![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mast cells can contribute to axon–glial dissociation and fibrosis in peripheral nerve 1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA 2Present address, Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA Correspondence should be addressed to: Nancy Ratner, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Experimental Hematology, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA, phone: +1 513 636 9469, fax: +1 513 636 3549, email: Nancy.Ratner/at/cchmc.org The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Neuron Glia Biol.Abstract Expression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in murine Schwann cells results in loss of axon–Schwann cell interactions and collagen deposition, modeling peripheral nerve response to injury and tumorigenesis. Mast cells infiltrate nerves in all three situations. We show that mast cells are present in normal mouse peripheral nerve beginning at 4 weeks of age, and that the number of mast-cells in EGFR+ nerves increases abruptly at 5–6 weeks of age as axons and Schwann cells dissociate. The increase in mast cell number is preceded and accompanied by elevated levels of mRNAs encoding the mast-cell chemoattractants Rantes, SCF and VEGF. Genetic ablation of mast cells and bone marrow reconstitution in W41 × EGFR+ mice indicate a role for mast cells in loss of axon – Schwann cell interactions and collagen deposition. Pharmacological stabilization of mast cells by disodium cromoglycate administration to EGFR+ mice also diminished loss of axon – Schwann cell interaction. Together these three lines of evidence support the hypothesis that mast cells can contribute to alterations in peripheral nerves. Keywords: Schwann cell, NF1, EGFR, Remak bundle INTRODUCTION The peripheral nerve is a complex organ containing neuronal axons, Schwann cells, fibroblasts, blood vessels and mast cells. In addition to their well-characterized role in allergic inflammation (Galli et al., 2005), mast cells are implicated in arthritis and multiple sclerosis (Lee et al., 2002; Tanzola et al., 2003). Although mast cells were identified in peripheral nerve over 100 years ago (Gamble and Goldby, 1961) their function in this tissue is unknown. In the normal peripheral nerve, large axons are surrounded by a Schwann cell myelin sheath to allow for efficient transmission of electric current. Small axons are grouped together in Remak bundles, that are organized and ensheathed by the membrane of a single non-myelinating Schwann cell (Corfas et al., 2004). Thus, axons are in intimate contact with Schwann cell processes that wrap them, and the two cell types are co-dependent for proper development, morphology and function. Axon – Schwann cell interactions are disrupted in pathological conditions, including after nerve injury and in tumors of the peripheral nervous system. Under these conditions mast-cell numbers increase but a possible role of mast cells in nerve homeostasis has not been studied. Peripheral nerve tumors highly infiltrated by mast cells are the hallmark of the disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) (Pineda, 1965; Olsson, 1971), and patients often complain of pain and itchiness localized to regions of their tumors, neurofibromas (Riccardi, 1987), which is a classic indicator of mast-cell activation. NF1 affects 1:3000 live births and results from mutations in the NF1 gene. Neurofibromas are composed of elements of normal peripheral nerve: mainly Schwann cells and fibroblasts, as well as mast cells and neurons. The tumors can be highly disfiguring and are a major source of patient morbidity (Rasmussen and Friedman, 2000). Schwann cells are the crucial pathogenic cell type in neurofibroma formation because mutations in both NF1 alleles are present only in neurofibroma Schwann cells (Kluwe et al., 1999; Serra et al., 2001). Treatment of NF1 patients with Ketotifen, a mast-cell stabilizer, minimizes neurofibroma-associated pain, although tumor growth was not quantified (Riccardi, 1987; Riccardi, 1993). Schwann cell survival, proliferation and differentiation are regulated via the ErbB2/ErbB3 receptor signaling complex (Jessen et al., 1994; Leimeroth et al., 2002). The related ErbB1 receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is not expressed by Schwann cells but is expressed in Schwann cells with Nf1 loss in vitro, in cells derived from mouse and human NF1 malignant nerve tumors, and in a few S100+ cells from primary neurofibromas (DeClue et al., 2001; Li et al., 2002; Carroll and Stonecypher, 2005). We previously generated mice that express human EGFR in Schwann cells (EGFR+ mice) through the use of the CNPase promoter, which serves as a promoter throughout the Schwann cell lineage (Ling et al., 2005; Gravel et al., 1994). A striking peripheral nerve phenotype develops in EGFR+ mice, which is similar to pathological changes found in injured peripheral nerve and in human neurofibromas, with mast-cell infiltration, collagen deposition and disrupted axon – Schwann cell interactions. Chen et al. showed that blocking ErbB signaling in non-myelinating Schwann cell results in a progressive peripheral neuropathy (Chen et al., 2003). This pathology is distinct from changes that manifest in the EGFR+ model, but both point to a crucial role for ErbB-family signaling in proper maintenance of axon – Schwann cell interactions in nerve homeostasis, especially in non-myelin forming Schwann cells. The EGFR+ mouse affords a straightforward system in which factors affecting nerve homeostasis can be assessed. We used the EGFR+ model to directly test the role of mast cells in nerve pathology. By time-course analysis, we show that arrival of increased mast cells to EGFR+ nerve correlates with phenotype onset. By ablation and reconstitution we show that bone marrow-derived cells play a causative role in the development of pathologies observed in EGFR+ nerves. Pharmacological stabilization of mast cells by disodium cromoglycate (cromolyn) administration also blocks EGFR+-induced pathology. These studies offer new insights into nerve homeostasis and describe a novel role for mast cells in nerve pathology. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that mast cells play a causative role in the development of peripheral nerve pathology observed in mice that aberrantly express EGFR in Schwann cells. To this end, we correlated mast-cell influx into nerve with disruption of axon–glial interactions, and utilized the mast cell-deficient mouse strain W41 to genetically ablate mast cells in EGFR+ mice. We also pharmacologically stabilized mast cells by cromolyn administration to define the role of mast cells in initiation and maintenance of nerve pathology. METHODS Mice and genotyping C57Bl/6 CNPase-EGFR transgenic mice, which express wild type, human EGFR in Schwann cells, had been backcrossed onto the C57Bl/6 background for more than seven generations at the initiation of this study. Mice were genotyped as described (Ling et al., 2005). W41 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor). They were on the C57Bl/6 strain and were intercrossed at least two generations with the CNPase-EGFR C57Bl/6 transgenic mice. The W41 mice are genotyped based on coat color; W41/W41 mice are white with gray spots, and W41/+ mice are black with a single white belly spot. Mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled viaticum that was kept on a 12-hour dark/light cycle with free access to food and water. The animal care and use committees of the University of Cincinnati and the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Research Foundation approved all animal use. Histology We sacrificed mice by perfusion fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde and harvested sciatic and saphenous nerves. We embedded nerves in paraffin and cut 5–6 µm thin sections proximal to the sciatic bifurcation. We stained sections with either toluidine blue or Giemsa for mast cells and Masson’s trichrome for collagen. Mast cells were identified in tissue sections from their characteristic granular, metachromatic appearance. Quantitative real-time PCR Sciatic nerves were harvested from wild-type and EGFR+ mice at designated ages. cDNA was generated and triplicate PCR reactions per primer set were performed as described (Ling et al., 2005). Primer sequences are published (Ling et al., 2005). Examination of nerve ultrastructure Disruption of axon–Schwann interaction was quantified as a percentage of grouped unmyelinated axons in electron micrographs as described in Ling et al. (Ling et al., 2005). An axon bundle was considered grouped if three or more small axons were wrapped by a single Schwann cell, and ungrouped if two or fewer. At least 200 axon bundles were counted in each experimental group using micrographs from 3–4 mice per genotype. BrdU incorporation Proliferation was assessed in tissue sections as described (Wu et al., 2006). Bone marrow engraftment Congenic wild-type adult C57Bl/6 mice from the W41 × EGFR+ intercrosses were sacrificed and long leg bones and iliac crest removed and placed in sterile RPMI. In a sterile hood, marrow was flushed from bones, triturated and spun down at 1000 RPM for 10 min. Cells were then resuspended in 4 ml red blood cell (RBC) lysis buffer for 4 min at 25°C. RBC lysis buffer is an ammonium chloride solution containing 4.15 g NH4Cl and 0.65 g Tris (0.01 M final concentration) in 500 ml ddH2O. The solution was brought to a pH of 7.5 using 1 M HCl and then sterile filtered. The lysis reaction was stopped by adding 6 ml of RMPI + 10% FBS. Cells were spun at 1000 RPM for 10 min, washed in RPMI + 10% FBS. The spin and wash steps were repeated and cells reconstituted in sterile 0.1 M PBS for injections. Four-week-old mice were injected via tail vein with 1.8 × 107 cells in ~150 µl. Non-engrafted control mice were injected with 150 µl of sterile 0.1 M PBS. Mice were sacrificed 12 weeks after injection and analyzed. Cromolyn administration A solution of Cromolyn (Sigma) was made fresh daily in sterile 1 × PBS. For short-term studies, mice were injected i.p. with 10 mg kg−1 cromolyn solution or sterile 1 × PBS daily for 21 days, beginning at 6 weeks of age. Mice were sacrificed at 9 weeks of age and analyzed. For long-term studies, mice were injected daily with the same dose/volume of cromolyn or PBS for 8 weeks, beginning at 4 months of age. Mice were sacrificed at 6 months of age and analyzed. Statistical analysis All statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Kruskall-Wallis. RESULTS Time course of mast-cell recruitment to nerve and EGFR+ nerve pathology Although the presence of mast cells in normal peripheral nerve is well documented their function and temporal arrival to nerves has not been analyzed. Therefore, we monitored the timing of mast-cell recruitment to normal nerves. We used total mast cells per nine high-powered fields (400 ×) in sciatic nerve to monitor mast cell numbers. Mast cells arrived at the same time and in similar numbers in wild-type and EGFR+-transgenic nerves at 4 weeks of age; mast cells began to increase in the EGFR+ animals at 5–6 weeks (Fig. 1A
Because of the abrupt increase in mast-cell number in transgenic nerve, we investigated the expression level of mRNAs encoding mast-cell chemoattractants in wild-type and EGFR+ nerve at 4, 5 and 6 weeks of age. We examined Rantes, stem cell factor (SCF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) because we have shown previously that mRNAs encoding these proteins are either present or upregulated in EGFR+ adult nerve (Ling et al., 2005). TGF-β1 mRNA was not expressed in either wild-type or EGFR+ nerve at these early ages (data not shown). Compared to wild-type nerves, mRNA encoding Rantes was upregulated in EGFR+ nerve 3.94-fold (2.43–6.40) at 4 weeks of age and 3.2-fold (1.74–5.91) at 5 weeks of age. SCF mRNA was upregulated 6.73-fold (6.17–7.36) at 4 weeks of age and 4.08-fold (3.16–5.28) at 5 weeks of age. VEGF mRNA was upregulated 8.05-fold (6.18–10.50) at 4 weeks of age and 12.64-fold (10.85–14.72) at 5 weeks of age. The concentration of mRNAs encoding these three chemoattractants was not upregulated in EGFR+ nerve compared to wild-type nerve at 6 weeks of age (Fig. 1B The ultrastructure of transgenic nerves was analyzed by electron microscopy at weekly intervals between 3 and 6 weeks of age. Axon–Schwann cell interactions were normal until mast-cell numbers increased in EGFR+ nerves (Fig. 1C–F Genetic ablation of mast cells inhibits pathology The correlation between mast-cell infiltration and the initiation of nerve pathology led us to investigate the role of mast cells in the EGFR+ phenotype. We mated C57Bl/6 EGFR+ mice to the fertile, mast-cell deficient, dominant white spotting W41 strain, also on the C57Bl/6 background. W41 mice are Kit hypomorphs, with a point mutation in the C-terminal domain of the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is necessary for migration and maturation of mast cells. This point mutation reduces RTK activity by ~85% (Nocka et al., 1990; Reith et al., 1990). In addition to mast-cell deficiency, W41 mutants have mild, macrocytic anemia and a slightly elevated white cell count (Geissler and Russell, 1983). Importantly, these hematological abnormalities do not compromise either fertility or survival because the lifespan of these animals is normal. Therefore, these mice represent a unique, fertile, mast-cell deficient animal model. Intercrosses between the two strains resulted in six genotypes: wild type, EGFR+, W41/W41/EGFR+, W41/+/EGFR+, W41/W41 and W41/+. Offspring were aged and analyzed at 6 months of age when the EGFR+ phenotype is pronounced (n = 3 for each genotype except for W41/W41/EGFR+, where n = 5). First, we analyzed mast-cell numbers in peripheral nerve for all six genotypes. Adult EGFR+ nerves harbored ~10-fold more mast cells than wild type (Ling et al., 2005). W41/W41/EGFR+ nerves contained fewer mast cells than wild type, and W41/+/EGFR+ nerves contained an intermediate number of mast cells compared to EGFR+ and wild-type nerves (Fig. 2A
Second, we examined fibrosis at 6 months of age by staining sciatic nerve sections with Masson’s trichrome for collagen (Fig. 2B–D Third, we examined nerve ultrastructure at 6 months by electron microscopy. Wild-type nerves showed characteristically well-organized small axons ensheathed by non-myelinating Schwann cells (Remak bundles) (n = 3) (Fig. 3A
We also examined BrdU incorporation in adult W41/W41/EGFR+ mouse nerve (n = 3), and found that mast-cell ablation had no effect on Schwann cell proliferation. W41/W41/EGFR+ nerves displayed a proliferation rate of 0.13%, which is characteristic of Schwann cells in normal adult mouse nerve (Brown and Asbury, 1981), and did not differ significantly from wild-type, adult nerve (P = 0.53). We previously showed that the percentage of proliferating cells in adult EGFR+ nerves does not differ from wild-type nerve (Ling et al., 2005); rather, a burst of Schwann cell proliferation occurs in EGFR+ nerves between birth and 2 weeks of age (Wu et al., 2006). Mast cells do not arrive at peripheral nerves until 4 weeks of age (Fig. 1A Bone marrow reconstitution restores pathology To test whether phenotypic reversal in W41 matings is caused by loss of blood-derived mast cells, rather than an unrelated effect of the Kit receptor mutation, we engrafted wild-type bone marrow into W41/W41/EGFR+ animals. We chose this approach because purified mast cells do not cross the blood – brain barrier (Tanzola et al., 2003), and so are not expected to cross the blood – nerve barrier. Bone marrow is the source of all hematopoietic progenitors including mast-cell precursors. Mast-cell precursors from wild-type marrow harbor functional Kit, allowing proper migration and maturation in mutant hosts. We injected mice (via the tail vein) with wild-type bone marrow cells at 4 weeks of age to recapitulate temporal arrival of mast cells to peripheral nerves. We examined animals 12 weeks after injection (at 4 months of age) and quantified mast cells in nerve tissue sections after Giemsa and toluidine blue staining. Mast cells were evident in engrafted W41/W41/EGFR+ peripheral nerves (Fig. 4A
We examined nerve ultrastructure and found that disruption was significantly more severe in engrafted than non-engrafted W41/W41/EGFR+ nerve (P = 0.03). Quantification of axon bundles in engrafted versus non-engrafted W41/W41/EGFR+ nerves and a representative electron micrograph of an engrafted W41/W41/EGFR+ nerve are shown (Fig. 4E,F We also examined EGFR+ peripheral nerves for increases in other hematopoietic cells: neutrophils, eosinophils and basophils, and found no influx of these cell types to peripheral nerves (data not shown). This observation, and the marrow engraftment experiments, are consistent with the hypothesis that EGFR signaling and mast cells are relevant for the pathology observed in EGFR+ nerves. Early cromolyn treatment ablates mast-cell accumulation and prevents pathology We sought a pharmacological approach to test if mast cells, rather than other hematopoetic cells, were responsible for nerve pathology in EGFR+ mice. The release of granules from mast cells is blocked by cromolyn (Ginsburg and Baldwin, 2004; Goldgraber, 1976). We injected mice i.p. daily from 6–9 weeks of age with 10 mg kg−1 cromolyn. Cromolyn also blocks granular release from other cell types, such as eosinophils and basophils but, as noted above, we did not observe an influx of these cells in EGFR+ peripheral nerves. We examined nerve ultrastructure and found that early exposure of EGFR+ animals to cromolyn maintained nerve axon – Schwann cell interactions at wild-type levels. The percentage of grouped axons was quantified (Fig. 5A
We quantified mast-cell number in peripheral nerves. In wild-type peripheral nerves, mast-cell number was unaffected by treatment of mice with either carrier (n = 3) or cromolyn (n = 4) (Fig. 5B Late cromolyn treatment arrests pathology from time of administration To test if later treatment with cromolyn reversed pathology once it had begun to manifest, we treated mice daily for 8 weeks with 10 mg kg−1 cromolyn. We began treatment at 4 months of age, when pathology in EGFR+ nerves is pronounced and ended treatment at 6 months of age, when pathology is severe. Control mice were injected daily with saline. We also included untreated, 4-month-old mice in the analysis of this experiment. We examined nerve ultrastructure and found that cromolyn exposure from 4–6 months of age in EGFR+ animals maintained nerve axon – Schwann cell interactions at 4-month-old pathological levels. The percentage of grouped axons was quantified (Fig. 5C We quantified nerve mast-cell number and found that treatment of mice with carrier (n = 3) or cromolyn (n = 4) had no effect on mast-cell number in wild-type peripheral nerves (Fig. 5D Based on this experiment we conclude that late exposure cromolyn (starting after pathologies are manifest) does not restore normal morphology to EGFR+ nerves. However, late administration of cromolyn prevents further pathological developments, and maintains the nerve in an earlier state of disruption. CONCLUSIONS
DISCUSSION In this work we provide several lines of evidence that support a role for mast cells in the pathology of EGFR+ peripheral nerves. First, the number of mast cells increases in EGFR+ nerve at the same time as axon – Schwann cell interactions are disrupted and fibrosis develops. Second, genetic ablation of mast cells through W41 mating prevents pathologies associated with transgenic expression of EGFR. Third, reconstitution of blood-derived cells, including mast cells, to W41/W41/EGFR+ peripheral nerve via marrow engraftment restores pathologies. Fourth, treatment of EGFR+ mice with cromolyn inhibits mast-cell recruitment to peripheral nerves and pathological progression. Based on these experiments, we hypothesize that mast-cells that are normally resident in peripheral nerve are activated in response to the EGFR+ environment, possibly in response to increased Rantes, SCF and VEGF present at 4 and 5 weeks of age, and recruit additional mast-cell progenitors from bone marrow, which exacerbates EGFR+-initiated pathologies (Fig. 6
W41 mice are Kit hypomorphs, and Ryan et al. showed that Kit is expressed in an MPNST cell line derived from an NF1 patient, but not in normal human Schwann cells (Ryan et al., 1994). Therefore the loss of the nerve pathology phenotype in W41/W41/EGFR+ might result from effects on Schwann cells. Restoration of the phenotype by bone marrow reconstitution, which restores normal mast cells but not Schwann cells, makes this explanation unlikely. Mast cells arrive in wild-type and EGFR+ nerve at the same time in development (4 weeks) (Fig. 1A SCF was reported to directly trigger mast-cell degranulation (Taylor et al., 1995), although recent studies call this result into question (Gilfillan and Tkaczyk, 2006). Our data showing that cromolyn treatment prevents nerve pathology supports the idea that mast-cell degranulation, mediated by SCF or other factors, is crucial in the EGFR+ phenotype. Cromolyn also caused a profound decrease in the number of mast cells recruited to EGFR+ peripheral nerves. Because cromolyn is thought to block mast-cell degranulation, we suggest that mast cells in EGFR+ nerves degranulate in response to the EGFR+ environment, and that the mast-cell mediators that are released contribute to increased recruitment of mast cells to nerves (Fig. 6 We can exclude a cromolyn effect on other bone marrow-derived cells that contain granules because eosinophils, neutrophils and basophils were not observed in nerves. It is also unlikely that cromolyn affects nerve cells directly because the nerves of wild-type, control animals treated with cromolyn were morphologically similar to the nerves of either untreated or carrier-injected wild-type animals. However, because the exact mechanism of action of cromolyn is not known, we can not completely rule out effects on other cell types. It is also possible that other cell types are necessary intermediates between Schwann cells and mast cells. Mast cells can release mediators from preformed granules by exocytosis; these mediators include proteases, granule amines, proteoglycans, heparin, NGF and serotonin (Leon et al., 1994; Gurish and Austin, 2001; Maurer et al., 2003; Crivellato et al., 2004). Any of the >20 molecules released from mast-cell granules might be responsible for disruption of EGFR+ nerves. Although NGF and serotonin are attractive candidates because Schwann cells express their receptors (Taniuchi et al., 1986; Gaietta et al., 2003), in preliminary experiments we found that blocking serotonin receptors did not affect EGFR+ nerve pathology (not shown). The local environment can regulate the composition of mast-cell granules (Galli et al., 2005), and it is possible that the Schwann cell environment in EGFR+ mice results in the de novo synthesis of mast-cell mediators that are responsible for the pathological progression in EGFR+ nerves. We also cannot exclude piecemeal degranulation in the EGFR+ nerve phenotype. This work describes novel roles for mast cells in nerve homeostasis and pathology. A pivotal link between inflammation and carcinogenesis is being unraveled (Coussens et al., 1999; Balkwill and Coussens, 2004; de Visser et al., 2005), and the classical view of mast cells as effectors in allergy and IgE-mediated immune response is becoming outmoded as essential, non-immunological roles for mast cells are identified (Crivellato and Ribatti, 2005; Galli et al., 2005). Mast cells might have roles in the development of other nerve pathologies in which Schwann cells lose contact with axons, including peripheral nerve tumor formation in NF1, Guillain-Barré syndrome and Wallerian degeneration (Tanzola et al., 2003; Dines and Powell, 1997). Our findings contribute to this newly emerging body of work and support a vital role for mast cells in the development of Schwann cell-mediated nerve pathology. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge helpful suggestions of D. Wade Clapp (Indiana University), Ann Dvorak (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Greg Gregory (Northwestern University), Michael Gurish (Harvard University), Todd Nick (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), Anat Stemmer-Rachamimov (Mass. General Hospital) and Mindy Tsai (Stanford University). We also thank Peter Ackerman, Edward Brown and Jennifer Kordich for outstanding technical support. This work was supported by grants NIH NS28840 and DAMD 17-02-1-0679 to N.R. K.R.M. was supported by T32-CA-59268 and the Albert J. Ryan Foundation. J.W. was a DAMD Neurofibromatosis Fellow. REFERENCES
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Science. 2002 Sep 6; 297(5587):1689-92.
[Science. 2002]Nature. 1961 Mar 4; 189():766-7.
[Nature. 1961]J Neurosci. 2004 Oct 20; 24(42):9250-60.
[J Neurosci. 2004]Arch Neurol. 1965 Oct; 13(4):372-82.
[Arch Neurol. 1965]Acta Neurol Scand. 1971; 47(3):357-68.
[Acta Neurol Scand. 1971]Arch Dermatol. 1987 Aug; 123(8):1011-6.
[Arch Dermatol. 1987]Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jan 1; 151(1):33-40.
[Am J Epidemiol. 2000]Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999 Mar; 24(3):283-5.
[Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999]Neuron. 1994 Mar; 12(3):509-27.
[Neuron. 1994]Dev Biol. 2002 Jun 15; 246(2):245-58.
[Dev Biol. 2002]Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1; 62(15):4507-13.
[Cancer Res. 2002]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]J Neurosci Res. 1994 Jun 15; 38(3):243-7.
[J Neurosci Res. 1994]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2006 May; 168(5):1686-96.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]EMBO J. 1990 Jun; 9(6):1805-13.
[EMBO J. 1990]Genes Dev. 1990 Mar; 4(3):390-400.
[Genes Dev. 1990]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Exp Neurol. 1981 Oct; 74(1):170-86.
[Exp Neurol. 1981]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Am J Pathol. 2006 May; 168(5):1686-96.
[Am J Pathol. 2006]Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 May; 286(5):H1750-6.
[Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004]Ann Allergy. 1976 Aug; 37(2):123-5.
[Ann Allergy. 1976]J Neurosci Res. 1994 Feb 15; 37(3):415-32.
[J Neurosci Res. 1994]Cancer Cell. 2005 Jan; 7(1):65-75.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]J Clin Invest. 2003 Dec; 112(12):1851-61.
[J Clin Invest. 2003]Immunology. 1995 Nov; 86(3):427-33.
[Immunology. 1995]J Exp Med. 2001 Jul 2; 194(1):F1-5.
[J Exp Med. 2001]Exp Dermatol. 2003 Dec; 12(6):886-910.
[Exp Dermatol. 2003]Histol Histopathol. 2004 Jan; 19(1):259-70.
[Histol Histopathol. 2004]J Neurocytol. 2003 May; 32(4):373-80.
[J Neurocytol. 2003]Genes Dev. 1999 Jun 1; 13(11):1382-97.
[Genes Dev. 1999]Nature. 2004 Sep 23; 431(7007):405-6.
[Nature. 2004]Cancer Cell. 2005 May; 7(5):411-23.
[Cancer Cell. 2005]Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005 Feb; 4(1):9-11.
[Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005]