![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 by the Genetics Society of America Inducing Segmental Aneuploid Mosaicism in the Mouse Through Targeted Asymmetric Sister Chromatid Event of Recombination *Université d'Orléans, UMR6218, Molecular Immunology and Embryology, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France, †Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR6218, Immunologie and Molecular Embryology, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France and ‡Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPS44, Transgenese, Archivage Animaux Modèles, Institut de Transgenose, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France 1Corresponding author: CNRS, Institut de Transgénose 3B rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2 France. E-mail: herault/at/cnrs-orleans.fr Communicating editor: N. Arnheim Received June 6, 2008; Accepted July 10, 2008. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Loss or gain of whole chromosomes, or parts of chromosomes, is found in various pathological conditions, such as cancer and aneuploidy, and results from the missegregation of chromosomes during cellular division or abnormal mitotic recombination. We introduce a novel strategy for determining the consequences of segmental aneuploid mosaicism, called targeted asymmetric sister chromatin event of recombination (TASCER). We took advantage of the Cre/loxP system, used extensively in embryonic stem cells for generating deletions and duplications of regions of interest, to induce recombination during the G2 phase. Using two loxP sites in a Cis configuration, we generated in vivo cells harboring microdeletions and microduplications for regions of interest covering up to 2.2 Mb. Using this approach in the mouse provides insight into the consequences of segmental aneuploidy for homologous regions of the human chromosome 21 on cell survival. Furthermore, TASCER shows that Cre-induced recombination is more efficient after DNA replication in vivo and provides an opportunity to evaluate, through genetic mosaics, the outcome of copy number variation and segmental aneuploidy in the mouse. VARIATIONS in copy number are an important source of modifications in the genome, contributing to the diversity of phenotypes and to disease (Shaw and Lupski 2004; Gonzalez et al. 2005; Aitman et al. 2006; Fellermann et al. 2006; Sebat et al. 2007; Sharp et al. 2007, 2008; Hollox et al. 2008). They correspond to segmental duplications or deletions and represent rare variants or polymorphic events in the population (Feuk et al. 2006a; Redon et al. 2006; Kidd et al. 2008). As a consequence, genetic expression could change either directly, for genes located inside the region, or indirectly through positional effects for genes located outside (Lupski and Stankiewicz 2005; Feuk et al. 2006a,b; Freeman et al. 2006). Complete loss of a chromosome often induces more severe consequences with cellular dysfunction, such as tumorigenesis, impaired viability, such as spontaneous abortion, or aneuploid syndromes such as Down syndrome (DS) (Robinson et al. 1999, 2001; Hassold and Hunt 2001; Hassold et al. 2007). Nevertheless, aneuploid mosaicism has been described for almost all the chromosomes in humans and confined chromosomal mosaicism affects ~2% of viable pregnancies (Hahnemann and Vejerslev 1997; Kalousek 2000). It originates during cell division with the missegregation of a chromosome; while one cell will receive an additional chromosome leading to trisomy, the second daughter cell will be monosomic. Somehow, the distribution of mosaicism depends on the timing, the cell lineage, the viability of the aneuploid cells, and the chromosome or the region involved. Generalized chromosomal mosaicisms, induced early during embryogenesis, exist but are less frequent and often linked to pathological conditions. For example, in DS, mosaicism represents 1–2% of cases (Mikkelsen 1977), whereas the complete absence of the HSA21 is almost incompatible with life (Katz-Jaffe et al. 2004, 2005). Somatic aneuploid mosaicism has been described in blood cells (Cheung et al. 2007) and in normal brain with a frequency of 1.25–1.45% per chromosome and a percentage of aneuploid cells >30% (Rehen et al. 2001, 2005; Kingsbury et al. 2005, 2006; Yurov et al. 2008). Several hypotheses have been drawn to explain the presence and the outcome of such aneuploid cells (Kingsbury et al. 2006) but no clear evidence has been documented. In vivo, the induction of segmental aneuploidy has been achieved by using the Cre/loxP recombinase system in several species (for review see Lewandoski and Martin 1997; Brault et al. 2006). In the mouse, a large panel of Cre transgenes are described to generate segmental deletion, duplication, inversion, and translocation (Kmita et al. 2002; Spitz et al. 2005; Wu et al. 2007). For such large fragments, specific promoters have been used to direct the expression of the recombinase during meiosis in the targeted meiotic recombination (TAMERE), (Herault et al. 1998; Kmita et al. 2002; Genoud et al. 2004; Zakany et al. 2004; Tarchini and Duboule 2006), in different tissues (Mao et al. 2005; Spitz et al. 2005), or in specific cell lineages (Zheng et al. 2000). The improvement of the chromosomal engineering technique is definitely based on the availability of a powerful Cre-expressing construct such as the Hprt1tm1(Cre)Mnn mouse line (Tang et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2007). To go further into the analysis of the aneuploid mosaicism consequences, we used the property of the Cre recombinase to react on G2 phase of the cell cycle to develop a strategy for generating segmental aneuploid mosaicism in mouse tissues, allowing the study of the survival and the function of cells carrying microdeletion and microduplication. This strategy is based on a targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination (TASCER), due to a Cre-dependent recombination induced after the replication of DNA. In this article, we reveal for the first time the utility of TASCER to determine the consequences of segmental aneuploid mosaicism for two specific regions homologous to the telomeric part of HSA21 in the mouse. MATERIALS AND METHODS Gene targeting and mouse lines: The targeting vectors for Prmt2 and U2af1 were isolated from the 3′HPRT library, whereas the Col6a1, Cstb, and Abcg1 targeting vectors were obtained from the 5′HPRT library (Zheng et al. 1999). LoxP sites were inserted in the same relative orientation by two successive homologous recombination events in HM-1 embryonic stem (ES) cells, as described in (Besson et al. 2007). For each targeting event, ES clones were selected for homologous recombination at the defined loci and injected into blastocysts to obtain chimeras. By crossing with C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we established the Cis(Prmt2-Col6a1)tm1Yah, Cis(Prmt2-Cstb)tm1Yah, and Cis(Abcg1-U2af1)tm1Yah mouse lines called Cis1 (Besson et al. 2007), Cis2, and Cis3, respectively, which carry the two loxP sites in a Cis configuration on Mus musculus (MMU) chromosome 10 (MMU10) for the first two lines and 17 (MMU17) for the last one. Four transgenic mouse lines, expressing the CRE recombinase were used. They are either transgenic or site-targeted derived and express the Cre gene from various promoters: ubiquitously [Tg(CMV-Cre)1Pcn] (Dupe et al. 1997), during female ovogenesis [Tg(Zp3-Cre)93Knw](De Vries et al. 2000), in specific tissues, such as neural progenitors [Tg(Nes-Cre)1Kln] (Tronche et al. 1999), or in specific cell types from the myeloid lineage [Tg(MLys1-Cre)Cgn] (Clausen et al. 1999). Cre mouse lines were crossed with the “Cis” lines described above to generate double heterozygote individuals, which were studied further. All animals were bred under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions and were treated in compliance with animal welfare policies from the French Ministry of Agriculture (law 87 848 and YH accreditation 45-31). Genotyping and sequencing: Genomic DNA was extracted from tails, ES cells, and mouse organs, including testis, intestine, liver, kidney, muscles (gastrocnemius and biceps brachialis), heart, lung, brain, cerebellum, tongue, eyes, salivary glands, spleen, skin, stomach, and thymus. The analysis was carried out by PCR or Southern blot using standard operating procedures (Besson et al. 2007). Specific primer pairs (available upon request) were used to generate PCR-derived probes for the ampicillin and the neomycin resistance genes included in the targeting vectors. In addition, PCR was performed to amplify specific 2-kb and 3-kb DNA fragments from the chromosomes carrying the deletion and the segmental duplication, respectively. To check the integrity of the recombined sequences, sequencing was performed with the BigDye Terminator V3.1 chemistry and analyzed with an ABI PRISM 310 apparatus (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA), as described previously (Besson et al. 2005). Fluorescence in situ hybridization: Interphase nuclei were recovered by affixing a sample of frozen/defrosted organs onto a slide. The mouse BACs were chosen from the RPCI-24 Mouse BAC Library (C57BL/6J Male, http://bacpac.chori.org/mmouse24.htm). BAC DNAs were purified with Nucleobond BAC 100 (Macherey-Nalgen, Hoerdt, France). One microgram of mouse BAC located inside (RPCI24-445L22) and outside (RPCI24-247G13) of the deleted region was used to generate DNA probes labeled by nick translation with DIG-dUTP (for 445L22) and biotin-dUTP (for 247G13) using ROCHE nick translation mix for in situ probe. The detection was realized by the use of both antidigoxigenin-rhodamine antibody and avidin-fluorescein (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instruction manual. The slides were mounted and images were captured as described previously (Besson et al. 2007). RESULTS Generating targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination: To generate segmental mosaic aneuploidies on the two distinct chromosomes MMU10 (Cis1 and Cis2; Figure 1
The CMV promoter is known to be expressed ubiquitously and early during embryogenesis (Zakany and Duboule 1996; Dupe et al. 1997; Spitz et al. 2005). Consequently, the Cre recombinase should be active in a variety of cell types using the Tg(CMV-Cre)1Pcn transgene (Dupe et al. 1997). We isolated DNA from 18 different organs from ~20 Cis2/+, Tg(CMV-Cre)1Pcn/0 mice to detect the corresponding Del2 deletion. Southern blot analysis, as shown in Figure 2A
To produce both the deleted and the duplicated configurations, there should be a TASCER. This event takes place between the two loxP sites placed in a Cis configuration after the replication of cellular DNA when loxP are present on both sister chromatids (Figure 3
We next analyzed the border of the new loci by direct sequencing of specific PCR products generated from the duplicated and the deleted regions. No modification of the sequence was observed and we confirmed that the recombination takes place as expected (Figure 4
Thus, starting from a Cis configuration with two loxP sites in the same relative orientation, located either 0.5 or 2.2 Mb apart, the expression of the Cre does not produce solely a complete deletion, but a more complex situation with monosomic and trisomic cells due to an efficient recombination after the G2 phase. This event should result from a higher activity of the Cre recombinase in dividing cells, but raises the question whether the TASCER is dependent on the tissue or on the Cre-expressing transgene. Tissue-specific aneuploid mosaicism: Although the TASCER event occurs in tissues from different embryonic origins, such as muscle and cerebellum, the segmental aneuploid mosaicism shows a large variability between tissues. Some tissues, such as the cerebellum and muscle, sustain or maintain the aneuploid conditions, while in others the level of aneuploid cells is reduced. In addition, the duplicated configuration is normally unstable with three unmodified loxP sites (Holzenberger et al. 2000). Consequently, duplication should be observed only (1) if the expression or the activity of the Cre recombinase is reduced or (2) if the local and tissue-specific structure of the chromosome does not allow the Cre to act on the loxP sites. Definitely the level of the Cre recombinase should reach a level that allows the recombination to occur in the tissue. Nevertheless the variability of aneuploid cells between different tissues may be a direct consequence of the Cre expression level or may result from the lethal effect induced by the aneuploidy during cellular development. Indeed, it is known that complete monosomy 21 often leads to premature death of the patient. Thus, we explored further the potential of the TASCER strategy by comparison with classical deletion induced by the Cre. We used additional transgenic lines expressing constitutive Cre in specific tissues, such as neural progenitors [Tg(Nes-Cre)1Kln] (Tronche et al. 1999), in cell types derived from the myeloid lineage [Tg(MLys1-Cre)Cgn] (Clausen et al. 1999), and in another cell line carrying two loxP sites located 0.6 Mb apart on MMU17 (Cis3; Figure 1
DISCUSSION In this article we report a strategy, called TASCER, for engineering segmental aneuploidy mosaicism in vivo. We show, on two distinct chromosomes and with three different Cre-expressing transgenes, how TASCER can efficiently recover cells with partial monosomy and trisomy with a relatively constant level, in a variety of tissues. We took advantage of the post-S phase-induced Cre recombination on loxP sites inserted on the same chromosome in a Cis configuration separated by up to 2.2 Mb. Such an event has not been previously reported, presumably because the Cre is very active on loxP sites that are located nearby, such as in most Cre/loxP applications. At this point, the duplicated configuration that contains three loxP sites may happen but should react again to get a Cis or a deletion and could not be observed. In our Cis configuration where the two loxP sites are located far away, the distances tend to decrease from the Cre-mediated recombination frequency (Liu et al. 1998; Zheng et al. 2000) somehow preserving the chromosome with a large duplication. Although duplications were commonly produced to obtain germline transmission of new configurations (Puech et al. 2000; Zheng et al. 2000), an in vivo generated duplication coming from a Cis configuration has not been published to date. The Cre-mediated recombination event that takes place in between loxP sites after the S phase is crucial to the TASCER process. TASCER clearly depends on the capacity of the targeted cells to proliferate and on the ability of the Cre transgene to be expressed during proliferation. Results obtained with the three distinct Cis configurations tested in this report demonstrate that in the mouse, the Cre recombinase is much more active during the G2 phase than in G1, a phenomenon already described in vitro (Liu et al. 1998, 2002; Yu and Bradley 2001) and discussed in vivo (Zong et al. 2005). Nevertheless, the in vitro efficiency was so low that the restoration of a selectable marker, such as the Hprt minigene, is required to select the event (Ramirez-Solis et al. 1995; Adams et al. 2004). In our experiment, the rate of recombination in TASCER is far more efficient than the in vitro induction in embryonic stem cells (Liu et al. 2002). Somehow, the Cre recombinase is more active in vivo, presumably due to stable conditions of expression in vivo, after the replication of DNA, in the G2 phase, while the chromatin structure is changing to prepare the future mitosis (Liu et al. 1998; Wu et al. 2007). We could also assume that the in vivo condition is more permissive to support the aneuploid cells due to the variety of tissue conditions. The physical connection of the sister chromatids due to structure, such as the cohesin complex that is found until anaphase, should facilitate the induced event of mitotic recombination between DNA (Losada et al. 2002; Takata et al. 2007). In addition, the TASCER observation suggests that the Cre is preferentially active in vivo while cells are proliferating. As reported in previous studies, the Cre recombinase activity is dose dependent and varies with the driving promoter. The human cytomegalovirus sequence is a powerful promoter that directs Cre expression in early embryogenesis. Thus it has been used to completely knock out genes of interest or to generate large rearrangements (Zakany and Duboule 1996; Spitz et al. 2005). Here, we were able to induce up to 2.2 Mb long chromosomal rearrangements with a set of three promoters driving the expression of the Cre recombinase. Remarkably, although the duplicated configuration should be unstable due to the presence of three loxP sites in the same orientation (Holzenberger et al. 2000), trisomic cells were found in a variety of organs showing that trisomy might be beneficial in some tissues. We tried without success to generate larger aneuploid mosaicisms with the Tg(CMV-Cre)1Pcn transgene for a region of ~9.2 Mb. The recombination of a larger genetic interval might require a stronger promoter such as the CAG promoter inserted in the Hprt locus of the Hprt1tm1(Cre)Mnn mouse line, which has been used successfully in a recent study (Tang et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2007). As a consequence, inducing mosaic conditions in an adult animal will require preliminary experiments to balance the size of the targeted region with the expression level of the Cre gene. In addition, TASCER should be taken into account when trying to generate deletions in vivo. Additional controls to check for the duplication event should be carried out to avoid interference in the analysis of conditional knockouts for large genes or chromosomal regions. Thus, the degree of mosaicism generated through TASCER could vary in different tissues depending on the Cre transgene and on the proliferative capacities of the different cell types of each tissue. Chromosomal mosaicism has been observed in pathological conditions, such as mosaic trisomy 21 (Modi et al. 2003) or in cancer (Weaver and Cleveland 2007). In this report, we followed the impact of time on the survival of cells that are trisomic and monosomic for small regions homologous to HSA21 and we did not find any dramatic changes. Thus, the presence of trisomic and monosomic cells for the analyzed regions does not affect the cell survival. Due to the cellular organization of muscle cells, any trisomic or monosomic consequences should be compensated by the plurinucleated syncitia of the muscle fiber. On the contrary, in the cerebellum the consequence of aneuploidy on cell survival could only be compensated through noncell autonomous effect. To date, little evidence supports a functional consequence of partial trisomy or copy number variation in nonpathological conditions, even though aneuploidies have been described in normal lineages, such as neurons (Iourov et al. 2006; Kingsbury et al. 2006; Muotri and Gage 2006; Yurov et al. 2007a,b, 2008) but one could expect to use TASCER to study such impact. More importantly, TASCER allows us to induce partial aneuploid conditions that will mimic the aneuploidy detected in cancer cells and to study further the consequence of loss or gain of copy number for chromosomal regions during tumorigenesis (Weaver and Cleveland 2007). For example, looking for tumor suppressor genes in a region identified as an aneuploidy-induced loss of heterozygosity in cancer cells could be done on a larger scale with TASCER compared to classical loss-of-function studies that need gene-by-gene inactivation or ES-cell-derived technology such as Micer (Adams et al. 2004). In conclusion, we believe that TASCER opens new perspectives to assess the consequence of aneuploid conditions on viability and to decipher the impact of copy number variation during cell fate determination and tumorigenesis. Acknowledgments We thank members of the laboratory for helpful discussion, in particular Veronique Brault and Kathryn Jane Mitchell, and also Karine Maillard, Elodie Desale, and Tamara Durand for taking care of the animals and members of the AnEUploidy consortium (http://www.aneuploidy.org). We are grateful to P. Chambon, B. Knowkles, R. Klein, and I. Forster, respectively, for the Tg(CMV-Cre)1Pcn, the Tg(Zp3-Cre)93Knw, the Tg(Nes-Cre)1Kln, and the Tg(MLys1-Cre)Cgn mouse lines. The “Cis” mutant mice are available for distribution through the EMMA network (European Mouse Mutant Archive, http://www.emmanet.org). This work was funded by grants from the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), the Region Centre, the Conseil Général du Loiret, Fondation Jerome Lejeune, and the AnEUploidy project (LSHG-CT-2006-037627) supported by the European commission under FP6. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Apr 1; 13 Spec No 1():R57-64.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2004]Science. 2005 Mar 4; 307(5714):1434-40.
[Science. 2005]Nature. 2006 Feb 16; 439(7078):851-5.
[Nature. 2006]Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Sep; 79(3):439-48.
[Am J Hum Genet. 2006]Science. 2007 Apr 20; 316(5823):445-9.
[Science. 2007]Am J Med Genet. 1999 May 7; 84(1):34-42.
[Am J Med Genet. 1999]Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Dec; 69(6):1245-54.
[Am J Hum Genet. 2001]Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr; 2(4):280-91.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2001]Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Oct 15; 16 Spec No. 2():R203-8.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2007]Am J Med Genet. 1997 May 16; 70(2):179-87.
[Am J Med Genet. 1997]Nat Genet. 1997 Oct; 17(2):223-5.
[Nat Genet. 1997]PLoS Genet. 2006 Jul; 2(7):e86.
[PLoS Genet. 2006]Nature. 2002 Nov 14; 420(6912):145-50.
[Nature. 2002]Nat Genet. 2005 Aug; 37(8):889-93.
[Nat Genet. 2005]Nat Genet. 2007 Jul; 39(7):922-30.
[Nat Genet. 2007]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jun 1; 27(11):2354-60.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Sep 1; 16(17):2040-52.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2007]Development. 1997 Jan; 124(2):399-410.
[Development. 1997]Genesis. 2000 Feb; 26(2):110-2.
[Genesis. 2000]Nat Genet. 1999 Sep; 23(1):99-103.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Transgenic Res. 1999 Aug; 8(4):265-77.
[Transgenic Res. 1999]Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Sep 1; 16(17):2040-52.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2007]Biol Cell. 2005 Oct; 97(10):787-98.
[Biol Cell. 2005]Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Sep 1; 16(17):2040-52.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2007]Development. 1997 Jan; 124(2):399-410.
[Development. 1997]Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Sep 1; 16(17):2040-52.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2007]Nature. 1996 Nov 7; 384(6604):69-71.
[Nature. 1996]Development. 1997 Jan; 124(2):399-410.
[Development. 1997]Nat Genet. 2005 Aug; 37(8):889-93.
[Nat Genet. 2005]Nat Genet. 1999 Sep; 23(1):99-103.
[Nat Genet. 1999]Transgenic Res. 1999 Aug; 8(4):265-77.
[Transgenic Res. 1999]Genetics. 1998 Nov; 150(3):1155-68.
[Genetics. 1998]Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Jan; 20(2):648-55.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 29; 97(18):10090-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Genetics. 1998 Nov; 150(3):1155-68.
[Genetics. 1998]Nat Genet. 2002 Jan; 30(1):66-72.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Oct; 2(10):780-90.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2001]Cell. 2005 May 6; 121(3):479-92.
[Cell. 2005]Nature. 1995 Dec 14; 378(6558):720-4.
[Nature. 1995]Nature. 1996 Nov 7; 384(6604):69-71.
[Nature. 1996]Nat Genet. 2005 Aug; 37(8):889-93.
[Nat Genet. 2005]Genesis. 2002 Mar; 32(3):199-202.
[Genesis. 2002]Nat Genet. 2007 Jul; 39(7):922-30.
[Nat Genet. 2007]Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Jun; 6(4):499-503.
[Reprod Biomed Online. 2003]Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 1; 67(21):10103-5.
[Cancer Res. 2007]Int Rev Cytol. 2006; 249():143-91.
[Int Rev Cytol. 2006]Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Nov; 63(22):2626-41.
[Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006]Nature. 2006 Jun 29; 441(7097):1087-93.
[Nature. 2006]PLoS One. 2007 Jun 27; 2(6):e558.
[PLoS One. 2007]J Med Genet. 2007 Aug; 44(8):521-5.
[J Med Genet. 2007]