• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of qualhcLink to Publisher's site
Qual Health Care. Sep 1998; 7(3): 149–158.
PMCID: PMC2483604

Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework


The argument put forward in this paper is that successful implementation of research into practice is a function of the interplay of three core elements--the level and nature of the evidence, the context or environment into which the research is to be placed, and the method or way in which the process is facilitated. It also proposes that because current research is inconclusive as to which of these elements is most important in successful implementation they all should have equal standing. This is contrary to the often implicit assumptions currently being generated within the clinical effectiveness agenda where the level and rigour of the evidence seems to be the most important factor for consideration. The paper offers a conceptual framework that considers this imbalance, showing how it might work in clarifying some of the theoretical positions and as a checklist for staff to assess what they need to do to successfully implement research into practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488–1492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kitson A, Ahmed LB, Harvey G, Seers K, Thompson DR. From research to practice: one organizational model for promoting research-based practice. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Mar;23(3):430–440. [PubMed]
  • Harvey G, Kitson A. Achieving improvement through quality: an evaluation of key factors in the implementation process. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jul;24(1):185–195. [PubMed]
  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ellis J, Mulligan I, Rowe J, Sackett DL. Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. A-Team, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine. Lancet. 1995 Aug 12;346(8972):407–410. [PubMed]
  • Cullum N. Identification and analysis of randomised controlled trials in nursing: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care. 1997 Mar;6(1):2–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):53–56. [PubMed]
  • Burrows DE. Facilitation: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997 Feb;25(2):396–404. [PubMed]
  • Bryce FP, Neville RG, Crombie IK, Clark RA, McKenzie P. Controlled trial of an audit facilitator in diagnosis and treatment of childhood asthma in general practice. BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):838–842. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hearnshaw HM, Baker RH, Robertson N. Multidisciplinary audit in primary healthcare teams: facilitation by audit support staff. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):164–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...