|
|
PLoS Genet. 2008 November; 4(11): e1000267. Published online 2008 November 21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000267. | PMCID: PMC2580034 |
Copyright Hyppa et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Indistinguishable Landscapes of Meiotic DNA Breaks in rad50+ and rad50S Strains of Fission Yeast Revealed by a Novel rad50+ Recombination Intermediate Randy W. Hyppa, Gareth A. Cromie, and Gerald R. Smith* Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America Gregory P. Copenhaver, Editor The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America Received August 18, 2008; Accepted October 16, 2008. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rec12 protein, the homolog of Spo11 in other organisms, initiates meiotic recombination by creating DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and becoming covalently linked to the DNA ends of the break. This protein–DNA linkage has previously been detected only in mutants such as rad50S in which break repair is impeded and DSBs accumulate. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DSB distribution in a rad50S mutant is markedly different from that in wild-type (RAD50) meiosis, and it was suggested that this might also be true for other organisms. Here, we show that we can detect Rec12-DNA linkages in Sc. pombe rad50+ cells, which are proficient for DSB repair. In contrast to the results from Sa. cerevisiae, genome-wide microarray analysis of Rec12-DNA reveals indistinguishable meiotic DSB distributions in rad50+ and rad50S strains of Sc. pombe. These results confirm our earlier findings describing the occurrence of widely spaced DSBs primarily in large intergenic regions of DNA and demonstrate the relevance and usefulness of fission yeast studies employing rad50S. We propose that the differential behavior of rad50S strains reflects a major difference in DSB regulation between the two species—specifically, the requirement for the Rad50-containing complex for DSB formation in budding yeast but not in fission yeast. Use of rad50S and related mutations may be a useful method for DSB analysis in other species. During meiosis, which creates haploid gametes from diploid cells, recombination between two homologous chromosomes increases genetic diversity and, in most organisms, is crucial for proper segregation of chromosomes into haploid nuclei. To better understand where recombination occurs and why it occurs there, we investigated in fission yeast the initiating step in recombination—formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A genome-wide DSB map is crucial to understand how DNA sequence and chromatin structure affect DSB formation and may help answer these questions in other organisms, including humans. Mutants in which DSBs accumulate are particularly useful for determining the DSB distribution. As recently reported, however, in budding yeast the DSB distribution in one such widely used mutant, rad50S, differs markedly from that in a dmc1 mutant, in which DSBs also accumulate and appear to have a more nearly wild-type distribution. We have detected in fission yeast a DNA–protein intermediate of recombination assumed to exist, but never before detected, in a recombination-proficient strain (rad50+). The distributions of this intermediate, and therefore those of DSBs, in rad50+ and rad50S strains are indistinguishable. rad50S-like mutations may also accurately reflect the wild-type DSB distribution in other species and may be particularly useful in species lacking Dmc1 orthologs. Sexual reproduction involves the fusion of two gametes to create diploid offspring with equal genetic contributions from each parent. To maintain the proper chromosome number (ploidy), it is therefore necessary for the gametes to be haploid. This is achieved via meiosis, where a single round of DNA replication is followed by two nuclear divisions: in the first division, homologous chromosomes (homologs) separate from each other (Meiosis I), followed in the second division by the separation of sister chromatids (Meiosis II). Meiotic recombination, a highly conserved feature of meiosis, creates between the homologs a physical connection that is necessary in most species for proper homolog segregation during Meiosis I. Before the first meiotic division, homologs become aligned and then intimately synapsed [1]. During this time meiotic recombination is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), introduced by Spo11 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae or its ortholog Rec12 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe [2]. The DNA ends undergo 5′ to 3′ resection, producing 3′ single-stranded (ss) ends capable of invading intact homologous DNA, with the invaded duplex serving as the template for new DNA synthesis [3]. Resolution of the joint DNA molecules can result in a reciprocal exchange of genetic information, called a crossover, which aids proper homolog segregation at Meiosis I. This exchange of genetic material is also beneficial in that it enhances the genetic diversity of the progeny. As a type II topoisomerase-like protein, Spo11 (or Rec12) breaks phosphodiester bonds in the two DNA strands and becomes covalently bound to each 5′ DNA end of the DSB [4], [5]. This DNA-protein linkage enables determination of where DSBs are made, by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of Spo11 or Rec12 and assay of the attached DNA, e.g. by tiling microarray hybridization. In wild-type cells the Spo11 protein is removed from the DNA end by endonuclease action before strand resection occurs [6]. In rad50S mutants, the bound Spo11 or Rec12 protein is not removed from the DNA ends, repair of the DSB by recombination is blocked, and the protein-bound DSBs accumulate [2]. This has facilitated genome-wide analysis of the DSB distribution in both fission and budding yeast strains with the rad50S mutation. These comprehensive DSB maps revealed in both organisms regions of DNA within which DSBs are made at high frequency, called DSB hotspots [5], 7. Two recent studies [8], [9] described a new technique for genome-wide mapping of DSBs that cast doubt on earlier results where a rad50S mutant was used. It had previously been observed that DSBs in S. cerevisiae strains with a rad50S mutation (or mutations in other genes with similar phenotypes, such as sae2Δ and mre11S) did not show in many regions of the genome the same DSB pattern as that in dmc1 Δ mutants [10]. In addition, the overall genetic map of recombination (crossovers) did not agree in certain intervals with the frequency of DSBs determined in rad50S strains [11]. This led Buhler et al. [8] and Blitzblau et al. [9] to develop a method that enriched for regions of ss DNA formed in a dmc1 mutant; dmc1 mutants lack a protein important for strand exchange, and DSBs with resected ends accumulate in these mutants. The enriched ss DNA was hybridized to a genome-wide tiling microarray of oligonucleotides to identify sites of DSBs. The results showed, in many but not all regions of the genome, a clear under-representation of DSB hotspots in rad50S-like mutants compared to the distributions in the wild type or dmc1Δ mutant, which appear similar by Southern blot analysis. Specifically, the intensity of breakage at some, but not all, DSB hotspots was greatly reduced in the rad50S-like mutants compared to that in the wild type or dmc1Δ mutant. The validity of DSB maps created with rad50S mutants, not only in S. cerevisiae but in other organisms as well, is therefore under new scrutiny. Our lab has reported that DSB hotspots in S. pombe are preferentially located in large intergenic regions and are widely-spaced – on average there are about 65 kb between hotspots – but these experiments were done with rad50S mutants [5], [12]. We wanted to know if a wild-type ( rad50+) strain has a DSB map similar to that seen in rad50S mutants. ChIP experiments to detect the Spo11-DNA covalently linked intermediates in RAD50 strains of budding yeast have not been successful [13], [14; M. Lichten, personal communication], apparently due to the short life-span of the hypothesized Spo11-DNA complexes. By contrast, in fission yeast we were able to detect and analyze the wild-type ( rad50+) Rec12-DNA complexes. To our knowledge, this is the first time that this protein-DNA intermediate has been detected in recombination-proficient cells. We report here that the locations of DSBs, measured as Rec12-DNA linkages, across the genome in S. pombe rad50+ meiosis are indistinguishable from those in rad50S strains, although the intensities are lower, as expected due to ongoing DSB repair in rad50+ strains. Therefore, conclusions from our earlier studies using the rad50S mutation are still valid: in particular, DSBs are separated by large distances and are preferentially located in large intergenic regions [5], [12]. However, the genetic recombination maps (crossover distributions) and physical maps (DSB distributions in rad50+ and rad50S strains) display non-congruence in S. pombe. We discuss the significance of these observations for studies of meiotic recombination in S. pombe and in other species, including humans. Meiotic DSB Hotspots Mapped by Southern Blots Are the Same in rad50+ and rad50S Strains We began our comparison of the DSB distributions in rad50+ and rad50S strains by assaying DSBs using standard Southern blots. rad50+ and rad50S strains were meiotically induced ( Figure S1), and the DNA was extracted and digested with NotI restriction enzyme to generate large DNA fragments, which were separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Previous Southern blot analyses of DNA from rad50+ and rad50S strains revealed the same meiotic DSB pattern on the 0.5 Mb NotI restriction fragment J, which includes the well-characterized DSB hotspot mbs1 [5], [12], [15]. Two additional NotI fragments were probed to strengthen this observation; these analyses were of the 0.5 Mb NotI fragment K ( and S2A) and the 1.2 Mb NotI fragment D ( and S2B). These results revealed that rad50+ strains have on each fragment multiple DSB sites at the same locations as those from a rad50S strain. As expected, in almost all cases the maximal level of the transient DSBs in the rad50+ strain was less than that in the rad50S strain, in which DSBs accumulate. At each hotspot site on these NotI fragments in a rad50+ strain there is a hotspot in the rad50S strain, and vice versa. We next compared DSB sites in a repair-deficient mutant other than rad50S in which DSBs accumulate. During meiotic recombination in S. pombe there are two mediator complexes that assist the strand exchange protein Rhp51 in strand invasion: Swi5-Sfr1 and Rhp55-Rhp57 [16], [17]. Mutants lacking either complex show reduced recombination and delayed DSB repair, and strains with a mutation in both complexes display recombination defects and spore viability as severe as an rhp51 null mutant [16], [18] but slightly better growth and meiotic induction than an rhp51 null mutant (RWH, unpublished data). Thus, the double swi5Δ rhp57Δ mutant is an ideal candidate for assaying defective DSB repair at a stage later than the rad50S repair defect, allowing for DSB accumulation in a non- rad50S strain. Southern blot analysis of NotI fragments K (), D (), and J (data not shown) from the swi5Δ rhp57Δ mutant revealed a DSB pattern similar to those seen in rad50+ and rad50S strains, except that the broken DNA persisted in rad50S and swi5Δ rhp57Δ mutants but was repaired in wild type. Thus, by Southern blot analysis in the rad50S mutant there is no lack of DSB sites that are present in other mutants, unlike the situation in S. cerevisiae, as noted above [8], [9]. ChIP Enrichment Shows Transient Rec12-DNA Covalent Linkage in rad50+ Strains Since Rec12 becomes covalently bound to the DNA ends at a meiotic DSB [5], ChIP of epitope-tagged Rec12 protein without exogenous cross-linking can identify the genomic loci where DSBs occur. Previous ChIP analysis of FLAG-tagged Rec12 in rad50S meiosis showed that DSB hotspots assayed by locus-specific PCR gave a meiosis-specific signal dependent on Rec12 ( i.e., DSB formation), while DSB coldspots gave no detectable signal [5]. We wanted to know if it was possible to repeat this analysis in a rad50+ meiosis, or if Rec12 was removed from the DNA too quickly to be detected, as appears to be the case in budding yeast [13], [14]. PCR analysis of two prominent DSB hotspots, ade6-3049 on chromosome III [19] and mbs1 on chromosome I, revealed that DNA isolated 3.5 h after induction of meiosis was considerably enriched by ChIP when compared to 0 h (uninduced) DNA, based on the relative abundance of PCR products. This was true for DNA from a rad50+ strain as well as from a rad50S strain, though as expected enrichment was lower in the rad50+ strain due to ongoing repair of the DSBs (). There was no detectable enrichment at the DSB coldspot ura1 ( and [5]). In addition, the enrichment at the hotspots in rad50+ was transient: very little signal was detected at 0 h (before DSB formation) or at 6 h after meiotic induction (after DSB repair). The maximal signal was at 3.5 h, which is about the time of maximal DSBs detectable by Southern blots in rad50+ strains ( and [5]). This contrasts with a rad50S meiosis, where the PCR assay detects high DNA enrichment at least to 6 h after meiotic induction [5], a reflection of Rec12 remaining bound and the DSBs not being repaired in rad50S meiosis. As an additional test for Rec12-DNA linkages in rad50+ strains, we treated meiotic extracts with a protease (or not, as a control) and extracted the material with phenol. Protein-linked DNA is removed from the aqueous phase by phenol extraction [20]. A significant fraction of the DNA at the mbs1 and ade6-3049 DSB hotspots was removed by phenol extraction, as expected for DNA covalently linked to Rec12 protein, unless the extracted material was treated with a protease before extraction. This was true for material from both rad50+ and rad50S strains ( Figure S3), and contrasts sharply with results from S. cerevisiae, in which no detectable DNA is removed by phenol extraction in RAD50 strains [20]. Our results show that a significant fraction of the DNA at DSB hotspots in S. pombe rad50+ strains remains linked to a protein, likely Rec12. Genome-Wide Distribution of Rec12-DNA ChIP in rad50+ Strains Is Coincident with That in rad50S Strains To extend these observations to the entire genome, we used a genome-wide microarray analysis similar to our previous analysis with rad50S strains [5]. We prepared Rec12-DNA samples from immunoprecipitated (IP) chromatin and from whole-cell extracts (WCE) prepared at 0 and 3.5 h in rad50+ meiosis and at 0 and 5 h in rad50S meiosis. These samples were amplified, differentially labeled, and hybridized to a tiling oligonucleotide microarray (~44,000 60-mers, “probes,” spaced approximately every 290 bp across ~12.5 Mb of the non-repetitive S. pombe genome). The relative frequency of Rec12-DNA linkage at each probe position was measured as the median-normalized ratio of IP signal to WCE signal. The 0 h data [log (IP/WCE) values] were normally distributed, as expected for random background data ( Figure S4). In contrast, a distinct subset of probes in both the 3.5 h rad50+ and 5 h rad50S data showed elevated non-normal ratios, reflecting genuine enrichment over background. The analysis below is focused on these enriched values. The data show that the sites of Rec12-DNA linkage, and hence the sites of meiotic DSBs, in a rad50+ meiosis almost completely coincide with those in a rad50S meiosis. The genomic intervals of NotI fragment K and NotI fragment D, analyzed for DSBs by Southern blot analysis (), are compared by microarray analysis in . There are no significant peaks of Rec12-DNA linkage in rad50+ that are not also in rad50S; this correspondence is true genome-wide, as well ( Figure S5). This result is dramatically different from that observed in S. cerevisiae, where multiple genomic regions show many more DSB hotspots in RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) meiosis than in rad50S meiosis, as measured by the enrichment for accumulated ss DNA ends [8], [9]. Within these regions, at many DSB hotspots seen in RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) the level of breakage in rad50S falls below the authors' definition of a hotspot. We note in particular that the DSB patterns surrounding the centromeres in rad50S and rad50+ strains are indistinguishable in S. pombe ( and S5) but markedly different in S. cerevisiae [8], [9]. Closer examination of one hotspot from each of NotI fragments K and D revealed that the shape of the enrichment peaks, considering non-background probes, was essentially identical for the rad50+ and rad50S datasets, but with ~3-fold less enrichment in the rad50+ experiment (). This 3-fold difference is consistent with comparisons of maximal meiotic DSB frequencies in rad50+ and rad50S strains by Southern blot analysis [5; unpublished data] and appears to hold true genome-wide (, S6A and S7A). The matching peak shapes indicate that the Rec12-DNA shear sizes, DSB positions, and relative DSB intensities are nearly identical in the rad50+ and rad50S experiments. This result rules out the possibility that the Rec12-DNA species detected by microarray hybridization in the rad50+ experiment involves a significantly different length of DNA than that in the rad50S experiment. More specifically, we can discount the Rec12-DNA species in the rad50+ experiment being a short Rec12-oligonucleotide released after DSB end-processing [6], rather than the Rec12-DNA intermediate first formed by Rec12 and accumulating in the rad50S background. In fact, such a short Rec12-oligonucleotide would not be amplified and hybridized in the procedure used here. As expected, the lengths of the two strands of DNA extending from one side of the DSBs at one hotspot to a common restriction site were similar ( Figure S8), suggesting that at least some of the 5′ ends remain full length ( i.e., attached to Rec12). All Detectable Meiotic DSB Hotspots in rad50+ Are Also Hotspots in rad50S We analyzed our genome-wide data on a probe-by-probe basis to determine if hotspots of DSBs were at the same positions in both rad50+ and rad50S; i.e., are the probes with high IP/WCE ratios in rad50+ also high in rad50S? For each of the ~44,000 probes on the microarray, the IP/WCE ratio from the 3.5 h rad50+ DNA was plotted against the IP/WCE ratio of the 5 h rad50S DNA; these are the times of maximal DSB levels in the two strains ( [5], [12]). Essentially every probe that showed enrichment (high normalized IP/WCE ratio) in one strain was enriched in the other ( and S6A). There is a clear quantitative, positive correlation between the IP/WCE ratios ( Figure S9A) of these enriched (DSB hotspot) probes across the two experimental conditions, consistent with the data in . Background probes showed no such quantitative correlation. Probes showing enrichment in the rad50S 5 h (induced) DNA ( i.e., DSB hotspot probes) showed, however, no significant enrichment in the rad50+ 0 h (non-induced) DNA (, S6B, and S9A), as expected since DSB hotspots are not apparent in the 0 h data ( and S5). The subset of enriched probes in the 5 h rad50S and 3.5 h rad50+ conditions was consistent across the two independent inductions of rad50S and rad50+ ( Figure S10). These data indicate that there are no obvious regions of the S. pombe genome where DSB hotspots occur in rad50+ but not in rad50S strains. Compared to the correlation between the S. pombe rad50+ and rad50S meiotic datasets, the correlation between the RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) and rad50S enrichment ratios of S. cerevisiae is much weaker ( Figures S6C, S6D, and S9B). Among probes showing enrichment, there are many probes that have a higher, and often much higher, enrichment ratio in RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) meiosis than in rad50S meiosis, as well as other probes that show similar high enrichment ratios in both. This is expected, given loci where DSBs are frequent in both RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) and rad50S meiosis and other loci where DSBs are frequent only in RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) [8], [9]. As another way of comparing the meiotically induced rad50S and rad50+ data from S. pombe, we identified regions of significant ChIP enrichment using ChIPOTle [21], with a p value cutoff of 0.001. Due to the accumulation of Rec12-DNA intermediates, Rec12 ChIP enrichment over background should be greater in the rad50S experiments. As the p value that ChIPOTle attaches to peaks is dependent on their degree of enrichment over background, peaks can be detected with greater sensitivity in the rad50S experiments. Therefore, for any given significance threshold, if the same pattern of DSBs occurs in both the rad50S and rad50+ experiments, we expect some peaks (the stronger ones) to be detected in both sets of experiments but other peaks (the weaker ones) to be detected only in the rad50S experiments. This is what we observed. Combining the two independent inductions ( Datasets S1 and S2), an average of 10.2% and 5.0% of the genome was enriched ( i.e., within ChIPOTle-determined peaks) in the 5 h rad50S and the 3.5 h rad50+ data, respectively, but 4.9% of the genome was enriched in both. Therefore, there is no significant class of peaks identified in the rad50+ data that do not have equivalents in the rad50S data. In contrast, in S. cerevisiae [8] 63% of the genome was enriched in the RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) strain, and 32% in the rad50S strain, but 31% of the genome was enriched in both. Therefore, in S. cerevisiae there is a significant class of probes that are enriched only in the RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) background, as well as probes that are enriched in both backgrounds. A simpler consideration of the ChIPOTle analysis leads to the same conclusion. In our S. pombe data, an average of 255 significant peaks was detected in the two 3.5 h rad50+ datasets, and 427 in the two 5 h rad50S datasets. Essentially all (94%) of the rad50+ peaks were present in the corresponding rad50S datasets ( i.e., the peaks overlap), but only 48% of rad50S peaks were present in the rad50+ dataset. That is, there are almost no peaks detectable in the rad50+ background that are not detected in the rad50S background. The larger number of peaks identified in the rad50S background is expected from the greater peak detection sensitivity of ChIPOTle using the rad50S dataset, as discussed above. For probes showing enrichment in either the 3.5 h rad50+ or 5 h rad50S datasets, the rad50S enrichment ratio is consistently ~3 fold higher than the rad50+ enrichment ratio ( Figure S7A). In comparison, the data from S. cerevisiae [8] look very different. Here, 95% of 2010 rad50S peaks overlap with RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) peaks but only 60% of 1816 RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) peaks overlap with rad50S peaks. That is, there is a substantial number of loci (hotspots) where significant DNA breakage is seen in the RAD50 ( dmc1Δ) strain but not in the rad50S strain, as well as other loci where significant breakage is seen in both strains ( Figure S7B). Our detection, for the first time, of Rec12-DNA covalent linkages in recombination-proficient ( rad50+) cells allowed us to compare the genome-wide distribution of these linkages, and hence meiotic DSBs, in rad50+ strains and the more thoroughly studied rad50S strains. Our results show that the genomic distributions of S. pombe meiotic DSBs in these strains are indistinguishable (, , , S2, S5, and [5], [12]). In addition to confirming our previous meiotic DSB map [5], our results have additional implications about the regulation of DSB formation and differences in this regulation among species, as discussed below. Different DSB Regulation by the MRN Complex in S. pombe and S. cerevisiae An analysis of DSBs by ChIP of the Spo11 protein in a rad50+ meiosis in budding yeast has not been successful [13], [14; M. Lichten, personal communication], presumably because Spo11 is rapidly removed from the DSB 5′ ends. The success of our Rec12-ChIP analysis in fission yeast rad50+ strains (, , and S5) suggests that the Rec12 protein remains linked to DNA for a longer period of time in fission yeast than does Spo11 in budding yeast. However, even in fission yeast, Rec12 appears to be removed in a rather short period – a DNA sample taken 30 min after the 3.5 h DNA sample studied here (, , and S5) and similarly analyzed on a microarray showed no discernible difference genome-wide from the 0 h pre-meiotic DNA sample (unpublished data). In addition, multiple assays for Rec12-DNA by PCR at selected loci show that the Rec12-DNA species diminishes substantially between 3.5 and 4 h ( and unpublished data). Thus, the first step of DSB repair (Rec12 removal) begins about 30 min after DSB formation (which occurs at about 3 h after meiotic induction) and about 30 min before joint DNA molecules (single Holliday junctions) are first detected [22]. The time between DSB formation and joint molecule detection in S. cerevisiae is also about 1 h [e.g., 23]. We infer that in S. pombe the Rec12-DNA complex persists until the nuclease for its removal, perhaps the MRN (Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1) complex, binds and acts on this intermediate. In S. cerevisiae this step may be very fast. Why does the rad50S mutation behave differently in these two yeasts? The answer may lie in the differential dependence on the MRN (MRX in S. cerevisiae) complex for DSB formation in these two distantly related yeasts. S. cerevisiae rad50Δ and mre11Δ mutants do not form DSBs [24], [25], whereas S. pombe rad32Δ ( mre11 homolog) and rad50Δ mutants form DSBs with the same kinetics as rad50S mutants, although none of these mutants repair the DSBs [26]. The dependence on MRX for DSB formation in budding yeast likely reflects its Spo11-dependent binding at sites of DSBs [13], where it is then also in position to quickly remove the Spo11 protein from the DNA. Since fission yeast lacks this MRN requirement for DSB formation, MRN may be recruited only after DSBs are formed, allowing for a greater life-span of Rec12-DNA complexes. The initial steps of DSB repair – the removal of Rec12 (Spo11) and resection to form invasive ss DNA ends [6] – by MRN and other proteins are thought to be similar in both organisms. The rad50S mutation commonly used in both organisms changes the same amino acid of the protein (Lys 81→Ile 81) [12], [18], [24], [27], but this rad50S mutant does not form the full number of DSBs in budding yeast [8], [9]. These observations lead us to suggest that in budding yeast, which requires MRX for DSB formation, the rad50S (K81I) mutant is incompetent (or less competent) compared to RAD50 to activate DSB formation at some sites or regions but not at others. Thus, not all hotspots are revealed in S. cerevisiae rad50S (K81I) strains [8], [9]. In dmc1 mutants, a more complete spectrum of hotspots would, in this view, be activated by the wild-type MRX complex, as observed [8], [9]. In contrast, the lack of MRN requirement for DSB formation in S. pombe may be the basis for the rad50S mutation having no discernible effect on the distribution of DSBs in fission yeast. The decision to make DSBs is made before MRN's meiotic activity on DNA, making MRN unnecessary for the formation – but not the processing – of meiotic DSBs. Thus, in S. pombe the entire spectrum of DSBs, with readily detectable Rec12-DNA complexes, is observed. In S. cerevisiae and other species in which Rad50 is required for DSB formation, rad50 mutants with an amino acid substitution other than Rad50 (K81I) [27] and that accumulate DSBs may also allow a full spectrum of DSBs to be observed. S. pombe DSB Map Is Non-Congruent with the Genetic Map Crossovers arising from meiotic recombination are much more uniformly distributed across the genomes of both fission yeast and budding yeast than are the sites of DSBs observed in rad50S strains [8], [11], [12], [15]. A recent study by Buhler et al. [8] determined that the non-congruence in S. cerevisiae is due at least in part to a lower DSB frequency and more restricted DSB distribution in a rad50S strain than in a dmc1Δ strain, which appears to be more representative of wild-type meiosis. Our results in wild-type ( rad50+) S. pombe meiosis reveal the same DSB pattern as that seen in earlier studies of rad50S mutants [5], [12]: meiotic DSBs are preferentially located in large intergenic DNA regions and are separated by long distances (~65 kb on average) where no DSBs are apparent. Studies of wild-type ( rad50+) meiosis have in the past been problematic, primarily because the repair of DSBs in wild-type strains prevents all of the meiotic DSBs from being analyzed and low-level breaks can be missed. While there may be low-level DSBs dispersed across the S. pombe genome and not detected in our analysis, it is clear that there are essentially no DSB hotspots in rad50+ that are not present in rad50S (, , and S5). In S. pombe, some intervals with no detectable DSBs nevertheless contain abundant crossovers [5], [12], [15]. The 0.5 Mb region of NotI fragment J on chromosome I has been extensively studied both genetically for crossovers and physically for DSBs [12]. The number of DSBs detected in this interval – about one DSB per four DNA molecules in a meiotic cell – is not enough to account for the crossovers that occur on this fragment – about one per meiotic cell – since there are about three times more intersister (genetically silent) exchanges than interhomolog exchanges, at least at the major DSB hotspot mbs1 on that fragment [15]. In the 57 kb res2 – ura1 subregion of NotI fragment J there are ~0.08 crossovers, over 10 times more than predicted by the <0.005 DSBs per meiotic tetrad [12; unpublished data]. It had been suggested that crossovers in such regions might arise from ss nicks [15], but since all meiotic crossovers are dependent on Rec12 [28], we would expect even sites of nicks to have Rec12 covalently linked to the DNA and therefore enriched by ChIP. Ludin et al. [29] analyzed by microarrays the genome-wide distribution of Rec12 after it was formaldehyde-crosslinked to DNA and found a more uniform distribution than we find for Rec12 self-linked to DNA. Although much of the Rec12 detected with formaldehyde-crosslinking does not make detectable DSBs, this population of Rec12 may nevertheless be required for crossovers in DSB-poor regions. Although the basis of the DSB–crossover discrepancy remains undetermined, our results rule out one explanation – that DSBs are underrepresented in rad50S strains. Suitability of rad50S Strains for DSB Analysis in Other Species Results from the DSB analysis of a dmc1Δ mutant in S. cerevisiae [8], [9] have brought into question the reliability of DSB maps generated using the rad50S mutation. Our results in S. pombe question whether these findings from budding yeast apply to other organisms. rad50S-like mutations may reveal the wild-type distribution in other species, particularly those in which Rad50 is not required for DSB formation, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, Coprinus cinereus, and perhaps Caenorhabditis elegans [30], [31], [32; M. Zolan, personal communication]. In species that appear not to have a Dmc1 ortholog a microarray analysis of DSBs performed with a rad50S-like mutant may be the most feasible method to reveal the DSB distribution. Our results indicate that in these cases the results may reflect those in wild type. Regardless of the genetic background used and methodology chosen, understanding where meiotic DSBs occur and what DNA characteristics influence DSB location remains an important question in understanding the regulation of meiotic recombination. S. pombe Strains Strains used were GP1979 ( h−/h − ade6-52/ade6-M26 lys3-37/+ +/ura1-171 pro1-1/+ pat1-114/pat1-114 end1-458/end1-458), GP3718 (h + ade6-3049 pat1-114 rad50S end1-458), GP6203 (h −/h − ade6-3049/ade6-3049 pat1-114/pat1-114 rad50S/rad50S rec12-201::6His-2FLAG/rec12-201::6His-2FLAG +/his4-239 lys4-95/+), and GP6232 (h −/h − ade6-3049/ade6-3049 pat1-114/pat1-114 rec12-201::6His-2FLAG/rec12-201::6His-2FLAG +/his4-239 lys4-95/+). Alleles were described previously [5], [18], [19], [26]. Meiotic DNA Preparation and Southern Blot Analysis To assess events in S. pombe meiosis, we used strains carrying the temperature-sensitive pat1-114 mutation, which affords high synchrony but has no detectable effect on DSB formation or location [5], [33]. Cultures were grown to mid log-phase and starved for nitrogen to arrest cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle; nitrogen was restored and the temperature raised to initiate meiosis. Cells were harvested, embedded in agarose plugs, and treated with enzymes to lyse the cells and to partially purify the DNA. After digestion with NotI restriction enzyme, the DNA was subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern blot hybridization. These methods are detailed elsewhere [12], [34]. The probe used on NotI fragment K ( and S2A) extends from bp 3600336 to bp 3601359 on chromosome I; the probe used on NotI fragment D ( and S2B) extends from bp 1025344 to bp 1026300 on chromosome I (accession # NC_003424.3). Preparation of Meiotic Chromatin, Rec12 ChIP, and Microarray Analysis Strains with both rad50+ and rad50S genetic backgrounds were induced twice. Chromatin was prepared, immunoprecipitated, assayed by locus-specific PCR, and analyzed on microarrays as described [5], except that Agilent Whole Genome 4×44 K S. pombe oligonucleotide microarrays were used. The 0 h and 3.5 h rad50+ DNA and the 5 h rad50S DNA were analyzed on microarrays twice; the 4 h rad50+ DNA was analyzed only once, as was the 0 h rad50S DNA, which confirmed earlier results [5]. Identification of Rec12 Enrichment peaks Regions of significant enrichment were identified using the Gaussian setting of ChIPOTle (v 1.0) [21] with a p value cutoff of 0.001. Figure S1 FACS Analysis Shows the Majority of Cells Were in G1 Phase after Nitrogen Starvation at the Start of Meiosis in Both Strains GP6203 and GP6232. After meiotic induction by the addition of nitrogen and shift to high temperature, each strain underwent a nearly synchronous meiosis, with DNA replication occurring between 2 and 3 h. (0.05 MB PDF) Figure S2 Southern Blots Reveal Indistinguishable DSB Hotspots in rad50+ and rad50S Strains. DNA from meiotically induced strains was digested with NotI, and the fragments separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Inductions were performed concurrently with rad50+ (GP1979; left) and rad50S (GP3718; right) strains. (A) The blots were probed on the left end of the 480 kb NotI restriction fragment K of chromosome I. (B) The same blots were probed on the left end of the 1.2 Mb NotI restriction fragment D of chromosome I. On the right are lane traces of the time of maximal DSBs [3.5 h rad50+ (dark lines) and 5 h rad50S (light lines)] for each probing. Data from rad50+ are from an induction independent of that shown in . Independent data for NotI fragment D from rad50S are shown in Cromie et al. [5]. (4.6 MB TIF) Figure S3 Rec12 Is Bound to DSB Ends in Both rad50+ and rad50 Strains. DNA from meiotically induced rad50+ (GP6232) and rad50S (GP6203) cells was extracted either with or without Proteinase K digestion followed by phenol-chloroform extraction, ethanol precipitation, MluI digestion, and ethanol precipitation, similar to the method of Keeney et al. [20]. The DNA was separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization. Substantially more meiotically broken (DSB) DNA was recovered from both the rad50+ (left panels) and rad50S (right panels) strains with Proteinase K digestion than without, indicating that a significant amount of DSB DNA was bound by Rec12 in both cases. Quantitation of the gels is shown on the far right. The MluI restriction fragments with ade6-3049 (top panels) and mbs1 (bottom panels) are 28.2 and 20.9 kb, respectively. The probe for ade6-3049 extends from bp 1309506 to bp 1310549 on chromosome III (accession # NC_003421.2); the probe for mbs1 extends from bp 768436 to bp 769496 on chromosome I (accession # NC_003424.3). (0.3 MB PDF) Figure S4 Rec12 IP/WCE Enrichment Is Seen Only in the 5 rad50S h and 3.5 h rad50+ Data. Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots are of IP/WCE hybridization ratios (log 10) for Dataset S2 versus simulated normal values (with a mean of 0 and variance of 1). Normally distributed log IP/WCE hybridization ratios should result in a straight line passing through the origin. Note that the 0 h rad50+ data closely follow this background expectation, while the 5 rad50S h and 3.5 h rad50+ data have many high IP/WCE ratios clearly above those expected from the normal distribution, as expected for Rec12-DNA enrichment at linkage sites. (0.1 MB PDF) Figure S5 Rec12-DNA Linkages across the Entire S. pombe Genome. Shown are the median-normalized IP/WCE hybridization ratios from experiment 2 ( Dataset S2). Data from induced cells ( rad50+ strain GP6232 at 3.5 h after meiotic induction and rad50S strain GP6203 at 5 h) are in red. Data from uninduced (0 h) cells ( rad50+ strain GP6232) are in blue. Where peaks go off-scale, the peak maximum is indicated. The data are neither smoothed nor filtered for spurious values, except for removal of 25 data points for ~10.7 kb of DNA deleted in the rad50S strain GP6203 between direct repeats at bp 2929282–2931720 and 2939711–2942292 on chromosome I (Accession: NC_003424.3) (unpublished data). These ~2.5 kb repeats have identities at both ends but an ~150 bp internal region of non-homology. These 25 data points have spuriously low hybridization values for DNA from the WCE, as expected for a deletion. The strong peak seen in the 0 h data for chromosome III occurs at the site of the ade6-3049 break hotspot. It is not clear why this peak is present in the 0 hr data. It is absent from the 0 hr experiments in Dataset S1. (1.9 MB PDF) Figure S6 All DSB Hotspots Detected in rad50+ Are Also DSB Hotspots in rad50S; In S. cerevisiae Microarray Experiments Many Probes Show Greater Meiotic DSB Hotspot Activity in dmc1Δ Mutants Than in rad50S Mutants. The IP/WCE ratio of each probe in the rad50+ microarray hybridization is plotted against the IP/WCE ratio of the same probe in the 5 h rad50S microarray hybridization. The plots are on a log scale. Color indicates density of plotted points with yellow highest and dark blue lowest, calculated by superimposing a grid with spacing 10 0.01 on the chart (log 10 enrichment values) and coloring all points within each grid square based on the number of points in that square. (A) The 3.5 h rad50+ IP/WCR ratios are positively correlated with those of the 5 h rad50S data. All probes enriched by IP of the rad50+ DNA are enriched in the rad50S DNA and vice versa. (B) The uninduced (0 h) rad50+ IP/WCR ratios show no correlation with those of rad50S, as expected for uninduced background signals. These data are from experiment 1 ( Dataset S1); similar results were obtained in an independent induction of each strain (). The number of points per grid square ranged from 1 to 37 in A and 1 to 19 in B. For comparison with S. cerevisiae, we replotted data from [8]. The normalized DSB enrichment ratio of each probe in the meiotic dmc1Δ microarray hybridization (C) or meiotic dmc1Δ spo11-Y135F (inactive Spo11) microarray hybridization (D) is plotted against the enrichment ratio of the same probe in the meiotic rad50S microarray hybridization. The plots are on a log scale. Some probes show similar enrichment in the dmc1Δ and rad50S datasets, while others are much more highly enriched in the dmcΔ dataset (C). No probes enriched in the rad50S dataset show significant enrichment in the negative control dmc1Δ spo11-Y135F dataset (D). Color indicates density of plotted points as above. The number of points per grid square ranged from 1 to 22 in C and 1 to 6 in D. (2.7 MB PDF) Figure S7 Enriched Probes Are Consistently ~3-Fold More Highly Enriched in the 5 h rad50S Datasets of S. pombe Compared to the 3.5 h rad50+ Datasets; In Contrast, Many Probes Show Enrichment Only in the Meiotic dmc1Δ Datasets and Not the rad50S Datasets of S. cerevisiae. (A) A frequency histogram of the log 10 [(3.5 h rad50+ value)/(5 h rad50S value)] for probes showing enrichment (Rec12 IP/WCE≥10) in either the S. pombe 5 h rad50S (top) or the 3.5 h rad50+ (bottom) conditions from Dataset S2 is shown. In both cases, the IP/WCE ratios are consistently ~3-fold higher in the rad50S condition (average log 10 ratio between conditions of ~−0.5). A similar result was obtained using Dataset S1 (data not shown). (B) A frequency histogram of the log 10 [( dmc1Δ value)/( rad50S value)] for probes showing enrichment (enrichment ratio≥10) in either the rad50S (top) or the dmc1Δ (bottom) conditions from [8] is shown. For probes showing enrichment in the rad50S condition, enrichment ratios are similar in the rad50S and dmc1Δ conditions (average log 10 ratio between conditions of ~0). In contrast, for many probes showing enrichment in the dmc1Δ condition, the rad50S enrichment ratio is much lower, giving significantly higher average log ratios between conditions. (0.1 MB PDF) Figure S8 Full-length DNA Strands with 5′ and 3′ Ends at DSBs Appear in rad50+ Meiosis. DNA from meiotically induced cells with the ade6-3049 hotspot was treated with Proteinase K, digested with AflII, electrophoresed through an alkaline agarose gel (50 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA), and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization using two probes for the right end of the 6.6 kb AflII fragment containing ade6. Each probe was specific for either the strand with 3′-ends or the strand with 5′-ends at the DSBs as indicated. DNA from three independent experiments using strains GP6232 (rad50+) and GP3718 (rad50S) harvested at the indicated time after meiotic induction was analyzed in panels A, B, and C. [32P]-labelled 1 kb Plus DNA markers (Invitrogen) were run on the gels; white arrowheads indicate the 1 kb fragment. Line traces from phosphorimage analysis are from the times and strains indicated with an asterisk. Note that the peaks with 3′-strand probes (red lines) and 5′-strand probes (blue lines) nearly coincide, indicating that the complementary strands have indistinguishable end points at the DSBs. In DNA from rad50+ DNA the peaks are sharper and more intense with 3′-strand probes than with 5′-strand probes, indicating that the 3′-ends undergo less resection than 5′-ends, as expected from ongoing DSB repair in rad50+ strains. (0.4 MB PDF) Figure S9 IP/WCE Ratios for Rec12-Enriched Probes Are Highly Correlated between the 3.5 h rad50+ and 5 h rad50S Data; A Much Weaker Correlation Is Seen between the Meiotic DSB Enrichment Ratios of dmc1Δ and rad50S Mutants of S. cerevisiae. (A) Probes were ranked by the 5 h rad50S IP/WCE ratio from S. pombe Dataset S2 and divided into 20 groups of equal numbers of probes. For each group of probes the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (R) was calculated first between the log 5 h rad50S and log 3.5 h rad50+ ratio values and then between the log 5 h rad50S and log 0 h rad50+ ratio values. R 2 values, representing the association between the paired ratios, are plotted against the ordered five-centile groupings (where 100 is the 5 h rad50S centile with the highest IP/WCE values). (B) Probes were ranked by the meiotic rad50S IP/WCE ratio from S. cerevisiae, taken from [8], and divided into 20 groups of equal numbers of probes. For each group of probes the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (R) was calculated first between the log meiotic rad50S and log meiotic dmc1Δ ratio values and then between the log meiotic rad50S and log meiotic dmc1Δ spo11-Y135F (negative control) values. R 2 values, representing the association between the paired ratios, are plotted against the ordered five-centile groupings (where 100 is the meiotic rad50S centile with the highest IP/WCE values). (0.3 MB PDF) Figure S10 A Consistent Subset of Probes Shows Rec12 IP/WCE Enrichment across Hybridizations in Both rad50+ and rad50S Backgrounds. (A) The 5 h Rec12 IP/WCE ratio of each probe in the second rad50S microarray hybridization ( Dataset S2) is plotted against the 5 h IP/WCE ratio of the same probe in the first rad50S microarray hybridization ( Dataset S1). (B) The 3.5 h Rec12 IP/WCE ratio of each probe in the second rad50+ microarray hybridization ( Dataset S2) is plotted against the 3.5 h IP/WCE ratio of the same probe in the first rad50+ microarray hybridization ( Dataset S1). In both (A) and (B), essentially all probes showing enrichment in one hybridization also show enrichment in the other. The plots are on a log scale. (0.1 MB PDF) Dataset S1 Median-normalized Genome-wide IP/WCE Hybridization Ratios from Experiment 1. Data are from strain GP6203 (rad50S) before (0 h) and 3.5 h after meiotic induction and from strain GP6232 (rad50+) before (0 h) and 5 h after meiotic induction. (7.9 MB XLS) Dataset S2 Median-normalized Genome-wide IP/WCE Hybridization Ratios from Experiment 2. Data are from strain GP6203 (rad50S) before (0 h) and 3.5 h and 4 h after meiotic induction and from strain GP6232 (rad50+) 5 h after meiotic induction. (7.8 MB XLS) We thank Jeff Delrow, Jimiane Ashe, and Cassie Sather (FHCRC Microarray Facility) for help generating data; Hugh Cam for helpful consultations; Michael Lichten and Mimi Zolan for unpublished observations; and Sue Amundsen and Michael Lichten for helpful comments on the manuscript. 1. Roeder GS. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2600–2621. [PubMed] 2. Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2001;52:1–53. [PubMed] 3. Terasawa M, Ogawa H, Tsukamoto Y, Shinohara M, Shirahige K, et al. Meiotic recombination-related DNA synthesis and its implications for cross-over and non-cross-over recombinant formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5965–5970. [PubMed] 4. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell. 1997;88:375–384. [PubMed] 5. Cromie GA, Hyppa RW, Cam HE, Farah JA, Grewal SHIS, Smith GR. A discrete class of intergenic DNA dictates meiotic DNA break hotspots in fission yeast. PLoS Genetics. 2007;3:e141. [PubMed] 6. Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature. 2005;436:1053–1057. [PubMed] 7. Gerton JL, DeRisi J, Shroff R, Lichten M, Brown PO, et al. Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11383–11390. [PubMed] 8. Buhler C, Borde V, Lichten M. Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e324. [PubMed] 9. Blitzblau HG, Bell GW, Rodriguez J, Bell SP, Hochwagen A. Mapping of meiotic single-stranded DNA reveals double-stranded-break hotspots near centromeres and telomeres. Curr Biol. 2007;17:2003–2012. [PubMed] 10. Dresser ME, Ewing DJ, Conrad MN, Dominguez AM, Barstead R, et al. DMC1 functions in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic pathway that is largely independent of the RAD51 pathway. Genetics. 1997;147:533–544. [PubMed] 11. Baudat F, Nicolas A. Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:5213–5218. [PubMed] 12. Young JA, Schreckhise RW, Steiner WW, Smith GR. Meiotic recombination remote from prominent DNA break sites in S. pombe. Molecular Cell. 2002;9:253–263. [PubMed] 13. Borde V, Lin W, Novikov E, Petrini JH, Lichten M, et al. Association of Mre11p with double-strand break sites during yeast meiosis. Mol Cell. 2004;13:389–401. [PubMed] 14. Prieler S, Penkner A, Borde V, Klein F. The control of Spo11's interaction with meiotic recombination hotspots. Genes Dev. 2005;19:255–269. [PubMed] 15. Cromie GA, Rubio CA, Hyppa RW, Smith GR. A natural meiotic DNA break site in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a hotspot of gene conversion, highly associated with crossing over. Genetics. 2005;169:595–605. [PubMed] 16. Ellermeier C, Schmidt H, Smith GR. Swi5 acts in meiotic DNA joint molecule formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 2004;168:1891–1898. [PubMed] 17. Akamatsu Y, Dziadkowiec D, Ikeguchi M, Shinagawa H, Iwasaki H. Two different Swi5-containing protein complexes are involved in mating-type switching and recombination repair in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15770–15775. [PubMed] 18. Farah JA, Hartsuiker E, Mizuno K-I, Ohta K, Smith GR. A 160-bp palindrome is a Rad50•Rad32-dependent mitotic recombination hotspot in Schizosacchromyces. pombe. Genetics. 2002;161:461–468. [PubMed] 19. Steiner WW, Smith GR. Optimizing the nucleotide sequence of a meiotic recombination hotspot in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 2005;169:1973–1983. [PubMed] 20. Keeney S, Kleckner N. Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5′ strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:11274–11278. [PubMed] 21. Buck MJ, Nobel AB, Lieb JD. ChIPOTle: a user-friendly tool for the analysis of ChIP-chip data. Genome Biol. 2005;6:R97. [PubMed] 22. Cromie GA, Hyppa RW, Taylor AF, Zakharyevich K, Hunter N, et al. Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination. Cell. 2006;127:1167–1178. [PubMed] 23. Hunter N, Kleckner N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell. 2001;106:59–70. [PubMed] 24. Cao L, Alani E, Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990;61:1089–1101. [PubMed] 25. Johzuka K, Ogawa H. Interaction of Mre11 and Rad50: Two proteins required for DNA repair and meiosis-specific double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995;139:1521–1532. [PubMed] 26. Young JA, Hyppa RW, Smith GR. Conserved and nonconserved proteins for meiotic DNA breakage and repair in yeasts. Genetics. 2004;167:593–605. [PubMed] 27. Alani E, Padmore R, Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell. 1990;61:419–436. [PubMed] 28. Davis L, Smith GR. Non-random homolog segregation at meiosis I in Schizosacchharomyces pombe mutants lacking recombination. Genetics. 2003;163:857–874. [PubMed] 29. Ludin K, Mata J, Watt S, Lehmann E, Bahler J, et al. Sites of strong Rec12/Spo11 binding in the fission yeast genome are associated with meiotic recombination and with centromeres. Chromosoma. 2008 30. Puizina J, Siroky J, Mokros P, Schweizer D, Riha K. Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1968–1978. [PubMed] 31. Mehrotra S, McKim KS. Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Drosophila females. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e200. [PubMed] 32. Hayashi M, Chin GM, Villeneuve AM. C. elegans Germ cells switch between distinct modes of double-strand break repair during meiotic prophase progression. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e191. [PubMed] 33. Iino Y, Yamamoto M. Negative control for the initiation of meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:2447–2451. [PubMed] 34. Hyppa RW, Smith GR. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe meiosis to analyze DNA recombination intermediates. In: Keeney S, editor. Meiosis. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; in press.
|
This article has been 
