![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 Ng and Yang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Effects of ginsenosides Re and Rg3 on intracellular redox state and cell proliferation in C6 glioma cells 1Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, PR China Corresponding author.Wai Yee Ng: 06458815/at/hkbu.edu.hk; Mildred S Yang: msyang/at/hkbu.edu.hk Received February 26, 2008; Accepted July 11, 2008. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Cellular redox state is important to cell growth and death. The growth of tumor cells may be modulated by intracellular reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG). The present study aims to investigate the effects of ginsenosides Re and Rg3 on cellular redox state and cell proliferation in C6 glioma cells. Methods Cultured C6 glioma cells were exposed to various concentrations of either Rg3 or Re for 24 hours. Cell growth and death were measured by the BrdU incorporation assay and the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay respectively. Cellular redox state was determined by free radical production using flow cytometry and GSH/GSSG using spectrofluorometry. Results At a sub-lethal concentration, Re suppressed cell proliferation with a significant decrease in BrdU incorporation. Re did not increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production but increased GSH/GSSG via increased activity of gamma glutamylcystenyl synthase (γ-GCS). In contrast, Rg3 increased free radical production and reduced GSH/GSSG. The effects of Rg3 were probably due to increased activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx). Conclusion Re and Rg3 alter cellular redox state of C6 glioma cells in opposite directions. Changes in cellular redox state induced by Re and Rg3 are correlated with the proliferation rates of C6 glioma cells. Background Cellular redox state can be monitored by intracellular thiol levels, among which the ratio of reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is the most useful [1,2]. In the presence of free radicals, mainly H2O2, GSH acts as electron donor and is oxidized into GSSG by glutathione peroxidase (GPx). The GSSG generated is later converted back to GSH by glutathione reductase (GR) in which reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) is the hydrogen donor. In living tissues, the level of glutathione is ranged 5–10 mM. In cultured cells, the level of intracellular glutathione is several folds higher than the level of total adenosine nucleotides [3]. Under stable conditions, cells maintain a constant ratio of GSH/GSSG [1,4,5]. Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) decreases the GSH/GSSG ratio [6]. The GSH/GSSG ratio is increased by the addition of N-acetylcysteine (NAC, a cysteine analogue) [7] or by improved enzymes for glutathione synthesis [8]. Antioxidants or molecules that increase the GSH/GSSG ratio suppress cell proliferation [9-14], while oxidative stress increases cell proliferation and leads to cell death [2,15-19]. Cellular redox state also affects cellular signaling pathways, gene expression and enzymes associated with cell cycle progression [2,6,11,12,15,16,18,19]. Conour et al. identified 92 candidate proteins involved in cell cycle progression that are redox sensitive [20]. Growth and metastasis of tumor cells may also be regulated by intracellular redox state [2,17,21,22]. Ginseng (Panax ginseng, Renshen) is a popular Chinese herbal medicine known for its wide spectrum of pharmacological actions [23]. Ginseng is composed of a series of saponins known as ginsenosides which are derivatives of triterpene dammarane. There are two categories of ginsenosides, namely protopanaxadiol (PPD, e.g. Ra, Rb, Rc, Rd, Rg3, Rh2) and protopanaxatriol (PPT, e.g. Re, Rf, Rg1, Rg2, Rh1). Each gensenoside is characteristic in its sugar moiety position on dammarane. Some ginsenosides modulate cardiovascular and neurological functions [24], whereas others act as antioxidants [25-29] to prevent cancer [30-32], protect against chemically induced tissues damage [33-36] and delay ageing [25]. Ginsenoside Re has anti-oxidative abilities apart from its immunomodulatory, antihyperlipidemic and neuroprotective activities. In cardiomyocytes, pretreatment with Re significantly attenuates H2O2 induced free radical production and protect cell death [37]. Rg3 acts as a prooxidant to accelerate 2,2'-azobis (2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride (AAPH) induced haemolysis in human erythrocytes [26]. Rg3 is anti-angiogenic and anticancer through inducing apoptosis [30,38]. Ginsenosides are active components in ginseng which has anticancer properties [23,32,39-41]. The present study investigates how Re and Rg3 suppress the growth of C6 glioma cells. The C6 glioma cell is a model for studying a form of malignant brain tumor glioblastoma multiform [42]. The study also investigates the mechanisms through which ginsenosides Re and Rg3 modulate the levels of oxidized and reduced glutathione, and ROS production Methods Materials Cell culture media and all reagents for biochemical assays were purchased from Sigma Chemical (MO, USA). Perchloric acid (PCA) and potassium hydroxide were purchased from Fisher Scientific (NJ, USA). Antibiotics were purchased from Life Technologies (NY, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 6-carboxy-2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) were purchased from Invitrogen (Scotland, UK) and Molecular Probes (NJ, USA) respectively. Ginsenosides Re and Rg3 (purity>99%) were obtained from International laboratory (USA). The identities of ginsenosdies were confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrospray ionization – mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). The Rg3, a 20(S) isoform, and the Re were 784 Daltons and 946 Daltons of molecular weight respectively (Figure (Figure1).1
Buthionine-(S, R)-sulfoximine (BSO), an inhibitor of gamma glutamylcystenyl synthase (γ-GCS), was dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and sterilized through a 0.2 μm membrane. Cultured C6 glioma cells (ATCC no CCL-107) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (USA). Cell culture The cells were maintained in the F-12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (tested for lipopolysaccharide) and 0.5% antibiotics (amphotericin B and penicillin-streptomycin) in a humidifier under 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. Treatment of cells Cells were sub-cultured into 6-well plates until confluence. The incubation media were then removed and replaced with those containing the required concentration of Rg3 or Re. The concentration of DMSO in each well was kept at 0.5%, which did not affect intracellular glutathione level and GSH/GSSG. Cells were treated with 100 μM BSO for 24 hours for the study of cell response in the absence of GSH. Analysis of cell viability The viability of C6 glioma cells treated with Re and Rg3 was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Briefly, cells were cultured in 96-well plates and treated with various concentrations (0–800 μg/ml) of Re or Rg3. After incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS. A medium (100 μl) containing 500 μg/ml MTT was added to each well. The medium was removed after 3 hours of incubation and DMSO (100 μl) was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. Light absorbance at 595 nm was measured with a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite F200, Germany). Cell viability was the optical density ratio of a treated culture over an untreated control. Cell proliferation assay The effects of either Re or Rg3 on cell proliferation were determined by the BrdU cell proliferation kit (Calbiochem, Germany). Cells were cultured in 96-well plates. Upon confluence, they were incubated with either Re or Rg3 of various concentrations for 24 hours. BrdU was added to the medium 20 hours before the end of incubation. The amount of BrdU incorporated into cells was determined by binding BrdU to mouse anti-BrdU antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Tetra-methylbenzidine, the substrate of horseradish peroxidase, was later added. The color product of the enzymatic reaction was measured in a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite F200, Germany) at 450–540 nm. Analysis of intracellular glutathione metabolism Intracellular glutathione metabolism is reflected by the interplay of GSH, GSSG, GPx, GR and γ-GCS. Cells were incubated for 24 hours before intracellular metabolites were extracted by 0.3 M PCA containing 1 mM ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) with a previously described method [43]. The levels of GSH and GSSG were determined with spectrofluorometry [3]. For enzyme assays, cells were washed twice with pre-warmed PBS and extracted with a protein extraction kit (EMB Biosciences, Calbiochem, USA) with a previously described method [8]. Analysis of ROS production by flow cytometry Intracellular production of ROS was evaluated with H2DCFDA which is converted to a fluorescence product dichlorodihydrofluoroscine (DCF) when treated with H2O2. Cells were treated for 24 hours with either 100 μg/ml of BSO or 200 μg/ml of Re. Thirty minutes before the end of experiment, H2DCFDA was added (final concentration 10 μM). The cells were then trypsinized, centrifuged, re-suspended in PBS and passed through the FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, U.S.A.). Fluorescence intensities of DCF were measured by excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 620 nm. In each sample, approximately 10000 cells were analyzed by the CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, U.S.A.). Data analysis Cellular redox state was determined by the ratio of GSH/GSSG. Each experiment was repeated 3–8 times. The means and standard deviations were calculated. The differences between samples were evaluated by the one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by tests for differences between groups by a post-hoc method (Dunnett C) without an assumption of equal variance between groups (SPSS version 14). The differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Selection of concentrations of Re and Rg3 for the study of cell proliferation A 24 and 48 hour dose-response study was conducted. Cells were treated with various concentrations (0–800 μg/ml) of Re and Rg3. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.01) in cell viability upon treatment with 100 μg/ml of Rg3 for 24 hours (Figure (Figure2).2
A decrease in cell proliferation was also demonstrated by decreased BrdU incorporation. While cell viability did not decrease (Figure (Figure2a)2a
Glutathione metabolism The resting level of GSH is three folds higher than that of GSSG. The GSH/GSSG ratio ranges from 2 (in tumor cells) to >40 (in normal cells) [44]. The GSH/GSSG ratio may be altered by either toxicants [3] or antioxidants [45]. Re treatment increased GSH but not GSSG (Figure (Figure4a),4a
Re treatment did not significantly change the activity of either GPx or GR (Figure (Figure7a)7a
Suppreession of γ-GCS activity by BSO reverses Re induced changes To further confirm that Re acts by changing γ-GCS activity, treatment of cells with BSO, an inhibitor of γ-GCS which could significantly lowered (P<0.01) the GSH/GSSG ratio (Figure (Figure9)9
Discussion The present study showed that both Re and Rg3 affected the survival of C6 glioma cells. While Re suppressed the growth of C6 glioma cells at low concentrations, Rg3 caused death of C6 glioma cells via oxidative stress. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the action of Re was correlated with an increase in the intracellular GSH level, thereby raising the GSH/GSSG ratio. BSO (an inhibitor of γ-GCS) treatment reversed the GSH/GSSG rise induced by Re (Figure (Figure9)9 γ-GCS is the rate limiting enzyme in glutathione synthesis. The enzyme and its gene expression may be modulated by a number of factors. For example, an increase in the γ-GCS activity may be stimulated by oxidative metabolites. Shi et al. showed that the heavy subunit mRNA level and subsequent enzyme activity increased in response to 2,3-dimethoxy-1,4-napthoquinone (DMNQ) through transcriptional activation of γ-GCS [46]. Our previous studies showed that the production of quinone metabolite of benzo [a]pyrene activated γ-GCS [8]. However, no such quinone metabolites were detected in the metabolism of Re in biological tissues. Furthermore, the present study showed that Re treatment suppressed free radical production (Figure (Figure6),6 A number of factors must be considered before using Re to treat brain tumor. Firstly, Re suppresses cell proliferation at a low rate. At a low concentration of 50 μg/ml, Re was effective in suppressing cell proliferation (Figure (Figure3).3 Conclusion Re suppresses the growth and proliferation of C6 glioma cells and increases the cellular GSH/GSSG ratio by enhancing the γ-GCS activity, suppressing ROS generation and reducing cell proliferation rate. Rg3 causes cell death via oxidative stress. While both Re and Rg3 eliminate the growth and proliferation of C6 glioma cells, they modulate cellular redox state in opposite directions. Yue et al. suggest that ginseng or selected ginsenosides modulate cellular function via specific intracellular receptors in a way that may reflect the Ying/Yang actions of ginseng [49]. The opposite actions in modulating cellular redox state by Re and Rg3 may be another example of the Ying/Yang actions of ginseng. Abbreviations γ-GCS: gamma glutamylcystenyl synthase; AAPH: 2,2'-azobis (2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride; BSO: buthionine-(S, R)-sulfoximine; DMNQ: 2,3-dimethoxy-1,4-napthoquinone; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; EDTA: ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid; ESI-MS: electrospray ionization – mass spectrometry; Fetal bovine serum (FBS); GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GR: glutathione reductase; GSH: reduced glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; H2DCFDA: 6-carboxy-2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography; MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NAC: N-acetylcysteine; NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; -PBS: phosphate buffered saline; Perchloric acid (PCA); PPD: protopanaxadiol; PPT: protopanaxatriol; -ROS: reactive oxygen species Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions WN is an MPhil student who carried out the experiments and helped draft the manuscript. MY supervised the study and drafted the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Prof ZH Jiang, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University for the HPLC and ESI-MS analyses to confirm the ginsenosides Re and Rg3 used in this study. This study was supported by the Hong Kong Baptist University Faculty Research Grant. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Methods Enzymol. 2002; 348():93-112.
[Methods Enzymol. 2002]Free Radic Biol Med. 2002 Dec 1; 33(11):1499-506.
[Free Radic Biol Med. 2002]Toxicology. 2004 Sep 1; 201(1-3):105-13.
[Toxicology. 2004]Clin Chem. 1999 Jul; 45(7):1084-6.
[Clin Chem. 1999]Clin Chim Acta. 1999 May; 283(1-2):21-32.
[Clin Chim Acta. 1999]Biochem Pharmacol. 1999 Dec 1; 58(11):1685-93.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1999]Diabetes. 2002 Jun; 51(6):1851-8.
[Diabetes. 2002]J Pharm Pharmacol. 2004 Jan; 56(1):107-13.
[J Pharm Pharmacol. 2004]Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005 Jan; 26(1):56-62.
[Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Apr 14; 342(3):824-8.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006]Biochem Pharmacol. 1999 Dec 1; 58(11):1685-93.
[Biochem Pharmacol. 1999]Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 Jun; 98(6):588-92.
[Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006]Biofactors. 2006; 26(1):29-43.
[Biofactors. 2006]J Nutr. 2004 Mar; 134(3):489-92.
[J Nutr. 2004]Cell Tissue Res. 2002 Dec; 310(3):257-70.
[Cell Tissue Res. 2002]Toxicology. 2004 Sep 1; 201(1-3):105-13.
[Toxicology. 2004]Toxicology. 2007 Jun 3; 235(1-2):1-10.
[Toxicology. 2007]Anal Biochem. 1976 Jul; 74(1):214-26.
[Anal Biochem. 1976]Toxicology. 2004 Sep 1; 201(1-3):105-13.
[Toxicology. 2004]Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007 Apr 15; 53(1):56-61.
[Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007]Am J Physiol. 1994 Oct; 267(4 Pt 1):L414-21.
[Am J Physiol. 1994]Toxicology. 2007 Jun 3; 235(1-2):1-10.
[Toxicology. 2007]J Biol Chem. 2006 May 19; 281(20):14440-5.
[J Biol Chem. 2006]Biol Pharm Bull. 2005 Oct; 28(10):1903-8.
[Biol Pharm Bull. 2005]Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005 May-Jun; 7(5-6):711-8.
[Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005]Chin Med. 2007 May 15; 2():6.
[Chin Med. 2007]