• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(12): e3870.
Published online Dec 5, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0003870
PMCID: PMC2586086

Urinary α1-Antichymotrypsin: A Biomarker of Prion Infection

Manuel B. Graeber, Editor

Abstract

The occurrence of blood-borne prion transmission incidents calls for identification of potential prion carriers. However, current methods for intravital diagnosis of prion disease rely on invasive tissue biopsies and are unsuitable for large-scale screening. Sensitive biomarkers may help meeting this need. Here we scanned the genome for transcripts elevated upon prion infection and encoding secreted proteins. We found that α1-antichymotrypsin (α1-ACT) was highly upregulated in brains of scrapie-infected mice. Furthermore, α1-ACT levels were dramatically increased in urine of patients suffering from sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and increased progressively throughout the disease. Increased α1-ACT excretion was also found in cases of natural prion disease of animals. Therefore measurement of urinary α1-ACT levels may be useful for monitoring the efficacy of therapeutic regimens for prion disease, and possibly also for deferring blood and organ donors that may be at risk of transmitting prion infections.

Introduction

The prion [1] is the infectious agent causing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, which include sporadic (sCJD) and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) in humans, scrapie in sheep, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, and chronic wasting disease (CWD) in cervids [2]. Although prions may replicate in extraneural tissues [3], [4], cellular damage is essentially limited to the central nervous system (CNS). The molecular mechanisms underlying prion replication and subsequent neural damage are not entirely understood. No effective therapeutic strategies are available.

An essential component of the prion is PrPSc, an abnormally folded, aggregated isoform of the host protein PrPC [5]. To date, all validated laboratory assays for prion diseases rely on the immunochemical detection of PrPSc. These methods are highly specific, but suffer from limited sensitivity as one infectious prion may be equivalent to <102 aggregated PrPSc molecules [6] – which is much lower than the threshold of detection of most immunoassays. Additionally, the presence of excess PrPC in complex biological fluids may confound immunochemical detection, even if biophysical detection methods are employed. Consequently, while positive detection of PrPSc suffices to establish a firm diagnosis of prion infection, its absence by no means rules out the presence of prion infectivity.

The hundreds of iatrogenic transmissions through organ extracts [7], contaminated surgical instruments [8], and probably through blood transfusions [9], [10] have tragically highlighted the current inability of diagnosing presymptomatic prion infections. While there has been recent progress in detecting low amounts of PrPSc in blood of experimentally inoculated hamsters by protein misfolding cyclic amplification [11], it is unknown whether this technology possesses adequate sensitivity and throughput for prion detection in human blood.

The use of surrogate biomarkers represents a diagnostic strategy fundamentally different to those delineated above. Since they typically identify secondary host reactions, surrogate biomarkers of prion infection cannot aspire at matching the specificity of PrPSc detection. On the other hand, surrogate biomarkers may be useful for identifying subjects at risk, and specifying acceptance or deferral of blood donations. In such cases high sensitivity (i.e. the identification of all suspect individuals) is more important than absolute diagnostic specificity, as the latter can be supplied by confirmatory assays.

Surrogate biomarkers may represent proteins that are differentially expressed or represented in body fluids of prion-affected individuals. S-100, neuron-specific enolase, and 14-3-3 protein have been reported to be elevated in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of sCJD patients [12], [13], [14]. These proteins may represent consequences of CNS damage and neuronal death. The cysteine proteinase inhibitor cystatin C was also reported to be elevated in CSF of sCJD patients [15], [16].

In an effort to characterize the transcriptome of prion-infected murine tissues, we have searched for transcripts which (1) are profoundly upregulated and (2) whose predicted gene products contain secretory leader peptides. One transcript fulfilling these criteria is serpin-a3n, the murine homolog of human alpha-1-antichymotrypsin (α1-ACT), a serine proteinase inhibitor which has been previously implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease [17], [18] and which has been reported to be a candidate plasma and CSF biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD) [19], [20], [21], [22]. In the present study, we sought to investigate the potential usefulness of α1-ACT, and to compare it to the recently proposed cystatin C, as candidate biomarker for prion diagnostics in body fluids.

Results

Transcriptional microarray analysis of whole brains from prion-infected and mock-infected mice

We have performed a genomie-wide interrogation of the brain transcriptome of C57Bl/6 mice at 145 days post inoculation (dpi) intraperitoneally (i.p.) with scrapie prions (RML strain, passage 5). In this model of murine scrapie, the incubation period between the date of inoculation and the onset of terminal clinical signs of scrapie is approximately 200 dpi.

The extracerebral inoculation route and the 145 dpi time point were chosen in order to minimize any severe histopathological changes to the brain, thereby lowering the occurrence of unspecific transcriptional changes. This goal was essentially achieved, since the vast majority of transcripts were quantitatively unaffected in prion-infected vs. mock-infected brains. When applying stringent filter settings, we identified a total of only 77 transcripts which appeared up- or down-regulated with a confidence limit of >90% and Student's t test p values of <0.05 (Table S1 online).

The majority of these changes in expression were modest (−2.04 to +3.41 fold). Some transcripts, including glial fibrillary acidic protein, complement components, and beta-2-microglobulin, had been previously identified as being differentially expressed following prion infection [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Serpin-a3n was identified as a very highly overexpressed transcript in brains of prion-infected mice before the onset of clinical signs. The latter observation was particularly intriguing in view of the fact that Serpin-a3n encodes a secreted protein which is detectable in a variety of body fluids. This suggested that Serpin-a3n may represent a candidate biomarker for preclinical diagnosis of prion infections in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum.

Serpin-a3n1-ACT transcription in brain during prion pathogenesis

Both Northern hybridization and QPCR confirmed that whole-brain transcription of Serpin-a3n increased progressively during the course of prion infections. Significant overexpression was detected already between 120 and 130 dpi (Fig. 1A), and reached levels of up to 17-fold higher than controls by 190 dpi (Fig. 1B). Therefore, Serpin-a3n ranks among the most highly upregulated transcripts in prion-infected brains. For comparison, glial fibrillary acidic protein transcripts, a marker of reactive astrogliosis often used to quantitate brain damage, only reached levels of ≤8-fold higher than controls by late-stage of prion pathogenesis (Fig. 1A & B).

Figure 1
Serpin-a3n1-ACT transcripts in brain during prion pathogenesis.

Having established that whole-brain Serpin-a3n RNA was markedly elevated upon prion infection, we investigated its regional expression in specific segments of the CNS. We found that Serpin-a3n RNA was upregulated 6-fold higher in spinal cord, 3-fold in cerebellum, and 5-fold in cortex of prion-infected mice by 140 dpi (Fig. 1C). For comparison, GFAP RNA was overexpressed 3-fold in spinal cord and 4-fold in cerebellum and cortex of the same mice (Fig. 1A & C). The very high upregulation found in the spinal cord may be related to the i.p. route of inoculation, which favors prion entry into the thoracic segments of the spinal cord.

The human homologue of Serpin-a3n is α1-anti-chymotrypsin (α1-ACT). We investigated α1-ACT mRNA in post-mortem occipital cortex of patients suffering from AD and sporadic CJD (sCJD). Brains of non-demented, age-matched patients were used for control (Fig 1D, left panel). Similarly to the observations reported above for prion-infected mice, α1-ACT RNA was significantly elevated in the CNS of sCJD patients (p = 0.019, Fig. 1D).

Cystatin C and α1-ACT levels are unaltered in AD and sCJD patient plasma

Plasma cystatin C and α1-ACT were measured by sandwich ELISA and expressed either as raw concentration (ng/ml), or relative to total plasma protein (Table 1). For control, we assayed plasma from individuals with non-neurodegenerative diseases. Samples were from patients of similar age and gender distribution to the AD and sCJD groups, and were obtained at mid- and late-stage of disease. However, no alterations in the plasma concentration of either cystatin C or α1-ACT were evident in the sCJD and AD groups relative to controls.

Table 1
Plasma concentration of Cystatin C and α1-ACT in patients suffering from AD or sCJD.

Cystatin C and α1-ACT in cerebrospinal fluid

We used sandwich ELISA to measure cystatin C and α1-ACT in the CSF of patients suffering from AD, sCJD and vCJD at mid- to late-clinical stage of disease. Values were expressed either as absolute concentrations or relative to total CSF protein (Table 2). The age and gender composition of sCJD patients, AD patients, and control group A (patients suffering from non-neurodegenerative diseases) was similar (p>0.05). Control group B represents patients of similar age and gender distribution to the vCJD collective, and was derived from patients initially suspected of having CJD but later determined to suffer from other diseases. Since vCJD tends to occur at a much younger age than sCJD, the average age of the two control groups is very different. Interestingly, the total CSF protein concentration and the concentrations of cystatin C were different between control groups A and control group B, suggesting that they may be modulated by an age-dependent process (Table 3).

Table 2
Cystatin C and α1-ACT in patient cerebrospinal fluid.
Table 3
Cystatin C, α1-ACT and α1-microglobulin in the urine of patients.

In contrast to previous reports [15], [16], we found no elevated CSF levels of cystatin C in sCJD and vCJD patients (Table 2). Furthermore, Western blot analysis using immunoreagents derived from the same source as in one of these studies [16] showed levels of cystatin C in CSF of sCJD patients indistinguishable from non-CJD controls (Fig. 2). α1-ACT concentrations were then divided by total CSF protein concentration, and each patient collective was compared to the appropriate control group. After the latter normalization we found a moderate, yet significant, elevation of α1-ACT in CSF samples of sCJD patients (46% , p<0.001, Table 2).

Figure 2
Western blot analysis of cystatin C in the CSF of patients suffering from sCJD.

Urinary levels of cystatin C, α1-antichymotrypsin and α1-microglobulin

The urinary concentration of cystatin C and α1-ACT in AD, sCJD and vCJD patients at mid-to-late stages of disease was determined by sandwich ELISA. Similarly to the CSF analysis reported above, urinary α1-ACT concentrations of sCJD patients were compared to those of AD patients and of control group A. We found dramatically elevated urinary α1-ACT in sCJD patients (Table 3, Figure 3). This was particularly evident when α1-ACT concentrations were normalized to albumin or to creatinine (p<0.001), but it reached significance even when raw concentrations were analyzed without any attempt at normalization (p<0.05).

Figure 3
Urinary α1-ACT and creatinine levels.

We considered several artifactual scenarios which may have led to the above observations. Since both cystatin C and α1-ACT are present in urine at concentrations far below those observed in plasma (See Table 2), alterations may simply reflect general proteinuria resulting from compromised renal function. We addressed this in several ways. Firstly, prospectively recruited patients with known macro- or microhaematuria, or proteinuria, and retrospectively collected urine samples with albuminuria of ≥150 µg/ml, were excluded from further analysis. Secondly, we obtained urine from an additional set of patients (control group C) which predominantly included post-kidney-transplant patients following diabetic nephropathy or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and reflux nephropathy. Thirdly, we investigated urine from patients presenting with bladder carcinoma, and with pyelonephritis with bacteriuria (Control group C). These groups also served to assess the specificity of the changes observed in the CJD groups relative to other non-neurological conditions.

Since many factors can affect urine concentration and, consequently, concentration of test substances, we normalized cystatin C and α1-ACT concentration against urinary creatinine. In the absence of renal dysfunction, the excretion rate of creatinine is relatively constant and has been used for adjusting urine concentration/dilution effects in measurement of urinary metabolites [28]. Normalization to creatinine therefore controls for both potential variations in urine concentration between individuals in spot-test urine samples and renal function. For these reasons we also expressed cystatin C and α1-ACT concentrations relative to both albumin and creatinine (Table 3). Urinary α1-ACT levels were evident in sCJD patients regardless of normalization to urinary albumin or creatinine. Additionally, we observed that neither age, sex or study centre sampling location were variables contributing to elevated urinary α1-ACT levels in sCJD patients (not shown).

Since ELISA results can be confounded by crossreactive contaminants, we performed Western blotting analyses on selected urine samples. These confirmed dramatically elevated immunoreactive bands with the electrophoretic motility of α1-ACT in sCJD patients (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4
Urinary α1-ACT of sCJD patients.

In contrast, we observed no statistically significant alteration in urinary cystatin C between sCJD or vCJD groups and respective controls, regardless of whether cystatin C concentration was expressed as raw, non-normalized data, or relative to either urinary albumin or creatinine (Table 3).

In addition, urinary α1-ACT was also significantly higher in sCJD patients compared to control group C when expressed either relative to albumin or creatinine (Table 3, p<0.001).

When sCJD patients were compared to control groups A, C, and AD patients, the sensitivity and specificity of elevated urinary α1-ACT for sCJD were, respectively, 72.4%, 87.5% (µg/mg albumin) or 89.7%, 100% (µg/g creatinine) if Control group C is not included in the calculation, and 79.3%, 94.7% (µg/mg albumin) or 96.6%, 100% (µg/g creatinine) if Control group C is included in the calculation (Fig 5). In contrast to the data obtained for sCJD patients, we observed no significant alterations in urinary α1-ACT from vCJD patients referenced to control group B (Table 3, Figure 3).

Figure 5
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis.

Longitudinal measurements of two sCJD patients presented to the NRPE (one definite and one probable sCJD) revealed a progressive increase in urinary α1-ACT relative to both albumin and creatinine throughout the clinical course of disease (Fig. 4B). This finding suggests that urinary α1-ACT excretion may be useful for monitoring disease progression, (e.g. in therapeutical trials) as a responsive surrogate biomarker.

As a further indication of renal proximal tubule function, we measured urinary levels of α1-microglobulin in the sCJD and vCJD groups relative to respective control groups. The concentration of α1-microglobulin, normalized to creatinine or albumin, were not significantly altered in sCJD urine (Table 3), yet appeared to be higher in urine of vCJD patients than in appropriate controls (p<0.001). Normalization of values to both albumin and creatinine, and comparison to control group C, indicates that the observed increase in urinary α1-ACT concentrations in sCJD patients is independent of renal function. We also retrospectively assessed plasma creatinine and urea levels in 19 CJD patients presented to the NRPE. This analysis did not bring forward any evidence that gross renal impairment may represent a general feature of late-stage sCJD (Table 4).

Table 4
Selected NRPE sCJD patient plasma creatinine and urea levels.

Urinary α1-ACT in field cases of animal prion diseases

We carried out Western blot analyses of urine from scrapie-sick sheep, cattle with confirmed Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and deer with confirmed Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), along with urine from healthy animals collected post-mortem (Fig. 6A–C). In addition, we analyzed by Western blot urine samples collected sequentially from one sheep that was pre-clinically infected with scrapie and went on to display clinical signs of disease. Scrapie was confirmed post-mortem in this sheep by histopathology and Western blot analysis of brain tissue (data not shown). Urine from the latter sheep was analyzed at 10, 9, 2 & 1 months prior to the development of terminal scrapie, together with urine from six sheep unaffected by scrapie (Fig. 6D). Urinary α1-ACT was increased 2 months before terminal disease, and remained sustained thereafter.

Figure 6
Western blot analysis of urinary α1-ACT from natural field cases of prion disease.

We also observed significantly elevated levels of urinary α1-ACT in two of six BSE-affected cattle (Fig. 6B) and in one of two CWD-affected deer (Fig. 6C). One animal from the sheep study shown in Fig. 6A was culled following appearance of scrapie-like symptoms. However, post-mortem biochemical and pathological confirmation was inconclusive, and this particular animal was classified as “atypical” scrapie. It is therefore unclear whether elevated urinary α1-ACT in this animal represents a false positive, or the identification of a scrapie case hitherto unqualified by other biochemical and histological techniques.

Discussion

A global microarray screen of scrapie-infected mouse brains identified a limited number of genes undergoing transcriptional elevation well before the clinical onset of disease. One of these was Serpin-a3n, which encodes the serine proteinase inhibitor α1-antichymotrypsin (α1-ACT). Its transcription was drastically elevated not only in whole-brain homogenates of scrapie-infected mice, but also in occipital cortices of sCJD patients. These observations suggest that α1-ACT elevation occurs in prion infections of many species.

Serpin-a3n encodes a secretory leader peptide, and α1-ACT is present in body fluids. This raised the possibility that α1-ACT may represent a candidate biomarker of prion infection. Since many brain metabolites are found in the CSF, we first tested whether CSF concentrations of α1-ACT would predict prion infection. Indeed, sCJD patients exhibited a highly significant (p<0.001) increase of α1-ACT in CSF when normalized against total CSF protein and compared to appropriate age-matched controls.

α1-ACT is elevated in brains of AD patients and contributes to AD amyloid plaque deposits [17], [18], but the value of α1-ACT as a biomarker of AD is unclear. Some studies have reported elevated α1-ACT in plasma or CSF of AD patients [19], [20], [21], [22], whereas others found no changes [29]. In agreement with the latter study, we found no increased α1-ACT in plasma and CSF of AD patients in the present study.

We then sought to compare the diagnostic value of α1-ACT with that of cystatin C, which had been claimed to be a biomarker for CJD. We found that plasma and CSF levels of cystatin C did not discriminate between AD patients and age and gender-matched control patients, in agreement with previous findings [30]. Also, CSF measurements of cystatin C by sandwich ELISA in large collectives of sCJD, vCJD, and control samples was not discriminatory between these three groups. The latter finding is at striking variance with two studies of cystatin C in the CSF of small collectives of CJD patients (n = 8 and 6, respectively) [15], [16] reporting up to 30-fold increases of CSF cystatin C in sCJD patients.

Cystatin C undergoes proteolytic processing, and a 12.5 kDa cleavage product was reported to be elevated in the CSF of patients suffering from multiple sclerosis, even if the levels of full-length 13.4 kDa cystatin C were unaltered [31]. Therefore, antibodies differentially recognizing cystatin C and its degradation products may introduce a confounding factor. However, we were unable to demonstrate any differences in cystatin C levels in CSF of sCJD patients by Western blotting even when using the same antibody that had led to the claim of a 30-fold elevation of CSF cystatin C in sCJD patients [16]. We conclude that CSF cystatin C is unaltered in the collective of patients investigated here (n = 8) and therefore does not represent a biomarker of sCJD or vCJD.

We then studied the occurrence of immunoglobulins, α1-ACT, and cystatin C in urine samples. We were unable to confirm the previously reported presence of protease-resistant immunoglobulin light chains in the urine of prion-affected animals and humans [32], [33], [34]. Our use of anti-mouse IgG2a as secondary antibody rather than total IgG may account for this discrepancy. Also, cystatin C excretion was unaltered urine of AD, sCJD, and vCJD patients regardless of the normalization method used, and therefore not diagnostic of prion infection.

Surprisingly, urine samples from sCJD patients belonging to the UK, German and Swiss collectives displayed consistently elevated α1-ACT. Significance was attained independently of whether ELISA results were expressed as raw concentrations, or normalized against creatinine or albumin. ROC curve analysis confirms high specificity and sensitivity of the ability of urinary α1-ACT measurement to discriminate sCJD status. In a ROC curve the true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (100-Specificity) for different cut-off points. Each point on the ROC plot represents a sensitivity/specificity pair corresponding to a particular decision threshold. A test with perfect discrimination (no overlap in the two distributions) has a ROC plot that passes through the upper left corner (100% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Therefore the closer the ROC plot is to the upper left corner, the higher the overall accuracy of the test. The α1-ACT ELISA assay predicted prion infection with excellent sensitivity and specificity. The highest degree of sensitivity and specificity was observed for urinary α1-ACT normalised to creatinine. Vastly increased excretion of α1-ACT observed by ELISA-based measurement, this was also confirmed by Western blot analysis.

The enhanced excretion of α1-ACT in prion infections is surprising. In view of the unaltered plasma α1-ACT levels of sCJD patients, α1-ACT “spillover” from blood to urine is unlikely to underlie our observations. We therefore considered, and attempted to control for, possible artifactual effects. First, we considered that increased α1-ACT excretion may result from glomerular dysfunction. However, normalization of data to either urinary creatinine or albumin, which would be increased in many renal diseases, did not affect the results. Secondly, urinary cystatin C, a marker of glomerular filtration rate [35], was unaltered in sCJD patients, suggesting that increased α1-ACT excretion does not result simply from compromised renal function. Thirdly, elevated α1-antichymotrypsin levels in sCJD urine are unlikely to result from proximal tubule defects, since urinary α1-microglobulin levels were not significantly different in urine of sCJD patients relative to respective controls. Fourthly, our retrospective analyses of sCJD patient plasma creatinine and urea indicate that renal insufficiency is not a typical feature of late-stage sCJD patients (Table 4). Finally, urinary α1-ACT levels were significantly higher in sCJD than (1) in post-kidney transplant subjects following diabetic nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and reflux nephropathy, (2) in patients with bladder carcinoma, and (3) patients with pyogenic nephritis leading to bacteriuria. These aggregated data argue against increased levels of α1-ACT in urine from sCJD patients simply resulting from renal disease, or from generally compromised health.

We considered that enhanced α1-ACT detection may result from sample collection or processing anomalies. We deem this unlikely for a number of reasons. Firstly, high urinary α1-ACT was diagnostic in sCJD patient collectives from each of three separate national reference centers. Secondly, no alterations of α1-ACT concentration in test urine were found when comparing voided vs. non-voided (P>0.05) urine, pre- vs. post-pellet urine (P>0.05), and urine samples collected in the morning or evening (P>0.05). Thirdly, the α1-ACT ELISA yielded similar results whether urines was stored immediately at −80°C or left at room temperature or 4°C overnight before testing (P>0.05). Therefore, none of the common sample collection and processing artifacts account for the reported results. Finally, elevated urinary α1-ACT was evident in a number of BSE-affected cattle, CWD-affected deer, and scrapie-affected sheep. In the latter, it was diagnostic at least 2 months prior to terminal disease.

Enhanced α1-ACT excretion may prove useful for correlating responsiveness to experimental therapeutic regimens and perhaps for biochemical discrimination of vCJD from sCJD without invasive biopsies. Finally, considering its excellent specificity and good sensitivity, one might consider exploring the usefulness of urinary α1-ACT determinations as a means of deferring blood units from asymptomatic donors who may be harboring preclinical prion infections.

Materials and Methods

Prion inoculations

Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Eight week-old inbred C57Bl/6 mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 100 µl (6 log LD50 units) of the Rocky Mountain laboratory (RML) scrapie strain (passage 5 in CD1 mice, hence called RML5) prepared as a 10% (w/v) clarified brain homogenate containing 5% BSA. The titer of this standard RML5 inoculum was 8.9 log LD50 g−1 of brain tissue [36]. Age- and gender-matched control mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 100 µl of a 10% (w/v) clarified brain homogenate from healthy CD1 mice. The incubation period of this model until onset of terminal disease was approximately 200–210 days post inoculation (dpi). Tissues from mice at 45, 100, 145 and 190 dpi stages of pathogenesis were used for real-time quantitative RT-PCR analyses. All manipulations were approved by the Animal Experimentation Committee of the Canton of Zürich.

Tissue collection and RNA isolation

Human occipital cortex tissue was provided via the Swiss Reference Center for Prion Diseases (NRPE) and was collected at autopsy from a cohort of Swiss patients who died between 1996 and 2004. Patients with prion disease, Alzheimer's disease and patients without neurologic disorders were included. Tissues were processed according to established guidelines regarding safety and ethics and periods from death until post-mortem tissue collection were approximately 4–18 hours. All tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to long-term storage at −80°C. Tissues from the RML murine model of prion pathogenesis were collected at various stages throughout pathogenesis. All murine tissues were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to storage at −80°C until required. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen AG, Switzerland) from eight patients of each control, AD and sCJD group.

Preparation of labeled cRNA and microarray hybridization

All procedures for preparation of labelled cRNA probes and subsequent Genechip hybridisations were performed according to suggested Affymetrix guidelines (http://www.affymetrix.com). Total RNA isolated from whole brain using Trizol was subjected to a purification step (RNeasy mini kit, Qiagen, Switzerland). Quality of total RNA was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Equal amounts of total RNA from 3 individual brains of mice at 145 dpi stage of prion pathogenesis were combined to act as template for generation of probe for one biological replicate. Thus, from nine mock-inoculated and nine prion inoculated mice, a total of three sets of labelled cRNA probes were synthesized representing three biological replicates. Double-stranded cDNA was synthesized using 20 µg total RNA as template (cDNA Synthesis kit, Cat.No.11917-010, Invitrogen, Switzerland) and primer 5′-GGCCAGTGAATTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGGCGG(dT)24-3′. Biotin-labeled cRNA was synthesized, using Enzo BioArray HighYield RNA transcript labeling Kit (T7) (Enzo Life Sciences, Germany), purified using the RNeasy mini kit and quantified by spectrophotometry. Quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Typical yields were in the range of 120–150 µg labeled cRNA. 15 µg of labeled cRNA was fragmented in 40 mM Tris-acetate, 100 mM KOAc, 30 mM MgOAc, pH 8.1 at 95°C for 35 min. Following fragmentation, an aliquot of one representative of the replicates of each sample was hybridized to Affymetrix Test3 arrays to determine the quality of the probes, reflected by the 3′/5′ ratios, and to test all buffers using conditions outlined in the Affymetrix expression analysis manual. The samples were then hybridized to Affymetrix MOE430A and MOE430B chips. All hybridizations were carried out for 16 h at 45°C at 60 rpm. Chips were then washed and incubated with streptavidin-phycoerythrin according to the manufacturers instructions on the Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 with and scanned using the Affymetrix GS Scanner 2500 in conjunction with Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0 software.

Microarray Data Analysis

Intensity values of all chips were normalized with dChip software (http://www.dchip.org) [37] and applying the model-based expression analysis algorithm (PM-only or PM/MM model) the expression values were calculated.

Global brain gene expression profiles from mice 145 days post-inoculation, with either mock inoculum or the RML prion strain, were compared applying a 1.3-fold change as the lower limit, lower 90% confidence boundary of fold change and p values of <0.05. Only those genes were considered which were flagged present in 100% of chips from cRNA probes derived from at least either mock or prion inoculated mice. Microarray datasets are available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo; accession number GSE7207.

Northern Blot Analyses

Northern blot hybridisation experiments as previously described [38] using 15 µg total RNA. Random primed [α32P]dCTP probes were prepared from 20 ng of gel-purified DNA homologous to target transcripts using Rediprime II random priming kit (Amersham Biosciences, Switzerland) and purified with Nick Sephadex G50 columns (Amersham Biosciences, Switzerland). Prehybridization and hybridization was performed overnight at 42°C using Ultrahyb (Ambion, USA), containing 1×106 cpm/ml radiolabelled probe and 100 µg/ml denatured herring sperm DNA (Catalysis AG, Switzerland) and 20 µg/ml denatured yeast tRNA (Sigma Fluka, Switzerland). Post-hybridization washes were performed according to Ultrahyb instructions. Hybridization signals were quantified using Fujifilm imaging plate technology (BAS-1800II, Fujifilm, Japan) and normalized for variations in RNA loading by subsequent probing with an excess of 18S rRNA cDNA probe [38].

Probes and accession numbers

Murine cDNAs for derivation of probes for Serpin-a3n and Gfap were obtained from Open Biosystems (www.openbiosystems.com); accession numbers were BI145274 and AI836096 respectively.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (QPCR)

In all cases 5 µg of total RNA was used as template for first-strand cDNA synthesis. Prior to cDNA synthesis, residual genomic DNA was removed by the DNA free-kit (Ambion, USA). Total RNA was converted into cDNA using the bulk first strand cDNA synthesis kit and Not I-(dT)18 as primer (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Germany). Control reactions omitting reverse transcriptase were performed to validate successful removal of contaminating genomic DNA. Successful cDNA synthesis and lack of contamination with genomic DNA was tested by performing PCR (40 cycles) with primers specific for β-actin. All samples utilized for QPCR analysis were validated free of contaminating genomic DNA. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen AG, Switzerland) on an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Switzerland) using default cycling conditions. For murine samples, triplicate reactions of three biological replicates were utilized. In the case of human material, triplicate reactions were performed for each sample. Expression levels of serpin-a3n1-ACT were normalized to β-actin. Primer sequences were as follows: 5′- tatctgcctccacccaaaag-3′ & 5′- gccagatgtggacaaagtga-3′ (murine serpin-a3n), 5′-atggatgacgatatcgctg-3′ & 5′-atgaggtagtctgtcaggt-3′ (murine ActB), 5′-tctcccaggtggtccataag-3′ & 5′-ttactgagagccccactgct-3′ (human α1-ACT), 5′-ggacttcgagcaagagatgg-3′ & 5′-agcactgtgttggcgtacag-3′ (human ACTB).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for α1-antichymotrypsin (α1-ACT)

Human α1-ACT was measured by triple antibody sandwich ELISA. Microtiter plate wells (Nunc F96 Maxisorb, Milan Analytica, Switzerland) were coated with 100 µl of 5.4 µg/ml affinity purified rabbit anti-human α1-ACT (Dako, Switzerland) in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6. The plates were then sealed and incubated overnight at 4°C. After six washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST) the remaining binding sites in the wells were blocked by incubating with 100 µl of PBST containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) for 2 h at room temperature with shaking, followed by six washes with PBST. Thereafter, 100 µl of purified recombinant human α1-ACT (R&D Systems, UK), in several dilutions ranging from 0 to 200 ng/ml to generate a standard curve, and test samples were added. Standard curve and test samples were diluted into PBS sample buffer containing a final concentration of 0.05% Tween-20 and 1% BSA. Serum, CSF and urine were diluted 1[ratio]250 000, 1[ratio]3000 and 1[ratio]300 respectively such that all samples were contained within the measurable range of the standard curve. Standard curve and test sample dilutions were prepared in triplicate. The plates were sealed and incubated at room temperature for 2 h at room temperature with shaking and washed six times with PBST. Then 100 µl of sheep anti-human α1-ACT (The Binding Site, UK), diluted to 31 µg/ml in PBST containing 1% BSA, was added to each of the wells and the plate sealed and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with shaking. Following a further six washes with PBST 100 µl of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated donkey anti-sheep IgG, diluted 1[ratio]1000 in PBST containing 1% BSA, was added to each well and the plate sealed and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Following a final six washes with PBST 100 µl of 3,3′,5,5′-teramethylbenzidine chromogenic substrate (TMB, Invitrogen, UK) was added to each well. Following colour development 100 µl of H2SO4 was added to each well to stop the reaction and the optical density measured at 450 nm or 405 nm in an ELISA micro-plate reader. Values were expressed as concentration per ml fluid (plasma, CSF & urine), relative to total protein (plasma & CSF) or relative to creatinine and albumin (urine). Inter- and intra-assay correlation of variance was 7.36% and 3.84% respectively.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for cystatin C

Measurement of human cystatin C was performed using a commercial sandwich ELISA kit (Biovendor Laboratory Medicine Inc., Czech Republic) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Human cystatin C standard curve and test samples were diluted into PBS sample buffer containing a final concentration of 0.05% Tween-20 and 1% BSA. Serum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine were diluted 1[ratio]300, 1[ratio]1000 and 1[ratio]100 respectively such that all assay values were contained within the measurable range of the standard curve. Standard curve and test sample dilutions were prepared in triplicate. Optical density was measured at 450 nm or 405 nm in an ELISA micro-plate reader. Values were expressed as concentration per ml fluid (plasma, CSF & urine), relative to total protein (plasma & CSF) or relative to creatinine and albumin (urine).

Albumin & α1-microglobulin

Measurements of human urinary albumin and α1-microglobulin were performed using a commercial competitive ELISA for albumin (Orgentec Diagnostika, Germany) and a sandwich ELISA format for α1-microglobulin (ImmunDiagnostik, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Optical density was measured at 450 nm in an ELISA micro-plate reader. Values were expressed as concentration per ml urine (albumin) or normalized to albumin or creatinine (α1-microglobulin).

Urinary creatinine

Measurement of urinary creatinine was performed using a commercial kit (Cayman Europe, Estonia) based on the Jaffe alkaline picrate reaction according to the manufacturer's instructions. Urine samples were diluted 1[ratio]15 in molecular biology grade water such that assay values were contained within the measurable range of the standard curve. Optical density was measured at 490 nm in an ELISA micro-plate reader. Values were expressed as concentration per ml urine.

Western blots

Total protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) or microBCA (Perbio Science, Switzerland). Equal amounts (µg) of total protein were separated by electrophoresis through 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Reducing conditions were used in all cases except for detection of human α1-ACT. The membranes were blocked in PBST containing 5% non-fat milk for 2 h at room temperature prior to incubating overnight at 4°C with primary antibody. Following six minute washes with PBST the membranes were incubated in PBST containing 5% non-fat milk and the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. In the case of cattle urine, Top-block (GE Healthcare, UK) was used instead of 5% non-fat milk. As a positive control, purified recombinant human α1-ACT (R&D Systems, UK) was also included.

For detection of α1-ACT in human, sheep and deer urine, murine anti-human α1-ACT (R&D Systems, UK) was used at a concentration of 2 µg/ml followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG2a (Invitrogen, UK) at a dilution of 1[ratio]5000. For detection of α1-ACT in cattle urine, rabbit anti-human α1-ACT (Dako, Switzerland) was used at a dilution of 1[ratio]1000, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare, UK) at a dilution of 1[ratio]1000. For detection of cystatin C in human CSF, samples were prepared under non-reducing conditions, electrophoresed and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking as outlined above, membranes were incubated in PBST containing 5% non-fat milk and a 1[ratio]1000 dilution of rabbit anti-human cystatin C (Upstate, UK), followed by washing with PBST and incubation with HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare, UK) at a dilution of 1[ratio]1000. Following addition of ECL substrate (Perbio, Switzerland) signal was visualized using a VersaDoc model 4000 Imaging system (BioRad, Switzerland). Membranes were stripped (Western blotting stripping solution, Socochim, Switzerland) and re-probed with rabbit anti-human albumin (Abcam, UK), at a dilution of 1[ratio]5000, followed by HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare, UK), at a dilution of 1[ratio]1000, and subsequent ECL detection as outlined above.

Body fluid samples of patients

Samples were obtained from patients who presented to the NRPE, the United Kingdom CJD Surveillance Unit (CJDSU), the German Reference Centre for Prion Diseases, the Clinic for Nephrology, the Institute for Clinical Pathology, and the Division of Psychiatric Research at University of Zürich. Collection of blood, CSF and urine for subsequent analysis was approved by the Swiss Federal Office of Health.

For control, we assembled two distinct groups of persons. Control group A consisted of individuals whose age and gender matched those of patients suffering from sCJD or AD, whereas the demographics of control group B matched patients suffering from variant CJD (vCJD). Specifically, control group B consisted of patients who initially presented to the UK CJDSU with suspected CJD, but were later determined to suffer from other ailments.

Urine and CSF samples were obtained from patients at varying clinical stages of CJD, from mid-clinical stage to terminal disease. In the case of terminal patients, body fluids were collected at post-mortem. Plasma was derived from patients ante mortem. From pre-mortem patients where sCJD was suspected, samples were included in the study only following post-mortem confirmation of sCJD.

In addition, we investigated a control group consisting of urine collected from patients post-kidney transplant following diabetic nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and reflux nephropathy conditions, from patients presenting with bladder carcinoma and bacteriuria, and from patients with cerebrovascular disease or encephalitis.

Urine from patients with known macro- or microhaematuria, or proteinuria, was excluded from further analysis. In retrospectively collected urine samples in which this was unknown, samples containing >150 µg/ml albumin were excluded from the study. Within approximately 18 h of collection, urine was centrifuged briefly, aliquoted and stored at −80°C until analysis. Blood was collected in tubes containing citrate to a final concentration of 0.5% and, within 12 h of collection, centrifuged a 2 280 g for 4 minutes at room temperature. The plasma layer was aliquoted and stored at −80°C until required. Cerebrospinal fluid was collected, aliquoted and stored at −80°C. Informed consent was obtained in all relevant cases.

Field Animals

Urine samples were obtained from sheep scrapie cases both pre-terminal (without the use of diuretic drugs or catheter) or at post-mortem via bladder puncture. Urine from deer CWD and cattle BSE cases (and controls) were obtained at post-mortem by bladder puncture. Pre-terminal scrapie cases consisted of six healthy Sarda sheep held in the Sassari region of Italy (PRNP genotypes: ARR/ARQ, ARQ/VRQ, ARR/ARR, ARQ/ARQ) and one natural scrapie positive animal (ARQ/ARQ), from which urine was collected pre-clinical and throughout the clinical phase of disease. Urine from terminal sheep was derived from UK sheep of the Suffolk breed and consisted of males and females displaying no clinical signs of scrapie (ARR/ARR and ARQ/ARQ PRNP genotypes) and natural scrapie positive males and females (ARQ/ARQ PRNP genotypes).

Statistical tests

Data was analyzed for statistical significance using two-tailed unpaired Mann-Whitney t-test with 95% confidence interval. Significance of p<0.05, and p<0.001 is indicated by * and ** respectively. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated and plotted using the software MedCalc.

Supporting Information

Table S1

(0.08 MB XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Veterinary Laboratories Agency TSE archive for provision of urine from field cases of BSE-affected and unaffected cattle, Gabriella Carcassola, Holger Moch, Christina Sigurdson, Markus Glatzel, Mark Head and Patricia Padberg for assistance with obtaining samples, and Audrey Marcel and Dimitri Robay for technical assistance.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: Max Bassagni has an interest in Prion Diagnostica Srl, which commercializes prion detection assays. All remaining authors declare no conflict of interests.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (G.M.), and in part by grants from the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (A.A. & G.M.) an EU Framework Programme 6 STREP grant (A.A.) and Nationale TSE-Forschungsplattform: Etablierung einer nationalen CJD-Probenbank (BMBF, 01KO0101) and CJK-Netz (Forschungsnetz zur Verbesserung der Früh- und Differentialdiagnose der CJK und rasch progressiver Demenzen, BMBF 01 610 301) to Inga Zerr.

References

1. Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 1982;216:136–144. [PubMed]
2. Aguzzi A, Polymenidou M. Mammalian prion biology: one century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2004;116:313–327. [PubMed]
3. Fraser H, Dickinson AG. Pathogenesis of scrapie in the mouse: the role of the spleen. Nature. 1970;226:462–463. [PubMed]
4. Prinz M, Heikenwalder M, Junt T, Schwarz P, Glatzel M, et al. Positioning of follicular dendritic cells within the spleen controls prion neuroinvasion. Nature. 2003;425:957–962. [PubMed]
5. McKinley MP, Bolton DC, Prusiner SB. A protease-resistant protein is a structural component of the scrapie prion. Cell. 1983;35:57–62. [PubMed]
6. Silveira JR, Raymond GJ, Hughson AG, Race RE, Sim VL, et al. The most infectious prion protein particles. Nature. 2005;437:257–261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Rappaport EB. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology. 1987;37:1520–1522. [PubMed]
8. Bernoulli C, Siegfried J, Baumgartner G, Regli F, Rabinowicz T, et al. Danger of accidental person-to-person transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by surgery. Lancet. 1977;1:478–479. [PubMed]
9. Llewelyn CA, Hewitt PE, Knight RS, Amar K, Cousens S, et al. Possible transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Lancet. 2004;363:417–421. [PubMed]
10. Peden AH, Head MW, Ritchie DL, Bell JE, Ironside JW. Preclinical vCJD after blood transfusion in a PRNP codon 129 heterozygous patient. Lancet. 2004;364:527–529. [PubMed]
11. Castilla J, Saa P, Soto C. Detection of prions in blood. Nat Med. 2005;11:982–985. [PubMed]
12. Jimi T, Wakayama Y, Shibuya S, Nakata H, Tomaru T, et al. High levels of nervous system-specific proteins in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with early stage Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Clin Chim Acta. 1992;211:37–46. [PubMed]
13. Hsich G, Kenney K, Gibbs CJ, Lee KH, Harrington MG. The 14-3-3 brain protein in cerebrospinal fluid as a marker for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:924–930. [PubMed]
14. Sanchez-Juan P, Green A, Ladogana A, Cuadrado-Corrales N, Saanchez-Valle R, et al. CSF tests in the differential diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology. 2006;67:637–643. [PubMed]
15. Sanchez JC, Guillaume E, Lescuyer P, Allard L, Carrette O, et al. Cystatin C as a potential cerebrospinal fluid marker for the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Proteomics. 2004;4:2229–2233. [PubMed]
16. Piubelli C, Fiorini M, Zanusso G, Milli A, Fasoli E, et al. Searching for markers of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in cerebrospinal fluid by two-dimensional mapping. Proteomics. 2006;6(Suppl 1):S256–261. [PubMed]
17. Abraham CR, Selkoe DJ, Potter H. Immunochemical identification of the serine protease inhibitor alpha 1-antichymotrypsin in the brain amyloid deposits of Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 1988;52:487–501. [PubMed]
18. Abraham CR, Shirahama T, Potter H. Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin is associated solely with amyloid deposits containing the beta-protein. Amyloid and cell localization of alpha 1-antichymotrypsin. Neurobiol Aging. 1990;11:123–129. [PubMed]
19. Wang X, DeKosky ST, Ikonomovic MD, Kamboh MI. Distribution of plasma alpha 1-antichymotrypsin levels in Alzheimer disease patients and controls and their genetic controls. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23:377–382. [PubMed]
20. DeKosky ST, Ikonomovic MD, Wang X, Farlow M, Wisniewski S, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid alpha1-antichymotrypsin levels in Alzheimer's disease: correlation with cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:81–90. [PubMed]
21. Sun YX, Minthon L, Wallmark A, Warkentin S, Blennow K, et al. Inflammatory markers in matched plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003;16:136–144. [PubMed]
22. Licastro F, Parnetti L, Morini MC, Davis LJ, Cucinotta D, et al. Acute phase reactant alpha 1-antichymotrypsin is increased in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with probable Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1995;9:112–118. [PubMed]
23. Duguid JR, Rohwer RG, Seed B. Isolation of cDNAs of scrapie-modulated RNAs by subtractive hybridization of a cDNA library. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:5738–5742. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Duguid JR, Dinauer MC. Library subtraction of in vitro cDNA libraries to identify differentially expressed genes in scrapie infection. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:2789–2792. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Diedrich JF, Minnigan H, Carp RI, Whitaker JN, Race R, et al. Neuropathological changes in scrapie and Alzheimer's disease are associated with increased expression of apolipoprotein E and cathepsin D in astrocytes. J Virol. 1991;65:4759–4768. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Baker CA, Manuelidis L. Unique inflammatory RNA profiles of microglia in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:675–679. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Brown AR, Webb J, Rebus S, Williams A, Fazakerley JK. Identification of up-regulated genes by array analysis in scrapie-infected mouse brains. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2004;30:555–567. [PubMed]
28. Trevisan A. Concentration adjustment of spot samples in analysis of urinary xenobiotic metabolites. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17:637–642. [PubMed]
29. Pirttila T, Mehta PD, Frey H, Wisniewski HM. Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin and IL-1 beta are not increased in CSF or serum in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1994;15:313–317. [PubMed]
30. Kalman J, Marki-Zay J, Juhasz A, Santha A, Dux L, et al. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid cystatin C levels in vascular and Alzheimer's dementia. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;101:279–282. [PubMed]
31. Irani DN, Anderson C, Gundry R, Cotter R, Moore S, et al. Cleavage of cystatin C in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:237–247. [PubMed]
32. Halimi M, Dayan-Amouyal Y, Kariv-Inbal Z, Friedman-Levi Y, Mayer-Sonnenfeld T, et al. Prion urine comprises a glycosaminoglycan-light chain IgG complex that can be stained by Congo red. J Virol Methods. 2006;133:205–210. [PubMed]
33. Kariv-Inbal Z, Halimi M, Dayan Y, Engelstein R, Gabizon R. Characterization of light chain immunoglobulin in urine from animals and humans infected with prion diseases. J Neuroimmunol. 2005;162:12–18. [PubMed]
34. Serban A, Legname G, Hansen K, Kovaleva N, Prusiner SB. Immunoglobulins in urine of hamsters with scrapie. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48817–48820. [PubMed]
35. Tan GD, Lewis AV, James TJ, Altmann P, Taylor RP, et al. Clinical usefulness of cystatin C for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes: reproducibility and accuracy compared with standard measures and iohexol clearance. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2004–2009. [PubMed]
36. Kaeser PS, Klein MA, Schwarz P, Aguzzi A. Efficient lymphoreticular prion propagation requires PrP(c) in stromal and hematopoietic cells. J Virol. 2001;75:7097–7106. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Li C, Hung Wong W. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application. Genome Biol. 2001;2:RESEARCH0032. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Miele G, MacRae L, McBride D, Manson J, Clinton M. Elimination of false positives generated through PCR re-amplification of differential display cDNA. Biotechniques. 1998;25:138–144. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...