![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Elucidating Bone Marrow Edema and Myelopoiesis in Murine Arthritis Using Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1Steven T. Proulx, PhD, Edmund Kwok, PhD, Zhigang You, MS, M. Owen Papuga, MS, Christopher A. Beck, PhD, Laura M. Calvi, MD, Christopher T. Ritchlin, MD, Hani A. Awad, PhD, Brendan F. Boyce, MBChB, Lianping Xing, PhD, Edward M. Schwarz, PhD: University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 2David J. Shealy, PhD: Centocor Research and Development, Radnor, Pennsylvania Address correspondence and reprint requests to Edward M. Schwarz, PhD, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642. E-mail: Edward_Schwarz/at/URMC.Rochester.edu. Dr. Shealy owns stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Ritchlin has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria (less than $10,000 each) from Wyeth, Amgen, Abbott, Centocor, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche. Dr. Schwarz has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria (less than $10,000 each) from Amgen, Centocor, and Abbott; he owns stock or stock options in Amgen and LAGeT. Dr. Schwarz has provided expert testimony on inflammatory bone loss for Amgen. He also has received research grants from Amgen and Centocor. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Drs. Schwarz and Proulx had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study design. Schwarz, Kwok, You, Shealy, Calvi, Ritchlin, Awad, Boyce, Xing, Proulx. Acquisition of data. Kwok, You, Awad, Proulx. Analysis and interpretation of data. Schwarz, Kwok, Beck, Shealy, Calvi, Ritchlin, Awad, Boyce, Xing, Papuga, Proulx. Manuscript preparation. Schwarz, Kwok, You, Beck, Shealy, Calvi, Ritchlin, Awad, Boyce, Xing, Papuga, Proulx. Statistical analysis. Schwarz, Beck, Proulx. Provision of reagents. Shealy. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available free at Arthritis Rheum.Abstract Objective While bone marrow edema (BME) detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a biomarker of arthritis, its nature remains poorly understood due to the limitations of clinical studies. In this study, MRI of murine arthritis was used to elucidate its cellular composition and vascular involvement. Methods BME was quantified using normalized bone marrow intensity (NBMI) from precontrast MRI and normalized marrow contrast enhancement (NMCE) following intravenous administration of gadopentate dimeglumine. Wild-type (WT) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-transgenic mice were scanned from 2 to 5 months of age, followed by histologic or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of marrow. In efficacy studies, TNF-transgenic mice were treated with anti-TNF or placebo for 8 weeks, and then were studied using bimonthly MRI and histologic analysis. Results NBMI values were similar in WT and TNF-transgenic mice at 2 months. The values in WT mice steadily decreased thereafter, with mean values becoming significantly different from those of TNF-transgenic mice at 3.5 months (mean ± SD 0.29 ± 0.08 versus 0.46 ± 0.13; P < 0.05). Red to yellow marrow transformation occurred in WT but not TNF-transgenic mice, as observed histologically at 5 months. The marrow of TNF-transgenic mice that received anti-TNF therapy converted to yellow marrow, with lower NBMI values versus placebo at 6 weeks (mean ± SD 0.26 ± 0.07 versus 0.61 ± 0.22; P < 0.05). FACS analysis of bone marrow revealed a significant correlation between NBMI values and CD11b+ monocytes (R2 = 0.91, P = 0.0028). Thresholds for “normal” red marrow versus pathologic BME were established, and it was also found that inflammatory marrow is highly permeable to contrast agent. Conclusion BME signals in TNF-transgenic mice are caused by yellow to red marrow conversion, with increased myelopoiesis and increased marrow permeability. The factors that mediate these changes warrant further investigation. Inflammatory erosive arthropathies, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis, are common joint disorders that affect >1% of the population (1,2). The important role of inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumor necrosis factor (TNF), in the pathogenesis of synovial inflammation and joint destruction has been firmly established, and TNF antagonism is regarded as a therapeutic breakthrough for patients with these disorders (3). Despite these clinical advances, several pivotal questions related to the biology of inflammatory erosive arthritis have not been addressed. Of particular importance is the need to identify biomarkers of early disease before irreversible joint damage has occurred. Active research is focused on bone marrow edema (BME), an enigmatic signal that appears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients with arthritis (4-6). BME is a term with broad meaning that is audience dependent. BME in the wrist has been shown to be a predictor of eventual bone erosions at the same site (7-9), and BME may be a better indicator of joint damage than MRI-detected synovitis or traditional clinical outcome measures (10). Studies have also shown a correlation between BME and pain (11,12). Perhaps the most advanced use of this biomarker is in the evaluation of patients with ankylosing spondylitis, where an anti-TNF therapy-induced reduction in BME signals has been correlated with amelioration of disease and a patient’s ability to return to work (13,14). Despite increased attention, little has been published on the histologic correlates of BME. This is largely due to the difficulty in procuring bone biopsy specimens of BME lesions from patients with arthritis. Recent histologic studies of tissue retrieved at joint replacement surgery correlated a cellular infiltrate in close proximity to a cortical break with radiologically identified BME (6,15-17). Immunohistochemical analysis determined that B cells were the predominant cells in the affected marrow (18). However, it has not been possible to perform similar analyses on bone from patients with early arthritis, making natural history studies impossible. Therefore, novel imaging methods using animal models are needed to characterize BME in early arthritis and to define its role in the pathogenesis of synovitis and focal erosion. To elucidate the nature of BME, we have developed high-resolution MRI to visualize and quantify in vivo biomarkers in mice with knee arthritis (19,20). During the course of our investigations, we noticed 2 distinct patterns of enhanced signal in the bones of TNF-transgenic mice versus their wild-type (WT) littermates. One pattern appeared as a bright contrastenhancing signal in the subchondral regions of inflamed joints, similar to BME as described in the clinical literature (7-9), while the other presented as a diffuse signal throughout the bone marrow. This second signal was observed early in the disease process before focal erosions could be detected by microfocal computed tomography (micro-CT). The current study was undertaken to evaluate this BME pattern in more detail and to better understand the contribution of specific cell types to events in the subchondral bone marrow. We also investigated the relationship between TNF-induced BME and the increased myelopoiesis responsible for the generation of CD11b+ osteoclast precursors in mice (21-24) and in patients with inflammatory erosive arthritis (25). MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals and anti-TNF treatment The 3647 line of TNF-transgenic mice, which develops inflammation and erosive arthritis much later than the 197 line (26), was obtained from Dr. George Kollias (Institute of Immunology, Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center, Vari, Greece), and the mice were maintained as heterozygotes in a CBA × C57BL/6 background (27). Experiments were performed with sex-matched TNF-transgenic mice and WT littermate controls under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. An initial natural history study of marrow edema was performed, as previously described (20). TNF-transgenic and WT mice (n = 5 per group) underwent MRI beginning at 2 months of age, and were scanned bimonthly until they were 5 months of age. We were unable to collect data at 4 months of age due to temporary technical problems with the scanner. In drug intervention studies, mice received either murine monoclonal anti-TNF anti-human IgG1 antibody or an irrelevant murine IgG1 placebo control (Centocor R&D, Radnor, PA) at a dosage of 10 mg/kg/week intraperitoneally, as previously described (28). We studied 2 groups of mice, each with 4 female TNF-transgenic animals. These mice were scanned every 2 weeks starting at 3 months of age and were entered into the study when their synovial volumes, as detected by contrast-enhanced MRI, rose above 3 mm3. The mean ± SD age of mice at initiation of treatment was 3.9 ± 0.8 months. One group received weekly anti-TNF injections, while the second group received placebo. MRI scans were performed at baseline and every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. At 8 weeks, mice were killed and the knee and ankle joints were harvested for histologic analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging Images were obtained using a Trio 3.0T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), as previously described (20). Briefly, mice were anesthetized and positioned on an imaging platform for localization scans, followed by a fat-suppressed, high-resolution scan (sagittal 3-dimensional fast low-angle shot [FLASH]). The acquisition parameters were as follows: flip angle 25°, repetition time (TR) 45 msec, echo time (TE) 9.03 msec, matrix 192 × 192 pixels, field of view 20 × 20 mm, slice thickness 0.16 mm, acquisition time 8 minutes, 28 seconds, and 1 acquisition. For this gradient-echo sequence, the short TR and TE values gave this sequence T1-weighting, while the low flip angle value gave T2-weighting. Gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) (Omniscan; Amersham Health, Oslo, Norway), at a dose of 0.5 ml/kg and diluted in sterile saline, was injected via the retroorbital venous plexus. After 3 minutes, a second high-resolution scan was performed with contrast enhancement. Imaging sessions took ~30 minutes per mouse. MRI data analysis An OsiriX DICOM viewer was used for image processing and analysis. To perform quantitative longitudinal assessments of MRI signal intensities, a method was developed to normalize for signal variations that are present between scans due to differences in mouse positioning in the knee coil or fluctuations in field strength. Region of interest (ROI) circles (~0.7 mm2) were drawn on 5 contiguous 2-dimensional slices in the tibial marrow at a distance of 1 mm from the proximal end of the tibial plateau. The ROI was copied and placed in the gastrocnemius muscle at an equivalent distance from the center of the coil. The muscle serves as a normalization tissue, since its MRI signal with and without contrast is not affected by joint inflammation. The average value of mean marrow signal intensity divided by mean muscle signal intensity for 5 slices is known as normalized bone marrow intensity (NBMI). On postcontrast scans the ROIs in the tibial marrow were copied from the precontrast scans. The average value of the mean signal intensity of the ROIs on the postcontrast scans is known as marrow contrast enhancement. This value is typically normalized for dosage variations by dividing by the contrast enhancement value of a large 3-dimensional section of muscle (>15 mm3), segmented and analyzed using Amira 3.1 software (Mercury Computer Systems, Chelmsford, MA), as previously described (20). The normalized value is termed normalized marrow contrast enhancement (NMCE). Analysis of both quantifications takes ~15 minutes by an experienced operator. Reproducibility of BME measurements was assessed for intrareader, interreader, and inter-MRI variation. For intrareader variation, 10 contrast-enhanced MRI scans (5 TNF-transgenic and 5 WT mice) were analyzed by the same operator (STP) on 2 different days in random order. A second operator (MOP) analyzed the same 10 scans after a training period of 1 hour to determine interreader variation. For inter-MRI variation, 8 TNF-transgenic mice with BME of varying severity were scanned twice within 48 hours and the same operator analyzed the scans in random order. Histologic examination The right knee and ankle joints were removed and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The joints were decalcified in 14% EDTA at room temperature (pH adjusted to 7.2) for 21 days. Joints were then carefully embedded in paraffin for sectioning into 3-μm slices. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Alcian blue, and orange G for histologic examination, as previously described (29). Immunohistochemical analysis to identify T cells, B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils was performed, as previously described (18), using primary antibodies specific for CD3 (1:100; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), CD45R/B220 (1:300; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), F4/80 (1:80; Serotec, Raleigh, NC), and Neu7/4 (clone MCA771G, 1:2,000; Serotec), respectively. Histomorphometry Knee joint sections containing the tibial middiaphyseal red marrow were used for histomorphometric analysis of marrow vascularity by the point-counting steriometric method, as previously described (30). Sections from WT and TNF-transgenic mice treated with placebo or anti-TNF for 8 weeks (n = 3 per group) were used for analysis. For each mouse, 3 different levels comprising tibial marrow were analyzed. On each level, 3 regions (each 0.04 mm2) of marrow consisting of purely cellular regions without adipocytes were analyzed at a distance of ~5 mm from the proximal growth plate using point counting. Vascular regions (defined as dense accumulations of red blood cells) versus hematopoietic regions were counted. The proportion of vascular regions divided by total area analyzed is defined as the vascular area (mm2 per mm2 of red marrow). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis Five-month-old TNF-transgenic and WT mice (n = 3 per group) were killed and tibial marrow was harvested for FACS analysis, as previously described (21). Cells were then labeled with fluorescence probes: allophycocyanin-anti-murine CD11b (BD PharMingen), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-anti-murine Ly-6G and Ly-6C (Gr-1) (BD PharMingen), FITC-anti-murine CD3 (Serotec), or FITC-anti-murine CD45R/B220 (BD PharMingen). Data were acquired with a FACS-Calibur instrument (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) and analyzed using WinMDI software (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). Statistical analysis Linear mixed-effects regression models, with mouse as a random effect and time (treated as a continuous covariate) as a fixed effect, were used to assess changes over time based on longitudinal data. Similar models used age instead of time to assess changes with respect to age based on repeated measurements. Analyses based on cross-sectional data used standard linear regression models. Two-sided t-tests assuming unequal variances were used to make comparisons of histomorphometry, or contrast-enhanced MRI data between groups at the same time point or age. Correlations between measures were estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and tested for significance using a 2-sided t-test. Interreader, intrareader, and inter-MRI reliability was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on random-effects analysis of variance models. All underlying assumptions of the parametric methods were checked, and no serious violations were detected. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant, and P values less than 0.01 were considered highly significant. RESULTS MRI biomarkers of BME With the aid of a custom surface coil and carefully designed MRI pulse sequence, we were able to generate images that could clearly differentiate the marrow of TNF-transgenic and WT mice on both precontrast and postcontrast scans (Figure 1
Intrareader, interreader, and inter-MRI reliability of marrow MRI biomarkers was measured using ICC analysis, and was found to be excellent for all variables. NBMI was found to have ICC values of 0.998 for intrareader, 0.997 for interreader, and 0.982 for inter-MRI reliability. NMCE quantifications had ICC values of 0.981, 0.984, and 0.944, respectively. Conversion of red marrow to yellow marrow in aging WT mice, but not in TNF-transgenic mice The yellow marrow pattern seen in 5-month-old WT mice led us to hypothesize that MRI could track the conversion from cellular, red marrow to fatty, yellow marrow, which is a natural consequence of aging in the bones of mammals (32). To test this hypothesis in a natural history study, 5 WT and 5 TNF-transgenic animals received bimonthly MRI scans from 2 to 5 months of age. Quantification (Figure 1G Conversion of red marrow to yellow marrow in TNF-transgenic animals following anti-TNF therapy To further validate our marrow quantifications, and to determine if yellow marrow conversion could be induced in TNF-transgenic animals, we tested the hypothesis that anti-TNF therapy administered to TNF-transgenic mice would significantly lessen both the NBMI and the NMCE. We observed a decrease in signal intensity in the marrow from baseline (Figure 2A
Effect of joint synovitis on diffuse bone marrow patterns in adjacent marrow Results of histologic examinations of 5-month-old TNF-transgenic mice and their WT littermates were compared, to better understand the origin of marrow conversion in our model. We also wanted to determine if the hypercellular marrow pattern was generated in response to signals derived from the adjacent inflamed joint, or if it resulted from endocrine effects due to elevated levels of TNF in the systemic circulation of TNF-transgenic mice. The histologic analysis showed that in WT mice, marrow of the distal lower limb at 5 months of age was entirely filled with adipose tissue (Figure 3A
We observed a different pattern of marrow cellularity in the proximal tibiae of TNF-transgenic mice, in which the histologic analysis showed hypercellular marrow irrespective of the severity of knee inflammation. As an example, Figure 3C Marrow conversions and their relationship to vascularity The tibial diaphyses of 5-month-old TNF-transgenic mice show the region in which systemic marrow conversions occurred. Histologic examination of TNF-transgenic mice (Figures 3I and J Diffuse BME signals are associated with increased myelopoiesis, while focal edema signals colocalize with invading pannus through cortical breaks To further define the nature of the persisting red marrow in TNF-transgenic mice, we performed FACS analyses of marrow-derived cells from the tibiae of 5-month-old WT and TNF-transgenic mice (Figures 4A-D
Furthermore, TNF-transgenic mice >8 months old typically have severe erosive arthritis that leads to cortical breaks and contiguous pannus that spans from the synovial lining of the knee joint into the bone marrow (27). Interestingly, in addition to the diffuse BME signal throughout their distal femora and proximal tibiae, these mice have higher signal intensity in the marrow adjacent to the synovium (Figure 4E BME in TNF-transgenic mice is associated with increased Gd-DTPA perfusion Although the aforementioned results suggest that the elevated marrow signals are associated with red marrow myelopoiesis, we also made several observations that clearly indicated that further abnormalities in red marrow must occur in order to present as BME on MRI. First, the MRI signal in older WT animals with incomplete marrow conversion appeared dark in both the red and the yellow marrow regions of the tibia (Figures 1D-F
MRI thresholds of yellow marrow, normal red marrow, and BME Given that there is a broad spectrum of signals from normal and pathologic red marrow, we performed a linear regression analysis of the NBMI versus NMCE signals from the WT and TNF-transgenic mice shown in Figure 1
DISCUSSION Despite the increasing usage of BME as a clinical biomarker of arthritis, the cellular and molecular constituents that give rise to BME signals remain very poorly understood (4). To elucidate the nature of these BME signals, we performed a systematic quantitative contrast-enhanced MRI and histologic evaluation of the knee joints of WT and TNF-transgenic mice. We discovered a diffuse BME pattern in arthritic mice, distinct from subchondral BME that coexists with focal erosions. This persistent inflammatory red marrow was associated with increased myelopoiesis and increased perfusion of Gd-DTPA contrast agent. Amelioration of this marrow pattern was seen after effective anti-TNF therapy, highlighting the role of long-term TNF treatment in this process. Clinical recommendations for MRI examination of BME suggest a T2-weighted sequence or a T1-weighted sequence with Gd-DTPA to visualize edema as a hyperintense region of the marrow (33). Typically, T1-weighted sequences show increased water content as low intensity. However, the 3-dimensional FLASH shot used in the current study is able to visualize edema as “bright” on scans both before and after administration of Gd-DTPA. This is due to both T1- and T2-weighted characteristics being built into the FLASH sequence. This “dual-weighting” facilitated quantification of BME by allowing image subtraction of precontrast scans from postcontrast scans. Unlike dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI methods that have recently been applied to BME (34), which use time as a denominator for quantification of enhancement, the current method uses surrounding muscle as a normalization tissue. This allowed normalization of quantifications of both precontrast (NBMI) and postcontrast (NMCE) scans to be developed and validated. Although reproducibility studies demonstrated that NBMI was the more reliable measure, NMCE may have the advantage of increased sensitivity, as shown by the larger treatment effect values after anti-TNF therapy. Although the generalized pattern of marrow conversion to inflammatory red marrow from central to distal joints in TNF-transgenic mice has not been described in RA, it is possible that it has been overlooked. Typically, BME in RA is seen on MRIs of affected distal joints such as the wrist (8). This subchondral BME is described in close conjunction with focal erosions, and may be a “reaction” of the bone marrow to infiltrating synovium (18). However, in our TNF-transgenic mouse model we did not see evidence of subchondral bone marrow changes until late in the disease process. Systemic marrow conversions of the type shown here would likely be initiated at central joints that would not be assessed in RA. However, marrow biopsies of red marrow locations, such as the iliac crest, in adults with RA showed abnormal marrow that was due to elevated TNF levels (35). In addition, marrow from RA patients has shown an increased percentage of myeloprogenitor cells, similar to our findings in TNF-transgenic mice (36,37). A histologic study of resected knee and hip joints revealed increased red marrow in RA patients compared with osteoarthritis controls (38). Thus, more research is necessary to determine if inflammatory arthritis is associated with a systemic marrow disorder and increased myelopoiesis. The development of methods to distinguish “normal” red marrow from “pathologic” red marrow is of paramount importance. By combining 2 quantitative outcome measures of BME (Figure 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Patricia Weber for technical assistance with the MRI, Laura Yanoso for technical assistance with the micro-CT, Colleen Hock for assisting with animal breeding and genotyping, and Krista Scorsone for technical assistance with the histologic examinations. Supported by research grants from Centocor and by grants from the US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service/NIH (AR-43510, AR-46545, AR-48697, AR-51469, AR-54041, DE-17096, and DK-64381). REFERENCES 1. Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN. Rheumatoid arthritis. Cell. 1996;85:307–10. review. [PubMed] 2. Firestein GS. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2003;423:356–61. review. [PubMed] 3. Feldmann M, Maini RN. TNF defined as a therapeutic target for rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. Nat Med. 2003;9:1245–50. published erratum appears in Nat Med 2003;9:1433. [PubMed] 4. McQueen FM, Ostendorf B. What is MRI bone oedema in rheumatoid arthritis and why does it matter? Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:222. review. [PubMed] 5. Appel H, Loddenkemper C, Grozdanovic Z, Ebhardt H, Dreimann M, Hempfing A, et al. Correlation of histopathological findings and magnetic resonance imaging in the spine of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R143. [PubMed] 6. Jimenez-Boj E, Nobauer-Huhmann I, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Dorotka R, Wanivenhaus AH, Kainberger F, et al. Bone erosions and bone marrow edema as defined by magnetic resonance imaging reflect true bone marrow inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1118–24. [PubMed] 7. McQueen FM. Magnetic resonance imaging in early inflammatory arthritis: what is its role? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:700–6. review. [PubMed] 8. McQueen FM, Benton N, Perry D, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, et al. Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:1814–27. [PubMed] 9. Haavardsholm EA, Boyesen P, Ostergaard M, Schildvold A, Kvien TK. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 84 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: bone marrow oedema predicts erosive progression. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:794–800. [PubMed] 10. McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57:350–6. [PubMed] 11. Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY, Riyazi N, Rosendaal FR, Nelissen RG, et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006;239:811–7. [PubMed] 12. Hofmann S, Kramer J, Vakil-Adli A, Aigner N, Breitenseher M. Painful bone marrow edema of the knee: differential diagnosis and therapeutic concepts. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:321–33. review. ix. [PubMed] 13. Braun J, Landewe R, Hermann KG, Han J, Yan S, Williamson P, et al. the ASSERT Study Group. Major reduction in spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with infliximab: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1646–52. [PubMed] 14. Van der Heijde D, Han C, DeVlam K, Burmester G, van den Bosch F, Williamson P, et al. Infliximab improves productivity and reduces workday loss in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:569–74. [PubMed] 15. Jimenez-Boj E, Redlich K, Turk B, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Wanivenhaus A, Chott A, et al. Interaction between synovial inflammatory tissue and bone marrow in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol. 2005;175:2579–88. [PubMed] 16. Appel H, Kuhne M, Spiekermann S, Ebhardt H, Grozdanovic Z, Kohler D, et al. Immunohistologic analysis of zygapophyseal joints in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2845–51. [PubMed] 17. Appel H, Kuhne M, Spiekermann S, Kohler D, Zacher J, Stein H, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of hip arthritis in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of the bone-cartilage interface and subchondral bone marrow. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1805–13. [PubMed] 18. Gortz B, Hayer S, Redlich K, Zwerina J, Tohidast-Akrad M, Tuerk B, et al. Arthritis induces lymphocytic bone marrow inflammation and endosteal bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:990–8. [PubMed] 19. Proulx ST, Kwok E, You Z, Beck CA, Shealy DJ, Ritchlin CT, et al. MRI and quantification of draining lymph node function in inflammatory arthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1117:106–23. [PubMed] 20. Proulx ST, Kwok E, You Z, Papuga MO, Beck CA, Shealy DJ, et al. Longitudinal assessment of synovial, lymph node, and bone volumes in inflammatory arthritis in mice by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and microfocal computed tomography. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:4024–37. [PubMed] 21. Li P, Schwarz EM, O’Keefe RJ, Ma L, Looney RJ, Ritchlin CT, et al. Systemic tumor necrosis factor α mediates an increase in peripheral CD11bhigh osteoclast precursors in tumor necrosis factor α-transgenic mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:265–76. [PubMed] 22. Yao Z, Li P, Zhang Q, Schwarz EM, Keng P, Arbini A, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α increases circulating osteoclast precursor numbers by promoting their proliferation and differentiation in the bone marrow through up-regulation of c-Fms expression. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:11846–55. [PubMed] 23. Kitaura H, Sands MS, Aya K, Zhou P, Hirayama T, Uthgenannt B, et al. Marrow stromal cells and osteoclast precursors differentially contribute to TNF-α-induced osteoclastogenesis in vivo. J Immunol. 2004;173:4838–46. [PubMed] 24. Kitaura H, Zhou P, Kim HJ, Novack DV, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. M-CSF mediates TNF-induced inflammatory osteolysis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3418–27. [PubMed] 25. Ritchlin CT, Haas-Smith SA, Li P, Hicks DG, Schwarz EM. Mechanisms of TNF-α- and RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in psoriatic arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:821–31. [PubMed] 26. Keffer J, Probert L, Cazlaris H, Georgopoulos S, Kaslaris E, Kioussis D, et al. Transgenic mice expressing human tumour necrosis factor: a predictive genetic model of arthritis. EMBO J. 1991;10:4025–31. [PubMed] 27. Li P, Schwarz EM. The TNF-α transgenic mouse model of inflammatory arthritis. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2003;25:19–33. review. [PubMed] 28. Shealy DJ, Wooley PH, Emmell E, Volk A, Rosenberg A, Treacy G, et al. Anti-TNF-α antibody allows healing of joint damage in polyarthritic transgenic mice. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:R7. [PubMed] 29. Flick LM, Weaver JM, Ulrich-Vinther M, Abuzzahab F, Zhang X, Dougall WC, et al. Effects of receptor activator of NFκB (RANK) signaling blockade on fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:676–84. [PubMed] 30. Franzoso G, Carlson L, Xing L, Poljak L, Shores EW, Brown KD, et al. Requirement for NF-κB in osteoclast and B-cell development. Genes Dev. 1997;11:3482–96. [PubMed] 31. Daldrup-Link HE, Henning T, Link TM. MR imaging of therapy-induced changes of bone marrow. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:743–61. review. [PubMed] 32. Vogler JB, III, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:679–93. review. [PubMed] 33. Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, McQueen F, Bird P, Ejbjerg B, et al. OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies: core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1385–6. [review] [published erratum appears in J Rheumatol 2004;31:198] [PubMed] 34. Hodgson R, Grainger A, O’Connor P, Barnes T, Connolly S, Moots R. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of bone marrow oedema in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:270–2. [PubMed] 35. Papadaki HA, Kritikos HD, Gemetzi C, Koutala H, Marsh JC, Boumpas DT, et al. Bone marrow progenitor cell reserve and function and stromal cell function are defective in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for a tumor necrosis factor α-mediated effect. Blood. 2002;99:1610–9. published erratum appears in Blood 2007;109:4180. [PubMed] 36. Tomita T, Shimaoka Y, Kashiwagi N, Hashimoto H, Kawamura S, Lee SB, et al. Enhanced expression of CD14 antigen on myeloid lineage cells derived from the bone marrow of patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:465–9. [PubMed] 37. Tomita T, Takeuchi E, Toyosaki-Maeda T, Oku H, Kaneko M, Takano H, et al. Establishment of nurse-like stromal cells from bone marrow of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: indication of characteristic bone marrow microenvironment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:854–63. [PubMed] 38. Bugatti S, Caporali R, Manzo A, Vitolo B, Pitzalis C, Montecucco C. Involvement of subchondral bone marrow in rheumatoid arthritis: lymphoid neogenesis and in situ relationship to subchondral bone marrow osteoclast recruitment. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3448–59. [PubMed] 39. Kouskoff V, Korganow AS, Duchatelle V, Degott C, Benoist C, Mathis D. Organ-specific disease provoked by systemic autoimmunity. Cell. 1996;87:811–22. [PubMed] 40. Calvi LM, Adams GB, Weibrecht KW, Weber JM, Olson DP, Knight MC, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–6. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Cell. 1996 May 3; 85(3):307-10.
[Cell. 1996]Nature. 2003 May 15; 423(6937):356-61.
[Nature. 2003]Nat Med. 2003 Oct; 9(10):1245-50.
[Nat Med. 2003]Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8(6):222.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2006]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr; 56(4):1118-24.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jul; 39(7):700-6.
[Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000]Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Jun; 67(6):794-800.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2008]Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Jun; 57(6):350-6.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 1998]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr; 56(4):1118-24.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]J Immunol. 2005 Aug 15; 175(4):2579-88.
[J Immunol. 2005]Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun; 54(6):1805-13.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2006]J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Jun; 19(6):990-8.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2004]Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov; 1117():106-23.
[Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec; 56(12):4024-37.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jul; 39(7):700-6.
[Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000]Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Jun; 67(6):794-800.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2008]Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jan; 50(1):265-76.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2004]EMBO J. 1991 Dec; 10(13):4025-31.
[EMBO J. 1991]Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2003 Aug; 25(1):19-33.
[Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2003]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec; 56(12):4024-37.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]Arthritis Res. 2002; 4(5):R7.
[Arthritis Res. 2002]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec; 56(12):4024-37.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec; 56(12):4024-37.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]J Orthop Res. 2003 Jul; 21(4):676-84.
[J Orthop Res. 2003]J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Jun; 19(6):990-8.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2004]Genes Dev. 1997 Dec 15; 11(24):3482-96.
[Genes Dev. 1997]Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jan; 50(1):265-76.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2004]Eur Radiol. 2007 Mar; 17(3):743-61.
[Eur Radiol. 2007]Radiology. 1988 Sep; 168(3):679-93.
[Radiology. 1988]Radiology. 1988 Sep; 168(3):679-93.
[Radiology. 1988]J Biol Chem. 2006 Apr 28; 281(17):11846-55.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2003 Aug; 25(1):19-33.
[Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2003]Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8(6):222.
[Arthritis Res Ther. 2006]J Rheumatol. 2003 Jun; 30(6):1385-6.
[J Rheumatol. 2003]Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb; 67(2):270-2.
[Ann Rheum Dis. 2008]Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jul; 48(7):1814-27.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2003]J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Jun; 19(6):990-8.
[J Bone Miner Res. 2004]Blood. 2002 Mar 1; 99(5):1610-9.
[Blood. 2002]J Rheumatol. 1997 Mar; 24(3):465-9.
[J Rheumatol. 1997]Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Sep; 38(9):854-63.
[Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999]Cell. 1996 Nov 29; 87(5):811-22.
[Cell. 1996]Nature. 2003 Oct 23; 425(6960):841-6.
[Nature. 2003]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec; 56(12):4024-37.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec; 56(12):4024-37.
[Arthritis Rheum. 2007]