• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(8): e2871.
Published online Aug 6, 2008. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0002871
PMCID: PMC2518513

Characterization of Unique Small RNA Populations from Rice Grain

Hany A. El-Shemy, Editor

Abstract

Small RNAs (~20 to 24 nucleotides) function as naturally occurring molecules critical in developmental pathways in plants and animals [1], [2]. Here we analyze small RNA populations from mature rice grain and seedlings by pyrosequencing. Using a clustering algorithm to locate regions producing small RNAs, we classified hotspots of small RNA generation within the genome. Hotspots here are defined as 1 kb regions within which small RNAs are significantly overproduced relative to the rest of the genome. Hotspots were identified to facilitate characterization of different categories of small RNA regulatory elements. Included in the hotspots, we found known members of 23 miRNA families representing 92 genes, one trans acting siRNA (ta-siRNA) gene, novel siRNA-generating coding genes and phased siRNA generating genes. Interestingly, over 20% of the small RNA population in grain came from a single foldback structure, which generated eight phased 21-nt siRNAs. This is reminiscent of a newly arising miRNA derived from duplication of progenitor genes [3], [4]. Our results provide data identifying distinct populations of small RNAs, including phased small RNAs, in mature grain to facilitate characterization of small regulatory RNA expression in monocot species.

Introduction

Rice is one of the world's most important food crops, as it is produced in over 100 countries and is a staple food for half of the world's population (OECD, 2004). In addition to the importance of rice as a food staple, its genetic synteny, ease of transformation and an assembled genome [5] make it a model system for the study of cereal grasses. The importance of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in plant developmental regulation have made the investigation of small RNA populations an important aspect in understanding the regulation of higher plant genomes and processes. Classes of small RNAs including miRNAs, ta-siRNAs, and nat-siRNAs regulate important developmental and physiological processes in land plants and most regulatory small RNAs and target genes are conserved among higher plants [1], [2], [6]. In general, these classes of regulatory RNAs suppress gene expression by inhibition of translation or destabilization of target mRNAs in trans. miRNAs and ta-siRNAs are derived from distinct transcriptional units that either form internal foldback structures or recruit a specific RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) RDR6. Additional endogenous siRNAs often associated with repetitive elements have also been characterized that are processed from long double stranded RNA (dsRNA), and function to silence transcription in cis through modification of the chromatin state.

As in-depth annotation and functional gene network relationships are developed for rice, the analysis of small RNA expression will facilitate a deeper understanding of these relationships. An extensive and diverse population of small RNAs have been identified in Arabidopsis and rice utilizing high throughput sequencing methods [3], [7][14], however only developing or stressed tissues were evaluated [15][17]. In an attempt to gain a broader understanding of gene expression in rice grain, we characterized small RNA populations from Oryza sativa spp. japonica cv. Nipponbare utilizing a deep sequencing approach. As approximately 70% of all human food consumption is derived from seeds [18] it is important to understand the role of small RNAs in seed development given the known roles of miRNAs in organ identity, morphogenesis, and polarity in actively growing tissues. Seed development is a highly regulated and coordinated process involving deposition of seed storage reserves, novel morphogenic events to define the embryo and endosperm, and maturation drying and quiescence. Grain in the dormant state is typically characterized by little or no active translation, given this and the known roles of miRNAs in developing tissues only actively growing tissues have previously been analyzed in depth. The regulatory role of small RNAs in repression of gene expression could potentially provide an important mechanism in establishing or maintaining the dormant state in grain or altering storage reserves. In this study, we have initiated the sequencing of the small RNA population from rice grain and seedlings to determine the abundance and role of miRNAs and other small RNAs in both dormant and growing tissues.

Results

Deep sequencing of rice grain and seedling small RNA populations

Small RNA libraries were constructed from three pools of mature, dormant rice grain and three-week post germination seedlings utilizing RNA-adapter mediated ligation [19], [20]. Each of the four libraries were independently sequenced using high-throughput pyrosequencing [21]. We obtained a total of 679,146 sequences from the three rice grain libraries and 257,394 from one rice seedling library (Table 1). Greater than 41% of these sequences represent unique reads. Grain and seedling small RNAs were similar in size distributions with distinct peaks at 21- and 24-nt (Figure S1). Consistent with previous reports, the 21-nt small RNAs comprised many redundant reads, whereas the 24-nt class comprised primarily unique or low abundance reads. In seedling, greater than 30% of the ~21-nt redundant reads matched to known miRNAs. Despite a similar distribution of ~21-nt redundant sequences in grain, less than 5% could be accounted for by previously characterized miRNAs. The majority of these small RNAs were from non-repetitive elements, suggesting either many novel grain specific miRNAs or alternative siRNA generating loci such as nat- or ta-siRNAs. These data represent the first large scale sequencing of small RNAs from mature rice grain and an opportunity to assess the role of small RNAs in grain.

Table 1
Genome and transcriptome matches to rice small RNA sequences.

Conservation of small RNAs in plants and animals

To contribute to our understanding of small RNA function and conservation, we compared rice small RNA sequences to genomes of species representing important lineages throughout evolution. We found the highest conservation among plant species with a lesser percentage similarity among distantly related species. For example, there are 13,288 matches between the rice grain small RNA and Arabidopsis thaliana genome and 621 between the rice grain small RNA and Drosophila melanogaster genome. As previously reported [22] there is little conservation of small RNAs between rice and any animal species tested (Table 1). Small RNAs conserved among distantly related non-animal species were generally low abundance sequences, whereas the highly abundant miRNAs were conserved among plants. While more small RNAs, primarily miRNAs, are conserved among plants, many small RNAs were also found with perfect homology to sequences in human and other animal transcriptomes (Table 1). The majority of rice small RNAs matched to unannotated intergenic regions, with only 29% matching to the rice transcriptome, including 12% to the complement. Sequences unmatched to the rice genome were likely a result of sequencing errors or from regions of the rice genome that remain unmapped. Here, we have not removed small RNAs matching to rRNAs, tRNAs, or sn/snoRNAs from the analysis as these are unlikely to be mRNA degradation products due to the requirement for a 5′ phosphate group in the cloning protocol. However, because these small RNAs could have multiple genomic origins, we have normalized to genome copy number to help remove this potential error. We have also chosen to keep these small RNAs in the analysis group, as interesting new classes of small RNAs from similar repeat regions have been reported (piwi-RNAs) and from alternative size classes [23].

Categorization of small RNA populations through hotspot determination

The three replicates of rice grain libraries allow us to estimate expression and assess the quality and coverage of each sequencing reaction. Amongst the three replicates, we obtained 285,873 unique sequences, however little overlap was observed among these sequences in independent libraries. We found only ~1.4% of unique sequences were shared among all three replicates, and only ~5.9% between at least two replicates (Figure 1a). This illustrates that despite the high number of sequences obtained; the endogenous rice grain small RNA population is far greater than captured by our sequencing effort.

Figure 1
Overlap among small RNA sequences and hot spots.

While miRNAs represent a significant portion of the total number of sequences obtained, in comparison they represent a minor component of the unique small RNA population. In contrast, small RNAs from repetitive loci are disperse and may account for the low overlap among unique sequences from replicate libraries [10]. To determine if clustering small RNAs from specific loci would result in greater overlap of replicates, we calculated hotspots individually for each grain library replicate. Hotspots were identified by dividing the genome into 1-kb bins and small RNA abundance was calculated for each strand of the genome separately. We calculated a P value for each bin and defined hotspots as P<E-50 (see Methods S1). Of the 551,274 sequences from rice grain that mapped to the genome, 53.2% were captured in 680 clusters representing less than 0.1% of the rice genome. In contrast to unique sequences, 67% of hotspots were represented in more than one replicate (Figure 1). These results are similar to reports in Arabidopsis, in which little similarity was observed among unique small RNA sequences yet a greater overlap was observed among clustered small RNAs [10]. For further categorization of small RNA populations, we utilized hotspot cluster determination to facilitate identification of abundant, unique miRNA loci, and loci from which many low abundance sequences are derived.

We examined the distribution of small RNAs by plotting abundance across the twelve rice chromosomes, calculated as transcripts per quarter million sequences (tpq) (Figure 2 and Figure S2). Regions of high small RNA expression around centromeres have been reported for Arabidopsis leaf tissue [10], [13]. In contrast, we generally did not observe a concentration of small RNAs in centromeric and pericentromeric regions using repeat-normalized expression. Rather, expression was localized to specific regions across the rice chromosomes, indicating the majority of the rice small RNA population derives from a small number of highly expressed loci. In many cases, the regions of highest localized expression mapped to known miRNA loci. Grain and seedling libraries showed distinct, tissue-specific expression patterns, with more miRNA-associated hotspots in seedlings. The higher number of miRNA hotspots is consistent with known roles for miRNAs in regulating development in plants [1].

Figure 2
Small RNA expression from rice grain and seedling libraries across Chromosome 1 and Chromosome 6.

Small RNAs from hotspots of seedling and grain libraries were categorized into repetitive elements, miRNAs, miRNA targets, sparse hotspots, phased hotspots such as ta-siRNAs, and disperse hotspots (Figure 3a). Phased hotspots were defined as those regions from which small RNAs were generated in a 21-nt register, while disperse hotspots were those regions of the genome from which many small RNAs were generated with no particular phasing or clustering. The reasons for evaluating hotspots were twofold; first they represent the population of small RNAs most likely involved in modulating gene expression in these tissues, and second the potential for incorrectly characterizing small RNAs decreases when low abundance sequences are not considered [1]. Furthermore, in the absence of a panel of RNAi pathway gene knockouts, such as is available in Arabidopsis, hotspot characterization helps to elucidate the functional classification of a given small RNA because the neighboring small RNAs are included in the analysis. For example, miRNA genes show two characteristic peaks of abundance, often located within a short distance of each other, with the miRNA sequence several times more abundant than the partially complementary miRNA* sequence. In this way, important regulatory elements such as miRNA and trans-acting siRNA loci can be found, although potentially at the expense of a number of false negatives due to the stringent requirements on abundance.

Figure 3
Characterization of rice hotspot small RNAs.

The unique small RNA sequences from grain and seedling were significantly different, which could reflect either lack of sequence coverage to fully capture the complexity of the small RNA population, or regions of small RNA expression unique to each tissue. To subvert this obstacle we evaluated genomic regions by categorizing 1 Kb regions (as described above), rather than individual small RNA sequences. This changed the overlap of the three rice grain replicates to 67% for 1 Kb bins over 1.4% overlap that was found when unique sequences were compared (Figure 1). For analysis of the three rice grain library replicates, we used the average normalized tpq. Using a cutoff of P<E-50 for hotspots resulted in a combined total of 498 small RNA clusters in grain and seedling (Table S2). The largest class of hotspots contained repetitive elements, such as transposons, ribosomal DNA, and tRNA genes. The second largest class was from MIRNA genes for which we captured 93 loci[24]; thirteen miRNA targets were also captured by similarity to truncated miRNAs. Consistent with the role of miRNAs in development and morphology, we detected more miRNA loci hotspots specific to seedlings (39) when compared to grain (4). The remaining hotspots were separated into sparse clusters associated with one or two specific peaks, phased, and disperse hotspots. Each of these categories was then analyzed for novel miRNAs, ta-siRNAs, and siRNA regulated genes, respectively.

Identification of novel miRNAs by hotspot determination

Discovery efforts in Arabidopsis and rice have used abundant clusters containing only a small number of unique siRNAs as a starting point for prediction of novel miRNAs [3], [10], [12]. Following this rationale, we utilized sparse hotspots to search for new miRNAs. We propose that with extensive sequencing the propensity for false positive miRNA identification increases dramatically if low abundance siRNAs are considered. For example, using criteria derived from known miRNAs [1], [25] we predicted 840 candidate miRNAs from 1072 loci that form miRNA-like precursors. Potentially, many of these miRNA candidates represent species specific miRNA-like genes arising from recent duplication of progenitor sequences [3], [4]. In contrast, among sparse hotspots from grain and seedlings only five loci were found to contain miRNA-like foldback structures. While many of the 1072 miRNA-like loci are likely to represent bona fide miRNAs, we chose to only analyze the five corresponding to sparse small RNA hotspots. Expression of putative miRNAs from sparse hotspots was confirmed by Northern blot analysis (Figure 3b). All miRNAs except miRMON18, also detected in maize, were specific to rice. Similarly, the vast majority of recently identified miRNAs in Arabidopsis were non-conserved [3], [12]. Based on criteria for prediction of known miRNAs [1], [25] from which we predicted 840 potential miRNAs, rice also appears to have a diverse set of non-conserved miRNAs, which appear as low abundance sequences.

Prediction of target genes for rice miRNAs

We predicted targets of the five new miRNAs using a scoring system that penalizes weak pairing to the 5′ end of the miRNA to reduce false positive predictions [26]. The results of this analysis were compared to small RNA hotspot clusters within predicted protein coding genes, including those flagged for short 18-nt matches. We expect to find miRNA targets in small RNA hotspots because many miRNAs are highly similar to their target sequences [27] and due to the possibility of transitivity [28]. We found thirteen previously predicted miRNA targets among clusters, supporting this hypothesis (Table S2). In addition, we were able to identify the PPR repeat target (Os10g35436) of miRMON13 utilizing hotspot classification, which was later validated by 5′ RACE assay.

Predicted targets of new miRNAs included an SPX-domain (miRMON18), PPR repeats (miRMON13), and CACTA transposon (miRMON22) gene families (Table S4). A non-conserved miRNA, miR827, predicted to target SPX genes in Arabidopsis [3], [12] varies by two nucleotides from miRMON18. Targets Os02g45520 and Os04g48390 are most similar to a subclade of Arabidopsis SPX genes predicted to be targets of miR827 [29]. Targets, Os02g45520 and Os02g48390 (SPX genes) for miRMON18 and Os10g35436 (PPR) for miRMON13 were tested using a standard 5′ RACE analysis. Cleavage events at the predicted site, 10 nucleotides from the 5′ end of the small RNA, were detected for all three predicted targets (Figure 3c). Three week old seedling tissue was used for validation of targets. Due to the similarity between the mature miRNA and predicted targets, miRMON18 is most likely a related family member of miR827 found in monocot accessions. miRMON13 was predicted to target seven PPR genes from an orthologous clade of PPR genes that have spurned miRNAs and ta-siRNAs in Arabidopsis [3], [26], [27], [30]. Target predictions for the remaining three novel miRNAs (miRMON24, 25, and 27) were performed but consisted largely of unannotated regions of the genome. This could be due to a lack of transcribed data for rice grain or due to the rapid evolution of miRNA genes [3], [4]. There is also no public microarray data for rice grain and low coverage with EST data for this tissue. This makes evaluating the possible functions of these genes difficult. Genes predicted to be regulated by abundant or grain-specific small RNAs are, however good candidates for further functional characterization and evaluation of their involvement in grain development.

Small RNA generating hotspots from rice grain include phased siRNAs and protein coding genes

In our small RNA libraries, miRNAs accounted for 33.0% of all seedling small RNAs, in comparison to only 2.4% from grain (Figure S1). Despite the difference in miRNA abundance, 21-nt small RNAs were essentially equivalent in abundance from both tissues (Figure S1). We hypothesize that alternative regulatory siRNAs, including ta-siRNAs and naturally occurring antisense siRNAs, (nat-siRNA) might account for the discrepancy in miRNA abundance between grain and seedling 21-nt siRNAs [31], [32]. To test this hypothesis, we determined phased hotspots by calculating phase uniqueness (p-score) based on ratio of abundance of in-phase siRNAs to out-of-phase siRNAs and fullness of each phase (see Methods S1). A single TAS3-like gene on Chromosome 3 was identified among phased hotspots (Table S2) [26]. Additional phased siRNAs from three hotspots on chromosomes 6 and 12 together accounted for ~22% of the 21-nt small RNAs from rice grain. Unlike ta-siRNAs and nat-siRNAs, phased siRNAs from both loci were exclusively from one strand, suggesting an alternative origin.

We chose to examine the locus on Chromosome 6 in detail, due to it generating siRNAs with the highest abundance, which were specific to rice grain. The phased siRNAs were distributed between two tightly clustered regions (Figure 4a). We cloned an 880-nt precursor that mapped to the Os6g21900 locus (see Data S1). Exons 2 and 3 form a long, imperfect foldback structure containing eight 21-nt phased siRNA duplexes, separated by an ~1.2 kB intron (Figure 4b). No small RNAs were found that match exon I, nor were we able to identify a miRNA target sequence that could initiate ta-siRNA phasing [26], [33], [34]. RNA gel blot analysis of the most abundant phased siRNA confirmed expression specific to rice grain (Figure 4c). We were unable to detect either of the two most abundant phased siRNAs (P7 and P4) in seedling or other plant species tested. To determine whether the phased siRNAs are expressed in other tissues, we also compared the precursor to public EST collections and the rice MPSS database. All matched ESTs and MPSS signatures were from rice grain or six days post germination libraries. In addition, the passenger strand was also cloned for all phased 21-nt siRNAs (except P2), confirming siRNA biogenesis from the foldback structure.

Figure 4
Phased siRNAs from the Os6g21900 locus.

We predicted that phased siRNAs would be processed by DCL4 due to the phased nature of 21-nt siRNAs, and would not require miRNA pathways because of the presence of a foldback structure in the Os06g21900 phased siRNA precursor RNA. To test this hypothesis, the full length cDNA from the Os06g21900 locus was transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 ecotype, and mutants dcl1-7 and dcl4-1 diagnostic for miRNAs and ta-siRNAs, respectively. We detected P5 and P7 phased siRNAs in Col-0 and dcl1-7 (Figure 4d). The abundant 21-nt phased siRNAs were absent in dcl4-1, replaced by faint 24-nt siRNAs, similar to what was observed for ta-siR255. Foldback structures with DCL4-dependent phased processing were observed for ASRP1729/miR822 and miR839, although in both cases the phasing was less precise than that seen for Os06g21900 [4], [12]. Furthermore recent reports [35] of DCL4-dependent generation of 21-nt small RNAs in rice suggest DCL4 plays a broader role than in Arabidopsis development and support our hypothesis that DCL4 can process phased small RNAs independent of an RdRP. Analysis of our data revealed an inverted repeat on chromosome 12 as a hotspot for generation of phased siRNAs. Small RNAs generated from this locus were identified in two previous reports [12], [35] as being dependent on DCL4. Together, these results confirm that phased siRNAs are processed through a distinctly different pathway than canonical miRNAs.

In Arabidopsis, miRNA-like genes have been characterized in which multiple phased ~21-nt siRNAs are processed from a single foldback structure derived from duplication of progenitor genes [4], [12]. To test the possibility that this locus is a recently emergent miRNA-like gene, we compared the halves of the foldback sequences to protein coding genes in rice. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found significant similarity (E<10−7) to proton-dependent oligopeptide transporter (POT) genes (Figure S3). Phased siRNAs are reminiscent of miR163 in Arabidopsis in which two phases of siRNAs were sequenced, although only miR163 accumulates significantly [4], [36]. Unlike TAS loci in Arabidopsis that require RDR6 to generate dsRNA, phased siRNAs derive from an extended imperfect foldback structure. Given the high abundance of multiple, phased siRNAs from a single foldback precursor transcript and processing, we believe that these phased siRNAs represent a novel regulatory class present in rice grain.

In addition to the phased siRNAs found on Chromosome 6, we inspected three abundant disperse hotspots on Chromosome 1 from the grain libraries that map to HAP5 transcripts (Table S2). In contrast to phased siRNAs, individual siRNAs were in low abundance, confined to the transcribed region, and randomly distributed across the transcript (Figure 5). Based on similarity comparisons and secondary structure predictions, we found no evidence of inverted repeats at any of the three HAP5 loci on Chr 1 ((Os01g01290, Os01g24460, Os01g39850) (Table S2)). Upstream of each HAP5 gene there is an associated siRNA region, with weak phasing (p-score 0.691). Greater than 82% of the siRNAs from the three HAP5 hotspots were 21 to 22-nt, whereas siRNAs typically associated with disperse clusters are typically 24-nt [37][39]. A likely explanation for siRNA production would be bi-directional transcription forming nat-siRNAs [31]. We searched the MPSS database for signatures, and found signatures for expression only in the sense orientation in 6-day old seedlings [40]. There is little data available for mature rice grain, so it is possible that antisense transcription is responsible, although we favor a model in which an RdRP is recruited to the three HAP5 transcripts derived from Chromosome 1.

Figure 5
Disperse siRNAs associated with HAP5 genes.

Discussion

While our efforts in deep sequencing of rice grain and seedling tissue have revealed a number of unique elements in the regulatory small RNA family of rice, the functions of many of these remain to be elucidated. We have developed a method of hotspot determination to uniquely validate the class of small RNA in the absence of readily available mutants, which would lend themselves to characterization of small RNAs. Characterization in this manner allows for more rigorous analysis of small RNA data from sequenced genomes, despite the fact that it may produce false negatives, as indicated by the predicted 1072 pre-miRNAs based solely on foldback data. Using sparse hotspots as the defining criteria for miRNAs limited this set to five novel miRNAs, which were validated by Northern blot and predicted targets for two of the five novel miRNAs were validated by 5′ RACE analysis. Furthermore, we compared miRNAs from our large prediction set to those reported recently from wheat [41] and found 3 possible homologs with 4 to 5 nucleotide differences, but did not find any identical small RNAs. We verified 101 MIRNA genes in 27 families with high expression in mature grain and 3 week old seedlings by their presence in hotspot clusters.

Target prediction for the 5 novel miRNAs, revealed that miRMON13 targets a clade of PPR genes. The PPR family has expanded considerably in plants, comprising >450 genes in Arabidopsis and >600 in rice [42], [43]. Although it is not surprising to see miRNA genes derived from a rapidly expanding gene family, the preference to maintain suppression elements specific to a specific clade of PPR genes both in Arabidopsis and rice is curious. One possible model is that maintenance of proper gene dosage from this PPR clade is critical to plant fertility. Fertility restoration genes (Rf) have been found to contain PPR motifs, and mutations lead to cytoplasmic male sterility. Rapid evolution of miRNA and ta-siRNA genes from PPR progenitor genes may offer a mechanism to suppress aberrant or excess transcripts to prevent reduced fertility [3], [12].

In Arabidopsis, small RNAs principally of the 24-nt class, accumulated in pericentromeric regions [10], [13] whereas we observed a very different distribution in rice. Small RNA hotspots were more randomly distributed across the chromosomes, with 21-nt loci including miRNA and phased siRNA genes more readily apparent. This may be reflected in the tissues used for analysis, as epigenetic states should be established in mature grain and therefore accumulation of heterochromatin associated siRNAs is not required to the extent it would be in growing floral or vegetative tissues. Small RNA hotspot clusters accounted for over 53% and 49% of the total small RNA abundance in grain and seedling, respectively. In both tissues, clusters were confined to a very small proportion of the rice genome indicative of unique small RNA generating genes, many with unknown function. Many of these hotspots were not attributable to novel miRNAs or other characterized classes of small RNA generating loci; characterization of these genes is likely to reveal interesting and new mechanisms for gene regulation in plants.

A striking finding was the abundance of 21-nt siRNAs specific to rice grain that were not attributable to miRNAs. We identified hotspots expressing extraordinarily abundant 21-nt phased siRNAs (Os06g21900) or disperse ~21-nt siRNAs (Chr. 1 HAP5 genes, Os01g01290) specific to dormant grain. Similar miRNA-like genes have been described in Arabidopsis [4], [12], from which multiple, phased 21-nt siRNAs dependent primarily on DCL4 are expressed. In contrast, the phased siRNA genes in rice showed a far stricter phasing (out-of-phase siRNAs did not accumulate), and expression of nearly all phases were equivalent to expression of conserved miRNAs. The phased siRNA precursor at Os06g21900 displays similarity to POT family nitrate transporters, consistent with a model in which miRNA genes derive from inverted duplication of progenitor genes [3], [4], [12].

In addition to abundant grain specific phased siRNAs, three HAP5 loci were found that generate an extraordinary number of 21-nt siRNAs across the length of the transcript. These transcripts could represent nat-siRNA loci, although we were unable to identify any antisense cDNAs or MPSS data indicating antisense PolII transcription. This could be due to the lack of available transcript/cDNA from mature rice grain. There is no evidence for inverted repeats from the transcribed regions at these loci, indicating that these (siRNAs) are unlikely to be DCL4 products Together with HAP2 and HAP3 proteins, HAP5 forms a ternary CCAAT transcription factor complex. This complex has known roles in controlling expression of seed storage protein genes in Arabidopsis [44], [45]. Our finding that, a subset of HAP5 genes generate such a large number of siRNAs in mature seed suggest post-transcriptional regulation of the HAP complex, potentially involved in modulating seed storage proteins. From the scope of all small RNA space, we observed that the reverse complementary match to the rice transcriptome is 40% over-represented for the unique grain small RNAs versus those from the seedling (Table 1. 13% vs. 9%). This over-representation of potential transcription repressors in grain might facilitate maintaining a general expression suppression state in the dormant grain stage. Further investigation into the roles of these siRNAs could lend insight into biology of seeds and the roles of these distinct populations of siRNAs.

All data will be deposited into NCBI GEO upon publication of this manuscript.

Methods

Plant materials and RNA isolation

Oryza sativa spp. japonica cv. Nipponbare was used for small RNA library construction and Northern blot analysis. Plant material for RNA isolation was obtained from dehulled mature grain and 23 day old seedlings planted from the same seed lot and grown in a greenhouse under non-stress conditions. RNA was isolated for Northern analysis from Zea mays var. LH244 leaves, roots (both at stage V6), and 32–39 day after pollination kernels; Glycine max var. A3525 trifoliate leaves, roots, and S3 to S5 seed; and Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0. Seed for dcl1-7 (CS3089) and dcl4-1 (GK_106G05) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. A. thaliana was transformed with a CaMV 35S binary expression vector using the floral dip method, and events containing a single T-DNA insertion selected. Total RNA was isolated from plant tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen).

Construction and computational analysis of small RNA libraries

Small RNA library construction was performed as described previously [20]. Three micrograms of each small RNA cDNA library was sent to 454 Life Sciences for sequencing. Small RNA inserts in the raw sequences were parsed by locating the 5′ and 3′ adaptors to obtain strand and position information by Perl scripts. Small RNAs of 18–26 nt were compared with genomes using BLAST (Table S1 for databases used). To compare small RNA expression from different libraries, abundance was calculated as transcripts per quarter million sequences (tpq) [8], [10]. Normalized abundance was determined as tpq divided by the number of perfect matches to the rice genome. To determine small RNA expression hotspots in the rice genome, each chromosome was divided into 1-kb bins and small RNAs were assigned to specific bins. In cases where small RNAs were divided between bins, the 5′ end of the small RNA was used to determine in which bin it should be placed. Normalized small RNA abundances with each bin were summed to give the total abundance of the bin.

Statistical analyses

See Methods S1 for detailed description of statistical methods used in analysis.

Small RNA blotting and hybridization

Five micrograms of total RNA was separated on a 17% PAGE-urea gel and blotted as previously described [4]. Complementary oligonucleotide probes specific to small RNA sequences were end labeled with γ32P-ATP using OptiKinase (USB Corporation) [46]. Probe sequences are listed in Table S3. LNA probes were ordered for miRMON13 and miRMON27. Oligo probes for ta-siR255, miR173, and phased siRNAs in Arabidopsis were end-labeled with digoxygenin according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Roche). Probe sequences are listed in Table S3.

Target Validation

Target Validation using a 5′ RACE assay was done with the GeneRacer Kit (Invitrogen). Poly(A) mRNA was isolated from 3 week old rice seedling tissue, ligated to the adaptor, converted to cDNA and PCR amplified, using gene-specific and adaptor-specific primers. PCR products were gel purified, cloned and sequenced. Successfully validated miRNA target gene-specific primer sequences are shown in Table S3.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

(a) The majority of small RNAs matched to miRNAs, rRNA repeats, and transposable elements. Annotated miRNAs from miRBase accounted for 33.0% of seedling small RNAs and 2.4% from grain. (b) The size distribution of small RNA populations from grain and seedling were similar, with 21-nt small RNAs as the most abundant class, followed by the 24-nt class.

(0.08 MB AI)

Figure S2

Small RNA expression from grain and seedling libraries, calculated as transcripts per quarter million (tpq) across the twelve rice chromosomes. Abundance was normalized by dividing small RNA tpq by the number of perfect matches in the rice genome. For rice grain, the average tpq of the three libraries was used. Centromere position is indicated by a circle and bins containing small RNA hotspots are indicated in red. Each bar represents a 100 kb bin. A ceiling of 500 tpq was used. Location of phased siRNAs are indicated by an asterisk (*). The majority of rice or monocot specific miRNAs are represented by a single locus.

(0.55 MB PDF)

Figure S3

Alignment of the foldback structure regions of exon 3 and the reverse complement of exon 2 from Os06g21900 with putative progenitor genes. Conserved positions are highlighted as follows: 7/7 red, 5/7 or 6/7 orange, 4/7 yellow, 3/7 green (including at least one conserved base in Os06g21900 foldback).

(0.09 MB PDF)

Table S1

Sources of genome and transcriptome data.

(0.02 MB XLS)

Table S2

Small RNA hotspots from rice.

(0.10 MB XLS)

Table S3

Small RNA probes for Northern blot analysis & Target Validation

(0.02 MB XLS)

Table S4

Predicted Targets for miRMON13 and miRMON18.

(0.02 MB XLS)

Methods S1

Statistical methods used in hotspot determination.

(0.05 MB DOC)

Data S1

Sequence of phased siRNA precursor Os06g21900

(0.02 MB DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Chris Kavanaugh, Katharine Mueller and Heidi Windler for plant care support; Susan Martino-Catt, Larry Gilbertson, Shihshieh Huang, Tom Malvar, Sergey Ivashuta, Tom Adams and Nancy Houmard for stimulating discussion on the manuscript; Harold Bockelman (USDA), Tim Coombe and Brenda Bader for providing seed stocks. We also thank Bill Donovan for performing the experiments with Arabidopsis dcl mutants.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was funded by Monsanto Company.

References

1. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57 [PubMed]
2. Mallory AC, Vaucheret H. Functions of microRNAs and related small RNAs in plants. Nat Genet. 2006;38(Suppl) [PubMed]
3. Fahlgren N, Howell MD, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, et al. High-Throughput Sequencing of Arabidopsis microRNAs: Evidence for Frequent Birth and Death of MIRNA Genes. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Sung GH, Spatafora JW, et al. Evolution of microRNA genes by inverted duplication of target gene sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1282–90. [PubMed]
5. Gale MD, Devos KM. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science. 1998;282:656–659. [PubMed]
6. Brodersen P, Voinnet O. The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants. Trends Genet. 2006;22 [PubMed]
7. Nobuta K, Venu RC, Lu C, Belo A, Vemaraju K, et al. An expression atlas of rice mRNAs and small RNAs. Nat Biotech. 2007;25:473–477. [PubMed]
8. Lu C, Tej SS, Luo S, Haudenschild CD, Meyers BC, et al. Elucidation of the small RNA component of the transcriptome. Science. 2005;309:1567–1569. [PubMed]
9. Qi Y, He X, Wang XJ, Kohany O, Jurka J, et al. Distinct catalytic and non-catalytic roles of ARGONAUTE4 in RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nature. 2006;443:1008–1012. [PubMed]
10. Lu C, Kulkarni K, Souret FF, MuthuValliappan R, Tej SS, et al. MicroRNAs and other small RNAs enriched in the Arabidopsis RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-2 mutant. Genome Res. 2006;16:1276–1288. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Henderson IR, Zhang X, Lu C, Johnson L, Meyers BC, et al. Dissecting Arabidopsis thaliana DICER function in small RNA processing, gene silencing and DNA methylation patterning. Nat Genet. 2006;38:721–725. [PubMed]
12. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 2006;20:3407–3425. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Kasschau KD, Fahlgren N, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Cumbie JS, et al. Genome-Wide Profiling and Analysis of Arabidopsis siRNAs. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e57. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Johnson C, Bowman L, Adai AT, Vance V, Sundaresan V. CSRDB: a small RNA integrated database and browser resource for cereals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D829–D833. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Liu B, Li P, Li X, Liu C, Cao S, et al. Loss of Function of OsDCL1 Affects MicroRNA Accumulation and Causes Developmental Defects in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:296–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Sunkar R, Girke T, Zhu JK. Identification and characterization of endogenous small interfering RNAs from rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Luo YC, Zhou H, Li Y, Chen JY, Yang JH, et al. Rice embryogenic calli express a unique set of microRNAs, suggesting regulatory roles of microRNAs in plant post-embryogenic development. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:5111–5116. [PubMed]
18. Bewley JD, Black M. Seeds physiology of development and germination. New York: Plenum Press; 1994.
19. Lau NC, Lim EP, Weinstein EG, Bartel DP. An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001;294:858–862. [PubMed]
20. Llave C, Kasschau KD, Rector MA, Carrington JC. Endogenous and silencing-associated small RNAs in plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1605–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437:376–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Axtell MJ, Bartel DP. Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant Cell. 2005;17 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Katiyar-Agarwal S, Gao S, Vivian-Smith A, Jin H. A novel class of bacteria-induced small RNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes and Development. 2007;21:3123–3134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: the microRNA sequence database. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;342:129–138. [PubMed]
25. Ambros V, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Burge CB, Carrington JC, et al. A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA. 2003;9:277–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–21. [PubMed]
27. Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, et al. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002;110:513–520. [PubMed]
28. Ronemus M, Vaughn MW, Martienssen RA. MicroRNA-targeted and small interfering RNA-mediated mRNA degradation is regulated by argonaute, dicer, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1559–1574. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Wang Y, Ribot C, Rezzonico E, Poirier Y. Structure and expression profile of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene family indicates a broad role in inorganic phosphate homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:400–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2001–2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Borsani O, Zhu J, Verslues PE, Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Endogenous siRNAs Derived from a Pair of Natural cis-Antisense Transcripts Regulate Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2005;123:1279–1291. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Hammond SM. Dicing and slicing: the core machinery of the RNA interference pathway. FEBS Lett. 2005;579 [PubMed]
33. Qiu S, Adema CM, Lane T. A computational study of off-target effects of RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Yoshikawa M, Peragine A, Park MY, Poethig RS. A pathway for the biogenesis of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2164–2175. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Liu B, Chen Z, Song X, Liu C, Cui X, et al. Oryza sativa Dicer-like4 Reveals a Key Role for Small Interfering RNA Silencing in Plant Development. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:2705–2718. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Kurihara Y, Watanabe Y. Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12753–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Xie Z, Johansen LK, Gustafson AM, Kasschau KD, Lellis AD, et al. Genetic and functional diversification of small RNA pathways in plants. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:E104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Chan SW, Zilberman D, Xie Z, Johansen LK, Carrington JC, et al. RNA silencing genes control de novo DNA methylation. Science. 2004;303:1336. [PubMed]
39. Zilberman D, Cao X, Jacobsen SE. ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation. Science. 2003;299:716–719. [PubMed]
40. Meyers BC, Lee DK, Vu TH, Tej SS, Edberg SB, et al. Arabidopsis MPSS. An online resource for quantitative expression analysis. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:801–813. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Yao Y, Guo G, Ni Z, Sunkar R, Du J, et al. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome Biology. 2007;8:R96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Lurin C, Andres C, Aubourg S, Bellaoui M, Bitton F, et al. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis pentatricopeptide repeat proteins reveals their essential role in organelle biogenesis. Plant Cell. 2004 tpc.104.022236. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Small ID, Peeters N. The PPR motif - a TPR-related motif prevalent in plant organellar proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25:46–7. [PubMed]
44. Kagaya Y, Toyoshima R, Okuda R, Usui H, Yamamoto A, et al. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 controls seed storage protein genes through its regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:399–406. [PubMed]
45. Santos MM, Dubreucq B, Miquel M, Caboche M, Lepiniec L. LEAFY COTYLEDON 2 activation is sufficient to trigger the accumulation of oil and seed specific mRNAs in Arabidopsis leaves. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:4666–4670. [PubMed]
46. Xie Z, Allen E, Fahlgren N, Calamar A, Givan SA, et al. Expression of Arabidopsis MIRNA Genes. Plant Physiol 2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...