• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of aacPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAAC ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Oct 2008; 52(10): 3755–3762.
Published online Jul 21, 2008. doi:  10.1128/AAC.01613-07
PMCID: PMC2565880

Genomic Analysis Reveals a Point Mutation in the Two-Component Sensor Gene graS That Leads to Intermediate Vancomycin Resistance in Clinical Staphylococcus aureus[down-pointing small open triangle]


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), once restricted to hospitals, is spreading rapidly through the wider community. Resistance to vancomycin, the principal drug used to treat MRSA infections, has only recently emerged, is mainly low level, and characteristically appears during vancomycin therapy (vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA] and hetero-resistant VISA). This phenomenon suggests the adaptation of MRSA through mutation, although defining the mutations leading to resistance in clinical isolates has been difficult. We studied a vancomycin-susceptible clinical MRSA isolate (MIC of 1 μg/ml) and compared it with an isogenic blood culture isolate from the same patient, despite 42 days of vancomycin treatment (MIC of 4 μg/ml). A whole-genome sequencing approach allowed the nearly complete assembly of the genome sequences of the two isolates and revealed only six nucleotide substitutions in the VISA strain compared with the parent strain. One mutation occurred in graS, encoding a putative two-component regulatory sensor, leading to a change from a polar to a nonpolar amino acid (T136I) in the conserved histidine region of the predicted protein. Replacing the graS allele of the vancomycin-susceptible parent strain with the graS allele from the VISA derivative resulted in increased vancomycin resistance at a level between those of the vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus and VISA clinical isolates, confirming a role for graRS in VISA. Our study suggests that MRSA is able to develop clinically significant vancomycin resistance via a single point mutation, and the two-component regulatory system graRS is a key mediator of this resistance. However, additional mutations are likely required to express the full VISA phenotype.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) emerged as a major nosocomial pathogen in the early 1970s, necessitating the increased use of vancomycin. Fully vancomycin-resistant MRSA resulting from the acquisition of the enterococcal van genes has been described (34); however, such strains are rare. In contrast, vancomycin treatment failure due to vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) or hetero-resistant VISA (hVISA) is being increasingly recognized (4, 15, 30), but the underlying molecular mechanisms of this clinically important low-level resistance remain to be fully elucidated.

VISA and hVISA were first reported in 1997 (11, 12) and are being increasingly reported globally (30). In many cases, hVISA (defined by vancomycin population analysis profile [PAP] testing [35]) or VISA (defined as having a vancomycin broth MIC of 4 to 8 μg/ml [5]) have been detected after a patient, initially infected with a vancomycin-susceptible strain, remained unwell despite vancomycin treatment. Subsequent cultures revealed MRSA which had evolved to hVISA or VISA (13).

Phenotypically, hVISA/VISA strains have thickened cell walls (7, 8, 13), reduced autolytic activity (13, 26, 29), increased production of abnormal muropeptides, increased numbers of d-Ala-d-Ala residues, and reduced peptidoglycan cross-linking (9, 29). Although the phenotypic changes have been well characterized, the genetic changes leading to the hVISA/VISA phenotype are poorly understood. Microarray data suggest that global regulators are involved in the expression of the hVISA/VISA phenotype, often leading to cell wall thickening (18, 19, 22, 28). Attempts to define the mutations causing resistance by sequencing loci such as vraSR, saeSR, and agr, known to be involved in global regulation, have not been successful (14).

Recently, a number of mutations were detected in the VISA strain JH9 compared to the vancomycin-susceptible strain JH1. These mutations had been acquired in vivo during persistent infection (24). A potentially important mutation was detected in the vraSR operon which has been linked to the activity of the “cell wall stimulon.” Although mutations in this operon were found in a small number of additional VISA isolates by Mwangi et al. (24), we found no mutations in the vraSR operon among our pairs of vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates (14), suggesting that other mutations are responsible for resistance in our strains. In addition, confirmation of the impact of the mutation found by Mwangi et al. by the introduction of the mutation into a sensitive strain was not performed. Neoh et al. recently sequenced hVISA (Mu3) and VISA (Mu50) strains isolated from different patients and found 16 nucleotide differences (25). A mutation in the response regulator graR was linked to a change in vancomycin resistance from hVISA to VISA status; however, introduction of the mutation into a vancomycin-susceptible strain did not alter susceptibility (25), suggesting that the mutation found in graR could not fully explain the resistant phenotype, and additional mutations are required for resistance in strain Mu50. The recent development of high-throughput genome sequencing technologies has significantly reduced the time and cost of complete bacterial genome sequencing. In this study, we have performed whole-genome comparisons of a vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant pair of clinical MRSA isolates from the same patient who experienced vancomycin treatment failure. We then used allelic replacement to test the contribution of a single nucleotide substitution found in a putative two-component regulatory locus for increased vancomycin resistance.


Bacterial strains for whole-genome sequencing.

The S. aureus strains JKD6009 and JKD6008 were isolated from a hospitalized patient who developed a postsurgical wound infection and subsequent MRSA bacteremia and native valve endocarditis, despite treatment with vancomycin. JKD6009 was a surgical wound isolate obtained before the exposure of the patient to glycopeptide antibiotics. JKD6008 was a blood culture isolate obtained after 42 days of vancomycin therapy. Both isolates were multilocus sequence type ST239, spa type 3, identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multiresistant—specifically, resistant to ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, and gentamicin (13). JKD6009 is vancomycin susceptible (vancomycin broth MIC of 1 μg/ml; PAP area under the curve ratio of <0.9) (35). JKD6008 is a VISA isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 4 μg/ml (5) (Table (Table11).

Strains and plasmids used in this study

454 Genome sequencing and mutation detection.

Genomic DNA was extracted from JKD6008 and JKD6009 using the GenElute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instructions and then subjected to single-read 454 pyrosequencing using the GS-20 sequencing system as described previously (21). Sequences were assembled using Newbler software with reference to the MRSACOL genome sequence (GenBank accession number CP000046). All large contigs (≥500 bp) were joined by 17 N′s to generate pseudomolecules for JKD6008 and JKD6009. For mutation detection, reciprocal BLASTN analysis between each strain was performed for all large contigs of JKD6008 versus the JKD6009 pseudomolecule and vice versa. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing confirmed potential regions of difference. The oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table Table2.2. All mutations were mapped to a location on the MRSACOL genome sequence.

Primers used in this study

Screening of additional isolate pairs for mutations.

The same regions were also PCR amplified and sequenced from four other clinical vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) and hVISA/VISA pairs (13) to determine whether mutations found in JKD6008 were also detected in the same loci in other hVISA/VISA strains of the same genetic background (Table (Table1,1, isolate pairs 2 to 5).

Bacterial strains and plasmids.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table Table1.1. Staphylococcal strains were stored in glycerol broth at −80°C and normally subcultured twice onto Columbia blood agar (Oxoid) for 48 h before being used in an experiment. Unless otherwise indicated, all S. aureus isolates were grown in brain heart infusion broth (BHIB; Oxoid), and Escherichia coli was grown in LB broth (Oxoid). When required, media were supplemented with the following antibiotics at the indicated concentrations: for E. coli, 100 μg/ml ampicillin; for S. aureus RN4220, 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol; and for S. aureus clinical isolates, 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol.

Susceptibility tests.

Vancomycin MICs were determined by broth microdilution in Mueller-Hinton broth and read at 24 h according to CLSI criteria (5). Using the new criteria, S. aureus strains with a vancomycin MIC of 4 to 8 μg/ml were defined as VISA. The vancomycin PAP was determined by serial dilution of an overnight BHIB culture and by inoculation of BHI agar (BHIA) containing 0 to 8 μg/ml of vancomycin. Colonies were counted after incubation for 48 h in air at 37°C and plotted as numbers of CFU/ml versus the vancomycin concentration. A macromethod Etest to test susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin was performed with a 200-μl inoculum onto BHIA, and results were read after 48 h of incubation at 37°C as previously described (33).

DNA methods and molecular techniques.

Standard procedures were used for DNA manipulations and molecular techniques (27). E. coli plasmid DNA was isolated by the alkaline lysis method according to the manufacturer's instructions (High Pure plasmid isolation kit; Roche). S. aureus plasmid DNA was also isolated using alkaline lysis after an initial 2 h of incubation in TES [N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2- aminoethanesulfonic acid] buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl; pH 8.0) with lysostaphin and lysozyme at 37°C. PCR amplification of DNA was carried out using Taq, a DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). DNA sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 cycle sequencing kits (Applied Biosystems), and the reaction mixtures were analyzed with a model 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing results were analyzed using Sequencher version 3.0 (Gene Codes Corporation) and Artemis version 6 (Sanger Institute). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence comparisons were performed using the NCBI BLAST server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST), resources at the Sanger Institute (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk), and the Victorian Bioinformatics Consortium (http://vbc.med.monash.edu.au). PFGE and spa typing were carried out as described previously (13).

In vitro generation of VISA from JKD6009.

VISA strains were generated from the clinical VSSA isolate JKD6009 by two methods. In the first approach, JKD6009 was sequentially subcultured for 48 h in BHIB with increasing concentrations of vancomycin to generate the VISA strain JKD6112, which was isolated after growth in 7 μg/ml vancomycin. In the second method, JKD6009 was repeatedly subcultured onto a BHIA-vancomycin gradient plate. After incubation, the colonies growing at the highest vancomycin concentrations were transferred to a new gradient plate, resulting in the VISA strain JKD6118. Molecular typing by PFGE and spa typing was performed on JKD6112 and JKD6118 to allow comparisons with the parent strain, JKD6009.

Construction of mutants.

The cloning and transformation of E. coli were carried out using standard techniques. Electroporation of S. aureus was performed as previously described (20). Restriction endonuclease and T4 DNA ligase (Promega) reactions were carried out according to the manufacturers’ instructions. To test the impact on vancomycin susceptibility of the single-base mutation in graS leading to the T136I mutation, two approaches were employed. The E. coli/S. aureus shuttle vector pKOR1 was used to conduct allelic replacement and allele deletion experiments as previously described (3). The plasmid pCU1 was used for the complementation of deletion mutants (2).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The whole-genome shotgun sequences have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession numbers ABRZ00000000 (JKD6008) and ABSA00000000 (JKD6009).


Whole-genome sequencing of VSSA and VISA and mutation detection.

For both the vancomycin-susceptible and -intermediate S. aureus strains JKD6009 and JKD6008, respectively, sequencing yielded approximately 2.82 Mb of mappable data and resulted in the assembly of 130 large contigs (>500 bp), with an average 20-fold coverage. After generation of pseudomolecules and reciprocal BLASTN analysis, only six nucleotide substitutions were found between JKD6009 and JKD6008, suggesting that one or more of these mutations in JKD6008 was responsible for the resistant phenotype that had arisen after 42 days of exposure to vancomycin therapy. PCR and Sanger sequencing confirmed the six mutations in JKD6008. The location of each mutation was mapped to positions on the S. aureus COL genome (Table (Table33).

Summary of mutations

Although six mutations were found in JKD6008 compared to JKD6009, one potentially important mutation led to a predicted polar (threonine)- to nonpolar (isoleucine)-amino-acid substitution that was 7 amino acids downstream of the conserved histidine in the SACOL0717 kinase (Fig. (Fig.1)1) at amino acid position 136 (T136I). The mutation in SACOL0971 (rexA) was synonymous, while the mutation in SACOL2314 returned the nucleotide sequence to the SACOL reference sequence. The mutation in the intergenic region was downstream of two loci and was considered less likely to affect function. The mutation in SACOL1694 (queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase) led to an amino acid change at position 365 (F365Y). SACOL1694 is involved in translation and exchanges the guanine residue with 7-aminomethyl-7-deazaguanine in tRNAs with GU(N) anticodons. The mutation in the hypothetical protein SACOL2600 led to a G268D amino acid change. This hypothetical protein has conserved domains with sequence similarity to thioredoxin reductase, an enzyme that maintains thioredoxin in a reduced state and plays a role in the protection of cells against toxic oxygen species (32).

FIG. 1.
Schematic diagram of the graRS loci. The point mutation in the nucleotide sequence of the sensor region of SACOL0717 is shown (the Tsp45I site is underlined) and is close to the conserved histidine in the sensor histidine kinase. SACOL0715, hypothetical ...

Screening for mutations in other VSSA and hVISA/VISA isolate pairs.

The primers in Table Table22 were used for DNA amplification and sequencing of the loci where the mutations in JKD6008 were found, except for the synonymous mutation in SACOL0971. This included sequencing the whole graRS loci from all isolates. DNA sequencing of the regions that spanned each of the five mutations in our four other pairs of VSSA and hVISA/VISA clinical strains did not reveal any changes in these regions. To determine whether the same mutations occur in an in vitro-derived VISA strain generated from JKD6009, two VISA strains were generated (JKD6112 and JKD6118; both had a vancomycin broth MIC of 4 μg/ml). By PFGE, isolates JKD6009, JKD6112, and JKD6118 had different banding patterns. JKD6009 and JKD6112 demonstrated a three-band difference, while JKD6009 and JKD6118 had only a single-band difference. The spa sequences were identical for the in vitro-derived VISA strains and JKD6009, indicating that the VISA strains were derived from JKD6009. Sequencing of the six loci where mutations were found in JKD6008 did not demonstrate any mutations in VISA strains JKD6112 and JKD6118.

Introduction of the SACOL0717 (graS) T136I mutation into JKD6009 increases vancomycin resistance.

To test the impact of the T136I mutation on vancomycin resistance, an allelic-replacement experiment was performed by taking graS from the VISA strain JKD6008 and using it to replace graS in the vancomycin-susceptible parent, JKD6009. The graRS loci from JKD6008 were amplified by PCR using primers DAP1367_attB1 and DAP1365_attB2 (Table (Table2),2), and the resulting amplicon was cloned into pKOR1 to create pJKD3138. This construct was transformed sequentially into E. coli DH5α and then into S. aureus RN4220 and finally JKD6009. Several potential double-crossover mutants were analyzed by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, as the T136I mutation disrupts a Tsp45I restriction site. An isolate (JKD6208) with a graRS restriction profile matching that of JKD6008 (Fig. (Fig.1)1) was further analyzed by sequencing of the entire locus, including flanking sequences, to ensure that no additional changes had been introduced during homologous recombination.

Vancomycin susceptibility testing of JKD6208 revealed a distinct increase in resistance. The MICs to vancomycin and teicoplanin as determined by the macromethod Etest increased (JKD6009, vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/ml, teicoplanin MIC of 3 μg/ml; JKD6208, vancomycin MIC of 6 μg/ml, teicoplanin MIC of 12 μg/ml), and a change was also observed in the vancomycin PAP curve (Fig. (Fig.22 and Table Table4).4). The macromethod Etest was used, as it is more sensitive than standard MIC testing in detecting changes in vancomycin resistance (33). These observations confirm that the single nucleotide change observed in graS was a major contributor to the emergence of this VISA isolate.

FIG. 2.
Vancomycin PAPs for clinical isolate JKD6009 (VSSA), JKD6008 (VISA), and mutant strains. (A) graS allelic-exchange strain JKD6208 (JKD6009 with a single-base mutation in graS leading to a T136I change), demonstrating increased resistance to vancomycin ...
Macromethod Etest results for strainsa

In a second approach to explore the contribution of graRS to VISA, the locus was disrupted in the susceptible parent JKD6009 by homologous-recombination-mediated deletion, using pKOR1 as previously described (3, 25), to generate the strain JKD6196. To complement the mutation in JKD6196, the graRS locus was PCR amplified on a 3-kb fragment from JKD6008 that included a 300-bp region upstream of SACOL0715 and the 3′ end of SACOL0717 using the primers insertF and insertR (Table (Table2)2) and cloned into the HindIII site of pCU1. This construct (pJKD6148) was transformed sequentially into E. coli DH5α, S. aureus RN4220, and then JKD6196 to generate JKD6207. In addition, a control mutant was generated by the amplification and cloning of the identical 3-kb region from JKD6009 (without the mutation in the sensor region) and electroporated into JKD6196 to generate JKD6206. Additionally, pCU1 was electroporated into JKD6196 as an empty vector control (JKD6205). The plasmids extracted from E. coli were sequenced to confirm the correct insert sequence before electroporation into RN4220. Testing of the graRS knockout, JKD6196, showed a decrease in vancomycin resistance (from 2 μg/ml to 1.5 μg/ml) and teicoplanin resistance (from 3 μg/ml to 2 μg/ml) compared to that of JKD6009, as measured by the macromethod Etest and PAP analysis (Table (Table4;4; Fig. Fig.2B).2B). Complementation of JKD6196 with the entire graRS locus from JKD6009 (susceptible parent) resulted in a restoration of the original JKD6009 VSSA MIC profile, and complementation of JKD6009 with an empty vector had no effect on the MIC profile (Fig. (Fig.2B;2B; Table Table4).4). Complementation of JKD6196 with the graRS locus from the VISA strain JKD6008 (strain JKD6207) led to increased vancomycin resistance compared with that of JKD6009 but did not produce an MIC as high as that for JKD6008. Unfortunately, JKD6008 was not electrocompetent, and hence, no genetic experiments could be performed directly on this strain.


We have studied an isogenic pair of clinical MRSA isolates obtained from a patient who initially had an MRSA surgical wound infection but who subsequently developed MRSA endocarditis and persistent bacteremia despite 42 days of vancomycin therapy. Although the change in vancomycin MIC in the clinical context was small (from 1 μg/ml to 4 μg/ml), it was linked to an unequivocal failure of antibiotic therapy. By taking a combined comparative genomic and genetic approach, we have shown for the first time that a single base substitution increases vancomycin resistance in an initially vancomycin-susceptible isolate. By sequencing the isogenic pair of clinical isolates obtained from this patient before and after vancomycin treatment failure, we identified a mutation that affects a putative sensor histidine kinase, encoded by graS. We then demonstrated by allelic replacement that a single amino acid substitution within the histidine kinase domain was a major factor in the emergence of the hVISA/VISA phenotype from a vancomycin-susceptible strain.

The two-component regulator graRS is one of many regulatory systems that are found in S. aureus. The functions of graRS are only just being uncovered, with recent comparative transcriptomics suggesting that the locus might control at least 248 genes (10). It has been shown to control the expression of the ABC transporters vraF and vraG (23), two genes that are upregulated in VISA (19). Overexpression of graRS has also been linked to the VISA phenotype (6), and recently, a graR knockout mutant of the VISA strain Mu50 demonstrated increased susceptibility to vancomycin (23). We have confirmed these findings but have also demonstrated increased susceptibility to glycopeptides in the graRS knockout strain generated from the already vancomycin-susceptible strain JKD6009. The recent demonstration that a mutation in the response regulator graR is linked to an increase in vancomycin resistance from hVISA to VISA status confirms the importance of the graRS loci in the expression of hVISA/VISA (25). Neoh et al. suggested that a mutation in graRS could not generate hVISA/VISA from a vancomycin-susceptible strain but could only increase resistance in a strain that already demonstrated the hVISA phenotype, as found in their study (25). However, our study clearly demonstrates that a single nucleotide change in the graRS loci is able to generate increased vancomycin resistance in a fully vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus isolate (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A). Mwangi et al. (24) linked an increase in vancomycin MIC from 1 to 4 μg/ml to seven different point mutations at other sites. These and other data (including our own) suggest that the emergence of the hVISA/VISA phenotype arises from a variety of mutations in different genetic loci.

Although swapping graS from the VSSA parent with graS from the VISA progenitor (Fig. (Fig.2A)2A) caused an increase in vancomycin resistance, it did not generate the expression of the full-resistance phenotype of the clinical isolate JKD6008. Similarly, full resistance was not restored by complementation of the VSSA graRS knockout with the VISA graRS loci. These data suggest that one or more of the five other mutations may play a role in resistance in JKD6008. Based on predicted function and the location of the mutations, it is not apparent which mutation is most likely to contribute. In particular, three of the mutations (SACOL0971, SACOL2314, and the intergenic region) might not be expected to alter function, unless they encode undiscovered regulatory RNAs. The mutations in SACOL1694 and SACOL2600 are also unlikely to produce the significant phenotypic alterations and global transcriptional changes that are associated with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in JKD6008 (13, 14). It appears that the mutation in graS is the major factor leading to reduced vancomycin susceptibility in JKD6008; however, a complete understanding of the impact of each of the additional mutations will require significant work to individually generate the mutations and assess their impact on resistance. To better understand the pathways to intermediate vancomycin resistance, it will also be important to develop systems for the delivery of DNA to VISA strain JKD6008, as it is refractory to transformation by electroporation, presumably attributable to the cell wall changes noted in this strain (13). Alternative methods, such as conjugation, are currently being explored to address this issue.

Previous studies have focused on the role of the cell wall stimulon and mutations in the vraSR operon as important in the expression of the VISA phenotype (18, 22, 24, 28). Of interest, upregulation of vraS and related genes was detected in JKD6008, compared to JKD6009, in our previous microarray analysis (14). Because we found no mutations in the vraSR operon in JKD6008, we can conclude that mutations in other regions of the genome (including in the graRS operon) can lead to the upregulation of the cell wall stimulon.

We generated laboratory-induced VISA strains from JKD6009 to determine whether consistent mutations would lead to VISA in isolates of the same genetic background. The laboratory-derived VISA strains JKD6112 and JKD6118 had different PFGE banding patterns from JKD6009, and mutations were not found in the same loci in these laboratory-derived strains, providing further evidence that mutations in different chromosomal regions are linked to the VISA phenotype. This included sequencing the whole graRS locus. This supports the results of our previous microarrays where divergent transcriptional patterns were found, even in closely related strains, suggesting that different transcriptional pathways (and presumably different mutations) are linked to resistance (14). Importantly, there were three or fewer bands of difference in the PFGE profiles, and the spa sequences were identical between strains JKD6009, JKD6112, and JKD6118, indicating that JKD6112 and JKD6118 were indeed derived from JKD6009.

The rapid rise of community-onset MRSA (1, 16), and the persistently high prevalence of hospital MRSA (31, 36), will continue to promote increasing vancomycin use. We have demonstrated that a single base substitution can be associated with the evolution of hVISA/VISA from VSSA during persistent infection associated with vancomycin treatment failure. Given the ease with which this evolution occurred, which results in levels of resistance that have been clearly linked to vancomycin treatment failure, it is likely that VISA will remain a major antimicrobial resistance problem. Further comparative and functional genomics will be essential if we are to develop a more complete understanding of the genetics of the VISA phenotype and use this knowledge to improve our strategies for treating infection with S. aureus.


Benjamin Howden was supported by a Postgraduate Medical and Dental Scholarship from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. This work was supported by the Australian Bacterial Pathogenesis Program from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, and the Austin Hospital Medical Research Foundation.

We thank Timothy Foster, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, for supplying control strains and pCU1 and Taeok Bae, Indiana University School of Medicine, for supplying pKOR1.


[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 21 July 2008.


1. Appelbaum, P. C. 2007. Microbiology of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45(Suppl.):S165-S170. [PubMed]
2. Augustin, J., R. Rosenstein, B. Wieland, U. Schneider, N. Schnell, G. Engelke, K. D. Entian, and F. Gotz. 1992. Genetic analysis of epidermin biosynthetic genes and epidermin-negative mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur. J. Biochem. 204:1149-1154. [PubMed]
3. Bae, T., and O. Schneewind. 2006. Allelic replacement in Staphylococcus aureus with inducible counter-selection. Plasmid 55:58-63. [PubMed]
4. Charles, P. G., P. B. Ward, P. D. Johnson, B. P. Howden, and M. L. Grayson. 2004. Clinical features associated with bacteremia due to heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:448-451. [PubMed]
5. CLSI. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, 7th ed. CLSI document M7-A7. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
6. Cui, L., J.-Q. Lian, H.-M. Neoh, E. Reyes, and K. Hiramatsu. 2005. DNA microarray-based identification of genes associated with glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3404-3413. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Cui, L., X. Ma, K. Sato, K. Okuma, F. C. Tenover, E. M. Mamizuka, C. G. Gemmell, M.-N. Kim, M.-C. Ploy, N. El Solh, V. Ferraz, and K. Hiramatsu. 2003. Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5-14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Hanaki, H., K. Kuwahara-Arai, S. Boyle-Vavra, R. S. Daum, H. Labischinski, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. Activated cell-wall synthesis is associated with vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains Mu3 and Mu50. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:199-209. [PubMed]
9. Hanaki, H., H. Labischinski, Y. Inaba, N. Kondo, H. Murakami, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. Increase in glutamine-non-amidated muropeptides in the peptidoglycan of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain Mu50. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:315-320. [PubMed]
10. Herbert, S., A. Bera, C. Nerz, D. Kraus, A. Peschel, C. Goerke, M. Meehl, A. Cheung, and F. Götz. 2007. Molecular basis of resistance to muramidase and cationic antimicrobial peptide activity of lysozyme in staphylococci. PLoS Pathog. 3:E102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673. [PubMed]
12. Hiramatsu, K., H. Hanaki, T. Ino, K. Yabuta, T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135-136. [PubMed]
13. Howden, B. P., P. D. R. Johnson, P. B. Ward, T. P. Stinear, and J. K. Davies. 2006. Isolates with low-level vancomycin resistance associated with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3039-3047. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Howden, B. P., D. J. Smith, A. Mansell, P. D. R. Johnson, P. B. Ward, T. P. Stinear, and J. K. Davies. 2008. Different bacterial gene expression patterns and attenuated host immune responses are associated with the evolution of low-level vancomycin resistance during persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. BMC Microbiol. 8:39. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Howden, B. P., P. B. Ward, P. G. Charles, T. M. Korman, A. Fuller, P. du Cros, E. A. Grabsch, S. A. Roberts, J. Robson, K. Read, N. Bak, J. Hurley, P. D. Johnson, A. J. Morris, B. C. Mayall, and M. L. Grayson. 2004. Treatment outcomes for serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:521-528. [PubMed]
16. King, M. D., B. J. Humphrey, Y. F. Wang, E. V. Kourbatova, S. M. Ray, and H. M. Blumberg. 2006. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:309-317. [PubMed]
17. Kreiswirth, B. N., S. Lofdahl, M. J. Betley, M. O'Reilly, P. M. Schlievert, M. S. Bergdoll, and R. P. Novick. 1983. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature 305:709-712. [PubMed]
18. Kuroda, M., H. Kuroda, T. Oshima, F. Takeuchi, H. Mori, and K. Hiramatsu. 2003. Two-component system VraSR positively modulates the regulation of cell-wall biosynthesis pathway in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 49:807-821. [PubMed]
19. Kuroda, M., K. Kuwahara-Arai, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. Identification of the up- and down-regulated genes in vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains Mu3 and Mu50 by cDNA differential hybridization method. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269:485-490. [PubMed]
20. Lee, J. C. 1995. Electrotransformation of staphylococci. In J. A. Nickoloff (ed.), Methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
21. Margulies, M., M. Egholm, W. E. Altman, S. Attiya, J. S. Bader, L. A. Bemben, J. Berka, M. S. Braverman, Y. J. Chen, Z. Chen, S. B. Dewell, L. Du, J. M. Fierro, X. V. Gomes, B. C. Godwin, W. He, S. Helgesen, C. H. Ho, G. P. Irzyk, S. C. Jando, M. L. Alenquer, T. P. Jarvie, K. B. Jirage, J. B. Kim, J. R. Knight, J. R. Lanza, J. H. Leamon, S. M. Lefkowitz, M. Lei, J. Li, K. L. Lohman, H. Lu, V. B. Makhijani, K. E. McDade, M. P. McKenna, E. W. Myers, E. Nickerson, J. R. Nobile, R. Plant, B. P. Puc, M. T. Ronan, G. T. Roth, G. J. Sarkis, J. F. Simons, J. W. Simpson, M. Srinivasan, K. R. Tartaro, A. Tomasz, K. A. Vogt, G. A. Volkmer, S. H. Wang, Y. Wang, M. P. Weiner, P. Yu, R. F. Begley, and J. M. Rothberg. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376-380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. McAleese, F., S. W. Wu, K. Sieradzki, P. Dunman, E. Murphy, S. Projan, and A. Tomasz. 2006. Overexpression of genes of the cell wall stimulon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus exhibiting vancomycin-intermediate-S. aureus-type resistance to vancomycin. J. Bacteriol. 188:1120-1133. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Meehl, M., S. Herbert, F. Götz, and A. Cheung. 2007. Interaction of the GraRS two-component system with the VraFG ABC transporter to support vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:2679-2689. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Mwangi, M. M., S. W. Wu, Y. Zhou, K. Sieradzki, H. de Lencastre, P. Richardson, D. Bruce, E. Rubin, E. Myers, E. D. Siggia, and A. Tomasz. 2007. Tracking the in vivo evolution of multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by whole-genome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:9451-9456. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Neoh, H.-M., L. Cui, H. Yuzawa, F. Takeuchi, M. Matsuo, and K. Hiramatsu. 2008. Mutated response regulator graR is responsible for phenotypic conversion of Staphylococcus aureus from heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate resistance to vancomycin-intermediate resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:45-53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Pfeltz, R. F., V. K. Singh, J. L. Schmidt, M. A. Batten, C. S. Baranyk, M. J. Nadakavukaren, R. K. Jayaswal, and B. J. Wilkinson. 2000. Characterization of passage-selected vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains of diverse parental backgrounds. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:294-303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
28. Scherl, A., P. Francois, Y. Charbonnier, J. M. Deshusses, T. Koessler, A. Huyghe, M. Bento, J. Stahl-Zeng, A. Fischer, A. Masselot, A. Vaezzadeh, F. Galle, A. Renzoni, P. Vaudaux, D. Lew, C. G. Zimmermann-Ivol, P. A. Binz, J. C. Sanchez, D. F. Hochstrasser, and J. Schrenzel. 2006. Exploring glycopeptide-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a combined proteomics and transcriptomics approach for the identification of resistance-related markers. BMC Genomics 7:296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Sieradzki, K., and A. Tomasz. 2003. Alterations of cell wall structure and metabolism accompany reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in an isogenic series of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 185:7103-7110. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Tenover, F. C., and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 2007. The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:1208-1215. [PubMed]
31. Tiemersma, E. W., S. L. Bronzwaer, O. Lyytikainen, J. E. Degener, P. Schrijnemakers, N. Bruinsma, J. Monen, W. Witte, and H. Grundman. 2004. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe, 1999-2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:1627-1634. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Uziel, O., I. Borovok, R. Schreiber, G. Cohen, and Y. Aharonowitz. 2004. Transcriptional regulation of the Staphylococcus aureus thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase genes in response to oxygen and disulfide stress. J. Bacteriol. 186:326-334. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Walsh, T. R., A. Bolmström, A. Qwärnström, P. Ho, M. Wootton, R. A. Howe, A. P. MacGowan, and D. Diekema. 2001. Evaluation of current methods for detection of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2439-2444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Weigel, L. M., D. B. Clewell, S. R. Gill, N. C. Clark, L. K. McDougal, S. E. Flannagan, J. F. Kolonay, J. Shetty, G. E. Killgore, and F. C. Tenover. 2003. Genetic analysis of a high-level vancomycin-resistant isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Science 302:1569-1571. [PubMed]
35. Wootton, M., R. A. Howe, R. Hillman, T. R. Walsh, P. M. Bennett, and A. P. MacGowan. 2001. A modified population analysis profile (PAP) method to detect hetero-resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus in a United Kingdom hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:399-403. [PubMed]
36. Zinn, C. S., H. Westh, and V. T. Rosdahl. 2004. An international multicenter study of antimicrobial resistance and typing of hospital Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 21 laboratories in 19 countries or states. Microb. Drug Resist. 10:160-168. [PubMed]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...