![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
HIV-1 clade-specific differences in the induction of neuropathogenesis 1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA 3Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 4Jawaharalal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India 5Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ and Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium Address for correspondence: Vinayaka R. Prasad Ph.D., Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, Tel: 718-430-2517, Fax: 718-430-8976, Email: prasad/at/aecom.yu.edu §Present Address: Nagadenahalli B. Siddappa, Department of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. The publisher's final edited version of this article is available free at J Neurosci. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.Abstract HIV associated dementia (HAD) is common among clade-B HIV-infected individuals, but less common and less severe among individuals infected with clade-C HIV-1, suggesting clade-specific differences in neuropathogenicity. Though differences in neuro-pathogenecity have been investigated in-vitro using viral proteins responsible for HAD, to date there are no virological studies using animal models to address this issue. Therefore, we investigated neuropathogenesis induced by HIV-1 clades using SCID mouse HIV encephalitis model, which involves intracranial injection of macrophages infected with representative clade B (HIV-1ADA) or clade C (HIVIndie-C1) HIV-1 isolates into SCID mice. In cognitive tests, mice exposed to similar inputs of HIV-1 clade-C made fewer memory errors than those exposed to HIV-1 clade-B. Histopathological analysis of mice exposed to clade-B exhibited greater astrogliosis and increased loss of neuronal network integrity. In-vitro experiments revealed differences in a key characteristic of HIV-1 that influences HAD, increased monocyte infiltration. HIV-1Indie-C1-infected macrophages recruited monocytes poorly in-vitro compared to that of HIV-1ADA–infected macrophages. Monocyte recruitment was HIV-1 Tat and CCL2 dependent. This is the first demonstration, ever since HIV neuropathogenesis was first recognized, that viral genetic differences between clades can affect disease severity and that such studies help identify key players in neuropathogenesis by HIV-1. Keywords: Dementia, Human, Virus, Cognitive, Lentiviruses, Macrophage INTRODUCTION HIV associated dementia (HAD) affected 15 to 30% of infected individuals prior to the widespread use of HAART (highly active anti-retroviral therapy) in the US (McArthur et al., 1993). Despite reduced HAD incidence with the advent of HAART (Sacktor et al., 2001; Dore et al., 2003), improved survival rates of HIV-infected individuals have lead to increase in cognitive impairment due to chronic central nervous system HIV exposure (Sacktor et al., 2001; Langford et al., 2003). In contrast, incidence/prevalence of severe forms of HAD is reported to be considerably lower (2 to 4 percent) in the HAART-naïve HIV-1 infected population in India although milder forms of disease have been reported (Satishchandra et al., 2000; Riedel et al., 2006; Gupta et al., 2007). Considering that the Indian AIDS epidemic is dominated by clade-C HIV-1 (Chakrabarti et al., 2000; Siddappa et al., 2004) and that the clade-C HIV-1 is found in brain autopsies (Mahadevan et al., 2007) from HIV infected Indian patients, suggest a clade-specific difference in the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1. Clade-C HIV-1 is responsible for more than half of new HIV-1 infections worldwide (Geretti, 2006) and a major proportion of HIV infections in India (Siddappa et al., 2004) whereas in North America, HIV-1 clade-B is responsible for nearly all HIV-1 infections. Mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of HAD, characterized by neuronal injury, are complex including infiltration of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) into brain and neurotoxic effects of HIV-1 proteins (e.g., gp120 and Tat). Tat plays multiple roles in HAD pathogenesis including direct neurotoxicity (Gourdou et al., 1990; Sabatier et al., 1991), chemokine dysregulation (Conant et al., 1998; Weiss et al., 1999) and cytokine induction. A dicysteine motif in Tat has been implicated in direct monocyte chemotaxis in-vitro (Albini et al., 1998). We previously reported that clade-C Tat is divergent from other HIV-1 clades in that the dicysteine motif (C30C31), which is highly conserved in all clades examined, exhibits a C31S polymorphism (Ranga et al., 2004) rendering it defective for monocyte chemotaxis in-vitro. Differential distribution of B and C HIV-1 clades, differences in host genetics and access to anti-retrovirals make it difficult to assess neuropathologic differences between populations infected by B and C HIV-1 clades. These difficulties are largely overcome by the use of the severe combined immune deficiency mouse HIV encephalitis (SCID HIVE) model (Tyor et al., 1993; Persidsky et al., 1996), in which for the first time the two HIV-1 clades are compared in a single host. This model involves intracranial injection of MDM infected by HIV-1 into SCID mice and its strength lies in its ability to recapitulate key pathological and behavioral features of human HAD (Avgeropoulos et al., 1998; Cook et al., 2005). Importantly, these mice also exhibit behavioral deficits when tested in a water radial arm maze (WRAM) (Avgeropoulos et al., 1998; Sas et al., 2007), which are consistent with cognitive dysfunction in human HAD. In this report, we primarily investigate neuropathogenic differences of clade-B and clade-C HIV-1 isolates. We find that neuropathogenesis by a clade-C HIV-1 results in a milder cognitive dysfunction than with a clade-B HIV-1. We also show that: (i) HIV-infected MDM or the media from such cells can recruit monocytes; (ii) that monocyte recruitment is Tat- and CCL2-dependent; and (iii) that clade-C HIV-1 is significantly compromised for monocyte chemotaxis. Our work shows that both direct and indirect effects of HIV-1 Tat protein are compromised in subtype C HIV-1 in a virological setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS HIV-1 Infection, Animals and Behavioral Testing Primary human MDM (purchased from the U. Nebraska Medical Center) were cultured in DMEM (GIBCO) with 10% Human Serum (Sigma Hyclone), Penicillin-Streptomycin (GIBCO) and monocyte-colony stimulating factor (MCSF; Sigma) at 6.6ng/ml at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 7 days in Teflon-coated flasks to prevent attachment. To ensure that the HIV-infected MDMs utilized for intracranial injection had equivalent viral loads, approximately 5 x 106 MDMs were infected with HIV-1ADA (clade-B) at a Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) of 0.1 (1 h) or HIV-1IndieC1 (clade-C) at an MOI of 0.01 (3 h). HIV-1ADA was obtained from the U. Nebraska Medical center and HIV-1IndieC1 prepared by transfecting 293T cells with p93IN101 DNA (Mochizuki et al., 1999). Uninfected MDM were used as controls. Following infection, MDM were resuspended in medium devoid of MCSF and cultured for 14 days with media changes every third day. At the end of 14-day incubation, both sets of MDM displayed similar viral load as determined by immunocytochemistry with anti-p24 antibodies (DAKO) and ELISA to measure p24 levels in the media (Perkin-Elmer) (Figure 2
Eighteen four week-old C57BL SCID mice (Jackson Laboratory) were acclimatized to the animal room for a week prior to injection. Mice were single-housed in micro-isolator cages (biosafety level-3 equivalent). The animal room was set on a 12 hour light cycle. Cages, bedding, food, and water were sterilized before use. Animal protocols were approved by the Medical University of South Carolina’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Approximately 1 x 105 HIV-1 infected MDMs (Clade-B or C) or uninfected MDMs were injected into the right frontal lobe of 5-week old SCID mice (n = 6 per group). Six days after intracranial (IC) injections, WRAM behavior testing ensued. This win-shift WRAM utilizes water escape onto hidden platforms as the reinforcer (Hyde et al., 1998; Bimonte-Nelson et al., 2003; Hunter et al., 2004). The 8-arm maze had submerged escape platforms placed on the ends of 4 arms. Each subject had different platform locations that remained fixed throughout the experiment. A subject was released from the start arm and had 2 min to locate a platform. Once a platform was found, the mouse remained on it for 15s, and was then returned to its heated cage for 30s until the next trial. During the interval, the platform found by the mouse was removed from the maze. The animal was then placed again into the start alley and allowed to locate a second platform. The same sequence of events was repeated daily until all four platforms were located. Thus, for each animal, a daily session consisted of four trials, with the number of platformed arms reduced by one on each subsequent trial resulting in the working memory system becoming increasingly demanding as trials progressed. Animals received 4 trials per day for 12 days. The testing protocol included an initial learning phase (days 1–8) and a final testing phase (days 9–12). Working memory correct (WMC) and working memory incorrect (WMI) errors were quantified based on Jarrard et al.’s orthogonal measures (Jarrard, 1993; Hyde et al., 1998; Bimonte-Nelson et al., 2003; Hunter et al., 2004). WMC errors were defined as entries into an arm wherein a platform had already been located and WMI errors were defined as repeat entries into an arm that never contained a platform. Immunohistochemistry, densitometry and detection of HIV RNA levels using Real-time PCR Following WRAM testing, mice were sacrificed and brains extracted and frozen for immunohistochemistry (n = 6). Approximately 13 sets of serial five micron, coronal sections were taken from the frontal through the temporo-parietal lobes of each mouse. Each set was separated by 46 intervening 5 micron sections, which were saved for RNA extraction. Each stained set consisted of slides that underwent immunoperoxidase staining separately for human macrophages (EBM-11, Dako); HIV-1 p24 (p24, DAKO); astrocytes (GFAP, Chemicon) and neuronal dendrites (MAP2, Chemicon) as described (Avgeropoulos et al., 1998; Sas et al., 2007). Average number of primary human macrophages (EBM-11 positive cells) and HIV-infected cells (p24 positive cells) were determined by light microscopy. Immunoperoxidase stained slides were imaged at 20x using an Olympus microscope. Densitometry analysis was performed to determine the intensity of immunoperoxidase stain using NIH Image software on the images (20x) representing sections stained for astrogliosis (GFAP) and neuronal network integrity (MAP-2) (Sas et al., 2007). For measuring neuronal integrity (MAP-2), the left hemisphere (non-injected hemisphere) of each mouse served as a normal control and was set at 100%. The measured value of the right hemisphere was compared to the left hemisphere of the section to determine the relative differences in MAP2 staining. Three sections per mouse from 6 mice per group were analyzed in the above manner to derive the final values plotted in Figure 3
For real time PCR measurements of viral RNA, the tissue from these intervening sections was homogenized and the RNA was extracted according to the RNAwiz (Ambion, Austin, TX) protocol. Approximately 1μg total RNA was used for complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the High Capacity cDNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). HIV-1 gag RNA levels were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction with ABI 7000 prism (Applied Biosystems) to determine viral load, according to manufacturer’s suggested protocol. Measurement of monocyte migration using a dual chamber assay Human MDM were cultured for 4 days under the same conditions as described above. About 2 x 105 of MDM were plated in the lower wells of a 24-well plate. (Rao et al., 2009) Approximately 2 x 105 cultured MDM were infected with HIV-1ADA virus (clade-B) at a MOI of 0.1 for 1 h or HIV-1IndieC1 (clade-C) at an MOI of 0.01 for 3 hours and incubated for 5 days in the above-mentioned medium devoid of MCSF. ELISA for p24 in the supernatant staining and p24 staining of macrophages were used to ensure equal viral load for both HIV-1ADA and HIV-1 IndieC1. In the upper chamber, 2 X 105 elutriated human monocytes were added. To facilitate their identification subsequent to migration, monocytes were stained with CFSE dye prior to adding them to the transwells. After 24 h incubation, cells in the lower chamber were examined in a fluorescence microscope to quantify the migrated cells. Neutralization of Tat and CCL2 proteins Neutralization of Tat and CCL2 proteins was carried out by a slightly modified version of the earlier technique (Weiss et al., 1999). Four days post HIV-1 infection, the infected MDM prepared the same way as described in the migration experiments, were incubated with fresh medium (DMEM 2% Human serum) for 24 h. (Rao et al., 2009) The conditioned medium (supernatant from HIV-1 infected and Control wells) was then incubated for 1 h with Pansorbin beads (Calbiochem) to which either anti-Tat (E1.1, which neutralizes both Tat proteins - U. Ranga, unpublished observations) or anti-CCL2 antibodies (MAb 279; R & D Systems) were pre-bound. Optimal antibody concentrations were determined for Tat by testing increasing concentrations of antibodies and for CCL2 based on the CCL2 levels in the medium determined by ELISA. Beads were removed by pelleting and the supernatant used in migration experiments following the above mentioned migration protocol. Tat-induced and HIV-infection induced secretion of CCL2 from MDM and astrocytes Four days after HIV-infection, MDMs were incubated for 24 hours in fresh medium without human serum to eliminate the contribution of CCL2 in human serum. The Day-5 no serum supernatant was collected and ELISA for CCL2 (R&D Systems) was performed in triplicates in 3 separate experiments as described before (Eugenin et al., 2006). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis for the behavior study was via StatView. Repeated measures ANOVA analysis was performed and the p values obtained by comparing errors made by clade-B, clade-C and control mice individually to each other. For migration studies, chemokine expression and histopathology analysis, the significance and p values were determined using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS SCID mice with clade-C HIV-1 display milder cognitive deficits than clade-B HIV SCID mice The SCID mouse HIV encephalitis model, developed originally by Tyor et al. (Tyor et al., 1993) and subsequently improved by both W. Tyor and coworkers and H. Gendelman and coworkers, is a useful, sensitive and well characterized animal models to test HIV-induced neurotoxicity and behavioral changes. (Persidsky et al., 1996; Persidsky et al., 1997; Avgeropoulos et al., 1998; Cook et al., 2005; Sas et al., 2007). Behavioral testing with WRAM revealed that clade-B HIVE mice exhibited poor working memory as shown on two orthogonal measures of working memory competence. Clade-B HIVE mice made more working memory incorrect (WMI; a form of long-term memory) and working memory correct (WMC; a form of short-term memory) errors when compared to controls (Figure 1
Brains of SCID mice exposed to either HIV-1 clade-B or C show similar viral loads, but those with clade-C HIV-1 show decreased pathology Evaluating different clades of HIV-1 for their potential to induce SCID HIVE requires that the viral load of these related, but distinct, viruses are comparable. Therefore, in addition to ensuring that the MDM injected into mouse brain contained equal proportions of HIV-positive cells with similar viral replication (Figure 2 Astrogliosis, as evidenced by GFAP staining, and a decrease in neuronal network integrity, as indicated by reduction in MAP2-staining, were observed in the brains of mice injected with HIV-infected MDM in frontal lobe sections around the injection tract. Brains of control mice also displayed low levels of astrogliosis and a slight reduction in MAP-2 staining suggesting background inflammation. However, the severity of astrogliosis in the frontal cortex region was greatest in clade-B HIV-infected SCID mice (Figure 3a Clade-C HIV-infected MDMs display reduced monocyte chemotaxis Monocyte infiltration into the brain is a hallmark of HAD. Although Tat causes monocyte chemotaxis in-vitro, monocyte chemotaxis by Tat in the context of HIV-infected cells has not been demonstrated. To investigate clade differences in monocyte chemotaxis, we employed MDM, HIV-1 susceptible cells that are relevant to HIV-1 neuropathogenesis, that were infected with either HIV-1ADA (clade-B) or HIV-1IndieC1 (clade-C). HIV-infected MDM were added to the bottom chamber of the trans-well system and elutriation-derived, undifferentiated monocytes to the top chamber. (Rao et al., 2009) Following 24h incubation, we observed that clade-B infected MDMs attracted 64% (p = 3.5X10−5) more monocytes than did clade-C infected MDM (Figure 4a
Chemotaxis induced by HIV-infected MDMs is mediated by Tat and CCL2 HIV-infected MDM secrete a number of soluble factors into the medium including Tat protein. To delineate the contribution of factors influencing monocyte chemotaxis, the medium from infected MDM cell culture was first confirmed to induce chemotaxis using the in vitro dual chamber assay described earlier (Figure 4b Poor induction of CCL2 chemokine by clade-C HIV-1 and its Tat protein Tat released from infected cells can gain access into uninfected cells in the vicinity (Schwarze et al., 1999). A transcriptional transactivator of both viral and cellular genes, Tat induces astrocytes and monocytes in vitro to produce chemokines (e.g. CCL2) (Conant et al., 1998; Weiss et al., 1999; D’Aversa et al., 2004). Therefore, we investigated the mechanistic basis for lowered monocyte chemotaxis by clade-C Tat protein. We measured the production of CCL2 by monocytes and astrocytes following the addition of Tat protein from either clade to cultures for 24 hours. Clade-C Tat protein, as compared to clade-B Tat, induced significantly lower levels of CCL2, in a dose-dependent manner, in both MDM (100ng Tat, p = 1.4x10−5; 500ng Tat, p = 6.1x10−10) and astrocytes (100ng Tat, p = 0.0017; 500ng Tat, p = 0.0001) (Figure 5a, 5b
To test the relevance of this finding in the context of HIV-1 replication, we measured the secretion of CCL2 by clade-B and C HIV-1-infected MDM. HIV-infected MDM were incubated for 24h in serum-free medium to eliminate the confounding presence of CCL2 in human serum employed for growing MDM. Clade-C HIV-infected MDM displayed a significantly reduced ability to secrete CCL2 in comparison with clade-B-HIV-infected MDM (p = 0.0124) (Figure 5c DISCUSSION Reports of reduced prevalence of severe forms HAD in regions with predominantly clade-C HIV-infections, such as India (Satishchandra et al., 2000; Riedel et al., 2006; Gupta et al., 2007), imply clade-specific differences in neuropathogenesis. To verify this hypothesis, we have employed in-vitro experiments with purified Tat proteins and in-vivo experiments using infectious molecular clones of HIV-1 in the SCID HIVE model. We have extended our previous findings that clade-C Tat is defective in its chemotactic properties. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, differences in neuropathogenesis between clade-B and C HIV-1 isolates in an in-vivo model. Differential neuropathogenesis observed for the two clades in-vivo also correlated with differential ability of HIV-infected MDM to recruit monocytes in-vitro and in inducing chemokines such as CCL2 in infected cells. Our results revealed significant differences between the two clades in terms of behavioral deficits. Clade-B HIVE mice made most working me mory errors and clade-C HIVE mice made an intermediate number of errors in reference to clade B and control mice. Our approach of injecting HIV-infected macrophages into the frontal cortex produces well-documented neuropathological and behavioral effects that are widespread rather than limited to the site of injection or right side alone. As previously described (Griffin et al., 2004), multiple areas of the brain are likely involved in causing the behavioral abnormalities, including frontal lobes, hippocampus, and basal ganglia. Some of these affects require a relatively remote action of HIV. These effects are thought to be related to diffusible substances produced by HIV infected macrophages and activated glia (Griffin et al., 2004). Our behavioral testing protocol does not include WRAM testing of uninoculated normal SCID mice as they have been previously shown (Avgeropoulos et al., 1998) to perform consistently with, or even better than, our controls injected with uninfected MDMs. MAP2 staining serves both as a means of measuring HIV induced damage to neuronal network integrity (Avgeropoulos et al., 1998; Zheng et al., 2001; Dou et al., 2003; O’Donnell et al., 2006) as well as a histopathological correlate of HIV induced behavioral abnormalities. (Cook-Easterwood et al., 2007; Sas et al., 2007) Results from analysis of MAP-2 stained frontal cortex regions parallel the behavioral findings. Loss of MAP-2 staining produced by clade-C HIV-1 is intermediate compared to clade-B and control mice. Astrogliosis, a key pathological feature of HAD, was significantly greater (p = 0.0117) in clade-B HIVE mice compared to clade-C HIVE mice. Similar number of p24-positive cells in the brains of both types of mice confirmed equal viral loads in both cases. These findings not only suggest that clade differences play a major role in pathogenesis of HAD, but also highlight the usefulness of the SCID HIVE mouse model in detecting subtle differences in behavior and histopathology. More recently it has been shown that direct neurotoxicity of Tat may be mediated by Tat’s binding to NMDA receptor subunits NR1 and 2A (Avindra Nath, personal communication) and that clade-C or a C31S mutant of clade-B Tat protein does not cause neurotoxicity (Li et al., 2005), providing an additional explanation for clade differences in NeuroAIDS. The mechanism of toxicity was not mediated by a complex formation among LRP, PSD-95, NMDAR and nNOS on the surface of human neurons, as we described previously (Eugenin et al., 2007). It was also not due to LRP-mediated Tat-internalization as described in neurons (Liu et al., 2000), because RAP, an LRP blocker, did not abrogate toxicity. These differences in Tat-mediated toxicity may be due to the low expression of LRP receptor on HEK cells and the absence of PSD-95 to bridge NMDA receptors and LRP. Irrespective of the precise mechanism of Tat-mediated effects on neurons, our results show that behavioral and neuropathological differences between HIV-1 clades are due to an attenuated ability of clade-C Tat to cause neurotoxicity by both direct and indirect mechanisms. While the studies by A. Nath and colleagues (personal communication) point to clade-differences in NMDA receptor-mediated apoptosis, Campbell et al. showed that clade-C Tat protein is defective in its ability to generate an intracellular calcium influx and in inducing TNF-α(Campbell et al., 2007), a cytokine which promotes astrogliosis. Additionally, Mishra et al. have reported lower neurotoxicity, a significantly reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) induction and weaker mitochondrial membrane polarization in human neurons by clade-C Tat (Mishra, 2007). These neurotoxic effects of clade-B HIV-1 may have implications for both neuronal and astrocytic dysfunction in HIVE in SCID mice and HAD in humans. The increased astrogliosis seen in HIVE mice with clade-B HIV-1 compared to C reflect a larger pool of dysfunctional astrocytes (Lipton and Gendelman, 1995) observed. Normally, astrocytes are responsible for clearing excess glutamate at the synaptic cleft to prevent NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity. However, if astrocytes are impaired in this function, it could explain why neurons in the area of greatest astrogliosis display decreased dendritic arborization. In addition, neurotoxicity in clade B mice could have more direct affects on neurons that are in the vicinity of HIV-infected human MDM, adding to (indirect) astrocyte affects on neuronal dendritic formation. Therefore, since frontal cortical dendritic formation is important to learned behavior, the clade-B mice make a greater number of errors in the WRAM. Previously, we showed that clade-C Tat is defective in monocyte chemotaxis using purified Tat protein in-vitro (Ranga et al., 2004) Here, we utilized HIV-1 infected MDM for the recruitment of monocytes to demonstrate that monocyte chemotaxis occurs in the setting of virus-infected cells. In comparing the two clades of HIV-1, the differences observed were not caused by differential virus growth. Under these conditions, clade-C HIV-infected cells were able to recruit significantly reduced numbers of monocytes compared to clade-B HIV-infected MDM. The SCID HIVE model, employed here does not allow us to examine whether the differential monocyte chemotaxis observed in vitro applies to monocyte migration across the blood brain barrier in vivo. Therefore we are looking into developing of modified mouse models, in which, one can observe the migration of macrophages introduced in the periphery to the sites in brain where HIV-infected macrophages reside under conditions that transiently break down the blood-brain barrier. In verifying that the monocyte chemotaxis induced by HIV-infected MDMs is truly mediated by Tat protein, we employed anti-Tat antibodies with a proven ability to neutralize both clade-B and clade-C Tat proteins (Siddappa et al., 2006). Interestingly, neutralizing the Tat protein present in the spent media lowered monocyte migration to control levels and neutralizing the CCL2 was also effective in blocking monocyte migration – suggesting that Tat or HIV-infection induces the secretion of CCL2 which then mediates monocyte migration. These novel findings demonstrate a direct role for Tat during HIV-infection of MDM in monocyte migration. CCL2 is presumably produced as a result of HIV-1 infection. Media from clade-C HIV-infected MDM also showed reduction in the migrating monocytes with anti-Tat and anti-CCL2 antibodies. This reduction was lower than that observed with clade-B, but statistically significant (p = 008 for anti-Tat and p = 0.005 for anti-CCL2). The ability of clade-B HIV-1 Tat protein as well as clade-B HIV-1 virus to induce MDM and astrocytes to secrete CCL2 points to an indirect means by which HIV-infection leads to enhanced monocyte infiltration into the brain. We took advantage of the availability of Tat preparations that were equally biologically active in their ability to be taken up by cells and to activate HIV-1 LTR-mediated expression of a GFP reporter (Siddappa et al., 2006). Despite their similar activities (Siddappa et al., 2006), there were significant differences in CCL2 induction by the two different Tat proteins when incubated with primary astrocytes or MDM. These differences were also observed between MDM infected with the two clades of HIV-1. The differential induction of CCL2 by the two Tat proteins and by infection with the two clades of HIV-1 suggests another key difference between the clades in the pathogenesis of HAD. Our results demonstrate that genotypic differences between HIV-1 clade-B and clade-C viruses do translate to phenotype differences in HAD pathogenesis outcomes in-vivo by virtue of decreased direct neurotoxicity of clade-C HIV-1 as well as lead to differences observable in-vitro, including defective monocyte migration and the impaired secretion of chemotactic proteins such as CCL2. Our results provides a concrete proof of inter-clade differences and hope that specific HIV genes directly involved in neuropathogenesis can be pinpointed by the use of chimeric viruses between clades, work on which is currently being pursued in our lab. The findings reported here may have significant implications for future treatment strategies in HAD by helping target specific genes responsible for pathogenesis of HAD. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the Einstein/MMC Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) for the use of Immunology/Pathology and BSL3/Clinical Virology core services, Albert Einstein Cancer Center for the use of histopathology core and Adam Davis for reading the manuscript. The research described in this report was supported by Public Health Service research grants to V.R.P. (R21 MH075636, RO1 MH083579). A.S. is supported by an NIH pre-doctoral fellowship (F31 NS054592) and E.A.E. by a mentoring grant (KO1 MH076679). Housing of mice at MUSC was partially supported by NIH C06 RR015455. Footnotes COMPETING INTERESTS There are no competing interests References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Neurology. 1993 Nov; 43(11):2245-52.
[Neurology. 1993]Neurology. 2001 Jan 23; 56(2):257-60.
[Neurology. 2001]AIDS. 2003 Jul 4; 17(10):1539-45.
[AIDS. 2003]Brain Pathol. 2003 Apr; 13(2):195-210.
[Brain Pathol. 2003]Indian J Med Res. 2000 Jan; 111():14-23.
[Indian J Med Res. 2000]C R Acad Sci III. 1990; 311(4):149-55.
[C R Acad Sci III. 1990]J Virol. 1991 Feb; 65(2):961-7.
[J Virol. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17; 95(6):3117-21.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Immunol. 1999 Sep 1; 163(5):2953-9.
[J Immunol. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1998 Jun 26; 273(26):15895-900.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 15; 90(18):8658-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Am J Pathol. 1996 Sep; 149(3):1027-53.
[Am J Pathol. 1996]J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 May 1; 18(1):13-20.
[J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998]Ann Neurol. 2005 Jun; 57(6):795-803.
[Ann Neurol. 2005]AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1999 Sep 20; 15(14):1321-4.
[AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1999]Brain Res. 1998 Mar 2; 785(2):236-44.
[Brain Res. 1998]Behav Brain Res. 2003 Feb 17; 139(1-2):47-57.
[Behav Brain Res. 2003]Neurobiol Aging. 2004 Aug; 25(7):873-84.
[Neurobiol Aging. 2004]Behav Neural Biol. 1993 Jul; 60(1):9-26.
[Behav Neural Biol. 1993]J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 May 1; 18(1):13-20.
[J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998]J Immunol. 1999 Sep 1; 163(5):2953-9.
[J Immunol. 1999]J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 25; 26(4):1098-106.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 15; 90(18):8658-62.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Am J Pathol. 1996 Sep; 149(3):1027-53.
[Am J Pathol. 1996]J Neurovirol. 1997 Dec; 3(6):401-16.
[J Neurovirol. 1997]J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 May 1; 18(1):13-20.
[J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998]Ann Neurol. 2005 Jun; 57(6):795-803.
[Ann Neurol. 2005]Science. 1999 Sep 3; 285(5433):1569-72.
[Science. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17; 95(6):3117-21.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Immunol. 1999 Sep 1; 163(5):2953-9.
[J Immunol. 1999]J Neurovirol. 2004 Apr; 10(2):86-97.
[J Neurovirol. 2004]Indian J Med Res. 2000 Jan; 111():14-23.
[Indian J Med Res. 2000]J Neurovirol. 2006 Feb; 12(1):34-8.
[J Neurovirol. 2006]J Neurovirol. 2007 Jun; 13(3):195-202.
[J Neurovirol. 2007]J Neurovirol. 2004 Apr; 10(2):109-15.
[J Neurovirol. 2004]J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 May 1; 18(1):13-20.
[J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998]J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 May 1; 18(1):13-20.
[J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998]Neurotox Res. 2001 Oct; 3(5):443-59.
[Neurotox Res. 2001]J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 8; 23(27):9162-70.
[J Neurosci. 2003]J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 18; 26(3):981-90.
[J Neurosci. 2006]Exp Neurol. 2007 Jun; 205(2):506-12.
[Exp Neurol. 2007]Neurotox Res. 2005 Oct; 8(1-2):119-34.
[Neurotox Res. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27; 104(9):3438-43.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007]Nat Med. 2000 Dec; 6(12):1380-7.
[Nat Med. 2000]J Virol. 2007 Jun; 81(11):5919-28.
[J Virol. 2007]N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 6; 332(14):934-40.
[N Engl J Med. 1995]J Virol. 2004 Mar; 78(5):2586-90.
[J Virol. 2004]Retrovirology. 2006 Aug 18; 3():53.
[Retrovirology. 2006]Retrovirology. 2006 Aug 18; 3():53.
[Retrovirology. 2006]