![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008, American Society of Plant Biologists Metabolic Network Fluxes in Heterotrophic Arabidopsis Cells: Stability of the Flux Distribution under Different Oxygenation Conditions1[W][OA] Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom *Corresponding author; e-mail george.ratcliffe/at/plants.ox.ac.uk. 2These authors contributed equally to the article. Received June 24, 2008; Accepted July 28, 2008. Abstract Steady-state labeling experiments with [1-13C]Glc were used to measure multiple metabolic fluxes through the pathways of central metabolism in a heterotrophic cell suspension culture of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The protocol was based on in silico modeling to establish the optimal labeled precursor, validation of the isotopic and metabolic steady state, extensive nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of the redistribution of label into soluble metabolites, starch, and protein, and a comprehensive set of biomass measurements. Following a simple modification of the cell culture procedure, cells were grown at two oxygen concentrations, and flux maps of central metabolism were constructed on the basis of replicated experiments and rigorous statistical analysis. Increased growth rate at the higher O2 concentration was associated with an increase in fluxes throughout the network, and this was achieved without any significant change in relative fluxes despite differences in the metabolite profile of organic acids, amino acids, and carbohydrates. The balance between biosynthesis and respiration within the tricarboxylic acid cycle was unchanged, with 38% ± 5% of carbon entering used for biosynthesis under standard O2 conditions and 33% ± 2% under elevated O2. These results add to the emerging picture of the stability of the central metabolic network and its capacity to respond to physiological perturbations with the minimum of rearrangement. The lack of correlation between the change in metabolite profile, which implied significant disruption of the metabolic network following the alteration in the oxygen supply, and the unchanging flux distribution highlights a potential difficulty in the interpretation of metabolomic data. Although the complexity and plasticity of the metabolic network in plants allows them to adapt to fluctuating environmental conditions, the same properties also present a significant obstacle to metabolic engineering (Carrari et al., 2003a; Kruger and Ratcliffe, 2008; Sweetlove et al., 2008). The problem is particularly acute in primary metabolism, where there have been numerous instances of unsuccessful engineering, and reflects the current incomplete understanding of the way in which metabolic networks respond to environmental and genetic perturbations. Fluxes of central carbon metabolism are part of the missing information (Sweetlove et al., 2003), and although they are necessarily related to enzyme abundances, metabolite concentrations, and transcriptional responses (Carrari et al., 2006; Junker et al., 2007), their reliable prediction from the available data remains a non-trivial task (Sweetlove and Fernie, 2005). For this reason, the development and application of techniques for the measurement of flux in plants has become an important area of research (Schwender et al., 2004a; Fernie et al., 2005; Ratcliffe and Shachar-Hill, 2006). Steady-state metabolic flux analysis (MFA) has the capacity to resolve parallel, cyclic, and reversible fluxes, making it a useful technique for quantifying metabolic fluxes and investigating the factors that control them in plants (Roscher et al., 2000; Ratcliffe and Shachar-Hill, 2006). MFA studies have revealed novel aspects of plant metabolism, as well as providing the first measurements of many fluxes in vivo and independently verifying previous research on plant metabolism (Schwender et al., 2004a). For example, recent work on Brassica napus embryos highlighted the importance of Rubisco in refixation of CO2 for improved conversion of photosynthate to seed storage compounds (Schwender et al., 2004b), while work on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) embryos (Alonso et al., 2007a) provided evidence that pyruvate uptake is not the dominant route for the provision of precursors for plastidic fatty acid synthesis, in agreement with recent work on Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Andre et al., 2007). Recent refinements to MFA theory (Sriram and Shanks, 2004a; Ghosh et al., 2006; Kruger et al., 2007a; Libourel et al., 2007) and the development of specialized software (Wiechert et al., 2001; Sriram et al., 2004) have been accompanied by a rapid increase in the number of species investigated using MFA (Schwender, 2008). However, the approach has yet to be applied to Arabidopsis, and this article describes an MFA study of respiratory and biosynthetic carbon metabolism in a heterotrophic Arabidopsis cell suspension. A key question in the regulation of central carbon metabolism is how the simultaneous demands of catabolic respiratory metabolism and anabolic biosynthetic metabolism are managed. The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle is central to both processes, generating reducing equivalents for the mitochondrial electron transfer chain, and providing precursors for several biosynthetic pathways (Fernie et al., 2004). Recent studies have helped to demonstrate the degree to which the TCA cycle is connected to other metabolic processes: for example, antisense knockdown of malate dehydrogenase (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005), and fumarase (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007), and a mutation within the aconitase gene (Carrari et al., 2003b) all had marked effects on photosynthetic performance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), while the effects of oxidative stress on the TCA cycle propagated throughout the metabolic network in Arabidopsis (Baxter et al., 2007). MFA has demonstrated that the TCA cycle operates in different flux modes in different systems. For example, in B. napus embryos, photosynthetic ATP production alleviates the need for any cyclic TCA cycle flux (Schwender et al., 2006), while in other systems, there appears to be more conventional operation of the TCA cycle (Rontein et al., 2002; Alonso et al., 2007b) with both significant respiratory and biosynthetic flux. MFA can also be used to investigate the response of the TCA cycle and its associated pathways to different growth conditions. Recent work revealed that B. napus embryos respond to a switch from an organic to an inorganic nitrogen source by increasing anaplerotic flux through phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), thereby replacing the carbon removed from the TCA cycle for ammonium assimilation (Junker et al., 2007). In soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons, relative flux through PEPC was reduced by increased growth temperature (Iyer et al., 2008). Thus, a quantitative picture is emerging of TCA cycle fluxes and the extent to which they vary depending on the need to generate precursors for biosynthesis and reductant for ATP synthesis. However, the factors that may control the rates of biosynthesis and respiration, and the balance between these two competing processes, have not been tested systematically. Accordingly, we varied the concentration of O2 in the medium of an Arabidopsis cell suspension culture with the aim of perturbing the operation of the TCA cycle. The effect of this manipulation on the flux map of central metabolism, and in particular the effect on the balance between respiratory and biosynthetic fluxes, was quantified using steady-state MFA. RESULTS Construction and Refinement of a Metabolic Model The successful application of MFA requires the construction of a model that not only accurately reflects metabolism within the experimental system, but that also can be solved with the quantity and quality of data that are likely to be obtainable. To this end, we constructed an initial model of central carbon metabolism in heterotrophic Arabidopsis cell suspension cultures using a format compatible with the steady-state MFA software 13C-FLUX (Wiechert et al., 2001). The structure of the network was based on information from the literature, principally other MFA studies of heterotrophic metabolism in plants (Schwender et al., 2006; Alonso et al., 2007a; Sriram et al., 2007), and from metabolic databases (Schomburg et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005). Reactions primarily associated with photosynthetic metabolism (Calvin cycle, photorespiration) and seed germination (glyoxylate cycle) were not included, because there is no evidence that they occur to any significant extent in dark-grown Arabidopsis cell suspensions. Carbon transitions within the network were derived from the primary literature and standard biochemical textbooks. Accurate representation of carbon transitions around the TCA cycle in the model was confirmed by comparing data from a 13C NMR analysis of the labeling of organic and amino acids in methanolic extracts of heterotrophic cell suspensions fed with [2,3-13C]succinate for 6 or 18 h with the pattern of label distribution predicted by the model (data not shown). The complexity of the network that can be analyzed is partly determined by the extent to which the redistribution of the 13C-label can be quantified after labeling to isotopic steady state. We used the statistical analysis component of 13C-FLUX, EstimateStat, to predict errors on optimized flux estimates for different network configurations and 13C-labeled precursors and, hence, refined the initial model to the point where it could be solved with the data obtainable from a steady-state labeling experiment. By this method, structurally nonidentifiable fluxes, i.e. those that can take any value without impacting on the observed label distribution (Wiechert et al., 2001), were identified and removed from the network. For example, flux from 2-oxoglutarate to succinate, whether occurring via α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase or via the γ-aminobutyrate (GABA) shunt, was considered as a single flux, because these parallel pathways produce identical distributions of label in their product, and Suc cycling was excluded from the model for the reasons discussed elsewhere (Kruger et al., 2007a). Simplifications were also introduced where the accuracy of flux estimates was predicted to be poor, providing that such simplifications would not prevent conclusions being drawn about the function of the TCA cycle. The refined network is illustrated in Supplemental Figure S1. Determination of Optimal 13C-Labeled Precursor EstimateStat was also used to predict the optimal precursor for estimating TCA cycle fluxes in the refined model. Figure 1
Elevated O2 Conditions Perturb Cell Suspension Culture Metabolism As oxygen is required to support respiration, the availability of oxygen to the cell suspension cultures might be expected to influence overall rates of metabolism and/or the partitioning of carbon entering the TCA cycle between respiration and biosynthesis. To test this hypothesis, we established a system for culturing cells at elevated O2 concentration by replacing the aluminum foil used to seal the flasks with Miracloth. After 5 d of growth, there was consistently more oxygen dissolved in the medium of cultures covered with Miracloth (elevated O2) than those covered with foil (standard O2); in a representative experiment, the oxygen concentration of the culture medium was 161.5 ± 12.5 μm for elevated O2 cells and 76.0 ± 2.5 μm for standard O2 cells, both of which are lower than the 270 μm expected for air-saturated water at 21°C (Truesdale and Downing, 1954). This difference was sufficient to cause significant increases in the abundance of amino acids (Glu, GABA, and Ala) and sugars (Glc) and decreases in the abundance of organic acids (malate, succinate, citrate, and fumarate) under elevated O2 conditions (Fig. 2
Validation of Isotopic and Metabolic Steady State Steady-state flux analysis requires isotopomer abundances to be measured when the system is at isotopic and metabolic steady state, i.e. when metabolic fluxes are constant and when the distribution of label throughout the network has stabilized (Ratcliffe and Shachar-Hill, 2006). To confirm that isotopic steady state was reached after 5 d of growth under both elevated and standard O2 conditions, cells were fed with [U-13C6]Glc (6% of total Glc supplied) for 4.5 or 5 d and then the distribution of 13C within soluble metabolites was analyzed using one-dimensional (1D) 13C NMR. Cumomer abundances as a percentage of total labeling of a metabolite were calculated and compared between 4.5 and 5 d. There was no significant variation in abundance for the majority of measurements, and although several measurements showed significant variation, these reflected changes in abundance of <2.5%, strongly suggesting that these metabolites had reached isotopic steady state after 5 d (Fig. 3A
The existence of an isotopic steady state suggests that any changes in metabolic fluxes over time must be relatively slow (Roscher et al., 2000). Stronger evidence for a metabolic steady state in our system is provided by the fact that the abundance of most soluble metabolites did not change from 4.5 to 5.5 d (Fig. 2 Label Measurements and Estimation of Instrument Precision Cell cultures were labeled to isotopic steady state by growth on 100% [1-13C]Glc for 5 d under elevated O2 and standard O2 conditions. Quantitative 1D 13C NMR spectroscopy was used to obtain the label measurements necessary for estimation of metabolic fluxes from soluble metabolites, protein amino acids, and Glc digested from starch. The contributions to each assigned peak were analyzed by line-fitting (Fig. 4
To optimize flux estimates, 13C-FLUX minimizes the variance-weighted sum of squared differences between the experimental labeling data and simulated labeling data generated by 13C-FLUX using the flux estimates. The algorithm is therefore guided to an optimal flux solution by the size of the errors assigned to individual label measurements, and thus the accurate assignment of errors is likely to be important for the reproducible determination of the true flux solution. To accommodate this in the analysis, an empirical relationship was established between relative peak error and peak signal to noise ratio (SNR; Fig. 4 Exploration of Network Structure and Active Reactions The 13C-FLUX implementation of the sequential quadratic programming algorithm Donlp2 (Peter Spellucci, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany) was used to fit the free net and exchange fluxes to the measured isotopomer data. Fluxes were fitted to all three biological replicates for a single treatment simultaneously to give a single solution that should represent the average flux state of the three replicates. To constrain the flux solution within known bounds, we used the rates of Glc consumption and biomass accumulation, and the biomass composition (Table I) to calculate input and output fluxes for cell suspensions grown under elevated and standard O2 (Sriram et al., 2006; Alonso et al., 2007a; Supplemental Table S2). Fluxes derived from biomass measurements were constrained to the mean measured value and were not allowed to vary during the fitting procedure (Schwender et al., 2006). Allowing these output fluxes to vary (Alonso et al., 2007a) led to unacceptably large discrepancies between the fitted biomass fluxes and the measured values. Free net and exchange fluxes were chosen as recommended elsewhere (Wiechert et al., 2001), and exchange fluxes were constrained to zero for steps considered to be thermodynamically irreversible. At this stage, modifications to the network were incorporated to reflect the available isotopomer and biomass data and to test whether alterations to the network structure could improve the fit of the data as measured by the sum of squared, weighted differences between the real and simulated data. The presence of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) in the cell cultures is supported by proteomic analysis (L. Miguet, unpublished data; Baerenfaller et al., 2008), and the possibility of a significant flux through PEPCK was investigated by allowing a reversible flux through the PEPC step (ana1; Fig. 5
The labeling data from amino acids synthesized from cytosolic (Ala; see Miyashita et al., 2007) and plastidic (Val, Ile, and Leu) pyruvate indicated that pyruvate in these compartments is not at isotopic equilibrium. This was modeled by introducing separate pools of pyruvate in the plastid and cytosol (ppyruvate and cpyruvate; Fig. 5 Recent data also suggest that cytosolic and plastidic isoforms of NADP-malic enzyme (ME) are expressed constitutively in heterotrophic tissues of Arabidopsis (Gerrard Wheeler et al., 2008). While addition of a plastidic NADP-ME (ana3 oxaloacetate → ppyruvate; Fig. 5 Model Validation and Statistical Analysis The final network structure is shown in Figure 5
Figure 7
The errors for the optimal fluxes were derived using EstimateStat and are summarized in Table II. To ensure that biological error present within the replicate label measurements and biomass fluxes was translated into errors in the flux estimates, the labeling data, excluding the poorly fitting data described above, were reduced to a single set of measurements (see “Materials and Methods”). It was then possible to use EstimateStat in combination with replicate fitting experiments (Fig. 6
Flux Maps of Central Carbon Metabolism under Standard and Elevated Oxygen Conditions Table II contains net and exchange fluxes together with errors calculated using EstimateStat for the optimal flux solutions under standard and elevated O2 conditions. Figure 8
DISCUSSION This study aimed to quantify multiple fluxes within the central carbon metabolism of Arabidopsis and to investigate the effect of an altered O2 concentration on the relationship between respiratory and biosynthetic fluxes around the TCA cycle. The flux maps reported here are the first, to our knowledge, to be obtained using steady-state MFA for Arabidopsis, and they show that while an elevated O2 concentration in a cell culture can increase fluxes throughout the metabolic network and alter the abundance of soluble metabolites, these changes do not require either a major reorganization of the network or a change in the balance between respiratory and biosynthetic flux. Reliable Quantification of Metabolic Fluxes Flux quantification was carried out using data obtained by 1D 13C NMR from three biological replicates of a [1-13C]Glc labeling experiment, leading to a set of statistically well-determined flux estimates that appears to represent the global optimum flux solution. The MFA protocol incorporated several refinements aimed at improving the precision and reliability of the flux estimates. First, to increase the likelihood of being able to accurately quantify TCA cycle fluxes, we began our investigation by predicting the optimal 13C-labeled precursor to use for isotopic steady-state labeling experiments. While the approach used here considered fewer parameters than recent work in this area (Ghosh et al., 2006; Libourel et al., 2007), it nevertheless indicated that the use of [1-13C]Glc would permit the accurate quantification of TCA cycle fluxes and associated biosynthetic and anapleurotic fluxes. To extend this relatively simple approach beyond the most commonly available isotopomers of Glc, it will be necessary to develop methods for predicting how the precise mixture of 13C-labeled precursors influences the labeling measurements that can be made. Second, to quantify the biosynthetic capacity of the TCA cycle more completely than hitherto, measurements of organic and amino acids derived from the TCA cycle were incorporated into the model (Fig. 2 Finally, to avoid the need to calculate averages of relative cumomer abundances, which are nonlinear functions of metabolic fluxes, fluxes were fitted simultaneously to three separate biological replicates. This process was assisted by assigning specific errors to individual measurements on the basis of SNR (Fig. 4 The relative simplicity of the protocol developed in this study suggests that it may be possible to determine metabolic fluxes in heterotrophic tissue cultures of Arabidopsis reasonably easily, potentially allowing a wide range of genotypes and environmental conditions to be analyzed. The large datasets collected in this study will allow us, by exploiting the ability of 13C-FLUX to determine the sensitivity of individual label measurements to changes in fluxes (see Schwender et al., 2006), to identify the minimum dataset needed to acquire accurate and robust estimates of metabolic fluxes in Arabidopsis. Because the acquisition and analysis of large numbers of 1D 13C NMR measurements from multiple sources (soluble metabolites, starch, and protein amino acids) is currently a time-consuming process, this refinement should reduce the experimental effort required for future investigations. To apply our approach to different genotypes, it will, however, be necessary adapt the method for systems other than cell suspension cultures, which require considerable time and effort to establish. The TCA Cycle in Arabidopsis While the flux distribution centered on the TCA cycle in heterotrophic Arabidopsis cell suspensions under standard O2 conditions is qualitatively similar to flux distributions in other plant species (Rontein et al., 2002; Alonso et al., 2007a, 2007b; Sriram et al., 2007), there are nonetheless quantitative differences that may reflect the precise function of the TCA cycle in different systems. Entry of carbon into the TCA cycle via both pyruvate dehydrogenase and PEPC has been observed in all MFA studies of plants. In the Arabidopsis cells, the flux through PEPC was 38% of pyruvate uptake by the mitochondrion, identical to the value obtained for soybean embryos (38%; Sriram et al., 2004b) and similar to values obtained for tomato cell suspension cultures (27% in pre-stationary phase; Rontein et al., 2002) and Catharanthus roseus hairy root cultures (23%; Sriram et al. 2007). While these values for PEPC broadly agree with those measured in other tissues, the flux through NAD-ME as a percentage of pyruvate uptake was the lowest yet measured in plants (2.5%), contrasting with the previous lowest value found in tomato cell suspensions at pre-stationary phase (6%) and values as high as 66% found in B. napus embryos (Schwender et al., 2006). This result suggests that a dominant role of this enzyme in pyruvate production, as proposed by others (Tronconi et al., 2008), may be a specific feature of leaves in which malate that accumulates during the light is metabolized in the subsequent dark period. Because our cells show no sign of hypoxia under standard O2 conditions, the lack of NAD-ME flux is consistent with the proposed role for NAD-ME under low O2 (Roberts et al., 1992; Edwards et al., 1998). In Arabidopsis under standard O2 conditions, 38% of carbon entering the TCA cycle was used for biosynthetic processes, including the synthesis of protein and accumulation of amino acids and organic acids (Fig. 8 The Metabolic Response to Increased O2 Concentration The increased rates of biomass accumulation and Glc consumption in the Arabidopsis cell suspension culture at elevated O2 concentrations were associated with increases in net fluxes throughout the metabolic network (Fig. 8 While manipulation of O2 concentration brought about marked changes in absolute fluxes, expressing flux relative to the rate of Glc uptake showed that there was no major rearrangement of the metabolic network despite the associated changes in soluble metabolite levels (Fig. 2 Overall, the O2 concentration did not exert significant control over the balance between respiration and biosynthesis under these conditions, even though it had a significant influence on the growth of the cells. Heterotrophic Arabidopsis cultures may therefore respond to changes in O2 concentration by altering rates of respiration, biosynthesis, and ultimately growth proportionally, such that the demand for ATP to support biosynthesis is balanced by the rate of respiratory processes that generate ATP. Network Stability Stability of relative fluxes in carbon metabolism has become a recurring theme in plant MFA studies. While certain environmental and genetic perturbations have been shown to alter the flux distribution in the central metabolic network (Spielbauer et al., 2006; Junker et al., 2007; Iyer et al., 2008), it is also possible for the fluxes to vary in absolute magnitude without any change in their relative values. This is certainly the case in the Arabidopsis cell study reported here, and a similar result was obtained in a less statistically rigorous flux analysis of a tomato cell suspension, where the relative fluxes through glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway remained similar, even though the net fluxes decreased over the culture period (Rontein et al., 2002). Similarly analysis of wild-type, hybrid, and starch-deficient maize (Zea mays) lines (Spielbauer et al., 2006) revealed few differences in relative fluxes despite the great variation in accumulation of starch and seed weight across the genotypes. A similar trend has also been observed in microorganisms (Fischer and Sauer, 2003, 2005) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Blank et al., 2005). For example, the systematic flux ratio analysis of 137 Bacillus subtilis gene deletion mutants revealed that although there was more than 30% variation in growth rate in 90% of the mutants examined, relative fluxes varied by only 3% to 8% (Fischer and Sauer, 2005). Thus, the emerging picture is one in which central metabolism is well adapted to the demands that can be put on it, and it seems likely that only environmental or genetic perturbations that have a major impact on overall biomass composition (Iyer et al., 2008) or uptake fluxes (Junker et al., 2007) are likely to affect metabolism to a degree that an effect on relative fluxes in central carbon metabolism can be detected using MFA. The stability of the central metabolic network also complicates the interpretation of metabolite profiling data. The levels of most metabolites represent only a very small fraction of the total biomass, making it unlikely that changes in level will reflect significant changes in flux within the central network. Thus, the changes in metabolite abundance caused by altering the availability of oxygen (Fig. 2 CONCLUSION A comprehensive description of the fluxes through the TCA cycle and associated pathways in an Arabidopsis cell suspension has been obtained using a robust steady-state stable isotope-labeling protocol. Increasing the concentration of dissolved oxygen increased fluxes throughout the network and caused changes in the soluble metabolite profile, while at the same time having no effect on the proportion of carbon entering the TCA cycle that was used for biosynthesis and no significant impact on the relative flux distribution in the central network. Ultimately, while the mechanism by which the cells respond to increased oxygen has yet to be established, the study demonstrates the utility of MFA as a tool for probing the impact of an environmental perturbation on the operation of the central metabolic network. MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental System Cell suspensions of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotype Landsberg erecta (May and Leaver, 1993) were maintained in 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks under a 16-h-light, 8-h-dark cycle at 21°C on an orbital shaker. Every 7 d, 15 mL cell suspension was subcultured into 90 mL fresh Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 3% (w/v) Glc, 0.5 mg/L naphthylacetic acid, and 0.05 mg/L kinetin. Heterotrophic cell suspensions were produced by subculturing 15 mL of a 7-d-old, light-grown cell suspension into 90 mL fresh medium and incubating in the dark at 21°C on an orbital shaker. The concentration of oxygen in the growth medium was altered by controlling the rate of diffusion of air into the flask air space via the material used to seal the cultures. Standard O2 cultures were sealed with a double layer of aluminum foil, while elevated O2 cultures were sealed with four layers of Miracloth (Merck Chemicals) secured with Micropore (3M) surgical tape. Oxygen Electrode Measurements Measurements of dissolved oxygen concentration were made using a Clark type oxygen electrode at 21°C. Arabidopsis cell suspension (1 mL) was transferred to the electrode chamber, and oxygen consumption was monitored until the trace became linear. The linear portion was extrapolated to time zero to determine the oxygen concentration at the point of sample addition. Isotopic Steady-State Labeling Cells were labeled to isotopic steady state by subculturing light-grown cell suspension into medium where a proportion of the unlabeled Glc was replaced with 13C-labeled Glc (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and Sigma-Aldrich). This procedure has been shown to have no discernible effect on the flux distribution through the Arabidopsis metabolic network (Kruger et al., 2007b). Biological variation was assessed by subculturing from three separate light-grown stocks that had been maintained independently for several weeks. Cultures were incubated on an orbital shaker in the dark at 21°C for 4.5, 5, or 5.5 d, as appropriate. Cells were harvested by vacuum filtration through a single paper filter, washed with 210 mL Glc-free growth medium, weighed, and immediately frozen in liquid N2. Tissue was stored at −80°C prior to analysis. Soluble metabolites were extracted from frozen tissue labeled to isotopic steady state using perchloric acid (Kruger et al., 2007b). Following the final freeze-drying step, samples were redissolved in 10% 2H2O, with 10 mm EDTA, 25 mm 1,4-dioxane, and 10 mm KH2PO4/K2HPO4, pH 7.5, for NMR spectroscopy. Starch was extracted from the insoluble residue remaining from perchloric acid extractions. The residue was washed and autoclaved in 100 mm sodium acetate, pH 4.8, for 2 h. Gelatinized starch was then enzymatically digested overnight at 37°C with 30 units of α-amylase (Roche) and 5 units of amyloglucosidase (Roche). The supernatant, containing Glc released from starch, was freeze dried and redissolved in 10% 2H2O with 25 mm 1,4-dioxane for 13C NMR analysis. Protein was extracted by repeated washing of ground, lyophilized tissue with phosphate buffered saline (130 mm NaCl, 100 mm Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, pH 7.0). Prior to hydrolysis, protein was precipitated using 12% TCA, washed with ice-cold acetone, and resuspended in 6 m HCl. Hydrolysis was carried out in Pierce hydrolysis tubes; samples were degassed and flushed with N2 three times, then heated at 95°C for 24 h under vacuum. Samples were freeze dried to remove HCl and redissolved in 10% 2H2O with 25 mm 1,4-dioxane, pH 7.5, for 13C NMR analysis. Biomass Analysis Growth rate of cell suspensions was determined from fresh weight recorded during harvest and converted to change in dry weight by assuming that fresh cells contained 95% water by weight. This value was supported by experiments in which cell mass was determined before and after freeze drying. Measurements of the abundance of protein, amino acids, cell wall, starch, lipids, and soluble metabolites were made using either tissue labeled to isotopic steady state with [1-13C]Glc or tissue grown concurrently from the same stock cultures. Protein extracted with phosphate buffered saline was quantified using the Bradford assay. The amino acid content of labeled protein hydrolysates was determined by HPLC (Bruckner et al., 1995) after 1D 13C NMR analysis; amino acids were derivatized with O-phthaldialdehyde, separated using a reverse phase C18 column, and quantified by fluorescence using standard curves. Starch was quantified by autoclaving duplicate samples of ground, unlabeled, lyophilized tissue for 1 h in 25 mm sodium acetate, pH 4.8. Fifteen units of α-amylase (Roche) and 5 units of amyloglucosidase (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to one of the samples, and both samples were placed at 37°C overnight. Glc in the supernatants from both samples was quantified using a spectrophotometric assay (Sweetlove et al., 1996), and the abundance of starch was calculated from the difference in the amount of Glc in the enzyme treated and untreated samples. The same spectrophotometric assay was used to quantify Glc in the growth medium. Cell wall was extracted by repeated washing of a known mass of unlabeled ground lyophilized tissue with a mixture of phenol, acetic acid, and water in the ratio 2:1:2 (Sriram et al., 2006). Insoluble material remaining was washed with distilled water to remove residual phenol, freeze dried, and weighed. The mass was corrected for the presence of contaminating starch using the starch quantification protocol above. Lipids were extracted from a known mass of ground, labeled, lyophilized tissue using hexane and isopropanol according to an established protocol (Hara and Radin, 1978; Mhaske et al., 2005). Solvent was removed by gentle heating and lipids quantified by weight. Soluble metabolites were extracted with methanol as described elsewhere (Le Gall et al., 2003). A known mass of ground, lyophilized tissue was shaken with 70% methanol, 30% buffer (1 mm sodium 3-trimethylsilylpropionate 2H4 [TSP], 1 mm EDTA, 50 mm KH2PO4, 50 mm KH2PO4) for 30 min. Solvent was removed under vacuum and samples were redissolved in 800 μL 2H2O for 1H NMR analysis. Quantification was based on the addition of a known quantity of TSP to representative samples. NMR Spectroscopy Spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity Inova 600 spectrometer (Varian). 1D 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 150.9 MHz using either a 10-mm broadband or a 10-mm 13C/31P switchable probe, and in all experiments Waltz16 decoupling was applied during the detection period to decouple 1H signals. Spectra were referenced to 1,4-dioxane at 67.3 ppm. Where absolute quantification of labeling was not required, a recycle delay of 6 s was used, and the NOE was induced during the relaxation delay to increase SNR values. For quantitative data, the recycle delay was extended to 19 s and the nuclear Overhauser effect was not induced. Acquisition times of the order of 60 h (10,240 scans) were required to obtain suitable spectra from labeled samples for accurate line-fitting. Spectra were acquired in blocks of 1,024 scans that were manually summed following inspection to confirm that there was no significant degradation during acquisition. 1D 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 600 MHz using a 5-mm HCN triple resonance probe and the standard Varian pulse program. Presaturation was applied during the relaxation delay to suppress the water signal, and spectra were referenced to TSP at 0 ppm. Two-dimensional 1H/13C gHMBC and gHSQC spectra were recorded at 600 MHz (1H) and 150.9 MHz (13C) using a 5-mm HCN triple resonance probe and standard Varian pulse programs. WURST-40 or Garp1 decoupling was applied during the detection period to remove 13C-1H coupling. All spectra were processed and analyzed using NUTS (Acorn NMR). 1D 13C spectra were processed using a line-broadening of 2.5 Hz for spectra requiring line-fitting or 1 Hz for spectra requiring integration. 1D 1H spectra were processed using a line-broadening of 1 Hz. 1H and 13C assignments were based on literature values, comparison with pure standards, and the results of two-dimensional NMR experiments. Spectral deconvolution (line-fitting) of 1D 13C spectra was carried out using the line-fitting subroutine in NUTS. During line-fitting, resonance frequency, signal intensity, line-width, and fraction Lorentzian lineshape were varied to minimize the difference between the real and simulated spectra. The SNR values for the 1D 13C NMR signals from soluble extracts of cells labeled to isotopic steady state with [1-13C]Glc varied over more than two orders of magnitude between different metabolites and different experimental conditions. Variation in extraction efficiency and sample fresh weights also contributed to considerable variation in signal intensity for the same metabolites between biological replicates. Because instrumental precision depends on SNR, it would have been incorrect to assign the same relative error to every label measurement during optimization of fluxes. We therefore recorded replicate quantitative 1D 13C NMR spectra of standard samples of organic and amino acids (25 mm Ala, 50 mm citrate, 5 mm Glu, 0.5 mm Asp, and 1 mm malate) and [U-13C6]Glc. Signal intensities were measured by line-fitting, and the relative error of the same signal over three replicate spectra was correlated with the corresponding SNR (Fig. 4 Metabolic Modeling Metabolic modeling was carried out using 13C-FLUX (version 20050329; Wiechert et al., 2001, and refs. therein). The EstimateStat component of 13C-FLUX was used to refine the metabolic network. To do this, initial flux estimates were taken from the literature (Rontein et al., 2002), and lists of 1D 13C NMR measurements were taken from steady-state experiments carried out previously in our lab (P. Lelay, unpublished data). The CumoNet component of 13C-FLUX was then used to predict a set of cumomer and isotopomer abundances consistent with the initial flux estimates, and these abundances were combined appropriately to produce pseudo 1D 13C NMR datasets in which the label measurements perfectly reflected the underlying fluxes. An error of 5% was assumed for each measurement within this dataset. EstimateStat was then used to determine the errors associated with the flux estimates. The same approach was used to predict the optimum labeled precursor for minimization of predicted flux estimate errors. Here, the refined network was used in conjunction with sets of 1D 13C NMR measurements derived from experiments specific to the fed precursor. The estimated flux errors produced by EstimateStat are sensitive to measurement configuration and relative measurement errors but do not depend on absolute label measurements (Wiechert et al., 2001). To derive flux error estimates that incorporate biological error, we determined the relative error in cumomer abundances between the different biological replicates. To do this, we first normalized the labeling data from the three biological replicates using the group scaling factors estimated during the fitting process (Wiechert et al., 2001). The average and sd of replicate normalized cumomer abundances were then calculated, and these measurements used with EstimateStat to estimate flux errors. To combine the errors in fluxes derived from the biomass data with errors associated with the labeling data, the biomass-derived fluxes were set as free fluxes for this part of the analysis, and the biomass-derived fluxes and their sds were defined in the Flux Measurements section of the input file. Statistical Analysis All indications of statistical significance are based on a Student's t test with P < 0.05 unless otherwise indicated. Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
[Supplemental Data]
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. W. Wiechert (Department of Simulation, University of Siegen, Germany) for permission to use 13C-FLUX. Notes 1This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: R. George Ratcliffe (george.ratcliffe/at/plants.ox.ac.uk). [W]The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA]Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metab Eng. 2003 Jul; 5(3):191-200.
[Metab Eng. 2003]Biochem J. 2008 Jan 1; 409(1):27-41.
[Biochem J. 2008]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun; 132(2):420-5.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2006 Dec; 142(4):1380-96.
[Plant Physiol. 2006]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2232-42.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]J Biotechnol. 2000 Jan 28; 77(1):81-102.
[J Biotechnol. 2000]Plant J. 2006 Feb; 45(4):490-511.
[Plant J. 2006]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun; 7(3):309-17.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Nature. 2004 Dec 9; 432(7018):779-82.
[Nature. 2004]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun; 7(3):254-61.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb; 137(2):611-22.
[Plant Physiol. 2005]Plant J. 2007 Jun; 50(6):1093-106.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2003 Nov; 133(3):1322-35.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan; 143(1):312-25.
[Plant Physiol. 2007]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 10; 281(45):34040-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2243-57.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1; 32(Database issue):D431-3.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2004]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2189-96.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Plant J. 2006 Feb; 45(4):490-511.
[Plant J. 2006]J Biotechnol. 2000 Jan 28; 77(1):81-102.
[J Biotechnol. 2000]J Biotechnol. 2000 Jan 28; 77(1):81-102.
[J Biotechnol. 2000]Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Nov-Dec; 22(6):1659-63.
[Biotechnol Prog. 2006]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 10; 281(45):34040-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]Science. 2008 May 16; 320(5878):938-41.
[Science. 2008]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant J. 2007 Mar; 49(6):1108-21.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Cell. 2007 Jun; 19(6):2006-22.
[Plant Cell. 2007]Plant Mol Biol. 2008 Jun; 67(3):231-42.
[Plant Mol Biol. 2008]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]Metab Eng. 2006 Sep; 8(5):491-507.
[Metab Eng. 2006]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2211-21.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 10; 281(45):34040-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 15; 277(46):43948-60.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]Metab Eng. 2007 Sep-Nov; 9(5-6):419-32.
[Metab Eng. 2007]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2243-57.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Plant Physiol. 2004 Oct; 136(2):3043-57.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 10; 281(45):34040-7.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Plant J. 2007 Oct; 52(2):296-308.
[Plant J. 2007]Plant Cell. 2007 Jun; 19(6):2006-22.
[Plant Cell. 2007]J Cell Sci. 1974 Mar; 14(2):331-7.
[J Cell Sci. 1974]Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Jan; 49(1):92-102.
[Plant Cell Physiol. 2008]Biol Chem. 2000 Aug; 381(8):723-40.
[Biol Chem. 2000]Plant Physiol. 2004 Jul; 135(3):1809-21.
[Plant Physiol. 2004]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Jun; 6(3):247-56.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003]Phytochemistry. 2006 Jul; 67(14):1460-75.
[Phytochemistry. 2006]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2232-42.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Apr; 31(4):506-17.
[Plant Cell Environ. 2008]J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 15; 277(46):43948-60.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Eur J Biochem. 2003 Mar; 270(5):880-91.
[Eur J Biochem. 2003]Biochem J. 2008 Jan 1; 409(1):27-41.
[Biochem J. 2008]Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005 Feb; 80(1):27-43.
[Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005]Plant Physiol. 1993 Oct; 103(2):621-627.
[Plant Physiol. 1993]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2176-88.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Phytochemistry. 2007 Aug-Sep; 68(16-18):2176-88.
[Phytochemistry. 2007]Biochem J. 1996 Dec 1; 320 ( Pt 2)():493-8.
[Biochem J. 1996]Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Nov-Dec; 22(6):1659-63.
[Biotechnol Prog. 2006]Anal Biochem. 1978 Oct 1; 90(1):420-6.
[Anal Biochem. 1978]Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005 Apr; 43(4):413-7.
[Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005]J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Apr 23; 51(9):2447-56.
[J Agric Food Chem. 2003]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 15; 277(46):43948-60.
[J Biol Chem. 2002]Metab Eng. 2001 Jul; 3(3):265-83.
[Metab Eng. 2001]