![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society of Plant Biologists Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of Uncapped mRNAs in Arabidopsis Reveals Regulation of mRNA Degradation[W] California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology 156-29, Pasadena, California 91125 1Address correspondence to jiao/at/caltech.edu. 2Current address: Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats and Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics, Jordi Girona 18-26, Barcelona 08034, Spain. Received August 21, 2008; Revised September 26, 2008; Accepted October 10, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The composition of the transcriptome is determined by a balance between mRNA synthesis and degradation. An important route for mRNA degradation produces uncapped mRNAs, and this decay process can be initiated by decapping enzymes, endonucleases, and small RNAs. Although uncapped mRNAs are an important intermediate for mRNA decay, their identity and abundance have never been studied on a large scale until recently. Here, we present an experimental method for transcriptome-wide profiling of uncapped mRNAs that can be used in any eukaryotic system. We applied the method to study the prevalence of uncapped transcripts during the early stages of Arabidopsis thaliana flower development. Uncapped transcripts were identified for the majority of expressed genes, although at different levels. By comparing uncapped RNA levels with steady state overall transcript levels, our study provides evidence for widespread mRNA degradation control in numerous biological processes involving genes of varied molecular functions, implying that uncapped mRNA levels are dynamically regulated. Sequence analyses identified structural features of transcripts and cis-elements that were associated with different levels of uncapping. These transcriptome-wide profiles of uncapped mRNAs will aid in illuminating new regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional networks. INTRODUCTION The abundance of mRNA within cells is determined by rates of mRNA synthesis and degradation. A major research goal of the past few years has been the identification of factors controlling and participating in transcriptional regulatory networks, such as those associated with developmental processes and environmental responses (Wellmer and Riechmann, 2005; Barkoulas et al., 2007; Jiao et al., 2007). In addition to transcriptional regulation, the reconstruction of gene expression networks clearly requires data for mRNA degradation and other modes of regulation of mRNA transcript abundance (Belostotsky and Rose, 2005; Yuan et al., 2008). The molecular basis of mRNA degradation is best characterized in yeast and mammalian cells, in which general mRNA decay is initiated by deadenylation via a variety of mRNA deadenylases that shorten the 3′ poly(A) tail (Mitchell and Tollervey, 2000). Two major exoribonuclease-mediated degradation pathways have been identified in which mRNA can be digested from either the 5′ or the 3′ end following partial deadenylation (Parker and Song, 2004). In the 5′-3′ decay pathway, a decapping enzyme complex consisting of DCP1 and DCP2 removes the 5′ modified guanine nucleotide cap structure. The decapped transcripts are progressively digested by a 5′-3′ exonuclease known as XRN1 (Coller and Parker, 2004; Liu and Kiledjian, 2006). Decapping proteins accumulate in specific cytoplasmic foci referred to as P bodies (Parker and Sheth, 2007). As an alternative, deadenylated mRNAs can be degraded in a 3′-5′ direction by the cytoplasmic exosome complex (Houseley et al., 2006). In addition, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), a quality control system, rapidly degrades mRNAs containing premature termination codons through direct decapping without deadenylation (Amrani et al., 2006; Shyu et al., 2008). The degradation of individual mRNAs can also be initiated by endonuclease cleavage, mediated either indirectly by small RNA-mediated silencing or directly by endonuclease-mediated cleavage, both of which will generate uncapped mRNA (Meyer et al., 2004; Halbeisen et al., 2008). It is largely unknown how much these endonucleases contribute to the degradation of mRNAs. Similar mRNA decay mechanisms are present in plants, and genetic analyses have highlighted their importance in the plant's life cycle (Gutierrez et al., 1999; Belostotsky and Rose, 2005; Belostotsky, 2008). One mRNA deadenylase, PARN, was found to be essential for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (Chiba et al., 2004; Reverdatto et al., 2004; Nishimura et al., 2005). Recent work revealed that the Arabidopsis decapping complex, which includes DCP2, DCP1, and VARICOSE, with DCP2 containing the decapping activity, is similar to its human counterpart (Xu et al., 2006; Goeres et al., 2007; Iwasaki et al., 2007; Gunawardana et al., 2008). Mutagenesis studies indicated that the Arabidopsis decapping complex is essential for postembryonic development (Xu et al., 2006; Goeres et al., 2007; Iwasaki et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis, the cytoplasmic 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN4 is involved in the decay of specific transcripts (Kastenmayer and Green, 2000; Souret et al., 2004), and its targets include mRNAs of two regulators of the ethylene signaling pathway (Olmedo et al., 2006; Potuschak et al., 2006). The 3′-5′ degradation pathway is also present in Arabidopsis, and subunits of the exosome are functionally specialized, ranging from being dispensable to being essential for growth (Chekanova et al., 2007). Using inducible knockout lines of essential subunits, a wide range of exosome substrates were identified, including structural RNAs, a subset of mRNAs, microRNA (miRNA) intermediates, and noncoding RNAs (Chekanova et al., 2007). Similarly, NMD is also conserved in plants (Hori and Watanabe, 2005; Arciga-Reyes et al., 2006; Yoine et al., 2006; Kerenyi et al., 2008). Numerous studies indicate that mRNA decay is a determining factor for the steady state levels of mRNAs in cells. The decay of mRNA, in turn, can be affected by various developmental and environmental stimuli (Gutierrez et al., 1999; Parker and Song, 2004). Experiments using chemicals that inhibit transcription in Arabidopsis suspension cell cultures and in young seedlings have shown that mRNA half-lives can vary widely (Gutierrez et al., 2002; Narsai et al., 2007). In addition to general structural cis-acting elements that are found at the ends of virtually all mRNAs, where they affect mRNA stability, specific sequence elements have been identified that control mRNA turnover in plants (Gallie and Bailey-Serres, 1997; Gutierrez et al., 1999). Moreover, mRNA turnover affects the small RNA-mediated silencing pathway in plants (Gazzani et al., 2004; Gregory et al., 2008). The abundance of decapped mRNAs affects the levels of several classes of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Genome-wide profiling methods have been used to study mRNA expression and how it changes across tissues, among cell types, in developmental processes, in response to environmental stimuli, etc. However, these studies generally capture the steady state mRNA composition of the transcriptome and therefore do not reveal the layered nature of transcriptional regulation, where the abundance of a given mRNA species is determined and regulated by multiple mechanisms. Here, we present a method to capture and profile uncapped mRNAs, which are intermediates of the 5′-3′ decay pathway downstream of decapping and endonuclease cleavage. Applying this method to analyze the transcriptome during early Arabidopsis flower development, we show that levels of uncapped mRNAs are highly regulated. The prevalence of uncapping varies widely among different transcripts and can be correlated to the functions of the encoded proteins. In addition, we identify structural features that correlate with uncapping levels. RESULTS A Method to Profile the Decapped Transcriptome To undertake a global study of uncapped gene transcript abundance, we developed a method based on the RNA ligase-mediated 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RLM 5′-RACE). Similarly to the original RLM 5′-RACE (Liu and Gorovsky, 1993; Llave et al., 2002), our method takes advantage of the presence of a 5′ monophosphate group at the 5′ end of the mRNAs of interest (in this case, uncapped mRNAs). This 5′ monophosphate group is used for the T4 RNA ligase-mediated ligation of the uncapped RNA to the 3′ end of an RNA adaptor, which is subsequently used to purify uncapped mRNAs. By contrast, intact mRNAs with a 5′ cap structure cannot be ligated to the RNA adaptors, since the 5′ cap efficiently blocks the reaction. Our method aims to capture all uncapped mRNAs in the population, so as to provide a transcriptome-wide profile that will not only reveal the identity but also determine the relative quantity of each uncapped mRNA species. As uncapped mRNAs are unstable, they are present in cells at very low levels compared with intact mRNAs. To efficiently isolate uncapped mRNAs free from intact, capped mRNA contamination, a two-step strategy was developed (see Supplemental Figure 1 and Supplemental Methods online), including affinity purification and selective synthesis of cDNA from decapped mRNAs (see Supplemental Figure 2 online). Following in vitro transcription, the resulting amplified and labeled RNAs were used in oligonucleotide microarray hybridizations using standard procedures (Wellmer et al., 2006). In the oligonucleotide microarrays used in the experiments, ~25,500 Arabidopsis genes are represented (described in Wellmer et al., 2006), although noncoding RNA species are usually not among those represented. Using mock experiments without T4 RNA ligase, we confirmed that contamination from intact mRNAs with a 5′ cap was generally below the detectable level in the positive control (see Supplemental Figure 3 and Supplemental Methods online). By comparing with semiquantitative RLM 5′-RACE PCR using gene-specific primers, we found that our microarray-based method yielded similar results for the sample genes tested (see Supplemental Figure 4 online). It is possible that ex vivo decapped mRNAs could be captured by our method, although their abundance is expected to be low. Abundance of Uncapped mRNAs Is Highly Regulated The method described above was used to study the uncapped transcriptome during the early stages of flower development in Arabidopsis. For this, we used the 35S:AP1-GR ap1 cal floral induction system recently developed in our laboratory (Wellmer et al., 2006). In brief, flower formation in the 35S:AP1-GR ap1 cal plants is blocked, and, instead, the plants undergo a massive overproliferation of inflorescence-like meristems. Treatment of these inflorescences with the synthetic steroid hormone dexamethasone (Dex) activates the AP1-GR fusion protein and leads to a synchronized formation of large numbers of floral buds (Wellmer et al., 2006). Using this system, we collected inflorescence tissues immediately before and after Dex treatment and at 1-d intervals for 5 d. At these time points, floral buds are at stages of development, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 6, and 6 to 7, respectively (Wellmer et al., 2006). From those tissues, samples of purified uncapped mRNAs and of total mRNA (which mostly consists of intact mRNAs, since uncapped mRNAs are naturally present at low quantities in the cell) were prepared and used to generate labeled RNA that was cohybridized to the microarrays. During the duration of the time course, from day 0 to day 5 after the application of Dex (i.e., in early developing flowers from stages 0 to 7), we could detect expression of ~14,000 genes (or ~60% of annotated genes represented on the microarray). Uncapped transcripts were clearly detected for >90% of those expressed genes. In addition, a total of 1223 transcripts were detected only in the uncapped form at least at one stage (Table 1). Although the abundance of uncapped mRNAs was generally correlated with the level of total mRNA, over- and underrepresentation of uncapped transcripts was evident for many genes (Figure 1A
Distinct Uncapping Profiles among Gene Functional Classes To reveal possible general relationships between functions of genes and levels of uncapping of their transcripts, we employed the Gene Ontology (GO) broad functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome (Berardini et al., 2004). As the day 5 data showed the largest numbers of transcripts that were either enriched or depleted in uncapped forms, we focused on this time point in the subsequent analyses unless otherwise stated. Data from other time points showed similar trends as did the day 5 data. The distribution of relative uncapped/total mRNA ratios was found to be significantly biased (P < 0.001) in about half of the categories of molecular function, cellular component, and biological process (Figure 2
In particular, we detected a very substantial enrichment in uncapped mRNAs and a deficit of capped ones among kinase gene transcripts. This finding, together with the widely accepted important roles of kinases, led us to further dissect this group. Among the kinase families that were significantly enriched in uncapped gene transcripts were Raf kinases, casein kinases, cdc2-like kinases, receptor-like kinases (RLKs), and mitogen-activated protein kinases (see Supplemental Table 2 online). Phylogenic analyses were integrated with uncapped transcriptome profiles for the RLK family (see Supplemental Figure 7 online), which is significantly expanded in flowering plants, with >600 members in Arabidopsis (Shiu and Bleecker, 2001). High ratios of uncapped gene transcripts as well as low ratios were evident within many clades of kinases of distinct extracellular domains. For example, genes coding for leucine-rich repeat (LRR)–containing RLKs generally showed a high prevalence of uncapped transcripts. LRR subfamilies are of particular interest because they include RLKs with known developmental functions, such as BAK1, BRI1, CLV1, ERECTA, and HAESA (Torii et al., 1996; Clark et al., 1997; Li and Chory, 1997; Jinn et al., 2000; Li et al., 2002; Nam and Li, 2002). Clades spanning CLV1 and its related BAM1, 2, 3; ERECTA and its related ERL1, 2; and HAESA were all highly enriched with uncapped transcripts, although CLV1 RNA appears to be less uncapped than the RNA of BAMs. Gene transcripts for the brassinosteroid receptors BAK1 and BRI1, as well as related mRNAs to both, had intermediate levels of uncapping. Different from LRR subfamilies, various loosely related receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase subfamilies were relatively enriched with capped mRNAs. By contrast, gene transcripts coding for transcription factors showed, in general, average uncapping levels (see Supplemental Table 3 online). Except a relatively high ratio of uncapped transcripts observed among transcripts from the PHD and HB families, most families had a similar level of uncapping to the average of the entire transcriptome. Transposable element (TE)-related genes and pseudogenes do not have obvious biological functions, although they are widespread in the Arabidopsis genome. Subsets of TE-related genes and pseudogenes are represented on our microarray, and a comparison of their mRNA uncapping profiles clearly indicated that both groups were prone to be uncapped (Figure 4A
Analysis of miRNA Targets Shows Variability in the Levels of Transcripts Uncapping Plant miRNAs and trans-acting siRNAs (tasiRNAs) frequently interact with target transcripts, inducing cleavage at the tenth nucleotide of complementary sites (Llave et al., 2002). Similar to uncapped transcripts generated by uncapping enzymes, the resulting 3′ fragments have a 5′ monophosphate and can be captured by our RNA ligation-based protocol. To systematically elucidate miRNA-directed cleavage, we globally compared the relative levels of uncapped transcripts of all verified and predicted target genes of miRNAs and tasiRNAs, although our microarray-based approach could not precisely define the termini generated by cleavage. As expected, the target gene transcripts of miRNAs and tasiRNAs were enriched in uncapped forms (Figures 4B and 4C A recent computational approach to identify miRNAs in plant genomes predicted ~1200 miRNA candidates (termed miSVM) using a supervised computational learning method (Lindow et al., 2007). A comparison of the uncapping profiles of the putative targets of these newly predicted miSVMs with the uncapping profiles of the entire transcriptome showed that the miSVM targets were slightly more prone to uncapping (Figure 4B The 5′ Untranslated Region Structure and Transcript Length Associated with Uncapped Transcript Level The integration of signals from mRNA binding regulatory proteins coordinately regulates selective mRNA decay as well as transcription (Gallie, 2002; Belostotsky and Rose, 2005; Keene, 2007). To understand features of mRNAs that may regulate their interaction with other regulatory molecules and/or may affect turnover through other means, we explored various structural properties of mRNAs with respect to their relationship with the mRNA uncapping profiles detected in our experiments. To reveal features of the untranslated region (UTR) that are related to mRNA uncapping, we tested UTR length, GC content, minimal free energy of a secondary structure, introns, short open reading frames (sORFs), and pseudoknots. We found that some characteristics of the 5′ UTR, including the presence of sORFs, introns, or pseudoknots, were associated with higher levels of mRNA uncapping. Among these structural features, the presence of sORFs had the most obvious effect in that mRNAs with sORFs in their 5′ UTR were clearly enriched in uncapped transcripts (Figure 5A
Similarly, the existence of introns and pseudoknots in the 5′ UTR correlated with higher uncapping levels. Whereas the presence of one intron in the 5′ UTR of the gene has a rather limited effect, the presence of two or more introns in the same UTR correlated with enrichment of uncapped mRNAs (Figure 5B Sequence Elements in 5′ and 3′ UTR Correlate with mRNA Uncapping Transcript decay can be affected by conserved sequence elements in the 3′ and 5′ UTR regions. Thus, genes that show enrichment or depletion for uncapped transcripts could share common regulatory elements or motifs in their UTR regions. Using a modified enumerative method that statistically analyzes the frequency of exactly matched overrepresented motifs, we examined all possible motifs of up to 12 nucleotides in both the 3′ and the 5′ UTR of mRNAs with high and with low uncapping levels. By comparing with the group of all the genes represented in the microarray, we were able to identify around a dozen consensus motifs that were statistically overrepresented by both raw counting and on a per-UTR basis (Figure 6
DISCUSSION Transcriptome-Wide Profiling Reveals Widespread Uncapped mRNAs in Vivo In a eukaryotic cell, the dynamic life of an mRNA begins with its transcription in the nucleus. Once completely processed, including 5′ cap addition, splicing, editing, and polyadenylation, it is transported to the cytoplasm and translated by the ribosome. At the end of its life, the mRNA is degraded. Although mRNA steady state levels have been extensively studied at the genome scale in various organisms, work on other major stages in the life of an mRNA life are mostly limited to selected genes. The systems perspective emerging in biology promises to explain the transcriptional regulation based on modular networks of transcription, regulation, and degradation (Belostotsky and Rose, 2005; Yuan et al., 2008). It is therefore essential that biological systems data include RNA dynamics. Using chemical inhibition of transcription in cultured cells and young seedlings, it has been shown that mRNA decay rates vary widely in Arabidopsis (Gutierrez et al., 2002; Narsai et al., 2007). These experiments, however, do not distinguish between the (at least) two parallel mechanisms that coexist after deadenylation: decapping plus 5′-3′ degradation and 3′-5′degradation. In addition, it is important to avoid the use of chemical inhibitors of transcription since they induce stress responses (Narsai et al., 2007). The experimental approach we developed in this work captures all uncapped mRNAs based on their 5′ monophosphate and 3′ poly(A) tail (see Supplemental Figure 1 online), which are found following 5′ decapping or endonuclease cleavage. In addition, this protocol may capture a small number of intermediates before capping and in splicing due to lariats being debranched. The identity and abundance of uncapped mRNAs were then analyzed using microarrays. Using this strategy, we were able to identify uncapped mRNAs for most of the expressed genes (Table 1). It should be noted that because poly(A) tails of uncapped mRNAs, as well as capped mRNAs, have a range in size (Couttet et al., 1997), our protocol selecting for poly(A)+ RNAs potentially excludes uncapped mRNAs with extremely short poly(A) tails. A recent study of Arabidopsis exosome mutants suggested that only ~200 mRNAs are affected by defects in exosome subunits (Chekanova et al., 2007). Our results are consistent with this observation, together suggesting that 5′ decapping and subsequent 5′-3′ degradation plays the most significant role in mRNA decay in Arabidopsis. This is an extension of the prediction based on the degradation profile of unstable oat (Avena sativa) phytochrome A mRNAs (Higgs and Colbert, 1994). Alternatively, this observation can also be explained by most mRNA decay being initiated by an unidentified endonuclease cleavage independent of 5′ decapping. Among all uncapped transcripts, this method also has the potential to identify small RNA cleavage targets at the genome scale. Indeed, a similar RNA ligation-based method has recently been developed to identify endogenous miRNA and tasiRNA targets when combined with deep sequencing (Addo-Quaye et al., 2008; German et al., 2008; Gregory et al., 2008). In addition to taking an inventory of all uncapped mRNAs, we were able to compare the relative levels of uncapped mRNA with total mRNA, which is predominantly composed of intact processed mRNA, to reveal the relative degree of uncapping for each gene transcript. This is important to understand the uncapping profiles, as uncapped mRNA abundance and mRNA steady state level are largely correlated (Figure 1 Relationship between Gene Function and Uncapped Transcripts Our profiling analysis suggests that levels of uncapped mRNAs vary significantly among genes encoding proteins of distinct functions or with different subcellular localization. Detailed analysis of the uncapping profile revealed two general trends: first, mRNAs encoding essential biological functions for cellular viability are usually weakly uncapped; second, regulatory gene transcripts are more likely to be uncapped. The first trend is suggested by the general negative correlation between relative uncapping levels (instead of absolute uncapped mRNA abundance) and total mRNA levels (Figure 5F Uncapped mRNA regulation is surely more complicated than this, though. First, several housekeeping function pathways were found to have a high proportion of transcript uncapping (Figure 3 Gene Transcript Features Correlate with Uncapping Profiles As can be expected, cis- and trans-acting factors correlate with the uncapping levels of gene transcripts. For trans-acting factors, small RNAs would be expected to be uncapping promoters. We indeed found that known and predicted miRNA and tasiRNA target mRNAs were proportionately more uncapped than the average (Figure 4B METHODS Plant Materials and Experimental Design The Arabidopsis thaliana 35S:AP1-GR ap1-1 cal-1 line (in the Landsberg erecta background) was used in this study. This line allows for the synchronization of early developing flowers (Wellmer et al., 2006). Plants were grown on a soil:vermiculite:perlite mixture under constant illumination with a light intensity range of 80 to 100 μmol·m−2·s−1 at 20°C. Inflorescence tissue was collected under a dissecting microscope 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 d after Dex treatment or before treatment (Wellmer et al., 2006). Four independent sets of biological samples were used for the experiments. Uncapped and total RNA samples derived from each time point were cohybridized. The dyes used for labeling RNA from a given time point were switched in the replicate experiments to reduce dye-related artifacts. Ligation-Mediated Isolation of Uncapped mRNA Briefly, uncapped mRNAs were isolated by adapting a modified RLM 5′-RACE protocol to globally sample RNAs with a 5′ monophosphate and a 3′ poly(A)+ tail. An RNA adaptor was ligated directly to poly(A)+ RNA having a free 5′ monophosphate. This adaptor was subsequently used for affinity purification and selective double-strand cDNA synthesis from uncapped mRNA. For more detailed methodology, see the Supplemental Methods and Supplemental Figure 1 online. Microarray Analysis Microarrays were based on the Arabidopsis Genome Oligo Set Version 1.0 and Version 1 Upgrade (Operon). These sets consist of a total of 30,194 70-mer oligonucleotides that correspond to 25,521 annotated genes according to The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) genome annotation version 6. The oligonucleotide probes in these sets were preferentially designed to correspond to the 3′ end of transcripts, when possible. Microarrays were printed and processed as previously described (Wellmer et al., 2004, 2006). Labeled antisense RNA from uncapped mRNA and from total mRNA from the same biological sample were cohybridized. Microarrays were scanned with a GenePix 4200A scanner, and raw images were analyzed using the GenePix Pro 5.0 software (Molecular Devices). GenePix Pro output data were normalized using eCADS to remove intensity-dependent biases (Dabney and Storey, 2007). A reproducible significant intensity above that 90% of negative controls in three out of four replicate experiments was used as the threshold to classify a probe as detecting a positive signal of gene expression (Ma et al., 2005). To identify enrichment or depletion of uncapped transcripts, significance analysis was performed using EDGE for each time point and for the developmental time course, which address the multiple testing errors using the false discovery rate (Leek et al., 2006). Assignment of Gene Functions GOSlim annotation developed by TAIR was used to organize sets of genes into broad ontology categories (Berardini et al., 2004). Further classification of kinases was according to the KinG database (Krupa et al., 2004). Further classification within the RLK family followed Shiu and Bleecker (2001). Classification of transcription factors was according to the Database of Arabidopsis Transcription Factors (Guo et al., 2005). TE-related genes and pseudogenes were according to TAIR annotation version 7. Annotations of miRNA and tasiRNA as well as their targets were according to the Arabidopsis Small RNA Project database (Gustafson et al., 2005). Computationally predicted miSVMs were from Lindow et al. (2007). Putative nat-siRNA targets were following Jin et al. (2008). Further classification of all other functional groups combined GO annotation by TAIR and TIGR, gene annotation by TAIR, and manual curation according to the literature. Analysis of Sequence Features Transcript sequences and the associated annotation were downloaded from TAIR (Arabidopsis genome annotation version 7). The minimal energy for secondary structures was calculated using RNAfold (Hofacker et al., 1994), and pseudoknot structures were predicted using RNABOB (ftp://selab.janelia.org/pub/software/rnabob/). All other pattern search and calculations were performed using custom scripts in Perl and R. Accession Number Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We thank Vijaya Kumar, Lorian Schaeffer, and Joanne Tan-Cabugao for assistance with microarray manufacture, David Mathog for advice on sequence analysis, and Zachary Nimchuk, Adrienne Roeder, and Kathrin Schrick for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation 2010 Project Grant 0520193 to J.L.R. and E.M.M. and by the Millard and Muriel Jacobs Genetics and Genomics Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology. Notes The authors responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) are: Yuling Jiao (jiao/at/caltech.edu) and Elliot M. Meyerowitz (meyerow/at/caltech.edu). [W]Online version contains Web-only data References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Int J Dev Biol. 2005; 49(5-6):745-59.
[Int J Dev Biol. 2005]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Dec; 10(6):660-6.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007]Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Mar; 8(3):217-30.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2007]Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jul; 10(7):347-53.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2005]Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Apr; 13(4):165-71.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2008]Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Oct 25; 21(21):4954-60.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1993]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2053-6.
[Science. 2002]PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul; 2(7):e117.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul; 2(7):e117.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul; 2(7):e117.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11; 98(19):10763-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Plant Cell. 1996 Apr; 8(4):735-46.
[Plant Cell. 1996]Cell. 1997 May 16; 89(4):575-85.
[Cell. 1997]Cell. 1997 Sep 5; 90(5):929-38.
[Cell. 1997]Genes Dev. 2000 Jan 1; 14(1):108-17.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2053-6.
[Science. 2002]PLoS One. 2007 Feb 14; 2(2):e219.
[PLoS One. 2007]PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e57.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]Plant Cell. 2003 Nov; 15(11):2730-41.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Science. 2004 Mar 26; 303(5666):2022-5.
[Science. 2004]PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Nov; 3(11):e238.
[PLoS Comput Biol. 2007]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(6):R51.
[Genome Biol. 2005]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(4):R30.
[Genome Biol. 2005]Cell. 2005 Dec 29; 123(7):1279-91.
[Cell. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 21; 103(47):18002-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Dec; 50(6):949-70.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2002]Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jul; 10(7):347-53.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2005]Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jul; 8(7):533-43.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2007]PLoS Biol. 2005 Jun; 3(6):e213.
[PLoS Biol. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(21):6147-57.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]EMBO J. 2008 Jun 4; 27(11):1585-95.
[EMBO J. 2008]Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jul; 10(7):347-53.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2005]Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Apr; 13(4):165-71.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20; 99(17):11513-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Plant Cell. 2007 Nov; 19(11):3418-36.
[Plant Cell. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27; 94(11):5628-33.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Cell. 2007 Dec 28; 131(7):1340-53.
[Cell. 2007]Plant Cell. 1994 Jul; 6(7):1007-19.
[Plant Cell. 1994]Curr Biol. 2008 May 20; 18(10):758-62.
[Curr Biol. 2008]Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Aug; 26(8):941-6.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2008]Dev Cell. 2008 Jun; 14(6):854-66.
[Dev Cell. 2008]PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Nov; 3(11):e238.
[PLoS Comput Biol. 2007]Science. 2008 May 30; 320(5880):1185-90.
[Science. 2008]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr; 15(4):2145-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Plant Cell. 2007 Nov; 19(11):3418-36.
[Plant Cell. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1; 100(7):3889-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul; 2(7):e117.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Plant Cell. 2004 May; 16(5):1314-26.
[Plant Cell. 2004]PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul; 2(7):e117.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Genome Biol. 2007; 8(3):R44.
[Genome Biol. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2005 May; 138(1):80-91.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 15; 22(4):507-8.
[Bioinformatics. 2006]Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1; 32(Database issue):D153-5.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11; 98(19):10763-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Bioinformatics. 2005 May 15; 21(10):2568-9.
[Bioinformatics. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1; 33(Database issue):D637-40.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2005]PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Nov; 3(11):e238.
[PLoS Comput Biol. 2007]