• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmjBMJ helping doctors make better decisionsSearch bmj.comLatest content
BMJ. Jan 8, 1994; 308(6921): 107–110.
PMCID: PMC2539237

Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To clarify poorly understood epidemiological features of appendicitis. DESIGN--Retrospective study of consecutive cases from a defined population and analysis of data from published studies. SETTING--County of Jönköping, Sweden. 3029 patients who underwent operation in 1984-9 and 4717 patients from the county town who underwent operation in 1970-89, all for suspected appendicitis, plus 48,426 cases from six reported studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Incidences specific for age and sex and temporal trends of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis and removal of a normal appendix. Associations between diagnostic accuracy, rate of perforation, and incidences of removal of a normal appendix and of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis. RESULTS--The incidence of appendicitis was 116/100,000 inhabitants. Appendicitis was more common in male patients. The incidence of perforating appendicitis was independent of age, stable over time, and uninfluenced by the rate of laparotomy, whereas the incidence of non-perforating appendicitis was age dependent, decreasing over time, and related to the diagnostic accuracy and rate of removal of a normal appendix. CONCLUSIONS--Perforating and non-perforating appendicitis seem to be separate entities, and appendicitis that resolves spontaneously is common. This may have important implications for managing suspected appendicitis.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (846K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Lichtner S, Pflanz M. Appendectomy in the Federal Republic of Germany: epidemiology and medical care patterns. Med Care. 1971 Jul-Aug;9(4):311–330. [PubMed]
  • West RR, Carey MJ. Variation in rates of hospital admission for appendicitis in Wales. Br Med J. 1978 Jun 24;1(6128):1662–1664. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rutkow IM, Zuidema GD. Surgical rates in the United States: 1966 to 1978. Surgery. 1981 Feb;89(2):151–162. [PubMed]
  • Arnbjörnsson E, Asp NG, Westin SI. Decreasing incidence of acute appendicitis, with special reference to the consumption of dietary fiber. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148(5):461–464. [PubMed]
  • Noer T. Decreasing incidence of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand. 1975;141(5):431–432. [PubMed]
  • Peltokallio P, Tykkä H. Evolution of the age distribution and mortality of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1981 Feb;116(2):153–156. [PubMed]
  • Ricci MA, Cuasay RS, Beck WC. Appendicitis: the perforation rate when reviewed by decades in a general hospital. Am Surg. 1988 May;54(5):273–275. [PubMed]
  • Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ. Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg. 1992 Jan;158(1):37–41. [PubMed]
  • Waldron R, Johnston JG. Appendicitis: 357 consecutive cases. Ir Med J. 1983 Nov;76(11):446–448. [PubMed]
  • Foster HM, Webb SJ. Appendicitis and appendicectomy in a Melanesian population. Br J Surg. 1989 Apr;76(4):368–369. [PubMed]
  • Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910–925. [PubMed]
  • Pieper R, Kager L. The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy. An epidemiological study of 971 cases. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148(1):45–49. [PubMed]
  • Pieper R, Kager L, Näsman P. Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148(1):51–62. [PubMed]
  • Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, de Vries BC, van der Werf SD, Dörr JP, Blok RA. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 1987 Sep 10;317(11):666–669. [PubMed]
  • Amland PF, Skaane P, Rønningen H, Nordshus T, Solheim K. Ultrasonography and parameters of inflammation in acute appendicitis. A comparison with clinical findings. Acta Chir Scand. 1989 Mar;155(3):185–189. [PubMed]
  • Butsch DW, Jothi R, Butsch WL, Butsch JL. Recurrent appendicitis: fact not fallacy. Postgrad Med. 1973 Oct;54(4):132–137. [PubMed]
  • HOWIE JG. TOO FEW APPENDICECTOMIES? Lancet. 1964 Jun 6;1(7345):1240–1242. [PubMed]
  • Pieper R, Kager L, Näsman P. Clinical significance of mucosal inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Ann Surg. 1983 Mar;197(3):368–374. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thomson HJ, Jones PF. Active observation in acute abdominal pain. Am J Surg. 1986 Nov;152(5):522–525. [PubMed]
  • Graham DF. Computer-aided prediction of gangrenous and perforating appendicitis. Br Med J. 1977 Nov 26;2(6099):1375–1377. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van Dieijen-Visser MP, Go PM, Brombacher PJ. The value of laboratory tests in patients suspected of acute appendicitis. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1991 Nov;29(11):749–752. [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...