![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dynein Is Required for Polarized Dendritic Transport and Uniform Microtubule Orientation in Axons 1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Departments of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Yuh Nung Jan (Email: yuhnung.jan/at/ucsf.edu) 2these authors contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: Y. Zheng, J.W., S.H.Y. and Y.N.J. conceived and designed the project. Y. Zheng, J.W., A.K. and S.H.Y. carried out the genetic screen. B.Y. and Y. Zhang completed the Golgi outpost analysis and S.Z. analyzed the EB1-GFP movies. Y. Zheng and J.W. performed all other experiments and contributed equally to this fwork. Y. Zheng, J.W. L.Y.J. and Y.N.J. wrote the paper. All authors read and edited the manuscript. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Nat Cell Biol. See commentary "Dynein branches out." in Nat Cell Biol, volume 10 on page 1131. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract Axons and dendrites differ in both microtubule (MT) organization and in the organelles and proteins they contain. Here we show that the MT motor dynein plays a critical role in polarized transport and in controlling the orientation of axonal MTs in fly dendritic arborisation (da) neurons. Changes in organelle distribution within the dendritic arbors of dynein mutant neurons correlate with a proximal shift in dendritic branch position. Dynein is also necessary for the dendrite-specific localization of Golgi outposts and the ion channel Pickpocket. Axonal MTs are normally oriented uniformly plus end-distal, but without dynein axons contain both plus and minus end-distal MTs. These data suggest that dynein is required for the distinguishing properties of the axon and dendrites: without dynein, dendritic organelles and proteins enter the axon and the axonal MTs are no longer uniform in polarity. The differential distribution of organelles and proteins to distinct compartments within cells is critical to their specialized functions. Proteins and organelles are transported to different subcellular compartments by the MT motors dynein and kinesin. The multi-subunit dynein complex travels towards MT minus ends whereas the majority of kinesins travel towards MT plus ends. Cargo localization depends on motor activity and MT organization1. In neurons, the signal-sending axons contain MTs that are oriented uniformly plus end-distal, whereas the signal-receiving dendrites have MTs whose orientation is mixed2. How might this difference in MT orientation be created? Dynein and kinesin not only move along MTs, but can also transport MTs3. Without the kinesin CHO1/MKLP the orientation of dendritic MTs are uniformly plus end-distal, rather than mixed, raising the possibility that MT motors may regulate MT polarity4, 5. Whether dynein contributes to MT orientation in neurons remains an outstanding question. Similar to most mammalian neurons, the fly dendritic arborisation (da) neurons have distinct axonal and dendritic compartments6–9, and their MT organization resembles that in typical mammalian neurons6,7. In a genetic screen we uncovered mutations in components of the dynein complex, dynein light intermediate chain 2 (dlic2) and dynein intermediate chain (dic, also called short wing), that cause a proximal shift in both organelle distribution and branch position within mutant dendritic arbours. These dynein mutations cause dendritic cargo to be mislocalized to axons and result in mixed orientation of axonal MTs. Our results provide new insight into the function of dynein in neurons, including hitherto unrecognized roles in polarized dendritic targeting and in regulating MT polarity. A forward genetic screen uncovered mutations in the dynein complex components Dlic2 and Dic causing radical changes in da neuron dendritic arbour patterning (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S1). Mosaic analysis revealed that removing Dlic2 specifically within da neurons resulted in a drastic reduction in dendrite arborisation with greatly reduced receptive field coverage (control: 16,903 ± 3,292 μm; dlic21157: 3,671 ± 681 μm, p<0.001; data represent mean ± standard deviation; n=4; Fig. 1a,b,f
Dynein mediates the subcellular localization of Golgi10. In mammalian and fly neurons, Golgi structures in the form of “outposts” localize to dendrites and influence branching8, 11. Indeed, distal dlic21157 dendritic arbours displayed a nearly four-fold decrease in the number and size of Golgi outposts, which were marked by Mannosidase II-eGFP (ManII-eGFP) (number per 100 μm: control: 7.92 ± 3.11, n=6; dlic21157: 2.00 ± 2.00, p<0.025, n=3; total size per 100 μm: control: 1.12 ± 0.36 μm2, n=6; dlic21157: 0.25 ± 0.25 μm2, n=3, p<0.01; Fig. 2g,h,k,l
In contrast to the scarcity of Golgi outposts in wild type axons8 (Fig. 2a,c,k Dynein also transports endosomes12, which regulate dendritic membrane supply13, 14. Indeed, disrupting endosomal function alters dendrite morphogenesis, including branch formation15. Normally, the recycling and early endsomal marker Rab4-RFP and the late endosome and lysosome marker Spinster (Spin)-RFP localize to both axons and dendrites (Fig. 3a,a′,c,c′
We hypothesized that as Dlic2 decreases over time in dlic21157 clones, Golgi outposts and endosomes would fail to travel distally, and new branches would only be added proximally. Indeed, time lapse analysis revealed proximal branch dynamics increased in dlic21157 dendritic arbours and the change in branch dynamics correlated with Golgi outpost position (Supplementary Information, Fig S6), suggesting that machinery (including Golgi outposts) required for branch growth and dynamics accumulate proximally in dynein mutant neurons. Next we examined the localization of Pickpocket (Ppk), which belongs to a family of conserved degenerin/epithelial sodium channels that likely function as sensory channels16. Whereas Ppk is normally detectable at low levels in dendrites but not in axons17 (Fig. 3e,e′ Besides transporting organelles and proteins, dynein also transports MTs within axons, leading us to investigate if axonal MT organization is impacted by the loss of dynein function. First we used the MT minus end marker Nod-βgal, a chimera comprised of the Nod motor domain fused to the Kinesin1 (Kin1) coiled-coiled domain and β-galactosidase18. Although full length Nod preferentially binds MT plus ends19, the Nod-βgal chimera localizes to MT minus ends in multiple cell types and is commonly used as a MT minus end marker18 (Supplementary Information, Fig. S7). In fly neurons, including da neurons, Nod-βgal localizes specifically to dendrites6–9, 18, 20, 21 (Fig. 4a,a′
Next we employed the axon specific marker Kin-βgal18, 24, which is comprised of the Kin1 motor and coiled-coiled domains together with β-galactosidase, and found it is localized exclusively to axons in all three different dynein loss-of-function scenarios as in control neurons (Fig. 4e–h The ectopic axonal localization of Nod-βgal in dynein loss-of-function neurons suggests a change in MT polarity. To further analyze MT orientation we utilized EB1-GFP, which binds growing MT plus ends and takes on a comet-like appearance as the MT grows. In fly PNS axons EB1-GFP always moves away from the soma (anterograde)7, indicating the axonal MTs are orientated with their plus ends-distal, as in mammalian neurons2. Similar to control neurons (Fig. 5a,b,e
Proper cellular morphology and function depends on the polarized localization of organelles and proteins to specific subcellular compartments. In this study, we show that dynein plays a crucial role in dendrite arbour patterning and in organizing distinct functional compartments (the axon and dendrites) of a neuron. The position of branches within a dendritic arbour has a key role in determining the inputs a neuron receives from pre-synaptic axons or, in the case of sensory neurons, the local environment. We show here that dynein is necessary for proper positioning of dendritic branches relative to the soma. As a motor, dynein likely influences branch formation by mediating the distribution of cargos that affect branch growth and dynamics. Notwithstanding an overall decrease in dendrite extension and branching in dynein mutants, time-lapse analysis of a few dendrites revealed that they extend normally but have fewer and less stable terminal branches, suggesting that decreased terminal branching is not simply caused by a decrease in dendrite growth. One likely explanation is that “branching machinery” (including Golgi outposts, endosomes and potentially other proteins and/or organelles) that are normally transported distally for dendrite extension and maintenance become trapped in the proximal arbour in the dynein mutant neurons, resulting in decreased distal branching and the formation of ectopic branches close to the cell body. Without dynein, Golgi outposts and Ppk are present ectopically in axons, revealing a previously unappreciated role for dynein in mediating the dendrite-specific localization of organelles and proteins. One possible explanation for axonal mislocalization is that Golgi outposts and Ppk interact with a MT plus end-directed motor (e.g., kinesin) that transports them into axons in the absence of dynein. Dynein might normally transports such cargo directly to dendrites; alternatively, it is also possible that cargo first enters axons but that dynein counter-acts kinesin and carries this cargo out of axons. Since we never observed Golgi outposts moving from the soma into the axon in wild type neurons, our data favour the former possibility. In contrast to the mislocalization of dendritic protein and organelles, Kin-βgal and proteins destined for the axonal terminal retain their polarized distribution, perhaps to be expected given that kinesin mediates the majority of anterograde axonal transport1. In mammalian and fly neurons, axonal MTs are arrayed plus end-distal whereas dendritic MT orientation is mixed2, 7. A long-standing question concerns the mechanism(s) that establish and maintain different MT orientations in axons and dendrites. Loss of dynein function causes the axonal localization of Nod-βgal and retrograde movement of EB1-GFP, indicating that minus end-distal MTs are present in these mutant axons. How might dynein regulate the orientation of axonal MTs? The sliding filament model of axonal MT transport proposes that a subset of dynein in the axon is stationary (via an interaction with stable MTs and/or actin) and that dynein’s motor domain interacts with short MT polymers, propelling plus end-distal MTs down the axon as the motor moves to the MT minus end3. Our in vivo data support the idea that in addition to transporting MTs, dynein functions as a “gatekeeper” to move minus end-distal MTs towards the soma, excluding them from the axon. Neurons lacking functional dynein would still transport MTs, likely via kinesin3, but now minus end-distal MTs would infiltrate the axon. Proximal axons likely have unique properties1, providing a possible explanation for how minus end distal MTs would be excluded from axons but not dendrites. Recent studies indicate that the trans Golgi network (TGN), which comprises part of the Golgi outposts25, 26, can also function as a MT organizing center (MTOC)27, 28 and influence MT organization. Although it is conceivable that Golgi outposts mislocalized to dynein mutant axons could alter MT polarity, expressing lava lampdominant-negative, which prevents Golgi from associating with dynein without affecting dynein function29, causes Golgi outposts to mislocalize to axons without altering MT orientation (Ye et al., 2007 and unpublished observations). Moreover, the change in axonal MT orientation is not likely to be simply a consequence of altered axon morphology because the loss of dynein function also alters the MT orientation of class I neuron axons, which appear relatively normal. With our current level of understanding, the model in which dynein acts as a “gatekeeper” is most consistent with our results and the findings of others. METHODS Mutagenesis and Mapping EMS mutagenesis was performed according to standard protocols. Briefly, male flies were fed 20 mM EMS to induce mutations on an isogenic FRT 19A chromosome. We screened the live embryonic and larval progeny of approximately 1,900 lethal lines and recovered 112 mutants that affect dendrite and/or axon morphogenesis. Mutations were mapped using X chromosome duplications and deficiencies from Bloomington, followed by complementation tests with known mutants (see Supplemental Information for additional details). Fly Stocks dlic21157 and dic1229 were generated by EMS mutagenesis as described above. Both mutations cause lethality during the 2nd larval instar. The following lines were generously shared: FRT G13 lis1G10.14 and FRT 2A dhc64C4–19 (L. Luo), UAS-EB1-GFP (T. Uemura), UAS-dmn (R. Warrior), dic+ transgene (T. Hays), and UAS-Spin-RFP (S. Sweeney). UAS-Rab4-RFP, dicts and lis14–19 are from Bloomington. To generate UAS-dlic2-eGFP flies, dlic2 cDNA from the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center was cloned into a modified pUAST vector so that eGFP was fused in frame to the Dlic2 C-terminus; transgenic flies were generated according to standard protocols. UAS-dmn was over-expressed in class IV neurons using ppk-Gal4 and 4-77-Gal4. Clonal Analysis Clonal analysis (MARCM) was performed as previously described8, 30. Briefly, embryos were collected on grape plates for 2 hr, allowed to develop for 2 hr at 25°C and heat shocked for 45 min twice at 38°C with a 30 min rest in between. Larvae with da neuron clones were selected and examined by either live imaging or immunohistochemistry. For da neuron clone analysis yw hs-flp tub-Gal80 FRT 19A; 109(2)80-Gal4 UAS-mCD8-GFP flies were mated with: (1) yw FRT 19A (control), (2) yw dlic21157 FRT 19A and (3) yw dlic21157 FRT 19A; UAS-dlic2-eGFP (dlic2+ rescue). The location of dic between the centromere and FRT 19A has prevented us from generating loss-of-function clones, so we focused on the phenotypes displayed in dlic21157 clones. lis1 clones: yw hs-flp elav-Gal4 UAS-mCD8-GFP; FRT G13 lis1G10.14/FRT G13 hs-flp tub-Gal80. dhc64C clones: yw hs-flp elav-Gal4 UAS-mCD8-GFP; FRT 2A dhc64C4–19/FRT 2A tub-Gal80. For Golgi outpost analysis yw hs-flp tub-Gal80 FRT 19A; 109(2)80-Gal4 UAS-ManII-eGFP flies were mated with: (1) yw FRT 19A; UAS-mCD8-dsRed (control) and (2) yw dlic21157 FRT 19A; UAS-mCD8-dsRed. The number and size of Golgi outposts in fixed (Fig. 3a–h,k,l Live Imaging and Analysis of EB1-GFP 2nd or 3rd instar larvae of the following genotypes were imaged: (1) 4-77-Gal4 UAS-mRFP; UAS-EB1-GFP (control), (2) dic1229/dicts; 4-77-Gal4 UAS-mRFP; UAS-EB1-GFP, (3) 2-21-Gal4/UAS-EB1-GFP (control) and (4) dic1229/dicts; 2-21-Gal4/UAS-EB1-GFP. Larvae were washed briefly in 1X PBS before mounting in halocarbon oil for live imaging of ddaC (class IV) and ddaE (class I) neurons. Larvae were imaged on average 5–15 min but no longer than 25 min on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. Movies of EB1-GFP comets were made by imaging axons or dendrites every second for 1.5 to 6.5 min. For each genotype multiple larvae were imaged. EB1-GFP direction and rate were calculated using ImageJ (NIH), which was also used to generate the kymographs. Immunohistochemistry and Dendrite Analysis 3rd instar larvae were fixed according to standard protocols30. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-βgal, 1/5000 (Cappel); rat anti-mCD8, 1/100 (Invitrogen); rabbit anti-GFP, 1/3000; rabbit, anti-Ppk 1/800 (generously provided by W. Johnson); mouse 22C10, 1/100 (DSHB); Cy3-conjugated anti-HRP, 1/1000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch). In the Figures, we label the neurites that extend within the intersegmental nerve (ISN) as axons; however, as described in the text, these neurites contain proteins and organelles that are normally found specifically in dendrites. Dendrite analysis was performed using Neurolucida. Statistical analysis All statistical tests were performed with two-tailed Student t-test according to standard methods. SupData Click here to view.(2.3M, pdf) Acknowledgments We would like to thank T. Uemura, F.B. Gao, L. Luo, R. Warrior, T. Hays and the Bloomington Stock Center for fly stocks; W. Song, C. Han, S. Zhu, P. Soba, J. Parrish, J. Kardon and S. Reck-Peterson for helpful suggestions and comments on the manuscript and members of the Jan Lab for stimulating discussions. We thank T. Uemura for communicating results prior to publication. This work was supported by Kirschstein NRSA fellowships F32-MH75223 (Y. Zheng), F32-HD53199 (J.W.), a NIH Pathway to Independence Award K99MH080599 (B.Y.), a graduate fellowship from Genentech, Inc. and the Sandler Family Supporting Foundation (Y. Zhang) and NIH grants R01NS40929 and RO1NS47200 (Y.N.J.). Y.N.J. and L.Y.J. are Investigators of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. References 1. Hirokawa N, Takemura R. Molecular motors and mechanisms of directional transport in neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:201–214. [PubMed] 2. Baas PW, Deitch JS, Black MM, Banker GA. Polarity orientation of microtubules in hippocampal neurons: uniformity in the axon and nonuniformity in the dendrite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:8335–8339. [PubMed] 3. Baas PW, Vidya Nadar C, Myers KA. Axonal transport of microtubules: the long and short of it. Traffic. 2006;7:490–498. [PubMed] 4. Sharp DJ, et al. Identification of a microtubule-associated motor protein essential for dendritic differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:833–843. [PubMed] 5. Yu W, et al. Depletion of a microtubule-associated motor protein induces the loss of dendritic identity. J Neurosci. 2000;20:5782–5791. [PubMed] 6. Andersen R, Li Y, Resseguie M, Brenman JE. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alters structural plasticity and cytoskeletal dynamics in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8878–8888. [PubMed] 7. Rolls MM, et al. Polarity and intracellular compartmentalization of Drosophila neurons. Neural Develop. 2007;2:7–20. [PubMed] 8. Ye B, et al. Growing Dendrites and Axons Differ in Their Reliance on the Secretory Pathway. Cell. 2007;130:717–729. [PubMed] 9. Yamamoto M, Ueda R, Takahashi K, Saigo K, Uemura T. Control of axonal sprouting and dendrite branching by the Nrg-Ank complex at the neuronglia interface. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1678–1683. [PubMed] 10. Allan VJ, Thompson HM, McNiven MA. Motoring around the Golgi. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:E236–242. [PubMed] 11. Horton AC, et al. Polarized secretory trafficking directs cargo for asymmetric dendrite growth and morphogenesis. Neuron. 2005;48:757–771. [PubMed] 12. Murray JW, Wolkoff AW. Roles of the cytoskeleton and motor proteins in endocytic sorting. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:1385–1403. [PubMed] 13. Park M, et al. Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes. Neuron. 2006;52:817–830. [PubMed] 14. Park M, Penick EC, Edwards JG, Kauer JA, Ehlers MD. Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science. 2004;305:1972–1975. [PubMed] 15. Sweeney NT, Brenman JE, Jan YN, Gao FB. The coiled-coil protein shrub controls neuronal morphogenesis in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1006–1011. [PubMed] 16. Ernstrom GG, Chalfie M. Genetics of sensory mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:411–453. [PubMed] 17. Adams CM, et al. Ripped pocket and pickpocket, novel Drosophila DEG/ENaC subunits expressed in early development and in mechanosensory neurons. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:143–152. [PubMed] 18. Clark IE, Jan LY, Jan YN. Reciprocal localization of Nod and kinesin fusion proteins indicates microtubule polarity in the Drosophila oocyte, epithelium, neuron and muscle. Development. 1997;124:461–470. [PubMed] 19. Cui W, et al. Drosophila Nod protein binds preferentially to the plus ends of microtubules and promotes microtubule polymerization in vitro. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:5400–5409. [PubMed] 20. Sanchez-Soriano N, et al. Are dendrites in Drosophila homologous to vertebrate dendrites? Dev Biol. 2005;288:126–138. [PubMed] 21. Lee T, Winter C, Marticke SS, Lee A, Luo L. Essential roles of Drosophila RhoA in the regulation of neuroblast proliferation and dendritic but not axonal morphogenesis. Neuron. 2000;25:307–316. [PubMed] 22. Whited JL, Cassell A, Brouillette M, Garrity PA. Dynactin is required to maintain nuclear position within postmitotic Drosophila photoreceptor neurons. Development. 2004;131:4677–4686. [PubMed] 23. Welte MA. Bidirectional transport along microtubules. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R525–537. [PubMed] 24. Giniger E, Wells W, Jan LY, Jan YN. Tracing neurons with a kinesin-beta-galactosidase fusion protein. Roux’s Archives of Developmental Biology. 1993;202:112–122. 25. Pierce JP, Mayer T, McCarthy JB. Evidence for a satellite secretory pathway in neuronal dendritic spines. Curr Biol. 2001;11:351–355. [PubMed] 26. Sytnyk V, et al. Neural cell adhesion molecule promotes accumulation of TGN organelles at sites of neuron-to-neuron contacts. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:649–661. [PubMed] 27. Chabin-Brion K, et al. The Golgi complex is a microtubule-organizing organelle. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:2047–2060. [PubMed] 28. Efimov A, et al. Asymmetric CLASP-dependent nucleation of noncentrosomal microtubules at the trans-Golgi network. Dev Cell. 2007;12:917–930. [PubMed] 29. Papoulas O, Hays TS, Sisson JC. The golgin Lava lamp mediates dynein-based Golgi movements during Drosophila cellularization. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:612–618. [PubMed] 30. Grueber WB, Jan LY, Jan YN. Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. Development. 2002;129:2867–2878. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Mar; 6(3):201-14.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov; 85(21):8335-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988]Traffic. 2006 May; 7(5):490-8.
[Traffic. 2006]J Cell Biol. 1997 Aug 25; 138(4):833-43.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]J Neurosci. 2000 Aug 1; 20(15):5782-91.
[J Neurosci. 2000]J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28; 25(39):8878-88.
[J Neurosci. 2005]Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 22; 16(16):1678-83.
[Curr Biol. 2006]Neural Dev. 2007 Apr 30; 2():7.
[Neural Dev. 2007]Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Oct; 4(10):E236-42.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2002]Cell. 2007 Aug 24; 130(4):717-29.
[Cell. 2007]Neuron. 2005 Dec 8; 48(5):757-71.
[Neuron. 2005]Cell. 2007 Aug 24; 130(4):717-29.
[Cell. 2007]Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003 Nov 14; 55(11):1385-403.
[Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003]Neuron. 2006 Dec 7; 52(5):817-30.
[Neuron. 2006]Science. 2004 Sep 24; 305(5692):1972-5.
[Science. 2004]Curr Biol. 2006 May 23; 16(10):1006-11.
[Curr Biol. 2006]Annu Rev Genet. 2002; 36():411-53.
[Annu Rev Genet. 2002]J Cell Biol. 1998 Jan 12; 140(1):143-52.
[J Cell Biol. 1998]Development. 1997 Jan; 124(2):461-70.
[Development. 1997]Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Nov; 16(11):5400-9.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2005]J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28; 25(39):8878-88.
[J Neurosci. 2005]Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 22; 16(16):1678-83.
[Curr Biol. 2006]Dev Biol. 2005 Dec 1; 288(1):126-38.
[Dev Biol. 2005]Development. 1997 Jan; 124(2):461-70.
[Development. 1997]Neural Dev. 2007 Apr 30; 2():7.
[Neural Dev. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov; 85(21):8335-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Mar; 6(3):201-14.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov; 85(21):8335-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988]Neural Dev. 2007 Apr 30; 2():7.
[Neural Dev. 2007]Traffic. 2006 May; 7(5):490-8.
[Traffic. 2006]Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Mar; 6(3):201-14.
[Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005]Curr Biol. 2001 Mar 6; 11(5):351-5.
[Curr Biol. 2001]J Cell Biol. 2002 Nov 25; 159(4):649-61.
[J Cell Biol. 2002]Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Jul; 12(7):2047-60.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2001]Dev Cell. 2007 Jun; 12(6):917-30.
[Dev Cell. 2007]Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Jun; 7(6):612-8.
[Nat Cell Biol. 2005]J Cell Biol. 1997 Aug 25; 138(4):833-43.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Nov; 16(11):5400-9.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2005]Cell. 2007 Aug 24; 130(4):717-29.
[Cell. 2007]Development. 2002 Jun; 129(12):2867-78.
[Development. 2002]Development. 2002 Jun; 129(12):2867-78.
[Development. 2002]