![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society of Plant Biologists Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845 (J.M., S.P., K.D.H.); Plant Physiology Group, United States Department of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service, Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 (J.M., K.D.H.); Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (H.T., J.M.W.); and Department of Immunology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 (C.S.S.) *Corresponding author; e-mail kendalh/at/bcm.tmc.edu. Received May 8, 2008; Accepted August 30, 2008. Abstract The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cation calcium exchangers (CCXs) were recently identified as a subfamily of cation transporters; however, no plant CCXs have been functionally characterized. Here, we show that Arabidopsis AtCCX3 (At3g14070) and AtCCX4 (At1g54115) can suppress yeast mutants defective in Na+, K+, and Mn2+ transport. We also report high-capacity uptake of 86Rb+ in tonoplast-enriched vesicles from yeast expressing AtCCX3. Cation competition studies showed inhibition of 86Rb+ uptake in AtCCX3 cells by excess Na+, K+, and Mn2+. Functional epitope-tagged AtCCX3 fusion proteins were localized to endomembranes in plants and yeast. In Arabidopsis, AtCCX3 is primarily expressed in flowers, while AtCCX4 is expressed throughout the plant. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed that expression of AtCCX3 increased in plants treated with NaCl, KCl, and MnCl2. Insertional mutant lines of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 displayed no apparent growth defects; however, overexpression of AtCCX3 caused increased Na+ accumulation and increased 86Rb+ transport. Uptake of 86Rb+ increased in tonoplast-enriched membranes isolated from Arabidopsis lines expressing CCX3 driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Overexpression of AtCCX3 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) produced lesions in the leaves, stunted growth, and resulted in the accumulation of higher levels of numerous cations. In summary, these findings suggest that AtCCX3 is an endomembrane-localized H+-dependent K+ transporter with apparent Na+ and Mn2+ transport properties distinct from those of previously characterized plant transporters. The plant vacuole and other endomembrane compartments play an important role in the sequestration of various compounds (Marschner, 1995; Marty, 1999). Concentration gradients of Na+, Ca2+, Cd2+, NO3−, and Mn2+ are established across these membranes by cation/H+ exchange activities (Schumaker and Sze, 1985; Salt and Wagner, 1993; Barkla and Pantoja, 1996; Gonzalez et al., 1999). Several genes encoding these transport activities have been identified (Shigaki and Hirschi, 2006). However, the biological functions of many of the individual transporters remain for the most part undefined. CCXs (for calcium cation exchangers) were previously identified as CAX (for cation exchanger) homologs. Recently CAX7 to CAX11 were reclassified as CCX1 to CCX5 due to higher homology to mammalian K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+ antiporters (Shigaki et al., 2006). CAXs are cation/H+ antiporters that show high-capacity, low-affinity transport and have been characterized in a variety of plants (Blumwald and Poole, 1986; Kasai and Muto, 1990; Ettinger et al., 1999; Cheng et al., 2002; Luo et al., 2005). CAXs are energized by the pH gradient established by proton pumps such as H+-ATPase or H+-pyrophosphatase (Kamiya and Maeshima, 2004). Several plant CAXs have been characterized as vacuole-localized transporters, which function in H+-coupled antiport of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Mn2+, resulting in the accumulation of these cations in vacuoles (Hirschi, 1999; Pittman and Hirschi, 2001; Pittman et al., 2004a). CCXs have not been studied, and it would be interesting to compare and contrast their activities with those of CAXs and the less closely related Na+(K+)/H+ exchangers of the NHX family. CAX proteins have N-terminal regulatory domains (Pittman and Hirschi, 2001), and AtCAX1 and AtCAX2 were originally cloned as functional N-terminal deletions (lacking the negative regulatory domain; Hirschi et al., 1996). We refer to these forms as sCAX1 and sCAX2 (Shigaki and Hirschi, 2006). Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants expressing AtsCAX1 exhibit Ca2+ deficiencies, leaf necrosis, tip burning, and hypersensitivity to ion imbalances, as well as increased tonoplast Ca2+/H+ transport activity (Hirschi, 1999). The N termini of CCXs lack homology with CAXs, and it is not known if the N terminus has a regulatory function. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CCXs are related to mammalian plasma membrane Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (NCXs). The NCXs mediate the exchange of Na+ for Ca2+ depending on the electrochemical gradients, and NCKXs (for Na2+/Ca2+-K+ exchangers) transport K+ and Ca2+ in exchange for Na+ (Lytton, 2007). Interestingly, both NCX and NCKX exchangers can operate in a forward (Ca2+ exit) or reverse (Ca2+ entry) mode, which is mediated by the change in Na+ gradients and the potential across the membrane (Cai and Lytton, 2004a). However, the extent to which CCX transporters from Arabidopsis transport Na+ or K+ has not been addressed. To investigate the function of CCX transporters, we cloned AtCCX3 and the closely related AtCCX4. We expressed the transporters in various yeast strains in order to compare and contrast their functions to those of AtCAX1 and AtNHX1 transporters. We monitored the expression and localization of AtCCX3 in yeast cells and in planta. Finally, we overexpressed AtCCX3 in plants and examined ion uptake and plant growth. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that AtCCX3 is an endomembrane H+-dependent K+ transporter. RESULTS AtCCXs Show Homology to Mammalian NCKXs A family of genes originally identified as members of plant CAXs (Maser et al., 2001) were recently found to have high similarity to mammalian NCKX6 (a member of the CCX family) and weak similarity to AtNHX1 (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Thus, these transporters were reclassified as AtCCXs (Shigaki and Hirschi, 2006). We hypothesized that these putative transporters might function in cation homeostasis. We prepared open reading frame (ORF) clones for AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 from Arabidopsis (Columbia ecotype) genomic DNA, since these genes were predicted to contain no introns. The cloned AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 open reading frames contained 1,935 and 1,938 nucleotides, which could encode 644 and 645 amino acids and produce putative proteins of 70.1 and 70.8 kD, respectively. AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 are 79.50% identical and 86.02% similar to one another. They share more identity (26.8% identical, 46.9% similar) with human (Homo sapiens) HsNCKX6 than with AtCAX1 (12.1% identical, 25.1% similar). In contrast to AtNHX1, a known plant Na+ transporter, the AtCCXs have very little sequence homology (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Both AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 contain short N-terminal hydrophilic domains, which are not related to the AtCAX1 N-terminal autoinhibitory domain (Supplemental Fig. S1B). Comparisons of the AtCCX3, AtCCX4, and HsNKX6 proteins show a short (25 amino acids) N-terminal region, followed by five transmembrane domains separated from another seven transmembrane domains by a long hydrophilic region (75 amino acids for HsNCKX6 and 115 amino acids for AtCCX4). By contrast, AtCAX1 has a long N-terminal domain containing 65 amino acids and has two sets of four transmembrane domains separated by a shorter hydrophilic domain (35 amino acids). Also, AtCCX3, AtCCX4, and HsNCKX6 have very short (15 amino acids) C-terminal domains compared with AtCAX1, which has a longer C-terminal region (25 amino acids; Supplemental Fig. S1C). Phylogenetic analysis of AtCCX1 to AtCCX5, AtCAXs, and the human K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+ antiporter HsNCKX6 clearly indicates that CCXs are more closely related to the K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+ antiporter than to any of the CAXs (Supplemental Fig. S1A; Shigaki et al., 2006). Specifically, AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 share the characteristic α-repeats GNG(A/S)PD in α1 and (G/S)(N/D)SxGD in α2 with HsNCKX6 (Supplemental Fig. S1B; Cai and Lytton, 2004a, 2004b); these are highly conserved Ca2+ and Na+ domains (Winkfein et al., 2003; Kang et al., 2005). Expression of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 in Yeast AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 were cloned into the piHGpd vector (Nathan et al., 1999) for expression in yeast under the control of the GPD promoter. To test the possibility of a CCX N-terminal regulatory domain, we made a truncation in the AtCCX3 ORF (AtsCCX3). These plasmids were then introduced into the yeast strains AXT3 (ena1 HIS3 ena4, nha1 LEU2, nhx1 TRP1, ura3-1; Yokoi et al., 2002) and wx1 (nhx1 mutant; Nass et al., 1997) with defects in vacuolar Na+/K+ transport. AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 expression did not alter growth of the yeast in Arg phosphate (AP) medium (Fig. 1A
We also tested the possibility that AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 transport other metals, thus making the host yeast cells tolerant or hypersensitive to these metals. Expression of AtCCX3 in an Mg2+-requiring strain (CM66) did not suppress the ion sensitivity of these strains (MacDiarmid and Gardner, 1998). AtCCX3-expressing cells were also tested with a range of metals, such as Al3+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+, in various mutant yeast strains (K661, K667; Salt and Wagner, 1993; Cunningham and Fink, 1996; Liu et al., 1997; Tuttle et al., 2003). In each case, AtCCX3 cells were indistinguishable from vector controls in our assay conditions. However, expression of AtCCX3 could suppress Mn2+ growth sensitivity in a yeast strain defective in both plasma and vacuolar membrane Mn2+ transport (smf1 + smf2; Supek et al., 1996; Cohen et al., 2000; Luk and Culotta, 2001; Fig. 1D Transport Properties of AtCCX3 in Yeast In order to determine whether AtCCX3 mediated K+ transport, we measured 86Rb+ uptake as a tracer for K+ into yeast cells and yeast microsomal membranes (Venema et al., 2002; Pittman et al., 2004a, 2004b). In wx1 yeast, only cells expressing AtCCX3 or AtNHX1 showed higher 86Rb+ uptake at high K+ concentrations (20 mm; data not shown) relative to vector controls. At low external K+ (0.02 mm) concentrations, 86Rb+ uptake by cells expressing AtCCX3 and AtNHX1 was similar to that of vector controls (data not shown). This suggests that AtCCX3 can facilitate K+ uptake with low affinity in yeast, although it is unclear whether K+ uptake is mediated directly or indirectly by CCX3. Transport assays were performed using vacuole membrane-enriched vesicles from yeast. Membranes isolated from wx1 cells expressing AtCCX3 or AtNHX1 showed increased 86Rb+ uptake at 50 mm K+ concentrations (Fig. 2A
These phenotypes suggest that AtCCX3 has a role in K+ transport, but the suppression of the Δsmf1, Δsmf2 Mn2+-sensitive yeast strain also suggests that AtCCX3 functions in Mn2+ transport (Cohen et al., 2000). To further investigate the yeast phenotypes, 86Rb+ uptake into vesicles was measured in the presence of excess nonradioactive KCl, NaCl, MnCl2, CaCl2, and ZnCl2. Excess (300 μm) KCl and NaCl reduced 86Rb+ uptake mediated by AtNHX1 and AtCCX3 by 50% and 40%, respectively (Fig. 2B Metal Measurements in Yeast Expressing AtCCX3 and AtNHX1 We tested the alkali cation content in mutant alone or in yeast strains expressing AtCCX3 and AtNHX1 after cells were exposed to 100 mm NaCl or KCl. Yeast cells expressing AtCCX3 and AtNHX1 showed a 25% increase in Na+ and a 50% increase in K+ content, compared with yeast cells expressing only the vector (Fig. 3
Localization of AtCCX3 in Yeast and Plants An N-terminal HA-tagged AtCCX3 construct conferred resistance to high Na+ and K+ stress in wx1 (data not shown). We utilized this construct to identify the cellular location of AtCCX3. As shown in Figure 4A
To investigate the subcellular localization of AtCAX3 in plants, microsomal membranes from transgenic lines harboring the AtCCX3-GFP fusion protein were fractionated. Centrifugation through a linear Suc gradient was first used to compare the distribution of the epitope-tagged transporter in transgenic Arabidopsis (Fig. 5A GFP alone was localized to both the cytosol and the nucleus. In contrast, fluorescence was consistent with cytoplasmic vesicles and the vacuolar membrane, but some localization to the plasma membrane cannot be excluded in plant cells expressing 35S AtCCX3-GFP (Fig. 5B
Expression of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 in Arabidopsis Analysis of publicly available Arabidopsis microarray data indicates that AtCCX3 is expressed at very low levels and predominantly in flowers and pollen grains (Bock et al., 2006; https://www.genevestigator.ethz.ch). This low level of expression made the use of northern blot and GUS promoter reporter analysis difficult (data not shown). In order to more precisely monitor expression, we conducted reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and detected the expression of AtCCX3 primarily in flowers, roots, and stems of wild-type Arabidopsis (Fig. 6A
The ability of AtCCX3 to suppress a yeast mutant sensitive to Na+ and K+ and the increased sensitivity of wild-type yeast to Mn2+ prompted us to examine whether these or other cations could induce AtCCX3 expression in Arabidopsis roots, leaves, and flowers. Expression of AtCCX3 increased 2- to 3-fold in response to exogenous Na+ and K+, and by 0.5-fold compared with Mn2+, in both roots and flowers (Fig. 6B Analysis of T-DNA Insertional Mutants of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 To investigate the physiological function of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 in Arabidopsis, we obtained two independent lines containing T-DNA insertions inside each open reading frame (Supplemental Fig. S2D). Homozygous lines were isolated by screening for the presence of the T-DNA insert and lack of native AtCCX. We isolated two different mutant alleles for AtCCX3, termed atccx3-1 and atccx3-2, and two alleles for AtCCX4, termed atccx4-1 and atccx4-2. RT-PCR analysis of the four different alleles showed no expression of AtCCX3 or AtCCX4 in the respective mutants (Supplemental Fig. S2, B and C). Pollen viability, pollen tube growth, and seed set were not altered in these mutants (data not shown), nor were there any other discernible growth abnormalities. Ectopic Expression of AtCCX3 To further test the function of AtCCX3 in Arabidopsis, AtsCCX3 and AtCCX3 were expressed using the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Despite increased expression of AtCCX3 RNA in the Arabidopsis lines, no visible changes in plant growth or development were detected (Supplemental Fig. S2A; J. Morris, unpublished data). However, lack of an AtCCX3-specific antibody prevented actual quantification of alterations of AtCCX3 protein amounts. 35S AtCCX3 Arabidopsis plants treated with exogenous NaCl accumulated 35% more Na+ compared with controls (26,490 ± 370 μg g−1 dry weight for 35S AtCCX3, 17,305 ± 2,145 μg g−1 dry weight for controls). In contrast, when grown under normal conditions, there was only a modest Na+ accumulation in 35S AtCCX3 lines (6,044 ± 55 μg g−1 for 35S AtCCX3, 5,772 ± 73 μg g−1 for controls).To determine the in planta K+ transport properties of AtCCX3, direct 86Rb uptake assays into whole plants and vacuole-enriched vesicles isolated from Arabidopsis roots were assayed (Pittman et al., 2004a). Given the difficulty of inferring function from whole plant uptake assays, we isolated tonoplast-enriched vesicles to better understand the function of AtCCX3 in planta. Vesicles from 35S AtCCX3 and AtNHX1 plants both showed higher 86Rb uptake at high K+ concentrations (50 mm; Fig. 7A AtCCX3 plants. Reduced uptake of 86Rb in both AtNHX1- and 35S AtCCX3-expressing plants was found when the H+ gradient was disrupted by removing MgCl2 from the reaction mixtures. Like our yeast assays, these plant membrane uptake values suggest that AtCCX3 is an H+-driven Na+, K+, and Mn2+ exchanger.
We also tested the inhibition of 86Rb uptake by competition with excess (300 μm) nonlabeled cation chlorides. Similar to our results in yeast, excess KCl and NaCl reduced 86Rb uptake, while CaCl2 and ZnCl2 had no effect on 86Rb uptake into membranes isolated from cells expressing AtNHX1 and AtCCX3 (Fig. 7B AtCCX3-expressing membranes but showed no inhibition of 86Rb uptake in AtNHX1-expressing membranes (Fig. 7BThe Arabidopsis AtCCX3 and AtsCCX3 were also heterologously expressed in tobacco (KY14 variety). As shown in Figure 8C AtCCX3 transgenic lines. The inability to detect transcript in the vector lines indicates the specificity of the primers used during the amplification process. Visible alterations in plant growth were readily apparent in the 35S AtCCX3-expressing lines (Fig. 8C AtCCX3 formed leaves with small yellowing necrotic lesions (Fig. 8A AtCCX3-expressing plants were severely stunted. The 35S AtCCX3 transgenic lines with the least dramatic growth changes always displayed low levels of 35S AtCCX3 expression (data not shown). In contrast to these dramatic phenotypes, the 12 35S AtsCCX3-expressing lines displayed phenotypes indistinguishable from the vector-expressing controls. Because the 35S AtCCX3 phenotypes were so dramatic, we repeated the transformation process and obtained identical results in a replicate experiment (data not shown).
35S AtCCX3 lines were selected for further study on the basis of their T1 phenotype and their ability to make seeds. All lines analyzed that displayed the altered morphology were fertile (n = 13). The same growth abnormalities revisited all of the lines in the second generation. When grown from seed in tissue culture, the T2 plants appeared normal and unperturbed for the first 2 weeks, after which time the leaves began to display altered growth phenotypes (data not shown). T2 35S AtCCX3-transformed plants that were sown and grown in the greenhouse also displayed leaf symptoms after 3 weeks of growth (Fig. 8B AtsCCX3- or vector control-expressing plants displayed these phenotypes.Effects of AtCCX3 on Plant Growth The symptoms of the 35S AtCCX3-expressing tobacco plants could not be phenocopied in vector control lines under any growth conditions tested (excess and depleted Na+, Mg2+, K+, Mn2+, and Ca2+; data not shown). Primary transformants and T2 35S AtCCX3-expressing plants displayed altered morphology regardless of the medium used for growth. Conceivably, constitutive AtCCX3 expression may alter various mineral levels simultaneously, making suppression of the phenotypes dependent on the addition or subtraction of multiple components. To ascertain whether 35S AtCCX3 expression altered ion content, we measured the total accumulation of ions in both mature and young leaves. In 35S AtCCX3-expressing plants, young leaves accumulated at least 40% more K+ and Na+ (Fig. 9A AtCCX3-expressing plants and detected the carbonyl content of the proteins. As shown in Supplemental Figure S3A, the protein carbonyl content was higher in 35S AtCCX3-expressing plants compared with vector controls and AtsCCX3-expressing lines. In fact, these alterations were detectable before the onset of morphological changes in leaf architecture. Together, these findings suggest that AtCCX3 has a role in ion homeostasis in plants and that when AtCCX3 expression is heightened, increases in protein oxidation occur.
DISCUSSION The plant vacuole is a cation depot, and numerous transporters have been proposed to mediate influx and efflux from this endomembrane compartment (Marty, 1999; Maeshima, 2000; Ratajczak, 2000; Hirschi, 2001). Here, we use yeast suppression screens, in planta expression analysis, yeast and plant membrane transport studies, and AtCCX-generated phenotypes in transgenic tobacco to suggest that AtCCX3 expression is judiciously regulated and is part of an ensemble of transporters regulating K+, Na+, and possibly Mn2+ levels within plant cells. Sequence Comparison of AtCCXs and HsNCKX6 Phylogenetic analysis recently identified five Arabidopsis CCX transporters as being closely related to mammalian K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (Supplemental Fig. S1A; Shigaki et al., 2006). The functions of AtCCX1 to AtCCX5 in plants are unknown, although they may functionally resemble NCKXs. NCKX exchangers are involved in mammalian signaling (Blaustein and Lederer, 1999; Lee et al., 2002) by catalyzing the electrogenic countertransport of four Na+ for one Ca2+ and one K+ (Cervetto et al., 1989; Dong et al., 2001). Like the HsNCKX6, AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 have similar conserved α-repeats (Supplemental Fig. S1B), which may play a critical role in maintaining a proper chemical microenvironment for ion binding (Cai and Lytton, 2004b). AtCCX3, AtCCX4, and HsNCKX6 also share similar membrane topologies, which differ from that of AtCAX1 (Supplemental Fig. S1C). Function of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 in Yeast Our data show that AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 have functions distinct from AtNHX1. Results from transport assays in yeast are consistent with the phylogenetic analysis and indicate a possible Na+/K+ transport function for AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 (Fig. 1 AtCCX3- and AtCCX4-expressing yeast cells did not completely phenocopy AtNHX1-expressing yeast cells. AtCCX3- and AtCCX4-expressing cells could not suppress the hygromycin sensitivity of nhx1-deficient cells (data not shown; Nass and Rao, 1998; Darley et al., 2000). Both AtCCX3 and AtNHX1 are predominantly localized to the vacuole (see below), in contrast to the prevacuolar localization of yeast NHXp1 (Nass and Rao, 1998). A possible altered localization could explain the inability of AtCCX3-expressing cells to suppress this defect in the yeast secretory pathway. AtCCX3 expression suppressed the growth sensitivity in a yeast strain defective in both plasma and vacuolar membrane Mn2+ transport (Fig. 1D Our other yeast data further support AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 having biochemical functions distinct from CAX transporters. For example, N-terminal truncations of AtCAX1 and AtCAX2 suppress the Ca2+ sensitivity of yeast cells defective in vacuolar Ca2+ transport (Hirschi et al., 1996). In contrast, expression of both full-length and N-terminal truncations of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 in yeast could not suppress these Ca2+ transport defects. Furthermore, the N-terminal domains of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 were required for function. The requirement of the N-terminal domain in these yeast assays suggests that AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 do not contain a CAX-like N-terminal regulatory domain. AtCCX3 Is an Endomembrane-Localized Transporter in Flowers Functional epitope tags of AtCCX3 demonstrated that AtCCX3 localized to the endomembrane in both yeast and plants (Figs. 4 Although the precise role of AtCCX3 is still unclear, low AtCCX3 expression levels suggest that AtCCX3 might have a role in cation uptake in a specific subset of cells rather than be involved in bulk cation uptake (Fig. 6 AtCCX3 Phenotypes in Plants AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 may function in concert with numerous other transporters to regulate pollen growth. The atccx3 and atccx4 lines displayed no altered pollen phenotypes, and general plant growth appeared robust in all our assays (Supplemental Fig. S2, B and C; data not shown). This lack of altered growth could be related to the expression of other AtCCX transporters during vegetative and pollen development (Sze et al., 2004; Bock et al., 2006). Many Arabidopsis T-DNA mutants lack any morphological phenotype, presumably due to functional redundancy (Krysan et al., 1999). Our working hypothesis is that AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 have similar functions because they arose from a gene duplication. The strong phenotype resulting from overexpression of AtCCX3 in tobacco indicates that AtCCX3 must be carefully modulated. Tobacco plants ectopically expressing 35S AtCCX3 were stunted in growth and contained necrotic lesions in the leaf interveinal regions (Fig. 8AAlthough no phenotypes related to changes in Mn2+ concentrations could be observed in Arabidopsis either lacking or expressing 35S AtCCX3, the Mn2+ inhibition of 86Rb uptake in vacuole-enriched vesicles suggests that AtCCX3 has a role in Mn2+ homeostasis (Fig. 7BProtein Oxidation Is Increased in Plants Expressing AtCCX3 AtCCX3 function may be related to plant reactive oxygen species signaling (Supplemental Fig. S3). Indeed, tobacco plants expressing 35S AtCCX3 showed much higher oxidation of proteins compared with controls (Supplemental Fig. S3). The drastic phenotypes observed in 35S AtCCX3 tobacco lines may be due to the perturbation of transient metal concentrations in AtCCX3-expressing tobacco lines (Figs. 8In summary, we have characterized what are to our knowledge the first CCX transporters from plants. We demonstrate that AtCCX3 resides predominantly on an endomembrane and may function as an H+-dependent K+ transporter that can also transport Na+ and Mn2+. The ability to transport both monovalent and divalent cations will need to be directly demonstrated, although it is analogous to yeast SMF1, which transports Fe2+ and is permeable by Na+, Li+, and K+ (Chen et al., 1999). This dual-capacity transport suggests a role in vacuolar cation homeostasis in planta, which might protect a subset of cells from metal ion overload (Chen et al., 1999). MATERIALS AND METHODS See Supplemental Table S1 for primer information. Cloning of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 cDNAs and Plasmid DNA Constructs AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 were amplified from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genomic DNA using PCR. Both AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 are predicted to have no introns. The primers are listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 1–5). AtCCX3, AtsCCX3, and AtCCX4 cDNAs were subcloned into the yeast expression vector piHGpd (Nathan et al., 1999; Pittman and Hirschi, 2001; Pittman et al., 2002a). The AtsCAX2 plasmid was cloned previously (Shigaki et al., 2003). The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ exchanger AtNHX1 was PCR cloned from plasmid DNA with the primers listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 6 and 7) and cloned into yeast expression vectors. The AtCCX3 and AtsCCX3 ORFs were cloned into a modified pBIN19 vector (Dr. Toshiro Shigaki, Clontech, personal communication). The resulting constructs contained the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter fragment driving expression of the transporters and the NOS terminator (Hull et al., 2000). The triple HA epitope-tagged AtCCX3 (HA-AtCCX3) was constructed as described previously (Shigaki et al., 2001). The primers used are listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 8–11). The two fragments were ligated with the yeast expression vector piHGpd (Nathan et al., 1999). The C-terminal GFP tag AtCCX3 (CCX3-GFP) was constructed as described previously (Cheng et al., 2004). The primers used are listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 12–15). After cloning into the appropriate yeast vectors, this expression cassette was also cloned into pBIN19. Yeast Strains and Growth Conditions The following Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains were used in this study: W303-1A (MATa ade2-1 can1-100 his3-11,15 leu2-3, 112 trp1-1 ura3-1; Wallis et al., 1989) and R100 (Δnhx1 URA3; Nass et al., 1997), which is isogenic to W303 and AXT3 (ena1 HIS3 ena4, nha1 LEU2, nhx1 TRP1, ura3-1; Yokoi et al., 2002). The Mn2+-sensitive strain Δsmf1 + Δsmf2 was used in yeast growth assays (Cohen et al., 2000). The Mg2+-sensitive yeast strain CM66 (MATa Δalr1 HIS3, Δalr2 TRP, his3-v200, ura3-52, leu2-v1, lys2-v202 trp1-v63; Liu et al., 2002) was used in yeast growth assays as well. The yeast strains K661 (MATa Δvcx1 URA3, ade2-1 can1-100 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1; Cunningham and Fink, 1996) and K667 (cnb1 LEU2 pmc1 TRP1 vcx1Δ; Cunningham and Fink, 1996) were also used in yeast growth assays. Yeast metal-sensitive growth assays were performed as described previously (Hirschi et al., 1996; Nass et al., 1997; Nass and Rao, 1998; Darley et al., 2000; Shigaki et al., 2003; Padmanaban et al., 2007). Yeast samples for liquid culture assays were 5-fold serial diluted, and 10 μL of the 125-fold diluted inoculum was grown in 190 μL of medium supplemented with various concentrations of NaCl2, KCl, and MnCl2 at 30°C with continuous shaking. For the NaCl2 assays in the AXT3 strain, the medium was supplemented with 1 mm KCl (Yokoi et al., 2002). After 48 h, optical density at 600 nm (OD600) measurements were taken.Yeast Sample Processing and Cation Analysis Yeast culture conditions and sample processing were modified from previous studies (Lahner et al., 2003; Eide et al., 2005; Mei et al., 2007). Yeast strains expressing vector, AtNHX1, or AtCCX3 were grown overnight in AP medium. After measuring the OD600, equal numbers of cells were grown in 5 mL of yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) supplemented with 100 mm NaCl or 200 μm MnCl2 for 16 h. Plant Materials and Growth Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia was used as the wild type. Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 was transformed with AtCCX3, AtsCCX3, or vector controls (Sambrook et al., 1989). Arabidopsis plants were transformed using the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum ‘KY14’; Koren'kov et al., 2007) transformation was done using the leaf disc method as described previously (Tarczynski et al., 1992). Cation Analysis of Tobacco and Arabidopsis Plants Arabidopsis seeds expressing 35S:AtCCX3 were planted on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) + 1% Suc plates and grown for 10 d. Plants were transferred to soil and watered with 100 mL of 50 mm NaCl twice weekly. Plants were harvested at 35 d of age, dried at 68°C, and ground. Tobacco seeds were germinated on half-strength MS + 3% Suc and grown for 2 weeks, then they were transferred to soil. At 28 and 40 d of age, leaves were removed, dried at 68°C, and ground. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis was done as described previously (Franson, 1989). 86Rb+ Uptake Assay in Yeast and Arabidopsis Roots A yeast strain (wx1) expressing AtCCX3, AtNHX1, and vector were grown for 16 h in AP selection medium, and membrane vesicles were isolated as described previously (Pittman and Hirschi, 2001; Cheng and Hirschi, 2003; Pittman et al., 2004b). Plants were grown hydroponically, and membrane vesicles were isolated as described previously (Pittman and Hirschi, 2001; Shigaki et al., 2001, 2003; Cheng et al., 2003). Time-dependent 86Rb+ uptake measurements into membrane vesicles were performed as described previously (Venema et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2003; Pittman et al., 2004a, 2004b). For the measurement of ΔpH-dependent KCl uptake, vacuole-enriched membrane (100 μg protein mL−1) vesicles were incubated in buffer containing 0.3 M sorbitol, 5 mm Tris-MES (pH 7.6), 25 mm KCl, 0.1 mm sodium azide, and 0.2 mm sodium orthovanadate. The vesicles were added to 1 mm MgSO4 and 1 mm ATP to reach a steady-state pH gradient for 5 min at 25°C before the addition of 86Rb+ (1 μCi mL−1; GE Bioscience). Benzamil was used at 10 μm to inhibit AtNHX1 uptake. For metal competition experiments, 25 μm 86Rb+ uptake was measured at the 8-min time point in the presence of 300 μm concentrations of the nonradioactive metals KCl, NaCl, CaCl2, MnCl2, and ZnCl2. Protein Isolation and Western-Blot Analysis of Epitope-Tagged AtCCX3 from Yeast and Plants Total protein was isolated from yeast expressing HA-AtCCX3 using the glass bead method (Ausubel et al., 1998). Suc fractionation and western blotting of membranes were done as described previously (Pittman et al., 2004a, 2004b). The vacuolar marker ALP (Molecular Probes) was used at a 1:2,000 dilution, and the plasma membrane H+-ATPase Pma1p was used at a 1:1,000 dilution. For the GFP-tagged protein, total plant protein was isolated as described previously (Fitzpatrick and Keegstra, 2001). Microsomal membranes were prepared from AtCCX3-GFP-expressing Arabidopsis leaf tissues as described previously (Cheng et al., 2003). Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Pittman and Hirschi, 2001). The GFP epitope and the membrane marker proteins were detected as described previously (Cheng et al., 2003). Onion Epidermis Bombardment and Visualization of the GFP Subcellular Localization Single epidermis layers were removed from white onion (Allium cepa) bulb and placed on the surface of a MS plate (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) containing 2% Suc and 50 μg mL−1 ampicillin. The constructs 35S CCX3-GFP and 35S GFP were introduced into onion epidermal cells by particle bombardment. The process of particle preparation, coating, and bombardment was as described previously (Sivitz et al., 2007). The GFP fluorescence acquisition was performed with a Plan Apo 20×/0.75 numerical aperture objective. Images were recorded with picture size of 512 × 512 pixels. Individual sections along whole cells were captured in IDS format and then transferred into TIFF files.RNA Extraction and RT-PCR RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plant Kit (Qiagen) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. RT-PCR was performed to detect mRNA transcript in Arabidopsis of AtCCX3 and AtCCX4 knockout lines, Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtCCX3 and AtsCCX3, and tobacco plants ectopically expressing AtCCX3 and AtsCCX3. One microliter of the first-strand cDNA was used to amplify an AtCCX3 gene-specific fragment and an Actin1 fragment (Geisler et al., 2000). Primers are listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 18–23). The relative intensities in different lanes within each individual experiment were independent of the number of PCR cycles performed. Isolation of Homozygous T-DNA Insertional Lines To isolate ccx3 and ccx4 null alleles, two T-DNA insertional lines were obtained from the SAIL T-DNA insertion collection (Sessions et al., 2002) for AtCCX3 (SAIL_F-09, ccx3-1; SAIL_C30-05, ccx3-2) and two from the SALK T-DNA insertion collection (Alonso et al., 2003) for AtCCX4 (SALK_113447, ccx4-1; SALK_040272, ccx4-2). Homozygous plants from each T3 generation were obtained by PCR screening using primers listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 24–27). For AtCCX4, primers 5 and 28 listed in Supplemental Table S1 were used. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of AtCCX3 At 14 d of age, 25 plants were transferred to control medium or medium supplemented with 100 mm KCl, 50 mm NaCl, or 1 μm MnCl2. After 24 h, the plants were harvested and total plant RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Kit (Qiagen). For floral RNA, 25 plants were transferred to soil and watered weekly with 50 mL of 100 mm KCl, 50 mm NaCl, or 1 μm MnCl2 solution. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Kit (Qiagen). Serial dilutions of RNA were made from 5 μg to 5 ng, and first-strand cDNA was synthesized as described previously (Geisler et al., 2000). The PCR amplification was performed with 5 μL of cDNA, 0.5 μm of each primer, and 1× SYBR Green PCR mix (Invitrogen). The primers used are listed in Supplemental Table S1 (primers 29–34). Quantitative PCR was done using the SYBR Green probe, 1 μg of cDNA, and the ABI 7900HT RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Real-time PCR amplification was performed and calculations were made with the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Relative transcript abundance was determined using the comparative ΔΔCT method with SDS software version 2.2.2 (Applied Biosystems). For a standard control, expression of the 18S ribosomal subunit was used. Protein Oxidation Analysis Carbonyl assays for the analysis of oxidized proteins in plant cells were performed as described previously (Levine et al., 1994; Davletova et al., 2005; Cheng et al., 2006). Total protein was isolated from young and old leaves of 6-week-old tobacco plants ectopically expressing AtCCX3, AtsCCX3, and vector only, as described previously (Cheng et al., 2006). The oxidized proteins were detected by protein gel blotting using anti-dinitrophenylhydrazone antibody (Davletova et al., 2005). Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Ramon Gonzalez for providing AtNHX1 in pDR196. We thank Bronwyn Barkla and Heven Sze for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Adam Gillum for his help with the preparation of the figures. Notes 1This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service (Cooperative Agreement no. 58–62650–6001), the National Science Foundation (grant nos. NSF 0344350 and NSF 020977), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (grant no. 2005–34402–17121 to K.D.H.). The National Science Foundation (grant no. 0209792) funded work in the laboratory of J.M.W. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Kendal D. Hirschi (kendalh/at/bcm.tmc.edu). [W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA]Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Plant Cell. 1999 Apr; 11(4):587-600.
[Plant Cell. 1999]Plant Physiol. 1985 Dec; 79(4):1111-1117.
[Plant Physiol. 1985]J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 15; 268(17):12297-302.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun; 47():159-184.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996]Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Jul; 8(4):419-29.
[Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006]J Mol Evol. 2006 Dec; 63(6):815-25.
[J Mol Evol. 2006]Plant Physiol. 1986 Mar; 80(3):727-731.
[Plant Physiol. 1986]J Membr Biol. 1990 Mar; 114(2):133-42.
[J Membr Biol. 1990]Plant Physiol. 1999 Apr; 119(4):1379-86.
[Plant Physiol. 1999]Plant Physiol. 2002 Apr; 128(4):1245-54.
[Plant Physiol. 2002]Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov; 127(3):1020-9.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6; 93(16):8782-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Jul; 8(4):419-29.
[Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006]Plant Cell. 1999 Nov; 11(11):2113-22.
[Plant Cell. 1999]Biochem J. 2007 Sep 15; 406(3):365-82.
[Biochem J. 2007]Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Sep; 21(9):1692-703.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2001 Aug; 126(4):1646-67.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Jul; 8(4):419-29.
[Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006]J Mol Evol. 2006 Dec; 63(6):815-25.
[J Mol Evol. 2006]Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Sep; 21(9):1692-703.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 Feb 13; 279(7):5867-76.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16; 96(4):1409-14.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Plant J. 2002 Jun; 30(5):529-39.
[Plant J. 2002]J Biol Chem. 1997 Oct 17; 272(42):26145-52.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Plant Cell. 1999 Nov; 11(11):2113-22.
[Plant Cell. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2001 Nov 16; 276(46):43152-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1998 Jan 16; 273(3):1727-32.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 15; 268(17):12297-302.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May; 16(5):2226-37.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1996]J Biol Chem. 1997 May 2; 272(18):11763-9.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jan 10; 278(2):1273-80.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jan 25; 277(4):2413-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 54(4):1104-16.
[Mol Microbiol. 2004]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Dec; 56(6):959-71.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 20; 278(25):22453-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 27; 275(43):33388-94.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Plant Cell. 2004 Dec; 16(12):3285-303.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Plant Physiol. 1992 May; 99(1):161-169.
[Plant Physiol. 1992]Plant Physiol. 2002 Apr; 128(4):1245-54.
[Plant Physiol. 2002]J Biol Chem. 1989 May 25; 264(15):8557-62.
[J Biol Chem. 1989]Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan; 143(1):188-98.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2006 Apr; 140(4):1151-68.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Plant J. 2002 Jun; 30(5):529-39.
[Plant J. 2002]Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 54(4):1104-16.
[Mol Microbiol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jan 25; 277(4):2413-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Plant Cell. 1999 Apr; 11(4):587-600.
[Plant Cell. 1999]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 May 1; 1465(1-2):37-51.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000]Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Mar; 6(3):100-4.
[Trends Plant Sci. 2001]J Mol Evol. 2006 Dec; 63(6):815-25.
[J Mol Evol. 2006]Physiol Rev. 1999 Jul; 79(3):763-854.
[Physiol Rev. 1999]J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15; 22(16):6891-9.
[J Neurosci. 2002]Nature. 1989 Feb 23; 337(6209):740-3.
[Nature. 1989]J Biol Chem. 2001 Jul 13; 276(28):25919-28.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]J Mol Evol. 2006 Dec; 63(6):815-25.
[J Mol Evol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1998 Aug 14; 273(33):21054-60.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]Biochem J. 2000 Oct 1; 351(Pt 1):241-9.
[Biochem J. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 14; 93(10):5105-10.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 27; 275(43):33388-94.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 14; 276(50):47556-62.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6; 93(16):8782-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan; 54(380):73-81.
[J Exp Bot. 2003]J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan; 54(380):65-72.
[J Exp Bot. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep; 136(1):2532-47.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2006 Apr; 140(4):1151-68.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Plant Cell. 1999 Dec; 11(12):2283-90.
[Plant Cell. 1999]Plant Cell. 1999 Nov; 11(11):2113-22.
[Plant Cell. 1999]Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Jul; 8(4):419-29.
[Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006]Science. 1999 Aug 20; 285(5431):1256-8.
[Science. 1999]Plant J. 2003 Oct; 36(2):229-39.
[Plant J. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 54(4):1104-16.
[Mol Microbiol. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun; 141(2):312-22.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1999 Dec 3; 274(49):35089-94.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16; 96(4):1409-14.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov; 127(3):1020-9.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jul 19; 277(29):26452-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 21; 278(8):6610-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29; 97(5):2379-84.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]J Biol Chem. 2001 Nov 16; 276(46):43152-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16; 96(4):1409-14.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]FEBS Lett. 2004 Feb 13; 559(1-3):99-106.
[FEBS Lett. 2004]Cell. 1989 Jul 28; 58(2):409-19.
[Cell. 1989]J Biol Chem. 1997 Oct 17; 272(42):26145-52.
[J Biol Chem. 1997]Plant J. 2002 Jun; 30(5):529-39.
[Plant J. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 27; 275(43):33388-94.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Aug 6; 213(2):231-7.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002]Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Oct; 21(10):1215-21.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2003]Genome Biol. 2005; 6(9):R77.
[Genome Biol. 2005]J Exp Bot. 2007; 58(12):3419-27.
[J Exp Bot. 2007]Plant J. 1998 Dec; 16(6):735-43.
[Plant J. 1998]Planta. 2007 Jan; 225(2):403-11.
[Planta. 2007]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1; 89(7):2600-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov; 127(3):1020-9.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 21; 278(8):6503-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Dec; 56(6):959-71.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2001 Nov 16; 276(46):43152-9.
[J Biol Chem. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 21; 278(8):6610-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2002 Jan 25; 277(4):2413-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Plant Cell. 2003 Feb; 15(2):347-64.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 54(4):1104-16.
[Mol Microbiol. 2004]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Dec; 56(6):959-71.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov; 54(4):1104-16.
[Mol Microbiol. 2004]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Dec; 56(6):959-71.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]Plant J. 2001 Jul; 27(1):59-65.
[Plant J. 2001]Plant Cell. 2003 Feb; 15(2):347-64.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov; 127(3):1020-9.
[Plant Physiol. 2001]Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan; 143(1):188-98.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2000 Dec; 124(4):1814-27.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Plant Cell. 2002 Dec; 14(12):2985-94.
[Plant Cell. 2002]Science. 2003 Aug 1; 301(5633):653-7.
[Science. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2000 Dec; 124(4):1814-27.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Methods Enzymol. 1994; 233():346-57.
[Methods Enzymol. 1994]Plant Cell. 2005 Jan; 17(1):268-81.
[Plant Cell. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 8; 281(36):26280-8.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]