• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. Nov 2008; 4(11): e1000257.
Published online Nov 14, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1000257
PMCID: PMC2573955

CTCF cis-Regulates Trinucleotide Repeat Instability in an Epigenetic Manner: A Novel Basis for Mutational Hot Spot Determination

Veronica van Heyningen, Editor

Abstract

At least 25 inherited disorders in humans result from microsatellite repeat expansion. Dramatic variation in repeat instability occurs at different disease loci and between different tissues; however, cis-elements and trans-factors regulating the instability process remain undefined. Genomic fragments from the human spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) locus, containing a highly unstable CAG tract, were previously introduced into mice to localize cis-acting “instability elements,” and revealed that genomic context is required for repeat instability. The critical instability-inducing region contained binding sites for CTCF—a regulatory factor implicated in genomic imprinting, chromatin remodeling, and DNA conformation change. To evaluate the role of CTCF in repeat instability, we derived transgenic mice carrying SCA7 genomic fragments with CTCF binding-site mutations. We found that CTCF binding-site mutation promotes triplet repeat instability both in the germ line and in somatic tissues, and that CpG methylation of CTCF binding sites can further destabilize triplet repeat expansions. As CTCF binding sites are associated with a number of highly unstable repeat loci, our findings suggest a novel basis for demarcation and regulation of mutational hot spots and implicate CTCF in the modulation of genetic repeat instability.

Author Summary

The human genome contains many repetitive sequences. In 1991, we discovered that excessive lengthening of a three-nucleotide (trinucleotide) repeat sequence could cause a human genetic disease. We now know that this unique type of genetic mutation, known as a “repeat expansion,” occurs in at least 25 different diseases, including inherited neurological disorders such as the fragile X syndrome of mental retardation, myotonic muscular dystrophy, and Huntington's disease. An interesting feature of repeat expansion mutations is that they are genetically unstable, meaning that the repeat expansion changes in length when transmitted from parent to offspring. Thus, expanded repeats violate one major tenet of genetics—i.e., that any given sequence has a low likelihood for mutation. For expanded repeats, the likelihood of further mutation approaches 100%. Understanding why expanded repeats are so mutable has been a challenging problem for genetics research. In this study, we implicate the CTCF protein in the repeat expansion process by showing that mutation of a CTCF binding site, next to an expanded repeat sequence, increases genetic instability in mice. CTCF is an important regulatory factor that controls the expression of genes. As binding sites for CTCF are associated with many repeat sequences, CTCF may play a role in regulating genetic instability in various repeat diseases—not just the one we studied.

Introduction

Trinucleotide repeat expansion is the cause of at least 25 inherited neurological disorders, including Huntington's disease (HD), fragile X mental retardation, and myotonic dystrophy (DM1) [1]. One intriguing aspect of trinucleotide repeat disorders is ‘anticipation’ – a phenomenon whereby increased disease severity and decreased age-of-onset are observed as the mutation is transmitted through a pedigree [2]. In spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7), for example, disease onset in children, who inherit the expanded repeat, averages 20 years earlier than in the affected parent [3]. The basis of the profound anticipation in SCA7 stems from a significant tendency to undergo large repeat expansions upon parent-to-child transmission [4]. Other similarly-sized, disease-linked CAG/CTG repeat tracts do not exhibit strong anticipation, and are much more stable upon intergenerational transmission, as occurs at the spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) disease locus [5]. Drastic differences in the stability of CAG/CTG repeats, depending upon the locus at which they reside, strongly support the existence of cis-acting DNA elements that modulate repeat instability at certain loci. Furthermore, dramatic variation in CAG tract instability in tissues from an individual patient, together with disparities in the timing, pattern, and tissue-selectivity of somatic instability between CAG/CTG disorders, indicates a role for epigenetic modification in DNA instability [1], [6]9. While the existence of cis-elements regulating disease-associated instability is widely accepted, the identities of cis-elements that define the mutability of any repeat are still unknown. Proposed cis-elements that regulate repeat instability include: the sequence of the repeat tract, the length and purity of the repeat tract, flanking DNA sequences, surrounding epigenetic environment, replication origin determinants, trans-factor binding sites, and transcriptional activity [10][12]. Such cis-elements may enhance or protect against CAG tract instability.

To identify cis-elements responsible for CAG expansion at the SCA7 locus, we previously introduced SCA7 CAG-92 repeat expansions into mice, either on 13.5 kb ataxin-7 genomic fragments or on ataxin-7 cDNAs. Comparison of CAG repeat length change revealed that ataxin-7 genomic context drives repeat instability with an obvious bias toward expansion, while SCA7 CAG repeats introduced on ataxin-7 cDNAs were stable [13]. To localize the cis-acting elements responsible for this instability tendency, we derived lines of transgenic mice based upon the original 13.5 kb ataxin-7 genomic fragment, deleting a large region (~8.3 kb) of human sequence beyond the 3′ end of the CAG tract (α-SCA7-92R construct). As deletion of the 3′ region in the α-SCA7-92R transgenic mice significantly stabilized the CAG-92 tract [13], we hypothesized that cis-elements within this 3′ region modify repeat instability at the SCA7 locus. To identify cis-acting instability elements at the SCA7 locus and the trans-acting proteins that regulate them, we evaluated the critical genomic region 3′ to the CAG repeat for sequences that might regulate genetic instability. In the case of SCA7 and a number of other highly unstable CAG/CTG repeat loci, including HD, DM1, SCA2, and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, binding sites for a protein known as CTCF (i.e. the “CCCTC binding factor”) have been found [14]. CTCF is an evolutionarily conserved zinc-finger DNA binding protein with activity in chromatin insulation, transcriptional regulation, and genomic imprinting [15],[16]. As CTCF affects higher order chromatin structure [17],[18], we wondered if CTCF binding at the SCA7 locus might regulate CAG repeat instability. To test this hypothesis, we derived SCA7 genomic fragment transgenic mice with CTCF binding site mutations, and found that impaired CTCF binding yielded increases in both intergenerational and somatic instability at the SCA7 locus. Detection of increased somatic instability in association with hypermethylation of the CTCF binding site indicated a role for epigenetic regulation of SCA7 CAG repeat stability. Our results identify CTCF as an important modifier of repeat instability in SCA7, and suggest that CTCF binding may influence repeat instability at other tandem repeat expansion disease loci.

Results

At the SCA7 locus, there are two CTCF binding sites that flank the CAG repeat tract; the CTCF-I binding site is located 3′ to the CAG repeat (Figure S1), within the critical region deleted from the SCA7 genomic fragment in the α-SCA7-92R mice (Figure 1A). As CTCF binding sites are associated with highly unstable repeat loci [14], and CTCF binding can alter chromatin structure and DNA conformation [17],[18], we hypothesized that CTCF binding might be involved in SCA7 repeat instability. To test this hypothesis, we decided to compare SCA7 CAG repeat instability in mice carrying either the wild-type CTCF binding site or a mutant CTCF binding site that would be incapable of binding CTCF. To define the CTCF binding sites, we performed electrophoretic mobility shift assays to confirm that CTCF protein specifically binds to the putative CTCF-I binding site, and we found that both the CTCF DNA binding domain fragment and full-length CTCF protein bind to the SCA7 repeat locus 3′ region (Figure 1B). When we mapped the CTCF-I contact regions at the SCA7 repeat locus by methylation interference and DNA footprinting, we defined a region that is protected from DNase I treatment upon CTCF binding and subject to altered CTCF binding upon methylation treatment (Figure 1C). We then introduced point mutations at 11 nucleotides within this 3′ CTCF-I binding site, including eight contact nucleotides contained within the footprinted region (Figure 1C; Figure 1A, bottom). After confirming that CTCF binding was abrogated by these point mutations in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Figure 1B), we derived a RL-SCA7 94R 13.5 kb genomic fragment construct, that was identical to our original RL-SCA7 92R genomic fragment construct [13], except for: i) the presence of a mutant CTCF-I binding site, and ii) a minor repeat size increase to 94 CAG repeats. The RL-SCA7 94R CTCF-I-mutant construct was microinjected, and two independent lines of RL-SCA7 94R CTCF-I mutant transgenic mice were generated (hereafter referred to as the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut line mice – to distinguish them from the original RL-SCA7-92R transgenic mice with an intact CTCF-I binding site, hereafter referred to as the SCA7-CTCF-I-wt line mice).

Figure 1
Analysis and mutagenesis of the SCA7-CTCF-I binding site.

To assess in vivo occupancy of the CTCF-I binding site in SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. To distinguish between the two CTCF binding sites, separated by a distance of 562 bp, we used two primer sets, including one extending 3′ to the CAG repeat. Quantitative PCR amplification with a primer set (‘A’) within ~800 bp of the CTCF-I and CTCF-II sites yielded comparable CTCF occupancy in SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and -mut mice. As most sheared DNA fragments isolated by ChIP exceed 1 kb, intact CTCF-II sites and the primer set ‘A’ amplicon will be present in sheared DNA fragments isolated by ChIP from SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and -mut mice, accounting for comparable CTCF occupancy with primer set A. However, a significant reduction in CTCF occupancy at the CTCF-I site was observed in the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice for primer set B, which is closer to the CTCF-I binding site (at a distance of ~700 bp) than the CTCF-II binding site (at a distance of ~1,200 bp, thereby exceeding the size of most sheared DNA fragments isolated by ChIP) (Figure 1D; p = 0.02, one-way ANOVA). Thus, ChIP analysis indicated that in vivo CTCF-I occupancy is significantly diminished in the cerebellum of SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice.

We assessed intergenerational repeat length instability in 3 month-old SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice by PCR amplification of the CAG repeat from tail DNAs, and found that mutation of the CTCF-I site destabilized the CAG repeat during intergenerational transmission (p = 0.002, Mann-Whitney two-tailed test) (Figure 2A). Increased intergenerational instability in the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice was reflected by a broader range of repeat length change, as mean expansion and deletion sizes were greater for SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice in comparison to SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice (+4.4 CAG's/−4.7 CAG's vs. +2.6 CAG's/−2.0 CAG's). Analysis of repeat length instability between the two SCA7-CTCF-I-mut lines revealed similar intergenerational repeat instability (p = 0.93, chi-square), and there was no difference in expansion bias between the two lines (p = 0.25, chi-square). Thus, the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice did not show integration site effects, suggesting that increased instability in the two lineages results from altered CTCF binding. We then assessed germ line repeat instability by small-pool PCR of individual alleles in sperm DNAs from mice at age 2 months and 16 months (Figure 2B–C). As the mice aged, the CAG repeat in SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice became increasingly unstable (p = 0.009, Mann-Whitney two-tailed test), as mean expansion and deletion sizes were significantly greater for 16 month-old SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice in comparison to SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice (+24.3 CAG's/−15.5 CAG's (mut) vs. +9.2 CAG's/−1.0 CAG (wt)). Increasing CAG repeat instability with aging in SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice suggests a role for CTCF in DNA instability during spermatogenesis, or for the male germ line-restricted CTCF-like paralogue (CTCFL), also known as brother of the regulator of imprinted sites, or ‘BORIS’ [19]. A potential role for CTCFL/BORIS in male germ line instability in the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice is plausible, as mutation of the SCA7-CTCF-I site also prevented binding of CTCFL/BORIS in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Figure S2).

Figure 2
SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice display increased germ line instability.

Another intriguing feature of repeat instability is variation in repeat size within and between the tissues of an individual organism. This tissue-specific instability, or “somatic mosaicism”, occurs in human patients with repeat diseases, and in mouse models of repeat instability and disease [1],[8],[11]. While shown to be age-dependent, the mechanistic basis of inter-tissue variation, which even occurs in postmitotic neurons [20], is unknown. To determine if somatic CAG mosaicism at the SCA7 locus involves CTCF binding, we surveyed repeat instability in various tissues from SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice. At two months of age, the SCA7 CAG repeat was remarkably stable in all analyzed tissues (Figure 3A). However, by ~10 months of age, SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice displayed large CAG repeat expansions in the cortex and liver (Figure 3B). The liver also exhibited a bimodal distribution of repeat size (i.e. two populations of cells with distinct tract lengths) (Figure 3B). The most pronounced somatic instability differences existed in the kidney, with large expansions for SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice, but stable repeats in the SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice (Figure 3B). This pattern of increased kidney and liver repeat instability was present in both SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines (Figure 3B; Figure S3). Indeed, comparable somatic instability was also detected in both SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines at five months of age (Figure S4). When we closely examined repeat instability in the cortex by small-pool PCR, we observed significantly different repeat sizes (p = 8.6×10−5, Mann-Whitney), with a range of 39 to 152 CAG repeats in SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice and 26 to 245 CAG repeats in SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice (Figure 3C; Table 1). The increased somatic instability occurred in both SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines, as an expansion bias was apparent in both lineages upon small-pool PCR analysis (Figure 3D; Table 1). These findings suggest that CTCF binding stabilizes the SCA7 CAG repeat in certain tissues. Thus, as noted for the germ line and documented for two independent lines of SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic mice, SCA7 somatic CAG instability is dependent upon age and the presence of intact CTCF binding sites.

Figure 3
SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice display increased somatic instability.
Table 1
Repeat sizes of cortex DNA: CAG tract length - Small-pool PCR.

CTCF binding can be regulated by CpG methylation, as methylation at CTCF recognition sites abrogates binding [16]. This finding was confirmed for un-methylated and methylated versions of the SCA7 CTCF-I recognition site (Figure 4A; Figure S5). Highly variable levels of instability have been documented in the kidneys of transgenic repeat instability mouse models [21],[22], although the reasons for pronounced instability in this tissue are unknown. Interestingly, one mouse with a wild-type CTCF-I binding site (SCA7-CTCF-I-wt) displayed marked CAG repeat instability in its kidney DNA (Figure 4B), paralleling the considerable instability observed in the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice (Figure 3B). Bisulfite sequencing of kidney DNA from this SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mouse revealed high levels of CpG methylation at the wild-type CTCF-I binding site, including the central CTCF contact site (Figure S6); whereas methylation was not observed in kidney DNAs from 14 other SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice that displayed only modest levels of CAG instability (Figure 4C). The high levels of CAG instability and the CpG methylation in this mouse were restricted to the kidney, as the cerebellum and tail DNAs of the same mouse, which showed limited CAG instability (Figure 4B), were completely unmethylated (Figure 4C). This finding suggests a direct link between methylation status of the CTCF binding site and CAG repeat instability. Of all the tissues analyzed from SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice, liver exhibits the greatest amount of somatic mosaisicm, with the largest repeat expansions (Figure 3B). We hypothesized that the high levels of CAG repeat instability in the liver of SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice might result from methylation of the CTCF-I binding site. To address this question, we performed bisulfite sequencing analysis of liver DNAs from SCA7-CTCF-I-wt mice, and documented moderately high levels of methylation at the CTCF-I binding site (Figure 4D; Figure S7). These results indicate a correlation between CpG methylation and CAG repeat instability. Thus, in SCA7 transgenic mice, decreased CTCF binding, either by CpG methylation or mutagenesis of the CTCF-I binding site, enhanced CAG repeat instability.

Figure 4
Epigenetic regulation of CTCF binding modulates instability at the SCA7 locus.

Discussion

We have identified a CTCF binding site as the first cis-element regulating CAG tract instability at a disease locus. Furthermore, binding of the trans-factor CTCF to this cis-element influences CAG instability, and this interaction is epigenetically regulated. At the SCA7 locus and four other CAG/CTG repeat loci known to display pronounced anticipation, functional CTCF binding sites occur immediately adjacent to the repeats, and CTCF binding can affect DNA structure and chromatin packaging at such loci, and elsewhere [14], [23][26]. Although an interplay between GC-content, CpG islands, epigenetic modification, chromatin structure, repeat length, and unusual DNA conformation has long been postulated to underlie trinucleotide repeat instability [11], [27][29], the mechanistic basis of this process is ill-defined. CTCF insulator and genomic imprinting functions are subject to epigenetic regulation, as methylation status is a key determinant of CTCF action at certain “differentially methylated domains” and methylation changes at CTCF binding sites are linked to oncogenic transformation [16],[18]. At the SCA7 locus, methylation status of the CTCF-I binding site may be similarly important for its ability to tamp down repeat instability, as hypermethylation of the CTCF-I site was associated with a dramatic enhancement of somatic instability in the SCA7 genomic fragment transgenic mouse model. Thus, inability to bind CTCF at sites adjacent to CAG tracts, because of binding site mutation or CpG methylation in the case of the SCA7-CTCF-I site, can promote further expansion of disease-length CAG repeat alleles (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Model for CTCF regulation of CAG repeat instability.

In both human patients and transgenic mice with expanded repeat tracts, the repeat displays high levels of instability. The flanking sequence has been thought to contain elements that may protect or enhance repeat instability. Our results show that CTCF binding is a stabilizing force at the SCA7 repeat locus, suppressing expansion of the CAG repeat in the germ line and soma. Interestingly, deletion of ~8.3 kb of 3′ genomic sequence in our previous SCA7 transgenic mouse, including the CTCF-I site, stabilized the repeat [13]. The CAG-92 stabilization, arising from the ~8.3 kb 3′ genomic fragment deletion, suggests the existence of positive cis-regulators that were “driving” CAG instability. One such element could be a replication initiation site that was mapped within the genomic region 3′ to the CTCF-I binding site at the SCA7 locus [30]. Hence, the 8.3 kb 3′ deletion could grossly alter the chromatin organization of the adjacent repeat, and would likely ablate replication origin activity, stabilizing the CAG repeat tract. However, this ~8.3 kb genomic region likely also contained negative cis-regulators of CAG repeat instability, whose dampening effects would not be apparent due to the coincident loss of instability drivers. Our results indicate that CTCF binding negatively regulates expanded CAG repeat instability at the SCA7 locus. CTCF regulation of repeat instability potential is consistent with its many roles in modulating DNA structure. CTCF can mediate long-range chromatin interactions and can co-localize physically distant genomic regions into discrete sub-nuclear domains [17],[18]. CTCF insulates heterochromatin and silenced genes from transcriptionally active genes, as CTCF binding sites occur at transition zones between X-inactivation regions and genes that escape from X-inactivation [24]. CTCF has been implicated in genomic imprinting, although recent studies indicate that such transcription insulator events may involve the coordinated action of CTCF with cohesin [31][33]. CTCF binding at the DM1 locus sequesters repeat-driven heterochromatin formation to the immediate repeat region, while repeat expansion-induced loss of CTCF binding may permit spreading of heterochromatin to adjacent genes, accounting for the mental retardation phenotype in congenital DM1 [23]. As DNA structural conformation and transcription activity are two highly intertwined processes that appear fundamental to the instability of expanded tandem repeats [10],[11], CTCF appears a likely candidate for modulation of trinucleotide repeat instability.

At the SCA7 locus, a pronounced tendency for repeat expansion has been associated with transmission through the male germ line [3],[4],[34]. Although we have hypothesized that CTCF is principally responsible for modulating SCA7 CAG repeat instability both in the germ line and in the soma, we considered a possible role for the related CTCF-like factor BORIS. BORIS and CTCF share identical 11 zinc-finger domains for DNA binding [19]; hence, both CTCF and BORIS can bind to the CTCF binding sites at the SCA7 locus. Upon mutation or methylation of the CTCF binding site 3′ to the SCA7 CAG repeat, neither CTCF nor BORIS can bind (Figure 1C; Figure 4A; Figure S8). As BORIS can bind to the H19 differentially methylated domain even when it is methylated [35], our results suggest that the methylation dependence of BORIS binding is locus specific. BORIS and CTCF expression patterns overlap very little, if at all, and in the male germ line, BORIS appears restricted to primary spermatocytes, while CTCF occurs almost exclusively in post-meiotic cells, such as round spermatids [19]. Interestingly, neither BORIS nor CTCF could be detected by immunostaining proliferating spermatogonia. In human HD patients and transgenic mouse models of CTG/CAG instability, large repeat expansions have been documented in spermatogonia, but not in post-meiotic spermatids or spermatozoa [36][39]. Thus, absence or low levels of BORIS or CTCF in spermatogonia — the cells in which the largest and most frequent repeat expansions occur — may contribute to the paternal parent-of-origin expansion bias common to most CAG/CTG repeat diseases. In spermatocytes, BORIS may stabilize expanded CAG repeats, just as CTCF binding appears to promote repeat stability in somatic tissues. Thus, in the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut mice, abrogated binding of BORIS may contribute to increased repeat instability and expansion bias in the male germ line.

Our findings suggest that CTCF is a trans-acting factor that specifically interacts in a methylation-dependent manner with the adjacent cis-environment to prevent hyper-expansion of disease length CAG repeats. In a Drosophila model of polyglutamine repeat disease, expression of the mutant gene product modulated repeat instability by altering transcription and repair pathways [10]. Similarly, uninterrupted repeat sequences, and in particular, runs of CG-rich trinucleotide repeats, can affect replication machinery, DNA repair pathways, and nucleosome positioning, though in cis, by altering the structure and conformation of the DNA regions within which they reside [40],[41]. Association of adjacent CTCF binding sites with repeat loci is a common feature of unstable microsatellite repeats [14]. We propose that acquisition of CTCF binding sites at mutational hot spots represents an evolutionary strategy for insulating noxious DNA sequences [42], and our findings indicate that CTCF binding site utilization at a mutational hot spot is subject to epigenetic regulation. We thus envision a predominant role for CTCF in modulating genetic instability at DNA regions containing variably-sized repeats, unstable sequence motifs, or other repetitive sequence elements.

Materials and Methods

Generation of SCA-CTCF-I-mut Transgenic Mice

To derive the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic construct, we synthesized a PCR primer with randomly mutated nucleotides introduced at the CTCF-I contact sites for recombineering into the RL-SCA7-92R (SCA7-CTCF-I-wt) construct [13], and then confirmed loss of CTCF binding by the mutated fragment by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (protocol provided below). Using a standard recombineering approach [43], we PCR-generated a SCA7-CTCF-I targeting cassette containing a Chloramphenicol resistance gene and Cla I restriction site flanked by SCA7-CTCF-I region sequences with the following primer set: hSCA7-wt-CAM-F, 5′-tcccccctgcccccctcctgtatcgatgtttaagggcaccaataactgc-3′ & hSCA7-mut-CAM-R, 5′-catctctgcccctcgatttttatcgatatcgataatgatgagcacttttcgaccg-3′. After recombineering the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut targeting cassette into the SCA7-CTCF genomic fragment carried on a plasmid, selection, and PCR screening, we deleted the Chloramphenicol gene by Cla I digestion and ligation. We verified the sequence of the SCA7-CTCF-I-mut construct prior to linearization with Sal I – Spe I digestion, gel purification, and microinjection into C57BL/6J×C3H/HeJ oocytes. Transgene-positive founders were backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J background for more than 12 generations to yield incipient congenic mice before repeat instability analysis commenced. All experiments and animal care were performed in accordance with the University of Washington IACUC guidelines.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays

We amplified a 161 bp DNA fragment (SCA7-CTCF-I) from the SCA7 locus with primers (5′-ctccccccttcaccccctcgagac-3′ & 5′-gtgacgcacactcacgcacgcacgg-3′) labeled at their 5′ ends by γ-32P-ATP. We gel-purified the 5′ end-labeled fragment, and used it for electrophoretic mobility shift assays, with in vitro translated proteins, as previously described [14]. We synthesized the CTCF-11 zinc finger (ZF) DNA binding domain, full length CTCF and full length CTCFL/BORIS proteins using the pCITE-11ZF, pCITE-7.1, and pCITE-BORIS expression constructs [14],[19],[44], with the TnT reticulocyte lysate coupled in vitro transcription-translation system (Promega). For “super-shifts”, we used an anti-CTCF antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) or anti-BORIS antibody [19],[44]. We methylated the end-labeled SCA7-CTCF-I fragment with Sss I methyl-transferase (New England Biolabs) in the presence of 0.8 mM S-adenosylmethionine. We confirmed the methylation status by restriction enzyme digestion with Nru I, and used unmethylated fragment as a control [14].

DNase I Footprinting and Methlyation Interference Analysis

We PCR-amplified the SCA7-CTCF-I fragment and labeled it at the 5′ end on either the coding or anti-sense strand, incubated the purified probes with CTCF and then partially digested them with DNase I, or partially methylated them at guanine residues with dimethyl sulfate, and then incubated them with CTCF. Details of these protocols, as well as our methods for isolation and analysis of free probe DNA fragments on sequencing gels, have been described [14].

DNA Methylation Sequencing

Bisulfite treatment of tissue DNAs was done as previously described [45], and PCR primers spanning the SCA7-CTCF-I region were designed so that they excluded CpG dinucleotides within the binding region. PCR products were then cloned into a Topo TA vector and sequenced. Sequencing of positive control samples, treated with Sss I to methylate all cytosines in CpG dyads, were included in every run, and revealed lack of C to T conversion at all CpG dyads in all control samples analyzed.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

We prepared tissues, cross-linked proteins to DNA, and processed tissue samples essentially as we have done previously [46]. However, we doubled the length of the sonication step, and, prior to immunoprecipitation, we fractionated supernatant DNAs on agarose gels to gauge the extent of shearing. After confirming that the bulk of sheared DNAs migrated in the 500–1,000 bp range, we performed immunoprecipitation with an anti-CTCF antibody (Upstate Biotechnology), as described [14]. DNAs were isolated and then subjected to real-time qPCR analysis with different SCA7 genomic region primer and probe sets (available upon request) on an ABI-7700 sequence detection system. For each CTCF ChIP sample, we normalized SCA7 locus occupancy to a control region of the Myc locus lacking CTCF binding sites [14]. All primer and probe sequence sets are available upon request.

Repeat Instability Analysis

We PCR-amplified the SCA7 CAG repeat from genomic DNA samples in the presence of 0.1µCi of α-32P-ATP, and resolved the radiolabeled PCR products on 1.8% agarose gels [13]. For small-pool PCR, dilution of genomic DNA's, yielding 1–5 genome equivalents, was performed prior to amplification and sizing [4]. In all experiments, at least three mice/genotype, or three samples/time point, were analyzed. All primer sequences are available upon request.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Sequence of the SCA7-CTCF region. Primary sequence for the 3′ end of intron 2, all of exon 3, and the 5′ end of intron 3 are shown. Intron sequence is lowercase; exon sequence is uppercase. CTCF binding sites are shown in blue. Note that the CTCF-I binding site is located in intron 3, while the CTCF-II binding site encompasses intron 2 - exon 3 boundary. Start site of translation is underlined in blue, and CAG repeat is shown in red. Mapped contact regions from methylation interference and DNase I footprinting analysis are indicated by filled circles, and DNase I hypersensitivity sites are marked by arrows (see Figure 1C). The primer sequences for generation of the probe fragment for all electrophoretic mobility shift assays are underlined in black.

(0.02 MB PDF)

Figure S2

Mutation of SCA7-CTCF-I site also abrogates binding by BORIS. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with SCA7-CTCF-I-wt and -mut probe fragments were performed with probe only, the 11 zinc-finger DNA binding domain region of CTCF, full-length CTCF protein, full-length BORIS protein, BORIS protein with anti-BORIS sera (BORIS+α-BORIS), or BORIS with pre-immune anti-BORIS sera (BORIS+pI). Arrows indicate shifted CTCF-DNA complexes, shifted BORIS-DNA complexes, and super-shifted BORIS-DNA complexes. Addition of CTCF-DM1 probe as cold competitor prevented CTCF-DNA and BORIS-DNA complex formation for the SCA7-CTCF-I-wt fragment, while non-specific cold competitor did not (data not shown).

(0.06 MB PDF)

Figure S3

Increased somatic instability in both SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines. Here, we see representative results for PCR analysis of somatic repeat instability for aged individuals from each of the two SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines analyzed in this study. Note that comparable patterns of increased somatic mosaicism are observed in each lineage.

(0.73 MB PDF)

Figure S4

Comparable somatic mosaicism in both SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines. Here, we see representative images for PCR analysis of somatic repeat instability for 5 month-old individuals from each of the two SCA7-CTCF-I-mut transgenic lines analyzed in this study. Note that comparable patterns of increased somatic mosaicism are again observed at this earlier point.

(0.66 MB PDF)

Figure S5

Methylation of SCA7-CTCF-I-wt probe fragment for gel shift analysis. Sss I was used to methylate cytosine residues in CpG dyads in the SCA7-CTCF-I-wt probe fragment. Digestion of control (unmethylated) and Sss I-methylated probe fragments with the methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme Nru I revealed complete methylation of Sss I-treated SCA7-CTCF-I-wt probe fragment.

(0.79 MB PDF)

Figure S6

Amplicon for bisulfite sequencing for epigenotype determination. PCR amplification of bisulfite-converted genomic DNA for the fragment shown here was performed to derive CpG methylation status at the SCA7-CTCF-I binding site in murine tissues. Intron sequence is lowercase; exon sequence is uppercase. The SCA7-CTCF-I binding site is shown in blue. The thirteen CpG dyads included in the epigenotyping are shown, and the dyad with filled circles corresponds to a critical CTCF contact site, based upon footprinting analysis (see Figure 1C).

(0.03 MB PDF)

Figure S7

Epigenotype data for bisulfite sequencing analysis of the CTCF-I binding site region in SCA7-CTCF-I-wt transgenic liver. Results of bisulfite sequencing analysis for liver DNAs obtained from three SCA7-CTCF-I-wt transgenic mice reveal moderate to high levels of CpG methylation in this tissue, especially when compared to the completely un-methylated status of CpG dyads observed in all tail DNAs and kidney DNAs, with one exception.

(0.53 MB PDF)

Figure S8

Methylation of the SCA7-CTCF-I site abrogates binding of BORIS as well as CTCF. Gel retardation assays with unmethylated or Sss I-methylated SCA7-CTCF-I-wt probe fragments were performed with probe only, the 11 zinc-finger DNA binding domain region of CTCF, CTCF with pre-immune anti-CTCF sera (CTCF+pI), CTCF protein with anti-CTCF sera (CTCF+α-CTCF), BORIS with pre-immune anti-BORIS sera (BORIS+pI), or BORIS protein with anti-BORIS sera (BORIS+α-BORIS). Arrows indicate shifted CTCF-DNA complexes and shifted BORIS-DNA complexes. Methylation of the SCA7-CTCF-I probe fragment abrogates all binding. Success of Sss I methylation was confirmed by Nru I restriction digestion (see Figure S5).

(2.87 MB PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank A.C. Smith, J.E. Young, and K. Takushi for technical assistance, and we are grateful to D.I. Loukinov and V.V. Lobanenkov for providing us with the BORIS cDNA and anti-BORIS antibody.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This work was supported by the NIH (GM59356 & EY14061 to ARL; CA68360 to GNF; AR4203 & AR050741 to SJT; and AG00057 to VVP), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CEP and JDC), Muscular Dystrophy Association (CEP), Hospital for Sick Children Research Training Centre (KAH), the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (MMA), an ASHG Trainee Award (KAH), and the Canadian Institute of Health Research/University of Toronto Molecular Medicine Studentship Award (KAH and MMA).

References

1. Pearson CE, Nichol Edamura K, Cleary JD. Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:729–742. [PubMed]
2. Harper PS, Harley HG, Reardon W, Shaw DJ. Anticipation in myotonic dystrophy: new light on an old problem. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51:10–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Gouw LG, Castaneda MA, McKenna CK, Digre KB, Pulst SM, et al. Analysis of the dynamic mutation in the SCA7 gene shows marked parental effects on CAG repeat transmission. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:525–532. [PubMed]
4. Monckton DG, Cayuela ML, Gould FK, Brock GJ, Silva R, et al. Very large (CAG)(n) DNA repeat expansions in the sperm of two spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 males. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:2473–2478. [PubMed]
5. La Spada AR, Roling DB, Harding AE, Warner CL, Spiegel R, et al. Meiotic stability and genotype-phenotype correlation of the trinucleotide repeat in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nat Genet. 1992;2:301–304. [PubMed]
6. Ansved T, Lundin A, Anvret M. Larger CAG expansions in skeletal muscle compared with lymphocytes in Kennedy disease but not in Huntington disease. Neurology. 1998;51:1442–1444. [PubMed]
7. Hashida H, Goto J, Kurisaki H, Mizusawa H, Kanazawa I. Brain regional differences in the expansion of a CAG repeat in the spinocerebellar ataxias: dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, Machado-Joseph disease, and spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:505–511. [PubMed]
8. La Spada AR. Trinucleotide repeat instability: Genetic features and molecular mechanisms. Brain Path. 1997;7:943–963. [PubMed]
9. Thornton CA, Johnson K, Moxley RT., 3rd Myotonic dystrophy patients have larger CTG expansions in skeletal muscle than in leukocytes. Ann Neurol. 1994;35:104–107. [PubMed]
10. Jung J, Bonini N. CREB-Binding Protein Modulates Repeat Instability in a Drosophila Model for PolyQ Disease. Science. 2007;315:1857–1859. [PubMed]
11. Mirkin SM. Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature. 2007;447:932–940. [PubMed]
12. Sinden RR. Origins of instability. Nature. 2001;411:757–758. [PubMed]
13. Libby RT, Monckton DG, Fu YH, Martinez RA, McAbney JP, et al. Genomic context drives SCA7 CAG repeat instability, while expressed SCA7 cDNAs are intergenerationally and somatically stable in transgenic mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:41–50. [PubMed]
14. Filippova GN, Thienes CP, Penn BH, Cho DH, Hu YJ, et al. CTCF-binding sites flank CTG/CAG repeats and form a methylation-sensitive insulator at the DM1 locus. Nat Genet. 2001;28:335–343. [PubMed]
15. Lobanenkov VV, Nicolas RH, Adler VV, Paterson H, Klenova EM, et al. A novel sequence-specific DNA binding protein which interacts with three regularly spaced direct repeats of the CCCTC-motif in the 5′-flanking sequence of the chicken c-myc gene. Oncogene. 1990;5:1743–1753. [PubMed]
16. Ohlsson R, Renkawitz R, Lobanenkov V. CTCF is a uniquely versatile transcription regulator linked to epigenetics and disease. Trends Genet. 2001;17:520–527. [PubMed]
17. Ling JQ, Li T, Hu JF, Vu TH, Chen HL, et al. CTCF mediates interchromosomal colocalization between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1. Science. 2006;312:269–272. [PubMed]
18. Filippova GN. Genetics and epigenetics of the multifunctional protein CTCF. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;80:337–360. [PubMed]
19. Loukinov DI, Pugacheva E, Vatolin S, Pack SD, Moon H, et al. BORIS, a novel male germ-line-specific protein associated with epigenetic reprogramming events, shares the same 11-zinc-finger domain with CTCF, the insulator protein involved in reading imprinting marks in the soma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6806–6811. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Gonitel R, Moffitt H, Sathasivam K, Woodman B, Detloff PJ, et al. DNA instability in postmitotic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:3467–3472. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Gomes-Pereira M, Fortune MT, Monckton DG. Mouse tissue culture models of unstable triplet repeats: in vitro selection for larger alleles, mutational expansion bias and tissue specificity, but no association with cell division rates. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:845–854. [PubMed]
22. van den Broek WJ, Nelen MR, Wansink DG, Coerwinkel MM, te Riele H, et al. Somatic expansion behaviour of the (CTG)n repeat in myotonic dystrophy knock-in mice is differentially affected by Msh3 and Msh6 mismatch-repair proteins. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:191–198. [PubMed]
23. Cho DH, Thienes CP, Mahoney SE, Analau E, Filippova GN, et al. Antisense transcription and heterochromatin at the DM1 CTG repeats are constrained by CTCF. Mol Cell. 2005;20:483–489. [PubMed]
24. Filippova GN, Cheng MK, Moore JM, Truong JP, Hu YJ, et al. Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. Dev Cell. 2005;8:31–42. [PubMed]
25. Navarro P, Page DR, Avner P, Rougeulle C. Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2787–2792. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Splinter E, Heath H, Kooren J, Palstra RJ, Klous P, et al. CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2349–2354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Brock GJ, Anderson NH, Monckton DG. Cis-acting modifiers of expanded CAG/CTG triplet repeat expandability: associations with flanking GC content and proximity to CpG islands. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:1061–1067. [PubMed]
28. Gourdon G, Dessen P, Lia AS, Junien C, Hofmann-Radvanyi H. Intriguing association between disease associated unstable trinucleotide repeat and CpG island. Ann Genet. 1997;40:73–77. [PubMed]
29. Nichol K, Pearson CE. CpG methylation modifies the genetic stability of cloned repeat sequences. Genome Res. 2002;12:1246–1256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Nenguke T, Aladjem MI, Gusella JF, Wexler NS, Arnheim N. Candidate DNA replication initiation regions at human trinucleotide repeat disease loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1021–1028. [PubMed]
31. Parelho V, Hadjur S, Spivakov M, Leleu M, Sauer S, et al. Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell. 2008;132:422–433. [PubMed]
32. Stedman W, Kang H, Lin S, Kissil JL, Bartolomei MS, et al. Cohesins localize with CTCF at the KSHV latency control region and at cellular c-myc and H19/Igf2 insulators. Embo J. 2008;27:654–666. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Wendt KS, Yoshida K, Itoh T, Bando M, Koch B, et al. Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature. 2008;451:796–801. [PubMed]
34. David G, Abbas N, Stevanin G, Durr A, Yvert G, et al. Cloning of the SCA7 gene reveals a highly unstable CAG repeat expansion. Nat Genet. 1997;17:65–70. [PubMed]
35. Nguyen P, Cui H, Bisht KS, Sun L, Patel K, et al. CTCFL/BORIS is a methylation-independent DNA-binding protein that preferentially binds to the paternal H19 differentially methylated region. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5546–5551. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Savouret C, Brisson E, Essers J, Kanaar R, Pastink A, et al. CTG repeat instability and size variation timing in DNA repair-deficient mice. Embo J. 2003;22:2264–2273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Savouret C, Garcia-Cordier C, Megret J, te Riele H, Junien C, et al. MSH2-dependent germinal CTG repeat expansions are produced continuously in spermatogonia from DM1 transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:629–637. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Yoon SR, Dubeau L, de Young M, Wexler NS, Arnheim N. Huntington disease expansion mutations in humans can occur before meiosis is completed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8834–8838. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Zhang Y, Monckton DG, Siciliano MJ, Connor TH, Meistrich ML. Age and insertion site dependence of repeat number instability of a human DM1 transgene in individual mouse sperm. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:791–798. [PubMed]
40. Mirkin SM. Toward a unified theory for repeat expansions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12:635–637. [PubMed]
41. Wang YH, Griffith J. Expanded CTG triplet blocks from the myotonic dystrophy gene create the strongest known natural nucleosome positioning elements. Genomics. 1995;25:570–573. [PubMed]
42. Benzer S. On The Topography Of The Genetic Fine Structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961;47:403–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, et al. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics. 2001;73:56–65. [PubMed]
44. Vatolin S, Abdullaev Z, Pack SD, Flanagan PT, Custer M, et al. Conditional expression of the CTCF-paralogous transcriptional factor BORIS in normal cells results in demethylation and derepression of MAGE-A1 and reactivation of other cancer-testis genes. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7751–7762. [PubMed]
45. Laird CD, Pleasant ND, Clark AD, Sneeden JL, Hassan KM, et al. Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:204–209. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Chen S, Peng GH, Wang X, Smith AC, Grote SK, et al. Interference of Crx-dependent transcription by ataxin-7 involves interaction between the glutamine regions and requires the ataxin-7 carboxy-terminal region for nuclear localization. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:53–67. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...