![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA Evolution From the Cover Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica aDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469; bGreen Plant Institute, Seoul National University, Gwonseon, Suwon, Gyeonggi 441-853, Korea; cSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469; dDepartment of Biological Sciences and the Roy J. Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324; and eDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mrumpho/at/umit.maine.edu Edited by Lynn Margulis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, and approved September 17, 2008 Author contributions: M.E.R. and J.R.M. designed research; J.M.W., J.L., and K.K. performed research; J.L., M.S.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; K.K., D.B., A.M., and J.R.M. analyzed data; and M.E.R. wrote the paper. Received June 9, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The sea slug Elysia chlorotica acquires plastids by ingestion of its algal food source Vaucheria litorea. Organelles are sequestered in the mollusc's digestive epithelium, where they photosynthesize for months in the absence of algal nucleocytoplasm. This is perplexing because plastid metabolism depends on the nuclear genome for >90% of the needed proteins. Two possible explanations for the persistence of photosynthesis in the sea slug are (i) the ability of V. litorea plastids to retain genetic autonomy and/or (ii) more likely, the mollusc provides the essential plastid proteins. Under the latter scenario, genes supporting photosynthesis have been acquired by the animal via horizontal gene transfer and the encoded proteins are retargeted to the plastid. We sequenced the plastid genome and confirmed that it lacks the full complement of genes required for photosynthesis. In support of the second scenario, we demonstrated that a nuclear gene of oxygenic photosynthesis, psbO, is expressed in the sea slug and has integrated into the germline. The source of psbO in the sea slug is V. litorea because this sequence is identical from the predator and prey genomes. Evidence that the transferred gene has integrated into sea slug nuclear DNA comes from the finding of a highly diverged psbO 3′ flanking sequence in the algal and mollusc nuclear homologues and gene absence from the mitochondrial genome of E. chlorotica. We demonstrate that foreign organelle retention generates metabolic novelty (“green animals”) and is explained by anastomosis of distinct branches of the tree of life driven by predation and horizontal gene transfer. Keywords: symbiosis, Vaucheria litorea, evolution, plastid, stramenopile Symbiotic associations and their related gene transfer events are postulated to contribute significantly to evolutionary innovation and biodiversity. This comes from extensive analysis of organelles such as plastids (e.g., chloroplasts) that originated via primary endosymbiosis of a free-living cyanobacterium (1, 2). The cyanobacterial genome was greatly reduced by endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT) to the host nucleus and wholesale gene loss, giving rise to the primary lineages of plants and green algae (streptophytes and chlorophytes), red algae (rhodophytes), and glaucophytes (3–6) [see the scheme in supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. The diverse group of secondary or “complex” algae (e.g., chromalveolates, euglenids), in turn, arose by secondary endosymbiosis—the uptake of a eukaryotic alga (green or red lineage) by a heterotrophic eukaryotic host. In this case, in addition to EGT, transfer of genes between the unrelated organisms by lateral or horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and loss of genes occurred as a result of the “merger” of the two nuclei (host and endosymbiont) (7). As a result of primary and secondary endosymbiosis, plastid genomes (ptDNAs) encode less than 10% of the predicted 1,000 to 5,000 proteins required to sustain the metabolic capacity of the plastid (8, 9). Examples of HGT between unrelated or nonmating species are abundant among prokaryotes (10, 11) but less so between prokaryotes and unicellular (12–14) or multicellular eukaryotes (15–20). Most of these latter examples are associated with parasitism or phagotrophy, including the elegant studies of HGT from the α-proteobacteria Wolbachia to insects and nematodes (16–18), and the finding of rhizobial-like genes in plant parasitic nematodes (19, 20). The exchange of genetic material between two eukaryotes is extremely rare, or at least not well documented to date. The best-studied cases include the transfer of mitochondrial DNA from achlorophyllous or epiphytic plants to the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) of their closely related photosynthetic hosts (21), the exchange of transposons between two animal (22) or two plant (23) species, and the presence of plant genes in plant parasitic nematodes (in addition to the rhizobial genes discussed previously), which are hypothesized to be “defense” genes whose products protect the parasite from host detection (20). The sacoglossan mollusc (sea slug) Elysia chlorotica represents a unique model system to study the potential for interdomain HGT between two multicellular eukaryotes—in this case, from a filamentous secondary (heterokont) alga (Vaucheria litorea) to a mollusc. This emerald green sea slug owes its coloring and photosynthetic ability to plastids acquired during herbivorous feeding (24–29). The plastids do not undergo division in the sea slug and are sequestered intracellularly in cells lining the finely divided digestive diverticula. The plastids continue to carry out photosynthesis, providing the sea slug with energy and carbon during its approximately 10-month life span (27, 28). Long-term plastid activity continues despite the absence of algal nuclei (27, 29), and hence a source of nuclear-encoded plastid-targeted proteins. We hypothesize that the algal nuclear genes encoding essential plastid proteins are present in the sea slug, presumably as a result of HGT. Here, we present evidence for such interdomain HGT of psbO, a nuclear gene encoding the plastid manganese-stabilizing protein (MSP = PsbO). MSP is a subunit of the photosystem II complex associated with photosynthetic oxygen evolution (30, 31), which is, unquestionably, the most important enzyme complex of oxygenic life. Results and Discussion Plastid Genetic Autonomy. The plastids in E. chlorotica are not transmitted vertically; rather, they must be acquired with each generation early in development to ensure maturation to the adult sea slug (32). Laboratory coculturing studies were carried out to establish that the alga V. litorea, a derived heterokont alga that contains secondary plastids of red algal origin (33) (Fig. S1), was the sole source of plastids in the sea slugs (Fig. 1
Examining the genetic autonomy of V. litorea ptDNA revealed the absence of the major core protein of the oxygen evolving complex of photosystem II, MSP (encoded by psbO). MSP has been reported to be critical to the stability of the water-splitting reaction of photosynthesis that generates atmospheric oxygen (30, 31). The evolutionary conservation of this reaction is demonstrated by the presence of MSP in all oxygenic photosynthetic organisms (30). Likewise, animal genomes have never been shown to contain psbO; hence, MSP cannot be made by the sea slug in the absence of HGT. We have previously demonstrated that oxygen evolution is linked to photosynthetic electron transport in the sea slug for at least 5 months after being removed from its algal prey (27), and photosystem II is generally highly susceptible to photo-oxidative damage requiring de novo synthesis and reassembly of its subunits (38, 39). For these reasons, we targeted psbO for HGT from V. litorea to E. chlorotica. HGT and Expression of psbO. Heterologous degenerate primers (Table S2) were designed based on alignments of published psbO sequences to amplify an internal fragment using reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. A 452-bp fragment was amplified from both algal and sea slug cDNA (5 months after algal feeding) (Fig. 3
Although it had been several months since the sea slugs had been in contact with any algal prey, the possibility of algal nuclei remaining in the gut of the sea slug and contaminating the total genomic DNA preparation was eliminated by carrying out the same PCR on sea slug egg DNA. Because plastids are not inherited in E. chlorotica, eggs provide a source of animal DNA and RNA that is free of algal contamination (27). Amplification of the sea slug egg DNA with the same primers resulted in a 963-bp fragment (Fig. 3 The identical translated MSP amino acid sequences for both V. litorea and E. chlorotica (Fig. 3 Recently, it was reported that nuclear genes encoding plastid-localized light harvesting complex proteins (fcp, lhcv1, and lhcv2) have also been transferred from V. litorea to E. chlorotica (45). Using a similar PCR approach, identical nucleotide sequences were reported for sea slug and algal fcp and lhcv1, and only a single base substitution was found between larval lhcv2 and adult sea slug or alga lhcv2. Although evidence from Southern blotting has not been achieved in the study reported here or for the light harvesting complex protein genes (45), we were able to obtain sequence information using genome walking for the 3′ untranslated flanking region of the psbO gene from both algal DNA and sea slug egg DNA. A nested gene-specific primer coupled with an adapter-specific primer (Table S2) yielded a 3′ flanking sequence from both organisms that was identical for the first 81bp corresponding to the 3′ end of the psbO gene and ending with the stop codon (Fig. S4). This sequence was followed by a highly diverged sequence corresponding to the 3′ untranslated region in each genome. These results support the interdomain transfer of an algal gene to a mollusc, its expression in the foreign host, and also that the gene has been inserted into the germline, even though the plastids are not yet transmitted vertically in the sea slug. Mechanism and Site of Integration of Transferred Genes. Similar to many other phagocytic or parasitic relations that lead to presumptive HGT events, the E. chlorotica/V. litorea plastid endosymbiosis involves intimate physical contact between predator and prey. During the sea slug's phagocytic feeding, the algal nuclei come into direct physical contact with the sea slug digestive epithelium. Upon nuclear rupture in the gut, pieces of algal chromosomal DNA (and possibly transcripts) may have been randomly transferred by “bulk transfer” or viral transmission (46) to the sea slug. Two potential sites for insertion of foreign genes in the sea slug are the nuclear genome and the mtDNA. Mitochondrion-to-mitochondrion gene transfer is now recognized as a dominant mode of HGT in plants because of the larger and more plastic mtDNAs in these taxa (21). The smaller compact animal or metazoan mitochondrion genome is generally believed to be a poorer target for foreign gene insertion. However, some basal metazoans do exhibit greater variation in mtDNA size and gene content (47). This includes multiple examples of HGT of group I intron sequences (normally not found in animals) into the mtDNA of a sponge (48), a sea anemone (49), and a coral (50). To determine if the mtDNA of E. chlorotica serves as a target for any foreign genes, including psbO, we used PCR and primer walking to obtain the complete sequence and map the 14,132-bp mtDNA from sea slug eggs (Fig. 4
Conclusions Molecular evidence is presented supporting eukaryotic multicellular interdomain HGT (including into the germline) using a mollusc model and expression of an essential algal nuclear gene required for photosynthesis. Many questions remain to be answered, however; for example, the chromosomal location and additional flanking sequences of the psbO gene in the sea slug. Key will be to establish how this gene was activated in the mollusc and to identify the mechanism of plastid protein targeting. It is also very likely that HGT contributes to the long-term survival and functioning of V. litorea plastids in E. chlorotica and that many more algal nuclear genes have been transferred in the sea slug. In light of these findings, the prospect of natural HGT taking place between distantly related organisms, especially with any physical contact, must be considered formally possible. This is especially true in the context of genetically modified organisms. The implications for evolution and speciation through acquisition of foreign parts and selected genes to produce new lineages, as proposed by Margulis (2), are heightened by this unusual photosynthetic mollusc. Methods Experimental Materials. E. chlorotica was collected from Martha's Vineyard Island in Massachusetts and maintained without algae in aquaria containing aerated artificial seawater (925 mosmol; Instant Ocean, Aquarium Systems) at 12 °C during a 14-h photoperiod (27). After 3 months, eggs produced by E. chlorotica were used to initiate culturing experiments as described in SI Methods. V. litorea CCMP2940 filaments were maintained in a modified f/2 medium (27). Nucleic Acid Preparation. DNA and RNA were isolated from sea slugs (5 months after feeding or collection), sea slug eggs, and algal filaments using DNAzol or DNAzol extra strength (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) and the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen), respectively, unless noted differently. RNase and DNase were added during the extraction process for DNA and RNA, respectively, and negative controls were run on each. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II ribonuclease H− RT (Invitrogen) and oligo d(T) priming on DNase-treated RNA. PCR Amplification and Northern Blotting. Degenerate primers (psbO R and psbO L2; see Table S2) were designed to amplify an internal fragment of V. litorea psbO based on the conserved regions of several heterokont and red alga psbO sequences (for list, see SI Methods). This 452-bp psbO fragment was then used as a probe for Northern blot analysis with the Northern Max kit (Ambion) and RediprimeII random prime labeling system (Amersham Biosciences). RACE and Phylogenetic Analysis of psbO. The complete V. litorea psbO gene was obtained by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) using the Gene-Racer Kit (Invitrogen) and primers listed in Table S2. Homologous primers (psbO L5 and psbO R8) were then designed to amplify a larger (963-bp) internal fragment of the V. litorea psbO cDNA. Phylogenetic analysis of psbO (MSP) was based on amino acid sequences of 25 mature proteins (for list, see SI Methods) and carried out using maximum parsimony in PAUP 4.0b10 (41). ptDNA Sequencing. ptDNA was purified from V. litorea filaments as described (51). ptDNA was digested with the restriction endonucleases PstI, HindIII, and EcoRI. The PstI and HindIII fragments were cloned, and a restriction site map using all three enzymes was produced as described by Lehman and Manhart (52). A total of 104 kb was obtained from cloned restriction fragments. The remainder of the genome (11 kb) was obtained by PCR amplification (53). Thirty-eight oligonucleotide primers were used to fill gaps between cloned restriction fragments and to check fragment connections, using all possible combinations of these primers. Fragments were sequenced by primer walking (53). Genome Walking. Clontech's Genome Walking Kit was used with gene-specific and adapter primers (sequences presented in Table S2) to amplify the 3′ end of the psbO gene and the flanking untranslated region using algal DNA and sea slug egg DNA (see SI Methods for additional details). mtDNA Sequencing. Universal primers (ref. 54; Table S3) were used to amplify fragments of the mitochondrial rrnL, cob, and cox1 regions from sea slug egg DNA and then in various combinations to amplify the entire mtDNA. The mitochondrial sequence was annotated using Dual Organellar GenoMe Annotator (DOGMA) (55), and the map was drawn using OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) (56). Additional information, including analysis for HGT, is provided in SI Methods. Supporting Information
Acknowledgments. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants IBN-9808904 (M.R. and J.M.) and IOS-0726178 (M.R. and M.T.); the American Society of Plant Biologists' Education Foundation (M.R. and M.T.); the Maine Technology Institute (M.R.); Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Korean Government, Korea Research Foundation (J.L.); the National Institutes of Health (grant R01ES013679 to D.B.), and the University of Maine (M.R.). This is manuscript no. 3024 of the Maine Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station Hatch Project no. ME08361-08MRF (NC 1168). Footnotes The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0804968105/DCSupplemental. References 1. Martin W, Kowallik KV. Annotated English translation of Mereschkowsky's 1905 paper Über Natur und Ursprung der Chromatophoren im Pflanzenreiche. Eur J Phycol. 1999;34:287–295. 2. Margulis L, Sagan D. Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2003. 3. Martin W. Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: Frequent and in big chunks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8612–8614. [PubMed] 4. Reyes-Prieto A, Weber AP, Bhattacharya D. The origin and establishment of the plastid in algae and plants. Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:147–168. [PubMed] 5. Margulis L. Origin of Eukaryotic Cells. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ Press; 1970. 6. Mulkidjanian AY, et al. The cyanobacterial genome core and the origin of photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:13126–13131. [PubMed] 7. Lane CE, Archibald JM. The eukaryotic tree of life: Endosymbiosis takes its TOL. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23:268–275. [PubMed] 8. Martin W, et al. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12246–12251. [PubMed] 9. Richly E, Leister D. An improved prediction of chloroplast proteins reveals diversities and commonalities in the chloroplast proteomes of Arabidopsis and rice. Gene. 2004;329:11–16. [PubMed] 10. Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Aravind L. Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:709–742. [PubMed] 11. Dagan T, Martin W. Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:870–875. [PubMed] 12. Andersson JO. Lateral gene transfer in eukaryotes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:1182–1197. [PubMed] 13. Loftus B, et al. The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nature. 2005;33:865–868. [PubMed] 14. Nosenko T, Bhattacharya D. Horizontal gene transfer in chromalveolates. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:173. [PubMed] 15. Starcevic A, et al. Enzymes of the shikimic acid pathway encoded in the genome of a basal metazoan, Nematostella vectensis, have microbial origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:2533–2537. [PubMed] 16. Nikoh N, et al. Wolbachia genome integrated in an insect chromosome: evolution and fate of laterally transferred endosymbiont genes. Genome Res. 2008;18:272–280. [PubMed] 17. Fenn K, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the Wolbachia of nematodes and arthropods. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e94. [PubMed] 18. Dunning-Hotopp JC, et al. Widespread lateral gene transfer from intracellular bacteria to multicellular eukaryotes. Science. 2007;317:1753–1756. [PubMed] 19. Scholl EH, Thorne JL, McCarter JP, Bird DMcK. Horizontally transferred genes in plant-parasitic nematodes: A high-throughput genomic approach. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R39. [PubMed] 20. Wasmuth J, Schmid R, Hedley A, Blaxter M. On the extent and origins of genic novelty in the Phylum Nematoda. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e258. [PubMed] 21. Richardson AO, Palmer JD. Horizontal gene transfer in plants. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:1–9. [PubMed] 22. Lampe DJ, Witherspoon DJ, Soto-Adames FN, Robertson HM. Recent horizontal transfer of Mellifera subfamily mariner transposons into insect lineages representing four different orders shows that selection acts only during horizontal transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:554–562. [PubMed] 23. Roulin A, Piegu B, Wing RA, Panaud O. Evidence of multiple horizontal transfers of the long terminal repeat retrotransposon RIRE1 within the genus Oryza. Plant J. 2008;53:950–959. [PubMed] 24. Trench RK. Of ‘leaves that crawl’: Functional chloroplasts in animal cells. In: Jennings DH, editor. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. London: Cambridge Univ Press; 1975. pp. 229–265. 25. Rumpho ME, Summer EJ, Manhart JR. Solar-powered sea slugs. Mollusc/algal chloroplast symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2000;123:29–38. [PubMed] 26. Rumpho ME, Dastoor FP, Manhart JR, Lee J. In: Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration—The Structure and Function of Plastids. Wise RR, Hoober JK, editors. Berlin: Springer; 2006. pp. 451–473. 27. Green BJ, et al. Mollusc-algal chloroplast endosymbiosis: Photosynthesis, thylakoid protein maintenance, and chloroplast gene expression continue for many months in the absence of the algal nucleus. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:331–342. [PubMed] 28. Rumpho ME, Summer EJ, Green BJ, Fox TC, Manhart JR. Mollusc/algal chloroplast symbiosis: How can isolated chloroplasts continue to function for months in the cytosol of a sea slug in the absence of an algal nucleus? Zoology. 2001;104:303–312. [PubMed] 29. Mujer CV, Andrews DL, Manhart JR, Pierce SK, Rumpho ME. Chloroplast genes are expressed during intracellular symbiotic association of Vaucheria litorea plastids with the sea slug Elysia chlorotica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:12333–12338. [PubMed] 30. De Las Rivas J, Barber J. Analysis of the structure of the PsbO protein and its implications. Photosynth Res. 2004;81:329–343. [PubMed] 31. Roose JL, Wegener KM, Pakrasi HB. The extrinsic proteins of photosystem II. Photosynth Res. 2007;92:369–387. [PubMed] 32. West HH, Harrigan J, Pierce SK. Hybridization of two populations of a marine opistobranch with different development patterns. Veliger. 1984;26:199–206. 33. Lee RE. In: Phycology. Lee RE, editor. New York: Cambridge Univ Press; 1989. pp. 507–522. 34. Oudot-Le Secq MP, et al. Chloroplast genomes of the diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana: Comparison with other plastid genomes of the red lineage. Mol Genet Gen. 2007;277:427–439. 35. Cattolico RA, et al. Chloroplast genome sequencing analysis of Heterosigma akashiwo CCMP452 (West Atlantic) and NIES293 (West Pacific) strains. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:211. [PubMed] 36. Paquin B, Kathe SD, Nierzwicki-Bauer SA, Shub DA. Origin and evolution of group I introns in cyanobacterial tRNA genes. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6798–6806. [PubMed] 37. Reith M, Munholland JA. High-resolution gene map of the chloroplast genome of the red alga Porphyra purpurea. Plant Cell. 1993;5:464–475. 38. Roose JL, Kashino Y, Pakrasi HB. The PsbQ protein defines cyanobacterial photosystem II complexes with highest activity and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:2548–2553. [PubMed] 39. Andersson B, Aro E-M. Photodamage and D1 protein turnover in photosystem II. In: Andersson B, Aro E-M, editors. Regulation of Photosynthesis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 2001. pp. 377–393. 40. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. 41. Swofford DL, et al. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol. 2001;50:525–539. [PubMed] 42. Westerlund I, von Heijne G, Emanuelsson O. LumenP—A neural network predictor for protein localization in the thylakoid lumen. Protein Sci. 2003;12:2360–2366. [PubMed] 43. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP, and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:953–971. [PubMed] 44. Chaal BK, Green BR. Protein import pathways in ‘complex’ chloroplasts derived from secondary endosymbiosis involving a red algal ancestor. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;57:333–342. [PubMed] 45. Pierce SK, Curtis NE, Hanten JJ, Boerner SL, Schwartz JA. Transfer, integration and expression of functional nuclear genes between multicellular species. Symbiosis. 2007;43:57–64. 46. Pierce SK, Maugel TK, Rumpho ME, Hanten JJ, Mondy WL. Annual viral expression in a sea slug population: Life cycle control and symbiotic chloroplast maintenance. Biol Bull. 1999;197:1–6. 47. Lavrov DV. Key transitions in animal evolution: A mitochondrial DNA perspective. Integr Comp Biol. 2007;47:734–743. 48. Rot C, Goldfarb I, Ilan M, Huchon D. Putative cross-kingdom horizontal gene transfer in sponge (Porifera) mitochondria. BMC Evol Biol. 2006;6:71. [PubMed] 49. Beagley CT, Okada NA, Wolstenholme DR. Two mitochondrial group I introns in a metazoan, the sea anemone Metridium senile: One intron contains genes for subunits 1 and 3 of NADH dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:5619–5623. [PubMed] 50. van Oppen MJH, et al. The mitochondrial genome of Acropora tenuis (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) contains a large group I intron and a candidate control region. J Mol Evol. 2002;55:1–13. [PubMed] 51. Palmer JD. Plastid chromosomes: Structure and evolution. In: Bogorad L, Vasil IK, editors. The Molecular Biology of Plastids. San Diego: Academic; 1991. pp. 5–53. 52. Lehman RL, Manhart JR. Preliminary comparison of restriction fragment patterns in the genus Caulerpa (Chlorophyta) and the unique structure of the chloroplast genome of Caulera sertularioides. J Phycol. 1997;33:1055–1062. 53. Lee J, Manhart JR. Four embryophyte introns and psbB operon indicate Chlorokybus as a basal streptophyte lineage. Algae. 2002;17:53–58. 54. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh R, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed] 55. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3252–3255. [PubMed] 56. Lohse M, Drechsel O, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW)—A tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr Genet. 2007;52:267–274. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22; 100(15):8612-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Annu Rev Genet. 2007; 41():147-68.
[Annu Rev Genet. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 29; 103(35):13126-31.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006]Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 May; 23(5):268-75.
[Trends Ecol Evol. 2008]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 17; 99(19):12246-51.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001; 55():709-42.
[Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 16; 104(3):870-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005 Jun; 62(11):1182-97.
[Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005]Nature. 2005 Feb 24; 433(7028):865-8.
[Nature. 2005]BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Sep 25; 7():173.
[BMC Evol Biol. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2000 May; 123(1):29-38.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Plant Physiol. 2000 Sep; 124(1):331-42.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Zoology (Jena). 2001; 104(3-4):303-12.
[Zoology (Jena). 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29; 93(22):12333-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Photosynth Res. 2004; 81(3):329-43.
[Photosynth Res. 2004]BMC Genomics. 2008 May 8; 9():211.
[BMC Genomics. 2008]J Bacteriol. 1997 Nov; 179(21):6798-806.
[J Bacteriol. 1997]Photosynth Res. 2004; 81(3):329-43.
[Photosynth Res. 2004]Photosynth Res. 2007 Jun; 92(3):369-87.
[Photosynth Res. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2000 Sep; 124(1):331-42.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13; 104(7):2548-53.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2000 Sep; 124(1):331-42.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Syst Biol. 2001 Aug; 50(4):525-39.
[Syst Biol. 2001]Protein Sci. 2003 Oct; 12(10):2360-6.
[Protein Sci. 2003]Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(4):953-71.
[Nat Protoc. 2007]Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Feb; 57(3):333-42.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2005]Zoology (Jena). 2001; 104(3-4):303-12.
[Zoology (Jena). 2001]J Exp Bot. 2007; 58(1):1-9.
[J Exp Bot. 2007]BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Sep 14; 6():71.
[BMC Evol Biol. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28; 93(11):5619-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]J Mol Evol. 2002 Jul; 55(1):1-13.
[J Mol Evol. 2002]Plant Physiol. 2000 Sep; 124(1):331-42.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Syst Biol. 2001 Aug; 50(4):525-39.
[Syst Biol. 2001]Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct; 3(5):294-9.
[Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994]Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 22; 20(17):3252-5.
[Bioinformatics. 2004]Curr Genet. 2007 Nov; 52(5-6):267-74.
[Curr Genet. 2007]