KCNQ3 channels at the AIS and node has emerged from studies of nerve and muscle cells in vitro and in transgenic mice, and by analogy with better understood protein interactions between ankyrin-G homologues and their binding partners. NaV, KCNQ2, and KCNQ3 polypeptides all possess cytoplasmic anchor motifs that share the sequence IAxGESDxD/E and are required for their immobilization at the AIS (Figure 1C–D Although colocalization of channels per se is not uncommon, initial studies raised a series of questions about how mammalian NaV, KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 channels had evolved such similar ankyrin interaction sequences [20]. BLAST search identified no other mammalian proteins bearing the anchor motifs. A first phylogenetic survey revealed that the NaV and KCNQ anchor motifs were extremely well conserved through over 350 million years of vertebrate evolution, from teleost fish to man, but were absent from the homologous channels of fly, squid and worm (Figure 1E Here, using molecular phylogenetic analysis, we have reconstructed a sequence of evolutionary events through which mammalian NaV and KCNQ channels acquired their anchor motifs. Fly and worm, the model invertebrates most frequently studied by molecular neurobiologists, are protostomes, separated from vertebrates by an important evolutionary gap (Figure 1E Results The Sodium Channel Anchor Motif Is a Shared Exclusive Feature of Chordates NaV channels with rapid opening and closing kinetics are present on the motor axons and stinging nematocysts of jellyfish, where they serve in escape swimming, defense, and predation [40],[41]. Although cnidarians appear to possess only a single NaV channel gene, in many protostomes and deuterostomes, multiple homologous NaV channel genes derived from a common ancestor are present (e.g., Drosophila melanogaster, n = 2; Ciona intestinalis, n = 4; Homo Sapiens, n = 10) [1], [42]–[44]. The 10 mammalian NaV genes are linked to the four mammalian hox loci, implying that they all descended from a single gene linked to the ancestral bilaterian hox locus [37],[44],[48]. Phylogenetic analysis of the origin of the anchor motif supported this scenario (Figure 2A–B
The NaV genes lacking anchor motifs (i.e., all non-chordate NaV genes and chordate NaV2-4 genes) all appeared basal to, and exhibited greater sequence divergence than, the NaV1-like gene clade. Phylogenic relationships among these anchorless genes appeared complex, which could potentially reflect gene duplications and losses that remain unresolved (Figure 2A Axon Initial Segment NaV Channel Clustering Is Prominent in Lamprey Lampreys are jawless vertebrates, descendants of a lineage that diverged from other crown vertebrates by the early Ordovician Period, long before the evolution of myelin and saltatory conduction [39],[50],[51]. Searching the genome of the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus disclosed 2 NaV channel genes, both bearing anchor motifs (Figures 2A–B
We confirmed the labeled structures to be AISs by combining immunostaining with dye-filling of identified motor system neurons [55]. In lampreys, as in jawed fish, giant Mauthner cells of the medulla project to contralateral spinal motoneurons, mediating the C-bend, a rapid escape behavior [56]. Mauthner dye-fills showed large somata and dendrites, and giant (40–80 µm diameter) distal axons, but markedly narrowed (~5 µm diameter) proximal axons (Figure 4A, 4C
Invertebrates Possess KCNQ1 and KCNQ4/5-Like Channels That Lack Anchor Motifs Although the five mammalian KCNQ genes are paralogues, only KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 genes possess anchor motifs (reference [20] and Figures 1B–C Residues within an intracellular subunit interaction domain (SID) unique to the KCNQ channels (Figures 1C C. intestinalis KCNQ4/5 Has Many Properties Characteristic of Vertebrate KCNQ2-5 Subunits, but Lacks an Anchor Motif We cloned C. intestinalis KCNQ1 (GenBank FJ461775), and one additional gene, previously called Ci KCNQ2/3/4/5 [43], but more closely related to vertebrate KCNQ4/5 than KCNQ2/3 genes (Figures 2C
The KCNQ2/3 Anchor Is a Shared Feature of Extant Jawed Vertebrates In addition to KCNQ1, the genome of the lamprey P. marinus contains sequences suggesting the existence of four other KCNQ genes (Figure 8B
The NaV and KCNQ Anchor Motifs Appear To Be Topologically Analogous In the chordate NaV1 and co-orthologous vertebrate NaV genes, anchor motifs lie in the sodium channel intracellular loop between homologous domains II and III, at a highly conserved distance from the DIII S1 (~97±3.1 residues) and DII S6 (113±7.9 residues) transmembrane segments (Figure S2, see Methods). The KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 anchor motifs are about 450–500 residues distant from the end of the S6 membrane helix. However, approximately the first 300 of these residues are believed to have a compact ternary structure near the membrane (Figure S7), based on mapping of conserved adjoining regions for interaction with the membrane lipid phosphatidyl inositol 4,5 bisphosphate and calmodulin, and for subunit interaction [59], [68]–[70]. Among 16 vertebrate KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 subunits, the polypeptide portion between the SID end, and the start of the conserved domain containing the anchor motif, has low sequence conservation and no known function, but a conserved length of 129±7.5 residues (Figure S7). This is similar to the conserved distance between the membrane and anchor motifs in NaV channel polypeptides. Thus, NaV, KCNQ2, and KCNQ3 channel anchors appear to have “mooring lines” of similar, conserved length, allowing them to access ankyrin immobilized below the membrane surface (Figure 1B Discussion In many mammalian neurons, clustering of ion channels at the AIS and nodes of Ranvier is the basis for rapid, reliable, and precisely-timed action potential initiation and conduction [3], [11]–[14]. Our investigation of the evolutionary origin of this clustering yielded three main findings (Figure 9
Multiple Functions of NaV-Ankyrin Interaction: Inward Current Density Elevation, Capacitance Reduction, Cell Polarization Ankyrins have earlier-evolved roles on axons, predating the divergence of arthropods, nematodes, and chordates, which, though incompletely understood, include the mediation of L1-family cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM) signals for pathfinding, cell-cell interaction, and synaptogenesis [75]–[78]. L1-CAMs of fly, worm, and vertebrates share a conserved intracellular ankyrin-binding motif, FIGQY, required for these functions. C. intestinalis possesses one ankyrin gene, ancestral to the three vertebrate ankyrin paralogues [45],[79]. The evolutionary co-optation of axonal L1-CAM/ankyrin/spectrin/actin complexes for clustering of NaV channels resulted in several new advantages. Because rapid AP propagation depends on a low ratio of membrane capacitance to axial conductance, invertebrates lacking myelin rely on large diameter axons to increase conductance speed [3]. However, initiation of APs in such giant axons is necessarily slowed, since the rate of depolarization from rest is dependent on membrane capacitance, and therefore, axonal circumference at the initiation site. The spectrins are large, extensible molecules that can be linked into a submembranous network by short filamentous actin hubs [15],[80]. Where NaV channels are linked by dense spectrin-actin networks, local inward conductance density can be very markedly elevated [13]. Furthermore, spectrin behaves as a molecular spring that preferentially adopts conformations about half its fully extended length, a property which contributes to erythrocyte mechanical resiliency [80]. At nodes of Ranvier, spectrin shortening appears to function like a corset, constricting the diameter overlying axonal membrane [16], simultaneously reducing the total membrane capacitance and increasing channel density. Placing this molecular complex in the AIS provides very rapid depolarization at this location, and thus, precise spatiotemporal control of initiation [14]. Finally, in erythrocytes, epithelial cells, and mammalian axons, actin-spectrin networks and ankyrin-bound transmembrane proteins form a dense barrier that retains proteins bound within and excludes non-bound proteins, thereby helping maintain subcellular domains containing distinctive populations of proteins and lipids [15],[81]. Thus, achieving strongly preferential AP initiation at the AIS through this mechanism divides the neuron into distinct upstream (somatodendritic) and downstream (axonal) domains, both morphologically and functionally [13],[14]. Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Clusters as “Excitozones” In clarifying the evolutionary relationship between channel clustering at the AIS and at the unmyelinated gap in the node of Ranvier, our studies highlight the need for clearer distinction between the membrane-associated protein complexes themselves and these two axonal subcellular domains. Although NaV channel-interacting complexes are conspicuous at vertebrate AISs and nodes, these subcellular locations contain multiple additional components (e.g., AISs have synapses, fasciculated microtubules, and cisternal organelles; nodes have paranodal septate-like junctions, etc.). Also, NaV channel complexes have recently been found in mammals at sites of AP initiation and reinitiation other than AISs and nodes, including at the afferent endings of sensory nerve fibers, the dendrites of olfactory bulb neurons, and cell-cell junctions in cardiomyocytes [33],[82],[83]. Finally, the axons of protostomes must possess a point of origin, and thus have “axonal initial segments.” Because discussion is hampered by lack of adequate terminology, we suggest that this crucially important, chordate-specific membrane-associated complex, i.e., NaV channels clustered via ankyrin and cytoskeletal interaction, be called the excitozone, which is succinct. The excitozone is a not a particular subcellular domain, but a modular (and therefore, scalable and pluripotent) membrane-cytoskeletal assemblage, deployed at a variety of locations on vertebrate (and, possibly, invertebrate chordate) excitable cells for AP generation and regeneration. Why Do NaV and KCNQ2/3 Channels Bear Similar Anchor Motifs? Although the NaV and KCNQ2/3 anchor sequences are very similar, they are non-identical. Within the motifs, 7 of 10 residues implicated in ankyrin interaction are shared [17],[18],[20]. These motifs are contained within longer sequences that are highly conserved within the respective vertebrate NaV and KCNQ2/KCNQ3 genes, but completely distinctive between the two channel families (Figures 2B, 2D Each ankyrin-G molecule possesses one docking site for interaction with the NaV anchor motif [33]. The high sequence similarity in KCNQ and NaV anchors suggests they compete for these ankyrin-G sites, thereby conferring precise control of the number and ratio of the two channel types at AISs and nodes. Voltage-clamp studies show a 40 1 ratio of NaV and KCNQ conductance at mammalian peripheral nodes of Ranvier [85]. However, because KCNQ channels have a higher open probability than transient NaV channels in the voltage range between resting membrane potentials and AP threshold, and close very slowly once opened by depolarization, a small proportion of KCNQ channels can significantly dampen excitability [25],[27],[86]. The mechanism setting the excitozone NaV KCNQ channel ratio, and its potential for plasticity, deserves further study. The critical importance of this ratio is illustrated by mutations that disrupt the function of the AIS-localized NaV and KV channels in humans and transgenic mice, causing conspicuous neurological phenotypes: myokymia, neuromyotonia, episodic ataxia, and epilepsy [24], [29], [87]–[90].The Excitozone and the Divergence and Success of Vertebrates The excitozone has evolved, in its components, cellular distribution and function, in parallel with the chordates. The localization of NaV channels in B. floridae and C. intestinalis neurons is unknown. Recent morphological studies have shown that many of the neurons of C. intestinalis have polar morphology of the vertebrate type, with long, branched dendrites or afferent endings that converge upon somata, and a single axon arising from the soma and innervating the efferent targets [91] (i.e., Figure 1A Thus, our findings indicate that the clustering of NaV channels on early chordate axons was a pivotal innovation, preceding and making possible the subsequent evolution of mechanisms for compact, energetically-efficient, rapid, and reliable AP initiation and conduction deployed by all extant jawed vertebrates [3],[14]. This conclusion represents an addendum to the influential “new head” hypothesis linking neural crest and ectodermal placode evolution to vertebrate origins and success [92],[97],[98], complementing ongoing studies of systems level morphological reorganization and its genetic control [99],[100] with a new focus on subcellular, intrinsic, neuronal electrical signaling. The new head required more elaborate mechanisms for sensation (e.g. eyes and ears), neural computation, and behavior (e.g., improved motor control and jaws). Evolution and deployment of the excitozone proceeded in parallel with and enabled a cascade of related changes integral to the new head. Localizing preferential AP initiation to a single neuronal site at the AIS conferred new polarity, uniformity, and robustness to signaling by individual neurons [13],[14]. This reorganization of the neuron ultimately allowed for signaling both by active dendritic AP back-propagation and axonal saltatory conduction. Integration of such neurons in larger networks of interconnected circuits made possible the more diverse, active, and sometimes predatory behavior of vertebrates, and a new ecological order [101]. This view of the excitozone, as an evolutionary “watershed” [102],[103], can be tested by further analysis of the distribution and function of excitozones in basal chordates and vertebrates. Methods Identification of NaV and KV Channel Sequences Complementary DNAs for C. intestinalis KCNQ1 and KCNQ5 clones were amplified by a combination of PCR, 3′ RACE, and 5′ RACE, using a full-length cDNA pool derived from hatched larvae. To identify KCNQ channel sequences, the P. marinus NCBI WGS trace archive and Ensembl Pre assembly were searched using mammalian and C. intestinalis KCNQ channel sequences. To identify NaV and KCNQ sequences from S. purpuratus (sea urchin), B. floridae (amphioxus), and Callorhinchus milii (elephant shark), databases at NCBI and the Elephant Shark Genome Project website (http://esharkgenome.imcb.a-star.edu.sg/) were similarly searched. Genomic DNA hits were translated and aligned using CLUSTAL to identify exon-intron junctions. In Situ Hybridization and Xenopus Oocyte Expression Adult C. intestinalis were collected at Nishiura port in Gamagori (Aichi, Japan). C. intestinalis ova were fertilized in vitro and subjected to whole mount in situ hybridization, mounted and imaged under differential interference contrast optic using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope. Xenopus oocytes were isolated, cRNA prepared and injected, and two to five days later, two electrode voltage-clamping was performed as described previously [104]. Immunostaining Lampreys were obtained from streams feeding Lake Michigan, and housed and handled according to procedures approved by the University of Pennsylvania Animal Use and Care Committee. Lamprey brain and spinal cord cryosections were prepared without fixation as described previously [20], and stained for NaV channels using either mouse monoclonal (Sigma) or affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal (Millipore) antibodies against the conserved NaV channel DIII–IV intracellular loop. Peptide pre-absorption control experiments were performed as described [105]. Prior to whole mount immunostaining, reticulospinal neurons were backfilled by surgically exposing and transecting the spinal cord at the level of the 4th gill slit, and inserting a gelfoam piece soaked in 5% FITC-dextran solution in PBS (10,000 Da; Invitrogen). Spinal motoneurons were backfilled by injecting dorsal muscle with FITC-dextran using a 25 gauge needle. Two to five days later, the central nervous system was removed, fixed for 30 min using 4% paraformaldehyde, and then immunostained using the monoclonal antibody, Pan NaV. Stained samples were imaged by widefield immunofluorescence microscopy (Nikon E80i, KE Spot 740 cooled CCD camera and Spot 4.0 software) or confocal microscopy (Leica SP2). Sequence Comparisons and Phylogeny Construction Sequences were aligned using the Clustal algorithm using MEGA V4.0 [106], and adjusted manually. Phylograms and bootstrap values were calculated using minimal evolution, maximal parsimony, and neighbor joining algorithms. Calculations of mean (±S.D.) NaV DII–DIII linker and KCNQ C-terminal sequence lengths, and distances between transmembrane segments, tetramerization domains, and anchor motifs, were based on genes (n = 16, each group) for which cDNA sequences were available.Figure S1 Alternative algorithms give similar NaV channel phylogenies. Figure 2A (0.20 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(199K, tif) Figure S2 Location of anchor motifs in the NaV channel DII–III intracellular loop. (A) Cartoon showing NaV channel topology. The four homologous domains (I–IV), each with 6 transmembrane segments, and the DII–III loop (shaded) are labeled. (B) Sequence alignment of 12 non-chordate, chordate and vertebrate DII–III loops. The locations of the conserved distal DII S6, anchor motif, and proximal DIII S1 segments are indicated. (1.81 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.7M, tif) Figure S3 Lamprey AISs are immunolabeled by two different NaV channel antibodies. (A) Alignment of the sp-19/Pan NaV epitope used for antibody generation [52],[53] with lamprey sequences. (B) Unfixed transverse cryosection of lamprey spinal cord, immunostained with affinity purified mouse monoclonal Pan NaV primary antibodies and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (false colored yellow). DAPI (blue) shows location of cell nuclei in grey matter region of the cord. (C, D) Monochrome display of sections processed in parallel, stained using primary antibodies that were preincubated for 1 hr. with (D) and without (C, same section shown in color in B) a 25-fold molar excess of the synthetic peptide immunogen. In D and C (unlike B), image intensities have been increased linearly and identically to reveal the weakest detectable staining. As a result, B best shows selective labeling of putative AISs in locations adjoining neuronal cell bodies, C reveals saturated AIS profiles and examples of higher-than-background labeling continuing (in putative axons) beyond AISs, and D shows that both AIS and weaker axonal labeling is undetectable after peptide preadsorption. For B–D, mouse primary antibodies were detected with affinity purified, species preadsorbed Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies. (E) Unfixed transverse cryosection of lamprey spinal cord, immunostained with affinity purified rabbit polyclonal (sp-19) primary antibodies and affinity purified, species preadsorbed Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (false colored yellow). DAPI (blue) shows location of cell nuclei. AIS profiles identical to those seen using monoclonal Pan NaV are detected. (1.86 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.7M, tif) Figure S4 Sequence alignment of C. intestinalis KCNQ1 and KCNQ5 with orthologous human genes. Full length C. intestinalis KCNQ1 and KCNQ5 sequences were obtained by PCR using primers derived from the partial genomic sequence, followed by 3′ RACE and 5′ RACE to identify start and stop codons and the polyA tract. Deduced sequences are shown aligned with human KCNQ1 and KCNQ5. Locations of functional domains of the polypeptides are indicated. (0.90 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(878K, tif) Figure S5 Alignment of derived sea lamprey and human KCNQ4 and KCNQ5 polypeptide sequences. (A) Cartoon depiction exon structure of P. marinus KCNQ4 and KCNQ5, deduced by cDNA cloning (colored boxes connected by black bars, limits marked by blue arrows) and genomic contigs (unlinked exons). (B) Alignment of human and P. marinus genes. Functional regions are labeled, and limits of cDNA clones are marked by arrows as in A. (1.34 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(1.2M, tif) Figure S6 KCNQ gene family phylogeny (minimal evolution) based on analysis of exons 4–14. Nodes are labeled by bootstrap values, scale indicates changes per residue. The branch on the phylogram in which the anchor motif first evolved is shown in red. Nodes associated with gene duplications are indicated by red dots. Results are similar to those derived from analysis of conserved exons 5–7 only (shown in Figure 2C (0.26 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(256K, tif) Figure S7 KCNQ exons encoding the C-terminal region begin with conserved sequence encoding the subunit interaction domain, but are otherwise poorly conserved in length and sequence except for the domains of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 bearing the anchor motif. Aligned peptide sequences corresponding to the entire 3′ coding exons of 15 representative vertebrate and invertebrate KCNQ genes are shown. Except for the initial ~15 residues (forming part of the subunit interaction domain), only the distal domains containing anchor motifs, which are exclusive to jawed vertebrate KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 sequences (blue lettered subunits), are conserved. Codon lengths for the exons are given at bottom right; the 5′ portion of sequence for shark is unknown. (2.67 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file.(2.5M, tif) Table S1 Database of NaV and KCNQ channel genes used in this study. (0.14 MB XLS) Click here for additional data file.(137K, xls) Table S2 Lamprey exon sequences identified in this study. Sequences were identified by BLAST search of the NCBI whole genome database and Ensembl contig database. Sequences of exons linked by cDNA cloning, or in silico by genomic DNA assembly, are enclosed in same-colored boxes. (0.02 MB XLS) Click here for additional data file.(23K, xls) Table S3 Shark KCNQ channel exon sequences identified in this study. Sequences were identified by BLAST search of the Elephant Shark Genome Project (http://esharkgenome.imcb.a-star.edu.sg/) database. Tentative orthologies were assigned by BLAST of mammalian database with identified shark exons. Sequences of exons linked by genomic assembly are enclosed in same-colored boxes. (0.02 MB XLS) Click here for additional data file.(17K, xls) Acknowledgments We are grateful to Frederick Bushman, Miriam Meisler, and Steven Scherer for helpful discussion and manuscript review, Peter Holland for discussion and sharing of unpublished results, Cindy Larimore for assistance with cDNA cloning, Thomas Qualiano for teaching on invertebrates, and Yoshihiro Kubo for support of KN. Footnotes The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This work was supported by the Roy and Diana Vagelos Scholars Program in the Molecular Life Sciences (AH), NIH Grants R01-NS14837 (MES), R01-NS38537 (MES), R24-HD050838 (MES), the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (MES), a Japan-U.S. Brain Research Cooperative Program Grant (YO), a Human Frontiers Science Program Short Term Fellowship (ECC), a US-Japan Brain Research Cooperative Program Supplement (R01 NS49119, ECC), and the Miles Family Fund (ECC). The funders had no role in study design, conduct, data interpretation, or manuscript preparation. References 1. Hille B. Ionic channels of excitable membranes. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer; 2001. 2. Schweigreiter R, Roots BI, Bandtlow CE, Gould RM. Understanding myelination through studying its evolution. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006;73:219–273. [PubMed] 3. Hartline DK, Colman DR. Rapid conduction and the evolution of giant axons and myelinated fibers. Curr Biol. 2007;17:R29–35. [PubMed] 4. Rolls MM, Satoh D, Clyne PJ, Henner AL, Uemura T, et al. Polarity and intracellular compartmentalization of Drosophila neurons. Neural Develop. 2007;2:7. [PubMed] 5. Ramon y Cajal S. Texture of the nervous system of man and the vertebrates. New York: SpringerWein; 1907. Pasic P, Pasic T, translators and editors. 2002. 6. Cooke IM. Reliable, responsive pacemaking and pattern generation with minimal cell numbers: the crustacean cardiac ganglion. Biol Bull. 2002;202:108–136. [PubMed] 7. Melinek R, Muller KJ. Action potential initiation site depends on neuronal excitation. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2585–2591. [PubMed] 8. Bucher D, Thirumalai V, Marder E. Axonal dopamine receptors activate peripheral spike initiation in a stomatogastric motor neuron. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6866–6875. [PubMed] 9. Meyrand P, Weimann JM, Marder E. Multiple axonal spike initiation zones in a motor neuron: serotonin activation. J Neurosci. 1992;12:2803–2812. [PubMed] 10. Maratou E, Theophilidis G. An axon pacemaker: diversity in the mechanism of generation and conduction of action potentials in snail neurons. Neuroscience. 2000;96:1–2. [PubMed] 11. Ogawa Y, Rasband MN. The functional organization and assembly of the axon initial segment. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008;18:307–313. 12. Dzhashiashvili Y, Zhang Y, Galinska J, Lam I, Grumet M, et al. Nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments are ankyrin G-dependent domains that assemble by distinct mechanisms. J Cell Biol. 2007;177:857–870. [PubMed] 13. Kole MH, Ilschner SU, Kampa BM, Williams SR, Ruben PC, et al. Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:178–186. [PubMed] 14. Yu Y, Shu Y, McCormick DA. Cortical Action Potential Backpropagation Explains Spike Threshold Variability and Rapid-Onset Kinetics. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7260–7272. [PubMed] 15. Bennett V, Baines AJ. Spectrin and ankyrin-based pathways: metazoan inventions for integrating cells into tissues. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:1353–1392. [PubMed] 16. Lacas-Gervais S, Guo J, Strenzke N, Scarfone E, Kolpe M, et al. βIVΣ1 spectrin stabilizes the nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:983–990. [PubMed] 17. Garrido JJ, Giraud P, Carlier E, Fernandes F, Moussif A, et al. A targeting motif involved in sodium channel clustering at the axonal initial segment. Science. 2003;300:2091–2094. [PubMed] 18. Lemaillet G, Walker B, Lambert S. Identification of a conserved ankyrin-binding motif in the family of sodium channel alpha subunits. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27333–27339. [PubMed] 19. Devaux JJ, Kleopa KA, Cooper EC, Scherer SS. KCNQ2 is a nodal K+ channel. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1236–1244. [PubMed] 20. Pan Z, Kao T, Horvath Z, Lemos J, Sul JY, et al. A common ankyrin-G-based mechanism retains KCNQ and NaV channels at electrically active domains of the axon. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2599–2613. [PubMed] 21. Rasmussen HB, Frokjaer-Jensen C, Jensen CS, Jensen HS, Jorgensen NK, et al. Requirement of subunit co-assembly and ankyrin-G for M-channel localization at the axon initial segment. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:953–963. [PubMed] 22. Wang H-S, Pan Z, Shi W, Brown BS, Wymore RS, et al. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: molecular correlates of the M-channel. Science. 1998;282:1890–1893. [PubMed] 23. Delmas P, Brown DA. Pathways modulating neural KCNQ/M (Kv7) potassium channels. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:850–862. [PubMed] 24. Dedek K, Kunath B, Kananura C, Reuner U, Jentsch TJ, et al. Myokymia and neonatal epilepsy caused by a mutation in the voltage sensor of the KCNQ2 K+ channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:12272–12277. [PubMed] 25. Schwarz JR, Glassmeier G, Cooper EC, Kao TC, Nodera H, et al. KCNQ channels mediate IKs, a slow K+ current regulating excitability in the rat node of Ranvier. J Physiol. 2006;573:17–34. [PubMed] 26. Yue C, Yaari Y. Axo-somatic and apical dendritic Kv7/M channels differentially regulate the intrinsic excitability of adult rat CA1 pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3480–3495. [PubMed] 27. Shah MM, Migliore M, Valencia I, Cooper EC, Brown DA. Functional significance of axonal Kv7 channels in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7869–7874. [PubMed] 28. Chung HJ, Jan YN, Jan LY. Polarized axonal surface expression of neuronal KCNQ channels is mediated by multiple signals in the KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 C-terminal domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:8870–8875. [PubMed] 29. Ogiwara I, Miyamoto H, Morita N, Atapour N, Mazaki E, et al. NaV1.1 localizes to axons of parvalbumin-positive inhibitory interneurons: a circuit basis for epileptic seizures in mice carrying an Scn1a gene mutation. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5903–5914. [PubMed] 30. Rogawski MA, Loscher W. The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of nonepileptic conditions. Nat Med. 2004;10:685–692. [PubMed] 31. Rogawski MA, Loscher W. The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:553–564. [PubMed] 32. Xiong Q, Gao Z, Wang W, Li M. Activation of Kv7 (KCNQ) voltage-gated potassium channels by synthetic compounds. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29:99–107. [PubMed] 33. Lowe JS, Palygin O, Bhasin N, Hund TJ, Boyden PA, et al. Voltage-gated NaV channel targeting in the heart requires an ankyrin-G dependent cellular pathway. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:173–186. [PubMed] 34. Zhang Z, Devarajan P, Dorfman AL, Morrow JS. Structure of the ankyrin-binding domain of alpha-Na,K-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:18681–18684. [PubMed] 35. Chang SH, Low PS. Identification of a critical ankyrin-binding loop on the cytoplasmic domain of erythrocyte membrane band 3 by crystal structure analysis and site-directed mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:6879–6884. [PubMed] 36. Doolittle RF. Convergent evolution: the need to be explicit. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994;19:15–18. [PubMed] 37. De Robertis EM. Evo-devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell. 2008;132:185–195. [PubMed] 38. Conway Morris S. The Cambrian “explosion”: slow-fuse or megatonnage? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4426–4429. [PubMed] 39. Bullock TH, Moore JK, Fields RD. Evolution of myelin sheaths: both lamprey and hagfish lack myelin. Neurosci Lett. 1984;48:145–148. [PubMed] 40. Meech RW, Mackie GO. Ionic currents in giant motor axons of the jellyfish, Aglantha digitale. J Neurophysiol. 1993;69:884–893. [PubMed] 41. Anderson PA, McKay MC. The electrophysiology of cnidocysts. J Exp Biol. 1987;133 42. Hong CS, Ganetzky B. Spatial and temporal expression patterns of two sodium channel genes in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1994;14:5160–5169. [PubMed] 43. Okamura Y, Nishino A, Murata Y, Nakajo K, Iwasaki H, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the ascidian genome reveals novel insights into the molecular evolution of ion channel genes. Physiol Genomics. 2005;22:269–282. [PubMed] 44. Plummer NW, Meisler MH. Evolution and diversity of mammalian sodium channel genes. Genomics. 1999;57:323–331. [PubMed] 45. Okamura Y. Evolution of chordate physiological functions viewed from ion channel genes. Kai-yo. 2005;41:61–70. 46. Okamura Y, Ono F, Okagaki R, Chong JA, Mandel G. Neural expression of a sodium channel gene requires cell-specific interactions. Neuron. 1994;13:937–948. [PubMed] 47. Wilson RJ, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, consortium atf. FlyBase: integration and improvements to query tools. Nucleic Acid Res. 2008;36:D588–D593. [PubMed] 48. Lopreato GF, Lu Y, Southwell A, Atkinson NS, Hillis DM, et al. Evolution and divergence of sodium channel genes in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:7588–7592. [PubMed] 49. George AL., Jr Inherited disorders of voltage-gated sodium channels. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1990–1999. [PubMed] 50. Gess RW, Coates MI, Rubidge BS. A lamprey from the Devonian period of South Africa. Nature. 2006;443:981–984. [PubMed] 51. Zalc B, Goujet D, Colman D. The origin of the myelination program in vertebrates. Curr Biol. 2008;18:R511–512. [PubMed] 52. Vassilev PM, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Identification of an intracellular peptide segment involved in sodium channel inactivation. Science. 1988;241:1658–1661. [PubMed] 53. Rasband MN, Peles E, Trimmer JS, Levinson SR, Lux SE, et al. Dependence of nodal sodium channel clustering on paranodal axoglial contact in the developing CNS. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7516–7528. [PubMed] 54. Winckler B, Forscher P, Mellman I. A diffusion barrier maintains distribution of membrane proteins in polarized neurons. Nature. 1999;397:698–701. [PubMed] 55. Grillner S. The motor infrastructure: from ion channels to neuronal networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:573–586. [PubMed] 56. Eaton RC, Hofve JC, Fetcho JR. Beating the competition: the reliability hypothesis for Mauthner axon size. Brain Behav Evol. 1995;45:183–194. [PubMed] 57. Teravainen H, Rovainen CM. Fast and slow motoneurons to body muscle of the sea lamprey. J Neurophysiol. 1971;34:990–998. [PubMed] 58. Donoghue PC, Purnell MA. Genome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:312–319. [PubMed] 59. Schwake M, Athanasiadu D, Beimgraben C, Blanz J, Beck C, et al. Structural determinants of M-type KCNQ (Kv7) K+ channel assembly. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3757–3766. [PubMed] 60. Howard RJ, Clark KA, Holton JM, Minor DL., Jr Structural insight into KCNQ (Kv7) channel assembly and channelopathy. Neuron. 2007;53:663–675. [PubMed] 61. Schenzer A, Friedrich T, Pusch M, Saftig P, Jentsch TJ, et al. Molecular determinants of KCNQ (Kv7) K+ channel sensitivity to the anticonvulsant retigabine. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5051–5060. [PubMed] 62. Wuttke TV, Seebohm G, Bail S, Maljevic S, Lerche H. The new anticonvulsant retigabine favors voltage-dependent opening of the Kv7.2 (KCNQ2) channel by binding to its activation gate. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67:1009–1017. [PubMed] 63. Long SB, Campbell EB, Mackinnon R. Voltage sensor of Kv1.2: structural basis of electromechanical coupling. Science. 2005;309:903–908. [PubMed] 64. Wei AD, Butler A, Salkoff L. KCNQ-like potassium channels in Caenorhabditis elegans. Conserved properties and modulation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:21337–21345. [PubMed] 65. Jentsch TJ. Neuronal KCNQ potassium channels: physiology and role in disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000;1:21–30. [PubMed] 66. Lamprey Genome Cloning Project. 2007. “Petromyzon marinus Sequencing Plan” Available: http://genome.wustl.edu/genome/other_vertebrates/Petromyzon_marinus/seq_plan.cgi. Accessed 20 December 2007. 67. Venkatesh B, Kirkness EF, Loh YH, Halpern AL, Lee AP, et al. Survey sequencing and comparative analysis of the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) genome. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e101. [PubMed] 68. Zhang H, Craciun LC, Mirshahi T, Rohacs T, Lopes CM, et al. PIP(2) activates KCNQ channels, and its hydrolysis underlies receptor-mediated inhibition of M currents. Neuron. 2003;37:963–975. [PubMed] 69. Wen H, Levitan IB. Calmodulin is an auxiliary subunit of KCNQ2/3 potassium channels. J Neurosci. 2002;22:7991–8001. [PubMed] 70. Yus-Najera E, Santana-Castro I, Villarroel A. The identification and characterization of a noncontinuous calmodulin-binding site in noninactivating voltage-dependent KCNQ potassium channels. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:28545–28553. [PubMed] 71. Hedstrom KL, Rasband MN. Intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of ion channel localization in neurons. J Neurochem. 2006;98:1345–1352. [PubMed] 72. Lynch M, Conery JS. The origins of genome complexity. Science. 2003;302:1401–1404. [PubMed] 73. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1970. 74. Zhang J. Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Evolution and Ecology. 2003;18:292–298. 75. Godenschwege TA, Kristiansen LV, Uthaman SB, Hortsch M, Murphey RK. A conserved role for Drosophila Neuroglian and human L1-CAM in central-synapse formation. Curr Biol. 2006;16:12–23. [PubMed] 76. Hortsch M, Paisley KL, Tian MZ, Qian M, Bouley M, et al. The axonal localization of large Drosophila ankyrin2 protein isoforms is essential for neuronal functionality. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;20:43–55. [PubMed] 77. Pocock R, Benard CY, Shapiro L, Hobert O. Functional dissection of the C. elegans cell adhesion molecule SAX-7, a homologue of human L1. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;37:56–68. [PubMed] 78. Otsuka AJ, Boontrakulpoontawee P, Rebeiz N, Domanus M, Otsuka D, et al. Novel UNC-44 AO13 ankyrin is required for axonal guidance in C. elegans, contains six highly repetitive STEP blocks separated by seven potential transmembrane domains, and is localized to neuronal processes and the periphery of neural cell bodies. J Neurobiol. 2002;50:333–349. [PubMed] 79. Cai X, Zhang Y. Molecular evolution of the ankyrin gene family. Mol Biol Evol. 2005 80. Elgsaeter A, Stokke BT, Mikkelsen A, Branton D. The molecular basis of erythrocyte shape. Science. 1986;234:1217–1223. [PubMed] 81. Nakada C, Ritchie K, Oba Y, Nakamura M, Hotta Y, et al. Accumulation of anchored proteins forms membrane diffusion barriers during neuronal polarization. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:626–632. [PubMed] 82. Wooltorton JR, Gaboyard S, Hurley KM, Price SD, Garcia JL, et al. Developmental changes in two voltage-dependent sodium currents in utricular hair cells. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1684–1704. [PubMed] 83. Kosaka T, Komada M, Kosaka K. Sodium channel cluster, betaIV-spectrin and ankyrinG positive “hot spots” on dendritic segments of parvalbumin-containing neurons and some other neurons in the mouse and rat main olfactory bulbs. Neurosci Res. 2008;62:176–86. [PubMed] 84. Babushok DV, Ostertag EM, Kazazian HH., Jr Current topics in genome evolution: molecular mechanisms of new gene formation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:542–554. [PubMed] 85. Roeper J, Schwarz JR. Heterogeneous distribution of fast and slow potassium channels in myelinated rat nerve fibres. J Physiol. 1989;416:93–110. [PubMed] 86. McIntyre CC, Richardson AG, Grill WM. Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:995–1006. [PubMed] 87. Herson PS, Virk M, Rustay NR, Bond CT, Crabbe JC, et al. A mouse model of episodic ataxia type-1. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:378–383. [PubMed] 88. Smart S, Lopantsev V, Zhang CL, Robbins C, Wand H, et al. Deletion of the Kv1.1 potassium channel causes epilepsy in mice. Neuron. 1998;20:809–820. [PubMed] 89. Singh NA, Westenskow P, Charlier C, Pappas C, Leslie J, et al. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel genes in benign familial neonatal convulsions: expansion of the functional and mutation spectrum. Brain. 2003;126:2726–2737. [PubMed] 90. Hart IK, Waters C, Vincent A, Newland C, Beeson D, et al. Autoantibodies detected to expressed K+ channels are implicated in neuromyotonia. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:238–246. [PubMed] 91. Imai JH, Meinertzhagen IA. Neurons of the ascidian larval nervous system in Ciona intestinalis: II. Peripheral nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2007;501:335–352. [PubMed] 92. Northcutt RG, Gans C. The genesis of neural crest and epidermal placodes: a reinterpretation of vertebrate origins. Q Rev Biol. 1983;58:1–28. [PubMed] 93. Voas MG, Lyons DA, Naylor SG, Arana N, Rasband MN, et al. αII-spectrin is essential for assembly of the nodes of Ranvier in myelinated axons. Curr Biol. 2007;17:562–568. [PubMed] 94. Ogawa Y, Horresh I, Trimmer JS, Bredt DS, Peles E, et al. Postsynaptic density-93 clusters Kv1 channels at axon initial segments independently of Caspr2. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5731–5739. [PubMed] 95. Sanchez-Ponce D, Tapia M, Munoz A, Garrido JJ. New role of IKKα/β phosphorylated IκBα in axon outgrowth and axon initial segment development. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;37:832–844. [PubMed] 96. Eshed Y, Feinberg K, Poliak S, Sabanay H, Sarig-Nadir O, et al. Gliomedin mediates Schwann cell-axon interaction and the molecular assembly of the nodes of Ranvier. Neuron. 2005;47:215–229. [PubMed] 97. Gans C, Northcutt RG. Neural Crest and the Origin of Vertebrates: A New Head. Science. 1983;220:268–273. [PubMed] 98. Zalc B, Colman DR. Origins of vertebrate success. Science. 2000;288:271–272. [PubMed] 99. Bronner-Fraser M. On the trail of the ‘new head’ in Les Treilles. Development. 2008;135:2995–2999. [PubMed] 100. Yu JK, Meulemans D, McKeown SJ, Bronner-Fraser M. Insights from the amphioxus genome on the origin of vertebrate neural crest. Genome Res. 2008;18:1127–1132. [PubMed] 101. Lacalli TC. New perspectives on the evolution of protochordate sensory and locomotory systems, and the origin of brains and heads. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356:1565–1572. [PubMed] 102. Dawkins R. The evolution of evolvability. In: Kumar S, Bentley PJ, editors. On Growth, Form and Computers. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2003. pp. 239–255. 103. Kirschner M, Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:8420–8427. [PubMed] 104. Nakajo K, Katsuyama Y, Ono F, Ohtsuka Y, Okamura Y. Primary structure, functional characterization and developmental expression of the ascidian Kv4-class potassium channel. Neurosci Res. 2003;45:59–70. [PubMed] 105. Cooper EC, Harrington E, Jan YN, Jan LY. M-channel KCNQ2 subunits are localized to key sites for control of neuronal network oscillations and synchronization in mouse brain. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9529–9540. [PubMed] 106. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. [PubMed] 107. Pan Z, Selyanko AA, Hadley JK, Brown DA, Dixon JE, et al. Alternative splicing of KCNQ2 potassium channel transcripts contributes to the functional diversity of M-currents. J Physiol. 2001;531:347–358. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006; 73():219-73.
[Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006]Neural Dev. 2007 Apr 30; 2():7.
[Neural Dev. 2007]Biol Bull. 2002 Apr; 202(2):108-36.
[Biol Bull. 2002]Neuroscience. 2000; 96(1):1-2.
[Neuroscience. 2000]J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8; 26(10):2599-613.
[J Neurosci. 2006]J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 16; 28(29):7260-72.
[J Neurosci. 2008]J Cell Biol. 2007 Jun 4; 177(5):857-70.
[J Cell Biol. 2007]Physiol Rev. 2001 Jul; 81(3):1353-92.
[Physiol Rev. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 25; 278(30):27333-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 4; 24(5):1236-44.
[J Neurosci. 2004]Science. 2003 Jun 27; 300(5628):2091-4.
[Science. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 25; 278(30):27333-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8; 26(10):2599-613.
[J Neurosci. 2006]J Cell Biol. 2008 Jan 14; 180(1):173-86.
[J Cell Biol. 2008]J Biol Chem. 1998 Jul 24; 273(30):18681-4.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8; 26(10):2599-613.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Jan; 19(1):15-8.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1994]Cell. 2008 Jan 25; 132(2):185-95.
[Cell. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 25; 97(9):4426-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006; 73():219-73.
[Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006]Neurosci Lett. 1984 Jul 27; 48(2):145-8.
[Neurosci Lett. 1984]J Neurophysiol. 1993 Mar; 69(3):884-93.
[J Neurophysiol. 1993]J Neurosci. 1994 Sep; 14(9):5160-9.
[J Neurosci. 1994]Genomics. 1999 Apr 15; 57(2):323-31.
[Genomics. 1999]Cell. 2008 Jan 25; 132(2):185-95.
[Cell. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19; 98(13):7588-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan; 36(Database issue):D588-93.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2008]Genomics. 1999 Apr 15; 57(2):323-31.
[Genomics. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19; 98(13):7588-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]J Clin Invest. 2005 Aug; 115(8):1990-9.
[J Clin Invest. 2005]Neurosci Lett. 1984 Jul 27; 48(2):145-8.
[Neurosci Lett. 1984]Nature. 2006 Oct 26; 443(7114):981-4.
[Nature. 2006]Curr Biol. 2008 Jun 24; 18(12):R511-2.
[Curr Biol. 2008]Science. 1988 Sep 23; 241(4873):1658-61.
[Science. 1988]J Neurosci. 1999 Sep 1; 19(17):7516-28.
[J Neurosci. 1999]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jul; 4(7):573-86.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003]Brain Behav Evol. 1995; 45(4):183-94.
[Brain Behav Evol. 1995]J Neurophysiol. 1971 Nov; 34(6):990-8.
[J Neurophysiol. 1971]Nature. 2006 Oct 26; 443(7114):981-4.
[Nature. 2006]Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jun; 20(6):312-9.
[Trends Ecol Evol. 2005]J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8; 26(10):2599-613.
[J Neurosci. 2006]J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5; 26(14):3757-66.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Neuron. 2007 Mar 1; 53(5):663-75.
[Neuron. 2007]J Neurosci. 2005 May 18; 25(20):5051-60.
[J Neurosci. 2005]Science. 2005 Aug 5; 309(5736):903-8.
[Science. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2005 Jun 3; 280(22):21337-45.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]Physiol Genomics. 2005 Aug 11; 22(3):269-82.
[Physiol Genomics. 2005]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct; 1(1):21-30.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000]PLoS Biol. 2007 Apr; 5(4):e101.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]J Physiol. 2001 Mar 1; 531(Pt 2):347-58.
[J Physiol. 2001]J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5; 26(14):3757-66.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Neuron. 2003 Mar 27; 37(6):963-75.
[Neuron. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2002 Aug 9; 277(32):28545-53.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 9; 17(1):R29-35.
[Curr Biol. 2007]J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 16; 28(29):7260-72.
[J Neurosci. 2008]Science. 2003 Nov 21; 302(5649):1401-4.
[Science. 2003]Genomics. 1999 Apr 15; 57(2):323-31.
[Genomics. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19; 98(13):7588-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Curr Biol. 2006 Jan 10; 16(1):12-23.
[Curr Biol. 2006]J Neurobiol. 2002 Mar; 50(4):333-49.
[J Neurobiol. 2002]Curr Biol. 2006 Jan 10; 16(1):12-23.
[Curr Biol. 2006]J Neurobiol. 2002 Mar; 50(4):333-49.
[J Neurobiol. 2002]Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 9; 17(1):R29-35.
[Curr Biol. 2007]Physiol Rev. 2001 Jul; 81(3):1353-92.
[Physiol Rev. 2001]Science. 1986 Dec 5; 234(4781):1217-23.
[Science. 1986]J Cell Biol. 2008 Jan 14; 180(1):173-86.
[J Cell Biol. 2008]J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb; 97(2):1684-704.
[J Neurophysiol. 2007]Neurosci Res. 2008 Nov; 62(3):176-86.
[Neurosci Res. 2008]Science. 2003 Jun 27; 300(5628):2091-4.
[Science. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 25; 278(30):27333-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8; 26(10):2599-613.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007 Mar; 64(5):542-54.
[Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007]J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5; 26(14):3757-66.
[J Neurosci. 2006]J Cell Biol. 2008 Jan 14; 180(1):173-86.
[J Cell Biol. 2008]J Physiol. 1989 Sep; 416():93-110.
[J Physiol. 1989]J Physiol. 2006 May 15; 573(Pt 1):17-34.
[J Physiol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jun 3; 105(22):7869-74.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008]J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb; 87(2):995-1006.
[J Neurophysiol. 2002]J Comp Neurol. 2007 Mar 20; 501(3):335-52.
[J Comp Neurol. 2007]Q Rev Biol. 1983 Mar; 58(1):1-28.
[Q Rev Biol. 1983]Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20; 17(6):562-8.
[Curr Biol. 2007]J Neurosci. 2008 May 28; 28(22):5731-9.
[J Neurosci. 2008]Neuron. 2005 Jul 21; 47(2):215-29.
[Neuron. 2005]Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 9; 17(1):R29-35.
[Curr Biol. 2007]J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 16; 28(29):7260-72.
[J Neurosci. 2008]Q Rev Biol. 1983 Mar; 58(1):1-28.
[Q Rev Biol. 1983]Science. 1983 Apr 15; 220(4594):268-273.
[Science. 1983]Science. 2000 Apr 14; 288(5464):271-2.
[Science. 2000]Neurosci Res. 2003 Jan; 45(1):59-70.
[Neurosci Res. 2003]J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 8; 26(10):2599-613.
[J Neurosci. 2006]J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15; 21(24):9529-40.
[J Neurosci. 2001]Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug; 24(8):1596-9.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2007]Science. 1988 Sep 23; 241(4873):1658-61.
[Science. 1988]J Neurosci. 1999 Sep 1; 19(17):7516-28.
[J Neurosci. 1999]