![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org PCB126 Exposure Disrupts ZebraFish Ventricular and Branchial but Not Early Neural Crest Development *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Pathobiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425 †Duke University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal-Perinatal Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina 27710 ‡Qualyst, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 §Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106 3To whom correspondence should be addressed at Duke University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics (Neonatology), Box 3179, Room 157 Bell Research Building, Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710. Fax: (919) 668-1599. E-mail: mlkirby/at/duke.edu. 1Present address: Departamento de Biología del Desarrollo Cardiovascular, Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3 E-28029 Madrid, Spain. 2These authors contributed equally to the experimental work presented. Received June 6, 2008; Accepted July 14, 2008. Abstract We have used zebrafish and 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126) to investigate the developmental toxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) that exert their effects through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). We found that cardiac and neural crest (NC)–derived jaw and branchial cartilages are specifically targeted early in development. The suite of malformations, which ultimately leads to circulatory failure, includes a severely dysmorphic heart with a reduced bulbus arteriosus and abnormal atrioventricular and outflow valve formation. Early NC migration and patterning of the jaw and branchial cartilages was normal. However, the jaw and branchial cartilages failed to grow to normal size. In the heart, the ventricular myocardium showed a reduction in cell number and size. The heart and jaw/branchial phenotype could be rescued by pifithrin-α, a blocker of p53. However, the function of pifithrin-α in this model may act as a competitive inhibitor of PCB at the AHR and is likely independent of p53. Morpholinos against p53 did not rescue the phenotype, nor were zebrafish with a mutant p53-null allele resistant to PCB126 toxicity. Morpholino knockdown of cardiac troponin T, which blocks the onset of cardiac function, prevented the PCB126-induced cardiac dysmorphogenesis but not the jaw/branchial phenotype. The cardiovascular characteristics appear to be similar to hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and introduce the potential of zebrafish as a model to study this environmentally induced cardiovascular malformation. HLHS is a severe congenital cardiovascular malformation that has previously been linked to industrial releases of dioxins and PCBs. Keywords: zebrafish, ventricular development, valvulogenesis, cardiotoxicity, PCB126, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, proliferation, branchial cartilages Heart development is impaired in many animal species by exposure to a number of environmental toxins including dioxins (Thackaberry et al., 2005) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (DeWitt et al., 2006). Although industrial production of PCBs was stopped in the United States after 1978 due to concerns about accumulation, persistence, and toxicity, many are still released into the environment accidentally. PCBs are highly stable (congener-dependent half-life ranges from 1 day to 70 years) and lipophilic (WHO, 2000), resulting in biomagnification (Kuehl and Loffredo, 2006). Bioconcentration factors are very high for PCBs (Fox et al., 1994). Many PCBs act through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway. This receptor is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix Per-Arnt-Sim family of transcriptional regulators. Although it has been studied intensively, its downstream targets and actual mechanisms of toxicity remain elusive (Schmidt and Bradfield, 1996). Both the AHR and its obligatory binding partner aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocation protein (ARNT) are found to be present at low levels in many embryonic tissues, with the highest levels in heart and neuroepithelium and neuroepithelial/NC-derived tissues such as visceral arches and otic and optic placodes (Abbott and Probst, 1995). Several studies have been performed previously in which zebrafish and zebrafish embryos were exposed to PCBs and, specifically, 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126). Such PCBs accumulate in a dose-related manner and are effective inducers of hepatic ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase activity, and have a negative effect on zebrafish reproduction (Orn et al., 1998). Zebrafish embryos exposed to Aroclor 1254, a mixture of PCB congeners that are common environmental contaminants, showed a reduction in expression of heat-shock protein 70 and serotonin in specific central nervous system neurons (Kreiling et al., 2007). In embryos, PCB126 induces cyp1a, cyp1b1, cyp1c1 and cyp1c2. While CYP1A may have a protective role against AHR agonists in liver and gut, CYP1B1, CYP1C1 and CYP1C2 may also play endogenous roles in eye and heart and possibly other organs, as well as during development (Jönsson et al., 2007a). A previous study has shown that PCB126 causes a concentration-dependent cyp1 gene induction in zebrafish embryos and that these embryos develop pericardial effusion by 3-days postfertilization (dpf) (Jönsson et al., 2007b). In addition, cell proliferation is depressed. Blocking AHR2 translation significantly inhibits these effects, showing that embryotoxicity is due to AHR2 activation (Jönsson et al., 2007b). However, morpholino knockdown of CYP1A in zebrafish embryos exposed to tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), another strong AHR agonist, did not protect against the toxic effects of the TCDD, suggesting that the toxic effect of AHR agonists is independent of CYP1A (Carney et al., 2004). While other members of the CYP1 family could mediate the embryotoxicity, this has not been tested. Evidence from several studies has suggested an association of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) with environmental exposures to toxic compounds, and although additional genetic factors are implicated (Hinton et al., 2007), a definitive inherited pattern has yet to be established. Clusters of HLHS have been reported in at least two heavily industrialized regions of the United States: Maryland (Kuehl and Loffredo, 2006) and Wisconsin (Cronk et al., 2004). The epidemiological association of PCB with HLHS was recently published using data acquired during the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study (Ferencz et al., 1993). Kuehl and Loffredo (2006) show a link to the accidental release of PCBs and dioxins. HLHS includes a suite of malformations characterized by abnormal development of the left heart and the aorta (Bharati and Lev, 1984). Severe forms of the syndrome can include aortic and mitral atresia along with almost nonexistent left ventricle, while milder manifestations may present with hypoplasia of the aortic and mitral valves and milder degrees of left ventricular hypoplasia. It is the most common cardiac cause of neonatal fatality, and its etiology is poorly understood. In this study, we utilized zebrafish and PCB126, which is a model AHR agonist, to investigate the cardiotoxicity of such compounds and show that they affect the development of the atrioventricular and outflow valves, the smooth muscle component of the cardiac outflow tract, ventricular myocardium, and jaw and branchial cartilages. Ventricular cell cycle and growth are specifically arrested in the heart, and ventricular myocardial cell size is reduced. Because of the resemblance of the malformations and common causality of the defects, that is, PCB, and the genetic tractability of zebrafish, we propose that this is an excellent model system in which to investigate the etiology of environmental contaminant-induced HLHS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fish Strains Fish strains utilized included AB and Tübingen wild-type, Tg(cmlc::DsRed2-nuc) transgenics (Mably et al., 2003), a kind gift from Dr Kenneth Poss (Duke University) with permission from Dr C. Geoffrey Burns (Harvard Medical School), Tg(cmlc2::GFP) transgenics (Huang et al., 2003), a kind gift from Debbie Yelon (Skirball Institute, New York) with permission from Dr Huai-JenTsai (National Taiwan University, Taiwan), Tg(Flk1::EGFP)s843 transgenics (Jin et al., 2005), a kind gift from Dr Kenneth Poss (Duke University) with permission from Dr Suk-Won Jin (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), and the p53 mutant (ZIRC) (Berghmans et al., 2005). All experiments were performed using conditioned zebrafish system water (Nusslein-Volhard and Dahm, 2002). PCB126 exposure. Healthy embryos at various stages of development from 5 to 48 h postfertilization (hpf) were selected for the experiments and transferred to 20-ml glass scintillation vials (12 embryos per vial, maximum). At approximately 5 hpf, water was removed from the vials and replaced with either 8 ml water containing various concentrations of PCB126 (AccuStandard, New Haven, CT, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or water containing an equivalent volume of DMSO only (vehicle control). After 24 h, the exposure water was removed and replaced with clean fish water. Embryos were then incubated at 28.5°C and observed periodically for the development of phenotype. Experiments were performed in triplicate. The optimum dose of PCB126 to produce a uniform, fully penetrant phenotype in greater than 90% of the embryos using this protocol was found to be 7.5 μg/l. The protocol was tested independently on several hundred embryos by several different investigators. Pifithrin-α treatment. Following similar protocols to those described above, embryos were exposed to either 7.5 μg/l PCB126 or DMSO (vehicle control) or 7.5 μg/l PCB126 supplemented with doses of 1μM pifithrin-α. Pifithrin-α was tested at doses to ascertain the optimal rescue conditions. In these experiments, concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10μM were used. In all, 1.0μM pifithrin-α gave the most consistent rescue. Additionally, pifithrin-α was found to be lethal at doses much higher than 1μM, and so the 1μM dose was chosen for all the co-incubation experiments with PCB126. Because pifithrin-α is also maintained in a DMSO stock solution, the DMSO concentration in controls was adjusted accordingly. After 24 h, exposure water was removed and replaced with either fresh pifithrin-α solution or fresh water containing an appropriate concentration of DMSO. Embryos were then incubated at 28.5°C and observed periodically for the development of phenotype. Because pifithrin-α is light sensitive, for these experiments, embryos were maintained at 28.5°C in the dark. Cardiomyocyte counting. Using a transgenic fish that expresses Discosoma red fluorescent protein in cardiomyocyte nuclei (Tg[cmlc2::DsRed2-nuc]), the PCB126 exposure regime described above was followed. Fish from control and PCB126-exposed groups at 48 and 72 hpf were anesthetized, and their hearts were excised. The hearts were mounted in 3% methylcellulose in fish water on glass microscope slides and coverslipped before being imaged by deconvolution microscopy using a Leica DM RAZ microscope equipped with a fluorescence imaging system. Cells of the atrium and ventricle were differentiated by a constriction at the atrioventricular border and by the fact that atrial nuclei are more round and less closely associated than those of the ventricle. Cells from six hearts for each group were counted, and the data were analyzed using student's t-test. Immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was performed essentially as previously described (Grimes et al., 2006), with the following exceptions. For experiments to determine cardiomyocyte size, PCB-exposed and control Tg(cmlc::DsRed2-nuc) fish of various stages were anesthetized in 0.016% tricaine containing 0.1M potassium chloride to relax the heart chambers in diastole. Fish were fixed for 1 h at room temperature in 2% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) supplemented with 5% sucrose, dehydrated in methanol series, and stored at − 20°C for 24 h. After rehydration into PBST (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20), fish were treated with 2 μg/ml proteinase K dissolved in water for 5, 15, or 25 min (for 48, 72, and 96 hpf, respectively). After rinsing twice in PBST, fish were washed in PBST containing 0.1% DMSO for 15 min, blocked in antibody solution (PBS with 10% [vol/vol] sheep serum; 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin; 0.2% [wt/vol] saponin; 0.1% [vol/vol] DMSO) for 1 h, and then incubated with 1:1000 Living Colors anti-DsRed polyclonal antibody (Clontech Laboratories, Moutain View, CA) and 1:500 Zn5 monoclonal antibody (ZFIN, Eugene, OR) overnight at 4°C in antibody solution as above. After rinsing four times for 15 min each in PBST/0.1% DMSO, embryos were incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the dark with 1:200 AlexaFluor 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG(H+L) and 1:200 AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in antibody solution as before. This protocol allowed visualization of cardiomyocyte borders in green and nuclei in red. For experiments to determine endocardial development, PCB-exposed and control Tg(Flk1::EGFP)s843 fish of various stages were anesthetized in 0.016% tricaine containing 0.1M potassium chloride as above. Fish were fixed for 1 h at room temperature in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4), and the remainder of the protocol was performed essentially as described above but without DMSO supplementation of the buffers. In this case, primary antibodies used were 1:1000 anti-GFP polyclonal (Millipore, Temecula, CA) and 1:20 anti-myosin monoclonal MF20 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, IA). Secondary antibodies were 1:200 AlexaFluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG2b and 1:200 AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG(H+L). This protocol allowed visualization of myocardium in red and endocardium in green. Following labeling, hearts were excised and either imaged using epifluorescence microscopy or by confocal as described above. A total of 24 PCB-exposed and 24 control fish were analyzed for each stage (48, 72 and 96 hpf). Six PCB-exposed and six control fish (three for each treatment at both 48 and 96 hpf) were imaged by confocal. Alcian blue cartilage staining. In all, 96 hpf embryos from control, PCB126-exposed, and PCB126/pifithrin-α cotreated groups were anesthetized in 0.016% tricaine, fixed in 3.7% neutral buffered formalin (pH 7.0) at room temperature overnight, and then transferred to a 0.1% solution of Alcian blue dissolved in 80% ethanol/20% glacial acetic acid. After staining overnight, embryos were rinsed in ethanol, rehydrated in an ethanol series, and had the pigment bleached with 3% hydrogen peroxide/1% potassium hydroxide for 30 min. Tissues were cleared in 0.05% trypsin dissolved in a saturated solution of sodium tetraborate for 3 h. Stained embryos were mounted in 80% glycerol prior to imaging. Visualization of outflow tract development. To monitor development of the smooth muscle component of the cardiac outflow tract (the bulbus arteriosus), live control and PCB-exposed Tg(cmlc2::GFP) zebrafish at various stages were transferred from fish water directly into a 10μM solution of DAR-4M (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) in fish water adjusted to pH 7.0, and incubated overnight in the dark. Following incubation, embryos were either visualized in vivo or fixed in preparation for further immunohistochemical labeling as above. DAR-4M is a red fluorescent nitric oxide indicator that labels the bulbus arteriosus from early developmental stages similarly to the fluorescein-based DAF-2DA as has been previously described (Grimes et al., 2006). Paraffin embedding and sectioning. Following whole-mount visualization of DAR-4M and MF20 immunohistochemical labeling, selected embryos dehydrated in methanol series and cleared in 2:1 benzyl benzoate:benzyl alcohol. After clearing, embryos were transferred directly to xylenes and allowed to equilibrate for 5 min prior to being placed in paraffin and maintained at 60°C for 90 min. Embryos were embedded in disposable plastic moulds and allowed to cool before being sectioned at 8 μm on a Leica RM2155 microtome, mounted on glass sides, and dried overnight in the dark. The following day, slides were heated to 60°C, placed in xylenes for 5 min, rehydrated through an ethanol series to water, and coverslipped using warmed ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). TUNEL labeling. Vehicle control and PCB126-exposed embryos were collected at 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hpf. As a positive control, prior to each time point, a third group was incubated for 6 h in fish water containing 500nM camptothecin, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces apoptosis. Fish were anesthetized in 0.016% tricaine and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C and prepared for paraffin embedding and sectioning as above. After paraffin removal in xylenes and rehydration, sections were digested in 10 μg/ml proteinase K for 5 min, rinsed once in distilled water, and twice in PBS (pH 7.4). Cell death was visualized using the ApopTag Red Kit (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) following manufacturer's instructions. Sections were colabeled with anti-myosin MF20 and coverslipped using DAPI as previously described. BrdU incorporation. Vehicle control and PCB126-exposed embryos were collected at 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 hpf and placed in a solution of fish water containing 10mM BrdU/15% DMSO in tissue culture dishes over a 4°C ice-water bath for 30 min. Embryos were rinsed three times with fish water, incubated for 30 min at 28.5°C, anesthetized in 0.016% tricaine, and fixed in methacarn for 1 h at room temperature. Following dehydration in ethanol, embryos were processed for paraffin embedding and sectioning as previously described. After paraffin removal in xylenes and rehydration, sections were treated with 5% hydrogen peroxide in methanol, rinsed in water, and then digested with 10 μg/ml proteinase K for 5 min. Following a further rinse in water, sections were treated with 2N HCl for 45 min at 37°C, washed twice in borate buffer (70mM boric acid/9mM sodium borate), twice in 0.1M Tris buffer (pH 7.0), and then blocked for 1 h in Tris/2% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Sections were incubated for 1 h with anti-BrdU antibody (Roche, Nutley, NJ) in Tris/2% FBS, rinsed in Tris, and reblocked before incubating with AlexaFluor 488 secondary antibody (1:200 in Tris/2% FBS). Sections were colabeled with anti-myosin MF20 and coverslipped using DAPI as previously described. Confocal imaging to determine cell size and disruption of endocardium. To determine cell size, the hearts from control and PCB-exposed Tg(cmlc2::DsRed2-nuc) zebrafish were labeled in whole mount using anti-DsRed and Zn5 antibodies as described above, the hearts excised, and imaged using a Zeiss LSM510 on an Axiovert200 motorized inverted stand. Still, composite images were compiled and mean cell size calculated using using CellProfiler software (Carpenter et al., 2006), according to the instructions provided. Similarly, to determine disruption to endocardium, Tg(Flk1::GFP) fish were labeled in whole mount using anti-GFP and MF20 antibodies. Embryos at 48 hpf were imaged as above in whole mount. At 96 hpf, the hearts were excised and imaged as above. Primers and PCR Conditions
For RNA extraction, embryos were homogenized, and total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), digested with RQ1 DNase (Promega, Madison, WI), and further purified using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE), and quality was verified using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. First-strand cDNA was generated from 2 μg total RNA with SuperscriptII Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo dT primers in 20-μl reactions. cyp1a, β-actin, and hprt cDNAs were PCR amplified separately in triplicate using a Bio-Rad iCycler iQ. In all, 2 μl cDNA was PCR amplified in a 25-μl reaction volume using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Real-time PCR reaction conditions were 95°C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 57°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 30 s with a final extension of 7 min at 72°C. Formation of specific products was verified through melting curve analysis and electrophoresis. cyp1a expression was quantified relative to DMSO control and normalized against β-actin and hprt using REST 2005 (Relative Expression Software Tool) using PCR efficiency in the calculation. Morpholinos The p53 morpholino (5′-GCGCCATTGCTTTGCAAGAATTG-3′) targets the start site and was originally used and characterized by Langheinrich et al. (2002) and recently reported by Robu et al. (2007) to block apoptosis. The tnnt2 morpholino (5′-CATGTTTGCTCTGATCTGACACGCA-3′) (Sehnert et al., 2002) targets the start site. GeneTools standard control morpholino (CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA) was used as negative control. We injected 4-15 ng of the morpholino oligo into embryos at the 1−4 cell stage. RESULTS The PCB126-Induced Heart Phenotype A screen of various environmental contaminants showed that PCB126 induced consistent dysmorphogenesis of the heart, jaw, and branchial cartilages (Fig. 1
Using Tg(cmlc2::GFP) transgenic fish, the bilateral heart fields were visible by 20 somites, and heart field migration, fusion to form the initial heart tube, and the overall size and morphology of the heart up to approximately 24 hpf were similar in exposed and vehicle control fish. Chamber specification also appeared normal, based on the presence of a constriction at the atrioventricular border and the expression of cardiac-specific markers (Figs. 1H–K
The heart failed to loop correctly and by 48 hpf appeared to be stretched across the enlarging pericardial cavity. By 72 hpf, the heart was a linear tube, had diminished in size, and beat erratically. By 96 hpf, pericardial and yolk sac effusion were extreme, and the heart had become a narrow tube with severely reduced diameter. The heart size was reduced not only in comparison to vehicle controls but also to its own size earlier in development (compare Figs. 2C and 2H Using DAR-4M, which, similarly to DAF-2DA, labels the bulbus arteriosus from its earliest development (Grimes et al., 2006), we showed that the bulbus failed to develop properly and by 96 hpf was diminished in length and diameter compared to controls. Normally, the bulbus is added to the heart between 48 and 96 hpf and, through development, its attachment to the ventricular outflow moves from a cranial branchial position to a more caudal position within the pericardial cavity. In PCB126-exposed embryos, the outflow remained attached to the cranial limit of the pericardial cavity, just under the jaw. Because pericardial effusion could contribute to the heart phenotype, we provided osmotic support to PCB126-exposed embryos using 175mM mannitol (Hill et al., 2004). While this prevented the development of both pericardial and yolk sac effusion, it had little impact on the development of cardiac and branchial cartilage phenotypes. By 96 hpf, the bulbus was reduced, and the heart had failed to loop, remaining considerably smaller than in controls (data not shown). NC Migration, Patterning, and Differentiation Are Unaffected Because the AHR is highly expressed in NC-derived tissues (Abbott and Probst, 1995) and evidence exists that NC cells contribute to zebrafish myocardium in addition to the jaw and branchial cartilages (Li et al., 2003; Sato and Yost, 2003), we analyzed NC development using crestin (Luo et al., 2001) or AP2-α (Li et al., 2003). We saw no difference in either the level or pattern of message expression between control and PCB-exposed fish (Supplementary Fig. 1). These data suggest that, while NC-derived tissues are affected by PCB126, the phenotype does not arise from an impairment of NC migration, patterning, or differentiation. NC cells adopt their correct positions but subsequently fail to grow correctly, even though they appear to differentiate as cartilage at the appropriate time. PCB126 Does Not Cause Increased Cell Death but Blocks Ventricular Proliferation While cell death could cause PCB126-exposed hearts to diminish in size over time, TUNEL assays showed that the phenotype was not caused by increased cell death (Supplementary Fig. 2). There was an almost complete lack of TUNEL labeling in the branchial cartilages or myocardium of control and PCB126-exposed embryos at all time points examined. Results were confirmed with two additional markers of cell death, acridine orange and anti-caspase 3 (data not shown). The effectiveness of the protocols was confirmed using a positive control, camptothecin, which induced high levels of cell death in all tissues (Supplementary Fig. 2). A second mechanism by which heart and cartilage growth could be impaired is reduced proliferation. BrdU incorporation experiments over the same range of developmental time points showed that proliferation was diminished in the myocardium, endocardium, and branchial tissues of exposed embryos (Fig. 3
To determine the consequences of reduced proliferation quantitatively, myocardial cell numbers were analyzed using Tg(cmlc2::DsRed2-nuc) fish (Figs. 4A–F
To quantify the reduction in size of ventricular cardiomyocytes, we used the Tg(cmlc2::DSRed2-nuc) fish double labeled with Zn5, a monoclonal antibody that marks cardiomyocyte cell boundaries. During normal zebrafish cardiogenesis, the heart chambers are established by differential growth and changing morphology of cardiomyocytes in the outer curvature (Auman et al., 2007). In PCB-exposed hearts, these processes were initiated normally as there were no obvious morphological differences between the ventricular myocytes residing at the inner and outer curvatures and clear development of the chambers (Figs. 5A and 5B
Outflow Tract Endocardium Is Disrupted To investigate endothelial/endocardial involvement in the heart phenotype, we used transgenic fish that express GFP in endothelial and endocardial cells. By 48 hpf, outflow tract endocardium appeared to be dysmorphic in 75% of fish investigated (17/24) and was either reduced to a narrow, compact line of endocardial cells, or missing entirely, with no obvious luminal space (Fig. 6B
Pifithrin-α Rescues the Heart Phenotype in a p53-Independent Manner The reduced ventricular proliferation suggested that PCB126 might perturb the cell cycle. Because the cell cycle checkpoint protein p53 is known to block the cell cycle, we adopted a chemical approach and used pifithrin-α, a well-known inhibitor of p53 transcriptional activity (Komarov et al., 1999). Pifithrin-α (1μM) cotreatment with PCB126 restored a normal heart phenotype in over 80% of cases (47/60). Proliferation was restored, pericardial effusion eliminated, and the heart and bulbus arteriosus returned to their usual shape, size, and orientation. Furthermore, Alcian blue staining of the branchial cartilages revealed that jaw development was partially restored (Fig. 7
In an attempt to duplicate the rescue conferred by chemical suppression of p53, we used p53 morpholino injections at several concentrations (Langheinrich et al., 2002). No protection against PCB126 was conferred at doses between 4 and 15 ng. However, this morpholino rescued camptothecin-induced apoptosis, showing that p53 had been successfully knocked down (data not shown). As a final test, p53-null mutant fish were exposed to PCB126. These fish were not resistant to the PCB-induced cardiotoxic effect as 100% of the fish developed the heart phenotype (n = 48). Pifithrin-α is a known AHR agonist (Hoagland et al., 2005), although the concentration used for rescue in these experiments was well below that calculated to compete with PCB126, which has 10-fold higher binding affinity. To determine whether pifithrin-α acted as a competitive agonist, we used cyp1a expression as a measure of AHR activation. Quantitative PCR assays on RNA from whole embryos using primers specific for cyp1a showed that pifithrin-α induced a modest increase in message compared to PCB126. The induction of cyp1a in fish cotreated with PCB126 and pifithrin-α remained at the level of pifithrin-α treatment alone (Fig. 7G The PCB-Induced Heart Phenotype Depends on Cardiac Function Because endocardial disruption and occlusion of the outflow tract suggested that hemodynamic forces may play a role in the development of the heart phenotype, we eliminated heartbeat and circulation by injection of the cardiac troponin T (tnnt2) morpholino (Sehnert et al., 2002). Heart function was inhibited in 100% of the tnnt2 morpholino-injected embryos. Heart development in the morphant embryos was somewhat abnormal in that chamber size appeared slightly larger. Chamber size appeared to be increased in tnnt2 morphants exposed to PCB126, completely reversing the reduction in chamber size in embryos treated with control morpholinos and exposed to PCB126 (Figs. 7H–K DISCUSSION Our study presents a comprehensive analysis of the cardiac phenotype induced in zebrafish embryos by exposure to PCB126. The phenotype includes stenotic or obstructed ventricular outflow, underdevelopment of the bulbus arteriosus, disrupted atrioventricular (AV) valve formation, reduction in myocardial cell size, and ventricular myocardial hypoplasia following cell cycle arrest. The similarity of the PCB-induced phenotype to that of HLHS is striking especially in view of the recent linkage of PCBs and dioxins to HLHS in humans (Kuehl and Loffredo, 2006). Examining possible processes whereby the heart of PCB-exposed fish could diminish in size over time, we established that the phenotype was not caused by cell death. In contrast, proliferation was markedly reduced in PCB-exposed fish, specifically in cardiac and NC-derived branchial tissues. Furthermore, PCB126 induced a ventricular-specific reduction of the number of cardiomyocytes, which became hypoplastic and considerably smaller than in controls by 96 hpf. This is in accord with previous work (Antkiewicz et al., 2005), in which TCDD-exposure induced reductions in the total number of zebrafish cardiomyocytes by 48 hpf and a “ventricular standstill” by 5 dpf. In that study, and in this, the atrium of exposed fish continued beating, but the frequency of ventricular contractions began to drop by 72 hpf and was abolished by 5 dpf (data not shown). The lack of ventricular proliferation in PCB-exposed fish suggested that the cell cycle might be a primary target for perturbation. It has previously been proposed that the AHR may regulate the cell cycle (Elferink, 2003), and microarray data from TCDD-exposed zebrafish hearts suggest that the most reliably affected cluster of genes is involved in cell cycle processes (Carney et al., 2006). A direct interaction of the AHR with the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) has been proposed (Ge and Elferink, 1998), and p53 involvement has been suggested to correlate with increased apoptosis (Denison and Nagy, 2003). However, although p53 was implicated in our initial studies where pifithrin-α rescued the PCB-induced heart phenotype, the absence of TUNEL labeling in exposed embryos suggested that cell cycle arrest was not coupled with cell death. Further analysis of cyp1a mRNA showed that the phenotypic rescue by pifithrin-α may result from competitive binding of the AHR. It was therefore surprising that cotreatment with PCB126 and pifithrin-α did not cause additive effects but rather maintained levels of message induced by the weaker agonist alone. This highlights the complexity of AHR signaling. Pifithrin-α has also been shown to be a potent CYP1 enzyme inhibitor. The dose of PCB126 and associated level of cyp1a induction needed to induce cardiovascular toxicity is not known. Thus, the ability of pifithrin-α to rescue may be related to its ability to block CYP1 enzyme activity, rather than its potential to reduce PCB126 activation of the AHR. A plausible mechanism for cell cycle arrest is the failure of myocardial cells to grow to appropriate sizes for the next division. Our data indicate that myocardial cell size is generally smaller than normal, and this is similar to what has been found in human hearts with HLHS (Bohlmeyer et al., 2003). While it is established that cell growth in yeast is coupled to cell cycling through p53 checkpoint arrest, the mechanism for coupling cell size and cell division in metazoans is unknown. Initial morphological development of the heart was relatively unaffected by PCB126. In the majority of cases, cardiovascular failure became obvious by the appearance of pericardial effusion, blood pooling at the cardiac inflow, and morphological change of the heart. In some extreme cases, mild effusion was seen as early as 24 hpf, indicating that, despite the lack of gross morphological differences, cardiac function may be impaired very early in development. The early, modest reduction in the numbers of atrial myocytes may account for this apparently mild, early-onset phenotype. Regardless, the likelihood of early impaired cardiac function is of particular interest. Any dysmorphology of the heart observed up to 48 hpf is at a developmental stage before addition to the cardiac outflow tract of the bulbus arteriosus, a structure proposed to be akin to the arterial trunk of air-breathing vertebrates (Grimes et al., 2006). By 96 hpf, arterial pole defects included an almost total lack of the bulbus arteriosus and a truncated, stenotic outflow. It seems unlikely that cardiac and arterial trunk dysmorphogenesis would be independent of one another, but the sequence of events suggests that developmental impairment of the bulbus arteriosus (arterial trunk) may be secondary to cardiac dysfunction. It is possible that PCB126 elicits its cardiotoxic effects by targeting endocardial cells. The AHR and CYP1A are strongly activated in the vascular endothelium of several species (Montie et al., 2008; Omori et al., 2007; Pelclova et al., 2007). Endocardial signaling is a known requirement for myocardial maturation and for the development of trabeculae (Grego-Bessa et al., 2007). Of particular interest is the zebrafish cloche mutant, which lacks endocardial cells and in which the ventricular myocardium beats weakly (Stainier et al., 1995). Utilizing the Tg(Flk1::EGFP)s843 transgenic zebrafish, we examined the effect of PCB126 on endocardial development. By 96 hpf, PCB126 induced universal disruption of outflow tract endocardium and, in some cases, a complete lack of endocardium within this region, causing occlusion or total blockage of the myocardial component of the outflow (the conus arteriosus––Grimes et al., 2006; Icardo, 2006). It is unclear why outflow endocardium would be specifically targeted by PCB126, but because of the occasional total lack of outflow tract endocardium, one could speculate that this particular cell population has an embryonic origin (spatial or temporal) distinct from ventricular and atrial endocardium. Regardless of this, the data are compelling. Mehta et al. (2008) showed that TCDD causes alterations in AV valve development and consequent blood regurgitation in the hearts of zebrafish. This study focused primarily on the development of the AV valve, and it is unclear whether similar outflow occlusion occurs in TCDD-treated embryos. HLHS has been classified based on the pathologic anatomy of both the aortic and mitral valves (Tchervenkov et al., 2006). It has therefore been suggested that valvular and/or endocardial dysfunction may be a primary cause of the condition and that hypoplasia of the ventricle is secondary to the resulting reduced blood flow (Hinton et al., 2007). Support for this comes from an experimental embryonic chick model of HLHS in which ligation of the left atrium induces hypoplasia of the left ventricle (Sedmera et al., 2002). To test this hypothesis, we used a morpholino approach to eliminate blood flow. Cardiac troponin T (tnnt2) has previously been identified as the gene responsible for the zebrafish silent heart (sih) mutation, in which cardiac conduction and contraction are uncoupled so that heart function is not initiated (Sehnert et al., 2002). Although the heart of these morphants was slightly dysmorphic, there was no difference between those exposed to PCB126 and controls. Furthermore, the cardiac dysmorphogenesis was consistent with the previously published sih phenotype (Sehnert et al., 2002). Interestingly, although these experiments strongly suggest a link between cardiac function and hemodynamic forces and the heart phenotype, the jaw phenotype was not rescued in these experiments. This suggests distinct etiologies for the heart and jaw malformations and may account for a lack of reported craniofacial abnormalities in human cases of HLHS. While it was not possible to determine definitively whether myocardial dysmorphogenesis was secondary to endocardial disruption and impaired hemodynamics, a model where reduced blood flow through the ventricle leads to secondary hypoplasia is not without precedent (Fishman et al., 1978). Recent pedigree analysis suggested that HLHS may be a serious form of valve malformation as there was a high prevalence of valve dysplasia in HLHS subjects and of bicuspid aortic valves in the study subjects' family members, but no familial prevalence of mitral valve dysfunction (Hinton et al., 2007). Importantly, outflow valve abnormalities have been described as “universal” in HLHS, whereas mitral valve malformations are only described as “common” (Bharati and Lev, 1984). It is known that the AHR is highly expressed in many NC-derived tissues including the visceral arches (Abbott and Probst, 1995; Schmidt and Bradfield, 1996). Furthermore, morpholino knockdown of the ARNTs in zebrafish leads to downregulation of transcripts involved in NC development (Wu et al., 2006), suggesting that the AHR pathway may be necessary for normal NC development and function. However, expression of crestin and AP2 shows that NC migration is not impaired by PCB126. Furthermore, we found that Alcian blue–stained NC-derived branchial cartilages are all patterned correctly in exposed fish, although they become diminished in size. The failure in growth rather than disrupted patterning is supported by phenotypes arising from a known failure of NC development, such as in the van gogh mutant (tbx1 null) (Piotrowski et al., 2003), which reveals a dramatic difference between branchial cartilage patterning defects arising from a failure of NC migration and the PCB-induced phenotype. Two other studies support our conclusion that early NC development is not affected in PCB-treated embryos. Using TCDD, Ivnitski et al. (2001) showed increased apoptosis in the developing chick heart. However, they concluded that the apoptotic cells were not of neural crest origin. Another study in zebrafish embryos showed abnormal jaw development caused by TCDD exposure (Teraoka et al., 2002). However, because the NC cells have finished forming the lower jaw by 24 hpf and the defective development appeared after that, the investigators concluded that NC migration was unlikely to be a TCDD target. In summary, although gross signs of cardiotoxicity are very subtle during early stages of development (up to 24 hpf), they suggest that perturbation of cardiogenesis is already occurring. PCB126 toxicity certainly affects both endocardial and myocardial development, specifically in the AVC, ventricle, and arterial pole. A link to hemodynamic forces is strongly suggested by this work. However, the precise nature of this early insult and how it leads to ventricular myocardial cell cycle arrest remains to be elucidated. The zebrafish may be an excellent model in which to investigate these unresolved questions and the etiology of HLHS. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FUNDING National Institutes of Health (R01 70140 to M.L.K.); a Duke Environmental Health Sciences Research Center Pilot Project Grant (to M.L.K and A.C.G.) [Supplementary Data]
Acknowledgments The authors thank Ranjula Wijayatunge, Ronald Perez, Kristen Winkler, Trisha Saha, Dr Tim Oliver, Dr David Sedmera, Dr Lisa Satterwhite, Dr Fernando Martinez, and Laura A. Barbosky. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006 Feb; 25(2):541-51.
[Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006]Pediatr Cardiol. 2006 Jan-Feb; 27(1):25-31.
[Pediatr Cardiol. 2006]Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1994 Jun; 28(1):99-109.
[Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1994]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996; 12():55-89.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996]Dev Dyn. 1995 Oct; 204(2):144-55.
[Dev Dyn. 1995]Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998 Jul; 35(1):52-7.
[Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998]J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Jun; 70(12):1005-13.
[J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007]Mol Pharmacol. 2004 Sep; 66(3):512-21.
[Mol Pharmacol. 2004]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 16; 50(16):1590-5.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007]Pediatr Cardiol. 2006 Jan-Feb; 27(1):25-31.
[Pediatr Cardiol. 2006]Curr Biol. 2003 Dec 16; 13(24):2138-47.
[Curr Biol. 2003]Dev Dyn. 2003 Sep; 228(1):30-40.
[Dev Dyn. 2003]Development. 2005 Dec; 132(23):5199-209.
[Development. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11; 102(2):407-12.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005]Dev Biol. 2006 Feb 15; 290(2):265-76.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Dev Biol. 2006 Feb 15; 290(2):265-76.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Genome Biol. 2006; 7(10):R100.
[Genome Biol. 2006]Curr Biol. 2002 Dec 10; 12(23):2023-8.
[Curr Biol. 2002]PLoS Genet. 2007 May 25; 3(5):e78.
[PLoS Genet. 2007]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Dev Biol. 2006 Feb 15; 290(2):265-76.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Toxicol Sci. 2004 Mar; 78(1):78-87.
[Toxicol Sci. 2004]Dev Dyn. 1995 Oct; 204(2):144-55.
[Dev Dyn. 1995]Dev Dyn. 2003 Mar; 226(3):540-50.
[Dev Dyn. 2003]Dev Biol. 2003 May 1; 257(1):127-39.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Dev Dyn. 2001 Feb; 220(2):169-74.
[Dev Dyn. 2001]PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e53.
[PLoS Biol. 2007]Science. 1999 Sep 10; 285(5434):1733-7.
[Science. 1999]Curr Biol. 2002 Dec 10; 12(23):2023-8.
[Curr Biol. 2002]J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Aug; 314(2):603-10.
[J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Pediatr Cardiol. 2006 Jan-Feb; 27(1):25-31.
[Pediatr Cardiol. 2006]Toxicol Sci. 2005 Apr; 84(2):368-77.
[Toxicol Sci. 2005]Prog Cell Cycle Res. 2003; 5():261-7.
[Prog Cell Cycle Res. 2003]Mol Pharmacol. 2006 Aug; 70(2):549-61.
[Mol Pharmacol. 2006]J Biol Chem. 1998 Aug 28; 273(35):22708-13.
[J Biol Chem. 1998]Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003; 43():309-34.
[Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003]Cardiovasc Pathol. 2003 Jan-Feb; 12(1):23-31.
[Cardiovasc Pathol. 2003]Dev Biol. 2006 Feb 15; 290(2):265-76.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Aquat Toxicol. 2008 Feb 18; 86(3):397-412.
[Aquat Toxicol. 2008]Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007 Oct; 26(10):811-6.
[Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007]Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007 Sep; 26(9):705-13.
[Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007]Dev Cell. 2007 Mar; 12(3):415-29.
[Dev Cell. 2007]Development. 1995 Oct; 121(10):3141-50.
[Development. 1995]Dev Biol. 2006 Feb 15; 290(2):265-76.
[Dev Biol. 2006]Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Aug; 288(8):900-8.
[Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006]Toxicol Sci. 2008 Aug; 104(2):303-11.
[Toxicol Sci. 2008]Cardiol Young. 2006 Aug; 16(4):339-68.
[Cardiol Young. 2006]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 16; 50(16):1590-5.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007]Anat Rec. 2002 Jun 1; 267(2):137-45.
[Anat Rec. 2002]Nat Genet. 2002 May; 31(1):106-10.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Circulation. 1978 Aug; 58(2):354-64.
[Circulation. 1978]J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 16; 50(16):1590-5.
[J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007]Dev Dyn. 1995 Oct; 204(2):144-55.
[Dev Dyn. 1995]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996; 12():55-89.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996]Development. 2003 Oct; 130(20):5043-52.
[Development. 2003]Toxicol Sci. 2002 Feb; 65(2):192-9.
[Toxicol Sci. 2002]