• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of pnasPNASInfo for AuthorsSubscriptionsAboutThis Article
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct 28, 2008; 105(43): 16737–16742.
Published online Oct 15, 2008. doi:  10.1073/pnas.0806414105
PMCID: PMC2575489

Chromosome replication dynamics in the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius


The “baby machine” provides a means of generating synchronized cultures of minimally perturbed cells. We describe the use of this technique to establish the key cell-cycle parameters of hyperthermophilic archaea of the genus Sulfolobus. The 3 DNA replication origins of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius were mapped by 2D gel analysis to near 0 (oriC2), 579 (oriC1), and 1,197 kb (oriC3) on the 2,226-kb circular genome, and we present a direct demonstration of their activity within the first few minutes of a synchronous cell cycle. We also detected X-shaped DNA molecules at the origins in log-phase cells, but these were not directly associated with replication initiation or ongoing chromosome replication in synchronized cells. Whole-genome marker frequency analyses of both synchronous and log-phase cultures showed that origin utilization was close to 100% for all 3 origins per round of replication. However, oriC2 was activated slightly later on average compared with oriC1 and oriC3. The DNA replication forks moved bidirectionally away from each origin at ≈88 bp per second in synchronous culture. Analysis of the 3 Orc1/Cdc6 initiator proteins showed a uniformity of cellular abundance and origin binding throughout the cell cycle. In contrast, although levels of the MCM helicase were constant across the cell cycle, its origin localization was regulated, because it was strongly enriched at all 3 origins in early S phase.

Keywords: Archaea, cell cycle, DNA replication

During initiation of chromosome replication, initiator proteins bind to and act on DNA replication origins to control DNA unwinding for new DNA synthesis. The genomes of the hyperthermophilic archaeal genus Sulfolobus each encode 3 initiator proteins: Orc1-1, -2, and -3 (also known as Cdc6-1, -2, and -3). Like most archaeal proteins involved in DNA replication, the Orc1 proteins are homologous to their eukaryotic counterparts, Orc1 and Cdc6. In Sulfolobus solfataricus, there are 3 specific origins of replication located around the ≈3-Mb single circular genome, and the 3 Orc1 proteins bind with distinct patterns and affinities to the different origins (13). The Orc1 proteins contain AAA+ domains, suggesting they probably remodel origin DNA during their ATPase cycle (4). However, almost nothing is known about how the origins are regulated.

Sulfolobus genomes also contain a gene encoding a homolog of eukaryotic MCM2–7, another AAA+ domain protein involved in the initiation and elongation stages of DNA replication. MCM2–7 is thought to be the central component of the helicase assembly that unwinds DNA for ongoing DNA synthesis. Biochemical assays with purified recombinant protein have demonstrated that Sulfolobus MCM forms a homo-hexamer and has ATP-dependent helicase activity in vitro (5). However, it is still not known whether Sulfolobus MCM functions at replication origins and acts as the replicative helicase in vivo.

Chromosome replication in Sulfolobus initiates very soon after the preceding cell division, to give a very short G1 phase of ≤5% of the generation time (6). Once chromosome replication is complete (normally taking ≈35–45% of the cell cycle), a relatively long G2 phase persists until chromosome segregation and cytokinesis complete cell duplication (2, 6, 7).

The above parameters were established by using asynchronous cultures, but the ability to synchronize the growth and division cycle of a population of cells is essential for further studies of chromosome replication and cell cycle. A synchronization method for Sulfolobus acidocaldarius was previously described that involves an initial treatment of a midlog-phase culture with 3 mM acetate (2). Cells stop growth and accumulate with a 2N genomic content, suggesting a G2 or stationary phase-like arrested state (2, 6). Upon “release” of the cells by resuspension in fresh growth medium, a fraction of the cells resume growth, resulting in a broad wave of cell division and subsequent chromosome replication very reminiscent of the partially synchronous growth out from stationary phase (8). Although such “arrest and release” techniques are simple to do and can be of use for certain experimental approaches, they frequently cause ambiguous or artifactual results, because a cellular response may be the direct consequence of the treatment or an incomplete cell cycle arrest (at the subcellular level), rather than normal cell cycle progression (see refs. 911).

To synchronize cells at the start of G1 phase and to avoid the problems associated with arrest and release, we adapted the membrane elution or “baby machine” synchronization technique for high temperature use with Sulfolobus. In the baby machine, an asynchronously dividing culture of cells bound to the surface of a membrane is continually perfused with medium. As each cell divides, 1 daughter cell remains bound to the membrane and the other is shed into the liquid medium (12). The liquid eluate thus contains early-G1 synchronized cells that have a very high degree of synchrony and are physiologically minimally perturbed (see refs. 13 and 14). We have used the technique to study replication origin usage during the early stages of chromosome replication in S. acidocaldarius, and we have measured the relative cellular levels of the above initiator proteins and their binding to replication origins throughout the cell cycle. Our findings offer new insights into chromosome replication and the cell cycle in the archaea and open the door to unambiguous cell cycle analyses in this domain of life.


Cell-Cycle Synchronization of S. acidocaldarius.

Each baby machine experiment was initiated by filtering midlog phase cells onto a membrane. The membrane was then inverted, and medium pumped through to culture the cells on the lower surface. Fig. 1A shows cell concentrations in the effluent in 3 independent experiments initiated with different cell numbers. Overall yields of cells in the effluent did not greatly increase when >1010 starting cells were used, and the purity of synchronized cells, containing ≈1 chromosome equivalent, was generally lower when compared with subsaturating experiments. During the early stages of elution the cell concentration declined (Fig. 1A), and we observed a relatively poor, but steadily improving, enrichment of newborn cells (data not shown). After 60–120 min, the cell concentration then steadily increased (Fig. 1A), and there was significant improvement in the selection for newborn cells. The maximum purity of newborn cells was achieved after ≈180 min, as judged by analysis of cell size (Fig. 1B) and cellular DNA content (Fig. 1D Upper). The proportion of newborn cells in the population was typically ≈70% (at 180 min), and the modal fluorescence value of the sharp G1 peak in the DNA content distribution was 49% of that for the G2 peak derived from the smaller population of contaminating asynchronous cells (Fig. 1D, 0 min). We conclude that the baby machine produces sharply synchronized cells of S. acidocaldarius.

Fig. 1.
Baby machine synchronization of S. acidocaldarious. (A) Cell numbers eluting from the baby machine were recorded with a Coulter counter. Three independent experiments were initiated with either 2.5 × 109 (square), 5 × 109 (filled circle), ...

Synchronized cells collected from the baby machine were grown at 75 °C in a rotary water bath, and the cell concentration, cell size distribution and DNA content distribution were recorded from samples withdrawn at intervals (Fig. 1 C and D). The results of these time courses were highly reproducible. The mean cell diameter began to increase immediately after the start of the incubation, and it increased linearly throughout the S-phase and the early G2 phase of the first synchronous cell cycle (Fig. 1C). The first round of DNA replication (S phase) also started very soon after the experiment was started, with significant progression into S-phase clearly evident at the first time-point (15 min), and it took ≈90 min to complete (Fig. 1D). At 135 min, the first cells to divide were becoming evident, because there was both a downturn in the mean cell size of the population (Fig. 1C), and a reappearance of cells with a G1 DNA-content (Fig. 1D). The midpoint of the first wave of cell division of the population was ≈180 min. A second wave of chromosome replication was also in progress in many cells by the 180-min stage, because replication initiates around the time of cytokinesis (Fig. 1D). Flow cytometry analysis of longer-term incubated cultures indicated that at least 3 successively poorer quality synchronous rounds of DNA replication were detectable (data not shown), and the culture eventually reached a stationary phase of normal cell density.

Mapping S. acidocaldarius Origins of Replication.

Three replication origins in S. acidocaldarius were previously localized to 3 ≈50-kb regions around the 2.2-Mb circular genome (2). To examine timing of replication origin usage during initiation of chromosome replication by using baby machine synchronization, we first sought to map the replication origins to a greater accuracy. The replication origins were located by sequence homology to the precisely known S. solfataricus origins (1, 3, 15). Samples of total cellular DNA extracted from a midlog phase culture embedded in agarose plugs were digested with restriction enzymes to give fragments that contained each of the putative origins within ≈4–7 kb fragments. DNA replication intermediates were analyzed by 2D gel electrophoresis and Southern blot analysis by using probes for the putative origin loci; and for 1 control locus near the expected terminus region (Fig. 2A). Three different types of branched DNA structures were identified (Fig. 2A). First, the classical “bubble arc” that is representative of DNA fragments in various stages of DNA replication after initiation from an origin within the fragment (see ref. 16) was clearly present for the fragments located at 0 (oriC2), 579 (oriC1), and 1,197 kb (oriC3) but not for the control locus at 1,727 kb. Second, all 4 Southern blots displayed the common “fork arc,” representing Y-shaped molecules with a single replication fork at various locations in the population of fragments. Third, the origin-containing fragments displayed X-shaped molecules (the “X-spike” on the 2D pattern), consisting of 2 unit-length DNA segments linked together at various positions.

Fig. 2.
Mapping of the 3 S. acidocaldarius origins of chromosome replication. (A) DNA extracted from a midlog-phase culture embedded in agarose was digested with the indicated restriction enzymes and then separated by neutral-neutral 2D gel electrophoresis followed ...

Timing of Replication Origin Firing During Synchronous Growth.

We next sought to analyze replication origin activity during the cell cycle. Samples were withdrawn from a synchronized culture after 0-, 30-, 60-, and 90-min incubation, and DNA was analyzed by 2D gel electrophoresis and Southern blot analysis with a probe for oriC1 (Fig. 3A). There was clear origin activity at 0 min, which contains newborn cells (Fig. 1). No origin firing was detected at 30, 60, or 90 min, which suggested that initiation of replication in the synchronous population had ended before 30 min, consistent with the flow cytometry in Fig. 1D. Also, the fork arc was extremely faint at the latter 3 time points, and the X-spike was not detectable in any of the Southern blots. Next, we examined the timing of each origin's firing at a narrower time window very early in the cell cycle. Samples were collected at 0, 2, 6, and 10 min after starting growth of a baby machine synchronized culture, and all 3 origins were analyzed by 2D gel electrophoresis at each time point (see Fig. 3B). At the 0- and 2-min time points, obvious bubble arcs were present for all 3 origins, but at the 6-and 10-min time points (Fig. 3), the bubble arc had faded very significantly. Close examination of the oriC2 2D results suggests marginally enhanced persistence of the bubble arc in the 6- and 10-min time-points. This was investigated further, as described below.

Fig. 3.
Early firing of S. acidocaldarius replication origins. (A) Analysis of oriC1 activity during S phase. Baby machine synchronized cells were grown for the indicated times before analysis by 2D gel electrophoresis and Southern blot analysis with detection ...

Chromosome Replication in Synchronized S. acidocaldarius.

To quantify origin usage and examine replication fork movement around the whole chromosome in synchronized culture, we used microarray based whole-genome marker frequency analysis (MFA), which compares the relative copy number of markers from replicating cells with those in nonreplicating cells (from stationary phase). Fig. 4A shows the marker ratios obtained for baby-machine synchronized cultures, grown for 0, 10, 30, 60, or 90 min. At 0 min, significant replication was evident around the 3 origins, as indicated by the greater ratio for origin-proximal markers compared with other origin-distal markers (note that oriC2 is at the breakpoint in the genome sequence; see Fig. 2A). By 10 min, the marker ratio around the origins was significantly greater, approaching 1.5, indicating that further initiation had occurred during the first 10 min, as expected (see Fig. 3B). The 30- and 60-min time points represent mid-S phase cells, and they showed equivalent maximum ratios of 1.6. This was clearly significantly <2.0, which would be expected for complete duplication of origin regions in all cells, due largely to the presence of the contaminating population of asynchronous cells that would contribute a much lower marker ratio (see below). Replication fork movement can be clearly seen when comparing the 30- and 60-min datasets (Fig. 4A). The average position of each replication fork was taken to be the center point of each transition from maximum to minimum marker ratios. The positions of the 2 forks between oriC2 and oriC3 at 30 and 60 min allowed us to directly calculate the average speed of both forks: 88 (±2) bp per second. Two independent experiments are shown for the 90-min time point in Fig. 4A, demonstrating the reproducibility of synchronization. By 90 min, chromosome replication was largely completed, as indicated by the essentially flat marker ratio distribution along the majority of the chromosome, consistent with flow cytometry (Fig. 1D). The only region to remain incompletely replicated at 90 min was a terminus region between oriC2 and oriC3, the 2 origins that are furthest apart (see Fig. 2A).

Fig. 4.
Whole-genome MFA of chromosome replication dynamics in S. acidocaldarious. The normalized ratios of replicating to stationary phase DNA hybridization signals are plotted against chromosome position (kb). (A) Cells were collected at the indicated synchronous ...

To investigate the relative usage of origins, we additionally carried out a MFA of a standard asynchronous, log-phase culture. This type of MFA determines the average marker frequency in a population of cells at different stages of the cell cycle. The result, shown in Fig. 4B, shows 3 peaks corresponding to the location of the 3 replication origins, as expected (2). The original marker frequency equation (17) was then used to simulate log-phase conditions in which each origin had either 100%, or a lower probability, of firing during a round of replication (Fig. 4C). This approach differs significantly from the previous S. acidocaldarius MFA formula (2), which was only used to distinguish between general single and multiple origin usage models and did not take into account the exponential age distribution of the replicating chromosomes (the fact that chromosomes at early stages of replication are more frequent than chromosomes at later stages because of continual cell/chromosome duplication in the population). A good correspondence between the simulation and the log-phase data were achieved when probabilities of 100% usage for oriC1 and oriC3 and 90% usage for oriC2 were simulated (compare Fig. 4 B with C). Importantly, this differential usage effect could have been caused by a slightly later average replication of oriC2, rather than a reduced probability of firing per round of replication as modeled in Fig. 4C, the log phase data alone do not allow such a distinction to be drawn. However, a comparison of the relative frequency of the origin regions during synchronous growth reveals that the frequency of oriC2 reaches that of oriC1 and oriC3 later in the S phase (Fig. 4A). We conclude that oriC2 has a slightly later average replication than oriC1 and oriC3, and that it too would have close to 100% efficiency when considered at the level of the whole cell cycle.

Levels of Initiator Proteins Throughout the Cell Cycle.

To begin to study the regulation of origin activity, we wished to determine whether there were cell-cycle regulated protein level fluctuations of the candidate replication initiator proteins Orc1-1, -2, 1–3, and MCM. We withdrew samples from a synchronized culture at regular time intervals and analyzed the relative levels of the 4 proteins by using quantitative Western blot analysis. As can be seen in Fig. 5, the levels of these 4 proteins were uniform throughout the cell cycle and were thus proportional to culture biomass (as measured by A600), and not cell cycle position. Replicate experiments using cells collected from the baby machine for a 15-min period at 75 °C before incubation, rather than the normal collection on ice, gave the same results (data not shown).

Fig. 5.
Orc1-1, -2, -3, and MCM protein levels do not fluctuate significantly during the cell cycle. Baby machine synchronized cells were analyzed by Western blot analysis after samples were withdrawn from a culture at the indicated time-points (min), washed, ...

Association of Initiator Proteins with Replication Origins During the Cell Cycle.

To determine whether there were changes in the levels of binding of Orc1-1, -2, -3, and MCM to each of the origins during different cell-cycle phases in vivo, we carried out ChIP assays, in which affinity-purified antibodies were used to isolate specific protein–DNA complexes from extracts of formaldehyde-treated cells. The relative amount of each origin bound to each protein was then measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR). We observed clear binding patterns for each of the 4 proteins to the different origins in asynchronous log-phase cells, as described below (Fig. 6A). MCM was clearly detected at all 3 replication origins but was detected only at very low levels at the control locus, lrs14 (≈70 kb from oriC2). The amount of DNA recovered from the MCM ChIP varied for the 3 origins, although influencing this would be both the stoichiometry and affinity of the various MCM–origin complexes and possible technical factors such as potential differences in antibody accessibility to epitopes and protein–DNA cross-linking efficiency in the various protein–origin complexes.

Fig. 6.
Interactions of the Orc1–1, Orc1–2, Orc1–3 and MCM proteins with replication origins in vivo. (A) DNA recovered from the indicated chromatin immunoprecipitates from a midlog phase cell extract was analyzed by quantitative PCR by ...

The Orc1-1 ChIP reaction in Fig. 6A showed clear binding of oriC1, but, unexpectedly, the levels of oriC2 and oriC3 recovered were very low. In the Orc1-2 ChIP reaction, the amount of origin DNA recovered was only marginally above background for all 3 origins. Orc1-3 clearly bound oriC2 (Fig. 6A), but only very low levels of the other 2 origins were detected. Western blot analysis experiments confirmed that all 4 proteins were efficiently recovered in these ChIP reactions, and, in a further control for the Orc1-2 ChIP, we detected significant binding around the orc1-2 gene promoter region, consistent with previous findings in S. solfataricus (S.D.B., unpublished results) and demonstrating that Orc1-2 copurified with at least 1 expected locus. Finally, we found that the mcm gene was not detected significantly above background in the MCM ChIP reaction, ruling out coupled transcription/translation as a general factor contributing to DNA recovery (data not shown). We suspect that the failure to detect several expected Orc1 interactions that have been observed at the homologous S. solfataricus origins by ChIP, footprinting, and in a corresponding X-ray crystal structure of an oriC2/Orc1–1/Orc1–3 subcomplex (1, 3, 4) may reflect a detection limitation of the ChIP reported here. It is clear that the highest affinity interactions seen in S. solfataricus (1) were those clearly detected in the present ChIP study of the S. acidocaldarius homologs. However, we cannot formally exclude the possibility that the origin binding patterns are significantly different in these 2 species. Nevertheless, our aim in the present study was to determine whether the detected binding patterns varied throughout the cell cycle, as described below.

The results of ChIP experiments using cells collected at 0 (G1), 30 (S), and 110 min (G2) during synchronous growth are shown in Fig. 6B. When the binding patterns were compared between the various time points, we observed that both Orc1–1 binding at oriC1 and Orc1–3 binding at oriC2 remained bound at a constant level throughout the cell cycle, and the levels of binding were very similar to those seen in the log-phase sample. Significantly, however, MCM levels at all 3 origins were significantly elevated at the G1 (0 min) time point compared with the asynchronous log-phase situation (see Fig. 6B Bottom), strongly implicating MCM function at the origins during initiation of replication. The levels of MCM dropped significantly after 0 min, with levels detected at the 30 (S) and 110 min (G2) time points similar to the levels seen for the log-phase sample.


In the current work, we describe the use of the baby machine as a means of obtaining a nonchemically perturbed synchronized culture of an archaeon. Previous attempts to synchronize archaea have relied on either DNA replication inhibitors or treatment of cultures with acetate (2, 18, 19). The latter treatment leads to arrest of Sulfolobus cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. The mechanism of the G2 arrest is not yet known (although it may be due to respiration uncoupling; see ref. 20), and thus it is not possible to deconvolute genuine cell cycle effects from acetate-induced perturbations of normal cell physiology. Such ambiguity is well illustrated by the difference between results obtained when measuring levels of Orc1 proteins in baby machine vs. acetate treated cells. We observed in baby machine synchronized cells that Orc1 levels remained constant across the cell cycle (Fig. 5), whereas cells arrested by acetate showed elevated levels of Orc1–2 and low levels of Orc1–1 and Orc1–3 (1); resumption of growth after arrest resulted in elevated Orc1–1 and -3 and greatly reduced Orc1–2. Several laboratories have reported microarray analyses of the response of the Sulfolobus transcriptome to a range of physiological stresses such as UV treatment, viral infection, and heat shock (2124). Interestingly, these studies have revealed modulation of Orc1 gene transcript and/or protein levels; similar to that seen with microarray analysis of acetate-treated cells (25). It seems likely, therefore, that the modulation of Orc1/Cdc6 levels induced by acetate treatment and subsequent resumption of growth reflects a stress response in Sulfolobus cells rather than a true cell cycle effect.

The origin occupancy of the Orc1/Cdc6 initiator proteins also did not vary across the cycle, as detected by ChIP (Fig. 6). This is reminiscent of the situation in budding yeast where ORC remains chromatin-associated through the cell cycle and differs from higher eukaryotes where ORC1 levels and localization are controlled during the cell cycle (26). In contrast to the invariance of Orc1 at origins, we observe significant enrichment of MCM at all 3 origins in G1 and early S-phase cells, in strong agreement with the proposed role of archaeal MCM as the replicative helicase. We note that the ChIP analysis of MCM at oriC2 yields the greatest recovery of DNA. Although this may be simply due to technical reasons, it is also compatible with our observation that oriC2 shows delayed kinetics of firing in a significant population of cells. Perhaps this reflects prolonged occupancy of this origin by the MCM protein in prereplicative complexes.

2D gel analysis of DNA replication intermediates from synchronized cells demonstrated that activation of all 3 replication origins occurs very early in the cell cycle, as predicted based on flow cytometry analysis of asynchronous cultures (6). Our analyses also identified important differences between the DNA replication intermediates detected at origins in log-phase vs. synchronized cells. In addition to replication initiation “bubbles” at origins, we clearly detected a similar abundance of Y- and X-shaped molecules in log-phase S. acidocaldarius (Fig. 2). The Y-shaped molecules were strongly associated with initiation of replication and were almost undetectable at oriC1 in mid and late S phase synchronized cells (Fig. 3A). The presence of Y-shaped molecules during initiation of replication at S. acidocaldarius replication origins could be explained by a degree of heterogeneity in the timing of each replication fork's departure from the origins; the greater relative abundance of the large Y-shaped molecules is consistent with this interpretation (Fig. 3). In contrast, the X-shaped molecules were not detected during initiation of replication in synchronized cultures and were seen only in log-phase samples in which much larger quantities of total DNA were analyzed (Figs. 2A and and3).3). Thus, the X-shaped molecules seen at replication origins, which appear to be hemi-catenanes rather than Holliday junctions in S. solfataricus (3) and budding yeast (27) are not directly associated with replication initiation or fork movement in synchronized S. acidocaldarius.

Quantitative analyses of chromosome replication dynamics by MFA revealed that, in both log-phase cells and baby machine synchronized cells, a great majority of cells use all 3 origins in chromosome replication (Fig. 4). The kinetics of firing suggested a degree of coordination, with the majority of firing occurring within a few minutes of cytokinesis. This very tight temporal association between cytokinesis and initiation of chromosome replication suggests there might be a direct link between cytokinesis and the regulation of origin firing. The MFA of asynchronous cells revealed an underrepresentation of oriC2 sequences compared with oriC1 and oriC3. Interestingly, this phenomenon was apparent in a previous study but was not commented on (2). The underrepresentation of oriC2 sequences could be due to either a reduced frequency of usage of oriC2 per round of replication or a later average firing of oriC2. Our MFA data from synchronized cells strongly support the latter possibility, because by 60 min, the relative frequency of the 3 origin peaks had equalized. Thus, oriC2 of S. acidocaldarius can be considered a somewhat later-firing origin compared with oriC1 and oriC3.

Materials and Methods

Baby Machine Synchronization of Sulfolobus.

The baby machine and synchronization technique were similar to those described (13, 14), with modifications as described in supporting information (SI) Materials and Methods.

Coulter Counting and Flow Cytometry.

Cell counting and sizing were done by using a Multisizer 3 Coulter counter with a 20-μm aperture tube, calibrated using 2-μm diameter latex beads (Beckman–Coulter). Cells were diluted 1/100 by using Isoton II dilutent (Beckman-Coulter) that had been filtered by using a 0.2-μm filter unit. Volumetric cell count analysis was carried out within 10 min of dilution to avoid any cell volume changes that occurred after extended periods after dilution. For flow cytometry, cells were fixed with ice-cold ethanol (70% final concentration) and then prepared as described (21). Approximately 105 cells were analyzed to generate DNA content distributions by using a MoFlo cell sorter (Dako), as described (3).

Neutral-Neutral 2D Gel Electrophoresis.

2D gel analysis was performed essentially as described (1), with modifications described in SI Materials and Methods.

Marker Frequency Analysis by Microarray Hybridization.

Genomic DNA preparation and labeling, and microarray hybridizations were performed by using standard techniques, with modifications described in SI Materials and Methods. The marker frequency equation was used to generate all marker frequency simulations (equation 4 in ref. 17), as detailed in SI Materials and Methods.

Analysis of Protein Levels by Western Blot Analysis.

Cells from 5 mL of culture were washed with 1 mL of PBS then resuspended in 0.1 mL of PBS, and then the A600 was measured and the sample stored at −20 °C. Thawed samples were diluted with PBS as necessary to give equivalent A600 values for all samples and were then analyzed by SDS/PAGE and Western blot analysis by using standard techniques and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences) detection with preflashed autoradiography film.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and qPCR.

Formaldehyde cross-linked cell extracts were prepared, and immunoprecipitation reactions were carried out essentially as described (1), with modifications described in SI Materials and Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information:


We are grateful to Chris Summerfield and Steve Scotcher from the Medical Research Council engineering workshop (Cambridge, U.K.) for construction of the baby machine apparatus, and Charles Helmstetter, Kathryn Leigh Eward, Nicholas Robinson, Rachel Samson, Kate Michie, and Neville Michie for scientific discussion. This work was funded by the Medical Research Council and the Edward Penley Abraham Trust.


The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0806414105/DCSupplemental.


1. Robinson NP, et al. Identification of two origins of replication in the single chromosome of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Cell. 2004;116:25–38. [PubMed]
2. Lundgren M, Andersson A, Chen L, Nilsson P, Bernander R. Three replication origins in Sulfolobus species: Synchronous initiation of chromosome replication and asynchronous termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7046–7051. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Robinson NP, Blood KA, McCallum SA, Edwards PA, Bell SD. Sister chromatid junctions in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. EMBO J. 2007;26:816–824. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Cunningham Dueber EL, Corn JE, Bell SD, Berger JM. Replication origin recognition and deformation by a heterodimeric archaeal Orc1 complex. Science. 2007;317:1210–1213. [PubMed]
5. McGeoch AT, Trakselis MA, Laskey RA, Bell SD. Organization of the archaeal MCM complex on DNA and implications for the helicase mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12:756–762. [PubMed]
6. Bernander R, Poplawski A. Cell cycle characteristics of thermophilic archaea. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:4963–4969. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Poplawski A, Bernander R. Nucleoid structure and distribution in thermophilic Archaea. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7625–7630. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Hjort K, Bernander R. Changes in cell size and DNA content in Sulfolobus cultures during dilution and temperature shift experiments. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5669–5675. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Cooper S. Rejoinder: Whole-culture synchronization cannot, and does not, synchronize cells. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:274–276. [PubMed]
10. Kurose A, Tanaka T, Huang X, Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z. Synchronization in the cell cycle by inhibitors of DNA replication induces histone H2AX phosphorylation: An indication of DNA damage. Cell Prolif. 2006;39:231–240. [PubMed]
11. Cooper S, Chen KZ, Ravi S. Thymidine block does not synchronize L1210 mouse leukaemic cells: Implications for cell cycle control, cell cycle analysis and whole-culture synchronization. Cell Prolif. 2008;41:156–167. [PubMed]
12. Helmstetter CE, Thornton M, Romero A, Eward KL. Synchrony in human, mouse and bacterial cell cultures—a comparison. Cell Cycle. 2003;2:42–45. [PubMed]
13. Helmstetter CE, Eenhuis C, Theisen P, Grimwade J, Leonard AC. Improved bacterial baby machine: Application to Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:3445–3449. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Thornton M, Eward KL, Helmstetter CE. Production of minimally disturbed synchronous cultures of hematopoietic cells. BioTechniques. 2002;32:1098–1105. [PubMed]
15. Chen L, et al. The genome of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, a model organism of the Crenarchaeota. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:4992–4999. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Brewer BJ, Fangman WL. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1987;51:463–471. [PubMed]
17. Sueoka N, Yoshikawa H. The chromosome of Bacillus subtilis. I Theory of marker frequency analysis. Genetics. 1965;52:747–757. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Baumann A, Lange C, Soppa J. Transcriptome changes and cAMP oscillations in an archaeal cell cycle. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:21–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Hjort K, Bernander R. Cell cycle regulation in the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Mol Microbiol. 2001;40:225–234. [PubMed]
20. Rosenthal AZ, Kim Y, Gralla JD. Regulation of transcription by acetate in Escherichia coli: In vivo and in vitro comparisons. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68:907–917. [PubMed]
21. Frols S, et al. Response of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus to UV damage. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:8708–8718. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Gotz D, et al. Responses of hyperthermophilic crenarchaea to UV irradiation. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R220. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Ortmann AC, et al. Transcriptome analysis of infection of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus with Sulfolobus turreted icosahedral virus. J Virol. 2008;82:4874–4883. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Tachdjian S, Kelly RM. Dynamic metabolic adjustments and genome plasticity are implicated in the heat shock response of the extremely thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:4553–4559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Lundgren M, Bernander R. Genome-wide transcription map of an archaeal cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:2939–2944. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. DePamphilis ML. Cell cycle dependent regulation of the origin recognition complex. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:70–79. [PubMed]
27. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Liberi G, Foiani M. Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1499–1510. [PubMed]
28. Sambrook J, Russell D. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 2001.
29. Wang JD, Sanders GM, Grossman AD. Nutritional control of elongation of DNA replication by (p) ppGpp. Cell. 2007;128:865–875. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Saeed AI, et al. TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol. 2006;411:134–193. [PubMed]
31. Wold S, Skarstad K, Steen HB, Stokke T, Boye E. The initiation mass for DNA replication in Escherichia coli K-12 is dependent on growth rate. EMBO J. 1994;13:2097–2102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...