• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of embojLink to Publisher's site
EMBO J. Nov 5, 2008; 27(21): 2809–2816.
Published online Oct 16, 2008. doi:  10.1038/emboj.2008.217
PMCID: PMC2570475

Transient receptor potential channels meet phosphoinositides

Abstract

Transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels are unique cellular sensors that are involved in multiple cellular functions, ranging from transduction of sensory signals to the regulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ homoeostasis. Malfunctioning of TRP channels is now recognized as the cause of several hereditary and acquired human diseases. At the time of cloning of the first Drosophila TRP channel, a close connection between gating and phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs) was already recognized. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the mechanisms of interaction between TRP channels and PIPs, and discuss the possible functional implications of TRP–PIP interactions to human physiology and pathophysiology.

Keywords: disease, ion channels, phosphoinositides, transient receptor potential channels

TRP channels regulated by phosphoinositides

Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels provide a close sensory interface between the environment and interior of cells. To fulfil this function, TRP channels require polymodality, that is, they are activated by a huge variety of stimuli, including physical factors such as temperature, voltage and mechanical forces, chemical factors such as pH and ions, mainly Ca2+ and Mg2+, and various intracellular signalling pathways (Voets et al, 2005; Nilius et al, 2007; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007). Although crystal structures of entire TRP channels are currently missing, it is generally accepted that TRP channels form homo- or heterotetramers and have a similar topology as voltage-gated K+, Na+ and Ca2+ channels. They contain six transmembrane (TM) segments per subunit with a pore region between TM5 and TM6, and intracellular amino (N) and carboxy (C) termini (Owsianik et al, 2006; Gaudet, 2008).

Transmembrane channels not only have an important function in the sensory system, but they are also involved in global Ca2+ and Mg2+ homoeostasis (Hoenderop and Bindels, 2008), and in various Ca2+-dependent signalling processes that regulate cell growth, cell death, dendrite growth, cell cycle regulation, migration and many more (for reviews, see Bandell et al, 2007; Nilius et al, 2007; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007; Talavera et al, 2008). In addition to their normal physiological functions, the involvement of TRP channels in the development of human diseases becomes an extremely important issue (Nilius et al, 2007).

Understanding the widespread physiological functions of TRP channels requires knowledge of the general aspects of their regulation and modulation. One exciting aspect of TRP channel regulation is the interaction with and modulation by plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs), and in particular by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate (PI(4,5)P2). PI(4,5)P2 is present in the cytoplasmic leaflet of the plasma membrane, where it constitutes about 1% of the lipid and forms the precursor of important signalling molecules such as inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate (IP3), diacylglycerol (DAG) and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 triphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3) (McLaughlin and Murray, 2005; Suh and Hille, 2007). Importantly, PI(4,5)P2 itself exerts an effect as a signalling molecule that modulates the function of a variety of membrane proteins, including ion channels and transporters (Gamper and Shapiro, 2007; Suh and Hille, 2008). Rapid changes in PI(4,5)P2 concentration occur upon activation of phospholipase C, leading to the formation of IP3 and DAG. Moreover, different PIPs can occur in microdomains where they can be rapidly interconverted by an extremely dynamic signalling network of phospinositide phosphatases and kinases (Blero et al, 2007). At physiological PIPs are negatively charged (e.g., PI(4,5)P2 has a valence of approximately −4) residues, allowing them to interact electrostatically rather non-specifically with positively charged residues on membrane proteins and with other cationic molecules. In addition, specialized PIP interaction sites have been identified, such as the pleckstrin homology (PH) domains, that function as a more specific PIP binding pocket.

As summarized in Table I, interactions with PIPs have been reported for a large number of TRP channels. In some cases, molecular details about the mode and specificity of the interaction have been reported. Although different PIPs may have comparable potencies in regulating TRP channels, it seems that PI(4,5)P2 is the more crucial regulator, most likely due to its relative abundance in the plasma membrane. For example, TRPV1 was inhibited only by a recombinant PI(4,5)P2-specific PH-domain construct, whereas a PH-domain that binds PI(3,4,5)P3 or enzymatic production of PI(4)P were ineffective (Klein et al, 2008). However, there are also a worrisome number of conflicting reports for several TRP channels as to whether PI(4,5)P2 activates or inhibits TRP channel gating. Apart from differences in experimental procedures and/or their interpretation, such apparently conflicting results may indicate the existence of more than one mode of PI(4,5)P2-dependent regulation of a single TRP channel, leading to a bell-shaped PI(4,5)P2 dependence. Obviously, a clearer molecular picture of the PIP–TRP channel interaction and a better understanding of the gating mechanisms will be required to fully understand the impact of the different PIPs on the different TRPs. Recently developed methods that allow rapid modulation of the PIPs in the plasma membrane without production of DAG and IP3 or release of intracellular calcium represent powerful new tools that will facilitate research approaching the mechanistic and functional principles of TRP–PIP interactions (for recent reviews, see McLaughlin, 2006; Suh and Hille, 2008).

Table 1
TRPs and PIPs: putative binding sites and functional effects of interaction

Mechanisms of TRP–PIP interactions

Full understanding of the molecular basis of the regulation of TRP channel function by PIPs requires detailed information about (1) the interaction site(s) of PIP on the channel or on associated proteins and (2) the mechanism whereby PIP-binding influences channel gating.

At this point, there are experimental data suggesting the existence of multiple distinct types of PIP interaction sites in the TRP superfamily (Figure 1), all of which are characterized by an abundance of positively charged residues. First, a region containing eight positive charges in the C terminus of TRPV1 was identified as a possible PI(4,5)P2 interaction site responsible for PI(4,5)P2-mediated channel inhibition (Prescott and Julius, 2003). However, it should be noted that recent reports have cast doubts over the inhibitory effect of PI(4,5)P2 on TRPV1, and the relevance of this putative PI(4,5)P2 site remains controversial (Stein et al, 2006; Lishko et al, 2007; Lukacs et al, 2007; Rohacs, 2007; Kim et al, 2008a). Second, Rohacs et al (2005) have implicated the TRP domain, a C-terminal region adjacent to TM6 in the TRPV, TRPM and TRPC subfamilies, in the PI(4,5)P2-dependent regulation of different TRP channels, including TRPM8, TRPV5 and TRPM5. Neutralization of conserved positive charges in this region caused a reduction in the apparent PI(4,5)P2 affinity of these channels, suggesting that these residues interact directly with membrane PIPs. Third, evidence from mutagenesis experiments revealed a function of a more distal C-terminal region in the PI(4,5)P2-dependent regulation of TRPM4 (Nilius et al, 2006). This region also contains a cluster of basic residues and can be considered as a PH-like domain because it contains the PH consensus sequence (K/R)-Xn-(K/R)-X-(K/R)2 (were X is any amino acid). Analysis of the sequence of the TRP superfamily (Figure 1) reveals one or more such PH-like domains in the majority of mammalian TRP channels, but whether these domains bind PIPs and/or modulate channel function is currently unclear. Atomic structures and biochemical evidence would be required to determine whether regions in TRP channels containing the PH-like consensus region actually form a PH domain, which normally consists of a seven-stranded β sandwich formed by two orthogonal antiparallel β sheets and a C-terminal amphiphilic α-helix (Suh and Hille, 2008). Fourth, Kwon et al (2007) found that the PIPs, particularly PI(3,4,5)P3 as well as IP6, disrupt the interaction between calmodulin and the C terminus of TRPC6. Moreover, mutating basic residues in the calmodulin binding site affected PIP binding and channel function, suggesting that PIPs interact directly with the calmodulin-binding site. Fifth, Otsuguro et al (2008) studied the effects of PI(4,5)P2 on two different splice isoforms of TRPC4 and found that TRPC4α is inhibited by PI(4,5)P2, whereas TRPC4β, which lacks 84 amino acids (Δ84AA) in the C terminus, is PI(4,5)P2 insensitive. This suggests that this stretch of 84 AA contains all or part of a PI(4,5)P2 interaction site. Clearly, there is a large variability in the nature and location of the putative PIP-interacting sites, which may not be too surprising, given the broad functional diversity and considerable sequence variation within the TRP superfamily.

Figure 1
PIP binding on TRP channels. (A) Known binding sites of PIPs on TRP channels are shown. The localization is indicated. (B) Putative PIP-binding site in PH-like domains in human TRP channels are shown for all TRP channels (note that no PH-like motifs were ...

In addition, recent evidence indicates that PI(4,5)P2-dependent regulation of TRPV1 occurs through an accessory protein, Pirt. PI(4,5)P2 binding is dependent on a cluster of basic residues in the C terminus of Pirt, and this binding enhances TRPV1 channel activity (Kim et al, 2008a). It is highly possible that other TRP channels are regulated in a similar way through interaction with a PIP-binding accessory subunit. The results obtained with Pirt also indicate that defining PIP-binding sites purely based on mutagenesis of TRP channel proteins is not unequivocal, as mutations that alter the interaction between the channel and a PIP-binding accessory subunit would lead to a change in the apparent PIP affinity of the channel.

So how does binding of PI(4,5)P2 and other PIPs influence channel gating? We are currently far from understanding the structural rearrangements that occur upon PIP binding and TRP channel gating, but on the basis of the available results, four main mechanisms of action can be distinguished (Figure 2). Note that although these four mechanisms are depicted in such a way that PI(4,5)P2 enhances channel opening, inhibitory effects of PI(4,5)P2 may work along similar lines.

Figure 2
Mechanisms causing functional changes in TRP channel activity. (A) Binding of intracellular parts of the channel to PI(4,5)P2 increases the probability of the channel spent in an open configuration. (B) PI(4,5)P2 interacts with a normally inhibitory factor ...

In the first and most straightforward model, specific intracellular parts of the channel are attracted towards the plasma membrane due to the direct interaction with PI(4,5)P2, leading to a stabilization of the open state (Figure 2A). This is similar to what has been proposed for PI(4,5)P2-dependent gating of inward-rectifier K+ channels, where results from structural, functional and molecular modelling studies suggest that PI(4,5)P2 exerts tangential force on the N- and C-termini to open the channel (Logothetis et al, 2007; Suh and Hille, 2008).

In the second mechanism, modulation of a TRP channel occurs through a competition between PIPs and other accessory proteins for binding to the same site on the TRP channel (Figure 2B). This model is based on results obtained for TRPC6, where binding of calmodulin to a C-terminal site inhibits the channel, whereas removal of calmodulin by PIPs results in channel activation (Kwon et al, 2007). Indeed, also for TRPC3, 6 and 7, PI(4,5)P2 is bound to a site localized in the C-terminal calmodulin-IP3-receptor-binding site (Patterson et al, 2002; van Rossum et al, 2005; Kwon et al, 2007).

The third mechanism depicts the situation where PIPs interact indirectly with the TRP channel, through a PIP-binding accessory protein, as in the case of the Pirt-dependent modulation of TRPV1 by PI(4,5)P2 (Kim et al, 2008a) (Figure 2C). The consequences of this interaction may be similar to what we described for the model in Figure 2A. In case of TRPC4, inhibition by PI(4,5)P2 depends on the association of the channel with actin cytoskeleton depending on a C-terminal PDZ-binding motif (Thr-Thr-Arg-Leu) that links TRPC4 to F-actin through NHERF and ezrin. Deletion of this site prevents inhibitory effects of PI(4,5)P2 (Otsuguro et al, 2008).

The fourth mechanism might exploit TRP-channel interaction with an agonist-delivering enzyme (Figure 2D). Such a mechanism can be hypothesized for TRPC3 (van Rossum et al, 2005), where interaction between channel and PI(4,5)P2 involves an intermolecular PH-like domain, with the N-terminal part provided by PLCγ1 and the C-terminal part provided by TRPC3. The close association between TRPC3, PLCγ1 and PI(4,5)P2 may be considered as a signalplex, causing localized production of the channel agonist DAG and controlling the surface expression of the channel (van Rossum et al, 2005).

Independent of the structures and mechanisms underlying the PIP–TRP channel interactions, it is interesting to evaluate the consequences of this interaction on the basic electrophysiological properties of the channel. In most cases, it seems that the interaction with specific PIPs such as PI(4,5)P2 is not absolutely required for channel opening, but rather influences the relative stability of open and closed states and/or influences the channels' sensitivity to different activating stimuli (Liu and Liman, 2003; Rohacs et al, 2005; Nilius et al, 2006; Stein et al, 2006). This is in detail exemplified by the effects of PI(4,5)P2 on the Ca2+-activated, voltage-dependent TRP channel TRPM4. In inside-out patches, TRPM4 activity decays rapidly, due to the loss of PI(4,5)P2 from the excised membrane patch (Nilius et al, 2006). Addition of PI(4,5)P2 to the cytosolic side of the patch then results in an ~100-fold increase in the affinity of TRPM4 for Ca2+ (Figure 2E) and a significant leftward shift of the voltage-dependent activation curve (Figure 2F) (Nilius et al, 2006). The effect of PI(4,5)P2 on the voltage dependence of TRP channels such as TRPM4 and TRPM8 is reminiscent to results obtained for the bacterial voltage-gated K+ KvAP (Voets et al, 2004a; Rohacs et al, 2005; Nilius et al, 2006; Schmidt et al, 2006). To be operational, the voltage sensor KvAP requires negatively charged phospholipids, such as phosphatidylglycerol, (Schmidt et al, 2006), which provide a stabilizing environment for the positively charged arginines of the KvAP voltage sensor. Recent evidence indicates that the voltage sensor of TRP channels is located in the region encompassing S4, similar to that of classical voltage-gated cation channels (Voets et al, 2007). Moreover, in silico modelling efforts suggest an interaction between PI(4,5)P2 and basic residues in the S4-S5 linker of TRPV1 (Brauchi et al, 2007). A direct interaction between PI(4,5)P2 and the voltage sensor may also explain why the apparent gating charge of TRPM4 decreases from 0.7 equivalent charges upon PI(4,5)P2 depletion to ~0.35 equivalent charges in the presence of PI(4,5)P2 (Nilius et al, 2006).

(Patho)physiological implications of PIP–TRP interactions

We are only starting to understand the importance of PIP–TRP interactions, but the various functions of TRP channels in sensory and non-sensory processes predict that alterations in cellular PIP levels will have diverse (patho)physiological consequences.

Desensitization

Somatosensory processes including thermosensing and pain are known to exhibit desensitization, meaning that the perceived intensity of an invariant stimulus decreases with time. There are several lines of evidence that alterations of cellular PI(4,5)P2 levels have an important function in this process. A nice example is the PI(4,5)P2-dependent regulation of TRPM8, the main sensor for innocuous cold. Ca2+ influx through the activated TRPM8 channel causes depletion of the cellular PI(4,5)P2 pool through stimulation of a Ca2+-sensitive PLC, thereby gradually reducing TRPM8 activity. This may contribute to the well-known adaptation to a mildly cold stimulus. Similarly, the PI(4,5)P2-dependent regulation of TRPV1, one of the most important ion channels for pain sensation, may have important effects on pain perception. TRPV1 rapidly desensitizes upon stimulation with agonists such as capsaicin, and recovery from desensitization requires resynthesis of PI(4,5)P2 (Liu and Qin, 2005). PI(4,5)P2 breakdown is also crucially involved in the desensitization of receptor-operated channels, whose activation is coupled to activation of PLC-coupled receptors. For example, desensitization of TRPC5 following activation by muscarinic receptor stimulation is slowed by intracellularly applied PI(4,5)P2. This type of regulation may be important for muscarinic fine-tuning of smooth muscle contraction (Kim et al, 2008b).

Excitability

There are indications that voltage-dependent non-selective cation channels, most likely mediated by TRPM4 and/or TRPM5, have an important function in regulating neuronal excitability (Egorov et al, 2002; Crowder et al, 2007). For example, neurons in the brain stem preBötzinger complex generate discharge bursts of action potentials that drive the inspiratory phase of breathing. Modulation of PI(4,5)P2 levels alter the inspiratory drive potentials, which has been attributed to modulation of TRPM4/TRPM5 (Crowder et al, 2007).

Trafficking

Binding of PIPs to TRPs has been implicated in TRP channel trafficking to the plasma membrane. For example, EGF receptor-induced translocation of TRPC5 depends on the rac1-mediated activation of PIP(5) kinase, leading to the production of PI(4,5)P2 (Bezzerides et al, 2004). Likewise, the interaction between PI(4,5)P2 and the intermolecular PH-like domain formed by TRPC3 and PLCγ1 regulates the incorporation of TRPC3 into the plasma membrane (van Rossum et al, 2005).

Feedback regulation

Transient receptor potential channels are involved in the transepithelial transport of both Ca2+ (TRPV5 and TRPV6) and Mg2+ (TRPM6 and TRPM7). To maintain a balance between apical divalent cation influx (through TRP channels) and basolateral cation extrusion, the activity of these TRP channels is tightly regulated by Ca2+- or Mg2+-dependent feedback mechanisms. Ca2+-dependent inactivation of TRPV5 and TRPV6 involves Ca2+- and PLC-dependent reduction of cellular PI(4,5)P2 levels (Gordon-Shaag et al, 2008; Thyagarajan et al, 2008), whereas Mg2+-dependent inactivation of TRPM6 and TRPM7 may be partially due to screening of the negative charges of the PI(4,5)P2 by intracellular Mg2+ (Runnels et al, 2002; Voets et al, 2004b; Kozak et al, 2005).

Human diseases

In the case of inwardly rectifying Kir channel, mutations that directly affect channel–PI(4,5)P2 interactions have been shown to cause hereditary diseases. Mutation of arginine at position 218 in Kir 2.1 to either glutamine or tryptophane causes Andersen's s syndrome (Plaster et al, 2001), whereas mutations in Kir1.1 (R311Q and R311W) are responsible for genetic defects associated with the antenatal variant of Bartter's syndrome (Schulte et al, 1999). At present, no such mutations have been identified in TRP channels, but the increasing number of diseases associated with genetic defects in TRP channel genes urges further research in this direction (Nilius, 2007; Nilius et al, 2007).

In addition, several diseases are known to be due to defects in enzymes involved in PIP metabolism (Halstead et al, 2005). In view of the often dramatic effects of PI(4,5)P2 on TRP channels, it must be considered that alterations in the availability of PI(4,5)P2 could translate into deregulation of the TRP channel activity and thereby contribute to the pathological process (for reviews, see Blero et al, 2007; Krauss and Haucke, 2007). For example, there is evidence linking bipolar disorder to altered PI(4,5)P2 signalling (Halstead et al, 2005), which might include TRP channel dysfunction (Chahl, 2007; Nilius et al, 2007). Lowe syndrome (mental retardation, lens cataract, glaucoma, growth defects and renal dysfunction) is linked to a decreased PI-5-phosphatase function, which leads to increased plasma membrane PI(4,5)P2 content and most likely dysregulation of many TRP channels. Other examples in which disturbances in the PIP metabolism are linked to diseases are shown in Figure 3 and comprise tumour syndromes, cornea diseases, forms of leukaemia and disorders connected to endocytosis.

Figure 3
Diseases linked to PIP metabolism. A scheme of the PIP metabolism including some critical kinases (PIxK, in red) and phosphatases (x-ppase in blue) is shown. The boxes shown refer to defective enzyme functions that can lead to human diseases. For details, ...

Conclusions

From the data reviewed here, it can be concluded that regulation by PIPs represents a general mechanism for modulation of the majority, if not all, of TRP channels. Only a few TRP channel–PIP interactions, however, have been studied in detail. With the recent advances in the molecular tools to study and modulate PIP metabolism, we foresee that some urgent questions regarding the mechanisms and (patho)physiological implications of this form of TRP channel regulation will be answered in the coming years.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the Leuven laboratory for helpful suggestions and criticisms. This work was supported by grants from the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme—Belgian State—Belgian Science Policy, P6/28, and the Flemish Government (Excellentiefinanciering EF/95/010).

References

  • Bandell M, Macpherson LJ, Patapoutian A (2007) From chills to chilis: mechanisms for thermosensation and chemesthesis via thermoTRPs. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17: 490–497 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bezzerides VJ, Ramsey IS, Kotecha S, Greka A, Clapham DE (2004) Rapid vesicular translocation and insertion of TRP channels. Nat Cell Biol 6: 709–720 [PubMed]
  • Blero D, Payrastre B, Schurmans S, Erneux C (2007) Phosphoinositide phosphatases in a network of signalling reactions. Pflugers Arch Europ J Physiol 455: 31–44 [PubMed]
  • Brauchi S, Orta G, Mascayano C, Salazar M, Raddatz N, Urbina H, Rosenmann E, Gonzalez-Nilo F, Latorre R (2007) Dissection of the components for PIP2 activation and thermosensation in TRP channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 10246–10251 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chahl LA (2007) TRP's: links to schizophrenia? Biochim Biophys Acta 1772: 968–977 [PubMed]
  • Crowder EA, Saha MS, Pace RW, Zhang H, Prestwich GD, Del Negro CA (2007) Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate regulates inspiratory burst activity in the neonatal mouse prebotzinger complex. J Physiol 582: 1047–1058 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Egorov AV, Hamam BN, Fransen E, Hasselmo ME, Alonso AA (2002) Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons. Nature 420: 173–178 [PubMed]
  • Gamper N, Shapiro MS (2007) Regulation of ion transport proteins by membrane phosphoinositides. Nat Rev Neurosci 8: 921–934 [PubMed]
  • Gaudet R (2008) TRP channels entering the structural era. J Physiol 586: 3565–3575 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gordon-Shaag A, Zagotta WN, Gordon SE (2008) Mechanism of Ca2+-dependent desensitization of TRP channels. Channels 2: 125–129 [PubMed]
  • Gwanyanya A, Sipido K, Vereecke J, Mubagwa K (2006) ATP- and PIP2-dependence of the magnesium-inhibited, TRPM7-like cation channel in cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 291: C627–C635 [PubMed]
  • Halstead JR, Jalink K, Divecha N (2005) An emerging role for PtdIns(4,5)P(2)-mediated signalling in human disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci 26: 654–660 [PubMed]
  • Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ (2008) Calciotropic and magnesiotropic TRP channels. Physiology (Bethesda) 23: 32–40 [PubMed]
  • Karashima Y, Prenen J, Meseguer V, Owsianik G, Voets T, Nilius B (2008) Modulation of the transient receptor potential channel TRPA1 by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate manipulators. Pflugers Arch Europ J Physiol 457: 77–89 [PubMed]
  • Kim AY, Tang Z, Liu Q, Patel KN, Maag D, Geng Y, Dong X (2008a) Pirt, a phosphoinositide-binding protein, functions as a regulatory subunit of TRPV1. Cell 133: 475–485 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kim BJ, Kim MT, Jeon JH, Kim SJ, So I (2008b) Involvement of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in the desensitization of canonical transient receptor potential 5. Biol Pharm Bull 31: 1733–1738 [PubMed]
  • Kim D, Cavanaugh E, Simkin D (2008c) Inhibition of transient receptor potential A1 by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C92–C99 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Klein RM, Ufret-Vincenty CA, Hua L, Gordon SE (2008) Determinants of molecular specificity in phosphoinositide regulation: PI(4,5)P2 is the endogenous lipid regulating TRPV1. J Biol Chem 283: 26208–26216 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kozak JA, Matsushita M, Nairn AC, Cahalan MD (2005) Charge screening by internal pH and polyvalent cations as a mechanism for activation, inhibition, and rundown of TRPM7/MIC channels. J Gen Physiol 126: 499–514 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Krauss M, Haucke V (2007) Phosphoinositide-metabolizing enzymes at the interface between membrane traffic and cell signalling. EMBO Rep 8: 241–246 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kwon Y, Hofmann T, Montell C (2007) Integration of phosphoinositide- and calmodulin-mediated regulation of TRPC6. Mol Cell 25: 491–503 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Langeslag M, Clark K, Moolenaar WH, van Leeuwen FN, Jalink K (2006) Activation of TRPM7 channels by PLC-coupled receptor agonists. J Biol Chem 282: 232–239 [PubMed]
  • Lee J, Cha SK, Sun TJ, Huang CL (2005) PIP2 activates TRPV5 and releases its inhibition by intracellular Mg2+. J Gen Physiol 126: 439–451 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lemonnier L, Trebak M, Putney JW Jr (2008) Complex regulation of the TRPC3, 6 and 7 channel subfamily by diacylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Cell Calcium 43: 506–514 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lishko PV, Procko E, Jin X, Phelps CB, Gaudet R (2007) The ankyrin repeats of TRPV1 bind multiple ligands and modulate channel sensitivity. Neuron 54: 905–918 [PubMed]
  • Liu B, Qin F (2005) Functional control of cold- and menthol-sensitive TRPM8 ion channels by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Neurosci 25: 1674–1681 [PubMed]
  • Liu D, Liman ER (2003) Intracellular Ca2+ and the phospholipid PIP2 regulate the taste transduction ion channel TRPM5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15160–15165 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Logothetis DE, Jin T, Lupyan D, Rosenhouse-Dantsker A (2007) Phosphoinositide-mediated gating of inwardly rectifying K(+) channels. Pflugers Arch Europ J Physiol 455: 83–95 [PubMed]
  • Lukacs V, Thyagarajan B, Varnai P, Balla A, Balla T, Rohacs T (2007) Dual regulation of TRPV1 by phosphoinositides. J Neurosci 27: 7070–7080 [PubMed]
  • Ma R, Li WP, Rundle D, Kong J, Akbarali HI, Tsiokas L (2005) PKD2 functions as an epidermal growth factor-activated plasma membrane channel. Mol Cell Biol 25: 8285–8298 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McLaughlin S (2006) Tools to tamper with phosphoinositides. Science 314: 1402–1403 [PubMed]
  • McLaughlin S, Murray D (2005) Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics. Nature 438: 605–611 [PubMed]
  • Nilius B (2007) TRP channels in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1772: 805–812 [PubMed]
  • Nilius B, Mahieu F, Prenen J, Janssens A, Owsianik G, Vennekens R, Voets T (2006) The Ca2+-activated cation channel TRPM4 is regulated by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate. EMBO J 25: 467–478 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nilius B, Owsianik G, Voets T, Peters JA (2007) Transient receptor potential channels in disease. Physiol Rev 87: 165–217 [PubMed]
  • Otsuguro KI, Tang J, Tang Y, Xiao R, Freichel M, Tsvilovskyy V, Ito S, Flockerzi V, Zhu MX, Zholos AV (2008) Isoform-specific inhibition of TRPC4 channel by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Biol Chem 283: 10026–10036 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Owsianik G, D'Hoedt D, Voets T, Nilius B (2006) Structure-function relationship of the TRP channel superfamily. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 156: 61–90 [PubMed]
  • Patterson RL, van Rossum DB, Ford DL, Hurt KJ, Bae SS, Suh PG, Kurosaki T, Snyder SH, Gill DL (2002) Phospholipase C-gamma is required for agonist-induced Ca(2+) entry. Cell 111: 529–541 [PubMed]
  • Plaster NM, Tawil R, Tristani-Firouzi M, Canun S, Bendahhou S, Tsunoda A, Donaldson MR, Iannaccone ST, Brunt E, Barohn R, Clark J, Deymeer F, George AL Jr, Fish FA, Hahn A, Nitu A, Ozdemir C, Serdaroglu P, Subramony SH, Wolfe G, Fu YH, Ptacek LJ (2001) Mutations in Kir2.1 cause the developmental and episodic electrical phenotypes of Andersen's syndrome. Cell 105: 511–519 [PubMed]
  • Prescott ED, Julius D (2003) A modular PIP2 binding site as a determinant of capsaicin receptor sensitivity. Science 300: 1284–1288 [PubMed]
  • Rohacs T (2007) Regulation of TRP channels by PIP2. Pflugers Arch Europ J Physiol 453: 753–762 [PubMed]
  • Rohacs T, Lopes CM, Michailidis I, Logothetis DE (2005) PI(4,5)P(2) regulates the activation and desensitization of TRPM8 channels through the TRP domain. Nat Neurosci 8: 626–634 [PubMed]
  • Runnels LW, Yue L, Clapham DE (2002) The TRPM7 channel is inactivated by PIP(2) hydrolysis. Nat Cell Biol 4: 329–336 [PubMed]
  • Schmidt D, Jiang QX, Mackinnon R (2006) Phospholipids and the origin of cationic gating charges in voltage sensors. Nature 444: 775–779 [PubMed]
  • Schulte U, Hahn H, Konrad M, Jeck N, Derst C, Wild K, Weidemann S, Ruppersberg JP, Fakler B, Ludwig J (1999) pH gating of ROMK (K(ir)1.1) channels: control by an Arg-Lys-Arg triad disrupted in antenatal Bartter syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 15298–15303 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stein AT, Ufret-Vincenty CA, Hua L, Santana LF, Gordon SE (2006) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase binds to TRPV1 and mediates NGF-stimulated TRPV1 trafficking to the plasma membrane. J Gen Physiol 128: 509–522 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Suh BC, Hille B (2007) Electrostatic interaction of internal Mg2+ with membrane PIP2 seen with KCNQ K+ channels. J Gen Physiol 130: 241–256 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Suh BC, Hille B (2008) PIP2 is a necessary cofactor for ion channel function: how and why? Annu Rev Biophys 37: 175–195 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Talavera K, Nilius B, Voets T (2008) Neuronal TRP channels: thermometers, pathfinders and life-savers. Trends Neurosci 31: 287–295 [PubMed]
  • Thyagarajan B, Lukacs V, Rohacs T (2008) Hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates calcium induced inactivation of TRPV6 channels. J Biol Chem 283: 14980–14987 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Trebak M, Lemonnier L, DeHaven WI, Wedel B, Bird GSJ, Putney JW (2008) Complex functions of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in regulation of TRPC5 cation channels. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology (in press) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van Rossum DB, Patterson RL, Sharma S, Barrow RK, Kornberg M, Gill DL, Snyder SH (2005) Phospholipase Cgamma1 controls surface expression of TRPC3 through an intermolecular PH domain. Nature 434: 99–104 [PubMed]
  • Venkatachalam K, Montell C (2007) TRP channels. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 387–417 [PubMed]
  • Voets T, Droogmans G, Wissenbach U, Janssens A, Flockerzi V, Nilius B (2004a) The principle of temperature-dependent gating in cold- and heat-sensitive TRP channels. Nature 430: 748–754 [PubMed]
  • Voets T, Nilius B, Hoefs S, van der Kemp AW, Droogmans G, Bindels RJ, Hoenderop JG (2004b) TRPM6 forms the Mg2+ influx channel involved in intestinal and renal Mg2+ absorption. J Biol Chem 279: 19–25 [PubMed]
  • Voets T, Owsianik G, Janssens A, Talavera K, Nilius B (2007) TRPM8 voltage sensor mutants reveal a mechanism for integrating thermal and chemical stimuli. Nat Chem Biol 3: 174–182 [PubMed]
  • Voets T, Talavera K, Owsianik G, Nilius B (2005) Sensing with TRP channels. Nature Biol Chem 1: 85–92 [PubMed]
  • Zhang Z, Okawa H, Wang Y, Liman ER (2005) Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate rescues TRPM4 channels from desensitization. J Biol Chem 280: 39185–39192 [PubMed]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of The European Molecular Biology Organization
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...