![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society of Plant Biologists Functional Characterization of the Plastidic Phosphate Translocator Gene Family from the Thermo-Acidophilic Red Alga Galdieria sulphuraria Reveals Specific Adaptations of Primary Carbon Partitioning in Green Plants and Red Algae1[W][OA] Institut für Biochemie der Pflanzen, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany (M.L., A.P.M.W.); Genetics Graduate Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 (M.L.); and Botanisches Institut II, Albertus-Magnus-Universität, 50931 Cologne, Germany (A.J.) *Corresponding author; email andreas.weber/at/uni-duesseldorf.de. 2Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755. Received September 8, 2008; Accepted September 15, 2008. Abstract In chloroplasts of green plants and algae, CO2 is assimilated into triose-phosphates (TPs); a large part of these TPs is exported to the cytosol by a TP/phosphate translocator (TPT), whereas some is stored in the plastid as starch. Plastidial phosphate translocators have evolved from transport proteins of the host endomembrane system shortly after the origin of chloroplasts by endosymbiosis. The red microalga Galdieria sulphuraria shares three conserved putative orthologous transport proteins with the distantly related seed plants and green algae. However, red algae, in contrast to green plants, store starch in their cytosol, not inside plastids. Hence, due to the lack of a plastidic starch pool, a larger share of recently assimilated CO2 needs to be exported to the cytosol. We thus hypothesized that red algal transporters have distinct substrate specificity in comparison to their green orthologs. This hypothesis was tested by expression of the red algal genes in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and assessment of their substrate specificities and kinetic constants. Indeed, two of the three red algal phosphate translocator candidate orthologs have clearly distinct substrate specificities when compared to their green homologs. GsTPT (for G. sulphuraria TPT) displays very narrow substrate specificity and high affinity; in contrast to green plant TPTs, 3-phosphoglyceric acid is poorly transported and thus not able to serve as a TP/3-phosphoglyceric acid redox shuttle in vivo. Apparently, the specific features of red algal primary carbon metabolism promoted the evolution of a highly efficient export system with high affinities for its substrates. The low-affinity TPT of plants maintains TP levels sufficient for starch biosynthesis inside of chloroplasts, whereas the red algal TPT is optimized for efficient export of TP from the chloroplast. In plants, the photosynthetic light reactions provide the energy for major plastid localized pathways, such as CO2 assimilation, the synthesis of starch, fatty acids, several amino acids, nucleic acids, and the reductive assimilation of inorganic ions like nitrate and sulfate (Weber et al., 2005; Zrenner et al., 2006). To supply the cell and the organism with these primary metabolites, a large number of precursors, end products, and intermediates have to be transported across the organelle envelope membrane and therefore present-day plastids are extensively connected to the cytoplasm by metabolite transporters that reside in the envelope membranes (Tegeder and Weber, 2006; Weber and Fischer, 2007). Chloroplasts originated approximately 1.6 billion years ago through a single primary endosymbiosis between a nonphotosynthetic primitive mitochondriate eukaryote and a cyanobacterium (Yoon et al., 2004; Bhattacharya et al., 2007; Reyes-Prieto et al., 2007). Within a period of 0.15 billion years, establishment of the plastid and divergence of the three major lineages of the Archaeplastida (Adl et al., 2005), that is the red algae (Rhodophyceae), green algae/land plants (Chloroplastida), and glaucophytes (Glaucophyta), began (Bhattacharya et al., 2004; Yoon et al., 2004). Establishment of the chloroplast within the host cell required massive remodeling of its membrane proteome; novel transport proteins to connect its metabolism with the metabolic network of the host cell had to be acquired (Bhattacharya et al., 2007; Weber and Fischer, 2007). Phylogenetic and phylogenomics analyses recently revealed that a large portion of these plastid-resident transporters is host derived, indicating that integration of the chloroplast with host metabolism was predominantly a host-driven process (Tyra et al., 2007). Genes encoding these transporters are not present in extant cyanobacterial genomes but most are conserved throughout the Archaeplastida, indicating they have been established at an early stage during formation of endosymbiosis, likely already at the stage of the protoalga (Tyra et al., 2007). Of particular importance for establishment of chloroplasts was an efficient and controlled export of photoassimilates from the endosymbiont to its host cell (Weber et al., 2006). In the Chloroplastida, a triose-P (TP) translocator (TPT) exports a significant amount of the dihydroxy-acetonephosphate (DHAP) that is generated by the Calvin-Benson cycle to the cytosol; there it mainly serves as precursor for Suc and cell wall biosynthesis (Flügge, 1999; Reiter, 2002). However, part of the TP is retained in the plastid stroma and used to fuel starch biosynthesis and other intraplastidial biosynthetic pathways (Zeeman et al., 2007). TPT candidate orthologs are highly conserved throughout the photosynthetic eukaryotes (Weber et al., 2006), and transport experiments with isolated organelles or reconstituted organellar membranes demonstrated TP transport activity in the red algae and glaucophytes lineages, respectively (Schlichting and Bothe, 1993; Weber et al., 2004). Apparently, TP already served as the main export photoassimilate at the stage of the proto-alga (Weber et al., 2006). In the plant model organism Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), additional sugar phosphate transporters with specialized functions have been characterized (Flügge, 1999). Import of phosphoenolpyruvic acid (PEP) from the cytosol by the PEP/phosphate transporter (PPT) drives fatty acid biosynthesis and synthesis of compounds by the shikimate pathway (i.e. aromatic amino acids; Fischer et al., 1997; Knappe et al., 2003b; Voll et al., 2003) and a Glc-6-P/phosphate transporter (GPT) provides Glc-6-P for starch synthesis in heterotrophic plastids (Kammerer et al., 1998; Niewiadomski et al., 2005). Last, a protein closely related to the GPT, the pentose-P/phosphate transporter (XPT), connects the oxidative pentose-P pathways (OPPPs) in cytosol and plastid (Eicks et al., 2002; Flügge and Gao, 2005). Phylogenetic analysis showed that candidate orthologs for the PPT and the GPT/XPT type of translocators are present in the genome of the ancient red microalga Galdieria sulphuraria, which is separated from green plants by an evolutionary distance of at least 1 billion years (Yoon et al., 2004). However, reconstituted membrane fractions from G. sulphuraria showed neither significant PEP nor Glc-6-P transport activity (Weber et al., 2004). This raises the intriguing question as to whether the genetic repertoire present in the last common ancestor of Rhodophyceae and Chloroplastida was functionally maintained or whether it diverged after separation of the two phyla. To address this question, we used G. sulphuraria as a model for the Rhodophyceae. The draft genome of G. sulphuraria is publicly available and the unicellular organism shares core features of carbon metabolism with other red algae (Viola et al., 2001; Barbier et al., 2005a). In contrast to higher plants, starch in red algae is produced in the cytosolic compartment, using UDP-Glc as precursor (Coppin et al., 2005; Patron and Keeling, 2005). Cell wall polysaccharides as well as the major soluble carbohydrate floridoside (α-d-galactopyranosyl-1-2′-glycerol) are produced in the same compartment. Notably, in addition to photoautotrophic growth, G. sulphuraria also is able to grow mixo- or heterotrophically on more than 50 different carbon sources (Gross and Schnarrenberger, 1995; Barbier et al., 2005a). Carbon partitioning thus has to be coordinated not only during alternating light and dark periods but also under continuous heterotrophic growth conditions. It is not known in detail how the carbon allocation between the plastid and the cytosol is accomplished in red algae. Based on phylogenetic data, the plastid phosphate translocators presumably are the major routes for metabolite exchange. They have to balance a high demand for photo-assimilates in the cytosol with maintaining sufficient levels of TPs for rhodoplast-localized pathways. Here we report the heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of the plastid phosphate transporter family from G. sulphuraria. With regard to higher plants we will discuss an alternative strategy to fine-tune carbon flux across the plastid membrane in photosynthetic eukaryotes. RESULTS Molecular Features of the Plastidic Phosphate Translocator Homologs from G. sulphuraria Three genes encoding proteins with significant similarity to higher plant plastidic phosphate translocators (pPTs) have previously been identified in the genome of the red alga G. sulphuraria (Weber et al., 2006). Based on detailed phylogenetic analysis, GsHET39C12 is the candidate ortholog to the plastid TPT and will thus be called GsTPT. GsA14H8 and GsA16F5 cluster with the functionally characterized green plant plastid Glc-6-P/phosphate transport proteins (GPTs) and PEP/phosphate translocator proteins (PPTs), respectively. They were thus assigned with the acronyms GsGPT and GsPPT, respectively. The coding sequences of GsTPT and GsPPT contain 1,224 nucleotides, corresponding to 407 amino acid residues and computed molecular masses of 45.83 kD (TPT) and 44.98 kD (PPT). GsGPT has a calculated molecular mass of 45.45 kD, consisting of 410 amino acid residues that are encoded by 1,233 nucleotides. The N-terminal regions of all three proteins represent putative plastid target sequences that display only low sequence similarity with the pPTs from higher plants (Supplemental Fig. S1) and the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. The G. sulphuraria proteins show an average sequence identity of 37% and a 55% similarity with their Arabidopsis homologs and a slightly higher identity of 48% to the corresponding C. merolae proteins (Supplemental Table S2). Six Lys and two Arg residues that are invariantly embedded in conserved motifs in all functionally characterized pPT proteins to date (Knappe et al., 2003a) are also found in all three G. sulphuraria homologs. Relative to the GsTPT sequence, the positively charged amino acids are at positions K123, K199, R261, K266, K267, K361, R362, and K399 (Supplemental Fig. S1). All three putative transport proteins are highly hydrophobic proteins that are predicted by ConPred II (Arai et al., 2004) to contain nine to 10 membrane spanning α-helices. The GsTPT and GsGPT genes contain one intron that separates a short first exon from the residual coding sequence (Supplemental Table S2). GsPPT has a total of four exons. The last exon covers approximately 50% of the codons. All three sequences have been submitted to GenBank and also can be found at the Michigan State University Galdieria genome database (http://genomics.msu.edu/galdieria). Accession numbers and annotations are listed in Supplemental Table S2. Heterologous Expression of GsTPT, GsPPT, and GsGPT To assess the substrate specificities of the G. sulphuraria phosphate translocators (PTs), we cloned the corresponding cDNAs into the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) expression vector pYES/NT under control of the Gal-inducible GAL4 promoter. The regions of the cDNAs encoding for the putative target sequences of each protein were removed and instead fused to an N-terminal hexa-His tag. After transformation of the corresponding constructs into the yeast strain INVSc1, all three pPT homologs could be successfully expressed and accumulated in the membrane fraction (Supplemental Fig. S2). Immunoblot analysis with an anti-poly-His tag antibody verified the Gal-inducible accumulation of the pPT proteins (Supplemental Fig. S2, lane 2–4) compared to controls, which maintained the empty expression vector (Supplemental Fig. S2, lane 1). The calculated molecular masses of the N-terminal His-tagged proteins were 41.6 kD, 45.2 kD, and 41.2 kD for GsTPT, GsPPT, and GsGPT, respectively. The presence of recombinant protein was verified for all biological replicates by western blot before reconstitution. Functional Analysis of Three Putative Transport Proteins from G. sulphuraria All functionally characterized pPTs of higher plants catalyze, in addition to their characteristic substrates, a strict homo-exchange of orthophosphate (Pi) (Flügge, 1999). To test whether the yeast-expressed, recombinant GsPTs are functional, we thus first examined their ability to catalyze the signature Pi homo-exchange.To this end, they were reconstituted into liposomes that were preloaded with 30 mm Pi (i.e. the liposomes contained 30 mm Pi inside). Then radiolabeled [32P]phosphate was added to the liposomes and the uptake kinetics were recorded. In GsTPT and GsPPT containing proteoliposomes, protein-mediated isotope equilibrium was reached within 10 min, using an external Pi concentration of 0.25 mm (Fig. 1
Transport Properties of GsTPT, GsPPT, and GsGPT To assess the substrate specificity of the recombinant GspPT proteins, vesicles were preloaded with saturating concentrations (i.e. 30 mm) of various counter-exchange substrates and initial rates of [32P]Pi uptake were determined. GsTPT Relative to the Pi/Pi homo-exchange experiment, the uptake rate of [32P]Pi into proteoliposomes reconstituted with GsTPT was 86.7% ± 13.3% when proteoliposomes were preloaded with the TP DHAP. Uptake rates into liposomes preloaded with 3-phosphoglyceric acid (3-PGA), PEP, or Glc-6-P, respectively, were low (Fig. 2A
GsPPT Reconstituted GsPPT protein efficiently used Pi and PEP as a countersubstrate for the import of radiolabeled [32P]phosphate (Fig. 2B GsGPT Vesicles reconstituted with the GPT homolog from G. sulphuraria were preloaded with the same 20 substrates as given above; in all cases the [32P]Pi uptake was much lower than for liposomes preloaded with 30 mm Pi (Fig. 2C Transcript Levels and Protein Activity of the pPT Homologs in G. sulphuraria Cells In land plants, TPT expression is confined to photosynthetic tissues whereas GPT expression is highest in heterotrophic tissues (Kammerer et al., 1998; Flügge, 1999; Niewiadomski et al., 2005). PPT genes are expressed at low levels in various tissues (Knappe et al., 2003b). To determine the expression pattern of GspPTs, semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR was used. Figure 3
DISCUSSION In this study, we report the molecular and biochemical characteristics of the pPT family from the unicellular red alga G. sulphuraria. All three members of the GsPT gene family were heterologously expressed in yeast, functionally reconstituted into liposomes (Supplemental Fig. S1; Fig. 1 The G. sulphuraria Genome Encodes a High-Affinity TPT with Narrow Substrate Specificity Recombinant G. sulphuraria TPT mediates a strict counterexchange of the TP DHAP with Pi (Fig. 2
On the other hand, GsTPT is highly expressed and active in heterotrophically cultured G. sulphuraria cells (Fig. 3 G. sulphuraria Has a PPT with Similar Properties as Its Green Plant Ortholog PEP uptake from the cytosol is required for stroma-localized fatty acid and shikimate biosynthesis (Flügge, 1999). Previously published results have been ambiguous about the existence of a putative PPT in G. sulphuraria. Phylogenetic analysis revealed an orthologous candidate gene (Weber et al., 2006), although isolated membrane fractions did not exhibit pronounced PEP uptake activity (Weber et al., 2004). Here, we show that EST GsA16F5 (Weber et al., 2006) represents a highly conserved PPT with almost identical kinetic constants in both the green and red lineages (Table I). Both transporters are highly specific for Pi and PEP and poorly accept 3-PGA, DHAP, or any other of the 16 tested metabolites as a substrate (Fig. 2 A question that cannot be conclusively answered at the moment is whether rhodoplasts, analogous to chloroplasts of green plants, also have negligible activities of plastid phosphoglyceromutase and enolase to produce PEP from plastidial 3-PGA (Trimming and Emes, 1993). The G. sulphuraria genome encodes for two phosphoglyceromutase isozymes (Gs04140 and Gs52680) and a single enolase (Gs21490), which are all three computationally predicted as cytosolic enzymes (Nielsen et al., 1997) without any N-terminal targeting sequences, when compared with their homologous genes from Arabidopsis (phosphoglyceromutase: At4g09520, At3g08590, At1g09780; enolase: At2g36530, At2g29560, At1g74030; Friso et al., 2004; Larkin et al., 2007). Alternatively, PEP could be generated from pyruvic acid via the pyruvate Pi dikinase (PPDK) reaction. The annotated PPDK gene Gs42070 is computationally predicted to be localized in the cytosol, exhibiting a high similarity with cyanobacterial PPDK genes, and is not phylogenetically related to the dual targeted enzyme from Arabidopsis (At4g15530; Parsley and Hibberd, 2006). Although computational targeting predictions have to be taken with a grain of salt, bioinformatics analysis indicates that conversion of TP to PEP is not possible in G. sulphuraria, and rhodoplasts thus depend on PEP import from the cytosol to drive PEP-depended reactions in the stroma (Fig. 4 G. sulphuraria Does Not Possess a Plastidic Hexose-P Importer Reconstituted recombinant putative GsGPT mediated a strict Pi/Pi homo-exchange that followed a first-order rate kinetics (Fig. 1 In nongreen plastids of plants, Glc-6-P is the preferred precursor for starch synthesis and NADPH generation via the OPPP due to the absence of a Fru-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) activity (Flügge, 1999). In photosynthetic tissues, plastidic FBPase is inactivated at night and thus hexose-Ps cannot be generated from TPs (and vice versa). In contrast, red algal starch biosynthesis is cytosolic and plastidic FBPase from G. sulphuraria is not subject to a strict redox regulation (Reichert et al., 2003; Oesterhelt et al., 2007). Importing TPs via the GsTPT could thus sustain the production of hexose-P for carbon and NADPH supply in the rhodoplast during the night or prolonged heterotrophic growth conditions, thus bypassing the requirement for a plastidic hexose-P translocator (Fig. 4 An Operative DHAP/3-PGA Reduction Shuttle Is Unlikely in G. sulphuraria 3-PGA is a major substrate for the TPT in higher plants (Flügge, 1999). In spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and other model plants, 3-PGA levels in the plastid and the cytosol frequently exceed DHAP levels by severalfold (Gerhardt et al., 1987). However, the affinity of the spinach TPT is identical for both metabolites. It has been proposed that in vivo a significant amount of 3-PGA transport occurs across the envelope membrane; the TPT could thus operate as an NADPH reduction equivalent shuttle between stroma and cytosol (Heineke et al., 1991). The substrate specificity and the kinetic constants of recombinant proteins, as discussed in detail earlier, and total membrane fractions from G. sulphuraria presumably cannot sustain a physiological relevant exchange rate of 3-PGA across the rhodoplasts envelope membrane. Still, DHAP offers a possibility to export reduction equivalent to the cytosol. The nonphosphorylating glyceraldehyde-3-P dehydrogenase (Rius et al., 2006), which is also present in the draft genome sequence of the red alga (Gs00840) or the combined glycolytic reaction sequence of glyceraldehyde-3-P dehydrogenase and 3-PGA kinase (Plaxton, 1996) generates NADPH, or NADH and ATP, respectively. However, in contrast to green plants, not 3-PGA but Pi must be postulated as the alternative countersubstrate for DHAP. Impact of Subtle Differences of TPT in Chloroplastida and Rhodophyta TP is the main entry and branching point in the glycolytic network in photosynthetically active cells (Plaxton, 1996). Metabolic flux has to be regulated between generating hexose-Ps via gluconeogenesis and glycolytic “downstream” products, such as 3-PGA, PEP, and pyruvic acid. In higher plants, the redox transfer by a TP/3-PGA shuttle via nonphosphorylating glyceraldehyde-3-P dehydrogenase and 3-PGA kinase is proposed to be marginal and glyceraldehyde-3-P dehydrogenase expression is mainly induced under stress conditions, such as anaerobiosis and heat shock or Suc feeding (Yang et al., 1993; Bustos et al., 2008; Holtgrefe et al., 2008). On the other hand, glycolysis has to provide adequate amounts of PEP to replenish TCA intermediates used for biosynthesis of, e.g. amino acids, to produce pyruvic acid for mitochondrial metabolism, or to fuel plastid fatty acid biosynthesis (Plaxton, 1996). Because 3-PGA transport is seemingly a specific adaptation in plants, we hypothesize that 3-PGA transport across the chloroplast envelope membrane might provide a bypass of the complex regulation of the cytosolic TP pool that permits supporting cytosolic PEP biosynthesis and serves under stress conditions as an additional redox shuttle system. CONCLUSION Although the primary structures of pPTs are highly conserved between green plants and red algae, these proteins have evolved quite distinct biochemical characteristics in the different lineages of the Archaeplastida. Comparative biochemical analysis of candidate orthologs from distantly related organisms thus provides novel insights into alternative modes for regulating “ancient” metabolic pathways. While the TP/phosphate antiport activity across the plastid envelope membrane is highly conserved across all photosynthetic eukaryotes analyzed to date, the red algal transporters catalyze neither 3-PGA nor Glc-6-P transport (Fig. 4 G. sulphuraria must have evolved alternative mechanisms to distribute TP into various pools (i.e. floridean starch, floridoside, and fatty acid and amino acid synthesis), such as less stringent redox control of Calvin cycle, OPPP, and glycolysis (Oesterhelt et al., 2007). Plastidial phosphate translocators thus represent crucial components of primary carbon portioning in higher plants and red algae that have evolved to the specific requirements of each lineage through modulation of substrate specificities and kinetic constants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Growth and Sampling of Galdieria sulphuraria Cells Galdieria sulphuraria strain 074W (Gross et al., 1999) was cultured autotrophically in a minimal salt medium at 37°C with a light intensity of 80 μmol photons m−2 s−1. The culture was grown at pH 2.0 in Erlenmeyer flasks under vigorous shaking at ambient air conditions. Heterotrophic growth of the algal cells was performed at 37°C in culture flasks in complete darkness in the identical salt medium containing 25 mm Glc as sole carbon source. Cells were harvested at the late logarithmic phase by centrifugation (3,000g, 5 min, 4°C), washed with 1×TE buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mm EDTA), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C or directly used for nucleic acid extraction (Barbier et al., 2005b) or total membrane enrichment. Isolation of Genomic DNA and Total RNA from G. sulphuraria Isolation of genomic DNA was performed as previously described (Barbier et al., 2005b). Briefly, cells were ground in liquid nitrogen and proteins were removed by phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol (PCI) extraction. Nucleic acids were precipitated by ethanol and RNA was removed by a DNAse-free RNAse treatment and purified by an additional PCI and ethanol precipitation step. Total RNA was isolated with an acid guanidium isothiocyanate-phenol/chloroform solution as described by Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987). Enrichment of Total Membrane Fractions from G. sulphuraria Harvested cells were resuspended in breaking buffer (100 mm HEPES/KOH, pH 7.6, 1 mm EDTA, 5% glycerol, 5 mm ascorbic acid, 5 mm dithiothreitol, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) to yield an OD600 of approximately 100 (0.5 mL) and an equal volume of acid-washed glass beads (0.4–0.6 mm size; Sigma Aldrich) were added. Cells were lysed with a mixer mill (MM301; Retsch GmbH) for 4 min. Broken cells were diluted with 10 mL breaking buffer and centrifuged (2,000g, 1 min, 4°C). The supernatant contained the total membrane fractions. Membranes were pelleted from the supernatant by ultracentrifugation (100,000g, 50 min, 4°C), resuspended in 0.4 mL of 10 mm HEPES/KOH, pH 7.6, 1 mm MgCl2, and 0.05-mL aliquots reconstituted into liposomes. Expression of GsPTs in Yeast The coding sequences of all three GsPT cDNAs were amplified from G. sulphuraria cDNA by PCR (Platinum Pfx polymerase; Invitrogen) using the primer combinations listed in Supplemental Table S1. PCR products were subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector system (Promega) and sequenced. Forward and reverse primers for the genes GsHET39C12 and GsA16F5 were designed with BamHI and XhoI restriction recognition sites, respectively. The GsA14H8 specific forward primer had a KpnI and the reverse primer an XhoI restriction site. Each cDNA was ligated in frame with an N-terminal poly-His tag into the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) expression vector pYES2/NT (Invitrogen). Standard molecular methods were applied for DNA restriction and cloning (Sambrook et al., 1995). The resulting constructs were transformed into competent yeast INVSc1 cells (Invitrogen). Selection, maintenance of the transformants, and Gal-inducible expression of the recombinant proteins were done according to the manufacturer's instructions (pYES2/NT expression system; Invitrogen). Preparation of yeast membranes containing heterologously expressed GsHET3912, GsA16F5, and GsA14H8 proteins, respectively, was done as described previously (Bouvier et al., 2006), except that the expression was induced at an OD600 of 0.6 in the presence of 2% Gal and cells had been cultured for 8 h at 30°C. Presence of recombinant proteins was verified by standard SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis (Sambrook et al., 1995) using an anti-penta-His antibody (Qiagen) and a secondary anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with an alkaline phosphatase (Promega). Reconstitution into Liposomes and Transport Activity Assays Acetone-washed l-α-phosphatidylcholine (Sigma-Aldrich) had been sonicated (5 min on ice, Branson Sonicator 250, output 2, duty cycle 30%) to a final concentration of 2% (w/v) in 120 mm Tricine-KOH (pH 7.5) and 30 mm internal substrate. Yeast membrane fraction (50 μL) was reconstituted with 950 μL liposome suspension by the freeze-thaw procedure (Kasahara and Hinkle, 1977). After thawing, the proteoliposomes were pulsed 20 times on ice to yield unilamellar vesicles. PD10-desalting columns (GE Healthcare) were preequilibrated with 150 mm Tricine-KOH (pH 7.5) and used to remove nonincorporated substrate from the external medium. If not stated otherwise, all transport studies were initiated with radiolabeled [32P]Pi (GE Healthcare) at a final concentration of 0.25 mm. For each data point, 190 μL proteoliposomes were terminated with 10 μL inhibitor stop solution (200 mm pyridoxal-phosphate, 20 mm 4,4#-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2#-disulfonic acid, 100 mm Tricine-KOH, pH 8.0). Control experiments with membranes from yeast cells harboring the empty vector were performed in parallel. The addition of inhibitor mix before adding radiolabeled substrate was used to monitor unspecific binding. External phosphate was removed by strong anion-exchange chromatography with AG-1 X8 resin (acetate form, 200–400 mesh, preequilibrated with 150 mm sodium acetate; Bio-Rad). The flow-through of the anion-exchange columns containing the proteoliposomes with the imported radiolabeled phosphate was quantified by a liquid scintillation counting. All substrates used for uptake studies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Kinetic constants were determined by measuring the initial velocity of each experiment. Michaelis-Menten constant (KM) has been analyzed with at least six external phosphate concentrations ranging between 0.05 and 10 mm and competitive inhibition of Pi transport was assessed by the inhibitor constant Ki as described by Dixon (1953). GraphPad-Prism software was used for nonlinear regression fitting of all enzyme kinetic data. Reverse Transcription-PCR Gene Expression Study DNAse-treated RNA was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis (SuperScript II first-strand synthesis system; Invitrogen). Oligonucleotide primers for expression studies of the G. sulphuraria genes are summarized in Supplemental Table S1. Other Methods Protein concentrations were determined with a standard Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Proteins in the membrane fractions were delipidated by TCA-acetone extraction before determination (Shultz et al., 2005). Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We thank Guillaume Barbier and David Gagneul for support with cultivation of G. sulphuraria and the nucleic acid isolation and Prof. Dr. Gerald Schönknecht (Oklahoma State University, Stillwater) for critical discussion. Notes 1This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (award EF–0332882 to A.P.M.W.) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Andreas P.M. Weber (andreas.weber/at/uni-duesseldorf.de). [W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA]Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005; 56():133-64.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005]Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006; 57():805-36.
[Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006]FEBS Lett. 2007 May 25; 581(12):2215-22.
[FEBS Lett. 2007]Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May; 21(5):809-18.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2004]Bioessays. 2007 Dec; 29(12):1239-46.
[Bioessays. 2007]Annu Rev Genet. 2007; 41():147-68.
[Annu Rev Genet. 2007]J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005 Sep-Oct; 52(5):399-451.
[J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005]Bioessays. 2004 Jan; 26(1):50-60.
[Bioessays. 2004]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Mar; 5(3):609-12.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Dec; 5(6):536-42.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002]Biochem J. 2007 Jan 1; 401(1):13-28.
[Biochem J. 2007]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 May; 55(1):17-32.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May; 21(5):809-18.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2004]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 May; 55(1):17-32.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb; 137(2):460-74.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]J Mol Evol. 2005 Feb; 60(2):257-67.
[J Mol Evol. 2005]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Mar; 5(3):609-12.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar; 131(3):1178-90.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul 1; 32(Web Server issue):W390-3.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2004]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Biochem J. 1953 Aug; 55(1):170-1.
[Biochem J. 1953]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Plant Cell. 1998 Jan; 10(1):105-17.
[Plant Cell. 1998]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Plant Cell. 2005 Mar; 17(3):760-75.
[Plant Cell. 2005]Plant J. 2003 Nov; 36(3):411-20.
[Plant J. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb; 137(2):460-74.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]Planta. 2000 Feb; 210(3):371-82.
[Planta. 2000]Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Sep; 30(9):1126-49.
[Plant Cell Environ. 2007]Photosynth Res. 2004; 79(1):1-24.
[Photosynth Res. 2004]Biochem J. 2007 Jan 1; 401(1):13-28.
[Biochem J. 2007]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Mar; 5(3):609-12.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]Plant Mol Biol. 2004 May; 55(1):17-32.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2004]Planta. 1994; 194(2):181-5.
[Planta. 1994]Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Sep; 5(9):1517-31.
[Eukaryot Cell. 2006]Plant Cell. 2004 Feb; 16(2):478-99.
[Plant Cell. 2004]Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1; 23(21):2947-8.
[Bioinformatics. 2007]Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Oct; 62(3):339-49.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2006]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Feb 21; 1645(2):212-7.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003]Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Sep; 48(9):1359-73.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2007]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun; 50():27-45.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999]Plant Physiol. 1987 Feb; 83(2):399-407.
[Plant Physiol. 1987]Plant Physiol. 1991 Apr; 95(4):1131-1137.
[Plant Physiol. 1991]Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Aug; 61(6):945-57.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2006]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun; 47():185-214.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996]Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun; 47():185-214.
[Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996]Plant Physiol. 1993 Jan; 101(1):209-16.
[Plant Physiol. 1993]J Plant Physiol. 2008 Mar 13; 165(4):456-61.
[J Plant Physiol. 2008]Physiol Plant. 2008 Jun; 133(2):211-28.
[Physiol Plant. 2008]Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Sep; 48(9):1359-73.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2007]Gene. 1999 Apr 1; 230(1):7-14.
[Gene. 1999]Anal Biochem. 1987 Apr; 162(1):156-9.
[Anal Biochem. 1987]Plant Cell. 2006 Nov; 18(11):3088-105.
[Plant Cell. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1977 Oct 25; 252(20):7384-90.
[J Biol Chem. 1977]Biochem J. 1953 Aug; 55(1):170-1.
[Biochem J. 1953]