• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of mmbrPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalMMBR ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. Sep 2008; 72(3): 495–544.
PMCID: PMC2546859

Candida albicans Cell Wall Proteins


Summary: The Candida albicans cell wall maintains the structural integrity of the organism in addtion to providing a physical contact interface with the environment. The major components of the cell wall are fibrillar polysaccharides and proteins. The proteins of the cell wall are the focus of this review. Three classes of proteins are present in the candidal cell wall. One group of proteins attach to the cell wall via a glycophosphatidylinositol remnant or by an alkali-labile linkage. A second group of proteins with N-terminal signal sequences but no covalent attachment sequences are secreted by the classical secretory pathway. These proteins may end up in the cell wall or in the extracellular space. The third group of proteins lack a secretory signal, and the pathway(s) by which they become associated with the surface is unknown. Potential constituents of the first two classes have been predicted from analysis of genome sequences. Experimental analyses have identified members of all three classes. Some members of each class selected for consideration of confirmed or proposed function, phenotypic analysis of a mutant, and regulation by growth conditions and transcription factors are discussed in more detail.


The cell surface has two essential roles: to maintain the integrity of the cell and to interact with the environment. A rigid cell wall provides the surface that surrounds the cell. The surface is the contact point between the microbe and host surfaces including phagocytic cells. It may also be the target of antibody response. In addition, commensal microbes found in biofilms on mucosal surfaces or microbes in biofilms formed on medical devices and prostheses have surface interactions. For Candida albicans, the cell wall has been a consistent focus of attention over the last several decades. Keyword searches for “albicans,” “albicans cell wall,” and “albicans adherence” in PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) showed that total publications on C. albicans increased by over 50% in the decade between 1998 and 2007 from the previous decade (Table (Table1).1). The number of publications related to cell wall and adherence increased over the same period but decreased slightly as the proportion of the total reports. One area that has become more prominent in the last decade and that has a cell surface component is studies on C. albicans biofilm. In this area, there is a more-than-sixfold increase in the proportion of reported studies on biofilm. The availability of DNA sequences from the genomic sequencing project (162) applied to both individual genes and the whole genome, e.g., microarray generation and proteomics, has also contributed increasingly in this decade to studies of the cell surface from global and individual gene perspectives. Another characteristic of these reports not evident from these numbers appears to be a greater diversity or number of the proteins and functions examined. The study of C. albicans cell surface proteins is moving forward on a broad front utilizing a variety of tools.

Publications on C. albicans and cell wall

An extensive review of C. albicans cell wall and exported proteins (49) appeared in 1998, and this review will focus on the most recent decade. During this decade, there have been multiple reviews on various aspects of the C. albicans cell surface, including several very recently (100, 101, 116, 187, 215, 246, 312, 322, 355, 381). The proteins of the cell wall may play a role in maintaining structural integrity and in mediating adherence, whether to host or microbes, or they may have enzymatic functions, e.g., proteolysis. Additional factors that may influence these proteins are the morphology of yeast cells, pseudohyphae, and hyphae and the maintenance of either a planktonic or a sessile lifestyle. This review is not a comprehensive discussion of every proposed cell surface and exported protein. The number of potential and demonstrated proteins of the cell surface is too large, as will be indicated later, to give each of these proteins individual attention. However, the number of proteins with suggested functions and proteins which when deleted affect the cell are much fewer in number. The individual proteins discussed are from this latter group. Gene names are those from Candida Genome Database (CGD; August 2007 [9]). After an overview of cell wall-associated proteins, the review will focus on many of the enzymatic activities and adherence interactions mediated by cell surface proteins of the fungus in vitro.


Electron microscopy of thin sections of the C. albicans cell wall shows layers which appear to be derived from differential abundances of cell wall constituents (177, 179, 322). The number of layers observed is variable and seems to be related to both strains and methodology (reviewed in reference 49). The inner layer, enriched for chitin and polysaccharide matrix, is more electron translucent than outer layers, which are enriched for mannoprotein. In one study, the outer layer enriched for proteins was about 150 nm in width (386). The translucent layer was of a similar size, with a thin electron-dense layer adjacent to the cell membrane. Electron microscopy images in Fig. Fig.11 show aspects of cell wall structure with the presence of layers that differ in electron density. Structurally, the outer portion of the cell wall appears to have perpendicularly aligned fibrils that differ in length with surface hydrophobicity (136, 386). Figure Figure1C1C shows fibrils of a hydrophobic cell. The Klis laboratory made many contributions (e.g., references 73, 74, and 167 to 170) to the development of the view that the cell walls of C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are similar in their covalent structures (see the reviews in references 177, 179, and 322). There is a flexible, three-dimensional network of branched β-1,3-glucan to which is attached β-1,6-glucan and chitin through their reducing ends (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Some chitin may also be attached to β-1,6-glucan. Not depicted in Fig. Fig.22 is the association of polysaccharide chains. Chitin chains can form tight antiparallel hydrogen-bonded structures associated with high insolubility. β-1,3-Glucan can also have hydrogen bond-mediated local alignments. The cell wall proteins (CWPs) covalently attached to this meshwork of structural fibrillar polysaccharide are in two classes. The first and most abundant class of CWPs is linked to β-1,6-glucan through a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) remnant (GPI-CWP) (Fig. (Fig.2).2). The second class of proteins, termed Pir (proteins with internal repeats), are linked directly to the β-1,3-glucan. Pir proteins were first demonstrated in S. cerevisiae and subsequently simultaneously reported from the Klis and Chaffin laboratories for C. albicans (166, 168) (Fig. (Fig.2).2). In S. cerevisiae, the attachment has been identified as a linkage between a glutamine in the repeat sequence that is ultimately modified to a glutamic acid that forms a novel γ-carboxylic acid ester with a hydroxyl group in β-1,3-glucan (88). The alkali-labile linkage of the C. albicans Pir protein is likely through the same mechanism. The third class of proteins lacks the covalent attachment to the polysaccharide matrix (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Some of these proteins may be heterogeneously distributed at the surface, as described later for Pra1p. Noncovalently attached proteins may also be secreted into the external milieu and may not be cell associated. In addition, present in the wall is phospholipomannan (Fig. (Fig.2)2) with α-1,2-mannose linkages. The schematic emphasizes the general composition and linkage relationships and does not depict the layers and fibrils shown in Fig. Fig.11.

FIG. 1.
Electron microscopy of C. albicans cell wall. (A) Immunoelectron microscopy of thin sections reacted with antibody recognizing Pir1p and then with gold-conjugated second antibody showing protein presence within the cell wall. (Reprinted from reference ...
FIG. 2.
Schematic representation of major cell wall components. The cell wall is external to the cell membrane (shown in black and white at the bottom). Labeled symbols: red rectangles, GPI-CWPs; yellow hexagons, Pir proteins. Unlabeled symbols: dark blue lines, ...

The integrity of the cell wall is clearly of paramount importance to the survival of the organism. Yeasts have developed mechanisms, i.e., cell wall integrity pathways, to respond to stress that threatens the cell wall. Except for noting some individual genes that respond to certain stresses, e.g., cell wall loss, this review will not discuss these pathways. For further information on these damage control responses, see three recent reviews on C. albicans and S. cerevisiae cell walls that include information on integrity response (176, 204, 246).



With the availability of genome sequences, several laboratories have developed algorithms to predict proteins with various characteristics. Several studies have reported analyses of the C. albicans genome for proteins included in the GPI-CWP class (1, 74, 92, 118, 371). These proteins have been recently reviewed by Richard and Plaine (312), who focused on the three reports that used C. albicans genome assembly 19 (74, 92, 118). In their analyses, they listed 115 putative GPI-CWP class proteins (see Table Table11 in the work of Richard and Plaine [312]); 70 were common to all three reports, 6 were found in common between the analyses of de Groot et al. (74) and Eisenhaber et al. (92). The remaining proteins were unique to one of the studies: 24 proteins from the study of de Groot et al. (74), 9 from the study of Eisenhaber et al. (92), and 6 from the study of Garcerá et al. (118). GPI anchors may target proteins to the membrane or the cell wall. The location of GPI proteins has not been determined in most cases and, in some cases, conflicting reports have not been resolved. While individual proteins have been localized to the plasma membrane, a more global approach to protein composition of detergent-resistant membranes, i.e., lipid rafts, revealed 29 proteins (154). One of the proteins found was the CWP Ecm33p, so this protein was either in transit or distributed in both locations. Such a distribution may explain conflicts between reported locations. Indeed, Sap9p and Sap10p tagged with a marker are detected in both locations, with Sap9p being found predominately in the cell membrane (3).

The availability of the genome sequence has enabled the search not only for putative GPI-anchored proteins but also for additional sequence relationships. Among the GPI-anchored proteins, there are families of proteins, and about half of the GPI-anchored proteins belong to one of these families. The numbers of proteins in these families vary between 2 and 12 (see Table Table22 in the review by Richard and Plaine [312]). The IFF (IPF family file) family has 12 genes. As a brief note, the first to be studied, HYR1, encoding a hyphal surface protein, was found to cause no observable defect when deleted (15). On the other hand, IFF11 is a gene of the family that does not encode a protein with a GPI anchor. This protein is secreted to the medium and is not found in the cell wall unless it is present below the limit of detection (17). However, this protein had an effect on the cell wall. In a null strain, there was no obvious effect on growth in rich and minimal media, hyphal morphogenesis in serum, antifungal susceptibility, carbon assimilation, or adherence to buccal epithelial cells (BECs). However, there was an effect on cell wall integrity with hypersensitivity to calcofluor white, Congo red, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Supplementing the growth medium of the mutant with supernatant from the wild type did not alter sensitivity. This observation suggested that the function of Iff11p was prior to appearance in the culture medium and that it exerted its effect on the cell wall during the secretory process or transit of the cell wall. This is a very intriguing notion, since other proteins demonstrated to assist in cell wall biogenesis and remodeling are in the wall.

Selected cell wall GPI-CWPs: function and expressiona

With global transcriptional analyses of C. albicans cells grown under different conditions or comparisons of wild-type and null strains, there is considerable information emerging about the regulation of genes, including those predicted to encode proteins with GPI anchors. However, for many of these genes a function is unidentified. Richard and Plaine (312) estimated that function is unknown for about 65% of this class of protein. Table Table2.2. lists selected GPI-CWPs. The two criteria for selection were demonstrated or presumable presence in the cell wall and, secondly, information on function or the effect(s) of null strains. Genes of several families, namely, ALS (agglutinin-like sequence), IFF, Sap (secreted aspartyl proteinase), and CFEM (common in several fungal extracellular membranes) genes, are among those included. Some of the GPI-CWPs share enzymatic activity of the same type as found for some noncovalently attached proteins. Among the enzymatic activities found both for GPI-CWPs and noncovalent secreted proteins are aspartyl proteinase family proteins, phospholipases, chitinases, proteins for β-1,6-glucan biosynthesis, and enzymes with glucanase activity. The noncovalent or soluble enzymes are included in a subsequent section. It is readily apparent from inspection of the column labeled “Expression” in Table Table22 that the cell wall covalent structure is by no means static and that a variety of conditions can elicit a change in composition (assuming that protein abundance follows gene expression). The expression of some GPI-CWPs differs between yeast cell and hyphal morphology, and their expression responds to regulators of this process, e.g., Tup1p and Nrg1p. Other proteins respond to pH and Rim101p regulation. In addition, Ace2p, a regulator of cell separation, regulates several proteins listed in Table Table22 as well as some proteins not included in the table. The implication of such changes is that there are many protein compositions of the cell wall that fulfill the need for the structural and barrier capacity of the wall.

Pir Proteins

Pir proteins were first demonstrated in S. cerevisiae (385). The Klis (168) and Chaffin (166) laboratories simultaneously reported the presence of this protein class in the C. albicans cell wall of strain CAI4 (constructed from strain SC5314) and strain NCPF 3153, respectively. The presence of Pir1p in the cell wall was confirmed (Fig. (Fig.1A)1A) (168, 229a). The protein was detected in cell wall extracts, and abundance was increased upon heat shock (166). Under somewhat different conditions of heat shock, no difference was observed in mRNA levels (229a). Kapteyn et al. (168) found two Pir-immunoreactive bands in the cell wall extract of cells grown in synthetic complete medium but not when cells were grown in RPMI medium. Martínez et al. (229a) noted subsequently that there was deletion in one allele in the sequenced SC5314 genome but found that both alleles were similarly expressed by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). The sequences of the two bands observed previously were not determined and the growth conditions differed from those used for the analysis of allele expression. Consequently, whether the two bands represent the same protein encoded by the two alleles or two different proteins is unknown. Heterozygous strains with a deletion in either allele grew slowly and showed abnormal shape, a tendency to form clumps, and high sensitivity to calcofluor white and Congo red compared to the wild type (229a). This observation suggested a contribution to cell wall architecture. The failure to obtain a homozygous deletion suggested that PIR1 is essential.

PIR1 expression increased during the regeneration of spheroplasts, as determined by microarray and RT-PCR (46, 229a). Other factors also regulate PIR1 expression. Transcriptional profiling shows a pH effect, with repression of PIR1 by Rim101p (221) and reduced expression in hyphae and regulation by a morphogenetic regulator, Efg1p (356). In addition, expression increases by about eightfold in the presence of fluconazole (62), increases in the presence of high iron concentration (194), and modestly increases in response to reduced expression of a phospholipase, Plc1p (189). These observations show that both classes of covalently attached CWPs change in abundance in response to environmental conditions. In S. cerevisiae, which has four Pir family genes, the S. cerevisiae protein encoded by the ortholog of CaPIR1 mediates the translocation of Apn1p (an apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease) into the mitochondrion (399). In this case, a protein first identified in the cell wall was subsequently found to have a cytoplasmic function. A second C. albicans PIR gene, PIR32, is expressed abundantly in phagocytosed C. albicans cells recovered from macrophage compared to what is the case for uningested organisms (99). This protein has not yet been isolated from cell walls. The predicted Pir1p and Pir32p sequences have regions of identity, and another possibility for the two bands discussed above is that they represent these two proteins.


Not all CWPs utilize a covalent attachment for retention in the cell wall. These proteins, e.g., Bgl2p, have substrates within the cell wall and remain primarily cell associated. Some proteins may be found in culture supernatant also, while others are released to the external milieu; for example, Iff11p is predominantly recovered there. The proteins released to the environment may have hydrolytic functions that either provide nutrients for the organism or facilitate its status as a commensal or invasive pathogen. Some of these proteins recovered from the environment possess such activity, and this is used in their identification. There are two classes of these unattached proteins: proteins exported by the classical secretory pathway and proteins that use alternative routes to the cell surface. Two studies predicted proteins secreted by the classical pathway.


Monteoliva et al. (249) undertook an experimental approach to identify potential secreted proteins by a genetic selection for growth on sucrose by S. cerevisiae lacking extracellular invertase (suc). Three DNA libraries were constructed using the internal invertase sequence that lacks the N-terminal signal for classical export. The invertase sequence used for each library differed by 1 base length to allow in-frame fusions with C. albicans genomic DNA (0.5 to 2 kb). Each library was transformed into the suc S. cerevisiae strain, and colonies that were able to grow on sucrose were selected. The sequencing of 83 plasmids rescued from colonies growing on sucrose identified C. albicans sequences conferring export. At the time of the experiment, by use of genome assembly 6, 11 of the sequences were found to correspond to known sequences encoding proteins with predicted N-terminal signal sequences. Currently in the CGD (9), 63 of these sequences are identified.

The second approach was a genome analysis with algorithms for characteristics of secreted proteins (202). After the removal of proteins with predicted transmembrane domain(s), GPI anchors, and mitochondrial targeting sequences from the list of proteins with N-terminal signal sequences, the final set of predicted secreted proteins contained 283 open reading frames.

This review addresses only a few of the predicted secreted proteins. A major criterion for inclusion was a suggested or demonstrated function. Although transcriptional profiling reveals the conditions or transcriptional factors that regulate the expression of a protein, the function of the protein may remain unknown. For example, Rbe1p is a predicted secreted protein that is negatively regulated by Ace1p (256), Rim101p (23), Ssn6p (120), and Efg1p (356). Secreted proteins with enzymatic functions may catalyze reactions in which cell wall components are substrates, particularly glucan and chitin or other substrates, as in the case of trehalase. Enzymes of this class are discussed in the first section below. Other enzymes target substrates beyond the cell wall. Some of these soluble secreted proteins may be recovered from the cell wall as well as the extracellular environment. Certainly, even proteins primarily recovered from the extracellular environment must transit through the cell wall. Consideration of these hydrolytic enzymes is in the section following that for the cell wall-associated enzymes. The discussion of exported proteins identified as adhesins is in a later section, and the discussion of Iff11p is in the prior section on GPI-CWPs.

Cell Wall-Localized Proteins

Several proteins that are nonattached to the polysaccharide matrix have enzymatic functions in the cell wall. Perhaps not surprisingly, most of the studied proteins with enzymatic function affect the cell wall structure. Only acid trehalase, discussed below, is not involved in cell wall structure, although it is also a glycoside hydrolase (GH). GHs (EC 3.2.1) hydrolyze the glycosidic bond between carbohydrates or between carbohydrates and a noncarbohydrate moiety. This classification scheme does not reflect other characteristics such as structure and mechanism of action, and additional family classifications have been developed (CAZy database [http://www.cazy.org/index.html] [64]). The enzymes discussed below are found in several GH families that may include both the noncovalently attached enzymes and some GPI-CWPs (Table (Table22).

Polarized growth occurs in both hyphae and yeast cells but is tempered in yeast cells with isotropic growth to give the ovoid structure (for more detail, see the recent review in reference 406). The cell must balance cell wall integrity with cell expansion to allow the insertion of more constituents. The loss of integrity results in sensitivity to environmental factors and, if sufficiently severe, can result in cell death. In addition, the mother and daughter bud cells must separate after cell division into two cells while maintaining cell wall integrity. Thus, synthesis, remodeling, and hydrolysis must be coordinated in time and space to provide integrity, flexibility, and cell separation. Structural rigidity, thus maintaining shape, is conferred by polysaccharides, and the synthesis of polysaccharides has recently been reviewed (204, 322). Enzymes localized in the membrane synthesize the chitin and β-1,3-glucan. β-1,6-Glucan synthesis requires not only cytoplasmic proteins but also cell wall activities, i.e., Kre6p.

Other enzymes are involved in processing and remodeling. A combination of GPI-CWPs and soluble noncovalent enzymes contributes to this vital activity. The GPI-CWPs are covered in Table Table22 and the noncovalent proteins below. However, a brief overview is presented here. Enzymes with glucanosyltransferase activity split glucan and transfer part of the split chain to an acceptor chain, leading to cross-linking. Enzymes with this activity include Phr1p and Phr2p (Table (Table2)2) and Bgl2p (discussed below). Several CPI-CWPs of the CRH (Congo red hypersensitive) family (Crh11p, Crh12p, Utr2p) are putative transglucosidases that cross-link chitin and β-1,6-glucans. Other glucanases, e.g., Xog1p, release residues from β-1,3-glucan. Some enzymes, e.g., Eng1p and Sun41p, are implicated to various extents in cell separation. When deleted, the mutant strains have cell separation defects that have been tied to various extents to septum degradation. Any glucanase function of Mp65 may be more important in hyphae than in yeast cells. Although mutant strains have been produced, the roles of Scw4p and Scw11p are unclear. As noted above, chitin is synthesized by membrane-localized enzymes and cross-linked to glucan through several putative transglucosidases. Like glucan, chitin linkages must be modulated to accommodate cell growth and proliferation. Unlike the enzymes described above that have preferences for certain glucan structures and receptors, chitinases catalyze the random hydrolysis of N-acetylglucosamide β-1,4 linkages in chitin.


Kre9p, along with the covalently attached Crh11p, Crh12p, and Utr2p (Table (Table2),2), is in the GH16 family. Kre9p is involved in β-1,6-glucan biosynthesis. The synthesis of this polysaccharide requires both cytoplasmic and cell wall activities, and its synthesis is not as well understood as are those of the other two structural polysaccharides (204, 322). The null (kre9Δ/Δ) strain is inviable when grown on glucose (224, 279). The mutant strain grows poorly on other carbon sources (224). Growth on sucrose, mannose, maltose, or fructose is similar to or less than that on galactose. When growth was on galactose, the amount of β-1,6-glucan in the heterozygote fell to about 20% of that seen for the wild type and was undetectable in the null strain. Hyphae failed to form in serum. The strain showed attenuated virulence in a murine systemic disease model. The absence of β-1,6-glucan would remove the normal attachment site for GPI-CWPs (Fig. (Fig.2)2) (177, 179, 322). Interestingly, in S. cerevisiae, the loss of Stt1p, which has a role in N glycosylation, also leads to a substantial reduction in β-1,6-glucan and links N glycosylation with the cell wall (52). Transmission electron microscopy of the Stt1p-deficient cells showed a diffuse cell wall with a loss of outer mannan. C. albicans STT1 is an ortholog of the S. cerevisiae gene, and there also may be a similar linkage between N glycosylation and β-1,6-glucan. KRE9 is required for the induction of a high-affinity fibronectin receptor presumably attached to glucan, which is discussed later (293). This observation would be consistent with the loss of attachment sites, although there may be other possibilities. Growth on galactose apparently partially relieves the loss of β-1,6-glucan (189). In a study some 20 years ago, McCourtie and Douglas (238) showed that growth on galactose enhanced adherence to acrylic compared to what was seen for glucose-grown cells. Galactose-grown cells were more resistant to spheroplast formation with zymolyase. In addition, transmission electron microscopy revealed the presence of an additional surface layer. Such an outer layer may be the source of a partial remediation of the β-1,6-glucan defect.


Glucan is synthesized as a linear polymer; therefore, the branching of polysaccharide found in the cell wall (shown schematically in Fig. Fig.2)2) requires enzymes with the capability to form branches from the linear polymers. Bgl2p is in the same GH17 family as Mp65p and Scw4p, discussed below. Bgl2p catalyzes the splitting (removing a disaccharide) and linkage of β-1,3-glucan molecules, resulting in β-1,3-glucan chain elongation with a β-1,6 linkage at the transfer site. Bgl2p is the major β-1,3-glucosyltransferase (also sometimes called a glucan transferase); however, after deletion of both alleles, about 50% residual enzymatic activity is detected (reference 331; also reviewed previously in reference 49). The presence of residual activity suggests the presence of additional β-1,3-glucosyltransferase(s) that was associated with the formation of a product different from those formed by Bgl2p. There were no changes in β-1,3-glucan or β-1,6-glucan content in the mutant strain. However, the strain was more sensitive to the chitin synthesis inhibitor nikkomycin than was the parental strain. This suggests an increase in chitin and a compensatory role for chitin in cell walls with reduced branching. The expression of BGL2 alters in response to several conditions. Expression is reduced in low-iron conditions, as determined by microarray analysis (194). Several other cell wall-associated genes encoding GPI-CWPs (e.g., ALS2, RBT5, PHR2 [Table [Table2])2]) and PIR1 covalently attached proteins, and another putative glucanase, SCW11, responded to iron levels (194). In expression profiling, BGL2 expression is greater in the presence of fluconazole under conditions promoting SAP gene expression, as is GSC1, encoding a subunit of β-1,3-glucan synthase (62). Microarray analysis shows that BGL2 is also induced, not surprisingly, during cell wall regeneration along with other cell wall-associated genes, including genes for β-1,3-glucan synthase (46). In addition to this role in glucan metabolism, Bgl2p, also shows adhesin activity, which is discussed in a later section (160).


The exoglucanase Xog1p is the only C. albicans enzyme found in the GH5 family. Xog1p has a marked specificity for β-1,3-glucoside linkages compared to β-1,6-glucoside linkages (368). The enzyme catalyzes the successive removal of glucose residues from the nonreducing end of β-1,3-glucan, although at high acceptor concentration, transglucosylation with retention of the anomeric configuration can occur. The structure has been determined at 1.9 Å (67) and the insertion of serine at the CUG codon in the mature protein had a minor effect (66). Xog1p is the major exo-β-1,3-glucanase of the cell wall, as only residual activity is detected in the null strain (127). The loss of the enzyme did not impair yeast growth or morphogenesis, although there was a slight increase in sensitivity to chitin and glucan synthesis inhibitors. In addition, there was no apparent defect in the murine systemic infection model. Phr1p and Phr2p, which are glucan-attached proteins, may also have similar activities (Table (Table2).2). Another potential exoglucanase-encoding gene, EXG2, is induced during cell wall regeneration (46).

XOG1 is induced about 2.5- to 6.9-fold by morphogenesis in serum, as determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR and microarray analysis, and the level of enzyme activity is also increased (200). The expression of this gene in hyphae is dependent on SIT4, encoding a serine/threonine protein phosphatase that modulates morphogenesis. In the sit4Δ/Δ strain, enzymatic activity was repressed during hyphal formation. In the absence of Nrg1p and Tup1p, repressors of morphogenesis, the gene is expressed about fourfold more than in wild-type organisms (transcriptional profiling [259]). Exposure of opaque a cells to α pheromone results in a sixfold increase in expression (transcriptional profiling [22]). XOG1 is also activated by Rim101p in response to external alkaline pH (transcriptional profiling [221]). Constitutive expression of HGT4, encoding a glucose sensor required for growth on low glucose, elevated XOG1 expression compared to what was seen for the null strain (transcriptional profiling [33]). The hgt4Δ/Δ strain showed reduced the capacity to form filaments. XOG1 expression increased (1.6-fold) upon exposure to ketoconazole (transcriptional profiling [210]). The expression of a subunit of β-1,3-glucan synthase also increased. Ketoconazole does not directly affect the cell wall, so the mechanism by which the increased hydrolysis of β-1,3-glucan is involved in the response to fungistasis in unclear. Ketoconazole may exert its effect through changes in membrane sterols. Although XOG1 expression increases in hyphae and in strains lacking repressors of filamentation (259), the protein does not appear to have a critical role in morphogenesis, based on the ability to undergo this transition in the absence of Xog1p.


The cell wall enzyme Eng1p, along with cytoplasmic Acf2p, is in the GH81 family. Eng1p is a fungus-specific endo-1,3-β-glucanase involved in cell separation. It catalyzes the release of glucose from the nonreducing end. Eng1p had endoglucanase activity, as demonstrated by the release of reducing sugars from the substrate, and activity was specific for β-1,3-glucan (96). The eng1Δ/Δ strain showed normal growth and morphogenesis. However, microscopic examination showed clusters of yeast cells that had completed cytokinesis but failed to separate. ENG1 is a functional ortholog of S. cerevisiae DSE4 (ScDSE4). ScDse4p is a daughter cell protein involved in cell wall degradation from the daughter side during cell separation (61). The yeast septum is three layered, with the internal layer composed primarily of chitin and the layers on either side similar to general cell wall in composition (reviewed in references 35 and 409). ScDSE4 expression is cell cycle regulated and peaks in late M or at the M/G1 boundary (359). Ace2p is a transcription factor regulating genes involved in cell separation, and ENG1 is downregulated in the ace2Δ/Δ strain (256). Ace2p is localized to the daughter cell nucleus (172). Although Eng1p has not been localized to the daughter side of the septum, it seems likely to be found here, as it is a functional ortholog of a protein that is so localized and as a regulator of expression is localized in daughter nuclei. Observations with CRL1 provided additional evidence for a role for Eng1p in cell separation (86). CRL1 encodes a predicted GTPase of the Rho family. The crl1Δ/Δ strain had elongated cells and a separation defect. The overexpression of ENG1 suppressed the separation defect but not the elongation phenotype.

Northern analysis of the ENG1 transcript showed a decrease in abundance 2.5 h into germination (96). Another study found that ENG1 and XOG1 expression increased during hyphal formation and that the increase was dependent on the serine/threonine protein phosphatase Sit4p (transcriptional profiling [200]). These two studies appear to be in conflict. Both studies were performed with similar serum-containing media. Additionally, ENG1 expression responds to other conditions that also impact the cell wall. ENG1 is repressed by treatment with caspofungin, an inhibitor of β-glucan synthesis (transcriptional profiling [210]) and in response to pheromone in Spider medium (transcriptional profiling [22]). In both conditions, cell budding decreases and presumably there is little need for septum degradation. The evidence supports the role of Eng1p in the catabolism of the secondary septum between the daughter and mother cells, probably from the daughter side.


Mp65p is possibly a β-glucanase and is also discussed elsewhere as an adhesin. La Valle et al. (197a) found by Northern analysis that MP65 expression increased upon germ tube formation in Lee medium at 37°C. On the other hand, Sohn et al. (356) reported that MP65 expression was constitutive in both yeast cell conditions and hypha-promoting conditions. This latter study used yeast cell growth in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YEPD) or minimal essential medium plus glucose at 30°C and hyphal growth in YEPD plus serum or in minimal essential medium plus glucose at 37°C. The difference between the two reports may represent a medium-dependent enhancement of expression, as noted for some genes in the two conditions used by Sohn et al. (356).

The deletion of MP65 had no effect on growth rate, cell size, or sensitivity to cell wall-perturbing agents (325). However, gene deletion severely impaired morphogenesis. Mp65p was not detected on the cell surface by an Mp65p-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb). Yeast cells had reduced ability to adhere to polystyrene. The deletion strain was attenuated in the murine model of disseminated infection. Although the protein sequence contains two conserved glutamate residues crucial for activity of the glucanase family, GH17, with which Mp65p has been associated, the enzymatic activity of the recombinant protein has not been tested. Additional evidence points to the involvement of MP65 in cell wall metabolism or structure. MP65 expression also increased transiently during cell wall regeneration (transcriptional profiling [46]) and increased in response to pheromone (transcriptional profiling [22]). Expression decreased in response to treatment with caspofungin (transcriptional profiling [210]) and increased in response to ciclopirox olamine (transcriptional profiling [201). MP65 expression also responds to other conditions. MP65 expression is greater in a strain with reduced PLC1 expression than with wild-type PLC1 expression (transcriptional profiling [189]) and at alkaline compared to acid pH (transcriptional profiling [23]). Other putative glucanase genes, e.g., SIM1, respond to pH. MP65 is the ortholog of S. cerevisiae SCW4. A recent study showed that Scw4p is incorporated into the S. cerevisiae cell wall by an unknown alkali-sensitive linkage (378). A similar linkage for C. albicans Mp65p has not yet been examined. Although this protein has been studied for other properties unrelated to a cell wall function, the effect of deletion on morphogenesis and other observations suggest that it does have a cell wall function, perhaps as a glucanase.

Sun41p and Sim1p.

There are two other possible glucanases, Sun41p and Sim1p. The S. cerevisiae orthologs of CaSUN41 and CaSIM1 are ScSUN4 and ScUTH1, respectively. The S. cerevisiae genes are two of the four genes of the SUN family. ScSun4p and ScUth1p have been demonstrated to be in both the mitochondrion and the cell wall, where they are proposed to have glucanase activity (393). The Sim1p-invertase fusion was detected in export screening (249). In C. albicans, SUN41 and SIM1 both show an increase in expression during cell wall regeneration (transcriptional profiling [46]), during treatment with flucytosine (transcriptional profiling [210]), and under conditions of hypoxia (transcriptional profiling [346]). SIM1 is downregulated by Rim101p (transcriptional profiling [221]). SUN41 has decreased expression following infection of HEp2 cells (transcriptional profiling [326]) and treatment with caspofungin (transcriptional profiling [210]). It is also regulated by Efg1p and Cph1p (transcriptional profiling, Northern analysis [221]).

Four studies report defects associated with SUN41 deletion (103, 138, 279, 390). Deletion of both alleles resulted in defects in hyphal formation, cell separation, and biofilm formation (103, 138, 279). SUN41 expression in the parent strain did not change during entry into stationary phase and through 11 days of culture (390). However, the sun41Δ/Δ strain had a severe defect at day 8, with loss of viability affecting the maintenance of stationary phase. Mutant strains were more sensitive to caspofungin (279) and Congo red (138, 279) with slight or no change in calcofluor white sensitivity (103, 138). The mutant strain was unchanged compared to the parental strain in terms of sensitivity to other cell wall-perturbing agents or conditions such as nikkomycin Z treatment and oxidative stress (103). Mutant strains showed some reduction in adherence to a Caco-2 monolayer (138) but no difference in adherence or damage to FaDu oral epithelial cell line cells or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (279). In murine models of hematogenous and oral infections, the mutant was attenuated (279). The deletion of SIM1 resulted in only minor phenotypic alterations (103). The failure to achieve the deletion of both SUN41 and SIM1 supported a synthetic lethal condition. When the control of either gene was by the methionine/cysteine-repressible MET3 promoter, there was no growth under repressing conditions, and there was growth with increased doubling time in the absence of repressors remediated the lysis phenotype. Under repressing conditions, mother and daughter cells remained attached, and after several generations, primarily mother cells lysed. Transmission electron microscopy showed defects at the septum. The conditional strains were more sensitive to several agents, such as nikkomycin, azole-class drugs, and calcofluor white. The latter reagent showed variable chitin distribution in the mutant. Under repressing conditions, sorbitol remediated the lysis condition in rich but not minimal medium. These studies provide strong evidence that these genes contribute to cell wall integrity and share an essential function.

Other putative glucanases.

Less information is available for several other putative glucanases. C. albicans Scw4p is another unattached protein that may have glucosidase activity. The best hit for S. cerevisiae is ScSCW4, although this gene is the ortholog for CaMP65, discussed above. CaSCW4 expression is greater in opaque than in white cells (transcriptional profiling [193]) and is downregulated in alkaline conditions (transcriptional profiling [23]) and during cell wall regeneration (transcriptional profiling [46]). The observation of greater expression in opaque cells is interesting in view of the observation that the ScSCW4 ScSCW10 double deletion mutant has defects in mating (43). The best hit for ScSCW10 in C. albicans is MP65, discussed above. Yet another gene, SCW11, encoding a putative C. albicans glucanase shows altered expression in response to different conditions. Caspofungin treatment reduced expression (transcriptional profiling [210]). Expression also decreased late in protoplast regeneration (transcriptional profiling [46]). On the other hand, expression increased in response to elevated iron concentration (transcriptional profiling [194]). Expression is less in hyphae than in yeast cells and is regulated by Ace2p in both morphologies (RT-PCR [172]; transcriptional profiling [256]). The gene appears to be essential, as homozygous mutant strains were not recovered (279). As Ace2p is a regulator of cell separation and morphogenesis and expression is greater in yeast cells than in hyphae, Scw11p may be a glucanase involved in cell separation.


There are four annotated genes encoding chitinases in C. albicans. Three of these are cell wall associated and all are members of the GH18 family. Cht4p lacks a signal for classical export and is an ortholog of S. cerevisiae Cts2p, a cytoplasmic protein implicated in sporulation. Like glucanase activity, both covalently attached and soluble proteins are predicted cell wall chitinases. Cht2p is a GPI-CWP (Table (Table2)2) that has been found in cell wall extracts (see Table Table4).4). Deletion does not cause a defect in cytokinesis. Cht1p is a minor chitinase (85, 343). The null strain showed no growth differences in liquid medium from what was seen for the parental strain but had increased hyphal growth on solid medium (85). In some studies, the expression of CHT1 was not detected (172, 239). The gene was downregulated by Rim101p in alkaline medium (transcriptional profiling [23]). This observation is the likely reason for the failure of other studies to note expression, as in those studies cells were not grown at acidic pH. The mutant phenotype, if tested at acidic pH, may differ from that at alkaline pH. In addition to CHT1, PHR2 and SCW4 have a reduction in expression at alkaline pH (transcriptional profiling [23]). Changing the enzymes that contribute to cell wall polysaccharide structure and remodeling may reflect a pH optimum that is not broad enough to support adequate cell wall integrity under different conditions.

Proteins identified in proteomic analysis of various cell wall fractions and culture supernatant

Cht3p is the major chitinase (85, 343). In a CHT3 null strain, cell-associated chitinase activity was greater than culture supernatant activity, and both decreased about 60% in yeast cells in the mutant strain (343). In the strain lacking Cht2p, cell-associated activity decreased about 20%, while there was no decrease in culture supernatant activity. This observation is consistent with the covalent attachment of Cht2p and the greater contribution of Cht3p to chitinase activity. In hyphae, the activity was severalfold greater. In hyphae, the loss of Cht2p had no effect, while the loss of Cht3p reduced both cell-associated and culture supernatant activity by about 80%. This observation suggested that most of the increase in hyphal chitinase activity derived from Cht3p. The greater abundance of chitinase activity in hyphal organisms was unexpected, as a previous study reported the preferential transcription of both genes in yeast cells (Northern analysis [239]). Whether the difference in hypha-inducing conditions is responsible for the difference or whether there is posttranscriptional regulation is unknown. Deletion of various chitin synthase genes had either a modest effect or no effect on chitinase activity (343). Thus, there was not a concomitant decrease in chitin synthase activity when chitinase decreased. The increase in the chitin content of yeast and hyphal cells in CHT2 and CHT3 null mutant strains was not significant. However, there was some hypersensitivity to calcofluor white, which can reflect an increase in chitin.

Cells in which Cht1p or Cht2p was absent had no defect in cell separation, and the budding was bipolar (85). In contrast, the loss of Cht3p resulted in the failure of cells to separate. The restoration of CHT3 expression remediated the defect, confirming the role of Cht3p in cytokinesis. A deletion of the only S. cerevisiae chitinase gene, CTS1, causes the same cell separation defect in that organism (190). C. albicans CHT3 but not CHT1 or CHT2, when expressed in S. cerevisiae, partially complemented the loss of ScCTS1 (85). This observation identifies C. albicans CHT3 as the functional homolog of S. cerevisiae CTS1. In S. cerevisiae, Cts1p localizes to the daughter cell (61). The expression of ScCTS1 is cell cycle regulated and peaks at M or the M/G1 boundary (359). The functional homology of CaCht3p and ScCts1p suggests that CaCht3p also localizes to the daughter cell and hydrolyzes the primary chitin septum from the daughter side. In a C. albicans strain lacking the Ace2p transcription factor, which regulates cell separation, there was no effect on CHT2 expression. However, CHT3 expression was almost abolished in both yeast and hyphal cells (RT-PCR and transcriptional profiling [172, 256]). The expression of ENG1 and MP65, encoding glucanases, also decreased. This observation suggests that cell separation requires hydrolysis of both chitin and glucan. CHT2 and CHT3 expression increased in farnesol-treated biofilm (RT-PCR and transcriptional profiling [42]). Since this treatment favored yeast form growth, this observation would be consistent with the previously reported high transcript abundance in yeast cells compared to what was seen for hyphae (239) but not with the observations of enzyme abundance (343). Expression of CHT3 increased slightly during cell wall regeneration (transcriptional profiling [46]). This delay likely indicates that the regenerating cells do not make daughter cells during the early stages of cell wall replacement.

Other proteins.

WSC1 encodes a CWP whose expression increases in the absence of cyclic AMP (134). Expression decreased during mating (transcription profiling [411]). A deletion strain was hypersensitive to caspofungin, suggesting a requirement for Wsc1p for normal cell wall structure (279). The mutant strain had no defect in biofilm formation. However, the mutant strain had a severe defect on day 4 of culture growth, affecting the entry into stationary phase on day 5 (390). Cells become smaller as growth slows and cells enter stationary phase at approximately day 5 when grown on rich medium. Electron microcopy shows that after the cell enters stationary phase, the cell wall is thicker (45). SUN41, discussed above, had a severe defect at day 8 of culture growth that affected the maintenance of stationary phase (390). The effect on stationary phase of two CWPs emphasizes the necessity of constant vigilance to maintain cell wall integrity and that contributions to this integrity in growing and nongrowing cells may differ.


Unlike the enzymes discussed above, acid trehalase (GH65 family) is not involved in cell wall remodeling. Trehalose is a nonreducing disaccharide. Atc1p, acid trehalase, which contains a possible signal sequence for classical secretion, is one of two enzymes hydrolyzing trehalose (290). This enzyme has been recovered from isolated cell walls. The ATC1 in vitro translation product hydrolyzed trehalose. After the deletion of ATC1, a 170-kDa protein was missing from the extract of the mutant cell wall. The atc1Δ/Δ strain could not be grown on trehalose. The strain was also attenuated in the murine model of disseminated infection. Growth on glucose repressed the expression of ATC1 detected by RT-PCR compared to the growth on trehalose, thereby indicating that ATC1 expression is subject to glucose repression. Trehalose is a protectant against oxidative stress (7). The loss of a neutral cytosolic trehalase, Ntc1p, had no effect on the cellular response to oxidative stress (296). On the other hand, the atc1Δ/Δ strain, lacking acid trehalase, was more resistant to heat, osmotic, and oxidative environmental stress (289). At 1 h of exposure to 42°C, both the mutant and the wild-type strains were similar in terms of survival; however, after 3 h the mutant strain had an advantage. Osmotic stress did not affect the mutant strain until 3 h, while the parental strain was sensitive at 1 h. Although affected by oxidative stress, the mutant strain was more resistant. The mutant strain had somewhat reduced formation of germ tubes under conditions inducing morphogenesis. During longer periods of hyphal development, the mutant strain accumulated more trehalose than the parental strain. Thus, in the ATC1 deletion strain, the organism has a reduction in hyphal formation that is a putative virulence factor and continues to accumulate trehalose as protection against oxidative stress.

Non-Cell-Wall Functions

Some secreted proteins do not remain cell associated but forage into the extracellular environment. If such proteins are hydrolytic enzymes, they have capacity to hydrolyze large or complex substrates into small units that can be transported into the cell as a source of nutrition. If the degradation of host targets facilitates colonization or invasion, then such enzymes also function as virulence factors. In the last few years, several studies have examined clinical isolates for one or more phospholipase, proteinase, or hemolytic activities (126, 223, 283, 324, 387). These studies demonstrate the production of these activities by some but not all isolates. There are differences based on the site of isolation (283) or the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (387).

This section focuses on secreted hydrolyases. There are several secreted proteins that will not be further reviewed in this section: Hex1p of the GH20 family is a secreted β-N-acetylglucosaminidase which has received little attention since the last review, although the deletion strain was constructed a decade ago (49). Hemolytic activity also has received little attention. A mannoprotein in the 200-kDa range from culture supernatant mediated hemolytic activity (402). The activity was inactivated by periodate, thereby implicating the mannan in the activity. The protein has not been further characterized. In recent years, the two families of hydrolytic enzymes that have received the most attention are the Sap and phospholipase B (PLB) families. One of the characteristics of most of the hydrolytic activities is that there are multiple enzymes that may be expressed under different conditions. The identification of the genes encoding these proteins supported the construction of null strains. Fairly recent reviews (262, 336) address these and other hydrolytic enzymes, and the discussion of these enzymes is abbreviated. The Sap, PLB, and lipase families are discussed below, as are phosphatase and glucoamylase activities.


There are 10 SAP genes. Two of them, SAP9 and SAP10, encode proteins attached to the cell wall matrix by covalent linkages and are summarized in Table Table2.2. The products of SAP1 to SAP3 and SAP4 to SAP6 are approximately 67% and 89% identical, respectively, and cluster together (247, 248). There are three fairly recent reviews that cover the SAP gene family (261, 262, 336), and these should be consulted for more detail than will be presented here. The Saps are the only known proteinases excreted into the extracellular, non-cell-associated space. All Candida species secrete proteinases, but species other than C. albicans appear to do so at a lower level (321). The loss of SAP2 and SAP4 to SAP6 severely impairs growth with protein as the sole nitrogen source (149, 327). The Saps are synthesized as prepropeptides with a signal sequence and propeptide of about 60 amino acids (151, 268, 384). The signal peptide is lost in the endoplasmic reticulum after serving to target the protein to the endoplasmic reticulum, and the propeptide is lost in the Golgi. Once secreted, the Saps may hydrolyze host proteins. Sap2p is the major Sap protein produced in vitro and has been the most studied for its properties (148, 405). Sap2p has a broad substrate specificity and among various activities can degrade host ECM (extracellular matrix), keratin, mucin, stratum corneum, proteinase inhibitors α-macroglobulin and cystatin A, and immunoglobulins (Igs) and activate proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and clotting factor X (18, 57, 159-161, 245, 306, 382, 383). It is a classic aspartic proteinase like the prototype pepsin. Activity is inhibited by pepstatin A and as well by several clinically useful human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) proteinase inhibitors (27). Aspartic proteinases have an acidic optimum pH. This is a potential disadvantage for C. albicans, since host tissues are at neutral or less acidic pH. Candida is a commensal in the vagina, with an acidic pH, and in the oral cavity, with neutral pH. Normal blood pH is about 7.4. There are some differences among Saps in response to pH. Activity can span a pH range from 2 to 7. Sap1-3p have their highest activity at lower pH values, pH 3 to 5, while Sap4-6p have theirs at higher pH values, pH 5 to 7 (26, 354).

There are differences in expression, and gene expression generally correlates with protein abundance (405). SAP2 is the major SAP gene expressed during the early stage of growth in response to in vitro culture on protein as the nitrogen source (Northern analysis [148]). SAP8 production is temperature regulated, it is more strongly induced during early growth at 25°C than 37°C, and it is greater in opaque than in white cells (Northern analysis [247]). However, expression has been detected in infections, suggesting that additional regulatory mechanisms may operate in SAP8 expression (RT-PCR [263, 313]). For example, in humans SAP8 was expressed more during infection than in oral carriage and was preferentially expressed in vaginal compared to oral disease (263). SAP1 and SAP3, which have sequences related to that of SAP2, are regulated by phenotypic switching and are expressed in the opaque phase of strain WO-1 (Northern analysis [405]). SAP4 to SAP6 are almost exclusively expressed in hyphae at the neutral pH used for induction (Northern analysis [54, 148, 405]), and the corresponding proteins are found in the medium (54). Expression is not dependent on protein in the medium. The SAP genes are affected by exposure to α pheromone, with SAP1 and SAP3 expression repressed (Northern analysis, transcriptional profiling, and real-time RT-PCR [22, 211, 334]) and SAP4 to SAP7 expression enhanced (transcriptional profiling, real-time RT-PCR [22, 334]). There are conflicting reports as to whether SAP2 expression is repressed (transcriptional profiling [22]) or enhanced (real-time RT-PCR [334]). Mutant strains in which single SAP genes are deleted are viable, as are strains with deletions of multiple SAPs (69, 149, 186, 334, 375, 403). The proteinase activity in biofilm culture supernatant is greater than that in planktonic organisms (241).

There are numerous studies of SAP gene function and expression (69, 70, 98, 149, 156, 158, 186, 313, 335, 337-339, 341, 365, 375, 376). Various studies employed in vitro-reconstituted tissue and animal models infected with mutant strains as well as the detection of gene expression at various infection sites. There are differences among studies in the number of SAP genes expressed and the effects of mutants on the outcome of infection. Each of the genes from SAP1 to SAP8 is expressed in one or more models. In some studies, expression is detected for two SAP genes, while five or six are detected in other models (dot and Northern blot analysis, RT-PCR [70, 335]). The profiles of expressed genes also vary during infection. For example, during the progression of infection in a reconstituted vaginal epithelial model, the expression of SAP1, SAP2, SAP4, and SAP5 was detected prior to that of SAP6 and SAP7, and in this model strains lacking SAP1 or SAP2 were attenuated, while those lacking SAP3 or SAP4 to SAP6 were not (RT-PCR [335]). In a model of murine keratitis, the loss of SAP6 resulted in mild disease, while the loss of SAP1 to SAP3 or SAP4 and SAP5 resulted in infection similar to that seen for the parent strain (156). Collectively, the studies show the expression of SAP genes in vivo in human tissue, reconstituted tissue, and animal models and that the loss of one or more SAP genes may modify infection in model systems.

To reach the extracellular space, proteins such as Saps must pass through the cell wall and have been detected there. Immunoelectron microscopy with anti-Sap antibody shows protein in the cell wall. An anti-Sap MAb showed reactivity within the cell wall of in vitro-grown cells (367). In a rat vaginitis model, reactivity was detected in the fungal cell 1 day postinfection and, to a lesser extent, 5 days postinfection. Antibody to Sap1-3p was reactive with the walls of yeast cells above the epidermis, in contact with superficial cells of the reconstituted tissue, or within epidermal cells (338). In agreement with the predominant expression of SAP1 to SAP3 compared to SAP4 to SAP6 as detected by RT-PCR, antibody to Sap4-6p detected little reactivity. In a similar study with reconstituted vaginal epithelium, Schaller et al. (335) found more reactivity at 12 h postinfection in the cell wall with antibody to Sap1-3p than with antibody to Sap4-6. The expression of SAP2 was detected by RT-PCR at 6 h and additionally SAP1, SAP4, and SAP5 were detected at 12 h, while SAP6 and SAP7 were not detected until later. Saps may also contribute to adherence. Antibody that recognizes Sap1-3p bound to the cell surface and antibody to Sap4-6p to the surfaces of organisms several hours after phagocytosis (26). Strains lacking SAP1, SAP2, SAP3, or SAP4 to SAP6 showed altered adherence to poly-l-lysine, Matrigel (primarily laminin and other basement membrane components), or BECs, depending on the surface and organism growth in glucose or galactose (403). The strains with deletions of SAP1, SAP3, or SAP4 to SAP6 that were grown in glucose showed reduced adherence to poly-l-lysine; those strains lacking SAP3 and SAP4 to SAP6 showed reduced adherence to BECs; and only the strain lacking SAP3 showed reduced adherence to Matrigel. Some HIV protease inhibitors inhibit the adherence of C. albicans to a HeLa epithelial cell line (19). Adherence to Vero cells was inhibited by some HIV protease inhibitors, and this adherence was associated with Sap1-3p (27). On the other hand, the same drugs did not inhibit binding to endothelial cells (97), which is consistent with the observation that strains with deletions of SAP1, SAP2, or SAP3 are unaltered in their adherence to endothelial cells (152).

In S. cerevisiae, both pheromone secretion and extracellular acid proteinase (barrier activity) regulate mating. A search for a candidate for a similar barrier activity in C. albicans identified SAP30 (334). Sap30p was found in a large-scale fusion protein screening as one of the secreted proteins (249). SAP30 (alias BAR1) expression is associated with mating type a cells (transcriptional profiling [388]). Upon treatment of opaque a cells, SAP30 expression increased more than 200-fold (real-time RT-PCR [334]). The deletion of SAP30 results in opaque a cells having a hypersensitivity to α pheromone. Mutant a but not mutant α cells display a mating defect, with very few mating zygotes found.


Various extracellular phospholipase activities that include reactions associated with PLA, B, and C have been reported for C. albicans (see the reviews in references 49 and 123). However, currently only PLB-type proteins are thought to be secreted (336). There are five PLB genes with signals for secretion and one SPO1 gene encoding a protein with similarity to PLB, which has a possible signal sequence. Three of the PLB genes, PLB3, PLB4.5, and PLB5, have GPI anchors, and whether they are localized to the membrane or to the cell wall has not been clarified (379) (Table (Table2).2). Secreted phospholipase activity has been reviewed recently, and the reviews cover secreted phospholipases more extensively than here (123, 336). Extracellular enzymes transit the cell wall and may be found in the wall. Phospholipase activity (combined PLA and B) is found in the cell walls of both yeast cells and hyphae in an oral reconstituted human epithelium (RHE) infection model (159). Activity localized to the periphery of the yeast cell and at the tips of hyphae. Immunoelectron microscopy also detected the protein in the cell wall (203). Environmental factors influence the expression of PLB1. Expression was detected in rich medium at 30°C but not at 37°C, although the protein was detected at the higher temperature (Northern analysis [252, 254]). In defined medium, expression at the higher temperature was detected only with the addition of serum. Expression was found in both yeast cells and hyphae, although in early stages of yeast growth, expression may be greater in yeast cells than in hyphae (Northern analysis [142, 252]). Tup1p (transcriptional corepressor of filamentation) regulates the expression of PLB1, as in its absence expression increased (Northern analysis, transcriptional profiling [142, 258]). Expression was unregulated in the tup1Δ/Δ strain, as the PLB1 expression was similar in conditions that favored either yeast cell growth or hyphal formation in the wild type (Northern analysis [142, 258]). In another study, PLB1 expression determined by RT-PCR did not correlate with adherence or hemolysin production (324). This suggests that phospholipase activity is not responsible for hemolysis, and as noted above the mannan portion of a mannoprotein may have this activity.

A strain with deletion of PLB1 showed no obvious phenotype and was unaltered in its adherence to endothelial and epithelial cells, but its ability to penetrate the cells was diminished (203). The strain also showed attenuated virulence in a murine disseminated infection model. PLB2 has been cloned and expression was detected in rich medium (Northern analysis [370]). The gene has not been deleted. However, Plb1p accounts for most of the activity, as only about 1% of the phospholipase activity remained after the deletion of PLB1 (123). A more recent clinical isolate study that compared the expression levels of various lipase genes in phospholipase-positive and -negative clinical isolates supported a similar suggestion (323). The negative group expressed only PLB2 and PLD1, while the positive group expressed PLB1, PLC1, and PLD1.

PLB1 is one of the core genes repressed more than 1.5-fold in response to osmotic, oxidative, and heavy metal stress (transcriptional profiling [94]). Many of the genes in the repressed group are involved in transcription and metabolism, and the reduction may be related to slowed growth in the presence of the stress. Hog1p also contributes to the transcriptional regulation of some genes in the absence of stress. Compared to hog1Δ/Δ cells, PLB1 is expressed 3.8-fold higher in HOG1 cells. The stress associated with drug treatment appears not to affect the expression of PLB1. There was no effect of treatment with ciclopirox olamine or fluconazole (RT-PCR [272]), caspofungin (RT-PCR, transcriptional profiling [210, 272]), or amphotericin B, ketoconazole, and flucytosine (transcriptional profiling [210]). However, a bisquaternary ammonium salt whose likely target is phospholipase inhibits growth (269). PLB2 is induced sixfold in response to pheromone (transcription profiling [22]). Expression is not affected by exposure to ciclopirox olamine or fluconazole (Northern analysis [272]).

The expression of PLB1 and PLB2 has been detected in infection specimens. In saliva from humans with either oral carriage of C. albicans or infection, the expression of PLB1 was more frequently detected in specimens from infected individuals and correlated with infection (RT-PCR [263]). There was no difference in PLB2 expression among infected individuals and carriers. There was no difference between individuals with carriage and infection in the vagina. This suggests a site-dependent difference in expression. In an oral infection model in immunocompetent mice, PLB1 expression was sustained for several days early in infection (RT-PCF [313]). In a murine gastric infection model, PLB1 and PLB2 expression was observed in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient gnotobiotic mice (RT-PCR [341]). At 3 to 4 weeks after infection, PLB2 expression was noted in tongue, palate, esophagus, and stomach, while PLB1 was detected in stomach. This suggests a site-independent expression of PLB2 and a site-dependent expression of PLB1.


Enzymes that hydrolyze ester bonds either at the lipid aqueous interface (lipases) or in solution (esterases) have been reported for C. albicans but also have been rather neglected. They were included in a recent review (336), which is a source of more information than given here. The lipase family contains 10 genes, LIP1 to LIP10, with LIP7 lacking the signal for secretion. Molecular analysis of the LIP family began in 1997 with the cloning of LIP1 (112) and was followed in 2000 with the cloning of the other nine genes (150). The protein sequences are similar, with up to 80% amino acid identity. Expression analysis employed RT-PCR except for Northern blotting for LIP1. LIP3 to LIP6 are expressed in vitro in all the media and conditions tested. LIP1, LIP3 to LIP6, and LIP8 expression occurs in medium with Tween 40 as the carbon source, while LIP2 and LIP9 expression occurs only in medium without lipid. The expression of some lipase genes in the absence of lipid suggests that there may be additional functions for these enzymes. During hyphal formation in defined medium, the expression of LIP1 was not detectable by either Northern or RT-PCR analysis. LIP2 and LIP9 and LIP10 expression also was not detected. However, LIP3 to LIP5 and, to a lesser extent, LIP6 were expressed throughout the transition. LIP8 expression was detected at 1, 3, and 5 h but not subsequently. When serum was used for hyphal induction, the expression pattern was similar, except LIP1 was detected and LIP6 expression was enhanced. There are also differences in response to other in vitro conditions. LIP1 is repressed by α pheromone (transcription profiling [22]), LIP2 is repressed during mating (transcription profiling [411]), LIP4 is expressed more in opaque than in white cells (transcription profiling [193]), and LIP6 is induced upon adherence to polystyrene (transcription profiling [228]). Upon exposure to ciclopirox olamine, the responsivenesses of the genes were different, with LIP1, LIP2, and LIP5 showing strong, modest, and moderate repression, respectively (RT-PCR [272]). Organisms exposed to fluconazole showed a modest decrease in LIP4 expression and an increase in LIP8 expression. Another study found no effect of ketoconazole on LIP gene expression but observed a decrease in LIP6 expression upon exposure to caspofungin (transcription profiling [210]).

LIP4 has been expressed in S. cerevisiae and the recombinant protein analyzed (320). The enzyme is a true lipase hydrolyzing insoluble triglycerides and is able to use methyl, ethyl, and propyl esters. The enzyme had highest selectivity with unsaturated fatty acids. There was evidence that esterification was by acyltransfer. A screen for genes whose haploinsufficiency affected filamentation identified LIP5 through reduced filamentation on Spider medium (228). LIP8 has been deleted (115). Heterozygous lip8Δ and lip8Δ/Δ strains showed growth similar to that seen for the wild type in complete medium, but with Tween 40 as the carbon source, both strains showed less than 80% of the wild-type growth. Surface properties of the lip8Δ/Δ strain but not of the lip8Δ strain were altered, as the null strain showed a tendency to flocculate. There was no difference between mutant and wild-type strains in morphogenesis in serum-containing medium. There was no difference between mutants and wild type when they were grown on solid medium containing Tween 20 or Tween 80. However, in a specialized medium, the lip8Δ/Δ strain showed a moderate but significant reduction compared to other strains. The phenotypes on solid medium differed, as the mutant strains showed a rough phenotype at pH 7 and 10 compared to what was seen for the wild type or at pH 4. The introduction of one copy of the wild-type allele into the heterozygous but not the homozygous mutant reversed this appearance. Rough colonies primarily contained mycelia and smooth colonies of yeast cells. This difference could be due to a gene dosage effect or allelic differences, as seen in the ALS family discussed later. The lip8Δ/Δ strain showed attenuated virulence in the murine model of disseminated infection but not in peritoneal infection (115). As described below, LIP8 expression is frequently detected during infection.

As with SAP genes, there are differences in the expression of LIP genes in infection models. In a murine peritonitis model, the expression of lipase genes was determined in liver tissue (RT-PCR [150]). LIP5, LIP6, LIP8, and LIP9 were expressed in some or all livers analyzed. Subsequently, expression in this model was examined further with an analysis of livers obtained at 4 and 72 h postinfection (RT-PCR [366]). LIP10 was not detected. LIP4, 6, and 9 were expressed in most livers at the first time point, with LIP5 and LIP8 expression being found in all livers. LIP1 and LIP3 but not LIP2 expression was detected. At the later time, LIP5 and LIP8 expression was found in all livers, and LIP2 expression was then detected in some livers. The expression of other lipase genes, particularly LIP9, generally decreased. At 3 days, the expression pattern in kidney was similar to that in liver. In the RHE model, both constitutive and variable expression occurred. The expression of LIP1, LIP4, LIP5, LIP6, and LIP8 was observed at all three time points, i.e., 12, 36, and 48 h after inoculation (RT-PCR [366]). LIP2 and LIP9 expression was not detectable until 36 h and was still present at 48 h. LIP3 and LIP9 were just barely detectable at 48 h. In another murine model, expression was monitored in alimentary tract colonization in the cecum and mucosal infection in the stomach, hard palate, esophagus, and tongue (RT-PCR [340]). The expression was determined in immunodeficient gnotobiotic mice 3 to 4 weeks after inoculation. LIP4 to LIP8 were expressed in mucosal tissues and cecum contents, while LIP1, LIP3, and LIP9 and occasionally LIP10 were detected in gastric tissue but not oral tissue. LIP2 expression was detected only in cecum contents. Analysis of lipase expression in eight saliva specimens from patients with oral infection also showed selective expression (RT-PCR [366]). The most commonly expressed genes were LIP4, LIP5, and LIP8 in four or five specimens; LIP6 was detected in two specimens, while LIP1-3 were detected in a single specimen and LIP10 was not detected. These observations are similar to those discussed above for SAP genes, for which there is apparent condition-dependent use of genes of a family.


C. albicans has both internal and extracellular phosphatases. There are both constitutive and inducible acid phosphatases. The secreted acid phosphatase was one of the first mannoproteins to be characterized (reviewed in reference 49). These enzymes have received little recent attention as phosphatases. Pho100p is induced at acid pH and low phosphate (129). The protein is extracted from intact cells in buffer containing dithiothreitol (DTT). Pho100p is N glycosylated. PHO100 expression is induced in early biofilm formation (transcription profiling [260]). Pho112p and Pho113p, constitutive phosphatases, were also extracted from cells with DTT-containing buffer (129). Both phosphatases were N glycosylated. Pho112p was detected in the large-scale protein fusion screen for secreted proteins (249). PHO113 was negatively regulated by Rim101p (transcription profiling, RT-PCR [311]).


There are two potential glucoamylases. A 190-kDa protein was expressed more abundantly on the surfaces of galactose-grown cells (reviewed in reference 49). Peptide sequences from this protein were obtained and suggested a glucoamylase (369). Probing a genomic library with a sequence from a heterologous gene with protein homology to the peptides resulted in the isolation of the gene. GCA1 encoded a protein with potential N-glycosylation sites. Northern analysis showed that the gene was expressed at a high level in organisms grown on galactose compared to what was seen for those grown on glucose or sucrose. RT-PCR analysis showed that expression in cells grown on starch and cellobiose was the same as expression in cells grown on galactose. Expression was less for cells grown on sucrose and even less for cells grown on glucose. GCA1 was corepressed by Mig1p and Tup1p (transcription profiling [258]). GCA1 expression is downregulated at alkaline pH by Rim101p (transcription profiling [23]) and induced by ketoconazole (transcriptional profiling [210]). GCA1 is also expressed in a rat model of oral infection (RT-PCR [369]). Expression in cells grown in Lee medium was 3.5-fold greater than that in vivo. The second gene, SGA1, encodes a fungus-specific putative glucoamylase that has not been localized (31). Sga1p was identified as part of the large-scale genetic screen for exported proteins (249). Sga1p was one of proteins encoded by fusions of C. albicans DNA with the intracellular form of invertase that conferred growth when expressed in a heterologous S. cerevisiae suc strain. The protein has a predicted signal sequence. C. albicans SGA1 is the ortholog of S. cerevisiae SGA1, which encodes an intracellular sporulation-specific enzyme. C. albicans SGA1 expression decreased rapidly as protoplast regeneration was initiated (transcription profiling [46]).


What's There

One of the changes in recent years is the application of global approaches not only to gene expression but also to protein abundance and identification and metabolism. Several studies have investigated the subproteome of the cell surface (73, 87, 301, 303, 380, 391; M. Martínez-Gomariz, P. Perumal, S. Mekala, C. Nombela, C. Gil, and W. L. Chaffin, unpublished data). Fractionation of this subproteome employed various extraction procedures from either intact organisms or isolated cell walls. Additionally, proteins secreted by spheroplasts during cell wall regeneration and proteins from culture supernatants were analyzed. Table Table33 shows the estimated numbers of protein species in various fractions. One study which examined four cell wall fractions estimated that overall about 1,600 proteins were detected from these fractions of yeast cell and hyphal cell walls (303). The differences in procedures for and analysis of the proteins of the fractions and multiple protein species (discussed below) and the same protein in more than one fraction make it difficult to assess the number of unique proteins from the cell wall (Table (Table4).4). The most striking difference from Table Table33 is in the fraction that is released by glucanase or mild alkali from cell walls previously washed with NaCl and boiled in buffer containing SDS and reducing agent (73, 87, 303). Generally one protocol employs washes of isolated cell walls with 1 M NaCl; boiling in 2% SDS, 40 mm βME (β-mercaptoethanol), 10 mM EDTA, Tris (pH 7.8) twice for 10 min; and then washing in water before enzyme treatment (73). The other procedure uses washing with a step series (0.86 M, 0.34 M, and 0.17 M) of NaCl, boiling using 10 mM DTT and Tris (pH 8) along with the SDS and EDTA, and then washing with sodium acetate (87, 303). It seems that either the difference in washes or in the application of the isolation procedure in different laboratories has a profound difference on the proteins found in this fraction.

Estimation of protein number in extracts of cell wall proteins prepared by various methods

One hundred seventy-three proteins have been identified in the various fractions, primarily by mass spectrometry (Table (Table4).4). Extracts contained additional proteins, but sequence analysis was not sufficient to identify the encoding gene. de Groot et al. (73) detected and identified 14 proteins in extracts expected to contain only covalently attached proteins (Table (Table3).3). Urban et al. (391) identified the 39 major bands of proteins that were biotinylated on intact cell surfaces. Another study that detected about 40 proteins in culture supernatants of planktonic organisms and biofilms identified 34 of the spots (380). However, among other studies that examined fractions that contained hundreds of protein spots, the investigators did not attempt to identify all proteins (87, 253, 303, 380; Martínez-Gomariz et al., unpublished). Therefore, there are hundreds of protein spots awaiting identification.

Many of the proteins have multiple species, so not all spots on gels represent unique proteins (Table (Table4).4). Since many proteins are unidentified, other proteins may also have multiple species. Some of the proteins with multiple species have been obtained from more than one extraction protocol and in more than one study. Most extraction procedures include one or more protease inhibitors, suggesting that the multiple species may exist in the cell wall. Some of these proteins and multiple species have been observed for more than one growth condition or medium. For example, multiple species of Pdc11p have been observed from extracts obtained by six different methods and reported by several laboratories. The purpose of several studies was a comparison of protein species obtained from yeast cell and hyphal organisms, or planktonic organisms and biofilms. These studies found that some proteins differed in abundance on different cell surfaces. Interestingly, one or more species of the same protein differed in abundance in some reports. Sensitive difference gel electrophoresis technology was used in two studies allowing determination of abundance differences directly in the same gel (253; Martínez-Gomariz et al., unpublished). In the study by Martínez-Gomariz et al. (unpublished), multiple replicates of extracts from yeast cells, hyphae, and biofilm were examined, allowing a statistical analysis of differential abundance. This study also applied multivariate analysis and K-means clustering to the differentially abundant proteins to assess patterns of abundance. This latter analysis showed clusters of proteins that differed between all three conditions or two conditions and various relationships of increased or decreased abundance. There were also differences among the studies, with a protein being reported as present in one study and absent in another or differentially abundant when two conditions were compared in one study but not in another study. These differences may arise from several sources, such as differences in growth conditions (e.g., medium, culture age), extraction method, the sensitivity of the detection method, and the number of proteins identified.

The studies identified both proteins reported in previous smaller studies as well as proteins not previously identified. As indicated in Fig. Fig.22 and discussed previously, there are three major classes of proteins recovered from the cell wall. Representatives of all three classes were found in these proteomic studies (Table (Table4).4). de Groot et al. (74) identified 12 proteins of the GPI-CWP class from yeast cells. These proteins included proteins of the Als family (Als1p, Als4p) and Phr1p and Phr2p. The Phr proteins were found as predicted based on culture pH. Other proteins included Chr11p, Ecm33p, Rbt6p, Ssr1p, Sod4p, and Pga4, 24, and 29p. Mild alkali treatment released the expected Pir1p and the unexpected protein Mp65p. The S. cerevisiae ortholog of Mp65p has also been found attached in S. cerevisiae (410). C. albicans Mp65p was initially identified as an abundant protein in hyphal culture supernatants (32) and was found recently as more abundant in culture supernatant of biofilms than in planktonic cultures (Table (Table4).4). One suggestion is that this protein may have two relationships with the cell surface, with a small portion being covalently attached through alkali-labile bonds (73).

Other proteins with an N-terminal signal sequence are likely to be cell wall localized but not covalently attached to the glucan-chitin matrix. Bgl2p, with β-1,3-glucosyltransferase activity, appeared both in soluble cell wall extracts and among proteins secreted by protoplasts (Table (Table4).4). Cht3p, the main chitinase, is a secreted protein (85) and was identified in the supernatants of planktonic and biofilm cultures. Another secreted protein, Pra1p, was also present in planktonic and biofilm culture supernatants.

The majority of proteins identified in these studies lack the signal sequence for secretion through the classical endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi pathway (Table (Table4).4). Most of these proteins have roles in the cytoplasm, as indicated by the names of the corresponding genes. Such proteins with dual locations have been termed “moonlighting” proteins. There are proteins associated with cytoplasmic glycolysis and fermentation, e.g., enolase (Eno1p), triose phosphate isomerase (Tpi1p), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Tdh3p), pyruvate kinase (Cdc19p), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (Fba1p), and alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1p). Other proteins with cytoplasmic metabolic roles include Leu2p, Met6p, and Cit1p. There are examples of heat shock and chaperone proteins that include Hsp70p, Ssa2p, Hsp104p, and Ssz1p. Also detected were examples of transcription factors (Eft3p, Eft2p, Teff1p, and Efb1p). Other examples include GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase (Srb1p), a thiol-specific antioxidant-like protein (Tsa1p), and a homolog of translationally controlled tumor protein (Tma19p).

Cell Wall Localization of Moonlighting Proteins

The general protein secretory pathway has been conserved among organisms (41). The secretion of proteins through the eucaryotic classical endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi pathway has been studied in detail, and signal sequences targeting proteins into this pathway have been identified. Analysis in S. cerevisiae has played a key role in dissecting the pathway, and C. albicans has orthologs of these genes, e.g., SEC genes and SNARE complex genes, e.g., Orf19.1182. Eukaryotic peptides secreted through this pathway have an N-terminal sequence that targets them to the endoplasmic reticulum to exit on the trans-Golgi face being loaded into vesicles destined for the vacuole and plasma membrane. Along the way, the signal is lost and other processing may occur, e.g., glycosylation. Thus, proteins with covalent attachment to the polysaccharide matrix and proteins such as Cht3p and Saps noted above have the signal that shunts them to this pathway of cell exit. There are two alternate pathways in S. cerevisiae and C. albicans. ScSTE6 encodes an ATP-binding cassette transporter that exports only the peptide pheromone a-factor, and the C. albicans ortholog HST6 is required for mating (225). Another pathway, the nonclassical export pathway, involves two genes, NCE101 and NCE102 (60), and has orthologs in several yeasts, including C. albicans. This pathway was responsible for the heterologous secretion of mammalian nonclassical export substrate galectin-1, suggesting a common mechanism in the eukaryotes. Among probable endogenous substrates, only Nce103p, a carbonic anhydrase-like protein, has been identified. It is possible that some of the proteins lacking the signal for classical secretion use this pathway. Endosome recycling is a mammalian alternative mechanism (270) that is proposed for the recycling of S. cerevisiae Ste13p, a classically exported pheromone receptor (53).

How the proteins that lack the signal for classical secretion reach the cell surface is a major question in cell wall formation for C. albicans as well as for other yeasts on whose surfaces such proteins have also been detected. Some of the proteins in this group, such as those involved in glycolysis, are abundant cytoplasmic proteins and would be released by lysed cells. These proteins could then stick nonspecifically to the C. albicans surface and thus be present when the cell walls are analyzed. Some studies were performed with isolated cell walls that are bathed in cytoplasmic contents before the particulate cell walls are obtained, and this possibility therefore could not be excluded. To remove proteins that adhere during cell wall isolation, some procedures, such as those indicated as “IS” in Table Table4,4, employ salt washes prior to the extraction of isolated cell walls. However, the proteins that remain after this procedure would suggest a very tight interaction or incorporation more securely within the cell wall matrix. Two studies that have examined the adherence of cytoplasmic proteins to cell surfaces made differing observations. In one study, Hsp70p, enolase, and cytoplasmic proteins adhered to cell walls previously treated by boiling in SDS (95). In another study, Tsa1p-green fluorescent protein (Tsa1p-GFP) present in cytoplasm did not adhere to the surfaces of intact hyphae nor did exposure to cytoplasmic proteins change the surface proteins detected in the absence of exposure (391). One possible explanation for these differences is that in one case noncovalent proteins had been substantially removed, leaving unoccupied sites to which proteins might bind through either glucan or protein interactions, and that in the other case the sites might be occupied and little exchange occurred with added protein.

Methods that do not rupture cells have also been used. These methods, such as those indicated as “S” in Table Table4,4, usually employ a reducing agent, DTT or βME, SDS, NaCl, or a combination. Many of the proteins identified from isolated cell walls have also been identified in extracts obtained by these methods. Recently, it has been suggested that reducing agents and detergent induce membrane leakage, which accounts for the presence of proteins extracted by these methods (178). Another method to avoid cell breakage and membrane permeability is the use of membrane-impermeable reagents such as sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin that tag proteins external to the membrane for subsequent identification. A number of proteins, including Hsp70p, Pdc11p, and Tdh3p, have been identified by this method as located outside the cell membrane (“LIS” in Table Table4),4), as reviewed previously (49).

Although applied to a more limited number of proteins, other methods have been used to identify surface proteins on organisms that have been washed with buffer such as phosphate-buffered saline but not otherwise treated. Antibodies to specific proteins have been used to confirm the cell surface localizations of Hsp70p, Pgk1p, Tdh3p, and Eno1p (reviewed in reference 49) and of Adh1p (182). Antibodies have also been used to localize several of these proteins by immunoelectron microscopy by reaction with thin sections. These reports show reactivity within the cell wall and not just on the surface, as might otherwise be predicted by adsorption from medium (Fig. (Fig.1D)1D) (5, 128, 213). Other reports of antibodies and reagents reacted with the cell surface prior to sectioning have shown these reagents were restricted to the cell surface (Fig. (Fig.1B)1B) (128, 245, 394). Genetic studies using the internal form of invertase as a reporter have shown that that S. cerevisiae enolase and Fba1p and C. albicans Tdh3p allow the enzyme to support the growth of a suc (invertase-negative) strain (219, 287). A construct with only the internal invertase form did not support growth. The N-terminal region of Tdh3p and the first 169 amino acids of enolase are sufficient for this activity.

Reaching the Cell Surface

C. albicans is not the only organism on whose surface has been found many of the same or similar proteins. Other such organisms include fungi S. cerevisiae, Histoplasma capsulatum, Kluyveromyces lactis, K. marxianus, and K. bulgaricus; parasites Schistosoma mansoni and Entamoeba histolytica; and bacteria Streptococcus oralis, S. pneumonia, S. pyogenes, S. mutans, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus anthracis, and the gram-negative Bacteroides fragilis and Aeromonas hydrophila (briefly reviewed in reference 278). In these organisms, the signal for export through established pathways is also missing.

Multiple export pathways in various bacteria have been established, including a type III (114, 285, 310), a type IV (82), and the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) (81) pathways. However, there are still proteins, including those mentioned above, that are secreted by an unidentified route(s) and lack anchorage structures in the bacterial cell wall (21, 57). Bendtsen et al. (21) examined the patterns represented in these proteins and developed a predictive algorithm, SecretomeP, for both gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Feature-based analysis has the potential to uncover additional protein export pathways (383).

In addition to galectin, which is heterologously exported from S. cerevisiae, several other proteins have been demonstrated to exit the mammalian cell by nonclassical pathways (reviewed in reference 270), including cytokines (IL-1β, thioredoxin, macrophage migration inhibitory factor), proangiogenic growth factors (fibroblast growth factor 1 [FGF-1] and FGF-2), galectins (e.g., galectin-1 and -3), some viral proteins (e.g., HIV Tat), visfatin and epimorphin (139, 373), and Hsp70 and Hsp90 (389). Some of the processes by which some of these proteins are exported have been reported (reviewed in references 270, 271, 278, and 353). These include membrane blebbing (galectins), membrane flip-flop (HASPB, a Leishmania protein produced in the infected cell), and endosomal recycling (IL-1β, En2, and HMGB1). Other routes include substrate-specific interactions of helper proteins with the secreted protein (FGF-1, IL-1α, translationally controlled tumor protein) (308, 309), nanosized exosomes (Hsp70, Hsp90) (59, 195), and a pathway involving a short basic amino acid sequence (HIV Tat) (104). SecretomeP, noted above, was originally developed as a predictive algorithm for mammalian proteins secreted by nonclassical pathway(s) (20).

The examples of nonclassical secretion in bacteria and mammalian cells suggest that additional alternative export pathways may exist in yeasts. The sensitivity of current proteomic techniques has not been applied to determining other possible substrates for the nonclassical export pathway. There is a suggestion that proteins lacking the signal sequence perhaps could hitch a ride on post-Golgi vesicles carrying classical pathway proteins destined for the membrane and thus reach the cell wall (75). Endosome recycling may be another possibility (53). Another suggestion is that chaperones such as the Hsp70 family could assist translocation across the cell membrane (216). Some of these proteins, e.g., enolase, Gpm1p, and Cdc19p, can bind to phospholipids (418), and subsequent translocation across the cell membrane would result in secretion. Recently, extracellular vesicles with capsular polysaccharide and proteins have been isolated from Cryptococcus neoformans, and vesicles were suggested as the solution to the issue of the trans-cell wall transport (315, 316). There may be multiple routes with various degrees of specificity. Whatever mechanism underlies the presence of proteins on the cell surface, they have a role in the interaction between the fungus and the host.


The cell wall is the organelle of the yeast cell that maintains structural integrity and by virtue of its location has a role in the physical interaction of the cell and its host. C. albicans can adhere to itself by flocculation, to other microbes by coaggregation, and to host proteins and cells, e.g., fibronectin. These interactive properties are associated with surface adhesins. The interactions may be between proteins and proteins or between proteins and sugars. The interacting partners may both be cell associated, or the interaction may be between C. albicans and a soluble or immobilized host ligand. Biofilm formation also involves surface interactions. As a commensal, C. albicans can be found on the skin and on mucosal surfaces. To remain in these locales and not be removed, there must be interactions to retain host association. During infection, the fungus may encounter any host tissue and potentially new ligands, such as hemoglobin in blood, in order to infect tissues. Also in this relationship with the host are the host innate defenders in phagocytic cells. These cells are stimulated by the recognition of microbial surface components. At times, these adherence interactions may promote the interest of C. albicans in maintaining commensal status or, if conditions are favorable, overgrowing in the sites of colonization or establishing metastatic disease. The host also has an interest in permitting commensal organisms to persist to compete with infectious microbes for binding sites. On the other hand, the host must protect itself from the invasion of sterile sites. There is still much to learn about the interplay between microbe and host in health and disease. In the following section, there is a brief look at the fungal ligands recognized by innate immune system receptors. The major part of this section focuses on adherence. The first subsection of this part focuses on adhesins and the ligands with which they bind, and the second section focuses on the ligand and the adhesin(s) that recognize the ligand.

Cell Wall Polysaccharides as Ligands for Innate Immune System Receptors

Although this review focuses on proteins, on the unopsonized C. albicans cell fungal polysaccharide is a ligand for host proteins on host immune system cells (see the reviews in references 79, 100, 124, 266, and 317). For example, β-1,3-glucan exposed at the yeast surface but not accessible at the hyphal surface is recognized by Dectin-1 (137). The recognition of glucan by neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]) is reduced by antibody to PMN surface complement receptor 3 as well as by antibody to glucan (198). There are several mannose binding proteins: Dectin-2, mannose receptor, and SIGNR1. Mannose receptors recognize oligosaccharides with terminal mannose, glucose, or N-acetylglucosamine (364) and preferentially recognize α-linked branching oligosaccharide (173). Dectin-2 preferentially binds to hyphae compared to yeast cells (332) and recognizes high-mannose structures (240). In addition to the mannose receptor, dendritic cells can interact with C. albicans through DC-SIGN (36). SIGNR1 is another mannan binding receptor on resident peritoneal macrophages (377). Interactions between Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and non-TLRs such as Dectin-1 may also be important in the response, and Dectin-1 is suggested to be major receptor for myeloid cells (79). Overall, it is clear that the recognition of cell wall polysaccharide interacts with pattern recognition receptors such as Dectin-1 and TLRs, but there are differences between studies to be resolved in understanding the conditions and ligands that prompt the innate immune response toward protective stimulation.

Adhesins and Ligands

Interest in the adherence of C. albicans to ligands that retain the organism in the host and on inanimate surfaces is of long standing. These interactions prevent fluids, such as saliva, from removing the organism from the host. A major method used to identify these interactions and participants was to test the ability of the organism to bind to a substrate (cell, protein, or other substrate) selected by the investigator and then use various methods to characterize the interaction.

During the 1990s, many C. albicans adhesins and host ligands were identified (reviewed in reference 49). These ligands included components of host ECM, laminin, fibronectin, collagen, entactin, and vitronectin. Tenascin was the last ligand from ECM identified (214). The second major group was serum proteins that included fibrinogen and complement fragments C3d and iC3b (reviewed in reference 49). The adhesins were identified by a variety of techniques including far-Western blotting, affinity chromatography, and immunoprecipitation. Multiple C. albicans protein species were detected as adhesins for the various ligands, and several of the putative adhesins interacted with more than one ligand. Surprisingly, during the last 10 years, even with access to more-rapid and small-scale techniques for the determination of protein sequences, knowledge of the identities of these adhesins and of their relationships to each other advanced only modestly. One area that received considerable attention and clarification is the Als family of GPI-CWPs. For convenience, in the first section, the adhesive interactions will be discussed by reference to adhesin and, in the second section, the discussion will be organized by host ligand.

Although this review focuses on proteins, glycosylation too has an effect on adherence and will be considered briefly. The proteins secreted via the classical secretory pathway may become both N and O glycosylated. Some of the proteins may be extensively glycosylated, with resultant molecular sizes much larger than predicted from the protein sequence. For a more detailed description of mannan, see the reviews in references 49, 122, and 307. N-linked mannan attached through asparagine residues of the protein consists of a core sequence and highly branched outer chains. The outer chains have acid-stable side chains and acid-labile chains containing β-1,2-mannose chains linked through phosphate esters to the stable mannan. β-1,2-Mannose chains have also been found in phospholipomannan (Fig. (Fig.2).2). O-linked mannan is a short linear α-1,2-mannose-linked chain attached to protein serine or threonine residues. Mannan has been implicated in adherence. For example, strains with deletions of MNT1 and MNT2, encoding α-1,2-mannosyl transferases, are impaired in adherence to BECs and an ECM preparation from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm cells (257).


Als protein family.

The ALS gene family encoding GPI-CWPs (Table (Table2)2) includes eight genes and the family has recently been reviewed by Hoyer et al. (144) and should be consulted for a more extensive discussion. As expected, the Als proteins are found at the cell surface (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B). Briefly, the encoded proteins have three domains (143). The central domain, consisting of tandem repeats, can vary in number between genes and alleles and can be used to classify three subgroups: based on cross-hybridization of the tandem repeats, ALS1, ALS2, ALS3, and ALS4 are in one group and ALS5, ALS6, and ALS7 are in a second group, while ALS9 is in neither of these two groups (143, 145, 146). The last two domains have multiple glycosylation sites that are predicted to lead to a stretched conformation that can extend the N-terminal probable binding domain from the attachment site. The presence of tandem repeats is a potential site for allelic variation. Allelic variation can occur within the same cell with differences in the two alleles borne by the diploid cell or between strains (144). For example, in the widely used strain SC5314, the larger alleles of ALS1, ALS5, and ALS9 are on one chromosome, while the smaller alleles are on the other (417). In one study with many isolates, the tandem repeat number within ALS1 was 16 for the most common allele, but alleles with 4 to 37 copies were also found (220). As noted below, alleles may differ in their contributions to the phenotype of the organism. Recombinant soluble Als5p fragments can aggregate in solution as amyloid-like fibers, and there are conserved sequences associated with this aggregation in other Als proteins (284). Such interactions may contribute to the adherence function of Als proteins, and this possibility undoubtedly will be explored.

The transcription of all family genes in vitro and during infection has been detected, but some genes (ALS6 and ALS7) have been observed with only low levels of expression (144). ALS gene expression may be affected by the stage of growth and by morphology (133). ALS1, ALS2, and ALS3 have a dynamic range of expression, with large increases and decreases. The expression of Als proteins was monitored by constructing strains that expressed a GFP fusion protein. Als1p-GFP expression (monitored through fluorescence flow cytometry) increased more than 20-fold upon transfer into fresh medium before slowly decreasing, and Als7p-GFP had a transient increase shortly after transfer, although at a low level. Als5p-GFP and Als6p-GFP were expressed at low levels, with a small, late increase in Als6p-GFP expression. Both Als3p-GFP and Als9p-GFP were at background levels. During germ tube formation, Als1p-GFP expression was the first to increase and attained the highest level; Als3p-GFP expression increased more slowly and rose abruptly coincident with microscopic germ tube emergence. The expression levels of Als5p-GFP, Als6p-GFP, Als7p-GFP, and Als9p-GFP were each comparable to the control level. The early expression of Als1p-GFP followed by a decrease in germ tube formation suggests that Als1p should be found in the initial growth of the germ tube. This was observed with a MAb to the N terminus of Als1p, where bright fluorescence was localized to the base of the germ tube (232). Transcript numbers determined by real-time RT-PCR generally agree with the relative abundance as assessed by GFP monitoring (132). Real-time RT-PCR and RT-PCR showed that when expression occurred ALS1, ALS2, and ALS3 were the most abundantly expressed group, while ALS4 was the most abundantly expressed of the low or weakly expressed group (130, 133). ALS3 expression was much greater in germ tubes than in a 16-h yeast culture. In biofilms, ALS1 was also a major differentially expressed gene compared to what was seen for planktonic gene expression by microarray analysis (119) and real-time RT-PCR (280). If protein abundance parallels gene expression, then some of the Als proteins may be present at very low levels and perhaps not detected, as in the studies by de Groot et al. (73), who detected only Als1p and Als4p, and Ebanks et al. (87), who detected either Als3p or Als6p (Table (Table4).4). The ALS genes as well as EAP1 are genes of the broader class of flocculation genes found in yeasts (see the review in reference 395). SFL1 (Orf19.454) is an ortholog of S. cerevisiae SFL1, a suppressor of flocculation (18). In the absence of Sfl1p, the expression of ALS1 and ALS3 increased. Recently, the regulation of ALS3 expression focused on the promoter region (8). Two regions were identified, one required for activation in hyphae and proximal to the coding region and a distal region that amplified the response (8).

In disease models and clinical samples, ALS genes show variation in expression. In a RHE model, the expression of ALS1, ALS2, ALS3, ALS4, ALS5, and ALS9 was present over time (12, 24, 36, and 48 h) for each of the three inoculum concentrations tested (RT-PCR [130]). For both ALS3 and ALS5, one replicate among all the analyses fell below the detection limit. However, for ALS6 and ALS7, this occurred more often and in the case of ALS6 both replicates were below the detection limit for two analyses. This suggests that ALS7 and particularly ALS6 are expressed at low levels. Two studies compared expression from human clinical specimens with expression in an animal model. Analysis of mRNA was more sensitive than total RNA for human vaginal fluid samples (RT-PCR [55]). ALS1-3 and ALS9 were detected in 70 to 87% of specimens; ALS4, ALS5, and ALS7 were detected in about 30% of samples; and ALS6 was detected in only 13% of samples. In a murine vaginitis model, ALS expression was determined at day 4 and day 7. The percentage of samples in which expression was detected was greater at day 7 than at day 4. At day 7, ALS, ALS2, and ALS3 expression was detected in all mice. ALS9 expression was detected in about one half of the animals on both days. ALS6 and ALS7 expression was detected on both days in one or two mice. ALS4 and ALS5 were detected on day 7 only in one of five mice. Expression in a vaginal RHE model was assessed at 12, 24, and 36 h. ALS, ALS2, ALS3, and ALS9 were consistently strongly expressed and ALS5 was consistently but somewhat more weakly expressed. ALS4, ALS6, and ALS7 expression showed negative or weak signals. Since ALS4 showed strong expression in inoculum cells, the reduction of its expression in samples recovered from the vaginal RHE suggested that expression may be downregulated.

In a hyposalivatory rat model of oral infection, ALS expression was greater at day 5 than at day 3 after inoculation (RT-PCR [131]). ALS1, ALS2, ALS3, and ALS4 expression was detected at both time points, while ALS5 and ALS9 expression was not detected until day 5. ALS6 was detected only once, and ALS7 expression was never detected. There were differences in the numbers of expressed ALS genes depending on the tissue. Generally, more genes were expressed in organisms from the tongue and mandible than in those from mucosae. Oral scrapings from HIV-positive individuals were analyzed for ALS expression. The expression of all ALS genes was detected in some specimens. ALS1, ALS2, ALS3, and ALS9 expression was found in all specimens. Expression of the other genes was more variable, with ALS4, ALS5, and ALS7 found in 66 to 83% of samples and ALS6 being detected least often, at 50%. In a murine model of disseminated infection, only GFP fusion constructs with ALS1 and ALS3 were detectable by protein expression, primarily in the kidney (132). The kidney was the most frequently infected organ, followed by the heart, with the liver and spleen occasionally infected. The more sensitive RT-PCR method was also used for detection. The other ALS genes were detected by more-sensitive RT-PCR. ALS1-3, ALS9, and, less frequently, ALS4 were expressed, while ALS5, ALS6, and ALS7 expression was not detected. Generally, both clinical samples and model samples show two classes of expressed genes. ALS1, ALS2, ALS3, and ALS9 are the most abundantly expressed genes, while the others are less frequently expressed, particularly ALS6. Generally, the genes most abundantly expressed in culture are also the most abundantly or frequently expressed in infection models, except for ALS9, which was often expressed at low levels in culture but was consistently found to be expressed in infection models.

The sequence- and homology-based prediction that Als proteins would have adherence properties was borne out by several studies (144). Some of these properties are summarized in Table Table5.5. Since the Als proteins expressed on yeast cells can vary with the growth state, there should also be variation in the contribution of Als proteins to adhesive interactions. Adhesive properties of these proteins have also been examined by heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae. This approach offers an opportunity to study their adhesive properties in greater isolation than possible on the C. albicans cell but also has the risk that context modifies the properties. These studies are discussed in the review by Hoyer et al. (144) and will not be included here. Adherence to host cells or other ligands shows that strains with deletions of ALS genes have altered binding. The loss of Als1p reduced binding by 20% (strain 1) and 35% (strain 2) to HUVECs (113, 413), and overexpression increased binding (113). Antibody to the N terminus of Als1p reduced binding to endothelial cells (113) and again implicated the N terminus in binding. Using a third als1Δ/Δ strain and an assay for cell association, no reduction in cell association with HUVECs was noted (300). There are also conflicting reports on the effect of the deletion on binding to epithelial cells. Yet another strain showed a reduced binding to FaDu cells (pharyngeal epithelial cell line established from a squamous cell carcinoma) (1), while strain 3 showed no reduction in association with FaDu cells (300). A fourth als1Δ/Δ strain showed attenuation in an oral model of infection and reduced binding to murine tongue in an ex vivo assay (165). Strain 1 showed no loss of binding to FaDu cells, BECs, or RHE, although there was a reduction in the destruction of RHE compared to what was seen for the control strain (413). There was no effect on binding to fibronectin or laminin (144, 413). The apparent differences among strains may arise from one or more sources, such as unknown alteration(s) introduced into the mutant during construction, differences in the mammalian cells, differences in the growth levels, and differences in assays of the interaction between fungus and host cells. A side-by-side comparison of these strains should answer at least some of these questions.

Effect of ALS gene deletion on adherence to various ligands and cellsa

The deletion of ALS2 could not be achieved, and the gene was placed under the MAL2 promoter (416). The deletion of ALS4 resulted in an increased expression of ALS2 and vice versa with the uninduced conditional ALS2 strain, as determined by real-time RT-PCR. This suggests that there may be some compensatory effects and perhaps some functional overlap. The loss of ALS4 reduced adherence to HUVECs but not to BECs or RHE and did not cause the destruction of RHE. The uninduced conditional ALS2 strain showed reduced adherence to HUVECs and RHE and reduced RHE destruction, compared to what was seen for the control, but loss of adherence to BECs.

Compared to the loss of Als1p, the absence of Als3p had a great effect on reducing adherence to HUVECs (413). While the absence of Als1p did not alter binding to BECs, the absence of Als3p reduced binding about 60%. The expression of the N-terminal region of Als3p in the null strain partially restored binding to BECs (412). Antibody recognizing the N-terminal region reduced binding. In the case of RHE, the strain lacking Als3p bound and there was little subsequent destruction of RHE (413). There was no effect on binding to fibronectin or laminin (144, 413). When a second strain was tested for cell association, there was a reduction in the interaction with HUVECs but no change with FaDu cells (300). Like the als1Δ/Δ strains, there may be several sources for differences between strains and assays. Indeed, as is noted below, the second strain showed a large reduction in endocytosis with both HUVECs and FaDu cells (300). In strain SC5314, the two ALS3 alleles have different numbers of tandem repeats (282). A heterozygous strain expressing the allele with more tandem repeats showed adherence to HUVECs and FaDu pharyngeal epithelial cells similar to that seen for the parent strain. The heterozygous strain expressing the allele with fewer repeats had diminished adherence compared to the parent, thus implicating this region in adherence. However, the role of this highly glycosylated repeat is likely that of extending the N-terminal binding domain further from the attachment site (144, 282).

The effect of deleting ALS5, ALS6, or ALS7 was surprising in that the strains with a deletion showed increased adherence to HUVECs and BECs (414). The loss of Als7p had no effect on cellular aggregation, while the loss of Als5p and Als6p increased aggregation slightly but not enough to account for the increased adherence of strains lacking Als5p, Als6p, or Als7p. The reintegration of one allele did not restore adherence comparable to that of the control strain, except for the strain with a reintegration of one ALS6 allele in terms of its adherence to HUVECs. Deletion had no effect on the destruction of RHE. Since expression of these genes is at very low levels, proteins may also be at very low levels. This potential low level of protein suggests that these proteins may have a role in cell surface conformation by exposing adhesins or by an alteration that is compensated by additional adhesins. The absence of Als9p altered adherence to endothelial cells but not that to epithelial cells or laminin (415). There was also no effect with the RHE model (414). In a strain with reintegration of the functional gene, one allele but not the other could restore function (415). This is another example of allelic difference.

In biofilms, organisms are in contact with other organisms and Als adhesins. BCR1 encodes a transcription factor required for biofilm formation that regulates expression of several adhesin genes, including ALS1 and ALS3 (273). Nobile et al. (273) found that an ALS1 null strain formed an in vitro biofilm that was not strongly attached to the surface. In addition, the strain with a loss of ALS3 had severely inhibited biofilm formation. Only a rudimentary biofilm that had mainly yeast cells formed in vitro on a silicone surface. A bcr1Δ/Δ strain did not form biofilm but was rescued by the overexpression of ALS3 and partially rescued by the overexpression of ALS1. Since ALS3 is not normally expressed in yeast cells, and cells of an als3Δ/Δ strain can adhere, the defect in the als3Δ/Δ strain is likely to be later in biofilm development. In an in vivo rat venous catheter model, the bcr1Δ/Δ strain also failed to form biofilm, but the als3Δ/Δ strain produced apparently normal biofilm. However, as in vitro, the overexpression of Als3p rescued the in vivo biofilm defect of the bcr1Δ/Δ strain. Hoyer and colleagues (412) found that throughout the biofilm Als3p-GFP was distributed diffusely on the germ tube surface. In this study, biofilms formed by als3Δ/Δ were disorganized and unstable, with hyphae that were parallel rather than exhibiting the usual entwined structure. Efg1p is required for the expression of ALS3, and a strain lacking EFG1 formed only a sparse structure. The overexpression of Als3p in an efg1Δ/Δ strain restored biofilm formation. Although both studies with ALS3 null strains reached similar conclusions that Als3p is important for biofilm formation, there were differences in the reduced biofilm formed. While this may reflect strain differences, it may also reflect the influence of environmental conditions, e.g., medium, on biofilm formation, as suggested by the differences in in vitro and in vivo biofilm formation described above. The loss of Als2p but not of Als4p reduced biofilm mass about 15% (416). This suggests that although there is some compensatory expression of ALS4 when ALS2 is deleted and vice versa (416), the compensation of Als4p is insufficient or does not extend to this function.

A recent report identified cadherin as another ligand for Als3p (300). C. albicans invades endothelial and oral epithelial cells by the hyphal induction of host cell endocytosis (102, 288, 298). Host cell N-cadherin is the surface receptor engaging hyphae (299). The deletion strain lacking Als3p but not Als1p failed to induce endocytosis by both HUVECs and epithelial cells of the FaDu cell line (300). The restoration of functional Als3p also restored endocytosis. An affinity purification scheme found that N-cadherin and E-cadherin from endothelial and epithelial cells, respectively, were missing from host proteins bound to the Als3p-deficient strain compared to what was seen for parental and Als1p-deficient strains. In the absence of endocytosis, little damage occurred to the mammalian cells. The binding site resides in the N-terminal portion of Als3p. Latex beads were coated with recombinant N-terminal protein fragment (~400 amino acids) of Als1p or Als3p or control bovine serum albumin (BSA). The rAls3p-coated beads were endocytosed by CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells expressing either N-cadherin or E-cadherin, while control beads coated with BSA were not. Although Als1p and Als3p share considerable similarities, molecular modeling revealed differences that predicted that the Als3p N-terminal domain would interact with either cadherin, similar to what is seen for cadherin-cadherin interactions.

Als proteins may have an additional role in cell growth. Despite the expression of the corresponding proteins at very low levels in wild-type cells, the deletion of ALS5 or ALS6 resulted in strains with slowed growth (414). The growth rate did not change with the addition of uridine, suggesting that the defect was not associated with the URA3 marker. Only in the case of the ALS5 strain did the restoration of one allele restore a normal growth rate. Yeast cells of the als1Δ/Δ strain were smaller in size than the control strain when grown in the same conditions (144). Germ tube formation was also delayed in deletion strains (113, 413). The deletion strain also had delayed pathogenesis in several models (1, 113, 165). An earlier report by Chaffin and Sogin (50) associated decreasing cell size with delayed germ tube emergence. The delay in pathogenesis may be associated with the delay in hyphal formation. These observations with Als1p, Als5p, and Als6p suggest, at least with these proteins, that proteins may have more than a single role.


Eap1p was originally identified in a screen of a genomic library expressed for sequences that conferred adhesive properties on S. cerevisiae (205). In C. albicans, EAP1 is regulated by Efg1p, a regulator of cell morphology. Eap1p, like Als proteins, is a GPI-CWP (Table (Table2)2) and corresponds to one of the yeast flocculation genes reviewed by Verstrepen and Klis (395) and to yeast adhesins reviewed by Dranginis et al. (84). An indirect immunofluorescence assay demonstrated that Eap1p tagged with a hemagglutinin epitope is found at the cell surface (206). Glucanase digestion released a tagged protein construct from the cell wall, and the loss of the GPI anchor site also resulted in finding the protein in the medium. To assess the adherence of wild-type and eap1Δ/Δ strains to polystyrene surfaces, the shear force required for detachment was determined. Fewer mutant cells than wild-type cells adhered. The heterozygous EAP1/eap1Δ cells adhered with intermediate frequency. This observation suggested that Eap1p contributes to adherence to polystyrene but is not the only adhesive surface component. However, once adhered, both wild-type and mutant cells were fairly resistant to removal. Comparison of the adherence of wild-type cells and that of mutant cells to a human embryonic kidney cell line showed that mutant cells were reduced 37% compared to what was seen for the wild type (205). Adherence was dependent on Efg1p, as the efg1Δ/Δ strain had reduced adherence compared to the wild-type strain and adherence was restored by the expression of EAP1 under the actin promoter in the efg1Δ/Δ strain (205). Since the deletion of EAP1 did not abrogate adherence, this observation suggests that other factors also contribute to adherence. Northern analysis showed that EAP1 was expressed in both yeast cells and hyphae and that expression was dependent on Efg1p (205). An earlier transcriptional profiling study of the yeast-to-hypha transition reported a twofold increase in EAP1 at 6 hours (264). However, in this study no morphological difference in expression was noted at 6 h with Northern analysis (205). EFG1 is a regulator of morphogenesis and cell wall remodeling. Although EAP1 expression is not induced in germ tube formation, its expression is still controlled by Efg1p.

Biofilms for both the wild-type and null strains were formed under constant medium flow with defined shear force (206). The wild type formed biofilm as described in other biofilm studies. Biofilm developed from adhered yeast cells to a multilayered structure with yeast cells and hyphae and ECM. Yeast cells of the mutant strain adhered and formed pseudohyphae and hyphae at 8 h in a biofilm several layers thick. However, by 20 h most of the cells washed out. Thus, the eap1Δ/Δ strain was able neither to form a thick biofilm nor to maintain a reduced thickness biofilm in vitro. The strains were also tested in vivo in the rat venous catheter model and, as described elsewhere for ALS3 and HWP1 strains, the wild type formed a biofilm in the catheter lumen. The null strain did not. EAP1 gene expression in sessile cells from both the in vitro and in vivo models was about twice that of planktonic organisms (real-time RT-PCR). The planktonic control contained a mixture of morphological forms, as did the biofilm. This difference is the same for morphological forms found by transcriptional profiling (264) but differs from the lack of difference determined by Northern analysis (205). This difference may be associated with biofilm formation or may be influenced by the different growth media used in the determinations.


Hw1p is a unique adhesin expressed on the hyphal surface that becomes covalently attached to host cells (see the reviews in references 49 and 371). An initial description of HWP1 expression found the transcript only in hyphal organisms by Northern analysis (363), and a subsequent analysis found very faint levels in yeast cells by Northern analysis (68). Antibody to the protein showed expression only on hyphal surfaces both from in vitro-produced hyphae (68, 363) and hyphae in the superficial layer of the stomach of a highly colonized beige mouse (363). HWP1 encodes a GPI-CWP whose expression is regulated by a number of transcription factors that control morphogenesis and mating (Table (Table2).2). Exposure of opaque a/a cells but not α/α cells to α pheromone increased HWP1 expression in Lee medium (Northern analysis [68]) and also on Spider medium (transcription profiling [22]). While opaque cells do not form germ tubes in response to α pheromone, they do form conjugation tubes in preparation for mating, and these conjugation tubes are elongated structures. Treatment with anti-Hwp1p antibody specifically stained the emerging and elongating conjugation tubes of the a/a cells (68). When the growth reverted to yeast growth at the apex, expression terminated and the yeast cell was unstained. When α/α cells along with a/a cells were exposed to α pheromone in a mating culture, only the conjugation tubes of a/a cells expressed Hwp1p. The differential Hwp1p expression on parent cells facilitated the determination that the first daughter cell of a mating emerges from the conjugation tube contributed by the a/a parent. Adherence to bring the mating cells together is involved in mating, but whether Hwp1p functions as an adhesin in this process is unknown.

Recently, an analysis of a segment of the promoter region was found to bind several proteins that differed in yeast cells and during hyphal induction (175). Like the promoter analysis of ALS3 above (8), two regions were found. The model proposed for yeast cells was that the promoter was occupied by DNA-histone octamers and Gfc1p and Hbp3p that inhibited the binding of activators (175). During hyphal formation, the removal of this blockage allowed activation that was amplified by the interaction of the distal region with transcription factors previously described, e.g., Efg1 and Nrg1. HWP1 is also regulated by the recently described Sfl1p, with increased expression in the absence of Sfl1p (RT-PCR [18]).

This GPI-CWP protein is a substrate for mammalian transglutaminases that cross-link the C. albicans protein to the surface of oral mucosa (362). The cross-linking occurs in the N-terminal domain of Hwp1p. There is similarity in this domain to small proline-rich proteins (PRPs) expressed on the surface of stratified squamous epithelium. Like the adhesive interactions between Als3p and cadherins described above, the C. albicans protein may mimic a host protein. Not all BECs are capable of cross-linking with C. albicans via Hwp1p (362). Recombinant Hwp1p attached to only the more terminally differentiated BECs displaying SPR3 (a small PRP) and keratin 13 and not to the less terminally differentiated cells displaying involucrin (305).

Recent reports have suggested the possibility of a new adhesive role for the protein in biofilms (273, 277). The expression of the transcription factor Bcr1p was required for biofilm formation (276). Targets for control by this factor include several genes encoding surface proteins: ALS3, ALS1, and HWP1. A strain lacking Hwp1p formed a biofilm which was prone to detaching from the abiotic substrate (273). The hwp1Δ/Δ strain produced a biofilm with reduced biomass compared to that seen for the wild type (277). The biofilm had few hyphae, while both planktonic yeast cells and hyphae were in the surrounding medium. Several years ago, a study showed that the deletion of HWP1 does not cause a filamentation defect (347). Biofilms formed when bcr1Δ/Δ mutant cells were mixed in various ratios with cells of strains with wild-type HWP1 or with heterozygous or homozygous null mutations (277). The surrounding medium of a biofilm formed with the bcr1Δ/Δ strain had many planktonic organisms. The mixture with hwp1Δ/Δ mutant cells also had many planktonic organisms but fewer than the bcr1Δ/Δ mutant alone. When mixed with a strain expressing Hwp1p, the planktonic population was substantially lower, even when 87.5% of cells were from the BCR1 null strain. The authors suggested that Hwp1p acts as an adhesin to retain organisms in the biofilm. In the in vivo model for biofilm formation in a rat venous catheter, the HWP1 null strain was also defective in in vivo biofilm production. This is unlike what is the case for the als3Δ/Δ mutant discussed previously, which formed biofilm in vivo but not in vitro. Also, unlike what was seen for Als3p, the overexpression of Hwp1p in the BCR1 null strain did not restore the biofilm formation defect. However, in view of the differences with als3Δ/Δ mutants in vitro and in vivo, environmental conditions may be a factor.


Ywp1p is a GPI-CWP (Table (Table2)2) whose expression is greatest on yeast cell surfaces just after the end of the most rapid exponential growth and thereafter declines (129). In low-phosphate medium, GFP-tagged protein persisted longer on growing cells and cells from several-day-old cultures. Expression was not observed on hyphae and pseudohyphae. The protein in the medium increased as the culture approached stationary phase through either shedding of attached protein or secretion without attachment or both. The ywp1Δ/Δ strain adhered more to polystyrene and other surfaces than did the wild type and formed yeast cell biofilm with several layers, in contrast to wild-type cells. Wild-type cells showed less adherence and monolayer formation under biofilm conditions. At conditions conducive to hyphal formation, there was less effect, as Ywp1p is not expressed on hyphal surfaces. Thus, this protein appears to block adherence of wild-type cells, a property that it shares with Als5p, Als6p, and Als7p (Table (Table5).5). The suggestion put forth was that the protein promoted dispersal through limited adherence or perhaps inhibition by soluble protein, which would allow the organism to seek new sites for colonization. This suggestion was supported by the observation that the addition of culture medium containing the protein was more inhibitory of adherence and biofilm formation than that of culture medium without the protein. To colonize new sites, cells from biofilm must disperse and, as most wild-type biofilms have abundant hyphae, this protein on yeast cells might promote this. YWP1 expression is upregulated in white cells of the WO-1 strain, where there are distinct microscopic morphological differences between the white and opaque yeast cells (transcriptional profiling [193]). This suggests that the role of Ywp1p is more important in white cells. The expression of this gene is also regulated under other conditions (Table (Table2).2). One transcription regulator displays a complex regulation. YWP1 expression is dependent on EFG1 as well as downregulated in both an EFG1 null strain and an EFG1-overexpressing strain, perhaps through both the activation and the repression of YWP1 (83, 356).


Ecm33p is a GPI-CWP (Table (Table2).2). ECM33 is a member of a two-gene family that includes ECM331. ECM33 contains an intron (231). Genes involved in splicing, translation, and mitochondrial respiration are overrepresented among genes with introns (244). ECM33 is not part of this bias representation, as it encodes a CWP. The deletion of this gene affects both yeast cell and hyphal morphology. On solid medium, ecm33Δ/Δ cells seemed to be rounder and larger than in liquid media, with this appearance being even more pronounced in stationary phase. However, the period of growth appeared to be 24 h, which is less time than in a more rigorous description of stationary phase (390). As normal cells progress into stationary phase, they become smaller. This ecm33Δ/Δ strain may also have abnormalities after an additional growth period to reach and maintain stationary-phase status. The doubling time of the mutant strain was greater than that of the parental strain (232). In the ecm33Δ/Δ cells, filamentation was delayed in YEPD with serum, and fewer hyphal organisms were produced, with the width of those filaments being greater than that seen for the parental strain (231). In wild-type strains, the more rapidly growing cells are larger than the slower-growing cells (48). In addition, germ tubes are initiated more rapidly from large cells than from small cells (50). Comparison of the ecm33Δ/Δ cells with wild-type cells suggests that there is a disregulation in cell size. Cells of the als1Δ/Δ strain also have delayed filamentation, but the yeast cells are also smaller (144, 413), and the size relationships with wild-type cells appear to be retained in this mutant. Calcofluor white staining of ecm33Δ/Δ cells showed an alteration, with much of the reactive material appearing as an aggregate (231). Both ECM33/ecm33Δ and ecm33Δ/Δ cells had a tendency to flocculate in a medium-dependent manner, as this flocculation was observed in YEPD and not in yeast nitrogen base. This may represent a protein interaction or a loss of interaction with another medium-dependent CWP. For example, PIR1 is not expressed in YEPD but is in yeast nitrogen base (166, 229a). The gene dosage effect was also seen for the heterozygous and homozygous deletion strains in sensitivities to Calcofluor white, Congo red, and hygromycin B. These observations implicate Ecm33p in cell wall integrity and shape.

Electron microscopic imaging of the ecm33Δ/Δ and ECM33/ecm33Δ strains and comparison to wild-type and complemented strains showed differences (232). Both the heterozygous, complemented strain with one allele and the null strain showed differences. Strains with one wild-type allele showed an abnormally wide and electron-dense outer layer in comparison to the wild type (Fig. (Fig.11 shows examples of the wild type). In the ecm33Δ/Δ strain, not only was the outer layer unusually electron dense but the inner electron translucent layer was wider and less electron dense in comparison to the wild type. Additional evidence of aberrant wall structure was obtained with the reaction of a MAb to the N terminus of Als1p. In the wild-type hyphae, Als1p was localized to the region adjacent to the mother cell. In a heterozygous strain, the immunofluorescence associated with the binding of the MAb extended further up the developing hyphae, and in the null strain the fluorescence was diffusely observed everywhere on the hyphae except the tip.

The slow growth of the ecm33Δ/Δ yeast cells makes it difficult to interpret the reduced virulence of these cells in the murine systemic infection model (231). In vitro models where growth is not expected to be as critical were examined. When added to HUVECs and FaDu cells, the null strain rapidly germinated and produced hyphae of normal length. The conditions appear to affect the germination of the null strain, since in liquid and solid media, as discussed above, filamentation was delayed. The number of organisms adhered to the two cell surfaces decreased as a wild-type allele was deleted such that deletion strains had the least adherence and heterozygous strains had intermediate adherence. The same gene dosage effect was noticed when endocytosis and HUVEC and FaDu cell damage were examined. These observations support a contribution of Ecm33p to adherence and host cell interactions. However, the aberrant architecture of the cell wall raises the questions of whether the effect is a direct one.


The binding of fibrinogen was particularly well characterized when studies began on host proteins that could serve as ligands for C. albicans surface receptors (see the review in reference 49). Briefly, as a fibrinogen binding protein, Pra1p was found on both yeast cell and hyphal surfaces (44) and in vivo and in vitro (218). The protein was ubiquitinated (345). The binding of fibrinogen and antibody to Pra1p was heterogeneous, with a patchy distribution on the surface (229b). This suggests that at least Pra1p and perhaps others are asymmetrically exposed at the cell surface. Whether the pattern of surface exposure reflects the distribution of any nonexposed protein is unknown. The gene encoding Pra1p was identified both through its fibrinogen binding property (alias FBP1 [4]) and by its being a pH-regulated antigen (344). PRA1 expression was regulated in response not only to pH but also to medium (Northern analysis [4, 344]). Expression was found in yeast cells and germ tubes in Lee medium and tissue culture medium 199 at 25°C and 37°C. However, expression was not detected at either temperature when organisms were grown in YEPD medium. Also, transcript was not abundant immediately following inoculation into fresh medium, despite cell growth (Northern analysis [344]). Transcriptional profiling subsequently showed that the pH regulation is mediated through Rim101p (transcription profiling, RT-PCR [311]). Recently, Pra1p was found among proteins biotinylated at the hyphal surface but not at the yeast cell surface (391). However, yeast cells were grown in YEPD, where previous studies would predict that PRA1 would not be expressed. Pra1p contains a signal sequence for classical secretion.

The strain with both alleles deleted is viable (344). The general growth characteristics of the strain were normal. The pra1Δ/Δ strain formed germ tubes at 37°C but not at 42°C. At the higher temperature, the chitin distribution was altered. These latter two characteristics suggest a contribution to the cell wall but are clearly milder than the effects of other genes when deleted. PRA1 has not been reported among the genes regulated by morphogenesis in transcription profiling studies, e.g., general morphogenesis (264) and regulation by Nrg1p (259). However, in addition to the regulation of expression by pH and medium noted above, PRA1 expression rapidly decreases when cells are transferred into blood (transcription profiling, RT-PCR [111]). Response to estrogen compounds supports additional regulation (transcriptional profiling [56]). The abundance of PRA1 transcript decreased in response to exposure to 17-β-estradiol by over twofold in a strain lacking CDR1 and CDR2, encoding drug efflux pumps. Only a small number of genes responded to estrogen compound exposure in the three strains tested. The changes were confirmed by RT-PCR.

In a proteomic study, three of six spots that were more abundant in a silver-stained gel of hyphal whole-cell lysates were identified as Pra1p (58). Two of the spots were identified as Phr1p. A similar comparison between the wild type and the pra1Δ/Δ strain detected the absence of Pra1p only in the mutant strain. Surprisingly, when similar profiling was performed on the phr1Δ/Δ strain, not only was Phr1p missing but Pra1p was decreased in abundance relative to what was seen for the wild type. Northern analysis of PRA1 showed no difference in expression in yeast and hyphal cells and the absence of the transcript in the pra1Δ/Δ strain but not the phr1Δ/Δ strain. These observations support a possible posttranscriptional regulation in hyphae and phr1Δ/Δ cells. The extent to which extracts and separations are replicated may affect the detection of differential protein abundance, as may the presence of multiple species, not all of which may be identified and therefore considered. The more recent studies of Pra1p have focused not on adherence properties but on antigenic properties and potential as a vaccine candidate rather than as an adhesin (see references 397 and 398, for example).

Recently, Pra1p has been identified as a ligand for a host integrin receptor, αMβ2 (CD11b/CD18, Mac-1) (357). αMβ2 is the major receptor on PMNs. This receptor is the PMN partner for binding with C. albicans germ tubes, and it mediates the migration of leukocytes to infection sites and the subsequent PMN interaction with the fungal cell (106-109). Supernatants of 2- to 3-day cultures were the starting material to identify the C. albicans ligand. Supernatant immobilized in wells of a tissue culture plate supported the adherence of THP-1 cells and their migration through filters in a transwell migration assay. The supernatant activity increased over several days of fungal growth. The addition of antibodies to either the integrin subunit or a high-affinity ligand of the integrin blocked activity. The activity of the supernatant was sensitive to proteases but not to other hydrolytic enzymes. Hybridomas prepared from mice immunized with culture supernatant were tested for the ability of secreted MAb to block the activity of the supernatant. The antigen recognized by the most potent MAb was obtained by affinity chromatography with immobilized MAb. The isolated material was a large complex that dissociated after heating at or above 65°C to give several bands detected by staining a SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel. Western blotting with the MAb identified a single band of 52 kDa in the heated sample and with the large complex (~250 kDa) in the unheated sample. The protein in the reactive bands was digested with trypsin and the peptides were identified by mass spectrometry. The smaller, 52-kDa band yielded peptides only from the Pra1p sequence. The 250-kDa band yielded peptides from the Pra1p sequence as well as Mp65p and Hyr1p. A second method to identify the fungal ligand utilized affinity chromatography with recombinant purified αMβ2. Conventional N-terminal sequencing as well as mass spectrometry of the bound protein again identified Pra1p. In the affinity purifications, the eluted material supported the adherence of THP-1, while the column pass-through material was depleted compared to the starting material. The supernatant obtained from the PRA1 null strain failed to support the adherence or migration of THP-1 cells. The role of Pra1p in PMN killing and phagocytosis was further investigated by testing the ability of human PMNs to kill and phagocytose cells of either the parental strain or the mutant strain. After 5 h of coincubation, 52% of the wild-type C. albicans cells were viable, compared to 90% viability for the mutant. The addition of antibodies to the αMβ2 receptor blocked the killing of wild-type cells. Purified Pra1p also protected wild-type cells from killing. The release of Pra1p from fungal cells provides an evasion from PMN action by blocking adherence to the hyphae, which is required for killing.

In addition to the above-described study, an earlier study also found Pra1p to be part of a larger complex, but the other components were not identified (217). The identities of the complex components are interesting with respect to the nature of their association when in the cell wall. As noted above, Pra1p has a signal sequence for secretion and Hyr1p is a GPI-CWP (Table (Table2).2). The other component, Mp65p, may be held in the cell wall by as-yet-uncharacterized alkali-labile linkage, as described earlier for this protein. Along with the fibrinogen binding activity, Pra1p contributes in several ways to the interaction between fungus and host.


Cell surface hydrophobicity has been implicated as a contributor to adherence to host ECM and cells and resistance to macrophage killing (reviewed in references 49 and 135). This could be a factor in the high virulence of hydrophobic cells compared to that of hydrophilic cells in mice. MAbs to cell surface hydrophobic protein inhibited the adherence of cells to fibronectin and laminin (237). Pretreatment of hydrophobic cells with MAb also reduced adherence to endothelial cell monolayers (125). These studies implicated the protein recognized by MAb and perhaps the hydrophobic properties in the adherence of ligands and cells. The acid-released fraction of mannan from hydrophobic cells was longer and more abundant than that from hydrophilic cells (236), and hydrophobicity was independent of serotype A or B (235).

A scheme to identify the protein and encoding gene employed antibody that recognized the hydrophobic protein and peptide sequences of the isolated protein (352). The identification of CSH1, which encodes a predicted protein of 38 kDa, was the result. The predicted protein sequence lacked an N-terminal secretion signal suggesting cytoplasmic localization and was a protein of the aldo-keto reductase family. Several other sequences in the genome had similarity to CSH1. The deletion of CSH1 decreased cell surface hydrophobicity about 75% and decreased adherence to fibronectin. By Western blotting, a 38-kDa protein was missing from the whole-cell lysate of the mutant strain separated in one dimension. The protein is apparently not glycosylated but must influence the acid-labile mannan composition, as there are differences between hydrophobic and hydrophilic cells, as noted above. Western blot analysis of a two-dimensional separation showed that the major activity observed in the parental strain was lost in the mutant strain (351). There was a minor cross-reactivity unaffected by the deletion of CSH1. In a strain in which one copy of CSH1 was reintegrated, the expression of Csh1p increased with increasing temperature between 23°C and 37°C. Interestingly, by Northern analysis CSH1 expression was greater at the lower temperature. Thus, there appeared to be an inverse relationship between transcript and protein abundance. Maximum CSH1 expression occurred at 11 h in actively growing cells at 37°C but later (26 h) in a culture growing at 23°C. Western blotting of extracts of proteins biotinylated on the intact cell, proteins released by limited glucan digestion of intact cells, and cytoplasmic lysate showed that most of the 38-kDa protein was in the cytoplasm. However, it was present in the cell wall extracts and the amount of protein in the cell surface extracts was increased in extracts of hydrophobic cells compared to what was seen for hydrophilic cells.

During frozen storage, the null strain reacquired cell surface hydrophobicity levels similar to those of the parent strain (350). However, the 38-kDa protein was absent from the cell extract, and thus the increase in hydrophobicity is associated with an unknown mechanism. The strain also showed an increase in binding to fibronectin that supports multiple adhesins for this ligand. The strain lacking CSH1 and strain in which one copy of CSH1 was reintegrated showed similar hydrophobicities. In a murine model of disseminated infection, both strains showed similar levels of virulence, although the deleted strain had a small increase in mean survival. In a murine vaginitis model, the strains were similar.

A study undertaken to study the variation in biofilm formation with multilocus genotypes isolated from different sources found little correlation (207). However, there was a positive correlation between the cell surface hydrophobicity of the inoculum and biofilm formation. CSH1 expression decreased in biofilm treated with farnesol (transcription profiling, RT-PCR [42]). Cell surface hydrophobicity decreased with increasing farnesol concentration added for biofilm formation. These two studies suggest that cell surface hydrophobicity contributes to biofilm formation and further links CSH1 expression with that phenotype. Under oxidative stress conditions, expression increased compared to what was seen for unstressed organisms (transcription profiling [93]). Three studies find increased expression in response to inhibitors or drug resistance. Expression was greater in ketoconazole-treated cells than in untreated cells (transcription profiling [210]). In benomyl-treated cells in which MDR1 (encoding a multidrug efflux pump) expression increases, CSH1 expression increased. Expression was similarly increased more than 100-fold in a strain with upregulated MDR1 (transcript profiling [171]). In a series of clinical isolates with stepwise acquisition of fluconazole resistance, CSH1 expression was increased in expression coordinately with MDR1 (transcription profiling, RT-PCR [318]). These changes may be related to the putative cytoplasmic function as an aldo-keto reductase. Whether these challenges also result in changes to surface hydrophobicity is untested.

Sap protein family.

In addition to their role as proteinases discussed previously, an adherence role has been proposed for Saps (see the review in reference 262). Adherence to three substrates was examined (403). Poly-l-lysine and ECM obtained from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm cells were immobilized on glass slides. Adherence to BECs was also examined. The adherence of strains defective in one or more SAP genes to these substrates was tested. The observations supported a generally modest contribution to adherence. Galactose-grown cells adhered more than glucose-grown cells. Preincubation of cells with pepstatin A inhibited adherence to poly-l-lysine more than that to ECM. The differences with what was seen for mutant strains were generally small: strains lacking SAP1, SAP3, or SAP4 to SAP6 grown on glucose but not galactose adhered less to poly-l-lysine than did parental cells. The loss of SAP2 had no effect for growth on either sugar. On ECM, only the sap3Δ/Δ strain showed a small reduction in adherence. Adherence to BECs was less for the glucose-grown strains lacking SAP3 or SAP4 to SAP6 and for galactose-grown cells for all mutants.


A 65-kDa mannoprotein present in the cell wall and in culture supernatant has been studied extensively as an important target for host defense. It is a putative β-glucanase that was described in an earlier section (“Cell Wall-Localized Proteins”). The sequence contains an RGD motif that has been implicated in a variety of adhesins (197a). Recently, the adherence properties of this protein have been examined (325). Although yeast cells of a null and wild-type strain did not differ in generation time or size, cells of the null mutant did not form germ tubes. Cells of the mutant strain adhered less well to polystyrene than did the wild-type cells. Cells of heterozygous strains (including a null strain with one allele replaced) had an intermediate adherence level. Antibody to recombinant Mp65p inhibited the binding of wild-type yeast cells to plastic. This observation suggested that the loss of Mp65p and not failure to make germ tubes contributed to reduced plastic adherence. Human variable heavy- and light-chain domains lacking the Fc region that recognized Mp65p were generated from a phage library (71). This antibody construct inhibited the binding of C. albicans wild-type cells to epithelial cells of rat vagina. These recent studies support that Mp65p not only is a major target for cell-mediated immune response but also has adhesive properties. Whether the protein has the putative β-glucanase enzymatic function is unknown.

Hsp70 protein family.

Histatins are small histidine-rich salivary peptides with potent antifungal activity. Over the last decade, a clear picture has been emerging of how these peptides interact with and kill C. albicans. Histatin 5 binding to C. albicans is saturable (91). A binding protein of about 70 kDa was identified from surface extracts of C. albicans as well as sensitive S. cerevisiae. The binding protein was isolated and identified as Hsp70 (208). Hsp70 proteins have been demonstrated on the cell surface (Table (Table4)4) (reviewed in reference 49). However, unlike the adhesins discussed above with the exception of Csh1p, Hsp70 proteins lack a signal for classical secretion. The S. cerevisiae parental strain and the ssa1 ssa2 mutant (missing two genes of stress-70 subfamily A) strains provided further confirmation, as the mutant strain was much less sensitive to histatin 5. Recently, both pulldown assays and yeast two-hybrid assays showed greater interaction between histatin 5 and C. albicans Ssa2p than between histatin 5 and Hsp70p (alias Ssa1p) (209). C. albicans mutants with deletion of either SSA2 or HSP70 showed normal growth and filamentation. However, the SSA2 null strain was highly resistant to killing, while the HSP70 null strain was not, suggesting that Ssa2p has the major receptor role. P-113 (amino acids 4 to 16), a peptide fragment that was as active as histatin 5, was inhibited when the salt concentration was increased (319). P-113 lost activity when two lysine residues were replaced by glutamine. This observation suggested that binding involved ionic interaction. The glutamine-substituted peptide binds to the surfaces of both wild-type and SSA2 null cells at levels higher than those seen for the unsubstituted peptide but is not translocated into the cytoplasm (157). A peptide array of overlapping peptides of Ssa2p showed that P-113 had strong binding to two peptides, while the glutamine-substituted peptide did not bind to the array peptides. Wild-type and mutant cells failed to import the substituted peptide into the cytoplasm, while the wild-type cells imported the unsubstituted peptide more rapidly and more extensively than mutant cells. These observations support an ionic interaction between surface protein and histatin 5.

Histatin 5 interaction with C. albicans leads to ATP release in a nonlytic manner as a prelude to fungal cell death (184). The ATP itself has a cytotoxic role because the removal of the released ATP can inhibit the killing. When histatin 5 was directly introduced into the fungal cell, bypassing the entry step, it was still capable of inducing the release of ATP and killing C. albicans (11). This observation suggested that the signal for killing did not come externally. The loss in cell viability was concomitant with a decrease in cell volume and in the number of G1-arrested cells (12). As the cell volume decreased, the proportion of unbudded cells increased. RT-PCR analysis of histatin 5-treated cells showed a drop in G1 cyclin, CLN1, and CLN3 expression levels. Anion channels and ATP release have been implicated in cell volume regulation, and DIDS (4,4′-dithiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid), a chloride anion-channel-blocking drug, inhibited the histatin 5-associated loss in viability. Potassium and magnesium ions are lost along with ATP, and one route for nonlytic loss may be through potassium channel Tok1p. The deletion of TOK1 reduced but did not abolish ATP efflux (13). Histatin 5 treatment of tok1Δ/Δ cells still produced substantial killing. These observations suggested that Tok1p contributes to but is not the main site for action. TRK1 encodes the potassium transporter. Attempts to delete the second allele were unsuccessful, suggesting that TRK1 is an essential gene (14). However, the deletion of one allele resulted in reduced histatin 5 killing, histatin 5 induced ATP release, and the influx of K+ (measured as 86R+) was reduced five- to sevenfold. These observations suggest that Trk1p is the mediator of ATP loss.

Very recently, the Edgerton laboratory reported that transcriptional profiling of histatin 5-treated C. albicans showed that the major response was in genes involved in adaptation to osmotic stress (400). Activation of the HOG pathway was shown. Prestressed (sorbitol-treated) cells were hypersensitive to histatin 5, while concurrent stress did not change sensitivity. Oxidative prestress did not alter histatin 5 sensitivity. This suggests a common response to osmotic stress and to histatin 5.

Other small peptides of the oral cavity may use the same pathway as histatin 5 in their antimicrobial action. Human neutrophil defensin 1 is active at a concentration similar to the active concentration of histatin 5 and also induces nonlytic efflux of ATP (90). The binding protein for histatin 5 was identified by a blot overlay method. C. albicans proteins were electrophoretically separated and transferred to a membrane for blotting with labeled histatin 5. Preincubation of the blot with neutrophil defensin 1 or unlabeled histatin 5 abrogated the binding of labeled histatin 5. This observation suggested that the two peptides shared a binding protein on the fungal surface. When neutrophil defensin 1 was incubated with wild-type, hsp70Δ/Δ, and ssa2Δ/Δ strains, the mutant strains remained susceptible to killing (401). This observation is at odds with the first observation of competition for the binding site. The binding protein for neutrophil defensin 1 remains unresolved. When human β-defensin 2 was incubated with the three strains, at low peptide concentrations (2 to 10 μM) there was reduced susceptibility of both mutant strains, but at 12 μM the killing was about 90% of that observed with the wild-type strain. When β-defensin-3 was incubated with the strains, there was again reduced susceptibility with both mutant strains, which was particularly marked in the case of the hsp70Δ/Δ strain. When these three peptides were tested with the parental and TRK1/trk1Δ strains, there was no difference. These results suggest that β-defensin-2 and β-defensin-3 may share binding proteins with histatin 5 but that the subsequent mechanism of killing follows a different path(s).

ECM Proteins as Ligands

The implications of and interest in host ECM proteins as adherence targets of C. albicans were largely due to the work of Klotz and colleagues published about 20 years ago (reviewed in reference 49). Epithelium and endothelium are in contact with a thin (40- to 120-nm) basal lamina (basement membrane) that separates monolayers from underlying connective tissue, which also contains ECM. Basal lamina also surrounds some cells, e.g., individual muscle cells, and can vary from tissue to tissue (see the review and summary information in references 2 and 199). Damage to epithelium or endothelium can expose the underlying basal lamina, and this can be a site for arresting C. albicans though binding interactions. For example, damage to endothelium may provide a site at which the fungus can escape the vascular system and disseminate. The ubiquitous presence of ECM makes its components attractive targets for adherence. Several studies that focused on the group of ECM proteins rather than on a single constituent are discussed first. In the decade following the last review, no subsequent studies have addressed interaction with entactin (49). Binding to individual components collagen, vitronectin, fibronectin, laminin, and tenascin-C are considered separately.

If the binding of C. albicans to host cells is via specific ligands, the reduction or modification of those host cell surface ligands would be predicted to reduce C. albicans adherence. Blocking laminin, fibronectin, collagen type 1, and collagen type IV on the surfaces of Hep-2 cells with MAbs reduced the binding of the fungus (63). The incorporation of galactosamine into the adherence assay also reduced binding. The combination of galactosamine and anti-collagen type IV MAb reduced adherence about 70%. This suggests multiple binding interactions potentially involving both protein-protein and protein-carbohydrate interactions. Another study examined the adherences of four C. albicans strains to uncoated polystyrene wells, ECM, and fibronectin in the presence of IgG-class antibody (314). IgG was purified from rabbit serum prior to and after immunization with C. albicans cytoplasmic extract (preimmune/nonspecific and specific, respectively). Yeast cells were incubated with either IgG preparation before adherence. Both preparations significantly reduced adherence to all three surfaces, but there was rarely any difference between specific and nonspecific IgG. Numerous other studies that have tested antibodies showed that they did not appear to bind to the surface, thus suggesting that conditions in other studies did not promote nonspecific antibody binding (see the examples in reference 49).

A more recent study examined the ability of C. albicans to invade or cross an ECM barrier (333). A layer of ECM was prepared on top of a porous filter. Yeast cells were inoculated on the top of the ECM barrier and incubated overnight. Gentle washing and swabbing removed unadhered yeast cells. The top and bottom of the filter were then examined for organisms by scanning electron microscopy. The parental strain showed hyphae on both surfaces. However, the efg1Δ/Δ strain, which does not form filaments, showed only a few cells on the bottom surface. The defect may be in adherence with only cells that adhere having a potential to transverse the gel and filter. Organisms of the mutant strain showed reduced adherence to immobilized fibrinogen and ECM components, fibronectin, tenascin, and laminin compared to what was seen for the parental strain. Proteins extracted from the surface with βME were analyzed by electrophoresis. Thirty proteins that were differentially abundant were identified (Table (Table4).4). None of these proteins was implicated in the apparent difference in adherence.


C. albicans adheres to type I, denatured type I (gelatin), and type IV collagen to different extents (reviewed in reference 49). Competition with fibronectin, various peptides, heparin, and dextran sulfate reduced cell adherence. However, dextran sulfate may bind to collagen rather than to the fungal cell. Collagen affinity chromatography yielded two proteins as potential adhesins. Collagen IV monomers have three domains; an N-terminal 7S domain (7S), a central collagenous triple alpha helix domain (CC), and a noncollagenous C-terminal domain (NC1). Binding to the three domains of collagen IV was examined further (6). Binding to immobilized collagen IV was greater than that to laminin or fibronectin, and the presence of divalent cations enhanced binding. Binding to the 7S domain, NC1, or CC was cation dependent, partially dependent, or independent, respectively. Levels of adherence to the 7S and CC domains were similar and somewhat greater than that to NC1. Enzymatic removal of N-linked oligosaccharides from the 7S domain reduced adherence, and this along with cation dependence suggested a lectin-like C. albicans adhesin. Addition of glucose, galactose, lactose, or heparin sulfate resulted in no reduction of binding. However, N-acetyllactosamine followed by N-acetylglucosamine, methylmannoside, and l-fucose, sugars known to be in the N-linked oligosaccharide, inhibited binding up to 50%. Trypsin treatment of yeast cells reduced binding. The putative protein(s) mediating adherence was not identified.

A second study examined adherence to collagen type I and gelatin immobilized on nitrocellulose filters and placed in polystyrene wells for assay (226). C. albicans adhered to both ligands. Preincubation with either of two peptides containing RGD sequences but not the peptide in which E was substituted for D inhibited binding to gelatin. There was no effect on binding to collagen I. Thus, it appeared that C. albicans recognized RGD in the denatured but not in the native collagen. Further, either one or more adhesins recognize more than one ligand sequence, or else there are multiple collagen adhesins.


Adherence to vitronectin was reviewed previously (49). Briefly, both carbohydrate β-glucan and protein were potential adhesins for this constituent of vascular wall and serum. Far-Western (ligand affinity) blotting identified a 30-kDa protein. Since integrins (αβ heterodimers) recognize host ECM ligands, frequently involving an RGD binding motif, there was considerable speculation that C. albicans adhesins would share some integrin characteristics (see the review of integrins in reference 222). Since the last review (49), that notion guided subsequent studies of adherence to vitronectin. MAbs and polyclonal antibodies recognizing human αv, β3, β5, αvβ3, or αvβ5 were used (361). MAbs to both subunits and complexes bound to C. albicans, as determined by flow cytometry. Immunoprecipitation of yeast cell lysate with antisera to either α or β3 subunits yielded the same 130-, 110-, and 100-kDa proteins. This is the same size range as for human integrin subunits. The antibody to β3 precipitated a dominant 84-kDa protein along with 130- and 100-kDa proteins. Antibodies, particularly the combination of antibodies to αvβ3 or αvβ5, blocked fungal adherence to immobilized vitronectin, as did RGD-containing peptides. Antibodies also blocked adherence to an endothelial cell line expressing surface vitronectin. Similar experiments were performed on germ tubes (329). MAbs to the α subunit or complexes with either β subunit stained organisms. Organisms reactive with antibody to αvβ3 increased, while organisms reactive with antibody to αvβ5 decreased. About 65% of the germ tubes adhered to vitronectin, with the extent of adherence affected by the presence of divalent cations. Antibody to αvβ3 and its subunits but not antibody to αvβ5 inhibited binding. Antibodies, heparin, or RGD-containing peptide reduced adherence to an endothelial cell line, and their combination abolished binding. The adherence of germ tubes differed from what was seen for yeast cells by the apparent absence of a contribution to binding of moiety(ies) reactive with antibody to αvβ5. Such observations continue to support the notion of shared function or structure between mammalian cells and fungus. However, the binding proteins have not been identified to permit more than a superficial understanding of the relationship.

When mammalian integrins bind ligands, outside-in signaling can be initiated by receptor clustering and with involvement of kinases, prominently including FAK (focal adhesion kinase) (reviewed in references 222 and 348). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g., genistein, inhibited yeast cell binding to vitronectin and an endothelial cell line (328). Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting with antibody to mammalian FAK revealed a 105-kDa cytoplasmic protein band that is similar in size to mammalian FAK. Confocal microscopy of permeabilized yeast cells adhered to vitronectin showed that protein reacting with anti-FAK antibody was in the membrane and colocalized with protein reactive with anti-αv, -β3, or -β5 antiserum. The protein immunoprecipitated with anti-FAK antibody from cells bound to vitronectin or endothelial cells, compared to unbound cells, showed a high level of reactivity with anti-phosphotyrosine, suggesting phosphorylation and putative activation upon binding to vitronectin. Binding to fibrinogen, BSA, or poly-l-lysine did not result in a similar change. None of the reactive proteins was identified. In this area, the studies have not progressed to the identification of putative proteins participating in the binding.

In another study, antibody to the human fibronectin integrin receptor, α5β1, was used to screen yeast cell and germ tube cDNA libraries (182). The reactive clones had greater activity with the anti-vitronectin receptor (αvβ3) antibody but did not react with antibodies to the human iC3b receptor (αMβ2) and did not hybridize in Southern analysis with the fibronectin receptor probe. In vitro protein expression from some clones yielded a 37-kDa protein that could be precipitated with appropriate antisera. The nucleotide sequence was that of ADH1 (Orf19.3997). Western blot analysis of a detergent-based cell wall extract with anti-fibronectin receptor and anti-vitronectin receptor antibody showed a reactive 37-kDa protein similar to S. cerevisiae Adh1p, which was used as a control. However, there was reactivity with multiple bands, with prominent bands being larger or smaller depending on the antibody. In particular, anti-fibronectin receptor antibody detected larger species near the top of the gel. A 37-kDa reactive band was also detected in culture supernatant. There are differences in the sources of extracts and proteins for Western blotting between this and a previous study of the vitronectin receptor (361). These and previous studies reviewed elsewhere (49) consistently show antigenic relatedness between C. albicans proteins and human integrin proteins.


Fibronectin is a large dimeric glycoprotein that circulates in plasma as well as being part of the host ECM. Fibronectin as a ligand for C. albicans adhesins was the focus of many studies in the 1990s (reviewed in reference 49), in contrast to what has been the case more recently. Multiple protein species were identified by various means of monitoring interactions with fibronectin. Some studies reported that RGD peptides inhibited fibronectin binding to C. albicans, while other studies did not. As discussed for vitronectin, the notion that C. albicans adhesins for ECM may be related to human integrins underlay a strategy to clone a gene encoding a protein that reacted with anti-fibronectin integrin receptor antibody (182). As noted above, the cloned sequence was homologous with ADH1. The encoded protein as well as authentic alcohol dehydrogenase reacted with antibodies to human fibronectin and vitronectin receptors.

Among the receptors for fibronectin previously reviewed was a low-affinity receptor induced by the addition of hemoglobin to a defined medium (49). The induction of this activity greatly increased the binding of soluble fibronectin. The binding was saturable, with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 2.7 × 10−8 M. The yeast cells grown in hemoglobin also had increased binding to immobilized fibronectin and bovine corneal endothelial cells. The researchers went on to demonstrate that the receptor induced by growth in the presence of hemoglobin was promiscuous (407). It was also a receptor for soluble laminin, fibrinogen, and collagen type IV but not collagen type I. A 55-kDa protein present in DTT and lyticase extracts of the cell surface was identified as the binding protein. The binding to fibronectin was through the fibronectin cell binding domain (408). A C-terminal portion of the cell binding domain containing an RGD sequence was an effective inhibitor with or without the RGD sequence. The binding of the cells grown in hemoglobin was enhanced to immobilized fibronectin and fragments containing the cell binding domain. The 55-kDa protein has not been identified.

As reviewed previously (49), Negre et al. (265) reported a high-affinity fibronectin receptor (Kd = 1.3 × 10−9 M) detected on the surfaces of organisms grown in complex media as well as a low-affinity receptor. The ligand for the high-affinity receptor was in the collagen binding domain of fibronectin. Although other peptides inhibited the binding of soluble fibronectin, they were much less effective. Maximal binding to immobilized fragments was observed with the gelatin/collagen binding domain. Pendrak et al. (293) examined the effect of caspofungin on the induction of the high-affinity fibronectin receptor. Yeast cells were grown in defined medium with or without subinhibitory levels of caspofungin. Cells grown in caspofungin alone showed high binding of soluble fibronectin compared to control cells, although binding was less than that of cells grown with hemoglobin. The maximum caspofungin effect was at doses at which there was also development of misshapen cells. A lower dose of 10 ng/ml, at which there were no obvious morphological or growth defects, was used for subsequent experiments. Nikkomycin, a chitin biosynthesis inhibitor, also induced enhanced fibronectin binding but to a lesser extent than caspofungin. Fluconazole had no effect. The binding constant for soluble fibronectin to caspofungin-treated cells was about 1 nM, the same as previously reported for the high-affinity receptor. The binding constant was similar for the nikkomycin-treated cells, but the receptor surface density was less. Competition with the soluble fibronectin for binding occurred with the collagen binding domain fragment but not with the cell binding domain fragment. Cells from which proteins had been sheared in a blender had reduced fibronectin binding capacity. Proteins sheared from the cell were bound to polystyrene wells, and the binding of fibronectin to these immobilized proteins was greater for the fraction recovered from caspofungin-treated cells than for what was seen for untreated controls. The binding activity was concentrated in a fraction of a molecular weight greater than 500,000. Treatment with trypsin and DTT and to a lesser extent with β-1,3-glucanase reduced binding to the complex. In a KRE9 null strain lacking β-1,6-glucan, there was no effect of caspofungin on the induction of fibronectin binding. Also, in a heterozygous strain in which one allele of the essential HBR1 (hemoglobin response) gene was deleted, the induction of fibronectin binding by caspofungin was absent. However, the heterozygous deletion had no effect on the induction of the low-affinity receptor by hemoglobin. This study and that of Soustre et al. (358), also discussed elsewhere, report opposite effects of caspofungin treatment on binding to fibronectin. In both studies, organisms were grown in yeast nitrogen base with glucose (2% [111 mM] in one case and 50 mM in the other). There is a large difference in the caspofungin MICs of 625 ng/ml (293) and 8 ng/ml (358) but less difference in the amounts of caspofungin used, as the former used 10 ng/ml and the latter used MIC/2. One study used soluble fibronectin (293) and the other immobilized fibronectin (358); however, with the high-affinity receptor, maximal activity was found with the gelatin/collagen binding domain fragment in both soluble and immobilized assays.


Adherence to laminin received considerable attention in the previous decade (see the review in reference 49) but has received less attention more recently. Laminin is a large (900-kDa) protein composed of A, B1, and B2 chains. Previously, GAPDH encoded by TDH3 was identified as an adhesin for laminin, and the surface enzymatic activity was observed. This was confirmed by use of S. cerevisiae, where strains lacking either Tdh1p, Tdh2p, or Tdh3p or double mutants lacking Tdh1p and Tdh2p or Tdh2p and Tdh3p had cell wall-associated enzymatic activity (78). The recombinant Candida Tdh3p protein was purified and was enzymatically active (396). The purified protein also bound to laminin and fibronectin. The expression of the C. albicans Tdh3p on the surface was examined further using a Tdh3p fusion with the internal form of S. cerevisiae invertase (76). When the plasmid containing this construct was transformed into a suc strain of S. cerevisiae, the transformant was able to grow on sucrose. Further constructs localized the region of Tdh3p required to support the growth of transformants on sucrose to the N-terminal half of the protein. The cell wall-associated ScGAPDH activity increased in response to starvation and temperature increase (77). When a transformant with a C. albicans Tdh3-invertase fusion was examined, there was a similar response in terms of an increase in both GAPDH and invertase activity. This increase was not dependent upon either protein synthesis or the ubiquitin stress response. These observations provide additional support for Tdh3p as an adhesin and for its presence on the cell surface.


Tenascin is a hexameric protein with subunits generally of around 200 kDa (see the review in reference 147). The protein has repeated structural motifs, typically including 14.5 epidermal growth factor-like repeats, fibronectin type III repeats, and a globular fibrinogen-like domain. Tenascins have tightly regulated expression during the development and lifetime of vertebrates. Tenascins modulate cell-matrix interactions. With a sharing of the various structural motifs present in other host ligands to which C. albicans binds, tenascin-C would be predicted to bind to the fungus. Soluble tenascin-C bound to germ tubes but not to yeast cells, as determined by indirect immunofluorescence (214). Cell surface extracts from both yeast cells and germ tubes bound to immobilized tenascin-C. Antibody to either C. albicans or tenascin but not to laminin inhibited binding. This observation supported a specific interaction. Inhibition of the binding of fungal proteins to tenascin-C by fibronectin but not fibrinogen implicated the fibronectin type III repeats in binding. The binding of fungal protein was RGD peptide and divalent cation independent. The failure of soluble tenascin-C to bind to yeast cells coupled with the binding of a component(s) of a yeast cell surface extract to immobilized tenascin-C suggests that either the adhesin or the adhesive motif is blocked on the yeast cell surface but exposed at the germ tube surface.

Effect of antifungal drugs on adherence.

Several studies in recent years examined the effect of pretreatment with subinhibitory drug concentrations on adherence to various host ligands. Imbert and colleagues (47, 153, 358) examined adherence to uncoated polystyrene, fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, gelatin, collagen type IV, and ECM (a mixture of laminin, collagen type IV, entactin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan) for yeast cells treated with one-fourth the MIC. Treatment with flucytosine had no effect. Amphotericin B, itraconazole, fluconazole, and terbinafine decreased adherence to polystyrene, fibrinogen, and fibronectin. All except amphotericin B also decreased adherence to laminin, gelatin, collagen type IV, and ECM (153). Caspofungin at one-half the MIC decreased adherence to ECM for all six fluconazole-sensitive strains tested (358). However, when strains were fluconazole resistant in vitro, three of five strains showed reduced adherence when treated with the low concentration of caspofungin. Another echinocandin, aminocandin, was studied at one-half the MIC with fibronectin as well as the ECM complex (47). Five of six fluconazole-sensitive strains showed reduced adherence to ECM, and three were less adherent to fibronectin. Five fluconazole-resistant strains all showed reduced adherence to ECM and four strains reduced adherence to fibronectin. The outcome differed when the same fluconazole-resistant strains were tested with caspofungin, as two strains were unaffected. Although the number of strains is small, this suggests a difference between two drugs of the same class on fluconazole-resistant strains. As the mechanism of fluconazole resistance for these strains is unknown, there is a possibility that the fluconazole resistance mechanism may underlie differences in the echinocandin drug effect. The effect of caspofungin treatment of reducing the adherence to fibronectin differed from what was found in the previously discussed study of Pendrak et al. (293), who observed increased binding to fibronectin.


Klotz and colleagues have examined the adherence of C. albicans and S. cerevisiae expressing Als1p and Als5p to beads coated with 7-mer peptides from a peptide library (180). The sequence was determined for five beads that bound C. albicans as well as the Als1p- and Als5p-expressing S. cerevisiae. All peptides shared common characteristics in which the first residue had a high turn property, e.g., A, D, or P; the second was a bulky hydrophobic or aromatic amino acid, e.g., F, T, or W; and the third was an R or a K. This motif was termed “τϕ+.” Scrambling sequences had little effect on C. albicans cells but reduced binding of the S. cerevisiae strains. Perhaps this difference was due to the redundancy of adhesins on the C. albicans surface. When BSA was denatured, exposing several of these motifs, and mixed with C. albicans yeast cells, the cells aggregated, while they did not with native BSA. The addition of a 23-mer peptide derived from the cell binding domain of fibronectin inhibited binding to a bead coated with a 7-mer peptide (181). Smaller peptides derived from the sequence were ineffective. This peptide also killed C. albicans in a manner independent of the adhesive interaction. The fungicidal activity was inhibited by physiological salt concentrations, as are host microbicidal peptides.

Beads coated with different ECM proteins, fibronectin, type IV collagen, laminin, BSA, or casein supported the binding of C. albicans yeast cells, germ tubes, and pseudohyphae (121). Homopolymers composed of 10 serine, threonine, or alanine residues attached to beads supported the binding of the various C. albicans forms, while the single amino acids did not. After a few hours, the cells separated from the polyalanine-coated beads but not from other two homopolymers. Urea, formamide, and a pH of 12 inhibited binding to fibronectin- or polythreonine-coated beads. The addition of glucose, galactose, mannose, fucose, 1 M NaCl, EDTA, or Tween 20 had no effect. This suggested that the adhesive interactions with the two ligands were chemically similar. The addition of accessible threonine residues to the C terminus of a nonadhesive peptide stimulated binding.

Serum Proteins as Ligands

The entry of C. albicans into the bloodstream directly through catheters or by translocation exposes the organism to proteins and other constituents of blood. It is has been appreciated for many years that serum can induce morphogenesis and this can be incorporated into an identification scheme. Microarray analysis shows that after introduction into blood, C. albicans responds with a change in transcription profile (111). Serum proteins can bind to the C. albicans surface, and the binding of several of these proteins has been the focus of many studies (reviewed in reference 49). In particular, the binding of complement fragments C3d and iC3b contributed to the notion that functional similarity might extend to structural similarity of adhesins. In mammals, integrins are adhesins for these proteins, and antibodies to mammalian integrins were utilized as probes for C. albicans adhesins. The considerable study of C3d and iC3b binding to C. albicans in the 1990s has not continued. The identity of proteins implicated in binding of these two complement fragments remains unknown. Fibrinogen is another serum ligand that bound to cells, and continued studies of this ligand resulted in the identification of one of the adhesins, Pra1p, discussed above. More recently, studies have described the binding capacity for fluid-phase complement system regulators C4b binding protein (C4BP) and factors H and FHL-1. Additionally, other studies report some of the characteristics of a receptor for hemoglobin and adhesins for plasminogen.

C4BP and factors H and FHL-1.

In addition to C3d and iC3b, three other complement pathway proteins, C4BP (from the classical and lectin pathways) and factors H and FHL-1 (regulatory components from the alternative pathway), bind to the cell surface (242, 243). The binding of these regulatory factors is a possible mechanism of complement escape by microbes (185, 242, 243, 304). These factors affect the decay of the C3 convertase and factor I-mediated degradation of C3b, thus diminishing complement activation. Factors H and FHL-1 bind to the yeast surface in a patchy pattern (243). A heterogeneous distribution of binding is reported for other ligands such as fibrinogen and laminin (49). Binding of the two factors from EDTA-treated normal human serum was dose dependent and specific, as purified recombinant proteins competed with radiolabeled protein (243). Factors H and FHL-1 contain multiple short complement regulator domains (SCRs), and binding of various recombinant proteins with deleted domains identified a common C. albicans binding region within SCRs 6 and 7. A second binding site unique for factor H mapped to SCRs 19 and 20. Factor H has heparin interaction sites localized to SCRs 7, 13, and 20. Heparin inhibited the binding of factor H. The attached factors bound to the yeast cells retained their activity and mediated the factor I-dependent cleavage of C3b.

C4b, a part of the C3 convertase, forms during the activation of the classical and lectin complement pathways. The multimeric C4BP can bind to C4b and accelerate the decay of the enzyme and the factor I-dependent degradation of C4b. C4BP bound to yeast cells and the tips of hyphae in a patchy pattern, as did factors H and FHL-1 (242). The binding was dose dependent and observed with recombinant protein as well as EDTA-treated normal human serum. The observation that unlabeled C4BP, factor FHL-1 at a high concentration, and to a lesser extent factor H inhibited binding of radiolabeled C4BP suggested a common binding site for C4BP and factor FHL-1. C4BP has seven α chains and a single β chain. Binding was mediated by α chains, and the binding was due primarily to ionic interaction. The chains are composed of eight complement control protein (CCP) domains. Binding of recombinant proteins lacking one of the domains to hyphae showed that binding was localized to CCP1 and CCP2 and possibly to CCP6. Like factors H and FHL-1 of the alternative pathway, C4BP retained cofactor activity. Bound C4BP mediated the factor I-dependent cleavage of C4b. Compared to yeast cells treated with buffer alone, yeast cells with bound C4BP were adherent to HUVECs. Thus, the bound C4BP may contribute to host interaction by the inhibition of complement activation and enhanced adherence.

To identify the fungal adhesin for these ligands, the binding of factors H and FHL-1 to a S. cerevisiae protein array was determined (304). Three proteins bound both factors and one protein bound only factor H. Phosphoglycerate mutase bound both factors and was selected for further characterization with the C. albicans ortholog, Gpm1p. Recombinant Gpm1p (rGmp1p) bound both factors H and FHL-1 but not C4BP. The binding of recombinant factors H and FHL-1, described above, to rGpm1p was determined, and this confirmed that SCRs 6 and 7 are a common region for the two factors and a second and lower-intensity binding region for factor H in SCRs 19 and 20. This confirmed the observations of binding to yeast cells. The factors bound to rGmp1p also had factor I-dependent cleavage of C3b, as they did when bound to intact cells. The presence of Gpm1p on the surfaces of intact yeast cells and hyphae was confirmed by antibody prepared to rGmp1p. Antibody reactivity showed the same pattern of surface distribution as noted for bound factors, with a heterogeneous distribution on yeast cells and at the hyphal tip. A deletion strain of GPM1 lacked protein reactive with the antibody in both cytoplasmic and cell wall fractions. Compared to cells of the wild-type strain, cells of the deletion strain bound somewhat less factor H or FHL-1. As suggested by the array studies, the presence of multiple adhesins on the surface is the likely explanation for the partial reduction.


Initial studies of hemoglobin on the induction of surface changes affecting binding to fibronectin were reviewed previously (49), and a more recent review focused on hemoglobin sensing and fungal response in greater detail than presented here (295). There are two reports describing receptors for hemoglobin (291, 404). Both reports provide evidence for a low-affinity receptor. However, there are some differences between conditions and parameters tested that complicate determining whether the same receptor is described. Pendrak et al. (291) examined receptor characteristics for the induction of fibronectin binding, while Weissman and Kornitzer (404) focused on Fe utilization from hemoglobin and hemin and specific receptors. Pendrak and colleagues went on to follow up on the signaling function (292-295).

As discussed above, cells grown in defined medium with hemoglobin have enhanced binding to fibronectin, laminin, collagen type IV, and fibrinogen mediated by a promiscuous receptor. Fibronectin receptor expression was induced by ferric, ferrous, and cobalt-protoporphyrin derivatives of hemoglobin (291). Since the cobalt-containing molecule was active, the requirement was not for iron. In addition, the internalization of iron from hemoglobin occurred after the detection of enhanced binding capacity. The hemoglobin binding protein haptoglobin inhibited binding, and globin was inactive, thus suggesting that some structural aspect of the globin-porphyrin complex is required. Yeast cells were able to bind to immobilized hemoglobin. Since the induction of fibronectin binding was saturable and dose dependent, the presence of a receptor was suspected. In solution, the binding of hemoglobin, at a Kd of 1.2 × 10−6 M, suggested the presence of a low-affinity receptor. This receptor has not been further identified. Prior to the demonstration of a low-affinity receptor on yeast cells, an earlier report found that hemoglobin bound to hyphae at levels higher than those to yeast cells (374). Hyphae can use hemoglobin as a source of iron. Whether the binding to hyphal organisms is through the same receptor that is more abundantly expressed on hyphae or via a different receptor is not known. The hemoglobin receptor also appears to have a signaling function. Pendrak et al. (295) reported that hemoglobin induces the expression of other genes, e.g., HBR1 and HMX1. Hbr1p is a suppressor of white-opaque switching (294). As opaque cells are more susceptible to host defenses than are white cells (183), the suppression of switching while in the vascular system may be an advantage for the microbe. More recently, hemoglobin has been identified as an inducer of morphogenesis under conditions of neutral pH and low glucose and ammonium ion (292).

C. albicans has the components for high-affinity iron import but can also use hemoglobin and hemin (oxidized heme). PGA10 (alias RBT51), with homology to RBT5, was identified by complementation in S. cerevisiae of a strain missing the high-affinity uptake receptor and in the presence of an iron chelator, ferroxine (404) (Table (Table2).2). PGA10 belongs to a family with RBT5 and CSA1, which encode predicted GPI-CWPs with the conserved CFEM domain (312). Rbt5p has been recovered from the cell wall (73), which conflicts with the suggestion of membrane localization (404). Each gene of the family was deleted in a strain missing the C. albicans high-affinity iron transporter (Ccc2p) (404). In the mutants, the RBT5 null strain was the one reduced in growth on hemoglobin in the presence of ferroxine. As monitored by Western blotting, Rbt5p increased in iron-starved cells. It is glycosylated, as indicated by its size, which was much larger than predicted, and a polydisperse band. Glycosylation was confirmed by other methods. Using antibody recognizing Rbt5p and zymolyase-treated cells, reactivity was associated with the cells. The authors suggested a membrane location. 55Fe-hemin bound to C. albicans in a saturable manner that was susceptible to competition by unlabeled hemin and hemoglobin. The competition suggested a single receptor class. The receptor has high affinity for hemoglobin and requires about 0.2 μM to compete at a labeled ligand concentration of 1 μM. In iron-starved cells, there are an estimated 3 × 106 receptors, compared to 1.2 × 105 receptors in unstarved cells. Although strains with single deletions of PGA10 or CSA1 were not impaired in binding, there was some contribution, as the strain with deletions of all three genes (RBT5, RBT51, and CSA1) bound less hemin than the single-deletion strains.

Although there is little free hemoglobin in serum, C. albicans possesses a hemolytic factor (reviewed in reference 49) that has been partially characterized (402). There are also some pathological conditions that can increase availability (reviewed in reference 295). As an iron source, once hemin has entered the cell, the release of Fe from heme is catalyzed by Hmx1p, a cytoplasmic protein (174) whose expression increases upon hemoglobin binding. In addition to the question of whether the CFEM family proteins Rbt5p, Rbt51p, and Csa1p are the receptors for signaling, there are many unanswered questions. Among these questions are how the signal transmits from the adhesin-ligand binding and how heme is released from hemoglobin and imported into the cell.


C. albicans produces extracellular Saps that can hydrolyze host proteins, as discussed briefly above. Some microbes can hijack host proteolytic proteins by binding plasminogen and use the host fibrinolytic system to enhance invasion. Two contemporaneous studies showed that C. albicans can bind human plasminogen (65, 163). Yeast cells in rich medium in exponential growth (163) or from a 24-h culture (65) bound soluble plasminogen. Plasminogen bound to immobilized cells in a dose-dependent manner with a Kd of 70 nM, which was in the same range as for other microbes (65). Cells can also bind the activated plasmin from solution (163).

To identify proteins binding plasminogen, Crowe et al. (65) extracted CWPs by treatment of cells with βME and Quantazyme (β1-3 glucanase). Plasminogen bound to the extracted immobilized proteins with a Kd of 112 nM. Proteins extracted from the S. cerevisiae and C. albicans glycosylation-deficient och1Δ/Δ, mnn4Δ/Δ, mnt4Δ/Δ, mnt2Δ/Δ, mnt3Δ/Δ, mnt4Δ/Δ, and mnt5Δ/Δ strains gave similar levels of binding. A lysine analog, epsilon-aminocaproic acid (epsilonACA), almost completely inhibited binding to proteins. The observation suggested that lysine residues were critical for binding. Far-Western blotting of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis-separated proteins indicated five major and several less intensely reacting spots. The addition of epsilonACA during the plasminogen binding step again blocked binding. To identify the reactive moieties, spots identified by far-Western blotting after two-dimensional separation were cut from the gel for sequence analysis. The major plasminogen binding spots were encoded by the genes GPM1, ADH1, TSA1, and CTA1. Each of the protein products contain C-terminal lysine residues. Tef1p was a minor binding protein although it has terminal lysine residues, suggesting that the lysine may not be readily exposed. Three other minor binding proteins were Pgk1p, Tdh3p, and Fba1p. These proteins lack signals for classical secretion, and such proteins are the topic of discussion elsewhere in this review (Table (Table4).4). Some of the proteins, in addition to having cytoplasmic functions, are associated with other surface functions, such as laminin binding by Tdh3p.

In addition to binding factors H and FHL-1, rGPm1p also bound plasminogen (304), as predicted by the study discussed above. The inhibition of plasminogen binding to rGmp1p by epsilonACA again implicated lysine residues as the binding motif of Gmp1p. Consistent with the observations of Crowe et al. (65) of multiple plasminogen adhesins, the strain with a deletion of GPM1 showed a reduction but not a complete loss of plasminogen binding capacity (304).

In other microbes, enolase is a surface protein that binds plasminogen. Jong et al. (163) studied a recombinant C. albicans enolase expressed in Escherichia coli. The recombinant protein was immobilized by a six-histidine tag-bound plasmin. The plasmin was enzymatically active and inhibited by known plasmin inhibitors. The binding was lysine dependent. Since the predicted sequence for Eno1p lacks C-terminal lysine but does have two residues within the last nine positions, it may be a relatively weak binder and not detected among the minor proteins by Crowe et al. (65). Plasminogen bound to a receptor undergoes a conformational change that alters the affinity for activators. The Km for streptokinase activation of plasminogen bound to immobilized enolase was about 10% of that of unbound plasminogen (163). This suggests that plasminogen bound to enolase undergoes a conformational change.

The three studies examined the effect of bound plasmin on C. albicans interaction with various substrates. In one study, C. albicans cells with bound plasminogen showed hydrolysis of a fibrin clot when an activator of plasminogen was present (65). There was no activity from fungal cells in the absence of bound plasminogen. The requirement for an exogenous activator suggested that C. albicans does not have an appropriate proteolytic activity at the cell surface. Plasminogen bound to rGpm1p was converted to proteolytically active plasmin in the presence of an activator (304). The hydrolytic activity increased with increasing rGpm1p available to bind plasminogen. A third study used a fibrin matrix gel. C. albicans cells with bound plasminogen or plasmin showed hydrolysis, and the activity was abolished by inhibitors (163). There was no activity in the absence of bound plasminogen or plasmin. Thrombin in the gel may have been responsible for activating the bound plasminogen. The effect of bound plasminogen in the presence of an activator to facilitate the transversal of an ECM barrier or to damage an endothelial monolayer was examined (65). No advantage was observed with the plasminogen-coated cells. In contrast, there was an advantage when an in vitro blood-brain barrier system of human brain microvascular endothelial cells was tested (163). C. albicans cells with or without bound plasmin were added to the upper chamber containing the endothelial cell monolayer, in which tight junctions had been formed. Of two strains tested, the plasmin-coated cells of a rapidly growing strain had a small advantage (about 20%) in transversal into the bottom chamber over what was seen for uncoated cells. The advantage was larger for plasmin-coated cells of a slower-growing strain that still formed germ tubes, although the overall number of cells that traversed the monolayer was less than half of those for the faster growing strain.

Salivary Proteins as Ligands

The oral cavity is a site of commensal colonization. The organism must be acquired and a stable population established. Organisms are constantly being cleared by the host, and thus to be retained, the organism must have some method of adherence within the mouth. All oral surfaces acquire a pellicle coating containing salivary components. As a commensal resident in the oral cavity, C. albicans must adhere to oral surfaces, which are constantly coated with saliva, and oral colonization has been the subject of two reviews (37, 38). Several identified and partially characterized adhesin-ligand interactions have previously been identified between C. albicans and BECs (see Table 1 in reference 38). In this review, several adhesins, Hwp1p and Saps (Table (Table22 and elsewhere), and Als family proteins (Table (Table5)5) which can mediate binding to BECs have been noted. Other than for histatin 5, which was discussed in a previous section, the progress in identifying adhesins has been modest since last reviewed (37, 38, 49). In this section, a study that confirms the adherence-promoting properties of saliva is considered and followed by separate sections for specific ligands.

Radiolabeled C. albicans yeast cells bound to three human epithelial cell lines: A549, derived from lung pneumocyte type II cells; HEp-2, derived from a laryngeal carcinoma; and HET-1A, originating from simian virus 40 T-antigen-immortalized esophageal cells (140). Adding pooled saliva to the binding assay increased yeast cell adherence, ultimately appearing to saturate binding at 40% saliva, and about 30 to 60% of added cells bound. Several C. albicans isolates showed similar behavior. Pretreatment of yeast cells with saliva also promoted adherence compared to what was seen for cells not pretreated, while pretreatment of the epithelial cell monolayers had a minimal effect on increasing adherence. When individual saliva samples were tested, saliva with more C. albicans-specific IgA was less effective at promoting adherence, and the removal of IgA increased the ability of the IgA-depleted saliva to promote adherence. These observations suggest that it is the adherence of salivary components to yeast cells and not to epithelial surfaces that promotes adherence.

Salivary bPRPs.

Along with histatin and statherin, PRPs are the major salivary polypeptides. bPRPs (basic PRPs) can be either glycosylated or not. C. albicans can adhere to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite and to immobilized salivary proteins (39, 283a). bPRPs are major ligands for C. albicans adherence (283a). A recent study implicates Bgl2p, discussed previously for its enzymatic activity in the cell wall, as an adhesin for salivary proteins (160). An extract obtained from yeast cells by mild glucanase treatment inhibited binding to salivary proteins in two assays: binding to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite beads and binding to a blot overlay of separated saliva. In the latter assay, bPRPs were the major saliva binding components. Mannoprotein purified by chromatography on concanavalin A-Sepharose was enriched for inhibitory activity and contained two major components of 35 kDa and 97.4 kDa. The inhibitory activity of the proteins eluted from a gel was about 30- to 100-fold more than that of the crude extract. The 97.4-kDa material yielded no identifiable sequence. However, the 35-kDa sequence corresponded with Bgl2p. Bgl2p has the signal sequence for secretion by the classical pathway. In the cell wall, it appears to have two functions, one enzymatic within the C. albicans cell wall and one as an adhesin for an abundant protein in the oral environment.

Polymicrobial biofilms form on silicone surfaces of voice prostheses. The components of saliva from oral rinses of patients with voice prostheses that promoted C. albicans adherence were examined (141). Salivary components that bound to silicone were eluted, separated by electrophoresis, stained for protein, and transferred onto nitrocellulose filters. Two major salivary proteins of about 40 and 53 kDa were removed from the silicone. A blot overlay assay with radiolabeled yeast cells was employed to identify ligands. In both the initial saliva and eluted saliva, PRPs were ligands. However, in the eluted material, only one PRP bound yeast cells. The major binding was to the 40- and 53-kDa bands. This suggests that bPRPs are not major silicone-bound components and that the two unidentified proteins promote adherence to silicone voice prostheses.


The major saliva component statherin is a 43-amino-acid phosphorylated polypeptide. Protein peaks from a chromatographic separation of saliva were bound to hydroxyapatite beads, and the ability of the bound protein to promote adherence was determined. The binding occurred with several fractions identified as glycosylated PRPs and some uncharacterized peaks and primarily to statherin but not to acidic PRPs. Fuc-α-1,2-Gal-β-1,4-Glc partially inhibited binding to material other than statherin. Purified statherin mediated the dose-dependent binding of C. albicans to hydroxyapatite beads (161). Antistatherin antibody inhibited binding to saliva-coated beads and to BECs by 93% and 43%, respectively. The addition of Fuc-α-1,2-Gal-β-1,4-Glc reduced adherence to BECs by 79%. There is some difference between this study and prior studies, including one discussed above, which found that the major ligands of saliva after electrophoretic separation and blot overlay assay of fractionated or unfractionated saliva was to bPRPs (160, 283a). Collectively, however, these studies suggest that multiple ligands and adhesins mediate adherence in the oral cavity. Interestingly, in saliva, PRPs and statherin share the property of inhibiting the spontaneous precipitation of calcium phosphate salts.


Biofilm formation is an area that has received much more attention in this decade than in the previous (Table (Table1).1). Biofilms have been reviewed frequently, with recent reviews available (24, 188, 212, 255, 267, 275, 395). With this wealth of current sources, biofilms will be discussed only superficially. With the increasing awareness of biofilm contribution to C. albicans biology and pathogenesis, biofilm formation is now one of the phenotypes that is frequently examined for mutant strains. This practice has added and will continue to add genes that impact biofilms to those genes identified in direct studies of biofilms. The description of biofilm clearly has a role for proteins in the interactions between cells in the biofilm and the extracellular production of matrix material. A glimpse of the impact of biofilm formation on extracellular proteins emerged from the proteomic analysis of noncovalently attached protein from biofilm cell wall and in culture supernatant (Table (Table4).4). In this review, a criterion for the discussion of individual genes required more than the identification of regulatory proteins and conditions. Fourteen proteins that in some way impacted biofilm formation, including proteins whose loss abolished biofilms in vitro and in vivo, were discussed. This confirms that extracellular proteins are important in biofilm formation and maintenance. The corresponding 14 genes are the following: ALS1, ALS3, CHT2, CHT3, CSA1, CSH1, EAP1, MP65, PGA10, PHO100, RBT4, SAP9, SUN41, and YWP1.


There is no doubt that the cell wall, with its polysaccharides and proteins, is a dynamic organelle. Under the seemingly placid surface seen through the microscope is a constantly readjusting structure. Indeed, even placing those cells under the coverslip creates changes in local environment, pH, nutrients, and oxygen that initiate changes in the wall. Global transcription and proteomic analyses are beginning to identify the proteins expressed under different conditions. However, since functional analysis through mutant construction is more labor-intensive, the pace at the individual gene level has been slower. Further, when genes are studied, the assumption about their location is not always confirmed. Adhesins for various ligands identified by size in the last decade have still not been associated with a particular protein and gene. The new technologies will not answer all questions. For instance, do all proteins that are implicated in cell wall structure, e.g., by their calcofluor white sensitivity, affect integrity in the same way? Are the secreted enzymes of cell wall metabolism functioning at localized sites when they change in response to environment or do they act around the whole periphery? Several of the transcription factors alter the expression of genes encoding proteins of the cell wall. Do these coordinately regulated proteins work together, or do they have independent functions? The challenge with analysis of adherence is particularly intriguing. How can the deletion of multiple proteins each reduce or ablate adherence? As the unraveling of the mysteries of the cell wall continues, a new challenge to weave the findings into a network rather than isolated proteins and regulatory factors will be developing. There is doubtlessly another decade of adventure ahead.


This article is dedicated to the memory of Helen R. Buckley, who first piqued my interest in C. albicans and then remained a friend and a source of inspiration, encouragement, and knowledge.


1. Alberti-Segui, C., A. J. Morales, H. Xing, M. M. Kessler, D. A. Willins, K. G. Weinstock, G. Cottarel, K. Fechtel, and B. Rogers. 2004. Identification of potential cell-surface proteins in Candida albicans and investigation of the role of a putative cell-surface glycosidase in adhesion and virulence. Yeast 21285-302. [PubMed]
2. Alberts, B., A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter. 2008. Molecular biology of the cell, 5th ed. Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY.
3. Albrecht, A., A. Felk, I. Pichova, J. R. Naglik, M. Schaller, P. de Groot, D. Maccallum, F. C. Odds, W. Schafer, F. Klis, M. Monod, and B. Hube. 2006. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteases of Candida albicans target proteins necessary for both cellular processes and host-pathogen interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 281688-694. [PubMed]
4. Alloush, H. M., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and W. L. Chaffin. 1996. Dynamic expression of cell wall proteins of Candida albicans revealed by probes from cDNA clones. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 3491-97. [PubMed]
5. Alloush, H. M., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, B. J. Masten, and W. L. Chaffin. 1997. 3-Phosphoglycerate kinase: a glycolytic enzyme protein present in the cell wall of Candida albicans. Microbiology 143321-330. [PubMed]
6. Alonso, R., I. Llopis, C. Flores, A. Murgui, and J. Timoneda. 2001. Different adhesins for type IV collagen on Candida albicans: identification of a lectin-like adhesin recognizing the 7S(IV) domain. Microbiology 1471971-1981. [PubMed]
7. Alvarez-Peral, F. J., O. Zaragoza, Y. Pedreno, and J. C. Arguelles. 2002. Protective role of trehalose during severe oxidative stress caused by hydrogen peroxide and the adaptive oxidative stress response in Candida albicans. Microbiology 1482599-2606. [PubMed]
8. Argimon, S., J. A. Wishart, R. Leng, S. Macaskill, A. Mavor, T. Alexandris, S. Nicholls, A. W. Knight, B. Enjalbert, R. Walmsley, F. C. Odds, N. A. Gow, and A. J. Brown. 2007. Developmental regulation of an adhesin gene during cellular morphogenesis in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 6682-692. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Arnaud, M. B., M. C. Costanzo, M. S. Skrzypek, G. Binkley, C. Lane, S. R. Miyasato, and G. Sherlock. 2005. The Candida Genome Database (CGD), a community resource for Candida albicans gene and protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 33D358-D363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Baek, Y. U., S. J. Martin, and D. A. Davis. 2006. Evidence for novel pH-dependent regulation of Candida albicans Rim101, a direct transcriptional repressor of the cell wall beta-glycosidase Phr2. Eukaryot. Cell 51550-1559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Baev, D., X. Li, and M. Edgerton. 2001. Genetically engineered human salivary histatin genes are functional in Candida albicans: development of a new system for studying histatin candidacidal activity. Microbiology 1473323-3334. [PubMed]
12. Baev, D., X. S. Li, J. Dong, P. Keng, and M. Edgerton. 2002. Human salivary histatin 5 causes disordered volume regulation and cell cycle arrest in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 704777-4784. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Baev, D., A. Rivetta, X. S. Li, S. Vylkova, E. Bashi, C. L. Slayman, and M. Edgerton. 2003. Killing of Candida albicans by human salivary histatin 5 is modulated, but not determined, by the potassium channel TOK1. Infect. Immun. 713251-3260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Baev, D., A. Rivetta, S. Vylkova, J. N. Sun, G. F. Zeng, C. L. Slayman, and M. Edgerton. 2004. The TRK1 potassium transporter is the critical effector for killing of Candida albicans by the cationic protein, histatin 5. J. Biol. Chem. 27955060-55072. [PubMed]
15. Bailey, D. A., P. J. Feldmann, M. Bovey, N. A. Gow, and A. J. Brown. 1996. The Candida albicans HYR1 gene, which is activated in response to hyphal development, belongs to a gene family encoding yeast cell wall proteins. J. Bacteriol. 1785353-5360. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Barker, K. S., S. Crisp, N. Wiederhold, R. E. Lewis, B. Bareither, J. Eckstein, R. Barbuch, M. Bard, and P. D. Rogers. 2004. Genome-wide expression profiling reveals genes associated with amphotericin B and fluconazole resistance in experimentally induced antifungal resistant isolates of Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54376-385. [PubMed]
17. Bates, S., J. M. de la Rosa, D. M. Maccallum, A. J. Brown, N. A. Gow, and F. C. Odds. 2007. Candida albicans Iff11, a secreted protein required for cell wall structure and virulence. Infect. Immun. 752922-2928. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Bauer, J., and J. Wendland. 2007. Candida albicans Sfl1 suppresses flocculation and filamentation. Eukaryot. Cell 61736-1744. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Bektic, J., C. P. Lell, A. Fuchs, H. Stoiber, C. Speth, C. Lass-Florl, M. Borg-von Zepelin, M. P. Dierich, and R. Wurzner. 2001. HIV protease inhibitors attenuate adherence of Candida albicans to epithelial cells in vitro. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 3165-71. [PubMed]
20. Bendtsen, J. D., L. J. Jensen, N. Blom, G. Von Heijne, and S. Brunak. 2004. Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 17349-356. [PubMed]
21. Bendtsen, J. D., L. Kiemer, A. Fausboll, and S. Brunak. 2005. Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria. BMC Microbiol. 558. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Bennett, R. J., and A. D. Johnson. 2006. The role of nutrient regulation and the Gpa2 protein in the mating pheromone response of C. albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 62100-119. [PubMed]
23. Bensen, E. S., S. J. Martin, M. Li, J. Berman, and D. A. Davis. 2004. Transcriptional profiling in Candida albicans reveals new adaptive responses to extracellular pH and functions for Rim101p. Mol. Microbiol. 541335-1351. [PubMed]
24. Blankenship, J. R., and A. P. Mitchell. 2006. How to build a biofilm: a fungal perspective. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9588-594. [PubMed]
25. Boone, C., A. Sdicu, M. Laroche, and H. Bussey. 1991. Isolation from Candida albicans of a functional homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae KRE1 gene, which is involved in cell wall beta-glucan synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1736859-6864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Borg-von Zepelin, M., S. Beggah, K. Boggian, D. Sanglard, and M. Monod. 1998. The expression of the secreted aspartyl proteinases Sap4 to Sap6 from Candida albicans in murine macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 28543-554. [PubMed]
27. Borg-von Zepelin, M., I. Meyer, R. Thomssen, R. Wurzner, D. Sanglard, A. Telenti, and M. Monod. 1999. HIV-protease inhibitors reduce cell adherence of Candida albicans strains by inhibition of yeast secreted aspartic proteases. J. Investig. Dermatol. 113747-751. [PubMed]
28. Braun, B. R., W. S. Head, M. X. Wang, and A. D. Johnson. 2000. Identification and characterization of TUP1-regulated genes in Candida albicans. Genetics 15631-44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Braun, B. R., and A. D. Johnson. 1997. Control of filament formation in Candida albicans by the transcriptional repressor TUP1. Science 277105-109. [PubMed]
30. Braun, B. R., and A. D. Johnson. 2000. TUP1, CPH1 and EFG1 make independent contributions to filamentation in Candida albicans. Genetics 15557-67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Braun, B. R., M. van Het Hoog, C. d'Enfert, M. Martchenko, J. Dungan, A. Kuo, D. O. Inglis, M. A. Uhl, H. Hogues, M. Berriman, M. Lorenz, A. Levitin, U. Oberholzer, C. Bachewich, D. Harcus, A. Marcil, D. Dignard, T. Iouk, R. Zito, L. Frangeul, F. Tekaia, K. Rutherford, E. Wang, C. A. Munro, S. Bates, N. A. Gow, L. L. Hoyer, G. Kohler, J. Morschhauser, G. Newport, S. Znaidi, M. Raymond, B. Turcotte, G. Sherlock, M. Costanzo, J. Ihmels, J. Berman, D. Sanglard, N. Agabian, A. P. Mitchell, A. D. Johnson, M. Whiteway, and A. Nantel. 2005. A human-curated annotation of the Candida albicans genome. PLoS Genet. 136-57. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Bromuro, C., A. Torosantucci, M. J. Gomez, F. Urbani, and A. Cassone. 1994. Differential release of an immunodominant 65 kDa mannoprotein antigen from yeast and mycelial forms of Candida albicans. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 32447-459. [PubMed]
33. Brown, V., J. A. Sexton, and M. Johnston. 2006. A glucose sensor in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 51726-1737. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Bruno, V. M., S. Kalachikov, R. Subaran, C. J. Nobile, C. Kyratsous, and A. P. Mitchell. 2006. Control of the C. albicans cell wall damage response by transcriptional regulator Cas5. PLoS Pathogens 2e21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Cabib, E., D. H. Roh, M. Schmidt, L. B. Crotti, and A. Varma. 2001. The yeast cell wall and septum as paradigms of cell growth and morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 27619679-19682. [PubMed]
36. Cambi, A., K. Gijzen, J. M. de Vries, R. Torensma, B. Joosten, G. J. Adema, M. G. Netea, B. J. Kullberg, L. Romani, and C. G. Figdor. 2003. The C-type lectin DC-SIGN (CD209) is an antigen-uptake receptor for Candida albicans on dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 33532-538. [PubMed]
37. Cannon, R. D., and W. L. Chaffin. 2001. Colonization is a crucial factor in oral candidiasis. J. Dent. Educ. 65785-787. [PubMed]
38. Cannon, R. D., and W. L. Chaffin. 1999. Oral colonization by Candida albicans. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 10359-383. [PubMed]
39. Cannon, R. D., A. K. Nand, and H. F. Jenkinson. 1995. Adherence of Candida albicans to human salivary components adsorbed to hydroxylapatite. Microbiology 141213-219. [PubMed]
40. Cao, F., S. Lane, P. P. Raniga, Y. Lu, Z. Zhou, K. Ramon, J. Chen, and H. Liu. 2006. The Flo8 transcription factor is essential for hyphal development and virulence in Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 17295-307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Cao, T. B., and M. H. Saier, Jr. 2003. The general protein secretory pathway: phylogenetic analyses leading to evolutionary conclusions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1609115-125. [PubMed]
42. Cao, Y. Y., Y. B. Cao, Z. Xu, K. Ying, Y. Li, Y. Xie, Z. Y. Zhu, W. S. Chen, and Y. Y. Jiang. 2005. cDNA microarray analysis of differential gene expression in Candida albicans biofilm exposed to farnesol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49584-589. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Cappellaro, C., V. Mrsa, and W. Tanner. 1998. New potential cell wall glucanases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their involvement in mating. J. Bacteriol. 1805030-5037. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Casanova, M., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, C. Monteagudo, A. Llombart-Bosch, R. Sentandreu, and J. P. Martinez. 1992. Identification of a 58-kilodalton cell surface fibrinogen-binding mannoprotein from Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 604221-4229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Cassone, A., D. Kerridge, and E. F. Gale. 1979. Ultrastructural changes in the cell wall of Candida albicans following cessation of growth and their possible relationship to the development of polyene resistance. J. Gen. Microbiol. 110339-349. [PubMed]
46. Castillo, L., A. I. Martinez, A. Garcera, J. Garcia-Martinez, J. Ruiz-Herrera, E. Valentin, and R. Sentandreu. 2006. Genomic response programs of Candida albicans following protoplasting and regeneration. Fungal Genet. Biol. 43124-134. [PubMed]
47. Cateau, E., P. Levasseur, M. Borgonovi, and C. Imbert. 2007. The effect of aminocandin (HMR 3270) on the in-vitro adherence of Candida albicans to polystyrene surfaces coated with extracellular matrix proteins or fibronectin. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 13311-315. [PubMed]
48. Chaffin, W. L. 1984. The relationship between yeast cell size and cell division in Candida albicans. Can. J. Microbiol. 30192-203. [PubMed]
49. Chaffin, W. L., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, M. Casanova, D. Gozalbo, and J. P. Martinez. 1998. Cell wall and secreted proteins of Candida albicans: identification, function, and expression. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62130-180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Chaffin, W. L., and S. J. Sogin. 1976. Germ tube formation from zonal rotor fractions of Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 126771-776. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Chauhan, N., D. Inglis, E. Roman, J. Pla, D. Li, J. A. Calera, and R. Calderone. 2003. Candida albicans response regulator gene SSK1 regulates a subset of genes whose functions are associated with cell wall biosynthesis and adaptation to oxidative stress. Eukaryot. Cell 21018-1024. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Chavan, M., T. Suzuki, M. Rekowicz, and W. Lennarz. 2003. Genetic, biochemical, and morphological evidence for the involvement of N-glycosylation in biosynthesis of the cell wall beta1,6-glucan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10015381-15386. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Chen, L., and N. G. Davis. 2000. Recycling of the yeast a-factor receptor. J. Cell Biol. 151731-738. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Chen, Y. C., C. C. Wu, W. L. Chung, and F. J. Lee. 2002. Differential secretion of Sap4-6 proteins in Candida albicans during hyphae formation. Microbiology 1483743-3754. [PubMed]
55. Cheng, G., K. Wozniak, M. A. Wallig, P. L. Fidel, Jr., S. R. Trupin, and L. L. Hoyer. 2005. Comparison between Candida albicans agglutinin-like sequence gene expression patterns in human clinical specimens and models of vaginal candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 731656-1663. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Cheng, G., K. M. Yeater, and L. L. Hoyer. 2006. Cellular and molecular biology of Candida albicans estrogen response. Eukaryot. Cell 5180-191. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Chhatwal, G. S. 2002. Anchorless adhesins and invasins of gram-positive bacteria: a new class of virulence factors. Trends Microbiol. 10205-208. [PubMed]
58. Choi, W., Y. J. Yoo, M. Kim, D. Shin, H. B. Jeon, and W. Choi. 2003. Identification of proteins highly expressed in the hyphae of Candida albicans by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Yeast 201053-1060. [PubMed]
59. Clayton, A., A. Turkes, H. Navabi, M. D. Mason, and Z. Tabi. 2005. Induction of heat shock proteins in B-cell exosomes. J. Cell Sci. 1183631-3638. [PubMed]
60. Cleves, A. E., D. N. Cooper, S. H. Barondes, and R. B. Kelly. 1996. A new pathway for protein export in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 1331017-1026. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Colman-Lerner, A., T. E. Chin, and R. Brent. 2001. Yeast Cbk1 and Mob2 activate daughter-specific genetic programs to induce asymmetric cell fates. Cell 107739-750. [PubMed]
62. Copping, V. M., C. J. Barelle, B. Hube, N. A. Gow, A. J. Brown, and F. C. Odds. 2005. Exposure of Candida albicans to antifungal agents affects expression of SAP2 and SAP9 secreted proteinase genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55645-654. [PubMed]
63. Cotter, G., R. Weedle, and K. Kavanagh. 1998. Monoclonal antibodies directed against extracellular matrix proteins reduce the adherence of Candida albicans to HEp-2 cells. Mycopathologia 141137-142. [PubMed]
64. Coutinho, P. M., and B. Henrissat. 1999. Carbohydrate-active enzymes: an integrated database approach., p. 3-12. In H. J. Gilbert, G. Davies, B. Henrissat, and B. Svensson (ed.), Recent advances in carbohydrate bioengineering. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
65. Crowe, J. D., I. K. Sievwright, G. C. Auld, N. R. Moore, N. A. Gow, and N. A. Booth. 2003. Candida albicans binds human plasminogen: identification of eight plasminogen-binding proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 471637-1651. [PubMed]
66. Cutfield, J. F., P. A. Sullivan, and S. M. Cutfield. 2000. Minor structural consequences of alternative CUG codon usage (Ser for Leu) in Candida albicans exoglucanase. Protein Eng. 13735-738. [PubMed]
67. Cutfield, S. M., G. J. Davies, G. Murshudov, B. F. Anderson, P. C. Moody, P. A. Sullivan, and J. F. Cutfield. 1999. The structure of the exo-beta-(1,3)-glucanase from Candida albicans in native and bound forms: relationship between a pocket and groove in family 5 glycosyl hydrolases. J. Mol. Biol. 294771-783. [PubMed]
68. Daniels, K. J., S. R. Lockhart, J. F. Staab, P. Sundstrom, and D. R. Soll. 2003. The adhesin Hwp1 and the first daughter cell localize to the a/a portion of the conjugation bridge during Candida albicans mating. Mol. Biol. Cell 144920-4930. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. De Bernardis, F., S. Arancia, L. Morelli, B. Hube, D. Sanglard, W. Schafer, and A. Cassone. 1999. Evidence that members of the secretory aspartyl proteinase gene family, in particular SAP2, are virulence factors for Candida vaginitis. J. Infect. Dis. 179201-208. [PubMed]
70. De Bernardis, F., A. Cassone, J. Sturtevant, and R. Calderone. 1995. Expression of Candida albicans SAP1 and SAP2 in experimental vaginitis. Infect. Immun. 631887-1892. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. De Bernardis, F., H. Liu, R. O'Mahony, R. La Valle, S. Bartollino, S. Sandini, S. Grant, N. Brewis, I. Tomlinson, R. C. Basset, J. Holton, I. M. Roitt, and A. Cassone. 2007. Human domain antibodies against virulence traits of Candida albicans inhibit fungus adherence to vaginal epithelium and protect against experimental vaginal candidiasis. J. Infect. Dis. 195149-157. [PubMed]
72. De Bernardis, F., F. A. Muhlschlegel, A. Cassone, and W. A. Fonzi. 1998. The pH of the host niche controls gene expression in and virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 663317-3325. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. de Groot, P. W., A. D. de Boer, J. Cunningham, H. L. Dekker, L. de Jong, K. J. Hellingwerf, C. de Koster, and F. M. Klis. 2004. Proteomic analysis of Candida albicans cell walls reveals covalently bound carbohydrate-active enzymes and adhesins. Eukaryot. Cell 3955-965. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. de Groot, P. W., K. J. Hellingwerf, and F. M. Klis. 2003. Genome-wide identification of fungal GPI proteins. Yeast 20781-796. [PubMed]
75. De Groot, P. W., A. F. Ram, and F. M. Klis. 2005. Features and functions of covalently linked proteins in fungal cell walls. Fungal Genet. Biol. 42657-675. [PubMed]
76. Delgado, M. L., M. L. Gil, and D. Gozalbo. 2003. Candida albicans TDH3 gene promotes secretion of internal invertase when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-invertase fusion protein. Yeast 20713-722. [PubMed]
77. Delgado, M. L., M. L. Gil, and D. Gozalbo. 2003. Starvation and temperature upshift cause an increase in the enzymatically active cell wall-associated glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase protein in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 4297-303. [PubMed]
78. Delgado, M. L., J. E. O'Connor, I. Azorin, J. Renau-Piqueras, M. L. Gil, and D. Gozalbo. 2001. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase polypeptides encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TDH1, TDH2 and TDH3 genes are also cell wall proteins. Microbiology 147411-417. [PubMed]
79. Dennehy, K. M., and G. D. Brown. 2007. The role of the beta-glucan receptor Dectin-1 in control of fungal infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 82253-258. [PubMed]
80. Dignard, D., and M. Whiteway. 2006. SST2, a regulator of G-protein signaling for the Candida albicans mating response pathway. Eukaryot. Cell 5192-202. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Dilks, K., R. W. Rose, E. Hartmann, and M. Pohlschroder. 2003. Prokaryotic utilization of the tiwn-arginine translocation pathway: a genomic survey. J. Bacteriol. 1851478-1483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
82. Ding, Z., K. Atmakuri, and P. J. Christie. 2003. The outs and ins of bacterial type IV secretion substrates. Trends Microbiol. 11527-535. [PubMed]
83. Doedt, T., S. Krishnamurthy, D. P. Bockmuhl, B. Tebarth, C. Stempel, C. L. Russell, A. J. Brown, and J. F. Ernst. 2004. APSES proteins regulate morphogenesis and metabolism in Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 153167-3180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
84. Dranginis, A. M., J. M. Rauceo, J. E. Coronado, and P. N. Lipke. 2007. A biochemical guide to yeast adhesins: glycoproteins for social and antisocial occasions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71282-294. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Dunkler, A., A. Walther, C. A. Specht, and J. Wendland. 2005. Candida albicans CHT3 encodes the functional homolog of the Cts1 chitinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 42935-947. [PubMed]
86. Dunkler, A., and J. Wendland. 2007. Candida albicans Rho-type GTPase-encoding genes required for polarized cell growth and cell separation. Eukaryot. Cell 6844-854. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Ebanks, R. O., K. Chisholm, S. McKinnon, M. Whiteway, and D. M. Pinto. 2006. Proteomic analysis of Candida albicans yeast and hyphal cell wall and associated proteins. Proteomics 62147-2156. [PubMed]
88. Ecker, M., R. Deutzmann, L. Lehle, V. Mrsa, and W. Tanner. 2006. Pir proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are attached to beta-1,3-glucan by a new protein-carbohydrate linkage. J. Biol. Chem. 28111523-11529. [PubMed]
89. Eckert, S. E., W. J. Heinz, K. Zakikhany, S. Thewes, K. Haynes, B. Hube, and F. A. Muhlschlegel. 2007. PGA4, a GAS homologue from Candida albicans, is up-regulated early in infection processes. Fungal Genet. Biol. 44368-377. [PubMed]
90. Edgerton, M., S. E. Koshlukova, M. W. Araujo, R. C. Patel, J. Dong, and J. A. Bruenn. 2000. Salivary histatin 5 and human neutrophil defensin 1 kill Candida albicans via shared pathways. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 443310-3316. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Edgerton, M., S. E. Koshlukova, T. E. Lo, B. G. Chrzan, R. M. Straubinger, and P. A. Raj. 1998. Candidacidal activity of salivary histatins. Identification of a histatin 5-binding protein on Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 27320438-20447. [PubMed]
92. Eisenhaber, B., G. Schneider, M. Wildpaner, and F. Eisenhaber. 2004. A sensitive predictor for potential GPI lipid modification sites in fungal protein sequences and its application to genome-wide studies for Aspergillus nidulans, Candida albicans, Neurospora crassa, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Mol. Biol. 337243-253. [PubMed]
93. Enjalbert, B., A. Nantel, and M. Whiteway. 2003. Stress-induced gene expression in Candida albicans: absence of a general stress response. Mol. Biol. Cell 141460-1467. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Enjalbert, B., D. A. Smith, M. J. Cornell, I. Alam, S. Nicholls, A. J. Brown, and J. Quinn. 2006. Role of the Hog1 stress-activated protein kinase in the global transcriptional response to stress in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 171018-1032. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Eroles, P., M. Sentandreu, M. V. Elorza, and R. Sentandreu. 1997. The highly immunogenic enolase and Hsp70p are adventitious Candida albicans cell wall proteins. Microbiology 143313-320. [PubMed]
96. Esteban, P. F., I. Rios, R. Garcia, E. Duenas, J. Pla, M. Sanchez, C. R. de Aldana, and F. Del Rey. 2005. Characterization of the CaENG1 gene encoding an endo-1,3-beta-glucanase involved in cell separation in Candida albicans. Curr. Microbiol. 51385-392. [PubMed]
97. Falkensammer, B., G. Pilz, J. Bektic, P. Imwidthaya, K. Johrer, C. Speth, C. Lass-Florl, M. P. Dierich, and R. Wurzner. 2007. Absent reduction by HIV protease inhibitors of Candida albicans adhesion to endothelial cells. Mycoses 50172-177. [PubMed]
98. Felk, A., M. Kretschmar, A. Albrecht, M. Schaller, S. Beinhauer, T. Nichterlein, D. Sanglard, H. C. Korting, W. Schafer, and B. Hube. 2002. Candida albicans hyphal formation and the expression of the Efg1-regulated proteinases Sap4 to Sap6 are required for the invasion of parenchymal organs. Infect. Immun. 703689-3700. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
99. Fernandez-Arenas, E., V. Cabezon, C. Bermejo, J. Arroyo, C. Nombela, R. Diez-Orejas, and C. Gil. 2007. Integrated proteomics and genomics strategies bring new insight into Candida albicans response upon macrophage interaction. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6460-478. [PubMed]
100. Filler, S. G. 2006. Candida-host cell receptor-ligand interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9333-339. [PubMed]
101. Filler, S. G., and D. C. Sheppard. 2006. Fungal invasion of normally non-phagocytic host cells. PLoS Pathogens 2e129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102. Filler, S. G., J. N. Swerdloff, C. Hobbs, and P. M. Luckett. 1995. Penetration and damage of endothelial cells by Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 63976-983. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
103. Firon, A., S. Aubert, I. Iraqui, S. Guadagnini, S. Goyard, M. C. Prevost, G. Janbon, and C. d'Enfert. 2007. The SUN41 and SUN42 genes are essential for cell separation in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 661256-1275. [PubMed]
104. Fittipaldi, A., and M. Giacca. 2005. Transcellular protein transduction using the Tat protein of HIV-1. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57597-608. [PubMed]
105. Fonzi, W. A. 1999. PHR1 and PHR2 of Candida albicans encode putative glycosidases required for proper cross-linking of beta-1,3- and beta-1,6-glucans. J. Bacteriol. 1817070-7079. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
106. Forsyth, C. B., and H. L. Mathews. 2002. Lymphocyte adhesion to Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 70517-527. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
107. Forsyth, C. B., and H. L. Mathews. 1996. Lymphocytes utilize CD11b/CD18 for adhesion to Candida albicans. Cell. Immunol. 17091-100. [PubMed]
108. Forsyth, C. B., and H. L. Mathews. 1993. A quantitative radiometric assay to measure mammalian cell binding to hyphae of Candida albicans. J. Immunol. Methods 165113-119. [PubMed]
109. Forsyth, C. B., E. F. Plow, and L. Zhang. 1998. Interaction of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans with integrin CD11b/CD18: recognition by the I domain is modulated by the lectin-like domain and the CD18 subunit. J. Immunol. 1616198-6205. [PubMed]
110. Fradin, C., P. De Groot, D. MacCallum, M. Schaller, F. Klis, F. C. Odds, and B. Hube. 2005. Granulocytes govern the transcriptional response, morphology and proliferation of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol. Microbiol. 56397-415. [PubMed]
111. Fradin, C., M. Kretschmar, T. Nichterlein, C. Gaillardin, C. d'Enfert, and B. Hube. 2003. Stage-specific gene expression of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol. Microbiol. 471523-1543. [PubMed]
112. Fu, Y., A. S. Ibrahim, W. Fonzi, X. Zhou, C. F. Ramos, and M. A. Ghannoum. 1997. Cloning and characterization of a gene (LIP1) which encodes a lipase from the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Microbiology 143331-340. [PubMed]
113. Fu, Y., A. S. Ibrahim, D. C. Sheppard, Y. C. Chen, S. W. French, J. E. Cutler, S. G. Filler, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 2002. Candida albicans Als1p: an adhesin that is a downstream effector of the EFG1 filamentation pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 4461-72. [PubMed]
114. Furutani, A., S. Tsuge, K. Ohnishi, Y. Hikichi, T. Oku, K. Tsuno, Y. Inoue, H. Ochiai, H. Kaku, and Y. Kubo. 2004. Evidence for HrpXo-dependent expression of type II secretory proteins in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J. Bacteriol. 1861374-1380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
115. Gacser, A., F. Stehr, C. Kroger, L. Kredics, W. Schafer, and J. D. Nosanchuk. 2007. Lipase 8 affects the pathogenesis of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 754710-4718. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Gagnon-Arsenault, I., J. Tremblay, and Y. Bourbonnais. 2006. Fungal yapsins and cell wall: a unique family of aspartic peptidases for a distinctive cellular function. FEMS Yeast Res. 6966-978. [PubMed]
117. Garcera, A., L. Castillo, A. I. Martinez, M. V. Elorza, E. Valentin, and R. Sentandreu. 2005. Anchorage of Candida albicans Ssr1 to the cell wall, and transcript profiling of the null mutant. Res. Microbiol. 156911-920. [PubMed]
118. Garcerá, A., A. I. Martinez, L. Castillo, M. V. Elorza, R. Sentandreu, and E. Valentin. 2003. Identification and study of a Candida albicans protein homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ssr1p, an internal cell-wall protein. Microbiology 1492137-2145. [PubMed]
119. Garcia-Sanchez, S., S. Aubert, I. Iraqui, G. Janbon, J. M. Ghigo, and C. d'Enfert. 2004. Candida albicans biofilms: a developmental state associated with specific and stable gene expression patterns. Eukaryot. Cell 3536-545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
120. Garcia-Sanchez, S., A. L. Mavor, C. L. Russell, S. Argimon, P. Dennison, B. Enjalbert, and A. J. Brown. 2005. Global roles of Ssn6 in Tup1- and Nrg1-dependent gene regulation in the fungal pathogen, Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 162913-2925. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
121. Gaur, N. K., R. L. Smith, and S. A. Klotz. 2002. Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing ALA1/ALS5 adhere to accessible threonine, serine, or alanine patches. Cell Commun. Adhes. 945-57. [PubMed]
122. Gemmill, T. R., and R. B. Trimble. 1999. Overview of N- and O-linked oligosaccharide structures found in various yeast species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1426227-237. [PubMed]
123. Ghannoum, M. A. 2000. Potential role of phospholipases in virulence and fungal pathogenesis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13122-143, table of contents. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
124. Gil, M. L., and D. Gozalbo. 2006. TLR2, but not TLR4, triggers cytokine production by murine cells in response to Candida albicans yeasts and hyphae. Microbes Infect. 82299-2304. [PubMed]
125. Glee, P. M., J. E. Cutler, E. E. Benson, R. F. Bargatze, and K. C. Hazen. 2001. Inhibition of hydrophobic protein-mediated Candida albicans attachment to endothelial cells during physiologic shear flow. Infect. Immun. 692815-2820. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
126. Gokce, G., N. Cerikcioglu, and A. Yagci. 2007. Acid proteinase, phospholipase, and biofilm production of Candida species isolated from blood cultures. Mycopathologia 164265-269. [PubMed]
127. Gonzalez, M. M., R. Diez-Orejas, G. Molero, A. M. Alvarez, J. Pla, C. Nombela, and M. Sanchez-Perez. 1997. Phenotypic characterization of a Candida albicans strain deficient in its major exoglucanase. Microbiology 1433023-3032. [PubMed]
128. Gozalbo, D., I. Gil-Navarro, I. Azorin, J. Renau-Piqueras, J. P. Martinez, and M. L. Gil. 1998. The cell wall-associated glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Candida albicans is also a fibronectin and laminin binding protein. Infect. Immun. 662052-2059. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
129. Granger, B. L., M. L. Flenniken, D. A. Davis, A. P. Mitchell, and J. E. Cutler. 2005. Yeast wall protein 1 of Candida albicans. Microbiology 1511631-1644. [PubMed]
130. Green, C. B., G. Cheng, J. Chandra, P. Mukherjee, M. A. Ghannoum, and L. L. Hoyer. 2004. RT-PCR detection of Candida albicans ALS gene expression in the reconstituted human epithelium (RHE) model of oral candidiasis and in model biofilms. Microbiology 150267-275. [PubMed]
131. Green, C. B., S. M. Marretta, G. Cheng, F. F. Faddoul, E. J. Ehrhart, and L. L. Hoyer. 2006. RT-PCR analysis of Candida albicans ALS gene expression in a hyposalivatory rat model of oral candidiasis and in HIV-positive human patients. Med. Mycol. 44103-111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
132. Green, C. B., X. Zhao, and L. L. Hoyer. 2005. Use of green fluorescent protein and reverse transcription-PCR to monitor Candida albicans agglutinin-like sequence gene expression in a murine model of disseminated candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 731852-1855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Green, C. B., X. Zhao, K. M. Yeater, and L. L. Hoyer. 2005. Construction and real-time RT-PCR validation of Candida albicans PALS-GFP reporter strains and their use in flow cytometry analysis of ALS gene expression in budding and filamenting cells. Microbiology 1511051-1060. [PubMed]
134. Harcus, D., A. Nantel, A. Marcil, T. Rigby, and M. Whiteway. 2004. Transcription profiling of cyclic AMP signaling in Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 154490-4499. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
135. Hazen, K. C., and P. M. Glee. 1995. Cell surface hydrophobicity and medically important fungi. Curr. Top. Med. Mycol. 61-31. [PubMed]
136. Hazen, K. C., and B. W. Hazen. 1992. Hydrophobic surface protein masking by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 601499-1508. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
137. Heinsbroek, S. E., G. D. Brown, and S. Gordon. 2005. Dectin-1 escape by fungal dimorphism. Trends Immunol. 26352-354. [PubMed]
138. Hiller, E., S. Heine, H. Brunner, and S. Rupp. 2007. Candida albicans Sun41p, a putative glycosidase, is involved in morphogenesis, cell wall biogenesis, and biofilm formation. Eukaryot. Cell 62056-2065. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
139. Hirai, Y., C. M. Nelson, K. Yamazaki, K. Takebe, J. Przybylo, B. Madden, and D. C. Radisky. 2007. Non-classical export of epimorphin and its adhesion to alphav-integrin in regulation of epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 1202032-2043. [PubMed]
140. Holmes, A. R., B. M. Bandara, and R. D. Cannon. 2002. Saliva promotes Candida albicans adherence to human epithelial cells. J. Dent. Res. 8128-32. [PubMed]
141. Holmes, A. R., P. van der Wielen, R. D. Cannon, D. Ruske, and P. Dawes. 2006. Candida albicans binds to saliva proteins selectively adsorbed to silicone. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 102488-494. [PubMed]
142. Hoover, C. I., M. J. Jantapour, G. Newport, N. Agabian, and S. J. Fisher. 1998. Cloning and regulated expression of the Candida albicans phospholipase B (PLB1) gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 167163-169. [PubMed]
143. Hoyer, L. L. 2001. The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 9176-180. [PubMed]
144. Hoyer, L. L., C. B. Green, S. H. Oh, and X. Zhao. 2008. Discovering the secrets of the Candida albicans agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) gene family—a sticky pursuit. Med. Mycol. 461-15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
145. Hoyer, L. L., and J. E. Hecht. 2000. The ALS6 and ALS7 genes of Candida albicans. Yeast 16847-855. [PubMed]
146. Hoyer, L. L., T. L. Payne, and J. E. Hecht. 1998. Identification of Candida albicans ALS2 and ALS4 and localization of Als proteins to the fungal cell surface. J. Bacteriol. 1805334-5343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
147. Hsia, H. C., and J. E. Schwarzbauer. 2005. Meet the tenascins: multifunctional and mysterious. J. Biol. Chem. 28026641-26644. [PubMed]
148. Hube, B., M. Monod, D. A. Schofield, A. J. Brown, and N. A. Gow. 1994. Expression of seven members of the gene family encoding secretory aspartyl proteinases in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 1487-99. [PubMed]
149. Hube, B., D. Sanglard, F. C. Odds, D. Hess, M. Monod, W. Schafer, A. J. Brown, and N. A. Gow. 1997. Disruption of each of the secreted aspartyl proteinase genes SAP1, SAP2, and SAP3 of Candida albicans attenuates virulence. Infect. Immun. 653529-3538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
150. Hube, B., F. Stehr, M. Bossenz, A. Mazur, M. Kretschmar, and W. Schafer. 2000. Secreted lipases of Candida albicans: cloning, characterisation and expression analysis of a new gene family with at least ten members. Arch. Microbiol. 174362-374. [PubMed]
151. Hube, B., C. J. Turver, F. C. Odds, H. Eiffert, G. J. Boulnois, H. Kochel, and R. Ruchel. 1991. Sequence of the Candida albicans gene encoding the secretory aspartate proteinase. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 29129-132. [PubMed]
152. Ibrahim, A. S., S. G. Filler, D. Sanglard, J. E. Edwards, Jr., and B. Hube. 1998. Secreted aspartyl proteinases and interactions of Candida albicans with human endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 663003-3005. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
153. Imbert, C., M. H. Rodier, G. Daniault, and J. L. Jacquemin. 2002. Influence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of conventional antifungals on metabolism of Candida albicans and on its adherence to polystyrene and extracellular matrix proteins. Med. Mycol. 40123-129. [PubMed]
154. Insenser, M., C. Nombela, G. Molero, and C. Gil. 2006. Proteomic analysis of detergent-resistant membranes from Candida albicans. Proteomics 6(Suppl. 1)S74-S81. [PubMed]
155. Jackson, B. E., B. M. Mitchell, and K. R. Wilhelmus. 2007. Corneal virulence of Candida albicans strains deficient in Tup1-regulated genes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 482535-2539. [PubMed]
156. Jackson, B. E., K. R. Wilhelmus, and B. Hube. 2007. The role of secreted aspartyl proteinases in Candida albicans keratitis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 483559-3565. [PubMed]
157. Jang, W. S., X. S. Li, J. N. Sun, and M. Edgerton. 2008. The P-113 fragment of histatin 5 requires a specific peptide sequence for intracellular translocation in Candida albicans, which is independent of cell wall binding. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52497-504. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
158. Jayatilake, J. A., Y. H. Samaranayake, L. K. Cheung, and L. P. Samaranayake. 2006. Quantitative evaluation of tissue invasion by wild type, hyphal and SAP mutants of Candida albicans, and non-albicans Candida species in reconstituted human oral epithelium. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 35484-491. [PubMed]
159. Jayatilake, J. A., Y. H. Samaranayake, and L. P. Samaranayake. 2005. An ultrastructural and a cytochemical study of candidal invasion of reconstituted human oral epithelium. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 34240-246. [PubMed]
160. Jeng, H. W., A. R. Holmes, and R. D. Cannon. 2005. Characterization of two Candida albicans surface mannoprotein adhesins that bind immobilized saliva components. Med. Mycol. 43209-217. [PubMed]
161. Johansson, I., P. Bratt, D. I. Hay, S. Schluckebier, and N. Stromberg. 2000. Adhesion of Candida albicans, but not Candida krusei, to salivary statherin and mimicking host molecules. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 15112-118. [PubMed]
162. Jones, T., N. A. Federspiel, H. Chibana, J. Dungan, S. Kalman, B. B. Magee, G. Newport, Y. R. Thorstenson, N. Agabian, P. T. Magee, R. W. Davis, and S. Scherer. 2004. The diploid genome sequence of Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1017329-7334. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
163. Jong, A. Y., S. H. Chen, M. F. Stins, K. S. Kim, T. L. Tuan, and S. H. Huang. 2003. Binding of Candida albicans enolase to plasmin(ogen) results in enhanced invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J. Med. Microbiol. 52615-622. [PubMed]
164. Kadosh, D., and A. D. Johnson. 2005. Induction of the Candida albicans filamentous growth program by relief of transcriptional repression: a genome-wide analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 162903-2912. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
165. Kamai, Y., M. Kubota, Y. Kamai, T. Hosokawa, T. Fukuoka, and S. G. Filler. 2002. Contribution of Candida albicans ALS1 to the pathogenesis of experimental oropharyngeal candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 705256-5258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
166. Kandasamy, R., G. Vediyappan, and W. L. Chaffin. 2000. Evidence for the presence of pir-like proteins in Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 186239-243. [PubMed]
167. Kapteyn, J. C., G. J. Dijkgraaf, R. C. Montijn, and F. M. Klis. 1995. Glucosylation of cell wall proteins in regenerating spheroplasts of Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 128271-277. [PubMed]
168. Kapteyn, J. C., L. L. Hoyer, J. E. Hecht, W. H. Muller, A. Andel, A. J. Verkleij, M. Makarow, H. Van Den Ende, and F. M. Klis. 2000. The cell wall architecture of Candida albicans wild-type cells and cell wall-defective mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 35601-611. [PubMed]
169. Kapteyn, J. C., R. C. Montijn, G. J. Dijkgraaf, and F. M. Klis. 1994. Identification of beta-1,6-glucosylated cell wall proteins in yeast and hyphal forms of Candida albicans. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 65402-407. [PubMed]
170. Kapteyn, J. C., R. C. Montijn, G. J. Dijkgraaf, H. Van den Ende, and F. M. Klis. 1995. Covalent association of beta-1,3-glucan with beta-1,6-glucosylated mannoproteins in cell walls of Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 1773788-3792. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
171. Karababa, M., A. T. Coste, B. Rognon, J. Bille, and D. Sanglard. 2004. Comparison of gene expression profiles of Candida albicans azole-resistant clinical isolates and laboratory strains exposed to drugs inducing multidrug transporters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 483064-3079. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
172. Kelly, M. T., D. M. MacCallum, S. D. Clancy, F. C. Odds, A. J. Brown, and G. Butler. 2004. The Candida albicans CaACE2 gene affects morphogenesis, adherence and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 53969-983. [PubMed]
173. Kery, V., J. J. Krepinsky, C. D. Warren, P. Capek, and P. D. Stahl. 1992. Ligand recognition by purified human mannose receptor. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 29849-55. [PubMed]
174. Kim, D., E. T. Yukl, P. Moenne-Loccoz, and P. R. Montellano. 2006. Fungal heme oxygenases: functional expression and characterization of Hmx1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and CaHmx1 from Candida albicans. Biochemistry 4514772-14780. [PubMed]
175. Kim, S., M. J. Wolyniak, J. F. Staab, and P. Sundstrom. 2007. A 368-base-pair cis-acting HWP1 promoter region, HCR, of Candida albicans confers hypha-specific gene regulation and binds architectural transcription factors Nhp6 and Gcf1p. Eukaryot. Cell 6693-709. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
176. Klis, F. M., A. Boorsma, and P. W. De Groot. 2006. Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 23185-202. [PubMed]
177. Klis, F. M., P. de Groot, and K. Hellingwerf. 2001. Molecular organization of the cell wall of Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 39(Suppl. 1)1-8. [PubMed]
178. Klis, F. M., M. de Jong, S. Brul, and P. W. de Groot. 2007. Extraction of cell surface-associated proteins from living yeast cells. Yeast 24253-258. [PubMed]
179. Klis, F. M., P. Mol., K. Hellingwerf, and S. Brul. 2002. Dynamics of cell wall structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26239-256. [PubMed]
180. Klotz, S. A., N. K. Gaur, D. F. Lake, V. Chan, J. Rauceo, and P. N. Lipke. 2004. Degenerate peptide recognition by Candida albicans adhesins Als5p and Als1p. Infect. Immun. 722029-2034. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
181. Klotz, S. A., N. K. Gaur, J. Rauceo, D. F. Lake, Y. Park, K. S. Hahm, and P. N. Lipke. 2004. Inhibition of adherence and killing of Candida albicans with a 23-mer peptide (Fn/23) with dual antifungal properties. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 484337-4341. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
182. Klotz, S. A., M. L. Pendrak, and R. C. Hein. 2001. Antibodies to alpha5beta1 and alpha(v)beta3 integrins react with Candida albicans alcohol dehydrogenase. Microbiology 1473159-3164. [PubMed]
183. Kolotila, M. P., and R. D. Diamond. 1990. Effects of neutrophils and in vitro oxidants on survival and phenotypic switching of Candida albicans WO-1. Infect. Immun. 581174-1179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
184. Koshlukova, S. E., M. W. Araujo, D. Baev, and M. Edgerton. 2000. Released ATP is an extracellular cytotoxic mediator in salivary histatin 5-induced killing of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 686848-6856. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
185. Kraiczy, P., and R. Wurzner. 2006. Complement escape of human pathogenic bacteria by acquisition of complement regulators. Mol. Immunol. 4331-44. [PubMed]
186. Kretschmar, M., A. Felk, P. Staib, M. Schaller, D. Hess, M. Callapina, J. Morschhauser, W. Schafer, H. C. Korting, H. Hof, B. Hube, and T. Nichterlein. 2002. Individual acid aspartic proteinases (Saps) 1-6 of Candida albicans are not essential for invasion and colonization of the gastrointestinal tract in mice. Microb. Pathog. 3261-70. [PubMed]
187. Kruppa, M., and R. Calderone. 2006. Two-component signal transduction in human fungal pathogens. FEMS Yeast Res. 6149-159. [PubMed]
188. Kumamoto, C. A., and M. D. Vinces. 2005. Alternative Candida albicans lifestyles: growth on surfaces. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59113-133. [PubMed]
189. Kunze, D., I. Melzer, D. Bennett, D. Sanglard, D. MacCallum, J. Norskau, D. C. Coleman, F. C. Odds, W. Schafer, and B. Hube. 2005. Functional analysis of the phospholipase C gene CaPLC1 and two unusual phospholipase C genes, CaPLC2 and CaPLC3, of Candida albicans. Microbiology 1513381-3394. [PubMed]
190. Kuranda, M. J., and P. W. Robbins. 1991. Chitinase is required for cell separation during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 26619758-19767. [PubMed]
191. Reference deleted.
192. Lamarre, C., N. Deslauriers, and Y. Bourbonnais. 2000. Expression cloning of the Candida albicans CSA1 gene encoding a mycelial surface antigen by sorting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transformants with monoclonal antibody-coated magnetic beads. Mol. Microbiol. 35444-453. [PubMed]
193. Lan, C. Y., G. Newport, L. A. Murillo, T. Jones, S. Scherer, R. W. Davis, and N. Agabian. 2002. Metabolic specialization associated with phenotypic switching in Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 9914907-14912. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
194. Lan, C. Y., G. Rodarte, L. A. Murillo, T. Jones, R. W. Davis, J. Dungan, G. Newport, and N. Agabian. 2004. Regulatory networks affected by iron availability in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 531451-1469. [PubMed]
195. Lancaster, G. I., and M. A. Febbraio. 2005. Exosome-dependent trafficking of HSP70: a novel secretory pathway for cellular stress proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 28023349-23355. [PubMed]
196. Lane, S., C. Birse, S. Zhou, R. Matson, and H. Liu. 2001. DNA array studies demonstrate convergent regulation of virulence factors by Cph1, Cph2, and Efg1 in Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 27648988-48996. [PubMed]
197. Lane, S., S. Zhou, T. Pan, Q. Dai, and H. Liu. 2001. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Cph2 regulates hyphal development in Candida albicans partly via TEC1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 216418-6428. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
197a. La Valle, R., S. Sandini, M. J. Gomez, F. Mondello, G. Romagnoli, R. Nisini, and A. Cassone. 2000. Generation of a recombinant 65-kilodalton mannoprotein, a major antigen target of cell-mediated immune response to Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 686777-6784. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
198. Lavigne, L. M., J. E. Albina, and J. S. Reichner. 2006. Beta-glucan is a fungal determinant for adhesion-dependent human neutrophil functions. J. Immunol. 1778667-8675. [PubMed]
199. LeBleu, V. S., B. Macdonald, and R. Kalluri. 2007. Structure and function of basement membranes. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 2321121-1129. [PubMed]
200. Lee, C. M., A. Nantel, L. Jiang, M. Whiteway, and S. H. Shen. 2004. The serine/threonine protein phosphatase SIT4 modulates yeast-to-hypha morphogenesis and virulence in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 51691-709. [PubMed]
201. Lee, R. E., T. T. Liu, K. S. Barker, R. E. Lee, and P. D. Rogers. 2005. Genome-wide expression profiling of the response to ciclopirox olamine in Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55655-662. [PubMed]
202. Lee, S. A., S. Wormsley, S. Kamoun, A. F. Lee, K. Joiner, and B. Wong. 2003. An analysis of the Candida albicans genome database for soluble secreted proteins using computer-based prediction algorithms. Yeast 20595-610. [PubMed]
203. Leidich, S. D., A. S. Ibrahim, Y. Fu, A. Koul, C. Jessup, J. Vitullo, W. Fonzi, F. Mirbod, S. Nakashima, Y. Nozawa, and M. A. Ghannoum. 1998. Cloning and disruption of caPLB1, a phospholipase B gene involved in the pathogenicity of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 27326078-26086. [PubMed]
204. Lesage, G., and H. Bussey. 2006. Cell wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70317-343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
205. Li, F., and S. P. Palecek. 2003. EAP1, a Candida albicans gene involved in binding human epithelial cells. Eukaryot. Cell 21266-1273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
206. Li, F., M. J. Svarovsky, A. J. Karlsson, J. P. Wagner, K. Marchillo, P. Oshel, D. Andes, and S. P. Palecek. 2007. Eap1p, an adhesin that mediates Candida albicans biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo. Eukaryot. Cell 6931-939. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
207. Li, X., Z. Yan, and J. Xu. 2003. Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans. Microbiology 149353-362. [PubMed]
208. Li, X. S., M. S. Reddy, D. Baev, and M. Edgerton. 2003. Candida albicans Ssa1/2p is the cell envelope binding protein for human salivary histatin 5. J. Biol. Chem. 27828553-28561. [PubMed]
209. Li, X. S., J. N. Sun, K. Okamoto-Shibayama, and M. Edgerton. 2006. Candida albicans cell wall ssa proteins bind and facilitate import of salivary histatin 5 required for toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 28122453-22463. [PubMed]
210. Liu, T. T., R. E. Lee, K. S. Barker, R. E. Lee, L. Wei, R. Homayouni, and P. D. Rogers. 2005. Genome-wide expression profiling of the response to azole, polyene, echinocandin, and pyrimidine antifungal agents in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 492226-2236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
211. Lockhart, S. R., R. Zhao, K. J. Daniels, and D. R. Soll. 2003. Alpha-pheromone-induced “shmooing” and gene regulation require white-opaque switching during Candida albicans mating. Eukaryot. Cell 2847-855. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
212. Lopez-Ribot, J. L. 2005. Candida albicans biofilms: more than filamentation. Curr. Biol. 15R453-R455. [PubMed]
213. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., H. M. Alloush, B. J. Masten, and W. L. Chaffin. 1996. Evidence for presence in the cell wall of Candida albicans of a protein related to the hsp70 family. Infect. Immun. 643333-3340. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
214. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., J. Bikandi, R. S. San Millan, and W. L. Chaffin. 1999. Interactions between Candida albicans and the human extracellular matrix component tenascin-C. Mol. Cell. Biol. Res. Commun. 258-63. [PubMed]
215. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., M. Casanova, A. Murgui, and J. P. Martinez. 2004. Antibody response to Candida albicans cell wall antigens. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 41187-196. [PubMed]
216. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., and W. L. Chaffin. 1996. Members of the Hsp70 family of proteins in the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 1784724-4726. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
217. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., J. P. Martinez, and W. L. Chaffin. 1995. Comparative study of the C3d receptor and 58-kilodalton fibrinogen-binding mannoproteins of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 632126-2132. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
218. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., C. Monteagudo, P. Sepulveda, M. Casanova, J. P. Martinez, and W. L. Chaffin. 1996. Expression of the fibrinogen binding mannoprotein and the laminin receptor of Candida albicans in vitro and in infected tissues. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 142117-122. [PubMed]
219. Lopez-Villar, E., L. Monteoliva, M. R. Larsen, E. Sachon, M. Shabaz, M. Pardo, J. Pla, C. Gil, P. Roepstorff, and C. Nombela. 2006. Genetic and proteomic evidences support the localization of yeast enolase in the cell surface. Proteomics 6(Suppl. 1)S107-S118. [PubMed]
220. Lott, T. J., B. P. Holloway, D. A. Logan, R. Fundyga, and J. Arnold. 1999. Towards understanding the evolution of the human commensal yeast Candida albicans. Microbiology 1451137-1143. [PubMed]
221. Lotz, H., K. Sohn, H. Brunner, F. A. Muhlschlegel, and S. Rupp. 2004. RBR1, a novel pH-regulated cell wall gene of Candida albicans, is repressed by RIM101 and activated by NRG1. Eukaryot. Cell 3776-784. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
222. Luo, B. H., C. V. Carman, and T. A. Springer. 2007. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25619-647. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
223. Luo, G., L. P. Samaranayake, and J. Y. Yau. 2001. Candida species exhibit differential in vitro hemolytic activities. J. Clin. Microbiol. 392971-2974. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
224. Lussier, M., A. M. Sdicu, S. Shahinian, and H. Bussey. 1998. The Candida albicans KRE9 gene is required for cell wall beta-1, 6-glucan synthesis and is essential for growth on glucose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 959825-9830. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
225. Magee, B. B., M. Legrand, A. M. Alarco, M. Raymond, and P. T. Magee. 2002. Many of the genes required for mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are also required for mating in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 461345-1351. [PubMed]
226. Makihira, S., H. Nikawa, M. Tamagami, T. Hamada, and L. P. Samaranayake. 2002. Differences in Candida albicans adhesion to intact and denatured type I collagen in vitro. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 17129-131. [PubMed]
227. Mao, Y., Z. Zhang, and B. Wong. 2003. Use of green fluorescent protein fusions to analyse the N- and C-terminal signal peptides of GPI-anchored cell wall proteins in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 501617-1628. [PubMed]
228. Marchais, V., M. Kempf, P. Licznar, C. Lefrancois, J. P. Bouchara, R. Robert, and J. Cottin. 2005. DNA array analysis of Candida albicans gene expression in response to adherence to polystyrene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 24525-32. [PubMed]
229. Martchenko, M., A. M. Alarco, D. Harcus, and M. Whiteway. 2004. Superoxide dismutases in Candida albicans: transcriptional regulation and functional characterization of the hyphal-induced SOD5 gene. Mol. Biol. Cell 15456-467. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
229a. Martínez, A. I., L. Castillo, A. Garcera, M. V. Elorza, E. Valentin, and R. Sentandreu. 2004. Role of Pir1 in the construction of the Candida albicans cell wall. Microbiology 1503151-3161. [PubMed]
229b. Martinez, J. P., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and W. L. Chaffin. 1994. Heterogeneous surface distribution of the fibrinogen-binding protein on Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 62709-712. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
230. .Reference deleted.
231. Martinez-Lopez, R., L. Monteoliva, R. Diez-Orejas, C. Nombela, and C. Gil. 2004. The GPI-anchored protein CaEcm33p is required for cell wall integrity, morphogenesis and virulence in Candida albicans. Microbiology 1503341-3354. [PubMed]
232. Martinez-Lopez, R., H. Park, C. L. Myers, C. Gil, and S. G. Filler. 2006. Candida albicans Ecm33p is important for normal cell wall architecture and interactions with host cells. Eukaryot. Cell 5140-147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
233. Reference deleted.
234. Reference deleted.
235. Masuoka, J., and K. C. Hazen. 2004. Cell wall mannan and cell surface hydrophobicity in Candida albicans serotype A and B strains. Infect. Immun. 726230-6236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
236. Masuoka, J., and K. C. Hazen. 1999. Differences in the acid-labile component of Candida albicans mannan from hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells. Glycobiology 91281-1286. [PubMed]
237. Masuoka, J., G. Wu, P. M. Glee, and K. C. Hazen. 1999. Inhibition of Candida albicans attachment to extracellular matrix by antibodies which recognize hydrophobic cell wall proteins. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 24421-429. [PubMed]
238. McCourtie, J., and L. J. Douglas. 1981. Relationship between cell surface composition of Candida albicans and adherence to acrylic after growth on different carbon sources. Infect. Immun. 321234-1241. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
239. McCreath, K. J., C. A. Specht, and P. W. Robbins. 1995. Molecular cloning and characterization of chitinase genes from Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 922544-2548. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
240. McGreal, E. P., M. Rosas, G. D. Brown, S. Zamze, S. Y. Wong, S. Gordon, L. Martinez-Pomares, and P. R. Taylor. 2006. The carbohydrate-recognition domain of Dectin-2 is a C-type lectin with specificity for high mannose. Glycobiology 16422-430. [PubMed]
241. Mendes, A., A. U. Mores, A. P. Carvalho, R. T. Rosa, L. P. Samaranayake, and E. A. Rosa. 2007. Candida albicans biofilms produce more secreted aspartyl protease than the planktonic cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 301813-1815. [PubMed]
242. Meri, T., A. M. Blom, A. Hartmann, D. Lenk, S. Meri, and P. F. Zipfel. 2004. The hyphal and yeast forms of Candida albicans bind the complement regulator C4b-binding protein. Infect. Immun. 726633-6641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
243. Meri, T., A. Hartmann, D. Lenk, R. Eck, R. Wurzner, J. Hellwage, S. Meri, and P. F. Zipfel. 2002. The yeast Candida albicans binds complement regulators factor H and FHL-1. Infect. Immun. 705185-5192. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
244. Mitrovich, Q. M., B. B. Tuch, C. Guthrie, and A. D. Johnson. 2007. Computational and experimental approaches double the number of known introns in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Genome Res. 17492-502. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
245. Mleczko, J., L. L. Litke, H. S. Larsen, and W. L. Chaffin. 1989. Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation on cell surface binding capacity of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 573247-3249. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
246. Monge, R. A., E. Roman, C. Nombela, and J. Pla. 2006. The MAP kinase signal transduction network in Candida albicans. Microbiology 152905-912. [PubMed]
247. Monod, M., B. Hube, D. Hess, and D. Sanglard. 1998. Differential regulation of SAP8 and SAP9, which encode two new members of the secreted aspartic proteinase family in Candida albicans. Microbiology 1442731-2737. [PubMed]
248. Monod, M., G. Togni, B. Hube, and D. Sanglard. 1994. Multiplicity of genes encoding secreted aspartic proteinases in Candida species. Mol. Microbiol. 13357-368. [PubMed]
249. Monteoliva, L., M. L. Matas, C. Gil, C. Nombela, and J. Pla. 2002. Large-scale identification of putative exported proteins in Candida albicans by genetic selection. Eukaryot. Cell 1514-525. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
250. Mouyna, I., T. Fontaine, M. Vai, M. Monod, W. A. Fonzi, M. Diaquin, L. Popolo, R. P. Hartland, and J. P. Latge. 2000. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glucanosyltransferases play an active role in the biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall. J. Biol. Chem. 27514882-14889. [PubMed]
251. Muhlschlegel, F. A., and W. A. Fonzi. 1997. PHR2 of Candida albicans encodes a functional homolog of the pH-regulated gene PHR1 with an inverted pattern of pH-dependent expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 175960-5967. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
252. Mukherjee, P. K., J. Chandra, D. M. Kuhn, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2003. Differential expression of Candida albicans phospholipase B (PLB1) under various environmental and physiological conditions. Microbiology 149261-267. [PubMed]
253. Mukherjee, P. K., S. Mohamed, J. Chandra, D. Kuhn, S. Liu, O. S. Antar, R. Munyon, A. P. Mitchell, D. Andes, M. R. Chance, M. Rouabhia, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2006. Alcohol dehydrogenase restricts the ability of the pathogen Candida albicans to form a biofilm on catheter surfaces through an ethanol-based mechanism. Infect. Immun. 743804-3816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
254. Mukherjee, P. K., K. R. Seshan, S. D. Leidich, J. Chandra, G. T. Cole, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2001. Reintroduction of the PLB1 gene into Candida albicans restores virulence in vivo. Microbiology 1472585-2597. [PubMed]
255. Mukherjee, P. K., G. Zhou, R. Munyon, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2005. Candida biofilm: a well-designed protected environment. Med. Mycol. 43191-208. [PubMed]
256. Mulhern, S. M., M. E. Logue, and G. Butler. 2006. Candida albicans transcription factor Ace2 regulates metabolism and is required for filamentation in hypoxic conditions. Eukaryot. Cell 52001-2013. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
257. Munro, C. A., S. Bates, E. T. Buurman, H. B. Hughes, D. M. Maccallum, G. Bertram, A. Atrih, M. A. Ferguson, J. M. Bain, A. Brand, S. Hamilton, C. Westwater, L. M. Thomson, A. J. Brown, F. C. Odds, and N. A. Gow. 2005. Mnt1p and Mnt2p of Candida albicans are partially redundant alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferases that participate in O-linked mannosylation and are required for adhesion and virulence. J. Biol. Chem. 2801051-1060. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
258. Murad, A. M., C. d'Enfert, C. Gaillardin, H. Tournu, F. Tekaia, D. Talibi, D. Marechal, V. Marchais, J. Cottin, and A. J. Brown. 2001. Transcript profiling in Candida albicans reveals new cellular functions for the transcriptional repressors CaTup1, CaMig1 and CaNrg1. Mol. Microbiol. 42981-993. [PubMed]
259. Murad, A. M., P. Leng, M. Straffon, J. Wishart, S. Macaskill, D. MacCallum, N. Schnell, D. Talibi, D. Marechal, F. Tekaia, C. d'Enfert, C. Gaillardin, F. C. Odds, and A. J. Brown. 2001. NRG1 represses yeast-hypha morphogenesis and hypha-specific gene expression in Candida albicans. EMBO J. 204742-4752. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
260. Murillo, L. A., G. Newport, C. Y. Lan, S. Habelitz, J. Dungan, and N. M. Agabian. 2005. Genome-wide transcription profiling of the early phase of biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 41562-1573. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
261. Naglik, J., A. Albrecht, O. Bader, and B. Hube. 2004. Candida albicans proteinases and host/pathogen interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 6915-926. [PubMed]
262. Naglik, J. R., S. J. Challacombe, and B. Hube. 2003. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67400-428. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
263. Naglik, J. R., C. A. Rodgers, P. J. Shirlaw, J. L. Dobbie, L. L. Fernandes-Naglik, D. Greenspan, N. Agabian, and S. J. Challacombe. 2003. Differential expression of Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinase and phospholipase B genes in humans correlates with active oral and vaginal infections. J. Infect. Dis. 188469-479. [PubMed]
264. Nantel, A., D. Dignard, C. Bachewich, D. Harcus, A. Marcil, A. P. Bouin, C. W. Sensen, H. Hogues, M. van het Hoog, P. Gordon, T. Rigby, F. Benoit, D. C. Tessier, D. Y. Thomas, and M. Whiteway. 2002. Transcription profiling of Candida albicans cells undergoing the yeast-to-hyphal transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 133452-3465. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
265. Negre, E., T. Vogel, A. Levanon, R. Guy, T. J. Walsh, and D. D. Roberts. 1994. The collagen binding domain of fibronectin contains a high affinity binding site for Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 26922039-22045. [PubMed]
266. Netea, M. G., G. Ferwerda, C. A. van der Graaf, J. W. Van der Meer, and B. J. Kullberg. 2006. Recognition of fungal pathogens by toll-like receptors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 124195-4201. [PubMed]
267. Nett, J., and D. Andes. 2006. Candida albicans biofilm development, modeling a host-pathogen interaction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9340-345. [PubMed]
268. Newport, G., and N. Agabian. 1997. KEX2 influences Candida albicans proteinase secretion and hyphal formation. J. Biol. Chem. 27228954-28961. [PubMed]
269. Ng, C. K., D. Obando, F. Widmer, L. C. Wright, T. C. Sorrell, and K. A. Jolliffe. 2006. Correlation of antifungal activity with fungal phospholipase inhibition using a series of bisquaternary ammonium salts. J. Med. Chem. 49811-816. [PubMed]
270. Nickel, W. 2003. The mystery of nonclassical protein secretion. A current view on cargo proteins and potential export routes. Eur. J. Biochem. 2702109-2119. [PubMed]
271. Nickel, W. 2005. Unconventional secretory routes: direct protein export across the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. Traffic 6607-614. [PubMed]
272. Niewerth, M., D. Kunze, M. Seibold, M. Schaller, H. C. Korting, and B. Hube. 2003. Ciclopirox olamine treatment affects the expression pattern of Candida albicans genes encoding virulence factors, iron metabolism proteins, and drug resistance factors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 471805-1817. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
273. Nobile, C. J., D. R. Andes, J. E. Nett, F. J. Smith, F. Yue, Q. T. Phan, J. E. Edwards, S. G. Filler, and A. P. Mitchell. 2006. Critical role of Bcr1-dependent adhesins in C. albicans biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo. PLoS Pathogens 2e63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
274. Nobile, C. J., V. M. Bruno, M. L. Richard, D. A. Davis, and A. P. Mitchell. 2003. Genetic control of chlamydospore formation in Candida albicans. Microbiology 1493629-3637. [PubMed]
275. Nobile, C. J., and A. P. Mitchell. 2006. Genetics and genomics of Candida albicans biofilm formation. Cell. Microbiol. 81382-1391. [PubMed]
276. Nobile, C. J., and A. P. Mitchell. 2005. Regulation of cell-surface genes and biofilm formation by the C. albicans transcription factor Bcr1p. Curr. Biol. 151150-1155. [PubMed]
277. Nobile, C. J., J. E. Nett, D. R. Andes, and A. P. Mitchell. 2006. Function of Candida albicans adhesin Hwp1 in biofilm formation. Eukaryot. Cell 51604-1610. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
278. Nombela, C., C. Gil, and W. L. Chaffin. 2006. Non-conventional protein secretion in yeast. Trends Microbiol. 1415-21. [PubMed]
279. Norice, C. T., F. J. Smith, Jr., N. Solis, S. G. Filler, and A. P. Mitchell. 2007. Requirement for Candida albicans Sun41 in biofilm formation and virulence. Eukaryot. Cell 62046-2055. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
280. O'Connor, L., S. Lahiff, F. Casey, M. Glennon, M. Cormican, and M. Maher. 2005. Quantification of ALS1 gene expression in Candida albicans biofilms by RT-PCR using hybridisation probes on the LightCycler. Mol. Cell. Probes 19153-162. [PubMed]
281. Reference deleted.
282. Oh, S. H., G. Cheng, J. A. Nuessen, R. Jajko, K. M. Yeater, X. Zhao, C. Pujol, D. R. Soll, and L. L. Hoyer. 2005. Functional specificity of Candida albicans Als3p proteins and clade specificity of ALS3 alleles discriminated by the number of copies of the tandem repeat sequence in the central domain. Microbiology 151673-681. [PubMed]
283. Oksuz, S., I. Sahin, M. Yildirim, A. Gulcan, T. Yavuz, D. Kaya, and A. N. Koc. 2007. Phospholipase and proteinase activities in different Candida species isolated from anatomically distinct sites of healthy adults. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 60280-283. [PubMed]
283a. O'Sullivan, J. M., R. D. Cannon, P. A. Sullivan, and H. F. Jenkinson. 1997. Identification of salivary basic proline-rich proteins as receptors for Candida albicans adhesion. Microbiology 143341-348. [PubMed]
284. Otoo, H. N., K. G. Lee, W. Qiu, and P. N. Lipke. 2008. Candida albicans Als adhesins have conserved amyloid-forming sequences. Eukaryot. Cell 7776-782. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
285. Page, A. L., and C. Parsot. 2002. Chaperones of the type III secretion pathway: jacks of all trades. Mol. Microbiol. 461-11. [PubMed]
286. Pardini, G., P. W. De Groot, A. T. Coste, M. Karababa, F. M. Klis, C. G. de Koster, and D. Sanglard. 2006. The CRH family coding for cell wall glycosylphosphatidylinositol proteins with a predicted transglycosidase domain affects cell wall organization and virulence of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 28140399-40411. [PubMed]
287. Pardo, M., L. Monteoliva, J. Pla, M. Sanchez, C. Gil, and C. Nombela. 1999. Two-dimensional analysis of proteins secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae regenerating protoplasts: a novel approach to study the cell wall. Yeast 15459-472. [PubMed]
288. Park, H., C. L. Myers, D. C. Sheppard, Q. T. Phan, A. A. Sanchez, J. E. Edwards, Jr., and S. G. Filler. 2005. Role of the fungal Ras-protein kinase A pathway in governing epithelial cell interactions during oropharyngeal candidiasis. Cell. Microbiol. 7499-510. [PubMed]
289. Pedreno, Y., P. Gonzalez-Parraga, M. Martinez-Esparza, R. Sentandreu, E. Valentin, and J. C. Arguelles. 2007. Disruption of the Candida albicans ATC1 gene encoding a cell-linked acid trehalase decreases hypha formation and infectivity without affecting resistance to oxidative stress. Microbiology 1531372-1381. [PubMed]
290. Pedreno, Y., S. Maicas, J. C. Arguelles, R. Sentandreu, and E. Valentin. 2004. The ATC1 gene encodes a cell wall-linked acid trehalase required for growth on trehalose in Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 27940852-40860. [PubMed]
291. Pendrak, M. L., H. C. Krutzsch, and D. D. Roberts. 2000. Structural requirements for hemoglobin to induce fibronectin receptor expression in Candida albicans. Biochemistry 3916110-16118. [PubMed]
292. Pendrak, M. L., and D. D. Roberts. 2007. Hemoglobin is an effective inducer of hyphal differentiation in Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 4561-71. [PubMed]
293. Pendrak, M. L., R. G. Rodrigues, and D. D. Roberts. 2007. Induction of a high affinity fibronectin receptor in Candida albicans by caspofungin: requirements for beta (1,6) glucans and the developmental regulator Hbr1p. Med. Mycol. 45157-168. [PubMed]
294. Pendrak, M. L., S. S. Yan, and D. D. Roberts. 2004. Hemoglobin regulates expression of an activator of mating-type locus α genes in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 3764-775. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
295. Pendrak, M. L., S. S. Yan, and D. D. Roberts. 2004. Sensing the host environment: recognition of hemoglobin by the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 426148-156. [PubMed]
296. Pendreno, Y., P. Gonzalez-Parraga, S. Conesa, M. Martinez-Esparza, A. Aguinaga, J. A. Hernandez, and J. C. Arguelles. 2006. The cellular resistance against oxidative stress (H2O2) is independent of neutral trehalase (Ntc1p) activity in Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 657-62. [PubMed]
297. Perez, A., B. Pedros, A. Murgui, M. Casanova, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and J. P. Martinez. 2006. Biofilm formation by Candida albicans mutants for genes coding fungal proteins exhibiting the eight-cysteine-containing CFEM domain. FEMS Yeast Res. 61074-1084. [PubMed]
298. Phan, Q. T., P. H. Belanger, and S. G. Filler. 2000. Role of hyphal formation in interactions of Candida albicans with endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 683485-3490. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
299. Phan, Q. T., R. A. Fratti, N. V. Prasadarao, J. E. Edwards, Jr., and S. G. Filler. 2005. N-cadherin mediates endocytosis of Candida albicans by endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 28010455-10461. [PubMed]
300. Phan, Q. T., C. L. Myers, Y. Fu, D. C. Sheppard, M. R. Yeaman, W. H. Welch, A. S. Ibrahim, J. E. Edwards, Jr., and S. G. Filler. 2007. Als3 is a Candida albicans invasin that binds to cadherins and induces endocytosis by host cells. PLoS Biol. 5e64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
301. Pitarch, A., A. Jimenez, C. Nombela, and C. Gil. 2006. Decoding serological response to Candida cell wall immunome into novel diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic candidates for systemic candidiasis by proteomic and bioinformatic analyses. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 579-96. [PubMed]
302. Pitarch, A., M. Pardo, A. Jimenez, J. Pla, C. Gil, M. Sanchez, and C. Nombela. 1999. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as analytical tool for identifying Candida albicans immunogenic proteins. Electrophoresis 201001-1010. [PubMed]
303. Pitarch, A., M. Sanchez, C. Nombela, and C. Gil. 2002. Sequential fractionation and two-dimensional gel analysis unravels the complexity of the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans cell wall proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1967-982. [PubMed]
304. Poltermann, S., A. Kunert, M. von der Heide, R. Eck, A. Hartmann, and P. F. Zipfel. 2007. Gpm1p is a factor H-, FHL-1-, and plasminogen-binding surface protein of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 28237537-37544. [PubMed]
305. Ponniah, G., C. Rollenhagen, Y. S. Bahn, J. F. Staab, and P. Sundstrom. 2007. State of differentiation defines buccal epithelial cell affinity for cross-linking to Candida albicans Hwp1. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 36456-467. [PubMed]
306. Popolo, L., and M. Vai. 1998. Defects in assembly of the extracellular matrix are responsible for altered morphogenesis of a Candida albicans phr1 mutant. J. Bacteriol. 180163-166. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
307. Poulain, D., and T. Jouault. 2004. Candida albicans cell wall glycans, host receptors and responses: elements for a decisive crosstalk. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7342-349. [PubMed]
308. Prudovsky, I., A. Mandinova, R. Soldi, C. Bagala, I. Graziani, M. Landriscina, F. Tarantini, M. Duarte, S. Bellum, H. Doherty, and T. Maciag. 2003. The non-classical export routes: FGF1 and IL-1alpha point the way. J. Cell Sci. 1164871-4881. [PubMed]
309. Rajalingam, D., I. Graziani, I. Prudovsky, C. Yu, and T. K. Kumar. 2007. Relevance of partially structured states in the non-classical secretion of acidic fibroblast growth factor. Biochemistry 469225-9238. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
310. Ramamurthi, K. S., and O. Schneewind. 2003. Substrate recognition by the Yersinia type III protein secretion machinery. Mol. Microbiol. 501095-1102. [PubMed]
311. Ramon, A. M., and W. A. Fonzi. 2003. Diverged binding specificity of Rim101p, the Candida albicans ortholog of PacC. Eukaryot. Cell 2718-728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
312. Richard, M. L., and A. Plaine. 2007. Comprehensive analysis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 6119-133. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
313. Ripeau, J. S., M. Fiorillo, F. Aumont, P. Belhumeur, and L. de Repentigny. 2002. Evidence for differential expression of Candida albicans virulence genes during oral infection in intact and human immunodeficiency virus type 1-transgenic mice. J. Infect. Dis. 1851094-1102. [PubMed]
314. Rodier, M. H., C. Imbert, C. Kauffmann-Lacroix, G. Daniault, and J. L. Jacquemin. 2003. Immunoglobulins G could prevent adherence of Candida albicans to polystyrene and extracellular matrix components. J. Med. Microbiol. 52373-377. [PubMed]
315. Rodrigues, M. L., E. S. Nakayasu, D. L. Oliveira, L. Nimrichter, J. D. Nosanchuk, I. C. Almeida, and A. Casadevall. 2008. Extracellular vesicles produced by Cryptococcus neoformans contain protein components associated with virulence. Eukaryot. Cell 758-67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
316. Rodrigues, M. L., L. Nimrichter, D. L. Oliveira, S. Frases, K. Miranda, O. Zaragoza, M. Alvarez, A. Nakouzi, M. Feldmesser, and A. Casadevall. 2007. Vesicular polysaccharide export in Cryptococcus neoformans is a eukaryotic solution to the problem of fungal trans-cell wall transport. Eukaryot. Cell 648-59. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
317. Roeder, A., C. J. Kirschning, R. A. Rupec, M. Schaller, G. Weindl, and H. C. Korting. 2004. Toll-like receptors as key mediators in innate antifungal immunity. Med. Mycol. 42485-498. [PubMed]
318. Rogers, P. D., and K. S. Barker. 2003. Genome-wide expression profile analysis reveals coordinately regulated genes associated with stepwise acquisition of azole resistance in Candida albicans clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 471220-1227. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
319. Rothstein, D. M., P. Spacciapoli, L. T. Tran, T. Xu, F. D. Roberts, M. Dalla Serra, D. K. Buxton, F. G. Oppenheim, and P. Friden. 2001. Anticandida activity is retained in P-113, a 12-amino-acid fragment of histatin 5. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 451367-1373. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
320. Roustan, J. L., A. R. Chu, G. Moulin, and F. Bigey. 2005. A novel lipase/acyltransferase from the yeast Candida albicans: expression and characterisation of the recombinant enzyme. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 68203-212. [PubMed]
321. Ruchel, R., F. de Bernardis, T. L. Ray, P. A. Sullivan, and G. T. Cole. 1992. Candida acid proteinases. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 30(Suppl. 1)123-132. [PubMed]
322. Ruiz-Herrera, J., M. V. Elorza, E. Valentin, and R. Sentandreu. 2006. Molecular organization of the cell wall of Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenicity. FEMS Yeast Res. 614-29. [PubMed]
323. Samaranayake, Y. H., R. S. Dassanayake, B. P. Cheung, J. A. Jayatilake, K. W. Yeung, J. Y. Yau, and L. P. Samaranayake. 2006. Differential phospholipase gene expression by Candida albicans in artificial media and cultured human oral epithelium. APMIS 114857-866. [PubMed]
324. Samaranayake, Y. H., R. S. Dassanayake, J. A. Jayatilake, B. P. Cheung, J. Y. Yau, K. W. Yeung, and L. P. Samaranayake. 2005. Phospholipase B enzyme expression is not associated with other virulence attributes in Candida albicans isolates from patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 54583-593. [PubMed]
325. Sandini, S., R. La Valle, F. De Bernardis, C. Macri, and A. Cassone. 2007. The 65 kDa mannoprotein gene of Candida albicans encodes a putative beta-glucanase adhesin required for hyphal morphogenesis and experimental pathogenicity. Cell. Microbiol. 91223-1238. [PubMed]
326. Sandovsky-Losica, H., N. Chauhan, R. Calderone, and E. Segal. 2006. Gene transcription studies of Candida albicans following infection of HEp2 epithelial cells. Med. Mycol. 44329-334. [PubMed]
327. Sanglard, D., B. Hube, M. Monod, F. C. Odds, and N. A. Gow. 1997. A triple deletion of the secreted aspartyl proteinase genes SAP4, SAP5, and SAP6 of Candida albicans causes attenuated virulence. Infect. Immun. 653539-3546. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
328. Santoni, G., R. Lucciarini, C. Amantini, J. Jacobelli, E. Spreghini, P. Ballarini, M. Piccoli, and A. Gismondi. 2002. Candida albicans expresses a focal adhesion kinase-like protein that undergoes increased tyrosine phosphorylation upon yeast cell adhesion to vitronectin and the EA.hy 926 human endothelial cell line. Infect. Immun. 703804-3815. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
329. Santoni, G., E. Spreghini, R. Lucciarini, C. Amantini, and M. Piccoli. 2001. Involvement of alpha(v) beta3 integrin-like receptor and glycosaminoglycans in Candida albicans germ tube adhesion to vitronectin and to a human endothelial cell line. Microb. Pathog. 31159-172. [PubMed]
330. Saporito-Irwin, S. M., C. E. Birse, P. S. Sypherd, and W. A. Fonzi. 1995. PHR1, a pH-regulated gene of Candida albicans, is required for morphogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15601-613. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
331. Sarthy, A. V., T. McGonigal, M. Coen, D. J. Frost, J. A. Meulbroek, and R. C. Goldman. 1997. Phenotype in Candida albicans of a disruption of the BGL2 gene encoding a 1,3-beta-glucosyltransferase. Microbiology 143367-376. [PubMed]
332. Sato, K., X. L. Yang, T. Yudate, J. S. Chung, J. Wu, K. Luby-Phelps, R. P. Kimberly, D. Underhill, P. D. Cruz, Jr., and K. Ariizumi. 2006. Dectin-2 is a pattern recognition receptor for fungi that couples with the Fc receptor gamma chain to induce innate immune responses. J. Biol. Chem. 28138854-38866. [PubMed]
333. Saville, S. P., D. P. Thomas, and J. L. Lopez Ribot. 2006. A role for Efg1p in Candida albicans interactions with extracellular matrices. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 256151-158. [PubMed]
334. Schaefer, D., P. Cote, M. Whiteway, and R. J. Bennett. 2007. Barrier activity in Candida albicans mediates pheromone degradation and promotes mating. Eukaryot. Cell 6907-918. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
335. Schaller, M., M. Bein, H. C. Korting, S. Baur, G. Hamm, M. Monod, S. Beinhauer, and B. Hube. 2003. The secreted aspartyl proteinases Sap1 and Sap2 cause tissue damage in an in vitro model of vaginal candidiasis based on reconstituted human vaginal epithelium. Infect. Immun. 713227-3234. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
336. Schaller, M., C. Borelli, H. C. Korting, and B. Hube. 2005. Hydrolytic enzymes as virulence factors of Candida albicans. Mycoses 48365-377. [PubMed]
337. Schaller, M., H. C. Korting, C. Borelli, G. Hamm, and B. Hube. 2005. Candida albicans-secreted aspartic proteinases modify the epithelial cytokine response in an in vitro model of vaginal candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 732758-2765. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
338. Schaller, M., C. Schackert, H. C. Korting, E. Januschke, and B. Hube. 2000. Invasion of Candida albicans correlates with expression of secreted aspartic proteinases during experimental infection of human epidermis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 114712-717. [PubMed]
339. Schaller, M., W. Schafer, H. C. Korting, and B. Hube. 1998. Differential expression of secreted aspartyl proteinases in a model of human oral candidosis and in patient samples from the oral cavity. Mol. Microbiol. 29605-615. [PubMed]
340. Schofield, D. A., C. Westwater, T. Warner, and E. Balish. 2005. Differential Candida albicans lipase gene expression during alimentary tract colonization and infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 244359-365. [PubMed]
341. Schofield, D. A., C. Westwater, T. Warner, P. J. Nicholas, E. E. Paulling, and E. Balish. 2003. Hydrolytic gene expression during oroesophageal and gastric candidiasis in immunocompetent and immunodeficient gnotobiotic mice. J. Infect. Dis. 188591-599. [PubMed]
342. Schweizer, A., S. Rupp, B. N. Taylor, M. Rollinghoff, and K. Schroppel. 2000. The TEA/ATTS transcription factor CaTec1p regulates hyphal development and virulence in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 38435-445. [PubMed]
343. Selvaggini, S., C. A. Munro, S. Paschoud, D. Sanglard, and N. A. Gow. 2004. Independent regulation of chitin synthase and chitinase activity in Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 150921-928. [PubMed]
344. Sentandreu, M., M. V. Elorza, R. Sentandreu, and W. A. Fonzi. 1998. Cloning and characterization of PRA1, a gene encoding a novel pH-regulated antigen of Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 180282-289. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
345. Sepulveda, P., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, D. Gozalbo, A. Cervera, J. P. Martinez, and W. L. Chaffin. 1996. Ubiquitin-like epitopes associated with Candida albicans cell surface receptors. Infect. Immun. 644406-4408. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
346. Setiadi, E. R., T. Doedt, F. Cottier, C. Noffz, and J. F. Ernst. 2006. Transcriptional response of Candida albicans to hypoxia: linkage of oxygen sensing and Efg1p-regulatory networks. J. Mol. Biol. 361399-411. [PubMed]
347. Sharkey, L. L., W. L. Liao, A. K. Ghosh, and W. A. Fonzi. 2005. Flanking direct repeats of hisG alter URA3 marker expression at the HWP1 locus of Candida albicans. Microbiology 1511061-1071. [PubMed]
348. Shattil, S. J., and P. J. Newman. 2004. Integrins: dynamic scaffolds for adhesion and signaling in platelets. Blood 1041606-1615. [PubMed]
349. Sigle, H. C., S. Thewes, M. Niewerth, H. C. Korting, M. Schafer-Korting, and B. Hube. 2005. Oxygen accessibility and iron levels are critical factors for the antifungal action of ciclopirox against Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55663-673. [PubMed]
350. Singleton, D. R., P. L. Fidel, Jr., K. L. Wozniak, and K. C. Hazen. 2005. Contribution of cell surface hydrophobicity protein 1 (Csh1p) to virulence of hydrophobic Candida albicans serotype A cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 244373-377. [PubMed]
351. Singleton, D. R., and K. C. Hazen. 2004. Differential surface localization and temperature-dependent expression of the Candida albicans CSH1 protein. Microbiology 150285-292. [PubMed]
352. Singleton, D. R., J. Masuoka, and K. C. Hazen. 2001. Cloning and analysis of a Candida albicans gene that affects cell surface hydrophobicity. J. Bacteriol. 1833582-3588. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
353. Slabas, A. R., B. Ndimba, W. J. Simon, and S. Chivasa. 2004. Proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis cell wall reveals unexpected proteins with new cellular locations. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 32524-528. [PubMed]
354. Smolenski, G., P. A. Sullivan, S. M. Cutfield, and J. F. Cutfield. 1997. Analysis of secreted aspartic proteinases from Candida albicans: purification and characterization of individual Sap1, Sap2 and Sap3 isoenzymes. Microbiology 143349-356. [PubMed]
355. Sohn, K., J. Schwenk, C. Urban, J. Lechner, M. Schweikert, and S. Rupp. 2006. Getting in touch with Candida albicans: the cell wall of a fungal pathogen. Curr. Drug Targets 7505-512. [PubMed]
356. Sohn, K., C. Urban, H. Brunner, and S. Rupp. 2003. EFG1 is a major regulator of cell wall dynamics in Candida albicans as revealed by DNA microarrays. Mol. Microbiol. 4789-102. [PubMed]
357. Soloviev, D. A., W. A. Fonzi, R. Sentandreu, E. Pluskota, C. B. Forsyth, S. Yadav, and E. F. Plow. 2007. Identification of pH-regulated antigen 1 released from Candida albicans as the major ligand for leukocyte integrin alphaMbeta2. J. Immunol. 1782038-2046. [PubMed]
358. Soustre, J., M. H. Rodier, S. Imbert-Bouyer, G. Daniault, and C. Imbert. 2004. Caspofungin modulates in vitro adherence of Candida albicans to plastic coated with extracellular matrix proteins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53522-525. [PubMed]
359. Spellman, P. T., G. Sherlock, M. Q. Zhang, V. R. Iyer, K. Anders, M. B. Eisen, P. O. Brown, D. Botstein, and B. Futcher. 1998. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 93273-3297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
360. Spreghini, E., D. A. Davis, R. Subaran, M. Kim, and A. P. Mitchell. 2003. Roles of Candida albicans Dfg5p and Dcw1p cell surface proteins in growth and hypha formation. Eukaryot. Cell 2746-755. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
361. Spreghini, E., A. Gismondi, M. Piccoli, and G. Santoni. 1999. Evidence for alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrin-like vitronectin (VN) receptors in Candida albicans and their involvement in yeast cell adhesion to VN. J. Infect. Dis. 180156-166. [PubMed]
362. Staab, J. F., S. D. Bradway, P. L. Fidel, and P. Sundstrom. 1999. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science 2831535-1538. [PubMed]
363. Staab, J. F., C. A. Ferrer, and P. Sundstrom. 1996. Developmental expression of a tandemly repeated, proline-and glutamine-rich amino acid motif on hyphal surfaces on Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 2716298-6305. [PubMed]
364. Stahl, P. D., J. S. Rodman, M. J. Miller, and P. H. Schlesinger. 1978. Evidence for receptor-mediated binding of glycoproteins, glycoconjugates, and lysosomal glycosidases by alveolar macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 751399-1403. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
365. Staib, P., M. Kretschmar, T. Nichterlein, H. Hof, and J. Morschhauser. 2000. Differential activation of a Candida albicans virulence gene family during infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 976102-6107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
366. Stehr, F., A. Felk, A. Gacser, M. Kretschmar, B. Mahnss, K. Neuber, B. Hube, and W. Schafer. 2004. Expression analysis of the Candida albicans lipase gene family during experimental infections and in patient samples. FEMS Yeast Res. 4401-408. [PubMed]
367. Stringaro, A., P. Crateri, G. Pellegrini, G. Arancia, A. Cassone, and F. De Bernardis. 1997. Ultrastructural localization of the secretory aspartyl proteinase in Candida albicans cell wall in vitro and in experimentally infected rat vagina. Mycopathologia 13795-105. [PubMed]
368. Stubbs, H. J., D. J. Brasch, G. W. Emerson, and P. A. Sullivan. 1999. Hydrolase and transferase activities of the beta-1,3-exoglucanase of Candida albicans. Eur. J. Biochem. 263889-895. [PubMed]
369. Sturtevant, J., F. Dixon, E. Wadsworth, J. P. Latge, X. J. Zhao, and R. Calderone. 1999. Identification and cloning of GCA1, a gene that encodes a cell surface glucoamylase from Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 37357-366. [PubMed]
370. Sugiyama, Y., S. Nakashima, F. Mirbod, H. Kanoh, Y. Kitajima, M. A. Ghannoum, and Y. Nozawa. 1999. Molecular cloning of a second phospholipase B gene, caPLB2 from Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 3761-67. [PubMed]
371. Sundstrom, P. 2002. Adhesion in Candida spp. Cell. Microbiol. 4461-469. [PubMed]
372. Sundstrom, P., J. E. Cutler, and J. F. Staab. 2002. Reevaluation of the role of HWP1 in systemic candidiasis by use of Candida albicans strains with selectable marker URA3 targeted to the ENO1 locus. Infect. Immun. 703281-3283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
373. Tanaka, M., M. Nozaki, A. Fukuhara, K. Segawa, N. Aoki, M. Matsuda, R. Komuro, and I. Shimomura. 2007. Visfatin is released from 3T3-L1 adipocytes via a non-classical pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 359194-201. [PubMed]
374. Tanaka, W. T., N. Nakao, T. Mikami, and T. Matsumoto. 1997. Hemoglobin is utilized by Candida albicans in the hyphal form but not yeast form. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 232350-353. [PubMed]
375. Taylor, B. N., H. Hannemann, M. Sehnal, A. Biesemeier, A. Schweizer, M. Rollinghoff, and K. Schroppel. 2005. Induction of SAP7 correlates with virulence in an intravenous infection model of candidiasis but not in a vaginal infection model in mice. Infect. Immun. 737061-7063. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
376. Taylor, B. N., P. Staib, A. Binder, A. Biesemeier, M. Sehnal, M. Rollinghoff, J. Morschhauser, and K. Schroppel. 2005. Profile of Candida albicans-secreted aspartic proteinase elicited during vaginal infection. Infect. Immun. 731828-1835. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
377. Taylor, P. R., G. D. Brown, J. Herre, D. L. Williams, J. A. Willment, and S. Gordon. 2004. The role of SIGNR1 and the beta-glucan receptor (dectin-1) in the nonopsonic recognition of yeast by specific macrophages. J. Immunol. 1721157-1162. [PubMed]
378. Teparic, R., I. Stuparevic, and V. Mrsa. 2007. Binding assay for incorporation of alkali-extractable proteins in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Yeast 24259-266. [PubMed]
379. Theiss, S., G. Ishdorj, A. Brenot, M. Kretschmar, C. Y. Lan, T. Nichterlein, J. Hacker, S. Nigam, N. Agabian, and G. A. Kohler. 2006. Inactivation of the phospholipase B gene PLB5 in wild-type Candida albicans reduces cell-associated phospholipase A2 activity and attenuates virulence. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296405-420. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
380. Thomas, D. P., S. P. Bachmann, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2006. Proteomics for the analysis of the Candida albicans biofilm lifestyle. Proteomics 65795-5804. [PubMed]
381. Thomas, D. P., A. Pitarch, L. Monteoliva, C. Gil, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2006. Proteomics to study Candida albicans biology and pathogenicity. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 6335-341. [PubMed]
382. Thomas, D. P., A. Viudes, C. Monteagudo, A. L. Lazzell, S. P. Saville, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2006. A proteomic-based approach for the identification of Candida albicans protein components present in a subunit vaccine that protects against disseminated candidiasis. Proteomics 66033-6041. [PubMed]
383. Tjalsma, H. 2007. Feature-based reappraisal of the Bacillus subtilis exoproteome. Proteomics 773-81. [PubMed]
384. Togni, G., D. Sanglard, M. Quadroni, S. I. Foundling, and M. Monod. 1996. Acid proteinase secreted by Candida tropicalis: functional analysis of preproregion cleavages in C. tropicalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 142493-503. [PubMed]
385. Toh-e, A., S. Yasunaga, H. Nisogi, K. Tanaka, T. Oguchi, and Y. Matsui. 1993. Three yeast genes, PIR1, PIR2 and PIR3, containing internal tandem repeats, are related to each other, and PIR1 and PIR2 are required for tolerance to heat shock. Yeast 9481-494. [PubMed]
386. Tokunaga, M., M. Kusamichi, and H. Koike. 1986. Ultrastructure of outermost layer of cell wall in Candida albicans observed by rapid-freezing technique. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo) 35237-246. [PubMed]
387. Tsang, C. S., F. C. Chu, W. K. Leung, L. J. Jin, L. P. Samaranayake, and S. C. Siu. 2007. Phospholipase, proteinase and haemolytic activities of Candida albicans isolated from oral cavities of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Med. Microbiol. 561393-1398. [PubMed]
388. Tsong, A. E., B. B. Tuch, H. Li, and A. D. Johnson. 2006. Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic. Nature 443415-420. [PubMed]
389. Tytell, M. 2005. Release of heat shock proteins (Hsps) and the effects of extracellular Hsps on neural cells and tissues. Int. J. Hyperthermia 21445-455. [PubMed]
390. Uppuluri, P., and W. L. Chaffin. 2007. Defining Candida albicans stationary phase by cellular and DNA replication, gene expression and regulation. Mol. Microbiol. 641572-1586. [PubMed]
391. Urban, C., K. Sohn, F. Lottspeich, H. Brunner, and S. Rupp. 2003. Identification of cell surface determinants in Candida albicans reveals Tsa1p, a protein differentially localized in the cell. FEBS Lett. 544228-235. [PubMed]
392. Urban, C., X. Xiong, K. Sohn, K. Schroppel, H. Brunner, and S. Rupp. 2005. The moonlighting protein Tsa1p is implicated in oxidative stress response and in cell wall biogenesis in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 571318-1341. [PubMed]
393. Velours, G., C. Boucheron, S. Manon, and N. Camougrand. 2002. Dual cell wall/mitochondria localization of the ′SUN′ family proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 207165-172. [PubMed]
394. Venezia, R. A., and R. C. Lachapelle. 1973. The use of ferritin-conjugated antibodies in the study of cell wall components of Candida albicans. Can. J. Microbiol. 191445-1448. [PubMed]
395. Verstrepen, K. J., and F. M. Klis. 2006. Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol. Microbiol. 605-15. [PubMed]
396. Villamon, E., D. Gozalbo, J. P. Martinez, and M. L. Gil. 1999. Purification of a biologically active recombinant glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 17961-65. [PubMed]
397. Viudes, A., A. Lazzell, S. Perea, W. R. Kirkpatrick, J. Peman, T. F. Patterson, J. P. Martinez, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2004. The C-terminal antibody binding domain of Candida albicans mp58 represents a protective epitope during candidiasis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 232133-138. [PubMed]
398. Viudes, A., S. Perea, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2001. Identification of continuous B-cell epitopes on the protein moiety of the 58-kilodalton cell wall mannoprotein of Candida albicans belonging to a family of immunodominant fungal antigens. Infect. Immun. 692909-2919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
399. Vongsamphanh, R., P. K. Fortier, and D. Ramotar. 2001. Pir1p mediates translocation of the yeast Apn1p endonuclease into the mitochondria to maintain genomic stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 211647-1655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
400. Vylkova, S., W. S. Jang, W. Li, N. Nayyar, and M. Edgerton. 2007. Histatin 5 initiates osmotic stress response in Candida albicans via activation of the Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Eukaryot. Cell 61876-1878. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
401. Vylkova, S., X. S. Li, J. C. Berner, and M. Edgerton. 2006. Distinct antifungal mechanisms: beta-defensins require Candida albicans Ssa1 protein, while Trk1p mediates activity of cysteine-free cationic peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50324-331. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
402. Watanabe, T., M. Takano, M. Murakami, H. Tanaka, A. Matsuhisa, N. Nakao, T. Mikami, M. Suzuki, and T. Matsumoto. 1999. Characterization of a haemolytic factor from Candida albicans. Microbiology 145689-694. [PubMed]
403. Watts, H. J., F. S. Cheah, B. Hube, D. Sanglard, and N. A. Gow. 1998. Altered adherence in strains of Candida albicans harbouring null mutations in secreted aspartic proteinase genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 159129-135. [PubMed]
404. Weissman, Z., and D. Kornitzer. 2004. A family of Candida cell surface haem-binding proteins involved in haemin and haemoglobin-iron utilization. Mol. Microbiol. 531209-1220. [PubMed]
405. White, T. C., and N. Agabian. 1995. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases: isoenzyme pattern is determined by cell type, and levels are determined by environmental factors. J. Bacteriol. 1775215-5221. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
406. Whiteway, M., and C. Bachewich. 2007. Morphogenesis in Candida albicans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61529-553. [PubMed]
407. Yan, S., R. G. Rodrigues, D. Cahn-Hidalgo, T. J. Walsh, and D. D. Roberts. 1998. Hemoglobin induces binding of several extracellular matrix proteins to Candida albicans. Identification of a common receptor for fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin. J. Biol. Chem. 2735638-5644. [PubMed]
408. Yan, S., R. G. Rodrigues, and D. D. Roberts. 1998. Hemoglobin-induced binding of Candida albicans to the cell-binding domain of fibronectin is independent of the Arg-Gly-Asp sequence. Infect. Immun. 661904-1909. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
409. Yeong, F. M. 2005. Severing all ties between mother and daughter: cell separation in budding yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 551325-1331. [PubMed]
410. Yin, Q. Y., P. W. de Groot, H. L. Dekker, L. de Jong, F. M. Klis, and C. G. de Koster. 2005. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls: identification of proteins covalently attached via glycosylphosphatidylinositol remnants or mild alkali-sensitive linkages. J. Biol. Chem. 28020894-20901. [PubMed]
411. Zhao, R., K. J. Daniels, S. R. Lockhart, K. M. Yeater, L. L. Hoyer, and D. R. Soll. 2005. Unique aspects of gene expression during Candida albicans mating and possible G1 dependency. Eukaryot. Cell 41175-1190. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
412. Zhao, X., K. J. Daniels, S. H. Oh, C. B. Green, K. M. Yeater, D. R. Soll, and L. L. Hoyer. 2006. Candida albicans Als3p is required for wild-type biofilm formation on silicone elastomer surfaces. Microbiology 1522287-2299. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
413. Zhao, X., S. H. Oh, G. Cheng, C. B. Green, J. A. Nuessen, K. Yeater, R. P. Leng, A. J. Brown, and L. L. Hoyer. 2004. ALS3 and ALS8 represent a single locus that encodes a Candida albicans adhesin; functional comparisons between Als3p and Als1p. Microbiology 1502415-2428. [PubMed]
414. Zhao, X., S. H. Oh, and L. L. Hoyer. 2007. Deletion of ALS5, ALS6 or ALS7 increases adhesion of Candida albicans to human vascular endothelial and buccal epithelial cells. Med. Mycol. 45429-434. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
415. Zhao, X., S. H. Oh, and L. L. Hoyer. 2007. Unequal contribution of ALS9 alleles to adhesion between Candida albicans and human vascular endothelial cells. Microbiology 1532342-2350. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
416. Zhao, X., S. H. Oh, K. M. Yeater, and L. L. Hoyer. 2005. Analysis of the Candida albicans Als2p and Als4p adhesins suggests the potential for compensatory function within the Als family. Microbiology 1511619-1630. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
417. Zhao, X., C. Pujol, D. R. Soll, and L. L. Hoyer. 2003. Allelic variation in the contiguous loci encoding Candida albicans ALS5, ALS1 and ALS9. Microbiology 1492947-2960. [PubMed]
418. Zhu, H., M. Bilgin, R. Bangham, D. Hall, A. Casamayor, P. Bertone, N. Lan, R. Jansen, S. Bidlingmaier, T. Houfek, T. Mitchell, P. Miller, R. A. Dean, M. Gerstein, and M. Snyder. 2001. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 2932101-2105. [PubMed]

Articles from Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews : MMBR are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...