![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Society for Reproduction and Fertility Effect of germ cell depletion on levels of specific mRNA transcripts in mouse Sertoli cells and Leydig cells Division of Cell Sciences, Institute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK Correspondence should be addressed to P J O'Shaughnessy (Email: p.j.oshaughnessy/at/vet.gla.ac.uk) Received January 8, 2008; Revisions requested February 26, 2008; Accepted April 2, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Society for Reproduction and Fertility's Re-use Licence which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract It has been shown that testicular germ cell development is critically dependent upon somatic cell activity but, conversely, the extent to which germ cells normally regulate somatic cell function is less clear. This study was designed, therefore, to examine the effect of germ cell depletion on Sertoli cell and Leydig cell transcript levels. Mice were treated with busulphan to deplete the germ cell population and levels of mRNA transcripts encoding 26 Sertoli cell-specific proteins and 6 Leydig cell proteins were measured by real-time PCR up to 50 days after treatment. Spermatogonia were lost from the testis between 5 and 10 days after treatment, while spermatocytes were depleted after 10 days and spermatids after 20 days. By 30 days after treatment, most tubules were devoid of germ cells. Circulating FSH and intratesticular testosterone were not significantly affected by treatment. Of the 26 Sertoli cell markers tested, 13 showed no change in transcript levels after busulphan treatment, 2 showed decreased levels, 9 showed increased levels and 2 showed a biphasic response. In 60% of cases, changes in transcript levels occurred after the loss of the spermatids. Levels of mRNA transcripts encoding Leydig cell-specific products related to steroidogenesis were unaffected by treatment. Results indicate (1) that germ cells play a major and widespread role in the regulation of Sertoli cell activity, (2) most changes in transcript levels are associated with the loss of spermatids and (3) Leydig cell steroidogenesis is largely unaffected by germ cell ablation. Introduction Germ cell proliferation, meiosis and differentiation during spermatogenesis are critically dependent on the actions of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and androgens mediated through the Sertoli cells. Loss of androgens and, to a lesser extent, FSH disrupts spermatogenesis (Lyon & Hawkes 1970, Kumar et al. 1997, De Gendt et al. 2004), while depletion and loss of function of the Sertoli cells lead to massive degeneration of the haploid germ cells and eventually to almost complete loss of germ cells (Russell et al. 2001). Overall, the Sertoli cells act to maintain spermatogenesis through provision of a structural support, generation of a unique environment in which the germ cells develop, movement of the germ cells as they progress through spermatogenesis and through secretion of factors, which aid germ cell development and differentiation (Mruk & Cheng 2004). Spermatogenesis is highly organised and orchestrated by the Sertoli cells and appears, in most mammals, as a wave within the tubule. While the role of the Sertoli cell in the process of spermatogenesis is apparent, the extent to which germ cells regulate Sertoli cell activity is less clear. Previous studies have shown that germ cell depletion can alter expression of Sertoli cell genes (Maguire et al. 1993, Jonsson et al. 1999) and secretion of specific Sertoli cell proteins (McKinnell & Sharpe 1997, Guitton et al. 2000). In addition, co-culture experiments have shown that factors secreted by the germ cells can influence Sertoli cell activity (Boitani et al. 1981, Le Magueresse & Jégou 1986, Syed et al. 1999, Vidal et al. 2001, Zabludoff et al. 2001, Delfino et al. 2003). Cryptorchidism has also been shown to affect Sertoli cell activity (Johnston et al. 2004, O'Shaughnessy et al. 2007a), although this may be a direct effect of increased temperature on the Sertoli cells (Bergh & Soder 2007). Overall, there has not been an extensive survey of either the role of germ cells in regulating Sertoli cell gene expression in vivo or the extent to which overall Sertoli cell activity is affected. In this study, therefore, we have treated outbred mice with busulphan and measured changes in the level of 26 different mRNA species expressed specifically in the Sertoli cells as germ cell depletion progresses. Androgen secretion by the testis is dependent upon the Leydig cells, which are regulated by luteinising hormone (LH). There is also good evidence, however, that the Sertoli cells influence Leydig cell activity and that ablation of the Sertoli cell population will lead to loss of the Leydig cells (Russell et al. 2001). We have, therefore, also measured Leydig cell activity and function in germ cell-depleted mice to determine whether the germ cells can directly or indirectly affect the steroidogenic function of the testis. Results Testis morphology Busulphan treatment had no apparent effect on testis morphology up to day 5 (Fig. 1
Hormone profiles Circulating levels of FSH did not change after busulphan treatment (Fig. 2
Germ cell genes Expression levels of three mRNA species encoding markers of different germ cell populations were measured following busulphan treatment to monitor loss of each population. The three markers examined were Stra8, Spo11 and Tnp1, which show predominant expression in spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids respectively (Yelick et al. 1989, Oulad-Abdelghani et al. 1996, Shannon et al. 1999). Levels of Stra8 mRNA were significantly reduced on day 5 and were barely detectable by day 10 (Fig. 3
Leydig cell-specific genes To determine whether Leydig cell function is affected by germ cell depletion levels of five Leydig cell-specific mRNA species (Lhr, Star, Hsd3b6, Cyp17a1 and Cyp11a1) were measured following busulphan treatment. No significant changes in transcript levels encoding the LH receptor, STAR protein or steroidogenic enzymes were seen following busulphan treatment (Fig. 4
Sertoli cell-specific genes To examine the effects of germ cell ablation on Sertoli cell activity, the levels of 26 Sertoli cell-specific mRNA species were measured (Fig. 5
Other testicular genes Levels of mRNA encoding three products with unknown (β-defensin 36, DEFB36) or mixed somatic expression (GATA4 and NR0B1) were also measured after busulphan treatment. Levels of transcripts encoding the β-defensin DEFB36 and the transcription factor GATA4 increased significantly 30 days after treatment with busulphan and remained high up to day 50 (Fig. 6
Discussion Busulphan induces apoptosis in spermatogonia within 1 week of treatment followed by a second wave of apoptosis in meiotic spermatocytes after 2 weeks (Choi et al. 2004). The expression pattern of germ cell markers was consistent with early loss of spermatogonia through apoptosis followed by loss of spermatocytes after 2 weeks and subsequent loss of spermatids between 20 and 30 days as existing spermatids mature and fail to be replaced. Histological changes in the testis after busulphan were also consistent with the changes in marker transcript levels although there tended to be a delay between loss of marker expression and loss of a particular cell population. Overall, the histological and marker data indicate that spermatogonia entered apoptosis within 5 days of treatment followed by loss of spermatocytes after day 10 and spermatids after day 15. By day 30 most tubules contained only the Sertoli cells and by day 50 germ cell repopulation was apparent in some tubules. It should be noted that since busulphan is a cytotoxic drug there is a possibility that it will also have direct effects on the somatic cells of the testis. It might be expected that any such effects would be rapid and, within any one cell type, have a relatively non-specific effect on transcript levels. Within the confines of the experimental design, however, no effects of this nature were seen apart from some early increases in specific Sertoli cell transcript levels (discussed below). Treatment with busulphan had no effect on intratesticular levels of testosterone confirming previous studies which have shown no effect of germ cell ablation on testosterone levels (Gomes et al. 1973, Morris et al. 1987, De Franca et al. 1994). Consistent with the failure to alter testicular androgen levels, busulphan treatment had no effect on levels of mRNA transcripts encoding proteins involved in steroidogenesis. Use of an external standard control for the real-time PCR studies meant that transcript levels were normalised to the whole testis and were, therefore, unaffected by changes in testis volume or cellular composition induced by busulphan. In addition, total Leydig cell number is unaffected by busulphan treatment in the adult mouse (O'Shaughnessy et al. 2003) and no corrections to the measured transcript levels per testis were required (O'Shaughnessy et al. 2007a, 2007b). The constant transcript levels per testis after busulphan treatment indicates, therefore, that there is no change in level per Leydig cell. This failure of germ cell ablation to affect the steroidogenic function of the Leydig cells in the adult animal contrasts with the reported effect of germ cell ablation in the fetal or prepubertal rat (Boujrad et al. 1995a, 1995b). Under these circumstances, Leydig cell number is reduced in the adult animal but testosterone production per cell is increased (Boujrad et al. 1995a, 1995b). This would suggest that germ cells are required at the pre-pubertal stage for normal development of Leydig cell number and function but that the Leydig cells become independent of germ cell regulation once the adult cohort is formed. Alternatively, it has been shown that cryptorchidism appears to have different effects on Leydig cell function in rats and mice (de Kretser et al. 1979, Jegou et al. 1983, Mendis-Handagama et al. 1990a, 1990b, Murphy & O'Shaughnessy 1991) and it is possible that there is a species difference in the Leydig cell response to germ cell depletion. In contrast to the steroidogenic apparatus, levels of mRNA encoding PDGF-A were significantly reduced coinciding with ablation of the spermatid population. This growth factor is required for normal Leydig cell development around puberty and is predominantly expressed in the Sertoli cells in the immature testis but in the adult animal it is localised in the Leydig cells (Gnessi et al. 2000, Fecteau et al. 2006). Altered expression of Pdgfa after busulphan suggests, therefore, that germ cell ablation can affect specific Leydig cell functions and this is likely to occur through changes in Sertoli cell activity. The failure of germ cell ablation to affect circulating FSH levels was somewhat surprising since busulphan caused transient but significant changes in inhibin βB-subunit mRNA levels and previous studies have shown that busulphan will increase circulating FSH levels in the rat between 6 and 10 weeks after injection (Gomes et al. 1973, Morris et al. 1987). The lack of a similar phenomenon in the mouse may be indicative of a species difference but a contributing factor in this study may also be that an outbred strain of mouse was used. This has the advantage that inbred strain-specific effects are avoided but at the expense of an overall increase in animal to animal variability which may have masked subtle changes in hormone levels. Despite failure to affect androgen or FSH levels, germ cell ablation had a marked and widespread effect on the Sertoli cells. This study examined 26 mRNA species that have been shown, within the testis, to be predominantly or exclusively expressed in the Sertoli cells (Table 1). Of the genes studied over 50% showed altered expression following germ cell ablation and since hormone levels were unaffected this is likely to be a direct response to the loss of germ cells. In addition, since busulphan treatment does not affect Sertoli cell number (O'Shaughnessy et al. 2003) changes in transcript levels per testis will be a reflection of changes per Sertoli cell. While extrapolation from this set of genes should be done with caution, the results indicate that a large number of Sertoli cell genes may be directly regulated by the germ cell component. Most of the genes affected by busulphan showed a late response (after 15 days) which indicates that Sertoli cell activity is particularly sensitive to regulation by the spermatid population. This is consistent with earlier in vivo studies which showed that spermatids are primarily responsible for changes in Sertoli cell function (Jegou et al. 1993, Maguire et al. 1993, McKinnell & Sharpe 1997). In addition, more recent in vitro studies using co-culture methods have shown specific effects of post-meiotic germ cells on Sertoli cell function (Vidal et al. 2001, Delfino et al. 2003). Sertoli cell activity also appears to be regulated by other germ cell populations and, in particular, the meiotic germ cells (Rey et al. 1994, Al Attar et al. 1997, Grandjean et al. 1997, Syed et al. 1999), although spermatogonia may also be involved (Fujino et al. 2006). This would be consistent with the earlier changes seen in mRNA species such as Shbg and Cst9 and the loss of Spata2 around day 15. As discussed above, it is also possible that early effects of busulphan could be due to direct effects of the drug on Sertoli cell activity but this appears unlikely since only a small number of genes are affected and in each case activity is increased after treatment.
Two recent studies have shown that there is high expression of β-defensins in the testis and male reproductive tract (Patil et al. 2005, Yenugu et al. 2006). In both studies, β-defensin 36 was shown to be abundantly expressed in the testis and we have included it as a representative β-defensin in this study. While β-defensins are generally expressed in epithelia the specific localisation of Defb36 expression in the testis is uncertain and Defb36 has not been considered with the other two groups. Results from this study show clearly that germ cell ablation will significantly increase Defb36 mRNA levels. The β-defensins act as broad spectrum antimicrobials which help protect the male reproductive tract against infection (Selsted & Ouellette 2005). It might, therefore, be expected that ablation of the germ cell population would act to increase levels of β-defensins as a protective response. During development, the transcription factor GATA4 and the nuclear receptor NR0B1 (DAX1) are involved in sex determination and differentiation of the fetal Leydig cells (LaVoie 2003, Park et al. 2005, Bielinska et al. 2007). In adult animals, their function is less clear although both may be involved in maintenance and regulation of steroidogenesis (LaVoie 2003, Niakan & McCabe 2005). The two factors are expressed in the both Sertoli cells and Leydig cells in the adult animal (Tamai et al. 1996, Ketola et al. 1999) and the late changes in transcript levels after busulphan treatment indicates that normal expression of these factors is regulated by the germ cells. It is not clear whether this regulation occurs in both cell types or is restricted to only one. Previous studies have examined the role of germ cells in the regulation of a small number of the mRNA species studied in this report at the mRNA level or as secreted proteins. During normal development, there is a marked, prepubertal decline in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) secretion by the Sertoli cells which is likely to be caused by increased androgen action on the Sertoli cells and by germ cell entry into meiosis (Al Attar et al. 1997, Rey et al. 2003). Since there was no significant change in intratesticular androgen levels in this study, the rise in Amh after busulphan treatment is consistent with regulation by the germ cells, although the effect of busulphan was only seen after loss of the spermatid population. Similarly, it has been reported that levels of the Sertoli cell secretory product testin are inversely proportional to germ cell numbers (Cheng et al. 1989, Guitton et al. 2000) which is consistent with results reported here. A number of earlier studies have shown that inhibin B levels are regulated by germ cells and data from the rat suggests that loss of post-meiotic germ cells is associated with a decline in inhibin B (Allenby et al. 1991, Guitton et al. 2000). By contrast, Clifton et al. (2002) have reported that meiotic germ cells act to inhibit Sertoli cell Inhbb mRNA levels in culture. Interestingly, it has been shown that inhibin B production appears to be germ cell stage dependent with a possible inhibitory effect of interleukin (IL)1α at the nadir of production (Okuma et al. 2006). The changes in Inhbb mRNA levels seen after busulphan in this study may, therefore, be related to disruption of the normal stage-dependent regulation of Sertoli cell activity, although the alteration in Il1a transcript levels after germ cell depletion may also play a role. Sertoli cell activin A production has also been shown to be germ cell stage dependent (Okuma et al. 2006) but Inhba transcript levels per testis did not change significantly after busulphan. This would suggest that there can be a complex effect of overall germ cell depletion on Sertoli cell transcripts which normally are under stage-dependent regulation. This may be because the overall effect of germ cell ablation will be a balance between the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of stage regulation aggregated across the whole testis. Results from this study indicate, overall, that germ cells play a major (mostly inhibitory) role in regulating Sertoli cell activity and that this regulation is primarily through the post-meiotic cells. The effects of germ cell ablation were widespread, affecting 50% of the mRNA species tested suggesting that the germ cells may have a greater overall effect on Sertoli cell activity than endocrine factors which tend to be more specific (Johnston et al. 2004, Denolet et al. 2006). It is likely that the overall effect of germ cell action is to fine-tune Sertoli cell activity during the different stages of spermatogenesis in order to maximise spermatogenic output. Materials and Methods Animals Adult (15 weeks) outbred MF1 mice were purchased from Harlan UK (Bicester, UK). Mice were given a single injection (i.p.) of busulphan (30 mg/kg) in DMSO/H2O (50/50 v/v) and were killed 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 or 50 days later. At each time point, three or four control animals and five treated animals were killed to allow for any effects of ageing of the mice. No significant differences between the control animals were seen and data from the control animals were pooled for analysis.One testis from each animal was frozen in liquid N2 while the other testis was weighed and cut into half. One half was frozen for subsequent measurement of intratesticular testosterone, while the other half was fixed in Bouin's. Trunk blood was collected from animals and serum used to measure circulating FSH. Measurement of mRNA levels Real-time PCR was used to quantify the content of specific mRNA species in the testes at different times following busulphan treatment. To allow specific mRNA levels to be expressed per testis and to control for the efficiency of RNA extraction, RNA degradation and the RT step, an external standard (luciferase; Promega UK) was used (Baker & O'Shaughnessy 2001, O'Shaughnessy et al. 2002, Johnston et al. 2004). Testis RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies) and luciferase mRNA (5 ng) was added to each testis at the start of the RNA extraction procedure. Residual genomic DNA was removed from extracted RNA by DNAse treatment (DNA-free; Ambion Inc., supplied by AMS Biotechnology, Abingdon, UK). The RNA was reverse transcribed using random hexamers and Moloney murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase (Superscript II, Life Technologies) as described previously (O'Shaughnessy & Murphy 1993, O'Shaughnessy et al. 1994).Measurement by real-time PCR used the SYBR method in a 96-well plate format. Reactions contained 5 μl 2× SYBR mastermix (Stratagene, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), primer (100 nM) and template in a total volume of 10 μl. The thermal profile used for amplification was 95 °C for 8 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 63 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 30 s. At the end of the amplification phase, a melting curve analysis was carried out on the products formed and gel electrophoresis was carried out on representative samples to confirm product size. The quantity of each measured cDNA was expressed relative to the internal standard in the same sample, which allows direct comparison of expression levels per testis between different samples (Johnston et al. 2004).Primers were designed using PrimerExpress software (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) using parameters described previously (O'Shaughnessy et al. 2007a, 2007b). The primers used are shown in Table 1. Measurement of hormone levels Levels of FSH in the serum were measured using a commercial RIA with rat standards (Amersham Biosciences). A dilution curve of mouse serum was parallel with the standard curve generated by the RIA. To measure intratesticular testosterone levels, steroids were extracted from frozen hemi-testes in ethanol and measured by RIA as previously described (O'Shaughnessy & Sheffield 1990). Histology Testes were fixed overnight in Bouin's and stored in 70% ethanol. Testes were embedded in Technovit 7100 resin, cut into sections and stained with Harris' hematoxylin and eosin. Statistical analysis Effects of drug treatment were analysed initially by single-factor ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis using Fisher's test. Acknowledgements These studies were supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust. We should like to thank Ana Monteiro for technical assistance. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Nature. 1970 Sep 19; 227(5264):1217-9.
[Nature. 1970]Nat Genet. 1997 Feb; 15(2):201-4.
[Nat Genet. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 3; 101(5):1327-32.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Biol Reprod. 2001 Jul; 65(1):318-32.
[Biol Reprod. 2001]Endocr Rev. 2004 Oct; 25(5):747-806.
[Endocr Rev. 2004]Biol Reprod. 2001 Jul; 65(1):318-32.
[Biol Reprod. 2001]Mol Reprod Dev. 1989; 1(3):193-200.
[Mol Reprod Dev. 1989]J Cell Biol. 1996 Oct; 135(2):469-77.
[J Cell Biol. 1996]FEBS Lett. 1999 Dec 3; 462(3):329-34.
[FEBS Lett. 1999]FEBS Lett. 2004 Sep 24; 575(1-3):41-51.
[FEBS Lett. 2004]Endocrinology. 1973 Oct; 93(4):800-9.
[Endocrinology. 1973]Int J Androl. 1987 Oct; 10(5):691-700.
[Int J Androl. 1987]Anat Rec. 1994 Oct; 240(2):225-32.
[Anat Rec. 1994]Biol Reprod. 2003 Sep; 69(3):797-808.
[Biol Reprod. 2003]Endocrinology. 2007 Jun; 148(6):2914-24.
[Endocrinology. 2007]J Cell Biol. 2000 May 29; 149(5):1019-26.
[J Cell Biol. 2000]Histol Histopathol. 2006 Dec; 21(12):1295-302.
[Histol Histopathol. 2006]Endocrinology. 1973 Oct; 93(4):800-9.
[Endocrinology. 1973]Int J Androl. 1987 Oct; 10(5):691-700.
[Int J Androl. 1987]Biol Reprod. 2003 Sep; 69(3):797-808.
[Biol Reprod. 2003]Endocrinology. 1993 Jun; 132(6):2557-62.
[Endocrinology. 1993]Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1993 Jul; 94(1):79-88.
[Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1993]Int J Androl. 1997 Jun; 20(3):171-9.
[Int J Androl. 1997]J Cell Sci. 2001 Jan; 114(Pt 2):435-43.
[J Cell Sci. 2001]Physiol Genomics. 2005 Sep 21; 23(1):5-17.
[Physiol Genomics. 2005]Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006 Feb 4; 4():7.
[Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006]Nat Immunol. 2005 Jun; 6(6):551-7.
[Nat Immunol. 2005]Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003 Dec; 228(11):1282-90.
[Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003]Development. 2005 May; 132(10):2415-23.
[Development. 2005]J Clin Invest. 1997 Sep 15; 100(6):1335-43.
[J Clin Invest. 1997]Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003 Dec 15; 211(1-2):21-31.
[Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003]J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 15; 264(35):21386-93.
[J Biol Chem. 1989]Int J Androl. 2000 Dec; 23(6):332-9.
[Int J Androl. 2000]Endocrinology. 1991 Jan; 128(1):467-76.
[Endocrinology. 1991]Endocrinology. 2004 Jan; 145(1):318-29.
[Endocrinology. 2004]Mol Endocrinol. 2006 Feb; 20(2):321-34.
[Mol Endocrinol. 2006]Reproduction. 2001 Oct; 122(4):553-9.
[Reproduction. 2001]Biol Reprod. 2002 Apr; 66(4):966-75.
[Biol Reprod. 2002]Endocrinology. 2004 Jan; 145(1):318-29.
[Endocrinology. 2004]J Mol Endocrinol. 1993 Aug; 11(1):77-82.
[J Mol Endocrinol. 1993]Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1994 May; 101(1-2):197-201.
[Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1994]Endocrinology. 2004 Jan; 145(1):318-29.
[Endocrinology. 2004]Endocrinology. 2007 Jun; 148(6):2914-24.
[Endocrinology. 2007]J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Dec; 92(12):4792-801.
[J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007]J Steroid Biochem. 1990 May; 35(6):729-34.
[J Steroid Biochem. 1990]