• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(11): e3681.
Published online Nov 10, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0003681
PMCID: PMC2577010

Rickettsia conorii Transcriptional Response within Inoculation Eschar

Aric Gregson, Editor

Abstract

Background

Rickettsia conorii, the causative agent of the Mediterranean spotted fever, is transmitted to humans by the bite of infected ticks Rhipicephalus sanguineus. The skin thus constitutes an important barrier for the entry and propagation of R. conorii. Given this, analysis of the survival strategies used by the bacterium within infected skin is critical for our understanding of rickettsiosis.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we report the first genome-wide analysis of R. conorii gene expression from infected human skin biopsies. Our data showed that R. conorii exhibited a striking transcript signature that is remarkably conserved across patients, regardless of genotype. The expression profiles obtained using custom Agilent microarrays were validated by quantitative RT-PCR. Within eschars, the amount of detected R. conorii transcripts was of 55%, this value being of 74% for bacteria grown in Vero cells. In such infected host tissues, approximately 15% (n = 211) of the total predicted R. conorii ORFs appeared differentially expressed compared to bacteria grown in standard laboratory conditions. These genes are mostly down-regulated and encode proteins essential for bacterial replication. Some of the strategies displayed by rickettsiae to overcome the host defense barriers, thus avoiding killing, were also pointed out. The observed up-regulation of rickettsial genes associated with DNA repair is likely to correspond to a DNA-damaging agent enriched environment generated by the host cells to eradicate the pathogens. Survival of R. conorii within eschars also involves adaptation to osmotic stress, changes in cell surface proteins and up-regulation of some virulence factors. Interestingly, in contrast to down-regulated transcripts, we noticed that up-regulated ones rather exhibit a small nucleotide size, most of them being exclusive for the spotted fever group rickettsiae.

Conclusion/Significance

Because eschar is a site for rickettsial introduction, the pattern of rickettsial gene expression observed here may define how rickettsiae counteract the host defense.

Introduction

Rickettsia conorii is a Gram-negative bacterium responsible for the Mediterranean spotted fever (MSF), a disease transmitted to humans by the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus [1]. Inoculation of rickettsiae to human beings leads to vasculitis and lesions at the site of tick bite [2]. The cutaneous necrosis that results from severe injury to many small vessels and otherwise called the “tâche noire” is the hallmark of many spotted fever group rickettsioses [3]. The histological examination of eschars collected from patients suffering from boutonneuse fever indicated that the alterations were mainly located in the dermis and subcutaneous tissues and evidenced the presence of rickettsiae in blood vessels [3]. Thus, indirect immunofluorescent detection of R. conorii on cryostat sections of skin biopsy specimens from patients was found to improve the early diagnosis of severe and atypical forms of MSF [4], [5].

Inoculation eschars correspond to the portal of entry of the infectious agent into the host and the first site of challenge between the infected human being and the bacterium. Within the first 24 hours after the tick attachment, the rickettsiae are already blood-borne and the observed rickettsiae in the tick feeding site and in particular within the eschar are left over rickettsiae undergoing clearance [2]. In this respect, the “tâche noire” was depicted as being an excellent, accessible model for the study of the human-Rickettsia interaction [6]. The intralesional expression of local mediators of inflammation and of immune response that could contribute both to anti-rickettsial immunity and the pathogenesis of the MSF, has recently been depicted in infected human tissues [7]. Analysis of the complementary picture, namely the survival strategies used by R. conorii within the inoculation site should provide a better understanding of rickettsial pathogenesis. While reports of global gene expression profiling in human tissue or non-invasive patient samples suffering from bacterial diseases are limited [8], [9], we explored the RNA profiles of R. conorii from eschars collected on MSF patients. This study was made possible by applying a strategy combining removal of eukaryotic contaminants with subsequent random amplification of prokaryotic cDNA [10] that was found convenient for microarray-based transcriptome analysis of obligate intracellular rickettsiae [11]. To identify genes differentially regulated within eschars, rickettsial microarrays hybridized with cDNA obtained from R. conorii grown in Vero cells monolayers at 32°C were used as control. The results obtained offer new insights into R. conorii survival within the eschar site.

Results

The transcriptome profile of R. conorii is highly conserved among different eschars

The bacterial RNA samples purified from 8 eschars derived from 7 individual patients (Table 1) were subjected to whole-genome-wide transcript expression profile analysis and compared to the transcriptome of R. conorii grown in vitro and used as reference. As illustrated by Figure 1, human skin biopsies of MSF patients are histologically dominated by severe cutaneous necrosis with coagulative necrosis of the epidermis. Such specimens contain R. conorii, the bacteria being mostly found in necrotic areas associated with inflammatory cells. Given the scarce amount of available material, only one sample was hybridized twice. Hierarchical clustering of the signal intensities of the individual transcripts in both groups evidenced a high similarity of transcript expression patterns among eschars or infected cell monolayers, respectively. Measurements derived from similarity matrix indicated that largest distance among Vero cells profiles was 0.056 whereas a distance of 0.188 was found for the different eschars (Fig. 2). To accurately assess variations in gene expression within the group left angle bracketleft angle bracketescharright angle bracketright angle bracket, the phylogenic analysis of the different clinical isolates was achieved with the multispacer typing (MST) based on the sequences of 3 variable intergenic spacers, namely dksA-xerC, mppA-purC, rpmE-tRNA(fMet) [12]. By combining the genotypes obtained from these three intergenic spacers, only 3 MST genotypes were obtained (Table 1). It is interesting to note that the two R. conorii isolates for which the transcriptome profiles appeared divergent from the main cluster (samples G and H) exhibited distinct MST genotypes.

Figure 1
Inoculation eschar from a patient with MSF.
Figure 2
Two-way clustering analysis of R. conorii transcriptomic patterns.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of patients included in this study.

The microarray results were confirmed by qRT-PCR for a subset of 16 targets. When comparing both methods, a high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.934) was observed (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Validation of microarray-based expression profiles by qRT-PCR.

General overview

When compared with bacteria grown in Vero cell monolayers, the R. conorii gene transcripts in eschars were mainly found to be down-regulated. Of the 5,098 probes represented on our microarrays, 211 transcripts representing 15.4% (211/1374) of the R. conorii ORFs were differentially expressed (P<0.05). Of these, 180 genes were down-regulated two-fold or greater in vivo (supplementary Table S2) while only 31 genes exhibited an increased expression (Table 2). In the R. conorii genome, the size of the 1,374 annotated ORFs is ranging from 120 to 6,063 nucleotides (nt) with a mean value of 804 nt [13]. We noticed that 87% (27/31) of up-regulated genes within eschars have a size ranging from 153 nt to 723 nt, being thus significantly smaller than the median value. We also observed that 21 of these genes, i.e. 67.7% are lacking or highly degraded in the typhus group (TG) rickettsiae. In contrast, the mean size of down-regulated genes was of 1,323 nt and 75% of them belong to the core gene of rickettsiae [14].

Table 2
Thirty one genes of R. conorii up-reguled within eschars.

Evidence for rickettsial growth arrest within eschars

The ORFs of R. conorii whose expression was significantly altered were classified into functional categories according to the Cluster of Orthologous Gene (COG) classification, as defined by the COGs database [15]. As illustrated Figure 4, the most down-regulated COGs were translation (J), cell wall and membrane biogenesis (M), intracellular trafficking and secretion (U) as well as energy production and conversion (C). The reduced expression of 24 genes encoding ribosomal proteins indicates that, within eschars, rickettsiae are reducing their translational capacity (supplementary Table S2). Eighteen of these genes (from RC0981 to RC1007) are grouped together on the rickettsial chromosome and are organized as a ribosomal protein gene cluster. Consistent with a bacterial growth arrest, we also noticed a dramatic decrease in the expression of cell wall components including several Sca family proteins (Sca0, Sca1, Sca4, Sca5 and Sca10). Following 23SrRNA (105.5-fold decrease), the most down-regulated genes are those encoding the rickettsial outer membrane protein (rOmpB otherwise called Sca5: 98.5-fold decrease) and the rickettsial adhesin Adr2 (79.7-fold decrease). While down-regulated in a lower extend (fold-change mean of 5.4), many of the variable genes from the U category, including VirB, SecE, SecF and SecY subunits, encode proteins associated with the cell membrane. We also noticed the down-regulation of genes involved in energy production that should also contribute to bacterial replication arrest. Finally, 18% of down-regulated genes have no clearly defined function (S and R) or are not assigned to any functional categories.

Figure 4
Distribution of R. conorii ORFs down-regulated during infection.

R. conorii response to the host attack

Among the 31 rickettsial genes up-regulated in eschars, several are plausibly involved to escape host response. They include genes coding for proteins involved in DNA repair and modification as RC0550 (RecB exonuclease), RC1204 (tmRNA-binding protein), RC1050 (transposase) and RC1125 (helicase). Bacteria also face to oxidative stress, as indicated by the increase expression of phbC (poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate polymerase), trxB2 (thioredoxin) and grxC1 (glutaredoxin). An enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress could be provided through the increased expression of proP9 (proline-betaine transporter) and nuoL3 (NADH dehydrogenase chain I). Adaptation of R. conorii within eschars promoted changes in cell-wall related proteins as glycosyltransferase and cephalosporin hydroxylase (cmcl) and was accompanied with the up-regulation of several ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters (RC0500, mdlB, atm1) and of two proteins that belong to the KAP NTPases, namely the NACHT NTPase and the putative AAA+ family ATPase, a new family characterized by the presence of transmembrane segments inserted into the P-loop NTPase domain [16]. We also noticed the over-expression of two genes encoding tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-containing proteins, suggesting the importance of this motif for protein-protein interactions between R. conorii and its host during infection, as previously evoked [17]. Apart from these, we also observed an increased expression of RC1370 and RC1298 genes that encode a prophage antirepressor and lysozyme, respectively. Finally, 11 out of the 31 up-regulated genes encode proteins with unknown function.

Discussion

Infection with R. conorii usually occurs following infected tick bite [2] and the first step of this host-pathogen interaction takes place at the inoculation site where anti-rickettsial immunity is enhanced [7]. The presence of an eschar in rickettsial disease is generally linked with a milder disease as more severe rickettsiosis, namely the Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF) and epidemic typhus do not exhibit inoculation eschars [1], [2], [18]. This suggests that eschar corresponds to the front line of human host defense against rickettsia diffusion, a point consistent with the fact that the highest bacteremia were detected in patients suffering from RMSF and typhus [19]. Accordingly, the factors involved in the bacterial survival strategy can be considered as crucial actors of R. conorii pathogenesis. We thus examined the expression patterns of R. conorii in such environment, using an approach successfully applied for the analysis of transcriptional profile of bacteria within infected epithelial monolayers [11].

The human skin biopsies being rare and precious, the optimal conditions for total RNA extraction were first assayed on eschars experimentally induced through the intradermal injection of R. conorii in rabbits (not shown). Starting material used in this study was collected at different time points after the tick bite and stored at −80°C for variable periods of time (up to 3 years) before processing. We predicted that this factor would interfere with the identification of differences in gene expression because of biological variations. In addition, the pattern of gene expression may also vary depending on the genetic background of infecting strains. Indeed, in microarray-based experiments, a lower hybridization can result either from a reduced amount of transcripts or from divergence in the sequence of the gene [20]. Thus, insertion or deletion events in the genome of clinical strains tested could affect the apparent transcript abundance measured by using a microarray designed from the genome sequence of the Malish strain (seven) of R. conorii [13]. Here, three R. conorii strains corresponding to cases issued from three different geographical sites were identified. However, analysis of rickettsial transcript expression patterns from the 8 human eschars included in this study yielded reproducible results and only minor variations were observed between biopsy specimens. Finally, results obtained by qRT-PCR indicated that reliable microarray hybridizations can be achieved with rickettsial RNA extracted from multiple and independently obtained eschars.

This work showed that within eschars, the R. conorii transcripts were mainly down-regulated compared to bacteria internalized in Vero cells. The most significantly repressed genes are those of the translation machinery. This observation is consistent with previous analysis of the transcriptional changes displayed by 19 different bacterial pathogens upon eukaryotic cell infection [8]. Within these conditions, a general decline of genes involved in general metabolism associated with bacterial growth (translation, transcription, cell wall biogenesis, energy production, transport of carbohydrates, amino acids and nucleotides) was observed. Such a global expression decrease resembles that depicted for Bacillus subtilis [21], Escherichia coli [22], Corynebacterium glutamicum [23], and Staphylococcus aureus [24] after inducing the stringent response [25]. The recent analysis of inflammatory and immune mediators present in skin-biopsy samples of patients suffering from MSF evidenced the production of some enzymes including inducible nitric oxide synthase and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, that should contribute to the bacterial growth arrest [7]. However, we observed that in some cases, the immune and inflammatory host response was therefore not strong enough to eradicate all infecting R. conorii as the bacterium was cultivable from 5 (62.5%) of the eschar biopsy specimens.

Analysis of obtained data highlighted some of the mechanisms displayed by the rickettsiae to counter the damage and survive within the host cells. Genes encoding proteins involved in genome repair and allowing bacteria to cope with DNA-damaging agents are probably critical in this situation and were up-regulated. DNA repair is a fundamental process used by pathogenic bacteria as one of the defense mechanisms that allow them to survive in their hosts [26]. As described for Helicobacter pylori [27], the DNA lesions could result from a cellular oxidative stress, a point consistent with the increased rickettsial defenses against reactive oxygen species. Noteworthy is that production of bactericidal reactive oxygen species is one of the key methods by which mammalian infected cells efficiently kill bacteria [28]. Within eschars, R. conorii also deal with osmotic stress as indicated by the up-regulation of proline-betaine transporter and of NADH dehydrogenase I. Proline and betaine are two osmoprotectants accumulated through enhanced uptake rather than synthesis by Gram negative bacteria to overcome the inhibitory effects of hyperosmolarity [29]. While the nuo genes of rickettsiae are more closely related to mitochondria than to any other studied microbe [30], enhancement of NADH dehydrogenase expression could correspond to another strategy of osmoadaptation evolved to achieve salt tolerance. R. conorii also displayed another hallmark feature of pathogens interacting with host cells, namely the phenotypic changes in the composition of several membrane proteins [8]. It is well established that antigenic variation is an important mechanism that allows pathogens to escape for immunity. In this respect, we noticed an important down-regulation of genes encoding for the Sca family proteins among which Sca0 (rOmpA) and Sca5 (rOmpB) which are two major rickettsial antigenic determinants [31]. Antigenic variation could also be related to the post-translational modifications of proteins. These changes could be afforded by Cmcl, a protein recently classified as a methyltransferase based on structural evidences [32], or by a glycosyltransferase. Because most glycoproteins were associated with virulence factors in bacterial pathogens [33], these events could contribute to differences in both virulence and antigenicity of R. conorii in vivo.

Clearly, besides evasion of host defense, rickettsiae also exhibited virulence determinants in vivo. Thus, the export of virulence proteins in the host cell cytoplasm could be achieved through the increased expression of ABC transporters that function as type I secretion system in Gram negative bacteria [34]. The way in which rickettsiae use the KAP NTPases in the intracellular host cell environments has not yet been investigated but several members of this family, namely the AAA+ ATPases were described to promote virulence of other bacterial pathogens [35]. A role for the α-superhelical structure domain of KAP NTPases has been evoked in protein-protein interactions [16]. Interestingly, such interactions can also be mediated by the TPR [36], another structural motif present within two R. conorii proteins up-regulated in vivo. Here again, the functional role of these ubiquitous domains was not deciphered. However, TPR repeat regions have been implicated in the ability of L. pneumophila to efficiently establish infection and/or to manipulate host cell trafficking event [37]. The whole picture of this host-pathogen interaction within the first step of infection is summarized Figure 5.

Figure 5
Schematic representation of the interaction between R. conorii and its host cell at the site of inoculation.

A more general view of obtained results showed that, to ensure microbial fitness and survival in the lethal host environment, R. conorii mainly promoted the transcription of small size genes. While a high proportion of them codes for proteins with unknown functions, those with functional attributes including phbC, mdlB and proP9 have already been associated with pathogenicity in other bacteria. Another interesting feature is that up-regulated genes are mostly exclusive for SFG rickettsiae, a finding consistent with the fact that the inoculation site corresponds to environmental conditions not encountered by TG bacteria that are transmitted to human by exposure to feces of infected lice or fleas [1].

Recent studies showed that an understanding of the basic mechanisms of adaptation of rickettsiae under various environments, including nutrient deprived medium [11] and temperature changes [38] can be gained by determining their global transcriptome profile by microarrays. As shown here, this approach also offers the opportunity to characterize strategies displayed by the bacteria for in vivo survival. A new picture of Rickettsia pathogenicity, still poorly known, has thus emerged. A better knowledge of such an host-pathogen interaction would offer the opportunity to identify future therapeutic targets usefull for the prevention or the treatment of rickettsiosis.

Materials and Methods

Human subjects and sample collection

From June 2004 through August 2006, cutaneous biopsy specimens were obtained from seven patients in Marseille with eschar-associated illnesses, and who were suspected of suffering from MSF on the basis of initial clinical findings or laboratory analysis. These biopsy specimens, excised by using a scalpel, were dissected in two pieces. For RNA extraction purpose, the tissues were collected in sterile Eppendorf tubes containing RNAlater Stabilization Reagent (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) refrigerated at 4°C overnight before storage at −80°C. The second half of specimens was processed for bacterial culture and PCR-based molecular diagnosis, histopathology as well as immunohistochemical staining after fixation in ethanol. Selected clinical variables of the individual patients are shown in Table 1. These experiments were carried out with both the approval from the local ethics committee (IFR 48 ethics committee) and the written consent of informed patients.

Histologic analysis and immunohistochemical detection of R. conorii

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens of the inoculation eschars were cut (3 µm thickness) and stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron by routine staining methods. Serial sections of each tissue specimen were also obtained for immunohistochemical investigations. The immunohistochemical analysis was performed by the indirect immunoperoxidase method has described elsewhere [39] and using a polyclonal rabbit antibody against R. conorii as primary antibody. Briefly, after deparaffinization, each tissue section was incubated with the polyclonal anti-R. conorii antibody (1[ratio]2000) and immunodetection was performed with biotinylated immunoglobulins, followed by peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (HistoStain plus kit, Zymed, Montrouge, France) with amino-ethyl-carbazole as substrate. The slides were counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin for 10 min. Images were acquired with a Zeiss Axioskop microscope coupled with a Nikon Coolpix 4500 digital camera.

Multispacer genotyping (MST) of R. conorii clinical isolates

Total genomic DNA was extracted from skin-biopsy specimens using the QIAamp Tissue kit (Qiagen), as described by the manufacturer. Amplification of the three highly variable intergenic spacers, dksA-xerC, mppA-purC, and rpmE-tRNAfMet was achieved using previously described primers [12] and HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). All primers were obtained from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium). PCR was carried out in a PTC-200 automated thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, Mass.) under the following conditions: an initial 15 min-step at 95°C was followed by 39 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at 54°C, and extension for 1 min at 72°C. Final amplification was completed by holding the reaction mixture for 5 min at 72°C to allow complete extension of the PCR products. Following purification (MultiScreen PCR filter plate, Millipore, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France), amplicons were sequenced in both directions using the BigDye 1.1 chemistry (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI 3130XL automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems) as described by the manufacturer. To avoid contamination, no positive control was used. Sterile water was used as a negative control in each PCR assay. Sequences from each DNA sample were checked twice in both directions to ensure the reliability of the MST method, then assembled and edited with the Sequencher 4.7 program (GeneCode, Ann Arbor, Mich.). For the phylogenetic analysis, the sequences of three spacers were concatenated. Multiple alignments of the concatenated spacer sequences were carried out using the CLUSTALW software [40]. Phylogenetic relationships were obtained using the neighbor-joining and maximum parsimony methods within the MEGA 4.1 software [41].

Microarray design

ArrayDesigner™ (Premier Biosoft) was used to generate an initial set of probes covering the whole genome of R. conorii strain Malish 7 (NC_003103), showing specific physico-chemical properties: (i) 71±12° C target Tm, (ii) 40–60 bp probe length, (iii) <−5.0 kcal/mol for hairpins, (iv) <−8.0 kcal/mol for self-dimers, and (v) dinucleotide repeats shorter than 5 bp. Candidate probes were tested for specificity against the aforementioned R. conorii genome using Olicheck [42]. To avoid cross-hybridization with host cell nucleic acids, the resulting set of probes was subjected to Blast analysis against the Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes (by default of the African green monkey genome, Vero cells). Probes with >18 consecutive nt matches were excluded. Preceding steps yielded a final oligonucleotide set of 5,098 probes resulting to a final coverage of 97% for ORFs and 63% for inter-ORFs (considering fragment with length >149 bp which is the median size of inter-ORFs). To minimize steric hindrance, all probes <60 nt in length were poly(T)-tailed to reach an overall length of 60 nt, following Agilent's recommendations. Microarrays (2×11K format) were manufactured by in situ synthesis SurePrint technology (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). All specific oligonucleotides as well as Agilent's control spots were printed in duplicate.

RNA isolation and purification from eschars

Total RNA extraction and purification from the eschar biopsies was carried out using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) with some modifications. Briefly, the tissue samples removed from RNAlater were rapidly decontaminated with iodated alcohol. After 2 washings in RNase-free water, 20 mg of tissue excised in small pieces were homogenized in RLT solution with tungsten beads and using the Mixer Mill MM300 (Qiagen). The resulting homogenate was then incubated at 55°C for 10 min with proteinase K (200 µg/ml) and centrifuged for 3 min at 10,000×g. Supernatant containing the total RNA fraction was supplemented with ethanol and purified onto RNeasy columns according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amount and quality of obtained RNA were determined with the microfluidic-based platform (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer) and using the RNA 6000 Nano Labchip kit (Agilent). In the electropherograms obtained with total RNA, the prokaryotic fraction was not always detected because its low abundance and the profiles of eukaryotic peaks were used as indicators for the integrity of both RNA populations. Estimated amount of total RNA extracted from 20 mg eschar was generally around 10 µg, including 90% of eukaryotic RNAs. These contaminants were removed using the MICROBEnrich procedure (Ambion, Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) and prokaryotic cDNA was synthesized as described [10] using the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France).

RNA isolation and purification from infected Vero cells

R. conorii strain Malish 7 (ATCC, VR613) grown in Vero cells for 48 h at 32°C were lysed in TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 7.0) supplemented with lysozyme (10 mg/ml) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Total RNA was then extracted and purified using RNeasy-Midi columns (Qiagen), as previously described [11]. Two batches bacteria grown separately (biological replicates) were collected for this study. We then applied the same procedure as for eschar samples for purification, amplification, labelling and hybridization of R. conorii cDNA.

Expression microarrays and analysis

Twenty nanograms of cDNA were amplified using the GenomiPhi DNA amplification kit (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) and labeled with Cy3-dCTP or Cy5-dCTP dyes (Amersham Biosciences) using the BioPrime DNA labeling System (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France). Following purification with GFX columns (Amersham Biosciences), the levels of Cy3-dCTP and Cy5-dCTP incorporation were quantified by absorbance measurement at 550 nm and 650 nm, respectively. Hybridizations were performed for 17 h at 60°C in dedicated micro-chambers with 75 pmol of both control or eschar samples. Stringent washings were then performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Slides dried by 30 sec washing with acetonitrile were scanned using 100% Photon Multiplier Tube power for both wavelengths using Agilent scanner (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) and extracted using Feature Extraction™ software (version 8, Agilent). Local background subtracted signals were corrected for unequal dye incorporation or unequal load of the labeled product and normalized using GeneSpring (Agilent). The algorithm consisted of a rank consistency filter and a curve fit using the default LOWESS (locally weighted linear regression) method. Data consisting of 10 independent control conditions hybridized against 10 independent patient eschar experiments were expressed as Log10 ratios and analyzed using GeneSpring 7.3 (Agilent). Statistical significance of differentially expressed genes was identified by variance analysis (ANOVA) [43], [44] performed using GeneSpring, including the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction (5%). Expression microarrays (normalized data) were clustered by a hierarchical clustering algorithm by using an average linkage method in GeneSpring. The expression values for a gene across all samples were standardized to have mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 by linear transformation. To determine the amount of detectable genes, the expression values were averaged for transcripts mapped by 2 or more probes. A cut-off value defined as 2×standard deviation obtained for background intensities was then applied [45].

Microarray data accession numbers

The data have been deposited in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The GEO accession numbers are GPL7040 for the platform of the microarray and GSE12130 for the experimental data set.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Validation of microarray data was achieved using cDNA synthesized from eschar specimens A/B, C and E and from R. conorii grown in Vero cells used as reference. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on the Smart-Cycler system (Cepheid) together with the QuantiTec Probe PCR kit (Qiagen) or SybrGreen DNA Fast Start kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), as indicated. Gene-specific primers are listed in the Supplementary Table S1. The values obtained for the 3 non-differentially expressed genes (trxB1, glyQ and dnaK) were used to normalize all data. The fold change (FC) in expression of the target genes relative to the 3 unregulated genes was determined as follows: FC = 2−ΔΔCt where ΔΔCt = (Mean-Cttarget−Mean-Ctcontrol)eschars−(Mean-Cttarget−Mean-Ctcontrol)reference. Ct values were defined as the cycle numbers at which the fluorescence signals were detected.

Supporting Information

Table S1

List of primers and conditions for qRT-PCR assays

(0.04 MB XLS)

Table S2

R. conorii genes down-regulated within eschars

(0.08 MB XLS)

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This project was granted by a research program “Hospital Clinical Research Program” from the French Health Ministry. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Raoult D, Roux V. Rickettsioses as paradigms of new or emerging infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:694–719. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Parola P, Paddock CD, Raoult D. Tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: emerging diseases challenging old concepts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:719–756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Montenegro MR, Mansueto S, Hegarty BC, Walker DH. The histology of “taches noires” of boutonneuse fever and demonstration of Rickettsia conorii in them by immunofluorescence. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1983;400:309–317. [PubMed]
4. Raoult D, de Micco C, Gallais H, Toga M. Laboratory diagnosis of Mediterranean spotted fever by immunofluorescent demonstration of Rickettsia conorii in cutaneous lesions. J Infect Dis. 1984;150:145–148. [PubMed]
5. Dujella J, Morovic M, Dzelalija B, Gveric M, Novakovic S. Histopathology and immunopathology of skin biopsy specimens in Mediterranean spotted fever. Acta Virol. 1991;35:566–572. [PubMed]
6. Walker DH, Occhino C, Tringali GR, Di Rosa S, Mansueto S. Pathogenesis of rickettsial eschars: the tache noire of boutonneuse fever. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:1449–1454. [PubMed]
7. de Sousa R, Ismail N, Nobrega SD, França A, Amaro M, et al. Intralesional expression of mRNA of interferon- gamma , tumor necrosis factor- alpha , interleukin-10, nitric oxide synthase, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, and RANTES is a major immune effector in Mediterranean spotted fever rickettsiosis. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:770–781. [PubMed]
8. La MV, Raoult D, Renesto P. Regulation of whole bacterial pathogen transcription within infected hosts. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:440–460. [PubMed]
9. Waddell SJ, Butcher PD, Stoker NG. RNA profiling in host-pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:297–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Francois P, Garzoni C, Bento M, Schrenzel J. Comparison of amplification methods for transcriptomic analyses of low abundance prokaryotic RNA sources. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;68:385–391. [PubMed]
11. La MV, Francois P, Rovery C, Robineau S, Barbry P, et al. Development of a method for recovering rickettsial RNA from infected cells to analyze gene expression profiling of obligate intracellular bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;71:292–297. [PubMed]
12. Fournier PE, Zhu Y, Ogata H, Raoult D. Use of highly variable intergenic spacer sequences for multispacer typing of Rickettsia conorii strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5757–5766. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Ogata H, Audic S, Renesto-Audiffren P, Fournier PE, Barbe V, et al. Mechanisms of evolution in Rickettsia conorii and R. prowazekii. Science. 2001;293:2093–2098. [PubMed]
14. Blanc G, Ogata H, Robert C, Audic S, Suhre K, et al. Reductive genome evolution from the mother of Rickettsia. PloS Genet. 2007;3:e14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution 225. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:33–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Aravind L, Iyer LM, Leipe DD, Koonin EV. A novel family of P-loop NTPases with an unusual phyletic distribution and transmembrane segments inserted within the NTPase domain. Genome Biology. 2004;5:R30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Ogata H, Robert C, Audic S, Robineau S, Blanc G, et al. Rickettsia felis, from culture to genome sequencing. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2005;1063:26–34. [PubMed]
18. Thorner AR, Walker DH, Petri WAJ. Rocky mountain spotted fever. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:1353–1359. [PubMed]
19. Tzianabos T, Anderson BE, McDade JE. Detection of Rickettsia rickettsii DNA in clinical specimens by using polymerase chain reaction technology. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2866–2868. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Le Gall T, Darlu P, Escobar-Páramo P, Picard B, Denamur E. Selection-driven transcriptome polymorphism in Escherichia coli/Shigella species. Genome Res. 2005;15:260–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Eymann C, Homuth G, Scharf C, Hecker M. Bacillus subtilis functional genomics: global characterization of the stringent response by proteome and transcriptome analysis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2500–2520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Chang D-E, Smalley DJ, Conway T. Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: an expanded stringent response model. Mol Microbiol. 2002;45:289–306. [PubMed]
23. Brockmann-Gretza O, Kalinowski J. Global gene expression during stringent response in Corynebacterium glutamicum in presence and absence of the rel gene encoding (p)ppGpp synthase. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Garzoni C, Francois P, Huyghe A, Couzinet S, Tapparel C, et al. A global view of Staphylococcus aureus whole genome expression upon internalization in human epithelial cells. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Cashel M, Gentry DR, Hernandez VJ, Vinella D. The stringent response. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtis R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, et al., editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1996. pp. 1458–1496.
26. Heithoff DM, Conner CP, Mahan MJ. Dissecting the biology of a pathogen during infection. Trends Microbiol. 1997;5:509–513. [PubMed]
27. O'Rourke EJ, Chevalier C, Pinto AV, Thiberge JM, Ielpi L, et al. Pathogen DNA as target for host-generated oxidative stress: role for repair of bacterial DNA damage in Helicobacter pylori colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2789–2794. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Radtke AL, O'Riordan MX. Intracellular innate resistance to bacterial pathogens. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:1720–1729. [PubMed]
29. Csonka LN. Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. Microbiol Rev. 1989;53:121–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Andersson SG, Zomorodipour A, Andersson JO, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Alsmark UC, et al. The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature. 1998;396:133–140. [PubMed]
31. Teysseire N, Raoult D. Comparison of Western immunoblotting and microimmunofluorescence for diagnosis of Mediterranean spotted fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:455–460. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Oster LM, Lester DR, Terwisscha van Scheltinga A, Svenda M, van Lun M, G, et al. Insights into cephamycin biosynthesis: the crystal structure of CmcI from Streptomyces clavuligerus. J Biol Mol. 2006;358:546–558. [PubMed]
33. Schmidt MA, Riley LW, Benz I. Sweet new world: glycoproteins in bacterial pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:564–561. [PubMed]
34. Davidson AL, Maloney PC. ABC transporters: how small machines do a big job. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15:448–455. [PubMed]
35. Henderson B, Allan E, Coates ARM. Stress wars: the direct role of host and bacterial molecular chaperones in bacterial infection. Infect Immun. 2006;74:3693–3706. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. D'Andrea LD, Reagn L. TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:655–662. [PubMed]
37. Newton HJ, Sansom FM, Bennett-Wood V, Hartland EL. Identification of Legionella pneumophila-specific genes by genomic subtractive hybridization with Legionella micdadei and identification of lpnE, a gene required for efficient host cell entry. Infect Immun. 2006;74:1683–1691. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Dreher-Lesnick SM, Ceraul SM, Rahman MS, Azad AF. Genome-wide screen for temperature-regulated genes of the obligate intracellular bacterium, Rickettsia typhi. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:61. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Lepidi H, Fournier PE, Raoult D. Quantitative analysis of valvular lesions during Bartonella endocarditis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114:880–889. [PubMed]
40. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice 200. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:1244–1245. [PubMed]
42. Charbonnier Y, Gettler B, Francois P, Bento M, Renzoni A, et al. A generic approach for the design of whole-genome oligoarrays, validated for genomotyping, deletion mapping and gene expression analysis on Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:95. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Churchill GA. Using ANOVA to analyze microarray data. Biotechniques. 2004;37:173–175. [PubMed]
44. Scherl A, Francois P, Charbonnier Y, Deshusses JM, Koessler T, et al. Exploring Glycopeptide Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A combined proteomics and transcriptomics approach for the identification of resistance related markers. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Scherl A, Francois P, Bento M, Deshusses JM, Charbonnier Y, et al. Correlation of proteomic and transcriptomic profiles of Staphylococcus aureus during the post-exponential phase of growth. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;60:247–257. [PubMed]
46. Teysseire N, Boudier JA, Raoult D. Rickettsia conorii entry into Vero cells. Infect Immun. 1995;63:366–374. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...