![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
ERK activation is only one role of PKC in TCR-independent cytotoxic T cell granule exocytosis From The Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut at Storrs, CT 06268 Address correspondence to: Dr. Adam Zweifach, Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology, 91 N Eagleville Rd, Storrs CT 06268-3125. Ph- 860 486 1627. Fax- 860 486 4331. Email: adam.zweifach/at/uconn.edu The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Biochem Biophys Res Commun.Abstract Cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) kill target cells by releasing lytic agents via regulated exocytosis. Three signals are known to be required for exocytosis: an increase in intracellular Ca2+, activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and activation of extracellular signal regulated signal kinase (ERK). ERK activation required for exocytosis depends on activity of PKC. The simplest possibility is that the sole effect of PKC required for exocytosis is ERK activation. Testing this requires dissociating ERK and PKC activation. We did this using TCR-independent stimulation of TALL-104 human leukemic CTLs. When cells are stimulated with thapsigargin and PMA, agents that increase intracellular Ca2+ and activate PKC, respectively, PKC-dependent ERK activation is required for lytic granule exocytosis. Expressing a constitutively-active mutant MAP kinase kinase activates ERK independent of PKC. However, activating ERK without PKC does not support lytic granule exocytosis, indicating that there are multiple effects of PKC required for granule exocytosis. Keywords: Signal transduction, PKC, ERK, flow cytometry, cytotoxicity, lytic granules, granule exocytosis, lymphocyte INTRODUCTION One mechanism cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) use to kill virus infected, tumor or transplanted target cells is regulated exocytosis of molecules such as perforin and granzymes from specialized preformed lytic granules (reviewed in [1; 2; 3]). Killing is initiated by T cell receptor (TCR) activation by antigen-MHC upon contact with an appropriate target cell, which leads to a complex set of signaling steps that ultimately trigger three signals required for the lytic interaction: protein kinase C (PKC) activation [4; 5; 6], activation of extracellular signal regulated kinases (p42/p44 ERKs, members of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) family [6; 7; 8]) and elevation of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) [9; 10]. Drugs that increase [Ca2+]i and activate PKC can promote granule exocytosis in the absence of TCR engagement [11; 12]. These stimuli, while not physiological, provide a simplified system for probing the signals regulating granule exocytosis. The involvement of PKC in both TCR-dependent and TCR-independent lytic granule exocytosis has been investigated [4; 5; 12; 13], revealing that the novel PKC isoform PKC does not play the kind of unique role in lytic granule exocytosis [4; 6] that it does in important helper T cell functions such IL-2 gene expression, Fas ligand expression and c-jun N terminal kinase activation (reviewed in [14]). However, knowledge of signaling events in CTLs downstream of PKC activation remains rudimentary, and PKC is likely to be involved in multiple steps of the lytic interaction, including regulating granule reorientation [15; 16] as well as granule exocytosis.ERK activation, which, as described above is critical for granule exocytosis, appears to be a downstream target of PKC [6; 7; 17]. It is posibble that the effects of PKC are mediated solely through ERK activation. If this were the case, then our view of lytic granule exocytosis would be greatly simplified. Importantly, it would mean that there would be no to try to identify additional currently unknown PKC substrates required for the fusion of lytic granules with the plasma membrane. To date, the only evidence against the idea that the sole role of PKC is ERK activation is pharmacological. Puente et al. showed that Go-6976, used as a conventional PKC inhibitor, blocked granule exocytosis stimulated by solid-phase anti-CD3, but did not block ERK activation [18]. However, the complexity of responses stimulated by cross-linked anti-CD3 makes it difficult to conclude from these data that it is the exocytic step that is affected. Also, the possibility off-target effects of drugs is always a concern. To test directly whether the sole role of PKC in promoting exocytosis is ERK activation requires finding a way to activate ERK without activating PKC. We used a constitutively-active mutant human MAP Kinase Kinase (hMKK) [19] which phosphorylates and activates ERK independently of PKC in TALL-104 human leukemic CTLs, a cell-line we have used as a model for dissecting signaling events downstream of TCR engagement [4; 8; 9; 20; 21; 22]. Our results indicate that PKC has multiple roles required for TCR-independent lytic granule exocytosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS cDNA constructs and transfections The constitutively active ΔN–S218E-S222D MAPKK Mutant (hMKK) [19] was given to us by Dr. Lynn Heasley (UCHSC,CO). Standard PCR methods were used to subclone it into pEGFPN1 (Clonetech) using engineered KpnI and BamH1 restriction sites. 2.5 × 106 TALLs were transfected using an Amaxa Nucleofector (Amaxa Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD) using program T-20 and solution V. Experiments were performed 6–7 hrs post-transfection. PKC mutant constructs have been previously described [4]. Chemicals and reagents Salts and PD 98059 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Fetal calf serum was rom Hyclone (South Logan, UT). Thapsigargin and PMA were from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA). ERK Inhibitor II (FR 180204) and Ro31-8220 were from EMD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Anti-CD107a (clone H4A3) was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA), and was conjugated to Alexafluor 647 using a kit from Molecular Probes/ Invitrogen (Eugene, OR). Alexafluor 647-conjugated anti-phospho p42/44 was purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). Recombinant human IL-2 was provided by the National Cancer Institute. Cells and solutions TALL-104 cells were from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Maryland) and cultured in Modified Dulbecco’s Iscoves medium with 10% FCS , 100 IU IL-2, 2mM L-glutamine and penn-strep antibiotic. Cells were grown in a humidifier incubator at 37°C in 10% CO2. Ringer’s solution contained (in mM): 145 NaCl, 4.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 5 HEPES and 10 glucose (pH 7.4 with NaOH). Immunostaining and flow cytometry LAMP externalization was monitored as described previously [4; 21; 22]. The anti-LAMP-1 antibody was either conjugated to Alexafluor 647, or purchased conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE) from BD Biosciences. In both the cases conjugated Anti-LAMP-1 antibody was used at 0.09 micrograms per test. For phospho-staining experiments, cells were fixed and permeabilized using CALTAG’s Fix/Perm kit (CALTAG laboratories, Burlingame, California) with methanol modification. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCalibur at the University of Connecticut at Storrs Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility. FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, Oregon) was used to analyze data offline. For multi-color experiments, data were acquired without hardware compensation. Unstained and single-color controls were run, and, when needed, data were compensated off-line using FlowJo. Statistics Statistical significance was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA (Instat, Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistically significant data (p<0.05) have been indicated with an asterisk (*). RESULTS TCR-independent lytic granule exocytosis requires PKC-dependent ERK activation We have previously shown that TCR-dependent lytic granule exocytosis in TALL-104 cells is ERK dependent [8]. We tested whether TCR- independent lytic granule exocytosis is also ERK dependent by treating cells with two different inhibitors of ERK signaling, PD 98059 (100 µM) and FR 180204 (100 µM), and measuring their effects on exocytosis by measuring LAMP-1 externalization. PD 98059 blocks the MAPKKs MEK 1/2 that phosphorylate and activate ERK [23], while FR 180204 blocks substrate phosphorylation by ERK by occluding its ATP-binding site [24]. Cells were pretreated with drugs or vehicle for one hour and then stimulated with thapsigargin (TG) in combination with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) for 50 minutes in the continued presence of drug or vehicle. TG activates Ca2+ influx, while PMA activates PKC. Representative flow histograms are shown in Figure 1Ai
PKC is involved in both TCR-dependent and TCR-independent lytic granule exocytosis. We tested the role of PKC in ERK activation (Figure 1B Overexpressing a constitutively-active mutant human MAPKK activates ERK A constitutively active human MAPKK (hMKK) mutant with ~400-fold higher activity than wild type has been previously characterized by others [19]. We fused this mutant to green fluorescent protein (GFP). To confirm that the mutant activates ERK at the expression levels we can attain, we transfected cells with either EGFP (vector alone) or hMKK-EGFP, and measured ERK phosphorylation levels 6–7 hours post transfection. At no level of expression of GFP alone was ERK phosphorylated (Figure 2A
ERK activation in the absence of PKC activations is not sufficient to support exocytosis Because the hMKK mutant activates ERK robustly, it provides a tool allowing us to determine whether ERK activation is the sole effect of PKC that is required for TCR-independent exocytosis; if it is, the hMKK mutant should render exocytosis independent of the need to activate PKC with PMA. Just as in a previous study PKC mutants replaced the requirement for PMA, we transfected cells with either EGFP (vector alone) or hMKK-EGFP then 6–7 hrs post transfection stimulated them with TG or with TG and PMA and measured granule exocytosis using the LAMP externalization assay (Figure 3
DISCUSSION The results presented here demonstrate two main points. First, PKC-dependent ERK activation is required for TCR-independent lytic granule exocytosis. Second, activating ERK cannot be the sole role of PKC in promoting exocytosis. While some might view results obtained with TCR-independent stimuli as being non-physiological, we do not see any feasible way in which ERK activation could be dissociated from PKC activation using TCR stimulation. Furthermore, as noted above, TCR-independent stimulation likely bypasses TCR-dependent events such as MTOC/ granule reorientation, allowing isolation of effects on exocytosis from processes upstream. PKC regulation of ERK activation appears to be complex. When stimulated through plate bound anti-CD3, novel PKC isoform(s) act upstream of Ras to activate ERK [6]. PI3 kinase may be involved in this pathway [30], and it appears that when nPKCs such as PKC–θ are knocked out, other isoforms can participate [6]. When stimulated via soluble anti-CD3, conventional PKC isoform(s) activate ERK downstream or independent of Ras [6], although exocytosis is not triggered, even after cross-linking of the CD3 with secondary antibodies [17]. Additionally, there may be MAPKK-independent routes of PKC-dependent ERK activation, including direct phosphorylation of ERK by PKC [29]. This might account for the fact that we found that PD98059 only partially inhibited ERK phosphorylation, while the PKC inhibitor Ro31-8200 blocked completely (Figure 1B Although the results presented here were obtained with TALL-104 human leukemic CTLs, we expect that they will be representative of events in other CTL systems. We have extensively used TALL-104 cells as a model system to study signaling events downstream of TCR engagement [4; 8; 9; 20; 21; 22] and to our knowledge all known key features of CTL exocytosis are preserved in TALL -104 cells. The substrate(s) of ERK that participate in exocytosis are unknown. The only candidate is paxillin, a cytoskeletal adaptor protein that has been suggested to be involved in TCR-dependent exocytosis based on its localization to the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) and its translocation to the point of target contact upon TCR activation [30]. A thorough examination of ERK substrates will be needed to understand the role of this kinase in lytic granule exocytosis. Apart from its participation in activating ERK, very little is known about potential substrates of PKC involved in granule exocytosis. PKC modulates exocytosis in many cell types that undergo regulated secretion, including chromaffin cells, mast cells, and some neurons (reviewed in [32]). Of identified PKC substrates, SNAP-25 and Munc 18 play a role in regulated exocytosis [32]. Munc13-4 plays a role in lytic granule exocytosis [33], but there are no known Munc 18 isoforms in CTLs. SNAP-25, found primarily in excitable cells, is not expressed in TALL-104 cells (A.P.F and A.Z, unpublished observations). However, the ubiquitously expressed SNAP-25 isoform SNAP-23 is expressed in TALL-104 cells, and at least some of it is plasma membrane resident (A.P.F. and A.Z., unpublished observations). PKC-dependent phosphorylation of SNAP-23 is important in exocytosis in platelets [34] and mast cells [35]. SNAP-23 may thus be a PKC substrate in CTLs. Also, PKC likely also participates in upstream steps of the lytic interaction such as granule reorientation [15; 16]. Thus, there may be different PKC substrates that are involved in different steps of the lytic interaction. Future experiments will be needed to identify PKC substrates and to identify the step(s) at which they participate. Footnotes We thank Dr. Carol Norris and the University of Connecticut Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility. Supported by NIH Grant R01 AI054839 to A.Z. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. REFERENCES 1. Berke G. The binding and lysis of target cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes: molecular and cellular aspects. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:735–753. [PubMed] 2. Berke G. The CTL's kiss of death. Cell. 1995;81:9–12. [PubMed] 3. Griffiths GM. The cell biology of CTL killing. Curr Opinions Immunol. 1995;7:343–348. 4. Grybko MJ, Pores-Fernando AT, Wurth GA, Zweifach A. Protein kinase C activity is required for cytotoxic T cell lytic granule exocytosis, but the theta isoform does not play a preferential role. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81:509–519. [PubMed] 5. Juszczak RJ, Russell JH. Inhibition of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated lysis and cellular proliferation by isoquinoline sulfonamide protein kinase inhibitors. Evidence for the involvement of protein kinase C in lymphocyte function. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:810–815. [PubMed] 6. Puente LG, He JS, Ostergaard HL. A novel PKC regulates ERK activation and degranulation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes: Plasticity in PKC regulation of ERK. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36:1009–1018. [PubMed] 7. Berg NN, Puente LG, Dawicki W, Ostergaard HL. Sustained TCR signaling is required for mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and degranulation by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1998;161:2919–2924. [PubMed] 8. Fierro AF, Wurth GA, Zweifach A. Cross-talk with Ca(2+) influx does not underlie the role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases in cytotoxic T lymphocyte lytic granule exocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:25646–25652. [PubMed] 9. Lyubchenko TA, Wurth GA, Zweifach A. Role of calcium influx in cytotoxic T lymphocyte lytic granule exocytosis during target cell killing. Immunity. 2001;15:847–859. [PubMed] 10. Takayama H, Sitkovsky M. Antigen receptor-regulated exocytosis in cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1987;166:725–743. [PubMed] 11. Nishimura T, Burakoff SJ, Herrmann SH. Protein kinase C required for cytotoxic T lymphocyte triggering. J Immunol. 1987;139:2888–2891. [PubMed] 12. Lancki DW, Weiss A, Fitch FW. Requirements for triggering of lysis by cytolytic T lymphocyte clones. J Immunol. 1987;138:3646–3653. [PubMed] 13. Langlet C, Schmitt-Verhulst AM. Electroporation of CTL clones: a useful method to investigate signalling pathways leading to the expression of effector functions. J Immunol Methods. 1992;151:107–115. [PubMed] 14. Altman A, Isakov N, Baier G. Protein kinase Ctheta: a new essential superstar on the T-cell stage. Immunol Today. 2000;21:567–573. [PubMed] 15. Ma J, Monu N, Shen D, Mecklenbräuker I, Radoja N, Haydar T, Leitges M, Frey A, Vukmanovic S, Radoja S. Protein kinase Cdelta regulates antigen receptor-induced lytic granule polarization in mouse CD8+ CTL. J Immunol. 2007;178:7814–7821. [PubMed] 16. Nesić D, Henderson S, Vukmanović S. Prevention of antigen-induced microtubule organizing center reorientation in cytotoxic T cells by modulation of protein kinase C activity. Int Immunol. 1998;10:1741–1746. [PubMed] 17. Puente LG, Stone JC, Ostergaard HL. Evidence for protein kinase C-dependent and -independent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in T cells: potential role of additional diacylglycerol binding proteins. J Immunol. 2000;165:6865–6871. [PubMed] 18. Puente LG, He JS, Ostergaard HL. A novel PKC regulates ERK activation and degranulation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes: Plasticity in PKC regulation of ERK. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36:1009–1018. [PubMed] 19. Mansour SJ, Matten WT, Hermann AS, Candia JM, Rong S, Fukasawa K, Vande Woude GF, Ahn NG. Transformation of mammalian cells by constitutively active MAP kinase kinase. Science. 1994;265:966–970. [PubMed] 20. Lyubchenko TA, Wurth GA, Zweifach A. The actin cytoskeleton and cytotoxic T lymphocytes: evidence for multiple roles that could affect granule exocytosis-dependent target cell killing. J Physiol (Lond). 2003;547:835–847. [PubMed] 21. Pores-Fernando AT, Bauer RA, Wurth GA, Zweifach A. Exocytic responses of single leukaemic human cytotoxic T lymphocytes stimulated by agents that bypass the T cell receptor. J Physiol (Lond). 2005;567:891–903. [PubMed] 22. Grybko MJ, Bartnik JP, Wurth GA, Pores-Fernando AT, Zweifach A. Calcineurin activation is only one calcium-dependent step in cytotoxic T lymphocyte granule exocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:18009–18017. [PubMed] 23. Dudley DT, Pang L, Decker SJ, Bridges AJ, Saltiel AR. A synthetic inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:7686–7689. [PubMed] 24. Ohori M, Kinoshita T, Okubo M, Sato K, Yamazaki A, Arakawa H, Nishimura S, Inamura N, Nakajima H, Neya M, Miyake H, Fujii T. Identification of a selective ERK inhibitor and structural determination of the inhibitor-ERK2 complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;336:357–363. [PubMed] 25. Chow S, Patel H, Hedley DW. Measurement of MAP kinase activation by flow cytometry using phospho-specific antibodies to MEK and ERK: potential for pharmacodynamic monitoring of signal transduction inhibitors. Cytometry. 2001;46:72–78. [PubMed] 26. Zampieri CA, Fortin JF, Nolan GP, Nabel GJ. The ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway contributes to Ebola virus glycoprotein-induced cytotoxicity. J Virol. 2007;81:1230–1240. [PubMed] 27. Krutzik PO, Nolan GP. Intracellular phospho-protein staining techniques for flow cytometry: monitoring single cell signaling events. Cytometry A. 2003;55:61–70. [PubMed] 28. Pardo J, Buferne M, Martinez-Lorenzo MJ, Naval J, Schmitt-Verhulst AM, Boyer C, Anel A. Differential implication of protein kinase C isoforms in cytotoxic T lymphocyte degranulation and TCR-induced Fas ligand expression. Int Immunol. 2003;15:1441–1450. [PubMed] 29. Grammer T, Blenis J. Evidence for MEK-independent pathways regulating the prolonged activation of the ERK-MAP kinases. Oncogene. 1997;14:1635–1642. [PubMed] 30. Robertson L, Mireau L, Ostergaard H. A role for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in TCR-stimulated ERK activation leading to paxillin phosphorylation and CTL degranulation. J Immunol. 2005;175:8138–8145. [PubMed] 31. Franklin RA, Atherfold PA, McCubrey JA. Calcium-induced ERK activation in human T lymphocytes occurs via p56(Lck) and CaM-kinase. Mol Immunol. 2000;37:675–683. [PubMed] 32. Morgan A, Burgoyne RD, Barclay JW, Craig TJ, Prescott GR, Ciufo LF, Evans GJ, Graham ME. Regulation of exocytosis by protein kinase C. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:1341–1344. [PubMed] 33. Feldmann J, Callebaut I, Raposo G, Certain S, Bacq D, Dumont C, Lambert N, Ouachee-Chardin M, Chedeville G, Tamary H, Minard-Colin V, Vilmer E, Blanche S, Le Deist F, Fischer A, Saint Basile G. Munc13-4 is essential for cytolytic granules fusion and is mutated in a form of familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL3). Cell. 2003;115:461–473. [PubMed] 34. Polgár J, Lane W, Chung S, Houng A, Reed G. Phosphorylation of SNAP-23 in activated human platelets. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:44369–44376. [PubMed] 35. Hepp R, Puri N, Hohenstein A, Crawford G, Whiteheart S, Roche P. Phosphorylation of SNAP-23 regulates exocytosis from mast cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:6610–6620. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Annu Rev Immunol. 1994; 12():735-73.
[Annu Rev Immunol. 1994]Cell. 1995 Apr 7; 81(1):9-12.
[Cell. 1995]J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Feb; 81(2):509-19.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2007]J Biol Chem. 1989 Jan 15; 264(2):810-5.
[J Biol Chem. 1989]Eur J Immunol. 2006 Apr; 36(4):1009-18.
[Eur J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 1987 Nov 1; 139(9):2888-91.
[J Immunol. 1987]J Immunol. 1987 Jun 1; 138(11):3646-53.
[J Immunol. 1987]J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Feb; 81(2):509-19.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2007]J Biol Chem. 1989 Jan 15; 264(2):810-5.
[J Biol Chem. 1989]J Immunol Methods. 1992 Jul 6; 151(1-2):107-15.
[J Immunol Methods. 1992]Eur J Immunol. 2006 Apr; 36(4):1009-18.
[Eur J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 1998 Sep 15; 161(6):2919-24.
[J Immunol. 1998]J Immunol. 2000 Dec 15; 165(12):6865-71.
[J Immunol. 2000]Eur J Immunol. 2006 Apr; 36(4):1009-18.
[Eur J Immunol. 2006]Science. 1994 Aug 12; 265(5174):966-70.
[Science. 1994]J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Feb; 81(2):509-19.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 11; 279(24):25646-52.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Immunity. 2001 Nov; 15(5):847-59.
[Immunity. 2001]J Physiol. 2003 Mar 15; 547(Pt 3):835-47.
[J Physiol. 2003]Science. 1994 Aug 12; 265(5174):966-70.
[Science. 1994]J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Feb; 81(2):509-19.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2007]J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Feb; 81(2):509-19.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2007]J Physiol. 2005 Sep 15; 567(Pt 3):891-903.
[J Physiol. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2007 Jun 22; 282(25):18009-17.
[J Biol Chem. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 11; 279(24):25646-52.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 15; 92(17):7686-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Oct 14; 336(1):357-63.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005]Cytometry. 2001 Apr 15; 46(2):72-8.
[Cytometry. 2001]J Virol. 2007 Feb; 81(3):1230-40.
[J Virol. 2007]Cytometry A. 2003 Oct; 55(2):61-70.
[Cytometry A. 2003]Eur J Immunol. 2006 Apr; 36(4):1009-18.
[Eur J Immunol. 2006]Int Immunol. 2003 Dec; 15(12):1441-50.
[Int Immunol. 2003]Science. 1994 Aug 12; 265(5174):966-70.
[Science. 1994]Eur J Immunol. 2006 Apr; 36(4):1009-18.
[Eur J Immunol. 2006]J Immunol. 2005 Dec 15; 175(12):8138-45.
[J Immunol. 2005]J Immunol. 2000 Dec 15; 165(12):6865-71.
[J Immunol. 2000]Oncogene. 1997 Apr 10; 14(14):1635-42.
[Oncogene. 1997]Mol Immunol. 2000 Aug; 37(11):675-83.
[Mol Immunol. 2000]J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Feb; 81(2):509-19.
[J Leukoc Biol. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 11; 279(24):25646-52.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Immunity. 2001 Nov; 15(5):847-59.
[Immunity. 2001]J Physiol. 2003 Mar 15; 547(Pt 3):835-47.
[J Physiol. 2003]J Physiol. 2005 Sep 15; 567(Pt 3):891-903.
[J Physiol. 2005]J Immunol. 2005 Dec 15; 175(12):8138-45.
[J Immunol. 2005]Biochem Soc Trans. 2005 Dec; 33(Pt 6):1341-4.
[Biochem Soc Trans. 2005]Cell. 2003 Nov 14; 115(4):461-73.
[Cell. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 7; 278(45):44369-76.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 25; 280(8):6610-20.
[J Biol Chem. 2005]J Immunol. 2007 Jun 15; 178(12):7814-21.
[J Immunol. 2007]