![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 The Author(s) The antiretroviral potency of APOBEC1 deaminase from small animal species 1Department of Retrovirology and Self-Defense, Faculty of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3Center for Animal Resources and Development, Institute of Resource Development and Analysis and 4Center for AIDS Research, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: Phone: +81 96 373 5133; Fax: +81 96 373 5132; Email: akoito/at/kumamoto-u.ac.jp Received August 28, 2008; Revised October 7, 2008; Accepted October 11, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Although the role of the APOBEC3-dependent retroelement restriction system as an intrinsic immune defense against human immunodeficiency virus type1 (HIV-1) infection is becoming clear, only the rat ortholog of mammalian APOBEC1s (A1) thus far has been shown to possess antiviral activity. Here, we cloned A1 cDNAs from small animal species, and showed that similar to rat A1, both wild-type and Δvif HIV-1 infection was inhibited by mouse and hamster A1 (4- to 10-fold), whereas human A1 had negligible effects. Moreover, rabbit A1 significantly reduced the infectivity of both HIV-1 virions (>300-fold), as well as that of SIVmac, SIVagm, FIV and murine leukemia virus. Immunoblot analysis showed that A1s were efficiently incorporated into the HIV-1 virion, and their packaging is mediated through an interaction with the nucleocapsid Gag domain. Interestingly, there was a clear accumulation of particular C-T changes in the genomic RNAs of HIV-1 produced in their presence, with few G-A changes in the proviral DNA. Together, these data reveal that A1 may function as a defense mechanism, regulating retroelements in a wide range of mammalian species. INTRODUCTION It is now clear that the scope of intracellular defense mechanisms against retroviral infections extend beyond the conventional innate and acquired immune responses, involving a series of dominant inhibitory activities that influence retroviral tropism. Two major restriction factors identified thus far are the early block owing to Fv1 and TRIM5α that target incoming retroviral capsids, and cytidine deaminases, such as APOBEC3 (A3) that function at the late phase to hypermutate retroviral genome (1). The A3 proteins have been shown to inhibit the infectivity potential and mobility of a broad and growing number of exogenous retroviruses as well as endogenous retroelements (2,3). A3 edits deoxycytidine (dC) to deoxyuridine (dU) on nascent DNA minus strands during reverse transcription, but the mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effect on retroviruses are not fully understood. The A3 encoded by mouse genome was found to be about ~30% identical to the human APOBEC3G (hA3G), initially identified as a critical target for the human immunodeficiency virus type1 (HIV-1) auxiliary protein Vif (4,5). Subsequently, anti-HIV activity of A3 was found to be maintained across diverse mammalian species, such as murine, cat and artiodactyls (cattle, pigs and sheep) in spite of extensive amino acid sequence divergence, and regardless of whether lentiviruses infect the species (5–8). However, the interaction of Vif with A3 molecules is species specific, and this Vif-resistant inhibition of HIV-1 by orthologous A3 proteins appears to contribute to restrict cells from nonprimate mammalian species to support productive HIV-1 replication. Thus, the removal of the A3-mediated block will be required for the development of a small animal model in which HIV-1 replicates efficiently. Although the role of the A3-dependent retroelement restriction system as an intrinsic resistance mechanism is becoming clear, less well understood is mammalian APOBEC1 (A1), the catalytic component of a complex that deaminates apolipoprotein B mRNA in gastrointestinal tissues (9,10). It has been also shown that A1 exhibit potent DNA mutator activity in an Escherichia coli assay (11). Rodent A1s share ~70% amino acid sequence identity with human A1, but only rat homolog of A1 was shown to restrict HIV-1 independent of Vif (12,13). To address whether A1 orthologs are involved in an innate pathway of restriction of retrovirus infection, A1 cDNAs from small animal species were cloned, and expressed in order to examine their abilities to influence the infectivities of retroviral virions. Our studies show that several A1s from small animal species were efficiently incorporated into the HIV-1 virion via interaction with the nucleocapsid (NC) Gag domain, and suppressed HIV-1 replication in a cytidine deaminase dependent as well as independent manner. Interestingly, there was a clear accumulation of particular C-T changes in the genomic RNAs produced in the presence of rabbit A1, with few G-A changes in the proviral DNA. Moreover, the local mutational preferences on HIV-1 genomic RNA were found to be similar to those observed in apoB mRNA. Importantly, mutation of the catalytic residue Glu63 significantly reduced antiviral activity, and diminished G-A or C-T changes. Further, these deaminases also inhibited simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)mac, SIVagm and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infections and to a lesser extent murine leukemia virus (MLV). Together, these data reveal that, unlike their human counterparts, A1 in a wide range of mammalian species may function as a defense mechanism regulating retroelements. MATERIALS AND METHODS Molecular cloning of A1s Primary tissues were prepared from small intestines, which had been removed aseptically from euthanatized ferret (Mustela putorius furo), rabbit (Kbt: NZW), hamster (Slc: Syrian) and mouse (C57BL/6N), respectively. Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and the synthesis of first strand cDNA was carried out with High Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using a random primer. cDNA from human small intestine and rat (Sprague-Dawley) liver was purchased from BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA (BDTM Marathon-Ready cDNA, Cat. #639326 and #639413, respectively). The cDNA encoding the entire open reading frame of the A1 were amplified using primer sets designated as seen in Table S1, based on A1 sequences from GeneBank except for ferret. Taq polymerase-amplified PCR products were cloned into pCR-Blunt (Invitrogen) vector and sequenced. The primary PCR product was subsequently reamplified by using oligonucleotides containing EcoRV and NotI cloning sites. Antisense primers encoded the hemagglutinin (HA)-epitope sequence YPYDVPDYA. Amplicons were cleaved at the restriction sites and ligated to similarly cleaved pCAGGS vector (14), yielding HA tagged A1 expression vectors. pCAGGS-based expression plasmids for HA-tagged hA3G has been described elsewhere (15). PCR products generated and digested as described above were also inserted into pcDNA 3.1/Zeo (Invitrogen). Generation of catalytic site-mutated rabbit A1 expression vectors Rabbit A1 catalytically inactive mutants E63A and E63Q were constructed with QuickChange® XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using oligonucleotide primers (Table S1), and inserted into pCAGGS vector. Amino acid alignments and phylogenetic analysis Protein sequences of full-length mammalian A1s were aligned with Clustal W software. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the neighbor-joining method with 2000 bootstrap replications. MEGA 3.1 was used for phylogenetic analysis. The GenBank accession numbers of the A1 sequences used in these comparisons were rat (NM012907), mouse (NM031159), human (NM001644), opossum (NM001032982), rabbit (U10695), orangutan (AH013823), chimpanzee (XM001164661), rhesus monkey (XM001112583), cattle (XM594173), dog (XM543826), hamster (AF176577) and horse (XM001493159). The sequence of A1s reported in this article has been deposited in the GenBank data base (accession number AB425821). Viral preparation and infectivity assay 293T, GP293, HeLa, Caco-2 and Mus dunni tail fibroblasts (MDTF) cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY). VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1-based luciferase reporter virus stocks were produced in 293T cells by cotransfection of wild-type or Δvif pNL4-3 Luc E−R− (5), together with pVSV-G and one of several expression vectors encoding APOBEC proteins, which are HA-epitope tagged or a control empty vector using Effectene® (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Culture supernatants were harvested, filtered and frozen in aliquots. The p24 content of the viruses was determined in ELISA kits (ZeptoMetrix, Buffalo, NY). Target fresh 293T cells were infected with 0.5–1.5 ng equivalent of luciferase reporter viruses and cultured for 48 h. Infected cells were lyzed, and each lysate was assayed for luciferase activity as previously described (16). Single-round SIVmac and SIVagm luciferase reporter virus stocks with or without Vif were produced as VSV-G pseudotypes in 293T cells by cotransfection of pSIV Luc E−R− or pSIV Luc E−R− Δvif (5) and an expression vectors for APOBECs or a mock vector. The p27 content of the viruses was determined in ELISA kits (ZeptoMetrix). Target fresh 293T cells were infected for with 4.0–80 ng equivalent of luciferase reporter viruses and cultured for 48 h. Infected cells were lyzed and each lysate was assayed for luciferase activity. To generate FIV-GFP virus, 293T cells were transfected with pFIV-H1/copGFP and pFIV-34N (System Bioscience, Mountain View, CA), pVSV-G and APOBEC expression vector or an empty vector. Culture supernatants were filtered and centrifuged at 40 000g for 1 h. Target cells were infected with FIV-GFP viruses, equivalent to 8 ng of reverse transcriptase estimated by using Reverse Transcriptase Assay (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and the infectivity was measured by flow cytometry at 48 h postinfection. Single-round MLV reporter virus stocks were produced as VSV-G pseudotypes in GP293 cells expressing Moloney MLV gag and pol genes (17) by cotransfection of pFB-Luc or pFB-hrGFP (Stratagene) together with expression vectors for APOBECs or a mock vector. Virus-containing supernatants were normalized for equal MLV p30 CA content estimated by Western analysis. Target MDTF cells were infected with equivalent amounts of MLV reporter viruses and cultured for 48 h. Values are presented as the percent infectivity relative to the value of the wild-type virus without the expression of APOBECs. Editing of HIV-1 proviral DNA and genomic RNA The cells were harvested 48 h postinfection, and total DNA was isolated using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen). A 408 bp of the HIV-1 pol region was amplified with the high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Takara, Ohtsu, Japan) subsequent to the digestion with DpnI. Amplified fragments were subsequently gel purified, then cloned into pCR-Blunt vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced. The viral genomic RNA in cell-free virions was purified using QIAamp viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) and converted to cDNA in vitro using a High Capacity cDNA Archive kit with random primers, sebsequent to the treatment with DNase. The pol region was amplified by PCR, cloned and sequenced as described above. Western blot analysis The encapsidation of APOBEC proteins into HIV-1 or MLV virions were detected by pelleting the supernatant of 293T cells transfected with viral DNA and HA-epitope tagged forms of the APOBEC expression vector through a 20% sucrose cushion. The pellets were solubilized in 50 μl of 1% Triton-containing buffer and the equivalent p24 of each solubilized virions was subjected to immunoblot analysis. Cell lysates, virion lysates and immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS–PAGE, and then transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were probed with the anti-HA epitope (HA.11; Covance, Princeton, NJ) or anti-β-actin (AC-74; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO) antibody. A monoclonal antibody recognizing the p24 CA (18) and a goat anti-MLV p30 serum (ViroMed Biosafety Labs, Camden, NJ) was used for detection of HIV-1 and MLV CA, respectively. Reactive proteins were detected using biotin-conjugated rabbit immunoglobulin (Sigma), streptoavidin-conjugated peroxidase (Sigma) and developed using Chemi-Lumi One (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The plasmids expressing HIV-1 Gag or the deletion mutants were described previously (22). Bands in western blots were quantified on a VersaDoc 5000 imager (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA). Nucleotide sequence accession numbers The sequences determined in this study have been submitted to GenBank and assigned accession no. AB425821. RESULTS Molecular cloning and phylogenetic analysis of mammalian A1s We cloned, sequenced and compared the predicted amino acid sequences of A1 cDNAs from primate (human), carnivora (ferret), lagomorphs (rabbit) and rodents (hamster, rat, mouse). Sequence analysis revealed that the clones obtained encoded genes that were identical to the GenBank sequences of A1s (rabbit;U10695, hamster; AF176577, rat;NM012907 and mouse;NM031159), except for one amino acid residue (M80I) substitution in human A1 (NM001644). Results showed that human A1 cDNA encodes an open reading frame of 236 amino acids that has a 78.0% amino acid sequence identity with ferret, 75.8% with rabbit and 70–72% with rodent orthologs. A short C-terminal extension was found in human and rabbit as previously reported (19), and also in ferrets but not in rodents. In particular, the active site motif, designated as His-X-Glu-(X)23-28-Pro-Cys-X2-Cys (X can be any amino acid) (20), was well conserved (Figure 1
A1s from small animal species inhibit HIV-1 virion infectivity To examine the anti-HIV activities of A1s from these small animal species, single-round infectivity assay with VSV-G pseudotyped wild-type and Δvif HIV-1 luciferase reporter viruses (5) produced in the presence of the influenza HA epitope-tagged A1 proteins was performed. hA3G was used as a control in these experiments. To examine the effect on HIV-1 infectivity quantitatively, virions were normalized based on p24 content. Virus-induced intracellular luciferase activity, which is directly proportional to the infectivity of the virus, was measured 48 h after infection and calculated relative to the APOBEC-negative control virus (Figure 2
The cytidine deaminase domains of APOBEC proteins contains an active site with conserved consensus motifs in which the His–Cys–Cys residues coordinate a Zn2+ ion, and the Glu residue serving an essential role in catalysis as a proton shuttle (21). Therefore, we generated the catalytic site mutant forms of rabbit A1 in which the critical Glu-63 of active site was changed to Ala or Gln (E63A, E63Q), and examined their antiviral activity. Results showed that the ability of the mutant proteins to restrict the infectivity of wild-type and Δvif viruses were severely, but not completely impaired (Figure 2 A1s are packaged into HIV-1 virions It is now well established that human and murine A3s inhibit HIV-1 infectivity by being packaged into progeny virions. Therefore, we verified whether A1 proteins (which are epitope tagged) would indeed be selectively packaged into HIV-1 virions. For these studies, transfected cells were harvested, and proteins in whole-cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting with anti-HA, anti-HIV-1 CA p24 and anti-β-actin monoclonal antibodies with the β-actin blot serving as a loading control. Data showed comparable amounts of A1 proteins and HIV-1 Gag precursor protein (p55) expression, but minor effects on the processing efficiency into p24 CA with some A1 proteins (e.g. human and rabbit, Figure 2 The HIV-1 Gag NC domain is required for A1 packaging We next determined whether parts of Gag were dispensable for A1 packaging into virions, by use of previously described Gag mutants (22). Two Gag deletion mutants, δ10-110 mutant lacking residues 10 through 110, δ10-277 mutant lacking residues 10 through 277 or the Zwt-p6 mutant, in which NC is replaced by a leucine zipper from GCN4 were tested (Figure 3
Editing of HIV-1 proviral DNA and genomic RNA by A1 proteins A3-mediated antiretroviral activity has been shown to be associated with cytidine deamination of nascently transcribed viral cDNAs following infection of target cells. Such dC-to-dU deamination in minus-strand DNA is detected as replacement of dG-to-dA in integrated proviral genomes. To address whether A1 functions in a similar manner, accumulation of dG-to-dA changes in the proviral DNA during reversetranscription was examined. Viral DNA was prepared from cells infected with wild-type or Δvif HIV-1 viruses produced in the presence of A1s from small animal species, and the 3′-end of the pol gene was analyzed for evidence of hypermutation. Consistent with previous reports, significant dG-to-dA hypermutation was observed for hA3G serving as a control for these studies (Table 1) and no dG-to-dA mutation was observed when the virus was prepared in the absence of an APOBEC protein (data not shown). In contrast, the predominant mutations induced by rabbit A1 that exhibited the most prominent antiviral activity were dC-to-dT changes (22 and 14 events in 23 664 and 24 480 bases in wild-type and Δvif viruses, respectively), which could have arisen through deamination of unpaired plus-stranded cDNA or virion RNA. To address the latter possibility, cell-free virions were purified and the genomic RNA was converted to cDNA for pol gene analyses. As can be seen in Table 2, there was a clear accumulation of dC-to-dT (U in the template RNA) changes in the RNAs of HIV-1 produced in the presence of rabbit A1 (39 and 51 events in 9792 and 8976 bases in wild-type and Δvif viruses, respectively), a frequency that is 4- to 5-fold higher than those observed in DNA sequencing. Thus, HIV-1 genome RNA as well as reversetranscribed proviral DNA could be a substrate for A1-mediated deamination.
The preferential sites of hypermutations induced by rabbit A1 were also examined (Figure 4
A1s from small animal species exhibit broad antilentiviral activity To assess the breath of A1-mediated antiviral activity, the activities of these proteins on SIV infectivity were examined. A single-round assay was used to measure the infectivity of wild-type and Δvif SIVmac, and SIVagm luciferase reporter viruses (5), in the presence of A1s. VSV-G pseudotyped viral supernatants were collected, normalized for SIV CA p27 and used to infect 293T cells. As expected, hA3G caused a profound decrease in infectivity of both wild-type and Δvif SIV viruses (Figure 5
To measure the activities of A1 proteins on FIV infectivity, plasmids expressing APOBECs were cotransfected with an FIV (pFIV-H1/U6-copGFP) genome along with the packaging pFIV-34N plasmid and pVSV-G. Viral supernatants of pseudotyped virions were collected, normalized for RT activity and used to infect 293T cells. The GFP expression was analyzed by flow cytometry at 48 h postinfection. Large proportion of of 293T cells were positive for GFP expression, with a MFI of 144.7, while in the cells transduced with hA3G containing FIV virions, only a few green cells were present, with 5.7-fold lower MFI of 25.0 (Figure 5 A1s affect MLV virion infectivity Evidence is mounting that some APOBEC proteins can target a variety of retroviral substrates, such as various oncovirus and spumavirus. The A3 orthologs from artiodactyls; cattle, pigs and sheep, as well as hAB and hA3G have been reported to exert antiviral activity on MLV (6,13,23,24). These findings suggest that A3s in artiodactyls could function as barriers of cross-subspecies transmission of MLV from mice. Interestingly, this simple oncovirus is resistant to the mouse A3, explaining the absence of a Vif-like activity in MLV (27,31), but the underlying mechanism is currently unknown (32). Therefore, we examined whether the A1s expressed in small animal species affect MLV infection. MLV-based reporter viruses were produced by transient transfection of pFB-Luc, encoding the luciferase gene, into the MLV packaging cell line GP293 with pVSV-G, in the presence of APOBEC proteins. As shown in Figure 6
DISCUSSION In this study, we showed that single domain cytidine deaminase A1 from rodents (mouse, rat and hamster) and largomorphs (rabbit) are capable of inhibiting the infectivity of various lentiviruses in tissue culture models. A rank order in anti-HIV potency was seen, with rabbit A1 showing the greatest activity. The finding of more efficient virion incorporation of rabbit as compared to other small animal species A1 proteins may be a contributing factor. Catalytic site mutant analysis suggested a deaminase-dependent restriction mechanism, with genomic RNA as well as reversetranscribed proviral DNA serving as substrates for A1-mediated deamination. A clear accumulation of C-T changes in the genomic RNAs of HIV-1 produced in the presence of rabbit A1 was observed, with G-A changes in the proviral DNA. Furthermore, expression of catalytic site mutant forms of rabbit A1 has little effect on the viral infectivity, supporting the importance of the deaminase activity for these repressive activities. Cytidine deaminase-defective A3 mutants have been shown to exhibit significant antiviral activity (33), implying that antiviral and deaminase activities can be uncoupled. Further evidence in support of editing-independent antiviral mechanism comes from studies on the enzymatically inactive, high-molecular mass complex of hA3G (34) as well as on the antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) (35). Nevertheless, more recent studies using deaminase-defective A3 mutants show that efficient inhibition of HIV-1 or retroelements requires catalytically active A3 (36,37). In this regard, although deaminase-defective rabbit A1 mutants were shown to inhibit various lentivirus and MLV, these antiviral activities were significantly lower than those seen with wild-type A1. The suppressive activity of A1, therefore, is principally associated with its cytidine deaminase activity. We demonstrated that the molecular mechanism for A1 editing of the HIV-1 genomic RNA and apoB mRNA overlapped. The C to U editing of apoB mRNA is shown to be a nuclear event (38), mediated by a complex composed of A1 homodimer and an A1 complementation factor (ACF) (39–41). Expression of ACF mRNA in cells such as Caco-2, a human colon cancer-derived cell line demonstrated to edit endogenous apoB mRNA has been documented (42). However, mRNA for ACF could not be detected by RT-PCR in 293T cells used for retorovirus production in this study (Supplementary Figure S5). Thus, the site(s) in virus-producing cells (e.g. nucleus, cytoplasm or both) where the deamination of HIV-1 genomic RNA takes place remains to be identified, and further experiments are needed to fully understand the role of ACF in the editing of retroviral genome observed in the present study. In our study, A1s were expressed using both a chick β-actin (CAG) and a cytomegalovirus promoter-driven expression vector, and the concentration of A1s required to mediate antiviral activity was titrated carefully. We found that only 0.05 μg of rabbit A1 was required to achieve significant inhibition against HIV-1 (Figure 2 We found that human A1 exhibited no antiretroviral activity, consistent with reports of others (12,13,29,43). A1 from hominoids, therefore, appears to exclusively mediate the C to U editing of apoB mRNA, giving rise to two proteins with different sizes in the gastrointesitinal tissues that function in lipid transport and metabolism. As there have been no reports thus far of lentivirus infection in rodents, the antiviral activity of A1 proteins in rodents seen against HIV, SIV and FIV are also unlikely to have evolved originally to restrict infection of these lentiviruses. Nevertheless, the finding that rabbit A1 can restrict MLV raises the possibility that A1s from small animals species evolved to restrict cross-subspecies transmission of oncoviruses from mice. Furthermore, endogenous lentivirus of rabbits has recently been described (44), lending biological significance to the antilentiviral activity in lagomorphs reported here. Further studies of the antiviral activities of A1 proteins from other members of the placentalia super-order of Laurasiatheria; cetartiodactyla (cow, pig, sheep) and carnivore (cat) will be required to fully understand the complex evolutionary history of APOBEC genes as an intrinsic resistance mechanism against retroelements. HIV-1 exhibits a highly restricted host cell tropism. The identification of chemokine receptors as entry cofactors with human CD4 raises the possibility that small animal species, in particular, rodents could be engineered to express these molecules, thereby rendering them able to support a productive HIV-1 infection. However, HIV-1 replication in rodents (45–47) and rabbits (48,49) expressing human versions of the HIV-1 receptors appeared to be limited and variable. Our findings with A1 suggest that this enzyme may be partly responsible for the inefficient replication of HIV-1 observed in rabbit as well as rodent cells. Blocking of antiviral A1 function by RNA interference in cells from small animal species should verify whether A1 acts as an intrinsic resistance factor. Further understanding of these species-nonspecific repressive activities to HIV-1 replication at the late phase, in conjugation with the early block owing to the different classes of activities, such as TRIM5α (50,51), may suggest approaches to the development of small animal models of HIV-1 infection. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online. FUNDING Higo Bank; Grants from the Japan Health Science foundation, Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan; The Cooperative Research Project on Clinical and Epidemiological Studies of Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases; Research and Education Program for Development of Therapy of Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases Including AIDS. Funding for open access charge: Higo Bank. Conflict of interest statement. None declared. [Supplementary Data]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank C. Cheng-Mayer for critical reviewing the article. We also thank P. D. Bieniasz, N. Landau, D. Trono, M. Hayami and H. Amanuma for providing reagents; J. Shibata, K. Monde and K. Yusa for discussions. REFERENCES 1. Bieniasz PD. Intrinsic immunity: a front-line defense against viral attack. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:1109–1115. [PubMed] 2. Holmes RK, Malim MH, Bishop KN. APOBEC-mediated viral restriction: not simply editing? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007;32:118–128. [PubMed] 3. Chiu YL, Green WC. The APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases: an innate defensive network opposing exogenous retroviruses and endogenous retroelements. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008;26:317–353. [PubMed] 4. Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Choi JD, Malim MH. Isolation of a human gene that inhibits HIV-1 infection and is suppressed by the viral Vif protein. Nature. 2002;418:646–650. [PubMed] 5. Mariani R, Chen D, Schrofelbauer B, Navarro F, Konig R, Bollman B, Munk C, Nymark-McMahon H, Landau NR. Species-specific exclusion of APOBEC3G from HIV-1 virions by Vif. Cell. 2003;114:21–31. [PubMed] 6. Jonsson SR, Hache G, Stenglein MD, Fahrenkrug SC, Andresdottir V, Harris RS. Evolutionarily conserved and non-conserved retrovirus restriction activities of artiodactyl APOBEC3F proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:5683–5694. [PubMed] 7. Munk C, Zielonka J, Constabel H, Kloke BP, Rengstl B, Battenberg M, Bonci F, Pistello M, Lochelt M, Cichutek K. Multiple restrictions of human immunodeficiency virus in feline cells. J. Virol. 2007;81:7048–7060. [PubMed] 8. Munk C, Beck T, Zielonka J, Hotz-Wagenblatt A, Chareza S, Battenberg M, Thielebein J, Cichutek K, Bravo IG, O’Brien SJ, et al. Functions, structure, and read-through alternative splicing of feline APOBEC3 genes. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R48. [PubMed] 9. Chester A, Scott J, Anant S, Navaratnam N. RNA editing: cytidine to uridine conversion in apolipoprotein B mRNA. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1494:1–13. [PubMed] 10. Keegan LP, Gallo A, O’Connell MA. The many roles of an RNA editor. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001;2:869–878. [PubMed] 11. Harris RS, Petersen-Mahrt SK, Neuberger MS. RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 and some of its homologs can act as DNA mutators. Mol. Cell. 2002;10:1247–1253. [PubMed] 12. Bishop KN, Holmes RK, Sheehy AM, Malim MH. APOBEC-mediated editing of viral RNA. Science. 2004;305:645. [PubMed] 13. Bishop KN, Holmes RK, Sheehy AM, Davidson NO, Cho S-J, Malim MH. Cytidine deamination of retroviral DNA by diverse APOBEC proteins. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:1392–1396. [PubMed] 14. Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki J. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene. 1991;108:193–199. [PubMed] 15. Ohsugi T, Koito A. Human T cell leukemia virus type I is resistant to the antiviral effects of APOBEC3. J. Virol. Methods. 2007;139:93–96. [PubMed] 16. Koito A, Kameyama Y, Cheng-Mayer C, Matsushita S. Susceptibility of mink (Mustera vision)-derived cells to replication by human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2003;77:5109–5117. [PubMed] 17. Burns JC, Friedmann T, Driever W, Burrascano M, Yee J.-K. Vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein pseudotyped retroviral vectors: concentration to very high titer and efficient gene transfer into mammalian and nonmammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:8033–8037. [PubMed] 18. Koito A, Hattori T, Matsushita S, Maeda Y, Nozaki C, Sagawa K, Takatsuki K. Conserved immunogenic region of a major core protein (p24) of human and simian immunodeficiency viruses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 1988;4:409–417. [PubMed] 19. Yamanaka S, Poksay KS, Balestra ME, Zeng G.-Q, Innerarity TL. Cloning and mutagenesis of the rabbit apoB mRNA editing protein. A zinc motif is essential for catalytic activity, and noncatalytic auxiliary factor(s) of the editing complex are widely distributed. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:21725–21734. [PubMed] 20. Harris RS, Liddament MT. Retroviral restriction by APOBEC proteins. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:868–877. [PubMed] 21. Betts L, Xiang S, Short SA, Wolfenden R, Carter CWJ. Cytidine deaminase. The 2.3 A crystal structure of an enzyme: transition-state analog complex. J. Mol. Biol. 1994;235:635–656. [PubMed] 22. Zennou V, Perez-Caballero D, Gottlinger H, Bieniasz PD. APOBEC3G incorporation into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles. J. Virol. 2004;78:12058–12061. [PubMed] 23. Harris RS, Bishop KN, Sheehy AM, Craig HM, Petersen-Mahrt SK, Watt IN, Neuberger MS, Malim MH. DNA deamination mediates innate immunity to retroviral infection. Cell. 2003;113:803–809. [PubMed] 24. Mangeat B, Turelli P, Caron G, Friedli M, Perrin L, Trono D. Broad antiretroviral defence by human APOBEC3G through lethal editing of nascent reverse transcript. Nature. 2003;424:99–103. [PubMed] 25. Zhang H, Yang B, Pomerantz RJ, Zhang C, Arunachalam SC, Gao L. The cytidine deaminase CEM15 induces hypermutation in newly synthesized HIV-1 DNA. Nature. 2003;424:94–98. [PubMed] 26. Yu Q, Konig R, Pillai S, Chiles K, Kearney M, Palmer S, Richman D, Coffin JM, Landau NR. Single-strand specificity of APOBEC3G accounts for minus-strand deamination of the HIV genome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:435–442. [PubMed] 27. Kobayashi M, Takaori-Kondo A, Shindo K, Abudu A, Fukunaga K, Uchiyama T. APOBEC3G targets specific virus species. J. Virol. 2004;78:8238–8244. [PubMed] 28. Liddament MT, Brown WL, Schumacher AJ, Harris RS. APOBEC3F properties and hypermutation preferences indicate activity against HIV-1 in vivo. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:1385–1391. [PubMed] 29. Wiegand HL, Doehle BP, Bogerd HP, Cullen BR. A second human antiretroviral factor, APOBEC3F, is suppressed by the HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vif proteins. EMBO J. 2004;23:2451–2458. [PubMed] 30. Fujino T, Navaratnam N, Jarmuz A, Von Haeseler A, Scott J. C – U editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA in marsupials: identification and characterization of APOBEC-1 from the American opossum Monodelphus domestica. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:2662–2671. [PubMed] 31. Doehle BP, Schafer A, Wiegand HL, Bogerd HP, Cullen BR. Differential sensitivity of murine leukemia virus to APOBEC3-mediated inhibition is governed by virion exclusion. J. Virol. 2005;79:8201–8207. [PubMed] 32. Browne EP, Littman DR. Species specific restriction of Apobec3, mediated hypermutation. J. Virol. 2008;82:1305–1313. [PubMed] 33. Newman EN, Holmes RK, Craig HM, Klein KC, Lingappa JR, Malim MH, Sheehy AM. Antiviral function of APOBEC3G can be dissociated from cytidine deaminase activity. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:166–170. [PubMed] 34. Chiu Y-L, Soros VB, Kreisberg JF, Stopak K, Yonemoto W, Greene WC. Cellular APOBEC3G restricts HIV-1 infection in restricting CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2005;435:108–114. [PubMed] 35. Turelli P, Mangeat B, Jost SS, Vianin S, Trono D. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by APOBEC3G. Science. 2004;303:1829. [PubMed] 36. Miyagi E, Opi S, Takeuchi H, Khan M, Goila-Gaur R, Kao S, Strebel K. Enzymatically active APOBEC3G is required for efficient inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2007;81:13346–13353. [PubMed] 37. Schumacher AJ, Hache G, MacDuff DA, Brown WL, Harris RS. The DNA deaminase activity of human APOBEC3G is required for Ty1, MusD and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 restriction. J. Virol. 2008;82:2652–2660. [PubMed] 38. Lau PP, Xiong WJ, Zhu HJ, Chen SH, Chan L. Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing is an intranuclear event that occurs posttranscriptionally coincident with splicing and polyadenylation. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:20550–20554. [PubMed] 39. Lellek H, Kirsten R, Diehl L, Apostel F, Buck F, Greeve J. Purification and molecular cloning of a novel essential component of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme-complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:19848–19856. [PubMed] 40. Mehta A, Kinter MT, Sherman NE, Driscoll DM. Molecular cloning of apobec-1 complementation factor, a novel RNA-binding protein involved in the editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:1846–1854. [PubMed] 41. Chester A, Somasekaram A, Tzimina M, Jarmuz A, Gisbourne J, O’Keefe R, Scott J, Navaratnam N. The apolipoprotein B mRNA editing complex performs a multifunctional cycle and suppresses nonsense-mediated decay. EMBO J. 2003;22:3971–3982. [PubMed] 42. Jiao S, Moberly JB, Schonfeld G. Editing of apolipoprotein B messenger RNA in differentiated Caco-2 cells. J. Lipid Res. 1990;31:695–700. [PubMed] 43. Zheng Y-H, Irwin D, Kurosu T, Tokunaga K, Sata T, Peterlin BM. Human APOBEC3F is another host factor that blocks human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication. J. Virol. 2004;78:6073–6076. [PubMed] 44. Katzourakis A, Tristem M, Pybus OG, Gifford RJ. Discovery and analysis of the first endogenous lentivirus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:6261–6265. [PubMed] 45. Browning J, Horner JW, Pettoello-Mantovani M, Raker C, Yurasov S, DePinho RA, Goldstein H. Mice transgenic for human CD4 and CCR5 are susceptible to HIV infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:14637–14641. [PubMed] 46. Sawada S, Gowrishankar K, Kitamura R, Suzuki M, Suzuki G, Tahara S, Koito A. Disturbed CD4+ T cell homeostasis and in vitro HIV-1 susceptibility in transgenic mice expressing T cell line-tropic HIV-1 receptors. J. Exp. Med. 1998;187:1439–1449. [PubMed] 47. Keppler OT, Welte FJ, Ngo TA, Chin PA, Patton KS, Tsou C.-L, Abbey NW, Sharkey ME, Grant RM, You Y, et al. Progress toward a human CD4/CCR5 transgenic rat model for de novo infection by human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:719–736. [PubMed] 48. Dunn CS, Mehtali M, Houdebine LM, Gut J.-P, Kirn A, Aubertin A.-M. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of human CD4-transgenic rabbits. J. Gen. Virol. 1995;76:1327–1336. [PubMed] 49. Speck RF, Penn ML, Wimmer J, Esser U, Hague BF, Kindt TJ, Atchison RE, Goldsmith MA. Rabbit cells expressing human CD4 and human CCR5 are highly permissive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. 1998;72:5728–5734. [PubMed] 50. Stremlau M, Owens CM, Perron MJ, Kiessling M, Autissier P, Sodroski J. The cytoplasmic body component TRIM5alpha restricts HIV-1 infection in old world monkeys. Nature. 2004;427:848–853. [PubMed] 51. Schaller T, Hue S, Towers GJ. An active TRIM5 in rabbits indicates a common antiviral ancestor for mammalian TRIM5 proteins. J. Virol. 2007;81:11713–11721. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Nat Immunol. 2004 Nov; 5(11):1109-15.
[Nat Immunol. 2004]Trends Biochem Sci. 2007 Mar; 32(3):118-28.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2007]Annu Rev Immunol. 2008; 26():317-53.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 2008]Nature. 2002 Aug 8; 418(6898):646-50.
[Nature. 2002]Cell. 2003 Jul 11; 114(1):21-31.
[Cell. 2003]Cell. 2003 Jul 11; 114(1):21-31.
[Cell. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(19):5683-94.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]J Virol. 2007 Jul; 81(13):7048-60.
[J Virol. 2007]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Nov 15; 1494(1-2):1-13.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000]Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Nov; 2(11):869-78.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2001]Mol Cell. 2002 Nov; 10(5):1247-53.
[Mol Cell. 2002]Science. 2004 Jul 30; 305(5684):645.
[Science. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Aug 10; 14(15):1392-6.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Gene. 1991 Dec 15; 108(2):193-9.
[Gene. 1991]J Virol Methods. 2007 Jan; 139(1):93-6.
[J Virol Methods. 2007]Cell. 2003 Jul 11; 114(1):21-31.
[Cell. 2003]J Virol. 2003 May; 77(9):5109-17.
[J Virol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1; 90(17):8033-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1988 Dec; 4(6):409-17.
[AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1988]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(21):12058-61.
[J Virol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 26; 269(34):21725-34.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Nat Rev Immunol. 2004 Nov; 4(11):868-77.
[Nat Rev Immunol. 2004]Cell. 2003 Jul 11; 114(1):21-31.
[Cell. 2003]Science. 2004 Jul 30; 305(5684):645.
[Science. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Aug 10; 14(15):1392-6.
[Curr Biol. 2004]J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 14; 235(2):635-56.
[J Mol Biol. 1994]J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(21):12058-61.
[J Virol. 2004]Cell. 2003 Jun 13; 113(6):803-9.
[Cell. 2003]Nature. 2003 Jul 3; 424(6944):99-103.
[Nature. 2003]Nature. 2003 Jul 3; 424(6944):94-8.
[Nature. 2003]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 May; 11(5):435-42.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004]J Virol. 2004 Aug; 78(15):8238-44.
[J Virol. 2004]Cell. 2003 Jul 11; 114(1):21-31.
[Cell. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(19):5683-94.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2006]Curr Biol. 2004 Aug 10; 14(15):1392-6.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Cell. 2003 Jun 13; 113(6):803-9.
[Cell. 2003]Nature. 2003 Jul 3; 424(6944):99-103.
[Nature. 2003]J Virol. 2004 Aug; 78(15):8238-44.
[J Virol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26; 15(2):166-70.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Nature. 2005 May 5; 435(7038):108-14.
[Nature. 2005]Science. 2004 Mar 19; 303(5665):1829.
[Science. 2004]J Virol. 2007 Dec; 81(24):13346-53.
[J Virol. 2007]J Virol. 2008 Mar; 82(6):2652-60.
[J Virol. 2008]J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 25; 266(30):20550-4.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]J Biol Chem. 2000 Jun 30; 275(26):19848-56.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Mar; 20(5):1846-54.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]EMBO J. 2003 Aug 1; 22(15):3971-82.
[EMBO J. 2003]J Lipid Res. 1990 Apr; 31(4):695-700.
[J Lipid Res. 1990]Science. 2004 Jul 30; 305(5684):645.
[Science. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Aug 10; 14(15):1392-6.
[Curr Biol. 2004]EMBO J. 2004 Jun 16; 23(12):2451-8.
[EMBO J. 2004]J Virol. 2004 Jun; 78(11):6073-6.
[J Virol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 10; 104(15):6261-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23; 94(26):14637-41.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]J Exp Med. 1998 May 4; 187(9):1439-49.
[J Exp Med. 1998]J Exp Med. 2002 Mar 18; 195(6):719-36.
[J Exp Med. 2002]J Gen Virol. 1995 Jun; 76 ( Pt 6)():1327-36.
[J Gen Virol. 1995]J Virol. 1998 Jul; 72(7):5728-34.
[J Virol. 1998]